HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 12, 10081-10086, March 21, 2003

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 278/12/10081    most recent M212462200v1 Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gardner, A. M. Articles by Gardner, P. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gardner, A. M. Articles by Gardner, P. R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Regulation of the Nitric Oxide Reduction Operon (norRVW) in Escherichia coli

ROLE OF NorR AND ⁵⁴ IN THE NITRIC OXIDE STRESS RESPONSE^*

Anne M. Gardner, Christopher R. Gessner, and Paul R. Gardner

From the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229

Received for publication, December 6, 2002, and in revised form, January 14, 2003

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Nitric oxide (NO) induces NO-detoxifying enzymes in Escherichia coli suggesting sensitive mechanisms for coordinate control of NO defense genes in response to NO stress. Exposure of E. coli to sub-micromolar NO levels under anaerobic conditions rapidly induced transcription of the NO reductase (NOR) structural genes, norV and norW, as monitored by lac gene fusions. Disruption of rpoN (⁵⁴) impaired the NO-mediated induction of norV and norW transcription and NOR expression, whereas disruption of the upstream regulatory gene, norR, completely ablated NOR induction. NOR inducibility was restored to NorR null mutants by expressing NorR in trans. Furthermore, an internal deletion of the N-terminal domain of NorR activated NOR expression independent of NO exposure. Neither NorR nor ₅₄ was essential for NO-mediated induction of the NO dioxygenase (flavohemoglobin) encoded by hmp. However, elevated NOR activity inhibited NO dioxygenase induction, and, in the presence of dioxygen, NO dioxygenase inhibited norV induction by NO. The results demonstrate the role of NorR as a ⁵⁴-dependent regulator of norVW expression. A role for the NorR N-terminal domain as a transducer or sensor for NO is suggested.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Nitric oxide (NO)¹ is a free radical with multiple and diverse biological functions (reviewed in Ref. 1). NO serves as an intermediate in microbial denitrification (2), a signal molecule controlling the activation of guanylate cyclases (3), and as a broad-spectrum antibiotic, anti-viral and anti-tumor agent secreted by host immune cells (4, 5). Sub-micromolar NO can inactivate or inhibit critical enzymes, including [4Fe-4S] (de)hydratases and heme-dependent terminal respiratory oxidases, accounting at least in part for the cytotoxic actions of NO (6-11).

Not surprisingly, organisms have evolved mechanisms for NO detoxification. NO reductases (NORs) reduce NO to N₂O and are widely distributed in denitrifying bacteria, nitrogen-dissimilating fungi, and pathogenic bacteria (2). Microbes also express NO dioxygenases (NODs) that utilize O₂ to convert NO to nitrate (12-18). Escherichia coli employs both of these enzymes. An inducible NOD (flavohemoglobin), encoded by the gene hmp (19), detoxifies NO under aerobic growth conditions (12, 15, 20). An inducible O₂-sensitive NOR activity encoded by the norRVW operon detoxifies NO under anaerobic and microaerobic conditions (8, 20). NorV is a di-iron center-containing flavorubredoxin-type NOR with orthologues in the Archeae, strict anaerobes, and facultative anaerobes (21-24). It is distinct from the bacterial heme/nonheme iron-containing cytochrome bc-type NORs and the fungal P450-type NOR (2). NorW functions as an NADH:flavorubredoxin oxidoreductase (21) and is required for maximal flavorubredoxin-catalyzed NO reduction in cells (8) and in vitro (25). Together, the O₂-dependent NOD and the O₂-sensitive NOR (NorVW) detoxify NO throughout the physiological [O₂] range (7, 8, 20).

NORs and NODs are induced by NO or NO-generating agents suggesting fine-tuned mechanisms for the coordination of microbial NO defenses to NO stress levels. In denitrifying Pseudomonas and Rhodobacter, cytochrome bc-type NORs are up-regulated by the Fnr-like DnrD/NnrR transcription regulators in response to nanomolar NO (26-28). However, unlike Fnr (29), DnrD/NnrR do not bear NO-reactive [4Fe-4S] centers, and the NO sensing mechanism is currently unknown (26-28, 30). In the denitrifier Ralstonia eutropha, the tripartite transcription factor NorR regulates denitrification, norA1B1 transcription, and NOR activity expression in a ⁵⁴-dependent mechanism in response to exposures to sodium nitroprusside, the NO donor compound NOC18, or during growth with nitrite or nitrate (31). E. coli and related microbes contain norR orthologues suggesting a global regulatory role for NorR in controlling defenses (i.e. norVW, norBC, and hmp) against the incipient toxicity of NO and secondarily derived reactive nitrogen species (8, 31, 32).

Recently, Hutchings et al. (32) reported NorR-dependent activation of norV transcription by the NO⁺ donor and NO-generating compound nitroprusside in support of the proposed regulatory function. Interestingly, nitroprusside-elicited norV transcription was increased >5-fold by normoxic O₂ suggesting mechanisms for NorR activation involving O₂-derived reactive nitrogen intermediates rather than NO per se. The large oxygen enhancement of norV transcription observed with or without nitroprusside exposure has also supported proposals for aerobic functions for the norRVW operon, including O₂ reduction and the detoxification of O₂-derived reactive nitrogen intermediates (25, 32).

