|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110784200 on December 17, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 7051-7058, March 1, 2002
Barbiturase, a Novel Zinc-containing Amidohydrolase Involved in
Oxidative Pyrimidine Metabolism*
Chee-Leong
Soong ,
Jun
Ogawa,
Eiji
Sakuradani , and
Sakayu
Shimizu§
From the Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of
Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
606-8502, Japan
Received for publication, November 9, 2001, and in revised form, December 13, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Barbiturase, which catalyzes the reversible
amidohydrolysis of barbituric acid to ureidomalonic acid in the second
step of oxidative pyrimidine degradation, was purified to homogeneity from Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM 3132. The characteristics
and gene organization of barbiturase suggested that it is a novel zinc-containing amidohydrolase that should be grouped into a new family
of the amidohydrolases superfamily. The amino acid sequence of
barbiturase exhibited 48% identity with that of herbicide
atrazine-decomposing cyanuric acid amidohydrolase but exhibited no
significant homology to other proteins, indicating that cyanuric acid
amidohydrolase may have evolved from barbiturase. A putative uracil
phosphoribosyltransferase gene was found upstream of the barbiturase
gene, suggesting mutual interaction between pyrimidine biosynthesis and
oxidative degradation. Metal analysis with an inductively coupled
radiofrequency plasma spectrophotometer revealed that barbiturase
contains ~4.4 mol of zinc per mol of enzyme. The homotetrameric
enzyme had Km and Vmax
values of 1.0 mM and 2.5 µmol/min/mg of protein,
respectively, for barbituric acid. The enzyme specifically acted on
barbituric acid, and dihydro-L-orotate, alloxan, and
cyanuric acid competitively inhibited its activity. The full-length
gene encoding the barbiturase (bar) was cloned and
overexpressed in Escherichia coli. The kinetic parameters
and physicochemical properties of the cloned enzyme were apparently
similar to those of the wild-type.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In a biological system, pyrimidines are metabolized through either
a reductive or an oxidative pathway (1, 2). It is well recognized that
mammals, plants, and microorganisms utilize the reductive pathway for
pyrimidine degradation (3-5), whereas some microorganisms use the
oxidative pathway (6-8).
In reductive pyrimidine metabolism, uracil, or thymine is first reduced
to its dihydro-derivative, which in turn is hydrolyzed to an
N-carbamoyl- -amino acid and finally decarbamoylated to a
-amino acid. This metabolic route, especially the hydrolysis of
dihydro-derivatives catalyzed by dihydropyrimidinase, has attracted much attention, because it is a potential target for drug therapy in
the treatment of cancer (9, 10), and it also has been used for the
industrial production of optically active amino acids (5, 11, 12). In
contrast, oxidative pyrimidine metabolism has been scarcely
investigated, and the references available so far are limited to the
early studies performed by three groups of scientists (6-8). These
reports showed that pyrimidine bases are first oxidized to barbituric
acid derivatives, and then the barbituric acid derivatives are further
hydrolyzed by barbiturase (EC 3.5.2.1) to urea and malonate
derivatives. However, these studies were carried out with crude enzyme
preparations, and the results presented were inadequate for confirming
the enzymatic conversion of barbituric acid to urea and malonate.
We have elucidated the enzymes involved in the oxidative pathway, and
clarified their physiological functions, in a bacterium, Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM 3132, which metabolizes
pyrimidine exclusively through the oxidative pathway (13). Our
preliminary enzymatic study on the oxidative pathway in this strain
revealed that barbiturase catalyzes the amidohydrolysis of barbituric
acid to ureidomalonic acid but not to urea and malonate (13).
Consequently, we found a novel enzyme, ureidomalonase, which catalyzes
the hydrolysis of ureidomalonic acid to urea and malonate, and proposed
a detailed metabolic pathway of oxidative pyrimidine metabolism as
shown below in Fig. 1A (13).
In the present study, we purified and characterized barbiturase in
detail. The full-length gene encoding the barbiturase (bar) was also cloned. The enzyme was found to contain zinc, and its amino
acid sequence exhibited good homology to that of cyanuric acid
amidohydrolase, an enzyme involved in the newly evolved catabolic pathway for herbicide atrazine degradation as shown below in Fig. 1B (14, 15). However, no sequence homology was found with other naturally existing amidohydrolases such as dihydropyrimidinase, dihydro-orotase, allantoinase, cytosine deaminase, and urease, suggesting that barbiturase represents a new family of the
amidohydrolase protein superfamily. The putative zinc-binding motif of
barbiturase is located in the COOH-terminal region, contrary to in the
cases of the zinc-containing amidohydrolases mentioned above, in which it is located in the NH2-terminal region, further
indicating that barbiturase is a novel zinc-containing amidohydrolase.
In addition, adjacent to the barbiturase gene is a putative uracil
phosphoribosyltransferase gene, this enzyme being involved in the
salvage pathway for uracil in pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis,
suggested that barbiturase may collaborate with this enzyme in the
regulation of pyrimidine metabolism.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Microorganism and Cultivation--
R. erythropolis
JCM 3132 was used and cultivated in uracil-rich medium as described
previously (13). Cultivation was carried out at 28 °C for 4 days
with shaking.
Enzyme Assay--
The standard enzyme assay mixture comprised
100 mM potassium phosphate (pH 8.0), 20 mM
barbituric acid, and an appropriate amount of enzyme in 100 µl. The
reaction was carried out at 30 °C for 10-15 min and stopped with 10 µl of 15% (v/v) perchloric acid, followed by neutralization with 90 µl of 500 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0). The reaction
mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and
the supernatant was analyzed as to the decrease in barbituric acid,
using a Shimadzu (Japan) LC-10A high performance liquid chromatograph
(HPLC,1 at 210 nm) fitted
with a reversed-phase Cosmosil 5C18 AR-II-packed column
(4.6 × 250 mm, Nacalai Tesque, Japan), and 100 mM KH2PO4 (pH 2.5) as the eluent at
the flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. One unit of enzyme was defined as the
amount of enzyme that catalyzed the consumption of substrate at the
rate of 1 µmol/min under the standard assay conditions described above.
Spectrophotometric Assay--
The enzyme activity was monitored
as the decrease in absorbance at 256 nm due to barbituric acid
( = 16,000 M 1
cm 1) with a microplate reader (Spectra Max 190, Molecular
Devices). The reaction mixture comprised 200 mM HEPES/NaOH
(pH 8.0), 0.1 mM barbituric acid, and an appropriate amount
of enzyme in 150 µl. The reaction was initiated by the addition of
the substrate, and the decrease in absorption of the barbituric acid
was monitored for 2 min at 30 °C. The absorbance at 256 nm of
barbituric acid was linear in this range.
Stabilization of Barbiturase--
Cells (50% w/v) suspended in
20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) were disrupted by
ultrasonication at 4 °C for 20 min and then centrifuged at
14,000 × g for 60 min. The resultant supernatant was
supplemented with the following compounds at various concentrations (0.5-2 mM) and then kept at 4 °C: reducing agents
(dithiothreitol, 2-mercaptoethanol, ascorbic acid, reduced glutathione,
and L-cysteine), cofactors (NADH, NADPH, NAD+,
NADP+, FAD, FMN, ATP, ADP, AMP, and 2-oxoglutaric
acid), metal ions (divalent and monovalent metal ions), protease
inhibitors, metal ion chelators, pyrimidine and purine-related
compounds, organic acids, non-ionic and ionic detergents at 1-10%
(v/v), and sugars at 10% (w/v). The barbiturase activity of each
supplemented sample was assayed periodically together with a
non-supplemented sample as a control.
Purification of Barbiturase--
All purification steps were
carried out at 0-5 °C. The buffer used was 20 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.0) containing 0.2 mM dithiothreitol and 10% (v/v) ethylene glycol (which was found to be a
stabilizer for barbiturase, as described under "Results"). Washed
cells (20 g (wet weight) from 10 liters of uracil-rich medium) were
harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g at 4 °C) and suspended in 20 ml of buffer. The cell suspension was disrupted with 0.25- to 0.50-mm diameter glass beads (Dyno-Mill KDL, W. A. Bachofen, Switzerland) at 5 °C for 25 min. The disrupted
cell suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C, and the resultant supernatant was used as the cell-free
extract. The cell-free extract was dialyzed against 10 liters of buffer
for 12 h. The dialyzed sample was then applied to a DEAE-Sephacel column (2.5 × 40 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer. After the column had been washed with 1 liter of buffer, the enzyme was
eluted with a linear gradient of 0-1 M NaCl in 1 liter of buffer. The active fractions were combined and dialyzed against 5 liters of buffer for 12 h. The dialyzed enzyme solution was applied to another DEAE-Sephacel column (2.5 × 20 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer. The column was washed with buffer containing 0.2 M NaCl and then eluted with a linear
gradient of 0.2-0.6 M NaCl in 500 ml of buffer. The active
fractions were combined and dialyzed against 5 liters of buffer for
12 h. The dialyzed enzyme was applied to a MonoQ HR 5/5 column
previously equilibrated with the buffer and then eluted with a linear
salt gradient (0-0.7 M NaCl) in 20 ml of buffer. The
active fractions were combined, solid NaCl was added to obtain a
concentration of 4 M, and the mixture was applied to a
phenyl-Superose HR 5/5 column previously equilibrated with the buffer
containing 4 M NaCl. The enzyme was eluted with a
decreasing salt gradient (4 to 0 M NaCl) in 20 ml of
buffer. The active fractions were combined and concentrated by
ultrafiltration with a 10,000 cut-off membrane. The concentrated enzyme
was applied to a Superdex 200 HiLoad 16/26 column equilibrated with the
buffer containing 0.2 M NaCl and then eluted with the same
buffer. The active fractions were used for characterization.
Analytical Methods The relative molecular weight was
determined by HPLC on a TSKgel G3000SW column (7.5 × 600 mm,
Tosoh, Japan) eluted with 100 mM potassium phosphate
containing 100 mM Na2SO4 and 0.2 M NaCl (pH 7.0) at the flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. The
molecular weight of barbiturase was calculated from the mobilities of
the standard proteins, glutamate dehydrogenase (290,000), lactate dehydrogenase (142,000), enolase (67,000), adenylate kinase (32,000), and cytochrome c (12,400).
SDS-PAGE was performed in a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel, which was
stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. The
NH2-terminal and internal amino acid sequences of the
purified enzyme were determined by automated Edman degradation with a
pulsed-liquid-phase protein sequencer (Applied Biosystems 476A).
Protein concentrations were determined by the dye binding method of
Bradford using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit.
Preparation of Internal Peptides The freeze-dried purified
enzyme (22 nmol) was dissolved in 20 mM Tris/HCl containing
8 M urea (pH 9.0) and incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. It
was then digested with 0.11 nmol of lysylendopeptidase in 20 mM Tris/HCl (pH 9.0) containing 4 M urea at
30 °C for 16 h. The mixture was then applied to a SMART
micro-purification system (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Sweden) equipped
with a µRPC C2/C18 PC 3.2/3 column and eluted with a linear gradient
(6 ml) of acetonitrile (0-80%) in the presence of 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid. The purified peptide solutions were evaporated to
dryness using a SpeedVac Plus SC110A (Savant Instruments, Inc., NY) and
stored at 20 °C. Amino acid sequencing was performed by Edman
degradation as described above.
Metal Analysis--
All glassware was soaked in 2 M
HCl overnight and rinsed thoroughly with ion-exchange distilled (IED)
water. Prior to enzyme dialysis, the dialysis tubing was successively
treated with hot sodium carbonate (0.1 M), EDTA (12 mM)/sodium acetate (33 mM), and acetate (10 mM) for 30 min each and then washed with IED water. The
treated tubing was then soaked in 50% ethanol for 2 h and washed
thoroughly with IED water. The highly purified and concentrated enzyme
(1.15 mg of protein/ml) was dialyzed extensively against 5 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5) containing 10% ethylene glycol
(special grade for amino acid analysis from Wako Pure Chemicals,
Japan). The dialyzed enzyme was analyzed with an inductively coupled
radiofrequency plasma spectrophotometer (ICPS), Shimadzu ICPS-8000
(27.120 MHz). The metal contents of the enzyme sample were determined
from the calibration curve for standard solutions, with the dialysis
buffer as a control.
DNA Manipulation and Sequencing--
Total genomic DNA from
R. erythropolis JCM 3132 was isolated and purified according
to the method of Saito and Miura (16). The protocols used for plasmid
isolation, agarose electrophoresis, ligation, and other standard
molecular biological techniques were as described by Sambrook et
al. (17). DNA labeling with alkaline phosphate for Southern and
colony hybridization was carried out using the materials and protocols
of chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., UK).
Sequencing was performed by the dideoxy chain-termination method using
a CEQ DTCS kit dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Beckman
Instruments) with an automated DNA sequencer (CEQ 2000XL DNA Analysis
System, Beckman Coulter, Inc.). The GENETYX software system (Software
Development Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used for computer analysis of
nucleotide sequences and deduced amino acid sequences.
PCR and Inverse-PCR Cloning--
Two degenerate
oligonucleotides (forward primer
5'-GA(A/G)GA(A/G)GTIGCIGA(A/G)GTICCIAT (A/C/T)GTNTGG-3', and
reverse primer 5'-TT(T/G/A)AT(C/T)TGIC (T/G)(G/A)TGCCA(G/A)TGIAC(G/A)TC-3',
where I = inosine and N = any base) were
synthesized based on two internal peptide sequences, EEVAEVPIVW (Ba-1)
and DVHWHRQIK (Ba-5), respectively. PCR amplification was performed
with ExTaq polymerase (Takara Shuzo, Japan) and the above primers, with
the genomic DNA of R. erythropolis as a template. A
Themoblock T-Gradient (Biometra, Germany) was programmed for 1 cycle of
denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at
95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 60 °C for 1 min, and extension at
72 °C for 3 min; and 1 cycle of extension at 72 °C for 5 min. A
single amplified PCR product of ~700 bp was ligated with TA cloning
vector pCR 2.1 (Invitrogen). Transformation into Escherichia
coli DH5- was carried out by electroporation using a Bio-Rad
Gene-Pulser. Screening for positive transformants was performed by
colony hybridization with the alkaline phosphatase-labeled 700-bp
fragment as a probe. The resultant cloned plasmid, pCR-BAR10, was
isolated using a QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen). The cloned 700-bp
insert was sequenced with M13 forward and reverse primers followed by
primer-walking with custom oligonucleotides synthesized by GENSET KK,
Kyoto, Japan.
Subsequent cloning of the upstream and downstream regions flanking the
barbiturase gene was carried out by inverse-PCR (18). Genomic DNA was
separately digested with several restriction enzymes, and a
NaeI digest of ~2.3-kb was selected on Southern blot
analysis as suitable for inverse-PCR. The genomic DNA was then digested with NaeI and self-ligated under dilute conditions (1 µg/ml) that favor intramolecular circularization (19). PCR
amplification of this ligated DNA was performed by using two
divergent oligonucleotides (S1, 5'-CGTCAACGTGTTCTTGAAGTGCGAG-3', and
AS1, 5'-GTCGGTCTTGGTGACCTTGTCTGCC-3', located within the
previously obtained insert sequence of pCR-BAR10) as primers. The
specific amplified 2.3-kb fragment was purified, ligated with a TA
cloning vector and then transformed into E. coli DH5- .
Screening for positive colonies was performed by colony hybridization.
The resultant cloned plasmid, pCR-BAR59, was isolated and sequenced.
Expression of Barbiturase in E. coli--
The recombinant form
of R. erythropolis barbiturase was obtained by PCR
amplification of the gene encoding the enzyme and its subsequent
cloning into T7 polymerase-driven expression vector pET21-a (Novagen,
Milwaukee, WI). For amplification, the forward primer
(5'-TACAAGGAGATGCATATGCCCGAAGCAATC-3') contained an
engineered NdeI site (underlined) and spanned positions 15
to +15 of the coding strand, whereas the reverse primer
(5'-AAGTTTCCAGCGGAATTCTTACCGGCTACT-3') had an
engineered EcoRI site (underlined) and corresponded to the
sequence ranging from +1106 to +1135 of the non-coding strand. The
conditions for PCR amplification with LATaq polymerase (Takara Shuzo,
Japan) were as described above, except that an annealing temperature of
65 °C and an extension temperature of 74 °C for 1 min were
employed. The resultant 1.1-kb gene encoding barbiturase was cloned
into the NdeI and EcoRI sites in expression
plasmid pET21-a, yielding plasmid pET-BAR11N5. This was maintained in E. coli DH5- , and the complete sequence of the
barbiturase gene was confirmed by sequencing of the genes from three
independent colonies harboring the pET-BAR11N5 plasmid. The gene
encoding barbiturase was expressed in E. coli
BL21( DE3)/pET-BAR11N5 cells grown in LB medium (500 ml in a 2-liter
flask) containing a final concentration of 1 mM
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside. Cultivation was
carried out at 37 °C for 6 h, after inoculation with 10% (50 ml) of an overnight seed culture. Cells were harvested by
centrifugation, washed twice with 0.85% NaCl, and then used for enzyme purification.
Purification of Recombinant Barbiturase from E. coli
Cells--
All purification procedures were carried out at 0-5 °C.
The bacterial cells obtained from 2 liters of culture were suspended in
buffer (20 mM potassium phosphate, 0.2 mM
dithiothreitol, 10% (v/v) ethylene glycol, pH 7.0). The cells were
disrupted by ultrasonication at 4 °C. The homogenate was centrifuged
at 14,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C and the
supernatant was dialyzed against 5 liters of buffer for 12 h. The
dialyzed sample was loaded onto a DEAE-Sephacel column (2.5 × 40 cm) previously equilibrated with the buffer and then eluted with a
linear gradient of 0-0.5 M NaCl (1 liter buffer). The
active fractions were pooled, solid NaCl was added to a concentration of 4 M, and then the fractions were applied to a
phenyl-Sepharose column (2.5 × 20 cm) previously equilibrated
with the buffer containing 4 M NaCl. The column was washed
with the buffer containing 2.5 M NaCl, followed by elution
with a decreasing gradient of 2.5 to 0 M NaCl (600 ml of
buffer). The active fractions were pooled, solid NaCl was added to a
concentration of 4 M, and then the fractions were applied
to a TSKgel butyl-Toyopearl 650M column (2.5 × 10 cm) previously
equilibrated with the buffer containing 4 M NaCl. The
enzyme was eluted with a decreasing gradient of 4 to 0 M
NaCl (400 ml of buffer). The active fractions were pooled and then dialyzed against the buffer for 12 h. The dialyzed sample was applied to a MonoQ HR 5/5 column and eluted with a linear gradient of
0.25 to 0.5 M NaCl (20 ml of buffer). The active fractions were combined and used for
characterization.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Proposed pathway for oxidative
pyrimidine metabolism (A) and catabolic pathway for
atrazine degradation (B).
|
|
 |
RESULTS |
Stabilization of Barbiturase--
During the initial study, we
encountered difficulty in purifying the barbiturase, because the enzyme
was unstable. The enzyme in a cell-free extract lost ~70% of its
initial activity (at 4 °C) within 2 weeks. Therefore, it could not
withstand the purification process, and no activity was detected after
the first two chromatographic steps. We then screened for possible
stabilizers of the enzyme. The enzyme activity was examined after the
addition of reducing agents, cofactors, metal ions, protease
inhibitors, pyrimidine and purine derivatives, organic acids,
detergents, and sugars. Among them, we found ethylene glycol is an
effective stabilizer for the barbiturase. In the presence of 10% (v/v)
ethylene glycol, the barbiturase could be kept for more than 3 months
at 4 °C without detectable loss of activity.
Purification and Criteria for Purity--
Barbiturase was purified
to homogeneity with an overall yield of 8% and a 40-fold increase in
specific activity (Table I). The purified
enzyme gave a single protein band on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2). Further evidence of its purity was
provided by gel-permeation HPLC on a G3000SW column, there being a
quite symmetrical protein absorption peak concomitant with barbituric
acid-hydrolyzing activity.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
SDS-PAGE of the wild-type and recombinant
barbiturases. Lane A, marker proteins; lane B,
purified recombinant enzyme; lane C, purified wild-type
enzyme.
|
|
Molecular Weight and Subunit Structure--
The relative molecular
weight of the enzyme was estimated to be 172,000. On SDS-PAGE,
the purified enzyme gave a single protein band corresponding to a
relative molecular weight of 45,000. Thus, the native enzyme probably
consists of four identical subunits.
Metal Ion Content--
An initial attempt to dialyze the enzyme
against 5 mM Tris/HCl buffer (pH 7.5) failed, because the
enzyme became aggregated. It was found that the addition of ethylene
glycol to the dialysis buffer prevented this enzyme aggregation.
Qualitative analysis of metals in the enzyme was performed for 66 elements by ICPS. Only zinc gave a significant reading, i.e.
~1.1 ± 0.1 mol per subunit. Other metals found in detectable
amounts were calcium and magnesium (0.045 and 0.01 mol/subunit,
respectively), but the amounts were too insignificant for these
elements to be considered present in the purified enzyme. Therefore,
barbiturase is a zinc-containing tetrameric enzyme with one atom of
zinc bound per subunit. This is analogous to other amidohydrolases such
as the dihydropyrimidinases from bovine and rat liver (20, 21), and the
hydantoinase from Arthrobacter aurescens (22).
The absorption spectrum of the purified enzyme showed the maximum
absorbance at 278 nm. No other absorption peak or shoulder was
observed, suggesting that no co-factor other than zinc would be bound
to the enzyme.
Substrate Specificity, Kinetic Constants, and Characteristics of
the Barbiturase Reaction--
The purified barbiturase showed strict
specificity toward barbituric acid. The following compounds were
not transformed by the purified enzyme: barbituric acid derivatives
such as barbital, cyclobarbital, allobarbital, and isobarbituric acid;
pyrimidine derivatives such as dihydro-L-orotate,
dihydrouracil, dihydrothymine, orotate, uracil, and thymine; and other
cyclic-amides such as cyanuric acid, alloxan, parabanic acid,
hydantoin, glutarimide, and succinimide.
The Km and Vmax values for
barbituric acid were 1.0 mM and 2.5 µmol/min/mg of
protein, respectively. Barbituric acid was hydrolyzed to ureidomalonic
acid, which showed the same elution profile on HPLC as that in our
previous report dealing with product (ureidomalonic acid)
identification (13). Urea and malonate were not detected in the
reaction mixture of the purified enzyme with barbituric acid as the
substrate on analysis by TLC, HPLC, and an enzymatic method using
urease. The non-reactive compounds listed above were examined as to
inhibition of barbituric acid hydrolysis by the purified barbiturase.
It was found that dihydro-L-orotate, alloxan, and cyanuric
acid competitively inhibited barbituric acid hydrolysis, the
Ki values being 4.5, 1.7, and 0.42 mM,
respectively (Fig. 3).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Competitive inhibition of barbituric acid
hydrolysis by dihydro-L-orotate, alloxan, and cyanuric
acid. A, in the presence of 0 mM ( ), 1 mM ( ), 3 mM ( ), or 5 mM ( )
dihydro-L-orotate; B, in the presence of 0 mM ( ), 5 mM ( ), 8 mM ( ),
or 10 mM ( ) alloxan; C, in the presence of 0 mM ( ), 2 mM ( ), 4 mM (+), or
6 mM (*) cyanuric acid.
|
|
The reaction time courses with various barbituric acid concentrations
(2-80 mM) showed time-dependent saturation of
the reactions, indicating that the reactions attained equilibrium (data
not shown). These results suggested that barbiturase catalyzes the
reversible hydrolysis of barbituric acid to ureidomalonic acid. An
equilibrium constant ([product]/[substrate]) of ~0.16 was
obtained at pH 8.0.
Effects of Inhibitors and Metal Ions--
The enzyme activity was
assayed under standard conditions in the presence of various compounds
(2 mM). The enzyme activity was completely inhibited by
sulfhydryl reagents p-chloromercuribenzoate and
N-ethylmaleimide, whereas N-bromosuccinimide and
5,5'-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) showed 60 and 50% inhibition,
respectively. Serine protease inhibitor diisopropyl phosphofluoridate
strongly inhibited the enzyme activity (90% inhibition). The enzyme
was sensitive to metal ion chelators such as
o-phenanthroline, 8-hydroxyquinoline, EDTA, and
, '-dipyridyl (80, 60, 30, and 30% inhibition, respectively), suggesting that metal ion (Zn2+) is essential for the
catalytic activity of the enzyme. The enzyme activity was not enhanced
on metal ion addition but partially inhibited by Ni2+,
Cd2+, and Co2+ (80, 60, and 51% inhibition,
respectively) and completely inhibited by Hg2+ and
Cu2+.
Effects of pH and Temperature--
The enzyme activity and
stability were assayed in MES/NaOH, potassium phosphate, Tris/HCl,
HEPES/NaOH, and NaHCO3-Na2CO3
buffer systems (100 mM) at pH 4.0-6.0, 6.5-8.0, 7.0-8.5,
7.0-8.0, and 9.4-10.0, respectively. Under the standard assay
conditions, the highest activity was observed at pH 8.0. When the
enzyme was incubated at 30 °C for 30 min, more than 80% of the
initial activity was retained at pH 6.0-8.0. The initial velocity of
the hydrolysis increased with increasing temperature, reaching a
maximum at 40-45 °C. No enzymatic activity remained after 30-min
incubation at 55 °C or above at pH 8.0.
Partial Amino Acid Sequence Analysis--
The
NH2-terminal and five internal amino acid sequences of
barbiturase (Ba-1 to Ba-5) are shown in Fig.
4. These sequences were compared with
those of proteins stored in protein sequence data bases (Swiss-Prot,
GenBankTM, EMBL, PIR, and PRF) using BLAST and FASTA
software. It was found that the NH2-terminal and peptide
Ba-5 sequences showed good homology to those of the NH2-
and COOH-terminal regions of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase (14),
respectively.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences
of the barbiturase gene. The underlined amino acid
sequences were those of the NH2-terminal and internal
peptides of the purified barbiturase determined by Edman degradation. A
potential ribosome-binding sequence is boxed. The stop codon
is represented by an asterisk. The putative zinc-binding
residues are marked (#). Arrows indicate the primer sequence
and the direction of extension on inverse-PCR. The nucleotide sequence
in boldface upstream of the barbiturase is the open reading
frame encoding a putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase.
|
|
Cloning, Sequence, and Putative Zinc-binding Motif of
Barbiturase--
Degenerative primers derived from the internal
peptide sequences of barbiturase specifically amplified a 0.7-kb
fragment. The deduced amino acid sequence of the 0.7-kb insert of
pCR-BAR10 corresponded precisely to the five internal peptide (Ba-1 to
Ba-5) sequence of barbiturase (Fig. 4). Using the inverse-PCR approach, we found the gene-specific non-degenerative 25-mer primers
(S1 and AS1, Fig. 4) specifically amplified the
upstream (2.0 kb) and downstream (0.3 kb) parts of the locus around the
0.7-kp gene of the Nae1 digest, thus allowing us to
determine the entire barbiturase structural gene. The enzyme gene was
located in a 1.1-kb open reading frame (ORF) starting with an ATG start
codon and terminating with a TAG codon and encoded a protein with a
molecular weight of 38,997.46 (Fig. 4). A typical Shine-Dalgarno
sequence was present 6 bp upstream from the initiation codon. The
NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of the ORF exactly matched
the 36-amino acid sequence of the NH2-terminal of the
purified barbiturase determined by Edman degradation except for the
first methionine residue, which may have been lost due to
post-translational modification.
A homology search of the protein data bases revealed significant
homology (48% identity, Fig. 5) with
cyanuric acid amidohydrolase, an enzyme that catalyzes the ring-opening
reaction of cyanuric acid and is involved in the final step degradation
of the S-triazine rings of atrazine herbicides (14). This is
likely, because the chemical structure of barbituric acid closely
resembles that of cyanuric acid, and both enzymes catalyze
amidohydrolytic reactions (Fig. 1). However, cyanuric acid
amidohydrolase does not act on barbituric acid but is competitively
inhibited by it (14). On the other hand, as mentioned above,
barbiturase did not act on cyanuric acid but was inhibited by it.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence
of the barbiturase with that of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase. The
alignment was performed with the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program. Gaps denoted
by dashes were inserted to obtain maximum homology.
Conserved residues are highlighted in white
letters on a black background. BBT,
barbiturase from R. erythropolis JCM 3132; CAA,
cyanuric acid amidohydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. strain
NRRLB-12227 (GenBankTM, AF086815).
|
|
The putative zinc-binding motif of barbiturase was shown in Fig. 4.
This motif, designated as DXHXH, is part
of a conserved sequence pattern suggested to be involved in the metal
assembly center of the amidohydrolases superfamily (23-25). Moreover,
site-directed mutagenesis of the conserved histidine residues of this
motif showed that they are responsible for zinc binding and essential for the catalytic activity of the enzyme (26, 27). However, surprisingly, the zinc-binding motif of barbiturase is located near the
COOH terminus, unlike in all other known amidohydrolases, in which the
motif is found near the NH2 terminus.
Interestingly, we found another open reading frame (624 bp) translated
in the opposite direction (from 224 to 847) upstream of the
barbiturase gene (Fig. 4). The gene encoded a protein of 207 amino
acids with a molecular weight of 21,920. A homology search of the
deduced amino acid sequence of this ORF revealed very high homology to
uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (Fig.
6). This enzyme catalyzes the reversible
phosphorolysis of uridine-5'-monophosphate to uracil and
5'-phospho- -D-ribose-1-diphosphate. It has been reported
to be a key enzyme in the salvage of uracil in the biosynthetic pathway
for pyrimidine nucleotides (28-30). Considering the adjacent location
of this putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene and the
barbiturase gene, the latter enzyme may be coupled with the former
enzyme in overall pyrimidine metabolism.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence
of an open reading frame upstream of the barbiturase gene with those of
uracil phosphoribosyltransferases from various sources. The
multiple alignment was performed with the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program. Gaps
denoted by dashes were inserted to obtain maximum homology.
Conserved residues are highlighted in white
letters on a black background. Rhoer,
R. erythropolis (this study); Myctu,
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Swiss-Prot, P94928);
Bacsu, Bacillus subtilis (Swiss-Prot, P39149);
Laclc, Lactococcus lactis (Swiss-Prot, P50926);
Metth, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum
(EMBL, AE00081); Strsl, Streptococcus salivarius
(Swiss-Prot, P36399); Nesme, Neisseria meningitis
(GenBankTM, AL162754).
|
|
Overexpression and Characterization of Recombinant
Barbiturase--
Barbiturase was successfully overexpressed as a
soluble form in the cyctoplasmic fraction of E. coli BL21
cells harboring the pET-BAR11N5 expression plasmid. After
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside induction,
barbiturase was estimated to constitute ~25% of the total crude
extract proteins. The specific barbiturase activity in a cell-free
extract of the recombinant E. coli (0.654 µmol/min/mg of
protein) is 10-fold higher than that of R. erythropolis
(0.0655 µmol/min/mg of protein). No barbiturase activity was detected in E. coli BL21 cells harboring the original pET21-a
plasmid. The recombinant barbiturase was purified to homogeneity
through four chromatographic steps with a yield of about 20% (Fig. 2). A kinetic study of the purified enzyme gave Km and
Vmax values of 0.67 mM and 2.58 µmol/min/mg of protein, respectively, which are apparently the same
as those of the wild-type. The relative molecular weight was estimated
to be 167,000 by gel-permeation HPLC. The recombinant enzyme exhibited
the same pH and temperature optima and is susceptible to metal ion
chelators. The sequence of the NH2-terminal 27 amino acids
was PEAIEVRKVPLHSVSDASELAKLIDDG, which is identical to that of the
purified wild-type. The loss of the initial methionine residue
suggested that the expression of barbiturase in E. coli is
also affected by post-translational modification.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Over the past several decades, no study has been focused on
oxidative pyrimidine metabolism. Before our studies, only a few early
works by three groups of scientists had been reported (6-8). Although
it is a naturally occurring metabolic pathway, knowledge on the
oxidative pathway and its biological importance is very limited. We
have studied the reductive pathway from the physiological and
application perspectives (31-37). At the same time, we initiated a
study on oxidative pyrimidine metabolism by screening for
microorganisms that utilize pyrimidine through the oxidative pathway,
and found an active strain, R. erythropolis JCM 3132. Enzymatic study revealed that the catalytic action of barbiturase is
different from that reported previously, and a novel enzyme,
ureidomalonase, is proposed to be involved in the oxidative pathway
(Fig. 1A). In this report, we report the detailed
physicochemical properties of barbiturase and molecular cloning of the enzyme.
Barbiturase consists of four identical subunits and is very specific
toward barbituric acid. The enzyme catalyzes the conversion of
barbituric acid to ureidomalonic acid, and the equilibrium of the
reaction is inclined toward barbituric acid formation. However, the
existence of ureidomalonase supports the successive hydrolysis of
ureidomalonic acid, which would pull the reaction toward barbituric
acid decomposition. The enzyme activity was competitively inhibited by
dihydro-L-orotate, which is an intermediate in the
pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. Likewise, it has been reported that
barbituric acid inhibits several enzymes that participate in de
novo pyrimidine biosynthesis (38-40). These results suggest that
there are some mutual interaction between pyrimidine anabolism and
oxidative catabolism. This proposition is supported by the fact that,
adjoining to the barbiturase gene is the putative uracil phosphoribosyltransferase gene, this enzyme being involved in the
salvage pathway for uracil in pyrimidine nucleotides biosynthesis. Uracil phosphoribosyltransferase is also involved in the control of the
rate of transcription of messenger RNA of the pyrimidine nucleotide
biosynthetic operon (30). Barbiturase may collaborate with uracil
phosphoribosyltransferase in catalytic, and probably genetic,
regulation of pyrimidine metabolism, especially in organisms that
degrade pyrimidine through the oxidative pathway.
Barbiturase is a zinc enzyme (containing four atoms of zinc per
molecule of enzyme), as directly determined by ICPS. In this respect, barbiturase is similar to dihydropyrimidinase/hydantoinase and
dihydro-orotase, which are involved in reductive and biosynthesis pyrimidine metabolism, respectively. The dihydropyrimidinase purified from rat and bovine liver contains four atoms of zinc per mol of enzyme
(20, 21). The dihydro-orotase from hamster was suggested to contain two
atoms of zinc per mol of enzyme (26), whereas recently the E. coli enzyme was revealed to have four atom of zinc per mol of
enzyme by three-dimensional structure analysis (41). A recently
purified and cloned human guanine deaminase (which also possesses the
metal binding motif DXHXH) was determined to
contain two atoms of zinc per mol of enzyme (42). The zinc-binding site
of barbiturase is located at amino acids 320-324 (DVHWH, Fig. 4). It
is found in the COOH-terminal region, contrary to in the cases of other
known amidohydrolases, in which the binding site is located near the
NH2-terminal region. The unique location of the
zinc-binding site of barbiturase suggesting that it is a novel
zinc-containing amidohydrolase.
The primary structure of barbiturase is very similar to that of
cyanuric acid amidohydrolase. Cyanuric acid has been identified as a
central intermediate in the pathway of atrazine degradation (43), and
the catalytic function of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase is to completely
mineralize the S-triazine ring (14) (Fig., 1B).
This enzyme is a homotetramer, and its physicochemical properties, such
as metal ion effects, and pH and temperature optima, are similar to
those of barbiturase. However, extensive dialysis of the enzyme against
EDTA did not result in a decrease in enzyme activity, indicating that
no metal ion binds to the active site of the enzyme. Moreover, amino
acid sequence alignment of cyanuric acid amidohydrolase with
barbiturase showed no corresponding DXHXH motif,
further suggesting that the enzyme has no metal binding site (Fig. 5).
Until this report, the evolutionary origin of cyanuric acid
amidohydrolase could not be predicted, because no sequence similarity
was found with known proteins in the protein data bases (14). Based on
the strong sequence similarity, we propose that cyanuric acid
amidohydrolase may have originally evolved from barbiturase, because
the latter participates in a naturally existing metabolic pathway,
whereas the former gene was reported to be located on a transposable
element (44).
The phylogenetic relationship among amidohydrolases from microorganisms
and mammals determined by the UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Group Method with
Arithmetic Mean) procedure with the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program is shown in
Fig. 7. Barbiturase and cyanuric acid
amidohydrolase are categorized into the same group, but they are
distinctly different from other amidohydrolase families. Although
barbiturase and cyanuric acid amidohydrolase did not exhibit sequence
similarity with other amidohydrolases, the dendrogram revealed that
both enzymes are evolutionary closer to cytosine deaminase and urease,
but are far away from dihydropyrimidinase/hydantoinase, allantoinase, and dihydro-orotase on the evolutionary tree. This phenomenon implies
that the amidohydrolase (barbiturase) of the oxidative pathway and the
amidohydrolase (dihydropyrimidinase) of the reductive pathway have
developed in different evolutionary directions. In summary, we propose
that barbiturase and cyanuric acid amidohydrolase belong to a new
family of the amidohydrolase superfamily.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Phylogenetic tree for
amidohydrolases. This tree was constructed by the UPGMA
procedure using the GENETYX-MAC 7.3 program. The tree was divided into
several amidohydrolase families, as presented earlier (23, 25). There
are mainly six families from the evolutionary standpoint, as shown in
boxes: dihydropyrimidinase/hydantoinase
(DHP/HYN), allantoinase (ALN), dihydro-orotase
(DHO), adenine deaminase (ADN),
urease/cytosine deaminase (URE/CYN), and the newly proposed
barbiturase/cyanuric acid amidohydrolase (BBT/CAA). All
sequences are retrieved from Swiss-Prot data base, and the accession
numbers for each sequence are given in parentheses: DHP, human
(Q14117); DHP, rat (Q63150); HYN, Pseudomonas putida
(Q59699); HYN, Bacillus stearothermophilus (Q45515); HYN,
Agrobacterium radiobacter (Q44184); HYN, Arthrobacter
aurescens (P81006); ALN, E. coli (P77671); ALN,
B. subtilis (032137); ALN, frog (P40757); ALN,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P32375); DHO,
Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (027199); DHO,
Pyrococcus horikoshii (057740); DHO, human (P27708); DHO,
Drosophila melanogaster (P05990); DHO, B. subtilis (P25995); DHO, Thermus aquaticus (P25995);
ADN, human (P00813); ADN, mouse (P03958); ADN, E. coli
(P22333); URE, Hemophilus influenzae (P44391); URE,
Klebsiella aerogenes (P18314); URE, B. subtilis
(P77837); URE, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (P50042); URE,
Lactococcus fermentum (P26929); URE, Clostridium
perfringens (P94669); CYN, Candida albicans (P78594);
CYN, S. cerevisiae (Q12178); BBT, R. erythropolis
(this study); CAA, Pseudomonas sp. strain NRRLB-12227
(GenBankTM, AF086815).
|
|
Barbituric acid is considered to be a non-anesthetic compound. However,
substitution by alkyl or aryl chains at the C5 position of barbituric
acid leads to a compound affecting the arousal reaction. Hypnotic and
convulsant reagents such as 5-benzylbarbituric acid, barbital,
phenobarbital, and 5,5-disubstituted barbiturates have been reported to
be useful for the therapy for cancer and other pathological and
physiological disorders (45, 46). Complete degradation of these drugs
may likely involve the ring cleavage of the core structure of
barbituric acid. Although so far there is no direct evidence of
barbiturase activity or the existence of oxidative pyrimidine
metabolism in mammals, some early articles reported that radioactive
15N- or 14C-urea, a possible product of
oxidative but not reductive metabolism, was detected in the urine when
15N- or 14C-labeled uracil was intravenously
administered to rats (47, 48). However, further investigation has to be
carried out to verify whether barbiturase or the oxidative pathway is
functioning in mammals. Nevertheless, together with that on the
reductive pathway, knowledge on the oxidative pathway will provide some insights as to its physiological importance in nucleic acid metabolism.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Seiichiro Matsumoto and Yoichi
Mikami, Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd., for their helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid of the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for Foreign
Researchers (P00151 to C.-L. S.) and by a grant from the Research for
the Future Program (JSPS-RFTF 97I00302 to S. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ320520.
Postdoctoral fellows supported by the JSPS.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Applied
Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. Tel.: 81-75-753-6115; Fax: 81-75-753-6128; E-mail:
sim@kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110784200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HPLC, high
performance liquid chromatography;
IED, ion-exchange distilled;
ICPS, inductively coupled radiofrequency plasma spectrophotometer;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
ORF, open reading frame;
UPGMA, Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Vogels, G. D.,
and Van Der Drift, C.
(1976)
Bacteriol. Rev.
40,
403-468[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Wasternack, C.
(1978)
Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz.
173,
371-403
|
| 3.
|
Wasternack, C.
(1980)
Pharmacol. Ther.
8,
629-651[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Tsai, C. S.,
and Axelrod, B.
(1965)
Plant Physiol.
40,
39-44[Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Syldatk, C.,
May, O.,
Altenbucher, J.,
Mattes, R.,
and Siemann, M.
(1999)
Appl. Microbiol. Biotech.
51,
293-309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Hayaishi, O.,
and Kornberg, A.
(1952)
J. Biol. Chem.
197,
717-732[Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Lara, F. J. S.
(1952)
J. Bacteriol.
64,
279-285[Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Wang, T. P.,
and Lampen, J. O.
(1952)
J. Biol. Chem.
194,
775-783[Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Naguib, F. M. N.,
el Kouni, M. H.,
and Cha, S.
(1985)
Cancer Res.
45,
5405-5412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Hull, W. E.,
Port, R. E.,
Herrmann, R.,
Britsch, B.,
and Kunz, W.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
1680-1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ogawa, J.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1997)
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic
2,
163-176[CrossRef]
|
| 12.
|
Soong, C.-L.,
Ogawa, J.,
and Shimizu, S.
(2001)
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic
12,
61-70[CrossRef]
|
| 13.
|
Soong, C.-L.,
Ogawa, J.,
and Shimizu, S.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
286,
222-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Karns, J. S.
(1999)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65,
3512-3517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Martinez, B.,
Tomkins, J.,
Wackett, L. P.,
Wing, R.,
and Sadowsky, M. J.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
5684-5697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Saito, H.,
and Miura, K.
(1963)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
72,
619-629[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 18.
|
Ochman, H.,
Gerber, A. S.,
and Hartl, D. L.
(1988)
Genetics
120,
621-623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Collins, S. F.,
and Weissman, S. M.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
6812-6816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Brooks, K. P.,
Jones, E. A.,
Kim, B. D.,
and Sander, E. G.
(1983)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
226,
469-483[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Kikugawa, M.,
Kaneko, M.,
Fujimoto-Sakata, S.,
Maeda, M.,
Kawasaki, K.,
Takagi, T.,
and Tamaki, N.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
219,
393-399[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
May, O.,
Siemann, M.,
Siemann, M. G.,
and Syldatk, C.
(1998)
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic
4,
211-218[CrossRef]
|
| 23.
|
Holm, L.,
and Sander, C.
(1997)
Proteins
28,
72-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Kim, G. J.,
and Kim, H. S.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
295-302
|
| 25.
|
May, O.,
Habenicht, A.,
Mattes, R.,
Syldatk, C.,
and Siemann, M.
(1998)
Biol. Chem.
379,
743-747[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Williams, N. K.,
Manthey, M. K.,
Hambley, T. W.,
O`Donoghue, S. I.,
Keegan, M.,
Chapman, B. E.,
and Christopherson, R. I.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11344-11352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Zimmermann, B. H.,
Kemling, N. M.,
and Evans, D. R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
7038-7046[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Rasmussen, U. B.,
Mygind, B.,
and Nygaard, P.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
881,
268-275[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Martinussen, J.,
Glaser, P.,
Andersen, P. S.,
and Saxild, H. H.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
271-274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Turner, R. J.,
Bonner, E. R.,
Grabner, G. K.,
and Switzer, R. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5932-5938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Ogawa, J.,
Shimizu, S.,
and Yamada, H.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
212,
685-691[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ogawa, J.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
223,
625-630[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Ogawa, J.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1995)
Arch. Microbiol.
164,
353-357[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Ogawa, J.,
Soong, C.-L.,
Honda, M.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1996)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
62,
3814-3817[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Ogawa, J.,
Soong, C.-L.,
Honda, M.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
243,
322-327[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Soong, C.-L.,
Ogawa, J.,
Sukiman, H.,
Prana, T.,
Prana, M. S.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1998)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
158,
51-55[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Soong, C.-L.,
Ogawa, J.,
Honda, M.,
and Shimizu, S.
(1999)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65,
1459-1462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Pinsky, L.,
and Krooth, R. S.
(1967)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
57,
1267-1274[Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Potvin, B. W.,
Stern, H. J.,
Randolph May, S.,
Lam, G. F.,
and Krooth, R. S.
(1978)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
27,
655-665[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Gero, A. M.,
O`Sullivan, W. J.,
and Brown, D. J.
(1985)
Biochem. Med.
34,
60-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Thodwn, J. B.,
Phillips, G. N., Jr.,
Neal, T. M.,
Raushel, F. M.,
and Holden, H. M.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
6989-6997[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Yuan, G.,
Bin, J. C.,
McKay, D. J.,
and Synder, F. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8175-8180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Eaton, R. W.,
and Karns, J. S.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
1363-1366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Eaton, R. W.,
and Karns, J. S.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
1215-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Naguib, F. N.,
Levesque, D. L.,
Wang, E. C.,
Panzica, R. P.,
and el Kouni, M. H.
(1993)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
46,
1273-1283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Ashour, O. M.,
Naguib, F. N.,
and el Kouni, M. H.
(1996)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
51,
1601-1611[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Plentl, A. A.,
and Schoenheimer, R.
(1944)
J. Biol. Chem.
203,
203-217
|
| 48.
|
Rutman, R. J.,
Cantarow, A.,
and Paschkis, K. E.
(1954)
J. Biol. Chem.
210,
321-329[Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mercier, S. Watt, J. Bahler, and S. Labbe
Key Function for the CCAAT-Binding Factor Php4 To Regulate Gene Expression in Response to Iron Deficiency in Fission Yeast
Eukaryot. Cell,
March 1, 2008;
7(3):
493 - 508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Loh, P. Gyaneshwar, E. Markenscoff Papadimitriou, R. Fong, K.-S. Kim, R. Parales, Z. Zhou, W. Inwood, and S. Kustu
From the Cover: A previously undescribed pathway for pyrimidine catabolism
PNAS,
March 28, 2006;
103(13):
5114 - 5119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. F. Ducey, M. B. Carson, J. Orvis, A. P. Stintzi, and D. W. Dyer
Identification of the Iron-Responsive Genes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Microarray Analysis in Defined Medium
J. Bacteriol.,
July 15, 2005;
187(14):
4865 - 4874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Fruchey, N. Shapir, M. J. Sadowsky, and L. P. Wackett
On the Origins of Cyanuric Acid Hydrolase: Purification, Substrates, and Prevalence of AtzD from Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
June 1, 2003;
69(6):
3653 - 3657.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|