|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110155200 on December 17, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 8, 6170-6177, February 22, 2002
Transcriptional Activation of a Heat-shock Gene,
lonD, of Myxococcus xanthus by a Two Component
Histidine-Aspartate Phosphorelay System*
Toshiyuki
Ueki and
Sumiko
Inouye
From the Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical
School, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
Received for publication, October 22, 2001, and in revised form, December 14, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
In vitro
transcription of lonD, a heat-shock gene from
Myxococcus xanthus, was stimulated in the presence of
extract from heat-shocked cells. For this stimulation the upstream
promoter region of lonD was found to be essential.
Activation of lonD transcription was also observed when
extract from non-heat-shocked cells was heat treated in
vitro at 42 °C for 10 min. A DNA binding assay and
footprinting analysis revealed that a factor(s) binds to the upstream
region from 122 to 107 with respect to the transcription initiation
site. This region was required for heat-shock induction of
lonD expression both in vitro and in
vivo. The lonD promoter-binding protein named HsfA
was purified, and its gene was cloned. Analysis of the DNA sequence
reveals that HsfA is a response regulator of the two-component system
and shows high sequence similarity to the NtrC family or the
enhancer-binding proteins. Upstream of hsfA, a gene
encoding a histidine kinase was identified and named hsfB.
HsfB was found to be autophosphorylated and able to phosphorylate HsfA.
HsfA with HsfB activated in vitro transcription of
lonD in a manner dependent on RNA polymerase containing
SigA, the housekeeping sigma factor of M. xanthus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The major pathway of signal transduction required for response and
adaptation to environmental changes in prokaryotes consists of the
two-component His-Asp phosphorelay system (1). This system basically
utilizes two protein components, a sensor histidine kinase and a
response regulator. Sensors typically contain a C-terminal transmitter
module or a histidine kinase domain coupled to an N-terminal input
domain. Response regulators typically contain an N-terminal receiver
domain coupled to a C-terminal output domain. The mechanisms of
transmitter-receiver communication involve phosphorylation and
dephosphorylation reactions. Transmitters or histidine kinases have an
autokinase activity that phosphorylates a specific histidine residue in
the presence of ATP. The product phosphohistidine serves as a high
energy intermediate for subsequent transfer of the phosphate group to a
specific aspartate residue in the receiver domain. Response regulators
become active upon receiving the phosphate group and generally function
as transcription factors for cognate gene expression.
Among various stress responses, the heat-shock response is the most
extensively studied. Transcription of heat-shock genes is regulated in
different fashions in bacteria (2-5). In Escherichia coli,
RNA polymerase (RNAP)1
containing an alternative sigma factor, RpoH ( H,
32) recognizes promoters of most of heat-shock genes and
initiates their transcription (2, 5). In addition to RpoH, RNAP
containing RpoE ( E, 24) transcribes other
heat-shock genes that are induced at higher temperature (50 °C) (2,
5). Bacillus subtilis utilizes rather complex mechanisms for
heat-shock response transcription. Heat-shock genes are classified into
four groups (Class I-IV) (3, 4). Class I and III genes are negatively
regulated by the CIRCE element and HrcA, and in tandem repeated DNA
sequences and CtsR, respectively. Class II genes are transcribed by
RNAP containing an alternative sigma factor, SigB. The mechanism for
transcription of Class IV genes is not known. Both RpoH-driven
transcription and negative regulation by CIRCE and HrcA are found in
Bradyrhizobium japonicum (4). Furthermore, another type of
negative regulation controls some heat-shock genes by ROSE, a DNA
element of approximately 100 bp in length and a putative repressor
(4).
Myxococcus xanthus is a Gram-negative bacterium that can
differentiate through fruiting body formation into spores upon
starvation (6, 7). It was found that M. xanthus contains at
least eight sigma factor genes, sigA (8), sigB
(9), sigC (10), sigD (11), sigE (12),
rpoE1 (13), rpoN (14), and carQ (15). SigB, SigC, and SigE show sequence similarity to RpoH. However, they
are not induced by heat-shock, and even the triple deletion of these
genes does not affect production of heat-shock proteins by heat-shock
(12).
To understand heat-shock response transcription in M. xanthus, we first identified the lonD gene as a
heat-shock gene. The lonD gene has been shown to be
essential for M. xanthus fruiting body development (16, 17).
Using the lonD gene, we have purified a DNA-binding protein
specific to the lonD promoter. This DNA-binding protein
belongs to the NtrC family or enhancer-binding proteins. Subsequent
analysis revealed that a histidine kinase is also involved in
lonD expression.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
M. xanthus DZF1 was grown in CYE liquid medium (18).
E. coli JM83 (19) was used as a recipient strain for
transformation and grown at 37 °C in LB medium (20) supplemented
with 50 µg/ml proper antibiotics when necessary. E. coli
BL21(DE3) (21) was used as a recipient strain for transformation to
overexpress genes cloned in pET24b and grown at 37 °C in LB medium
supplemented with 50 µg/ml kanamycin.
Preparation of AS Fractions
M. xanthus DZF1 cells were grown in CYE liquid medium
at 30 °C. Exponentially growing cells (Klett units of 80) at
30 °C were heat-shocked at 42 °C for 10 min. Cell extracts were
prepared as described by Gross et al. (22). The step (iv)
extracts were diluted by 5-fold and precipitated by ammonium sulfate
(40-65%). The precipitates were suspended in the buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM
EDTA, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, protease inhibitors (Roche),
and 0.1 M KCl. This extract is referred to as AS fraction.
In Vitro Transcription
Two different templates contain the lonD promoter
region from the 346 base to the +96 base (plonD346) and from 41 to
+96 (plonD41) for in vitro transcription analysis. The
in vitro transcription reaction was carried out in buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 25 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 25 µM NTPs, and 0.5 unit/µl RNase inhibitor (Roche))
containing 0.5 mg/ml plasmid DNA templates in a 40-µl total volume.
The reaction buffer was first incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. Then 2 mg/ml AS fraction was added, and incubation was continued for an
additional 15 min. When purified proteins were used, HsfB was first
incubated in the buffer supplemented with 1 mM ATP for 2 min at 30 °C, then HsfA was added and incubated for 5 min at
30 °C; RNAP containing SigA was added, and incubation was continued
for another 15 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by the
addition of 40 µl of stop solution (1 M ammonium acetate, 40 mM EDTA, and 0.4 mg/ml tRNA). The mixtures were
extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol, and transcripts were
precipitated with ethanol. Transcripts were resuspended in distilled
water and analyzed by primer extension analysis as described previously (11).
DNA Binding Assay and Footprinting Analysis
Plasmid plonD(346-42) containing the lonD promoter
region from the 346 base to the 42 base was prepared for the DNA
binding assay. The DNA fragments were prepared by digesting
plonD(346-42) with proper enzymes and purified with 5% polyacrylamide
gel. The enzymes used for each experiment are described in the text or figure legends. The DNA fragments were labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP by Klenow fragment.
DNA binding assays were performed in 10 µl of the reaction mixture
containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl,
1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 10%
glycerol, 1 µg of double-stranded poly(dI·dC) (Amersham
Biosciences, Inc.), 1 ng of 32P-labeled DNA fragments, and
50 µg of extracts. The mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 10 min
and loaded onto a 5% polyacrylamide; binding patterns were analyzed by
autoradiography. Footprinting was carried out by using
1,10-phenanthroline-copper as described by Kuwabara and Sigman
(23).
Purification of the lonD Promoter-binding Protein, HsfA, from
M. xanthus
M. xanthus DZF1 cells were grown exponentially (up to
Klett units of 80) in 1 liter of CYE liquid medium at 30 °C and
heat-shocked at 42 °C for 20 min. Heat-shocked cells were prepared
from total 10-liter cultures. AS fraction was prepared as described
above except that precipitates obtained after ammonium sulfate
precipitation were suspended in TGED buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8.0), 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM
dithiothreitol, protease inhibitors (Roche)). AS fraction was applied
to a DEAE-Sepharose column (Amersham Bioscience, Inc.) equilibrated
with TGED buffer. HsfA was eluted with TGED buffer containing 0.1 M KCl (TGED0.1K). The activity of HsfA was detected by DNA
binding assay. The eluate was applied to a heparin-agarose column
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) equilibrated with TGED0.1K. The column was
washed with TGED0.1K and eluted in the stepwise manner. HsfA was eluted
with TGED0.5K. The eluate was diluted with 4 volumes of TGED and
subjected to the lonD promoter-specific DNA affinity column
chromatography. The DNA affinity column was prepared as described
previously (24). Oligonucleotides containing the HsfA recognition
sequences from 128 to 105, 5'GCTAGGGGGGCGATCATGCCCCAC3' and
5'TAGCGTGGGGCATGATCGCCCCCC3', were used for preparation of the column.
The diluted eluate was mixed with poly(dI·dC) and incubated on ice
for 10 min. The mixture was applied to the DNA affinity column
equilibrated with TGED0.1K. The column was washed with TGED0.1K and
eluted in a stepwise manner. HsfA was eluted with TGED0.3K. The eluate
was diluted with 2 volumes of TGED, mixed with poly(dI·dC), and
incubated on ice for 10 min. The mixture was applied again to the DNA
affinity column equilibrated with TGED0.1K. Wash and elution were
performed as described above. HsfA was nearly homogeneous as
judged by SDS-PAGE analysis using silver staining (see Fig. 5).
The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified protein was
determined at the synthesizing/sequencing facility of Princeton University.
Purification of RNAP Containing SigA
AS fraction was applied to a DEAE-Sepharose column (Amersham
Biosciences, Inc.) equilibrated with TGED0.1K. The column was washed
with TGED0.1K and stepwise eluted. RNAP was eluted with TGED0.3K. This
eluate was diluted with 2 volumes of TGED and applied to a
heparin-agarose column equilibrated with TGED0.1K. The column was
washed with TGED0.1K and stepwise eluted. RNAP was eluted with
TGED0.5K. The eluate was diluted with 4 volumes of TGED and applied to
a DNA-cellulose column (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). The column was
washed with TGED0.1K and stepwise eluted. RNAP containing SigA was
eluted with TGED0.5K.
Purification of Recombinant Proteins
HsfA--
The hsfA gene was cloned in pET24b
(Novagen) (designated pET24bhsfA). pET24bhsfA was transformed into
E. coli BL21(DE3), and the hsfA gene was
overexpressed with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside. Cells were
harvested by centrifugation, suspended in TGED0.1K, and disrupted by
sonication. The lysate was cleared by centrifugation. The lysate was
applied to a DEAE-Sepharose column. The rest of procedure is same as
described above.
HsfB--
The hsfB gene was overexpressed as
described above. Because HsfB was produced as inclusion bodies, the
precipitates from the lysate were obtained by centrifugation. The
precipitates were then resuspended in TGED0.1K containing 8 M urea. The sample was dialyzed against TGED0.1K containing
4 M urea, TGED0.1K containing 2 M urea, and
TGED0.1K. The sample was cleared by centrifugation. The supernatant was
applied to a DEAE-Sepharose column equilibrated with TGED0.1K. After
washed with TGED0.1K, the column was eluted in the stepwise manner.
HsfB was eluted with TGED0.3K.
The HsfB kinase domain (Met174 to Pro527) and
the HsfB receiver domain (initiation Met to Gln177) were
purified as described for HsfB.
In Vitro Phosphorylation
An in vitro phosphorylation reaction was performed in
kination buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.2 µCi
[ -32P]ATP). 10 µM HsfA and 10 µM HsfB were incubated in 20 µl of the kination buffer
at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 5 µl of stop solution
(10% SDS, 0.4 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 50% glycerol, 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02% bromphenol blue). The samples
were subjected to 15% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of a Heat-shock Gene in M. xanthus--
We first
attempted to identify a heat-shock gene from M. xanthus
which could be used for in vitro transcription analysis
because no heat-shock gene had been identified. For this purpose,
primer extension analysis was carried out by using specific primers to lonV (25), lonD (16, 17), two clpP
(accession no. AF013216 and AF127082), and clpX (accession
no. AF127082) genes because they are known to be heat-shock genes in
other bacteria. It was found that only the lonD gene was
induced by heat-shock (Fig. 1A, data not shown for other
genes). Thus the promoter region for the lonD gene was
assigned as TTGCCA for the 35 region and TACGTT for the 10 region
as shown in Fig. 1B. These promoter sequences are more
closely related to the E. coli 70 recognition
consensus sequences, TTGACA ( 35) and TATAAT ( 10) (26, 27) than the
32 CTTGAA ( 35) and CCCCATNT ( 10) and the
24 GAACTT ( 35) and TCTGA ( 10) (2, 5) (Fig.
1C). Furthermore, the promoter sequences of the
lonD gene, not only at the 35/ 10 regions but also
surrounding regions, are very similar to those of the vegA
gene, which is expressed during vegetative growth (28) (Fig.
1C). The vegA promoter has been shown to be
recognized in vitro by RNAP containing SigA, the major
housekeeping sigma factor in M. xanthus (29). In contrast to
those heat-shock genes whose expressions are negatively regulated in
some bacteria, the lonD promoter region does not contain
such inverted repeat sequences (4).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Identification of lonD as a
heat-shock gene. Panel A, primer extension analysis.
Total RNA from cells before and after heat-shock was used.
32P-Labeled oligonucleotide 5'-CTCGCAGCGGAGCCCTTC-3' was
used as a primer. Lanes G, A, T, and
C represent sequence ladders. Lanes and
+ represent transcripts before and after heat-shock,
respectively. Panel B, the promoter region of the
lonD gene. The transcription initiation site is indicated by
+1 with a bold letter. The translation initiation
codon is indicated by Met. Promoter sequences corresponding
to the 10/ 35 regions are underlined. The region
protected in footprinting experiment is double underlined.
The sites of restriction enzymes used in this study are indicated.
Panel C, comparison of the lonD promoter sequence
with the vegA promoter sequence of M. xanthus and
70, 32, and 24 consensus
promoter sequences of E. coli. The 5'-TG-3' element is
indicated by a square.
|
|
In Vitro Transcription Analysis--
To elucidate the mechanism
regulating lonD expression, in vitro
transcription analysis was performed. At first, the cytoplasmic fraction was fractionated by ammonium sulfate, and the fraction obtained between 40 and 65% was found to contain most of the
lonD transcription activity (data not shown). This fraction
is referred to as AS fraction. AS fraction was prepared either from
heat-shocked cells (H-AS) or non-heat-shocked cells (NH-AS). Two
different templates were constructed to distinguish the effect of the
upstream region from the 35/ 10 promoter regions. One template
(plonD41) contains the promoter region up to 41 with respect to the
transcription initiation site, and the other (plonD346) up to
346.
When plonD41 was used as a template, H-AS was more active than NH-AS
(Fig. 2, lanes 2 and
3). This indicates that there may be a heat-shock sigma
factor. This will be discussed further later. When plonD346 was used as
a template, transcripts produced by H-AS increased compared with those
by NH-AS (Fig. 2, lanes 5 and 6). These results
revealed that a part of activation of lonD transcription was
dependent on the upstream region (Fig. 2, lanes 3 and
6). Interestingly, this activation was restored when NH-AS
was incubated at 42 °C for 10 min before the transcription reaction
with plonD346 (Fig. 2, lanes 4 and 7). This
activation was not observed when plonD41 was used. Therefore,
lonD expression was activated by in vitro
heat-shocked NH-AS, and this activation was dependent on the upstream
region. Furthermore, it appears that components involved in activation
of lonD expression were also present in NH-AS and were
capable of being activated by in vitro heat treatment. This
mechanism of in vitro activation is similar to that found in
human heat-shock factor. Human heat-shock factor itself can sense a temperature difference so it can be activated by in
vitro heat treatment to bind DNA (30, 31).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
In vitro transcription
analysis. AS fractions (lanes 2-7) were used as a
source of protein components. Fractions were prepared from
non-heat-shocked cells (lanes 2 and 5) and
heat-shocked cells (lanes 3 and 6). In
vitro heat-shock of NH-AS was performed at 42 °C for 10 min
before transcription reaction (lanes 4 and 7).
Plasmids plonD41 (lanes 2-4) and plonD346 (lanes
5-7) were used as templates. Transcripts were analyzed by primer
extension with the same primer used in Fig. 1A. Lane
1 represents products with in vivo total RNA prepared
from heat-shocked cells as a control.
|
|
To confirm that activation of lonD transcription in
vitro by heat-shock was specific to the lonD promoter,
the effect of heat-shock on the vegA promoter was also
examined. It should be noted that the vegA gene is known to
be expressed at normal growth temperature, and the vegA
promoter is recognized by RNAP containing SigA (RNAP/SigA) (29). By
primer extension analysis it was found that expression of the
vegA gene decreased slightly by heat-shock in
vivo (data not shown). In vitro transcription analysis
further demonstrated that there was no activation by H-AS for the
vegA promoter (data not shown). Therefore, activation of
lonD expression by heat-shock was dependent on the upstream
region of the lonD promoter.
Identification of the DNA Binding Site--
Because activation of
lonD expression in vitro was dependent on the
upstream region, next we attempted to identify possible trans-acting factors by DNA binding assay. The DNA fragment
containing the region from 42 to 346 with respect to the
transcription initiation site was used as a probe. As shown in Fig.
3A, there were retarded bands
with all extracts, NH-AS (lane 1), H-AS (lane 2),
and in vitro heat-shocked NH-AS (lane 3). This
result suggests that DNA-binding protein(s) involved in lonD
expression exist(s) in cells before heat-shock and supports the results
shown in Fig. 2, in that lonD expression with NH-AS was
activated by in vitro heat-shock. Furthermore, the DNA
binding activity is apparently same before and after heat-shock,
suggesting that the regulatory mechanism of the DNA binding activity is
different from that of eukaryotic heat-shock factor.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Identification of the binding
sites. Panels A-E, DNA binding assay. Probes were
prepared by digestion of plonD(346-42) with EcoRI and
BamHI (panel A), HincII and
BamHI (panel B), NarI and
BamHI (panel C), BspEI and
BamHI (panel D), and EcoRI and
NarI (panel E) and by labeling with
[ -32P]dCTP by Klenow fragment. Note that
EcoRI and BamHI are located in the vector. AS
fractions were used as a source of proteins. Lane 1, no
fraction; lane 2, NH-AS; lane 3, H-AS; lane
4, in vitro heat-shocked NH-AS. Bound probes are
indicated by arrows. Panel F, footprinting
analysis. The probe used in panel B was used for DNA binding
reactions. Lane 1 represents footprints from free probe.
Lanes 2-4 represent footprints from probes bound with
NH-AS, H-AS, and in vitro heat-shocked NH-AS, respectively.
Lanes G, A, T, and C
represent sequence ladders generated by primer
5'-GATCCTGCGTTTTTCCGCCCCCCGTC-3'.
|
|
To narrow the binding site(s), four other DNA fragments were used as
shown in Fig. 3, B-E. The results indicate that the binding site(s) is (are) located between the NarI site ( 140) and
the BspEI site ( 100).
We attempted to determine the sequences recognized by the DNA-binding
protein(s) by footprinting analysis. As a probe, the HincII
( 250)/BamHI ( 42) fragment (probe B in Fig. 3) was
labeled with [ -32P]dCTP by Klenow fragment. Therefore,
the 3'- end of the top strand was labeled. The same regions were
protected with all fractions as shown in Fig. 3F. One was
located from 122 to 107 upstream with respect to the transcription
initiation site and the other from 175 to 171. As shown in Fig.
1B, the region from 122 to 107 contains inverted repeat
sequences with 6 intervening bases. No such sequence was found in any
other genes of M. xanthus so far sequenced. The region from
175 to 171 contains half of the same sequence of the inverted
repeat sequences of the region from 122 to 107. However, no
retarded band was observed when the DNA fragment containing only this
region was used as a probe (Fig. 3E). It is possible,
however, that the region from 175 to 171 may be bound only when the
region from 122 to 107 exists together with it.
Mutational Analysis--
To confirm that the sequences centered at
114.5 are required for the activation of lonD expression,
the effects of mutations in this region were examined. Three different
mutations were constructed (Fig.
4A): GGC TTA (designated
120), AT CG (designated 113), and CCCC TATA (designated
109). As shown in Fig. 4B, two mutations, 120 and 109,
which destroy the inverted repeat sequences, abolished the DNA binding
activity, but mutation 113 located between inverted repeat sequences
did not. These results indicate that the inverted repeat sequences are
necessary for the DNA binding activity. Consistent with this result,
lonD transcription in vitro was reduced by the same mutations to the level acquired without the upstream promoter region as shown in Fig. 4C. This was confirmed further by
primer extension analysis to measure lonD expression
in vivo. The promoter regions containing either the
wild-type (up to 346 and 41) or mutant sequences (mutations 120
and 109) were cloned in the plasmid pSI1403Kmattp. pSI1403Kmattp was
constructed by cloning the DNA fragment containing attP into
pSI1403Km (32). Those plasmids were then integrated into the
attB site of chromosomal DNA of M. xanthus DZF1
by electroporation. The integration of the plasmid at attB
was confirmed by Southern blot analysis (data not shown). The antisense
oligonucleotide that is specific to the sequence downstream of the
cloned lonD promoter in pSI1403Kmattp was used as a primer
so that only transcripts from the integrated promoter were detected by
primer extension analysis. As shown in Fig. 4D, heat-shock
induction of lonD expression was observed only in the strain
harboring the promoter containing the wild-type sequences with the
upstream region. These results demonstrate that the upstream region
centered at 114.5 is required for the heat-shock induction of
lonD expression both in vivo and in
vitro.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mutational analysis. Panel A,
sequences of the DNA binding site. The mutated sequences are shown
below the wild-type sequences. Panel B, DNA binding assay.
Probes ( 250 to approximately 100) containing the wild-type and
mutated sequences were used. Bound probes are indicated by an
arrow. and + represent the absence and
presence of H-AS, respectively. Panel C, in vitro
transcription analysis. Template DNA containing either the wild-type or
mutated sequences in the promoter region ( 346 to approximately +95)
and the wild-type sequence ( 41 to approximately +95) was used with
H-AS for in vitro transcription reaction. Panel
D, in vivo expression. Total RNA was prepared from the
parent strain (DZF1) and strains harboring the vector without the
lonD promoter, with the wild-type lonD promoter
( 346 to approximately +95 and 41 to approximately +95), and with
the mutated lonD promoter. and + represent
non-heat-shocked cells and heat-shocked cells at 42 °C for 10 min,
respectively. Transcripts were analyzed by primer extension analysis.
The sequence of the primer used in this experiment is
5'-GGCGCCGCGTCAGATG-3', which is specific to the sequence downstream of
the cloned lonD promoter in the vector pSI1403Kmattp.
|
|
Purification and Identification of a DNA-binding Protein Specific
to the lonD Promoter--
Next the lonD promoter-binding
protein was purified by ammonium sulfate fractionation followed by
chromatography including DEAE-Sepharose, heparin-agarose, and DNA
affinity containing the lonD promoter from 128 to 105.
The activity of the protein was checked by DNA binding assay. After the
second DNA affinity column chromatography, a protein with an apparent
molecular mass of 55 kDa was obtained (Fig.
5).

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Purification of the lonD
promoter-binding protein (HsfA). Aliquots of fractions were
analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE, and the gel was stained with silver.
Lane 1, AS fraction; lane 2, DEAE-Sepharose
fraction; lane 3, heparin-agarose fraction; lane
4, first DNA affinity fraction; lane 5, second DNA
affinity fraction.
|
|
To clone the gene encoding the lonD promoter-binding
protein, the amino acid sequence of the N terminus of the purified
protein was determined and found to be MNQVKRAKVLVVDDDSVVLKAVTQILQREG. From this sequence, two degenerated oligonucleotides were designed, and
PCR amplification was carried out by using the oligonucleotides as
primers with M. xanthus chromosomal DNA as template.
Southern blot analysis was performed using PCR-amplified products as a probe with XmaI digests of M. xanthus chromosomal
DNA. A 1.6-kb DNA fragment from the XmaI digests which
hybridized with the probe was cloned. Analysis of the DNA sequence
revealed that the DNA fragment contained a gene encoding an ORF (485 residues) homologous to the NtrC family or enhancer-binding proteins.
The ORF designated HsfA contained the receiver domain of the response
regulator of the two-component His-Asp phosphorelay signal transduction
system at the N terminus, ATP hydrolysis domain at the center, and the DNA binding domain with the helix-turn-helix motif at the C terminus (see Fig. 8) as found in other NtrC family proteins (33-35).
A Histidine Kinase Gene, hsfB, Exists Upstream from
hsfA--
Another ORF was found immediately upstream of
hsfA. The ORF shows high sequence similarity to histidine
kinases of the two-component His-Asp phosphorelay signal transduction
system. The gene was designated hsfB and is likely to be in
the same operon with hsfA.
Subsequently, a 2.3-kb PstI fragment containing
hsfB was cloned and sequenced. The ORF (527 residues) was
found to consist of three domains; the receiver domain of the response
regulator at the N terminus, the histidine kinase domain at the C
terminus, and the domain with no significant similarity to known
proteins between the two domains (Fig. 8).
The downstream DNA of the hsfA gene was also cloned from phage DNA library of Sau3AI partial digests of M. xanthus chromosomal DNA (36). It was found that the operon is
likely to consist of four genes, hsfB, hsfA,
orf1, and orf2. ORF1 and ORF2 show sequence similarities to proteins of unknown functions (data not shown).
Phosphorylation of HsfA by HsfB in Vitro--
The function of some
NtrC family proteins is regulated by phosphorylation by cognate
histidine kinases (33-35). Because HsfA and HsfB seem to exist in an
operon, it is reasonable to speculate that the function of HsfA may be
regulated by phosphorylation by HsfB. To examine this possibility, HsfA
was overexpressed in E. coli and purified by chromatography
including DEAE-Sepharose, heparin-agarose, and DNA affinity. HsfB was
also overexpressed in E. coli and purified from inclusion
bodies followed by DEAE-Sepharose chromatography.
In vitro phosphorylation assays were performed by using
these purified proteins. As found in other histidine kinases, HsfB was
autophosphorylated with [ -32P]ATP (Fig.
6, lane 1). When mixed with
HsfB in the reaction mixture, HsfA was phosphorylated (Fig. 6,
lane 6). It should be noted that HsfA was not phosphorylated
without HsfB (Fig. 6, lane 3). Autophosphorylation of HsfB
and phosphorylation of HsfA by HsfB in vitro were not activated at a higher temperature (42 °C, data not shown).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Phosphorylation analysis with purified
proteins. HsfA, HsfB, HsfB-K, and HsfB-R were expressed in and
purified from E. coli. After in vitro
phosphorylation reaction, samples were analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE, and
phosphorylated bands were detected by autoradiography. A,
HsfA; B, entire HsfB; B-K, HsfB kinase domain;
B-R, HsfB receiver domain.
|
|
HsfB has an unusual domain organization in that the receiver domain is
within the N-terminal end, and the kinase domain is within the
C-terminal end (see Fig. 8). Such domain organization is also found in
AsgA (37) and AsgD (38) of M. xanthus. AsgA has been shown
to have autophosphorylation activity in vitro, but
phosphotransfer to its own receiver domain was not observed. Similar
biochemical assays have not been performed for AsgD. Because the
receiver domain of HsfB is highly homologous to other response regulators, we next examined whether the receiver domain of HsfB (HsfB-R) is phosphorylated in vitro by the kinase domain of
HsfB (HsfB-K). Thus, HsfB-K and HsfB-R were overexpressed in E. coli and purified from inclusion bodies followed by DEAE-Sepharose chromatography. HsfB-K was found to be autophosphorylated (Fig. 6,
lane 2) and be able to phosphorylate HsfA (Fig. 6,
lane 8). However, phosphorylation of HsfB-R was not observed
with either HsfB (Fig. 6, lane 5) or HsfB-K (Fig. 6,
lane 7). These results suggest that another histidine kinase
may exist which phosphorylates the receiver domain of HsfB in M. xanthus. Such phosphorylation of the receiver domain of HsfB may
modulate the function of the HsfB.
Transcriptional Activation of lonD by HsfA and HsfB in
Vitro--
To confirm that HsfA expressed in and purified from
E. coli cells binds the sequences recognized by HsfA
obtained from M. xanthus cells (Fig. 5, lane 5),
footprinting analysis was performed with the same DNA fragment used in
Fig. 3F. As shown in Fig.
7A, HsfA from M. xanthus and HsfA from E. coli bound sequences identical to those determined by AS fractions in Fig. 3F.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Footprinting and in vitro
transcription analysis with purified proteins. Panel
A, footprinting analysis with HsfA obtained from M. xanthus (Fig. 5, lane 5) and HsfA expressed in and
purified from E. coli. The probe used in this experiment is
the same as in Fig. 3F. Lane 1, no protein;
lane 2, HsfA from M. xanthus; lane 3,
HsfA from E. coli. Panel B, comparison of the
lonD promoter sequences with 54-like promoter
sequences of M. xanthus genes, 4521,
mbhA, and pilA, and the E. coli
54 consensus sequences. Panel C, in
vitro transcription analysis. RNAP/SigA was purified from M. xanthus, and HsfA and HsfB were expressed in and purified from
E. coli. Lane 1, in vivo RNA
(control); lane 2, transcripts by RNAP/SigA only; lane
3, transcripts by RNAP/SigA and HsfA; lane 4,
transcripts by RNAP/SigA, HsfA, and HsfB.
|
|
The enhancer-binding proteins usually activate transcription with RNAP
containing RpoN ( N, 54) (33-35) except
for one case reported thus far (39). The sequences of the
lonD promoter are compared with those of
54-like promoters of M. xanthus genes,
4521 (40), mbhA (41), and pilA (42)
and E. coli 54 consensus sequences (43) (Fig.
7B). Although the 12 region of the lonD
promoter shows some similarity to 54-like promoters, the
24 region does not show any similarity. It has been demonstrated by
mutational analysis that bases G, A, and G of the 4521
promoter at positions 26, 24, and 22, respectively, are important
for its transcription (40), and these bases are conserved among these
M. xanthus 54-like promoters (Fig.
7B). Therefore, it is unlikely that the lonD
promoter is recognized by RpoN. In contrast, because the lonD promoter is similar to the vegA promoter
(Fig. 1C), which has been shown to be recognized by SigA
(29), we examined whether or not RNAP/SigA can transcribe the
lonD gene in vitro. First, RNAP/SigA was purified
from M. xanthus cells by ammonium sulfate fractionation
followed by chromatography including DEAE-Sepharose, heparin-agarose,
and DNA-cellulose. This preparation was used in transcription reactions
performed in vitro with template DNA containing the
lonD promoter region. RNAP/SigA was indeed able to initiate
transcription in vitro (Fig. 7C, lane
2) from the same initiation site as found in vivo (Fig.
7C, lane 1). Enhancer-binding proteins with
receiver domains are activated for the transcriptional activity by
phosphorylation with cognate histidine kinases. When in
vitro transcription reactions were performed with HsfA purified from E. coli and RNAP/SigA, transcriptional activation was
observed (Fig. 7C, lane 3). When HsfA was mixed
with HsfB purified from E. coli before the in
vitro transcription reactions, more activation was observed (Fig.
7C, lane 4). Therefore, HsfA activated in
vitro transcription of lonD with RNAP/SigA in a manner
dependent on phosphorylation by HsfB. It is likely that the activation
observed in the absence of HsfB was the result of HsfA partially
phosphorylated by E. coli histidine kinases and/or low
molecular weight phosphodonors such as acetyl phosphate during
overexpression in E. coli. It should be noted that HsfB and
HsfA could not activate RNAP/SigA when the vegA promoter was
used as template for in vitro transcription (data not shown).
The hsfB and hsfA Genes Are Required for Normal Vegetative
Growth--
We attempted to construct deletion mutants of
hsfA and hsfB genes to elucidate their functions
in vivo. When the linearized plasmid in which the
hsfB gene was replaced by a kanamycin-resistant gene was
electroporated into M. xanthus DZF1, no transformants were
obtained (data not shown). To determine whether this result was caused
by the absence of the functional hsfB gene, the plasmid containing the hsfB gene was first integrated at the
attB site of M. xanthus DZF1 chromosome. In this
case, the original hsfB gene could be replaced by the
kanamycin-resistant gene (data not shown). This result indicates that
the hsfB gene is essential for normal vegetative growth.
Furthermore, the same strategy was performed for the hsfA
gene, and it was also found that the hsfA gene was required
for normal vegetative growth (data not shown).
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have identified a new two-component His-Asp phosphorelay system
that regulates expression of a heat-shock gene, lonD, in M. xanthus. This system consists of a response regulator,
HsfA, and a hybrid histidine kinase, HsfB. HsfA also belongs to the NtrC family or enhancer-binding proteins. HsfB has a rather unusual domain organization and consists of a receiver domain at the N-terminal end and a kinase domain at the C-terminal end (Fig.
8).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Model for the signal transduction pathway of
the lonD expression by heat-shock. For details,
see "Discussion."
|
|
Enhancer-binding proteins activate RNAP containing RpoN by binding
promoter regions that are localized in tandem at >100 bp upstream with
respect to the transcription initiation site (33-35). Enhancer-binding
proteins have ATPase activity that is required for transcriptional
activation. A subgroup of enhancer-binding proteins including NtrC
belongs to response regulators of the two-component His-Asp
phosphorelay signal transduction system. Therefore, it is regulated by
a cognate sensor kinase, NtrB, in the case of NtrC. Although DNA
binding of NtrC can be achieved in the absence of phosphorylation, only
the phosphorylated form of NtrC is able to promote transcription.
Phosphorylation is necessary for ATPase activity, oligomerization, and
formation of an open transcriptional complex.
We have demonstrated that extracts from both non-heat-shocked cells and
heat-shocked cells possess DNA binding activity to the upstream
promoter region of lonD, but that only the extract from
heat-shocked cells is able to activate transcription in a manner
dependent on the upstream promoter region of lonD. It was also found that transcriptional activity in the extract from
non-heat-shocked cells is restored by in vitro heat
treatment at 42 °C before transcription reaction, suggesting that a
factor(s) in the extract can sense temperature shift and activate
transcription of lonD.
Furthermore, we showed that HsfA is phosphorylated in vitro
by HsfB and that transcription of lonD is activated in the
presence of HsfA and HsfB. Although the extract prepared from
non-heat-shocked cells can become transcriptionally active after
in vitro heat-shock, purified HsfB was not activated by
elevated temperature (data not shown). This suggests that HsfB is not
the sensor kinase directly sensing heat-shock (this will be discussed
later in detail). As mentioned above, two binding sites are usually
found in the upstream promoter region of genes regulated by
enhancer-binding proteins, whereas only one region ( 122 to 107) was
identified in the lonD promoter by DNA binding assay. When
this region was mutated, no DNA binding activity was observed, and
transcriptional activation was abolished both in vivo and
in vitro. However, footprinting analysis exhibited another
protected region. The latter region may be bound by HsfA only when it
and the former region exist together. It is known that the
enhancer-binding proteins typically activate transcription with RNAP
containing RpoN. However, we performed in vitro
transcription with the major sigma factor, SigA, because the
lonD promoter regions show higher similarity to
70 consensus sequences than 54 (Figs.
1C and 7B). It was found that HsfA promoted
transcription of lonD in vitro with RNAP/SigA. It has been
reported that Rhodobacter capsulatus NtrC activates RNAP
containing RpoD or 70, the housekeeping sigma factor
(39).
Although the upstream promoter region was shown to be necessary for
in vivo heat-shock induction of lonD, in
vitro transcription analysis showed an increase of transcripts by
H-AS without the upstream promoter region of lonD. Because
the 35/ 10 promoter regions are recognized by RNAP/SigA, this
increase may result from stabilization and/or modification of SigA in
H-AS. RNAP/SigA in H-AS may be more active for the lonD
promoter because no difference by heat-shock was observed for in
vitro transcription with the vegA promoter.
Furthermore, it is possible that the 5'-TG-3' sequence element located
1 base upstream from the 10 hexamer element of the lonD
promoter (indicated by a square in Fig. 1C)
provides a motif necessary for transcription initiation as found in
some promoters of E. coli (44). This 5'-TG-3' element is not
found in the vegA promoter. Therefore, this element may
contribute to the increase of transcripts for lonD by
heat-shock in vitro in the absence of the upstream promoter
region and the HsfA/HsfB system. It has been demonstrated that some of
E. coli promoters are recognized in vitro by both
RNAP containing RpoD and RpoS, the stationary phase sigma factor
( S, 38) (45). In addition, the increase
in RpoS level is observed in E. coli when cells are exposed
to heat-shock (46). Therefore, it is possible that the M. xanthus stationary phase sigma factor, SigD (11), may be increased
by heat-shock, and SigD may be able to recognize the lonD
promoter in vitro, resulting in the increase of transcripts
with H-AS in the absence of the upstream promoter and the HsfA/HsfB system.
The His-Asp phosphorelay signal transduction system consists of two
basic components, a sensor kinase and a response regulator. However,
recent studies have demonstrated that three or four components (or
domains) are utilized in one phosphorelay signal transduction event in
which a phosphate group is transferred from histidine aspartate histidine aspartate (His-Asp-His-Asp phosphorelay) (47). The first
known phosphorelay was reported for regulation of initiation of
sporulation in B. subtilis (48). This relay begins with
autophosphorylation of one of three sensor kinases, KinA, KinB, or
KinC. The phosphate group is then transferred to a response regulator,
Spo0F. Spo0F serves as a phosphodonor for Spo0B. Finally, the phosphate
group is passed from Spo0B to Spo0A, which regulates a number of genes
involved in sporulation.
Hybrid kinases with transmitter domains of sensor kinases and receiver
domains of response regulators are usually found in His-Asp-His-Asp
phosphorelay. A receiver domain is typically fused to a transmitter
domain at the C terminus in hybrid kinases, but it also can be found at
the N terminus as found in M. xanthus HsfB (this study),
AsgA (37), and AsgD (38). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae
osmoregulation is controlled by the Sln1p-Ypd1p-Ssk1p system (49). The
first two phosphorylation sites are located in the transmembrane hybrid
kinase Sln1p. From Sln1p the phosphate group is transferred to Ypd1p,
then to Ssk1p. Ssk1p modulates the downstream MAP kinase cascade. The
BvgS-BvgA two-component system modulates regulation of virulence
factors in Bordetella pertussis (50). In this system the
first three steps of the four-step phosphorelay occur within the single
protein BvgS. This pathway represents another organizational design.
Furthermore, Ralstonia solanacearum utilizes in control of
expression of virulence factors the PhcS-PhcR-OrfQ system in which the
second and third phosphorylation sites appear to be located in the
hybrid kinase PhcR (51). It should be noted that PhcR has the same
domain organization as HsfB. With these instances, it is tempting to speculate that there may exist a presently unidentified kinase (HsfX in
Fig. 8) which functions as a temperature sensor and activates HsfB by
phosphorylation of the receiver domain upon heat-shock because purified
HsfB is not able to be activated by temperature shift in
vitro and contains a receiver domain at the N terminus. However,
we cannot exclude possibility that a factor(s) other than a sensor
kinase may sense heat-shock and transduce signals to HsfB. For example,
in control of nitrogen assimilation by the NtrB/NtrC system, protein II
or PII functions as a sensory component responsible for
sensing 2-ketoglutarate whose concentration reflects changes in
the nitrogen status of the cell (52).
The present HsfA/HsfB system is the two-component His-Asp phosphorelay
signal transduction system required for activation of a heat-shock gene
and is also necessary for vegetative growth. Because lonD is
dispensable for vegetative growth in M. xanthus (16, 17),
the HsfA/HsfB system appears to regulate genes required for vegetative
growth in addition to developmental genes such as lonD, an
essential gene for fruiting body development (16, 17).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to M. Inouye for discussion
and preparation of this manuscript. We thank L. Vales for critical
reading of this manuscript. We also thank C. Xu for DNA manipulation
and K. Yamanaka for suggestions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from the Foundation of
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF285783.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes La.,
Piscataway, NJ 08854. Tel.: 732-235-4161; Fax: 732-235-4559;
E-mail; sinouye@waksman.rutgers.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110155200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RNAP, RNA
polymerase;
AS, ammonium sulfate;
H-AS, AS fraction prepared from
heat-shocked cells;
NH-AS, AS fraction prepared from non-heat-shocked
cells;
RNAP/SigA, RNAP containing SigA;
ORF, open reading frame.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hoch, J. A.,
and Silhavy, T. J.
(1995)
Two-component Signal Transduction
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 2.
|
Gross, C. A.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology
(Neidhardt, F. C., ed)
, pp. 1382-1399, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 3.
|
Hecker, M.,
Schumann, W.,
and Volker, U.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
19,
417-428[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Narberhaus, F.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
31,
1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Yura, T.,
Kanemori, M.,
and Morita, M. T.
(2000)
in
Bacterial Stress Responses
(Storz, G.
, and Hengge-Aronis, R., eds)
, pp. 3-18, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 6.
|
Dworkin, M.
(1996)
Microbiol. Rev.
60,
70-102[Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Dworkin, M.,
and Kaiser, D.
(1993)
Myxobacteria II
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 8.
|
Inouye, S.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
80-85[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Apelian, D.,
and Inouye, S.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1396-1403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Apelian, D.,
and Inouye, S.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
3335-3342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ueki, T.,
and Inouye, S.
(1998)
Genes Cells
3,
371-385[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Ueki, T.,
and Inouye, S.
(2001)
J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
3,
287-293[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Ward, M. J.,
Lew, H.,
Treuner-Lange, A.,
and Zusman, D. R.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5668-5675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Keseler, I. M.,
and Kaiser, D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
1979-1984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
McGowan, S. J.,
Gorham, H. C.,
and Hodgson, D. A.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
10,
713-735[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Gill, R. E.,
Karlok, M.,
and Benton, D.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
4538-4544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Tojo, N.,
Inouye, S.,
and Komano, T.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
4545-4549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Campos, J. M.,
and Geisselsoder, J., Jr.
(1978)
J. Mol. Biol.
119,
167-178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Vieria, J.,
and Messing, J.
(1982)
Gene (Amst.)
19,
259-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Miller, J. H.
(1972)
Experiments in Molecular Genetics
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 21.
|
Studier, F. W.,
Rosenberg, A. H.,
Dunn, J. J.,
and Dubendorff, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
185,
60-89[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Gross, C. A.,
Engbaek, F.,
Flammang, T.,
and Burgess, R.
(1976)
J. Bacteriol.
128,
382-389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kuwabara, M. D.,
and Sigman, D. S.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
7234-7238[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Kadonaga, J. T.,
and Tjian, R.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5889-5893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Tojo, N.,
Inouye, S.,
and Komano, T.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
2271-2277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Harley, C. B.,
and Reynolds, R. P.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
2343-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Hawley, D. K.,
and McClure, W. R.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
2237-2255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Komano, T.,
Franceschini, T.,
and Inouye, S.
(1987)
J. Mol. Biol.
196,
517-524[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Biran, D.,
and Kroos, L.
(1997)
Mol. Microbiol.
25,
463-472[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Larson, J. S.,
Schuetz, T. J.,
and Kingston, R. E.
(1998)
Nature
335,
372-375
|
| 31.
|
Mosser, D. D.,
Kotzbauer, P. T.,
Sarge, K. D.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Accd. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
3748-3752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Hanlon, W. A.,
Inouye, M.,
and Inouye, S.
(1997)
Mol. Microbiol.
23,
459-471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Morett, E.,
and Segovia, L.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
6067-6074[Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
North, A. K.,
Klose, K. E.,
Stedman, K. M.,
and Kustu, S.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
4267-4273[Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Shingler, V.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
19,
409-416[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Zhang, W.,
Munoz-Dorad, J.,
Inouye, M.,
and Inouye, S.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
5450-5453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Plamann, L., Li, Y.,
Cantwell, B.,
and Mayor, J.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
2014-2020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Cho, K.,
and Zusman, D. R.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
34,
268-281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Bowman, W. C.,
and Kranz, R. G.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1884-1893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Keseler, I. M.,
and Kaiser, D.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
4638-4644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Romeo, J. M.,
and Zusman, D. R.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
2969-2976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Wu, S. S.,
and Kaiser, D.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
7748-7758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Thöny, B.,
and Hennecke, H.
(1989)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
63,
341-358
|
| 44.
|
Barne, K. A.,
Bown, J. A.,
Busby, S. J. W.,
and Minchin, S. D.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4034-4040[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Jishage, M.,
and Ishihama, A.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
6832-6835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Tanaka, K.,
Takayanagi, Y.,
Fujita, N.,
Ishihama, A.,
and Takahashi, H.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
3511-3515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Appleby, J. L.,
Parkinson, J. S.,
and Bourret, R. B.
(1996)
Cell
86,
845-848[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Perego, M.
(1998)
Trends Microbiol.
6,
366-370[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Posas, F.,
Wurgler-Murphy, S. M.,
Maeda, T.,
Witten, E. A.,
Thai, T. C.,
and Saito, H.
(1996)
Cell
86,
865-875[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Uhl, M. A.,
and Miller, J. F.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1028-1036[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Clough, S. J.,
Lee, K.-E.,
Schell, M. A.,
and Denny, T. P.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
3639-3648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Rhee, S. G.,
Park, S. C.,
and Koo, J. H.
(1985)
Curr. Top. Cell Regul.
27,
221-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Viswanathan, K. Murphy, B. Julien, A. G. Garza, and L. Kroos
Regulation of dev, an Operon That Includes Genes Essential for Myxococcus xanthus Development and CRISPR-Associated Genes and Repeats
J. Bacteriol.,
May 15, 2007;
189(10):
3738 - 3750.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Viswanathan, T. Ueki, S. Inouye, and L. Kroos
Combinatorial regulation of genes essential for Myxococcus xanthus development involves a response regulator and a LysR-type regulator
PNAS,
May 8, 2007;
104(19):
7969 - 7974.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ueki and D. R. Lovley
Heat-shock sigma factor RpoH from Geobacter sulfurreducens
Microbiology,
March 1, 2007;
153(3):
838 - 846.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Otani, T. Ueki, S. Kozuka, M. Segawa, K. Sano, and S. Inouye
Characterization of a Small Heat Shock Protein, Mx Hsp16.6, of Myxococcus xanthus
J. Bacteriol.,
August 1, 2005;
187(15):
5236 - 5241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Jelsbak, M. Givskov, and D. Kaiser
Enhancer-binding proteins with a forkhead-associated domain and the {sigma}54 regulon in Myxococcus xanthus fruiting body development
PNAS,
February 22, 2005;
102(8):
3010 - 3015.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ueki and S. Inouye
Identification of an activator protein required for the induction of fruA, a gene essential for fruiting body development in Myxococcus xanthus
PNAS,
July 22, 2003;
100(15):
8782 - 8787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Marin, I. Suzuki, K. Yamaguchi, K. Ribbeck, H. Yamamoto, Y. Kanesaki, M. Hagemann, and N. Murata
Identification of histidine kinases that act as sensors in the perception of salt stress in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803
PNAS,
July 22, 2003;
100(15):
9061 - 9066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Versteeg, A. Escher, A. Wende, T. Wiegert, and W. Schumann
Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis Heat Shock Gene htpG Is under Positive Control
J. Bacteriol.,
January 15, 2003;
185(2):
466 - 474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hao, D. Biran, G. J. Velicer, and L. Kroos
Identification of the {Omega}4514 Regulatory Region, a Developmental Promoter of Myxococcus xanthus That Is Transcribed In Vitro by the Major Vegetative RNA Polymerase
J. Bacteriol.,
June 15, 2002;
184(12):
3348 - 3359.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|