|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109453200 on December 14, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 6967-6973, March 1, 2002
The PDZ1 Domain of SAP90
CHARACTERIZATION OF STRUCTURE AND BINDING*
Andrea
Piserchio ,
Maria
Pellegrini§,
Sunil
Mehta§,
Scott M.
Blackman§,
Elizabeth P.
Garcia§,
John
Marshall§¶, and
Dale F.
Mierke §¶
From the Department of Chemistry and
§ Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Division of Biology
and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
Received for publication, October 1, 2001, and in revised form, December 10, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The structural features of the PDZ1 domain of the
synapse-associated protein SAP90 have been characterized by NMR. A
comparison with the structures of the PDZ2 and PDZ3 domains of SAP90
illustrates significant differences, which may account for the unique
binding properties of these homologous domains. Within the postsynaptic density, SAP90 functions as a molecular scaffold with a number of the
protein-protein interactions mediated through the PDZ1 domain. Here,
using fluorescence anisotropy and NMR chemical shift analysis, we have
characterized the association of PDZ1 to the C-terminal peptides of the
GluR6 subunit of the kainate receptor, voltage-gated
K+ channel Kv1.4, and microtubule-associate protein
CRIPT, all of which are known to associate with SAP90. The latter two,
which possess the consensus sequence for binding to PDZ domains
(T/S-X-V-oh), have low micromolar binding affinities
(1.5-15 µM). The C terminus of GluR6, RLPGKETMA-oh,
lacking the consensus sequence, binds to PDZ1 of SAP90 with an affinity
of 160 µM. The NMR data illustrate that although
all three peptides occupy the binding groove capped by the GLGF loop of
PDZ1, specific differences are present, consistent with the variation
in binding affinities.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Glutamatergic synapses express three types of ionotropic
glutamate receptors, N-methyl-D-aspartate,
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid, and
kainate, which are responsible for the majority of excitatory signals
in the central nervous system (1, 2). Clustering of these transmembrane
receptors at synapses is essential for efficient signal transmission
(3). The membrane-associated guanylate kinase family of postsynaptic
density (PSD)1 proteins is
believed to mediate receptor clustering and anchoring at the membrane
surface by binding the intracellular C-terminal tails of the
receptors (4, 5). Additionally, the same molecules provide a
scaffold for the assembly of transduction complexes, thus coupling
receptors to downstream signaling processes (6-11).
The PSD95/SAP90 protein is a member of the
membrane-associated guanylate kinase family and contains three PDZ
domains (PDZ1, PDZ2, and PDZ3), a Src homology 3 domain, and an
inactive guanylate kinase domain (12-14). These domains are involved
in the recognition of different membrane receptors, cytoskeleton,
and intracellular components of the signaling machinery (15). It is
known that SAP90 binds the NR2 subunits of
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors through the first two PDZ
domains (16, 17). SAP90 binds directly to the cytoskeleton via the
microtubule-associated protein CRIPT (18) and modulates the
cytoskeletal architecture and synaptic structure through interactions
mediated by the guanylate kinase domain (19-22).
Recently, SAP90 has been found to modulate the electrophysiological
properties of kainate receptors (23, 24). In particular, the KA2
subunit of the kainate receptor interacts with both the Src homology 3 and guanylate kinase domains of SAP90, whereas the GluR6 subunit binds
specifically to the PDZ1 domain (23). The last four residues of the
GluR6 C terminus (E-T-M-A-oh) were shown to be responsible for the
association. This motif presents a variation of the previously defined
consensus sequence for binding to PDZ domains (e.g.
T/S-X-V-oh) (5).
The PDZ domain consists of ~90 residues and is the most abundant
constituent of the superfamily of PSD proteins, to which PSD95/SAP90
belongs. The tertiary fold of PDZ domains typically exhibits a
six-stranded, antiparallel -barrel flanked by two helices (4, 25).
The C-terminal tails of the target molecules fit into a hydrophobic
groove and usually form an additional strand in the PDZ -sheet
(4). PDZ domains have been divided into two classes, according to the
nature of their ligands. The first class binds the consensus sequence
(S/T) 2X 1(V/I/L)0,
and the second class prefers the
(F/Y) 2X 1(F/V/A)0
motif; the preference for the X 1 position,
when present, is not easily generalized (5). Usually the C-terminal
carboxylate group of the target protein is directly involved in the
binding and fits into the loop formed by the first two strands of
the PDZ domain (4, 26-28).
