Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107014200 on November 6, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 8, 6391-6398, February 22, 2002
Protein Phosphatase 4 Is Involved in Tumor Necrosis
Factor-
-induced Activation of c-Jun N-terminal Kinase*
Guisheng
Zhou
§,
Kathie A.
Mihindukulasuriya
§,
Rebecca A.
MacCorkle-Chosnek
,
Aaron
Van Hooser¶,
Mickey C.-T.
Hu
,
B. R.
Brinkley¶, and
Tse-Hua
Tan
**
From the Departments of
Immunology and
¶ Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine and
Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, University of
Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
Received for publication, July 24, 2001, and in revised form, November 2, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Protein phosphatase 4 (PP4, previously named
protein phosphatase X (PPX)), a PP2A-related serine/threonine
phosphatase, has been shown to be involved in essential cellular
processes, such as microtubule growth and nuclear factor
B
activation. We provide evidence that PP4 is involved in tumor necrosis
factor (TNF)-
signaling in human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T)
cells. Treatment of HEK293T cells with TNF-
resulted in
time-dependent activation of endogenous PP4, peaking at 10 min, as well as increased serine and threonine phosphorylation of PP4.
We also found that PP4 is involved in relaying the TNF-
signal to
c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) as indicated by the ability of PP4-RL, a
dominant-negative PP4 mutant, to block TNF-
-induced JNK activation.
Moreover, the response of JNK to TNF-
was inhibited in HEK293 cells
stably expressing PP4-RL in comparison to parental HEK293 cells. The involvement of PP4 in JNK signaling was further demonstrated by the
specific activation of JNK, but not p38 and ERK2, by PP4 in transient
transfection assays. However, no direct PP4-JNK interaction was
detected, suggesting that PP4 exerts its positive regulatory effect on
JNK in an indirect manner. Taken together, these data indicate that
PP4 is a signaling component of the JNK cascade and involved in
relaying the TNF-
signal to the JNK pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A major mechanism by which cells regulate protein function is to
add or remove phosphate groups on serine, threonine, and tyrosine
residues. The steady-state level of phosphorylation and, thus, the
strength and duration of the signal transmitted are balanced by the
opposing actions of protein kinases and protein phosphatases (1-3).
Protein kinases, protein phosphatases, and their substrates are
integrated within an elaborate signal transducing network (3-5). The
defective or inappropriate operation of this network leads to many
diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and autoimmune disorders (6).
Mitogen-activated protein kinases
(MAPKs),1 including
extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK), and p38, play essential roles in many important biological processes such as the stress response, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumorigenesis (7-9). MAPK
activation involves sequential protein kinase reactions within a
three-kinase module (MAP3K-MAP2K-MAPK), whereby a MAP3K phosphorylates and activates a MAP2K, a dual-specificity kinase, that then
phosphorylates and activates a MAPK (7, 8, 10). In vivo MAPK
phosphorylation is a reversible process, indicating that protein
phosphatases provide an additional level of regulation of MAPKs. In
fact, the magnitude and duration of MAPK activation are tightly
controlled by the coordinate actions of protein kinases and protein
phosphatases. A large number of mammalian MAPK phosphatases have been
identified, including dual-specificity phosphatases and
tyrosine-specific phosphatases (11, 12). There is evidence that
serine/threonine-specific phosphatases also regulate MAPKs (13, 14).
MAPK phosphatases inactivate MAPKs by directly dephosphorylating both
threonine and tyrosine residues of MAPKs (12). The coordinate
regulation by protein kinases and phosphatases also occurs at many
other points within the three-kinase module. For example, MKP-1, a
dual-specificity phosphatase, inhibits ERK, but positively regulates
Raf-1 and MKK in an ERK-independent manner (15). PP2A also acts on
multiple components of the ERK pathway (12).
Protein phosphatase 4 (PP4, previously named protein phosphatase X
(PPX)) is a novel protein serine/threonine phosphatase that is a member
of the PP2A family of phosphatases (16). PP4 is highly conserved during
evolution, with human and Drosophila PP4 sharing 91% amino
acid identity (16). It has been shown that PP4 is localized at the
centrosomes in mammalian cells and Drosophila embryos, and
that PP4 is involved in the regulation of microtubule
growth/organization at centrosomes (17, 18). Our previous studies
showed that PP4 interacts with members of the nuclear factor
B
(NF-
B) family (such as c-Rel, p50, and RelA), stimulates the DNA
binding activity of c-Rel, and activates NF-
B-mediated transcription
(19). The high degree of conservation of PP4 suggests that PP4 may be
involved in many more essential cellular processes and is tightly
controlled in vivo. It has been shown that PP4 is
carboxymethylated (20). Furthermore, three potential regulatory
subunits have been identified for PP4:
4 (21, 22), PP4R1
(23), and PP4R2 (18). In an effort to further investigate
the cellular function of PP4, we found that PP4 acts as a specific
positive regulator for the JNK pathway and that PP4 is required to
relay the TNF-
signal to the JNK pathway.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents--
[
-32P]ATP and
[32P]orthophosphate were purchased from ICN Biomedicals
(Irvine, CA). An enhanced chemiluminescence system was purchased from
Amersham Biosciences, Inc. Ser/Thr phosphatase assay kit 1 was
purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Waltham, MA). TNF-
was
purchased from R&D Systems. Anti-HA antibody (12CA5) was
purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Monoclonal anti-Flag (M2)
and anti-
-tubulin antibodies were purchased from Sigma. Monoclonal
anti-PP1 and anti-c-Myc (9E10) antibodies, and goat anti-Bcl-XL antibody were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Goat anti-aldolase antibody was
purchased from Biodesign (Saco, ME). Monoclonal anti-golgin-97 was
purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Rabbit anti-GRP78
polyclonal antibody was purchased from StressGen (Victoria, British
Columbia, Canada). Monoclonal anti-lamin B1 was purchased
from Zymed Laboratories Inc. (South San Francisco,
CA). Goat anti-human and -rabbit IgG (H+L) conjugated to fluorescein
isothiocyanate and Texas Red were purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch
Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). Rabbit anti-PP4 polyclonal
antibodies Ab104 and Ab6101 were raised against the C-terminal regions
of PP4, 287EAAPQETRGIPSKKPVADY305, and
291QETRGIPSKKPVA303, respectively. Ab104 and
Ab6101 were peptide purified using the Sulfolink kit from Pierce.
Rabbit anti-JNK1 polyclonal antibody (Ab101) was described previously
(24). Human autoimmune serum (no. 4171, 1:2000) specific for proteins
of the pericentriolar matrix has been described previously (25). All
other chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma unless otherwise noted.
Plasmids--
The GST-Jun-(1-79) was a gift from Dr. M. Karin
(University of California, San Diego, CA). GST-ATF2-(1-96) and
pHA-ERK2 were provided by Dr. J. S. Gutkind (National Institutes
of Health, Bethesda, MD). GST-JNK (also called GST-SAPK) was a gift
from Dr. L. I. Zon (Children's Hospital, Boston, MA). pHA-MKK6
was provided by Dr. Z. Yao (Amgen, Boulder, CO). pHA-PKC-
, was a gift from Dr. M. W. Wooten (Auburn University, AL). pHA-JNK1 and HA-p38 were gifts from Dr. J. Woodgett (Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada). pCMV-PP1 was a gift from Dr. A. H. Schonthal (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) (26).
pMTSM-Myc-M3/6 was a gift from Dr. K. E. Davis (University of
Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom) (27). pBJF-Flag-PP2A and pBJF-Flag-PP6
were kindly provided by Dr. J. Chen (University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign, IL) (21). pCIneo-Flag-PP4 was constructed by
inserting an XbaI site and a Flag tag at the 5' end and a
NotI site at the 3' end of full-length human PP4 cDNA
(19) and subcloning the PCR product into the pCIneo expression vector.
PP4 and HA-PP4-RL were described previously (19).
Cells and Transfection--
Human HeLa cells, human embryonic
kidney 293T (HEK293T) and 293 (HEK293) cells were obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum and 100 units/ml streptomycin/penicillin at 37 °C
in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. HEK293T cells were
plated at a density of either 1.5 × 105 cells/35-mm
plate well or 1.0 × 106 cells/100-mm dish and
transfected the next day using the modified calcium phosphate
precipitation protocol (Specialty Media, Inc., Lavallette, NJ). Cells
were transfected with plasmids encoding
-galactosidase (0.15 µg)
in combination with an empty vector or various amounts of plasmids
encoding phosphatases, phosphatase mutants, kinases, or kinase mutants
as indicated in the figure legends.
Coimmunoprecipitation, Immunocomplex Kinase Assays, and Western
Blot Analysis--
Coimmunoprecipitation and immunocomplex kinase
assays were performed as described previously (28-31). Western blot
analysis was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection
kit according to the manufacturer's protocols (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.).
Phosphatase Assays--
HEK293T cells were lysed in buffer
containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1% Nonidet P-40, 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 6 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µM
p-amidinophenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and 2 µg/ml
aprotinin. Endogenous PP4 was immunoprecipitated with an anti-PP4
(Ab104) antibody. Overexpressed Flag-PP4 and HA-PP4-RL were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag (M2) and anti-HA (12CA5) antibodies,
respectively. The immunoprecipitates were washed three times with
buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.1% Triton X-100,
and 500 mM NaCl. Phosphatase assays were performed using Ser/Thr phosphatase assay kit 1, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Waltham, MA). The
immunoprecipitates were incubated with 4 µM KTpIRR
peptide in 40 µl of assay buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.0),
0.1 mM CaCl2, and 1 mM
MnCl2) at 30 °C for 30 min (unless otherwise indicated
in the figure legend). Buffer plus peptide was used as a negative
control. The immunoprecipitates were then pelleted, and the assay
buffer was transferred to a 96-well, half-volume plate. The assay was
terminated by the addition of 100 µl of Malachite Green solution (one
volume of 4.2% (w/v) ammonium molybdate in 4 M HCl, three
volumes of 0.045% (w/v) Malachite Green in water, and 1 µl/ml 10%
Tween 20 added fresh). After 15 min at room temperature, the assay was
read at 650 nm on a PerkinElmer Life Sciences Bioassay Reader (HTS 7000 Plus).
In Vitro Binding Assays--
GST and GST-SAPK fusion protein
were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads equilibrated in
incubation buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin. Cell lysates
(600 µg) from HEK293 cells stably transfected with Flag-PP4 or
HEK293T cells transiently transfected with Myc-M3/6 were incubated with GST-JNK fusion protein or GST-4T-Sepharose beads in incubation buffer
containing 3 mg/ml bovine serum albumin at 4 °C for 2 h. The
beads were washed five times with the incubation buffer, boiled in a
SDS-PAGE loading buffer for 5 min, resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and then subjected to Western
blotting with an anti-Flag (M2) or an anti-Myc antibody. The membrane
was then stripped with stripping buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 6.7), 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS) and reprobed with an anti-GST antibody.
Centrosome Isolation--
Centrosomes were purified from HeLa
cells by a standard protocol (32, 33). Briefly, 6 × 107 HeLa cells were incubated with 0.2 µM
nocodazole and 1 µg/ml cytochalasin D at 37 °C for 60 min. After
trypsinization, the cells were pelleted and washed one time with 1×
TBS (50 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl) and one
time with 0.1× TBS + 8% sucrose. The cells were then resuspended in 2 ml of 0.1× TBS + 8% sucrose and lysed by adding 8 ml of fractionation
lysis buffer (1 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1%
-mercaptoethanol, 1 µg/ml
leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM
p-amidinophenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
Na3VO4, and 0.5 mM NaF). The lysate
was spun at 2,500 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was
collected and spun again at 2,500 × g for 10 min. The
supernatant was transferred into a new tube through a 70-µm nylon
filter (Falcon 2350). The resulting supernatant was incubated with 10 mM HEPES and 1 µg/ml DNase on ice for 30 min, transferred
to a 15-ml ultracentrifuge tube, underlaid with 1 ml of 60% sucrose in
sucrose dilution buffer (10 mM PIPES (pH 7.2), 0.1% Triton
X-100, and 0.1%
-mercaptoethanol), and spun at 10,000 × g for 1.5 h. The bottom 3 ml was transferred to a new
tube containing a discontinuous 40/50/70% sucrose gradient in sucrose
dilution buffer. After spinning at 120,000 × g for 1.5 h, 0.5-ml fractions from the top were taken and diluted to 1 ml with 0.5 ml of PEM buffer (80 mM PIPES (pH 6.8), 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2). After mixing,
the solution was spun at 15,000 rpm in a tabletop centrifuge for 30 min. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of PEM buffer and spun at
15,000 rpm in a tabletop centrifuge for 30 min. The final pellet
containing centrosomes was washed twice with PEM buffer and then
resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) with 5%
-mercaptoethanol.
