![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 8, 6733-6742, February 22, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 Protein p16.7,
Involved in
29 DNA Replication, Is a Membrane-localized
Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein*
,From the Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Received for publication, September 26, 2001, and in revised form, November 19, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The functional role of the Studies on DNA replication and related processes have provided
detailed insights in the function of many proteins involved in these
processes (for review, see Ref. 1). Despite this, little is known about
the in vivo organization of DNA replication. To gain a
better insight in this fundamental process, we studied the in
vivo DNA replication of the Bacillus subtilis
bacteriophage The genome of
29-encoded integral
membrane protein p16.7 in phage DNA replication was studied using a
soluble variant, p16.7A, lacking the N-terminal membrane-spanning
domain. Because of the protein-primed mechanism of DNA replication, the bacteriophage
29 replication intermediates contain long stretches of
single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Protein p16.7A was found to be an
ssDNA-binding protein. In addition, by direct and functional analysis
we show that protein p16.7A binds to the stretches of ssDNA of the
29 DNA replication intermediates. Properties of protein p16.7A were
compared with those of the
29-encoded single-stranded DNA-binding
protein p5. The results obtained show that both proteins have
different, non-overlapping functions. The likely role of p16.7 in
attaching
29 DNA replication intermediates to the membrane of the
infected cell is discussed. Homologues of gene 16.7 are present in
29-related phages, suggesting that the proposed role of p16.7 is
conserved in this family of phages.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
29 (2). The detailed knowledge of its in
vitro mechanism of DNA replication (for reviews, see Refs. 3 and
4) made
29 an attractive system for this study.
29 is a linear double-stranded DNA
(dsDNA)1 of 19,285 base pairs
that contains a terminal protein (TP) covalently linked at each 5' end.
Fig. 1A shows a schematic
representation of the genetic and transcriptional organization of the
29 genome. Regulation of
29 DNA transcription, which can be
divided into an early and a late stage, has been studied extensively
in vivo as well as in vitro (for reviews, see
Refs. 3 and 5). The late expressed genes, all transcribed from a single
operon present in the central part of the genome, encode the structural
proteins of the phage, proteins involved in morphogenesis, and those
required for lysis of the infected cell. The early expressed genes are present in two operons that flank the late operon. The early operon located at the left side of the
29 genome encodes the
transcriptional regulator protein p4 and various proteins that are
directly involved in phage DNA replication, such as the DNA polymerase,
TP, single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB), double-stranded
DNA-binding protein, and protein p1. The operon located at the right
side of the
29 genome encodes, in addition to proteins p17 and
p16.7, four putative proteins of unknown function.

View larger version (59K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the genetic and
transcriptional organization of the
29 genome
and its in vitro DNA replication mechanism.
A, genetic and transcription map of phage
29 DNA. The
direction of transcription and length of the transcripts are indicated
by arrows. Positions of the various genes, indicated with
numbers, are shown between the two DNA strands. The proteins
relevant for this work are indicated. The positions of the open reading
frames 16.9, 16.8, 16.6, and 16.5, located at the right side of the
29 genome, are indicated with the numbers .9,
.8, .6, and .5, respectively. TD1,
position of a bidirectional transcriptional terminator. Filled
circles represent the covalently linked
29 terminal protein.
The map is adapted from Mellado et al. (37). DBP,
dsDNA-binding protein. B, Mechanism of in vitro
29 DNA replication. See the introduction for details.
Circles and triangles represent TP and DNA
polymerase, respectively. Synthesized DNA strands are indicated with
broken lines. Adapted from Meijer et al. (2).
A schematic overview of the in vitro
29 DNA replication
mechanism is shown in Fig. 1B. Initiation of
29 DNA
replication occurs via a so-called protein-primed mechanism (reviewed
in Refs. 3, 4, and 6). The TP-containing DNA ends constitute the origins of replication. Initiation of DNA replication starts by recognition of the origin by a heterodimer formed by the
29 DNA polymerase and the primer TP. The DNA polymerase then catalyzes the
addition of the first dAMP to the primer TP. Next, after a transition
step, these two proteins dissociate, and the DNA polymerase continues
processive elongation until replication of the nascent DNA strand is
completed. Replication, which starts at both DNA ends, is coupled to
strand displacement. This results in the generation of so-called type I
replication intermediates consisting of full-length double-stranded
29 DNA molecules with one or more single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)
branches of varying lengths. When the two converging DNA polymerases
merge, a type I replication intermediate becomes physically separated
into two type II replication intermediates. Each of these consists of a
full-length
29 DNA molecule in which a portion of the DNA, starting
from one end, is double-stranded, and the portion spanning to the other
end is single-stranded.
Over the last decades convincing evidence has been presented that
replication of bacterial genomes, including that of resident plasmids
and infecting phages, occurs at the bacterial cell membrane (for
review, see Ref. 7). Also, replication of
29 DNA takes place at the
membrane of the infected cell (2, 8, 9). Gene 16.7, present in the
early expressed operon located at the right side of the
29 genome
(see Fig. 1A), encodes an integral membrane protein of 130 amino acids. The efficiency of in vivo
29 DNA replication
is affected in the absence of protein p16.7 (10). In this work we
analyzed the functional role of p16.7 in
29 DNA replication using
purified p16.7A, a soluble variant of p16.7 lacking the N-terminal
transmembrane-spanning domain. We found that protein p16.7A can
functionally substitute the
29 SSB p5 in in vitro
29 DNA amplification assays, suggesting that it is a ssDNA-binding
protein. This inference was further supported by direct assays such as
electron microscopy and gel retardation studies. Thus, in addition to a
classical SSB p5,
29 encodes a membrane-localized ssDNA-binding
protein. Contrary to the SSB p5, p16.7A has no helix-destabilizing
activity, and p16.7 is not synthesized in stoichiometric amounts in
infected cells. These and other results show that p16.7 and SSB p5 have
non-overlapping functions. Based on the properties determined in this
work together with the features described before, it is most likely
that p16.7 attaches
29 DNA to the membrane of the infected cells by
binding to the stretches of ssDNA present in the replication intermediates.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial Strains, Bacteriophages, and Growth Conditions--
B. subtilis 110NA (trpC2, spoOA3,
su
(11)) was used as the non-suppressor strain
for
29 infections. Cells, grown at 37 °C in LB medium
supplemented with 5 mM MgSO4, were infected
with phage
29 mutant sus14(1242) (12) at a multiplicity of infection of 5. Phage
29 sus14(1242) contains a suppressor-sensitive mutation in gene 14 that encodes the holin gene. As a consequence, cell lysis is
delayed, which allowed determination of the amounts of p16.7 and SSB at
late stages in the infection cycle. The mutation has no effect on phage
DNA replication or phage morphogenesis and, therefore, is considered as
wild-type phage in these studies. Escherichia coli strain
JM109 (F' traD36 lacIq
(lacZ)M15
proA+B+/e14
(McrA
)
(lac-proAB) thi gyrA96
(Nalr) endA1 hsdR17
(rk
mk+) relA1
supE44 recA1) harboring plasmid pUSH16.7A (10) was used for
overexpression of protein p16.7A.
DNA Techniques--
All DNA manipulations were carried out
according to Sambrook et al. (13).
[
-32P]ATP and [
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) were obtained from Amersham Biosciences, Inc. DNA fragments
were isolated from agarose gels using the Qiaex gel extraction kit
(Qiagen, Inc., Chatsworth, CA).
PCR Techniques-- PCR reactions were carried out with proofreading-proficient Vent DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) using conditions as described before (10). Oligonucleotides were purchased from Isogen Bioscience BV (Maarsen, The Netherlands).
Overexpression and Purification of p16.7A-- Protein p16.7A was overexpressed and purified using a Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin column as described before (10).
29 Protein-primed Initiation, TP-DNA Replication, and
Amplification Assays--
These assays were performed as described
before (14). The reaction mixtures of the
29 TP-DNA replication
assays contained the indicated amount of protein p16.7A or SSB p5. The
amplification assays were stopped after an incubation period of 20 min.
Psoralen Cross-linking and Spreading of DNA Molecules for Electron Microscopy-- Replication reactions were carried out in the absence or in the presence of p16.7A or SSB p5 as described below. After 30 min at 30 °C the samples were stopped by adding 0.05 volumes of 4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen (200 µg/ml in 100% ethanol) on ice. The samples were then irradiated with 366-nm UV light on ice for 1 h with 2 psoralen additions, as described by Sogo and Thoma (15). These cross-linking conditions were sufficient to produce essentially complete cross-linking of the DNA molecules in the absence of protein. After psoralen cross-linking, the samples were digested with proteinase K (500 µg/ml) for 2 h at 56 °C and extracted with phenol, and the DNA was precipitated with ethanol. Denaturation and spreading of the psoralen cross-linked DNA for electron microscopy were carried out according the BAC technique, as described by Sogo et al. (16). Electron micrographs were taken with a Philips 420 electron microscope at 80 kV, routinely at a magnification of 20,000-fold.
Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
Unless stated otherwise, the
incubation mixtures contained, in a final volume of 20 µl, 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 4% Ficoll 400, 1 mM EDTA,
0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 10 mM dithiothreitol, the
indicated labeled DNA fragment, and the indicated amount of protein
p16.7A or
29 SSB p5. After incubation for 10 min at 4 °C, the
samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 4% non-denaturing polyacrylamide (80:1) gels containing 12 mM Tris acetate,
pH 7.5, and 1 mM EDTA and run at 4 °C using a running
buffer containing 12 mM Tris acetate, pH 7.5, and 1 mM EDTA at 70 V for 6 h. Next, the gels were dried and autoradiographed.
Glycerol Gradients--
Twenty µg of protein p16.7A was
subjected to a 15-30% linear glycerol gradient containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, and 7 mM
-mercaptoethanol and run as described before (14). After fractionation of the gradient, aliquots of each fraction were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and gel retardation assays.
Oligonucleotide Degradation and Helix Destabilization
Assays--
Oligonucleotide degradation assays and the helix
destabilization assays, the latter using 125 ng of primed M13mp18 DNA,
were carried out as described by Gascón et al. (17).
Oligonucleotide
40 Universal and the same with a 5' (5 thymidines) or a 3' (5 adenines) extension were end-labeled with
T4-polynucleotide kinase using [
-32P]ATP for 1 h
at 37 °C.
Preparation of Crude Cell Extracts, Western Blot, and
Quantification of p16.7A and SSB p5--
To determine the
intracellular levels of the viral proteins p16.7 and SSB throughout the
course of the
29 infection cycle, B. subtilis cells were
infected with phage
29 mutant sus14(1242) as described above. At
different times after infection, 1.5-ml samples were withdrawn and
processed as described before (10). Known amounts (ng) of the
corresponding purified proteins (p16.7A or SSB p5) were run in the same
gel to determine the standard curve. Polyclonal antisera from rabbits
against
29 p16.7 or against
29 SSB p5 were diluted 2,500 and
1,000 times, respectively.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein p16.7A Has No Effect On in Vitro
29 DNA Initiation of
Replication--
Previous results show that the absence of protein
p16.7 affects the efficiency of in vivo
29 DNA
replication, especially at early infection times (10). Protein p16.7
might stimulate
29 DNA replication by enhancing the rate-limiting
step of initiation of DNA replication. To study this possibility
in vitro,
29 DNA replication initiation assays were
performed in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of purified
p16.7A. Although efficient initiation requires the presence of
29
template TP-DNA, the DNA polymerase is also able to carry out the
TP-deoxynucleotidylation reaction in the absence of TP-DNA (18).
Therefore, in vitro
29 DNA initiation experiments were
performed in reaction mixtures either lacking or containing template
TP-DNA and in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of protein
p16.7A. No significant effect of p16.7A on the initiation reactions was
obtained (not shown), indicating that p16.7A plays no role in the
in vitro initiation of
29 DNA replication.
Protein p16.7A Can Functionally Substitute the SSB p5 in
29 DNA
Amplification Assays--
The possibility that p16.7A has a role in
29 DNA replication after the initiation step was analyzed by
studying the possible effects of protein p16.7A in an in
vitro
29 DNA amplification system. This system, which allows
the amplification of very low amounts of
29 template DNA, requires
the following four
29-encoded proteins: DNA polymerase, TP,
double-stranded DNA-binding protein p6, and the SSB p5 (19). It has
been described that omission of SSB p5 from the reaction mixtures
results in the generation (19) and amplification (20) of short
29
DNA products. Esteban et al. (20) demonstrated that the
short
29 DNA products are of palindromic nature and that they are
caused by a DNA polymerase template-switching event during replication.
Binding of SSB p5 to the displaced stretches of ssDNA present in type I
DNA replication intermediates avoids the DNA polymerase to switch
template, thus preventing the generation of short DNA products.
Interestingly, we found that the addition of increasing amounts of
protein p16.7A to reaction mixtures lacking SSB p5 resulted in the
synthesis of increasing amounts of full-sized
29 DNA and a
concomitant decrease in the amounts of short DNA products (Fig.
2). In fact, the generation of the short
DNA products was fully prevented when the reaction mixtures contained
14 or 28 µM protein p16.7A. These results show that,
under the conditions tested, the presence of protein p16.7A prevents
the DNA polymerase from switching template and, therefore, that it can
functionally substitute the SSB p5. The most likely explanation for
these results is that the p16.7A protein binds to the stretches of
displaced ssDNA present in the type I replication intermediates. The
amount of full-sized
29 DNA synthesized in the presence of 14 or 28 µM protein p16.7A is slightly lower than that compared in
the presence of 7 µM. Probably, this decrease is due to
binding of protein p16.7A to double-stranded
29 template DNA at
these elevated p16.7A concentrations (see below), causing a
small effect on the efficiency of the
29 DNA amplification.
|
Protein p16.7A Protects the Displaced ssDNA from Psoralen
Cross-linking--
Psoralen can cross-link portions of a dsDNA
molecule that are free of protein (15) as well as folded-back regions
in ssDNA (21). The presence of the
29 SSB p5 was shown to prevent
the displaced ssDNA of the
29 DNA replication intermediates from psoralen cross-linking, demonstrating that it binds to ssDNA (22-24). To study whether protein p16.7A indeed binds to the ssDNA portions of
29 DNA replication intermediates, as indicated by the results of the
29 DNA amplification assays described above, we used the psoralen
cross-linking technique. Thus,
29 DNA replication reactions, carried
out in the absence or presence of either protein p16.7A or SSB p5, were
treated with psoralen as described under "Materials and Methods."
Next, after the reaction products were treated with proteinase K,
extracted with phenol, and purified, they were spread under denaturing
conditions and analyzed by electron microscopy. As expected, in all
three samples full-length dsDNA molecules with one or more ssDNA tails
(type I) and full-length DNA molecules formed by a dsDNA portion of
variable length from one DNA end plus an ssDNA portion spanning to the
other DNA end (type II) were observed. A representative type I
replication intermediate of each sample is shown in Fig.
3. As described before (22-24), the
displaced ssDNA regions of replication intermediates produced in the
absence (Fig. 3A) or the presence of SSB p5 (Fig.
3C) appeared as collapsed and well unfolded structures,
respectively. Fig. 3B shows that the ssDNA portions in
replication intermediates produced in the presence of protein p16.7A
also had a well unfolded structure. These results, therefore, show that
protein p16.7A, like the SSB p5, prevents the ssDNA from psoralen
cross-linking, demonstrating that it binds to the ssDNA portions of the
replication intermediates generated during
29 DNA replication.
|
Protein p16.7A Has Higher Affinity for ssDNA Than the SSB
p5--
Binding of p16.7A to ssDNA was further analyzed by gel
mobility shift assays. For this purpose, the 175-base pair right-end fragment of the
29 genome was end-labeled with 32P (see
"Materials and Methods"), heat-denatured, and used in gel retardation assays in the absence or presence of increasing amounts of
purified protein p16.7A. Although retardation of the ssDNA fragment was
observed in the presence of 45 nM p16.7A, full retardation of all the ssDNA molecules required a p16.7A concentration of 360 nM (Fig. 4A).
Similar results were obtained with various other DNA fragments (results
not shown). To gain an insight in the global ssDNA binding of p16.7A
compared with that of the well studied
29 protein p5, the experiment
shown in Fig. 4A was carried out in parallel using purified
SSB p5. Whereas in agreement with previously published results
(25-27), some retardation of part of the ssDNA molecules occurred in
the presence of 3.3 µM SSB p5, full retardation of all
the ssDNA molecules required a concentration of 13.3 µM (Fig. 4B). Together, these results show that the ssDNA
binding activity of p16.7A is about 50 times higher than that of the
29 SSB. To study possible binding of protein p16.7A to dsDNA, the same fragment of the
29 genome used in Fig. 4, A and
B, but in its double-stranded form, was used in gel
retardation assays. The results, presented in Fig. 4C, show
that p16.7A binds to dsDNA, although the amount of p16.7A required to
obtain full retardation of all the dsDNA molecules was about 20-fold
higher than that required to bind the same DNA molecules in their
single-stranded form. The observation that a smear of retarded DNA
species is observed at low p16.7A concentrations (45-180 and 180-720
nM for ss- and dsDNA, respectively) indicates that the
nucleoprotein complex formed at these concentrations is rather
unstable. In addition, the increasing mobility shift caused by the
various concentrations of p16.7A protein analyzed suggests the binding of more than one protein molecule per DNA molecule. This inference is
further supported by the findings that a considerable amount of protein
p16.7A is required (i) to prevent the generation of short ssDNA
products in amplification assays lacking the SSB p5 (see above)
and (ii) to cover the complete circular M13 ssDNA in order to prevent
binding of the
29 DNA polymerase (see below).
|
To confirm that the observed retardation was due to protein p16.7A and not to a possible minor contaminant, the purified p16.7A protein was subjected to a glycerol gradient, after which aliquots of the gradient were analyzed for ssDNA binding by gel retardation. The results presented in Fig. 4D show that the ssDNA binding activity was restricted to those fractions that contained protein p16.7A.
Protein p16.7A Binds to Circular ssDNA--
The following approach
was used to study possible binding of p16.7A to circular ssDNA. The
29 DNA polymerase has strong affinity for naked ssDNA (28) but does
not bind ssDNA when it is covered with the SSB p5 (17, 23). In
addition, free
29 DNA polymerase, but not when bound to M13 ssDNA,
can degrade a single-stranded oligonucleotide due to its 3'-5'
exonucleolytic activity. M13 DNA that is complexed with an
ssDNA-binding protein, therefore, is unable to trap the
29 DNA
polymerase, which can be measured by the 3'-5' exonucleolytic activity.
Thus,
29 DNA polymerase was added to either naked M13 ssDNA or the
M13 ssDNA that was preincubated with increasing amounts of protein
p16.7A. Then, 1 min after a 5' labeled oligonucleotide was added to the
mixtures, samples were analyzed for degradation of the oligonucleotide. The assays were carried out in parallel using SSB p5. Fig.
5 shows, as expected, that the
oligonucleotide was degraded by the
29 DNA polymerase when the M13
ssDNA trap was omitted (lane 2), but it was not degraded
when the reaction mixtures contained naked M13 ssDNA (lane
3). In agreement with previously published results (17),
preincubation of the M13 ssDNA with increasing amounts of SSB p5
resulted in increasing levels of degradation of the oligonucleotide
(lanes 4-7). Similar results were obtained when the M13
ssDNA had been preincubated with protein p16.7A (lanes 9-12). The oligonucleotide was not degraded when it was only
incubated with the highest concentration of SSB p5 or p16.7A
(lanes 8 and 13, respectively). This excludes the
possibility that the observed degradation of the oligonucleotide would
be the consequence of a contaminant exonuclease in the purified protein
preparations. These results, therefore, indicate that protein p16.7A
binds to circular M13 ssDNA and that this prevents it from
29 DNA
polymerase binding.
|
Protein p16.7A Has No Helix-destabilizing Activity and Has No
Stimulatory Effect On in Vitro
29 TP-DNA Replication--
Possible
helix destabilization activity of protein p16.7A was studied by its
ability to displace a 5'-labeled 17-mer oligonucleotide hybridized to
its complementary sequence in circular M13 ssDNA molecules. This
substrate was incubated without or with increasing amounts of protein
p16.7A, after which the samples were analyzed by polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. The experiments were carried out in parallel using
29 SSB p5. As shown in Fig. 6,
incubation in the absence of protein did not result in release of the
labeled oligonucleotide, indicating that the hybrid substrate was
stable throughout the experiment. In agreement with previously
published results (17, 24), the
29 SSB p5 was able to displace the labeled oligonucleotide from the M13 DNA. However, no displacement of
the oligonucleotide was detected when the hybrid substrate was
incubated with protein p16.7A up to a concentration of 112 µM. To facilitate the oligonucleotide displacement, these
assays were also performed using an oligonucleotide that contained, in addition to the 17 complementary nucleotides, either a
non-complementary 5'- (5 thymidines) or a 3'- (5 adenines) tail.
Contrary to the SSB p5, protein p16.7A was also unable to displace
these oligonucleotides (results not shown). Because protein p16.7A is
able to bind M13 ssDNA (see above), these results strongly
suggest that protein p16.7A has no helix-destabilizing activity.
|
The
29-encoded TP and the DNA polymerase are the only two proteins
required in a minimal in vitro
29 DNA replication system (29). Contrary to the
29 DNA amplification system, the minimal replication system requires high concentrations of template TP-DNA and
is limited to one or two rounds of
29 DNA replication. To study a
possible effect of protein p16.7A in this system, in vitro
29 DNA replication assays were performed in the absence or presence of protein p16.7A using the SSB p5 as a control. The amount of incorporated [
-32P]dAMP was determined (Fig.
7A), after which the samples
were subjected to alkaline-agarose gel electrophoresis to determine the
size of the synthesized DNA (Fig. 7B). As reported
previously (23, 25), the SSB p5 stimulated the in vitro
29 DNA replication, especially at long incubation times. However, no
stimulatory effect on replication was observed in the presence of
protein p16.7A in this assay.
|
Relative Amounts of Protein p16.7 and SSB p5 Synthesized during the
Infection Cycle--
The intracellular amount of protein p16.7
accumulated in B. subtilis cells throughout the infection
cycle has been determined before by quantitative immunoblotting (10).
Although it has been described that the SSB p5 is one of the most
abundantly expressed
29-encoded proteins in infected cells (25), a
kinetic analysis of the accumulation of the SSB p5 during the infection
cycle had not been performed. We were especially interested in the
ratio between p16.7 and SSB p5 molecules per cell during the course of
the infection cycle. Thus, samples of a B. subtilis culture were withdrawn at different times after infection and used for quantitative immunoblotting using polyclonal antibodies against protein
p16.7 or against the
29 SSB p5. Fig.
8A shows the p16.7 and SSB p5
signals obtained in the Western blots. Both protein p16.7 and the SSB
p5 were detected as soon as 9 min after infection. Overexposure of the
blots shown in Fig. 8A and Western blots in which larger
amounts of cell extracts were used allowed the detection of both
proteins at 6 min after infection (results not shown). These latter
Western blots were used to determine the amounts of the accumulated
proteins at this early infection time (see below). In agreement
with earlier observations (10), the p16.7 level increased only
moderately during the middle stage of infection (10-30 min) and
remained almost constant at late infection times. On the contrary, a
great increase in the amount of accumulated SSB p5 was observed during
the middle stage of infection (10-30 min). Densitometric analyses of
the Western blot signals were used to calculate the number of protein
p16.7 and SSB p5 molecules per infected cell at the various times
analyzed (Fig. 8B). Whereas an infected cell contained a
maximum of about 180,000 molecules of p16.7, the SSB p5 reached levels
up to about 2 × 106. Fig. 8C shows that at
6 min after infection, the ratio between the SSB p5 and protein p16.7
is about 2, but this value increased rapidly during the next 10 min of
infection to a value of about 12.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
p16.7 Is a Membrane-localized, Dimeric, ssDNA-binding
Protein--
Here we demonstrated by functional and direct analysis
that protein p16.7A has high ssDNA binding activity and that it binds ssDNA without an apparent sequence preference. Thus, protein p16.7A is
an ssDNA-binding protein, and hence, the genome of
29 encodes for
two ssDNA-binding proteins, protein p16.7 and SSB p5. Previously, we
demonstrated that protein p16.7A forms dimers in solution, and in
vivo cross-linking experiments suggested that native p16.7 also
exists as a dimer in infected cells (10). In addition, we demonstrated
that the native protein p16.7 is an integral membrane protein and that
the N-terminal region of the protein, constituting a
transmembrane-spanning domain, is responsible for its membrane localization (2, 10). Together with the results obtained in this work,
we conclude that the native protein p16.7 is a membrane-localized, dimeric, ssDNA-binding protein. To the best of our knowledge this is
the first prokaryotic protein described with such characteristics.
29 Encodes for Two ssDNA-binding Proteins with Different
Characteristics--
In most systems SSBs stimulate DNA replication
(for reviews, see Refs. 1, 30, and 31). This stimulation is the result of direct and/or indirect effects that SSBs have on DNA replication. The direct effect, reported for several SSBs, involves specific interactions between the SSB and its cognate DNA polymerase. The indirect effect can be the consequence of one or more of the following mechanisms. First, in various prokaryotic and eukaryotic replication systems in which the DNA polymerase lacks strand displacement activity,
the SSB may help to load the helicase (for reviews, see Refs. 32 and
33). Second, upon binding, SSBs protect ssDNA from nuclease
degradation. Third, it prevents non-productive binding of the DNA
polymerase to ssDNA. Fourth, it prevents the formation of DNA secondary
structures, e.g. loops, hairpins, or triple helices, which
generally impede progression of the DNA polymerase. And finally,
cooperative binding of the SSB to the ssDNA strand reduces the energy
demand required for unwinding the dsDNA at the replication fork. Thus,
the helix destabilization activity inherited by many SSBs helps to
increase the DNA elongation rate.
Convincing evidence has been provided that the
29 gene 5, present in
the early expressed operon located in the left part of the
29 genome
(Fig. 1A), encodes an SSB (for reviews, see Refs. 3, 6, 34,
and 35). The
29 SSB p5 stimulates in vitro
29 DNA
replication, especially at long incubation times (23, 25). Because no
evidence has been obtained that the
29 SSB has direct interactions
with the
29 DNA polymerase, the stimulation is most likely due to
indirect effects. The following features of
29 SSB have been
described that, at least in part, explain this stimulatory effect.
First, binding of the
29 SSB protects ssDNA against nuclease
degradation (25, 26). Second, it prevents non-productive binding of the
29 DNA polymerase to ssDNA (17, 23). Third, it prevents and removes
the formation of DNA secondary structures (23, 24). Fourth, it assists
in unwinding the dsDNA at the replication fork due to its helix
destabilization activity (Refs. 17 and 24, this work, and Fig. 6). And
finally, it is required in in vitro
29 DNA amplification
assays when low amounts of
29 template TP-DNA are used (19).
Here we demonstrated that protein p16.7A has high ssDNA binding
activity. Contrary to SSB p5, however, protein p16.7A has no helix
destabilization activity, and its presence in the minimal in
vitro
29 DNA replication assay did not stimulate DNA
replication. These results indicate that, although both proteins bind
ssDNA, they have non-overlapping functions. This view is further
supported by the following results. First, the SSB p5 is essential for
in vivo
29 DNA replication (36), indicating that protein
p16.7 cannot replace all of the functions of the SSB p5. Second,
although both proteins are expressed early after infection, much lower amounts of protein p16.7 are synthesized than the SSB p5 during the
middle and late stages of phage infection. The rapid amplification of
the
29 genome during the middle stage of the infection cycle generates large amounts of ssDNA. The huge increase of SSB p5 synthesis
during this infection stage is in agreement with the view that the SSB
p5, as most other SSBs, is required in stoichiometric amounts.
Model of the Function of Protein p16.7 in in Vivo
29 DNA
Replication--
As a consequence of its protein-primed mechanism
of replication and the absence of lagging strand synthesis, the
29
DNA replication intermediates contain very long stretches (up to
>10,000 nucleotides in length) of displaced ssDNA (see Fig.
1B). Binding of protein p16.7A to these stretches of ssDNA
was demonstrated directly by electron microscopy analysis. Also, the
observation that protein p16.7A prevented the accumulation of short DNA
products in the in vitro
29 DNA amplification assays
lacking SSB p5 strongly indicates that it binds to these stretches of
ssDNA. Importantly, these latter results also show that the binding of
p16.7A to the stretches of ssDNA hardly interfered with DNA replication
in the dynamic
29 DNA amplification system. Rather, under these
conditions, protein p16.7A had a positive effect on the efficiency of
full-length
29 DNA synthesis. Based on these results, the
characteristics of p16.7A described above, and taking into account that
native protein p16.7 is membrane-localized (10), we propose, as
schematically presented in Fig. 9, that
the principal role of p16.7 in vivo involves the attachment
of replicating
29 DNA molecules to the membrane of infected cells.
Although not shown in the model, it is possible that both protein p16.7
and SSB p5 will be bound simultaneously to the ssDNA portions of the
29 DNA replication intermediates under natural conditions. The
percentage of the
29 ssDNA portions that is bound by either protein
probably varies during the infection cycle because of the different
expression patterns of these proteins. Nevertheless, based on the
relative ssDNA binding activities, it is most likely that p16.7 binds
more rapidly to a displaced ssDNA strand of a
29 replication
intermediate than the SSB p5, especially at early infection times when
the amount of p16.7 in the infected cell, compared with the SSB p5, is
relatively high. Interestingly, in vivo
29 DNA
replication is affected, especially at early infection times in the
absence of protein p16.7 (10), indicating that it has an important role
during early infection times. Attachment of
29 DNA replication
intermediates to the membrane by protein p16.7 will result in
compartmentalization of the phage DNA within the infected cell. Besides
a possible role of p16.7 in the organization of in vivo
29 DNA replication, compartmentalization of replicating
29 DNA
probably stimulates in vivo
29 DNA replication
directly.
|
The proposed role of p16.7 in in vivo
29 DNA replication
may explain several observations made by Ivarie and Pène (8), who
demonstrated for the first time that
29 DNA replication occurs at
the membrane of infected cells. These authors showed (i) that it took
at least 10 min before the parental infected
29 DNA molecules became
attached to the membrane, (ii) that early expressed viral protein(s)
was required for membrane association, (iii) that replicating
29 DNA
molecules were attached to the membrane and that the fully replicated
double-stranded
29 DNA molecules were first released from the
membrane before they were packaged into the phage particles, and (iv)
that phage DNA of a
29 mutant containing a temperature-sensitive mutation in gene 2 (later shown to encode the DNA polymerase) did not
become associated to the membrane when infected at the non-permissive
temperature. Replication of
29 DNA does not start until about 10 min
after infection (2, 8), implying that until this time no
ssDNA-containing replication intermediates are present in the infected
cell. This explains why the infecting
29 DNA molecules, present in
its double-stranded form, are not associated to the membrane at the
very early infection times even though p16.7 is already detected as
soon as 6 min after infection (this work and Ref. 10). Also the
observation that the replicating DNA molecules, but not the fully
replicated phage DNA molecules, are attached to the membrane is in
agreement with the proposed role of protein p16.7. By
immunofluorescence microscopy we have indeed confirmed that the
majority of the replicated double-stranded
29 DNA molecules present
at late infection times were no longer localized at the membrane.
Rather, these molecules were found within the bulk of the host nucleoid
(2). Finally, although the possibility, proposed by Ivarie and
Pène (8), that the
29 gene 2 product, the DNA polymerase,
could be directly involved in attachment of replicating
29 DNA to
the membrane still holds, another perhaps more logic explanation can be
considered. Replication will not occur in the absence of a functional
DNA polymerase. As a consequence, the infecting DNA, despite the
synthesis of protein p16.7 and other viral proteins, will remain
double-stranded, which explains why it did not become attached to the membrane.
By immunofluorescence microscopy it was shown that the first rounds of
29 DNA replication localized nearly always to the distal end of the
bacterial nucleoid both in the presence or absence of protein p16.7.
However, whereas a few minutes later, phage DNA replication was found
to occur at multiple sites at the membrane in the wild-type situation,
phage DNA replication remained restricted to the initial replication
site for a prolonged time in the absence of p16.7. These results
indicated that protein p16.7 is involved in the efficient distribution
of replicating phage DNA from its initial to additional replication
sites in the infected cell. During the middle stage of infection
protein p16.7 localizes throughout the membrane, and this pattern is
consistent with the localization of the viral DNA at these times (2).
This may suggest that the in vivo distribution of phage DNA
is a passive process due to the dispersed p16.7 localization. However,
active distribution of phage DNA within the infected cell cannot be
ruled out.
Gene 16.7 Is Conserved in
29-related Phages--
The generation
of replication intermediates containing large stretches of displaced
ssDNA is a characteristic feature of the protein-primed mechanism of
DNA replication. Thus, it is conceivable that gene 16.7 is conserved in
the genome of other phages that replicate by the protein-primed
mechanism. Phage
29 is the paradigm of a family of
Bacillus phages that all use the protein-primed mechanism of
DNA replication (for review, see Ref. 6). These
29-like phages can
be divided into three groups. The first group includes, in addition to
29, phages PZA,
15, and BS32. The second group comprises B103,
Nf, and M2Y (M2), and the third, most distantly related group, contains
GA-1 as its sole member. Except for phages Nf and M2Y, the DNA
sequences of the right part of these phage genomes are available.
Analysis of these DNA sequences revealed that they all contain an open
reading frame whose deduced protein sequence (ranging from 130 to 133 amino acids) shares significant similarity to that of the
29 protein
p16.7. In addition, Western blot analysis using polyclonal antibodies
against p16.7 of
29 provided evidence that phage Nf (group II)
encodes a p16.7 homologue (10). Together, these data show that gene
16.7 is conserved in most and probably all
29-related phages,
supporting the view that the proposed mechanism of p16.7-mediated
attachment of replicating phage DNA to the membrane of the infected
cell is conserved in all these phages.
In summary, we found that the integral membrane protein p16.7 of
29
is an ssDNA-binding protein. Based on the results reported here and
those reported previously (2, 10), it is most probable that the
principal role of p16.7 involves the attachment of replicating
29
DNA to the membrane of the infected cell, resulting in the efficient
distribution of replicating
29 DNA from its initial to additional
replication sites. Probably, this mechanism is conserved in all members
of the
29 family of phages. As such, these results are an important
contribution to the better understanding of protein-primed
29 DNA replication.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank L. Blanco for critical reading of the manuscript, María Teresa Rejas for electron microscopy assistance, and L. Villar and J. M. Lázaro for protein purification.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This investigation was supported by National Institutes of Health Research Grant 2R01 GM27242-22, Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica Grant PB98-0645, European Economic Community Grant ERBFMX CT97 0125, and an Institutional grant from Fundación Ramón Areces.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Holder of a predoctoral fellowship from Gobierno Vasco.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 34 91 397 8435; Fax: 34 91 397 8490; E-mail: Msalas@cbm.uam.es.
¶ Supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109312200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; TP, terminal protein; SSB, single-stranded DNA-binding protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Kornberg, A., and Baker, T. A. (1992) DNA Replication , W. H. Freeman and Co., San Fransisco |
| 2. | Meijer, W. J. J., Lewis, P. J., Errington, J., and Salas, M. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 4182-4190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Salas, M., and Rojo, F. (1993) in Bacillus subtilis and Other Gram-positive Bacteria: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Molecular Genetics (Sonenshein, A. L. , Hoch, J. A. , and Losick, R., eds) , pp. 843-858, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C. |
| 4. | Salas, M., Miller, J. T., Leis, J., and DePamphilis, M. L. (1996) in DNA Replication in Eukaryotic Cells (DePamphilis, M. L., ed) , pp. 131-176, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 5. | Rojo, F., Mencía, M., Monsalve, M., and Salas, M. (1998) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 60, 29-46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Meijer, W. J. J.,
Horcajadas, J. A.,
and Salas, M.
(2001)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
65,
261-287 |
| 7. | Firshein, W. (1989) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 43, 89-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Ivarie, R. D., and Pène, J. J. (1973) Virology 52, 351-362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Bravo, A., and Salas, M. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 269, 102-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Meijer, W. J. J., Serna-Rico, A., and Salas, M. (2001) Mol. Microbiol. 39, 731-746[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Moreno, F., Camacho, A., Viñuela, E., and Salas, M. (1974) Virology 62, 1-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Jiménez, F., Camacho, A., de la Torre, J., Viñuela, E., and Salas, M. (1977) Eur. J. Biochem. 73, 57-72[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 14. |
Serna-Rico, A.,
Illana, B.,
Salas, M.,
and Meijer, W. J. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
40529-40538 |
| 15. | Sogo, J. M., and Thoma, F. (1989) Methods Enzymol. 170, 142-165[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Sogo, J. M., Stasiak, A., DeBernadin, W., Losa, R., and Koller, T. (1987) in Electron Microscopy in Molecular Biology. A Practical Approach (Sommerville, J. , and Scheer, U., eds) , pp. 61-79, IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford |
| 17. |
Gascón, I.,
Lázaro, J. M.,
and Salas, M.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
2034-2042 |
| 18. |
Blanco, L.,
Bernad, A.,
Esteban, J. A.,
and Salas, M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1225-1230 |
| 19. |
Blanco, L.,
Lázaro, J. M.,
de Vega, M.,
Bonnin, A.,
and Salas, M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12198-12202 |
| 20. |
Esteban, J. A.,
Blanco, L.,
Villar, L.,
and Salas, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2921-2926 |
| 21. | Wollenzien, P. L. (1988) in Psoralen-DNA Photobiology (Gasparro, F. P., ed) , pp. 51-85, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL |
| 22. | Gutiérrez, C., Sogo, J. M., and Salas, M. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 222, 983-994[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Gutiérrez, C.,
Martín, G.,
Sogo, J. M.,
and Salas, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
2104-2111 |
| 24. | Soengas, M. S., Gutiérrez, C., and Salas, M. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 253, 517-529[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Martín, G.,
Lázaro, J. M.,
Méndez, E.,
and Salas, M.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
3663-3672 |
| 26. | Soengas, M. S., Esteban, J. A., Salas, M., and Gutiérrez, C. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 239, 213-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Gascón, I., Gutiérrez, C., and Salas, M. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 296, 989-999[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Blanco, L.,
Bernad, A.,
Lázaro, J. M.,
Martín, G.,
Garmendia, C.,
and Salas, M.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8935-8940 |
| 29. |
Blanco, L.,
and Salas, M.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
6404-6408 |
| 30. |
Meyer, R. R.,
and Laine, P. S.
(1990)
Microbiol. Rev.
54,
342-380 |
| 31. | Chase, J. W., and Williams, K. R. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55, 103-136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Kelman, Z., and O'Donnell, M. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 185-195[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Stillman, B. (1994) Cell 78, 725-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Salas, M. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 39-71[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Salas, M., Freire, R., Soengas, M. S., Esteban, J. A., Méndez, J., Bravo, A., Serrano, M., Blasco, M. A., Lázaro, J. M., Blanco, L., Gutiérrez, C., and Hermoso, J. M. (1995) FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 17, 73-82[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Mellado, R. P., Peñalva, M. A., Inciarte, M. R., and Salas, M. (1980) Virology 104, 84-96[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Mellado, R. P.,
Moreno, F.,
Viñuela, E.,
Salas, M.,
Reilly, B. E.,
and Anderson, D. L.
(1976)
J. Virol.
19,
495-500 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Alcorlo, V. Gonzalez-Huici, J. M. Hermoso, W. J. J. Meijer, and M. Salas The Phage {phi}29 Membrane Protein p16.7, Involved in DNA Replication, Is Required for Efficient Ejection of the Viral Genome J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2007; 189(15): 5542 - 5549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Munoz-Espin, M. A. Fuertes, M. Jimenez, L. Villar, C. Alonso, G. Rivas, M. Salas, and W. J. J. Meijer Structural and Functional Analysis of {varphi}29 p16.7C Dimerization Mutants: IDENTIFICATION OF A NOVEL AROMATIC CAGE DIMERIZATION MOTIF J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2007; 282(22): 16521 - 16531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |