Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110784200 on December 17, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 7051-7058, March 1, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/9/7051    most recent
M110784200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soong, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soong, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Barbiturase, a Novel Zinc-containing Amidohydrolase Involved in Oxidative Pyrimidine Metabolism*

Chee-Leong SoongDagger, Jun Ogawa, Eiji SakuradaniDagger, and Sakayu Shimizu§

From the Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

Received for publication, November 9, 2001, and in revised form, December 13, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Barbiturase, which catalyzes the reversible amidohydrolysis of barbituric acid to ureidomalonic acid in the second step of oxidative pyrimidine degradation, was purified to homogeneity from Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM 3132. The characteristics and gene organization of barbiturase suggested that it is a novel zinc-containing amidohydrolase that should be grouped into a new family of the amidohydrolases superfamily. The amino acid sequence of barbiturase exhibited 48% identity with that of herbicide atrazine-decomposing cyanuric acid amidohydrolase but exhibited no significant homology to other proteins, indicating that cyanuric acid amidohydrolase may have evolved from barbiturase. A putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene was found upstream of the barbiturase gene, suggesting mutual interaction between pyrimidine biosynthesis and oxidative degradation. Metal analysis with an inductively coupled radiofrequency plasma spectrophotometer revealed that barbiturase contains ~4.4 mol of zinc per mol of enzyme. The homotetrameric enzyme had Km and Vmax values of 1.0 mM and 2.5 µmol/min/mg of protein, respectively, for barbituric acid. The enzyme specifically acted on barbituric acid, and dihydro-L-orotate, alloxan, and cyanuric acid competitively inhibited its activity. The full-length gene encoding the barbiturase (bar) was cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. The kinetic parameters and physicochemical properties of the cloned enzyme were apparently similar to those of the wild-type.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In a biological system, pyrimidines are metabolized through either a reductive or an oxidative pathway (1, 2). It is well recognized that mammals, plants, and microorganisms utilize the reductive pathway for pyrimidine degradation (3-5), whereas some microorganisms use the oxidative pathway (6-8).

In reductive pyrimidine metabolism, uracil, or thymine is first reduced to its dihydro-derivative, which in turn is hydrolyzed to an N-carbamoyl-beta -amino acid and finally decarbamoylated to a beta -amino acid. This metabolic route, especially the hydrolysis of dihydro-derivatives catalyzed by dihydropyrimidinase, has attracted much attention, because it is a potential target for drug therapy in the treatment of cancer (9, 10), and it also has been used for the industrial production of optically active amino acids (5, 11, 12). In contrast, oxidative pyrimidine metabolism has been scarcely investigated, and the references available so far are limited to the early studies performed by three groups of scientists (6-8). These reports showed that pyrimidine bases are first oxidized to barbituric acid derivatives, and then the barbituric acid derivatives are further hydrolyzed by barbiturase (EC 3.5.2.1) to urea and malonate derivatives. However, these studies were carried out with crude enzyme preparations, and the results presented were inadequate for confirming the enzymatic conversion of barbituric acid to urea and malonate.

We have elucidated the enzymes involved in the oxidative pathway, and clarified their physiological functions, in a bacterium, Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM 3132, which metabolizes pyrimidine exclusively through the oxidative pathway (13). Our preliminary enzymatic study on the oxidative pathway in this strain revealed that barbiturase catalyzes the amidohydrolysis of barbituric acid to ureidomalonic acid but not to urea and malonate (13). Consequently, we found a novel enzyme, ureidomalonase, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of ureidomalonic acid to urea and malonate, and proposed a detailed metabolic pathway of oxidative pyrimidine metabolism as shown below in Fig. 1A (13).

In the present study, we purified and characterized barbiturase in detail. The full-length gene encoding the barbiturase (bar) was also cloned. The enzyme was found to contain zinc, and its amino acid sequence exhibited good homology to that of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase, an enzyme involved in the newly evolved catabolic pathway for herbicide atrazine degradation as shown below in Fig. 1B (14, 15). However, no sequence homology was found with other naturally existing amidohydrolases such as dihydropyrimidinase, dihydro-orotase, allantoinase, cytosine deaminase, and urease, suggesting that barbiturase represents a new family of the amidohydrolase protein superfamily. The putative zinc-binding motif of barbiturase is located in the COOH-terminal region, contrary to in the cases of the zinc-containing amidohydrolases mentioned above, in which it is located in the NH2-terminal region, further indicating that barbiturase is a novel zinc-containing amidohydrolase. In addition, adjacent to the barbiturase gene is a putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene, this enzyme being involved in the salvage pathway for uracil in pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis, suggested that barbiturase may collaborate with this enzyme in the regulation of pyrimidine metabolism.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Microorganism and Cultivation-- R. erythropolis JCM 3132 was used and cultivated in uracil-rich medium as described previously (13). Cultivation was carried out at 28 °C for 4 days with shaking.

Enzyme Assay-- The standard enzyme assay mixture comprised 100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 8.0), 20 mM barbituric acid, and an appropriate amount of enzyme in 100 µl. The reaction was carried out at 30 °C for 10-15 min and stopped with 10 µl of 15% (v/v) perchloric acid, followed by neutralization with 90 µl of 500 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0). The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was analyzed as to the decrease in barbituric acid, using a Shimadzu (Japan) LC-10A high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC,1 at 210 nm) fitted with a reversed-phase Cosmosil 5C18 AR-II-packed column (4.6 × 250 mm, Nacalai Tesque, Japan), and 100 mM KH2PO4 (pH 2.5) as the eluent at the flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. One unit of enzyme was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzed the consumption of substrate at the rate of 1 µmol/min under the standard assay conditions described above.

Spectrophotometric Assay-- The enzyme activity was monitored as the decrease in absorbance at 256 nm due to barbituric acid (Delta epsilon  = 16,000 M-1 cm-1) with a microplate reader (Spectra Max 190, Molecular Devices). The reaction mixture comprised 200 mM HEPES/NaOH (pH 8.0), 0.1 mM barbituric acid, and an appropriate amount of enzyme in 150 µl. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the substrate, and the decrease in absorption of the barbituric acid was monitored for 2 min at 30 °C. The absorbance at 256 nm of barbituric acid was linear in this range.

Stabilization of Barbiturase-- Cells (50% w/v) suspended in 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) were disrupted by ultrasonication at 4 °C for 20 min and then centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 60 min. The resultant supernatant was supplemented with the following compounds at various concentrations (0.5-2 mM) and then kept at 4 °C: reducing agents (dithiothreitol, 2-mercaptoethanol, ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione, and L-cysteine), cofactors (NADH, NADPH, NAD+, NADP+, FAD, FMN, ATP, ADP, AMP, and 2-oxoglutaric acid), metal ions (divalent and monovalent metal ions), protease inhibitors, metal ion chelators, pyrimidine and purine-related compounds, organic acids, non-ionic and ionic detergents at 1-10% (v/v), and sugars at 10% (w/v). The barbiturase activity of each supplemented sample was assayed periodically together with a non-supplemented sample as a control.

Purification of Barbiturase-- All purification steps were carried out at 0-5 °C. The buffer used was 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) containing 0.2 mM dithiothreitol and 10% (v/v) ethylene glycol (which was found to be a stabilizer for barbiturase, as described under "Results"). Washed cells (20 g (wet weight) from 10 liters of uracil-rich medium) were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g at 4 °C) and suspended in 20 ml of buffer. The cell suspension was disrupted with 0.25- to 0.50-mm diameter glass beads (Dyno-Mill KDL, W. A. Bachofen, Switzerland) at 5 °C for 25 min. The disrupted cell suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C, and the resultant supernatant was used as the cell-free extract. The cell-free extract was dialyzed against 10 liters of buffer for 12 h. The dialyzed sample was then applied to a DEAE-Sephacel column (2.5 × 40 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer. After the column had been washed with 1 liter of buffer, the enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient of 0-1 M NaCl in 1 liter of buffer. The active fractions were combined and dialyzed against 5 liters of buffer for 12 h. The dialyzed enzyme solution was applied to another DEAE-Sephacel column (2.5 × 20 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer. The column was washed with buffer containing 0.2 M NaCl and then eluted with a linear gradient of 0.2-0.6 M NaCl in 500 ml of buffer. The active fractions were combined and dialyzed against 5 liters of buffer for 12 h. The dialyzed enzyme was applied to a MonoQ HR 5/5 column previously equilibrated with the buffer and then eluted with a linear salt gradient (0-0.7 M NaCl) in 20 ml of buffer. The active fractions were combined, solid NaCl was added to obtain a concentration of 4 M, and the mixture was applied to a phenyl-Superose HR 5/5 column previously equilibrated with the buffer containing 4 M NaCl. The enzyme was eluted with a decreasing salt gradient (4 to 0 M NaCl) in 20 ml of buffer. The active fractions were combined and concentrated by ultrafiltration with a 10,000 cut-off membrane. The concentrated enzyme was applied to a Superdex 200 HiLoad 16/26 column equilibrated with the buffer containing 0.2 M NaCl and then eluted with the same buffer. The active fractions were used for characterization.

Analytical Methods---The relative molecular weight was determined by HPLC on a TSKgel G3000SW column (7.5 × 600 mm, Tosoh, Japan) eluted with 100 mM potassium phosphate containing 100 mM Na2SO4 and 0.2 M NaCl (pH 7.0) at the flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. The molecular weight of barbiturase was calculated from the mobilities of the standard proteins, glutamate dehydrogenase (290,000), lactate dehydrogenase (142,000), enolase (67,000), adenylate kinase (32,000), and cytochrome c (12,400).

SDS-PAGE was performed in a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel, which was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. The NH2-terminal and internal amino acid sequences of the purified enzyme were determined by automated Edman degradation with a pulsed-liquid-phase protein sequencer (Applied Biosystems 476A). Protein concentrations were determined by the dye binding method of Bradford using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit.

Preparation of Internal Peptides---The freeze-dried purified enzyme (22 nmol) was dissolved in 20 mM Tris/HCl containing 8 M urea (pH 9.0) and incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. It was then digested with 0.11 nmol of lysylendopeptidase in 20 mM Tris/HCl (pH 9.0) containing 4 M urea at 30 °C for 16 h. The mixture was then applied to a SMART micro-purification system (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Sweden) equipped with a µRPC C2/C18 PC 3.2/3 column and eluted with a linear gradient (6 ml) of acetonitrile (0-80%) in the presence of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The purified peptide solutions were evaporated to dryness using a SpeedVac Plus SC110A (Savant Instruments, Inc., NY) and stored at -20 °C. Amino acid sequencing was performed by Edman degradation as described above.

Metal Analysis-- All glassware was soaked in 2 M HCl overnight and rinsed thoroughly with ion-exchange distilled (IED) water. Prior to enzyme dialysis, the dialysis tubing was successively treated with hot sodium carbonate (0.1 M), EDTA (12 mM)/sodium acetate (33 mM), and acetate (10 mM) for 30 min each and then washed with IED water. The treated tubing was then soaked in 50% ethanol for 2 h and washed thoroughly with IED water. The highly purified and concentrated enzyme (1.15 mg of protein/ml) was dialyzed extensively against 5 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5) containing 10% ethylene glycol (special grade for amino acid analysis from Wako Pure Chemicals, Japan). The dialyzed enzyme was analyzed with an inductively coupled radiofrequency plasma spectrophotometer (ICPS), Shimadzu ICPS-8000 (27.120 MHz). The metal contents of the enzyme sample were determined from the calibration curve for standard solutions, with the dialysis buffer as a control.

DNA Manipulation and Sequencing-- Total genomic DNA from R. erythropolis JCM 3132 was isolated and purified according to the method of Saito and Miura (16). The protocols used for plasmid isolation, agarose electrophoresis, ligation, and other standard molecular biological techniques were as described by Sambrook et al. (17). DNA labeling with alkaline phosphate for Southern and colony hybridization was carried out using the materials and protocols of chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., UK). Sequencing was performed by the dideoxy chain-termination method using a CEQ DTCS kit dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Beckman Instruments) with an automated DNA sequencer (CEQ 2000XL DNA Analysis System, Beckman Coulter, Inc.). The GENETYX software system (Software Development Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used for computer analysis of nucleotide sequences and deduced amino acid sequences.

PCR and Inverse-PCR Cloning-- Two degenerate oligonucleotides (forward primer 5'-GA(A/G)GA(A/G)GTIGCIGA(A/G)GTICCIAT (A/C/T)GTNTGG-3', and reverse primer 5'-TT(T/G/A)AT(C/T)TGIC (T/G)(G/A)TGCCA(G/A)TGIAC(G/A)TC-3', where I = inosine and N = any base) were synthesized based on two internal peptide sequences, EEVAEVPIVW (Ba-1) and DVHWHRQIK (Ba-5), respectively. PCR amplification was performed with ExTaq polymerase (Takara Shuzo, Japan) and the above primers, with the genomic DNA of R. erythropolis as a template. A Themoblock T-Gradient (Biometra, Germany) was programmed for 1 cycle of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 60 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 3 min; and 1 cycle of extension at 72 °C for 5 min. A single amplified PCR product of ~700 bp was ligated with TA cloning vector pCR 2.1 (Invitrogen). Transformation into Escherichia coli DH5-alpha was carried out by electroporation using a Bio-Rad Gene-Pulser. Screening for positive transformants was performed by colony hybridization with the alkaline phosphatase-labeled 700-bp fragment as a probe. The resultant cloned plasmid, pCR-BAR10, was isolated using a QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen). The cloned 700-bp insert was sequenced with M13 forward and reverse primers followed by primer-walking with custom oligonucleotides synthesized by GENSET KK, Kyoto, Japan.

Subsequent cloning of the upstream and downstream regions flanking the barbiturase gene was carried out by inverse-PCR (18). Genomic DNA was separately digested with several restriction enzymes, and a NaeI digest of ~2.3-kb was selected on Southern blot analysis as suitable for inverse-PCR. The genomic DNA was then digested with NaeI and self-ligated under dilute conditions (1 µg/ml) that favor intramolecular circularization (19). PCR amplification of this ligated DNA was performed by using two divergent oligonucleotides (S1, 5'-CGTCAACGTGTTCTTGAAGTGCGAG-3', and AS1, 5'-GTCGGTCTTGGTGACCTTGTCTGCC-3', located within the previously obtained insert sequence of pCR-BAR10) as primers. The specific amplified 2.3-kb fragment was purified, ligated with a TA cloning vector and then transformed into E. coli DH5-alpha . Screening for positive colonies was performed by colony hybridization. The resultant cloned plasmid, pCR-BAR59, was isolated and sequenced.

Expression of Barbiturase in E. coli-- The recombinant form of R. erythropolis barbiturase was obtained by PCR amplification of the gene encoding the enzyme and its subsequent cloning into T7 polymerase-driven expression vector pET21-a (Novagen, Milwaukee, WI). For amplification, the forward primer (5'-TACAAGGAGATGCATATGCCCGAAGCAATC-3') contained an engineered NdeI site (underlined) and spanned positions -15 to +15 of the coding strand, whereas the reverse primer (5'-AAGTTTCCAGCGGAATTCTTACCGGCTACT-3') had an engineered EcoRI site (underlined) and corresponded to the sequence ranging from +1106 to +1135 of the non-coding strand. The conditions for PCR amplification with LATaq polymerase (Takara Shuzo, Japan) were as described above, except that an annealing temperature of 65 °C and an extension temperature of 74 °C for 1 min were employed. The resultant 1.1-kb gene encoding barbiturase was cloned into the NdeI and EcoRI sites in expression plasmid pET21-a, yielding plasmid pET-BAR11N5. This was maintained in E. coli DH5-alpha , and the complete sequence of the barbiturase gene was confirmed by sequencing of the genes from three independent colonies harboring the pET-BAR11N5 plasmid. The gene encoding barbiturase was expressed in E. coli BL21(lambda DE3)/pET-BAR11N5 cells grown in LB medium (500 ml in a 2-liter flask) containing a final concentration of 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside. Cultivation was carried out at 37 °C for 6 h, after inoculation with 10% (50 ml) of an overnight seed culture. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with 0.85% NaCl, and then used for enzyme purification.

