Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109924200 on December 20, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 7118-7126, March 1, 2002
Interferon-
-induced Epithelial ICAM-1 Expression
and Monocyte Adhesion
INVOLVEMENT OF PROTEIN KINASE C-DEPENDENT c-Src TYROSINE KINASE
ACTIVATION PATHWAY*
Ya-Jen
Chang,
Michael J.
Holtzman
, and
Ching-Chow
Chen§
From the Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, National
Taiwan University, Taipei 10018, Taiwan and the
Department of Medicine and Cell Biology, Washington
University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received for publication, October 13, 2001, and in revised form, December 6, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Interferon-
(IFN-
) induced intercellular
adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression in human NCI-H292 epithelial
cells, as shown by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and
immunofluorescence staining. The enhanced ICAM-1 expression resulted in
increased adhesion of U937 cells to NCI-H292 cells. Tyrosine kinase
inhibitors (genistein or herbimycin), Src family inhibitor (PP2), or a
phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C inhibitor (U73122) attenuated the
IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression. Protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors
(staurosporine or Ro 31-8220) also inhibited IFN-
-induced response.
12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), a PKC
activator, stimulated ICAM-1 expression; this effect was inhibited by
tyrosine kinase or Src inhibitor. ICAM-1 promoter activity was enhanced
by IFN-
and TPA in cells transfected with pIC339-Luc, containing the
downstream NF-
B and
-activated site (GAS) sites, but not in cells
transfected with GAS-deletion mutant, pIC135 (
AP2). Electrophoretic
gel mobility shift assay demonstrated that GAS-binding complexes in
IFN-
-stimulated cells contained STAT1
. The IFN-
-induced ICAM-1
promoter activity was inhibited by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, a
phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C inhibitor, or PKC inhibitors, and
the TPA-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity was also inhibited by tyrosine
kinase inhibitors. Cotransfection with a PLC-
2 mutant inhibited
IFN-
- but not TPA-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity. However,
cotransfection with dominant negative mutants of PKC
or c-Src
inhibited both IFN-
- and TPA-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity. The
ICAM-1 promoter activity was stimulated by cotransfection with wild
type PLC-
2, PKC
, c-Src, JAK1, or STAT1. An immunocomplex kinase
assay showed that both IFN-
and TPA activated c-Src and Lyn
activities and that these effects were inhibited by staurosporine and
herbimycin. Thus, in NCI-H292 epithelial cells, IFN-
activates
PLC-
2 via an upstream tyrosine kinase to induce activation of
PKC-
and c-Src or Lyn, resulting in activation of STAT1
, and GAS
in the ICAM-1 promoter, followed by initiation of ICAM-1 expression and
monocyte adhesion.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cell adhesion mediated by specific cell-surface molecules is
important in establishing and maintaining inflammation, bronchial asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, atopic dermatitis, tumor metastasis, and
allograft rejection (1-3). It elicits the recruitment of leukocytes
from the circulation into the extravascular space, a process involving
several steps (4, 5). The initial interaction between leukocytes and
the endothelium appears to be transient, resulting in the leukocytes
rolling along the vessel wall. These rolling leukocytes then become
activated by local factors generated by the endothelium, resulting in
their arrest and firm adhesion to the vessel wall. Finally, the
leukocytes migrate across the endothelium. These complex processes are
regulated, in part, by specific endothelial-leukocyte adhesion
molecules. The intercellular adhesion molecule-1
(ICAM-11; CD54), an
80-114-kDa inducible surface glycoprotein belonging to the
immunoglobulin superfamily, is involved in a wide range of inflammatory
and immune responses (6). During inflammation, ICAM-1 binds to two
integrins belonging to the
2 subfamily,
CD11a/CD18 (LFA-1) and CD11b/CD18 (Mac-1), both expressed by leukocytes
and that promote the adhesion and transendothelial migration of
leukocytes (7, 8). Similar processes govern leukocyte adhesion to lung airway epithelial cells and may contribute to the damage to these cells
seen in asthma (9). ICAM-1 can be up-regulated by bacterial lipopolysaccharide, phorbol esters, platelet-derived growth factor, and
inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor
(TNF-
), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interferon-
(IFN-
) (10-13). This
regulation occurs at the transcriptional level and involves the binding
of specific homo- or heterodimeric complexes to target DNA sequences located along the ICAM-1 promoter (14-16). The ICAM-1 promoter has
been identified and shown to contain two TATA boxes, two NF-
B sites,
two AP-1 sites, two AP-2 sites, two glucocorticoid receptor element
sites, and one IFN-
-activated (GAS) site (17-19).
IFN-
, a lymphocyte effector molecule produced by T cells and natural
killer cells, plays an important role in macrophage activation and is
implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of inflammatory diseases of
infectious or presumed autoimmune origin (20). The intracellular
signaling of IFN-
has been shown to act through the JAK/STAT pathway
in several different tissues (21, 22), and the mechanism of
IFN-
-mediated gene induction has been elucidated (21-23). Following
IFN-
binding, the IFN-
receptor oligomerizes and brings the Janus
kinases (JAKs) into juxtaposition, leading to their
cross-phosphorylation and activation. The JAKs in turn phosphorylate
tyrosine residues on receptors that lack intrinsic kinase activity,
thereby providing the docking site for downstream signaling proteins.
The signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs), which
are recruited to the JAK-receptor complex via their Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, are phosphorylated on a conserved tyrosine residue in the
C-terminal region. This phosphorylation results in STAT dimerization
and forms a protein complex first identified as
-activated factor (GAF). The GAF complex then translocates to the nucleus, where it binds
to the specific promoter DNA sequence, GAS, thereby affecting the
expression of multiple target genes, such as ICAM-1
(24, 25). In addition to the JAK-STAT pathway, other signaling
components are involved; these include phospholipase D
(PLD)-dependent arachidonic acid release to activate
protein kinase C (PKC) in endothelial cells (26, 27), PC-PLC and PKC
activation to induce inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression in J774
macrophages (28), or PKC activation to induce ICAM-1 in endothelial
cells (29). The intracellular signaling pathways by which IFN-
causes ICAM-1 expression are not well understood but have been
suggested to be involved; these include tyrosine kinase activation
(e.g. JAKs and their downstream transcriptional factors, the
STATs) (25), PKC, and intracellular Ca2+ concentration (29,
32). However, the relationship between these pathways is unknown. In
the present study, we explored the intracellular signaling pathway
involved in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression in a human alveolar
epithelial cell line, NCI-H292. The results show that IFN-
activates
phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C-
2 (PI-PLC-
2), resulting in
the activation of PKC
, c-Src or Lyn, STAT1
, and GAS in the ICAM-1
promoter, followed by ICAM-1 expression and monocyte adhesion.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Mouse monoclonal anti-human ICAM-1 antibody
(11C81) and recombinant human IFN-
were purchased from R & D Systems
(Minneapolis, MN). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for p65, p91
(STAT-1
), c-Src, Lck, Lyn, or Fyn were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). RPMI, fetal calf serum (FCS),
penicillin, and streptomycin were obtained from Invitrogen.
12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) was purchased
from LC Services (Woburn, MA). Staurosporine, pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDTC), O-phenylenediamine
dihydrochloride, and rabbit muscle enolase were obtained from Sigma.
D609, U73122, U73343, propranolol, Ro 31-8220, PP2, genistein, and
herbimycin were obtained from Calbiochem.
2',7'-Bis(carboxyethyl)-5,6-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) was obtained
from Molecule Probes; reagents for SDS-PAGE were from Bio-Rad; T4
polynucleotide kinase was from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA);
poly(dI-dC) was from Amersham Biosciences; [
-32P]ATP
(3,000 Ci/mmol) was from PerkinElmer Life Sciences; fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was from Cappel (Aurora,
OH), and TfxTM-50 and the luciferase assay kit were from
Promega (Madison, WI).
Plasmids--
The four ICAM-1 promoter constructs, pIC1352,
pIC339, pIC135, and pIC135(
AP2) (pIC135 with the
105/
38 region
deleted), were the generous gifts from Dr. P. T. Van der Saag
(Hubrecht Laboratory, Utrecht, Netherlands). The PLC-
2 wild type and
mutant, SH2(N), in which Arg-564 is replaced by Ala, and
the PKC
wild type and dominant negative mutant (K/R) were gifts from
Drs. T. Kurosaki (Kansai Medical University, Japan) and A. Altman (La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, San Diego, CA),
respectively. The JAK1 wild type and dominant negative JAK1 and JAK2
mutants were gifts from Dr. Rothman (Department of Microbiology,
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University) and Dr. Levy (Department of Pathology, New York University, New York), respectively. The STAT3(DN) was gift from Dr. Nakajima (Department of Molecular Oncology, Osaka university, Japan).
Cell Culture--
The human alveolar epithelial cell carcinoma
cell line, NCI-H292, was obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection (Manassas, VA) and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with
10% FCS, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin in
6-well plates for ICAM-1 promoter transfection, on 24-mm glass
coverslips in 35-mm dishes for ICAM-1 immunofluorescence studies, in
6-cm dishes for kinase activity measurements, or in 10-cm dishes for
the gel-shift assay.
The human monocytic leukemia cell line, U937, was obtained from the
Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan
University, Taiwan, and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with
10% FCS, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells
were split and fed every 3-4 days.
Quantification of ICAM-1 Expression--
The level of
cell-surface ICAM-1 expression was determined using an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously (33, 34). Each
assay was performed in triplicate, and the basal absorbance (about 0.2 units) was subtracted. In pretreatment experiments, cells were
incubated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors, genistein and
herbimycin, the PC-PLC inhibitor, D609, the PI-PLC inhibitor, U73122,
the phosphatidate phosphohydrolase inhibitor, propranolol, or the PKC
inhibitors, staurosporine and Ro 31-8220, and Src inhibitor, PP2 for 30 min before addition of IFN-
or TPA. None of these inhibitors
affected the basal ICAM-1 expression.
Immunofluorescence Staining--
NCI-H292 cells, grown on
coverslips, were treated for 18 h with IFN-
or TPA in growth
medium. Immunofluorescence staining was performed as described
previously (33).
Cell Adhesion Assay--
NCI cells, grown in 96-well plates,
were treated for 18 h at 37 °C with IFN-
or TPA and then
washed twice with PBS. U937 cells were labeled for 30 min at 37 °C
with 10 ng/ml BCECF and washed twice with growth medium, and then
2.5 × 105 (100 µl) of the labeled cells were added
to the NCI monolayer and the cultures incubated in a CO2
incubator for 1 h. Non-adherent cells were removed from the plate
by gentle washing with PBS and the number of adherent cells determined
by measuring the fluorescence intensity using a CytoFluor 2300 (Millipore, Bedford, MA).
To determine the contribution of ICAM-1 to IFN-
-induced monocytes
adherence, NCI cells were treated with anti-ICAM-1 antibody at a
concentration of 10 µg/ml for 30 min at 37 °C before the BCECF-labeled U937 cells were added.
Transient Transfection and Luciferase Activity
Assay--
NCI-H292 cells, grown in 6-well plates, were transfected
with the human ICAM-1 promoter-firefly luciferase constructs, pIC1352, pIC339, pIC135, or pIC135(
AP2), using TfxTM-50, as
described previously (35). The following day, cells were exposed to 10 ng/ml IFN-
or 1 µM TPA for 5 h; cell extracts were then prepared and the luciferase and
-galactosidase activities measured, and the luciferase activity of each well was normalized to
the
-galactosidase activity. In dominant negative mutant
experiments, cells were cotransfected with reporter/
-galactosidase
and the mutant PLC-
2 SH2(N), the dominant negative
PKC-
(K/R), c-Src (K295M),2
JAK1, JAK2, STAT1 (Y701M) or STAT3 mutant, or the empty vector.
In wild type experiments, cells were cotransfected with
reporter/
-galactosidase and the PLC-
2, PKC
, c-Src, JAK1, or
STAT1 wild type plasmids, or the empty vector using SuperFect
Transfection Reagent (Qiagen). Briefly, wild type plasmid or empty
vector (1.5 µg), pIC135 (0.5 µg), and
-galactosidase (0.25 µg)
were mixed with 1.87 µl (1:0.5) of SuperFect in 600 µl of
serum-free RPMI 1640 medium. After 10 min of incubation at room
temperature, 300 µl of serum-free RPMI 1640 medium was then applied
to the cells. Eight hours later, 100 µl of FCS was added, and the
cells were grown in medium containing 10% FCS. On the following day,
the cell extracts were prepared. The luciferase (Promega) and
-galactosidase activities were measured, and the luciferase activity
of each well was normalized to
-galactosidase activity. In PLC-
2
(wt), PKC
(wt), or c-Src(wt) and dominant negative c-Src(KM) or
STAT1(Y701M) mutant experiments, the wild types (1.5 µg) and dominant
negative mutants (2.0 µg) or the empty vector were cotransfected.
Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and the Electrophoretic Mobility
Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Cells were incubated for 10 min, 1 h, or
24 h with IFN-
and then nuclear extracts were prepared as
described previously (35). Oligonucleotides corresponding to the GAS
consensus sequence in the human ICAM-1 promoter
(5'-CGAGGTTTCCGGGAAAGCAGC-3') were synthesized, annealed,
and end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide
kinase, and EMSA was performed as described previously (35). When
supershift assays were performed, polyclonal antibodies specific for
p91 (STAT1-
) or p65 were added to the nuclear extracts 30 min before
the binding reaction, and the DNA-nuclear protein complexes were
separated on a 4.5% polyacrylamide gel.
In Vitro c-Src and Lyn Activity Assay--
After treatment with
IFN-
or TPA for 10, 30, or 60 min, with or without pretreatment with
various inhibitors for 30 min at 37 °C, the cells were rapidly
washed with PBS and then lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM NaF, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml of leupeptin, 20 µg/ml of
aprotinin, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1% Triton
X-100). A sample of total cell extract containing 50 µg of protein
was incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with 0.5 µg of anti-c-Src or
anti-Lyn antibody, and the antibody-bound protein was collected using
protein A-Sepharose CL-4B beads (Sigma). The beads were then washed
three times with lysis buffer without Triton X-100 and incubated for 30 min at 30 °C in 20 µl of kinase reaction mixture (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mM
Na3VO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5 µg
of enolase, and 10 µM [
-32P]ATP). The
reaction was then stopped by addition of 20 µl of Laemmli buffer and
the proteins subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE; the, phosphorylated enolase
was visualized by autoradiography. Quantitative data were obtained
using a densitometer with ImageQuant software.
 |
RESULTS |
IFN-
Induces Cell Surface ICAM-1 Expression in, and U937
Adhesion to, NCI-H292 Cells--
When NCI-H292 cells were treated with
100 ng/ml IL-1
, TNF-
, or IFN-
, with 1 µg/ml
lipopolysaccharide or with 1 µM TPA, only IFN-
and TPA
stimulated ICAM-1 expression, as measured by ELISA (data not shown).
IFN-
induced ICAM-1 expression in a concentration- and
time-dependent manner (Fig.
1). With an exposure period of 18 h,
maximal ICAM-1 expression was seen using 10 ng/ml IFN-
(Fig.
1A), and when cells were treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-
for various times, ICAM-1 expression was significantly increased after 5 h and was maximal at 18 h, remaining at this level for at
least 40 h (Fig. 1B). Induction of ICAM-1 by IFN-
was also demonstrated by immunofluorescence staining. As shown in Fig.
2, ICAM-1 was not seen in the basal state
(Fig. 2B) but appeared on the cell surface following
treatment with IFN-
or TPA (Fig. 2, D and F). In the following ICAM-1 expression experiments, the cells were treated
with 10 ng/ml IFN-
for 18 h. Under these conditions, both the
transcriptional and translational inhibitors, actinomycin and
cycloheximide, inhibited the IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression (data
not shown).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Concentration- and time-dependent
IFN- -induced ICAM-1 expression in NCI-H292
epithelial cells. Cells were incubated at 37 °C with various
concentrations of IFN- for 18 h (A) or with 10 ng/ml
IFN- for various time intervals (B). Surface expression
of ICAM-1 was measured by ELISA using anti-ICAM-1 antibody, as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are expressed as
the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in
triplicate.
|
|

View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Localization of ICAM-1 on the cell
surface. Immunofluorescent staining of NCI-H292 epithelial cells
with affinity-purified anti-ICAM-1 antibody (1:100). Control cells
(A and B), cells after 18 h treatment with
10 ng/ml IFN- (C and D), and cells after
18 h treatment with 1 µM TPA (E and
F) were fixed and stained as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Bar, 200 µm.
|
|
To determine whether IFN-
- or TPA-induced monocytes adherence to
NCI-H292 cells correlated with cell-surface ICAM-1 expression, we
analyzed U937 cell adhesion to NCI-H292 cells (Fig.
3). After 18 h of treatment with
IFN-
, adherence was increased by ~11-fold, and anti-ICAM-1
antibody reduced adherence to below the basal level, showing that
IFN-
-induced U937 cell adhesion to NCI-H292 cells was because of
ICAM-1 expression. Similarly, 18 h of treatment with TPA resulted
in a 10-fold increase in adherence, which was inhibited by 70% by
anti-ICAM-1 antibody, indicating a role of ICAM-1 in TPA-induced U937
cell adhesion.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Adhesion of U937 cells to
IFN- - or TPA-activated NCI-H292 epithelial
cells. U937 cells, labeled with BCECF, were added to NCI-H292
cells pretreated with IFN- (10 ng/ml) or TPA (1 µM)
for 18 h, and culture was continued at 37 °C for 1 h, and
then adhesion was measured as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Where indicated, anti-ICAM-1 antibody (10 µg/ml) was
added to the NCI-H292 cells 30 min before addition of BCECF-labeled
U937 cells. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of three
independent experiments, each value being the mean of six
determinations. *, p < 0.05 as compared with the basal
value.
|
|
Inhibitory Effect of Tyrosine Kinase, PI-PLC, or PKC Inhibitors on
IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 Expression--
To study the intracellular
signaling pathway involved in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression,
NCI-H292 cells were pretreated for 30 min with the tyrosine kinase
inhibitors, genistein and herbimycin. Under these conditions,
IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression was inhibited 34, 45, or 47%,
respectively, by 30 or 100 µM genistein or 1 µM herbimycin (Fig.
4A). When cells were
pretreated with the PI-PLC inhibitor, U73122, at 10 or 30 µM, IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression was inhibited by 31 or 50%, respectively, whereas 30 µM U73343 (an inactive
analogue of U73122), 100 µM D609 (a PC-PLC inhibitor), or
propranolol (a phosphatidate phosphohydrolase inhibitor) had no effect
(Fig. 4B).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of various inhibitors on
IFN- -induced ICAM-1 expression in NCI-H292
epithelial cells. NCI-H292 cells were pretreated for 30 min with
30 or 100 µM genistein or 1 µM herbimycin
(A), or 10 or 30 µM U73122, 30 µM U73343, 100 µM propranolol, or 100 µM D609 (B), or with the indicated
concentration of staurosporine or Ro 31-8220 (C) before
incubation with 10 ng/ml IFN- for 18 h. Surface expression of
ICAM-1 was measured by ELISA using anti-ICAM-1 antibody, as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Results are expressed as the
mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in
triplicate. *, p < 0.05 as compared with IFN-
alone.
|
|
Because IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression was inhibited by U73122,
indicating involvement of the PI-PLC pathway, which increases diacylglycerol levels and then activates PKC, the PKC inhibitors, staurosporine and Ro 31-8220, were used to determine whether PKC was
involved in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression. Following pretreatment of cells with 10, 30, or 100 nM staurosporine or with 0.1, 0.3, or 1 µM Ro 31-8220, IFN-
-induced ICAM-1
expression was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
4C).
Because PKC had been shown to be involved, the effect of direct
TPA-mediated PKC activation on ICAM-1 expression was examined. TPA (1 µM) also induced a time-dependent increase in
ICAM-1 expression, which was significant at 4.5 h and maximal at
16 h and then declined after 20 h (Fig.
5A). Induction of ICAM-1
expression by TPA was also demonstrated by immunofluorescence staining
(Fig. 2F) and U937 cell adhesion (Fig. 3). When cells were
pretreated with 100 nM staurosporine or 10, 30, and
100 µM genistein, or 1 µM herbimycin, TPA-induced ICAM-1 expression was inhibited by 89, or 40, 62, 80, or
52%, respectively (Fig. 5B). The specific Src inhibitor, PP2 (56), inhibited IFN-
- or TPA-induced ICAM-1 expression dose-dependently (Fig. 5C).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time-dependent TPA-induced ICAM-1
expression in NCI-H292 epithelial cells and the inhibitory effect of
genistein, herbimycin, or PP2. A, cells were incubated at
37 °C with 1 µM TPA for various time intervals.
B, cells were pretreated for 30 min with 100 nM
staurosporine or the indicated concentrations of genistein or 1 µM herbimycin before incubation with 1 µM
TPA for 18 h. C, cells were pretreated for 30 min with
the indicated concentrations of PP2 before incubation with 10 ng/ml
IFN- or 1 µM TPA for 18 h. Surface expression of
ICAM-1 was measured by ELISA using anti-ICAM-1 antibody, as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Results are expressed as the
mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in
triplicate. *, p < 0.05 as compared with TPA
alone.
|
|
Induction of ICAM-1 Promoter Activity by IFN-
and the Inhibitory
Effect of Genistein, Herbimycin, U73122, Staurosporine, Ro 31-8220, PLC-
2 Mutant, or Dominant Negative Mutants of PKC-
or
c-Src--
To study further the involvement of the
PI-PLC-dependent PKC pathway in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1
expression, transient transfection was performed using the human ICAM-1
promoter-luciferase constructs, pIC1352 (
1352/+1), which contains
full-length human ICAM-1 promoter; pIC339 (
339/+1), which contains
the downstream NF-
B and GAS sites in the ICAM-1 promoter; pIC135
(
135/+1), which contains the GAS site but not the NF-
B site; and
pIC135(
AP2), which does not contain either the NF-
B or the GAS
site but contains the proximal TATA box site. Treatment with 10 ng/ml
IFN-
or 1 µM TPA led to a 4.1- or 5.7-fold increase,
respectively, using pIC1352, and a 3.7- or 5.3-fold increase,
respectively, using pIC339, and a 3.5- or 3-fold increase,
respectively, using pIC135. However, using pIC135(
AP2), IFN-
, or
TPA treatment only resulted in a 1.4- or 1.2-fold increase,
respectively, in ICAM-1 promoter activity (Fig.
6). These results indicate that the GAS
cis-acting element is responsible for mediating both IFN-
- and
TPA-induced ICAM-1 expression in NCI-H292 cells and that NF-
B may be
involved in TPA- but not IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
GAS-dependent activation of the
ICAM-1 promoter by IFN- and TPA.
Upper diagram, schematic diagram of the 5' regulatory region
of the human ICAM-1 gene. Rectangles indicate the
location of potential binding sites for the transcription factors AP-1,
AP-2, Ets, NF- B, and Sp-1 and the binding sites TRE and GAS. The
arrow above the initiation codon ATG indicates
the translation start site. The cells were transfected with the
pIC1352, pIC339, pIC135, or pIC135( AP2) luciferase expression
vector, as under "Experimental Procedures," then incubated for
5 h with 10 ng/ml IFN- or 1 µM TPA. Cell extracts
were prepared and assayed for luciferase and -galactosidase
activity, and then the luciferase activity was normalized using the
-galactosidase activity and expressed as the mean ± S.E. of
three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *,
p < 0.05 as compared with pIC339.
|
|
By using pIC339, the induction of ICAM-1 promoter activity mediated by
IFN-
was attenuated by genistein, herbimycin, U73122, staurosporine,
or Ro 31-8220, but not by PDTC, whereas that induced by TPA was
inhibited by genistein, herbimycin, staurosporine, or PDTC (Fig.
7A). In cotransfection
experiments, the induction of ICAM-1 promoter activity by IFN-
was
inhibited by the mutant PLC-
2 SH2(N) or by the dominant
negative PKC-
/KR or c-Src(KM) mutants, whereas that induced by TPA
was inhibited by the dominant negative PKC-
/KR or c-Src(KM) mutants
but not by the mutant PLC-
2 SH2(N) (Fig. 7B).
By using pIC135, the IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity was also
inhibited by cotransfection with the above three mutants. Furthermore,
induction of ICAM-1 promoter activity by IFN-
was inhibited by
cotransfection with the dominant negative JAK1, JAK2, or STAT1
(Y701M) but not by STAT3 (Fig.
8A). The ICAM-1 promoter
activity was enhanced by cotransfection with wild type PLC-
2(wt),
PKC
(wt), c-Src(wt), JAK1(wt) or STAT1(wt), which led to 4.8-, 4.4-, 4.9-, 4.1-, or 6.4-fold increase, respectively (Fig. 8B).
The induction of ICAM-1 promoter activity by wild type PLC-
2 (wt) or
PKC
(wt) was blocked by cotransfection with dominant negative
c-Src(KM) or STAT1 (Y701M) mutant and that by wild type c-Src (wt) was
blocked by cotransfection with dominant negative STAT1 (Y701M) mutant
(Fig. 8C).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of inhibitors, mutants, or dominant
negative mutants on IFN- - or TPA-induced
ICAM-1 promoter activity. A, NCI-H292 cells were
transfected with the pIC339 luciferase expression vector and then
pretreated for 30 min with 100 µM genistein, 1 µM herbimycin, 30 µM U73122, 100 nM staurosporine, 1 µM Ro 31-8220, or 100 µM PDTC before incubation with 10 ng/ml IFN- or 1 µM TPA for 5 h. B, NCI-H292 cells were
cotransfected with pIC339 and the PLC- 2 mutant, the dominant
negative PKC- or c-Src mutant, or empty vector. Luciferase activity
was assayed as under "Experimental Procedures." The results were
normalized using the -galactosidase activity and expressed as the
mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in
triplicate; *, p < 0.05 as compared with IFN- or
TPA alone.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of mutants or dominant negative
mutants on IFN- or wild type plasmid-induced
ICAM-1 promoter activity. A, NCI-H292 cells were
cotransfected with pIC135 (0.5 µg) and the PLC- 2
(SH2(N)), PKC (K/R), c-Src(K/M), JAK1(DN), JAK2(DN), or
STAT1(Y701M) (1.5 µg) or the empty vector before incubation with 10 ng/ml IFN- for 5 h. B, NCI-H292 cells were
cotransfected with pIC135 (0.5 µg) and the wild type PLC- 2(wt),
PKC (wt), c-Src(wt), JAK1(wt), or STAT1(wt) (1.5 µg) or the empty
vector. C, NCI-H292 cells were cotransfected with wild type
PLC- 2(wt), PKC (wt), or c-Src(wt) (1.5 µg) and the dominant
negative c-Src(KM) or STAT1(Y701M) (2.0 µg) mutant or the empty
vector. Luciferase activity was assayed as under "Experimental
Procedures." The results were normalized using the -galactosidase
activity and expressed as the mean ± S.E. of three independent
experiments performed in triplicate. A, *, p < 0.05 as compared with IFN- alone. B, *,
p < 0.05 as compared with control vector.
D, *, p < 0.05 as compared with
PLC- 2(wt). **, p < 0.05 as compared with
PKC (wt). ***, p < 0.05 as compared with
c-Src(wt).
|
|
IFN-
and TPA Induce STAT1-
Binding to the GAS Site of the
ICAM-1 Promoter--
The ICAM-1 promoter contains a complex array of
transactivating binding sites. To determine whether the GAS element was
involved in ICAM-1 gene transcription following IFN-
stimulation,
GAF complex formation was examined by EMSA. Although no GAF-GAS
DNA-protein binding was seen in nonstimulated cells, IFN-
rapidly
(10 min) stimulated GAF-GAS DNA-protein binding, with similar
activation being seen after 1 and 24 h (Fig.
9A). TPA resulted in a similar pattern of GAF-GAS DNA-protein binding (data not shown). In subsequent EMSA experiments, cells were treated with IFN-
for 1 h. To
identify the specific subunits involved in the formation of the GAF-GAS complex after IFN-
stimulation, supershift assays were performed in
the presence of antibodies specific for STAT-1
(p91) or p65 (NF-
B). As shown in Fig. 9, B and C,
incubation of nuclear extracts with anti-STAT-1
antibody induced
attenuation of GAF-GAS DNA-protein binding (Fig. 9, B and
C, lane 3), but no shift or attenuation occurred in the
presence of anti-p65 antibody (Fig. 9B, lane 4), indicating
that the GAF complex induced by IFN-
contained STAT1
. Excess cold
GAS probe blocked the GAF-GAS DNA-protein binding (Fig. 9C, lane
4).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Kinetics of
IFN- -induced GAF-GAS DNA-protein binding in
NCI-H292 epithelial cells. A, cells were treated for 10 min, 1 h, or 24 h with 10 ng/ml IFN- , and then nuclear
extracts were prepared and tested using the GAS oligonucleotide probe
to measure the DNA-protein binding activity by EMSA as under
"Experimental Procedures." B, supershift assays were
performed using 2 µg of the indicated antibodies as described under
"Experimental Procedures." C, excess cold GAS probe was
used as competitor as described under "Experimental Procedures."
NS, nonspecific binding.
|
|
Induction of c-Src and Lyn Activation by IFN-
or TPA and the
Inhibitory Effect of U73122, Staurosporine, or Herbimycin--
Because
IFN-
- or TPA-induced ICAM-1 expression was inhibited by genistein,
herbimycin, and PP2 (Fig. 4A and Fig. 5, B and C), and the induced ICAM-1 promoter activity was inhibited
by a dominant negative c-Src(KM) mutant (Fig. 7B), these
results indicated that c-Src was involved downstream of PKC in the
induction of ICAM-1 expression. Western blot analysis using antibodies
against the Src family members, c-Src, Lck, Lyn, or Fyn, showed that
c-Src and Lyn were expressed substantially in NCI-H292 cells (data not shown). To determine whether IFN-
or TPA induced activation of these
two tyrosine kinases, c-Src and Lyn were isolated by
immunoprecipitation using anti-c-Src or anti-Lyn antibody and tested
for in vitro kinase activity, using enolase as substrate.
When cells were treated for 10, 30, or 60 min with 10 ng/ml IFN-
or
1 µM TPA, IFN-
induced c-Src and Lyn activation that
was significant at 10 min and maximal at 60 min (Fig.
10A), although TPA also
induced c-Src and Lyn activation, the kinetics were different, with
activation being significant at 10 min, maximal at 30 min, and
declining after 60 min (Fig. 10B). The activation of c-Src
and Lyn induced by IFN-
was inhibited by U73122, staurosporine,
and herbimycin and that induced by TPA was inhibited by staurosporine
and herbimycin (Fig. 11). These inhibitors alone had no effect on basal c-Src or Lyn activity (data not
shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Time-dependent activation of
c-Src or Lyn tyrosine kinase activity by IFN-
or TPA in NCI-H292 cells. Cells were treated for 10, 30, or
60 min with 10 ng/ml IFN- (A) or with 1 µM
TPA (B), and then whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with anti-c-Src or anti-Lyn antibody, followed by
autoradiography of phosphorylated enolase as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The amount of c-Src or Lyn in
immunoprecipitates was determined by Western blot (WB) using
anti-c-Src or anti-Lyn antibody.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Effect of various inhibitors on
IFN- - or TPA-induced c-Src or Lyn activation
in NCI-H292 epithelial cells. Cells were pretreated for 30 min
with 30 µM U73122, 100 nM staurosporine, or 1 µM herbimycin before incubation with 10 ng/ml IFN- for
60 min or with 1 µM TPA for 30 min. Whole cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-c-Src (A)
or anti-Lyn (B) antibody, followed by autoradiography for
phosphorylated enolase as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The amount of c-Src or Lyn in immunoprecipitates was
determined by Western blot (WB) using anti-c-Src or anti-Lyn
antibody.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, we have shown that IFN-
induced ICAM-1
expression in the plasma membrane of NCI-H292 epithelial cells, and
this resulted in increased adhesion of U937 cells. The transcriptional factor binding site, GAS, appears to be essential for the enhanced ICAM-1 expression seen after exposure to IFN-
in human monocytes (36). To test whether the NF-
B or GAS site was involved in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity in NCI-H292 cells, we used different deletion mutants of the ICAM-1 promoter-Luc construct, pIC1352, pIC339, pIC135, or pIC135 (
AP2). The results showed that
the GAS site was essential for both IFN-
- and TPA-induced ICAM-1
promoter activity and that the downstream NF-
B site reported to be
critical for TNF-
and IL-1
to induce ICAM-1 expression (33, 34)
was only involved in TPA-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity (Fig. 6).
Experiments using PDTC, an NF-
B inhibitor, further supported this
notion, because PDTC inhibited TPA-, but not IFN-
-, induced ICAM-1
promoter activity. In the EMSA, IFN-
increased GAF-GAS DNA-protein
binding, indicating that the GAS site in the ICAM-1 promoter was
involved in IFN-
-mediated ICAM-1 induction. GAF, the protein complex
binding to GAS sequences in IFN-
-treated cells, is a dimer of STAT1,
which is the prototype of a family of cytokine-responsive
transcriptional factors. The component of the GAF transcriptional
complex in NCI-H292 cells was identified as STAT1
. This result is
consistent with previous findings that IFN-
mediates ICAM-1
induction via translocation of activated STAT1
(30, 31).
We demonstrated that the PKC inhibitors, staurosporine and Ro 31-8220, inhibited the IFN-
-mediated induction of ICAM-1 expression in a
dose-dependent manner, indicating that PKC activation is an
obligatory event in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression in these cells.
This was further confirmed by the result that the dominant negative
PKC-
mutant, PKC-
(K/R), inhibited IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity (Fig. 7B), and overexpression of wild type
PKC-
(wt) enhanced ICAM-1 promoter activity (Fig. 8B).
PKC is activated by the physiological activator, diacylglycerol, which
can be generated either directly, by the action of PLC, or indirectly,
by a pathway involving the production of phosphatidic acid by PLD,
followed by a dephosphorylation reaction catalyzed by phosphatidate
phosphohydrolase. Normally, the PLC involved in the production of
diacylglycerol is PI-PLC, but PC-PLC can also be involved (37, 38). The
PI-PLC inhibitor, U73122, inhibited IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression, whereas the PC-PLC inhibitor, D609, the phosphatidate phosphohydrolase inhibitor, propranolol, and the inactive U73122 analogue, U73343, did
not. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors blocked IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression, indicating that the PI-PLC involved might be PLC-
, because PLC-
contains an SH2 domain used to link
phosphotyrosine-containing sequences in a receptor protein or in
cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase to PI hydrolysis (39). In the
present study, we used the PLC-
2 N-terminal SH2 (SH2(N))
mutant (40) to further determine the role of PLC-
, and we found that
it inhibited IFN-
- but not TPA-induced ICAM-1 promoter activity,
indicating the possible involvement of PLC-
2 in IFN-
-induced
ICAM-1 expression in NCI-H292 cells. This was further confirmed by the
result that cotransfection with wild type PLC-
2 (wt) increased
ICAM-1 promoter activity (Fig. 8B). Thus, IFN-
acts
through the PI-PLC-
2 pathway, but not through the PC-PLC or PC-PLD
pathway, to induce PKC activation in NCI-H292 cells. Although IFN-
has been reported to act mainly via JAK-STAT pathway to regulate most
gene expression, in some cases IFN-
acts via PI-PLC
to induce
Ca2+ signals in neutrophils (41), and it acts via PC-PLC to
induce PKC activation in macrophages (28) or via PC-PLD to activate PKC
in endothelial cells (26, 27).
Because PKC had been shown to be involved in the IFN-
signaling,
direct activation of PKC by TPA was tested and was found to induce
ICAM-1 expression, as shown both by ELISA and immunofluorescence staining. TPA-induced ICAM-1 expression was inhibited in a
dose-dependent manner by genistein, herbimycin, or PP2, as
was IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression. TPA also stimulated GAF-GAS
DNA-protein binding (data not show). The induction of ICAM-1 promoter
activity by TPA was inhibited by genistein or herbimycin and the
dominant negative c-Src(KM) mutant, as was that induced by IFN-
.
Furthermore, the induction of ICAM-1 promoter activity by PKC
(wt)
was also inhibited by cotransfection with dominant negative c-Src(KM)
mutant (Fig. 8C). These results suggest that the protein
tyrosine kinase, c-Src, acts downstream of PKC in the induction of
STAT1
activation and ICAM-1 expression. Two cytoplasmic protein
tyrosine kinases, c-Src and Lyn, were found to be activated by IFN-
and TPA in NCI-H292 cells. These effects were inhibited by
staurosporine and herbimycin, indicating the involvement of
PKC-dependent c-Src or Lyn activation in IFN-
-mediated
ICAM-1 induction. This might be a common signal pathway for inducible
gene expression, because TNF-
- or IL-1
-induced ICAM-1 or
cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human alveolar epithelial cells has also
been demonstrated to be involved in PKC-dependent
activation of c-Src or Lyn tyrosine kinase (33-35). In addition to
gene expression, a similar signal pathway has also been reported in the
development of ischemic preconditioning in the conscious rabbit, which
involved PKC
-dependent Src and Lck activation (42), in
the G protein-coupled receptors regulating
N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor in CA1
pyramidal neurons, which involved PKC-dependent c-Src
activation (43), and in the cellular response to oxidative stress,
which involved PKC
-dependent c-Abl activation (44).
STATs are latent cytoplasmic transcription factors that transduce
signals from the cell membrane to the nucleus upon activation by
tyrosine phosphorylation. Several protein tyrosine kinases can induce
phosphorylation of STATs in cells, including JAK and Src family
kinases. Previous studies (45-47) have shown that IFN-
-induced tyrosine 701 phosphorylation of STAT-1
is mediated by JAK tyrosine kinases. However, many cytokines and growth factors are reported to
recruit STATs via the cytoplasmic Src tyrosine kinase family (48). A
role for Src kinase in STAT activation was first suggested by studies
aimed at investigating the molecular mechanisms associated with
Src-mediated transformation of fibroblasts and hematopoietic cell
lines. STAT3 activation is required for v-Src-mediated transformation of NIH3T3 cells (49, 50), and a direct association of v-Src and STAT3
has been found in 32Dcl3 cells (51). In addition to v-Src, c-Src also
plays a role in IL-3-, epidermal growth factor-, and platelet-derived
growth factor-induced STAT3 or STAT1 activation (52-54). In A431
cells, epidermal growth factor-induced activation of STAT and c-Src
kinase and direct association of these two components were demonstrated
(53). In NIH3T3 cells, both tyrosine phosphorylation and DNA binding
activity of STAT1 and STAT3 were up-regulated in c-Src-overexpressing
cells, and coimmunoprecipitation of STAT1 and c-Src was also seen (54).
In Sf9 insect cells, overexpression of c-Src kinase without
expression of JAK family members can directly activate functional STAT1
and STAT3, indicating that c-Src can phosphorylate STATs independent of
JAKs (55). In the present NCI-H292 cells, STAT1 but not STAT3 is shown
to be involved in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression (Fig. 8,
A and B), and STAT1 acts downstream of c-Src
(Fig. 8C). Phosphorylation of STAT1 at Tyr-701 by
IFN-
and TPA is seen, and this effect is inhibited by inhibitors of
PKC and c-Src,3 indicating
that the phosphorylation of STAT1 at Tyr-701 is possibly due to
c-Src via IFN-
-induced PKC activation. Furthermore, direct association of c-Src and STAT1 is seen.3 Thus, c-Src can
directly phosphorylate STAT1 in NCI-H292 cells. JAK1 is also involved
in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression (Fig. 8, A and
B). However, its role in c-Src-induced STAT1 phosphorylation is unknown and is currently under investigation. The IFN-
-induced ICAM-1 expression in NCI-H292 cells was not affected by the
mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase
kinase inhibitor, PD98059, or the p38 inhibitor, SB203580 (data not
shown), excluding the involvement of p44/42 mitogen-activated protein
kinase and p38 in IFN-
-induced effect in this type of cells.
However, p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase was reported to be
activated by IFN-
to stimulate c/EBP-
-dependent gene
expression in RAW 264.7 cells (57), and p38 activation by IFN-
was
required for STAT1 serine phosphorylation in HeLa S3 cells (58).
In summary, the signaling pathway involved in IFN-
-induced ICAM-1
expression in human NCI-H292 epithelial cells has been explored.
IFN-
activates phospholipase C-
2 via an upstream tyrosine kinase
to induce activation of PKC-
and c-Src or Lyn, resulting in STAT1
activation, and activation of GAS in the ICAM-1 promoter, followed by
initiation of ICAM-1 expression and monocyte adhesion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Research Grant
NSC-90-2315-B002-004 from the National Science Council.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No.1, Jen-Ai Rd., 1st
Section, Taipei 10018, Taiwan. Tel.: 886-2-23123456 (Ext. 8321); Fax:
886-2-23947833; E-mail: ccchen@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 20, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109924200
2
W. C. Huang, J. J. Chen, and C.-C. Chen,
manuscript in preparation.
3
Y.-J. Chang, M. J. Holtzman, and C.-C.
Chen, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift
assay;
GAS,
-activated site;
IFN, interferon;
JAK, Janus family
kinase;
STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate;
ELISA, enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay;
PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C;
IL-1, interleukin-1;
PKC, protein kinase C;
BCECF, 2',7'-bis(carboxyethyl)-5,6-carboxyfluorescein;
PDTC, pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
wt, wild type;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
SH2, Src homology 2;
GAF,
-activated
factor;
PLD, include phospholipase D.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Springer, T. A.
(1990)
Nature
346,
425-434[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Wegner, C. D.,
Gundel, R. H.,
Reilly, P.,
Haynes, N.,
Letts, L. G.,
and Rothlein, R.
(1990)
Science
247,
456-459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Isobe, M.,
Yagita, H.,
Okmura, A. K.,
and Ihara, A.
(1992)
Science
255,
1125-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Springer, T. A.
(1994)
Cell
76,
301-314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Carlos, T.,
Kovach, N.,
Rosa, M.,
Newman, B.,
Wayner, E.,
Benjamin, C.,
Osborn, L.,
Lobb, R.,
and Harlan, J.
(1991)
Blood
77,
2266-2271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Staunton, D. E.,
Marlin, S. D.,
Stratowa, C.,
Dustin, M. L.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1988)
Cell
52,
925-933[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Rothlein, R.,
Dustin, M. L.,
Marlin, S. D.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1986)
J. Immunol.
137,
1270-1274[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Diamond, M. S.,
Staunton, D. E.,
Marlin, S. D.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1991)
Cell
65,
961-971[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Bloemen, P. G.,
Van Den Tweel, M. C.,
Henricks, P. A. J.,
Engel, F.,
Wagenaar, S. E.,
Rutten, A. A. J. J. L.,
and Nijkamp, F. P.
(1993)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
9,
586-593
|
| 10.
|
Morisaki, N.,
Takahashi, K.,
Shiina, R.,
Zenibayashi, M.,
Otabe, M.,
Yoshida, S.,
and Salto, Y.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
200,
612-618[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Read, M. A.,
Neish, A. S.,
Luscinskas, F. W.,
Palombella, V. J.,
Maniatis, T.,
and Collins, T.
(1995)
Immunity
2,
493-506[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
|
| 12.
|
Rothlein, R.,
Czaijkowski, M.,
O'Neil, M. M.,
Marlin, S. D.,
Mainolfi, E.,
and Merluzzi, V. J.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
141,
1665-1669[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Van de Stolpe, A.,
Caldinhoven, E.,
Stade, B. G.,
Koenderman, L.,
Raaijmakers, J. A.,
Johnson, J. P. M.,
and Van der Saag, P. T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6185-6192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Ledebur, H. C.,
and Parks, T. P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
933-943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Farina, A. R.,
Cappabianca, L.,
Mackay, A. R.,
Tiberio, A.,
Tacconelli, A.,
Tessitore, A.,
Frati, L.,
Martinotti, D.,
and Gulino, A.
(1997)
Cell Growth Differ.
8,
789-800[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Caldenhoven, E.,
Coffer, P.,
Yuan, J.,
Van de Stolpe, A.,
Horn, F.,
Kruijer, W.,
and Van der Saag, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21146-21154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Voraberger, G.,
Schafer, R.,
and Stratowa, C.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
147,
2777-2786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Degitz, K.,
Lian-Jie, L.,
and Caughman, S. W.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
14024-14030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Hou, J.,
Baichwal, V.,
and Cao, Z.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11641-11645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Schattner, A.
(1994)
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
70,
177-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Briscoe, J.,
Rogers, N. C.,
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Watling, D.,
Harpur, A. G.,
Wilks, A. F.,
Stark, G. R.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Kerr, I. M.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
799-809[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Heim, M. H.,
Kerr, I. M.,
Stark, G. R.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1995)
Science
258,
1808-1812
|
| 23.
|
Bach, E. A.,
Aguet, M.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
563-591[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Greenlund, A. C.,
Morales, M. O.,
Viviano, B. L.,
Yan, H.,
Krolewski, J.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1995)
Immunity
2,
677-687[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Look, D. C.,
Pelletier, M. R.,
and Holtzman, M. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
8952-8958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Mattila, P.,
and Renkonen, R.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
189,
1732-1738[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Mattila, P.,
Ustinov, J.,
and Renkonen, R.
(1993)
Scand. J. Immun.
38,
197-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Sands, W. A.,
Clark, J. S.,
and Liew, F. Y.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
199,
461-466[CrossRef] |