![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 8, 5952-5961, February 22, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
,
¶,
,
,
,
,
, and
¶§§
From the
Experimental Retrovirology Section, HIV and
AIDS Malignancy Branch, NCI, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, the ¶ Department of Internal Medicine
II, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Honjo 1-1-1 Kumamoto 860, Japan, the
Image Analysis Laboratory and
** AIDS Vaccine Program, Science Applications International
Corporation, NCI, Frederick, Maryland 21702, and the

Howard Hughes Medical Institute and
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland,
Baltimore, Maryland 21250
Received for publication, August 20, 2001, and in revised form, November 19, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amino acid substitutions in human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag cleavage sites have been
identified in HIV-1 isolated from patients with AIDS failing
chemotherapy containing protease inhibitors (PIs). However, a number of
highly PI-resistant HIV-1 variants lack cleavage site amino acid
substitutions. In this study we identified multiple novel amino acid
substitutions including L75R, H219Q, V390D/V390A, R409K, and
E468K in the Gag protein at non-cleavage sites in common among HIV-1
variants selected against the following four PIs: amprenavir, JE-2147,
KNI-272, and UIC-94003. Analyses of replication profiles of various
mutant clones including competitive HIV-1 replication assays
demonstrated that these mutations were indispensable for HIV-1
replication in the presence of PIs. When some of these mutations were
reverted to wild type amino acids, such HIV-1 clones failed to
replicate. However, virtually the same Gag cleavage pattern was seen,
indicating that the mutations affected Gag protein functions but not
their cleavage sensitivity to protease. These data strongly suggest that non-cleavage site amino acid substitutions in the Gag protein recover the reduced replicative fitness of HIV-1 caused by mutations in
the viral protease and may open a new avenue for designing PIs that
resist the emergence of PI-resistant HIV-1.
Combination antiretroviral therapy using reverse transcriptase
inhibitors and protease inhibitors
(PIs)1 produces substantial
suppression of viral replication in HIV-1-infected patients. However,
the emergence of drug-resistant HIV-1 variants in such patients has
limited the efficacy of combination chemotherapy. HIV-1 variants
resistant to any of the currently available antiretroviral therapeutics
have emerged both in vitro and in vivo (1). In particular, HIV-1 resistant to one PI is often cross-resistant to
another PI, presenting formidable challenges in the therapy of HIV-1
infection. Indeed, HIV-1 protease has been shown to tolerate extensive
sequence variations, remaining functional even with as many as 15 amino
acid substitutions accumulated in a molecule composed of 99 amino acids
(2, 3).
Amino acid substitutions in HIV-1 Gag precursor p7-p1 and p1-p6
cleavage sites have been identified in HIV-1 isolated from patients
with AIDS failing chemotherapy including PIs (4, 5). Those
substitutions are believed to compensate for the enzymatic impairment
of protease per se resulting from the acquisition of PI
resistance-conferring amino acid substitutions within the
protease-encoding region of the HIV-1 genome. However, a number of
highly PI-resistant HIV-1 variants lack such cleavage site amino acid
substitutions. Furthermore, recombinant HIV-1 clones to which PI
resistance-conferring substitutions in the protease-encoding region
were introduced are known to often fail to propagate in
vitro (6). Therefore, we thought that as yet unidentified amino
acid substitutions in the Gag-Pol polyprotein, the substrate for the
enzyme, compensate for the altered enzymatic function caused by the
acquisition of amino acid substitutions in the viral protease. To this
end, we generated PI-resistant HIV-1 variants by exposing HIV-1 to four different PIs including amprenavir (APV) (7), JE-2147 (2), KNI-272 (8),
and UIC-94003 (7), identified up to 23 amino acid substitutions in Gag
and protease, generated a variety of infectious HIV-1 clones containing
such amino acid substitutions, and characterized their replication
profiles. We conclude that Gag amino acid substitutions such as H219Q
and R409K, located outside the cleavage sites, contribute to the
development of HIV-1 resistance to PIs and are essential for the
replication of HIV-1 variants in the presence of PIs.
Cells and Antiviral Agents--
MT-2 and H9 cells were grown in
RPMI 1640-based culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(HyClone, Logan, UT), 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml
streptomycin. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from
healthy donors were stimulated by phytohemagglutinin (PHA) in RPMI
1640-based medium containing interleukin-2 (5 ng/ml) (R & D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN) for 2 days before HIV-1 exposure. APV was a kind gift
from Glaxo Wellcome. JE-2147 and KNI-272 were synthesized as described previously (2, 8, 9). UIC-94003 was synthesized by Arun Ghosh as
described previously (7, 10).
Generation of HIV-1 Resistant to PIs--
The wild type clonal
HIV-1, HIV-1NL4-3, obtained from COS-7 cells transfected
with pHIV-1NL4-3, was propagated in human CD4+ MT-2 cells
in the presence of increasing concentrations of PIs as described
previously (2, 7). Briefly, MT-2 cells (5 × 105) were
exposed to HIV-1NL4-3 (500 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50)) and cultured in the presence of APV,
KNI-272, or UIC-94003 at initial concentrations of 0.0005-0.03
µM. Viral replication was monitored by observation of the
cytopathic effect (CPE) in MT-2 cells. The culture supernatant was
harvested on day 7 of culture and used to infect fresh MT-2 cells for
the next round of culture. When the virus began to propagate in the
presence of the drug, the drug concentration was increased. This
selection was carried out for a total of 27-62 passages. For the
generation of JE-2147-resistant virus, HIV-1NL4-3/I84V (2)
was employed instead of HIV-1NL4-3. Proviral DNAs from the
lysates of infected cells from several passages were sequenced as indicated.
Determination of Nucleotide Sequences--
Molecular cloning and
determination of nucleotide sequences of HIV-1 passaged in the presence
or absence of antiretroviral agents was performed as described
previously (2). In brief, high molecular weight DNA was extracted from
HIV-1-infected MT-2 cells using High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) and the entire Gag- and protease-encoding
regions of the HIV-1 genome was amplified with Taq DNA
polymerase (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) using the following primer pair:
the forward primer (LF3) 5'-TCT CGA CGC AGG ACT CGG CTT GCT GAA GCG CGC
AC-3' and the reverse primer (XM1) 5'-GGC CAT CCA TCC CGG GCT TTA ATT
TTA CTG-3' (Fig. 1). The forward primer had a BssHII
site, whereas the SmaI site was introduced to the reverse
primer with synonymous substitutions at nucleotides 2590 and 2593. The
PCR products were purified with PCR Select III columns (5 Prime Generation of Recombinant HIV-1 Clones--
The PCR products
obtained as described above were digested with two of three enzymes
BssHII, ApaI, and SmaI, and the
obtained fragments were introduced into pHIV-1NLSma
designed to have a SmaI site by changing two nucleotides
(2590 and 2593) of pHIV-1NL4-3. To generate HIV-1 clones
carrying the mutations, site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange
Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was performed,
and the mutation containing genomic fragments were introduced to
pHIV-1NLSma. Determination of the nucleotide
sequences of plasmids confirmed that each clone had the desired
mutations but no unintended mutations. Each recombinant plasmid was
transfected into COS-7 cells with GenePORTER Transfection Reagent (Gene
Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA), and thus obtained infectious virions
were harvested 48 h after transfection and stored at MAGI Assay--
MAGI assay was employed to determine the
infectivity of the stock HIV-1 preparations as described previously
(11, 12). HeLa-CD4-LTR- Replication Kinetics Assay--
MT-2 cells (105) or
PHA-stimulated PBMCs (PHA-PBMCs, 5 × 106) were
exposed to each infectious virus preparation (500 and 2000 blue
cell-forming units defined in the MAGI assay for MT-2 cells and PBMCs,
respectively) for 12 h, washed twice with PBS, and cultured in 5 ml of complete medium in the presence or absence of PI. Culture
supernatants (200 µl) were harvested every other day, and p24 Gag
amounts were determined using a commercially available radioimmunoassay
kit (Dupont/NEN Research Products, Boston, MA). An
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Beckman Coulter, Inc.,
Fullerton, CA) was also used for the determination of p24 Gag amounts
as needed.
MTT
Assay--
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) assay was employed to determine the CPE of each stocked virus preparation. MT-2 cells (4 × 103 in 200 µl
complete medium per well) were plated onto 96-well flat-bottomed
microplates, and each virus preparation (20 blue cell-forming
units/well) was inoculated. In 10 days of culture, medium (100 µl)
was removed, and MTT solution (10 µl, 7.5 mg/ml) was added to each
well. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h and exposed to
100 µl of acidified isopropyl alcohol-containing 4% (v/v)
Triton X-100 to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance (wavelength, 570 nm) was then measured in a microplate reader. All
assays were performed in triplicate.
Competitive HIV-1 Replication Assay (CHRA)--
Freshly prepared
H9 cells (3 × 105) were exposed to infectious clones
to be examined for their replicative ability and cultured in the
presence or absence of APV as described previously (12). To ensure that
the infectivity of paired infectious clones was equal or comparable, a
fixed amount (200 TCID50) of one infectious clone was
combined with three different amounts (100, 200, and 300 TCID50) of the second infectious clone. On day 1 in
culture, one-third of infected H9 cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS, and cellular DNA was extracted and subjected to nested PCR
for amplification of the p7-p1-p6-encoding gag region plus the protease-encoding gene, and direct sequencing was performed. The
first primer pair used was CM1 (5'-ATG TAA AAG ACA CCA AGG AAG C-3) and
CM4.1 (5'-TAT TTT TTC TTC TGT CAA TGG C-3'). The second primer pair
used was CM3 (5'-TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT AAA TGA TGA CAG CAT GTC AGG
G-3) and CM4 (5'-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG ACC TAC TGG TAC AGT CTC AAT AGG
A-3'), which included the M13 forward and reverse sequences,
respectively (2). The HIV-1 coculture, which best approximated a 50:50
mixture on day 1, was further propagated, and the remaining cultures
were discarded. Every 7 or 10 days, the supernatants of the virus
coculture were transmitted to fresh uninfected H9 cells. The cells
harvested at each passage were subjected to direct DNA sequencing, and
viral population changes were determined. The persistence of the
original amino acid substitutions was confirmed for all infectious
clones used in this assay.
Western Blot Analysis--
To analyze whether HIV-1 polyproteins
in various HIV-1 clones were cleaved by protease, Western blot analysis
was conducted (13). It is of note that when the virus was propagated in
the presence of high concentrations of PIs, the amounts of Pr55Gag, p41, and p24 varied vastly, and no normalization was possible. Therefore, by assuming that the transfection efficiency was comparable, the 48-h supernatants of the culture of COS-7 cells transfected with
the same amount of each plasmid using the same conditions were directly
subjected to Western blot analysis as described previously (13).
Briefly, 48 h after transfection with plasmid preparations, the
culture supernatant was centrifuged at 13,800 × g for
10 min and passed through a 0.45-µm pore-size filter to remove
cellular debris. The filtrate was centrifuged at 20,380 × g for 4 h to pellet virions. The pelleted virions were
lysed in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1%
Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride). Transfected COS-7 cells were washed with PBS and lysed in lysis buffer
at 4 °C for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 13,800 × g to remove cell debris (13). Protein concentrations of the cell lysates were determined with the bicinchoninic acid protein assay
kit (Pierce). Cell lysates (30 µg of protein) were subjected to
electrophoresis on SDS-4-12% polyacrylamide gradient gels (Bio-Rad) under reducing conditions, followed by electroblotting onto
nitrocellulose membranes. The HIV-1 Gag proteins were visualized by
SuperSignal WestPico (Pierce) using anti-p24Gag antiserum
(Advanced Biotechnologies, Inc., Columbia, MD) or
anti-p6Gag antiserum (a kind gift from Louis E. Henderson).
When needed, anti-cyclophilin A (CypA) antiserum was also used (Biomol
Research Laboratories, Plymouth, PA).
Northern Blot Analysis--
To determine whether HIV-1 genomic
RNA was properly packaged in virions, Northern blot analysis was
performed as described previously (14). The above-mentioned pelleted
virus preparations were lysed in Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 10 mM EDTA, 1% (v/v) SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 50 µg/ml
tRNA, 100 µg/ml proteinase K for 4 h at 37 °C. Lysates were
extracted twice with an equal volume of phenol/chloroform/isoamyl
alcohol (25:24:1) and then ethanol-precipitated overnight at
Determination of Virus Particle Numbers by Electron
Microscopy--
To determine virus particle numbers in culture
supernatants of H9 cells chronically infected with an infectious HIV-1
clone, the negative stain electron microscopy was performed as
described previously by Palmer and Martin (15). Briefly,
HIV-1-containing culture supernatants (25 µl) were mixed with an
equal volume of 8% formaldehyde (Tousimis, Rockville, MD), and a
portion (2 µl) of the mixture was placed on a Formvar carbon-coated
grid. The grid was subsequently glow-discharged in a vacuum evaporator
(Denton Vacuum Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ) prior to use (16). The grid was washed once with glass-distilled water, stained with 1%
phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.0) (Fisher), and allowed to air-dry. The
grid was examined and digitally photographed under electron microscopy
(Hitachi H7000, Hitachi, Japan) operated at 75 kV. The number of virus particles in multiple (~10) areas of the grid square (60 × 60 mm) was determined, and the average numbers were generated for analysis.