Purification of Recombinant Barbiturase from E. coli Cells-- All purification procedures were carried out at 0-5 °C. The bacterial cells obtained from 2 liters of culture were suspended in buffer (20 mM potassium phosphate, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 10% (v/v) ethylene glycol, pH 7.0). The cells were disrupted by ultrasonication at 4 °C. The homogenate was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was dialyzed against 5 liters of buffer for 12 h. The dialyzed sample was loaded onto a DEAE-Sephacel column (2.5 × 40 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer and then eluted with a linear gradient of 0-0.5 M NaCl (1 liter buffer). The active fractions were pooled, solid NaCl was added to a concentration of 4 M, and then the fractions were applied to a phenyl-Sepharose column (2.5 × 20 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer containing M NaCl. The column was washed with the buffer containing 2.5 M NaCl, followed by elution with a decreasing gradient of 2.5 to 0 M NaCl (600 ml of buffer). The active fractions were pooled, solid NaCl was added to a concentration of 4 M, and then the fractions were applied to a TSKgel butyl-Toyopearl 650M column (2.5 × 10 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer containing 4 M NaCl. The enzyme was eluted with a decreasing gradient of 4 to 0 M NaCl (400 ml of buffer). The active fractions were pooled and then dialyzed against the buffer for 12 h. The dialyzed sample was applied to a MonoQ HR 5/5 column and eluted with a linear gradient of 0.25 to 0.5 M NaCl (20 ml of buffer). The active fractions were combined and used for characterization.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Proposed pathway for oxidative pyrimidine metabolism (A) and catabolic pathway for atrazine degradation (B).


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Stabilization of Barbiturase-- During the initial study, we encountered difficulty in purifying the barbiturase, because the enzyme was unstable. The enzyme in a cell-free extract lost ~70% of its initial activity (at 4 °C) within 2 weeks. Therefore, it could not withstand the purification process, and no activity was detected after the first two chromatographic steps. We then screened for possible stabilizers of the enzyme. The enzyme activity was examined after the addition of reducing agents, cofactors, metal ions, protease inhibitors, pyrimidine and purine derivatives, organic acids, detergents, and sugars. Among them, we found ethylene glycol is an effective stabilizer for the barbiturase. In the presence of 10% (v/v) ethylene glycol, the barbiturase could be kept for more than 3 months at 4 °C without detectable loss of activity.

Purification and Criteria for Purity-- Barbiturase was purified to homogeneity with an overall yield of 8% and a 40-fold increase in specific activity (Table I). The purified enzyme gave a single protein band on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2). Further evidence of its purity was provided by gel-permeation HPLC on a G3000SW column, there being a quite symmetrical protein absorption peak concomitant with barbituric acid-hydrolyzing activity.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Purification of barbiturase from R. erythropolis JCM 3132


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   SDS-PAGE of the wild-type and recombinant barbiturases. Lane A, marker proteins; lane B, purified recombinant enzyme; lane C, purified wild-type enzyme.

Molecular Weight and Subunit Structure-- The relative molecular weight of the enzyme was estimated to be 172,000. On SDS-PAGE, the purified enzyme gave a single protein band corresponding to a relative molecular weight of 45,000. Thus, the native enzyme probably consists of four identical subunits.

Metal Ion Content-- An initial attempt to dialyze the enzyme against 5 mM Tris/HCl buffer (pH 7.5) failed, because the enzyme became aggregated. It was found that the addition of ethylene glycol to the dialysis buffer prevented this enzyme aggregation. Qualitative analysis of metals in the enzyme was performed for 66 elements by ICPS. Only zinc gave a significant reading, i.e. ~1.1 ± 0.1 mol per subunit. Other metals found in detectable amounts were calcium and magnesium (0.045 and 0.01 mol/subunit, respectively), but the amounts were too insignificant for these elements to be considered present in the purified enzyme. Therefore, barbiturase is a zinc-containing tetrameric enzyme with one atom of zinc bound per subunit. This is analogous to other amidohydrolases such as the dihydropyrimidinases from bovine and rat liver (20, 21), and the hydantoinase from Arthrobacter aurescens (22).

The absorption spectrum of the purified enzyme showed the maximum absorbance at 278 nm. No other absorption peak or shoulder was observed, suggesting that no co-factor other than zinc would be bound to the enzyme.

Substrate Specificity, Kinetic Constants, and Characteristics of the Barbiturase Reaction-- The purified barbiturase showed strict specificity toward barbituric acid. The following compounds were not transformed by the purified enzyme: barbituric acid derivatives such as barbital, cyclobarbital, allobarbital, and isobarbituric acid; pyrimidine derivatives such as dihydro-L-orotate, dihydrouracil, dihydrothymine, orotate, uracil, and thymine; and other cyclic-amides such as cyanuric acid, alloxan, parabanic acid, hydantoin, glutarimide, and succinimide.

The Km and Vmax values for barbituric acid were 1.0 mM and 2.5 µmol/min/mg of protein, respectively. Barbituric acid was hydrolyzed to ureidomalonic acid, which showed the same elution profile on HPLC as that in our previous report dealing with product (ureidomalonic acid) identification (13). Urea and malonate were not detected in the reaction mixture of the purified enzyme with barbituric acid as the substrate on analysis by TLC, HPLC, and an enzymatic method using urease. The non-reactive compounds listed above were examined as to inhibition of barbituric acid hydrolysis by the purified barbiturase. It was found that dihydro-L-orotate, alloxan, and cyanuric acid competitively inhibited barbituric acid hydrolysis, the Ki values being 4.5, 1.7, and 0.42 mM, respectively (Fig. 3).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Competitive inhibition of barbituric acid hydrolysis by dihydro-L-orotate, alloxan, and cyanuric acid. A, in the presence of 0 mM (black-square), 1 mM (black-diamond ), 3 mM (), or 5 mM (black-triangle) dihydro-L-orotate; B, in the presence of 0 mM (), 5 mM (diamond ), 8 mM (open circle ), or 10 mM (triangle ) alloxan; C, in the presence of 0 mM (down-triangle), 2 mM (black-down-triangle ), 4 mM (+), or 6 mM (*) cyanuric acid.

The reaction time courses with various barbituric acid concentrations (2-80 mM) showed time-dependent saturation of the reactions, indicating that the reactions attained equilibrium (data not shown). These results suggested that barbiturase catalyzes the reversible hydrolysis of barbituric acid to ureidomalonic acid. An equilibrium constant ([product]/[substrate]) of ~0.16 was obtained at pH 8.0.

Effects of Inhibitors and Metal Ions-- The enzyme activity was assayed under standard conditions in the presence of various compounds (2 mM). The enzyme activity was completely inhibited by sulfhydryl reagents p-chloromercuribenzoate and N-ethylmaleimide, whereas N-bromosuccinimide and 5,5'-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) showed 60 and 50% inhibition, respectively. Serine protease inhibitor diisopropyl phosphofluoridate strongly inhibited the enzyme activity (90% inhibition). The enzyme was sensitive to metal ion chelators such as o-phenanthroline, 8-hydroxyquinoline, EDTA, and alpha ,alpha '-dipyridyl (80, 60, 30, and 30% inhibition, respectively), suggesting that metal ion (Zn2+) is essential for the catalytic activity of the enzyme. The enzyme activity was not enhanced on metal ion addition but partially inhibited by Ni2+, Cd2+, and Co2+ (80, 60, and 51% inhibition, respectively) and completely inhibited by Hg2+ and Cu2+.

Effects of pH and Temperature-- The enzyme activity and stability were assayed in MES/NaOH, potassium phosphate, Tris/HCl, HEPES/NaOH, and NaHCO3-Na2CO3 buffer systems (100 mM) at pH 4.0-6.0, 6.5-8.0, 7.0-8.5, 7.0-8.0, and 9.4-10.0, respectively. Under the standard assay conditions, the highest activity was observed at pH 8.0. When the enzyme was incubated at 30 °C for 30 min, more than 80% of the initial activity was retained at pH 6.0-8.0. The initial velocity of the hydrolysis increased with increasing temperature, reaching a maximum at 40-45 °C. No enzymatic activity remained after 30-min incubation at 55 °C or above at pH 8.0.

Partial Amino Acid Sequence Analysis-- The NH2-terminal and five internal amino acid sequences of barbiturase (Ba-1 to Ba-5) are shown in Fig. 4. These sequences were compared with those of proteins stored in protein sequence data bases (Swiss-Prot, GenBankTM, EMBL, PIR, and PRF) using BLAST and FASTA software. It was found that the NH2-terminal and peptide Ba-5 sequences showed good homology to those of the NH2- and COOH-terminal regions of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase (14), respectively.


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the barbiturase gene. The underlined amino acid sequences were those of the NH2-terminal and internal peptides of the purified barbiturase determined by Edman degradation. A potential ribosome-binding sequence is boxed. The stop codon is represented by an asterisk. The putative zinc-binding residues are marked (#). Arrows indicate the primer sequence and the direction of extension on inverse-PCR. The nucleotide sequence in boldface upstream of the barbiturase is the open reading frame encoding a putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase.

Cloning, Sequence, and Putative Zinc-binding Motif of Barbiturase-- Degenerative primers derived from the internal peptide sequences of barbiturase specifically amplified a 0.7-kb fragment. The deduced amino acid sequence of the 0.7-kb insert of pCR-BAR10 corresponded precisely to the five internal peptide (Ba-1 to Ba-5) sequence of barbiturase (Fig. 4). Using the inverse-PCR approach, we found the gene-specific non-degenerative 25-mer primers (S1 and AS1, Fig. 4) specifically amplified the upstream (2.0 kb) and downstream (0.3 kb) parts of the locus around the 0.7-kp gene of the Nae1 digest, thus allowing us to determine the entire barbiturase structural gene. The enzyme gene was located in a 1.1-kb open reading frame (ORF) starting with an ATG start codon and terminating with a TAG codon and encoded a protein with a molecular weight of 38,997.46 (Fig. 4). A typical Shine-Dalgarno sequence was present 6 bp upstream from the initiation codon. The NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of the ORF exactly matched the 36-amino acid sequence of the NH2-terminal of the purified barbiturase determined by Edman degradation except for the first methionine residue, which may have been lost due to post-translational modification.

A homology search of the protein data bases revealed significant homology (48% identity, Fig. 5) with cyanuric acid amidohydrolase, an enzyme that catalyzes the ring-opening reaction of cyanuric acid and is involved in the final step degradation of the S-triazine rings of atrazine herbicides (14). This is likely, because the chemical structure of barbituric acid closely resembles that of cyanuric acid, and both enzymes catalyze amidohydrolytic reactions (Fig. 1). However, cyanuric acid amidohydrolase does not act on barbituric acid but is competitively inhibited by it (14). On the other hand, as mentioned above, barbiturase did not act on cyanuric acid but was inhibited by it.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of the barbiturase with that of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase. The alignment was performed with the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program. Gaps denoted by dashes were inserted to obtain maximum homology. Conserved residues are highlighted in white letters on a black background. BBT, barbiturase from R. erythropolis JCM 3132; CAA, cyanuric acid amidohydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. strain NRRLB-12227 (GenBankTM, AF086815).

The putative zinc-binding motif of barbiturase was shown in Fig. 4. This motif, designated as DXHXH, is part of a conserved sequence pattern suggested to be involved in the metal assembly center of the amidohydrolases superfamily (23-25). Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis of the conserved histidine residues of this motif showed that they are responsible for zinc binding and essential for the catalytic activity of the enzyme (26, 27). However, surprisingly, the zinc-binding motif of barbiturase is located near the COOH terminus, unlike in all other known amidohydrolases, in which the motif is found near the NH2 terminus.

