Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108942200 on December 17, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 7037-7043, March 1, 2002
Formation of Murine Macrophage-derived
5-Oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid (FOG7) Is
Catalyzed by Leukotriene C4 Synthase*
John M.
Hevko and
Robert C.
Murphy
From the Division of Cell Biology, Department of Pediatrics,
National Jewish Medical and Research Center,
Denver, Colorado 80206
Received for publication, September 17, 2000, and in revised form, December 13, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
5-Oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic
acid (FOG7), a biologically active glutathione (GSH)
adduct of the eicosanoid 5-oxo-eicosatrienoic acid
(5-oxoETE), is the major metabolite formed within the murine peritoneal
macrophage. The conjugation of GSH to electrophilic 5-oxoETE in
vitro was found to be catalyzed by both soluble glutathione
S-transferase and membrane-bound leukotriene C4
(LTC4) synthase. The cytosolic glutathione
S-transferase-catalyzed products were not biologically
active; however, the adduct formed from recombinant LTC4
synthase had identical mass spectrometric properties and
biological activity to the macrophage-derived FOG7. The
biosynthesis of FOG7 in the macrophage was inhibited by
MK-886, a known inhibitor of LTC4 synthase, suggesting that
this nuclear membrane-bound enzyme might be responsible for GSH
conjugation to 5-oxoETE in the intact cell. Subcellular fractionation
revealed that the microsomal fraction from the murine macrophage
contained the enzyme responsible for FOG7
biosynthesis. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of
LTC4 synthase in the microsomal fraction that did not
catalyze conjugation of GSH to 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, indicating an absence of microsomal glutathione
S- transferase activity. These results suggest that
LTC4 synthase, thought to be specific for the
conjugation of GSH to LTA4, can also recognize 5-oxoETE as
an electrophilic substrate.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The enzymatic oxidation of arachidonic acid plays an important
role in biology, leading to the production of a diverse family of
biologically active eicosanoids, which typically carry information between cells, acting as intracellular chemical communicators of
cellular activation. One pathway of arachidonic acid oxidation involves
the addition of molecular oxygen to carbon-5 of arachidonic acid to
afford 5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid (1, 2), a reaction catalyzed
by 5-lipoxygenase, but also a product of free radical oxidation of
arachidonate. Leukotrienes are derived from the chemically reactive
intermediate leukotriene A4
(LTA4),1 which is
the product of a second 5-lipoxygenase-mediated reaction that utilizes
5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid as substrate. LTA4 is
transformed either into the neutrophil chemotactic leukotriene B4 (LTB4) (3) through the LTA4
hydrolase-catalyzed addition of water to LTA4 (4) or by
conjugation of the tripeptide glutathione (GSH) by LTC4
synthase to yield leukotriene C4 (LTC4) (5). LTC4 is rapidly metabolized through a series of peptidic
cleavage reactions by ectoenzymes to the cysteinyl-glycine leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and the cysteine leukotriene
E4 (LTE4) (6). These three cysteinyl
leukotrienes were previously known as slow reacting substances of
anaphylaxis (7) and are synthesized by several inflammatory cell types
including the eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, macrophages, and
platelets (8-10). As a family, cysteinyl leukotrienes possess potent
biological activities causing contraction of various smooth muscles and
have been implicated as mediators of acute hypersensitivity reactions
including asthma (11).
Although considerable interest has focused attention on the leukotriene
pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism within cells, it is now
recognized that another family of equally potent eicosanoids is formed
through the metabolism of 5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid via the
substrate 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, which itself is metabolized
into 5-oxoETE by a NADP+-dependent
dehydrogenase in the neutrophil (12, 13). The discovery that 5-oxoETE
is a potent chemotactic factor for the eosinophil has raised interest
in this eicosanoid because of a suggested role for eosinophils in the
pathogenesis of asthma (14, 15). Recently, a new biologically active
cysteinyl 5-lipoxygenase product was structurally characterized as
5-oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid (FOG7),
which was shown to be chemotactic for both the eosinophil and
neutrophil (16). FOG7 and LTC4 are the only
known biologically active GSH adducts of arachidonic acid and are,
interestingly, isobaric, with a molecular mass of 625 daltons.
The conjugation of GSH to various endogenous and exogenous
electrophiles is not uncommon in biological systems due to the presence
of numerous glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). The GSTs make
up a complex multigene family of proteins that play a central role in
detoxifying electrophilic xenobiotics in nearly all species studied
(17). The primary function of these proteins is to catalyze the
nucleophilic conjugation of GSH to exogenous and endogenous electrophiles by effectively increasing the concentration of the thiolate anion near the substrate when held in the active site (18).
GSTs are typically cytosolic enzymes; however, there are four known
microsomal GSTs including microsomal GST-I (19), microsomal GST-II
(20), microsomal GST-III (21), and LTC4 synthase (5).
LTC4 synthase, the enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis
of LTC4, differs from conventional GSTs by its selectivity for LTA4 and closely related analogs and failure to
conjugate GSH to xenobiotics (22). LTC4 synthase also
exhibits differential susceptibility to inhibitors (24) and lacks
immunoreactivity to antibodies for known GSTs (23). The purpose of the
present investigation was to determine which of these enzymes was
responsible for the 1,4-Michael addition of GSH to
5-oxoETE2 in vivo
to afford biologically active FOG7 in the murine peritoneal macrophage.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
5-oxoETE,
5-[6,8,9,11,12,14,15-D7]]oxoETE (greater than 99 atom % D7), LTA4 methyl ester, and LTC4
were purchased from the Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). Hanks'
balanced salt solution (HBSS) was purchased from Invitrogen.
Indo-1/AM was obtained from Calbiochem. Reduced glutathione (GSH),
1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB), lysophosphatidylcholine, human
placental (89 enzyme units/mg of protein), and rat liver GST (81 enzyme
units/mg of protein) were purchased from Sigma. NBD-phallicidin
(N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazal-4-yl)phallicidin) was
obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). All solvents were HPLC
grade and obtained from Fisher. MK-886 was a kind gift from Anthony
Ford-Hutchinson (Merck). Recombinant human LTC4
synthase and LTC4 synthase polyclonal antibody were kind
gifts from K. F. Austen and B. Lam (Harvard, Boston, MA).
FOG7 was synthesized from peritoneal macrophages as
previously described (16). The free acid of LTA4 was
synthesized by the hydrolysis of LTA4 methyl ester as
previously described (24).
Collection of Elicited Peritoneal Macrophages--
Elicited
macrophages were obtained by injecting 1 ml of thioglycolate 4% (10%)
into the peritoneum of ICR mice. After 3 days, the mice were euthanized
in a CO2 atmosphere. The peritoneum was then lavaged once
with 10 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal bovine
serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin with 1%
heparin. The peritoneal lavage fluid obtained was centrifuged at
600 × g for 8 min for the separation of cells from fluid.
Isolation of Neutrophils--
Leukocytes were prepared from
human peripheral blood in EDTA anticoagulant by dextran 60 sedimentation, contaminating erythrocytes were removed by brief (45 s)
hypotonic lysis, and neutrophils were purified on Ficoll-Hypaque,
yielding 96-97% neutrophils, 2-3% eosinophils, 0-1% mononuclear
cells. All experiments were done within a 2-h in vitro age
of the cell.
Preparation of Human Platelets--
Peripheral blood was
collected from healthy volunteers. The blood (20 ml) was treated with 2 ml of 77 mM EDTA (in saline). After two 15-min
centrifugation steps at 100 × g at room temperature to
remove contaminating red blood cells, the platelet-rich plasma was
acidified by the addition of
volume of ACD (100 mM sodium citrate, 41 mM citric acid, and 136 mM glucose) and centrifuged at 1,000 × g
for 15 min at room temperature. The platelets were washed using the
method of Patscheke (25) in citrate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 0.4%
bovine serum albumin, 100 nM PGE1. Platelets
were resuspended in Hanks' buffer containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum
albumin, pH 7.4, without Ca2+ and Mg2+ at
6 × 108 platelets/ml.
Preparation of Cytosolic and Microsomal Macrophage
Fractions--
All steps below were carried out at 4 °C.
Macrophages (80 × 106 cells) in HBSS were centrifuged
at 1,500 × g for 5 min. The pellet was washed with 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 6.7, containing 137 mM NaCl, 2.6 mM KCl, 0.36 mM
NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA containing
aprotinin (5 µg/ml) and leupeptin (5 µg/ml). The cell suspension
was lysed by nitrogen cavitation (700 p.s.i., 20 min), and the lysis
solution was centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 20 min to
pellet cellular debris. The supernatant fraction was collected and
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min. The pellet,
containing microsomal enzymes (total protein 1.1 mg) was separated from
the cytosolic enzymes in the supernatant (total protein 7.2 mg). The
microsomal fraction was resuspended in HEPES buffer containing Triton
X-100 (0.3%).
GST-catalyzed Synthesis of GSH-5-oxoETE Adducts--
The
addition of GSH (2 mM) to 5-oxoETE (10 µM)
was carried out in HBSS with the presence of either human placental GST
(5 units), rat liver GST (5 units), or recombinant human
LTC4 synthase (1.2 µg, partially purified from SF9
expression cells) for 15 min at 37 °C. GSH-5-oxoETE adducts were
collected by centrifugation and separation using solid phase
extraction. The above procedure was also carried out at pH 9 with
D7-5-oxoETE (10 µM) in the presence of human
placental GST (5 units) to afford the GSH-D6-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard (greater than 95% D6).
GSH-5-oxoETE Adduct Isolation and Purification--
The methanol
supernatant, after solid phase extraction, was evaporated to dryness by
vacuum rotary evaporation and redissolved in 60 µl of the initial
HPLC mobile phase. Reverse phase HPLC was used to separate the
GSH-5-oxoETE adducts by gradient elution with mobile phase A containing
8.3 mM acetic acid buffered at pH 5.2 with
NH4OH and mobile phase B composed of
CH3CN:methanol (65:35, v/v). GSH-5-oxoETE adducts were
separated on a 150 × 2.00-mm Columbus 5-µm C18 RP HPLC column
(Phenomenex, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA), and fractions were collected at
1-min intervals from the column eluted at 200 µl/min with a linear
gradient from 15% to 55% B in 10 min to 80% B in 25 min. Isolated
fractions containing GSH-5-oxoETE adducts were analyzed by
LC/MS/MS.
