JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108942200 on December 17, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 7037-7043, March 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/9/7037    most recent
M108942200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hevko, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hevko, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Formation of Murine Macrophage-derived 5-Oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid (FOG7) Is Catalyzed by Leukotriene C4 Synthase*

John M. Hevko and Robert C. MurphyDagger

From the Division of Cell Biology, Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80206

Received for publication, September 17, 2000, and in revised form, December 13, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

5-Oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid (FOG7), a biologically active glutathione (GSH) adduct of the eicosanoid 5-oxo-eicosatrienoic acid (5-oxoETE), is the major metabolite formed within the murine peritoneal macrophage. The conjugation of GSH to electrophilic 5-oxoETE in vitro was found to be catalyzed by both soluble glutathione S-transferase and membrane-bound leukotriene C4 (LTC4) synthase. The cytosolic glutathione S-transferase-catalyzed products were not biologically active; however, the adduct formed from recombinant LTC4 synthase had identical mass spectrometric properties and biological activity to the macrophage-derived FOG7. The biosynthesis of FOG7 in the macrophage was inhibited by MK-886, a known inhibitor of LTC4 synthase, suggesting that this nuclear membrane-bound enzyme might be responsible for GSH conjugation to 5-oxoETE in the intact cell. Subcellular fractionation revealed that the microsomal fraction from the murine macrophage contained the enzyme responsible for FOG7 biosynthesis. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of LTC4 synthase in the microsomal fraction that did not catalyze conjugation of GSH to 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, indicating an absence of microsomal glutathione S- transferase activity. These results suggest that LTC4 synthase, thought to be specific for the conjugation of GSH to LTA4, can also recognize 5-oxoETE as an electrophilic substrate.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The enzymatic oxidation of arachidonic acid plays an important role in biology, leading to the production of a diverse family of biologically active eicosanoids, which typically carry information between cells, acting as intracellular chemical communicators of cellular activation. One pathway of arachidonic acid oxidation involves the addition of molecular oxygen to carbon-5 of arachidonic acid to afford 5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid (1, 2), a reaction catalyzed by 5-lipoxygenase, but also a product of free radical oxidation of arachidonate. Leukotrienes are derived from the chemically reactive intermediate leukotriene A4 (LTA4),1 which is the product of a second 5-lipoxygenase-mediated reaction that utilizes 5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid as substrate. LTA4 is transformed either into the neutrophil chemotactic leukotriene B4 (LTB4) (3) through the LTA4 hydrolase-catalyzed addition of water to LTA4 (4) or by conjugation of the tripeptide glutathione (GSH) by LTC4 synthase to yield leukotriene C4 (LTC4) (5). LTC4 is rapidly metabolized through a series of peptidic cleavage reactions by ectoenzymes to the cysteinyl-glycine leukotriene D4 (LTD4) and the cysteine leukotriene E4 (LTE4) (6). These three cysteinyl leukotrienes were previously known as slow reacting substances of anaphylaxis (7) and are synthesized by several inflammatory cell types including the eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, macrophages, and platelets (8-10). As a family, cysteinyl leukotrienes possess potent biological activities causing contraction of various smooth muscles and have been implicated as mediators of acute hypersensitivity reactions including asthma (11).

Although considerable interest has focused attention on the leukotriene pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism within cells, it is now recognized that another family of equally potent eicosanoids is formed through the metabolism of 5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid via the substrate 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, which itself is metabolized into 5-oxoETE by a NADP+-dependent dehydrogenase in the neutrophil (12, 13). The discovery that 5-oxoETE is a potent chemotactic factor for the eosinophil has raised interest in this eicosanoid because of a suggested role for eosinophils in the pathogenesis of asthma (14, 15). Recently, a new biologically active cysteinyl 5-lipoxygenase product was structurally characterized as 5-oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid (FOG7), which was shown to be chemotactic for both the eosinophil and neutrophil (16). FOG7 and LTC4 are the only known biologically active GSH adducts of arachidonic acid and are, interestingly, isobaric, with a molecular mass of 625 daltons.

