Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110008200 on December 10, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 9, 7396-7404, March 1, 2002
A Lipid-regulated Docking Site on Vinculin for Protein Kinase
C*
Wolfgang H.
Ziegler
,
Ulrich
Tigges,
Anke
Zieseniss, and
Brigitte
M.
Jockusch
From the Department of Cell Biology, Zoological Institute,
Technical University of Braunschweig,
D-38092 Braunschweig, Germany
Received for publication, October 17, 2001, and in revised form, December 7, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
During cell spreading, binding of
actin-organizing proteins to acidic phospholipids and phosphorylation
are important for localization and activity of these proteins at
nascent cell-matrix adhesion sites. Here, we report on a transient
interaction between the lipid-dependent protein kinase C
and vinculin, an early component of these sites, during spreading of
HeLa cells on collagen. In vitro binding of protein kinase
C
to vinculin tail was found dependent on free calcium and acidic
phospholipids but independent of a functional kinase domain. The
interaction was enhanced by conditions that favor the oligomerization
of vinculin. Phosphorylation by protein kinase C
reached 1.5 mol of
phosphate/mol of vinculin tail and required the C-terminal hydrophobic
hairpin, a putative phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-binding site.
Mass spectroscopy of peptides derived from in vitro
phosphorylated vinculin tail identified phosphorylation of serines 1033 and 1045. Inhibition of C-terminal phospholipid binding at the vinculin
tail by mutagenesis or deletion reduced the rate of phosphorylation to
50%. We suggest a possible mechanism whereby phospholipid-regulated
conformational changes in vinculin may lead to exposure of a docking
site for protein kinase C
and subsequent phosphorylation of vinculin
and/or vinculin interaction partners, thereby affecting the formation of cell adhesion complexes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cell spreading is a complex process involving receptor-mediated
adhesion, membrane protrusion, and the formation of discrete cell-matrix adhesion sites linked to a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton (1-3). The modulation of proteins by protein kinase C
(PKC)1-dependent
phosphorylation and by phosphoinositide binding is critically involved
in the regulation of these phenomena (4-7). Both processes are part of
signaling cascades but are not independent of each other and
participate in other signaling pathways. PI4,5P2, the major
phosphoinositide involved, is not only a precursor of the second
messengers diacylglycerol, inositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, and
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate but is also critically involved in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton at the plasma
membrane (8-10). Its local concentration and accessibility control
multiple aspects of the cytoskeleton-plasma membrane linkage via ERM
proteins (11), assembly and disassembly of actin filaments (12-14),
and of protein complexes bundling these filaments and connecting them
to transmembrane receptors. Because of the heterogeneity and complexity
of their protein composition, structure and composition of these
complexes are only partially understood (2). Essential components
include vinculin, talin,
-actinin, and filamin (15), which have all
been proposed to be regulated in their conformation and ligand binding
activity by PI4,5P2 (16-19).
Vinculin, an early and essential component of nascent cell-matrix
adhesions (20), has been shown to associate with talin,
-actinin,
paxillin, and members of the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein/Ena and ponsin/ArgBP52/vinexin families (15). The
function of vinculin in cell adhesions is not fully understood. By
bringing multiple actin-organizing proteins in close proximity, vinculin may act as an adaptor protein in addition to its structural role in the binding and cross-linking of membrane-apposed actin filaments. The atomic structure of the entire vinculin molecule is
still not known, but the overall structure as revealed by electron microscopy shows a tadpole-like molecule whose tail can be folded and
attached to the more globular head portion (21). The vinculin tail,
whose atomic structure has been resolved (22), consists of a bundle of
five helices (H1-H5) in antiparallel orientation, with N- and
C-terminal extensions emerging from the same side of the bundle. It
contains two interaction sites for acidic phospholipids, one located at
the surface of helices H2-H3 (23), and a second one comprising a
C-terminal hydrophobic hairpin (22). In the closed vinculin
conformation that is supposed to reflect the cytosolic moiety, binding
sites for talin and
-actinin at the vinculin head, for F-actin at
the vinculin tail, and for vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein and
others at the proline-rich hinge between head and tail are not
accessible (20, 24-26). Both PI4,5P2 binding to and
phosphorylation of the tail are proposed to alter vinculin conformation
and, thus, expose protein ligand-binding sites (15, 16, 27, 28). Hence,
PI4,5P2-regulated protein kinases seem good candidates to
execute this change in vinculin conformation and activity, and PKC has
been shown in vitro to accept the vinculin tail as a
substrate (27, 29).
PKC is a lipid-regulated serine/threonine kinase (30, 31) whose
functional involvement in cell adhesion and spreading has been
documented by pharmacological studies in numerous cellular systems (4,
5, 32, 33). PKC isotypes
,
, and
have been implicated in the
formation and maintenance of cell-matrix adhesion sites (34-37). There
are mainly three (classes of) proteins that have been identified as PKC
binding partners in this location; the receptors for activated protein
kinase C (RACKs), syndecan 4, and the transmembrane-4 superfamily
(tetraspanins) (38-40). All three bind to integrin
-chains, and the
latter two are transmembrane proteins that function as integrin
co-receptors (41, 42). Binding partners and substrates of PKC directly
involved in the actin organization of cell adhesion complexes, however,
are less well defined (43). Although talin, vinculin, and filamin are considered potential PKC in vivo substrates (27, 44, 45), their role in PKC-dependent cell adhesion processes is
still not clear.
In this report, we present evidence for a physical interaction of
PKC
with vinculin during cell spreading. The docking of the enzyme
depends on the C-terminal lipid-binding site of the vinculin tail, and
PI4,5P2 binding capacity correlates with phosphorylation of
adjacent serine residues. These results suggest a possible mechanism
whereby PI4,5P2-induced conformational changes in vinculin may result in PKC
binding and subsequent phosphorylation of vinculin and/or vinculin interaction partners as required for the formation of
cell-matrix adhesion complexes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning, Mutagenesis, and Graphic Representation--
Constructs
used in this study were amplified according to standard PCR protocols,
cloned in pCR-blunt (Invitrogen), and verified by DNA sequencing.
Bovine PKC
cDNA (a gift of Dr. Peter J. Parker, Imperial Cancer
Research Fund, London) was equipped either with an N-terminal His tag
or a birch-profilin epitope tag (BiPro tag (46)) and cloned into
pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). An ATP binding-deficient K368M mutant (47) was
generated by site-directed mutagenesis according to the manufacturer's
instructions using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene). Vinculin fragments
encoding the tail domain (amino acids 858-1066) were equipped with an
N-terminal FLAG tag and cloned into pQE-30 (Qiagen) that contains a His
tag. To remove potential phosphorylation sites at Ser-941/Thr-43,
Ser-999, Thr-1050/Thr-55, and Thr-1062 single or double alanine mutants
of Vt-(858-1066) were generated, as described above. For the analysis
of the lipid dependence of the PKC-vinculin interaction, mutants
Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q), Vt-(T1062E), and the deletion fragment Vt-(858-1052)
were generated. Graphic views of Vt-(879-1061) based on PDB entry 1QRK
(22) were generated using SwissPDB viewer ((48) www.expasy.ch/spdbv) and POVray 3.1 (www.povray.org) on a Linux platform.
Protein Precipitation after in Situ Cross-linking--
Protein
complexes were obtained from HeLa cells that had been treated with the
membrane-permeant cross-linker dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) (DSP;
Pierce) before lysis essentially as described (20). In brief, cells
grown in Dulbecco's minimum Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% calf serum were transfected with His- or BiPro-tagged PKC
or
vector control. After 24 h, cells were collected, and 3 × 106 cells were plated on collagen-coated dishes for 10-15
min or 16 h before DSP was added. After the addition of DSP, cells
were kept in the incubator for another 15 min, excess cross-linker was
quenched in 0.2 M glycine in phosphate-buffered saline, and cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 1%
(v:v) Triton X-100, 0.25% deoxycholate, 1 mM EGTA,
150 mM NaCl, protease inhibitors). Cell debris, collected
by a brief centrifugation, was boiled in 20 µl of a 10% SDS solution
to extract the maximal amount of cross-linked complexes and spun again.
Supernatants of both centrifugation steps were pooled and adjusted with
RIPA buffer to reduce SDS concentration below 0.1%. Precipitation was performed either using Ni-NTA-agarose (Qiagen) for His-tagged PKC
or
a monoclonal antibody against the BiPro sequence (4A6 (46)) for
BiPro-tagged PKC
. Endogenous proteins were detected after Western
blotting with the antibodies anti-vinculin (hVIN-1) and anti-actin
(1A4) (Sigma). PKC
was probed with a monoclonal antibody (Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY). Horseradish peroxidase-coupled
secondary antibodies (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) were used for
detection by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech).
Protein Expression and Purification--
All recombinant
Vt-(858-1052/66) proteins bearing an N-terminal His tag and a FLAG tag
in tandem were expressed in the Escherichia coli strain M15.
Batch purification on Ni-NTA-agarose was performed according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). Purity of all proteins was
checked by SDS-PAGE and immunoblots using a FLAG antibody (M2; Sigma).
Protein concentration was determined by standard methods.
Maltose-binding protein (MBP)-tagged Vt proteins (893-1066, 893-985,
and 1016-66) (a gift of Dr. Stefan Huttelmaier) were prepared as
described in Huttelmaier et al. (49). Turkey gizzard
-actinin and vinculin were purified according to Feramisco and
Burridge (50) using a Q-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) instead
of a DEAE column. Actin (a gift of Dr. Kathrin Schluter) was prepared
from acetone powder of rabbit muscle as described in Spudich and Watt
(51), with an additional gel filtration step.
In Vitro Transcription/Translation and Dot Overlay
Assays--
His-tagged PKC
, wild type, or ATP
mutant were
synthesized as [35S]methionine-labeled protein by
in vitro transcription/translation using the TNT-coupled
reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). PI4,5P2 (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) was prepared as described in Huttelmaier et al. (20). Vinculin, Vt-(858-1066) and
-actinin were
incubated without or with a 50-fold molar excess of PI4,5P2
for 30 min at 4 °C and immobilized on nitrocellulose membrane (20 pmol of protein/spot) using a dot blotter with circular slots
(Biometra, Göttingen, Germany). The transfer was controlled by
Ponceau staining, and nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5%
nonfat milk powder in TBST (25 mM Tris, 150 mM
NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20, pH 7.6). In vitro translated
proteins were diluted (1:40-1:80) in TBST containing 20 mM
-mercaptoethanol. The membrane was incubated in this solution for
2 h at room temperature. After intensive washing in TBST, bound
proteins were detected by autoradiography.
Kinase Assays and Statistical Evaluation--
Phosphorylation of
Vt proteins was analyzed in a mixed micelle assay essentially as
described (52). Briefly, Vt proteins (100 pmol/reaction) were
preincubated in 36 µl of kinase buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH
7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EGTA,
0.25% Triton X-100) with 45 µM PI4,5P2 for
30 min on ice. Phosphorylation reactions were performed in a total
volume of 100 µl at 30 °C using 0.1 mM ATP, 1 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (4500Ci/mmol), 0.63 mM
CaCl2, 0.5 µM
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) (Calbiochem), and
120 µM phosphatidylserine (Sigma) in kinase buffer.
Reactions were started by the addition of 80 ng of recombinant PKC
(Panvera, Madison, WI) and stopped at different time points by mixing a
sample of 20 µl with 8 µl of SDS-sample buffer and boiling for 5 min at 95 °C. Subsequently, samples were separated by SDS-PAGE,
transferred onto nitrocellulose, and quantified by phosphorimaging
(Fuji BAS-2500) using Aida 2.1 (Advanced Isotope Data Analyzer)
analysis software (Fuji; Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany). Rates of
phosphorylation, based on values of phosphate incorporation from four
independent experiments, were compared by variance analysis (analysis
of variance for repeated measurements, Bonferroni/Dunn) using Statview
5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) (p < 0.05). To test
maximal incorporation, 25 pmol of substrate protein were phosphorylated
for 1 h using 30 ng of PKC
. Bands were excised and counted for
Cherenkov radiation to calculate molar phosphate incorporation.
MALDI Analysis of Phosphopeptides and MS/MS
Sequencing--
Vt-(wild type) or Vt-(858-1052) protein was
phosphorylated by PKC for 1 h (see above), lipids were extracted
(53), and pellets of phosphorylated protein were dissolved in 50 mM NH4HCO3 buffer, pH 8. 1 µg of
protein was digested by 10-50 ng of Glu-C or Lys-C endopeptidase
(sequencing grade) according to the manufacturer's instructions
(Promega). Mass spectra were obtained with a MALDI-time of flight
Reflex II (Bruker-Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). For co-precipitation, analyte and matrix solutions (20 mg/ml
-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamonic acid (4CHCA) in 60% acetonitrile) were mixed in equal portions (0.5 µl) on the MALDI target and dried. Spectra were externally calibrated
using monoisotopic (M+H)+ ions from two peptide standards.
Approximately 200 shots were collected for each mass spectrum. MS/MS of
phosphopeptides was performed by nano-electrospray ionization on a
Q-time of flight mass spectrometer (Micro Mass, Manchester, UK).
Actin Filament Binding Assays--
The interaction of
recombinant proteins, Vt-(wild type), Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q), and
Vt-(858-1052), with actin filaments was analyzed in a sedimentation
assay. All proteins used were centrifuged (100,000 × g, 30 min) before to the sedimentation assays to remove
protein aggregates. Pre-polymerized actin (3 µM final
concentration) was incubated in the absence or presence of recombinant
Vt proteins at various molar ratios at 37 °C for 2 h. Samples
were subjected to centrifugation at high speed (100.000 × g, 1 h) or low speed (12.000 × g, 15 min). Pellets and supernatants were analyzed on Coomassie-stained gels.
Low shear viscometry was essentially performed as described (54).
Recombinant Vt proteins (see above) were added to pre-polymerized actin
(3 µM final concentration) at various molar ratios. The solution was loaded in glass capillaries and incubated at 37 °C for
2 h. The viscosity of the samples was determined relative to the
time needed for a steel ball to pass the capillary filled only with an
F-actin control.
Recombinant Vt proteins (see above) were added to pre-polymerized actin
(3 µM) at a molar ratio of 0.8 Vt:actin. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C, 10% (v/v) tetramethylrhodamine-labeled phalloidin was added from a stock solution (0.1 mg/ml in methanol), and
incubation was continued for 1 h. Filaments were analyzed directly
via fluorescence microscopy (Axiophot; Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Images
were taken using a cooled CCD camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) and
the MetaMorph® software (Visitron, Puchheim, Germany).
PI4,5P2 Binding Assays--
Binding of the Vt C
terminus to PI4,5P2 micelles was tested as described (55).
Briefly, Microlon ELISA plates (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany)
were coated with Vt proteins (50 pmol each), blocked with 1% bovine
serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline, and incubated for 2 h
with increasing amounts of PI4,5P2 micelles (10-500 pmol),
prepared as described in Huttelmaier et al. (20). After
intensive washing, bound PI4,5P2 was detected using a
PI4,5P2-specific antibody (Assay Design Inc., Ann
Arbor, MI) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antiserum (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany). A colorimetric reaction was developed using 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenz-thiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) as
substrate, and absorption A410 was measured in
an ELISA reader. To compensate for variations in protein adsorption and
development between assays, we normalized the values using the highest
absorption as reference. The value of each data point is reported as
the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments.
 |
RESULTS |
PKC
and Vinculin Form Complexes in Vivo--
Because PKC
effects on cell spreading have been observed during the early phase and
flattening of cells (4, 5), we studied a possible association of
vinculin with PKC during the formation of focal adhesion structures at
early (compare with Huttelmaier et al. (20)) and late time
points during spreading. HeLa cells transfected with PKC
equipped
with either a His or a BiPro tag were seeded onto collagen and allowed
to adhere and spread for either 10-15 min or 16 h. To stabilize
presumptive membrane-associated protein complexes, they were then
treated with the membrane-permeant cross-linker DSP for a further 15 min. Subsequently, cells were lysed and rigorously extracted. PKC
was precipitated by either Ni-NTA-agarose or the BiPro-tag antibody,
and precipitates were collected by centrifugation and subjected to
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. As shown in Fig.
1, vinculin precipitated with His-tagged
PKC
(Fig. 1A) and with BiPro-PKC
(Fig. 1B)
when cells were harvested at the early time point after seeding. In
contrast, such co-precipitation was not observed with lysates obtained
after long term culture (Fig. 1B). Hence, these data support
our hypothesis on a transient association between vinculin and
PKC
.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Interaction of vinculin and
PKC is demonstrated by in vivo
chemical cross-linking. PKC -transfected HeLa cells and
vector-transfected controls were allowed to adhere on collagen for
10-15 min or overnight. Subsequently, cells were treated with a
membrane-permeant cross-linker (DSP) for 15 min and lysed. PKC was
precipitated from cleared supernatants. After reduction of DSP,
precipitated proteins were analyzed in a Western blot. The membrane was
probed sequentially with antisera specific to vinculin, PKC , or
actin (as indicated). A, His-tagged PKC was precipitated
from lysates of spreading cells using Ni-NTA-agarose. P,
precipitate. B, BiPro-tagged PKC was precipitated using a
BiPro-specific monoclonal antibody (4A6) (46). Cells were analyzed 15 min (15') and 16 h after plating (immunoprecipitate
(IP)). hc indicates the 50-kDa heavy chain of the
BiPro-specific antibody. Note that co-precipitation of PKC and
vinculin was obtained by both experimental approaches in spreading
cells, and actin was not part of the complex.
|
|
Interaction with Vinculin Depends on the PKC
Regulatory
Domain--
Early studies show that in vitro
phosphorylation of vinculin by PKC requires acidic phospholipids (27,
29) that bind to the vinculin tail (56). This requirement could derive
from the lipid-regulated head-to-tail interaction in vinculin, masking potential PKC binding and/or phosphorylation site(s) that are also
located in the vinculin tail. If the role of phospholipids in complex
formation between PKC and vinculin would be confined to unmasking such
sites, PKC should bind to the vinculin tail even in the absence of
phospholipids. On the other hand, the regulatory domain of PKC
that
consists of the C1 and C2 modules also binds phospholipids (57, 58),
and the C2 module requires a free Ca2+ concentration of
~100 µM. To analyze the conditions for the interaction between vinculin and PKC in more detail, we performed overlay experiments with purified smooth muscle vinculin or recombinant vinculin tail (Vt-(858-1066)) and in vitro translated
PKC
using PI4,5P2 as an acidic phospholipid. As shown in
Fig. 2, PKC binding to both vinculin and
vinculin tail was observed only when these proteins were preloaded with
PI4,5P2, indicating that the sole exposure of a PKC-binding
site on the vinculin tail without PI4,5P2 is insufficient
for PKC recognition. Remarkably, the addition of the lipid to the
PKC-containing solution used for the overlay experiments did not result
in PKC binding (data not shown). Furthermore, even with
PI4,5P2-preloaded vinculin proteins, the interaction was
effectively blocked by addition of the Ca2+ chelator EGTA
(Fig. 2). These results strongly suggest a prominent role of the
regulatory PKC-C2 module in the (protein-lipid)-protein interaction
with vinculin. This was in contrast to smooth muscle
-actinin, which
also binds to acidic phospholipids (18) and PKC
, but the interaction
was found independent of the free Ca2+ concentration in
this assay (Fig. 2). When an ATP binding-deficient PKC
mutant (47)
was used that is characterized by a defectively folded kinase domain,
the interaction with vinculin or vinculin tail was not reduced (Fig.
2). Taken together, these data allow for the conclusion that the
contact between vinculin and PKC
is mediated by the PKC regulatory
domain and not by the kinase domain.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The PKC regulatory domain mediates binding to
the vinculin tail. Vinculin, Vt-(858-1066), and -actinin were
preincubated with PI4,5P2 where indicated and spot-blotted
onto nitrocellulose. Overlay assays were performed with in
vitro-translated 35S-labeled PKC (wild type) or an
ATP binding-deficient (ATP ) mutant. EGTA (5 mM)
was used to reduce free Ca2+. The autoradiographs show that
the binding of PKC to vinculin or Vt-(858-1066) required both
PI4,5P2 and calcium, suggesting the involvement of the PKC
C2-module in binding. Conversely, unchanged binding properties of the
ATP binding-deficient PKC suggest that the kinase domain was not
involved.
|
|
Vinculin Tail Phosphorylation by PKC Depends on the C
Terminus--
We postulated that vinculin phosphorylation by PKC
depends on the PI4,5P2-mediated interaction between the
kinase and its substrate. The vinculin tail structure reveals two
acidic lipid-interacting areas, with a basic ladder at the H2-H3
helical hairpin and a basic collar connected to the C-terminal
hydrophobic hairpin (15, 22) that both could support the
lipid-regulated interaction with PKC. To clarify which of these sites
might be involved, in vitro phosphorylation assays with
recombinant PKC
and deletion fragments of the vinculin tail were
performed. We used vinculin tail constructs tagged with MBP that had
previously been shown to bind to actin like the wild type vinculin tail
and are thus probably in a native conformation (49). MBP itself was not
phosphorylated by PKC. As shown in Fig. 3
and consistent with earlier results from our and other groups (27, 29),
a Vt-(893-1066) fragment comprising the five-helix bundle (H1-H5) and
the C terminus was readily phosphorylated by PKC. A C-terminal deletion
fragment, Vt-(893-985), was not phosphorylated (Fig. 3), although this
protein contained the lipid binding domain in helices H2-H3 and several consensus motifs for PKC phosphorylation sites. In contrast, the short
C-terminal construct Vt-(1016-1066) comprising helix H5 and the C
terminus, retained some phosphate incorporation (Fig. 3). This was
~20-30% of the value obtained for the intact tail, as judged by
densitometric analysis of the signal. This indicated that at least some
of the phosphorylation sites are located at the very C terminus of the
vinculin tail (amino acid residues 1016-1066) and that this part also
includes the main binding site for the kinase.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
C-terminal deletion of the vinculin tail
interferes with phosphorylation by PKC. MBP fusion proteins of
Vt-(893-1066), Vt-(893-985), and Vt-(1016-1066) were purified from
bacterial extracts. Equimolar amounts of protein were subjected to
phosphorylation by recombinant PKC . Proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE, and phosphorylated products are revealed by autoradiography.
Note that MBP alone was not phosphorylated, whereas a faint PKC
autophosphorylation signal can be seen (PKC).
|
|
PKC Phosphorylates Serines 1033 and 1045 in Helix H5--
PKC
binding to vinculin during cell spreading is expected to have two major
consequences, localization of the activated kinase to a specific site
and phosphorylation of the binding partner(s). To further dissect the
involvement of vinculin with respect to defining potential
phosphorylation sites and analyzing the lipid binding properties of the
C-terminal arm, a number of Vt mutants were generated by site-directed
mutagenesis (Fig. 4A). Serine and threonine residues within a PKC consensus motif (59) were selected
from accessible loop regions and the C terminus of the vinculin tail
structure to generate phosphorylation site-deficient Vt proteins (Fig.
4, A and B). Mutant proteins included alanine substitutions of Ser-941/Thr-43 and Ser-999 from loop regions as well
as Thr-1050/Thr-55 and Thr-1062 from the C terminus. However, phosphorylation assays with the corresponding recombinant Vt proteins and PKC
did not demonstrate a reduction of phosphate incorporation as compared with the wild type Vt protein (1.5 ± 0.3 mol of
phosphate/mol of Vt). This result renders it rather unlikely that any
of the potential phosphorylation sites selected (Fig. 4B)
contribute markedly to the overall phosphorylation. In contrast, when
proteolytic peptides of phosphorylated vinculin tail were generated
using Lys-C or Glu-C endopeptidase and subsequently analyzed by MALDI and electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy, peptides
containing phosphorylated Ser-1033 and Ser-1045 were detected. The
identity of these peptides and their phosphorylation sites were
verified by MS/MS sequencing (Fig. 4B). Both sites are
located in helix H5. This is consistent with our results on the
phosphorylation of the MBP-Vt-(1016-1066) polypeptide.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Phosphorylation and lipid-binding site
mutants of Vt-(858-1066). Mutants were designed on the basis of
the Vt structure that shows five amphipathic helices (H1-H5) forming an
antiparallel bundle with short interconnecting stretches and arms at
the N and C terminus (22). A, sequence of the wild type
Vt-(858-1066) expression construct with N-terminal epitope tags, His
and FLAG, and positions of the helices (gray boxes).
Positions of PKC phosphorylation site mutants are highlighted by
numbers and red letters and positions of
lipid-binding site mutants are highlighted by blue letters
or a blue bar (deletion). B, ribbon
representation of Vt-(879-1061) showing the steric orientation
of Ser/Thr sites with the PKC consensus motif that were mutated to
alanine (black) and actual phosphorylation sites identified
by mass spectroscopy after phosphorylation reaction (red).
Masses of proteolytic peptides and sequences that were received are
indicated (phosphoserine (S(P)). C,
comparison of the vinculin C terminus with characterized
PI4,5P2-binding sites of syndecan 4 (60) and of several
actin-binding proteins, with the consensus sequence
(K/R)X3-5(K/R)X(K/R)(K/R) (62).
Peptides that are known to form homo-oligomers in the presence of
PI4,5P2 are underlined. D, view of
the solvent-accessible surfaces of Vt-(879-1061) and Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q
(Vt-RK1060/61QQ)). Arrows indicate
positions of Arg-1060/Lys-61 side chains in the wild type
molecule and changes in the mutant. The coloring is according to
electrostatic potential, blue for positive and
red for negative. The binding capacity for acidic
phospholipids (i.e. PI4,5P2) of the C terminus
was modulated either by alteration of the net charge Vt-(T1062E) and
Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q) or by deletion, Vt-(858-1052) (views in B
and D are based on PDB entry 1QKR (22) using SwissPDB viewer
(48) and POVray 3.1.). ST941/943AA, S941A/T43A;
TT1050/55AA, T1050A/T55A.
|
|
C-terminal Mutations in the Predicted PI4,5P2-binding
Site Do Not Interfere with Actin Binding--
To estimate the
importance of the lipid-binding site at the vinculin C terminus for
PKC-vinculin interactions, we generated appropriate vinculin mutants.
The selection of relevant mutants was based on the characterization of
the PI4,5P2-binding site in syndecan 4 that is essential
for PKC docking to this protein (60). PI4,5P2 binding to
syndecan 4 induces the oligomerization of the short cytoplasmic tail
(61), which is also known for the vinculin tail (20). In addition, both
syndecan 4 (amino acids 183-202) and the vinculin C terminus
(1053-1066) do not contain the consensus motif described for
PI4,5P2 binding in actin binding proteins,
(K/R)X3-5(K/R)X(K/R)(K/R) (62) (Fig. 4C). As shown in Fig. 4D, we constructed two
point mutants with amino acid substitutions and one deletion mutant.
The mutant Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q) was expected to display reduced or no
binding of the negatively charged phosphoinositol ring (Fig.
4D), whereas the Vt-(T1062E) mutant should mimic the effect
of a phosphorylation on Thr-1062. The deletion mutant Vt-(858-1052)
was generated to probe the importance of the vinculin C terminus for
PKC binding.
As it had been shown previously that the binding of PI4,5P2
and actin to the vinculin tail can mutually affect each other (16, 27,
63), we tested the actin binding of the presumed PI4,5P2
binding mutants to exclude general effects on folding and ligand
binding properties. The mutants Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q) and Vt-(858-1052)
were tested for their interaction with F-actin in cosedimentation and
microscopic assays as well as in low shear viscometry (49, 54, 64). As
shown in Fig. 5, actin binding and
bundling was unaffected in standard high and low speed centrifugation assays (Fig. 5A, low speed data not shown), in actin-bundle
formation of the co-polymers (Fig. 5B), and in low shear
viscometry (data not shown). These results suggest that both mutant
proteins are in their native conformation.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
F-actin binding and organization is not
affected in lipid-binding site mutants, whereas binding to
PI4,5P2 is reduced. A, binding of the Vt mutants
Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q) (Vt-(RK1060/61QQ)) and Vt-(858-1052) to
F-actin was compared with wild type Vt by high speed cosedimentation.
Pairs of pellet (P) and supernatant (S) are shown
for a range of Vt to actin ratios on Coomassie-stained gels. Note that
both mutant proteins sediment with F-actin. B, F-actin
bundling, as monitored by fluorescence microscopy. Actin filaments were
polymerized in the presence of either Vt-(wild type), Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q),
or Vt-(858-1052) and stained with tetramethylrhodamine-labeled
phalloidin. Note that the bundling capacity of all three Vt proteins is
comparable. C, PI4,5P2 binding of Vt-(858-1052)
( ) and Vt-(wild type) ( ) was compared in an ELISA assay. Protein
(50 pmol each) was coated on plates and incubated with increasing
amounts of PI4,5P2. Binding of the lipid was monitored by
PI4,5P2-specific antiserum and expressed as mean
values ± S.D. for three independent experiments. Note that at low
concentrations of PI4,5P2, Vt-(wild type) binds more
efficiently than Vt-(858-1052), whereas at high concentrations the
same end point is reached.
|
|
Deletion of the Presumed PI4,5P2-binding Region at the
Vinculin C Terminus Results in Reduced Affinity for
PI4,5P2--
The Vt C-terminal arm seems critical for the
binding to PI4,5P2- and phosphatidylserine-containing
multilamellar vesicles. This was shown in cosedimentation assays using
a Vt-(879-1051) mutant (22). For our deletion mutant Vt-(858-1052),
we tested PI4,5P2-binding as compared with wild type Vt
using an ELISA assay (Fig. 5C). Vt proteins (50 pmol each)
were adsorbed to ELISA plates and incubated with 5-500 pmol of
PI4,5P2 vesicles in a total volume of 100 µl. Lipid
binding was monitored with a PI4,5P2-specific antibody as
described earlier (55). As shown in Fig. 5C, the deletion
mutant bound less lipid at lower PI4,5P2 concentrations than wild type, suggesting that the affinity of this mutant protein for
lipids is reduced. However, the overall capacity of lipid binding was
comparable for both proteins when saturation levels of
PI4,5P2 were reached.
PKC Binding to Vt Mutants of the C-terminal
PI4,5P2-binding Site Is Reduced--
The mutants described
and characterized above were used in phosphorylation assays to estimate
relative binding affinities of PKC for the lipid-binding site of the
Vt. Vt proteins were preincubated with PI4,5P2 and analyzed
for phosphorylation in a PKC-mixed micelle assay (52). There was no
difference in the total amount of phosphate incorporated between these
mutants and wild type Vt protein (1.5 ± 0.3 mol of phosphate/mol
of Vt protein). However, when the initial rate of phosphate
incorporation (<0.4 mol phosphate/mol of Vt) was tested using a low
enzyme to substrate ratio, a significant difference was observed.
Variance analysis was performed to compare incorporation rates using
data from four independent experiments. All substrate proteins showed a
linear time dependence of phosphate incorporation
(R2 > 0.97). As shown in Fig.
6, Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q) and the deletion Vt-(858-1052) exhibited only 50%, and Vt-(T1062E) exhibited 75% of
wild type phosphorylation rate. Hence, deletion of or mutations in the
presumptive lipid-binding motif at the vinculin C terminus affects the
kinase activity, suggesting a possible mechanism for a regulated
interaction between both proteins, PKC and vinculin, as a function of
local PI4,5P2 availability.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
PKC phosphorylation with a low enzyme to
substrate ratio reveals reduced phosphate incorporation rates for
PI4,5P2 binding-defective Vt mutants. Purified Vt
proteins were incubated with PI4,5P2 before the addition of
recombinant PKC . Kinase was activated by phosphatidylserine,
calcium, and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate in the
reaction mix. Substrate proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and
transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Phosphate incorporation was
quantified by phosphorimaging. A, representative
autoradiograph of substrate phosphorylation. B, graph
representing means ± S.E. of phosphate incorporation of Vt-(wild
type) ( ), Vt-(T1062E) ( ), Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q)
((Vt-RK1060/61QQ) ), and Vt-(858-1052) ( )
calculated from four independent experiments. arb. units,
arbitrary units. C, rates of phosphorylation (from data in
B) were compared by variance analysis (analysis of variance
for repeated measurements, Bonferroni/Dunn) using Statview 5.0 (p < 0.05). Note that the lipid binding mutants,
Vt-(R1060Q/K61Q), Vt-(858-1052), and Vt-(T1062E) show a significantly
reduced phosphate incorporation rate as compared with Vt-(wild
type).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this paper, we have analyzed the interaction of vinculin, a
prominent component of focal contacts, and PKC, a Ser/Thr kinase that
is known to be essential for cell adhesion and spreading of fibroblasts
and other cell types (1). The interaction between PKC
and vinculin
was monitored at an early time point (15 min) after seeding of HeLa
cells, when adhesion has been completed, and the initial phase of
spreading is induced. Engagement of integrins by a suitable substrate
is accompanied by a rapid activation and translocation of PKC to the
plasma membrane (4, 65). To trap a presumedly labile and transient
interaction of the kinase with vinculin at the membrane, we used a dual
strategy. First, we expressed a PKC
construct to increase the number
of kinase molecules available for complex formation with endogenous
vinculin. Second, we used a cross-linking protocol to preserve
membrane-associated complexes formed in situ that could be
disintegrated during cell lysis. The usefulness of DSP cross-linking in
stabilizing such complexes has previously been shown in several studies
(20, 66, 67). The validity of both strategies is also demonstrated by
the fact that the PKC-vinculin complexes identified were confined to
spreading but were not seen with fully spread cells.
Although PKC activation upon cell adhesion and spreading has been known
for almost a decade, downstream events involving specific PKC-substrate
interactions and the mechanism(s) underlying these time point- and
site-specific interactions are poorly understood. The conformation and
activation of both PKC and vinculin both depend on acidic phospholipids
(31, 68). Therefore, a mechanism controlling local availability of
these lipids at the plasma membrane must be important for a regulated
interaction. Local fluctuations of phospholipids may be regulated by
GAP43-like proteins. These proteins accumulate at
PI4,5P2-enriched rafts, where they co-distribute with
PI4,5P2 and promote its retention and clustering. Changes in actin dynamics are correlated with alterations in raft organization by GAP43-like proteins (7, 10). The myristoylated alanine-rich protein
kinase C substrate (MARCKS), a widely expressed member of this family,
possibly acts as a key regulator in cell spreading. Sequestering of
acidic phospholipids, phosphatidylserine, and PI4,5P2 in
membrane domains by MARCKS is abolished by PKC-dependent phosphorylation (69, 70), resulting in a local release of these lipids.
Furthermore, fibroblasts expressing a palmitoylated, permanently
membrane-bound mutant of MARCKS do not spread. This loss of function
was attributed to the fact that the PKC
phosphorylation-dependent, transient displacement of MARCKS
from the membrane was blocked (6). The control by PKC of this
"myristoyl-electrostatic switch" (71) during cell spreading might
form the basis for rapid and local acidic phospholipid-driven events.
Concomitantly, active PKC recruited during spreading to the plasma
membrane (4) can induce and modulate a
phospholipid-dependent activation of focal contact proteins
like vinculin.
In a dot-overlay assay, we analyzed the binding of PKC
to
vinculin to better understand the characteristics of this
(protein-lipid)-protein interaction. By comparison of vinculin and
vinculin tail binding to in vitro translated PKC
or an
inactive mutant, respectively, we demonstrated that the lipid-bound
vinculin tail provides a Ca2+-dependent binding
site for the PKC regulatory domain. In our assay, vinculin and its tail
fragment were membrane-adsorbed after preincubation with
PI4,5P2. With this protocol a
Ca2+-dependent interaction with PKC was
observed that resisted intensive washing with TBST. Earlier, Hyatt
et al. (72) performed an overlay analysis with
membrane-bound vinculin and a partially purified PKC fraction and
observed a reversible interaction. The complex required the continuous
presence of lipids and Ca2+ throughout the washing and
staining procedure or, alternatively, a fixation step after kinase
addition. Fixation resulted in a residual binding of PKC
even in the
absence of Ca2+. The apparent discrepancy between the
results obtained by both procedures can be explained by the different
mode of lipid application. The addition of the lipid to membrane-bound
vinculin will loosen its intramolecular head-to-tail bonding and allow
a lipid-mediated binding of the kinase. In contrast, pretreatment of
soluble vinculin with PI4,5P2 results in the formation of
vinculin tail oligomers (20) that bind the lipid tightly, which
probably reflects the in vivo situation (56, 73). A similar
effect of the state of oligomerization on the binding of PKC to a
lipid-presenting partner was observed for syndecan 4. The cytoplasmic
tail of syndecan 4 binds to and activates PKC
only in its
lipid-bound, oligomeric conformation (61, 74). Oligomerization of the
syndecan 4 tail is inhibited by phosphorylation on Ser-183, which
results in a reduction of PKC activity by 1 order of magnitude
(74).
In a mixed micelle assay, we show that binding of PKC and subsequent
phosphorylation require and are probably restricted to the C-terminal
part of the vinculin tail (985-1066). This corroborates earlier
reports that located the main PKC phosphorylation site(s) to the
vinculin tail (27, 29). Surprisingly, some of the sites in Vt with a
PKC consensus motif, Ser-941 and Ser-999, predicted to be attractive
sites for PKC phosphorylation (15) as well as the C-terminal threonine
residues (Thr-1050, -55, -62) were not phosphorylated in our in
vitro assay. In contrast, serines 1033 and 1045 in helix H5,
adjacent to the PKC-binding site, were phosphorylated, and we have
preliminary data indicating one to two further sites in helices H3 and
H4.2 In the compact
conformation of the vinculin tail (879-1066) that has been determined
by x-ray structure analysis (22) the phosphorylation sites identified
so far appear to be readily accessible for the kinase. Ser-1033 and
-1045 both lie within the binding site for the vinculin head
(1009-1066) (24, 27, 75) and the C-terminal binding site for F-actin
(1016-1066) (49). Conversely, engagement of vinculin head or
actin-binding sites on the Vt might modulate PKC-dependent
phosphorylation. This concept is supported by an early study showing
that talin, a ligand of the vinculin head domain, can increase
PKC-dependent vinculin phosphorylation, whereas binding of
vinculin to F-actin decreases phosphorylation (76).
Remarkably, the two acidic phospholipid-binding sites in vinculin
tail, amino acids 916-970 in helices H2, H3 (23) and amino acids
1053-1066, representing the hydrophobic finger at the C terminus
(22), differed in their capacity to attract PKC. Although constructs
including these sites individually, MBP-Vt-(893-985) and
MBP-Vt-(1016-1066), both perform homotypic interactions (49), bind to
PI4,5P2 (20), and contain PKC consensus phosphorylation sites (Ref. 59 and this study), only the short Vt-(1016-1066) peptide
is accepted as a PKC substrate. This striking difference may result
from the configuration by which the lipid moiety is bound to the
respective peptide, thereby influencing the capacity of the PKC
regulatory domain to bind the Vt-lipid complexes. This notion is
supported by our kinetic analysis of the phosphorylation of
Vt-(858-1066) C-terminal lipid-binding site mutants. Mutants that were
designed to reduce binding of the negatively charged head group of
PI4,5P2 show a reduced phosphorylation rate (25-50%), although the overall organization and activity was not affected, as
judged by their capacity to interact with F-actin. Furthermore, the
effect on the phosphorylation rates not simply reflects a reduced
oligomerization of the vinculin tail mutants, since the deletion mutant
Vt-(858-1052) shows an increased capacity to oligomerize upon addition
of PI4,5P2 as compared with Vt-(wild
type).2 The syndecan 4/PKC
binding might again
serve as a model. For this pair, a biophysical analysis suggests that
PI4,5P2 mediates their interaction, and PKC binding
affinity mainly derives from its interaction with the inositol head
group (60). The reduced initial rate of phosphorylation observed for
lipid-binding site mutants of Vt suggests that PI4,5P2
binding to the C terminus can control interaction kinetics with PKC
.
Given the low number of PKC molecules in cells as compared with
vinculin, a lipid-induced rise in binding affinity may provide a
mechanism for efficient phosphorylation of vinculin at the time point
when focal contacts are being formed.
Although there are some reports on vinculin phosphorylation in cells
(77, 78), it has proven difficult to establish conditions of
phosphorylation. There are, however, two reports analyzing specific
activation events that provide evidence for a PKC-dependent phosphorylation and/or major subcellular redistribution of vinculin in
adherent cells. During Ca2+-induced junctional sealing in
Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, a PKC inhibitor-sensitive
redistribution of vinculin was observed. Phosphorylation of Ser/Thr
residues on vinculin immunoprecipitated from cell extracts was
dependent on PKC activity (79). Treatment of confluent epithelial cells
(Int 407) with the inflammatory mediator leukotriene D4 resulted
in a dissociation of vinculin from a complex containing
-catenin and
an increased localization to focal contacts. These effects were
mimicked by the PKC activator 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol
13-acetate (TPA) and blocked by the specific inhibitor bisin-dolylmaleimide I (GF109203X) (80).
So far, the mode of regulation of vinculin and its function in modeling
cell adhesion sites have escaped a comprehensive analysis. Our results
indicate a lipid-dependent mechanism for the release of the
inhibitory vinculin head-tail interaction by induction of
membrane-associated PKC activity. The principles of this model are
outlined in Fig. 7. Spreading-induced
activation of PKC at the plasma membrane leads to the phosphorylation
of GAP43 family proteins, like MARCKS. Phospho-MARCKS has a reduced
binding affinity for acidic phospholipids and is released from
PI4,5P2-enriched rafts. Cytosolic vinculin gains access to
the surface of rafts, where PI4,5P2 binding releases the
head-tail interaction, thereby activating cryptic binding and
homo-oligomerization sites in the molecule. Upon oligomerization of the
vinculin tail, a docking site for PKC is provided. PKC phosphorylation
of the vinculin tail and/or vinculin binding partners is expected to
regulate the incorporation of vinculin in nascent cell adhesion
complexes. Because of the large number of acidic phospholipid binding
molecules involved in the regulation of the membrane-anchored actin
cytoskeleton (2, 10), such a model may be expanded to other
proteins.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Putative model for a conformational
activation of vinculin (Vinc). I, upon
cell-matrix adhesion PKC is translocated to and activated (*) at the
membrane, where the kinase phosphorylates GAP43-like proteins,
e.g. MARCKS, displacing them from PI4,5P2 rafts.
II, locally increased PI4,5P2 attracts
lipid-binding proteins, e.g. vinculin and induces
conformational changes and/or oligomerization. III,
lipid-bound oligomeric vinculin tail serves as a PKC-docking site,
which leads to the phosphorylation and activation of vinculin and/or
vinculin binding partners (see "Discussion," last
paragraph).
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to P. Parker for the gift of
the PKC
cDNA and to S. Huttelmaier and K. Schluter for providing
Vt protein and actin, respectively. We thank E. Saxinger for technical
assistance, U. Beutling and S. Hermann for assistance with mass
spectroscopy, and D. Critchley, J. Norman, and S. Illenberger for
stimulating discussion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was financially supported by the German Research
Council.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: w.
ziegler{at}tu-bs.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110008200
2
W. H. Ziegler, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PKC, protein kinase
C;
PI4, 5P2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate;
DSP, dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate);
Vt, vinculin tail;
MBP, maltose-binding protein;
BiPro, birch profilin tag;
Ni-NTA, Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid complex;
TBST, Tris-buffered
saline with Tween 20;
MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization;
MS, mass spectroscopy;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay;
MARCKS, myristoylated alanine-rich protein kinase C
substrate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Clark, E.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1995)
Science
268,
233-239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Jockusch, B. M.,
Bubeck, P.,
Giehl, K.,
Kroemker, M.,
Moschner, J.,
Rothkegel, M.,
Rudiger, M.,
Schluter, K.,
Stanke, G.,
and Winkler, J.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
11,
379-416[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Yamada, K. M.,
and Geiger, B.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
76-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Vuori, K.,
and Ruoslahti, E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21459-21462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Defilippi, P.,
Venturino, M.,
Gulino, D.,
Duperray, A.,
Boquet, P.,
Fiorentini, C.,
Volpe, G.,
Palmieri, M.,
Silengo, L.,
and Tarone, G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21726-21734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Myat, M. M.,
Anderson, S.,
Allen, L. A.,
and Aderem, A.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
611-614[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Laux, T.,
Fukami, K.,
Thelen, M.,
Golub, T.,
Frey, D.,
and Caroni, P.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1455-1472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Hinchliffe, K.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
104-105
|
| 9.
|
Raucher, D.,
Stauffer, T.,
Chen, W.,
Shen, K.,
Guo, S.,
York, J. D.,
Sheetz, M. P.,
and Meyer, T.
(2000)
Cell
100,
221-228[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Caroni, P.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
4332-4336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Matsui, T.,
Yonemura, S.,
and Tsukita, S.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
1259-1262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Yamamoto, M.,
Hilgemann, D. H.,
Feng, S.,
Bito, H.,
Ishihara, H.,
Shibasaki, Y.,
and Yin, H. L.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
867-876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Hartwig, J. H.,
Bokoch, G. M.,
Carpenter, C. L.,
Janmey, P. A.,
Taylor, L. A.,
Toker, A.,
and Stossel, T. P.
(1995)
Cell
82,
643-653[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Barkalow, K.,
Witke, W.,
Kwiatkowski, D. J.,
and Hartwig, J. H.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
389-399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Critchley, D. R.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
133-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Gilmore, A. P.,
and Burridge, K.
(1996)
Nature
381,
531-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Martel, V.,
Racaud-Sultan, C.,
Dupe, S.,
Marie, C.,
Paulhe, F.,
Galmiche, A.,
Block, M. R.,
and Albiges-Rizo, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
21217-21227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Fukami, K.,
Furuhashi, K.,
Inagaki, M.,
Endo, T.,
Hatano, S.,
and Takenawa, T.
(1992)
Nature
359,
150-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Furuhashi, K.,
Inagaki, M.,
Hatano, S.,
Fukami, K.,
and Takenawa, T.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
184,
1261-1265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Huttelmaier, S.,
Mayboroda, O.,
Harbeck, B.,
Jarchau, T.,
Jockusch, B. M.,
and Rudiger, M.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
479-488[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Winkler, J.,
Lunsdorf, H.,
and Jockusch, B. M.
(1996)
J. Struct. Biol.
116,
270-277[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Bakolitsa, C.,
de Pereda, J. M.,
Bagshaw, C. R.,
Critchley, D. R.,
and Liddington, R. C.
(1999)
Cell
99,
603-613[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Johnson, R. P.,
Niggli, V.,
Durrer, P.,
and Craig, S. W.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
10211-10222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Johnson, R. P.,
and Craig, S. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12611-12619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Johnson, R. P.,
and Craig, S. W.
(1995)
Nature
373,
261-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Kroemker, M.,
Rudiger, A. H.,
Jockusch, B. M.,
and Rudiger, M.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
355,
259-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Weekes, J.,
Barry, S. T.,
and Critchley, D. R.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
314,
827-832
|
| 28.
|
Jockusch, B. M.,
and Rudiger, M.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol.
6,
311-315[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Schwienbacher, C.,
Jockusch, B. M.,
and Rudiger, M.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
384,
71-74[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Dekker, L. V.,
and Parker, P. J.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci
19,
73-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Nishizuka, Y.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
484-496[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Woods, A.,
and Couchman, J. R.
(1992)
J. Cell Sci.
101,
277-290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Miranti, C. K.,
Ohno, S.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10571-10581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Jaken, S.,
Leach, K.,
and Klauck, T.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
697-704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Barry, S. T.,
and Critchley, D. R.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
2033-2045[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Chun, J. S., Ha, M. J.,
and Jacobson, B. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13008-13012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Haller, H.,
Lindschau, C.,
Maasch, C.,
Olthoff, H.,
Kurscheid, D.,
and Luft, F. C.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
82,
157-165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Liliental, J.,
and Chang, D. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2379-2383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Oh, E. S.,
Woods, A.,
and Couchman, J. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8133-8136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Zhang, X. A.,
Bontrager, A. L.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
25005-25013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Saoncella, S.,
Echtermeyer, F.,
Denhez, F.,
Nowlen, J. K.,
Mosher, D. F.,
Robinson, S. D.,
Hynes, R. O.,
and Goetinck, P. F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
2805-2810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Hemler, M. E.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
578-585[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Jaken, S.,
and Parker, P. J.
(2000)
Bioessays
22,
245-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Turner, C. E.,
Pavalko, F. M.,
and Burridge, K.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
11938-11944[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Stossel, T. P.,
Condeelis, J.,
Cooley, L.,
Hartwig, J. H.,
Noegel, A.,
Schleicher, M.,
and Shapiro, S. S.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
2,
138-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Rudiger, M.,
Jockusch, B. M.,
and Rothkegel, M.
(1997)
Biotechniques
23,
96-97[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Ohno, S.,
Konno, Y.,
Akita, Y.,
Yano, A.,
and Suzuki, K.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
6296-6300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Guex, N.,
and Peitsch, M. C.
(1997)
Electrophoresis
18,
2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Huttelmaier, S.,
Bubeck, P.,
Rudiger, M.,
and Jockusch, B. M.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
247,
1136-1142[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Feramisco, J. R.,
and Burridge, K.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
1194-1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Spudich, J. A.,
and Watt, S.
(1971)
J. Biol. Chem.
246,
4866-4871 |