Mechanism-based Inhibition of Enzyme I of the Escherichia
coli Phosphotransferase System
CYSTEINE 502 IS AN ESSENTIAL RESIDUE*
Luis Fernando
García-Alles
,
Karin
Flükiger,
Johannes
Hewel§,
Regula
Gutknecht,
Christian
Siebold,
Stefan
Schürch§, and
Bernhard
Erni
From the Departement für Chemie und Biochemie and the
§ Mass-Spectrometry Laboratory, Universität Bern,
Freiestrasse 3, Bern CH-3012, Switzerland
Received for publication, October 18, 2001, and in revised form, December 7, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Four phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)
derivatives, carrying reactive or activable chemical functions in each
of the three chemical regions of PEP, were assayed as alternative
substrates of enzyme I (EI) of the Escherichia coli
PEP:glucose phosphotransferase system. The Z- and
E-isomers of 3-chlorophosphoenolpyruvate (3-Cl-PEP) were
substrates, presenting Km values of 0.08 and
0.12 mM, respectively, very similar to the
Km of 0.14 mM measured for PEP, and
kcat of 40 and 4 min
1, compared
with 2,200 min
1, for PEP. The low catalytic efficiency of
these substrates permits the study of activity at in vivo
EI concentrations. Z-Cl-PEP was a competitive inhibitor of
PEP with a KI of 0.4 mM.
E-Cl-PEP was not an inhibitor. Compounds 3 and 4, obtained
by modification of the carboxylic and phosphate groups of PEP, were
neither substrates nor inhibitors of EI, highlighting the importance of
these functionalities for recognition by EI. Z-Cl-PEP is a
suicide inhibitor. About 10-50 turnovers sufficed to inactivate EI
completely. Such a property can be exploited to reveal and quantitate
phosphoryl transfer from EI to other proteins at in vivo
concentrations. Inactivation was saturatable in Z-Cl-PEP,
with an apparent K
of 0.2-0.4 mM. The rate of inactivation increased with the
concentration of EI, indicating a preferential or exclusive reaction
with the dimeric form of EI. E-Cl-PEP inactivates EI much
more slowly, and unlike PEP, it did not protect against inactivation by
Z-Cl-PEP. This and the ineffectiveness of
E-Cl-PEP as a competitive inhibitor have been related to
the presence of two EI active species. Cys-502 of EI was identified by
mass spectrometry as the reacting residue. The C502A EI mutant showed
less than 0.06% wild-type activity. Sequence alignments and
comparisons of x-ray structures of different PEP-utilizing enzymes
indicate that Cys-502 might serve as a proton donor during catalysis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:glycose
phosphotransferase system
(PTS)1 catalyzes the uptake
and phosphorylation of carbohydrates (1). It is further involved in
signal transduction (2), e.g. catabolite repression (3),
chemotaxis (4), and allosteric regulation of metabolic enzymes and
transporters in response to the availability of carbohydrates (5, 6).
The PTS is widely distributed in eubacteria and absent from eukaryotes.
It generally consists of two central phosphoryl carriers, EI and HPr,
and depending on the species, between 1 and 20 peripheral
phosphotransferases, the integral membrane components that recognize
and transport hexoses, hexitols, and disaccharides. EI and HPr are the
proteins at the top of this divergent phosphorylation cascade (7).
EI is a 64-kDa two-domain protein (8, 9). In the amino-terminal domain
(EIN, residues 1-250) is located His-189, the amino acid transiently
phosphorylated by PEP. The three-dimensional structure of EIN has been
elucidated (10, 11) and its mode of interaction with HPr characterized
by NMR spectroscopy (12, 13). It is composed of a HPr binding
-helical subdomain and an
/
subdomain, structurally similar to
the phosphohistidine swivel domain of pyruvate phosphate dikinase
(PPDK). Phospho-EIN transfers the phosphoryl group to HPr, but it
requires the presence of the carboxyl-terminal domain (EIC) to become
phosphorylated by PEP (8, 14). EIC contains the PEP binding site (15) and plays a crucial role in dimerization (16, 17). It also confers
species and subunit specificity during the phosphoryl transfer to the
next phosphocarrier protein (14). EIC is proteolytically unstable and
flexible. Its structure is not yet known. However, the amino acid
sequence similarity between EIC and the PEP binding domain of PPDK of
Clostridium symbiosum points toward similar fold and
structure. There is also sequence similarity with PEP synthase
(18).
The mode of action of EI and the way its activity is controlled are not
yet fully understood. The protein dimerizes in a
temperature-dependent manner (19). The dissociation constant
has been reported to shift from 20 µM at 6 °C to 0.9 µM at 30 °C. The presence of divalent cations
(Mg2+ or Mn2+) and PEP also affects the
equilibrium and the association and dissociation rate constants (20,
21). The association rate constant is 2-3 orders of magnitude slower
than in other dimeric proteins, indicating that dimerization is
accompanied by major conformational rearrangements of the interacting
EIC domains (20, 22). Several studies suggest that the dimer is the
catalytically active form: (i) in vitro PTS activity
increases during a long lag time, which was explained by the slow
dimerization of EI to form the active species (23); (ii) PTS activity
at rate-limiting concentrations of wild-type EI was enhanced upon
addition of the inactive H189G and G338E EI mutants (24); (iii)
activity and fluorescence of pyrene-labeled EI changed in parallel as a
function of temperature, which was interpreted as a correlation between function and dimerization (20, 21).
Controversial issues concerning EI catalysis are: (i) the number of
sites per dimer which are phosphorylated at a given time, one (25, 26)
or two (27); (ii) the kinetic mechanism of EI, simple Bi Bi ping-pong
mechanism (28, 29) or a flip-flop mechanism (26, 30); and (iii) the
dynamics of monomer-dimer formation. Lag times suggest that dimer
formation is slow but that the dimer, once formed, remains stable (23).
Other data indicate that the EI dimer dissociates before or during the
transfer of the phosphate to HPr (19, 31). In relation to this, it is
not clear whether phosphorylation of EI favors dimerization (27, 32) or
to the contrary promotes monomer formation (19, 21).
The objective of the present work was to find irreversible inhibitors
(compounds 1-4,
Scheme I) and use them to characterize
the PEP binding site of EI and to study its catalytic properties.
Theoretically, compounds 1-3 are suicide inhibitors. They will release chloropyruvic acid (from 1 and
2) or chloroacetone (3) after transferring their phosphate group to EI. These molecules might then label catalytic residues of the protein. Compound 4 has been designed to react directly with nucleophiles present in the active site of EI,
presumably His-189. In general, substrate analogs have been widely
employed to study PEP-utilizing enzymes. For instance, C3-substituted
halo-PEP analogs were used with pyruvate kinase (PK) (33, 34), enolase
(33, 34), PEP carboxylase (PEPC) (35-37), PEP-carboxykinase (PEPCK)
(33), PPDK (33), UDP-GlcNAc enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA)
(38-40), 5-enol-pyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase
(EPSPS) (40, 41), and
3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase (DAHPS) (42). In the case of EI,
(Z)-phosphoenolbutyrate has helped to establish the
stereochemistry of protonation at C-3 of the enolate (43), which is now
known to happen from the 2-re-face.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
NADP (sodium salt) and bromopyruvic acid were
purchased from Fluka. PEP (cyclohexylammonium salt) and NADH (disodium
salt) were from Sigma. Chloropyruvic acid was synthesized as described previously (44). The synthesis and purification of compounds 1-4 will be reported elsewhere. They were
characterized by 1H, 13C, and 31P
NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The purity of compounds 1 and 2 was higher than 99%, as determined by
high performance liquid chromatography (not shown). Rabbit
muscle lactate dehydrogenase and yeast glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Overproduction and Purification of Proteins--
Proteins were
overexpressed in an Escherichia coli K12 strain
ZSC112L
HIC (ptsG, manZ,
ptsHIcrr, glk). EI, HPr, IIAGlc, and
IIABMan were purified as described (45, 46). Membranes
containing IICBGlc or IICMan/IIDMan
were prepared as described (46). Protein concentrations were determined
by quantitative amino acid analysis.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
The coding regions for EI- and
IIAGlc were cloned in the expression vector pJF119EH (47),
and the H189A, C502A mutants of EI and the H90Q mutant of
IIAGlc were prepared by recombinant circle PCR to afford
plasmids pMSEI189, pMSEI189H6, pMSEI502, pMSEI502H6, and pMSIIA90
(48).
Assay for PEP:Glucose Phosphotransferase Activity--
In
vitro PTS activity was coupled to the oxidation of glucose
6-phosphate to 6-phosphoglucono-
-lactone, catalyzed by
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Reactions were performed in 96-well
microtiter plates. The formation of NADPH at 30 °C was monitored
continuously at
= 340 nm in a Spectramax-250 plate reader.
Initial rates were determined from the maximal slope of the absorption
curves. Assay mixtures contained (150 µl/well): 1 µM
HPr, 20 µM IIAGlc, 1 µl of membrane
extract, 0.1 unit of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 1 mM NADP+, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 2.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM NaF, and 5 mM
MgCl2. The concentrations of EI and PEP are indicated in
the figure legends. EI was always rate-limiting. The rates did not
exceed 25% of the activity attained at saturating EI. The reactions
were started by the addition of 10 µl of 15 mM glucose,
PEP, or the PEP analog, to 140 µl/well of the assay mixture
containing the rest of components preincubated for 10 min at
30 °C.
Inactivation Assays--
EI (0.051-5.1 µM) was
shaken for 10 min at 30 °C in the presence of 0.5 µM
HPr, 5 µM IIAGlc (or 0.5 µM
IIABMan), 0.01 µl/µl membranes containing
IICBGlc (or IICDMan), 50 mM HEPES
pH 7.5, 2.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM NaF, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM glucose, 1 mg/ml
bovine serum albumin, 6 units/ml lactate dehydrogenase, and 1 mM NADH. Compounds 1-4, chloro- or
bromopyruvic acid were added to a final concentration of 0-5
mM, as indicated in the figure legends or in the text.
Aliquots were withdrawn at intervals, and the reaction was stopped by
dilution into at least 10 volumes of cold (4-10 °C) buffer
containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 50 mM HEPES, 2.5 mM DTT, 2.5 mM NaF, 5 mM
MgCl2, and 0.3-1 mM PEP. PTS activity of
inactivated EI was assayed in the PEP:glucose phosphotransferase assay
at 0.017 µM final EI concentration and 1 mM
PEP. In the case of incubation of 0.051 µM EI, the
aliquots (50 µl) were assayed directly by addition to 100 µl of a
mixture of the rest of components incubated at 30 °C and containing
3 mM PEP. Background activity was determined in the absence
of EI, and it was subtracted before subsequent calculations. To measure
protection of EI by substrate, the inhibitor and the protecting
substrate were mixed in the desired concentration ratio and added
simultaneously to the incubation mixture.
Calculation of Kinetic Parameters--
The
Km and kcat values were
calculated by least squares fit of the initial rates measured in the
presence of variable concentrations of PEP or PEP analogs
1-4 to a Michaelis-Menten hyperbola. The
inhibition constant KI and
Km were obtained by linear regression from the
plot of K
versus [I] according to the equation
K
= Km (1 + [I]/KI). In the
inactivation assays, the percent of residual EI activity
versus time was fitted to the second-order rate equation % activity = 100/(1 + kinact t) + Res, where Res represents the residual activity
remaining at long incubation times. kinact
values measured at a given EI concentration were plotted
versus inhibitor concentration and fitted to a hyperbola
kinact = k
[I]/(K
+ [I]).
From these curves the maximum inactivation rate
(k
) and the Michaelis
constant for inactivation
(K
) could be
determined at different EI concentrations. It must be noticed that the
reported kinact values (units:
min
1) are not real second-order rate constants (units:
concentration
1 time
1). In fact,
kinact = k
[E], where
[E] represents the unknown concentration of the reactive form of
EI.
Identification of the Labeled Amino Acid Residue by Mass
Spectrometry--
EI (30 µM, 1 ml) was treated under
turnover conditions with 2 mM Z-Cl-PEP (see
above). After 60 min NaBH4 was added to a final concentration of 20 mM and the reaction allowed to proceed
at room temperature for 60 min. A second sample of EI was subjected to
the same treatment without Z-Cl-PEP. Both samples were
cooled on ice, dialyzed against 100 volumes of buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM
DTT, 0.4 M NaCl), and EI was purified by gel filtration
chromatography (Superdex-200, Amersham Biosciences, Inc., same buffer).
Peak fractions were pooled, concentrated (Centricon-50, Amicon) to a
volume of 1 ml, and dialyzed overnight against 100 mM Tris
buffer. 50 µl of the solution was treated with 20 µl of 200 µg/ml
modified trypsin (sequencing grade, Promega) at 25 °C for 5 h.
Proteolysis was stopped by the addition of formic acid to a final
concentration of 1%. The volume was reduced to 20 µl by evaporation
in a Speed-Vac centrifuge. Peptides were transferred to tips containing
POROS R2 (C-18 reverse phase), desalted by washing with 0.01% formic
acid, eluted with 0.1% formic acid in 50% acetonitrile, and analyzed
by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS).
ESI-MS and tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) measurements were done
on an Applied Biosystems/Sciex QSTAR Pulsar hybrid quadrupole
time-of-flight (QqTOF) mass spectrometer (Sciex Concord, Canada),
equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Protana, Odense, Denmark),
under standard conditions. The spray capillary supplies a flow rate of
10-20 nl/min. A typical voltage of 900 V was applied, and nitrogen was
used as the curtain gas. Precursor ions were selected in the quadrupole
Q1 within an m/z window of ±0.7 and
subjected to collision-induced dissociation using nitrogen as the
collision gas. Collision energies in the range of 20-40 eV were
applied. The molecular masses of the peptides were calculated from the
series of multiply charged ions obtained by ESI-MS. The product ions of
selected peptides were subsequently analyzed by the second stage of
mass spectrometry. The accuracy of time of flight (reflectron) lies
within 10 ppm. The mass spectrometer was calibrated externally using a
mixture of cesium iodide and reserpine. The Applied Biosystems Analyst
QS software package was used for data acquisition and processing.
Sequence and Structural Comparisons--
Protein sequences (from
the Swiss Protein Database) were aligned using the PILEUP program from
the Wisconsin package, using standard values for the gap creation and
extension penalties (49). The resulting multiple alignments were shaded
using the BoxShade 3.21 program
(www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html).
Three-dimensional structural comparisons of PEP-consuming
proteins were done using Swiss-Pdbviewer, version 3.5b1 (www.expasy.ch/spdbv/mainpage.htm).
 |
RESULTS |
PEP Analogs as Substrates--
Compounds
1-4 are phosphate and phosphonate enol esters,
and as such they are potential substrates of EI. The Z- and
E-isomers of 3-Cl-PEP (compounds 1 and
2, respectively) function as alternative substrates in the
phosphotransferase assay, whereas the PEP derivatives with
modifications in the carboxylic (3) or phosphate group
(4) do not (Fig. 1 and Table I). Because Z-Cl-PEP also acts
as a suicide inhibitor (see below), EI becomes irreversibly inhibited
during the time of the assay. More than 50% inactivation was detected
at the highest concentration of 1 after 2 min. For that
reason, the initial rates measured for Z-Cl-PEP have been
also corrected for the progressive inactivation.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Z- and E-Cl-PEP
as phosphoryl donors. Shown is the rate of formation of glucose
6-phosphate after the addition of variable concentrations of
Z-Cl-PEP (open squares, using 2.5 µM EI) or E-Cl-PEP (open circles,
12.5 µM EI). Reactions were monitored during the first 2 min of reaction at 30 °C. The extent of concomitant EI inactivation
measured after this time is indicated with solid symbols;
immediately after the activity measurements aliquots were withdrawn and
diluted in cold buffer containing 0.3 mM PEP. The residual
activity was assayed at 0.017 µM EI, using 1 mM PEP. The plot obtained after correction for the
concomitant inactivation of EI by Z-Cl-PEP is shown in
dashed lines. The kinetic constants derived from these plots
are given in Table I.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Kinetic data from compounds 1-4 as phosphoryl donors to EI
and as inhibitors of PEP phosphorylation
Activity was measured at 30 °C, using 0-2 mM
concentrations of the compounds, at the EI concentrations indicated.
The initial rate dependence on the concentration was fitted to a
hyperbola to derive the value of the kinetic constants. Inhibition
constants were obtained by measuring the initial rates at 30 °C,
using 17 nM EI and 0-2 mM PEP in the presence
of 0, 0.12, 0.36, and 1.08 mM concentrations of the
inhibitor (Fig. 2). For further details, see "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
The Km values of EI for 1 (0.04-0.08
mM) and for 2 (0.12 mM) are
comparable with the Km determined for PEP (0.14 mM), which is also close to the published one (0.18 mM) (28). However, the turnover numbers
(kcat) of EI for Z-Cl-PEP and
E-Cl-PEP are 2 and 3 orders of magnitude smaller,
respectively, than for PEP (Table I). It is important to point out that
the EI concentration had to be increased 100-1,000-fold to detect
turnover with compounds 1 and 2. Consequently,
the EI dimer:monomer ratio is expected to increase. Because the dimer
probably is the most active species, the difference between the
catalytic constants for PEP and the 3-Cl-PEP analogs might be underestimated.
Similar results have been reported for other PEP-consuming enzymes. For
example, Z-Cl-PEP and Z-F-PEP are 3 orders of
magnitude worse substrates than PEP for pyruvate kinase and enolase
(33, 34, 50). Enzymatic preference for the Z-isomer is also
a common feature of PEP-utilizing enzymes, e.g.
PEPCK, PPDK, and enolase (33), and it had been already observed with EI
(43).
Z-Cl-PEP as Competitive Inhibitor--
Because the catalytic
efficiencies of 1-4 are very small, compared
with PEP, these compounds can also be studied as inhibitors.
Z-Cl-PEP inhibits PEP phosphoryl transfer to EI (Fig.