The conjugation of GSH to various endogenous and exogenous electrophiles is not uncommon in biological systems due to the presence of numerous glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). The GSTs make up a complex multigene family of proteins that play a central role in detoxifying electrophilic xenobiotics in nearly all species studied (17). The primary function of these proteins is to catalyze the nucleophilic conjugation of GSH to exogenous and endogenous electrophiles by effectively increasing the concentration of the thiolate anion near the substrate when held in the active site (18). GSTs are typically cytosolic enzymes; however, there are four known microsomal GSTs including microsomal GST-I (19), microsomal GST-II (20), microsomal GST-III (21), and LTC4 synthase (5). LTC4 synthase, the enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of LTC4, differs from conventional GSTs by its selectivity for LTA4 and closely related analogs and failure to conjugate GSH to xenobiotics (22). LTC4 synthase also exhibits differential susceptibility to inhibitors (24) and lacks immunoreactivity to antibodies for known GSTs (23). The purpose of the present investigation was to determine which of these enzymes was responsible for the 1,4-Michael addition of GSH to 5-oxoETE2 in vivo to afford biologically active FOG7 in the murine peritoneal macrophage.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- 5-oxoETE, 5-[6,8,9,11,12,14,15-D7]]oxoETE (greater than 99 atom % D7), LTA4 methyl ester, and LTC4 were purchased from the Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) was purchased from Invitrogen. Indo-1/AM was obtained from Calbiochem. Reduced glutathione (GSH), 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB), lysophosphatidylcholine, human placental (89 enzyme units/mg of protein), and rat liver GST (81 enzyme units/mg of protein) were purchased from Sigma. NBD-phallicidin (N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazal-4-yl)phallicidin) was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). All solvents were HPLC grade and obtained from Fisher. MK-886 was a kind gift from Anthony Ford-Hutchinson (Merck). Recombinant human LTC4 synthase and LTC4 synthase polyclonal antibody were kind gifts from K. F. Austen and B. Lam (Harvard, Boston, MA). FOG7 was synthesized from peritoneal macrophages as previously described (16). The free acid of LTA4 was synthesized by the hydrolysis of LTA4 methyl ester as previously described (24).

Collection of Elicited Peritoneal Macrophages-- Elicited macrophages were obtained by injecting 1 ml of thioglycolate 4% (10%) into the peritoneum of ICR mice. After 3 days, the mice were euthanized in a CO2 atmosphere. The peritoneum was then lavaged once with 10 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin with 1% heparin. The peritoneal lavage fluid obtained was centrifuged at 600 × g for 8 min for the separation of cells from fluid.

Isolation of Neutrophils-- Leukocytes were prepared from human peripheral blood in EDTA anticoagulant by dextran 60 sedimentation, contaminating erythrocytes were removed by brief (45 s) hypotonic lysis, and neutrophils were purified on Ficoll-Hypaque, yielding 96-97% neutrophils, 2-3% eosinophils, 0-1% mononuclear cells. All experiments were done within a 2-h in vitro age of the cell.

Preparation of Human Platelets-- Peripheral blood was collected from healthy volunteers. The blood (20 ml) was treated with 2 ml of 77 mM EDTA (in saline). After two 15-min centrifugation steps at 100 × g at room temperature to remove contaminating red blood cells, the platelet-rich plasma was acidified by the addition of <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> volume of ACD (100 mM sodium citrate, 41 mM citric acid, and 136 mM glucose) and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 15 min at room temperature. The platelets were washed using the method of Patscheke (25) in citrate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 0.4% bovine serum albumin, 100 nM PGE1. Platelets were resuspended in Hanks' buffer containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4, without Ca2+ and Mg2+ at 6 × 108 platelets/ml.

Preparation of Cytosolic and Microsomal Macrophage Fractions-- All steps below were carried out at 4 °C. Macrophages (80 × 106 cells) in HBSS were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 5 min. The pellet was washed with 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 6.7, containing 137 mM NaCl, 2.6 mM KCl, 0.36 mM NaH2PO4, and 1 mM EDTA containing aprotinin (5 µg/ml) and leupeptin (5 µg/ml). The cell suspension was lysed by nitrogen cavitation (700 p.s.i., 20 min), and the lysis solution was centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 20 min to pellet cellular debris. The supernatant fraction was collected and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min. The pellet, containing microsomal enzymes (total protein 1.1 mg) was separated from the cytosolic enzymes in the supernatant (total protein 7.2 mg). The microsomal fraction was resuspended in HEPES buffer containing Triton X-100 (0.3%).

GST-catalyzed Synthesis of GSH-5-oxoETE Adducts-- The addition of GSH (2 mM) to 5-oxoETE (10 µM) was carried out in HBSS with the presence of either human placental GST (5 units), rat liver GST (5 units), or recombinant human LTC4 synthase (1.2 µg, partially purified from SF9 expression cells) for 15 min at 37 °C. GSH-5-oxoETE adducts were collected by centrifugation and separation using solid phase extraction. The above procedure was also carried out at pH 9 with D7-5-oxoETE (10 µM) in the presence of human placental GST (5 units) to afford the GSH-D6-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard (greater than 95% D6).

GSH-5-oxoETE Adduct Isolation and Purification-- The methanol supernatant, after solid phase extraction, was evaporated to dryness by vacuum rotary evaporation and redissolved in 60 µl of the initial HPLC mobile phase. Reverse phase HPLC was used to separate the GSH-5-oxoETE adducts by gradient elution with mobile phase A containing 8.3 mM acetic acid buffered at pH 5.2 with NH4OH and mobile phase B composed of CH3CN:methanol (65:35, v/v). GSH-5-oxoETE adducts were separated on a 150 × 2.00-mm Columbus 5-µm C18 RP HPLC column (Phenomenex, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA), and fractions were collected at 1-min intervals from the column eluted at 200 µl/min with a linear gradient from 15% to 55% B in 10 min to 80% B in 25 min. Isolated fractions containing GSH-5-oxoETE adducts were analyzed by LC/MS/MS.

Effect of 5-Lipoxygenase-activating Protein (FLAP) MK-886 on GSH-5-OxoETE Adduct Formation-- Recombinant human LTC4 synthase, cytosolic human GST, cytosolic rat GST as well as the microsomal and cytosolic fractions from peritoneal macrophages (see above) were incubated with 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) in the presence of various concentrations of MK-886 for 15 min. The reactions were terminated by the addition of methanol and purified by solid phase extraction and analyzed by LC/MS/MS.

Effect of MK-886 on FOG7 and LTC7 Production in the Peritoneal Macrophage-- Both 5-oxo-ETE (10 µM) and LTA4 (10 µM) were incubated with elicited peritoneal macrophage (20 × 106 cell) in the presence of various concentrations of MK-886 for 15 min. Reactions were terminated by the addition of methanol, the samples were purified by solid phase extraction, and FOG7 and LTC4 production was analyzed by LC/MS/MS.

Measurement of Cytosolic Calcium Levels-- Intracellular cytosolic calcium was assessed by incubation of neutrophils (107 cells/ml) loaded with the acetoxymethyl ester of Indo-1 (Indo-1/AM) as described previously (26). Before the addition of each test substance, CaCl2 and MgCl2 were added to the cell suspensions at 1 mM final concentration to 3 × 106 neutrophils in a 4-ml cuvette. The KD of 250 nM for the Indo-1/AM Ca2+ complex was used to calculate the intracellular calcium concentration, a Fmax was determined by the addition of digitonin at 0.1%, and Fmin was determined by the addition of 7.8 mM EGTA in Tris buffer.

F-actin Polymerization Determination-- Actin polymerization was assessed by flow cytometry as described previously (27). Briefly, neutrophils (0.9 ml of 1 × 106 cell/ml) were incubated at 37 °C in HBSS in the presence of the test substance. After a 30-s incubation, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained in a single step by the addition of 0.1 ml of 37% phosphate-buffered formalin containing 1.65 × 10-6 M NBD-phallicidin and 100 µg of lysophosphatidylcholine. The stain mixture plus cells was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min at room temperature and resuspended in HBSS (1 ml) before analysis.

Enzyme Assays-- GST activity was measured using GSH and CDNB as substrates (28). The activity of the enzyme was determined in a 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 1 mM GSH and 1 mM CDNB using an extinction coefficient of 9.6 mM-1 cm-1. The rate of product formation was monitored by measuring the change in absorbance at 340 nm. LTC4 synthase activity was determined as previously described by measuring the formation of LTC4 methyl ester by reversed phase HPLC after incubation of samples with LTA4 methyl ester (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) in HBSS (29). Protein concentrations were determined using the method described by Bradford (30). Gel electrophoresis and antibody recognition of LTC4 synthase was carried out essentially as previously described (31) using a peptide antibody directed against GPPEFERVYRAQVN in the sequence for LTC4 synthase.3

Electrospray Mass Spectrometry (Negative Ions)-- Analysis of GSH-5-oxoETE and LTC4 production was carried out using a Sciex API 3000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (PE Sciex, Thornhill, Ontario, Canada). Multiple reaction monitoring of the specific transitions m/z 624 right-arrow 306, m/z 630 right-arrow 306, and m/z 624 right-arrow 272 were used to detect the elution of GSH-5-oxoETE adducts including FOG7, the D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard, and LTC4 eluting from the HPLC column, respectively. Each sample was chromatographed using a 1-mm × 150-mm Ultremex 3 C18 reverse phase HPLC column (Phenomenex) with the same gradient and solvent system for the GSH-5-oxoETE adduct isolation and purification but with a flow rate of 50 µl liters/min using air as the nebulizing gas and nitrogen as curtain gas. The electrospray ionization spray voltage was -3500 V, the orifice potential was maintained at -50 V, and the collisional offset potential 20 eV.

The quantity of GSH-5-oxoETE adduct produced in various studies was calculated from the abundance of the ion transition m/z 624 right-arrow 306 for the adduct relative to the abundance for the same transition (m/z 630 right-arrow306) from D6-GSH-5-oxoETE (2 ng), which was added as internal standard at a constant amount to each sample before work-up and LC/MS analysis. Determination of the quantity of D6-GSH-5-oxoETE added as internal standard was carried out using a standard curve derived from the abundance of the LTC4 molecular anion (m/z 624), measured by LC/MS from 1-50 ng injected on the column and injection of three different dilutions of synthetic D6-GSH-5-oxoETE to yield molecular anion (m/z 630) abundance within the linear region of the LTC4 calibration curve. This method assumed equal electrospray ionization efficiencies between LTC4 and the D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct. The quantity of LTC4 produced in the peritoneal macrophage was calculated from the ratio of the abundance of the ion transition for LTC4, m/z 624 right-arrow 272 with the transition m/z 630 right-arrow 306 for the D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard calibrated against the standard curve.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