Interestingly, we found another open reading frame (624 bp) translated in the opposite direction (from -224 to -847) upstream of the barbiturase gene (Fig. 4). The gene encoded a protein of 207 amino acids with a molecular weight of 21,920. A homology search of the deduced amino acid sequence of this ORF revealed very high homology to uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (Fig. 6). This enzyme catalyzes the reversible phosphorolysis of uridine-5'-monophosphate to uracil and 5'-phospho-alpha -D-ribose-1-diphosphate. It has been reported to be a key enzyme in the salvage of uracil in the biosynthetic pathway for pyrimidine nucleotides (28-30). Considering the adjacent location of this putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene and the barbiturase gene, the latter enzyme may be coupled with the former enzyme in overall pyrimidine metabolism.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence of an open reading frame upstream of the barbiturase gene with those of uracil phosphoribosyltransferases from various sources. The multiple alignment was performed with the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program. Gaps denoted by dashes were inserted to obtain maximum homology. Conserved residues are highlighted in white letters on a black background. Rhoer, R. erythropolis (this study); Myctu, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Swiss-Prot, P94928); Bacsu, Bacillus subtilis (Swiss-Prot, P39149); Laclc, Lactococcus lactis (Swiss-Prot, P50926); Metth, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (EMBL, AE00081); Strsl, Streptococcus salivarius (Swiss-Prot, P36399); Nesme, Neisseria meningitis (GenBankTM, AL162754).

Overexpression and Characterization of Recombinant Barbiturase-- Barbiturase was successfully overexpressed as a soluble form in the cyctoplasmic fraction of E. coli BL21 cells harboring the pET-BAR11N5 expression plasmid. After isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside induction, barbiturase was estimated to constitute ~25% of the total crude extract proteins. The specific barbiturase activity in a cell-free extract of the recombinant E. coli (0.654 µmol/min/mg of protein) is 10-fold higher than that of R. erythropolis (0.0655 µmol/min/mg of protein). No barbiturase activity was detected in E. coli BL21 cells harboring the original pET21-a plasmid. The recombinant barbiturase was purified to homogeneity through four chromatographic steps with a yield of about 20% (Fig. 2). A kinetic study of the purified enzyme gave Km and Vmax values of 0.67 mM and 2.58 µmol/min/mg of protein, respectively, which are apparently the same as those of the wild-type. The relative molecular weight was estimated to be 167,000 by gel-permeation HPLC. The recombinant enzyme exhibited the same pH and temperature optima and is susceptible to metal ion chelators. The sequence of the NH2-terminal 27 amino acids was PEAIEVRKVPLHSVSDASELAKLIDDG, which is identical to that of the purified wild-type. The loss of the initial methionine residue suggested that the expression of barbiturase in E. coli is also affected by post-translational modification.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Over the past several decades, no study has been focused on oxidative pyrimidine metabolism. Before our studies, only a few early works by three groups of scientists had been reported (6-8). Although it is a naturally occurring metabolic pathway, knowledge on the oxidative pathway and its biological importance is very limited. We have studied the reductive pathway from the physiological and application perspectives (31-37). At the same time, we initiated a study on oxidative pyrimidine metabolism by screening for microorganisms that utilize pyrimidine through the oxidative pathway, and found an active strain, R. erythropolis JCM 3132. Enzymatic study revealed that the catalytic action of barbiturase is different from that reported previously, and a novel enzyme, ureidomalonase, is proposed to be involved in the oxidative pathway (Fig. 1A). In this report, we report the detailed physicochemical properties of barbiturase and molecular cloning of the enzyme.

Barbiturase consists of four identical subunits and is very specific toward barbituric acid. The enzyme catalyzes the conversion of barbituric acid to ureidomalonic acid, and the equilibrium of the reaction is inclined toward barbituric acid formation. However, the existence of ureidomalonase supports the successive hydrolysis of ureidomalonic acid, which would pull the reaction toward barbituric acid decomposition. The enzyme activity was competitively inhibited by dihydro-L-orotate, which is an intermediate in the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. Likewise, it has been reported that barbituric acid inhibits several enzymes that participate in de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis (38-40). These results suggest that there are some mutual interaction between pyrimidine anabolism and oxidative catabolism. This proposition is supported by the fact that, adjoining to the barbiturase gene is the putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene, this enzyme being involved in the salvage pathway for uracil in pyrimidine nucleotides biosynthesis. Uracil phosphoribosyltransferase is also involved in the control of the rate of transcription of messenger RNA of the pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthetic operon (30). Barbiturase may collaborate with uracil phosphoribosyltransferase in catalytic, and probably genetic, regulation of pyrimidine metabolism, especially in organisms that degrade pyrimidine through the oxidative pathway.

Barbiturase is a zinc enzyme (containing four atoms of zinc per molecule of enzyme), as directly determined by ICPS. In this respect, barbiturase is similar to dihydropyrimidinase/hydantoinase and dihydro-orotase, which are involved in reductive and biosynthesis pyrimidine metabolism, respectively. The dihydropyrimidinase purified from rat and bovine liver contains four atoms of zinc per mol of enzyme (20, 21). The dihydro-orotase from hamster was suggested to contain two atoms of zinc per mol of enzyme (26), whereas recently the E. coli enzyme was revealed to have four atom of zinc per mol of enzyme by three-dimensional structure analysis (41). A recently purified and cloned human guanine deaminase (which also possesses the metal binding motif DXHXH) was determined to contain two atoms of zinc per mol of enzyme (42). The zinc-binding site of barbiturase is located at amino acids 320-324 (DVHWH, Fig. 4). It is found in the COOH-terminal region, contrary to in the cases of other known amidohydrolases, in which the binding site is located near the NH2-terminal region. The unique location of the zinc-binding site of barbiturase suggesting that it is a novel zinc-containing amidohydrolase.

The primary structure of barbiturase is very similar to that of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase. Cyanuric acid has been identified as a central intermediate in the pathway of atrazine degradation (43), and the catalytic function of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase is to completely mineralize the S-triazine ring (14) (Fig., 1B). This enzyme is a homotetramer, and its physicochemical properties, such as metal ion effects, and pH and temperature optima, are similar to those of barbiturase. However, extensive dialysis of the enzyme against EDTA did not result in a decrease in enzyme activity, indicating that no metal ion binds to the active site of the enzyme. Moreover, amino acid sequence alignment of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase with barbiturase showed no corresponding DXHXH motif, further suggesting that the enzyme has no metal binding site (Fig. 5). Until this report, the evolutionary origin of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase could not be predicted, because no sequence similarity was found with known proteins in the protein data bases (14). Based on the strong sequence similarity, we propose that cyanuric acid amidohydrolase may have originally evolved from barbiturase, because the latter participates in a naturally existing metabolic pathway, whereas the former gene was reported to be located on a transposable element (44).

The phylogenetic relationship among amidohydrolases from microorganisms and mammals determined by the UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) procedure with the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program is shown in Fig. 7. Barbiturase and cyanuric acid amidohydrolase are categorized into the same group, but they are distinctly different from other amidohydrolase families. Although barbiturase and cyanuric acid amidohydrolase did not exhibit sequence similarity with other amidohydrolases, the dendrogram revealed that both enzymes are evolutionary closer to cytosine deaminase and urease, but are far away from dihydropyrimidinase/hydantoinase, allantoinase, and dihydro-orotase on the evolutionary tree. This phenomenon implies that the amidohydrolase (barbiturase) of the oxidative pathway and the amidohydrolase (dihydropyrimidinase) of the reductive pathway have developed in different evolutionary directions. In summary, we propose that barbiturase and cyanuric acid amidohydrolase belong to a new family of the amidohydrolase superfamily.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Phylogenetic tree for amidohydrolases. This tree was constructed by the UPGMA procedure using the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program. The tree was divided into several amidohydrolase families, as presented earlier (23, 25). There are mainly six families from the evolutionary standpoint, as shown in boxes: dihydropyrimidinase/hydantoinase (DHP/HYN), allantoinase (ALN), dihydro-orotase (DHO), adenine deaminase (ADN), urease/cytosine deaminase (URE/CYN), and the newly proposed barbiturase/cyanuric acid amidohydrolase (BBT/CAA). All sequences are retrieved from Swiss-Prot data base, and the accession numbers for each sequence are given in parentheses: DHP, human (Q14117); DHP, rat (Q63150); HYN, Pseudomonas putida (Q59699); HYN, Bacillus stearothermophilus (Q45515); HYN, Agrobacterium radiobacter (Q44184); HYN, Arthrobacter aurescens (P81006); ALN, E. coli (P77671); ALN, B. subtilis (032137); ALN, frog (P40757); ALN, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P32375); DHO, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (027199); DHO, Pyrococcus horikoshii (057740); DHO, human (P27708); DHO, Drosophila melanogaster (P05990); DHO, B. subtilis (P25995); DHO, Thermus aquaticus (P25995); ADN, human (P00813); ADN, mouse (P03958); ADN, E. coli (P22333); URE, Hemophilus influenzae (P44391); URE, Klebsiella aerogenes (P18314); URE, B. subtilis (P77837); URE, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (P50042); URE, Lactococcus fermentum (P26929); URE, Clostridium perfringens (P94669); CYN, Candida albicans (P78594); CYN, S. cerevisiae (Q12178); BBT, R. erythropolis (this study); CAA, Pseudomonas sp. strain NRRLB-12227 (GenBankTM, AF086815).

Barbituric acid is considered to be a non-anesthetic compound. However, substitution by alkyl or aryl chains at the C5 position of barbituric acid leads to a compound affecting the arousal reaction. Hypnotic and convulsant reagents such as 5-benzylbarbituric acid, barbital, phenobarbital, and 5,5-disubstituted barbiturates have been reported to be useful for the therapy for cancer and other pathological and physiological disorders (45, 46). Complete degradation of these drugs may likely involve the ring cleavage of the core structure of barbituric acid. Although so far there is no direct evidence of barbiturase activity or the existence of oxidative pyrimidine metabolism in mammals, some early articles reported that radioactive 15N- or 14C-urea, a possible product of oxidative but not reductive metabolism, was detected in the urine when 15N- or 14C-labeled uracil was intravenously administered to rats (47, 48). However, further investigation has to be carried out to verify whether barbiturase or the oxidative pathway is functioning in mammals. Nevertheless, together with that on the reductive pathway, knowledge on the oxidative pathway will provide some insights as to its physiological importance in nucleic acid metabolism.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Seiichiro Matsumoto and Yoichi Mikami, Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd., for their helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for Foreign Researchers (P00151 to C.-L. S.) and by a grant from the Research for the Future Program (JSPS-RFTF 97I00302 to S. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ320520.

Dagger Postdoctoral fellows supported by the JSPS.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. Tel.: 81-75-753-6115; Fax: 81-75-753-6128; E-mail: sim@kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110784200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; IED, ion-exchange distilled; ICPS, inductively coupled radiofrequency plasma spectrophotometer; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; ORF, open reading frame; UPGMA, Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Vogels, G. D., and Van Der Drift, C. (1976) Bacteriol. Rev. 40, 403-468[Free Full Text]
2. Wasternack, C. (1978) Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz. 173, 371-403
3. Wasternack, C. (1980) Pharmacol. Ther. 8, 629-651[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Tsai, C. S., and Axelrod, B. (1965) Plant Physiol. 40, 39-44[Free Full Text]
5. Syldatk, C., May, O., Altenbucher, J., Mattes, R., and Siemann, M. (1999) Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 51, 293-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hayaishi, O., and Kornberg, A. (1952) J. Biol. Chem. 197, 717-732[Free Full Text]
7. Lara, F. J. S. (1952) J. Bacteriol. 64, 279-285[Free Full Text]
8. Wang, T. P., and Lampen, J. O. (1952) J. Biol. Chem. 194, 775-783[Free Full Text]
9. Naguib, F. M. N., el Kouni, M. H., and Cha, S. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 5405-5412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Hull, W. E., Port, R. E., Herrmann, R., Britsch, B., and Kunz, W. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 1680-1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Ogawa, J., and Shimizu, S. (1997) J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic 2, 163-176[CrossRef]
12. Soong, C.-L., Ogawa, J., and Shimizu, S. (2001) J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic 12, 61-70[CrossRef]
13. Soong, C.-L., Ogawa, J., and Shimizu, S. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 286, 222-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Karns, J. S. (1999) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 3512-3517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Martinez, B., Tomkins, J., Wackett, L. P., Wing, R., and Sadowsky, M. J. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 5684-5697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Saito, H., and Miura, K. (1963) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 72, 619-629[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
18. Ochman, H., Gerber, A. S., and Hartl, D. L. (1988) Genetics 120, 621-623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Collins, S. F., and Weissman, S. M. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 6812-6816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Brooks, K. P., Jones, E. A., Kim, B. D., and Sander, E. G. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 226, 469-483[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Kikugawa, M., Kaneko, M., Fujimoto-Sakata, S., Maeda, M., Kawasaki, K., Takagi, T., and Tamaki, N. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 219, 393-399[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. May, O., Siemann, M., Siemann, M. G., and Syldatk, C. (1998) J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic 4, 211-218[CrossRef]
23. Holm, L., and Sander, C. (1997) Proteins 28, 72-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Kim, G. J., and Kim, H. S. (1998) Biochem. J. 330, 295-302
25. May, O., Habenicht, A., Mattes, R., Syldatk, C., and Siemann, M. (1998) Biol. Chem. 379, 743-747[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Williams, N. K., Manthey, M. K., Hambley, T. W., O`Donoghue, S. I., Keegan, M., Chapman, B. E., and Christopherson, R. I. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 11344-11352[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Zimmermann, B. H., Kemling, N. M., and Evans, D. R. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 7038-7046[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Rasmussen, U. B., Mygind, B., and Nygaard, P. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 881, 268-275[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Martinussen, J., Glaser, P., Andersen, P. S., and Saxild, H. H. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 271-274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Turner, R. J., Bonner, E. R., Grabner, G. K., and Switzer, R. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5932-5938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Ogawa, J., Shimizu, S., and Yamada, H. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 212, 685-691[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Ogawa, J., and Shimizu, S. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 625-630[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Ogawa, J., and Shimizu, S. (1995) Arch. Microbiol. 164, 353-357[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Ogawa, J., Soong, C.-L., Honda, M., and Shimizu, S. (1996) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 3814-3817[Abstract]
35. Ogawa, J., Soong, C.-L., Honda, M., and Shimizu, S. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 243, 322-327[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Soong, C.-L., Ogawa, J., Sukiman, H., Prana, T., Prana, M. S., and Shimizu, S. (1998) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 158, 51-55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Soong, C.-L., Ogawa, J., Honda, M., and Shimizu, S. (1999) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 1459-1462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Pinsky, L., and Krooth, R. S. (1967) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 57, 1267-1274[Free Full Text]
39. Potvin, B. W., Stern, H. J., Randolph May, S., Lam, G. F., and Krooth, R. S. (1978) Biochem. Pharmacol. 27, 655-665[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Gero, A. M., O`Sullivan, W. J., and Brown, D. J. (1985) Biochem. Med. 34, 60-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Thodwn, J. B., Phillips, G. N., Jr., Neal, T. M., Raushel, F. M., and Holden, H. M. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6989-6997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Yuan, G., Bin, J. C., McKay, D. J., and Synder, F. F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8175-8180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Eaton, R. W., and Karns, J. S. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 1363-1366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Eaton, R. W., and Karns, J. S. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 1215-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Naguib, F. N., Levesque, D. L., Wang, E. C., Panzica, R. P., and el Kouni, M. H. (1993) Biochem. Pharmacol. 46, 1273-1283[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Ashour, O. M., Naguib, F. N., and el Kouni, M. H. (1996) Biochem. Pharmacol. 51, 1601-1611[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Plentl, A. A., and Schoenheimer, R. (1944) J. Biol. Chem. 203, 203-217
48. Rutman, R. J., Cantarow, A., and Paschkis, K. E. (1954) J. Biol. Chem. 210, 321-329[Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
A. Mercier, S. Watt, J. Bahler, and S. Labbe
Key Function for the CCAAT-Binding Factor Php4 To Regulate Gene Expression in Response to Iron Deficiency in Fission Yeast
Eukaryot. Cell, March 1, 2008; 7(3): 493 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. D. Loh, P. Gyaneshwar, E. Markenscoff Papadimitriou, R. Fong, K.-S. Kim, R. Parales, Z. Zhou, W. Inwood, and S. Kustu
From the Cover: A previously undescribed pathway for pyrimidine catabolism
PNAS, March 28, 2006; 103(13): 5114 - 5119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
T. F. Ducey, M. B. Carson, J. Orvis, A. P. Stintzi, and D. W. Dyer
Identification of the Iron-Responsive Genes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Microarray Analysis in Defined Medium
J. Bacteriol., July 15, 2005; 187(14): 4865 - 4874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
I. Fruchey, N. Shapir, M. J. Sadowsky, and L. P. Wackett
On the Origins of Cyanuric Acid Hydrolase: Purification, Substrates, and Prevalence of AtzD from Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 69(6): 3653 - 3657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/9/7051    most recent
M110784200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soong, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soong, C.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement