JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108075200 on December 10, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 6923-6928, March 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/9/6923    most recent
M108075200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, K. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Dynamic Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter Activity by Isoforms of CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Proteins*

Ying Zhu, Michael A. Saunders, Howard Yeh, Wu-guo Deng, and Kenneth K. WuDagger

From the Vascular Biology Research Center, Institute of Molecular Medicine, and Division of Hematology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030

Received for publication, August 22, 2001, and in revised form, November 5, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To elucidate the mechanism by which isoforms of CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins regulate cyclooxygenase-2 expression, we determined by a novel technique binding of six isoforms of this transactivator to two sequence-specific CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (-132/-125) and cyclic AMP (-59/-53) regulatory elements in human foreskin fibroblasts treated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate for 4 h. The delta  isoform bound to these two elements at basal state, which was displaced by full-length as well as two truncated beta  isoforms, a 41-kDa liver-enriched activating protein and a 16-kDa liver-enriched inhibitory protein, after phorbol ester stimulation. Kinetic analysis shows time-dependent changes in beta  and delta  binding that were concordant with time-dependent increase in cyclooxygenase-2 induction. Overexpression of the 16-kDa beta  isoform blocked the promoter activity and protein level induced by phorbol ester. Paradoxically, it increased binding of beta  isoforms to the sequence-specific promoter DNA but suppressed cyclooxygenase-2 promoter activation by p300 cotransfection. These findings provide new insight into the regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 promoter by an interplay between two opposite beta  isoforms and p300 co-activator.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)1 plays diverse pathophysiological roles notably in inflammation, tissue damage, and tumorigenesis (1-3). COX-2 is induced by myriad mitogenic and inflammatory mediators (4). Transcriptional regulation of COX-2 by various stimuli has been extensively investigated, and a large body of data has been reported. However, the mechanisms by which COX-2 transcription is activated and regulated are not entirely clear. NF-kB activation and binding to its cognate site on the COX-2 promoter region has been reported to mediate COX-2 transcription induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha  and hypoxia (5, 6), while binding of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) to its cognate site on COX-2 promoter has been reported to be crucial for promoter activation by stimuli such as phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), interleukin-1 and growth factors (7-9). Results from a recent report have shown that PMA increased C/EBPbeta binding to the C/EBP regulatory element of human COX-2 promoter region by a process depending on C/EBPbeta phosphorylation (10). C/EBPbeta belongs to the basic leucine zipper C/EBP family that comprises six members, and C/EBPbeta is closely related to C/EBPalpha and C/EBPdelta but is distantly related to C/EBPgamma , C/EBPepsilon , and C/EBPzeta (11, 12). Several truncated forms of C/EBPbeta have been noted. These truncated forms originate from the use of alternative translation start sites (13). A major truncated form with molecular weight close to the full-length C/EBPbeta was originally shown in liver cells to activate transcription and was named liver-enriched transcription activating protein (LAP), while a small molecular weight form was shown to repress transcription in liver cells and was named liver-enriched transcription inhibitory protein (LIP) (14). LAP and LIP have been shown to express in other types of cells, and LIP is considered as a dominant negative mutant of C/EBPbeta (15). Transient transfection of LIP has been shown to suppress COX-2 promoter activity (8). However, the physiological role of C/EBPbeta -LIP and C/EBPbeta -LAP in regulating COX-2 expression has not been reported. The roles of other C/EBP isoforms in regulating COX-2 expression are also unknown. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that PMA caused changes in C/EBP isoform binding to COX-2 promoter regulatory elements, which result in a dynamic control of COX-2 expression. Our results show that PMA increased binding of full-length C/EBPbeta (C/EBPbeta -FL), C/EBPbeta -LAP, and C/EBPbeta -LIP to C/EBP and CRE sites while it reduced C/EBPdelta level and its binding to the C/EBP site. Overexpression of C/EBPbeta -LIP suppressed COX-2 promoter activity and protein expression by interfering with the activity of a transcription co-activator p300.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- Human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) were purchased from ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. In all experiments, 85-90% confluent HFF were serum-starved for 24 h prior to treatment with PMA.

Plasmid DNA-- Luciferase expression vector pGL3 basic containing a COX-2 promoter region (-891/+9) was constructed as previously described (16). Site-directed mutation of C/EBP and CRE sites was previously described (10). Plasmids expressing C/EBPdelta were generously provided by Dr. Steven McKnight. Plasmid expressing C/EBPbeta was kindly provided by Dr. Philip Auron and was used as the template to generate C/EBPbeta -LIP by PCR. For LIP synthesis, forward primer 5'-GACAAGCTTATGGCGGCGGGCTTCCCGTAC-3' and reverse primer 5'-GACCTCGAGCTAGCAGTGGCCGGAGGAGGC-3' were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies. The PCR product was purified after double digestion with HindIII/XhoI and was cloned into the HindIII/XhoI sites of an expression vector pCMV-Tag2 (Stratagene). Plasmid expressing p300 was a gift from Dr. Joan Boyes.

Western Blot Analysis-- Whole cell lysates were prepared by lysing HFF with RIPA buffer (1× phosphate-buffered saline, 1% igepal CA-630, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) containing a protease inhibitor mixture (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitors (10 mM NaF, 25 mM beta -glycerophosphate, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min after sonication. The supernatants were mixed with 2× SDS loading buffer followed by boiling for 3 min. 20-50 µg of solubilized lysate proteins were separated on a 4-15% gradient SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking with 5% non-fat dried milk in phosphate-buffered saline/Tween buffer, the blots were incubated with polyclonal antibodies against isoforms of C/EBPs (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and COX-2 protein (Cayman). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was added, and the bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.

DNA-Protein Binding Assay-- As the conventional electrophoretic mobility shift assay is difficult to identify and quantify multiple C/EBP isoforms bound to a sequence-specific DNA probe, we developed a novel method by using streptavidin-coated beads to bind biotinated DNA probe, which was used to interact with nuclear extract proteins. After centrifugation, the pelleted beads were collected and washed, and proteins were eluted by loading buffer and separated by 4-15% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The separated proteins were analyzed by Western blots. In the experiments here, we incubated 600 µg of nuclear extract proteins with 6 µg of biotinated COX-2-specific C/EBP sequence or CRE sequence (Integrated DNA Technologies) and 60 µl of 4% beaded agarose (Sigma) mixed with 70% slurry at room temperature for 1 h with shaking. The bead concentration was in excess to lessen binding of nuclear extract proteins to free biotinated probes. Beads were pelleted and washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline for three times. Proteins bound to the beads were eluted and separated by SDS-PAGE. Western blot analysis was done as described above. 5'-biotinated wild-type and mutated C/EBP sequences were: C/EBP wild-type, 5'-/biotin/ACCGGCTTACGCAATTTTTTTAAG-3' and mutant, 5'-/biotin/ACCGGCGCGATAGCTTTTTTTAAG-3'. 5'-biotinated wild-type and mutant CRE sequences were CRE wild-type, 5'-/biotin/CAGTCATTTCGTCACATGGG-3', and mutant, 5'-/biotin/CAGTCATCGAGTCACATGGG-3'. Nuclear extracts were prepared from HFF by a method previously described (10). This novel DNA-protein binding assay had much less nonspecific binding than electrophoretic mobility shift assay.

Transient Transfections-- Transfection of HFF with a pGL3 luciferase expression vector containing COX-2 5'-flanking DNA fragment -891 to +9 was carried out as previously described (10). The expressed luciferase activity was determined in a luminometer. Cotransfection of pGL3-COX-2 promoter with C/EBP-containing plasmids was done by mixing 1 µg of pGL3-COX-2 promoter and 0.5 µg of C/EBP isoform plasmid DNA with 6 µl of FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), and the mixture was added to each well of HFF in a 6-well plate. After incubation for 8 h, the cells were washed twice with fresh medium and incubated in fresh medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 18 h. Cells were washed and incubated in serum-free medium for 24 h. The quiescent cells were treated with PMA (100 nM) or control vehicle for 4 h, and luciferase activity was measured.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PMA Selectively Reduced C/EBPdelta Protein Levels-- Consistent with previously reported results (10), PMA induced a significant amount of COX-2 protein in HFF after a 4-h treatment accompanied by a significant induction of the promoter activity (Fig. 1A). Since the C/EBP isoform protein levels in HFF have not been previously reported, we determined all six isoforms of C/EBP by Western blot analysis. A basal level of C/EBPalpha , C/EBPbeta , and C/EBPdelta were detected in unstimulated HFF (Fig. 1B) but C/EBPgamma , C/EBPepsilon , and C/EBPzeta were undetectable (data not shown). Two isoforms of C/EBPalpha , the 42-kDa full-length and a 30-kDa truncated form, and three isoforms of C/EBPbeta , the 46-kDa full-length (C/EBPbeta -FL), a 41-kDa C/EBPbeta -LAP, and a 16-kDa C/EBPbeta -LIP, were expressed in unstimulated cells (Fig. 1B). C/EBPdelta was detected as a single 36-kDa protein (Fig. 1B). After PMA treatment for 4 h, there was a significant reduction of C/EBPdelta protein levels, while neither C/EBPalpha nor C/EBPbeta isoforms were altered (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   PMA induced COX-2 expression and C/EBP protein levels in HFF. A, COX-2 protein and promoter activity in HFF treated with and without PMA (100 nM) for 4 h. B, C/EBP protein levels determined by Western blot analysis. Each lane was loaded with 30 µg of cell lysate proteins. This figure is representative of three separate experiments with similar results. C/EBPgamma , epsilon , and zeta  were undetectable (data not shown).

PMA Altered Binding of C/EBP Isoforms to C/EBP and CRE Sites of COX-2 Promoter-- The CRE site (-59/-53) and C/EBP site (-132/-125) at the 5'-untranslated region of COX-2 genes are essential for PMA-induced promoter activity.2 To evaluate the involvement of C/EBP isoforms in COX-2 promoter function, we determined binding of a COX-2-specific C/EBP or CRE sequence to C/EBP isoforms in nuclear extracts prepared from HFF treated with or without PMA for 4 h. In unstimulated cells, C/EBPdelta was the predominant isoform bound to C/EBP probe (Fig. 2A). C/EBPbeta -LIP binding was also detected. PMA treatment resulted in a reduction in C/EBPdelta and an increase in C/EBPbeta -LIP, C/EBPbeta -FL (46 kDa), and C/EBPbeta -LAP binding. Binding of all three isoforms of C/EBPbeta was abrogated when a C/EBP mutant replaced the wild-type C/EBP as the probe (Fig. 2A). PMA did not induce C/EBPalpha binding to the C/EBP site. There was basal binding of C/EBPbeta isoforms and C/EBPdelta to COX-2-specific CRE probes in unstimulated cells (Fig. 2B). PMA increased C/EBPbeta -LAP and C/EBPbeta -LIP binding to the CRE site without changing the binding of C/EBPdelta (Fig. 2B). There was no detectable C/EBPalpha binding to the CRE site (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Binding of C/EBP isoforms to COX-2-specific C/EBP (-132/-124) sequence (A) and CRE (-59/-53) sequence (B). Serum-starved HFF were treated with PMA (100 nM) for 4 h, and nuclear extracts were prepared. Binding assay was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." This figure is representative of three independent binding experiments with similar results. C/EBP mutant (C/EBP-M) and CRE-M were included to serve as control for wild-type (WT) C/EBP and CRE sequences, respectively.

Kinetics of PMA-induced C/EBP Binding and COX-2 Protein Expression-- These results suggest that COX-2 expression is regulated by a dynamic change in binding of C/EBP isoforms to the C/EBP and CRE sites of the COX-2 promoter. To discern the relationship of C/EBP isoform binding and COX-2 expression, we measured the kinetics of COX-2 protein levels, C/EBP isoform levels, and C/EBP binding to C/EBP and CRE probes in cells treated with PMA. COX-2 proteins were detectable at 2 h and increased with time after PMA treatment (Fig. 3). C/EBPbeta isoforms were not significantly changed over time, while the C/EBPdelta level was reduced with time (Fig. 3). The COX-2 protein increase was concordant with a time-dependent reduction in C/EBPdelta levels, a reduction in C/EBPdelta binding to the C/EBP probe (Fig. 4A), and an increase in C/EBPbeta -LAP, -FL, and -LIP binding (Fig. 4B) despite a lack of change in C/EBPbeta isoform levels (Fig. 3). These results are consistent with the interpretation that PMA increased C/EBPbeta binding through post-translational modification of C/EBPbeta (10). Results from this study further revealed a reduction in C/EBPdelta binding to the C/EBP site because of suppression of C/EBPdelta protein expression by PMA. There was also a time-dependent increase in binding of C/EBPbeta isoforms to the CRE (Fig. 5A) while there was no significant time-dependent change in C/EBPdelta binding to the CRE site (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Kinetics of COX-2 and C/EBP induction by PMA. COX-2 and C/EBP protein levels in HFF treated with PMA (100 nM) for 0-4 h were determined by Western blot analysis. Each lane was loaded with 30 µg of lysate proteins. This figure is representative of two experiments with similar results.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Time course of C/EBP isoform binding to C/EBP probes. A, C/EBPdelta binding. This figure was representative of two experiments with similar results. B, C/EBPbeta binding. Densitometry results are expressed as mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Time course of C/EBP isoform binding to CRE probes. A, C/EBPbeta binding and B, C/EBPdelta binding. Densitometry results are expressed as mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments.