FOG7 in Vitro Synthesis-- Cytosolic GSTs were examined as catalysts for conjugating GSH to 5-oxoETE via a 1,4-Michael addition reaction to afford product. For these studies, 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in the presence of both commercial rat liver and human placental GSTs. The adducts were purified by solid phase extraction after the addition of D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard and analyzed by LC/MS/MS (Fig. 1). Unique ion transitions were monitored for the GSH adducts and the internal standard such that production of adducts could be quantitated. In addition to investigating the catalytic properties of these cytosolic GSTs for 5-oxoETE conjugation, recombinant human LTC4 synthase was also investigated for this activity. Multiple reaction monitoring revealed that all of the tested enzymes could catalyze the conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE; however, not all GSH addition products had the biological activity of FOG7, as measured by F-actin polymerization using flow cytometry.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mass spectrometric analysis by multiple reaction monitoring (LC/MS/MS) of the production of GSH-5-oxoETE adducts, catalyzed by recombinant human LTC4 synthase (1.2 µg) (A), human placental GST (5 units) (B), and rat liver GST (5 units) (C). The abundance of each ion transition for m/z 624 right-arrow 306 and retention times were compared with FOG7 by the use of the GSH-D6-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard by monitoring the transition m/z 630 right-arrow 306 (inset).

Recombinant LTC4 synthase (Fig. 1A) produced a single product, observed by monitoring the transition m/z 624 right-arrow 306 by LC/MS/MS. This product eluted from the HPLC column slightly after that of the D6-GSH-5-oxoETE adduct internal standard (m/z 630 right-arrow 306). This was the observed trend for FOG7 biosynthesized by the peritoneal murine macrophage. The product catalyzed by LTC4 synthase was observed to co-elute with macrophage-derived FOG7 (data not shown).

The products catalyzed by both human placental (Fig. 1B) and rat liver cytosolic GSTs (Fig. 1C) produced similar results. Both the human and rat GSTs catalyzed the addition of GSH to 5-oxoETE to afford compounds that co-eluted with the authentic FOG7, suggesting that these GSH adducts might be FOG7. Furthermore, an additional minor adduct that eluted before that of D6-GSH-5-oxoETE internal standard was observed using rat liver GST (Fig. 1C).

FOG7 has been observed to profoundly activate chemotaxis and chemokinesis of both the human neutrophil and eosinophil by initiating polymerization of F-actin in these cells (16). The biological activity of the GSH-5-oxoETE adducts catalyzed by the cytosolic GSTs and the recombinant LTC4 synthase was compared with FOG7 for inducing F-actin polymerization in the human polymorphonuclear leukocyte. F-actin polymerization in neutrophils was induced by the LTC4 synthase GSH-5-oxoETE adduct (Fig. 2A), but the human placental GST conjugate product did not initiate the polymerization of F-actin in the human neutrophil (Fig. 2B), indicating that this latter GSH-5-oxoETE adduct most likely was not chemotactic for these cells, contrary to that of macrophage-derived FOG7. The two products catalyzed by the rat GST enzyme were separated by RP HPLC and analyzed for activity toward F-actin polymerization. Neither the major nor minor GSH-5-oxoETE adducts initiated polymerization of F-actin (Fig. 2, C and D). Flow cytometry revealed that the F-actin polymerization observed for FOG7 (50 nM) afforded a shift in fluorescence almost identical to that of the GSH-5-oxoETE adduct (50 nM) catalyzed by LTC4 synthase, again suggesting that this product might be FOG7 and that LTC4 synthase was perhaps the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of FOG7.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Measurement of F-actin polymerization using flow cytometry and NBD-phallicidin for the GSH-5-oxoETE adducts catalyzed by recombinant human LTC4 synthase (A), human placental GST (B), and rat liver GST (C and D).

Although 5-oxoETE had been observed to increase intracellular calcium in both the neutrophil and eosinophil as assessed using Indo-1/AM fluorescence, FOG7 did not induce calcium mobilization in these cells (16). The GSH-5-oxoETE adducts produced by LTC4 synthase and the cytosolic GSTs also showed no activity in regard to the elevation of intracellular calcium in the neutrophil (data not shown).

Effect of MK-886 on GSH conjugation to 5-OxoETE-- The inhibitor MK-886 was tested as an antagonist for the conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE, catalyzed by recombinant LTC4 synthase and both human and rat cytosolic GSTs. As observed for the LTC4 synthase conjugation of GSH to LTA4, MK-886 dose-dependently inhibited the addition of GSH to 5-oxoETE to afford the chemotactic adduct with an apparent IC50 of 7 µM (Fig. 3). The GSH-5-oxoETE adducts catalyzed by human and rat cytosolic GSTs were unaffected by MK-886 at concentrations up to 100 µM (Fig. 3).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor, MK-886 (0.1-100 µM), on human recombinant LTC4 synthase (1.2 µg), cytosolic human placental GST (5 units), and cytosolic rat liver GST (5 units) catalytic activity for GSH (2 mM) conjugation to 5-oxoETE (10 µM) expressed as % of control. The quantity of GSH-adduct made in the absence of MK-886 (control) was 5.2, 4.8, and 2.6 µg by rat GST, human GST, and recombinant LTC4 synthase, respectively.

When peritoneal murine macrophages were incubated for 15 min in the presence of 5-oxoETE (10 µM), a single GSH-5-oxoETE adduct resulted (previously referred to as FOG7), with a retention time on RP HPLC identical to that of the biologically active GSH-5-oxoETE adduct catalyzed by recombinant human LTC4 synthase. To investigate whether or not LTC4 synthase, expressed in the macrophage, catalyzed the formation of FOG7, the inhibitory effects of MK-886 were investigated in this cell. Elicited macrophages were incubated with 5-oxoETE (10 µM) at 37 °C for 15 min in the presence of various concentrations of MK-886. As shown in a typical experiment (Fig. 4), MK-886 inhibited the formation of FOG7 in the intact macrophage in a dose-related manner. The mean IC50 value for the mouse enzyme was 7.1 ± 1 µM (mean ± S.E., n = 3).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor, MK-886 (0.1-100 µM), on FOG7 and LTC4 biosynthesis from 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and LTA4 (10 µM), respectively, in intact peritoneal murine macrophage (40 × 106 cells) incubated in HBSS with 2 mM GSH for 15 min, expressed as % of control. The quantity of FOG7 and LTC4 produced in the absence of MK-886 (control) was 2.1 µg and 0.8 µg, respectively.

For comparison, elicited macrophages incubated with LTA4 (10 µM) at 37 °C for 15 min afforded LTC4, as identified by multiple reaction monitoring of the LTC4-specific transitions m/z 624 right-arrow 272. The production of LTC4 in the elicited macrophage was inhibited by MK-886 in a dose-related manner (Fig. 4). The mean IC50 value for this enzyme was 5.1 ± 1 µM (mean ± S.E., n = 3).

Subcellular Localization of Enzymatic Activity toward FOG7 Biosynthesis-- The location of FOG7 biosynthesis in the murine macrophage was determined in crude cell lysate, cytosol, and membrane fractions. Each subcellular fraction was incubated with 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and GSH (2 mM) for 15 min at 37 °C, and the extent of GSH conjugation to 5-oxoETE was analyzed by LC/MS/MS.

The total amount of protein recovered in both the cytosol and microsomal preparations was 83%. Both the cytosolic and microsomal fractions could catalyze the conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE, as evidenced by multiple reaction monitoring of aliquots from each of these samples. The microsomal fraction displayed a higher specific activity for the production of a GSH-5-oxoETE adduct than that observed from both the cell lysate and the isolated cytosolic fraction (Fig. 5). In addition to the higher specific activity, the GSH adduct from the microsomal fraction had a retention time identical to that of FOG7, as witnessed by co-elution of these two compounds during RP HPLC (data not shown). Also this compound was capable of initiating actin polymerization (Fig. 6A), and the production of this compound was inhibited by MK-886 (Fig. 5). The GSH adduct catalyzed by macrophage cytosolic GSTs eluted before the D6-GSH-5-oxoETE internal standard and as such, did not co-elute with authentic FOG7 (data not shown) and did not initiate actin polymerization (Fig. 6B). In addition to this lack of activity, MK-886 had little or no effect on the production of this compound (Fig. 5), a result consistent with that for the cytosolic GSTs tested previously.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Specific activity for GSH-5-oxoETE adduct and/or FOG7 formation in subcellular fractions of the peritoneal murine macrophage (5 µg of protein from each fraction) incubated for 15 min in HBSS with 2 mM GSH and 5-oxoETE (10 µM) and the effect of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor, MK-886 (100 µM), on GSH-5-oxoETE conjugation.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Measurement of F-actin polymerization using flow cytometry and NBD-phallicidin for the GSH-5-oxoETE adducts catalyzed by microsomal macrophage enzymes (A) and macrophage cytosol (B).

Identification of LTC4 Synthase in the Microsomal Fraction-- It appeared that the enzyme or enzymes responsible for the catalysis of GSH conjugation to 5-oxoETE to produce FOG7 were membrane-bound proteins isolated in the microsomal fraction by fractional centrifugation. Whether LTC4 synthase was the enzyme responsible for this process or whether additional microsomal GSTs were present in these cells and could catalyze this reaction was next examined.

Both the macrophage cell lysate, the cytosolic and the microsomal fractions (50 µg of protein), were assayed for LTC4 synthase activity. The crude cell lysate and microsomal fraction catalyzed the conjugation of GSH to LTA4-methyl ester to produce LTC4-methyl ester. The cell lysate not only catalyzed the formation of the methyl ester, but in addition to this, significant formation of the free acid of LTC4 was detected by UV analysis (Fig. 7), a reaction most likely catalyzed by cytosolic esterases present in the macrophage. The cytosolic fraction did not catalyze formation of either LTC4 or LTC4 methyl ester.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Production of LTC4 and LTC4-methyl ester from LTA4-methyl ester (10 µM) in the intact peritoneal murine macrophage (20 × 106 cells) incubated in HBSS for 10 min. LTC4 and LTC4-methyl ester were identified by comparing the UV chromophore at 280 nm and their respective retention times by RP HPLC with authentic LTC4 and LTC4-methyl ester. mAU, milli-absorbance units.

Both the cytosolic and the microsomal fractions were assayed for LTC4 synthase by Western blot analysis using peptide antibody raised against amino acids 65-78 in human LTC4 synthase. This antibody had specificity toward the mouse LTC4 synthase and revealed that this enzyme was present in the microsomal fraction and, as expected, was not detected in the cytosolic fraction (data not shown).

The apparent Km and Vmax for conjugation of glutathione to LTA4 and 5-oxoETE was determined in microsomes isolated from the murine macrophage containing LTC4 synthase. Various LTA4 and 5-oxoETE concentrations were incubated with microsomal fractions (0.15 mg of protein/ml) after adding 2 mM GSH for 5 min before sample work-up essentially as previously described in studies of the LTC4 synthase kinetics in platelets (10). Using hyperbolic regression analysis, the apparent Km was found to be 1.3 ± 0.34 for LTA4 and 1.6 ±0.22 for 5-oxoETE, with Vmax values for LTA4 and 5-oxoETE of 89 ± 4.7 and 130 ± 3.7, respectively. These results represent the mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments.

To distinguish between microsomal GST-mediated catalysis and LTC4 synthase catalysis in the membrane fraction, the conjugation of GSH to CDNB was examined. Recombinant LTC4 synthase had no catalytic activity toward the conjugation of GSH with CDNB, as was the case for the microsomal fraction (Fig. 8). The cytosolic fraction, however, did possess the ability to conjugate GSH to CDNB, indicating that there are cytosolic GSTs present in the murine macrophage (Fig. 8).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   GST activity for CDNB (1 mM) in subcellular fractions of the murine macrophage (5 µg of protein from each fraction), human placental GST (1 unit), and recombinant human LTC4 synthase incubated in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing GSH (1 mM), as measured by the change in absorbance at 340 nm over time using an extinction coefficient of 9.6 mM-1cm-1.

Platelet FOG7 Production-- Human platelets are known to express LTC4 synthase and efficiently convert LTA4 into LTC4 by transcellular biosynthesis (10, 32, 33). Incubation of 5-oxoETE (5 µM) carried out with isolated human platelets (6 × 108/ml) for 15 min at 37 °C resulted in a robust production of 58.3 ng of FOG7/109 platelets. This production of FOG7 by human platelets was inhibited by MK-886 (data not shown), a result consistent with that observed in the murine macrophage.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The macrophage is an efficient cell in processing arachidonic acid with the formation of both cyclooxygenase (34) and lipoxygenase products (35, 36). Although the macrophage is also capable of producing the chemotactic eicosanoid 5-oxoETE, the synthesis of this eicosanoid is not significantly enhanced by cell stimulus in contrast to other 5-lipoxygenase products (37). There is evidence to suggest that oxygenation of arachidonate at carbon-5 with formation of 5-hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid, a precursor of 5-oxoETE, may be a preferred free radical pathway of arachidonate metabolism (38). The major metabolite of 5-oxoETE in the macrophage is the GSH 1,4-Michael addition product FOG7, which also has chemotactic properties (16). The macrophage expresses the unique microsomal protein, LTC4 synthase (39), long thought to be specific only for LTA4 conversion to LTC4. It is now apparent that LTC4 synthase recognized 5-oxoETE as substrate and is likely the principal enzyme involved in the formation of FOG7 in the macrophage.

Recombinant human LTC4 synthase as well as human and rat cytosolic GSTs all catalyzed the conjugation of GSH to the electrophilic 5-oxoETE, as identified by multiple reaction monitoring on a tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer. LTC4 synthase catalyzed the production of a single GSH-5-oxoETE adduct, which displayed identical chromatographic properties and biological activity to that of macrophage-produced FOG7. Both human and rat GSTs catalyzed the conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE to produce an adduct that was not separable from FOG7 under the RP HPLC conditions used; however, these adducts did not initiate F-actin polymerization, suggesting that these compounds were in fact not FOG7. Rat GST also produced an additional minor adduct that was separable from FOG7 and the other GSH-5-oxoETE adducts. This minor GSH-5-oxoETE adduct also lacked the ability to initiate F-actin polymerization in the human neutrophil. MS/MS and MS3 analysis of these cytosolic GST-catalyzed products afforded spectra identical to that of FOG7, suggesting that these compounds are isomers of FOG7. Because the stereochemistry of FOG7 and these additional GSH-5-oxoETE adducts are not known, determination of the absolute stereochemistry of macrophage-derived FOG7 will likely require total organic synthesis. The chemical addition of GSH to 5-oxo-ETE would likely form equal quantities of two diastereoisomers at carbon-7 (absolute stereochemistry 7R and S), which may not substantially alter lipophilicity and, thus, RP-HPLC retention times.

The nuclear membrane-bound protein 5-lipoxygenase-activating-protein (FLAP) shows close homology to that of LTC4 synthase, and as a consequence, the FLAP antagonist, MK-886, has been shown to inhibit LTC4 synthase and formation of LTC4 from the reactive precursor LTA4 (39). FOG7 production in the intact macrophage was completely inhibited by MK-886 at concentrations of 100 µM, with an effective IC50 consistent with the inhibition of LTC4 formation from LTA4 in this cell type. The production of FOG7 catalyzed by the microsomal preparation was also inhibited by MK-886 (IC50, 7 µM). Even though this inhibition was not as efficient (80% inhibition at 100 µM) as that observed for the intact macrophage, this result was consistent with inhibition of recombinant LTC4 synthase-dependent conversion of LTA4 to LTC4 and may be due to the detergent used to solubilize these membrane-bound proteins. The apparent Km determined for LTA4 conversion to LTC4 and 5-oxoETE conversion to FOG7 by macrophage microsomes were essentially identical. This low Km for LTA4 and 5-oxoETE (1.3 ± 0.34 and 1.6 ± 0.22, respectively) reinforces the suggestion that murine macrophage LTC4 synthase can be involved in both the formation of LTC4 and FOG7, therefore having a potential dual role in the metabolism of 5-lipoxygenase arachidonate products.

Western blot analysis using a polyclonal antibody for LTC4 synthase revealed detection of this enzyme in the microsomal fraction but not in the cytosolic fraction. The antibody used, however, had been raised against peptides in the FERV region, a region almost identical in the human and murine sequence but having substantial amino acid sequence similarity in FLAP and microsomal GST-II (31), and as a consequence, this LTC4 synthase antibody might also detect both FLAP and microsomal GST-II.

The conversion of LTA4-methyl ester to LTC4-methyl ester as well as LTC4 in the macrophage indicated that LTC4 synthase was expressed in this cell as expected (39). The closely related microsomal GST-II has been previously shown to catalyze the conjugation of GSH to LTA4 but also mediates conjugation of GSH to CDNB (20, 40). The absence of microsomal GST-II in the macrophage was confirmed by a failure of this preparation to form the CDNB-GSH adduct. LTC4 synthase is the only known GST, both cytosolic and microsomal, that does not catalyze the conjugation of GSH to CDNB (20, 29, 41). Because the microsomal fraction did not conjugate GSH to CDNB, LTC4 synthase was therefore most likely responsible for the biosynthesis of FOG7 in the macrophage. The absence of microsomal GSTs in the peritoneal macrophage is consistent with the observation that LTC4 synthase expression is not prevalent in tissues that express microsomal GST-II and/or GST-III, with the testis being the exception (42). However, an interesting question remains to be answered as to whether or not microsomal GSTs expressed within another cell type could catalyze conversion of 5-oxoETE into FOG7.

Stimulation of the murine peritoneal macrophage by the calcium ionophore A23187 results in the abundant production of LTC4 due to generation of LTA4 but very little 5-oxoETE (37) and no FOG7.4 Because there have been no reports of stimulated production of both 5-oxoETE and LTA4 within the same cell type, it is difficult to assess whether these two substrates ever compete for LTC4 synthase. However, the generation of 5-oxoETE by nonenzymatic pathways (38) could lead to the presentation of this substrate to LTC4 synthase within the macrophage or other cell types (e.g. platelet) without activation of 5-lipoxygenase and concomitant formation of LTA4.

In summary, the biosynthesis of FOG7 from 5-oxoETE and GSH in the elicited peritoneal macrophage was found to be catalyzed by a membrane-localized enzyme rather than cytosolic GSTs. Biochemical and pharmacological evidence suggests that nuclear membrane-bound LTC4 synthase, long thought to be specific for the formation of LTC4 from LTA4, is responsible for this conjugation reaction.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The purification of recombinant LTC4 synthase was expertly carried out by Wesley Martin.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL64030 and HL36577.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Jewish Medical and Research Center, 1400 Jackson St., Denver, CO 80206. Tel.: 303-398-1849; Fax: 303-398-1694; E-mail: murphyr@njc.org.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108942200

2 Nomenclature is according to the following. The conjugation of GSH to 5-oxoETE can be catalyzed by various GSTs in vitro. These molecules will be referred to as GSH-5-oxoETE adducts as opposed to FOG7, which is the GSH-5-oxoETE adduct biosynthesized in the intact murine macrophage and is biologically active. Formation of the GSH-D6-5-oxoETE adduct used as an internal standard for these studies was catalyzed by human placental GST.

3 B. Lam, personal communication.

4 J. M. Hevko and R. C. Murphy, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LTA4 and LTC4, leukotriene A4 and C4, respectively; 5-oxoETE, 5-oxo-eicosatrienoic acid; FOG7, 5-oxo-7-glutathionyl-8,11,14-eicosatrienoic acid; GST, glutathione S-transferase; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; CDNB, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; LC, liquid chromatography; MS, mass spectrometry; FLAP, 5-lipoxygenase activating protein; NBD, N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazal-4-yl); RP, reverse phase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Samuelsson, B. (2000) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 161, Suppl. 2, Part 2, 2-6
2. Ford-Hutchinson, A. W., Gresser, M., and Young, R. N. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 383-417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Ford-Hutchinson, A. W., Bray, M. A., Doig, M. V., Shipley, M. E., and Smith, M. J. (1980) Nature 286, 264-265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Haeggstrom, J. Z. (1999) Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 17, 111-131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Lam, B. K., and Austen, K. (2000) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 161, Suppl. 2, Part 2, 16-19
6. Denzlinger, C., Guhlmann, A., Scheuber, P., H., Wilker, D., Hammer, D., K., and Keppler, D. J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 15601-15606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Murphy, R. C., Hammarström, S., and Samuelsson, B. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4275-4279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Samuelsson, B. (1983) Science 220, 568-575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Holtzman, M. J. (1991) Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 143, 188-203[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Maclouf, J. A., and Murphy, R. C. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 174-181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Leff, A. R. (2001) Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 86 Suppl. 1, 4-8[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Powell, W. S., Gravelle, F., and Gravel, S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19233-19241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Powell, W. S., Gravelle, F., and Gravel, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25373-25380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Butterfield, J. H., Lieferman, K. M., and Gleich, G. J. (1995) in Samter's Immunologic Diseases (Frank, M. J. , Austen, K. F. , Claman, H. N. , and Unanue, E. R., eds), 5th Ed. , pp. 501-527, Little, Brown, and Co., Boston
15. Martin, L. B., Kita, H., Lieferman, K. M., and Gleich, G. J. (1996) Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 109, 207-215[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Bowers, B. C., Hevko, J. H., Henson, P. M., and Murphy, R. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 29931-29934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Armstrong, R. N. (1991) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 4, 131-140[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Pickett, C. B., and Lu, A. Y. H. (1989) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 58, 743-764[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Lee, S. H., and DeJong, J. (199) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1446, 389-396[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Jakobsson, P. J., Mancini, J. A., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22203-22210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Jakobsson, P. J., Mancini, J. A., Rienndeau, D., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1997) J. Bio. Chem. 272, 22934-22939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Bach, M. K., Brashler, J. R., Peck, R. E., and Morton, D. R. (1984) J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 74, 353-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Nicholson, D. W., Klemba, M. W., Rasper, D. M., Metters, K. M., Zamboni, R. J., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 209, 725-734[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Carrier, D. J., Bogri, T., Cosentino, G. P., Guse, I., Rakhit, S., and Singh, K. (1988) Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids 34, 27-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Patscheke, H. (1981) Haemostasis 10, 14-27[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Grynkiewicz, G. M., Poenie, M., and Tsien, R. Y. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3440-3450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Howard, T. H., and Oresajo, C. O. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 1078-1085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Habig, W. B., Pabst, M. J., and Jacoby, W. B. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 7130-7139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Nicholson, D. W., Ali, A., Klemba, M. W., Munday, N. A., Zamboni, R. J., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17849-17857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Scoggan, K. A., Jakobsson, P. J., and Ford-Hutchinson, A. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10182-10187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Habib, A., and Maclouf, J. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 298, 544-552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Maclouf, J., Murphy, R. C., and Henson, P. M. (1990) Blood 76, 1838-1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Humes, J. L., Opas, E. E., Galavage, M., Soderman, D., and Bonney, R. J. (1986) Biochem. J. 233, 199-206[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Sun, D., and Funk, C. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24055-24062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Abe, M., Goya, T., Nagata, N., Takahashi, H., Muranishi, H., and Shigematsu, N. (1992) Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids 45, 1-59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Hevko, J. M., Bowers, R. C., and Murphy, R. C. (2001) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 296, 293-305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Khaselev, N., and Murphy, R. C. (2000) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 29, 620-632[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Lam, B. K., Penrose, J. F., Rokach, J., Kongyi, X., Baldasaro, M. H., and Austen, K. F. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 606-612[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Sjostrom, M., Jakobsson, P. J., Heimburger, M., Palmblad, J., and Haeggstrom, J. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 2578-2586[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Penrose, J. F., Gagnon, L., Goppelt-Struebe, M., Myers, P., Lam, B. K., Jack, R. M., Austen, K. F., and Soberman, R. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11603-11606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Kanaoka, Y., Maekawa, A., Penrose, J. F., Austen, K. F., and Lam, B. K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 22608-22613[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. B. Stamatiou, C.-C. Chan, G. Monneret, D. Ethier, J. Rokach, and W. S. Powell
5-Oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic Acid Stimulates the Release of the Eosinophil Survival Factor Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor from Monocytes
J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28159 - 28164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
C. Brink, S.-E. Dahlen, J. Drazen, J. F. Evans, D. W. P. Hay, G. E. Rovati, C. N. Serhan, T. Shimizu, and T. Yokomizo
International Union of Pharmacology XLIV. Nomenclature for the Oxoeicosanoid Receptor
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 56(1): 149 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Zarini and R. C. Murphy
Biosynthesis of 5-Oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic Acid from 5-Hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic Acid in the Murine Macrophage
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2003; 278(13): 11190 - 11196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/9/7037    most recent
M108942200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions