|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M210174200 on December 24, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 10, 7996-8005, March 7, 2003
Molecular Basis of H2O2 Resistance
Mediated by Streptococcal Dpr
DEMONSTRATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL INVOLVEMENT OF THE PUTATIVE
FERROXIDASE CENTER BY SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS IN STREPTOCOCCUS
SUIS*
Arto Tapio
Pulliainen ,
Sauli
Haataja,
Sanni
Kähkönen, and
Jukka
Finne
From the Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Turku, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
Received for publication, October 4, 2002, and in revised form, December 23, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
H2O2 is an
unavoidable cytotoxic by-product of aerobic life. Dpr, a recently
discovered member of the Dps protein family, provides a means for
catalase-negative bacteria to tolerate H2O2. Potentially, Dpr could bind free intracellular iron and thus inhibit the Fenton chemistry-catalyzed formation of toxic hydroxyl radicals (H2O2 + Fe2+ ·OH + -OH + Fe3+). We explored the in
vivo function of Dpr in the catalase- and NADH
peroxidase-negative pig and human pathogen Streptococcus suis. We show that: (i) a Dpr allelic exchange knockout mutant was hypersensitive (~106-fold) to
H2O2, (ii) Dpr incorporated iron in
vivo, (iii) a putative ferroxidase center was present in Dpr,
(iv) single amino acid substitutions D74A or E78A to the putative
ferroxidase center abolished the in vivo iron
incorporation, and (v) the H2O2 hypersensitive phenotype was complemented by wild-type Dpr or by a membrane-permeating iron chelator, but not by the site-mutated forms of Dpr. These results demonstrate that the putative ferroxidase center of Dpr is functionally active in iron incorporation and that the
H2O2 resistance is mediated by Dpr in
vivo by its iron binding activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Aerobic metabolism is essential for many living organisms for the
production of energy. However, partially reduced forms of oxygen
superoxide anion radical (O ), hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (·OH) are
formed and able to cause serious damage to cellular macromolecules (1-3). Despite the lack of oxidative phosphorylation,
H2O2 is produced by streptococci (4-7). In
addition, H2O2 is encountered as a part of host
defenses (8), and under certain conditions streptococci seem to utilize
it as their own virulence factor (4, 9, 10). However, streptococci lack
the H2O2-degrading enzyme catalase, which in
many organisms is responsible for the elimination of
H2O2. Identification and characterization of
the components mediating H2O2 resistance in
streptococci may eventually contribute to the development of means to
prevent and treat streptococcal diseases.
Dpr (Dps-like peroxide resistance
protein) is a recently discovered aerotolerance and
H2O2 resistance factor of Streptococcus mutans (11). Although Dpr is widely conserved in other
Gram-positive bacteria, including the important human pathogens
Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus
pneumoniae (11), relatively little is known of the molecular
mechanisms of its action. The primary amino acid sequence shares
similarity with Escherichia coli Dps (DNA-binding
protein from starved cells) (12, 13), a prototype for a large group of similar oligomeric proteins (14), which is
abundantly expressed in starved cells and involved in DNA protection by
DNA-Dps biocrystal formation (15, 16). Studies on Dps family members
also indicate that the protective function of Dpr against H2O2 might be mediated by
H2O2 degradation due to a catalase-like activity (14) or by chelation of free intracellular iron (17).
It is known that toxicity of H2O2
is relatively weak (3), although it easily diffuses across biological
membranes (18, 19) and oxidize thiols (3). However, if reduced
transition metal ions, especially iron, are present,
H2O2 is nonenzymatically cleaved into highly
toxic hydroxyl radicals by Fenton chemistry (H2O2 + Fe2+ ·OH + -OH + Fe3+) (20, 21). Dps family members share
a conserved amino acid motif, similar to mammalian ferritin
L-subunit iron nucleation center, in the N-terminal halves
of the proteins (14, 22-24). Because several members, including the
streptococcal Dpr (11, 25), are known to bind iron (17, 22, 26, 27),
the conserved motif is believed to serve a functional role. It has been
suggested that the motif catalyzes iron oxidation by its putative
ferroxidase activity and also directs the formation of an iron core
into the inner cavity of the oligomer (17, 22, 28, 29). However, there
is no direct experimental evidence for any of the Dps family members to
support the functionality of the putative ferroxidase center in iron
incorporation in vivo. Furthermore, the biological significance of iron incorporation is not well established.
Streptococcus suis is an important pig pathogen that causes
severe infections such as sepsis and meningitis, and it
occasionally causes life-threatening disease also in humans
(30). We have previously identified in S. suis a
galactose-specific adhesion activity (31-33). One of the proteins
identified as a candidate adhesin displaying binding activity to
glycoproteins had a 64% primary amino acid sequence identity with
S. mutans Dpr.1
S. suis seemed an ideal model organism to study the in
vivo function of Dpr in H2O2 resistance
because it not only lacks catalase but also lacks NADH peroxidase (34).
The results of the present study demonstrate that the putative
ferroxidase center of Dpr is involved in iron incorporation and that
the H2O2 resistance mediated by Dpr depends on
its iron incorporation activity in vivo.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Primers
The bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers used
in this study are listed in Tables I and
II. S. suis was cultured
aerobically or under 6% CO2 at 37 °C with or without
agitation in Todd Hewitt Broth medium (DIFCO) supplemented with
0.5% (w/v) yeast extract (Biokar Diagnostics)
(THY).2 E. coli
was grown aerobically at 37 °C with agitation in Luria-Bertani medium. When needed, media were solidified by 1.5% agar. All bacteria were stored at 70 °C in growth media containing 15% (v/v)
glycerol. Antibiotics (Sigma) were used at the following concentrations unless otherwise indicated: (i) E. coli, 100 µg/ml
ampicillin, 30 µg/ml kanamycin, 100 µg/ml spectinomycin, and 30 µg/ml chloramphenicol; and (ii) S. suis, 20 µg/ml
ampicillin, 500 µg/ml kanamycin, 1000 µg/ml spectinomycin, and 10 µg/ml chloramphenicol.
DNA Techniques
Genomic DNA of S. suis was isolated as
described previously (38). Standard protocols were used for PCR, DNA
modification, cloning, E. coli transformation, and Southern
and colony hybridization as described by Sambrook and Russel (39).
DNA-modifying enzymes were purchased from Promega and Fermentas, and
Vent DNA polymerase was purchased from New England Biolabs. DNA
molecular mass markers were from Promega. Plasmids amplified in
E. coli DH5 were isolated using QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit
(Qiagen) as described by the manufacturer. DNA fragments were purified
from agarose gels using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit or from PCR and
other enzymatic reactions using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit as
described by the manufacturer (Qiagen). DNA sequences were determined
by ABI Prism Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) with AmpliTaq DNA Polymerase FS (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). Sequencing primers were purchased from
Interactiva Biotechnologie GmbH. For Southern, Northern, and colony
hybridization, radioactive DNA probes were labeled with
[ -32P]CTP (Amersham Biosciences) using Prime-a-Gene
Labeling System (Promega) according to the instructions of the
manufacturer. Templates for labeling were generated by PCR using
primers DPR-5'-IN and DPR-3'-IN specific for dpr and 16S-5'
and 16S-3' specific for 16S rRNA genes and gel-isolated before
labeling. The hybridized membranes were analyzed with Fujifilm
BA-2500 Phosphor Imaging Plate System (Fuji Photo Film Co.) according
to the instructions of the manufacturer.
Cloning and Sequence Analysis of the dpr Locus
Southern hybridization was used to identify a 6.5-kb
ClaI-EcoRI genomic fragment that seemed to
contain the entire dpr from S. suis serotype 2 strain 628 (data not shown). To clone the 6.5-kb fragment, we ligated
gel-isolated, ClaI- and EcoRI-digested DNA fragments ranging from 6 to 7 kb into
EcoRI-NarI-digested pBR322, electrotransformed
the ligation mixture into E. coli DH5 cells, and screened
the transformants by colony hybridization. One hybridizing clone, designated pDPR6500, was isolated and sequenced. Sequencing data
were assembled, and the consensus sequence was edited using the MAC
DNAsis software (Hitachi). The web-based program ORF Finder (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html) was used to predict the coding
regions. The BLAST software package at the National Center for
Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used to search for
protein sequences homologous to the deduced amino acid sequences.
Promoter sequence features were searched using WWW Signal Scan
(bimas.dcrt.nih.gov/molbio/signal).
Electrotransformation of S. suis
Overnight S. suis cultures were diluted 100-fold into
50 ml of fresh THY supplemented with 30 mM glycin. Cultures
were incubated at 37 °C with slight agitation to
A600 of ~0.2. Cells were harvested by
centrifugation (2000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C) and washed
twice with 10 ml of ice-cold 0.5 M sucrose (2000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C) and once with 10 ml of ice-cold 0.5 M sucrose supplemented with 15% (v/v) glycerol (2000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C). The cells were resuspended in 50 µl of ice-cold 0.5 M sucrose supplemented with 15%
glycerol (v/v) and were either used directly or stored at 70 °C.
Electrotransformations were done using the Gene Pulser II
Electroporation System (Bio-Rad). 1 µg of suicide vector or 100 ng of
shuttle vector was mixed with 50 µl of the electrocompetent cells on
ice. The mixtures were transferred into prechilled sterile Gene Pulser
cuvettes (interelectrode distance, 0.1 cm; Bio-Rad) and pulsed with a
setting of 15 microfarads, 1.8 kV, and 200 ohms. After the electric
pulse, the cells were diluted in 1 ml of THY supplemented with 0.3 M sucrose and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C under 6%
CO2. The cells were then plated on THY agar containing the
appropriate antibiotics. The cells routinely yielded ~106
transformants/µg shuttle vector.
Isolation of Total RNA and Northern Hybridization
For extraction of total RNA, overnight S. suis
cultures were diluted 100-fold into fresh THY and grown at 37 °C
with vigorous shaking. At various levels of turbidity, 1-ml aliquots
were taken from the cultures. The cells were harvested by
centrifugation (15,000 × g, 2 min, 4 °C),
immediately snap-frozen in liquid N2, and stored at
70 °C. The cells were later thawed, and total RNA was extracted
using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) according to instructions of the
manufacturer. 20 µg of RNA was electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel
containing 2.2 M formaldehyde. The RNA Ladder (New England
Biolabs) served as a molecular mass marker. After electrophoresis, the
RNA was transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences).
Hybridization and washing conditions were performed as described by
Sambrook and Russel (39).
Preparation of Cellular Protein Extracts of S. suis
Overnight S. suis cultures were diluted 100-fold into
fresh THY and grown at 37 °C with vigorous shaking. At various
levels of turbidity, cells were harvested by centrifugation (2000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C), washed with Pi/NaCl (10 mM sodium phosphate buffer and 0.15 M NaCl (pH
7.4)) (2000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C), and resuspended in
750 µl of Pi/NaCl. The cells were disrupted by sonication
five times (20 s each time), with a chilling interval of 1 min between the sonications. EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Mixture Tablets (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) were added to the sonicates according to
instructions of the manufacturer. After unbroken cells and cell debris
were removed by centrifugation (15,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C), the cleared lysate was collected and stored at 4 °C.
Protein concentrations were determined at least in triplicate using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay, based on the Bradford dye binding procedure (40), using bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma) as a standard.
Preparation of Polyclonal Antibodies Specific for Dpr
Expression and purification of recombinant Dpr have been
described previously (41). Two rabbits were immunized subcutaneously with 1.0 ml of a mixture of the recombinant Dpr (100 µg/ml) and Freund's complete adjuvant (1:1, v/v). Booster injections with the
same protein mixture in Freund's incomplete adjuvant were given at 28 and 56 days, and sera were collected 14 days after each immunization.
The sera collected 14 days after the last booster had the highest
activity against Dpr and were used for subsequent work.
Western Analysis of Dpr Expression
For Western blotting, the proteins were resolved under
denaturing conditions in a 12% polyacrylamide gel or under
nondenaturing conditions in a 4-15% gradient Tris-HCl Ready Gel
(Bio-Rad) using SDS-PAGE Low Range (Bio-Rad) or equine spleen type I
ferritin (Sigma) and BSA as the molecular mass markers, respectively.
Proteins were subsequently transferred to a Protran Nitrocellulose
Transfer Membrane (Schleicher & Schell) using the 2117 Multiphor II
Electrophoresis Unit (LKB Bromma). The membranes were saturated with
3% (w/v) BSA and 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 in Pi/NaCl at room
temperature for 1 h. The anti-Dpr polyclonal antibodies were
diluted 1:10,000 in 1% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 in
Pi/NaCl, and the membranes were incubated at room
temperature for 30 min. After washing with Pi/NaCl, the
membranes were incubated at room temperature for 30 min in 1% BSA
(w/v) and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 in Pi/NaCl containing a
1:10,000 dilution of peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (DAKO). After washing with Pi/NaCl, the ECL
chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Biosciences) was used to
detect the binding according to instructions of the manufacturer.
Inactivation of dpr in S. suis
We generated a genetically stable deletion mutant
(D282 dpr) of the dpr by adopting the double
cross-over method.
Construction of the Suicide Vector pDPR2--
A 2.8-kb fragment
around the dpr was amplified by PCR using primers TOT-5' and
TOT-3'. The resulting PCR product was digested with BclI and
KpnI, and the resulting 2.6-kb fragment was cloned into the
KpnI-BamHI site of pID700 to generate pDPR1. The
dpr was deleted from the pDPR1 by PCR with primers DEL-5'
and DEL-3' and replaced by a spectinomycin resistance gene
(spc) devoid of terminator generated by PCR with primers
SPCS and SPCA using pKUN19-Spc as the template. The resulting plasmid,
pDPR2, was analyzed by restriction enzyme digestions and PCR to contain
the spc in the same direction of transcription as the
dpr.
Generation of the Mutant--
Because strain 628 has been poorly
transformable in our hands, we used D282 cells of same serotype and
with identical dpr sequence as strain 628, and colonies with
the single cross-over genotype (ChlR, SpcR)
were selected. One ChlR and SpcR colony was
chosen, and the double cross-over genotype (SpcR) was
selected as follows. Single cross-over mutant was first grown overnight
with spectinomycin (1000 µg/ml), allowing the vector to excise out of
the genome, leaving the spc in the place of the
dpr. Resulting double cross-over mutants were enriched by
using the bacteriostatic activity of chloramphenicol (10 µg/ml) and
at the same time killing the dividing bacteria (still having the vector
insertion) by using ampicillin (20 µg/ml). The enriched bacteria were
plated on THY with spectinomycin, and the double cross-over genotype
(SpcR) was verified by replica plating. The replacement of
dpr by spc was further verified by PCR with
primers DPR-5'-OUT and DPR-3'-OUT annealing upstream and downstream of
dpr, respectively, and by Western analysis.
Ectopic Expression of Dpr in D282 dpr
The dpr mutation was complemented by introducing
wild-type dpr into D282 dpr in an E. coli/Streptococcus sp. shuttle vector pLZ12-Km/Spc.
pLZ12-Km/Spc was generated by ligating the spc generated by
PCR with primers SPCS and SPCB using pKUN19-Spc as the template to
NcoI/EcoRI-digested pLZ12-Km. Two
dpr-containing DNA fragments, L4A and P3, were amplified by
PCR using primers 5'-DCOMP and 3'-COMP or 5'-UPCOMP and 3'-COMP,
respectively. These DNA fragments were digested with KpnI
and ligated into KpnI-digested and dephosphorylated pLZ12-Km/Spc to generate the plasmid constructs pLZ12-L4A and pLZ12-P3,
respectively. In these constructs, dpr transcription is
under the control of spc promoter or the possible promoter activity of dpr upstream sequence. The constructs were
sequenced to ensure that no mistakes were introduced into
dpr during the amplification and introduced into
D282 dpr, and complementation genotype (SpcR,
KanR) was selected on agar plates. The expression of Dpr
was verified by Western analysis.
Site-directed PCR Mutagenesis
Codons encoding Asp-74 (GAT) and Glu-78 (GAG) were independently
mutated into GCA (Ala) in the pLZ12-L4A, resulting in plasmids pLZ12-L4A-74 and pLZ12-L4A-78, respectively. Briefly, pLZ12-L4A was
linearized by PCR using the mutagenic oligonucleotides (DPR-AspA and
DPR-NAT-3'A for D74A and DPR-GluB and DPR-NAT-3'B for E78A) as follows:
40 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 65 °C, and 6 min at 72 °C for 15 cycles. The products from tubes containing varying amounts of
Mg2+ were pooled, purified, and digested with
DpnI to reduce the number of parental molecules. The
linearized PCR products were treated with T4 polynucleotide kinase,
gel-isolated, religated, and transformed to E. coli DH5 .
All mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The resulting
constructs were introduced into D282 dpr, and
complementation genotype (SpcR, KanR) was
selected on agar plates. Expression of Dpr was verified by Western analysis.
Radiometric Determination of Iron Content of Dpr
Overnight S. suis cultures were diluted 100-fold into
25 ml of fresh THY containing 55FeCl3 (663.3 MBq/mg; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) as 0.35 MBq/ml and grown to
early-stationary phase at 37 °C with vigorous shaking. The bacteria
were harvested by centrifugation (2000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C), washed once with Pi/NaCl (2000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C), and resuspended in 750 µl of
Pi/NaCl. Cellular protein extracts were prepared as
described. For determination of iron content of Dpr, 50 µg of
cellular protein extracts was resolved under nondenaturing conditions
in a 4-15% gradient Tris-HCl Ready Gel (Bio-Rad). After the run, one
gel was stained with Coomassie Blue to show the pattern of protein
bands for equal loading in each lane, and another gel was placed
between two plastic sheets and analyzed for 55Fe-containing
proteins using Fujifilm BA-2500 Phosphor Imaging Plate System (Fuji
Photo Film Co.) according to instructions of the manufacturer.
H2O2 Sensitivity Assays
Overnight S. suis cultures were diluted 100-fold into
fresh THY and grown to early-stationary phase at 37 °C with vigorous shaking. At this point, 1-ml aliquots were taken from the cultures and
exposed to H2O2 in concentrations of 0, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 mM. Cells were left in contact with
H2O2 for 2 h at 37 °C without agitation. Immediately after the incubation, cells were diluted in
Pi/NaCl and plated for viability counts onto THY agar.
Colonies were counted after overnight incubation under 6%
CO2 at 37 °C. In the iron chelator complementation
analysis of the H2O2 hypersensitivity of
D282 dpr, 1-ml aliquots of early-stationary phase cultures were first incubated with deferoxamine mesylate (DFOM) (Sigma) or
diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) (Sigma) at concentrations of 0, 10, 50, and 100 µM for 30 min at 37 °C without
agitation. The cells were then incubated with or without 5.0 mM H2O2 for 2 h at 37 °C
without agitation. Immediately after the incubation, cells were diluted
in Pi/NaCl and plated for viability counts onto THY agar.
Colonies were counted after overnight incubation under 6%
CO2 at 37 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
General Features of S. suis dpr Locus--
We have previously
identified in S. suis a galactose-specific adhesion activity
(31-33) and purified a candidate adhesin (42). Recently, the
corresponding gene was cloned, based on peptide sequence data of the
purified protein and by genome walking.1 The gene turned
out to encode a protein with 64% identity and 82% similarity to
S. mutans Dpr (NCBI Protein Database accession number
BAA96472) at the level of primary amino acid sequence. In the
present study, we identified by Southern hybridization and subsequently
cloned and sequenced a 6.5-kb ClaI-EcoRI fragment containing the entire dpr. As shown in Fig.
1A, we identified eight
possible ORFs in addition to dpr, some of which were in the
same direction of transcription. This indicated that dpr
might be transcribed in a multicistronic mRNA. To study this
possibility, we first analyzed the upstream region of dpr
for sequence features commonly associated with bacterial promoters. As
shown in Fig. 2, we found a possible
-factor 10 recognition sequence TATAAT and a 35 recognition
sequence TTGCAA between ORFI and dpr. A putative
Shine-Dalgarno box was found a few nucleotides upstream of the
initiation codon. Northern hybridization demonstrated that dpr is transcribed monocistronically with an approximate
mRNA size of 550 bp (Fig. 1B). Thus, there seems to be a
functional promoter between ORFI and dpr possibly including
the sequence features found in this study (Fig. 2). However, further
work including primer extension analysis is needed to characterize the
putative dpr promoter.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
General features and organization of the
dpr locus. A, genetic and physical map
of the cloned 6.5-kb ClaI-EcoRI fragment of
S. suis serotype 2 strain 628. Recognition sites for a few
commonly used restriction enzymes are indicated. The arrows
represent potential ORFs with more than 300 nucleotides complete coding
sequence. For possible functions of the gene products, see Table III.
B, Northern hybridization analysis of total RNA (20 µg)
with a dpr-specific DNA probe to reveal the size of
dpr mRNA.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Predicted promoter sequence features of
dpr and complementation strategy of dpr
mutation. Predicted promoter sequence features are
boxed. The predicted Shine-Dalgarno box is
underlined. The initiation codon of dpr is shown
in capital letters. The dpr mutation was
complemented by a wild-type dpr in E. coli/Streptococcus sp. shuttle vector pLZ12-Km/Spc. The
KpnI site of spc (shown as a black
bar) was used as an insertion site for the dpr
fragments. pLZ12-L4A and pLZ12-P3 were introduced into
D282 dpr, resulting in strains D282L4A and D282P3,
respectively.
|
|
Inactivation and Complementation of dpr in S. suis--
The
sequence information of the 6.5-kb ClaI-EcoRI
fragment allowed us to construct a suicide plasmid pDPR2 and
subsequently generate a dpr knockout mutant
(D282 dpr) using allelic replacement (Fig.
3A). PCR analysis with primers
DPR-5'-OUT and DPR-3'-OUT annealing upstream and downstream of
dpr, respectively, confirmed the replacement of
dpr by spc by homologous recombination (Fig. 3B). This was further verified by Western analysis (Fig.
3C). The dpr mutation was complemented by
introducing wild-type dpr into D282 dpr in an
E. coli/Streptococcus sp. shuttle vector
pLZ12-Km/Spc (Fig. 2). In pLZ12-L4A, dpr was inserted into
spc containing only its putative Shine-Dalgarno box, leading
to a Dpr expression level comparable with that of the wild-type strain
D282 at the early-stationary phase (Fig. 3C). In pLZ12-P3,
dpr was inserted into spc with its own putative
promoter and Shine-Dalgarno box, leading to overexpression of Dpr at
the early-stationary phase (Fig. 3C). The overexpression might have resulted from better stability of pLZ12-P3 or from inclusion
of the putative dpr promoter. In any case, the
complementation strains constructed allowed us to analyze the function
of Dpr with two cellular levels of the protein. Both of the constructed plasmids pLZ12-L4A and pLZ12-P3 induced a constant Dpr expression level
in early-stationary phase as analyzed by Western blotting of several
independent protein extracts.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Inactivation of the dpr and
Dpr expression levels in constructed strains. A, a
schematic presentation of the strategy for dpr allelic
replacement mutagenesis. B, PCR analysis of D282 and
D282 dpr chromosomal DNA for the replacement of
dpr by spc using oligonucleotide primers
annealing upstream and downstream of dpr. Sizes of the
expected PCR products are shown in A (dashed
lines). MW, 100-bp DNA ladder. C, Western
analysis of D282, D282 dpr, D282L4A, and D282P3 protein
extracts for Dpr expression with rabbit polyclonal antiserum against
recombinant Dpr. Equal amounts of protein samples (2 µg) were loaded
into each well. Dpr was occasionally seen as a double band due to
apparent proteolytic degradation. The predicted molecular mass of
full-length Dpr is 19.6 kDa.
|
|
Role of Dpr in Aerotolerance of S. suis--
Dpr is an important
aerotolerance factor for S. mutans (11). To study whether
Dpr is involved in aerotolerance of S. suis, we analyzed the
growth of our strains in solid and liquid THY incubated under normal or
6% CO2 atmosphere. At the same time, we quantified
dpr mRNA and Dpr levels at different time points of the
growth phase. We first grew D282 and D282 dpr to
early-stationary phase in THY at 37 °C under 6% CO2.
The cultures were then diluted 100-fold into fresh THY and incubated at
37 °C with vigorous shaking, which causes an extensive aeration of
the culture medium. The growth was monitored by measuring
A600 (Fig.
4A). As shown in Fig.
4B, Dpr expression was transcriptionally induced just after the culture entered the actively growing state. The transcriptional activity sharply decreased when the bacterial population reached the
stationary phase. The protein levels, on the other hand, reached the
maximum in the actively growing state and remained relatively unchanged
at the stationary phase (Fig. 4C). Thus, wild-type D282 cells clearly expressed Dpr during the growth period assayed. Yet, as
shown in Fig. 4A, there was no significant growth
retardation of D282 dpr as compared with D282. As analyzed
by plating of early-stationary phase cultures, there were no
significant differences between the colony forming abilities of
D282 dpr and D282, regardless of whether the THY plates
were incubated aerobically or under 6% CO2 (data
not shown). Taken together, the results indicate that Dpr is not an
essential aerotolerance factor for S. suis.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Aerobic growth of S. suis
and expression of dpr in relation to growth
phase. A, early-stationary phase cultures of D282 ( )
and D282 dpr ( ) in THY were diluted 100-fold into fresh
THY and incubated at 37 °C with vigorous shaking. The growth was
monitored by reading the A600 and is expressed
as the mean ± S.D. of triplicate samples at each time point.
Expression of Dpr at different time points (2-9 h) of D282 culture was
studied by Northern (B) and Western (C) analysis.
Equal amounts of total RNA (20 µg) or cellular protein extracts (2 µg) were loaded into each well. In Northern analysis, 16 S rRNA
served as the loading control.
|
|
Role of Dpr in H2O2 Resistance of S. suis--
Dpr is involved in H2O2 resistance
of S. mutans (11). Sensitivities of our S. suis
strains to H2O2 were tested by exposing early-stationary phase cultures to different concentrations of H2O2 and counting viable cells after plating
onto THY. Fig. 5 shows that over the
whole range of H2O2 concentrations used, there was only a slight loss of viability of the wild-type strain D282. In
contrast, D282 dpr was highly sensitive toward
H2O2 with a ~106-fold reduced
viability after exposure to 5.0 mM
H2O2. To examine the possibility that the
H2O2 hypersensitivity of D282 dpr
was not due to its Dpr deficiency but rather was caused by polar
effects of the spc insertion, genetic complementation
analyses were done. These experiments were important because D282 was
used for mutant construction due to poor transformability of 628, which
served as the initial source of sequence information (Fig.
1A). Also, ORFV with a predicted gene product of 16.2 kDa
(Fig. 1A; Table III) was in
the complementary strand to dpr and was also deleted in D282 dpr. Fig. 5 shows that over the whole range of
H2O2 concentrations used, both of the
complementation strains were resistant to H2O2. This confirmed that Dpr was responsible for the detected
H2O2 resistance in S. suis and ruled
out the participation of ORFV and other downstream effects.
Overexpression of Dpr in D282P3 (Fig. 3C) did not
significantly increase the ability of bacteria to tolerate
H2O2 (Fig. 5).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Role of Dpr in H2O2
resistance of S. suis. Viability curves of D282
( ) and derivative strains stressed with extragenously added
H2O2 are shown. Bacteria were grown to
early-stationary phase in THY and treated for 2 h with different
concentrations of H2O2 at 37 °C, and their
viabilities were counted after plating to THY. Values are given as
means of two independent experiments. Strains D282L4A ( ) and D282P3
( ) are otherwise like D282 dpr ( ) but express Dpr
from the pLZ12-L4A and pLZ12-P3, respectively, at two different
cellular levels (Fig. 3C).
|
|
Iron Chelator Complementation of the H2O2
Hypersensitivity of D282 dpr--
Free intracellular
Fe2+ nonezymatically cleaves H2O2
into hydroxyl radicals in Fenton chemistry fashion and is important for the actual toxicity of H2O2 (20, 21). We
analyzed how iron chelators with different membrane permeabilities
altered the H2O2 hypersensitivity of
D282 dpr. The hydrophilic iron chelator DFOM, a
siderophore produced by Streptomyces pilosus, has been used in several studies to interfere with the intracellular iron pool of
both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (43-46). DTPA, on the other
hand, has been used as an extracellular iron chelator (46). The effects
of these compounds on the H2O2 hypersensitivity
of D282 dpr were assayed by exposing early-stationary
phase cultures to 5.0 mM H2O2 after
preincubating the bacteria with different concentrations of the
chelators. As shown in Fig. 6 the
H2O2 hypersensitivity of D282 dpr
was complemented by a preincubation with 100 µM DFOM. In
contrast, DTPA did not complement the H2O2
hypersensitivity at any of the concentrations studied. The results
indicate that the intracellular but not the extracellular iron pool is
involved in H2O2 sensitivity of the bacteria
and that the absence of functional Dpr can be complemented by a
molecule capable of iron chelation.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of iron chelators on the
H2O2 hypersensitivity of
D282 dpr. D282 dpr,
grown to early-stationary phase in THY, was stressed with or without
5.0 mM H2O2 for 2 h at
37 °C after preincubating the bacteria for 30 min at 37 °C in the
presence of different concentrations of the chelators as indicated. The
cell viabilities were counted by plating to THY. DFOM + 0 mM H2O2, ; DTPA + 0 mM H2O2, ; DFOM + 5.0 mM H2O2, ; DTPA + 5.0 mM H2O2, .
|
|
Site-directed Mutagenesis of the Putative Ferroxidase Center of
Dpr--
Amino acid sequence alignment of Dps family members with
known crystal structures revealed that S. suis Dpr contained
a putative ferroxidase center in its N-terminal half (Fig.
7). It has been suggested that this amino
acid motif is involved in iron incorporation in a fashion similar to
that of classical ferritins (22, 27, 28, 47), but there is no direct
experimental evidence to support this proposal in vivo. When
we analyzed cellular protein extracts from early-stationary phase
cultures grown in the presence of 55FeCl3, Dpr
had clearly incorporated iron (Fig. 8).
To investigate the possible relationship of the in vivo iron
incorporation activity with the putative ferroxidase center, we
utilized site-directed mutagenesis. The negatively charged residues
Asp-74 and Glu-78 of the putative ferroxidase center (Fig. 7) were
independently substituted with Ala. As shown in Fig. 8A, the
mutations had no apparent effects on the level of expression or
solubility of Dpr. The mutations also seemed to have no effects on the
oligomeric stability of Dpr as indicated by similar mobility to
wild-type Dpr in nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels (Fig.
8B). In contrast, the mutations independently caused a
complete inactivation of the iron incorporation activity in
vivo (Fig. 8C). Taken together, S. suis Dpr
was able to incorporate iron in vivo, and this process was
dependent on Asp-74 and Glu-78, the amino acids conserved in the
putative ferroxidase centers of several Dps family members (Fig. 7)
(14, 22, 27, 28, 47).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Primary amino acid sequence
alignment of Dpr with Dps family members with known crystal
structures. The N-terminal half of S. suis Dpr was
aligned with the homologous regions of Listeria innocua
ferritin Flp (CAC96173), mini-ferritins Dlp-1 (1JI5A) and Dlp-2
(1JIGA) of Bacillus anthracis, and Dps (AAA21855) of
E. coli. NCBI Protein Database accession numbers in
parentheses. Amino acids shared with Dpr are shaded
gray. Amino acids involved in iron coordination of Flp (28)
or in Pb2+ coordination of the Dps heavy atom derivative
(47) are shaded black. Amino acids proposed to be involved
in iron coordination in Dlp-1 and Dlp-2 (27) are also shaded
black. Flp, the closest Dpr homolog with a solved
crystal structure, folds into a four-helix bundle, where amino acids
from helixes A and B (boxed) form the intersubunit
iron-binding pocket. In the dodecamer, 12 pockets are formed, each
serving as a putative ferroxidase center (28). The amino acids Asp-74
and Glu-78, chosen for independent substitution with Ala in S. suis Dpr, are marked with an asterisk.
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of the putative ferroxidase center
mutations on Dpr and its in vivo iron incorporation
activity. Western analysis of Dpr expression after resolving 2 µg of cellular protein extracts either under denaturing
(A) or nondenaturing (B) conditions. Under
nondenaturing conditions, equine spleen type I ferritin
(Fer) and BSA were used as molecular mass markers.
Recombinant Dpr (tDpr) lacks seven amino acids in its N
terminus (41), leading to slightly faster mobility of the Dpr oligomer.
C, iron (55Fe) incorporation into native and
site-mutated forms of Dpr during aerobic growth in THY. 50 µg of
cellular protein extracts from early-stationary phase cultures was
loaded into each well of a 4-15% gradient polyacrylamide gel, with
equine spleen type I ferritin and BSA serving as molecular mass
markers, and resolved under nondenaturing conditions. The gel was
subsequently analyzed for 55Fe-containing proteins by
autoradiography.
|
|
H2O2 Sensitivities of D282 dpr Expressing
Wild-type or Site-mutated Forms of Dpr--
The
H2O2 sensitivities of D282 dpr
expressing wild-type or site-mutated forms of Dpr were assayed by
exposing early-stationary phase cultures to different concentrations of
H2O2 and counting viable cells after plating
onto THY. As shown in Fig. 9 bacteria expressing wild-type Dpr were fully resistant to
H2O2. In contrast, bacteria expressing the
site-mutated and iron incorporation-negative forms of Dpr were
hypersensitive to H2O2 with a comparable
phenotype to dpr knockout. Thus, the detected
H2O2 resistance of S. suis was not
only critically dependent on Dpr but specifically on its iron
incorporation activity.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
H2O2 sensitivities of
D282 dpr expressing wild-type or
site-mutated forms of Dpr. Viability curves of D282 ( ) and
derivative strains stressed with extragenously added
H2O2 are shown. Bacteria were grown to
early-stationary phase in THY and treated for 2 h with different
concentrations of H2O2 at 37 °C, and their
viabilities were counted after plating to THY. Values are given as
means of two independent experiments. Strain D282L4A ( ) is otherwise
like D282 dpr ( ) but expresses wild-type Dpr from the
pLZ12-L4A. Strains D282L4A-74 ( ) and D282L4A-78 (*) are otherwise
like D282 dpr but express the site-mutated and iron
incorporation-negative forms of Dpr from pLZ12-L4A-74 and pLZ12-L4A-78,
respectively.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this paper, we provide for the first time direct in
vivo evidence on how streptococcal Dpr mediates its protective
function against H2O2.
H2O2 resistance is a crucial property for
streptococci because several species produce it as a part of their
metabolism despite the lack of oxidative phosphorylation (4-7).
H2O2 is also encountered as a part of host
defenses (8), and under certain conditions, streptococci seem to
utilize it as their own virulence factor (4, 9, 10). Thus, in addition
to maintenance of normal cellular physiology, Dpr may also have a role
in the pathogenesis of streptococcal infections. S. suis
seemed an ideal model organism to study the in vivo function
of Dpr because it not only lacks catalase, like other streptococci, but
also lacks NADH peroxidase (34). This enzyme is capable, to some
extent, of substituting for the absence of catalase (48, 49).
It is known that defects in the regulation of intracellular iron
homeostasis may lead to enhanced oxidative stress (46, 50, 51). Iron in
its reduced form nonenzymatically cleaves H2O2
into hydroxyl radicals, the most deleterious forms of reactive oxygen
intermediates, by Fenton chemistry (H2O2 + Fe2+ ·OH + -OH + Fe3+)
(20, 21, 52). Based on a primary amino acid sequence comparison, Dpr
has been reported to be a member of the Dps protein family (11), in
which one of the functional features is iron binding activity (17, 22,
26, 27). The family members seem to be able to oxidize Fe2+
and store it inside the oligomeric protein shell as Fe3+
(17, 29, 53, 54), resembling classical ferritins in this respect (23).
Indeed, Bozzi and co-workers (22) identified in L. innocua Flp, a member of the Dps family that is well characterized in vitro (53, 54), a homologous region to the iron
nucleation center of mammalian ferritin L-subunit (24).
They suggested that this region could carry out the initial steps in
iron core formation and also serve as a ferroxidase center. Although a
homologous region to this amino acid motif can be found in several Dps
family members (Fig. 7) (14), no direct experimental evidence is
available on its functionality in iron incorporation in
vivo. Furthermore, the biological significance of iron
incorporation is not well established. In the present study, a putative
ferroxidase center was identified in the N-terminal half of S. suis Dpr, and the structure-function relationship was studied by
site-directed mutagenesis.
The targets for the point mutations in the putative ferroxidase
center were chosen by using the three-dimensional structure of L. innocua Flp (28). Flp shares 44% primary amino acid sequence identity with S. suis Dpr. In Flp crystals, 12 iron atoms
have been directly observed occupying the putative ferroxidase centers, which are formed at the interfaces of two adjacent subunits (28). The
amino acids protruding into the interface of Flp dodecamer and
seemingly involved in the actual iron coordination (His-31, His-43,
Asp-47, Asp-58, and Glu-62) (28) are all conserved and similarly spaced
in S. suis Dpr as His-47, His-59, Asp-63, Asp-74, and
Glu-78, respectively (Fig. 7). The involvement of these amino acids in
forming a classical dinuclear ferritin-like ferroxidase center has been
modeled for Flp (28). In the initial step, the first ferrous iron,
guided into the interior of the dodecamer through hydrophilic channels,
would bind to His-31 from the A helix and Asp-58 and Glu-62 from the B
helix of an adjacent subunit (Fig. 7) (28). Based on the L. innocua Flp model, we decided to independently substitute two of
the homologous negatively charged amino acids, Asp-74 and Glu-78, with
Ala. The substitutions had no apparent effects on the expression,
solubility, or oligomeric stability of the Dpr dodecamer. In contrast,
Asp-74 and Glu-78 were crucial for the Dpr to incorporate iron in
vivo. This result represents the first direct demonstration of the
functional involvement of the putative ferroxidase center in iron
incorporation in vivo for Dpr or any of the Dps family members.
The dpr knockout of S. suis had a
~106-fold reduced viability under exposure to 5.0 mM H2O2 as compared with the
wild-type strain. By analyzing the H2O2
sensitivities of dpr knockout expressing wild-type or
site-mutated forms of Dpr, we determined the role played by the iron
incorporation activity of Dpr in H2O2
resistance. Strikingly, bacteria expressing iron incorporation-negative
forms of Dpr were hypersensitive to H2O2 with a
phenotype comparable to that of dpr knockout. Thus, Dpr
seemed to protect the bacteria against H2O2 by
its iron incorporation activity. This was supported by the iron
chelator complementation analysis of the H2O2
hypersensitivity of D282 dpr. DFOM, an iron chelator
interfering with the intracellular iron pool (43-46), was able to
rescue the viability defect of D282 dpr. Under the same
conditions, an extracellular iron chelator, DTPA (46), did not cause
any effect. Yamamoto et al. (25) recently reported data
indicating that S. mutans Dpr is capable of inhibiting the
action of Fenton chemistry in vitro. Thus, Dpr seems to
provide an indirect means for catalase-negative bacteria to tolerate
H2O2 by inhibiting the
Fe2+-catalyzed cleavage of H2O2
into more toxic reactive oxygen intermediates.
Mechanisms other than iron incorporation have been suggested for Dps
family members to explain the protection against
H2O2, and synergy between them is possible (12,
14-16). A convincing body of evidence indicates that E. coli Dps protects DNA by a direct association, which leads to
highly ordered DNA-Dps biocrystals (12, 15, 16, 55). However, Dps also
contains a putative ferroxidase center in its N-terminal half, and a
dual function in H2O2 resistance has been
proposed. Dps could directly protect the DNA by biocrystal formation
but could also inhibit the action of Fenton chemistry by its iron
incorporation activity (17, 29, 47). Whether Dpr also binds and
protects DNA remains contradictory. Yamamoto et al. (25)
recently reported data indicating that S. mutans Dpr has no
DNA binding activity. In our own studies using hydroxyl radical DNA
footprinting assays, we have not detected any DNA binding activity for
S. suis Dpr.3
Also, some other members of the Dps family seem to lack DNA binding activity (26, 27). The possibility that Dpr could differ from Dps in
lacking DNA binding activity is not unexpected, considering that the
primary amino acid sequence identity shared between S. suis
Dpr and E. coli Dps is only 25%. It also seems
unlikely that Dpr could have a catalase-like activity as reported for
the DpsA of Synechococcus sp. (14). S. suis Dpr
shares an extremely weak homology to DpsA (nondetectable in BLAST-P
data base search) and does not seem to contain heme, which has been
linked to the enzymatic activity of DpsA (14). Furthermore, Yamamoto
et al. (25) have recently presented data indicating that
S. mutans Dpr has no catalase-like activity. Indeed, the
results of our present study indicate that it is the iron incorporation
activity that is the molecular basis of Dpr-mediated
H2O2 resistance.
The Dps family includes molecules from diverse taxonomic lineages (14)
with striking similarities, even including a recent member in the
archaeon Halobacterium salinarum (56). Proteins fold into
four-helix bundles resembling the fold of mammalian ferritins and
assemble into large hollow globular complexes (23, 27, 28, 47). Based
on our present study, S. suis Dpr protected the bacteria
against H2O2 by its iron incorporation
activity. Whether this is true for the Dps family members in general is not known. However, the amino acid residues forming the putative ferroxidase centers are among the most conserved primary amino acid
sequence features of the family (Fig. 7) (14). Also, all members have
proven to be iron-binding proteins, if analyzed for this activity (11,
17, 22, 26, 27, 56). Thus, it is possible that in diverse bacterial
species, Dps-related molecules might serve as functional ferritin-like
molecules and protect bacteria against H2O2 as
inhibitors of Fenton chemistry. However, it has become evident that,
despite sharing the few highly conserved amino acid residues,
the putative ferroxidase centers vary considerably (Fig. 7), which
might lead to different functional properties. Indeed, Zhao et
al. (17) have recently reported data on iron oxidation and
incorporation properties of E. coli Dps that differ from
those of L. innocua Flp in both the rates of
Fe2+ binding and oxidation. Thus, it is obvious that more
studies are needed to further elucidate the importance of iron
incorporation activity for Dps family members in
H2O2 resistance.
The functional divergence of the Dps family is an important area of
further investigation. The family members seem to be involved in
aerotolerance (11), H2O2 resistance (11, 12,
57), cold shock adaptation (58), starvation tolerance (12), iron
storage (22), neutrophil activation (59, 60), carbohydrate binding (61), and adhesion (62). The molecular determinants mediating these
activities are largely unknown. Additional in vivo studies together with in vitro work using recombinant site-mutated
forms of the molecules in combination with crystal structure
information (27, 28, 41, 47) are needed to reveal the molecular
mechanisms behind these activities and their relationships to each
other. Determining the structural basis of these biological activities may eventually contribute to the development of means to prevent and
treat diseases caused by pathogenic bacteria.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge Drs. Hilde Smith
and Michael Caparon for kindly providing bacterial strains and
plasmids. Terttu Jompero, Jukka Karhu, and Tero Mustalahti are
acknowledged for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by the grants from the Sigrid
Jusélius Foundation and the Academy of Finland.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AY154459.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medical
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Turku,
Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. Tel.: 358-2-333-7254;
Fax: 358-2-333-7229; E-mail: endonukleaasi@hotmail.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 24, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M210174200
1
K. Tikkanen, A. T. Pulliainen, V.-P.
Korhonen, R. Segers, S. Haataja, J. Wahlfors, and J. Finne, submitted
for publication.
3
A. T. Pulliainen and J. Finne, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
THY, Todd Hewitt
Broth medium supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract;
ORF, open
reading frame;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
DFOM, deferoxamine mesylate;
DTPA, diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Imlay, J. A.,
and Fridovich, I.
(1991)
Free Radic. Res. Commun.
12-13,
59-66[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Imlay, J. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19767-19777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Storz, G.,
and Imlay, J. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
2,
188-194[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Hirst, R. A.,
Sikand, K. S.,
Rutman, A.,
Mitchell, T. J.,
Andrew, P. W.,
and O'Callaghan, C.
(2000)
Infect. Immun.
68,
1557-1562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Thomas, E. L.,
and Pera, K. A.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
154,
1236-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Thomas, E. L.,
Milligan, T. W.,
Joyner, R. E.,
and Jefferson, M. M.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
529-535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Nguyen, P. T.,
Abranches, J.,
Phan, T. N.,
and Marquis, R. E.
(2002)
Curr. Microbiol.
44,
262-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Nathan, C.,
and Shiloh, M. U.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8841-8848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Jansen, W. T.,
Bolm, M.,
Balling, R.,
Chhatwal, G. S.,
and Schnabel, R.
(2002)
Infect. Immun.
70,
5202-5207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Spellerberg, B.,
Cundell, D. R.,
Sandros, J.,
Pearce, B. J.,
Idanpaan-Heikkila, I.,
Rosenow, C.,
and Masure, H. R.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
19,
803-813[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Yamamoto, Y.,
Higuchi, M.,
Poole, L. B.,
and Kamio, Y.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
3740-3747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Almiron, M.,
Link, A. J.,
Furlong, D.,
and Kolter, R.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
2646-2654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Lomovskaya, O. L.,
Kidwell, J. P.,
and Matin, A.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
3928-3935[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Pena, M. M.,
and Bullerjahn, G. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22478-22482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Martinez, A.,
and Kolter, R.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
5188-5194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Frenkiel-Krispin, D.,
Levin-Zaidman, S.,
Shimoni, E.,
Wolf, S. G.,
Wachtel, E. J.,
Arad, T.,
Finkel, S. E.,
Kolter, R.,
and Minsky, A.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
1184-1191[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Zhao, G.,
Ceci, P.,
Ilari, A.,
Giangiacomo, L.,
Laue, T. M.,
Chiancone, E.,
and Chasteen, N. D.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
27689-27696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Gonzalez-Flecha, B.,
and Demple, B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13681-13687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Costa Seaver, L.,
and Imlay, J. A.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
7182-7189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Fenton, H. J. H.
(1894)
J. Chem. Soc.
65,
899-910
|
| 21.
|
Goldstein, S.,
Meyerstein, D.,
and Czapski, G.
(1993)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
15,
435-445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Bozzi, M.,
Mignogna, G.,
Stefanini, S.,
Barra, D.,
Longhi, C.,
Valenti, P.,
and Chiancone, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3259-3265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Harrison, P. M.,
and Arosio, P.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1275,
161-203[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Levi, S.,
Corsi, B.,
Rovida, E.,
Cozzi, A.,
Santambrogio, P.,
Albertini, A.,
and Arosio, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30334-30339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Yamamoto, Y.,
Poole, L. B.,
Hantgan, R. R.,
and Kamio, Y.
(2002)
J. Bacteriol.
184,
2931-2939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Tonello, F.,
Dundon, W. G.,
Satin, B.,
Molinari, M.,
Tognon, G.,
Grandi, G.,
Del Giudice, G.,
Rappuoli, R.,
and Montecucco, C.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
34,
238-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Papinutto, E.,
Dundon, W. G.,
Pitulis, N.,
Battistutta, R.,
Montecucco, C.,
and Zanotti, G.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
15093-15098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Ilari, A.,
Stefanini, S.,
Chiancone, E.,
and Tsernoglou, D.
(2000)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
7,
38-43[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Ilari, A.,
Ceci, P.,
Ferrari, D.,
Rossi, G.,
and Chiancone, E.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
37619-37623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Staats, J. J.,
Feder, I.,
Okwumabua, O.,
and Chengappa, M. M.
(1997)
Vet. Res. Commun.
21,
381-407[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Kurl, D. N.,
Haataja, S.,
and Finne, J.
(1989)
Infect. Immun.
57,
384-389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Haataja, S.,
Tikkanen, K.,
Liukkonen, J.,
Francois-Gerard, C.,
and Finne, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4311-4317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Haataja, S.,
Tikkanen, K.,
Nilsson, U.,
Magnusson, G.,
Karlsson, K. A.,
and Finne, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27466-27472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Niven, D. F.,
and Ekins, A.
(2001)
Can. J. Microbiol.
47,
412-416[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Vecht, U.,
Arends, J. P.,
van der Molen, E. J.,
and van Leengoed, L. A.
(1989)
Am. J. Vet. Res.
50,
1037-1043[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Lau, G. W.,
Haataja, S.,
Lonetto, M.,
Kensit, S. E.,
Marra, A.,
Bryant, A. P.,
McDevitt, D.,
Morrison, D. A.,
and Holden, D. W.
(2001)
Mol. Microbiol.
40,
555-571[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Smith, H. E.,
Wisselink, H. J.,
Vecht, U.,
Gielkens, A. L.,
and Smits, M. A.
(1995)
Microbiology
141,
181-188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Segers, R. P.,
Kenter, T.,
de Haan, L. A.,
and Jacobs, A. A.
(1998)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
167,
255-261[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Sambrook, J.,
and Russel, D. W.
(2001)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 3rd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laborartory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 40.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Haataja, S.,
Penttinen, A.,
Pulliainen, A. T.,
Tikkanen, K.,
Finne, J.,
and Papageorgiou, A. C.
(2002)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
58,
1851-1853[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Tikkanen, K.,
Haataja, S.,
Francois-Gerard, C.,
and Finne, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28874-28878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Kicic, A.,
Chua, A. C.,
and Baker, E.
(2001)
Cancer
92,
3093-3110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Richardson, D.,
Ponka, P.,
and Baker, E.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
685-689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Srinivasan, C.,
Liba, A.,
Imlay, J. A.,
Valentine, J. S.,
and Gralla, E. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
29187-29192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Keyer, K.,
and Imlay, J. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13635-13640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Grant, R. A.,
Filman, D. J.,
Finkel, S. E.,
Kolter, R.,
and Hogle, J. M.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
294-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Crane, E. J., III,
Parsonage, D.,
Poole, L. B.,
and Claiborne, A.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
14114-14124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Poole, L. B.,
and Claiborne, A.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
14525-14533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Touati, D.,
Jacques, M.,
Tardat, B.,
Bouchard, L.,
and Despied, S.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
2305-2314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Morris, C. J.,
Earl, J. R.,
Trenam, C. W.,
and Blake, D. R.
(1995)
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
27,
109-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Imlay, J. A.,
Chin, S. M.,
and Linn, S.
(1988)
Science
240,
640-642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Yang, X.,
Chiancone, E.,
Stefanini, S.,
Ilari, A.,
and Chasteen, N. D.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
349,
783-786[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Stefanini, S.,
Cavallo, S.,
Montagnini, B.,
and Chiancone, E.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
71-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Wolf, S. G.,
Frenkiel, D.,
Arad, T.,
Finkel, S. E.,
Kolter, R.,
and Minsky, A.
(1999)
Nature
400,
83-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Reindel, S.,
Anemuller, S.,
Sawaryn, A.,
and Matzanke, B. F.
(2002)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1598,
140-146[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Chen, L.,
and Helmann, J. D.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
18,
295-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Hebraud, M.,
and Guzzo, J.
(2000)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
190,
29-34[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Yoshida, N.,
Granger, D. N.,
Evans, D. J., Jr.,
Evans, D. G.,
Graham, D. Y.,
Anderson, D. C.,
Wolf, R. E.,
and Kvietys, P. R.
(1993)
Gastroenterology
105,
1431-1440[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Evans, D. J., Jr.,
Evans, D. G.,
Takemura, T.,
Nakano, H.,
Lampert, H. C.,
Graham, D. Y.,
Granger, D. N.,
and Kvietys, P. R.
(1995)
Infect. Immun.
63,
2213-2220[Abstract]
|
| 61.
|
Teneberg, S.,
Miller-Podraza, H.,
Lampert, H. C.,
Evans, D. J., Jr.,
Evans, D. G.,
Danielsson, D.,
and Karlsson, K. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19067-19071[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Brentjens, R. J.,
Ketterer, M.,
Apicella, M. A.,
and Spinola, S. M.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
808-816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Loimaranta, J. Hytonen, A. T. Pulliainen, A. Sharma, J. Tenovuo, N. Stromberg, and J. Finne
Leucine-rich Repeats of Bacterial Surface Proteins Serve as Common Pattern Recognition Motifs of Human Scavenger Receptor gp340
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 10, 2009;
284(28):
18614 - 18623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Herve-Jimenez, I. Guillouard, E. Guedon, S. Boudebbouze, P. Hols, V. Monnet, E. Maguin, and F. Rul
Postgenomic Analysis of Streptococcus thermophilus Cocultivated in Milk with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus: Involvement of Nitrogen, Purine, and Iron Metabolism
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
April 1, 2009;
75(7):
2062 - 2073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Feng, M. Li, H. Zhang, B. Zheng, H. Han, C. Wang, J. Yan, J. Tang, and G. F. Gao
Functional Definition and Global Regulation of Zur, a Zinc Uptake Regulator in a Streptococcus suis Serotype 2 Strain Causing Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome
J. Bacteriol.,
November 15, 2008;
190(22):
7567 - 7578.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Tsou, C. Chiang-Ni, Y.-S. Lin, W.-J. Chuang, M.-T. Lin, C.-C. Liu, and J.-J. Wu
An Iron-Binding Protein, Dpr, Decreases Hydrogen Peroxide Stress and Protects Streptococcus pyogenes against Multiple Stresses
Infect. Immun.,
September 1, 2008;
76(9):
4038 - 4045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Pulliainen, J. Hytonen, S. Haataja, and J. Finne
Deficiency of the Rgg Regulator Promotes H2O2 Resistance, AhpCF-Mediated H2O2 Decomposition, and Virulence in Streptococcus pyogenes
J. Bacteriol.,
May 1, 2008;
190(9):
3225 - 3235.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-L. Ng, H.-C. T. Tsui, and M. E. Winkler
Regulation of the pspA Virulence Factor and Essential pcsB Murein Biosynthetic Genes by the Phosphorylated VicR (YycF) Response Regulator in Streptococcus pneumoniae
J. Bacteriol.,
November 1, 2005;
187(21):
7444 - 7459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ceci, A. Ilari, E. Falvo, L. Giangiacomo, and E. Chiancone
Reassessment of Protein Stability, DNA Binding, and Protection of Mycobacterium smegmatis Dps
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 14, 2005;
280(41):
34776 - 34785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Pajunen, A. T. Pulliainen, J. Finne, and H. Savilahti
Generation of transposon insertion mutant libraries for Gram-positive bacteria by electroporation of phage Mu DNA transposition complexes
Microbiology,
April 1, 2005;
151(4):
1209 - 1218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. N. Olsen, M. H. Larsen, C. G. M. Gahan, B. Kallipolitis, X. A. Wolf, R. Rea, C. Hill, and H. Ingmer
The Dps-like protein Fri of Listeria monocytogenes promotes stress tolerance and intracellular multiplication in macrophage-like cells
Microbiology,
March 1, 2005;
151(3):
925 - 933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Ulijasz, D. R. Andes, J. D. Glasner, and B. Weisblum
Regulation of Iron Transport in Streptococcus pneumoniae by RitR, an Orphan Response Regulator
J. Bacteriol.,
December 1, 2004;
186(23):
8123 - 8136.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ceci, S. Cellai, E. Falvo, C. Rivetti, G. L. Rossi, and E. Chiancone
DNA condensation and self-aggregation of Escherichia coli Dps are coupled phenomena related to the properties of the N-terminus
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 8, 2004;
32(19):
5935 - 5944.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yamamoto, K. Fukui, N. Koujin, H. Ohya, K. Kimura, and Y. Kamio
Regulation of the Intracellular Free Iron Pool by Dpr Provides Oxygen Tolerance to Streptococcus mutans
J. Bacteriol.,
September 15, 2004;
186(18):
5997 - 6002.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|