![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 6923-6928, March 1, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Vascular Biology Research Center, Institute of Molecular Medicine, and Division of Hematology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030
Received for publication, August 22, 2001, and in revised form, November 5, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To elucidate the mechanism by which
isoforms of CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins regulate
cyclooxygenase-2 expression, we determined by a novel
technique binding of six isoforms of this transactivator to two
sequence-specific CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein ( Cyclooxygenase-2
(COX-2)1 plays diverse
pathophysiological roles notably in inflammation, tissue damage, and
tumorigenesis (1-3). COX-2 is induced by myriad mitogenic and
inflammatory mediators (4). Transcriptional regulation of COX-2 by
various stimuli has been extensively investigated, and a large body of data has been reported. However, the mechanisms by which COX-2 transcription is activated and regulated are not entirely clear. NF-kB
activation and binding to its cognate site on the COX-2 promoter region
has been reported to mediate COX-2 transcription induced by tumor
necrosis factor Cell Culture--
Human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) were
purchased from ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml
penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 incubator. In all experiments, 85-90% confluent HFF
were serum-starved for 24 h prior to treatment with PMA.
Plasmid DNA--
Luciferase expression vector pGL3 basic
containing a COX-2 promoter region ( Western Blot Analysis--
Whole cell lysates were prepared by
lysing HFF with RIPA buffer (1× phosphate-buffered saline, 1%
igepal CA-630, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) containing a
protease inhibitor mixture (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitors (10 mM NaF, 25 mM DNA-Protein Binding Assay--
As the conventional
electrophoretic mobility shift assay is difficult to identify and
quantify multiple C/EBP isoforms bound to a sequence-specific DNA
probe, we developed a novel method by using streptavidin-coated beads
to bind biotinated DNA probe, which was used to interact with nuclear
extract proteins. After centrifugation, the pelleted beads were
collected and washed, and proteins were eluted by loading buffer and
separated by 4-15% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The separated
proteins were analyzed by Western blots. In the experiments here, we
incubated 600 µg of nuclear extract proteins with 6 µg of
biotinated COX-2-specific C/EBP sequence or CRE sequence (Integrated
DNA Technologies) and 60 µl of 4% beaded agarose (Sigma) mixed with
70% slurry at room temperature for 1 h with shaking. The bead
concentration was in excess to lessen binding of nuclear extract
proteins to free biotinated probes. Beads were pelleted and washed with
cold phosphate-buffered saline for three times. Proteins bound to the
beads were eluted and separated by SDS-PAGE. Western blot analysis was
done as described above. 5'-biotinated wild-type and mutated C/EBP
sequences were: C/EBP wild-type, 5'-/biotin/ACCGGCTTACGCAATTTTTTTAAG-3'
and mutant, 5'-/biotin/ACCGGCGCGATAGCTTTTTTTAAG-3'. 5'-biotinated
wild-type and mutant CRE sequences were CRE wild-type,
5'-/biotin/CAGTCATTTCGTCACATGGG-3', and mutant,
5'-/biotin/CAGTCATCGAGTCACATGGG-3'. Nuclear extracts were prepared from
HFF by a method previously described (10). This novel DNA-protein
binding assay had much less nonspecific binding than electrophoretic
mobility shift assay.
Transient Transfections--
Transfection of HFF with a pGL3
luciferase expression vector containing COX-2 5'-flanking DNA fragment
PMA Selectively Reduced C/EBP PMA Altered Binding of C/EBP Isoforms to C/EBP and CRE Sites of
COX-2 Promoter--
The CRE site ( Kinetics of PMA-induced C/EBP Binding and COX-2 Protein
Expression--
These results suggest that COX-2 expression is
regulated by a dynamic change in binding of C/EBP isoforms to the C/EBP
and CRE sites of the COX-2 promoter. To discern the relationship of C/EBP isoform binding and COX-2 expression, we measured the kinetics of
COX-2 protein levels, C/EBP isoform levels, and C/EBP binding to C/EBP
and CRE probes in cells treated with PMA. COX-2 proteins were
detectable at 2 h and increased with time after PMA treatment (Fig. 3). C/EBP Effect of Transient Transfection of C/EBP Isoforms on COX-2
Promoter and C/EBP Binding Activities--
Transient overexpression of
C/EBP
We suspected that inhibition of COX-2 promoter by C/EBP-LIP
overexpression may be attributed to its interfering with binding of
C/EBP Overexpression of C/EBP C/EBP Results from this study indicate that PMA induces a dynamic switch
of C/EBP isoform binding to C/EBP and CRE sites on the 5'-untranslated
region of COX-2 promoter, thereby stimulating COX-2 promoter activity.
PMA causes three key switches: 1) increased binding of C/EBP PMA increased the binding of all three isoforms of C/EBP C/EBP In summary, we have provided several novel aspects of COX-2 promoter
stimulation by PMA. 1) Increased C/EBP
132/
125) and
cyclic AMP (
59/
53) regulatory elements in human foreskin fibroblasts treated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate for 4 h.
The
isoform bound to these two elements at basal state, which was
displaced by full-length as well as two truncated
isoforms, a
41-kDa liver-enriched activating protein and a 16-kDa liver-enriched inhibitory protein, after phorbol ester stimulation. Kinetic analysis shows time-dependent changes in
and
binding that
were concordant with time-dependent increase in
cyclooxygenase-2 induction. Overexpression of the 16-kDa
isoform blocked the promoter activity and protein level induced by
phorbol ester. Paradoxically, it increased binding of
isoforms to
the sequence-specific promoter DNA but suppressed cyclooxygenase-2
promoter activation by p300 cotransfection. These findings provide new
insight into the regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 promoter by an
interplay between two opposite
isoforms and p300 co-activator.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and hypoxia (5, 6), while binding of CCAAT/enhancer
binding protein (C/EBP) to its cognate site on COX-2 promoter has been
reported to be crucial for promoter activation by stimuli such as
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), interleukin-1 and growth factors
(7-9). Results from a recent report have shown that PMA increased
C/EBP
binding to the C/EBP regulatory element of human COX-2
promoter region by a process depending on C/EBP
phosphorylation
(10). C/EBP
belongs to the basic leucine zipper C/EBP family that
comprises six members, and C/EBP
is closely related to C/EBP
and
C/EBP
but is distantly related to C/EBP
, C/EBP
, and C/EBP
(11, 12). Several truncated forms of C/EBP
have been noted. These
truncated forms originate from the use of alternative translation start
sites (13). A major truncated form with molecular weight close to the
full-length C/EBP
was originally shown in liver cells to activate
transcription and was named liver-enriched transcription activating
protein (LAP), while a small molecular weight form was shown to repress transcription in liver cells and was named liver-enriched transcription inhibitory protein (LIP) (14). LAP and LIP have been shown to express
in other types of cells, and LIP is considered as a dominant negative
mutant of C/EBP
(15). Transient transfection of LIP has been shown
to suppress COX-2 promoter activity (8). However, the physiological
role of C/EBP
-LIP and C/EBP
-LAP in regulating COX-2 expression
has not been reported. The roles of other C/EBP isoforms in regulating
COX-2 expression are also unknown. In this study, we tested the
hypothesis that PMA caused changes in C/EBP isoform binding to COX-2
promoter regulatory elements, which result in a dynamic control of
COX-2 expression. Our results show that PMA increased binding of
full-length C/EBP
(C/EBP
-FL), C/EBP
-LAP, and C/EBP
-LIP to
C/EBP and CRE sites while it reduced C/EBP
level and its binding to
the C/EBP site. Overexpression of C/EBP
-LIP suppressed COX-2
promoter activity and protein expression by interfering with the
activity of a transcription co-activator p300.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
891/+9) was constructed as
previously described (16). Site-directed mutation of C/EBP and CRE
sites was previously described (10). Plasmids expressing C/EBP
were
generously provided by Dr. Steven McKnight. Plasmid expressing C/EBP
was kindly provided by Dr. Philip Auron and was used as the template to
generate C/EBP
-LIP by PCR. For LIP synthesis, forward primer
5'-GACAAGCTTATGGCGGCGGGCTTCCCGTAC-3' and reverse primer
5'-GACCTCGAGCTAGCAGTGGCCGGAGGAGGC-3' were obtained from Integrated DNA
Technologies. The PCR product was purified after double digestion with
HindIII/XhoI and was cloned into the HindIII/XhoI sites of an expression vector
pCMV-Tag2 (Stratagene). Plasmid expressing p300 was a gift from Dr.
Joan Boyes.
-glycerophosphate, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min after sonication. The supernatants were mixed
with 2× SDS loading buffer followed by boiling for 3 min. 20-50 µg
of solubilized lysate proteins were separated on a 4-15% gradient
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane.
After blocking with 5% non-fat dried milk in phosphate-buffered saline/Tween buffer, the blots were incubated with polyclonal antibodies against isoforms of C/EBPs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and
COX-2 protein (Cayman). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibody was added, and the bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.
891 to +9 was carried out as previously described (10). The expressed
luciferase activity was determined in a luminometer. Cotransfection of
pGL3-COX-2 promoter with C/EBP-containing plasmids was done by mixing 1 µg of pGL3-COX-2 promoter and 0.5 µg of C/EBP isoform plasmid DNA with 6 µl of FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), and the mixture was added to each well of HFF in a
6-well plate. After incubation for 8 h, the cells were washed twice with fresh medium and incubated in fresh medium containing 10%
fetal bovine serum for 18 h. Cells were washed and incubated in
serum-free medium for 24 h. The quiescent cells were treated with
PMA (100 nM) or control vehicle for 4 h, and
luciferase activity was measured.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Protein Levels--
Consistent
with previously reported results (10), PMA induced a significant amount
of COX-2 protein in HFF after a 4-h treatment accompanied by a
significant induction of the promoter activity (Fig.
1A). Since the C/EBP isoform
protein levels in HFF have not been previously reported, we determined
all six isoforms of C/EBP by Western blot analysis. A basal level of
C/EBP
, C/EBP
, and C/EBP
were detected in unstimulated HFF
(Fig. 1B) but C/EBP
, C/EBP
, and C/EBP
were
undetectable (data not shown). Two isoforms of C/EBP
, the 42-kDa
full-length and a 30-kDa truncated form, and three isoforms of
C/EBP
, the 46-kDa full-length (C/EBP
-FL), a 41-kDa C/EBP
-LAP,
and a 16-kDa C/EBP
-LIP, were expressed in unstimulated cells (Fig.
1B). C/EBP
was detected as a single 36-kDa protein (Fig.
1B). After PMA treatment for 4 h, there was a
significant reduction of C/EBP
protein levels, while neither C/EBP
nor C/EBP
isoforms were altered (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
PMA induced COX-2 expression and C/EBP
protein levels in HFF. A, COX-2 protein and promoter
activity in HFF treated with and without PMA (100 nM) for
4 h. B, C/EBP protein levels determined by Western blot
analysis. Each lane was loaded with 30 µg of cell lysate proteins.
This figure is representative of three separate experiments with
similar results. C/EBP
,
, and
were undetectable (data not
shown).
59/
53) and C/EBP site
(
132/
125) at the 5'-untranslated region of COX-2 genes are
essential for PMA-induced promoter
activity.2 To evaluate the
involvement of C/EBP isoforms in COX-2 promoter function, we determined
binding of a COX-2-specific C/EBP or CRE sequence to C/EBP isoforms in
nuclear extracts prepared from HFF treated with or without PMA for
4 h. In unstimulated cells, C/EBP
was the predominant isoform
bound to C/EBP probe (Fig.
2A). C/EBP
-LIP binding was
also detected. PMA treatment resulted in a reduction in C/EBP
and an
increase in C/EBP
-LIP, C/EBP
-FL (46 kDa), and C/EBP
-LAP
binding. Binding of all three isoforms of C/EBP
was abrogated when a
C/EBP mutant replaced the wild-type C/EBP as the probe (Fig.
2A). PMA did not induce C/EBP
binding to the C/EBP site.
There was basal binding of C/EBP
isoforms and C/EBP
to
COX-2-specific CRE probes in unstimulated cells (Fig. 2B). PMA increased C/EBP
-LAP and C/EBP
-LIP binding to the CRE site without changing the binding of C/EBP
(Fig. 2B). There
was no detectable C/EBP
binding to the CRE site (data not
shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Binding of C/EBP isoforms to COX-2-specific
C/EBP (
132/
124) sequence (A) and CRE (
59/
53)
sequence (B). Serum-starved HFF were treated with
PMA (100 nM) for 4 h, and nuclear extracts were
prepared. Binding assay was performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." This figure is representative of three
independent binding experiments with similar results. C/EBP mutant
(C/EBP-M) and CRE-M were included to serve as control for
wild-type (WT) C/EBP and CRE sequences, respectively.
isoforms were not
significantly changed over time, while the C/EBP
level was reduced
with time (Fig. 3). The COX-2 protein increase was concordant with a
time-dependent reduction in C/EBP
levels, a reduction in
C/EBP
binding to the C/EBP probe (Fig.
4A), and an increase in
C/EBP
-LAP, -FL, and -LIP binding (Fig. 4B) despite a lack
of change in C/EBP
isoform levels (Fig. 3). These results are
consistent with the interpretation that PMA increased C/EBP
binding
through post-translational modification of C/EBP
(10). Results from
this study further revealed a reduction in C/EBP
binding to the
C/EBP site because of suppression of C/EBP
protein expression by
PMA. There was also a time-dependent increase in binding of
C/EBP
isoforms to the CRE (Fig.
5A) while there was no
significant time-dependent change in C/EBP
binding to
the CRE site (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Kinetics of COX-2 and C/EBP induction by
PMA. COX-2 and C/EBP protein levels in HFF treated with PMA (100 nM) for 0-4 h were determined by Western blot analysis.
Each lane was loaded with 30 µg of lysate proteins. This figure is
representative of two experiments with similar results.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Time course of C/EBP isoform binding to C/EBP
probes. A, C/EBP
binding. This figure was
representative of two experiments with similar results. B,
C/EBP
binding. Densitometry results are expressed as mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Time course of C/EBP isoform binding to CRE
probes. A, C/EBP
binding and B, C/EBP
binding. Densitometry results are expressed as mean ± S.E. of
three separate experiments.
-LIP (Fig. 6A) reduced
COX-2 promoter stimulation by PMA to the basal promoter activity (Fig.
6B). C/EBP
overexpression (Fig. 6A) increased
basal level without suppressing PMA-induced COX-2 promoter activity
(Fig. 6B). Interestingly, C/EBP
-FL overexpression had no
significant effect on basal or PMA-induced COX-2 promoter activity
(Fig. 6B).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of overexpression of
and
C/EBP on COX-2
promoter activity. A,
-LIP and
C/EBP protein
overexpression by transient transfection.
-LIP expression was driven
by a cytomegalovirus promoter, while
expression by a
murine sarcoma virus promoter. B, COX-2 promoter activity in
cells cotransfected with
-full-length (FL),
-LIP, or
C/EBP. Each bar is mean ± S.E. of three
experiments.
-LAP to C/EBP or the CRE site. To our surprise, C/EBP
-LIP overexpression did not inhibit binding of C/EBP
-LAP but instead increased basal and PMA-induced C/EBP
-LAP binding to the C/EBP site
(Fig. 7A) and the CRE site
(Fig. 7B). Overexpression of C/EBP
increased the basal
binding of C/EBP
-LAP and C/EBP
-LIP to the C/EBP site (Fig.
8A) and the CRE site (Fig.
8B) and basal binding of C/EBP
to the C/EBP site (Fig.
8A). Interestingly, its binding to the C/EBP site was
significantly reduced in PMA-treated cells despite its overexpression
(Fig. 8A). C/EBP
overexpression did not influence
binding to the CRE site (Fig. 8B).

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Influence of
C/EBP
-LIP overexpression on
and
binding to C/EBP
sequence (A) and CRE sequence
(B). Each figure is representative of two
experiments with similar results.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Influence of C/EBP
overexpression on
and
binding to C/EBP sequence (A) and
CRE sequence (B). Each figure is representative
of two experiments.
-LIP Inhibited COX-2 Promoter Activation
by p300--
Since C/EBP
-LIP did not block binding of C/EBP
-LAP
and yet suppressed COX-2 promoter activity induced by PMA, we suspected that C/EBP
-LIP overexpression may act at the level of interaction between DNA-bound C/EBP
-LAP and co-activator p300.
Transfection of cells with p300 plasmids increased basal and
PMA-induced COX-2 promoter activity (Fig.
9). This increase was completely
abrogated by overexpression of C/EBP
-LIP (Fig. 9).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Interference of p300 co-activator activity by
C/EBP
-LIP overexpression. Transient
transfection of p300 increased basal and PMA-induced COX-2 promoter
activity. Co-transfection with LIP reduced both activities to the basal
level. Each bar is mean ± S.E. of three
experiments.
-LIP Inhibited COX-2 Protein Levels--
In
agreement with the COX-2 promoter results, overexpression of
C/EBP
-LIP by transient transfection reduced COX-2 protein levels
induced by PMA (Fig. 10), while neither
C/EBP
-FL nor C/EBP
overexpression altered the basal or
PMA-stimulated COX-2 protein levels (data not shown). However, unlike
the promoter data, p300 overexpression did not increase basal COX-2
protein level and increased PMA-induced COX-2 protein expression to a
lesser extent than the promoter activity (Fig. 10). We suspect that the
difference between promoter and protein stimulation by p300 is due to
an artificially high luciferase activity expressed by the transfected naked DNA. Nevertheless, COX-2 protein levels induced by PMA plus p300
overexpression were suppressed by cotransfection with C/EBP
-LIP (Fig. 10).

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Inhibition of COX-2 protein expression by
C/EBP
-LIP. The top panel shows
a representative Western blot, and the bottom panel the
densitometric analysis. C/EBP
-LIP overexpression suppressed
PMA-induced COX-2 protein levels stimulated with or without p300
overexpression.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-LAP to
C/EBP and CRE sites; 2) reduced binding of C/EBP
to the C/EBP site;
and 3) increased C/EBP
-LIP binding to C/EBP and CRE sites. Increased
binding of C/EBP
-LAP to these two regulatory elements plays a key
role in transactivation of COX-2 promoter, while increased C/EBP
-LIP
binding provides a negative regulation of COX-2 promoter activity. The
role of C/EBP
in this chain of events is less clear. Our data
suggest that it is involved in the control of basal COX-2 promoter
activity. Its binding to the C/EBP site is correlated with the protein
level. When its protein expression is aberrantly augmented, such as in skin carcinogenesis, it causes an autonomous COX-2 protein expression that contributes to cancer growth (17). PMA reduced C/EBP
protein levels, and this reduction resulted in a reduced binding of C/EBP
to
the C/EBP site. It is unclear whether the effect of PMA is at the
transcriptional or post-transcriptional level of C/EBP
expression.
That PMA also reduced C/EBP
binding in
-overexpression driven by
a viral promoter suggests that PMA might accelerate C/EBP
degradation. Reduced C/EBP
binding due to a lower C/EBP
protein
level coupled with an increased C/EBP
-LAP binding is likely to be
pivotal for COX-2 induction by PMA and other stimuli signaling via the
protein kinase C pathway. It is interesting to note that C/EBP
binding to the CRE site was not reduced despite a reduced C/EBP
level and an increased C/EBP
-LAP binding to this site. This result
suggests that following stimulation by PMA, the affinity of
C/EBP
-LAP binding to the C/EBP site is greatly enhanced, which leads
to displacement of C/EBP
from the C/EBP site.
to
C/EBP and CRE sites without increasing their protein expression. A
previous study showed that PMA induced phosphorylation of C/EBP
, and
the phosphorylated C/EBP
exhibited an increased DNA binding activity
(18). Our recent study showed that dephosphorylation of C/EBP
resulted in a marked reduction of C/EBP
binding to C/EBP site
on COX-2 promoter (10). Protein kinase C does not phosphorylate
C/EBP
directly (18) but mitogen-activated protein kinase,
calcium-dependent calmodulin kinase II, and ribosomal S6
kinase can directly phosphorylate C/EBP
at different
serine/threonine residues (19-21). It is unclear as to which kinase
phosphorylates C/EBP
, thereby increasing its binding activity in
response to exogenous stimulation by inflammatory or mitogenic factors.
It is also unknown whether C/EBP
-LIP binding depends on phosphorylation.
-LIP retains the C-terminal DNA binding domain and the leucine
zipper region but loses the N-terminal transactivation domain of
C/EBP
-FL or C/EBP
-LAP (14). It can form a homodimer or
heterodimer with C/EBP
-LAP or C/EBP
-FL and bind to C/EBP or CRE
site. Our results suggest that it can also form a heterodimer with
C/EBP
and bind to the CRE site. Results from our transient transfection experiment are consistent with previous reports that C/EBP
-LIP suppresses COX-2 promoter activity induced by exogenous stimuli (8). In this study, we provide evidence that C/EBP
-LIP suppresses COX-2 protein expression induced by PMA. Furthermore, we
have provided a novel mechanism by which C/EBP
-LIP blocked PMA-induced promoter activity and protein expression. C/EBP
-FL/LAP has been reported to recruit p300 family co-activators to the promoter
region through its direct interaction with the co-activator (22). Since
C/EBP
-LIP did not block the binding of C/EBP
-FL/LAP, we reasoned
that it may interfere with the interaction of p300 with
C/EBP
-FL/LAP. Our results show for the first time that
overexpression of C/EBP
-LIP abrogated the stimulatory effect of p300
on COX-2 promoter activity and protein expression. We speculate that
the inhibitory effect of C/EBP
-LIP is attributable to binding of an
increasing amount of LIP homodimers and LIP/LAP heterodimer to the
cognate site, which no longer interact with p300, and thus interfere
with recruitment of transcription machinery to the TATA region for RNA
polymerase II to initiate transcription.
-LAP binding to C/EBP and CRE
sites plays a pivotal role in COX-2 transcriptional activation. 2)
Sequence-specific binding of C/EBP
-LAP recruits p300 for initiation
of COX-2 transcription. 3) Concurrent increase in C/EBP
-LIP binding
to these two sites interferes with C/EBP-LAP interaction with p300 and
provides a dynamic control of COX-2 promoter function.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Marcus Kuo, University of Texas-M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for providing laboratory space to perform the p300 transfection experiments during the flood disaster and Susan Mitterling for editorial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant R01 HL-50675 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the NINDS, National Institutes of Health Grant P50 NS-23327.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Vascular Biology
Research Center and Div. of Hematology, Univ. of Texas-Houston Medical
School, 6431 Fannin, MSB 5.016, Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-500-6801;
Fax: 713-500-6812; E-mail: Kenneth.K.Wu@uth.tmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108075200
2 K. Schroer, M. A. Saunders, X.-M. Xu, Y. Zhu, J. Meyer-Kirchrath, and K. K. Wu, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2;
C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein;
PMA, phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate;
LAP, liver-enriched activating protein;
LIP, liver-enriched inhibitory protein;
HFF, human foreskin fibroblasts;
CRE, cyclic AMP responsive element;
C/EBP
-FL, full-length
C/EBP
.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Vane, J. R.,
Mitchell, J. A.,
Appleton, I.,
Tomlinson, A.,
Bishop-Bailey, D.,
Croxtall, J.,
and Willoughby, D. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2046-2050 |
| 2. |
Seibert, K.,
Zhang, Y.,
Leahy, K.,
Hauser, S.,
Masferrer, J.,
Perkins, W.,
Lee, L.,
and Isakson, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12013-12017 |
| 3. | Tsujii, M., and DuBois, R. N. (1995) Cell 83, 493-501[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Wu, K. K. (1995) Adv. Pharmacol. 33, 179-207 |
| 5. |
Yamamoto, K.,
Arakawa, T.,
Ueda, N.,
and Yamamoto, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
31315-31320 |
| 6. |
Schmedtje, S. F., Ji, Y-S.,
Liu, W-L.,
DuBois, R. N.,
and Runge, M. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
601-608 |
| 7. |
Inoue, H.,
Yokoyama, C.,
Hara, S.,
Tone, Y.,
and Tanabe, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24965-24971 |
| 8. |
Wadleigh, D. J.,
Reddy, S. T.,
Kopp, E.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6259-6266 |
| 9. | Thomas, B., Berenbaum, F., Humbert, L., Bian, H., Bereziat, G., Crofford, L., and Olivier, J. L. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6798-6809[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Saunders, M. A.,
Sansores-Garcia, L.,
Gilroy, D. W.,
and Wu, K. K.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18897-18904 |
| 11. | Wadel, A., and Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. L. (1995) Immunobiol. 193, 171-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Akira, S., and Kishimoto, T. (1997) Adv. Immunol. 65, 1-46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Ossipow, V.,
Descombes, P.,
and Schibler, U.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8219-8223 |
| 14. | Descombes, P., and Schibler, U. (1991) Cell 67, 569-576[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Liao, J., Piwien-Pilipuk, G., Ross, S. E., Hodge, C. L., Sealy, L., MacDougald, O. A., and Schwartz, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 315997-331604 |
| 16. | Tazawa, R., Xu, X-M., Wu, K. K., and Wang, L. H. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commu. 203, 190-199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Kim, Y.,
and Fischer, S. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27686-27694 |
| 18. | Trautwein, C., Caelles, C., Van der Geer, P., Hunter, T., Karin, M., and Chojkier, M. (1993) Nature 364, 544-547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Nakajima, T.,
Kinoshita, S.,
Sasagawa, T.,
Sasaki, K.,
Naruto, M.,
Kishimoto, T.,
and Akira, S.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2207-2211 |
| 20. |
Wegner, M.,
Cao, Z.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1992)
Science
256,
370-373 |
| 21. | Buck, M., Poli, V., Van der Geer, P., Chojkier, M., and Hunter, T. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 1087-1092[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Mink, S., Haenig, B., and Klempnauer, K.-H. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6609-6617[Abstract] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-H. Tsou, K.-Y. Chang, W.-C. Wang, J. T. Tseng, W.-C. Su, L.-Y. Hung, W.-C. Chang, and B.-K. Chen Nucleolin regulates c-Jun/Sp1-dependent transcriptional activation of cPLA2{alpha} in phorbol ester-treated non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells Nucleic Acids Res., January 17, 2008; 36(1): 217 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-G. Deng, A. J. Montero, and K. K. Wu Interferon-{gamma} Suppresses Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter Activity by Inhibiting C-Jun and C/EBP{beta} Binding Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(8): 1752 - 1759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Liu, Y. Yang, C. Gu, Y. Yue, K. K. Wu, J. Wu, and Y. Zhu Spike protein of SARS-CoV stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression via both calcium-dependent and calcium-independent protein kinase C pathways FASEB J, May 1, 2007; 21(7): 1586 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Brunelli, K. A. Cieslik, J. L. Alcorn, M. Vatta, and A. Baldini Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{delta} Upregulates 14-3-3{epsilon} in Human Endothelial Cells via CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein-{beta} Circ. Res., March 16, 2007; 100(5): e59 - e71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-K. Chen, C.-C. Huang, W.-C. Chang, Y.-J. Chen, U. Kikkawa, K.-i. Nakahama, I. Morita, and W.-C. Chang PP2B-mediated Dephosphorylation of c-Jun C Terminus Regulates Phorbol Ester-induced c-Jun/Sp1 Interaction in A431 Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 1118 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cascio, V. Bartella, C. Garofalo, A. Russo, A. Giordano, and E. Surmacz Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Differentially Regulates Estrogen Receptor-dependent Transcription at Estrogen Response Element and AP-1 Sites in Breast Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3498 - 3506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Cieslik, W.-G. Deng, and K. K. Wu Essential Role of C-Rel in Nitric-Oxide Synthase-2 Transcriptional Activation: Time-Dependent Control by Salicylate Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 2004 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Borger, M. Tamm, J. L. Black, and M. Roth Asthma: Is It Due to an Abnormal Airway Smooth Muscle Cell? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2006; 174(4): 367 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Degner, M. Q. Kemp, G. T. Bowden, and D. F. Romagnolo Conjugated Linoleic Acid Attenuates Cyclooxygenase-2 Transcriptional Activity via an Anti-AP-1 Mechanism in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells J. Nutr., February 1, 2006; 136(2): 421 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Wang, C.-Y. Ko, L.-C. Chen, W.-L. Wang, and W.-C. Chang Functional role of NF-IL6{beta} and its sumoylation and acetylation modifications in promoter activation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene Nucleic Acids Res., January 5, 2006; 34(1): 217 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Chen, W.-C. Huang, and C.-C. Chen Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Response to Proteasome Inhibitors Involves Reactive Oxygen Species-mediated Signaling Pathway and Recruitment of CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {delta} and CREB-binding Protein Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2005; 16(12): 5579 - 5591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. G. Bosc, J. J. Layne, M. T. Nelson, and D. C. Hill-Eubanks Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells and Serum Response Factor Cooperatively Regulate the Activity of an {alpha}-Actin Intronic Enhancer J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 26113 - 26120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-C. Chen, B.-K. Chen, and W.-C. Chang Activating Protein 1-Mediated Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Is Independent of N-Terminal Phosphorylation of c-Jun Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 2057 - 2069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Cieslik, Y. Zhu, M. Shtivelband, and K. K. Wu Inhibition of p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase-mediated CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {beta} Activation and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by Salicylate J. Biol. Chem., May 6, 2005; 280(18): 18411 - 18417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chen, M. Zhao, R. Rao, H. Inoue, and C.-M. Hao C/EBP{beta} and Its Binding Element Are Required for NF{kappa}B-induced COX2 Expression Following Hypertonic Stress J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 16354 - 16359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Wu, J.-Y. Liou, and K. Cieslik Transcriptional Control of COX-2 via C/EBP{beta} Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2005; 25(4): 679 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|