Effect of Transient Transfection of C/EBP Isoforms on COX-2 Promoter and C/EBP Binding Activities-- Transient overexpression of C/EBPbeta -LIP (Fig. 6A) reduced COX-2 promoter stimulation by PMA to the basal promoter activity (Fig. 6B). C/EBPdelta overexpression (Fig. 6A) increased basal level without suppressing PMA-induced COX-2 promoter activity (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, C/EBPbeta -FL overexpression had no significant effect on basal or PMA-induced COX-2 promoter activity (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of overexpression of beta  and delta  C/EBP on COX-2 promoter activity. A, beta -LIP and delta  C/EBP protein overexpression by transient transfection. beta -LIP expression was driven by a cytomegalovirus promoter, while delta  expression by a murine sarcoma virus promoter. B, COX-2 promoter activity in cells cotransfected with beta -full-length (FL), beta -LIP, or delta  C/EBP. Each bar is mean ± S.E. of three experiments.

We suspected that inhibition of COX-2 promoter by C/EBP-LIP overexpression may be attributed to its interfering with binding of C/EBPbeta -LAP to C/EBP or the CRE site. To our surprise, C/EBPbeta -LIP overexpression did not inhibit binding of C/EBPbeta -LAP but instead increased basal and PMA-induced C/EBPbeta -LAP binding to the C/EBP site (Fig. 7A) and the CRE site (Fig. 7B). Overexpression of C/EBPdelta increased the basal binding of C/EBPbeta -LAP and C/EBPbeta -LIP to the C/EBP site (Fig. 8A) and the CRE site (Fig. 8B) and basal binding of C/EBPdelta to the C/EBP site (Fig. 8A). Interestingly, its binding to the C/EBP site was significantly reduced in PMA-treated cells despite its overexpression (Fig. 8A). C/EBPdelta overexpression did not influence delta  binding to the CRE site (Fig. 8B).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Influence of C/EBPbeta -LIP overexpression on beta  and delta  binding to C/EBP sequence (A) and CRE sequence (B). Each figure is representative of two experiments with similar results.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Influence of C/EBPdelta overexpression on beta  and delta  binding to C/EBP sequence (A) and CRE sequence (B). Each figure is representative of two experiments.

Overexpression of C/EBPbeta -LIP Inhibited COX-2 Promoter Activation by p300-- Since C/EBPbeta -LIP did not block binding of C/EBPbeta -LAP and yet suppressed COX-2 promoter activity induced by PMA, we suspected that C/EBPbeta -LIP overexpression may act at the level of interaction between DNA-bound C/EBPbeta -LAP and co-activator p300. Transfection of cells with p300 plasmids increased basal and PMA-induced COX-2 promoter activity (Fig. 9). This increase was completely abrogated by overexpression of C/EBPbeta -LIP (Fig. 9).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Interference of p300 co-activator activity by C/EBPbeta -LIP overexpression. Transient transfection of p300 increased basal and PMA-induced COX-2 promoter activity. Co-transfection with LIP reduced both activities to the basal level. Each bar is mean ± S.E. of three experiments.

C/EBPbeta -LIP Inhibited COX-2 Protein Levels-- In agreement with the COX-2 promoter results, overexpression of C/EBPbeta -LIP by transient transfection reduced COX-2 protein levels induced by PMA (Fig. 10), while neither C/EBPbeta -FL nor C/EBPdelta overexpression altered the basal or PMA-stimulated COX-2 protein levels (data not shown). However, unlike the promoter data, p300 overexpression did not increase basal COX-2 protein level and increased PMA-induced COX-2 protein expression to a lesser extent than the promoter activity (Fig. 10). We suspect that the difference between promoter and protein stimulation by p300 is due to an artificially high luciferase activity expressed by the transfected naked DNA. Nevertheless, COX-2 protein levels induced by PMA plus p300 overexpression were suppressed by cotransfection with C/EBPbeta -LIP (Fig. 10).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Inhibition of COX-2 protein expression by C/EBPbeta -LIP. The top panel shows a representative Western blot, and the bottom panel the densitometric analysis. C/EBPbeta -LIP overexpression suppressed PMA-induced COX-2 protein levels stimulated with or without p300 overexpression.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Results from this study indicate that PMA induces a dynamic switch of C/EBP isoform binding to C/EBP and CRE sites on the 5'-untranslated region of COX-2 promoter, thereby stimulating COX-2 promoter activity. PMA causes three key switches: 1) increased binding of C/EBPbeta -LAP to C/EBP and CRE sites; 2) reduced binding of C/EBPdelta to the C/EBP site; and 3) increased C/EBPbeta -LIP binding to C/EBP and CRE sites. Increased binding of C/EBPbeta -LAP to these two regulatory elements plays a key role in transactivation of COX-2 promoter, while increased C/EBPbeta -LIP binding provides a negative regulation of COX-2 promoter activity. The role of C/EBPdelta in this chain of events is less clear. Our data suggest that it is involved in the control of basal COX-2 promoter activity. Its binding to the C/EBP site is correlated with the protein level. When its protein expression is aberrantly augmented, such as in skin carcinogenesis, it causes an autonomous COX-2 protein expression that contributes to cancer growth (17). PMA reduced C/EBPdelta protein levels, and this reduction resulted in a reduced binding of C/EBPdelta to the C/EBP site. It is unclear whether the effect of PMA is at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level of C/EBPdelta expression. That PMA also reduced C/EBPdelta binding in delta -overexpression driven by a viral promoter suggests that PMA might accelerate C/EBPdelta degradation. Reduced C/EBPdelta binding due to a lower C/EBPdelta protein level coupled with an increased C/EBPbeta -LAP binding is likely to be pivotal for COX-2 induction by PMA and other stimuli signaling via the protein kinase C pathway. It is interesting to note that C/EBPdelta binding to the CRE site was not reduced despite a reduced C/EBPdelta level and an increased C/EBPbeta -LAP binding to this site. This result suggests that following stimulation by PMA, the affinity of C/EBPbeta -LAP binding to the C/EBP site is greatly enhanced, which leads to displacement of C/EBPdelta from the C/EBP site.

PMA increased the binding of all three isoforms of C/EBPbeta to C/EBP and CRE sites without increasing their protein expression. A previous study showed that PMA induced phosphorylation of C/EBPbeta , and the phosphorylated C/EBPbeta exhibited an increased DNA binding activity (18). Our recent study showed that dephosphorylation of C/EBPbeta resulted in a marked reduction of C/EBPbeta binding to C/EBP site on COX-2 promoter (10). Protein kinase C does not phosphorylate C/EBPbeta directly (18) but mitogen-activated protein kinase, calcium-dependent calmodulin kinase II, and ribosomal S6 kinase can directly phosphorylate C/EBPbeta at different serine/threonine residues (19-21). It is unclear as to which kinase phosphorylates C/EBPbeta , thereby increasing its binding activity in response to exogenous stimulation by inflammatory or mitogenic factors. It is also unknown whether C/EBPbeta -LIP binding depends on phosphorylation.

C/EBPbeta -LIP retains the C-terminal DNA binding domain and the leucine zipper region but loses the N-terminal transactivation domain of C/EBPbeta -FL or C/EBPbeta -LAP (14). It can form a homodimer or heterodimer with C/EBPbeta -LAP or C/EBPbeta -FL and bind to C/EBP or CRE site. Our results suggest that it can also form a heterodimer with C/EBPdelta and bind to the CRE site. Results from our transient transfection experiment are consistent with previous reports that C/EBPbeta -LIP suppresses COX-2 promoter activity induced by exogenous stimuli (8). In this study, we provide evidence that C/EBPbeta -LIP suppresses COX-2 protein expression induced by PMA. Furthermore, we have provided a novel mechanism by which C/EBPbeta -LIP blocked PMA-induced promoter activity and protein expression. C/EBPbeta -FL/LAP has been reported to recruit p300 family co-activators to the promoter region through its direct interaction with the co-activator (22). Since C/EBPbeta -LIP did not block the binding of C/EBPbeta -FL/LAP, we reasoned that it may interfere with the interaction of p300 with C/EBPbeta -FL/LAP. Our results show for the first time that overexpression of C/EBPbeta -LIP abrogated the stimulatory effect of p300 on COX-2 promoter activity and protein expression. We speculate that the inhibitory effect of C/EBPbeta -LIP is attributable to binding of an increasing amount of LIP homodimers and LIP/LAP heterodimer to the cognate site, which no longer interact with p300, and thus interfere with recruitment of transcription machinery to the TATA region for RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription.

In summary, we have provided several novel aspects of COX-2 promoter stimulation by PMA. 1) Increased C/EBPbeta -LAP binding to C/EBP and CRE sites plays a pivotal role in COX-2 transcriptional activation. 2) Sequence-specific binding of C/EBPbeta -LAP recruits p300 for initiation of COX-2 transcription. 3) Concurrent increase in C/EBPbeta -LIP binding to these two sites interferes with C/EBP-LAP interaction with p300 and provides a dynamic control of COX-2 promoter function.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Marcus Kuo, University of Texas-M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for providing laboratory space to perform the p300 transfection experiments during the flood disaster and Susan Mitterling for editorial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant R01 HL-50675 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the NINDS, National Institutes of Health Grant P50 NS-23327.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Vascular Biology Research Center and Div. of Hematology, Univ. of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin, MSB 5.016, Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-500-6801; Fax: 713-500-6812; E-mail: Kenneth.K.Wu@uth.tmc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108075200

2 K. Schroer, M. A. Saunders, X.-M. Xu, Y. Zhu, J. Meyer-Kirchrath, and K. K. Wu, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; LAP, liver-enriched activating protein; LIP, liver-enriched inhibitory protein; HFF, human foreskin fibroblasts; CRE, cyclic AMP responsive element; C/EBPbeta -FL, full-length C/EBPbeta .

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Vane, J. R., Mitchell, J. A., Appleton, I., Tomlinson, A., Bishop-Bailey, D., Croxtall, J., and Willoughby, D. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2046-2050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Seibert, K., Zhang, Y., Leahy, K., Hauser, S., Masferrer, J., Perkins, W., Lee, L., and Isakson, P. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12013-12017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Tsujii, M., and DuBois, R. N. (1995) Cell 83, 493-501[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Wu, K. K. (1995) Adv. Pharmacol. 33, 179-207
5. Yamamoto, K., Arakawa, T., Ueda, N., and Yamamoto, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 31315-31320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Schmedtje, S. F., Ji, Y-S., Liu, W-L., DuBois, R. N., and Runge, M. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 601-608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Inoue, H., Yokoyama, C., Hara, S., Tone, Y., and Tanabe, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24965-24971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Wadleigh, D. J., Reddy, S. T., Kopp, E., Ghosh, S., and Herschman, H. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6259-6266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Thomas, B., Berenbaum, F., Humbert, L., Bian, H., Bereziat, G., Crofford, L., and Olivier, J. L. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6798-6809[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Saunders, M. A., Sansores-Garcia, L., Gilroy, D. W., and Wu, K. K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18897-18904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Wadel, A., and Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W. L. (1995) Immunobiol. 193, 171-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Akira, S., and Kishimoto, T. (1997) Adv. Immunol. 65, 1-46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Ossipow, V., Descombes, P., and Schibler, U. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8219-8223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Descombes, P., and Schibler, U. (1991) Cell 67, 569-576[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Liao, J., Piwien-Pilipuk, G., Ross, S. E., Hodge, C. L., Sealy, L., MacDougald, O. A., and Schwartz, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 315997-331604
16. Tazawa, R., Xu, X-M., Wu, K. K., and Wang, L. H. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commu. 203, 190-199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Kim, Y., and Fischer, S. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27686-27694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Trautwein, C., Caelles, C., Van der Geer, P., Hunter, T., Karin, M., and Chojkier, M. (1993) Nature 364, 544-547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Nakajima, T., Kinoshita, S., Sasagawa, T., Sasaki, K., Naruto, M., Kishimoto, T., and Akira, S. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2207-2211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Wegner, M., Cao, Z., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1992) Science 256, 370-373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Buck, M., Poli, V., Van der Geer, P., Chojkier, M., and Hunter, T. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 1087-1092[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Mink, S., Haenig, B., and Klempnauer, K.-H. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 6609-6617[Abstract]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J.-H. Tsou, K.-Y. Chang, W.-C. Wang, J. T. Tseng, W.-C. Su, L.-Y. Hung, W.-C. Chang, and B.-K. Chen
Nucleolin regulates c-Jun/Sp1-dependent transcriptional activation of cPLA2{alpha} in phorbol ester-treated non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells
Nucleic Acids Res., January 17, 2008; 36(1): 217 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
W.-G. Deng, A. J. Montero, and K. K. Wu
Interferon-{gamma} Suppresses Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter Activity by Inhibiting C-Jun and C/EBP{beta} Binding
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 27(8): 1752 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
M. Liu, Y. Yang, C. Gu, Y. Yue, K. K. Wu, J. Wu, and Y. Zhu
Spike protein of SARS-CoV stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression via both calcium-dependent and calcium-independent protein kinase C pathways
FASEB J, May 1, 2007; 21(7): 1586 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
L. Brunelli, K. A. Cieslik, J. L. Alcorn, M. Vatta, and A. Baldini
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{delta} Upregulates 14-3-3{epsilon} in Human Endothelial Cells via CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein-{beta}
Circ. Res., March 16, 2007; 100(5): e59 - e71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
B.-K. Chen, C.-C. Huang, W.-C. Chang, Y.-J. Chen, U. Kikkawa, K.-i. Nakahama, I. Morita, and W.-C. Chang
PP2B-mediated Dephosphorylation of c-Jun C Terminus Regulates Phorbol Ester-induced c-Jun/Sp1 Interaction in A431 Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2007; 18(3): 1118 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Cascio, V. Bartella, C. Garofalo, A. Russo, A. Giordano, and E. Surmacz
Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Differentially Regulates Estrogen Receptor-dependent Transcription at Estrogen Response Element and AP-1 Sites in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3498 - 3506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
K. A. Cieslik, W.-G. Deng, and K. K. Wu
Essential Role of C-Rel in Nitric-Oxide Synthase-2 Transcriptional Activation: Time-Dependent Control by Salicylate
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 2004 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. Borger, M. Tamm, J. L. Black, and M. Roth
Asthma: Is It Due to an Abnormal Airway Smooth Muscle Cell?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2006; 174(4): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. C. Degner, M. Q. Kemp, G. T. Bowden, and D. F. Romagnolo
Conjugated Linoleic Acid Attenuates Cyclooxygenase-2 Transcriptional Activity via an Anti-AP-1 Mechanism in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells
J. Nutr., February 1, 2006; 136(2): 421 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J.-M. Wang, C.-Y. Ko, L.-C. Chen, W.-L. Wang, and W.-C. Chang
Functional role of NF-IL6{beta} and its sumoylation and acetylation modifications in promoter activation of cyclooxygenase 2 gene
Nucleic Acids Res., January 5, 2006; 34(1): 217 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J.-J. Chen, W.-C. Huang, and C.-C. Chen
Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Response to Proteasome Inhibitors Involves Reactive Oxygen Species-mediated Signaling Pathway and Recruitment of CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {delta} and CREB-binding Protein
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2005; 16(12): 5579 - 5591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. V. G. Bosc, J. J. Layne, M. T. Nelson, and D. C. Hill-Eubanks
Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells and Serum Response Factor Cooperatively Regulate the Activity of an {alpha}-Actin Intronic Enhancer
J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 26113 - 26120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
L.-C. Chen, B.-K. Chen, and W.-C. Chang
Activating Protein 1-Mediated Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Is Independent of N-Terminal Phosphorylation of c-Jun
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2005; 67(6): 2057 - 2069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. A. Cieslik, Y. Zhu, M. Shtivelband, and K. K. Wu
Inhibition of p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase-mediated CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {beta} Activation and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by Salicylate
J. Biol. Chem., May 6, 2005; 280(18): 18411 - 18417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Chen, M. Zhao, R. Rao, H. Inoue, and C.-M. Hao
C/EBP{beta} and Its Binding Element Are Required for NF{kappa}B-induced COX2 Expression Following Hypertonic Stress
J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 16354 - 16359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. K. Wu, J.-Y. Liou, and K. Cieslik
Transcriptional Control of COX-2 via C/EBP{beta}
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2005; 25(4): 679 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page