Effect of 5-Lipoxygenase-activating Protein (FLAP) MK-886 on
GSH-5-OxoETE Adduct Formation--
Recombinant human LTC4
synthase, cytosolic human GST, cytosolic rat GST as well as the
microsomal and cytosolic fractions from peritoneal macrophages (see
above) were incubated with 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) in the presence of various concentrations of MK-886 for
15 min. The reactions were terminated by the addition of methanol and
purified by solid phase extraction and analyzed by LC/MS/MS.
Effect of MK-886 on FOG7 and LTC7
Production in the Peritoneal Macrophage--
Both 5-oxo-ETE (10 µM) and LTA4 (10 µM) were
incubated with elicited peritoneal macrophage (20 × 106 cell) in the presence of various concentrations of
MK-886 for 15 min. Reactions were terminated by the addition of
methanol, the samples were purified by solid phase extraction, and
FOG7 and LTC4 production was analyzed by
LC/MS/MS.
Measurement of Cytosolic Calcium Levels--
Intracellular
cytosolic calcium was assessed by incubation of neutrophils
(107 cells/ml) loaded with the acetoxymethyl ester of
Indo-1 (Indo-1/AM) as described previously (26). Before the addition of
each test substance, CaCl2 and MgCl2 were added
to the cell suspensions at 1 mM final concentration to
3 × 106 neutrophils in a 4-ml cuvette. The
KD of 250 nM for the Indo-1/AM
Ca2+ complex was used to calculate the intracellular
calcium concentration, a Fmax was determined by
the addition of digitonin at 0.1%, and Fmin was
determined by the addition of 7.8 mM EGTA in Tris buffer.
F-actin Polymerization Determination--
Actin polymerization
was assessed by flow cytometry as described previously (27). Briefly,
neutrophils (0.9 ml of 1 × 106 cell/ml) were
incubated at 37 °C in HBSS in the presence of the test substance.
After a 30-s incubation, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained
in a single step by the addition of 0.1 ml of 37% phosphate-buffered
formalin containing 1.65 × 10
6 M
NBD-phallicidin and 100 µg of lysophosphatidylcholine. The stain
mixture plus cells was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were
centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min at room temperature
and resuspended in HBSS (1 ml) before analysis.
Enzyme Assays--
GST activity was measured using GSH and CDNB
as substrates (28). The activity of the enzyme was determined in a 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 1 mM GSH and 1 mM CDNB using an extinction
coefficient of 9.6 mM
1 cm
1. The
rate of product formation was monitored by measuring the change in
absorbance at 340 nm. LTC4 synthase activity was determined as previously described by measuring the formation of LTC4
methyl ester by reversed phase HPLC after incubation of samples with LTA4 methyl ester (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) in HBSS (29). Protein concentrations were determined
using the method described by Bradford (30). Gel electrophoresis and
antibody recognition of LTC4 synthase was carried out
essentially as previously described (31) using a peptide antibody
directed against GPPEFERVYRAQVN in the sequence for LTC4
synthase.3
Electrospray Mass Spectrometry (Negative Ions)--
Analysis of
GSH-5-oxoETE and LTC4 production was carried out using a
Sciex API 3000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (PE Sciex,
Thornhill, Ontario, Canada). Multiple reaction monitoring of the
specific transitions m/z 624
306, m/z 630
306, and m/z
624
272 were used to detect the elution of GSH-5-oxoETE adducts
including FOG7, the D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct
internal standard, and LTC4 eluting from the HPLC column,
respectively. Each sample was chromatographed using a 1-mm × 150-mm Ultremex 3 C18 reverse phase HPLC column (Phenomenex) with the
same gradient and solvent system for the GSH-5-oxoETE adduct isolation
and purification but with a flow rate of 50 µl liters/min using air
as the nebulizing gas and nitrogen as curtain gas. The electrospray
ionization spray voltage was
3500 V, the orifice potential was
maintained at
50 V, and the collisional offset potential 20 eV.
The quantity of GSH-5-oxoETE adduct produced in various studies was
calculated from the abundance of the ion transition
m/z 624
306 for the adduct relative to the
abundance for the same transition (m/z 630
306) from D6-GSH-5-oxoETE (2 ng), which was added as
internal standard at a constant amount to each sample before work-up
and LC/MS analysis. Determination of the quantity of
D6-GSH-5-oxoETE added as internal standard was carried out using a standard curve derived from the abundance of the
LTC4 molecular anion (m/z 624),
measured by LC/MS from 1-50 ng injected on the column and injection of
three different dilutions of synthetic D6-GSH-5-oxoETE to yield molecular anion
(m/z 630) abundance within the linear region of
the LTC4 calibration curve. This method assumed equal
electrospray ionization efficiencies between LTC4 and the D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct. The quantity of LTC4
produced in the peritoneal macrophage was calculated from the ratio of
the abundance of the ion transition for LTC4,
m/z 624
272 with the transition
m/z 630
306 for the
D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard calibrated against
the standard curve.
 |
RESULTS |
FOG7 in Vitro Synthesis--
Cytosolic GSTs were
examined as catalysts for conjugating GSH to 5-oxoETE via a 1,4-Michael
addition reaction to afford product. For these studies, 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) were incubated for 10 min
at 37 °C in the presence of both commercial rat liver and human
placental GSTs. The adducts were purified by solid phase extraction
after the addition of D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard and analyzed by LC/MS/MS (Fig.
1). Unique ion transitions were monitored
for the GSH adducts and the internal standard such that production of
adducts could be quantitated. In addition to investigating the
catalytic properties of these cytosolic GSTs for 5-oxoETE conjugation,
recombinant human LTC4 synthase was also investigated for
this activity. Multiple reaction monitoring revealed that all of the
tested enzymes could catalyze the conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE;
however, not all GSH addition products had the biological activity of
FOG7, as measured by F-actin polymerization using flow
cytometry.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Mass spectrometric analysis by multiple
reaction monitoring (LC/MS/MS) of the production of GSH-5-oxoETE
adducts, catalyzed by recombinant human LTC4 synthase
(1.2 µg) (A), human placental
GST (5 units) (B), and rat liver GST (5 units)
(C). The abundance of each ion transition for
m/z 624 306 and retention times were compared
with FOG7 by the use of the GSH-D6-5-oxoETE
adduct internal standard by monitoring the transition
m/z 630 306 (inset).
|
|
Recombinant LTC4 synthase (Fig. 1A) produced a
single product, observed by monitoring the transition
m/z 624
306 by LC/MS/MS. This product eluted
from the HPLC column slightly after that of the
D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard
(m/z 630
306). This was the observed trend
for FOG7 biosynthesized by the peritoneal murine
macrophage. The product catalyzed by LTC4 synthase was observed to co-elute with macrophage-derived FOG7 (data not shown).
The products catalyzed by both human placental (Fig. 1B) and
rat liver cytosolic GSTs (Fig. 1C) produced similar results. Both the human and rat GSTs catalyzed the addition of GSH to 5-oxoETE to afford compounds that co-eluted with the authentic FOG7,
suggesting that these GSH adducts might be FOG7.
Furthermore, an additional minor adduct that eluted before that of
D6-GSH-5-oxoETE internal standard was observed using rat
liver GST (Fig. 1C).
FOG7 has been observed to profoundly activate chemotaxis
and chemokinesis of both the human neutrophil and eosinophil by
initiating polymerization of F-actin in these cells (16). The
biological activity of the GSH-5-oxoETE adducts catalyzed by the
cytosolic GSTs and the recombinant LTC4 synthase was
compared with FOG7 for inducing F-actin polymerization in
the human polymorphonuclear leukocyte. F-actin polymerization in
neutrophils was induced by the LTC4 synthase GSH-5-oxoETE
adduct (Fig. 2A), but the
human placental GST conjugate product did not initiate the
polymerization of F-actin in the human neutrophil (Fig. 2B),
indicating that this latter GSH-5-oxoETE adduct most likely was not
chemotactic for these cells, contrary to that of macrophage-derived
FOG7. The two products catalyzed by the rat GST enzyme were
separated by RP HPLC and analyzed for activity toward F-actin
polymerization. Neither the major nor minor GSH-5-oxoETE adducts
initiated polymerization of F-actin (Fig. 2, C and
D). Flow cytometry revealed that the F-actin polymerization
observed for FOG7 (50 nM) afforded a shift in
fluorescence almost identical to that of the GSH-5-oxoETE adduct (50 nM) catalyzed by LTC4 synthase, again
suggesting that this product might be FOG7 and that
LTC4 synthase was perhaps the key enzyme in the
biosynthesis of FOG7.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Measurement of F-actin polymerization using
flow cytometry and NBD-phallicidin for the GSH-5-oxoETE adducts
catalyzed by recombinant human LTC4 synthase
(A), human placental GST (B), and rat
liver GST (C and D).
|
|
Although 5-oxoETE had been observed to increase intracellular calcium
in both the neutrophil and eosinophil as assessed using Indo-1/AM
fluorescence, FOG7 did not induce calcium mobilization in
these cells (16). The GSH-5-oxoETE adducts produced by LTC4 synthase and the cytosolic GSTs also showed no activity in regard to
the elevation of intracellular calcium in the neutrophil (data not shown).
Effect of MK-886 on GSH conjugation to 5-OxoETE--
The inhibitor
MK-886 was tested as an antagonist for the conjugation of GSH to
5-oxoETE, catalyzed by recombinant LTC4 synthase and both
human and rat cytosolic GSTs. As observed for the LTC4 synthase conjugation of GSH to LTA4, MK-886
dose-dependently inhibited the addition of GSH to 5-oxoETE
to afford the chemotactic adduct with an apparent IC50 of 7 µM (Fig. 3). The
GSH-5-oxoETE adducts catalyzed by human and rat cytosolic GSTs were
unaffected by MK-886 at concentrations up to 100 µM (Fig.