Amino Acid Mutations Identified in Gag in PI-resistant HIV-1
Variants--
In an attempt to determine whether unidentified amino
acid substitutions were involved in the development of HIV-1 resistance to various PIs, we generated HIV-1 variants highly resistant to APV and
examined whether the resultant HIV-1 had amino acid substitutions in
the Gag proteins. The wild type HIV-1NL4-3 was propagated
in MT-2 cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of APV. By
passage 10 in culture where HIV-1 was propagating in the presence of
0.14 µM APV (HIV-1P10/APV), four amino acid
substitutions (L10F, V32I, M46I, and I84V) in the protease and three
mutations (V35I, L75R, and H219Q) in the Gag protein emerged (Table
I). Interestingly, 5 of 13 clones
examined for HIV-1P10/APV had L75R plus H219Q in Gag but no
substitutions in its protease, showing that these two Gag substitutions
emerged earlier than the substitutions in protease did in these five
clones. By passage 20 (with 2.5 µM APV), the overall
frequency of the 4 mutations in protease increased, and so did that of
the two Gag mutations except V35I. In addition, two amino acid
substitutions (R409K and E468K), which have not been previously
reported, emerged in Gag together with the p1-p6 cleavage site mutation
(L449F) reported by Doyon et al. (4). At passage 31 (with 10 µM APV), the addition of two mutations (I54M and A71V) in
protease and two mutations (E12K and V390D) in Gag were seen in HIV-1
clones (Table I). The five mutations in Gag (L75R, H219Q, R409K, L449F,
and E468K) seen at high percentages strongly suggest that these
mutations played a significant role in the development of HIV-1
resistance against APV.
We next asked whether the mutations seen in APV-resistant HIV-1
(HIV-1AR) described above also emerged in HIV-1 propagated in the presence of other PIs, JE-2147 (2), KNI-272 (8), and UIC-94003
(7, 10). HIV-1 variants resistant to each of the three PIs were
generated under conditions similar to those when HIV-1AR
was generated. In these HIV-1 variants, different protease mutation
profiles were seen compared with that of HIV-1AR (Table I)
(2, 7, 17). In HIV-1 propagated in the presence of JE-2147, one
mutation (M46I) in protease and two mutations (H219Q and V390A) in Gag
were detected at passage 6 (0.04 µM JE-2147). By passage
33 (2.2 µM JE-2147), the frequencies of these mutations increased and three additional mutations (V32I, I47V, and V82I) in
protease and two additional mutations (R409K and L449F) in Gag emerged
(Table I). In HIV-1 propagated in the presence of KNI-272 or UIC-94003,
two mutations (H219Q and R409K) in Gag, which were seen in both
HIV-1AR and HIV-1JR (JE-2147-resistant HIV-1),
were identified at high frequencies (60-100%). These data suggest
that although Gag mutation profiles may vary depending upon PI in use,
certain Gag mutations such as H219Q and R409K develop in common and may
facilitate the development of PI resistance. The locations where the
amino acid substitutions occurred are illustrated in Fig.
1.
L75R and H219Q Mutations in Gag Confer Replication Advantages
on HIV-1--
To analyze the effects of the above described three Gag
mutations (L75R, H219Q, and V390D) in HIV-1AR, we generated
five infectious HIV-1 clones, which had all or a subset of the three
mutations in addition to six protease mutations (L10F, V32I, M46I,
I54M, A71V, and I84V) plus three other Gag mutations (R409K, L449F, and
E468K) (see Table I and Fig. 1). As shown in Fig.
2A, when propagated in the
absence of PIs, among the five, two clonal HIV-1s containing both L75R
and H219Q substitutions
(HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 and
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390D) replicated even at an
greater level compared with the wild type HIV-1NL4-3,
whereas two clonal HIV-1s containing L75R or H219Q substitutions
(HIV-1ARL75R/H219/V390 and
HIV-1ARL75/H219Q/V390) replicated
comparably to HIV-1NL4-3. The clone containing none of the
three Gag mutations (HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390)
replicated, but only poorly. In the presence of 2.5 µM
APV, however, the two clones containing both L75R and H219Q
(HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 and
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390D) propagated,
whereas all other three clones failed to do so in the presence of APV
(Fig. 2B). These data strongly suggest that for the
replication of HIV-1AR in the presence of APV, two Gag mutations together (L75R and H219Q) are critical, whereas V390D apparently does not play a significant role. It is not clear whether the E12K and V35I substitutions (not tested) in Gag play a role in the
fitness of HIV-1AR; however, their role may not be
significant because their frequencies of emergence in
HIV-1AR were even less than that of V390D.
Because the Gag mutation H219Q was also seen in the HIV-1
variant selected against JE-2147 (HIV-1JR), we examined the
effects of H219Q on the replication of HIV-1JR in the
presence or absence of JE-2147. The H219Q-containing
HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390, which also contained
the JE-2147 resistance conferring mutations in protease (M46I, I47V,
V82I, and I84V) and R409K in Gag, replicated even at a greater level
than HIV-1NL4-3 in the absence of JE-2147 (Fig.
2C). HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390 also
replicated well in the presence of JE-2147, whereas the H219Q-lacking
HIV-1JRL75/H219/V390 failed to replicate (Fig.
2D), suggesting that the H219Q substitution was required for
the replication of HIV-1JR in the presence of JE-2147.
Role of L75R and H219Q Mutations in HIV-1NL4-3
Replication--
It has been reported that natural variations in
Gag-Pol polyprotein of HIV-1 may occur in HIV-1-infected individuals
receiving no PIs (18). We then asked whether any mutations in the
Gag-Pol polyprotein occurred when HIV-1NL4-3 was propagated
in the absence of PIs. When HIV-1NL4-3 was passaged 10 times in the absence of PIs, several mutations emerged sporadically in
the polyprotein, whereas in one of three independent experiments, H219Q
was identified in all 10 clones of HIV-1NL4-3;
however, L75R did not develop in any experiment (Table
II). In the other two experiments, A224V and V218M emerged, but the H219Q substitution did not emerge. No other
mutations occurred in common among the clones throughout entire
gag gene (Table II). It is possible that the acquisition of
the mutations illustrated in Table II including H219Q conferred on
HIV-1NL4-3 a greater replication capability. We therefore
generated HIV-1NL4-3 clones containing H219Q
(HIV-1NLL75/H219Q/V390) and examined its
replication profile in the presence or absence of APV. In the absence
of APV, HIV-1NLL75/H219Q/V390 readily outgrew
the wild type HIV-1NL4-3. An HIV-1 clone containing both
H219Q and L75R (HIV-1NLL75R/H219Q/V390)
replicated comparably to
HIV-1NLL75/H219Q/V390. Another HIV-1 clone
containing L75R (HIV-1NLL75R/H219/V390) had
moderately greater replicative fitness compared with
HIV-1NL4-3. In the presence of APV, however, all these
HIV-1NL clones failed to propagate (Fig. 2E).
These data indicate that both L75R and H219Q mutations confer
replication advantages on HIV-1NL4-3 in the absence of but
not in the presence of PIs.
Role of L75R and H219Q Mutations in HIV-1 Replication in
PBMCs--
To evaluate the possible biological relevance of the
replication kinetics data shown above using immortalized and long term cultured MT-2 cells, we conducted similar experiments using PHA-PBMCs freshly prepared from two healthy donors. As shown in Fig.
2F, HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390, which
replicated only poorly in MT-2 cells (Fig. 2A), moderately replicated compared with the wild type HIV-1NL4-3 in the
absence of PI. In contrast,
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 quickly replicated
compared with HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390. These data
are in agreement with the data with MT-2 cells showing that the two
amino acid substitutions, L75R and H219Q, recover the compromised
replicative ability of HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390. It
was noted, however, that HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390
did not outgrow HIV-1NL4-3, a difference from the
replication profiles shown in Fig. 2A. The reason for this
difference is as yet unknown, but cell-specific difference seems to be
involved, and this issue is a subject of future research.
Cytopathic Effect of Various HIV-1 Clones--
To define further
the significance of the Gag mutations seen in this study, the MTT assay
was performed using clonal HIV-1 preparations. MT-2 cells (4 × 103/well) were exposed to viruses, and CPE of each HIV-1
clone was determined using the MTT assay (Fig.
3). Two clonal HIV-1AR
containing both L75R and H219Q in Gag
(HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 and
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390D) exerted significant
CPE in the presence and absence of APV, whereas two HIV-1 clones
containing either L75R or H219Q
(HIV-1ARL75R/H219/V390 and
HIV-1ARL75/H219Q/V390) showed CPE comparable
with that of wild type HIV-1NL4-3
(HIV-1NL4-3L75/H219/V390). The
HIV-1AR clone containing none of the three Gag mutations (HIV-1ARL75/H219Q/V390) failed to exert CPE in
the presence and absence of drug. In contrast, the H219Q-containing
HIV-1JR (HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390)
showed significant CPE in the presence and absence of JE-2147, whereas
the H219Q lacking HIV-1JR
(HIV-1JRL75/H219/V390) showed only moderate CPE
in the absence of JE-2147. Two HIV-1NL clones carrying wild
type protease and containing H219Q
(HIV-1NLL75R/H219Q/V390 and
HIV-1NLL75/H219Q/V390) also showed potent
significant CPE, whereas another clone containing only L75R
(HIV-1NLL75R/H219/V390) showed moderate CPE in
the absence of APV. In the presence of APV, however, all
HIV-1NL clones failed to infect cells, and no CPE were
seen. These data corroborate the data of replication kinetics
illustrated in Fig. 2, A-E.
HIV-1 Mutants That Recover Replicative Fitness with Gag Mutations
Show No Recovery in Gag Processing--
To define the mechanism by
which L75R and H219Q Gag mutations recover replication competence of
HIV-1AR and HIV-1JR in the presence of APV and
JE-2147, respectively, we examined Gag cleavage patterns using the
supernatants and cell lysates of COS-7 cells transfected with each
plasmid employing Western blot analysis. In this assay, assuming that
the transfection efficiency was comparable, the 48-h supernatants of
the culture of COS-7 cells transfected with the same amount of each
plasmid using the same conditions were directly subjected to Western
blot analysis as described previously (13). As expected, there was no
significant difference in p24 amounts (Fig.
4A, lanes 1, 3, and
5-8). The pattern of HIV-1NL4-3 showed distinct
cleavage as described previously (13) (Fig. 4, A and
B, lane 1), and 2.5 µM APV completely blocked
the processing of p24 Gag (Fig. 4, A and B, lane
2). HIV-1NL4-3 and HIV-1NLL75R/H219Q/V390, which replicated more
efficiently than HIV-1NL4-3 (Fig. 2E), gave
comparable cleavage patterns in the presence and absence of 2.5 µM APV (Fig. 4, A and B, lanes 3 and 4). The replication-incompetent HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390 gave a pattern with more
immature p41 Gag protein (Fig. 4, A and B, lane
5), differing from the pattern of HIV-1NL4-3.
Unexpectedly, HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390,
which recovered its replicative fitness with L75R and H219Q substitutions (Fig. 2, A and B), gave the same
profile as the replication-incompetent
HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390 (Fig. 4,
A and B, lane 6). Even in the presence of APV
(2.5 and 10 µM), there was no significant difference in
cleavage pattern between
HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390 and
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390, although
the amounts of p24 Gag and p41 immature proteins were decreased, and
the amount of Pr55Gag polyprotein was increased in both
viruses (Fig. 4C, lanes 1-4). HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390, which replicated more
efficiently both in the presence and absence of JE-2147 than
HIV-1JRL75/H219/V390, also produced
profiles comparable with those of
HIV-1JRL75/H219/V390 (Fig. 4, A and
B, lanes 7 and 8, and C, lanes
5-8).
Northern Blot Analysis of HIV-1 Viral Genome
Packaging--
Because two Gag mutations L75R and H219Q did not
significantly alter the Gag cleavage profiles as shown above (Fig. 4),
we next asked whether viral RNA genomes were properly recognized and
packaged into virion particles produced in transiently transfected COS-7 cells.
The wild type HIV-1NL4-3 proved to contain a substantial
amount of genomic RNA and showed a strong signal at 9.2 kb, which corresponds to the size of full genomic RNA (HIV-1NL4-3
undiluted in Fig. 5). When the
sample of HIV-1NL4-3 was serially diluted (5-, 25-, and
125-fold), the signal decreased in a dose-response manner. Under the
same conditions, virtually the same level of signal was seen at 9.2 kb among four viral preparations examined (HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390,
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390,
HIV-1JRL75/H219/V390, and
HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390) regardless of the
presence of L75R and/or H219Q mutations (Fig. 5). These
data strongly suggest that neither mutations in protease nor those in
Gag affected the recognition and packaging of HIV-1 RNA genome into
virions.
No Difference in RNA Copy Numbers or p24 Contents in
Virions among HIV-1 Clones--
To corroborate the data of
Northern blot analysis (Fig. 5), we propagated five infectious
clones in H9 cells (HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390,
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390,
HIV-1JRL75/H219/V390,
HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390, and
HIV-1NL4-3), determined viral particle numbers using
electron microscopy (negative staining), counted viral RNA copies
using RT-PCR, and measured p24 amounts in each culture (Table
III). The culture supernatant of
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 contained the greatest
virion number, followed by that of
HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390, in agreement with the
replication kinetics data shown in Fig. 2. The remaining three cultures
contained less but varying virion numbers. It should be noted that the
variability in virion numbers determined with electron microscopy is up
to 3-fold.2 No significant
morphological differences were noted among the five virus preparations
examined under electron microscopy. The culture supernatant of
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 contained the greatest
p24 amount, but there was no significant difference (less than 3-fold
difference) in p24 amounts among other culture supernatants. It is of
note that there was a variability by 2-3-fold in RNA copies and p24
amounts as determined in supernatants of cultures prepared in multiple
replicates (Fig. 2).3 When
RNA copy number per virion was calculated, a difference by up to
8.3-fold (2.11 for HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390
versus 17.5 for
HIV-1JRL75/H219/V390) was identified among the
cultures, but considering the estimated variability in the
determination methods for both virion numbers and RNA copies, it
appears that there was no significant difference in RNA copy numbers
per virion. We found that the same was true for p24 amounts per virion
and RNA copy numbers per p24. Thus, we concluded that there was no
difference in the incorporation of RNA genomes in virions in
association with the mutations in the gag-pol gene we
examined in this study.
