|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M211086200 on December 9, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 10, 8380-8384, March 7, 2003
Lack of Tyrosine Nitration by Hypochlorous Acid in the
Presence of Physiological Concentrations of Nitrite
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF NITRYL CHLORIDE IN TYROSINE
NITRATION IN VIVO*
Matthew
Whiteman ,
Jia Ling
Siau, and
Barry
Halliwell
From the Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, National
University of Singapore, 8 Medical Dr., Singapore 117597, Republic
of Singapore
Received for publication, October 30, 2002, and in revised form, December 3, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Elevated levels of reactive nitrogen species
(RNS) such as peroxynitrite have been implicated in over 50 diverse
human diseases as measured by the formation of the RNS biomarker
3-nitrotyrosine. Recently, an additional RNS was postulated to
contribute to 3-nitrotyrosine formation in vivo; nitryl
chloride formed from the reaction of nitrite and neutrophil
myeloperoxidase-derived hypochlorous acid (HOCl). Whether nitryl
chloride nitrates intracellular protein is unknown. Therefore, we
exposed intact human HepG2 and SW1353 cells or cell lysates to HOCl and
nitrite and examined each for 3-nitrotyrosine formation by: 1) Western
blotting, 2) using a commercial 3-nitrotyrosine enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kit, 3) flow cytometric analysis, and 4) confocal
microscopic analysis. With each approach, no significant
3-nitrotyrosine formation was observed in either whole cells or cell
lysates. However, substantial 3-nitrotyrosine was observed when
peroxynitrite (100 µM) was added to cells or cell
lysates. These data suggest that nitryl chloride formed from the
reaction of nitrite with HOCl does not contribute to the elevated
levels of 3-nitrotyrosine observed in human diseases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
There is considerable interest in the role of reactive nitrogen
species (RNS)1 such as nitric
oxide (·NO) and peroxynitrite (ONOO ) in human
disease (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Numerous cell types are capable of
producing high micromolar concentrations of nitric oxide (·NO)
through the activation of inducible nitric-oxide synthase (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4). In vivo, ·NO is readily
oxidized via heme proteins to nitrite (NO ) and
nitrate (NO ). Thus, evidence for an elevated
production of ·NO comes from the measurement of
NO and NO in human body fluids
such as plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, synovial fluid, respiratory tract lining fluid, saliva, and sputum. This has implicated ·NO in a
large number and diverse range of human diseases (reviewed in Ref. 4).
Typically, levels of NO found in plasma taken from
healthy human volunteers range between 0.5 and 21.0 µM
(5, 6), and levels are significantly elevated during inflammation,
e.g. up to 36 µM in patients with human
immunodeficiency virus infection (7). Serum NO
levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (8), systemic sclerosis (9), and systemic lupus erythematosus (10) are reported to be in the
millimolar range, whereas in the synovial fluid of patients with
rheumatoid arthritis NO levels are reported to range
from 0.3 to 15 µM (11-13). Nitrite has been extensively
used for decades in the food industry as a preservative and for curing
meat. Approximately 5% of ingested nitrate is reduced to nitrite by
oral microflora where it enters the gastrointestinal tract and
protonates to form nitrous acid (NHO2,
pKa ~ 3.4) (reviewed in Refs. 14 and 15).
Furthermore, dietary NO has been proposed as an oral
and gut anti-microbial agent (14, 15) where salivary levels of NO of up to 98 µM have been reported (16), and near millimolar concentrations are reported to be reached in
the saliva of patients with systemic sclerosis (17).
Over 50 human disease conditions have elevated levels of
3-nitrotyrosine, a biomarker for RNS traditionally attributed to ONOO formation in vivo. These include
neurodegenerative, chronic inflammatory, gastrointestinal tract, and
cardiovascular disorders as well as viral and bacterial infections
(reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Recent research has shown that
3-nitrotyrosine formation is not solely a ONOO -mediated
phenomenon. It is also observed with peroxidases such as eosinophil
peroxidase (18), myeloperoxidase (released by activated neutrophils at
sites of inflammation) (19), and other peroxidases (20) in the presence
of NO . In addition, hemoglobin and other heme
proteins such as catalase may also serve as a mechanism for nitrating
tyrosine residues in proteins using NO as a
substrate (21).
Recently, a further mechanism for 3-nitrotyrosine formation was
proposed (22, 23); the formation of nitryl chloride (NO2Cl) by reaction of myeloperoxidase-derived hypochlorous acid (HOCl) with
NO (Reaction 1) (24).
It has been estimated that up to 80% of the
H2O2 generated by activated neutrophils during
the respiratory burst is used to form HOCl (25). Consequently,
NO2Cl formation from activated human neutrophils and
nitration of extracellular phenolics in the presence of added
NO have been demonstrated (23).
Although NO , NO , and HOCl are
formed in substantial amounts during inflammation and the former two
are normally present in saliva and are present in the gut at high
concentrations, whether NO2Cl plays any part in the
tyrosine nitration observed in vivo is unclear. Therefore,
in this report we investigated whether HOCl in the presence of
NO could nitrate intracellular protein using HepG2
hepatoma and SW1353 chondrosarcoma cells as models of human liver (26)
and cartilage cells (27, 28) exposed to RNS. We used four analytical
approaches: immunochemistry with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies
from two commercial sources using confocal microscopy, flow cytometry,
and Western blotting as well as a commercial ELISA kit.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Bovine serum albumin (BSA), oxidized glutathione
(GSSG), sodium nitrite (NaNO2), sodium nitrate
(NaNO3), sodium hypochlorite, and all other reagents were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). HOCl concentration was
quantified immediately before use spectrophotometrically at 290 nm (pH
12, = 350 M 1 cm 1)
(29). Hydrogen peroxide-free peroxynitrite was synthesized as described
previously (30) and quantified in 1 N NaOH at 302 nm
( = 1670 M 1 cm 1).
Rabbit polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies were from either Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (#12-348) or BIOMOL (Plymouth Meeting, PA,
#SA-297). Mouse monoclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies were obtained
from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA, #487923) or Alexis (#804-204). Peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for Western blotting were
purchased from Promega. Fluorescently labeled rhodamine anti-mouse IgG
(#12-329) was obtained from Calbiochem, and AlexaFluor 488 anti-rabbit
IgG (#A11008) was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). The
nitrotyrosine ELISA was purchased from Cambridge Biosciences
(Cambridge, England, #HK501).
Exposure of Cells to NO and HOCl--
Human
HepG2 hepatoma and SW1353 chondrosarcoma cells were obtained from the
American Tissue Culture Collection (Gaithersburg, MD). HepG2 cells were
grown in Minimum essential media, and SW1353 cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. Media were supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and cells were
grown at 37 °C in 5% CO2:95% O2 with
~95% humidity to 90% confluency before seeding into six-well plates
(Falcon) overnight at a density of 1 × 106
cells/well.
Cells were washed three times in warm PBS and further incubated for 10 min with PBS containing increasing concentrations of NaNO2
(10 µM to 1 mM). After this time, HOCl was
added to give final concentrations between 7 and 125 µM.
Cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. In parallel
experiments, cell lysates were obtained by freeze-thawing in 0.5 ml of
PBS and sonication at 4 °C for 10 min before addition of
HOCl/NO or ONOO for 5 min and the
addition of protease inhibitors (1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml
pepstatin A, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) as described (31).
After exposure to HOCl, ONOO , NO , or
NO /HOCl, cell viability was assessed using
3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) as
described (32).
Analysis of Nitrotyrosine--
After treatment, 10 mM GSSG was added to quench any unreacted HOCl, and cells
were washed twice with warm (37 °C) PBS. Cells were then lysed with
PBS containing 0.1% SDS and protease inhibitors (1 µg/ml aprotinin,
1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) as described (31).
Western blotting for nitrotyrosine-containing proteins was conducted as
described (31) using polyclonal or monoclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) followed by analysis using a Kodak image analyzer (IS440CF, PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA), and captured images were analyzed using Kodak Digital Science one-dimensional image analysis software. The same samples obtained for Western blotting were also analyzed for nitrotyrosine content by commercial ELISA, prepared using the manufacturer's instructions. Protein concentration was determined using a commercial kit (Bio-Rad Dc protein assay), and samples were normalized for protein
content. As an additional control, 1 mM ONOO
was added to BSA (4 mg/ml) to generate nitrated BSA.
Confocal Microscopy--
1 × 105 cells were
seeded overnight in glass bottom Petri dishes (WillCo-dish, Willco
Wells, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and washed three times in warm
(37 °C) NO -free PBS before addition of HOCl,
NO , or ONOO as described above. Cells
were then fixed and permeabilized in 1 ml of ice-cold ethanol (70%
v/v) and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. Control experiments using
100 µM NO alone were also performed
(33). Cells were then incubated with either monoclonal or polyclonal
anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies for 1 h at room temperature followed
by rhodamine- or AlexaFluor 488-labeled secondary anti-IgG antibodies
as described (33). Cells were processed and analyzed within 5 h of
initial treatment. Laser confocal microscopy was performed with a Zeiss
LSM410 confocal microscope. The red fluorescence of rhodamine and the
green fluorescence of AlexaFlour 488 were excited with the 568- and
488-nm lines of an argon-krypton laser. Fluorescence was split by a
560-nm emission dichroic filter and collected by separate
photomultipliers through 515- to 565-nm band pass and 590-nm long pass
barrier filters with the following settings held constant:
photo-multiplier tube (610), gain (4.2%), and offset (2%).
Flow Cytometry--
Cells were seeded overnight in six-well
plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells per well and
treated with HOCl, NO , or ONOO as
described above. Cells were then washed three times in
NO -free PBS, scraped into 1.5 ml of PBS in Eppendorf
tubes, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min, and fixed and permeabilized
with 1 ml of ice-cold ethanol (70%, v/v) at 4 °C for 2 h as
described (33, 34). Polyclonal or monoclonal anti-nitrotyrosine
antibodies were then added and incubated in PBS containing 1% (v/v)
fetal bovine serum for 1 h at room temperature. After washing,
fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (rhodamine or AlexaFluor
488) were then added for 1 h. Cells were then analyzed by flow
cytometry using a Epics Elite flow cytometer (ESP, Coulter, Miami, FL)
within 5 h of initial treatment. Data were analyzed from 20,000 cells using WinMDI 2.7 software (Scripps Institute, La Jolla, CA), and the percentage of nitrotyrosine-stained cells was determined from histogram analysis.
Data Analysis--
All graphs were plotted with mean ± S.D. In all cases the mean values were calculated from data
taken from at least six separate experiments performed on separate days
using freshly prepared reagents. Where significance testing was
performed, an independent test (Student's t test, two
populations) was used (*, p < 0.1; **,
p < 0.05; and ***, p < 0.01).
 |
RESULTS |
Assessment of Tyrosine Nitration by Commercial ELISA--
The
addition of HOCl to SW1353 and HepG2 cells for 5 min resulted in
negligible loss of cell viability as measured using MTT. For example,
the addition of 125 µM HOCl for 5 min resulted in a
8.8 ± 3.4% and 5.6 ± 4.8% reduction in SW1353 and HepG2
cell viability, respectively. The addition of HOCl,
NO , or ONOO did not significantly
alter the pH of the reaction mixture.
Using a commercially available nitrotyrosine ELISA kit, extensive
tyrosine nitration was observed after human HepG2 cells or SW1353 cells
(Fig. 1A) or cell lysates
(Fig. 1B) were exposed to 100 µM
ONOO for 5 min. In sharp contrast, cells treated with
HOCl and NO did not show any significant increase in
tyrosine nitration at any of the HOCl (7-125 µM) and
NO (10 µM to 1 mM)
concentrations used. Fig. 1A shows the results obtained with
125 µM HOCl and is representative of all the HOCl concentrations used. Similarly, the addition of HOCl and
NO to freshly prepared cell lysates did not show any
observable tyrosine nitration (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Analysis of tyrosine nitration by commercial
ELISA. Cells (A) or fresh cell lysates (B)
were incubated with NO at the concentrations stated
and HOCl (125 µM) added for 5 min or treated with 100 µM ONOO for 5 min. Residual HOCl was
quenched by the addition of GSSG, and the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine
was analyzed by ELISA as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. of six or more separate
experiments.
|
|
Assessment of Tyrosine Nitration by Western Blotting--
Western
blotting using monoclonal and polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies
from several commercial sources was also performed. Treating cells or
freshly prepared cell lysates with ONOO (100 µM, positive control) resulted in extensive tyrosine
nitration in cell lysates. However, exposure of the cells or cell
lysates to HOCl or HOCl and NO did not result in any
detectable tyrosine nitration with any of the commercial antibodies
used. Fig. 2 (A and
B) shows representative Western blots obtained using an
Upstate Biotechnology rabbit polyclonal antibody (Fig. 2A)
and the Calbiochem mouse monoclonal antibody (Fig. 2B) on
whole cell extracts and cell lysates from SW1353 cells. It can be seen
that, even after lengthy exposure (20 min) in ECL reagent, tyrosine
nitration was only detected in the positive control (100 µM ONOO ) using either monoclonal or
polyclonal antibodies. The same results were obtained with HepG2 cells
and cell lysates (data not shown).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analysis of tyrosine nitration by Western
blotting. SW1353 cells or fresh cell lysates were incubated with
NO at the concentrations stated, and HOCl (125 µM) was added for 5 min or treated with 100 µM ONOO for 5 min. Lanes:
(1) PBS, (2) whole cells exposed to 100 µM ONOO , (3) cell lysates
exposed to 100 µM ONOO , (4) HOCl
(125 µM), (5) HOCl + 125 µM
NO , (6) HOCl + 250 µM
NO , and (7) HOCl + 500 µM
NO . Lanes 8-10: SW1353 cell lysates
exposed to (8) HOCl + 125 µM
NO , (9) HOCl + 250 µM
NO , and (10) HOCl + 500 µM
NO . Lane 11: BSA treated with 1 mM ONOO . Residual HOCl was quenched by the
addition of GSSG, and the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine was
analyzed by Western blotting as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Data are representative of four separate
experiments.
|
|
Assessment of Intracellular Tyrosine Nitration by Flow
Cytometry--
Flow cytometric analysis of whole cells exposed to
ONOO , HOCl, and HOCl with NO was also
performed with monoclonal and polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies. Fig. 3 is representative of results
obtained using polyclonal (Fig. 3, A-D) and monoclonal
antibodies (Fig. 3, E-H) against nitrotyrosine in HepG2
(Fig. 3, A-D) and SW1353 cells (Fig. 3, E-H).
Treatment of cells with 100 µM ONOO
resulted in a substantial increase in the number of
nitrotyrosine-positive cells compared with untreated cells (Fig. 3,
A and E). Complete inhibition of antibody binding
was achieved by incubating the primary antibodies with 10 mM nitrotyrosine (Fig. 3, B and F). Incubation of cells with up to 125 µM HOCl for 5 min did
not result in the formation of intracellular 3-nitrotyrosine (Fig. 3,
C and G). Fig. 3 (D and H)
is representative of all the concentrations of NO
(0-1 mM) and HOCl (0-125 µM) tested, and,
in contrast to ONOO treatment, cells treated with HOCl in
the presence of up to 1 mM NO did not
show any observable nitrotyrosine formation (Fig. 3, D and
H).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of tyrosine nitration by
immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry. HepG2 cells were incubated
with NO at the concentrations stated, and HOCl (125 µM) was added for 5 min or treated with 100 µM ONOO for 5 min. Residual HOCl was
quenched by the addition of GSSG, and the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine
was analyzed by flow cytometry using polyclonal (A-D) or
monoclonal (E-H) anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies. In further
control experiments, antibody binding was blocked with 10 mM nitrotyrosine (B and F).
Experiments were conducted as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Data are representative of four separate
experiments.
|
|
Assessment of Intracellular Tyrosine Nitration by Confocal
Microscopy--
Laser scanning confocal microscopy was also used to
assess intracellular tyrosine nitration. Fig.
4 is representative of data obtained when
cells were exposed to either ONOO or HOCl in the presence
of NO . HepG2 cells were immunostained with
polyclonal anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies coupled to AlexaFluor
488-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit IgG (Fig. 4, A-C), and
SW1353 cells were immunostained with monoclonal anti-nitrotyrosine
antibodies coupled to rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Fig. 4,
D and E). Substantial positive 3-nitrotyrosine immunostaining was observed in HepG2cells and SW1353 cells exposed to
non-lethal concentrations of ONOO (100 µM)
using either polyclonal (Fig. 4B) or monoclonal (Fig. 4E) anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies. In contrast, treating the
cells with PBS alone (Fig. 4, A and D) or
incubating cells with NO followed by subsequent
addition of HOCl (Fig. 4, C and F) did not result
in any detectable nitrotyrosine formation at any of the
NO concentrations (10 µM to 1 mM) or HOCl concentrations (7-125 µM)
used.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of tyrosine nitration by
immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy. HepG2 cells
(A-C) or SW1353 cells (D and E) were
incubated with PBS (A and D), 100 µM ONOO (B and E), or
NO and 125 µM HOCl (C and
F) for 5 min. Residual HOCl was quenched by the addition of
GSSG, and the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine was analyzed by confocal
microscopy using polyclonal (A-C) or monoclonal
(D and E) anti-nitrotyrosine antibodies performed
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are
representative of four separate experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The formation of 3-nitrotyrosine has been observed in over 50 human disease conditions (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). The formation of
this biomarker has been attributed to an overproduction of ·NO
and subsequent formation of highly reactive nitrogen species (RNS)
usually attributed as ONOO . However, an overproduction of
·NO also results in the accumulation of NO , which has been reported to reach millimolar concentrations in certain
disease conditions (8-10). Nitrite also serves as a substrate for
peroxidases (20) such as myeloperoxidase (20, 23) and eosinophil
peroxidase (18) as well as heme proteins (21) to generate
tyrosine-nitrating species. At sites of chronic inflammation, neutrophils produce the oxidant HOCl, which in the presence of NO , forms an additional tyrosine-nitrating species,
nitryl chloride (NO2Cl) (22, 23). Although there is a
wealth of information on RNS-mediated processes, limited information is
available on the consequences of HOCl and NO accumulation and resulting NO2Cl formation generated from
this reaction (28, 32). The relatively fast second order rate constant of reaction of NO with HOCl (pH 7.2, 25 °C,
7.4 ± 1.3 × 103 M 1
s 1) (24) and the high concentrations of HOCl and
accumulation of NO at sites of chronic inflammation or in the gut after a meal (14, 15), suggest this reaction is plausible
in vivo. Recently, Panasenko et al. (24)
demonstrated protein modification, low density lipoprotein oxidation,
and -carotene and -tocopherol depletion by NO
and HOCl mixtures. NO also enhanced formation of
some DNA base damage products in HOCl-treated isolated calf thymus DNA
(35) as well as in DNA isolated from human bronchial epithelial cells
exposed to HOCl (32). The majority of reports thus far have focused on
the potentiation of oxidative and chlorinative reactions of HOCl by
NO , and the data on nitration of phenolics have been
conducted on cell media or buffer (23, 24) rather than the effects on
cells themselves. The extent to which NO2Cl penetrates the
cell membrane and reacts with intracellular tyrosine residues to
contribute to the tyrosine nitration observed in the diverse and large
number of human diseases is unknown. The relatively fast rate of
reaction and high concentrations of NO in
vivo also confers HOCl-scavenging abilities on
NO , such as inhibition of HOCl-mediated
anti-microbial activity (36-38) and cell toxicity (28). Therefore,
using two human cells lines as models of human cells exposed to RNS
in vivo, the extent of tyrosine nitration induced by
HOCl/NO was investigated using several established
analytical techniques.
Using several monoclonal and polyclonal commercial antibodies,
substantial nitrotyrosine formation was observed only when cells or
cells lysates were exposed to ONOO added at sublethal
concentrations (100 µM). No formation of 3-nitrotyrosine was observed by Western blot with enhanced chemiluminescence detection (Fig. 2) in either cells or cell lysates exposed to
HOCl/NO . Similarly, tyrosine nitration was only
detected with ONOO -treated cells using these antibodies
with flow cytometric or confocal microscopic analysis. In support,
Sampson et al. (20) also failed to detect tyrosine nitration
by Western blot in homogenates of horse hearts exposed to
HOCl/NO , but substantial nitrotyrosine formation was
observed when the homogenates were exposed to ONOO .
It is unlikely that residual HOCl degraded any protein bound
nitrotyrosine formed, as we recently reported in vitro (42) for the following reasons: 1) NO reacts with HOCl
rapidly (pH 7.2, 25 °C, 7.4 ± 1.3 × 103
M 1 s 1) (24); 2) analysis of
buffers after experimentation showed NO to be
oxidized to NO (this reaction is stoichiometric (1 mol of NO consumed by 1 mol of HOCl to give 1 mol of
NO ) (24, 28); and 3) the time course of exposure
used was short (5 min). HOCl-mediated loss of 3-nitrotyrosine in
proteins over the same time is negligible (42). The presence of a
variety of protease inhibitors during Western blotting and ELISA and
fixation in ethanol for flow cytometry and confocal microscopy
techniques should have inhibited any endogenous nitrotyrosine-removing
entities. In any case these reactions appear slow and incomplete such
as those observed in dog prostate tissue (39), rat brain and heart homogenates (40), and skin (41). Furthermore, the positive control
(ONOO -treated cells) performed adequately in each
technique used. Similarly, over this short time period there was
negligible loss of cell viability. However, for confocal microscopy,
even dead cells would have been fixed and would have immunostained
positively for nitrotyrosine if it had been formed. The possibility
that the levels of tyrosine nitration are too low for each of the four
separate techniques employed cannot be completely ruled out. However,
the majority of the published reports dealing with tyrosine nitration
in human disease have used the same techniques as described here
(reviewed in Ref. 2). The most commonly used detection of tyrosine
nitration in human disease lesions is immunohistochemistry with
colorimetric detection. This is less sensitive than fluorometric
immunohistochemistry detection with confocal microscopy and flow
cytometry used here. Similarly, Western blotting and ELISA are
routinely used techniques (2). Recently, Spencer et al. (23)
showed a potentiation of HOCl-mediated DNA base deamination and
inhibition of HOCl-mediated DNA strand breakage in HBE-1 cells with
high concentrations of NO (1 mM) when
added to high concentrations of HOCl (1 mM) followed by a
prolonged period of exposure (2 h). Therefore, reactive entities from
the reaction of HOCl and NO could penetrate the cell
membrane but are unlikely to cause tyrosine nitration, because it was
only observed with the positive control (100 µM
ONOO ) with each analytical technique used and not with
mixtures of NO and HOCl.
Therefore, it is possible that NO2Cl formed from the
reaction of physiologically attainable concentrations of
NO and HOCl in vivo contributes minimally
to the formation of intracellular tyrosine nitration observed in human
diseases and animal models. Consequently, the cellular nitration
reported in human disease (1, 2) is more likely to originate from
ONOO , peroxidase (18, 20, 23), or heme-mediated RNS (21). As with NO2Cl, the extent to which these contribute to
intracellular tyrosine nitration is unknown and is currently
being investigated by our laboratory.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to the National Medical
Research Council of Singapore for generous research support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the National Medical Research
Council of Singapore (Grants NMRC/0474/2000, NMRC/0481/2000, and NMRC/0635/2002).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 65-6874-8891;
Fax: 65-6779-1453; E-mail: bchwml@nus.edu.sg.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 9, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M211086200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RNS, reactive
nitrogen species;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
GSSG, oxidized
glutathione;
HOCl, hypochlorous acid;
MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Halliwell, B.,
Zhao, K.,
and Whiteman, M.
(1999)
Free Radic. Res.
31,
651-669[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Greenacre, S. A. B.,
and Ischiropoulos, H.
(2001)
Free Radic. Res.
34,
541-581[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Moncada, S.
(2001)
Verh. K. Acad. Geneeskd. Belg.
62,
171-179
|
| 4.
|
Ellis, G.,
Adatia, I.,
Yazdanpanah, M.,
and Makela, S. K.
(1998)
Clin. Biochem.
31,
195-220[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Leone, A. M.,
Francis, P. L.,
Rhodes, P.,
and Moncada, S.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
200,
951-957[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Ueda, T.,
Maekawa, T.,
Sadamitsu, D.,
Ohshita, S.,
Ogino, K.,
and Nakamura, K.
(1995)
Electrophoresis
16,
1002-1004[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Torre, D.,
Ferrario, G.,
Speranza, F.,
Fiori, G. P.,
and Zeroli, P.
(1996)
J. Clin. Path.
49,
574-576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Wanchu, A.,
Agnihotri, N.,
Deodhar, S. D.,
and Ganguly, N. K.
(1996)
Indian J. Med. Res.
104,
263-268[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Sud, A.,
Khullar, M.,
Wanchu, A.,
and Bambert, P.
(2000)
Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem.
4,
615-619[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Wanchu, A.,
Khullar, M.,
Deodhar, S. D.,
Bambery, P.,
and Sud, A.
(1998)
Rheum. Int.
18,
41-43
|
| 11.
|
Davies, C. A.,
Perrett, D.,
Zhang, Z.,
Nielsen, B. R.,
Blake, D. R.,
and Winyard, P. G.
(1999)
Electrophoresis
20,
2111-2117[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Zuber, M.,
and Miesle, R.
(1994)
in
Biology of Nitric Oxide
(Moncada, S.
, Feelisch, M.
, Busse, R.
, and Higgs, E. A., eds), Vol. 3
, pp. 503-505, Portland Press, London
|
| 13.
|
Ueki, Y.,
Tominaga, Y.,
and Eguchi, K. I.
(1996)
J. Rheumatol.
23,
230-235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
McKnight, G. M.,
Duncan, C. W.,
Leifert, C.,
and Golden, M. H.
(1999)
Br. J. Nutr.
81,
349-358[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Weitzberg, E.,
and Lundberg, J. O. N.
(1998)
Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem.
2,
1-7[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Helaleh, M. I. H.,
and Korenaga, T.
(2000)
J. Chromatogr. B.
744,
433-437[CrossRef]
|
| 17.
|
Konttinen, Y. T.,
Platts, L. A.,
Tuominen, S.,
Eklund, K. K.,
Santavirta, N.,
Tornwall, J.,
Sorsa, T.,
Hukkanen, M.,
and Polak, J. M.
(1997)
Arthritis Rheum.
40,
875-883[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Duguet, A.,
Iijima, H.,
Eum, S. Y.,
Hamid, Q.,
and Eidelman, D. H.
(2001)
Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med.
164,
1119-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Eiserich, J. P.,
Cross, C. E.,
Jones, A. D.,
Halliwell, B.,
and Van der Vliet, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19199-19208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Sampson, J. B.,
Ye, Y.,
Rosen, H.,
and Beckman, J. S.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
356,
207-213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Grzelak, A.,
Balcerczyk, A.,
Majeta, A.,
and Bartosz, G.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1528,
97-100
|
| 22.
|
Johnson, D. W.,
and Margerum, D. W.
(1991)
Inorg. Chem.
30,
4845-4851[CrossRef]
|
| 23.
|
Eiserich, J. P.,
Hristova, M.,
Cross, C. E.,
Jones, A. D.,
Freeman, B. A.,
Halliwell, B.,
and Van der Vliet, A.
(1998)
Nature
391,
393-397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Panasenko, O. M.,
Briviba, J.,
Klotz, L. O.,
and Sies, H.
(1997)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
343,
254-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Babior, B. M.
(2000)
Am. J. Med.
109,
33-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ahn, B.,
Han, B. S.,
Kim, D. J.,
and Ohshima, H.
(1999)
Carcinogenesis
20,
1337-1344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Mapp, P. I.,
Klocke, R.,
Walsh, D. A.,
Chana, J. K.,
Stevens, C. R.,
Gallagher, P. J.,
and Blake, D. R.
(2001)
Arthritis Rheum.
44,
1534-1539[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Whiteman, M.,
Hooper, D. C.,
Scott, G. S.,
Koprowski, H.,
and Halliwell, B.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
99,
12061-12066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Morris, J. C.
(1996)
J. Phys. Chem.
70,
3798-3805[CrossRef]
|
| 30.
|
Beckman, J. S.,
Chen, J.,
Ischiropolous, H.,
and Crow, J. P.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
223,
229-240
|
| 31.
|
Eiserich, J. P.,
Estevez, A. G.,
Bamberg, T. V.,
Ye, Y. Z.,
Chumley, P. H.,
Beckman, J. S.,
and Freeman, B. A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6365-6370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Spencer, J. P. E.,
Whiteman, M.,
Jenner, A.,
and Halliwell, B.
(2000)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
28,
1039-1050[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Clement, M.-V.,
Hirpara, J.,
Chowdhury, S.,
and Pervaiz, S.
(1998)
Blood
92,
996-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Choi, J.-J.,
Oh, Y.-K.,
Kim, H.-S.,
Kim, H.-C.,
Ko, K. H.,
and Kim, W.-K.
(2002)
Glia
39,
37-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Whiteman, M.,
Spencer, J. P. E.,
Jenner, A.,
and Halliwell, B.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
257,
572-576[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Klebanoff, S. J.
(1993)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
14,
351-360[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Kono, Y.
(1995)
Bioch. Mol. Biol. Int.
36,
275-283[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Marcinkiewicz, J.,
Chain, B.,
Nowak, B.,
Grabowska, A.,
Bryniarski, K.,
and Baran, J.
(2000)
Inflamm. Res.
49,
280-289[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kuo, W. N.,
Kanadia, R. N.,
and Shanbhag, V. P.
(1999)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
47,
1061-1067[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Kuo, W. N.,
Kanadia, R. N.,
Shanbhag, V. P.,
and Toro, R.
(1999)
Mol. Cell Biochem.
201,
11-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Greenacre, S. A.,
Evans, P.,
Halliwell, B.,
and Brain, S. D.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
262,
781-786[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Whiteman, M.,
and Halliwell, B.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
258,
168-172[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. D. Ramseyer and J. L. Garvin
Angiotensin II Decreases Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 Expression via Nitric Oxide and Superoxide in the Thick Ascending Limb
Hypertension,
February 1, 2009;
53(2):
313 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Radi
Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration
PNAS,
March 23, 2004;
101(12):
4003 - 4008.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|