3).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating
protein inhibitor, MK-886 (0.1-100
µM), on human recombinant
LTC4 synthase (1.2 µg), cytosolic
human placental GST (5 units), and cytosolic rat liver GST (5 units)
catalytic activity for GSH (2 mM) conjugation to 5-oxoETE
(10 µM) expressed as % of
control. The quantity of GSH-adduct made in the absence of MK-886
(control) was 5.2, 4.8, and 2.6 µg by rat GST, human GST, and
recombinant LTC4 synthase, respectively.
|
|
When peritoneal murine macrophages were incubated for 15 min in the
presence of 5-oxoETE (10 µM), a single GSH-5-oxoETE
adduct resulted (previously referred to as FOG7), with a
retention time on RP HPLC identical to that of the biologically active
GSH-5-oxoETE adduct catalyzed by recombinant human LTC4
synthase. To investigate whether or not LTC4 synthase,
expressed in the macrophage, catalyzed the formation of
FOG7, the inhibitory effects of MK-886 were investigated in
this cell. Elicited macrophages were incubated with 5-oxoETE (10 µM) at 37 °C for 15 min in the presence of various
concentrations of MK-886. As shown in a typical experiment (Fig.
4), MK-886 inhibited the formation of
FOG7 in the intact macrophage in a dose-related manner. The
mean IC50 value for the mouse enzyme was 7.1 ± 1 µM (mean ± S.E., n = 3).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating
protein inhibitor, MK-886 (0.1-100
µM), on FOG7 and
LTC4 biosynthesis from 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and LTA4 (10 µM), respectively, in intact peritoneal
murine macrophage (40 × 106 cells) incubated in HBSS
with 2 mM GSH for 15 min, expressed as % of control.
The quantity of FOG7 and LTC4 produced in the
absence of MK-886 (control) was 2.1 µg and 0.8 µg,
respectively.
|
|
For comparison, elicited macrophages incubated with LTA4
(10 µM) at 37 °C for 15 min afforded LTC4,
as identified by multiple reaction monitoring of the
LTC4-specific transitions m/z 624
272. The production of LTC4 in the elicited macrophage was
inhibited by MK-886 in a dose-related manner (Fig. 4). The mean
IC50 value for this enzyme was 5.1 ± 1 µM (mean ± S.E., n = 3).
Subcellular Localization of Enzymatic Activity toward
FOG7 Biosynthesis--
The location of FOG7
biosynthesis in the murine macrophage was determined in crude cell
lysate, cytosol, and membrane fractions. Each subcellular fraction was
incubated with 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) for 15 min at 37 °C, and the extent of GSH
conjugation to 5-oxoETE was analyzed by LC/MS/MS.
The total amount of protein recovered in both the cytosol and
microsomal preparations was 83%. Both the cytosolic and microsomal fractions could catalyze the conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE, as evidenced by multiple reaction monitoring of aliquots from each of
these samples. The microsomal fraction displayed a higher specific activity for the production of a GSH-5-oxoETE adduct than that observed
from both the cell lysate and the isolated cytosolic fraction (Fig.
5). In addition to the higher specific
activity, the GSH adduct from the microsomal fraction had a retention
time identical to that of FOG7, as witnessed by co-elution
of these two compounds during RP HPLC (data not shown). Also this
compound was capable of initiating actin polymerization (Fig.
6A), and the production of
this compound was inhibited by MK-886 (Fig. 5). The GSH adduct
catalyzed by macrophage cytosolic GSTs eluted before the
D6-GSH-5-oxoETE internal standard and as such, did not
co-elute with authentic FOG7 (data not shown) and did not initiate actin polymerization (Fig. 6B). In addition to this
lack of activity, MK-886 had little or no effect on the production of
this compound (Fig. 5), a result consistent with that for the cytosolic
GSTs tested previously.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Specific activity for GSH-5-oxoETE adduct
and/or FOG7 formation in subcellular fractions of the
peritoneal murine macrophage (5 µg of protein
from each fraction) incubated for 15 min in HBSS with 2 mM
GSH and 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and the
effect of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor, MK-886
(100 µM), on GSH-5-oxoETE
conjugation.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Measurement of F-actin polymerization using
flow cytometry and NBD-phallicidin for the GSH-5-oxoETE adducts
catalyzed by microsomal macrophage enzymes (A) and
macrophage cytosol (B).
|
|
Identification of LTC4 Synthase in the Microsomal
Fraction--
It appeared that the enzyme or enzymes responsible for
the catalysis of GSH conjugation to 5-oxoETE to produce
FOG7 were membrane-bound proteins isolated in the
microsomal fraction by fractional centrifugation. Whether
LTC4 synthase was the enzyme responsible for this process or whether additional microsomal GSTs were present in these cells and
could catalyze this reaction was next examined.
Both the macrophage cell lysate, the cytosolic and the
microsomal fractions (50 µg of protein), were assayed for
LTC4 synthase activity. The crude cell lysate and
microsomal fraction catalyzed the conjugation of GSH to
LTA4-methyl ester to produce LTC4-methyl ester.
The cell lysate not only catalyzed the formation of the methyl ester,
but in addition to this, significant formation of the free acid of
LTC4 was detected by UV analysis (Fig.
7), a reaction most likely catalyzed by
cytosolic esterases present in the macrophage. The cytosolic fraction
did not catalyze formation of either LTC4 or
LTC4 methyl ester.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Production of LTC4 and
LTC4-methyl ester from LTA4-methyl ester
(10 µM) in the intact peritoneal
murine macrophage (20 × 106 cells) incubated in HBSS
for 10 min. LTC4 and LTC4-methyl ester
were identified by comparing the UV chromophore at 280 nm and their
respective retention times by RP HPLC with authentic LTC4
and LTC4-methyl ester. mAU, milli-absorbance
units.
|
|
Both the cytosolic and the microsomal fractions were assayed for
LTC4 synthase by Western blot analysis using peptide
antibody raised against amino acids 65-78 in human LTC4
synthase. This antibody had specificity toward the mouse
LTC4 synthase and revealed that this enzyme was present in
the microsomal fraction and, as expected, was not detected in the
cytosolic fraction (data not shown).
The apparent Km and Vmax for
conjugation of glutathione to LTA4 and 5-oxoETE was
determined in microsomes isolated from the murine macrophage containing
LTC4 synthase. Various LTA4 and 5-oxoETE
concentrations were incubated with microsomal fractions (0.15 mg of
protein/ml) after adding 2 mM GSH for 5 min before sample
work-up essentially as previously described in studies of the
LTC4 synthase kinetics in platelets (10). Using hyperbolic regression analysis, the apparent Km was found to be 1.3 ± 0.34 for LTA4 and 1.6 ±0.22 for 5-oxoETE, with
Vmax values for LTA4 and 5-oxoETE of
89 ± 4.7 and 130 ± 3.7, respectively. These results
represent the mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments.
To distinguish between microsomal GST-mediated catalysis and
LTC4 synthase catalysis in the membrane fraction, the
conjugation of GSH to CDNB was examined. Recombinant LTC4
synthase had no catalytic activity toward the conjugation of GSH with
CDNB, as was the case for the microsomal fraction (Fig.
8). The cytosolic fraction, however, did
possess the ability to conjugate GSH to CDNB, indicating that there are
cytosolic GSTs present in the murine macrophage (Fig. 8).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
GST activity for CDNB (1 mM) in
subcellular fractions of the murine macrophage (5 µg of protein from each fraction), human placental
GST (1 unit), and recombinant human LTC4 synthase incubated
in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing GSH
(1 mM), as measured by the change in absorbance at 340 nm
over time using an extinction coefficient of 9.6 mM 1cm 1.
|
|
Platelet FOG7 Production--
Human
platelets are known to express LTC4 synthase and
efficiently convert LTA4 into LTC4 by
transcellular biosynthesis (10, 32, 33). Incubation of 5-oxoETE (5 µM) carried out with isolated human platelets (6 × 108/ml) for 15 min at 37 °C resulted in a robust
production of 58.3 ng of FOG7/109 platelets.
This production of FOG7 by human platelets was inhibited by
MK-886 (data not shown), a result consistent with that observed in the
murine macrophage.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The macrophage is an efficient cell in processing arachidonic acid
with the formation of both cyclooxygenase (34) and lipoxygenase products (35, 36). Although the macrophage is also capable of producing
the chemotactic eicosanoid 5-oxoETE, the synthesis of this eicosanoid
is not significantly enhanced by cell stimulus in contrast to other
5-lipoxygenase products (37). There is evidence to suggest that
oxygenation of arachidonate at carbon-5 with formation of
5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid, a precursor of 5-oxoETE, may be a
preferred free radical pathway of arachidonate metabolism (38). The
major metabolite of 5-oxoETE in the macrophage is the GSH 1,4-Michael
addition product FOG7, which also has chemotactic properties (16). The macrophage expresses the unique microsomal protein, LTC4 synthase (39), long thought to be specific
only for LTA4 conversion to LTC4. It is now
apparent that LTC4 synthase recognized 5-oxoETE as
substrate and is likely the principal enzyme involved in the formation
of FOG7 in the macrophage.
Recombinant human LTC4 synthase as well as human and rat
cytosolic GSTs all catalyzed the conjugation of GSH to the
electrophilic 5-oxoETE, as identified by multiple reaction monitoring
on a tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer. LTC4 synthase
catalyzed the production of a single GSH-5-oxoETE adduct, which
displayed identical chromatographic properties and biological activity
to that of macrophage-produced FOG7. Both human and rat
GSTs catalyzed the conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE to produce an adduct
that was not separable from FOG7 under the RP HPLC
conditions used; however, these adducts did not initiate F-actin
polymerization, suggesting that these compounds were in fact not
FOG7. Rat GST also produced an additional minor adduct that
was separable from FOG7 and the other GSH-5-oxoETE adducts.
This minor GSH-5-oxoETE adduct also lacked the ability to initiate
F-actin polymerization in the human neutrophil. MS/MS and
MS3 analysis of these cytosolic GST-catalyzed
products afforded spectra identical to that of FOG7,
suggesting that these compounds are isomers of FOG7.
Because the stereochemistry of FOG7 and these additional
GSH-5-oxoETE adducts are not known, determination of the absolute
stereochemistry of macrophage-derived FOG7 will likely require total organic synthesis. The chemical addition of GSH to
5-oxo-ETE would likely form equal quantities of two diastereoisomers at
carbon-7 (absolute stereochemistry 7R and S),
which may not substantially alter lipophilicity and, thus, RP-HPLC
retention times.
The nuclear membrane-bound protein 5-lipoxygenase-activating-protein
(FLAP) shows close homology to that of LTC4 synthase, and
as a consequence, the FLAP antagonist, MK-886, has been shown to
inhibit LTC4 synthase and formation of LTC4
from the reactive precursor LTA4 (39). FOG7
production in the intact macrophage was completely inhibited by MK-886
at concentrations of 100 µM, with an effective
IC50 consistent with the inhibition of LTC4 formation from LTA4 in this cell type. The production of
FOG7 catalyzed by the microsomal preparation was also
inhibited by MK-886 (IC50, 7 µM). Even though
this inhibition was not as efficient (80% inhibition at 100 µM) as that observed for the intact macrophage, this
result was consistent with inhibition of recombinant LTC4 synthase-dependent conversion of LTA4 to
LTC4 and may be due to the detergent used to solubilize
these membrane-bound proteins. The apparent Km
determined for LTA4 conversion to LTC4 and
5-oxoETE conversion to FOG7 by macrophage microsomes were essentially identical. This low Km for
LTA4 and 5-oxoETE (1.3 ± 0.34 and 1.6 ± 0.22, respectively) reinforces the suggestion that murine macrophage
LTC4 synthase can be involved in both the formation of
LTC4 and FOG7, therefore having a potential
dual role in the metabolism of 5-lipoxygenase arachidonate products.
Western blot analysis using a polyclonal antibody for LTC4
synthase revealed detection of this enzyme in the microsomal fraction but not in the cytosolic fraction. The antibody used, however, had been
raised against peptides in the FERV region, a region almost identical
in the human and murine sequence but having substantial amino acid
sequence similarity in FLAP and microsomal GST-II (31), and as a
consequence, this LTC4 synthase antibody might also detect both FLAP and microsomal GST-II.
The conversion of LTA4-methyl ester to
LTC4-methyl ester as well as LTC4 in the
macrophage indicated that LTC4 synthase was expressed in
this cell as expected (39). The closely related microsomal GST-II has
been previously shown to catalyze the conjugation of GSH to
LTA4 but also mediates conjugation of GSH to CDNB (20, 40).
The absence of microsomal GST-II in the macrophage was confirmed by a
failure of this preparation to form the CDNB-GSH adduct.
LTC4 synthase is the only known GST, both cytosolic and microsomal, that does not catalyze the conjugation of GSH to CDNB (20,
29, 41). Because the microsomal fraction did not conjugate GSH to CDNB,
LTC4 synthase was therefore most likely responsible for the
biosynthesis of FOG7 in the macrophage. The absence of microsomal GSTs in the peritoneal macrophage is consistent with the
observation that LTC4 synthase expression is not prevalent in tissues that express microsomal GST-II and/or GST-III, with the
testis being the exception (42). However, an interesting question
remains to be answered as to whether or not microsomal GSTs expressed
within another cell type could catalyze conversion of 5-oxoETE into
FOG7.
Stimulation of the murine peritoneal macrophage by the calcium
ionophore A23187 results in the abundant production of LTC4 due to generation of LTA4 but very little 5-oxoETE (37) and no FOG7.4 Because
there have been no reports of stimulated production of both 5-oxoETE
and LTA4 within the same cell type, it is difficult to
assess whether these two substrates ever compete for LTC4
synthase. However, the generation of 5-oxoETE by nonenzymatic pathways
(38) could lead to the presentation of this substrate to
LTC4 synthase within the macrophage or other cell types
(e.g. platelet) without activation of 5-lipoxygenase and
concomitant formation of LTA4.
In summary, the biosynthesis of FOG7 from 5-oxoETE and GSH
in the elicited peritoneal macrophage was found to be catalyzed by a
membrane-localized enzyme rather than cytosolic GSTs. Biochemical and
pharmacological evidence suggests that nuclear membrane-bound LTC4 synthase, long thought to be specific for the
formation of LTC4 from LTA4, is responsible for
this conjugation reaction.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
The purification of recombinant
LTC4 synthase was expertly carried out by Wesley Martin.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HL64030 and HL36577.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Jewish
Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson St., Denver, CO 80206. Tel.:
303-398-1849; Fax: 303-398-1694; E-mail: murphyr@njc.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108942200
2
Nomenclature is according to the following. The
conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE can be catalyzed by various GSTs
in vitro. These molecules will be referred to as
GSH-5-oxoETE adducts as opposed to FOG7, which is the
GSH-5-oxoETE adduct biosynthesized in the intact murine macrophage and
is biologically active. Formation of the GSH-D6-5-oxoETE
adduct used as an internal standard for these studies was catalyzed by
human placental GST.
3
B. Lam, personal communication.
4
J. M. Hevko and R. C. Murphy,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LTA4 and
LTC4, leukotriene A4 and C4,
respectively;
5-oxoETE, 5-oxo-eicosatrienoic acid;
FOG7, 5-oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution;
CDNB, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene;
HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography;
LC, liquid chromatography;
MS, mass spectrometry;
FLAP, 5-lipoxygenase activating protein;
NBD, N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazal-4-yl);
RP, reverse
phase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Samuelsson, B.
(2000)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
161, Suppl. 2, Part 2,
2-6
|
| 2.
|
Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.,
Gresser, M.,
and Young, R. N.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
383-417[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.,
Bray, M. A.,
Doig, M. V.,
Shipley, M. E.,
and Smith, M. J.
(1980)
Nature
286,
264-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Haeggstrom, J. Z.
(1999)
Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.
17,
111-131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Lam, B. K.,
and Austen, K.
(2000)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
161, Suppl. 2, Part 2,
16-19
|
| 6.
|
Denzlinger, C.,
Guhlmann, A.,
Scheuber, P., H.,
Wilker, D.,
Hammer, D., K.,
and Keppler, D. J.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
15601-15606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Murphy, R. C.,
Hammarström, S.,
and Samuelsson, B.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4275-4279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Samuelsson, B.
(1983)
Science
220,
568-575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Holtzman, M. J.
(1991)
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
143,
188-203[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Maclouf, J. A.,
and Murphy, R. C.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
174-181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Leff, A. R.
(2001)
Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.
86 Suppl. 1,
4-8[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Powell, W. S.,
Gravelle, F.,
and Gravel, S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19233-19241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Powell, W. S.,
Gravelle, F.,
and Gravel, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
25373-25380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Butterfield, J. H.,
Lieferman, K. M.,
and Gleich, G. J.
(1995)
in
Samter's Immunologic Diseases
(Frank, M. J.
, Austen, K. F.
, Claman, H. N.
, and Unanue, E. R., eds), 5th Ed.
, pp. 501-527, Little, Brown, and Co., Boston
|
| 15.
|
Martin, L. B.,
Kita, H.,
Lieferman, K. M.,
and Gleich, G. J.
(1996)
Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.
109,
207-215[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Bowers, B. C.,
Hevko, J. H.,
Henson, P. M.,
and Murphy, R. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
29931-29934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Armstrong, R. N.
(1991)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
4,
131-140[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Pickett, C. B.,
and Lu, A. Y. H.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
58,
743-764[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Lee, S. H.,
and DeJong, J.
(199)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1446,
389-396[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Jakobsson, P. J.,
Mancini, J. A.,
and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22203-22210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Jakobsson, P. J.,
Mancini, J. A.,
Rienndeau, D.,
and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.
(1997)
J. Bio. Chem.
272,
22934-22939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Bach, M. K.,
Brashler, J. R.,
Peck, R. E.,
and Morton, D. R.
(1984)
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
74,
353-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Nicholson, D. W.,
Klemba, M. W.,
Rasper, D. M.,
Metters, K. M.,
Zamboni, R. J.,
and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
209,
725-734[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Carrier, D. J.,
Bogri, T.,
Cosentino, G. P.,
Guse, I.,
Rakhit, S.,
and Singh, K.
(1988)
Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids
34,
27-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Patscheke, H.
(1981)
Haemostasis
10,
14-27[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Grynkiewicz, G. M.,
Poenie, M.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
3440-3450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Howard, T. H.,
and Oresajo, C. O.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
1078-1085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Habig, W. B.,
Pabst, M. J.,
and Jacoby, W. B.
(1974)
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
7130-7139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Nicholson, D. W.,
Ali, A.,
Klemba, M. W.,
Munday, N. A.,
Zamboni, R. J.,
and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17849-17857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Scoggan, K. A.,
Jakobsson, P. J.,
and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10182-10187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Habib, A.,
and Maclouf, J.
(1992)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
298,
544-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Maclouf, J.,
Murphy, R. C.,
and Henson, P. M.
(1990)
Blood
76,
1838-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Humes, J. L.,
Opas, E. E.,
Galavage, M.,
Soderman, D.,
and Bonney, R. J.
(1986)
Biochem. J.
233,
199-206[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Sun, D.,
and Funk, C. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24055-24062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Abe, M.,
Goya, T.,
Nagata, N.,
Takahashi, H.,
Muranishi, H.,
and Shigematsu, N.
(1992)
Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids
45,
1-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Hevko, J. M.,
Bowers, R. C.,
and Murphy, R. C.
(2001)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
296,
293-305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Khaselev, N.,
and Murphy, R. C.
(2000)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
29,
620-632[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Lam, B. K.,
Penrose, J. F.,
Rokach, J.,
Kongyi, X.,
Baldasaro, M. H.,
and Austen, K. F.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
238,
606-612[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Sjostrom, M.,
Jakobsson, P. J.,
Heimburger, M.,
Palmblad, J.,
and Haeggstrom, J.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
2578-2586[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Penrose, J. F.,
Gagnon, L.,
Goppelt-Struebe, M.,
Myers, P.,
Lam, B. K.,
Jack, R. M.,
Austen, K. F.,
and Soberman, R. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
11603-11606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Kanaoka, Y.,
Maekawa, A.,
Penrose, J. F.,
Austen, K. F.,
and Lam, B. K.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
22608-22613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. B. Stamatiou, C.-C. Chan, G. Monneret, D. Ethier, J. Rokach, and W. S. Powell
5-Oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic Acid Stimulates the Release of the Eosinophil Survival Factor Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor from Monocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 2, 2004;
279(27):
28159 - 28164.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Brink, S.-E. Dahlen, J. Drazen, J. F. Evans, D. W. P. Hay, G. E. Rovati, C. N. Serhan, T. Shimizu, and T. Yokomizo
International Union of Pharmacology XLIV. Nomenclature for the Oxoeicosanoid Receptor
Pharmacol. Rev.,
March 1, 2004;
56(1):
149 - 157.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zarini and R. C. Murphy
Biosynthesis of 5-Oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic Acid from 5-Hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic Acid in the Murine Macrophage
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 21, 2003;
278(13):
11190 - 11196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|