Decreased Cyclophilin A Incorporation into HIV-1 with Gag
Mutations--
Although L75R and H219Q mutations exerted positive
effects on the replication of HIV-1NL4-3 and its
PI-resistant variants, no significant changes in Gag cleavage or
genomic RNA packaging profiles were detected. Considering that
His-219 is located in the cyclophilin A (CypA) binding loop
(Fig. 1) and that the incorporation of CypA into HIV-1 particles is
thought to be indispensable for efficient viral replication (20, 21),
we asked whether the Gag mutations altered the incorporation of CypA
into HIV-1 particles. HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390,
which has mutant protease and wild type Gag protein, and
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390, which has mutant
protease plus L75R and H219Q mutations, were lysed, diluted, and
subjected to Western blot analysis. With comparable amounts of
Pr55Gag, p41, and p24 detected (see lanes 3 and
6 in Fig. 6), a substantially less amount of CypA was found incorporated in
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 than in
HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390. These results suggest
that the H219Q mutation might change the conformation of CypA binding
loop and decrease CypA incorporation into virion particles.
Effects of Three Gag Mutations (R409K, L449F, E468K) on the
Replication Kinetics of HIV-1AR--
We also examined the
effect of R409K, L449F, and E468K seen in HIV-1AR on the
replicative fitness in MT-2 cells. To this end, we generated various
HIV-1AR clones containing all or a subset of three
mutations in addition to three Gag mutations (L75R, H219Q, and V390D)
and six protease mutations (L10F, V32I, M46I, I54M, A71V, and I84V)
(see Table I and Fig. 1). When propagated in the absence of APV, a
clone lacking the cleavage site amino acid substitution L449F (4)
(HIV-1ARR409K/L449/E468K) failed to propagate,
whereas the clonal HIV-1 with L449F
(HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K) showed a markedly
improved fitness (Fig. 7A),
indicating that this cleavage site mutation is essential for the
fitness of HIV-1AR. Two clones that lacked either R409K or
E468K (HIV-1ARR409/L449F/E468K and
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468) also had a markedly
improved replicative fitness, although the latter appeared to be less
fit in the absence of APV (Fig. 7A).
When propagated in the presence of 2.5 µM APV,
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K, as expected,
predominated all other clones examined (Fig. 7B). We found
that the clone lacking R409K
(HIV-1ARR409/L449F/E468K), which exhibited the
greatest level of replication in the absence of drug (Fig.
7A), had a moderate level of fitness in the presence of APV,
whereas the replication pattern of HIV-1AR
R409K/L449F/E468 was apparently comparable with that of
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K (Fig. 7B).
It was noted that in the presence of APV, the R409K mutation provided
HIV-1AR with a replication advantage compared with E468K.
It has been reported that when the cleavage site mutation L449F
was introduced to HIV-1 carrying a wild type protease, its replication
capability was significantly reduced (4). We therefore asked whether
the replication profile of
HIV-1NLL75R/H219Q/V390D containing the
wild type protease was altered when R409K and E468K were introduced. In
our assays, the replication of
HIV-1NLL75R/H219Q/V390D exhibited a high level
of replication regardless of the presence of these two mutations (Fig.
7C).
Furthermore, to evaluate the possible biological relevance of the
replication kinetics data using MT-2 cells shown above, we also
conducted experiments using PHA-PBMCs freshly prepared from two healthy
donors. As shown in Fig. 7D, the replication profiles
of four infectious clones,
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K,
HIV-1ARR409/L449F/E468K,
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468,
HIV-1ARR409K/L449/E468K, were virtually
the same as those shown in Fig. 7A.
Competitive HIV-1 Replication Assays for HIV-1AR
Clones--
To define further the significance of R409K and E468K,
the viral fitness was compared among the HIV-1 clones described above in the presence and absence of 2.5 µM APV using CHRA
(12). In the absence of APV,
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K propagated comparably
to HIV-1ARR409/L449F/E468K (Fig.
8A) but readily outgrew
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468 (Fig. 8B).
In the presence of APV,
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K predominated
HIV-1ARR409/L449F/E468K and
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468, corroborating
that the presence of R409K and E468K in addition to the cleavage site
mutation confers on HIV-1AR a significant replication
advantage in the presence of APV (Fig. 8, C and
D). We also asked whether the cleavage of the Gag precursor
polyprotein was impaired when the HIV-1AR lacked either
R409K or E468K. However, Western blot analyses using anti-p6 antiserum
detected no difference in cleavage patterns among these three viruses
(data not shown).
To delineate how these two mutations affect the replication kinetics of
wild type protease-containing viruses, we also compared the fitness of
two HIV-1 clones. HIV-1NLR409K/L449/E468K was
slowly outgrown by HIV-1NLR409/L449/E468 (Fig.
8E), suggesting that R409K/E468K mutations compromise the fitness of HIV-1NL.
In this assay, it was possible that additional mutations were acquired
in HIV-1 clones during the assays, and such mutations might have
affected the replication profiles of HIV-1 clones examined. However,
when we determined the nucleotide sequence of the entire gag
and protease-encoding region, no additional mutations were identified
in any of HIV-1 clones at the conclusion of CHRA.
The role and impact of amino acid substitutions in the
gag gene of HIV-1 genome which emerge during therapy with
protease inhibitors in patients with AIDS have been poorly understood. This is mainly due to the findings that most of the amino acid substitutions detected in the gag gene are not seen in
common among clinical HIV-1 strains isolated from patients and even
among HIV-1 clones generated from HIV-1 of a single patient. More
problematic is that the functions and tertiary structures of HIV-1 Gag
proteins remain largely to be determined. In the present study, we used a single HIV-1 clone obtained from newly transfected COS-7 cells, HIV-1NL4-3, as a starting HIV-1 strain and propagated it in
the presence of increasing concentrations of four different PIs, APV, JE-2147, KNI-272, and UIC-94003 over 27-62 passages; and we studied 14 mutations identified in Gag (Table I), among which 9 mutations were
seen in more than two PI-exposed HIV-1 preparations. We focused on six
major Gag amino acid substitutions, L75R, H219Q, V390D/V390A, R409K,
L449F, and E468K in the present study (Table I).
When HIV-1 was passaged under APV pressure, L75R and H219Q mutations in
the Gag protein emerged prior to the emergence of protease mutations,
and we found that such Gag mutations were indispensable for the
efficient replication of APV resistant HIV-1 (HIV-1AR). We
thought that Gag polyprotein containing L75R or H219Q would be more
sensitive to the cleavage by mutant protease because such a protease
has impaired enzymatic activity due to the accumulation of amino acid
substitutions within itself. Indeed, HIV-1AR whose mutant
gag gene was substituted with a wild type gag
gene (but with the mutant protease being intact)
(HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390) failed to
replicate (Fig. 2A), in agreement with prior studies (6, 7).
However, Western blot analysis showed that the polyprotein cleavage
pattern was comparable between the replication-incompetent clonal HIV-1
with wild type Gag (e.g.
HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390) and the HIV-1 that
recovered replication competence with amino acid substitutions in Gag
(e.g. HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390). It is
possible that the difference in the Gag polyprotein processing is
functionally significant but is not readily detected with Western blot
analysis (8). It is also possible that such amino acid substitutions in Gag facilitate certain functions of Gag proteins such
as assembly, packaging, and budding functions, and the recovery of
polyprotein cleavage is not required.
There are several lines of evidence suggesting that trimerized matrix
proteins (MAs) serve as a fundamental building block for the formation
of the MA shell within the mature HIV-1 (19). The x-ray structural
analysis of HIV-1 MA suggests that residues Pro-66 and Gly-71, which
are highly conserved, function as "hinges" that allow a structural
reorientation of MA at the trimer interface and that Ser-72 and Leu-75
have a tight interaction, and when the distance between these amino
acids changes, the conformational interconversion of Gag occurs (22).
Yu et al. (23) constructed a mutant HIV-1 with a wild type
protease lacking 10 Gag amino acids (codons 68-77), which showed an
impaired viral production, suggesting that that stretch of amino acids
is essential for the replicative fitness of HIV-1. In the present
study, the L75R substitution in Gag conferred replication advantages on
HIV-1, particularly when combined with H219Q substitution. Taken
together, one can speculate that the L75R substitution may alter the
trimerization of MA and/or the interaction of MA with a lipid membrane
of HIV-1 resulting in its "membrane anchoring" through altered
electrostatic interactions. Such changes, with HIV-1AR
background, may ultimately confer a replication advantage on the virus.
The H219Q substitution in p24 was identified in all clones derived from
four PI-resistant HIV-1 variants. In this regard, the amino acids
217-225 reportedly made a single exposed loop in the capsid protein
that binds to the enzymatic active site of human CypA (24) whose
incorporation into HIV-1 particles seems to be indispensable for the
infectivity of HIV-1. In fact, HIV-1 replication is inhibited by
cyclosporin A that binds to CypA and interferes with the virion
association of CypA (20, 21). It has been noted that SIVmac capsid
protein also has an exposed loop but has no affinity to CypA and is
capable of replicating without CypA (25). Moreover, the transfer of the
HIV-1 loop to the corresponding position in SIVmac results in the
efficient incorporation of CypA and confers HIV-1-like sensitivity to
cyclosporin A (25). Yoo et al. (26) generated a number of
mutant p24 proteins, analyzed their binding affinity to CypA, and
showed that the H219Q mutation in Gag of HIV-1NL4-3
diminished CypA binding. It should be noted that H219Q represents a
polymorphic amino acid substitution and is often seen particularly in
clades F and G isolates (27). In the present study, we found that
His-219 in HIV-1NL4-3 obtained from freshly transfected
COS-7 cells spontaneously changed to glutamine over 10 passages in one
of three independent experiments. In the two other experiments, A224V
and V218M emerged when the H219Q substitution did not emerge, whereas
no mutations occurred in common among clones in other regions of the
entire gag gene (Table II). These data strongly suggest that
the H219Q substitution brings about a conformational change in the loop
formed by the stretch of the amino acids positioned 217-225
(corresponding to CypA binding loop).
Based on these data, we postulated that the exposed loop of p24
might exert a negative effect(s) on the replication of HIV-1 either at
the stages of assembly or disassembly and that the binding of CypA to
the loop might induce conformational changes so that the negative
effect(s) are canceled, thus restoring replicative fitness. Therefore,
we compared the amounts of viral particle-associated CypA in
H219Q-carrying and H219Q-lacking HIV-1
(HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 and
HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390, respectively) using the
Western blot assay, and we found that HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 contained less CypA
(Fig. 6) but replicated faster than
HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390 (Fig. 2, A and
F). These data suggest that H219Q substitution changed the
loop conformation so that the rate of replication became greater and
presumably relatively independent of the binding of CypA. Indeed, in
our preliminary structural characterization of HIV-1 matrix-capsid
antigens, the N terminus of capsid antigen appears to take multiple
conformations.4 It is
possible that the cleavage of matrix and capsid antigens shifts the
equilibrium toward a certain conformation (28), and CypA binding is
required for the stabilization of that conformation. In this respect,
the H219Q substitution per se might stabilize that
conformation, and the requirement of CypA binding is reduced. It is
worth noting that Western blot analysis has a limited utility in
quantification and that enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or its
related method should enable us to quantitate more precisely the levels
of virion-associated cyclophilin A than Western blot analysis. However,
to date, no cyclophilin-specific monoclonal antibody has been generated
or reported, and the establishment of a more quantitative method for
cyclophilin A is awaited for further detailed investigation into the
role of cyclophilin A in the replication of HIV-1.
Following the emergence of protease gene mutations in
HIV-1NL4-3 propagated in the presence of APV, two
substitutions R409K and E468K emerged in the Gag protein. Both codons
at 409 and 468 are known to be highly conserved (27). A newly generated
HIV-1 clone carrying these two mutations in addition to the cleavage site mutation L449F (HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K)
predominated two HIV-1 clones lacking either of these two
mutations in the presence of APV in the replication kinetics assay and
the CHRA (Fig. 7B and Fig. 8, C and
D). In contrast, HIV-1 carrying these two mutations and wild
type protease (HIV-1NLR409K/L449/E468K) was
outgrown by HIV-1 lacking the two mutations
(HIV-1NLR409/L449/E468) (Fig.
8E). Based on these data, we thought that these two
mutations altered the conformation of the tertiary structure of the
Gag precursor p7-p1-p6 and made the cleavage site more
accessible to the mutated protease, the rate-limiting step for
virus maturation (29-31). However, Western blot analysis failed to
reveal the difference in Gag cleavage profiles. There is a possibility
that the functions of Gag proteins are altered by L75R, H219Q, R409K,
or E468K substitutions, resulting in enhanced viral replication. One of
known Gag functions is the packaging of genomic RNA into HIV-1
particles (19). Therefore, we semi-quantified the amount of viral
particle-associated genomic RNA in five different clonal HIV-1
preparations
(HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390/R409K/L449F/E468K,
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390/R409K/L449F/E468K,
HIV-1JRL75/H219/ V390/R409K/L449/E468,
HIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390/R409K/L449/E468, and
HIV-1NLL75/H219/V390/R409/L449/E468) using
Northern blot analysis (Fig. 5) and RT-PCR (Table III), but the amounts
of RNA were all comparable.
Most of the Gag mutations identified in this study have not been
reported to be associated with the acquisition of HIV-1 resistance against PIs. For example, R409K occurred when HIV-1NL4-3
was passaged in the presence of all four PIs, APV, JE-2147, KNI-272,
and UIC-94003 (Table I). However, we failed to identify R409K in any of
~30 clones generated from each of four heavily PI-treated
HIV-1-infected patients whose HIV-1 was proved to harbor a number of
mutations in the protease-encoding gene (2). It appears that the R409K substitution occurs specifically with the HIV-1NL4-3
genetic background. In all the selection experiments in this study, we
used a newly generated HIV-1NL4-3, a highly pure clonal
HIV-1 preparation, which enabled us to identify such a mutation after
drug selection procedure. In this context, it is likely that HIV-1 in
patients represents the quasi-species carrying a myriad of genetic
backgrounds and, in response to PI(s) including APV, HIV-1 develops a
number of genetic background-specific Gag mutations, so that sequencing analyses of relatively few clones (i.e. ~30 clones in our
study) failed to identify common mutations.
The present data, taken together, suggest that HIV-1 resistance to PIs
is associated with primary and secondary mutations in the viral
protease and is also associated with the cleavage site amino acid
substitutions in Gag together with substitutions at non-cleavage sites.
Such non-cleavage site Gag mutations should render the polyprotein
cleavage sites more accessible to the protease, make polymerization of
viral proteins more efficacious, and/or make assembly and disassembly
more efficient. Alteration(s) of other unknown functions of Gag
proteins may also contribute to the HIV-1 acquisition of resistance to
PIs, but it appears that HIV-1 resistance to PIs is acquired with
multiple mechanisms.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
3
Prime, Inc., Boulder, CO) and subjected to molecular cloning
using Original TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen), followed by sequence
determination using an Applied Biosystems model 373 automated DNA sequencer.
80 °C
until use.
-gal cells (11) (104/well) were
plated in 96-well flat-bottomed microtiter culture plates. On the
following day, the medium was aspirated, and the cells were exposed to
HIV-1 in a total volume of 50 µl. After incubation at 37 °C for
2 h, fresh complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (50 µl)
was added to each well. Forty eight hours after viral exposure, the
total number of blue cells in each well was determined. All assays were
performed in triplicate.
20 °C. The amount of lysates used for each clone was adjusted
based on the p24 amount in the lysates for normalization. RNA
precipitates were collected by centrifugation and fractionated on a
denaturing formaldehyde/agarose gel. The fractionated RNAs were
transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and the membrane was
hybridized with 32P-labeled 8088-bp AvaI
fragments of pHIV-1NL4-3 prepared using the DECAprime Kit
(Ambion, Austin, TX). The filter was washed with 0.1% SDS in 0.1× SSC
at 65 °C and exposed to x-ray film (14).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Emergence of mutations during in vitro selection

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Locations where six major amino acid
substitutions occurred. The locations of six major amino acid
substitutions identified in the present study are shown in
bold with their codon numbers. The primer pair used for
amplification of the gag and protease-encoding gene is also
shown as a pair of arrows at the top. The forward
primer (LF3) contains a BssHII site and the
reverse primer (XM1) an SmaI site.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Replication kinetics of HIV-1 clones.
MT-2 cells (A-E) or PHA-stimulated PBMCs (F)
were exposed to each HIV-1 clone and cultured in the absence (A,
C, and F, and solid lines in E)
and presence of 2.5 µM APV (B and broken
lines in E) or 0.5 µM JE-2147
(D). Virus replication was monitored by the amounts of p24
produced in the culture supernatants. HIV-1AR variants had
six mutations in the viral protease (L10F, V32I, M46I, I54M, A71V, and
I84V) and three mutations in Gag protein (R409K, L449F, and E468K).
HIV-1JR variants had four mutations in the protease (M46I,
I47V, V82I, and I84V) and one mutation (R409K) in Gag. The results
shown are representative of three independent experiments
(A-E). Standard deviations are shown for the profile of the
wild type HIV-1NL4-3 (shown as
HIV-1NL4-3L75/H219/V390 for the sake of
clarity) replication in the absence of PI. Data in F
represent the geometric means (±1 S.D.) of two independent
experiments.
Amino acid sequences of p24 of HIV-1NL4-3 over 10 passages in
the absence of protease inhibitors

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Cytopathic effects of 11 HIV-1 clones.
MT-2 cells were exposed to each clone and cultured for 10 days in the
absence of PI (open bars) and presence of 2.5 µM APV (closed bars) or 0.5 µM
JE-2147 (hatched bars). Cell survival was assessed using the
MTT assay. The values shown are means (±1 S.D.) of three independent
experiments.

View larger version (80K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Western blot analysis of Gag protein cleavage
profiles. Western blot analysis was performed using
anti-p24Gag antiserum with virus pellets (A) and
lysates of COS-7 cells transfected (B and C).
A and B, COS-7 cells were transfected with
pHIV-1NLL75/H219/V390 (lanes 1 and
2), pHIV 1NLL75R/H219Q/V390
(lanes 3 and 4),
pHIV-1ARL75/H219/V390 (lane 5),
pHIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 (lane 6),
pHIV-1JRL75/H219/V390 (lane 7), or
pHIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390 (lane 8).
After 48 h of culture in the presence (lanes 2 and
4) or absence (other lanes) of 2.5 µM APV, the virions in the culture supernatant
(A) and the lysates of COS-7 cells (B) were
harvested. Note that no cleavage of Pr55Gag polyprotein was
detected, and none or the least amount of p24 was seen in lanes
2 and 4, whereas p24 and p41 (p17 + p24)
were seen in lanes 1 and 3 and 5-8.
C, COS-7 cells were transfected with
pHIV-1ARL75/H219/V390 (lanes 1 and
2), pHIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390
(lanes 3 and 4),
pHIV-1JRL75/H219/V390 (lanes 5 and
6), or pHIV-1JRL75/H219Q/V390
(lanes 7 and 8). After 48 h of culture in
the presence of 2.5 (lanes 1 and 3) or 10 µM (lanes 2 and 4) APV, 0.5 (lanes 5 and 7) or 2.5 µM
(lanes 6 and 8) JE-2147, COS-7 cells were
harvested and lysed, and the cell lysates were subjected to Western
blot analysis.

View larger version (87K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Northern blot analysis of PI-resistant HIV-1
variants. After 48 h of post-transfection, viruses were
harvested and lysed, and the viral RNA was purified and subjected to
Northern blot analysis. Serially diluted (undiluted, 5-, 25-, and
125-fold) samples of the wild type HIV-1NL4-3 served as
controls.
Virion numbers, RNA copies, and p24 amounts in culture supernatants of
various HIV-1 clones

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Western blot analysis of virion-incorporated
CypA. Two HIV-1 clones were lysed, diluted
(HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390: neat, 75, 50, and 25%
in lanes 1-4, respectively, and
HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390: neat, 80, 60, and 40%
in lanes 5-8, respectively), and subjected to Western blot
analysis using anti-p24Gag and anti-CypA antisera. Note
that with comparable amounts of Pr55Gag, p41, and p24
detected (see lanes 3 and 6), substantially less
CypA was found in HIV-1ARL75R/H219Q/V390 than
in HIV-1ARL75/H219/V390.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Replication kinetics of HIV-1AR
clones. MT-2 cells (A-C) or PBMCs (D) were
exposed to various HIV-1AR clones and cultured in the
absence (A, C, and D) or presence of 2.5 µM APV (B). Each HIV-1 clone contained three
mutations, L75R, H219Q, and V390D in Gag. The results shown are
representative of three independent experiments (A-C). Data
shown in D represent geometric means (±1 S.D.) of two
independent experiments.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Competitive HIV-1 replication assay for
HIV-1AR. Replication profiles of
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468K,
HIV-1ARR409/L449F/E468K,
HIV-1ARR409K/L449F/E468,
HIV-1NLR409K/L449/E468K, and
HIV-1NLR409/L449/E468 were examined in
CHRA. Each HIV-1 contained three mutations, L75R, H219Q, and V390D in
Gag. Two infectious HIV-1 clones to be compared for their fitness were
mixed 50:50 and used to infect H9 cells in the absence (A,
B, and E) or presence (C and D)
of 2.5 µM APV. The cell-free supernatant was transferred
to fresh H9 cells every 7 or 10 days. High molecular weight DNA
extracted from infected cells at the end of each passage was subjected
to nucleotide sequencing, and the proportions of Arg and Lys at
position 409 (A, C and E) in Gag and those of Glu
and Lys at position 468 (B, D and E) were
determined.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Louis E. Henderson for helpful discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by a Grant from Research for Future Program JSPS-RFTF 97L00705 of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (Priority Areas) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (Monbu-Kagakusho), a grant for Promotion of AIDS Research from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor of Japan (Kosei-Rohdosho), and by Science Applications International Corp. NCI-Frederick Grants N01-CO 56000 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Supported in part by the grant from the Japanese Foundation for AIDS Prevention.
§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Experimental Retrovirology Section, HIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, NCI, Bldg. 10, Rm. 5A11, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-496-9238; Fax: 301-402-0709; E-mail: hmitsuya@helix.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074.jbc.M108005200
2 K. Nagashima, unpublished data.
3 H. Gatanaga, unpublished data.
4 C. Tang and M. F. Summers, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PIs, protease inhibitors; HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1; APV, amprenavir; CPE, cytopathic effect; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; CHRA, competitive HIV-1 replication assay; RT, reverse transcriptase; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; CypA, cyclophilin A; MA, matrix protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Mitsuya, H., and Erickson, J. (1999) in Textbook of AIDS Medicine (Merigan, T. C. , Bartlet, J. G. , and Bolognesi, D., eds) , pp. 751-780, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore |
| 2. |
Yoshimura, K.,
Kato, R.,
Yusa, K.,
Kavlick, M. F.,
Maroun, V.,
Nguyen, A.,
Mimoto, T.,
Ueno, T.,
Shintani, M.,
Falloon, J.,
Masur, H.,
Hayashi, H.,
Erickson, J.,
and Mitsuya, H.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
8675-8680 |
| 3. | Erickson, J. W., Gulnik, S. V., and Markowitz, M. (1999) AIDS 13, 189-204 |
| 4. | Doyon, L., Croteau, G., Thibeault, D., Poulin, F., Pilote, L., and Lamarre, D. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 3763-3769[Abstract] |
| 5. | Zhang, Y. M., Imamichi, H., Imamichi, T., Lane, H. C., Falloon, J., Vasudevachari, M. B., and Salzman, N. P. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 6662-6670[Abstract] |
| 6. |
Rose, R. E.,
Gong, Y. F.,
Greytok, J. A.,
Bechtold, C. M.,
Terry, B. J.,
Robinson, B. S.,
Alam, M.,
Colonno, R. J.,
and Lin, P. F.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1648-1653 |
| 7. |
Yoshimura, K.,
Kato, R.,
Kavlick, M. F.,
Nguyen, A.,
Maroun, V.,
Maeda, K.,
Hussain, K. A.,
Ghosh, A. K.,
Erickson, J.,
and Mitsuya, H.
(2002)
J. Virol.
76,
1349-1358 |
| 8. |
Kageyama, S.,
Mimoto, T.,
Murakawa, Y.,
Nomizu, M.,
Ford, H., Jr.,
Shirasaka, T.,
Gulnik, S.,
Erickson, J.,
Takada, K.,
Hayashi, H.,
Broder, S.,
Kiso, Y.,
and Mitsuya, H.
(1993)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
37,
810-817 |
| 9. | Mimoto, T., Imai, J., Kisanuki, S., Enomoto, H., Hattori, N., Akaji, K., and Kiso, Y. (1992) Chem. Pharm. Bull. 40, 2251-2253 |
| 10. | Ghosh, A. K., Kincaid, J. F., Cho, W., Walters, D. E., Krishnan, K., Hussain, K. A., Koo, Y., Cho, H., Rudall, C., Holland, L., and Buthod, J. (1998) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 687-690[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Kimpton, J.,
and Emerman, M.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
2232-2239 |
| 12. |
Kosalaraksa, P.,
Kavlick, M. F.,
Maroun, V., Le, R.,
and Mitsuya, H.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
5356-5363 |
| 13. |
Sei, S.,
Yang, Q. E.,
O'Neill, D.,
Yoshimura, K.,
Nagashima, K.,
and Mitsuya, H.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
4621-4633 |
| 14. | Gorelick, R. J., Gagliardi, T. D., Bosche, W. J., Wiltrout, T. A., Coren, L. V., Chabot, D. J., Lifson, J. D., Henderson, L. E., and Arthur, L. O. (1999) Virology 256, 92-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Palmer, E. L., and Martin, M. L. (1988) Electron Microscopy in Viral Diagnosis , pp. 13-23, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL |
| 16. | Hayat, M. A. (1989) Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy. Biological Application , 3rd Ed. , pp. 352-376, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL |
| 17. | Gulnik, S. V., Suvorov, L. I., Liu, B., Yu, B., Anderson, B., Mitsuya, H., and Erickson, J. W. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 9282-9287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Barrie, K. A., Perez, E. E., Lamers, S. L., Farmerie, W. G., Dunn, B. M., Sleasman, J. W., and Goodenow, M. M. (1996) Virology 219, 407-416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Turner, B. G., and Summers, M. F. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Braaten, D., Franke, E. K., and Luban, J. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 3551-3560[Abstract] |
| 21. |
Braaten, D.,
Aberham, C.,
Franke, E. K.,
Yin, L.,
Phares, W.,
and Luban, J.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
5170-5176 |
| 22. | Massiah, M. A., Worthylake, D., Christensen, A. |