2A). The inhibition is
competitive with a KI of 0.4 mM. E-Cl-PEP (Fig. 2B), 3 and 4 do not inhibit EI. The strikingly different inhibitory strength of the
Z- and E-isomers is surprising in view of the
very similar Km values measured for both
compounds. The reason for this discrepancy is not known. Notice that
the inhibition assays were started by the simultaneous addition of PEP
and inhibitor to minimize irreversible inhibition of EI by the
Z-Cl-PEP analog. With this precaution less than 10% activity was lost, even at the highest inhibitor and minimal PEP concentrations used.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Z-Cl-PEP and
E-Cl-PEP as competitive inhibitors. Shown is a
Lineweaver-Burk plot of EI inhibition kinetics in presence of
Z-Cl-PEP (panel A) and E-Cl-PEP
(panel B). Concentrations were 0.017 µM EI,
0-2 mM PEP, 0 mM inhibitor
(squares), 0.12 mM inhibitor,
(circles), 0.36 mM inhibitor
(triangles), 1.08 mM inhibitor
(stars).
|
|
Z-Cl-PEP as a Suicide Inhibitor--
As has been mentioned,
phosphoryl transfer from the 3-Cl-PEP analogs to EI is accompanied by
the release of a chloropyruvate molecule, which might then react with
nucleophilic residues in the active site. Bearing this idea in mind, EI
was incubated at 30 °C with compound 1 or 2,
and aliquots were withdrawn at different time points to assay for
residual activity. As shown in Fig.
3A, EI is inactivated by
Z-Cl-PEP under turnover conditions, that is, in the presence
of glucose and catalytic amounts of the other PTS components.
Incubation of EI with Z-Cl-PEP alone is not inhibitory.
Omission of Mg2+ prevents inactivation at all EI
concentrations tested (0.051-5.1 µM), highlighting the
importance of this cation for catalysis (and consequently
inactivation). The results are independent of the transporter employed
(glucose or mannose PTS components). Irreversible inhibition is the
result of modification of EI because only the external addition of
fresh EI could restore the activity. Activity was not recovered after
gel filtration or extensive dialysis of the modified protein.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Time-dependent inactivation of
EI. Panel A, irreversible inhibition of EI under
turnover conditions. EI was incubated with 0.5 mM
Z-Cl-PEP (squares), 0.5 mM
E-Cl-PEP (circles), 5 mM compound
3 (triangles), 5 mM compound
4 (stars), 0.5 mM Z-Cl-PEP
in the absence of Mg2+ (diamonds), 0.5 mM Z-Cl-PEP in the presence of
IIABMan/IICDMan instead of
IIAGlc/IICBGlc (semicircles), or no
inhibitor (tick marks). Unless indicated otherwise, the
incubation mixture contained 5.1 µM EI; catalytic amounts
of HPr, IIAGlc, and IICBGlc; 1 mM
glucose; 5 mM Mg2+; 2.5 mM DTT; 6 units/ml lactate dehydrogenase; and 1 mM NADH. To stop the
reaction after the indicated incubation time at 30 °C, aliquots were
diluted 1:20 into cold buffer containing 0.3 mM PEP, and
the EI residual activity was then determined in a standard PTS assay.
50% inactivation was measured after incubation with compound
2 for 60 min, whereas treatment with compounds 3 and 4 for the same time had no effect (not shown).
Panel B, protection of EI from inactivation by
Z-Cl-PEP. 0.51 µM EI was treated with 0.3 mM Z-Cl-PEP (squares), 0.3 mM Z-Cl-PEP + 0.6 mM PEP
(circles), 0.3 mM Z-Cl-PEP + 0.6 mM E-Cl-PEP (triangles) under the
conditions described in panel A. Panel C, inactivation of EI
promoted by phosphoryl transfer to other proteins. 5.1 µM
EI was preincubated with 0.5 mM Z-Cl-PEP in the
presence of Mg2+ and 100 µM concentrations of
HPr (squares), IIAGlc (open circles),
IIAGlc H90Q mutant (solid circles), or
IIABMan (triangles). Inset, percent
of maximum inactivation as a function of the concentration of HPr
(squares) and IIAGlc (circles).
Inactivation curves were fitted to the function: % activity = 100/(1 + kinact t) + Res,
from which the maximum inactivation = 100% Res.
|
|
E-Cl-PEP is a 100-fold slower suicide inhibitor than the
Z-isomer. 0.5 mM E-Cl-PEP half
inactivates EI (5.1 µM) after ~60 min of incubation,
and similar to Z-Cl-PEP, turnover conditions are required
(not shown). On the other hand, compounds 3 and
4, which are neither substrates nor competitive inhibitors, do not induce any inactivation. Both the phosphate and carboxylic group
of PEP appear to be critical for EI binding (34, 51, 52). In fact,
there exist very few examples of PEP analogs carrying modifications in
these chemical functions which are still recognized by PEP-utilizing
enzymes. The employment of thiophosphates and the remarkable case of
sulfoenolpyruvate might be cited (53-55).
PEP efficiently protects against inactivation of EI by
Z-Cl-PEP (Fig. 3B). Notice that at the EI
concentration assayed the rate of disappearance of PEP is very fast
(limited by other PTS component). Because there are no signs of
incipient inactivation after 5 min of incubation, protection has to be
also effective at considerably lower PEP concentrations. This is also
suggested by the low inactivation observed at the lowest PEP
concentrations utilized in the experiments conducted to determine
Z-Cl-PEP competitive inhibition. Conversely to PEP,
E-Cl-PEP does not, or very weakly, protects against
inactivation (Fig. 3B).
Two experiments prove that the chloropyruvate produced from
Z-Cl-PEP does not equilibrate with the bulk solution before
inactivating the protein and that such a reaction involves a nonexposed
residue. (i) The addition of lactate dehydrogenase/NADH, a system known to quench halopyruvate reactivity, does not reduce the rate of inactivation by Z-Cl-PEP (35). (ii) Bromo- or chloropyruvate (0.5 mM) does not inactivate EI, provided that an excess of
DTT (2.5 mM) is present in the solution. The latter
observation indicates that DTT is able to quench these chemicals
efficiently, as Hoving et al. pointed out from EI labeling
studies carried out with bromopyruvate (30). Because DTT has been used
systematically in the Z-Cl-PEP inactivation experiments
shown in this work, it can be concluded that chloropyruvate reacts with
the protein before it leaves the protein environment, and probably at
the active site.
Inactivation of EI in Presence of Phosphoryl Acceptor
Proteins--
Multiple turnovers, and consequently,
time-dependent inactivation of EI by Z-Cl-PEP,
are also elicited with a stoichiometric excess of HPr, the phosphoryl
acceptor substrate of EI (Fig. 3C). Surprisingly, the
addition of IIAGlc also induces inactivation, although this
protein is believed to be phosphorylated by HPr and not by EI. The
nonphosphorylatable H90Q mutant of IIAGlc and the
functionally analogous but structurally different IIABMan
subunit have no effect. It should be noticed that EI, HPr, and IIAGlc were isolated from ptsH deletion strains.
It is also important to indicate that phosphoryl transfer from
Z-Cl-PEP to EI is the rate-limiting step during the
inactivation experiment. Therefore, the difference in the rate of
phosphotransfer from EI to HPr or to IIAGlc is not being
addressed in this experiment. EI phosphoryl transfer to HPr occurs
orders of magnitude faster than to IIAGlc. The
"cross-talk" reaction between EI and IIAGlc is unlikely
to be relevant in the living cell, being probably a manifestation of
the promiscuity of IIAGlc for binding a large number of
different proteins. Control experiments with [33P]PEP
confirmed that (i) IIAGlc is phosphorylated by EI in the
absence of HPr (Fig. 4B,
fourth lane) and (ii) phosphotransfer from PEP to HPr
or IIAGlc is also mediated by the nonphosphorylatable H189A
mutant of EI (second and fifth lanes).
No phosphorylation of IIAGlc could be detected in the
absence of EI (not shown).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Phosphotransferase activity of the C502A and
H189A mutants of EI. Panel A, PTS activity of wild-type
(squares), H189A (circles), and C502A
(triangles) EI. Initial rates were measured in a standard
PTS assay in the presence of 1 mM PEP and the indicated
concentrations of EI. Panels B and C,
EI-dependent protein phosphorylation. HPr (first
three lanes) and IIAGlc (last three
lanes) were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min with
[33P]PEP in the presence of wild-type (first
and fourth lanes), H189A (second and fifth
lanes), or C502A (third and sixth lanes) EI.
Proteins were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the
gel was autoradiographed (panel B) and then stained with
Coomassie Blue (panel C). No phosphorylation of
IIAGlc was detected in the absence of EI (not shown).
|
|
Different degrees of EI inactivation are achieved after some minutes of
incubation depending on the amount of acceptor protein used, as shown
in Fig. 3C, inset. Accurate estimations of the extent of maximum inactivation could be done with IIAGlc
because a clear plateau is reached after a few minutes of incubation, indicative of the stability of phospho-IIAGlc. From the
amount of IIAGlc consumed it can be calculated that about
10 turnovers are necessary to render EI inactive (considering EI
monomer). In the case of HPr, inactivation is biphasic, initially fast,
comparable with what happens with IIAGlc, then slow and
linear (not shown). This second phase is probably the result of the
continuous regeneration of HPr by slow hydrolysis of its phosphorylated
form (56).
Effect of Z-Cl-PEP and EI Concentrations on Inactivation--
The
time course of inactivation induced by 0-1 mM
concentrations of Z-Cl-PEP has been measured at three EI
concentrations (0.051, 0.51, and 5.1 µM). Fig.
5A shows the graphs obtained
at [EI] = 0.51 µM. The initial rates of inhibition as a
function of the inhibitor concentration are shown in the
inset of Fig. 5A. From this plot were derived the
Michaelis constant of inactivation (K
= 0.21 ± 0.03 mM) and the maximum rate of inactivation
(k
= 0.98 ± 0.06 min
1).
K
and
k
at the other EI
concentrations were determined in the same way (plots not shown). They
were K
= 0.40 ± 0.1 mM and
k
= 0.19 ± 0.02 min
1 at 0.051 µM EI, and
K
= 0.23 ± 0.05 mM and k
= 2.0 ± 0.2 min
1 at 5.1 µM
EI. Thus, k
increases 10-fold when the EI concentration is raised 100-fold, whereas K
does not change
significantly.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of the EI and
Z-Cl-PEP concentrations on the rate of
inactivation. Panel A, inactivation of 0.51 µM EI in presence of different concentrations of
Z-Cl-PEP: 0 mM (semicircles), 0.03 mM (tick marks), 0.05 mM
(diamonds), 0.09 mM (hexagons), 0.17 mM (stars), 0.31 mM
(triangles), 0.56 mM (circles), and 1 mM (squares). The inset shows a plot
of inactivation rates (kinact) as a function of
the Z-Cl-PEP concentration, from which the maximum
inactivation rate (k = 0.98 ± 0.06 min 1), and the Michaelis constant for
inactivation (K = 0.21 ± 0.03 mM) were calculated. Panel B,
inactivation by 1 mM Z-Cl-PEP at different
concentrations of EI: 0.019 µM (tick marks),
0.056 µM (semicircles), 0.64 µM
(stars), 1.28 µM (triangles), 2.55 µM (circles), and 5.1 µM
(squares). The inset shows a plot of the
inactivation rate (kinact, solid
squares) and the residual activity (open circles) as a
function of the EI concentration.
|
|
To confirm this trend further, the rate of inactivation was also
measured as a function of the EI concentration at a single Z-Cl-PEP concentration (1 mM) in a second
experiment (Fig. 5B). The inactivation rate
(kinact) increased with the EI concentration,
gradually approaching a maximum at 1.4 min
1 when EI > 1 µM (inset). Moreover, the smaller the EI
concentration, the higher the residual activity remaining after long
incubation times (inset). Taken together these results are
compatible with the notion of a dimeric form of EI being the most, if
not the only, active species (see "Discussion").
Identification of Cys-502 as the Reacting Amino Acid--
EI
treated with Z-Cl-PEP and an untreated control were reduced
with NaBH4 and digested with trypsin. The mass spectra of
the peptide mixtures are shown in Fig. 6,
A and B. The peptide mass fingerprints were
almost identical for both samples. However, a doubly charged peak at
m/z 756.85 (1,511.7 Da) emerged in the Z-Cl-PEP-treated sample, whereas the ion with
m/z 712.83 (1,423.6 Da) present in the untreated
control disappeared (Fig. 6, A and B). The two
ions were selected as precursors for collision-induced dissociation.
The product ion spectra included a complete series of the Yn ions of
the peptide W498TGM(X)GELAGDER510,
as shown in Fig. 6, C and D. Cys is the mass
difference corresponding to Cys-502 (103.0 Da) in the control, whereas
X matches the residue mass of an
S-carboxyhydroxyethyl-labeled Cys-502 (103 Da + 88 Da).
Reduction with NaBH4 was necessary to stabilize the
modified cysteine. Without such treatment the corresponding tryptic
peptide appeared at m/z 741.80 (1,481.60 Da). The
mass difference of 58 Da, instead of the expected 86 Da, points toward
the decomposition of the pyruvoyl moiety, as has been reported earlier
(57, 58).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
ESI-MS spectra of tryptic peptides of labeled
(panels B and D) and unlabeled
(panels A and C) EI.
Panels A and B, ESI-MS spectra. The
arrows indicate the unique fragments present in the
unlabeled (m/z 712.83; 1,423.60 Da) and the EI
labeled with Z-Cl-PEP (m/z 756.85;
1,511.70 Da). Note that the two fragments are exclusive, indicating
completeness of labeling (inset). Identified EI fragments:
m/z 509.63 (3+; 1,525.89 Da;
A16LLLKEDEIVIDR28), m/z
529.74 (2+; 1,057.48 Da; T297EFLFMDR304),
m/z 553.31 (2+; 1,104.62 Da;
V176LGFITDAGGR186), m/z
574.28 (2+; 1,146.56 Da; E350ENPFLGWR358),
m/z 652.68 (3+; 1,955.04;
T333MDIGGDKELPYMNFPK349),
m/z 687.40 (2+; 1,732.80 Da;
A319VAEACGSQAVIVR332),
m/z 694.84 (2+; 1,387.68 Da;
I31SADQVDQEVER42), m/z
731.45 (2+; 1,460.90 Da; M1ISGILASPGIAFGK15),
m/z 762.45 (3+; 2,284.35 Da;
V547LAEQALAQPTTDELMTLVNK567),
m/z 806.43 (2+; 1,610.86 Da;
S196LELPAIVGTGSVTSQVK213), and
m/z 893.54 (2+; 1,785.08 Da;
V547LAEQALAQPTTDELMTLVNK567). Panels
C and D, ESI-MS/MS spectra of precursor
[M+2H]2+ ions with m/z 712.83 (panel C) and m/z 756.85 (panel
D) (indicated with an asterisk). The mass difference
between y9 and y8 corresponds to cysteine (103 Da) in the unlabeled
sample (panel C) and to
S-carboxyhydroxyethylcysteine (103 Da + 88 Da) in the sample
treated with Z-Cl-PEP (panel D). Fragment ions
are indicated using the nomenclature of Biemann (76).
|
|
These results indicate that Cys-502 is modified by Z-Cl-PEP
and suggest that this residue is catalytically important. Initially the
rate of inactivation of EI is compatible with the involvement of a
cysteine (59). To confirm the catalytic role of this residue, the C502A
mutant of EI was prepared, purified, and its activity compared with
wild type and the H189A mutant of EI (Fig. 4A). C502A is
virtually inactive, having less than 0.06% of wild-type activity. It
is less active than the H189A mutant, which retains 0.5% activity. The
C502A is phosphorylated by [33P]PEP, indicating that its
folding is not affected by the mutation (Fig. 4B,
third lane). Phosphorylation takes place, in any case, several orders of magnitude slower than with the wild type, for which
it is instantaneous (not shown). As expected, the H189A mutant is not
phosphorylated (second and fifth lanes).
Cys-502 Counterparts in Homologous EI and in Other
PEP-consuming Enzymes--
Cys-502 of EI is the only invariant
cysteine residue in all other EI and EI-like proteins such as
EINtr (Fig. 7). Sequence
alignments reveal the presence of an invariant cysteine in equivalent
positions of the homologous PPDK and PEPS (Cys-831 of C. symbiosum PPDK, Cys-750 of E. coli PEPS, Fig. 7). Moreover, Cys-831 has been found to lie close to the methylene group of
a PEP molecule modeled into the x-ray structure of PPDK, suggesting the
involvement of its sulfhydryl group in the protonation of the released
enolate (60). PPDK is inactivated irreversibly by Z-Br-PEP
(33) and bromopyruvic acid (61). Inactivation was found to be the
result of the alkylation of Cys-831, and the C831A PPDK mutant was also
inactive (61).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Alignments of homologous sequences containing
the invariant cysteine (Cys-502 of EI of E. coli). Top panel, comparison of active site
regions of EI from 12 different bacteria: E. coli
(EI_E. coli, Swiss Protein P08398), Salmonella
typhimirium (EI_Salty, P12654), Hemophillus influenzae
(EI_Haein, P43922), Borrelia burgdorferi (EI_Borbu, O51508),
Lactococcus lactis (EI_Lacla, Q9CJ82), Streptococcus
salivarius (EI_Strsl, P30299), Bacillus sp.
(EI_Bacsp, O83018), Bacillus subtilis (EI_Bacsu, P08838),
Listeria monocytogenes (EI_Lismo, O31149),
Staphylococcus aureus (EI_Staau, P51183), Mycoplasma
capricolum (EI_Mycca, P45617), and Mycoplasma
pneumoniae (EI_Mycpn, P75168). Residues present in more than 90%
of the sequences are shown in reverse shading. Residue
numbers are indicated. Lower panel, comparison of the EI
active site sequence with the homologous sequences from PEP-utilizing
enzymes: EI (E. coli, P08839), EI-Ntr (E. coli,
P37177), PPDK (Clostridium symbiosum, P22983), and PEPS
(E. coli, P23538). Residues present in more than 90% within
a PEP-utilizing enzyme (for instance within 8 PPDK from different
species) are shown in reverse shading.
|
|
The mechanistic equivalence between Cys-502 of EI and Cys-831 of PPDK,
and the x-ray structure of the latter prompted us to look for analogous
amino acid residues in other PEP-utilizing enzymes of known
three-dimensional structure. These structures were superimposed by
matching the orientation of co-crystallized substrates or substrate
analogs. The correct spatial orientation of the active sites, relative
to each other, was confirmed by the presence of a similar
three-dimensional arrangement of functional groups (guanidinium and
carboxylate) surrounding the substrate (further information is given in
the legend to Fig. 8).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Amino acid segments in PEP-utilizing enzymes
approaching the 2-re- and 2-si-faces
of C3 of PEP. Panel A, schematic representation of
Cys-831 of PPDK and Cys-115 of MurA at the 2-re- and
2-si-face of PEP, respectively. Panel B, amino
acid sequence fragments containing the residues that overlap either
Cys-831 of PPDK (2-re-side) or Cys-115 of MurA
(2-si-face). These residues were found in three-dimensional
structures of PEP binding sites aligned by matching the orientation of
co-crystallized substrates or substrate analogs. Residue numbers are
given as superscripts. Residues present in more than 90% of
a particular PEP-utilizing enzyme are shown in reverse
shading. The following structures were used for structure
comparison: a noncrystallographic model of PPDK:Mg2+:PEP
(PPDK, C. symbiosum, Pdb:1dik) (60),
enolase:Mg2+:PEP/2-phosphoglycerate (Enolase,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pdb:1one) (62), MurA:fosfomycin
and MurA C115A:fluorinated intermediate (MurA, E. coli,
Pdb:1A2N and 1dlg) (77), EPSPS:glyphosate (EPSPS, E. coli,
Pdb:1G6S and 1 g6t) (71), PK:Mn2+:pyruvate and
PK:Mg2+:oxalate (PK, Oryctolagus cuniculus,
Pdb:1A49 and 1pkn) (72), PEPM:Mg2+:oxalate (PEPM,
Mytilus edulis, Pdb:1pgm) (78), a noncrystallographic model
of PEPC:Mn2+:PEP (PEPC, E. coli, Pdb:1QB4) (74),
and DAHPS:Pb2+:PEP and
DAHPS:Mn2+:phosphoglycolate (DAHPS, E. coli,
Pdb:1qr7 and 1gg1) (79). The active site of PEPM was oriented in such a
manner that the phosphate group of a bound PEP would face Asp-58, a
residue proposed to be transiently phosphorylated (80). EI and PEPS
fragments come from sequence comparisons with PPDK. PEPCK (E. coli, Swiss Protein P22259) residues were found by sequence
alignments using small sketches of PEPC (regions comprising residues
500-510 and 530-545).
|
|
Once all active sites were oriented, we then looked for
residues that were overlapping with or close to the thiol group of Cys-831 of PPDK. Two types of side chains could be discerned: (i)
potential catalytic residues, Glu-211 of enolase; and (ii) noncatalytic
amino acids, Ile-117 of MurA, the hydrocarbon side chain of Lys-340 of
EPSPS, Met-290 of PK, Leu-504 of PEPC, and Pro-98 of DAHPS (Fig.
8B). Interestingly, from all of these proteins, enolase is
the only one known to catalyze a reaction at the C-3 carbon atom of PEP
from the 2-re-face (62). Glu-211 has been proposed to serve
as the acid/base catalyst in the activation of water for attacking PEP
and produce 2-phospho-D-glycerate. The same kind of
stereoreactivity is known for EI (in this case protonation) (43). In
view of this observation and the sequence similarity among EI, PPDK,
and PEPS, it is likely that protonation by PPDK and PEPS also takes
place at the 2-re-face of PEP (as represented in Fig.
8A) and that their active site cysteines act as the
acid/base catalyst. The occurrence of neutral residues for the second
group of enzymes agrees with their documented
2-si-stereoreactivity: PK (63, 64), PEPC (65), DAHPS (66),
EPSPS (67), MurA (68), and PEPCK (69). The potential catalytic residues
of these enzymes were localized in these superimposed structures by
comparison with the Cys-115 of MurA (Fig. 8B), an amino acid known to protonate PEP from the 2-si-side (68, 70): Glu-341 of EPSPS (71) and Thr-327/Ser-361 of PK (72). No clear amino acid
matches were found in PEPC and DAHPS, probably because some space has
to be available at this side of the protein for E4P (73) and
HCO
binding (74). Neutral residues
are present in this region of the PPDK structure (and by analogy, of EI
and PEPS) and enolase (Fig. 8B), further supporting the
notion that these enzymes catalyze reactions on the
2-re-side.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Z-Cl-PEP and E-Cl-PEP are substrates of EI.
Km values comparable to that of PEP indicate
that substitution of the hydrogen for a chlorine atom does not alter
binding to the protein significantly. To the contrary, transition state
stabilization (kcat/Km) results strongly reduced (50-500-fold). At least two factors might contribute to such destabilization: (i) the electronegative atom modifies significantly the electron density of the C-C double bond of PEP, compromising catalysis if protonation at C-3 is rate-limiting; and (ii)
the bulkier chlorine atom raises detrimental steric interactions during
approach to the transition state. Additional experiments are now being
undertaken to clarify this issue. In any case, it is interesting to
highlight that the small kcat values displayed by the Cl-PEP analogs allow experimentation with EI at protein concentrations that are relevant in the intact cell and under conditions where the slow monomer-dimer equilibration no longer would
complicate EI kinetics.
Z-Cl-PEP is a suicide inhibitor of EI. The rate of
inactivation of EI by Z-Cl-PEP depends on EI concentration,
as expected if monomeric and dimeric EI have different catalytic
properties. Both the maximum inactivation rate
(k
) and the
completeness of inactivation increase with the EI concentration, indicating that the dimer is the most, if not the only, active form.
The incompleteness of inactivation at low EI concentrations would be a
reflection of the higher fraction of monomer which might not, or only
slowly react with the inhibitor. Conversely, K
does not vary
significantly, indicating that the same active form is probably
inactivated at all EI concentrations.
Inactivation of EI by Z-Cl-PEP occurs with a frequency of 1 in 50 turnovers, as calculated from the rates of chloropyruvic acid
formation ((kcat/Km = 400-500 mM
1 min
1) and EI
inactivation
(k
/K
= 8 mM
1 min
1). An independent
estimate, based on inactivation in presence of substrate amounts of
IIAGlc, indicates a rate of 1 in 10 turnovers. For
comparison, this inactivation efficiency is 20-100 times higher than
that of Z-Br-PEP with PEPC (35).
Cys-502 of EI is the residue labeled by Z-Cl-PEP. The C502A
mutant is practically inactive, emphasizing the relevance of this amino
acid for catalysis. Sequence alignments established the equivalence
among Cys-502 of EI, Cys-831 of PPDK, and Cys-750 of PEPS, confirming
the suggestion of Herzberg et al. (60) that Cys-831 of PPDK
is involved in the protonation of the pyruvate enolate.
More intriguing is the comparison of the kinetic properties displayed
by Z- and E-Cl-PEP. Z-Cl-PEP is not
only a 10-fold better substrate than the E-isomer, but it is
also a 100-fold better suicide inhibitor of EI. Initially, this might
be the result of a different orientation in the active site of the
electrophilic center of the chloropyruvic molecule released from each
isomer, relative to the thiol group of Cys-502. Two EI active species (presumably dimers), with different disposition of this cysteine, might
be an alternative explanation. Under this hypothesis,
Z-Cl-PEP, but not the E-isomer, would bind to and
react with one of these species. Such argument might help the
understanding of (i) why E-Cl-PEP does not protect EI from
inactivation by Z-Cl-PEP, and (ii) the discrepancy observed
between Z-Cl-PEP and E-Cl-PEP as competitive
inhibitors. Z-Cl-PEP was found to be a much better inhibitor
than the E-isomer
(K
/K
> 25), despite their comparable Km values
(K
/K
= 1.5-3.0). It should be noted that, theoretically, the
Km values of EI for both isomers are close to their
real dissociation constants, given their low
kcat.
A notion of two active forms, interconverting in presence of the
substrate, would also fit in with previous published observations. Hoving et al. (30) showed that inactivation of EI, under
conditions where EI is primarily in the dimeric form, by reaction with
bromopyruvic acid began to happen after alkylation of one irrelevant
cysteine. When the treatment was done in presence of PEP, pyruvate, or
oxalate, two cysteines could be labeled without causing inactivation
(30). These results were interpreted as an evidence of the presence of
two nonidentical subunits composing the dimer. The effect of PEP on the
reactivity of EI cysteines has been also documented by Han et
al. (59) and related to conformational changes of the EI dimer. In
a recent work, Brokx et al. (75) also suggested substrate-induced conformational changes of the PEP binding site of
EI.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant 31-45838.95 from the Swiss
National Science Foundation and a fellowship from the
Secretaría de Estado de Educación y Universidades, Spain
(to L. F. G.-A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
41-0-31-631-3792; Fax: 41-0-31-631-4887;
E-mail:garcia@ibc.unibe.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 7, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110067200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PTS, phosphoenolpyruvate:glucose phosphotransferase system;
Z-
and E-Cl-PEP, (Z)-3- and
(E)-3-chlorophosphoenolpyruvate;
DAHPS, 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate
synthase;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
EI, enzyme I;
EIN, EI amino-terminal
domain;
EIC, EI carboxyl-terminal domain;
EPSPS, 5-enol-pyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase;
ESI-MS, electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry;
ESI-MS/MS, electrospray
ionization-tandem mass spectrometry;
HPr, heat-stable protein;
MurA, UDP-GlcNAc enol-pyruvyl transferase;
PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate;
PEPC, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase;
PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase;
PK, pyruvate kinase;
PPDK, pyruvate
phosphate dikinase;
PEPM, phosphoenolpyruvate mutase;
PEPS, phosphoenolpyruvate synthase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Postma, P. W.,
Lengeler, J. W.,
and Jacobson, G. R.
(1993)
Microbiol. Rev.
57,
543-594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Saier, M. H. J.
(1993)
J. Cell. Biochem.
51,
1-6
|
| 3.
|
Saier, M. H. J.,
Chauvaux, S.,
Deutscher, J.,
Reizer, J.,
and Ye, J. J.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
267-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Lux, R.,
Jahreis, K.,
Bettenbrock, K.,
Parkinson, J. S.,
and Lengeler, J. W.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11583-11587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Hurley, J. H.,
Faber, H. R.,
Worthylake, D.,
Meadow, N. D.,
Roseman, S.,
Pettigrew, D. W.,
and Remington, S. J.
(1993)
Science
259,
673-677[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Titgemeyer, F.,
Mason, R. E.,
and Saier, M. H. J.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
543-546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Mukhija, S.,
Germeroth, L.,
Schneider-Mergener, J.,
and Erni, B.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
254,
433-438[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
LiCalsi, C.,
Crocenzi, T. S.,
Freire, E.,
and Roseman, S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19519-19527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Lee, B. R.,
Lecchi, P.,
Pannell, L.,
Jaffe, H.,
and Peterkofsky, A.
(1994)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
312,
121-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Liao, D. I.,
Silverton, E.,
Seok, Y. J.,
Lee, B. R.,
Peterkofsky, A.,
and Davies, D. R.
(1996)
Structure
4,
861-872[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Garrett, D. S.,
Seok, Y. J.,
Liao, D. I.,
Peterkofsky, A.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
2517-2530[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Garrett, D. S.,
Seok, Y. J.,
Peterkofsky, A.,
Clore, G. M.,
and Gronenborn, A. M.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
4393-4398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Garrett, D. S.,
Seok, Y. J.,
Peterkofsky, A.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
166-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Seok, Y. J.,
Lee, B. R.,
Zhu, P. P.,
and Peterkofsky, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
347-351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Seok, Y. J.,
Lee, B. R.,
Gazdar, C.,
Svenson, I.,
Yadla, N.,
and Peterkofsky, A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
236-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Zhu, P. P.,
Szczepanowski, R. H.,
Nosworthy, N. J.,
Ginsburg, A.,
and Peterkofsky, A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
15470-15479[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Chauvin, F.,
Fomenkov, A.,
Johnson, C. R.,
and Roseman, S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7028-7031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Pocalyko, D. J.,
Carroll, L. J.,
Martin, B. M.,
Babbitt, P. C.,
and Dunaway-Mariano, D.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
10757-10765[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Kukuruzinska, M. A.,
Turner, B. W.,
Ackers, G. K.,
and Roseman, S.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
11679-11681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Chauvin, F.,
Brand, L.,
and Roseman, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20270-20274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Chauvin, F.,
Brand, L.,
and Roseman, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20263-20269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Han, M. K.,
Knutson, J. R.,
Roseman, S.,
and Brand, L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
1996-2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Misset, O.,
Brouwer, M.,
and Robillard, G. T.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
883-890[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Seok, Y. J.,
Zhu, P. P.,
Koo, B. M.,
and Peterkofsky, A.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
250,
381-384[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Hoving, H.,
Lolkema, J. S.,
and Robillard, G. T.
(1981)
Biochemistry
20,
87-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Misset, O.,
and Robillard, G. T.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
3136-3142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Waygood, E. B.
(1986)
Biochemistry
25,
4085-4090[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Waygood, E. B.,
and Steeves, T.
(1980)
Can. J. Biochem.
58,
40-48 |