|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108777200 on December 5, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 5360-5368, February 15, 2002
Functional Cloning and Characterization of a Plant Efflux Carrier
for Multidrug and Heavy Metal Detoxification*
Legong
Li ,
Zengyong
He ,
Girdhar K.
Pandey ,
Tomofusa
Tsuchiya§, and
Sheng
Luan ¶
From the Department of Plant and Microbial Biology,
University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 and the
§ Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacological
Sciences, Okayama University, Tsushima, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan
Received for publication, September 12, 2001, and in revised form, December 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have identified a detoxifying efflux carrier
from Arabidopsis using a functional cloning strategy. A
bacterial mutant, KAM3, is deficient in multidrug resistance and does
not survive on medium containing norfloxacin. After transformation of
KAM3 cells with an Arabidopsis cDNA library,
transformants were selected for restored growth on the toxic medium.
One cDNA clone that complemented KAM3 encodes a novel protein with
twelve putative transmembrane domains and contains limited sequence
homology to a multidrug and toxin efflux carrier from bacteria. We
named this Arabidopsis protein AtDTX1 (for
Arabidopsis thaliana
Detoxification 1). A large gene family of at least 56 members encoding related proteins was
identified from the Arabidopsis genome. Further
functional analysis of AtDTX1 protein in KAM3 mutant demonstrated that
AtDTX1 serves as an efflux carrier for plant-derived alkaloids,
antibiotics, and other toxic compounds. Interestingly, AtDTX1 was also
capable of detoxifying Cd2+, a heavy metal. Further
experiments suggest that AtDTX1 is localized in the plasma membrane in
plant cells thereby mediating the efflux of plant-derived or exogenous
toxic compounds from the cytoplasm.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Plants, as well as other organisms, synthesize and accumulate a
diverse array of natural products, which can serve many functions, including defense against or attraction to various insects and microbes
in its environment. On the other hand, plants are also exposed to
exogenous toxins, including agrochemicals (e.g. pesticides) and toxic compounds secreted by other plants or pathogenic microbes. Disposal and detoxification of toxic compounds of both endogenous and
exogenous origin are important processes for plant survival and
development. Several possible mechanisms of detoxification include
modification of toxic compounds by endogenous enzymes (1),
sequestration into vacuole (2, 3), and transport outside of the cell
(4, 5).
A large number of transport proteins that mediate the efflux of a broad
range of compounds have been identified from various bacteria (6). Four
families of detoxifying efflux transporters have previously been
described that include major facilitator superfamily
(MFS1), the small multidrug
resistance (SMR) family, the resistance/nodulation/cell division (RND)
family, and the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily. The MFS, SMR,
and RND families are secondary transporters, typically energized by the
proton-motive force. In contrast, ATP is utilized as the energy donor
for members of the ABC family of multidrug efflux pumps that are often
considered primary transporters (4, 6). To date, ABC family of
multidrug efflux pumps have been identified in organisms ranging from
bacteria, yeast, animals, and plants. The SMR and RND are only found in
bacteria (4). Perhaps the most diverse of all is the MFS type of
transporters, which have 12-14 transmembrane domains (TMDs) and are
involved in the symport, antiport, or uniport of various substrates,
such as sugars, Krebs cycle intermediates, phosphate esters,
oligosaccharides, and antibiotics (7). More recent studies have
identified two new multidrug efflux proteins, NorM from Vibrio
parahaemolyticus and a homologue in Escherichia coli,
YdhE (8). Both transporters are required for the efflux of a broad
range of toxic compounds. NorM requires Na+ for their
activity, suggesting that these new systems are Na+/toxin
antiporters (9). The NorM homologues contain 12 predicted transmembrane
domains and therefore are grouped into the MFS family. However, these
proteins share no sequence similarity with any member of the MFS and do
not exhibit any of the signature sequences specific to the 18 MFS
families identified by Pao et al. (7). NorM and YdhE are
therefore defined as a new family of secondary transporters, which was
referred to as the MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion) family
(6).
Although extrusion of toxic compounds by efflux transporters is the
major route for detoxification in bacteria, most plant cells possess
large vacuoles that can serve as a disposal compartment for toxic
compounds. Indeed, at least one member of the plant ABC family, AtMRP1,
has been shown to transport glutathione conjugates into vacuoles (10),
providing a molecular basis for detoxification by vacuole sequestration
in plant cells. Further studies identified a large family of ABC-type
proteins from Arabidopsis referred to as AtMRPs (multidrug
resistance protein) (3). At least 60 genes in the
Arabidopsis genome are identified to encode MRP-like proteins (3, 11). It is speculated that these gene products are
localized to various cell membranes and may play different roles in
plant cells. For example, a plasma membrane protein, AtPGP1, is highly
homologous to animal multidrug resistance protein and is involved in
light-dependent hypocotyl elongation (12). A plastid ABC
protein is involved in the plastid-nucleus communication mechanism
(13). Although all these ABC-related proteins are presumed to play a
role in membrane transport, the transport function of AtPGP1 and the
plastid ABC protein has yet to be identified. Concerning detoxification
by a possible efflux mechanism, none of the plant proteins have been
shown to function as an efflux carrier for multidrug transport. Using a
functional cloning strategy, this study identified a MATE-related
efflux protein from Arabidopsis (AtDTX1). Transport assays
have demonstrated that AtDTX1 protein functions as an efflux
transporter that detoxifies a number of lipophilic cations and cadmium,
a heavy metal. We also provide evidence that AtDTX1 is localized in the
plasma membrane in Arabidopsis plants.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Isolation of AtDXT1 cDNA by E. coli KAM3 Mutant
Complementation--
E. coli mutant strain KAM3 harbors a
deletion in the chromosomal AcrAB genes of TG1 strain and
was sensitive to many drugs that are known as substrates of the AcrAB
system (14). This mutant strain does not grow on medium containing 0.05 µg/ml norfloxacin (8). We expressed an Arabidopsis
cDNA library CD4-7 (Arabidopsis Biological Resource
Center, Columbia, OH) in the KAM3 mutant and selected transformants on
the norfloxacin-containing medium. The cDNA clones that supported
growth of KAM3 mutant on the toxic medium were sequenced and subcloned
into pTrc99A vector (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). We focused on one
cDNA, AtDTX1, for further analyses. The cDNA sequence of AtDTX1
encodes the same protein as annotated under the accession number
AAD28687 in the Arabidopsis genomic sequence data base
(available at www.mips.biochem.mpg.de/proj/thal/).
For confirmation of complementation, AtDTX1 cDNA was constructed
into pTrc99A vector and transformed into KAM3 cells by electroporation. Transformants were selected on the LB medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin. Individual transformants were grown in LB liquid
medium containing the same concentration of antibiotics and 1 mM isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside for
induction of AtDTX1 expression. The cultures were adjusted to 1.0 A600, diluted to 10-fold gradient series,
and spotted (2 µl) onto LB solid medium supplemented with 0.05 µg/ml norfloxacin or different concentrations of heavy metal or
antibiotics. The growth of different strains was scored after
incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. The KAM3 mutant transformed with
pTrc99A was used as a control.
Assay of Drug Accumulation in Cells--
Assay of norfloxacin
and ethidium bromide accumulation was performed as described previously
(8, 9). Briefly, E. coli KAM3 containing pTrc99A empty
vector or pTrc99A-AtDTX1 were grown in the LB broth supplemented with
40 mM potassium lactate to the late, exponential phase of
growth under aerobic condition at 37 °C, harvested, and washed with
0.2 M MOPS-Tris buffer (pH7.0) containing 10 mM
MgSO4, and suspended in the same buffer to 50 mg (wet
weight)/ml. The assay mixture contained cells (10 mg (wet weight)/ml)
in the same buffer and 10 mM potassium lactate. After incubation at 37 °C for 5 min, norfloxacin (100 µM,
final concentration) was added to initiate the assay. Samples (1 ml
each) were taken at intervals, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 s
at 4 °C, and washed once with the same buffer. After 15 min of
initiating, carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone
(CCCP) was added to the assay mixture at 100 µM to
disrupt the proton gradient across the membrane. The pellet was
suspended in 1 ml of 100 mM glycine-HCl (pH 3.0). The
suspension was shaken vigorously for 1 h at room temperature to
release their fluorescent contents and then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm
for 10 min at room temperature. The fluorescence of supernatants was
measured (excitation at 277 nm and emission at 448 nm) with a Hitachi
F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer. The amount of fluorescence was
normalized against total protein concentration that was measured by
using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit (15).
Cells used in ethidium bromide accumulation assay were prepared
similarly as described above. After cells were washed and suspended in
0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) to A600 of
2.0 and placed in the fluorometer cuvette with 1:10 dilution in the
same buffer. Ethidium bromide was added at 20 µg/ml to the cell
suspension to initiate the assay. Samples (1 ml each) were taken at
different time points. CCCP was added at 100 µM at the
15-min time point. The fluorescence of the sample mixture was measured
with excitation and emission wavelength of 500 and 580, respectively
(16). Because ethidium bromide fluorescence results from binding to
intracellular components, especially to nucleic acids, the increase in
fluorescence intensity reflected the accumulation of the dye in the
cell (17). The amount of maximum fluorescence was normalized to
100%.
Efflux of Ethidium Bromide and Berberine--
For determining
ethidium bromide efflux, cells from an overnight culture (5 ml,
A600 = 2) were pelleted and washed twice with 100 mM MOPS-Tris (pH 7.0), 2 mM
MgSO4 buffer. To load cells with ethidium bromide, the
cells were incubated in the same buffer supplemented with 10 µg/ml
ethidium bromide and 20 µM CCCP by incubation at 37 °C
for 30 min as previously described (9, 17). Cells were pelleted, washed
twice, and resuspended at the same ice-cold buffer
(A600 = 4.0). Suspension was placed into a
fluorometer cuvette and diluted 100-fold with solutions indicated in
each figure legend. Because only nucleic acid-bound ethidium bromide
gives significant fluorescence, efflux of ethidium bromide from the
cells was determined as a decrease in fluorescence. Measurement of
berberine efflux was performed by a similar procedure with excitation
at 355 nm and emission at 517 nm. The concentration of berberine for
cell loading was 30 µg/ml (18).
Susceptibility Tests and Growth Curves--
Minimal inhibitory
concentrations (MICs) of heavy metals and drugs were determined by
culturing cells in the LB broth containing a particular heavy metal or
drug at various concentrations (18, 19). Aliquots of the culture were
taken at different time points to measure the growth rates that were
used to make a growth curve as indicated in figure legends.
Northern (RNA) Blotting--
Total RNA was isolated from
Arabidopsis seedlings by using the TRIzol reagent
(Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). 10 µg of total RNA was separated on
denaturing 1.2% formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred to a Hybond-N
nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.), and hybridized with probes
that were made from full-length AtDTX1 cDNA by random priming
(20).
Subcellular Localization of AtDTX1-GFP Fusion Protein--
The
subcellular localization of AtDTX1 protein was addressed by GFP fusion
and confocal microscopy. The coding region of AtDXT1 was fused to GFP
coding region in binary vector pMD1 that contains the cytomegalovirus
35S promoter followed by a short polylinker, GFP-coding
region, and the nopaline opine synthase terminator region (21).
The AtDTX1 cDNA without a stop codon was inserted into the
polylinker region to form an in-frame fusion with the GFP-coding
region. This construct was used to transform wild type
Arabidopsis plants (Columbia ecotype) by floral dip method
(22). Transformants were selected on 0.5× Murashige-Skoog medium
containing 1% (w/v) sucrose, 0.8% (w/v) agar, and 60 µg/ml
kanamycin and were propagated in the soil. T2 seedlings were used to
localize GFP fluorescence by a confocal microscope (Zeiss 510 UV-visible). The images were processed by Adobe PhotoShop.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of AtDTX1 by Functional Complementation--
We
designed a functional cloning strategy to identify putative multidrug
efflux carriers from Arabidopsis. An E. coli
mutant strain, KAM3, lacks AcrAB systems that are multidrug efflux
carriers required for multidrug resistance (14). As a result, KAM3
cells do not grow on medium containing 0.05 µg/ml norfloxacin, a
substrate of AcrAB efflux systems. We transformed KAM3 by an expression cDNA library of Arabidopsis plants and isolated those
cDNA clones that restored the growth of KAM3 mutant on the medium
supplemented with norfloxacin. Among the sequenced cDNA clones, one
showed limited homology to the MATE family efflux transporters in
bacteria. We referred to this cDNA clone as AtDTX1.
Others encoded proteins without significant similarity to any known
proteins in the data base (data not shown). This study focused on the
functional characterization of AtDTX1. To confirm that AtDTX1 cDNA
indeed complemented KAM3 mutant, we measured AtDTX1-mediated drug
resistance with the KAM3 strain as a negative control. As shown in Fig.
1, KAM3 containing empty pTrc99A vector
did not grow on medium containing 0.05 µg/ml norfloxacin and 100 µg/ml ampicillin. In contrast, KAM3 transformed with pTrc99A-AtDTX1
grew well. Both strains grew normally on LB medium containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. This result shows that AtDTX1 protein is capable of
detoxifying norfloxacin.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
AtDTX1 complements an AcrAB-deficient
E. coli mutant. KAM3 cells were transformed with
the empty pTrc99A vector (KAM3) or with pTrc99A containing
the AtDTX1 cDNA (AtDTX1).
|
|
AtDTX1 Represents a Large Multigene Family in Arabidopsis--
A
search for sequences with homology to the AtDTX1 gene led to
the identification of a large family of genes in the
Arabidopsis genome. At least 56 distinct genes were
identified that encode proteins with significant sequence similarity to
AtDTX1. We refer to these genes as AtDTX1 to
AtDTX56. Phylogenetic analysis of this family revealed that
members can be further divided into at least five clusters or
subfamilies (Fig. 2A). The
first cluster includes AtDTX1 through AtDTX19, the second cluster
includes AtDTX20 through AtDTX41, and the third cluster includes
AtDTX42 through AtDTX49. The fourth cluster may include AtDTX50 through
AtDTX55. The fifth group contains only AtDTX56. The putative proteins
in this family range in size from 414 to 539 residues, and hydropathy analyses revealed that they all possess 12 putative transmembrane domains (TMD) except for the third cluster of genes, which encode proteins with 8-13 TMDs. Sequence alignments among the genes in different clusters indicated that the most conserved sequences are CGQA
located between TMD2 and 3, and RVSNXLGA located in
TMD8 (Fig. 2B). Concerning the location of AtDTX
genes in the Arabidopsis genome, 21 members are located on
chromosome 1; 10 members on chromosome 2; 7 members on chromosome 3; 9 members on chromosome 4; and 9 members on chromosome 5. The
Arabidopsis genome initiative numbers showed their
chromosome location as listed in Fig. 2A. Some of these
genes are present as tandem arrangements on the chromosomes. The genes
in the same tandem array often show higher homology and are grouped in
the same cluster/subfamily, suggesting that they may be derived from
gene duplication.


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sequence analyses of AtDTX1
and related genes in the Arabidopsis genome. A,
phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of AtDTX1 and
other members in the AtDTX superfamily. The five clusters
are indicated and numbered. The tree was built upon a multiple
alignments of polypeptide sequences of AtDTX genes using the
ClustalX program (DNAstar DNA analysis software). The
horizontal scale indicates the probability (%) of
substitutions per amino acid position. B, AtDTX members from
different clusters (or subfamilies) are compared. Only limited homology
is shared by these members. C, sequence alignment of AtDTX1
with NorM and other putative MATE family transporters. The putative
TMDs of AtDTX1 protein, as produced by the TMHMM program, are indicated
by horizontal lines above the sequence. NorM,
NorM protein of V. parahaemolyticus (AB04063); YdhE, YdhE
protein of E. coli (P37340); MEP, multidrug
efflux protein of Xylella fastidiosa (XF2686);
ERC1, ethionine resistance protein of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (NP_382954); DinF, DNA damage-inducible
protein of Pyrococcus abyssi (A75151). Sequence alignments
in B and C were performed using the DNAstar
program with default parameters. Identical residues in the majority of
sequences are framed. Gaps were represented by
dashes and introduced for optimal alignment. D,
phylogenetic tree showing the evolutionary relationship of AtDTX1 and
related proteins from bacteria and yeast. See A for
interpretation.
|
|
AtDTX1 also showed limited homology to several genes in other
organisms, including NorM, YdhE, and DinF from bacteria, and ERC1 from
yeast (Fig. 2C). As discussed earlier, NorM and YdhE are
MATE family multidrug extrusion transporters. It is not known whether
DinF protein functions as an efflux transporter in bacteria (23). Its
expression has been shown to be induced by DNA damage (24).
ERC1 confers ethionine resistance in yeast, although a direct transport function of ERC1 protein has not been addressed (25).
The phylogenetic relationship of AtDTX1 and these MATE-related proteins
is presented in Fig. 2D. According to this phylogeny "tree," AtDTX1 shares the highest similarity with NorM gene and its homologues.
AtDTX1 gene expression appeared to be ubiquitous. As shown
in Fig. 3, AtDTX1 RNA was
detected in all organs examined. Its mRNA accumulated in flowers
and stems at higher levels as compared with those in leaves and
roots.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
RNA blot analysis of AtDTX1
transcript in various plant organs. Total RNA was isolated
from roots, stems, leaves, and flowers of Arabidopsis
plants. RNA (10 µg per lane) was separated, blotted, and hybridized
with 32P-labeled, random-primed AtDTX1 cDNA
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Ethidium
bromide-stained rRNA is shown as a loading control.
|
|
AtDTX1 Reduces Accumulation in KAM3 Cells--
AtDTX1 complemented
norfloxacin-sensitive mutant of E. coli and showed sequence
similarity to MATE efflux transporters from bacteria, suggesting that
AtDTX1 may function as a norfloxacin transport protein. To further
determine the functional properties of AtDTX1, we measured norfloxacin
accumulation in the KAM3 mutant cells and cells expressing AtDTX1. If
AtDTX1 serves as an efflux carrier, it is expected that KAM3 cells
expressing AtDTX1 would accumulate less norfloxacin. As shown in Fig.
4A, a high level of
norfloxacin accumulation was observed with the mutant cells harboring
the empty vector pTrc99A (KAM3-pTrc99A). In contrast, KAM3 transformed
by a plasmid expressing AtDTX1 showed much lower levels of norfloxacin
accumulation. This result suggests that AtDTX1 is capable of reducing
the net accumulation of the drug by inhibiting norfloxacin influx or
increasing efflux. Because efflux through secondary transporters often
depends on the transmembrane electrochemical gradient of proton or ions
(5), we measured norfloxacin accumulation in the presence of CCCP, a
de-coupler of the membrane proton gradient. After addition of CCCP to
the assay solution, accumulation level of norfloxacin increased
dramatically in AtDTX1-expressing cells, implying that AtDTX1 function
is inhibited by CCCP. This result is consistent with the possibility
that AtDTX1 functions as a norfloxacin efflux transporter that requires
a proton motive force.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
AtDTX1 reduces accumulation of norfloxacin
and ethidium bromide in bacterial cells. A,
accumulation of norfloxacin in cells transformed by empty vector
(KAM3/pTrc99A) or by AtDTX1 (KAM3-AtDTX1). CCCP was added to the
suspensions (arrow) at a final concentration of 100 µM during the assay. B, ethidium bromide
accumulation in the same strains used in A and presented as
relative amount of fluorescence (% of maximal accumulation).
|
|
Function of AtDTX1 as a multidrug transporter was examined further by
assaying accumulation of ethidium bromide, another putative substrate
for MATE transporters. Fig. 4B indicates that
AtDTX1-transformed KAM3 cells accumulated much less ethidium bromide as
compared with cells transformed by empty vector. After CCCP was added
to the assay mixture, the fluorescence of AtDTX1 transformants was rapidly increased to the similar level in KAM3-pTrc99A cells, suggesting that ethidium bromide, like norfloxacin, was likely to be
extruded from KAM3 cells by AtDTX1 protein.
AtDTX1 Mediates Efflux of Ethidium Bromide from KAM3 Cells--
To
further support that AtDTX1 mediates the efflux of the drugs, we
performed ethidium bromide efflux assay according to a previously
described procedure (10, 26). Cells were first loaded with ethidium
bromide under de-energized conditions in the presence of CCCP. After
removing external ethidium bromide and CCCP from the cells, potassium
lactate, an energy donor, was added to the efflux buffer to initiate
drug efflux process. KAM3 transformed by pTrc99A vector did not show
significant efflux of ethidium bromide whereas KAM3-AtDTX1 cells
displayed rapid efflux in the same buffer (Fig.
5).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Efflux of ethidium bromide from KAM3-pTrc99A
and KAM3-AtDTX1 cells. Cells were first loaded with ethidium
bromide. Reduction of fluorescence was used as a measure of the efflux
(see "Experimental Procedures").
|
|
Ethidium Bromide Efflux through AtDTX1 Is Regulated by External
pH--
It was recently reported that bacterial NorM protein functions
as a Na+/drug antiporter (9). We tested whether AtDTX1 also
depends on external Na+ for drug transport. Our results
showed that external sodium does not affect AtDTX1 function (data not
shown). In both bacteria and higher plants, H+ is a common
currency for energizing secondary transport processes (27). The fact
that CCCP inhibited efflux process revealed a requirement for
proton-motive force in AtDTX1-mediated transport. Proton-dependent transport is often regulated by external
pH values. We assayed ethidium bromide efflux at various extracellular
pH values (Fig. 6). From pH 4.0 to 8.0, activity of AtDTX1 increased significantly. When the external pH
increased to 9.0, the efflux activity sharply decreased. The pH
regulation observed with AtDTX1 is very similar to regulation of EmrE,
a multidrug efflux carrier that mediates proton/drug antiport in
bacteria (28).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Regulation of ethidium bromide efflux by
external pH. Efflux at pH 4 ( ), 5 ( ), 6 ( ), 7 ( ), 8 ( ), and 9 ( ) was assayed. KAM3-pTrc99 cells were used as a
control ( ).
|
|
If an inward proton gradient is the only parameter that is altered by
extracellular pH values, increasing extracellular pH values would
decrease such a gradient thereby inhibiting drug efflux. Our results on
AtDTX1 and from EmrE studies are exactly opposite to this prediction.
Clearly, a more complicated mechanism is involved in the pH regulation
of AtDTX1- or EmrE-mediated efflux. A model interpreting this pH effect
has been proposed with EmrE (28). In particular, studies on EmrE
suggest that proton and drug substrates share a common binding site in
the EmrE protein. Extracellular pH not only changes the proton gradient
but also regulates the charge state of the drug, the affinity of the
drug and proton to the common binding site of EmrE, and membrane
potential. The combination of these effects determines a net result on
the regulation of EmrE-mediated drug efflux by extracellular pH (28). More studies are required to determine if AtDTX1 regulation by pH
follows a similar model.
The reversal of pH effect at pH 9 has been reported earlier by Hsieh
et al. (26) with a different multidrug transporter that
depends on proton gradient. At alkaline pH, an electrogenic Na+/H+-antiporter in bacteria leads to the
acidification of the cytoplasm to maintain the pH homeostasis (29).
Hence, at pH 9.0, the pH gradient is inverted. The inverted pH gradient
will act to increase the accumulation of weak base and strongly inhibit
efflux activity (26).
Efflux of Plant Alkaloids through AtDTX1--
Berberine and
palmatine are common alkaloids produced in plants. Both exhibit
antibiotic properties and serve as substrates for the multidrug
resistance pump (26). Recent studies also show that plant alkaloids
such as berberine are common substrates for MATE family efflux carriers
such as NorM and YdhE (8). The fact that AtDTX1 shares sequence
similarity with NorM protein suggests that AtDTX1 may transport plant
alkaloids as well. If AtDTX1 mediates efflux of plant alkaloids, these
compounds may competitively inhibit the efflux of ethidium bromide. We
tested this possibility by using berberine and palmatine. As shown in Fig. 7A, several
concentrations, including 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 250 µM, of
berberine were added to the efflux assay mixture. When berberine
concentration increased to 100 µM, it significantly inhibited the efflux of ethidium bromide through AtDTX1. Palmatine also
inhibited efflux, although it was less effective as compared with
berberine (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
AtDTX1 mediates efflux of plant
alkaloids. A, effect of berberine on the efflux of
ethidium bromide. Efflux by KAM3-pTrc99A cells was used as a control
( ). Efflux of KAM3-AtDTX1 cells was measured in the presence of 0 µM ( ), 1 µM ( ), 5 µM
( ), 10 µM ( ), 50 µM ( ), 100 µM ( ), or 250 µM ( ) berberine.
B, efflux of EtBr is inhibited by both berberine (10 µM, ; 100 µM, ) and palmatine (10 µM, ; 100 µM, ). C, efflux
of berberine in KAM3-pTrc99A and KAM3-AtDTX1 cells.
|
|
To determine whether AtDTX1 utilizes plant alkaloids as substrates, we
examined alkaloid efflux directly using a similar procedure for
ethidium bromide efflux assay. Berberine is a planar cationic molecule
that resembles ethidium bromide and binds to DNA (30). Similar to
ethidium bromide, DNA-bound berberine has enhanced fluorescence. This
property of berberine was used to examine berberine efflux as was done
with ethidium bromide efflux. The fluorescence was measured with
excitation at 355 nm and emission at 517 nm as described earlier (18).
Cells were first loaded with berberine by adding CCCP in loading
mixture. Washed cells were resuspended, and efflux was initiated by
adding cells into fluorescence assay buffer. As shown in Fig.
7C, KAM3 transformed by AtDTX1 showed significantly more
efflux as compared with KAM3 cells transformed by pTrc99A vector under
the same conditions (Fig. 7C). These results indicate that
AtDTX1 mediates efflux of plant alkaloids.
AtDTX1 Confers Cadmium Resistance to KAM3 Cells--
Heavy metals
are toxic to plant growth, and relatively little is understood on the
mechanism of heavy metal detoxification in plants (31). In bacteria,
several studies suggest that some multidrug resistance proteins are
involved in heavy metal resistance (32). For example, disruption of
mdrL, a multidrug efflux carrier in Listeria monocytogenes,
was associated with reduction in heavy metal resistance (19). To test
whether AtDTX1 is involved in heavy metal detoxification, we
cultured KAM3-pTrc99A and KAM3-AtDTX1 strains on the media supplemented
with different heavy metals, including Al3+,
Co2+, Mn2+, Cu2+, Cd2+,
and Zn2+, respectively. The two strains grew
differently on the medium containing Cd2+ (Fig.
8A) but not on media
containing other heavy metals (data not shown). The mutant strain,
KAM3-pTrc99A, did not grow on the medium containing 10 µM
or higher concentrations of Cd2+. In contrast, KAM3
transformed with AtDTX1 tolerated Cd2+ up to 100 µM (Fig. 8A). More analysis using liquid
cultures further confirmed that the KAM3-AtDTX1 strain is significantly
more tolerant to Cd2+ as compared with KAM3-pTrc99A strain
(Fig. 8B). During a 24-h culture period, KAM3-pTrc99A and
KAM3-AtDTX1 cells grew similarly in the absence of Cd2+.
However, 10 and 100 µM Cd2+ almost completely
inhibited the growth of the KAM3-pTrc99A strain. In contrast, 10 µM Cd2+ had little effect on the overall
growth of KAM3-AtDTX1 cells. At 100 µM, Cd2+
inhibited early growth of KAM3-AtDTX1 cells, but these cells recovered
dramatically and nearly reach the density of the control at the end of
a 24-h culture. When Cd2+ concentration reached 1 mM, growth of AtDTX1 cells was inhibited. This result
clearly showed that AtDTX1 confers Cd2+ tolerance to KAM3
cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
AtDTX1 mediates cadmium resistance.
A, transformed strains were grown overnight in liquid LB
medium supplemented with 60 µg/ml ampicillin. The cultures were
diluted to 10 1-10 5
(A600) and spotted onto an LB ampicillin plate
containing different concentrations of CdCl2. B,
growth of KAM3 cells transformed with empty vector (KAM3) or
with vector containing AtDTX1 cDNA (AtDTX1) in LB medium
supplemented with 60 µg of ampicillin and different concentrations of
Cd2+. Samples were taken at six time points to monitor cell
density. Data from two time points (15 and 24 h) were used for
graphing. Experiments were repeated three times, and error
bars represent standard deviations. Control (no Cd2+,
open), 10 µM Cd2+ (solid), 100 µM (hatched), 1 mM
Cd2+ (gray).
|
|
GFP Fusion Analysis Suggests a Plasma Membrane Localization of
AtDXT1 in Arabidopsis Plants--
The functional analyses of AtDTX1 in
a bacterial model demonstrated that AtDTX1 serves as an efflux
carrier that extrude a number of toxic compounds and possibly heavy
metals from cells. To perform the similar cellular function in plants,
AtDTX1 protein must be localized to the plasma membrane. To determine
the subcellular localization of AtDTX1, we fused AtDTX1 cDNA to a
gene coding for green fluorescence protein (GFP) in a binary vector and
introduced the construct into Arabidopsis plants. We
determined the subcellular localization of AtDXT1-GFP fusion protein in
the transgenic plants by laser confocal microscopy. In all cell types
examined, fluorescence of AtDTX1-GFP was associated with the plasma
membrane. Fig. 9 presents confocal images
of root tip and elongated root cells from the controls and
AtDTX1-GFP-expressing plants. For the background controls, wild type
non-transformed plants and plants transformed with GFP alone were
analyzed. Background signals associated with the root tip region are
shown in Fig. 9A. Localization of GFP only is shown in Fig.
9 (B and G), indicating a ubiquitous localization pattern in plant cells. As a positive control for plasma membrane localization, plants transformed with a plasma membrane marker fused to
GFP were examined (Ref. 33, and available on the web at
deepgreen.stanford.edu). Fig. 9C shows a defined periphery localization pattern of this fusion protein. As in the positive control, the fluorescence detected in cells of root tip region and
elongation zone shows that AtDTX1-GFP fusion is also localized to the
cell periphery region (cell wall or plasma membrane) not the nucleus or
other intracellular compartments (Fig. 9, D and H). Because elongated root cells contain a large central
vacuole, the plasma membranes and tonoplasts are closely located and
may not be distinguishable by our procedure. However, cells in the root
tip region do not contain large central vacuoles and the fluorescence
pattern indicates plasma membrane or cell wall association. To
determine if AtDTX1 is localized to the cell wall or the plasma membrane, a plasmolysis experiment was performed. When roots from transgenic seedlings were placed in 0.5 M mannitol,
fluorescence in both the positive control and the
AtDTX1-GFP-transformed plants was internalized with the cytoplasm (Fig.
9, E and F). This localization pattern indicates
that AtDTX1 is localized in the plasma membrane but not in the cell
wall, consistent with the presence of 12 putative transmembrane domains
in the protein sequence.

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
GFP fusion analysis in transgenic plants
suggests a plasma membrane localization for AtDTX1 protein.
A, background fluorescence of a wild type
Arabidopsis root tip; B, fluorescence from a
transformed root tip expressing GFP; C, fluorescence from a
transformed root tip expressing cell surface marker fused to GFP (clone
#37-26, available at
deepgreen.stanford.edu/html/screen/cell%20surface); D,
fluorescence from a transformed root tip expressing AtDTX1-GFP fusion
protein; E, the same material as in C after
plasmolysis; F, the same material as in D after
plasmolysis; G, fluorescence from a transformed root
(elongation zone) expressing GFP; H, fluorescence from a
transformed root (elongation zone) expressing AtDTX1-GFP. The
horizontal scale bar indicates 50 µM.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although several families of detoxification efflux carriers have
been described in bacteria, little is known on the efflux system in
higher plants. Using a functional cloning strategy, our study has
identified and characterized the transport properties of a multidrug
efflux carrier from Arabidopsis (AtDTX1). To our knowledge,
this is the first plant protein that has been shown to function as a
detoxifying efflux carrier. Together with the evidence of plasma
membrane localization of AtDTX1 protein, our study shows that plant
cells possess an efflux mechanism, in addition to vacuole
sequestration, for multidrug and heavy metal detoxification.
The sequence of AtDTX1 protein bears a limited homology to MATE family
of multidrug resistance efflux carriers from bacteria. In particular,
AtDTX1, like the NorM protein in the MATE family, contains 12 putative
transmembrane domains suggesting that AtDTX1 and NorM protein share a
similar topology in the membrane. Consistent with this structural
similarity, AtDTX1 and NorM both function as an efflux carrier that
mediates the extrusion of lipophilic cations such as ethidium bromide
and berberine alkaloids. Regarding the mechanism underlying efflux
through AtDTX1, our results suggest that a proton-motive force is
required for AtDTX1-mediated efflux as supported by CCCP inhibition.
This is different from the mechanism of NorM-mediated transport that
requires a sodium gradient (9). The conclusion on NorM transport is
based on the finding that ethidium bromide efflux through NorM was
specifically dependent on the presence of an inward Na+
gradient. In addition, Na+ efflux was elicited by the
influx of ethidium bromide. We tested possible regulation of AtDTX1 by
Na+ but did not observe any effect. In contrast, CCCP
inhibition of efflux through AtDTX1 is a typical property of
proton-dependent transporters in bacteria (4, 29, 30).
Further studies are required to shed light on the mechanism of
AtDTX1-mediated efflux. Another important difference between AtDTX1 and
NorM is the capability of AtDTX1 to detoxify cadmium. There are studies
showing heavy metal detoxification by other types of MDRs in bacteria
(31). For instance, mdrL in L. monocytogenes was required
for heavy metal resistance (19). The mechanism for cadmium
detoxification is unknown. Comparing with ABC type transporters that
use glutathione conjugates as substrates, MATE-type transporters such
as NorM and AtDTX1 may transport the substrates that are not
conjugated. Finding of AtDTX transporters as detoxifying efflux
carriers expands the repertoire of plant transporters for removing
toxic compounds from important compartments such as cytoplasm.
Although NorM-type transporters often exist as a single gene in
bacteria, AtDTX1 is a member of a large multigene family
with at least 56 related members in the Arabidopsis genome
that is widely accepted as the simplest genome of flowering plants.
When this report was in preparation, two genetic studies in
Arabidopsis identified two genes that belong to the
AtDTX superfamily (34, 35). One gene, referred to as
TRANSPARENT TEST12, identical to AtDTX41
in Fig. 2A, was identified by phenotypic screening for
mutants with altered seed coat color. Mutation in the TT12 gene reduces the color in seed coat. Because the seed color is largely
the result of flavonoid accumulation in vacuoles, and the TT12 sequence
contains similarity to MATE transporters, TT12 is speculated to play a
role in sequestration of flavonoids into the vacuole of endothelium in
the seed coat (34). The second gene, ALF5 (corresponding to
AtDTX19 in Fig. 2A), was identified in search for
genes involved in lateral root formation. The gene product of
ALF5 also bears homology to MATE family members and confers
resistance to certain toxic compounds in yeast (35). It is hypothesized
that ALF5 may be involved in detoxifying toxic compounds in the growth
medium and, therefore, is required for lateral root formation and
growth. Because transport function and cellular localization of TT12
and ALF5 are not studied, it is not known whether these proteins indeed
play a role in membrane transport. It is also unclear whether they are
involved in vacuole sequestration or extrusion of toxic compounds from
cytoplasm. Nevertheless, both studies reveal the importance of
MATE-related proteins in plant development.
Although we doubted that our screening has reached saturation, it is
intriguing that complementation screening in this study failed to
isolate other members in the AtDTX superfamily if most of
these genes function in a similar manner as AtDTX1. One
plausible explanation is that different members of the family may
function differently. This possible functional diversity can be
reflected by several factors. First, the sequence diversity among the
members in different clusters of the large family implies diversity in structural features. For example, AtDTX1 represents a cluster of 19 members in the family. In the same cluster, the sequence identity is
rather high. If AtDXT1 were compared with those members in other
clusters, the sequence identity would drop significantly (Fig.
2B). This structural diversity may lead to functional
variations. It will be interesting to test whether members in the same
or different cluster function equivalently or differently as compared with AtDTX1 using the KAM3 mutant as a model.
The second factor that could determine the functional
diversity is the gene expression pattern and subcellular localization of each member in the family. In this study, we attempted to determine the expression pattern and subcellular location of AtDTX1 protein. Although the AtDTX1 gene did not appear to display much
specificity in different organs, we speculate that various members of
the AtDTX gene family may differ in their expression pattern
in various tissues and at different developmental stages of plants.
Different expression pattern would reflect different function. Using
GFP fusion and confocal microscopy, we identified plasma membrane as a
putative location for AtDTX1. This location is consistent with the
functional property of AtDTX1 as a detoxifying efflux carrier
characterized in a bacterial model. This also suggests that AtDTX1 may
function as an efflux carrier to extrude toxic compounds, including
exogenous chemicals (such as pesticides) and secondary metabolites
synthesized in plant cells. If some family members highly related to
AtDTX1 are also localized to the plasma membrane, it is likely that
these members would play a similar function as AtDTX1 does. However, if
highly related members are localized to the different compartments of
the cell, they must function differently. Study on TT12 could suggest
that members of the AtDTX family are localized to different membranes in plant cells. It is speculated that TT12 may serve as a tonoplast transporter for flavonoid sequestration into the vacuole, because tt12
mutation reduces seed coat color development (34). Analysis of
transport properties and cellular localization of TT12 protein will
test this hypothesis. Some other members of the AtDTX family contain
presequences that predict location in different membrane systems. For
example, AtDXT48 may target chloroplast according to the prediction
using the program PSORT (available at psort.nibb.ac.jp). Plant cells
have a number of compartments that may serve as a storage space for
secondary metabolites or that require such compounds in a metabolic
process. It is logical to target AtDTX members to the membrane of
various cellular compartments to coordinate the cellular trafficking of
their substrate compounds.
The third factor that can result in functional diversity of DTX members
is the substrate specificity. Although our study here does not exhaust
the list of possible substrates for AtDTX1, it is clear that AtDTX1
transports a broad range of substrates, including norfloxacin, ethidium
bromide, berberine alkaloids, and possibly heavy metals. It is
speculated that different substrates are transported by different
members. If TT12 indeed transports flavonoids into the vacuole as
speculated (34), it would have different substrate specificity from
AtDTX1 that does not appear to transport
flavonoids.2 As shown in this
study (Fig. 7), AtDTX1 mediates the efflux of alkaloids such as
berberine. This finding could be physiologically relevant, because it
has been shown that alkaloids are transported from one plant organ to
another through the xylem stream (36). We speculate that transport
proteins such as AtDTX1 would be required to export the compounds into
the xylem for long distance transport. Because plants produce a large
number of secondary metabolites, it will be important to determine if
AtDTX1 and other AtDTX members are indeed involved in the distribution
of alkaloids and other secondary metabolites. The large number of genes
in the AtDTX family and their possible substrate diversity are
consistent with their role in the transport of secondary metabolites.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM-52826 (to S. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Plant and
Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. Tel.:
510-642-6306; Fax: 510-642-4995; E-mail:
sluan@nature.berkeley.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 5, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108777200
2
L. Li and S. Luan, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MFS, major
facilitator superfamily;
SMR, small multidrug resistance family;
RND, resistance/nodulation/cell division family;
ABC, ATP-binding cassette
family;
TMD, transmembrane domain;
MATE, multidrug and toxic compound
extrusion family;
MRP, multidrug resistance protein;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
MIC, minimal inhibitory
concentrations;
GFP, green fluorescence protein;
CCCP, carbonyl cyanide
m-chlorophenylhydrazone;
AcrAB, acriflavine resistance
protein AB.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Dixon, D. P.,
Cummins, I.,
Cole, D. J.,
and Edwards, R.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
1,
258-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Yelin, R.,
Rotem, D.,
and Schuldiner, S.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
949-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Liu, G.,
Sanchez-Fernandez, R., Li, Z.-S.,
and Rea, P. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8648-8656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Putman, M.,
Veen, H. W.,
and Konings, W. N.
(2000)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
64,
672-693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Zgurskaya, H. I.,
and Nikaido, H.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
37,
219-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Brown, M. H.,
Paulsen, I. T.,
and Skurray, R. A.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
31,
394-395[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Pao, S. S.,
Paulsen, I. T.,
and Saier, M. H.
(1998)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62,
1-34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Morita, Y.,
Kodama, K.,
Shiota, S.,
Mine, T.,
Kataoka, A.,
Mizushima, T.,
and Tsuchiya, T.
(1998)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
42,
1778-1782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Morita, Y.,
Kataoka, A.,
Shiota, S.,
Mizushima, T.,
and Tsuchiya, T.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
6694-6697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Lu, Y.-P., Li, Z.-S.,
and Rea, P. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
8243-8248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Davies, T. G. E.,
and Coleman, J. O. D.
(2000)
Plant Cell Environ.
23,
431-443[CrossRef]
|
| 12.
|
Sidler, M.,
Hassa, P.,
Hasan, S.,
Ringli, C.,
and Dudler, R.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
1623-1636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Moller, S. G.,
Kunkel, T.,
and Chua, N.-H.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
90-103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Okusu, H., Ma, D.,
and Nikaido, H.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
306-308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Bolhuis, H.,
Molenaar, D.,
Poelarends, G.,
Van Veen, H. W.,
Poolman, B.,
Driessen, A. J. M.,
and Konings, W. N.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
6957-6964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Neyfakh, A. A.,
Bidnenko, V. E.,
and Chen, L. B.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
4781-4785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Stermitz, F. R.,
Lorenz, P.,
Tawara, J. N.,
Zenewicz, L. A.,
and Lewis, K.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1433-1437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Mata, M. T.,
Baquero, F.,
and Perez-Diaz, J. C.
(2000)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
187,
185-188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Gupta, R.,
Huang, Y.,
Kieber, J.,
and Luan, S.
(1998)
Plant J.
16,
581-589[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Sheen, J.,
Hwang, S.,
Niwa, Y.,
Kobayashi, H.,
and Galbraith, D. W.
(1995)
Plant J.
8,
777-784[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Clough, S. J.,
and Bent, A. F.
(1998)
Plant J.
16,
735-743[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Thomas, D.,
and Surdin-Kerjan, Y.
(1997)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
61,
503-532[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Thoms, B.,
and Wackenagel, W.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
1731-1736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Shiomi, N.,
Fukuda, H.,
Morikawa, H.,
Fukuda, Y.,
and Kimura, A.
(1988)
Appl. Microbiol. Biotech.
29,
302-304
|
| 26.
|
Hsieh, P.-C.,
Siegel, S. A.,
Rogers, B.,
Davis, D.,
and Lewis, K.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6602-6606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Michelet, B.,
and Boutry, M.
(1995)
Plant Physiol. (Rockville)
108,
1-6[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Yerushalmi, H.,
and Schuldiner, S.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
14711-14719[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Padan, E.,
and Schuldiner, S.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1187,
206-210[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Jennings, B. R.,
and Ridler, P. J.
(1983)
Biophys. Struct. Mech.
10,
71-79[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Silver, S.
(1996)
Gene (Amst.)
179,
9-19[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Cobbett, C. S.
(2000)
Plant Physiol. (Rockville)
123,
825-832[Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Cutler, S. R.,
Ehrhardt, D. W.,
Griffitts, J. S.,
and Somerville, C. R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
3718-3723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Debeaujon, I.,
Peeters, A. J. M.,
Leon-Kloosterziel, K. M.,
and Koornneef, M.
(2001)
Plant Cell
13,
853-871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Diener, A. C.,
Gaxiola, R. A.,
and Fink, G. R.
(2001)
Plant Cell
13,
1625-1637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Facchini, P.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
52,
29-66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Morita, N. Shitan, K. Sawada, M. C. E. Van Montagu, D. Inze, H. Rischer, A. Goossens, K.-M. Oksman-Caldentey, Y. Moriyama, and K. Yazaki
Vacuolar transport of nicotine is mediated by a multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) transporter in Nicotiana tabacum
PNAS,
February 17, 2009;
106(7):
2447 - 2452.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shoji, K. Inai, Y. Yazaki, Y. Sato, H. Takase, N. Shitan, K. Yazaki, Y. Goto, K. Toyooka, K. Matsuoka, et al.
Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion-Type Transporters Implicated in Vacuolar Sequestration of Nicotine in Tobacco Roots
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2009;
149(2):
708 - 718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yokosho, N. Yamaji, D. Ueno, N. Mitani, and J. F. Ma
OsFRDL1 Is a Citrate Transporter Required for Efficient Translocation of Iron in Rice
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2009;
149(1):
297 - 305.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Long, C. Rouquette-Loughlin, W. M. Shafer, and E. W. Yu
Functional Cloning and Characterization of the Multidrug Efflux Pumps NorM from Neisseria gonorrhoeae and YdhE from Escherichia coli
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
September 1, 2008;
52(9):
3052 - 3060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-Y. Kim, D.-Y. Kim, D. Shim, W.-Y. Song, J. Lee, J. I. Schroeder, S. Kim, N. Moran, and Y. Lee
Expression of the Novel Wheat Gene TM20 Confers Enhanced Cadmium Tolerance to Bakers' Yeast
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 6, 2008;
283(23):
15893 - 15902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Manabe, N. Tinker, A. Colville, and B. Miki
CSR1, the Sole Target of Imidazolinone Herbicide in Arabidopsis thaliana
Plant Cell Physiol.,
September 1, 2007;
48(9):
1340 - 1358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Marinova, L. Pourcel, B. Weder, M. Schwarz, D. Barron, J.-M. Routaboul, I. Debeaujon, and M. Klein
The Arabidopsis MATE Transporter TT12 Acts as a Vacuolar Flavonoid/H+-Antiporter Active in Proanthocyanidin-Accumulating Cells of the Seed Coat
PLANT CELL,
June 1, 2007;
19(6):
2023 - 2038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Richter, U. Sonnewald, and B. Drager
Calystegines in potatoes with genetically engineered carbohydrate metabolism
J. Exp. Bot.,
May 1, 2007;
58(7):
1603 - 1615.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Durrett, W. Gassmann, and E. E. Rogers
The FRD3-Mediated Efflux of Citrate into the Root Vasculature Is Necessary for Efficient Iron Translocation
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2007;
144(1):
197 - 205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. E. Tsyganov, A. A. Belimov, A. Y. Borisov, V. I. Safronova, M. Georgi, K.-J. Dietz, and I. A. Tikhonovich
A Chemically Induced New Pea (Pisum sativum) Mutant SGECdt with Increased Tolerance to, and Accumulation of, Cadmium
Ann. Bot.,
February 1, 2007;
99(2):
227 - 237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Otani, N. Shitan, K. Sakai, E. Martinoia, F. Sato, and K. Yazaki
Characterization of Vacuolar Transport of the Endogenous Alkaloid Berberine in Coptis japonica
Plant Physiology,
August 1, 2005;
138(4):
1939 - 1946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Wang and D. E. Crowley
Global Gene Expression Responses to Cadmium Toxicity in Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol.,
May 1, 2005;
187(9):
3259 - 3266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Dalton, L. He, B. Wang, M. L. Miller, L. Jin, K. F. Stringer, X. Chang, C. S. Baxter, and D. W. Nebert
Identification of mouse SLC39A8 as the transporter responsible for cadmium-induced toxicity in the testis
PNAS,
March 1, 2005;
102(9):
3401 - 3406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Hall and L. E. Williams
Transition metal transporters in plants
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 1, 2003;
54(393):
2601 - 2613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Campbell, P. M. Schenk, K. Kazan, I. A.M.A. Penninckx, J. P. Anderson, D. J. Maclean, B. P.A. Cammue, P. R. Ebert, and J. M. Manners
Pathogen-Responsive Expression of a Putative ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Gene Conferring Resistance to the Diterpenoid Sclareol Is Regulated by Multiple Defense Signaling Pathways in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2003;
133(3):
1272 - 1284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Rogers and M. L. Guerinot
FRD3, a Member of the Multidrug and Toxin Efflux Family, Controls Iron Deficiency Responses in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
August 1, 2002;
14(8):
1787 - 1799.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|