An alternative PDZ binding mode involves an internal motif, usually a
-finger, associating with the binding pocket of the PDZ domain. This
has been characterized for the binding of the neuronal nitric oxide
synthase-PDZ domain to the -syntrophin-PDZ domain (28) and to
the PDZ2 domain of SAP90 (29). The PDZ domain of neuronal nitric oxide
synthase inserts its C-terminal -finger into the canonical
syntrophin and SAP90 PDZ binding pocket, replacing the C-terminal tail
of the receptor with a turn.
Here, we describe the structural features of the PDZ1 domain of SAP90.
The conformation is compared with those reported for PDZ2 and PDZ3 of
SAP90, illustrating important differences and similarities to these
homologous protein domains. Using NMR chemical shift variation and
fluorescence anisotropy, the association of the C-terminal peptides of
GluR6, CRIPT, and the voltage-gated K+ channel Kv1.4 to the
PDZ1 domain of SAP90 is characterized.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Protein Overexpression and Purification--
The SAP90-PDZ1
domain was prepared by cloning a PCR-amplified DNA fragment encoding
residues 60-150 of rat SAP90 into the NcoI/BamHI
sites of pET 11d (Novagen). This construct contains a C-terminal
hexahistidine tag, so that a 96-amino acid protein is produced.
Synthesis of recombinant protein in BL21 (DE3)pLysS strain of bacteria
was induced when the optical density reached 0.4 by 1 mM isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside for
4 h at 37 °C. Cells were then harvested and lysed by French
Press as directed by the manufacturer (SLM Instruments, Inc.). The
soluble SAP90-PDZ1 was bound to Ni2+-NTA beads (Qiagen) for
1 h at room temperature with mixing, loaded into a column, eluted
from the Ni2+-NTA beads using a step gradient of 50, 100, 250, and 500 mM imidazole (Sigma) in phosphate-buffered
saline, and then dialyzed to remove the imidazole. The
15N-labeled protein was expressed in M9 minimal medium with
15NH4Cl (0.5 g/liter). The purity of the 10-kDa
protein was confirmed by SDS-PAGE.
Peptides--
Peptides containing the C termini of GluR6
(RLPGKETMA-oh), Kv1.4 (YKETDV-oh), and CRIPT (TKNYKQTSV-oh) were
purchased from Tufts Medical School (Boston, MA). Additionally, all of
the peptides were synthesized containing a fluorescein
isothiocyanate- -alanine at the N terminus.
NMR Spectroscopy--
All samples for the NMR experiments were
prepared at a protein concentration of 1.0 mM in an aqueous
10 mM phosphate buffer (10% D2O) with 150 mM NaCl at pH 6.8 (direct meter reading). The spectra were
collected at 25 °C and 35 °C on a Bruker Avance 600 spectrometer
using a triple resonance probe equipped with triple-axes gradients. All
spectra were processed with NMRPipe (30) and analyzed using Sparky 3 (as provided by T. D. Goddard and D. G. Kneller, University
of California San Francisco). The sequential assignment of the
1H and 15N resonances was obtained by
inspection of three-dimensional HNHA, 1H-15N
NOESY-HSQC, and 1H-15N TOCSY-HSQC experiments
as well as two-dimensional 1H-15N HSQC
experiments. The NOESY-type experiments were collected with mixing
times ranging between 80 and 120 ms, whereas both DIPSI and MLEV pulse
trains were implemented for TOCSY experiments, typically for 40 ms.
Titrations of the PDZ1 protein with peptidic ligands were performed by
adding solid aliquots of the peptides to 300 µM solutions of the protein until saturation was reached. The 1H and
15N resonance variations were followed at 35 °C by
collecting HSQC experiments. Combined chemical shift
perturbations were calculated using the following equation:
|
(Eq. 1)
|
with a scaling factor ( N) of 0.17 (31).
Structure Calculations--
Interproton upper bound restraints
of 2.2, 3.8, and 5.0 Å were obtained by sorting two-dimensional NOESY
and three-dimensional NOESY-HSQC peaks according to their relative
intensity. Pseudo-atom corrections were applied for methyl groups and
for unresolved methylene protons (32). Dihedral angles were constrained
to reproduce the coupling constants measured in HNHA experiments using
the Karplus equation.
Additional dihedral angle restraints were obtained by backbone chemical
shift analysis using TALOS (33). Amide protons involved in
intramolecular hydrogen bonding were identified by inspection of the
intensity of the amide/water exchange peaks in three-dimensional NOESY-
and TOCSY-HSQC experiments. Hydrogen bond restraints were introduced,
taking into account these data, the presence of secondary structure
from chemical shift deviations from random coil values (34), and the
proximity of a donor based on the NOEs. Structures were calculated
using the program CNS (35), employing a torsion angle simulated
annealing protocol following previously published procedures (36).
Floating chiralities were used for the methylene and methyl groups
resolved but not diastereotopically assigned. In the final minimization
step, a force constant of 75 Kcal·mol 1·Å 2 was applied for distance
constraints (including the hydrogen bond constraints), 200 Kcal·mol 1·rad 2 was applied for dihedral
restraints, and 1 Kcal mol 1 Hz 1 was applied
for coupling constants. A total of 100 structures was calculated. The
coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (accession
number 1KEF).
Fluorescence Anisotropy--
Steady-state fluorescence spectra
were collected on a SPEX 1681 Fluorolog (Edison, NJ) spectrofluorometer
using a 450-W xenon lamp for excitation and a cooled photomultiplier
tube for detection. Polarized spectra were collected in L-format using
Glan-Thompson polarizers (polarization > 200:1). Excitation
spectra were collected by observing the fluorescence emission at 530 nm
while varying the excitation wavelength between 450 and 500 nm.
Emission spectra were collected by exciting the sample at 492 nm and
observing the emission between 510 and 600 nm. Typically, an increment
of 2 nm/s was implemented. The total intensity (S)
and the anisotropy (r) were calculated according to the
equations:
|
(Eq. 2)
|
|
(Eq. 3)
|
where Ixy indicates the fluorescence
intensity (signal/reference background/reference) observed with
the excitation polarizer in the x orientation and the emission
polarizer in the y orientation. Correcting for lamp intensity
fluctuations using the spectrometer reference channel had no effect on
the anisotropy values. The emission polarization bias (g-factor) was
calculated using horizontally polarized excitation
(Ihv/Ihh).
Changes in the steady-state fluorescence anisotropy in a system
undergoing binding equilibrium can theoretically reflect changes in
global or local rotational mobility or in fluorescence lifetime or
quantum yield. If the fluorophore can exist in either a free form (F)
or bound to the protein (B), the observed anisotropy is given
by
|
(Eq. 4)
|
where rF and rB
are the anisotropies of the free and bound forms. For the case in which
quantum yield and fluorescence lifetime of the fluorophore are not
affected by binding, the quantities fF and
fB are the fraction of the total fluorophore
present in the free and bound form.
The binding models used to fit the data were derived from the following
equilibrium
|
(Eq. 5)
|
and, in the presence of a competitor,
|
(Eq. 6)
|
where F and B are the fluorescent states,
C and D are the unbound and bound nonfluorescent
competitor, respectively, and P is the unbound protein. For
the case of Eq. 5, the equilibrium concentration of B
may be solved for analytically in terms of the initial concentrations
of the reagents from the quadratic equation below.
|
(Eq. 7)
|
The solution to the simultaneous equilibrium of Eqs. 5 and 6
results in a similar cubic equation, which was solved numerically using
previously published algorithms (37). The latter model implies that the
competition between fluorescent and nonfluorescent peptide is direct.
Titration experiments were performed by adding the PDZ1 protein to
solutions containing a fixed amount of fluorescence-labeled peptide,
ranging between 70 nM and 7 µM. Competition
experiments were also carried out by adding a competing nonfluorescent
binder to a solution containing a fixed amount of both PDZ1 and a
fluorescent binder (normally 100 nM for the fluorescent
binder and 10 µM for the protein). These latter
experiments are particularly useful for determining the binding
characteristics of compounds with weak affinity, given that very high
concentrations of fluorescent peptide or protein are not required. They
also allow the anisotropy change associated with binding to be
distinguished from other factors, such as changes in viscosity due to
the addition of the protein. In all cases, the dissociation constant
(KD) was obtained by fitting the experimental data
with the appropriate equations derived from Eqs. 4-7. A
Marquardt-Levenberg global least-squares minimization package (38)
modified to include custom-written equilibrium binding and competition
simulations was used for fitting.
 |
RESULTS |
NMR Structure Determination of PDZ1--
The 1H and
15N resonances of the PDZ1 domain of SAP90 were assigned by
standard methods using a combination of two-dimensional (TOCSY and
NOESY) and three-dimensional (1H-15N TOCSY-HSQC
and NOESY-HSQC) experiments. A representative
1H-15N HSQC spectrum is shown in Fig.
1. All of the backbone resonances were
assigned, with the exception of the N- and C-terminal residues and the
15N resonances of the prolines. Approximately 95% of the
side chain 1H resonances were assigned. The experimental
restraints utilized in the structure calculations are reported in Table
I, together with the structural
statistics for a family of 28 structures, shown in Fig.
2. The 28 structures were selected from
the 100 calculated by requiring no NOE violations greater than 0.3 Å, no dihedral angles violations greater than 0.3°, and coupling constants violation greater than 2 Hz.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Structural statistics for a family of 28 structures
None of the structures exhibits distance violations greater than 0.3 Å, dihedral angle violations greater than 0.3 ° or coupling
constant violations greater than 2 Hz.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Stereoview of the final 28 structures
of the PDZ1 domain of SAP90, superimposed using backbone atoms (N,
C , and C' atoms, root mean square deviation = 0.87 Å).
|
|
The NMR-derived tertiary structure consists of two -helices and six
strands forming an antiparallel, -sandwich. The -sheets are
composed of four ( 1, 6, 4, and 5) and three ( 2, 3,
and the N-terminal portion of 4) strands, respectively (see Fig. 3). The angle between the two -sheets
is ~60°, with the helices located at the corners of the sandwich.
The loops interconnecting the secondary structure elements are
relatively well ordered, with the exception of the 1/ 2 loop, for
which very few intra- and inter-residue NOEs are observed. The general
folding of PDZ1 closely resembles the shape of the PDZ2 domain of SAP90
(31). In particular, the structural motif of the variable 2/ 3
loop is very similar in the two molecules and seems to represent a unique characteristic of the PDZ domains of SAP90. Excluding the 2/ 3 loop, the structural features of the PDZ1 domain observed here are similar to those of the functionally unrelated NHERF-PDZ1 domain, suggesting that this three-dimensional arrangement is widely
preserved in nature.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
One representative structure of the PDZ1
domain of SAP90 with the secondary structure elements
highlighted.
|
|
Closer inspection of the structure shows that the hydrophobic
residues Leu7, Leu14, Phe16,
Ile18, Ile33, Ile35,
Val73, and Leu76, most of which are highly
conserved, cluster together in the region between 2 and 2,
forming the characteristic binding pocket of PDZ domains. A serine
(Ser17) occupies the second position of the 2 strand, a
position that is often important for selectivity in ligand binding (18,
31). The conserved His69 is located at the beginning of the
2-helix, with the side chain projecting toward the hydrophobic
binding pocket. Similar to what is observed for the PDZ2 domain of
SAP90, the side chain of an asparagine (Asn24) is in the
middle of the 2/ 3 loop in proximity to the side chain of
His69 (31). In the same loop, His26 represents
another conserved feature, adopting a position similar to that of
His182 of the PDZ2 domain of SAP90 and Asn102
of the 1-syntrophin PDZ domain (28, 31). In both of these other
proteins, these residues are directly involved in the binding of their
targets. Finally, positively charged amino acids are found at key
positions at the beginning of the 1/ 2 loop (Arg9), in
the 3 strand (Lys37) just below the second position of
the 2 strand, and at the end of the 2-helix
(Lys77).
Peptide Binding to the PDZ1 Domain of SAP90--
The association
of peptides containing the C termini of GluR6, Kv1.4, and CRIPT was
examined. The binding affinity of these peptides for the PDZ1 domain
was measured by fluorescence anisotropy using both direct titration of
the fluorescein-labeled compounds and competition experiments (see
Figs. 4 and
5). All of the peptides display
ligand-specific, saturable binding to the PDZ1 domain of SAP90.
Importantly, the fluorescence intensities of the peptides are only
slightly altered by the addition of the protein, indicating that the
fluorescein is not directly interacting with the PDZ1 domain and
therefore is not affecting ligand binding. Indeed, the x-ray structure
of the PDZ3 domain of SAP90 bound to the C terminus of CRIPT indicates
that the N terminus of the peptide is removed from the protein,
projecting out into the solvent (4). The affinities increase going from
Kv1.4 to CRIPT to GluR6, with 1 order of magnitude difference
between each (KD = 1.5, 15, and 160 µM, respectively).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Binding of the Kv1.4 C terminus to PDZ1 of
SAP90 (10 µM concentration), as
determined by fluorescence anisotropy (KD = 1.5 µM) through direct titration
(left) and competition with unlabeled Kv1.4 C terminus
(right). In the titration experiment, the Kv1.4
concentration is equal to 7 ( ), 2 ( ), 0.2 ( ), and 0.07 µM ( ). The curves converge when the concentration of
the fluorescent ligand is below the KD.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Binding of the GluR6 C terminus peptide to
the PDZ1 domain of SAP90 (80 µM), as determined by
fluorescence anisotropy (KD = 160 µM)
through competition with the unlabeled C terminus peptide of Kv1.4 (10 µM).
|
|
The association of the PDZ1 domain of SAP90 with the C-terminal
peptides was also monitored by NMR. For all three peptides, titration
to the PDZ1 in solution induced a significant perturbation of the
backbone 1HN and 15N NMR chemical shifts of
several residues, as reported for the three peptides in Fig.
6. In the titration of the CRIPT- and
Kv1.4-derived peptides, the bound and unbound forms of PDZ1 produced
two distinct sets of NMR resonances simultaneously detectable in the
HSQC spectra. This is typical of slow kinetic rates
(koff/kon) for the
complex formation equilibrium and is often associated with tight
binding. The binding of the GluR6-derived peptide, on the other hand,
leads to a single set of resonances representing a population-weighed average of the bound and free forms of SAP90-PDZ1 (see Fig.
7). Furthermore, the change in the
chemical shifts is, in general, much less pronounced than that observed
for the titration of the other two peptides. These data are consistent
with the binding affinities obtained from the fluorescence anisotropy
measurements.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Histogram of chemical shift perturbation of
the PDZ1 domain of SAP90 upon titration with the C-terminal peptides of
Kv1.4 (A), GluR6 (B), and CRIPT
(C). The combined chemical shift changes were defined
as indicated in Eq. 1, and the scaling factor normalizing the
1H and 15N chemical shifts ( N)
is 0.17 (31).
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Expansion of two regions (A and
B) of a 1H-15N HSQC spectrum
illustrating some significant chemical shift changes of
15N-labeled PDZ1 of SAP90 upon titration with the C
terminus of GluR6.
|
|
To probe the association of the three peptides to PDZ1, the chemical
shift perturbation was mapped onto the three-dimensional structure of
PDZ1 determined here. The low binding affinities prevented the
measurement of direct interactions between the peptides and the PDZ1
domain (i.e. which specific residue of the ligand residue is
leading to the perturbation of chemical shift). It must be noted that
chemical shifts are very sensitive to changes in chemical environment
that may be due to direct interaction with the ligand or could be
induced by changes in protein structure. Here, we do not observe
differences in the NOE pattern of the PDZ1 domain upon ligand
titration. Additionally, the results of the chemical shift perturbation
for the three peptides present a general binding motif that is very
similar to that reported in the complex of the PDZ3 domain of SAP90
with the C terminus of CRIPT (4).
Based on the chemical shift perturbation, all three peptides bind to
the same region of the PDZ1 domain. Residues at the end of the
1/ 2 loop and the 2 strand (region
Gly15-Ile18) are the residues most affected by
the titration of the peptides. Similarly, the resonances of the amino
acids Thr22-Asn24 in the middle of the
2/ 3 loop are significantly perturbed, including a large change of
the side chain of Asn24. Smaller chemical shift variations
involving the 1-helix and the C-terminal end of the 2-helix are
also observed. Notably, the variation of the chemical shifts of the
3 strand is different for the three peptides examined. In fact,
Ile38, located in 3, is affected by the addition of the
peptides derived from Kv1.4 and GluR6, but not from CRIPT.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previous structural studies of the domains of SAP90 have provided
insight into many aspects of its biological function. Specifically, it
has been observed that the dimensions of the hydrophobic cavity within
the ligand binding pocket determine the selectivity toward leucine or
valine at the C terminus of the ligand (39, 40). Likewise, the side
chain of the second residue in the 2 strand dictates the preference
of the 1 position of the ligand. For example, a serine residue in the
PDZ1 (and PDZ2) domains of SAP90 is known to stabilize, through
hydrogen bonding, the acidic amino acids aspartate and glutamate (18,
41); a hydrophobic residue at this position would induce a preference
for other hydrophobic residues at the 1 position of the ligand
(41-44).
In the structure of the PDZ1 domain of SAP90 presented here, the
hydrophobic pocket for the C-terminal residue generated by the side
chains of Leu14 and Phe16 is small, consistent
with a preference for valine (over leucine or isoleucine) at position 0 of the C terminus. Indeed, both Kv1.4 and CRIPT possess valine at the C
terminus. In contrast, the C terminus of GluR6 is an alanine, which
would not be expected to adequately fill this binding pocket. At the
second position of the 2 strand, serine 17 would be expected to
stabilize the binding of peptides containing hydrophilic or charged
amino acids at the 1 position by the formation of hydrogen bonds.
Both Kv1.4 and CRIPT fulfill such criteria (aspartate and glutamine,
respectively), whereas GluR6 (with a methionine at position 1) does
not. Additionally, this methionine would not be expected to be
solvent-exposed.
From an examination of the binding pocket of the PDZ1 domain of SAP90,
we postulate that the long, hydrophobic side chain of the methionine at
position 1 occupies the binding pocket of valine (Val0)
of the consensus sequences. With the 1 methionine occupying the
hydrophobic pocket, the negatively charged C terminus of GluR6 would
project away from the binding pocket, not forming hydrogen bonds to the
GLGF loop as observed in the x-ray structure of PDZ3 of SAP90 (4). Such
an arrangement is similar to the -finger binding motif of neuronal
nitric oxide synthase. The carboxylate of Ala0 could easily
reach the positively charged residues near the binding pocket
(e.g. Arg9, Arg35, and
Lys77); the small size of the side chain of the alanine
side chain would not be expected to interfere with this interaction. In
support of this model, we observed that titration of the C terminus of GluR6 causes a perturbation of the chemical shift of the side chain of
Lys77, located in 2 of PDZ1. During the binding of the
GluR6 peptide, only the C-terminal portion of the 2-helix (including
Lys77) is affected; the remaining portion of the helix,
including His69, is not altered (see Fig.
8). The observation that
His69 is not involved in the binding of the GluR6 C
terminus is quite unique. In all other class I PDZ domains studied to
date, the side chain of this highly conserved histidine, located at the beginning of the 2-helix, contributes to ligand specificity by hydrogen bonding to the serine/threonine hydroxyl group at the 2
position of the ligand (4, 27). Instead, for the PDZ1 domain examined
here, we observe that Asn24, whose side chain is close in
space to His69, is affected by the binding of the peptides
(all three of them), as indicated by large chemical shift changes of
both the backbone and the side chain amide group. We therefore
postulate that the threonine residue at the 2 position (all three
peptides contain a Thr 2) is interacting with
Asn24 upon binding to the PDZ1 domain and not
His69. Interestingly, in the examination of the PDZ2 domain
of SAP90, both the asparagine in the 2/ 3 loop and the histidine
in the 2 helix are affected by the binding of the neuronal nitric
oxide synthase-binding protein CAPON, suggesting a slightly different binding mode between the two PDZ domains (31).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Illustration of the residues of the PDZ1
domain of SAP90 contributing to the binding of the C terminus of
GluR6. The residues displaying chemical shift changes (backbone
1HN and 15N, as defined in the text) greater
than 0.15 ppm are highlighted.
|
|
We have previously shown that SAP90 binds to kainate receptors through
a specific interaction between the C-terminal tail of GluR6 and the
PDZ1 domain of SAP90 (the C terminus of GluR6 displayed little affinity
for PDZ2 or PDZ3 of SAP90) (23, 24). Interestingly, a structural
comparison of the canonical binding regions of the PDZ1 and PDZ2
domains of SAP90 reveals a striking similarity. The protein folds are
comparable, and most of the residues forming the binding pockets are
identical. This may indicate that the observed specificity displayed by
the PDZ domains is a result of the tetrameric structure of the kainate
receptor (multiple copies of the C termini of the individual subunits)
at the postsynaptic membrane. Alternatively, the 2/ 3 loop,
which is divergent between PDZ1 and PDZ2 (see Fig.
9) and varies in the number of prolines and charge, with PDZ1 containing two additional aspartate residues may
play a role in the specificity. Importantly, the 2/ 3 loop of the
PDZ2 domain of SAP90 contributes directly to the binding of the
neuronal nitric oxide synthase-PDZ domain through an unusual interaction with a strand of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase -finger (41). In a similar fashion, residues of the C terminus of
GluR6 beyond the tetrapeptide may be interacting with the 2/ 3 loop, accounting for the binding specificity observed in the in vitro assays. Current mutational studies in our laboratories are probing this issue.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Amino acid sequence alignment of the three
SAP90 PDZ domains. Identical residues are marked with
asterisks. Colons and semicolons
indicate conserved and semi-conserved substitutions, respectively (45).
The secondary structure of PDZ1 as determined in this study is reported
above the sequence.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Amy L. Ulfers for careful reading of
the manuscript and useful suggestions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants NS-39309 (to J. M.) and RR-15578 (to J. M. and
D. F. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1KEF) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
¶
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
Pharmacology, Division of Biology and Medicine, Box G-B4, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912. Tel.: 401-863-2139 (D. F. M.) or
401-863-2574 (J. M.); Fax: 401-863-1595; E-mail:
dale_mierke@brown.edu (D. F. M.) or john_marshall{at}brown.edu
(J. M.).
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 14, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109453200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PSD, postsynaptic
density;
NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect;
NOESY, nuclear Overhauser
enhancement spectroscopy;
HSQC, heteronuclear single quantum coherence;
TOCSY, total correlation spectroscopy.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Seeburg, P. H.
(1993)
Trends Neurosci.
16,
359-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Hollmann, M.,
and Heinemann, S.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
17,
31-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Budnik, V.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
6,
858-867[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Doyle, D. A.,
Lee, A.,
Lewis, J.,
Kim, E.,
Sheng, M.,
and MacKinnon, R.
(1996)
Cell
85,
1067-1076[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Songyang, Z.,
Fanning, A. S., Fu, C., Xu, J.,
Marfatia, S. M.,
Chishti, A. H.,
Crompton, A.,
Chan, A. C.,
Anderson, J. M.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1997)
Science
275,
73-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Chen, H. J.,
Rojas-Soto, M.,
Oguni, A.,
and Kennedy, M. B.
(1998)
Neuron
20,
895-904[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Kim, E.,
DeMarco, S. J.,
Marfatia, S. M.,
Chishti, A. H.,
Sheng, M.,
and Strehler, E. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1591-1595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Furuyashiki, T.,
Fujisawa, K.,
Fujita, A.,
Madaule, P.,
Uchino, S.,
Mishina, M.,
Bito, H.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
109-118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Zhang, W.,
Vazquez, L.,
Apperson, M.,
and Kennedy, M. B.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
96-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Alam, M. R.,
Johnson, R. C.,
Darlington, D. N.,
Hand, T. A.,
Mains, R. E.,
and Eipper, B. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12667-12675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Fanning, A. S.,
and Anderson, J. M.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
767-772[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Cho, K. O.,
Hunt, C. A.,
and Kennedy, M. B.
(1992)
Neuron
9,
929-942[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kistner, U.,
Wenzel, B. M.,
Veh, R. W.,
Cases-Langhoff, C.,
Garner, A. M.,
Appeltauer, U.,
Voss, B.,
Gundelfinger, E. D.,
and Garner, C. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4580-4583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kuhlendahl, S.,
Spangenberg, O.,
Konrad, M.,
Kim, E.,
and Garner, C. C.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
252,
305-313[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Brenman, J. E.,
Chao, D. S.,
Gee, S. H.,
McGee, A. W.,
Craven, S. E.,
Santillano, D. R., Wu, Z.,
Huang, F.,
Xia, H.,
Peters, M. F.,
Froehner, S. C.,
and Bredt, D. S.
(1996)
Cell
84,
757-767[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kornau, H. C.,
Schenker, L. T.,
Kennedy, M. B.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1995)
Science
269,
1737-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Sheng, M.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
7058-7061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Niethammer, M.,
Valtschanoff, J. G.,
Kapoor, T. M.,
Allison, D. W.,
Weinberg, T. M.,
Craig, A. M.,
and Sheng, M.
(1998)
Neuron
20,
693-707[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Thomas, U.,
Kim, E.,
Kuhlendahl, S.,
Koh, Y. H.,
Gundelfinger, E. D.,
Sheng, M.,
Garner, C. C.,
and Budnik, V.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
787-799[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Missler, M.,
Fernandez-Chacon, R.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
1339-1347[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Naisbitt, S.,
Valtschanoff, J.,
Allison, D. W.,
Sala, C.,
Kim, E.,
Craig, A. M.,
Weinberg, R. J.,
and Sheng, M.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
4524-4534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Pak, D. T.,
Yang, S.,
Rudolph-Correia, S.,
Kim, E.,
and Sheng, M.
(2001)
Neuron
31,
289-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Garcia, E. P.,
Mehta, S.,
Blair, L. A.,
Wells, D. G.,
Shang, J.,
Fukushima, T.,
Fallon, J. R.,
Garner, C. C.,
and Marshall, J.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
727-739[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Mehta, S., Wu, H.,
Garner, C. C.,
and Marshall, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
16092-16099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Morais Cabral, J. H.,
Petosa, C.,
Sutcliffe, M. J.,
Raza, S.,
Byron, O.,
Poy, F.,
Marfatia, S. M.,
Chishti, A. H.,
and Liddington, R. C.
(1996)
Nature
382,
649-652[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Daniels, D. L.,
Cohen, A. R.,
Anderson, J. M.,
and Brunger, A. T.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
317-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Schultz, J.,
Hoffmuller, U.,
Krause, G.,
Ashurst, J.,
Macias, M. J.,
Schmieder, P.,
Schneider-Mergener, J.,
and Oschkinat, H.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
19-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Hillier, B. J.,
Christopherson, K. S.,
Prehoda, K. E.,
Bredt, D. S.,
and Lim, W. A.
(1999)
Science
284,
812-815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Christopherson, K. S.,
Hillier, B. J.,
Lim, W. A.,
and Bredt, D. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27467-27473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Delaglio, F.,
Grzesiek, S.,
Vuister, G. W.,
Zhu, G.,
Pfeifer, J.,
and Bax, A.
(1995)
J. Biomol. NMR
6,
277-293[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Tochio, H.,
Hung, F., Li, M.,
Bredt, D. S.,
and Zhang, M.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
295,
225-237[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Wuthrich, K.
(1986)
NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
, John Wiley, New York
|
| 33.
|
Cornilescu, G.,
Delaglio, F.,
and Bax, A.
(1999)
J. Biomol. NMR
13,
289-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Wishart, D. S.,
Sykes, B. D.,
and Richards, F. M.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
1647-1651[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Brunger, A. T.,
Adams, P. D.,
Clore, G. M.,
DeLano, W. L.,
Gros, P.,
Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W.,
Jiang, J. S.,
Kuszewski, J.,
Nilges, M.,
Pannu, N. S.,
Read, R. J.,
Rice, L. M.,
Simonson, T.,
and Warren, G. L.
(1998)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
54,
905-921[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Stein, E. G.,
Rice, L. M.,
and Brunger, A. T.
(1997)
J. Magn. Reson.
124,
154-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Press, W. H.,
Flannery, B. P.,
Teukolsky, S. A.,
and Vetterling, W. T.
(1986)
Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing
, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
|
| 38.
|
Hustedt, E. J.,
Cobb, C. E.,
Beth, A. H.,
and Beechem, J. M.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
64,
614-621[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Eriksson, A. E.,
Baase, W. A.,
Zhang, X. J.,
Heinz, D. W.,
Blaber, M.,
Baldwin, E. P.,
and Matthews, B. W.
(1992)
Science
255,
178-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Karthikeyan, S.,
Leung, T.,
and Ladias, J. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19683-19686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Tochio, H.,
Mok, Y. K.,
Zhang, Q.,
Kan, H. M.,
Bredt, D. S.,
and Zhang, M.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
303,
359-370[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Stricker, N. L.,
Christopherson, K. S., Yi, B. A.,
Schatz, P. J.,
Raab, R. W.,
Dawes, G.,
Bassett, D. E., Jr.,
Bredt, D. S.,
and Li, M.
(1997)
Nat. Biotechnol.
15,
336-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Schepens, J.,
Cuppen, E.,
Wieringa, B.,
and Hendriks, W.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
409,
53-56[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Maximov, A.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Bezprozvanny, I.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24453-24456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wolde, A. Fellows, J. Cheng, A. Kivenson, B. Coutermarsh, L. Talebian, K. Karlson, A. Piserchio, D. F. Mierke, B. A. Stanton, et al.
Targeting CAL as a Negative Regulator of {Delta}F508-CFTR Cell-Surface Expression: AN RNA INTERFERENCE AND STRUCTURE-BASED MUTAGENETIC APPROACH
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 16, 2007;
282(11):
8099 - 8109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Regalado, R. T. Terry-Lorenzo, C. L. Waites, C. C. Garner, and R. C. Malenka
Transsynaptic signaling by postsynaptic synapse-associated protein 97.
J. Neurosci.,
February 22, 2006;
26(8):
2343 - 2357.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gianni, A. Engstrom, M. Larsson, N. Calosci, F. Malatesta, L. Eklund, C. C. Ngang, C. Travaglini-Allocatelli, and P. Jemth
The Kinetics of PDZ Domain-Ligand Interactions and Implications for the Binding Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 14, 2005;
280(41):
34805 - 34812.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Wang, A. Piserchio, and D. F. Mierke
Structural Characterization of the Intermolecular Interactions of Synapse-associated Protein-97 with the NR2B Subunit of N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 22, 2005;
280(29):
26992 - 26996.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Madsen, T. Beuming, M. Y. Niv, C.-w. Chang, K. K. Dev, H. Weinstein, and U. Gether
Molecular Determinants for the Complex Binding Specificity of the PDZ Domain in PICK1
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 27, 2005;
280(21):
20539 - 20548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Zhou, Y. Xu, Y. Yang, A. Huang, J. Wu, and Y. Shi
Solution Structure of AF-6 PDZ Domain and Its Interaction with the C-terminal Peptides from Neurexin and Bcr
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 8, 2005;
280(14):
13841 - 13847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Bowie, E. P Garcia, J. Marshall, S. F Traynelis, and G D. Lange
Allosteric Regulation and Spatial Distribution of Kainate Receptors Bound to Ancillary Proteins
J. Physiol.,
March 1, 2003;
547(2):
373 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Birrane, J. Chung, and J. A. A. Ladias
Novel Mode of Ligand Recognition by the Erbin PDZ Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 10, 2003;
278(3):
1399 - 1402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Schnell, M. Sizemore, S. Karimzadegan, L. Chen, D. S. Bredt, and R. A. Nicoll
Direct interactions between PSD-95 and stargazin control synaptic AMPA receptor number
PNAS,
October 15, 2002;
99(21):
13902 - 13907.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|