Immunofluorescence--
As recently described in detail (34),
cells were grown on coverslips and the coverslips were washed in 0.5%
Triton X-100 for 2 min and fixed in cold 4% ultrapure formaldehyde
(Polysciences, Inc.) in PEM buffer (80 mM K-PIPES (pH 7.0),
5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2) for 10-20
min. For the immunofluorescence of
-tubulin, 4% polyethylene glycol
was added to PEM buffer during the permeabilization and fixation steps.
After they were fixed, the coverslips were washed with PEM buffer and
permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PEM buffer for 30 min. Then, the
coverslips were washed with PEM buffer and blocked in 2.5% nonfat dry
milk in TBST buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) overnight. The next day, the
coverslips were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with primary
antibodies diluted in TBST, washed in TBST, and incubated for 1 h
at 37 °C with secondary antibodies diluted in 1:200 in TBST. After
washing in TBST, coverslips were counterstained with 0.4 µg/ml
4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in TBST
and mounted with Vectashield® antifade medium (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) or ProLong antifade medium (Molecular
Probes, Eugene, OR). The figures are composite images obtained with a
Deltavision, deconvolution-based optical work station (Applied
Precision, Issaquah, WA). Z-series stacks of multiple focal planes were
used to render three-dimensional volumes.
Establishment of HEK293 Cell Clones Stably Transfected with
Flag-PP4 and HA-PP4-RL--
HEK293 cells were grown in complete DMEM
containing 10% fetal calf serum supplemented with 12.5 mM
HEPES, 50 µg/ml gentamycin, and 100 units/ml penicillin-streptomycin
(Invitrogen). We transfected the HEK293 cells with Flag-PP4 by
the Fugene 6 method according to the manufacturer's protocol (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). The transfected cells were selected by
Geneticin (G418; Invitrogen) at a concentration of 750 µg/ml or 1 mg/ml. The cells were replated at a 1:15 dilution whenever they reached
80% confluence. After 10-14 days, the T-75 flasks were trypsinized,
and the drug-resistant cells were replated at a limiting dilution to
obtain independent clones. Each clone was tested for Flag-PP4
expression by Western blotting. A similar approach was used to
establish an HEK293 cell line stably expressing HA-PP4-RL.
In Vivo Labeling of PP4 and Phosphoamino Acid
Analysis--
HEK293T cells (1 × 106 cells in 100-mm
dishes) were transfected with 5 µg of Flag-PP4. After 40 h, the
cells were maintained in phosphate-free DMEM containing 5% dialyzed
serum for 1 h at 37 °C. The cells were then labeled in
phosphate-free DMEM supplemented with 5% dialyzed serum and 100 µCi/ml [32P]orthophosphate for 4 h at 37 °C.
After TNF-
treatment, the cells were washed with PBS twice to remove
free [32P]orthophosphate. Flag-PP4 was immunoprecipitated
with an anti-Flag antibody (M2) and separated by SDS-PAGE. The
separated proteins were transferred to PVDF, and autoradiography was
performed. The membrane was then subjected to immunoblotting using an
anti-Flag (M2) antibody. The corresponding PP4 bands were cut out and
subjected to phosphoamino acid analysis (35, 36).
 |
RESULTS |
PP4 Is Activated by TNF-
--
In an effort to investigate which
signaling pathway(s) PP4 may be involved in, we examined the effect of
TNF-
on PP4 phosphatase activity. We first generated an anti-PP4
antibody, Ab104, which recognizes the C-terminal region of PP4. Western
blot analysis indicated that Ab104 specifically recognized PP4, but not
the most highly homologous phosphatases PP2A and PP6 (Fig.
1A). Previously, PP4 had been
shown to localize to the centrosomes via immunofluorescence staining
(17, 18). To confirm the specificity of Ab104, we isolated centrosomes
from HeLa cells and performed Western blotting with antibodies to PP4
(Ab104), as well as markers for various subcellular compartments. PP4
localized to centrosome fractions, and these fractions were shown to be
free of contamination from other subcellular compartments (Fig.
1B). We noticed that PP4 did not peak with
-tubulin.
Considering that
-tubulin is a component of the centrioles of the
centrosomes and that PP4 has been previously reported to be a component
of the pericentriolar matrix of the centrosomes (17), the slight
difference in the Western blot detection may be the result of slight
differences in the densities of the two centrosomal structures. The
association of PP4 with the centrosome was further confirmed by
immunofluorescence staining using a peptide purified anti-PP4 antibody
(Ab104). As shown in Fig. 1C, PP4 co-localized with proteins
of the pericentriolar matrix (PCM). Taken together, these data show
that PP4 is a component of the centrosome.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Characterization of a PP4-specific antibody,
Ab104. A, the anti-PP4 antibody, Ab104,
specifically recognizes PP4, but not PP2A and PP6. HEK293T cells were
transfected with 2 µg of empty vector (lanes 1), 2 µg of
Flag-PP4 (lanes 2), 2 µg of Flag-PP2A (lanes
3), or 2 µg of Flag-PP6 (lanes 4). Cells were
harvested 36 h after transfection and subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Western blotting was performed with 1 µg/ml Ab104. The experiments
were repeated four times with similar results. B, PP4
co-purifies with centrosomes. Centrosomes were prepared from 6 × 107 HeLa cells and purified on a discontinuous sucrose
gradient. 10% of protein recovered from each fraction and 5 µg of
HeLa whole cell lysate (W) were Western-blotted for the
presence of PP4 (Ab104) and subcellular compartment markers:
-tubulin (centrosome), aldolase (cytosol), lamin B1 (nucleus), GRP78
(endoplasmic reticulum), golgin-97 (Golgi), and Bcl-XL
(mitochondria). C, PP4 is a component of the centrosome.
HeLa cells were grown on polylysine-coated coverslips, extracted in
0.5% Triton X-100 for 2 min, and fixed in 4% ultrapure formaldehyde.
Fixed cells were incubated with DAPI DNA stain (DAPI;
blue), human autoimmune serum 4171 (PCM;
red), and the peptide-purified anti-PP4 antibody Ab104
(PP4; green; panels a-d) or normal
preimmune serum from the same rabbit used to generate Ab104, before
immunization with peptide (n.s.; green;
panels e-h). Panels PCM,
PP4, and DAPI were merged (merged;
panel d), to identify areas of colocalization of PP4 and PCM
staining (yellow). Arrows indicate position of
centrosomes. The experiments were repeated at least three times with
similar results.
|
|
We then measured the phosphatase activity of PP4 before and after
TNF-
treatment. PP4 phosphatase assays were established by using a
synthetic peptide substrate, KTpIRR. We first wanted to ensure that the
PP4 phosphatase assay is able to measure PP4 phosphatase activity.
Thus, we tested the assay to determine the linear range of the assay
and to show that increasing amounts of PP4 correlate with increasing
PP4 activity. PP4 showed a time-dependent increase in its
phosphatase activity in a time period of 1-50 min of incubation of PP4
with the peptide substrate (Fig.
2A, upper
panel). Within this time frame, PP4 activity increased with increased amounts of PP4 (Fig. 2A, lower
panel). HEK293T cells were treated with TNF-
(10 ng/ml),
and endogenous PP4 was immunoprecipitated from the cells with the
PP4-specific antibody, Ab104. The PP4 phosphatase activity was measured
by incubating the immunoprecipitated PP4 with the peptide substrate,
KTpIRR, for 30 min. PP4 phosphatase activity was increased following
TNF-
stimulation in a time-dependent fashion, peaking at
10 min (Fig. 2B, upper panel).
PP4 activity was decreased after 10 min, indicating that
TNF-
-induced PP4 activation was a transient event. The increased
phosphatase activity was not caused by variation in levels of PP4
because the amounts of PP4 immunoprecipitated were comparable (Fig.
2B, lower panel). Therefore, PP4 was
activated in response to TNF-
in HEK293T cells.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
TNF- activates both
PP4 and JNK in HEK293T cells. A, establishment of PP4
phosphatase assays. 800 µg of HEK293 cell lysate was
immunoprecipitated with either anti-PP4 antibody (Ab104) or protein A
bead alone. The immunoprecipitates were washed and incubated with assay
buffer and KTpIRR peptide at 30 °C for various times, from 0 to 120 min, as indicated (upper panel). 200, 400, 600, or 800 µg of HEK293 cell lysate was immunoprecipitated with either
anti-PP4 antibody (Ab104) or beads alone. The immunoprecipitates were
washed and incubated with assay buffer and KTpIRR peptide at 30 °C
for 30 min (lower panel). The phosphatase assays
were read at 650 nm. The readings are the average and standard
deviation of three separate immunoprecipitations (PP4) or two separate
immunoprecipitations (beads). B, TNF- activates PP4
phosphatase activity. HEK293T cells were seeded at a density of
3.5 × 106 cells/100-mm dish. After 24 h, the
cells were treated with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for various times as
indicated. PP4 was immunoprecipitated with an anti-PP4 antibody
(Ab104). The PP4 phosphatase activity was determined by using a
synthetic peptide, KTpIRR, as a substrate (upper
panel). The amounts of PP4 immunoprecipitated were monitored
by Western blotting using an anti-PP4 antibody (Ab6101;
lower panel). The experiments were repeated at
least three times with similar results. C, TNF- activates
JNK kinase activity. HEK293T cells were seeded at a density of 3.5 × 106 cells/100-mm dish. After 24 h, the cells were
treated with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for various times as indicated. JNK was
immunoprecipitated with an anti-JNK antibody (Ab101). The JNK
phosphatase activity was determined by using GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a
substrate. The experiments were repeated three times with similar
results.
|
|
It is known that TNF-
is a potent activator of the JNK pathway. To
establish a possible link between PP4 and the JNK pathway in response
to TNF-
, endogenous JNK was immunoprecipitated with an anti-JNK1
antibody (Ab101) from HEK293T cells, and its kinase activity was
determined by an immunocomplex kinase assay using GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as
substrate. As shown in Fig. 2C, JNK was activated by TNF-
with kinetics similar to that of PP4 in HEK293T cells. Thus, PP4 was
activated concomitant with JNK activation in response to TNF-
in
HEK293T cells.
TNF-
Induces Serine and Threonine Phosphorylation of
PP4--
To further confirm the involvement of PP4 in TNF-
signaling, we examined the effect of TNF-
on the phosphorylation
state of PP4, because PP2A, the phosphatase most homologous to PP4, is
regulated by phosphorylation. HEK293T cells were transfected with
Flag-PP4, labeled in vivo with
[32P]orthophosphate, and treated with TNF-
(10 ng/ml).
Flag-PP4 was then immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag antibody (M2).
We found that TNF-
treatment induced phosphorylation of PP4 in a time-dependent manner, peaking at 5 min (Fig.
3A). Phosphoamino acid
analysis showed that TNF-
-induced phosphorylation of PP4 occurred on
serine and threonine residues (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that PP4 is inducibly phosphorylated in response to TNF-
in
HEK293T cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
TNF- induces serine
and threonine phosphorylation of PP4. A, TNF-
induces PP4 phosphorylation. HEK293T cells (1 × 106
cells in 100-mm dish) were transfected with 5 µg of Flag-PP4. After
40 h, the cells were labeled in phosphate-free DMEM supplemented
with 5% of dialyzed serum and 100 µCi/ml
[32P]orthophosphate for 4 h at 37 °C and treated
with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for the period of time indicated. Flag-PP4 was
immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag antibody (M2) and subjected to
SDS-PAGE. The separated proteins were transferred to PVDF, and
autoradiography was performed. B, TNF- -induced
phosphorylation occurs on serine and threonine residues of PP4. The
corresponding PP4 bands were cut from the PVDF membrane (A)
and subjected to phosphoamino acid analysis. The experiments were
repeated at least two times with similar results.
|
|
JNK Activation by TNF-
Is Blocked by PP4-RL--
To investigate
the functional involvement of PP4 in the TNF-
signaling, we examined
the contribution of PP4 to TNF-
-induced JNK activation. We first
constructed a PP4 mutant, PP4-RL, in which the replacement of arginine
236 with leucine resulted in the loss of its phosphatase activity (Fig.
4B). We then examined the
effect of PP4-RL on JNK activation by TNF-
. HEK293T cells were
transfected with HA-JNK1 alone or HA-JNK1 plus PP4-RL. The transfected
cells were treated with TNF-
(10 ng/ml) for 10 min. We found that
TNF-
-induced JNK activation was blocked by PP4-RL (Fig.
4A, upper panel), indicating that
PP4-RL may be a dominant-negative mutant and that PP4 plays a role in
JNK activation by TNF-
.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
JNK activation by TNF-
is blocked by a phosphatase-dead PP4 mutant, PP4-RL.
A, PP4-RL blocks TNF- -induced JNK activation. HEK293T
cells (1.5 × 105 cells in 35-mm wells) were
transfected with HA-JNK (0.1 µg) alone or HA-JNK plus PP4-RL (2µg).
Empty vector was used to normalize the amount of transfected DNA.
36 h after transfection, the cells were treated with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for 10 min. Cell lysates were prepared, HA-JNK1 was
immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody (12CA5), and immunocomplex
kinase assays were performed using GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate
(top panel). Expression levels of HA-JNK and
HA-PP4-RL were monitored by immunoblotting using an anti-HA antibody
(12CA5, lower panel). The experiments were
repeated three times with similar results. B, PP4-RL is a
phosphatase-dead mutant. HEK293T cells (1.0 × 106
cells in 100-mm dishes) were transfected with 10 µg of either PP4 or
HA-PP4-RL. The cells were collected 48 h after transfection. PP4
and HA-PP4-RL were immunoprecipitated with an anti-PP4 (Ab104) and an
anti-HA (12CA5) antibody, respectively. The immunoprecipitates were
then subjected to phosphatase assays (upper
panel). The amounts of immunoprecipitated PP4 and HA-PP4-RL
were monitored by Western blotting using an anti-PP4 antibody (Ab6101;
lower panel). The experiments were repeated at
least five times with similar results. C, TNF- -induced
JNK activation was inhibited in HEK293-PP4-RL cells. Parental HEK293
and HEK293-PP4-RL cells were seeded at a density of 4.5 × 106 cells in 100-mm dishes. After 24 h, the cells were
treated with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for various times. Cell lysates were
prepared, JNK1 was immunoprecipitated with an anti-JNK1 antibody
(Ab101), and immunocomplex kinase assays were performed using
GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate (left panel).
Cell lysates from parental HEK293 cells and a HA-PP4-RL stably
transfected clone, HEK293-PP4-RL, were subjected to SDS-PAGE and
Western blotting with an anti-PP4 antibody (Ab104) or an anti-HA
antibody (12CA5, right panel).
|
|
We also established a HEK293 cell clone, called HEK293-PP4-RL, that
stably expresses HA-PP4-RL (Fig. 4C, right
panel). HEK293-PP4-RL cells were treated with TNF-
(10 ng/ml) for various times (0 to 60 min), and endogenous JNK was
immunoprecipitated from the cells with an anti-JNK antibody (Ab101).
The JNK kinase activity was measured by immunocomplex kinase assays
using GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate. As shown in Fig. 4C
(left panel), a decrease in JNK activation by
TNF-
in HEK293-PP4-RL cells was detected, in comparison to the
parental HEK293 cells. Although JNK activation by TNF-
peaked at 10 min in HEK293T cells (Fig. 2C), TNF-
-induced JNK
activation peaked at 20 min in HEK293 cells (Fig. 4C,
left panel). This kinetic difference between
HEK293 and HEK293T cells may be the result of the presence of SV40
large T antigen in HEK293T cells. Taken together, these data indicate
that PP4 is required for transducing TNF-
signals to the JNK pathway.
PP4 Specifically Activates JNK, but Not p38 and ERK2--
To
confirm the involvement of PP4 in the JNK signaling pathway, we tested
whether expression of PP4 had any effect on the activity of JNK.
Hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged JNK1 was cotransfected in HEK293T cells with
PP4, PP1, another serine/threonine phosphatase, or M3/6, a
dual-specificity MAPK phosphatase. HA-JNK1 was immunoprecipitated, and
its kinase activity was determined in vitro using
GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate. Cotransfection of PP4 resulted in
activation of JNK1 (Fig. 5, lanes
1 and 2), whereas, PP1 and M3/6 had no such effect on
JNK1 (Fig. 5, lanes 1, 3, and 4). M3/6
is a known JNK-inactivating dual-specificity phosphatase, which
dephosphorylates the TPY motif of JNK (27, 37). Transiently transfected
JNK is somehow partially activated. Therefore, cotransfection of M3/6
with JNK resulted in inhibition of JNK activity, as expected. The
nature of the inhibition of JNK by PP1 is not known at this point. It
is likely that PP1 dephosphorylates the threonine residue of the TPY
motif of JNK and thus inhibits JNK activity. These data indicate that PP4 exerted a positive regulatory effect on JNK1.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
PP4 activates JNK in transient transfection
assay. HEK293T cells (1.5 × 105 cells in 35-mm
wells) were transfected with HA-JNK1 (0.1 µg) alone or with 2 µg of
PP4, PP1, or Myc-M3/6. Empty vector was used to normalize the amount of
transfected DNA. 36 h after transfection, the cell lysates were
prepared. HA-JNK1 was immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody
(12CA5), and immunocomplex kinase assays were performed using
GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate. Expression levels of HA-JNK1, PP4,
PP1, and Myc-M3/6 were monitored by immunoblotting using anti-HA
(12CA5), anti-PP4 (Ab104), anti-PP1, and anti-Myc antibodies,
respectively (bottom panels). The experiments
were repeated at least 10 times with similar results.
|
|
To determine whether PP4's effect on JNK1 is specific, we also
examined the effect of PP4 on p38 and ERK2. HEK293T cells were transfected with various amounts of the PP4 expression plasmid together
with the HA-tagged MAPK constructs, HA-JNK1, HA-p38, and HA-ERK2.
HA-tagged MAPKs were immunoprecipitated, and their kinase activities
were determined in vitro using the appropriate substrates
(GST-c-Jun for JNK1, GST-ATF2 for p38, and myelin basic protein
for ERK2). JNK was activated by PP4 in a dose-dependent manner by PP4 (Fig. 6A). In
contrast, PP4 had no significant effect on the activities of either p38
(Fig. 6B) or ERK2 (Fig. 6C). These data indicate
that PP4 serves as a specific positive regulator for the JNK signaling
pathway. We also found that PP4-RL had no effect on PKC-
-induced ERK
and MKK6-induced p38 activation (data not shown).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
PP4 specifically activates JNK, but not p38
and ERK2. A, HEK293T cells (1.5 × 105
cells in 35-mm wells) were transfected with HA-JNK1 (0.5 µg) alone or
HA-JNK1 plus various amounts of PP4 as indicated. Empty vector was used
to normalize the amount of transfected DNA. 36 h after
transfection, the cell lysates were prepared. HA-JNK1 was
immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody (12CA5), and immunocomplex
kinase assays were performed using GST-c-Jun-(1-79) as a substrate.
Expression levels of HA-JNK1 and PP4 were monitored by immunoblotting
using anti-HA (12CA5) and anti-PP4 antibodies, respectively
(bottom panels). The experiments were repeated at
least 10 times with similar results. B, HEK293T cells
(1.5 × 105 cells in 35-mm wells) were transfected
with HA-p38 (1 µg) alone, HA-p38 plus various amounts of PP4, or
HA-p38 plus 2 µg of HA-MKK6, as indicated. Empty vector was used to
normalize the amount of transfected DNA. 36 h after transfection,
the cell lysates were prepared. HA-p38 was precipitated with an anti-HA
antibody (12CA5), and immunocomplex kinase assays were performed using
GST-ATF2-(1-96) as a substrate. Expression levels of HA-p38, HA-MKK6,
and PP4 were monitored by immunoblotting using anti-HA (12CA5) and
anti-PP4 antibodies, respectively (bottom
panels). C, HEK293T cells (1.5 × 105 cells in 35-mm wells) were transfected with HA-ERK2 (1 µg) alone, HA-ERK2 plus various amounts of PP4, or HA-ERK2 plus 1 µg of HA-PKC- , as indicated. Empty vector was used to normalize
the amount of transfected DNA. 36 h after transfection, the cell
lysates were prepared. HA-ERK2 was precipitated with an anti-HA
antibody (12CA5), and immunocomplex kinase assays were performed using
myelin basic protein as a substrate. Expression levels of
HA-ERK2, HA-PKC- , and PP4 were monitored by immunoblotting using
anti-HA (12CA5) and anti-PP4 (Ab104) antibodies, respectively
(bottom panels).
|
|
We next wanted to determine whether PP4 and JNK1 interact directly with
each other. We incubated GST-JNK fusion protein with cell lysates from
untreated or TNF-
treated HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-PP4.
The potential PP4-JNK interaction was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western
blotting using an anti-Flag antibody (M2). Similar to transient
transfected Flag-PP4 in HEK293T cells (Fig. 3), stably expressed
Flag-PP4 in HEK293 cells was also inducibly phosphorylated after 5-min
treatment of TNF-
(Fig. 7A,
lower panel). Association of PP4 with GST-JNK was
not detectable (Fig. 7A, upper panel)
in the absence or presence of TNF-
. We also found that PP4 had no
phosphatase activity toward in vitro phosphorylated GST-JNK
(data not shown). Under the same conditions, however, M3/6, a
dual-specificity phosphatase known to target JNK directly, interacted
with GST-JNK (Fig. 7B). Taken together, these data suggest
that PP4 affects the JNK pathway in an indirect manner.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
PP4 does not interact with JNK in
vitro. A, no PP4-JNK association was
detected in vitro. HEK293 cells stably transfected with
Flag-PP4 (10F1 clone) were seeded at 4 × 106
cells/100-mm dish and treated with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for 5 min the
next day. 600 µg of lysate from either TNF- -treated or untreated
10F1 HEK293 cells was incubated with GST or GST-JNK fusion protein
immobilized onto glutathione-agarose beads for 2 h at 4 °C. The
PP4-JNK interaction was analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-Flag
antibody (M2) to detect Flag-PP4 bound to GST-JNK after SDS-PAGE
(upper panel). The GST and GST-JNK were monitored
by immunoblotting with an anti-GST antibody (middle
panel). The experiments were repeated three times with
similar results. To assure Flag-PP4 was in a phosphorylated state, 10F1
HEK293 cells were labeled in the phosphate-free DMEM supplemented with
5% of dialyzed serum and 100 µCi/ml
[32P]orthophosphate for 4 h at 37 °C and treated
with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for 5 min. Flag-PP4 was immunoprecipitated with
an anti-Flag antibody (M2) and subjected to SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. The experiments were repeated two times with similar
results. B, M3/6 associates with JNK in vitro.
GST or GST-JNK fusion protein was immobilized on glutathione-agarose
beads and incubated with 600 µg of lysate from HEK293T cells
transiently transfected with Myc-M3/6 for 2 h at 4 °C. The
M3/6-JNK interaction was analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-Myc
antibody to detect Myc-M3/6 bound to GST-SAPK after SDS-PAGE
(upper panel). The GST and GST-SAPK were
monitored by immunoblotting with an anti-GST antibody (lower
panel).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
TNF-
is an important effector cytokine for inflammatory and
immune responses and is involved in many important cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (38). A variety
of protein phosphatases have been implicated in TNF-
signaling. For
example, calcineurin, a calcium-dependent serine/threonine phosphatase, participates in TNF-
-mediated apoptosis in rat hepatoma cells (39) and SHP-2, a Src homology 2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase, mediates the induction of interleukin-6 by TNF-
through
modulation of the NF-
B pathway (40). Another phosphotyrosine phosphatase, SHP-1, has been shown to mediate TNF-
's inhibitory effect on vascular endothelial cell growth factor-induced endothelial cell proliferation (41). PP2A has also been shown to be involved in
many TNF-
-induced cellular processes (42-45). However, many of
these studies relied on the use of okadaic acid, an inhibitor for PP1
and PP2A. Because okadaic acid inhibits PP4 with an IC50 comparable with that of PP2A (17), it is necessary to reexamine some of
the functions assigned to PP2A. We provide evidence here that PP4, a
novel member of the PP2A family, was activated by TNF-
in HEK293T
cells, as indicated by increased phosphatase activity, and increased
serine and threonine phosphorylation of PP4 itself. The involvement of
PP4 in TNF-
signaling was further demonstrated by the observation
that a PP4 mutant blocked TNF-
-induced JNK activation. Demonstration
of the involvement of PP4 in TNF-
signaling will help in exploring
the molecular mechanism by which TNF-
regulates cellular processes.
We found that the activation of PP4 by TNF-
was accompanied by an
increase in the serine and threonine phosphorylation of PP4. These
results indicate the novel finding that a member of the PP2A family is
subject to regulation by serine phosphorylation. It has been known that
the catalytic subunit of PP2A is subject to phosphorylation of a
conserved tyrosine and an as yet unidentified threonine (46-48), and
that phosphorylation of either the tyrosine or the threonine site
inhibits phosphatase activity of PP2A in vitro. However, in
human hepatoma Hep3B cells, interleukin-6 induced an increase in both
the phosphorylation and phosphatase activity of PP2A (39). The nature
of PP4 serine and threonine phosphorylation in response to TNF-
remains unknown at this point. We noted that PP4 phosphorylation
preceded PP4 activation in response to TNF-
(5 min versus
10 min). Considering the existence of multiple potential phosphorylation sites on PP4, we speculate that PP4 may be subject to
multiple phosphorylation in response to TNF-
, and it is the phosphorylation that occurred at 10 min, but not at 5 min, that contributes to activation of PP4. Further study, including
identification of the phosphorylation site(s) and characterization of
site-directed mutants of PP4, is required to understand the
relationship between the phosphorylation, which occurred at 5 min, and
PP4 activation. Alternatively, we cannot exclude the possibility that
PP4 phosphorylation precedes PP4 activation by inducing conformational
change(s) and/or recruiting some regulatory subunits required for the
activation of PP4.
Phosphorylation-dependent inactivation is characteristic of
many types of protein kinases, such as DNA-dependent
protein kinase (49), phosphoinositide 3 kinase (50), Raf-1 (51-53),
and CLK1 (54). It has been shown that PP2A dephosphorylates the
inhibitory phosphoserine residue 259 of Raf-1 and thus serves as a
positive regulator for Raf-1, an upstream activating kinase for the ERK pathway (55). Raf-1 and MEK1/2, another upstream activating kinase for
the ERK pathway, are positively regulated by MAPK phosphatase 1, a
dual-specificity phosphatase, in an ERK-independent manner (15). We
provide evidence here that PP4 acts as a specific positive regulator
for the JNK pathway. However, we did not detect a direct interaction
between PP4 and JNK1, strongly suggesting that PP4 exerts its positive
regulatory effect on the JNK pathway in an indirect manner. Given the
fact that the core of the JNK signaling pathway is a multiple-kinase
module that is assembled by scaffold proteins to act as a
stimulus-specific signaling complex (7-9), and that the magnitude and
duration of JNK activation are tightly controlled by the coordinate
actions of protein kinases and protein phosphatases (12), we speculate
that PP4 may target and activate the JNK upstream activating kinase(s),
which is negatively regulated by phosphorylation, and subsequently
leads to JNK activation. The target for PP4 could be a kinase at one or
multiple levels of the JNK signaling cascade.
In addition to regulation of upstream activating kinases, we cannot
exclude the possibility that PP4 may target a phosphatase which
inhibits JNK, and thus exert an indirect positive effect on the JNK
pathway. This putative JNK phosphatase may be activated by
phosphorylation, and hence inactivated by dephosphorylation. Because
only JNK, but not p38 or ERK, is activated by PP4, the putative
phosphatase should also be JNK-specific. Inhibition of this
JNK-specific phosphatase by PP4-mediated dephosphorylation would then
lead to JNK activation. Therefore, some JNK-specific, dual-specificity
phosphatases, such as M3/6 (37), may be good candidates for PP4 targets.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank our colleagues for providing
valuable reagents, members of the Tan laboratory for helpful
discussions and critical reading of the manuscript, Dr. C. H. McDonald for assistance in phosphoamino acid analysis, A. Ashtari for
technical assistance, and S. Robertson for secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants AI-38649 and AI-42532 (both to T.-H. T.) and CA-41424 (to B. R. B.) and by United States Army Breast Cancer Research
Program Predoctoral Fellowships DAMD 17-011-0139 (to K. A. M.) and DAMD 17-00-1-0141 (to R. A. M.-C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These authors contributed equally to this work.
**
Scholar of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. To whom
correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, M929, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-798-4665; Fax: 713-798-3033; E-mail:
ttan@bcm.tmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 6, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107014200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
TNF-
, tumor necrosis factor-
;
PP4, protein phosphatase 4;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PKC, protein kinase C;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
PCM, pericentriolar matrix;
MKK, MAPK kinase;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
TBST, Tris-buffered
saline plus Tween 20;
DAPI, 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole;
PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride;
NF-
B, nuclear factor
B.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hunter, T.
(1995)
Cell
80,
225-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Tonks, N. K.,
and Neel, B. G.
(1996)
Cell
87,
365-368[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(2000)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
57,
1172-1183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Evans, D. R.,
and Hemmings, B. A.
(1998)
Nature
394,
23-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Schillace, R. V.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
761-765[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Parsons, R.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
10,
88-91[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Ip, Y. T.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
205-219[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Widmann, C.,
Gibson, S.,
Jarpe, M. B.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
143-180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Chen, Y.-R.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(2000)
Int. J. Oncol.
16,
651-662[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Fanger, G. R.,
Gerwins, P.,
Widmann, C.,
Jarpe, M. B.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7,
67-74[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Camps, M.,
Nichols, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(2000)
FASEB J.
14,
6-16[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Keyse, S. M.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
186-192[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
Gomez, N.,
Moorhead, G.,
Lewis, T.,
Keyse, S. M.,
and Cohen, P.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
283-295[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Takekawa, M.,
Maeda, T.,
and Saito, H.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4744-4752[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Shapiro, P. S.,
and Ahn, N. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1788-1793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Brewis, N. D.,
and Cohen, P. T.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1171,
231-233[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Brewis, N. D.,
Street, A. J.,
Prescott, A. R.,
and Cohen, P. T.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
987-996[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Hastie, C. J.,
Carnegie, G. K.,
Morrice, N.,
and Cohen, P. T.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
347,
845-855
|
| 19.
|
Hu, M. C.-T.,
Tang-Oxley, Q.,
Qiu, W. R.,
Wang, Y.-P.,
Mihindukulasuriya, K. A.,
Afshar, R.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33561-33565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Kloeker, S.,
Bryant, J. C.,
Strack, S.,
Colbran, R. J.,
and Wadzinski, B. E.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
327,
481-486
|
| 21.
|
Chen, J.,
Peterson, R. T.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
247,
827-832[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Nanahoshi, M.,
Tsujishita, Y.,
Tokunaga, C.,
Inui, S.,
Sakaguchi, N.,
Hara, K.,
and Yonezawa, K.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
446,
108-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Kloeker, S.,
and Wadzinski, B. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5339-5347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Hu, M. C.-T.,
Qiu, W. R.,
Wang, X.,
Meyer, C. F.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2251-2264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Mack, G. J.,
Rees, J.,
Sandblom, O.,
Balczon, R.,
Fritzler, M. J.,
and Rattner, J. B.
(1998)
Arthritis Rheum.
41,
551-558[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Jaramillo-Babb, V. L.,
Sugarmans, J. L.,
Scavetta, R.,
Wang, S. J.,
Berndt, N.,
Born, T. L.,
Glass, C. K.,
and Schonthal, A. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5988-5992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Theodosiou, A. M.,
Rodrigues, N. R.,
Nesbit, M. A.,
Ambrose, H. J.,
Paterson, H.,
McLellan-Arnold, E.,
Boyd, Y.,
Leversha, M. A.,
Owen, N.,
Blake, D. J.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Davies, K. E.
(1996)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5,
675-684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Wang, W.,
Zhou, G., Hu, M. C.-T.,
Yao, Z.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22771-22775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Zhou, G.,
Lee, S. C.,
Yao, Z.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13133-13138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Ling, P.,
Yao, Z.,
Meyer, C. F.,
Wang, X. S.,
Oehrl, W.,
Feller, S. M.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1359-1368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Chen, Y.-R.,
Meyer, C. F.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
631-634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Wigley, W. C.,
Fabunmi, R. P.,
Lee, M. G.,
Marino, C. R.,
Muallem, S.,
DeMartino, G. N.,
and Thomas, P. J.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
481-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Fabunmi, R. P.,
Wigley, W. C.,
Thomas, P. J.,
and DeMartino, G. N.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
409-413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Van Hooser, A.,
and Brinkley, W. R.
(1999)
Methods Cell Biol.
61,
57-80[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Zhou, G.,
Seibenhener, M. L.,
and Wooten, M. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31130-31137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Yao, Z.,
Zhou, G.,
Wang, X. S.,
Brown, A.,
Diener, K.,
Gan, H.,
and Tan, T.-H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2118-2125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Muda, M.,
Theodosiou, A.,
Rodrigues, N.,
Boschert, U.,
Camps, M.,
Gillieron, C.,
Davies, K.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Arkinstall, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27205-27208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Wallach, D.,
Varfolomeev, E. E.,
Malinin, N. L.,
Goltsev, Y. V.,
Kovalenko, A. V.,
and Boldin, M. P.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
17,
331-367[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kantrow, S. P.,
Gierman, J. L.,
Jaligam, V. R.,
Zhang, P.,
Piantadosi, C. A.,
Summer, W. R.,
and Lancaster, J. R., Jr.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
483,
119-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
You, M.,
Flick, L. M., Yu, D.,
and Feng, G. S.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
193,
101-110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Guo, D. Q., Wu, L. W.,
Dunbar, J. D.,
Ozes, O. N.,
Mayo, L. D.,
Kessler, K. M.,
Gustin, J. A.,
Baerwald, M. R.,
Jaffe, E. A.,
Warren, R. S.,
and Donner, D. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11216-11221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Wright, S. C.,
Zheng, H.,
Zhong, J.,
Torti, F. M.,
and Larrick, J. W.
(1993)
J. Cell. Biochem.
53,
222-233[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Liu, X. H.,
Blazsek, I.,
Comisso, M.,
Legras, S.,
Marion, S.,
Quittet, P.,
Anjo, A.,
Wang, G. S.,
and Misset, J. L.
(1995)
Eur. J. Cancer
31A,
953-963[CrossRef]
|
| 44.
|
Sontag, E.,
Sontag, J. M.,
and Garcia, A.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5662-5671[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Uh, S.,
Van Linden, A.,
and Riches, D. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
793-800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Guo, H.,
and Damuni, Z.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2500-2504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Chen, J.,
Martin, B. L.,
and Brautigan, D. L.
(1992)
Science
257,
1261-1264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Chen, J.,
Parsons, S.,
and Brautigan, D. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7957-7962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Chan, D. W.,
and Lees-Miller, S. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8936-8941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Dhand, R.,
Hiles, I.,
Panayotou, G.,
Roche, S.,
Fry, M. J.,
Gout, I.,
Totty, N. F.,
Truong, O.,
Vicendo, P.,
and Yonezawa, K.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
522-533[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Morrison, D. K.,
Heidecker, G.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Copeland, T. D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
17309-17316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Mischak, H.,
Seitz, T.,
Janosch, P.,
Eulitz, M.,
Steen, H.,
Schellerer, M.,
Philipp, A.,
and Kolch, W.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5409-5418[Abstract]
|
| 53.
|
Tzivion, G.,
Luo, Z.,
and Avruch, J.
(1998)
Nature
394,
88-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Menegay, H. J.,
Myers, M. P.,
Moeslein, F. M.,
and Landreth, G. E.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
3241-3253[Abstract]
|
| 55.
|
Abraham, D.,
Podar, K.,
Pacher, M.,
Kubicek, M.,
Welzel, N.,
Hemmings, B. A.,
Dilworth, S. M.,
Mischak, H.,
Kolch, W.,
and Baccarini, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
22300-22304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike