JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108316200 on November 15, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 5660-5666, February 15, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/7/5660    most recent
M108316200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanguy Le Gac, N.
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanguy Le Gac, N.
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, P. E.

Activation of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Origin-binding Protein (UL9) by Heat Shock Proteins*

Nicolas Tanguy Le Gac and Paul E. BoehmerDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101-6129

Received for publication, August 29, 2001, and in revised form, November 8, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Heat shock proteins participate in the initiation of DNA replication of different organisms by facilitating the assembly of initiation complexes. We have examined the effects of human heat shock proteins (Hsp40 and Hsp70) on the interaction of the herpes simplex virus type-1 initiator protein (UL9) with oriS, one of the viral origins of replication. Hsp40 and Hsp70 act substoichiometrically to increase the affinity of UL9 for oriS. The major contributor to this effect is Hsp40. Heat shock proteins also stimulate the ATPase activity of UL9 with oriS and increase opening of the origin. In contrast, heat shock proteins have no effect on the origin-independent activities of UL9 suggesting that their role is not merely in refolding denatured protein. These observations are consistent with a role for heat shock proteins in activating UL9 to efficiently initiate viral origin-dependent DNA replication. The action of heat shock proteins in this capacity is analogous to their role in activating the initiator proteins of other organisms.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1)1 is a large double-stranded DNA virus with a genome of ~152 kbp. HSV-1 encodes its own complement of DNA replication enzymes that promotes replication from discrete viral origins. It therefore provides a eukaryotic-based system in which to study the mechanism of origin unwinding. The virus-encoded proteins required for origin-dependent replication are: a heterodimeric DNA polymerase (UL30 and UL42), a heterotrimeric DNA helicase-primase (UL5, UL8, and UL52), a single strand DNA-binding protein, referred to as ICP8 (Infected Cell Polypeptide 8) (UL29), and an initiator protein (UL9) that specifically recognizes elements within the origins and possesses ATPase and helicase activities (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). UL9 is a homodimer of ~94-kDa protomers both in solution and when bound to its recognition sequence (3-7). Dimerization is not necessary for origin binding since the ~37-kDa C-terminal domain of UL9, which exists as a monomer, retains activity (8, 9).

The HSV-1 genome contains three redundant and highly homologous origins, two copies of oriS, located within the "c" repeats flanking the unique small segment of the genome, and one copy of oriL, located in the middle of the unique long segment of the genome. The origins are small (<100 bp) palindromic sequences that consist of a central A/T-rich region flanked by UL9-binding sites (5'-CGTTCGCACT) (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2).

Several lines of evidence suggest that unwinding of oriS proceeds as follows. UL9 binds first to the high affinity recognition site, box I, followed by cooperative binding to the lower affinity site, box II (8, 10). Protein-protein interactions between oriS-bound UL9 lead to bending of the origin and opening of the A/T-rich region (5, 8, 11, 12). Finally, UL9 uses ATP to fuel its helicase activity to extrude single-stranded template from the base of the UL9 complex (5). It should also be noted that ICP8 is an essential cofactor in this process (13, 14). Here we hypothesize that host chaperones also play an important role in this process by modulating the oligomerization state of UL9 with possible implications on binding affinity and protein-protein interactions that lead to origin opening.

Molecular chaperones have been classified into several families among which heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and heat shock protein 40 (Hsp40) are involved in several fundamental cellular processes such as protein folding, translocation across membranes, and assembly and disassembly of protein complexes. Hsp70 is a weak ATPase whose activity is increased upon interaction with short peptides of 8-9 residues (15). The Hsp40 family of proteins acts as co-chaperones of Hsp70, stimulating the intrinsic and peptide-dependent ATPase activities of Hsp70 via a conserved protein interaction domain (J-domain) (15), but also exhibits independent activities (for review, see Ref. 16).

Studies on the involvement of chaperones in DNA replication have revealed that they can activate certain initiator proteins and influence the DNA binding activity of many proteins (for reviews, see Refs. 17 and 18). Escherichia coli DnaK and DnaJ are homologs of eukaryotic Hsp70 and Hsp40, respectively. Both DnaK and DnaJ play important roles in the initiation of chromosomal replication from oriC and are essential for origin-specific initiation of replication of bacteriophage lambda  and plasmid P1 (19-21). The recent identification of an interaction between Hsp70 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Orc4p suggests that regulation of eukaryotic initiator proteins may also require molecular chaperones (22).

Induction of heat shock proteins (HSPs) during the replication of several viruses such as adenovirus and cytomegalovirus suggests that molecular chaperones function in viral replication (23). Interactions between the human papillomavirus-11 (HPV-11) initiator protein (E1 helicase) and cellular chaperones occur through the J-domain of Hsp40 and stimulate formation of E1 double hexamers at the origin as well as viral replication in vitro (24). Further evidence for the role of chaperones in the initiation of viral replication is provided by the observation that simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen contains a functional J-domain that is required for efficient replication (25).

The heat shock response has also been implicated in herpes simplex virus replication. Thus, infection of rodent cells with HSV-1 and HSV-2 elevates Hsp70 mRNA levels within 4 h postinfection (26). Moreover, heat shock induces reactivation of latent HSV-1 in cultured cells (27, 28). It has been proposed that HSV-1 immediate early proteins ICP4, ICP0, and ICP27 are involved in Hsp70 induction (29). More recently, DNA microarray technology has been used to show the accumulation of transcripts for the stress-response protein GADD45 in HSV-1-infected human cells (30).

Little is known about the consequences of induction of HSPs during HSV-1 infection. In the present work, we describe novel interactions between the HSV-1 initiator protein, UL9, and two major inducible products of the heat shock response, Hsp70 and Hsp40. These studies may help to understand the mechanisms by which replication initiates at an HSV-1 origin and of viral reactivation and have bearing on the initiation of replication in other systems.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- ATP (disodium salt) and [alpha -32P]dATP (25 Ci/mmol) were from Sigma and ICN, respectively.

Exonuclease-deficient Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I and Sequenase Version 2.0 DNA polymerase were obtained from New England Biolabs and USB Corp., respectively. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was obtained from Bio-Rad. UL9, HisDelta UL9, and ICP8 were purified as described previously (31, 32). Protein concentrations, expressed in moles of monomeric protein, were determined using theoretical extinction coefficients of 43,626 (BSA), 89,220 (UL9), 38,250 (HisDelta UL9), and 82,720 (ICP8) M-1 cm-1 at 280 nm calculated from their predicted amino acid sequences (33). Recombinant human Hsp40 and Hsp70 produced in E. coli were purchased from StressGen Biotechnologies Corp. E. coli HSPs DnaJ, DnaK, and GrpE were obtained from Epicentre Technologies. The concentrations of Hsp40/DnaJ and GrpE are expressed as moles of dimeric protein (34, 35), while those of Hsp70/DnaK are expressed as moles of monomeric protein (17). Their concentrations were determined by the dye binding method of Bradford (36).

M13 mp18 single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) was obtained from New England Biolabs. oriS-containing pGEM822 was as described previ- ously (31). Oligodeoxyribonucleotides PB-9 (22-mer, 5'-ACTCTAGAGGATCCCCGGGTAC), PB-12 (80-mer, 5'-AATTCAAAAGAAGTGAGAACGCGAAGCGTTCGCACTTCGTCCCAATATATATATATTATTAGGGCGAAGTGCGAGCACTG), and PB-21 (20-mer, 5'-CCGGGCCTTTATGTGCGCCG) were obtained from Operon Technologies. (dT)60 was as described previously (37). oriS* DNA was formed by heating PB-12 in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 M NaCl to 95 °C followed by gradual cooling to >30 °C (38). The DNA helicase substrate was generated by annealing PB-9 to M13 mp18 ssDNA. PB-21 is complementary to positions 686-705 of HSV-1 oriS (39). The oriS-containing probe for the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was a 176-bp EcoRI restriction fragment derived from pCG5 (40). The probe was 3'-end-labeled with exonuclease-deficient Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, [alpha -32P]dATP, and unlabeled dTTP. The concentration of the probe was determined by densitometry using the Alpha Innotech AlphaImager 2000 imaging system and a known amount of the same DNA as a standard.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay-- UL9-DNA complexes were formed in 10 µl containing 20 mM EPPS-NaOH, pH 8.3, 2.5 mM dithiothreitol, 3 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM ATP, 10% glycerol, and 50 mM NaCl. The binding reactions were performed for 15 min at 37 °C with 100 fmol of oriS DNA. For experiments containing HSPs, the indicated amounts of HSPs and UL9 were incubated for 5 min at 37 °C prior to the addition of DNA. Reactions were mixed with 3 µl of 80% glycerol containing 0.25% bromphenol blue and resolved by 1% agarose-Tris-acetate-EDTA gel electrophoresis at 4 °C and 5 V/cm. Following electrophoresis, the gels were dried onto DE81 paper (Whatman). The reaction products were analyzed and quantitated by storage phosphor analysis with a Molecular Dynamics Storm 840. UL9-DNA complexes are expressed as a percentage of the total radioactivity and are corrected for background by subtracting the activity obtained in the absence of UL9.

ATPase Assay-- ATP hydrolysis was determined using an enzyme-linked assay as described previously (37). Reactions were performed at 37 °C and contained 20 mM EPPS-NaOH, pH 8.3, 4.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP, 200 µM NADH, 1.5 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 40 units/ml L-lactic dehydrogenase, 40 units/ml pyruvate kinase, 3 mM dithiothreitol, 100 nM UL9, 25 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70, and 250 nM ICP8, and 10 µM (nucleotide) DNA cofactor as indicated. The absorbance at 340 nm was converted to moles of ATP hydrolyzed using an extinction coefficient of 6,220 M-1 cm-1 for NADH.

DNA Helicase Assay-- Assays were performed essentially as described previously (41). Reactions were performed at 37 °C and contained 25 mM EPPS-NaOH, pH 8.3, 5.5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM ATP, 3 mM dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, 0.5 nM (molecules) M13:PB-9 substrate, and proteins as indicated. The reactions were terminated by the addition of 0.3 volumes of 90 mM EDTA, 6% SDS, 30% glycerol, 0.25% bromphenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanol, and 0.6 mg/ml proteinase K followed by a 15-min incubation at 37 °C. The reaction mixtures were resolved by electrophoresis through nondenaturing polyacrylamide-Tris-borate-EDTA gels. Following electrophoresis, the gels were dried onto DE81 paper (Whatman). The reaction products were analyzed and quantitated by storage phosphor analysis with a Molecular Dynamics Storm 840.

Potassium Permanganate Footprinting-- Distortion of the A/T-rich region of oriS was detected by the susceptibility of unpaired thymines to oxidation by potassium permanganate (11). Reactions (20 µl) contained 20 mM EPPS-NaOH pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 5.5 mM MgCl2, 3 mM ATP, 100 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70, and UL9 as indicated. UL9 was preincubated in the absence or presence of Hsp40 and Hsp70. After 5 min at 37 °C, 1 µg of pGEM822 was added. Following a 15-min incubation at 37 °C, KMnO4 was added to 30 mM, and incubation continued for 3 min. The reactions were terminated by the addition of 2-mercaptoethanol to 1 M. DNA samples were purified using the Wizard DNA clean-up system from Promega. Primer PB-21 was annealed to alkali-denatured DNA. Primed DNA was labeled with 2.5 units of Sequenase Version 2.0 DNA polymerase in the presence of 0.4 µM dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP and 25 µM [alpha -32P]dATP for 5 min at room temperature. Subsequently, DNA products were extended with 75 µM dNTP for 10 min at 37 °C. The samples were resolved by 8 M urea, 5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The reaction products were analyzed and quantitated by storage phosphor analysis with a Molecular Dynamics Storm 840. The positions of primer extension products were compared with a sequencing ladder of PB-21-primed pGEM822.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Stimulation of the Origin Binding Activity of UL9 by Heat Shock Proteins-- An EMSA was used to examine whether Hsp40 and Hsp70 had an effect on the origin binding activity of UL9. Fig. 1A shows that the mobility of the 176-bp oriS-containing probe was retarded with increasing concentrations of UL9. Depending on the duration of electrophoresis, two discernible UL9-DNA complexes were detected (see also Figs. 2A and 5A). Based on previous studies, we believe these to be due to binding of UL9 first to the high affinity binding site box I followed by binding to box II (8, 10). Consequently, the faster migrating UL9-DNA complex, which is formed at lower UL9 concentrations, is due to binding of UL9 to box I, while the slower migrating species, which is formed at higher UL9 concentrations, is due to binding of UL9 to both boxes I and II. Addition of Hsp40 and Hsp70 to the reactions led to efficient complex formation at lower concentrations of UL9. Careful resolution of the UL9-DNA complexes showed that HSPs did not affect the distribution of the two species (e.g. Fig. 2A). Quantitation of the UL9-DNA complexes indicates that addition of HSPs reduced the amount of UL9 required for half-maximal binding from ~200 to ~40 nM, a factor of ~5-fold (Fig. 1B). Consequently, HSPs appear to increase the affinity of UL9 for the origin. Importantly, stimulation of the origin binding activity of UL9 was specific for HSPs since a concentration of BSA equivalent to that of total monomeric HSPs produced only a modest effect (~2-fold), indicating that HSPs do not merely act by stabilizing the origin binding activity of UL9 (Fig. 1, C and D). However, addition of BSA enhanced the stimulation by HSPs, suggesting that nonspecific proteins contribute to the effect presumably by increasing protein stability (Fig. 1, C and D). Moreover, the data in Fig. 1, C and D, indicate that HSPs stimulated the origin binding activity of UL9 with a probe (oriS*) that contains only a single recognition site (38).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   HSPs increase the affinity of UL9 for the origin. A, EMSA was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" with increasing concentrations of UL9 (25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 nM, respectively) in the absence or presence of 100 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70 as indicated. The positions of free probe and of UL9-DNA complexes corresponding to binding of UL9 to box I (I) or to both boxes I and II (I+II) are as indicated. B, quantitation of the UL9-DNA complexes shown in A formed in the absence (empty circles) or presence (filled circles) of HSPs. C, EMSA was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" with 100 fmol of oriS* DNA, 50 nM UL9, 50 nM HSPs (100 nM monomeric Hsp40 and 50 nM Hsp70), and 150 nM BSA as indicated. The positions of free probe and of the UL9-DNA complex are as indicated. D, quantitation of the UL9-DNA complexes shown in C. The activity is normalized with respect to that observed with UL9 alone (3% DNA bound). Column 1, UL9; column 2, UL9 and HSPs; column 3, UL9 and BSA; column 4, UL9, HSPs, and BSA.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   HSPs have no effect on the stability of UL9-oriS complexes. A, EMSA was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" with 50 nM UL9 in the absence or presence of 50 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70 as indicated. Ten minutes after addition of the probe, a 20-fold molar excess of oriS* DNA was added, and incubation continued at room temperature for the times indicated followed by immediate electrophoresis. The positions of free probe and of UL9-DNA complexes corresponding to binding of UL9 to box I (I) or to both boxes I and II (I+II) are as indicated. B, quantitation of the UL9-DNA complexes shown in A formed in the absence (empty circles) or presence (filled circles) of HSPs. Given the stimulation elicited by HSPs, the values were normalized to the level prior to addition of competitor DNA.

HSPs had no significant effect on the dissociation of UL9 from the origin. Fig. 2 shows that the half-life of the UL9-oriS complex in the absence or presence of HSPs was ~5 min at room temperature in the presence of 20-fold excess oriS* competitor. This finding supports the notion that HSPs serve to increase the association of UL9 with oriS.

Fig. 3 shows that near-maximal stimulation of the origin binding activity of UL9 was achieved at a concentration of HSPs that was 50-fold lower than that of UL9 (1 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70 versus 50 nM UL9, assuming that protein determination was accurate), suggesting that HSPs act substoichiometrically. Curve-fit analysis showed that the concentration required for half-maximal stimulation was 0.6 nM HSPs. Moreover, HSPs were more effective in stimulating origin binding when preincubated with UL9 than if the proteins were added simultaneously or if UL9 was permitted to bind to the origin prior to addition of HSPs (data not shown).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Stimulation of the origin binding activity of UL9 by HSPs is catalytic. A, EMSA was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" with 100 fmol of oriS* DNA, 50 nM UL9, and increasing concentrations of HSPs (1, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70, respectively) as indicated. The reaction with HSPs alone contained 100 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70. The positions of free probe and of the UL9-DNA complex are as indicated. B, quantitation of the UL9-DNA complexes shown in A. The activity is normalized with respect to that observed with UL9 alone (2.6% DNA bound).

The previous experiments were performed with equimolar Hsp40 and Hsp70. The experiment shown in Fig. 4 addresses the effect of each protein with 50 nM UL9. At this UL9 concentration, origin binding activity is far below saturation (see Fig. 1B) and therefore allows detection of maximal stimulation. The data show that the major contributor to the stimulatory effect was Hsp40 with a small effect from Hsp70. Maximal stimulation was observed in the presence of both Hsp40 and Hsp70. Given the high degree of evolutionary conservation between HSPs, the action of equivalent concentrations of E. coli HSPs was compared with that of their human homologs. Interestingly, the stimulatory effects of the E. coli HSPs was similar to that of the human proteins with the major effect due to DnaJ and maximum stimulation produced by the combined action of DnaJ and DnaK. Moreover, E. coli GrpE, which has also been implicated in the initiation of lambda  and P1 replication (42, 43), also stimulated the origin binding activity of UL9 and further increased the effect brought about by DnaJ and DnaK. Overall, depending on the concentration of UL9, Hsp70/DnaK stimulated origin binding activity ~2-fold, while Hsp40/DnaJ produced a 3-fold effect. The combined action of both Hsp70/DnaK and Hsp40/DnaJ stimulated binding up to 5-fold. As already shown in Figs. 1 and 3, none of the HSPs alone or in combination exhibited any significant origin binding activity. As previously demonstrated, addition of ATP stimulated the origin binding activity of UL9 ~2-fold but had no effect on the stimulation by Hsp40 and/or Hsp70 (data not shown) (44).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Both human and E. coli HSPs stimulate the origin binding activity of UL9 with the major contributor being Hsp40/DnaJ. EMSA was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" with 50 nM UL9 and 50 nM of the indicated human (solid bars) or E. coli (open bars) HSPs. Column 1, UL9; column 2, UL9 and Hsp40/DnaJ; column 3, UL9 and Hsp70/DnaK; column 4, UL9, Hsp40/DnaJ, and Hsp70/DnaK; column 5, UL9 and GrpE; column 6, UL9 and DnaJ, DnaK, and GrpE; column 7, Hsp40/DnaJ; column 8, Hsp70/DnaK; column 9, Hsp40/DnaJ and Hsp70/DnaK; column 10, GrpE; column 11, DnaJ, DnaK, and GrpE.

A number of techniques, including gel-filtration chromatography, glycerol-gradient sedimentation, and electron microscopy have been used to demonstrate that UL9 exists as a dimer in solution (3-6). HSPs have previously been shown to activate the initiator proteins of other systems by converting oligomeric species into monomeric protein (21, 45). Consequently, it is possible that HSPs modulate the oligomerization state of UL9, thereby stimulating its origin binding activity. As a first attempt to address this possibility, the effect of HSPs on the origin binding activity of a monomeric UL9 deletion mutant (HisDelta UL9) was examined. HisDelta UL9 encompasses only the C-terminal origin-binding domain of UL9 and has been shown to be monomeric in solution (8). If the function of HSPs is to monomerize UL9 to generate high affinity origin-binding protomers, HisDelta UL9 should not be affected by HSPs and behave similarly to HSP-stimulated wild-type UL9. Fig. 5 shows that there was no effect of HSPs on the origin binding activity of HisDelta UL9. HisDelta UL9 reached half-maximal binding at ~10 nM, indicating that it binds to the origin with even higher affinity than wild-type UL9 stimulated by HSPs (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The monomeric C-terminal origin-binding domain of UL9 binds to the origin with high affinity and is not further stimulated by HSPs. A, EMSA was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" with increasing concentrations of HisDelta UL9 (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 nM, respectively) in the absence or presence of 100 nM Hsp40 and Hsp70 as indicated. The positions of free probe and of HisDelta UL9-DNA complexes corresponding to binding of HisDelta UL9 to box I (I) or to both boxes I and II (I+II) are as indicated. B, quantitation of the HisDelta UL9-DNA complexes shown in A formed in the absence (empty squares) or presence (filled squares) of HSPs.

HSPs Stimulate the Origin-dependent ATPase Activity of UL9-- The above experiments demonstrate that HSPs can enhance the binding of UL9 to the origin. To determine whether HSPs can stimulate the function of UL9 at the origin, their effect on the origin-dependent ATPase activity of UL9 was examined. The origin-containing DNA cofactor used in these experiments was oriS*, a putative intermediate in origin unwinding, that has previously been shown to act efficiently as a substrate for the origin binding and ATPase activities of UL9 (38, 46). The data in Fig. 6A show that oriS* stimulated the ATPase activity of UL9. Importantly, addition of Hsp40 and Hsp70 significantly increased the ATPase activity of UL9 with oriS*. In contrast, there was no effect of HSPs on the DNA-independent ATPase activity of UL9. Moreover, under the specified reaction conditions, HSPs alone did not exhibit significant ATPase activity either in the absence or presence of oriS*. ICP8, the HSV-1-encoded single strand DNA-binding protein, has previously been shown to specifically stimulate the nonspecific ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity of UL9 (37, 41). Fig. 6B shows that ICP8 also stimulated the origin-dependent ATPase activity of UL9. Consistent with the data in Fig. 6A, addition of HSPs to a reaction with UL9 and ICP8 further stimulated ATP hydrolysis (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   HSPs stimulate the origin-dependent ATPase activity of UL9. ATP hydrolysis was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, effect of HSPs on DNA-independent and origin-dependent ATP hydrolysis. Curve 1, UL9; curve 2, UL9 and HSPs; curve 3, HSPs. The arrow indicates the time at which oriS* DNA was added. B, origin-dependent ATP hydrolysis with 50 mM NaCl (curves 1, 3, and 5) or 50 mM KCl (curves 2, 4, and 6). Curves 1 and 2, UL9; curves 3 and 4, UL9 and ICP8; curves 5 and 6, UL9, ICP8, and HSPs. C, origin-dependent ATP hydrolysis with UL9, ICP8, and HSPs at 25 µM (curve 1) or 2 mM (curve 2) ATP.

The effect of HSPs on the origin-dependent ATPase activity of UL9 was also examined in the presence of K+, which is an essential cofactor for the ATPase activity of Hsp70 (47). Interestingly, substitution of 50 mM NaCl with 50 mM KCl stimulated the activity of UL9 (Fig. 6B). Likewise, KCl elicited a larger stimulation in the presence of ICP8 and HSPs (Fig. 6B). However, the magnitude of the effect of HSPs was similar in the presence of NaCl or KCl, indicating that the main function of K+ was in stimulating UL9 and not for the effect of HSPs. Substitution of 50 mM NaCl with 50 mM KCl also led to 5.5-fold stimulation in the origin binding activity of UL9.

The increase in ATP hydrolysis observed in the presence of HSPs was probably due to the ATPase activity of UL9 rather than that of Hsp70 since at 25 µM ATP, which is ~20-fold lower than the Km for ATP of UL9 (41) but sufficiently high to elicit near Vmax ATPase activity of Hsp70 (15), the effect of HSPs on ATP hydrolysis was greatly reduced (Fig. 6C).

There was no effect of Hsp40 and Hsp70 on the nonspecific ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity of UL9 (Fig. 7A). Both in the absence and presence of HSPs the rate of ATP hydrolysis with (dT)60 was 1.8 pmol/s. Similarly, HSPs did not affect the nonspecific DNA helicase activity of UL9 (Fig. 7B). The findings that HSPs only stimulate origin-dependent activities but have no effect on the nonspecific activities of UL9 indicate that they do not merely act as chaperones to refold denatured protein.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   HSPs have no effect on the nonspecific ssDNA-dependent ATPase and DNA helicase activities of UL9. A, ATP hydrolysis was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures" with (dT)60 cofactor. Curve 1, UL9; curve 2, UL9 and HSPs. B, DNA unwinding was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." Empty circles, UL9; filled circles, UL9 and HSPs; filled triangle, HSPs.

HSPs Enhance the Opening of the Origin by UL9-- UL9 has previously been shown to bend and distort the origin as a first step in the unwinding process (5, 11, 12). Distortion of the A/T-rich region in the origin may be detected by the susceptibility of unpaired bases to single strand-specific nucleases or reagents such as potassium permanganate, which oxidizes unpaired thymine residues thereby creating stop sites for a DNA polymerase in a primer extension assay (11). Fig. 8A shows that there was no potassium permanganate sensitivity in the A/T-rich region in the absence of UL9 or with HSPs alone. However, increasing UL9 concentrations led to potassium permanganate-induced stop sites. Addition of Hsp40 and Hsp70 enhanced the UL9-dependent sensitivity of the A/T-rich region to potassium permanganate. Quantitation of the signal corresponding to the A/T-rich region indicates that HSPs induced their maximal effect (2.5-fold stimulation) at low UL9 concentrations at which the signal is not saturated (Fig. 8B).


View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   HSPs enhance UL9-mediated distortion of the A/T-rich region of oriS. Potassium permanganate footprinting was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, primer extension products formed with increasing concentrations of UL9 (50, 100, and 250 nM, respectively) in the absence or presence of HSPs as indicated. The region corresponding to the A/T-rich region and the position of thymine 601 in oriS (39) are as indicated. B, the signal in the A/T-rich region was quantitated and corrected for the amount of radioactivity in each sample. The graph indicates the stimulation in potassium permanganate sensitivity in the presence of HSPs at each UL9 concentration.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present work, we describe that Hsp40 and Hsp70 act catalytically and in concert to increase the affinity of UL9 for oriS. The major contributor to this effect is Hsp40. We also observe that HSPs stimulate the activities of UL9 at the origin (origin-dependent ATPase and opening of the origin). It is unlikely that the stimulation by HSPs is merely the result of refolding of denatured UL9 since there was no effect of Hsp40 and Hsp70 on the origin-independent DNA helicase and ATPase activities of UL9. These findings illustrate a potential mechanism, similar to what has been described for plasmid P1 replication among others, whereby HSV-1 origin-dependent replication is regulated by the action of HSPs.

Plasmid P1 is a system in which the role of HSPs in origin-dependent initiation has been studied in great depth. In this system, the first regulatory step entails the dissociation of RepA dimers into active monomers by the action of E. coli Hsp40 (DnaJ) and Hsp70 (DnaK) homologs (21). DnaJ, DnaK, and GrpE function in the initiation pathway of bacteriophage lambda  by releasing DnaB helicase from the initiation complex to enable unwinding of the origin (42). In the case of oriC-dependent replication in E. coli, HSPs have been shown to play a multifaceted role. For example, DnaK prevents self-aggregation of the initiator protein, DnaA (45).

Involvement of HSPs in the initiation of origin-dependent replication has recently been realized with eukaryotic viruses. Hence, in the case of SV40, efficient replication depends on the presence of a J-domain in large T antigen, which presumably serves in the assembly of a functional hexamer at the origin, and may be further aided by Hsp70 (25). Similar to our findings, the origin binding activity of the HPV-11 initiator E1 is stimulated preferentially by Hsp40 and to a lesser extent by Hsp70 (24). In fact, a peptide encompassing the J-domain of Hsp40 was sufficient in stimulating E1. Consequently, the J-domain of Hsp40 may also mediate interactions between Hsp40 and UL9.

By analogy to other replication systems, a possible mechanism by which HSPs stimulate UL9 may be by modulating its dimerization status, activating its binding to the origin by formation of monomers. This notion is supported by our finding that HSPs have no effect on the origin binding activity of a monomeric mutant UL9 that exhibits origin binding properties similar to those of HSP-stimulated wild-type UL9. The importance of the oligomerization status of initiator proteins was recently addressed with the pi  plasmid initiator protein. In that study it was shown that pi  monomers preferentially bound to the gamma  origin and facilitated opening of its A/T-rich region (48). As previously mentioned, HSPs also play an active role in converting RepA dimers into active monomers and prevent aggregation of DnaA (21, 45). In addition, the J-domain of Hsp40 was shown to induce the formation of double hexamers of E1 at the HPV-11 origin (24).

Our results indicate that origin opening (potassium permanganate sensitivity) is directly related to the amount of UL9 bound to the origin. Maximal stimulation of origin opening by HSPs was observed at low UL9 concentrations, indicating that the effect of HSPs on origin opening is secondary and that their main function is to increase origin binding. This notion is supported by our observation that, given the resolution of our assay, interactions between HSPs and UL9 affected neither the mobility of the UL9-DNA complexes nor their stability. Therefore, it is unlikely that the interactions between HSPs and UL9 affect the conformation of the initiator complexes once bound to the origin.

Since no specific induction of Hsp40 during HSV-1 infection has previously been reported, we do not know at this point whether Hsp40 actually participates in HSV-1 initiation in vivo. The stimulation of UL9 binding to the origin by E. coli DnaJ suggests that the functional interaction we observe is not limited to the inducible form of Hsp40 used in the present study. It is possible that different members of the Hsp40 family or other J-domain-containing proteins could fulfill this function in vivo. In any case, in light of the requirement for efficient viral replication of a J-domain in SV40 large T antigen and the stimulation of HPV-11 replication by the J-domain, it appears that Hsp40 may be a conserved theme in the replication of eukaryotic DNA viruses.

Our results implicate the direct participation of HSPs in the interaction of UL9 with the origins and thereby suggest a mechanism by which the initiation of viral replication may be regulated. We propose that our current results with the HSV-1 system corroborate previous findings with other eukaryotic viruses (SV40 and HPV-11) and may have general implications for the role of HSPs in the initiation of eukaryotic chromosomal replication as indicated by the interaction of Hsp70 with S. cerevisiae Orc4p (22). Finally, it is noteworthy to mention that while the participation of host chaperones in the replication of SV40 and HPV-11 may not be unexpected, given their dependence on host enzymes, the proposed role of HSPs in herpesvirus replication is unexpected since this class of virus encodes it own DNA replication machinery.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM62643 and American Heart Association Grant 0050973B.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami School of Medicine, P.O. Box 016129, Miami, FL 33101-6129. Tel.: 305-243-2934; Fax: 305-243-3955; E-mail: pboehmer@molbio.med.miami.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 15, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108316200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type-1; BSA, bovine serum albumin; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; EPPS, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N'-(3-propanesulfonic acid); HPV, human papillomavirus; HSP, heat shock protein; Hsp40, heat shock protein 40; Hsp70, heat shock protein 70; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; SV40, simian virus 40; ICP, Infected Cell Polypeptide.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Boehmer, P. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 347-384[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Lehman, I. R., and Boehmer, P. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28059-28062[Free Full Text]
3. Bruckner, R. C., Crute, J. J., Dodson, M. S., and Lehman, I. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 2669-2674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Fierer, D. S., and Challberg, M. D. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 3986-3995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Makhov, A. M., Boehmer, P. E., Lehman, I. R., and Griffith, J. D. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 1742-1750[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Makhov, A. M., Boehmer, P. E., Lehman, I. R., and Griffith, J. D. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 258, 789-799[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Lee, S. S., and Lehman, I. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18613-18617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Elias, P., Gustafsson, C. M., Hammarsten, O., and Stow, N. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17424-17429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Weir, H. M., Calder, J. M., and Stow, N. D. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 1409-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Hazuda, D. J., Perry, H. C., and McClements, W. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14309-14315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Koff, A., Schwedes, J. F., and Tegtmeyer, P. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 3284-3292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. He, X., and Lehman, I. R. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 3024-3028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Lee, S. S., and Lehman, I. R. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2838-2842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. He, X., and Lehman, I. R. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 5726-5728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Jordan, R., and McMacken, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4563-4569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Kelley, W. L. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 222-227[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Hartl, F. U. (1996) Nature 381, 571-579[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Konieczny, I., and Zylicz, M. (1999) Genet. Eng. 21, 95-111
19. Malki, A., Hughes, P., and Kohiyama, M. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 225, 420-426[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Zylicz, M. (1993) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 339, 271-277[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Wickner, S. H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2690-2694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Giraldo, R., and Díaz-Orejas, R. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 4938-4943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Glotzer, J. B., Saltik, M., Chiocca, S., Michou, A. I., Moseley, P., and Cotten, M. (2000) Nature 407, 207-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Liu, J.-S., Kuo, S.-R., Makhov, A. M., Cyr, D. M., Griffith, J. D., Broker, T. R., and Chow, L. T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30704-30712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Campbell, K. S., Mullane, K. P., Aksoy, I. A., Studbal, H., Zalvide, J., Pipas, J. M., Silver, P. A., Roberts, T. M., Schaffhausen, B. S., and DeCaprio, J. A. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 1098-1110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Kobayashi, K., Ohgitani, E., Tanaka, Y., Kita, M., and Imanishi, J. (1994) Microbiol. Immunol. 38, 321-325[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Moriya, A., Yoshiki, A., Kita, M., Fushiki, S., and Imanishi, J. (1994) Arch. Virol. 135, 419-425[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Halford, W. P., Gebhardt, B. M., and Carr, D. J. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 5051-5060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Phillips, B., Abravaya, K., and Morimoto, R. I. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 5680-5692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Khodarev, N. N., Advani, S. J., Gupta, N., Roizman, B., and Weichselbaum, R. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 12062-12067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Sampson, D. A., Arana, M. E., and Boehmer, P. E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2931-2937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Boehmer, P. E., and Lehman, I. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8444-8448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Gill, S. C., and von Hippel, P. H. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 182, 319-326[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Sha, B., Lee, S., and Cyr, D. M. (2000) Struct. Fold. Des. 8, 799-807[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Harrison, C. J., Hayer-Hartl, M., Di, Liberto, M., Hartl, F., and Kuriyan, J. (1997) Science 276, 431-435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Boehmer, P. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2676-2683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Aslani, A., Simonsson, S., and Elias, P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5880-5887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Wong, S. W., and Schaffer, P. A. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 2601-2611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Hernandez, T. R., Dutch, R. E., Lehman, I. R., Gustafsson, C., and Elias, P. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 1649-1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Arana, M. E., Haq, B., Tanguy Le Gac, N., and Boehmer, P. E. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6840-6845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Wyman, C., Vasilikiotis, C., Ang, D., Georgopoulos, C., and Echols, H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25192-25196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Sozhamannan, S., and Chattoraj, D. K. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 3546-3555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Gustafsson, C. M., Hammarsten, O., Falkenberg, M., and Elias, P. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4629-4633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Banecki, B., Kaguni, J. M., and Marszalek, J. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1442, 39-48[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Aslani, A., Macao, B., Simonsson, S., and Elias, P. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 7194-7199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Feifel, B., Sandmeier, E., Schonfeld, H. J., and Christen, P. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 237, 318-321[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Krüger, R., Konieczny, I., and Filutowicz, M. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 306, 945-955[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
T. Carsillo, Z. Traylor, C. Choi, S. Niewiesk, and M. Oglesbee
hsp72, a Host Determinant of Measles Virus Neurovirulence
J. Virol., November 15, 2006; 80(22): 11031 - 11039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
O. Schildgen, S. Graper, J. Blumel, and B. Matz
Genome Replication and Progeny Virion Production of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Mutants with Temperature-Sensitive Lesions in the Origin-Binding Protein
J. Virol., June 1, 2005; 79(11): 7273 - 7278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. A. Trabold, M. Weinberger, L. Feng, and W. C. Burhans
Activation of Budding Yeast Replication Origins and Suppression of Lethal DNA Damage Effects on Origin Function by Ectopic Expression of the Co-chaperone Protein Mge1
J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12413 - 12421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. W. Fewell, C. M. Smith, M. A. Lyon, T. P. Dumitrescu, P. Wipf, B. W. Day, and J. L. Brodsky
Small Molecule Modulators of Endogenous and Co-chaperone-stimulated Hsp70 ATPase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 2004; 279(49): 51131 - 51140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Macao, M. Olsson, and P. Elias
Functional Properties of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type I Origin-binding Protein Are Controlled by Precise Interactions with the Activated Form of the Origin of DNA Replication
J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 29211 - 29217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. S. Trego and D. S. Parris
Functional Interaction between the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Polymerase Processivity Factor and Origin-Binding Proteins: Enhancement of UL9 Helicase Activity
J. Virol., December 1, 2003; 77(23): 12646 - 12659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. J. Cho, W. J. Yoon, C. H. Moon, S. J. Cha, H. Song, H. R. Cho, S. J. Jang, D. K. Chung, C. S. Jeong, and J. W. Park
Molecular Cloning of a Novel Chaperone-like Protein Induced by Rhabdovirus Infection with Sequence Similarity to the Bacterial Extracellular Solute-binding Protein Family 5
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 41489 - 41496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Y. Lin, A. M. Makhov, J. D. Griffith, T. R. Broker, and L. T. Chow
Chaperone Proteins Abrogate Inhibition of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) E1 Replicative Helicase by the HPV E2 Protein
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 6592 - 6604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/7/5660    most recent
M108316200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanguy Le Gac, N.
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanguy Le Gac, N.
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, P. E.


HOME