We now report the rapid and robust induction of norV and norW transcription and NorVW activity by sub-micromolar NO via a NorR- and ⁵⁴-dependent mechanism in E. coli. We also show that a deletion within the conserved NorR N-terminal domain activates NorVW expression independent of NO exposure, thus demonstrating the role of the N terminus in NO sensing and signaling. Contrary to the results obtained with nitroprusside (32), O₂ greatly diminished norV and norW induction by NO. The results are discussed in light of the proposed NO reduction and detoxification function of the norRVW operon within the NO defense network.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Chemicals and Reagents-- Bovine liver catalase (260,000 units/ml) was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Glucose oxidase (4,000 units/ml) and -galactosidase (1190 units/ml) were obtained from Sigma. Saturated NO stocks (2 mM) were prepared in water as previously described (7). Compressed gas cylinders containing 1200 ppm (±5%) of NO in ultrapure N₂, 99.999% N₂, 99.993% O₂, and 1.05% O₂ in ultrapure N₂ were obtained from Praxair (Bethlehem, PA).

Strain and Plasmid Construction-- Strains and plasmids are described in Table I. Chromosomal lacZ gene fusions of norR, norV, and norW were created as previously described (8). A Tn10 mutation in the rpoN locus was transduced with P1 phage and mutants were selected for tetracycline resistance. The pUC19NorR construct is a 1.9-kb SalI-PstI fragment cloned in pUC19 containing the intragenic region between norR and norV in addition to the norR coding region from the lambda phage 9G10 (36). To construct pUC19NorR30-164, a 1.1-kb fragment encoding the C terminus was PCR-amplified using pUC19NorR as the template and using the oligonucleotide primers 5'-GTTGCGGATCCAACAACTGGAAAGCCAGAATATGC-3' and 5'-CATGCCTGCAGGATTTCTATCAGGCCG-3' containing BamHI and PstI sites (underlined), respectively. pUC19NorR was digested with Bcl1 and PstI, and the 1.1-kb PCR fragment was subcloned. This procedure generated an in-frame fusion of NorR that deleted amino acids 30-164 and added a glutamate residue at the junction. A second in-frame deletion of amino acids 30-214 was created by digesting pUC19NorR with Bcl1 and religating.

Media, Growth Conditions, and Gas Exposures-- Anerobic starter cultures were grown static overnight at 37 °C in 15-ml tubes containing 10 ml of phosphate-buffered LB medium supplemented with 20 mM glucose (7). Aerobic and microaerobic starter cultures were grown overnight in 5 ml of phosphate-buffered LB medium in 15-ml tubes shaking at 200 rpm at 37 °C. Chloramphenicol and ampicillin were added as indicated at 30 and 50 µg/ml, respectively. Culture growth was monitored by following the turbidity at 550 nm (A₅₅₀) and by plating and counting. An A₅₅₀ value of 1.0 in a 1-cm cuvette was equivalent to 3 × 10⁸ bacteria per milliliter for cultures grown in phosphate-buffered LB media. Gases were mixed and delivered to sealed 50-ml growth flasks as previously described (20).

NO Consumption Assays-- Whole cell NO consumption rates were measured at 37 °C with a 2-mm ISO-NOP NO electrode (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) in the presence or absence of O₂ as previously described (12, 20).

-Galactosidase Assays-- Cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. -Galactosidase activity was measured according to the method of Miller (37) with the following modifications. Frozen cell pellets were suspended at ~1 × 10¹⁰ cells per milliliter in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and sonicated on ice. Cell-free extracts were prepared by centrifuging lysates at 12,000 × g for 5 min. Assays were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in a 0.1-ml volume with 1-15 µg of extract protein in a 96-well plate. Extract activities were determined using a standard curve generated with 0-3.5 milliunits of -galactosidase. Activity is reported in milliunits per milligram of extract protein where one milliunit cleaves 1 nmol of o-nitrophenyl--D-galactopyranoside per minute at room temperature. Background -galactosidase activity in parental AB1157 cells was 3.3 ± 0.6 milliunits/mg extract protein in anaerobic cells, 3.5 ± 0.7 in low aerobic cells, and 8.3 ± 1.0 in aerobic cultures. -Galactosidase activity remained constant in AB1157 cells irrespective of NO exposure and was subtracted from the activities measured in lacZ fusion strains under similar growth conditions. Soluble protein was measured using Bio-Rad dye reagent with bovine serum albumin as the standard (38).

Statistical Analysis-- Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined using the Tukey Kramer honestly significantly different method in the JMP program (SAS Institute).

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

NO Induces Transcription of norV and norW but Not norR-- norV and norW transcriptional units are arranged in a head-to-tail fashion with the start methionine of NorW located within the coding region of norV suggesting coordinate transcription and translation in response to NO stress (8). In contrast, norR is divergently transcribed from norVW (8) and is autogenously regulated (32).

Strain AG300 carrying a norV-lacZ fusion within the norV genomic locus and lacking inducible anaerobic NOR activity (8) was used to measure the responsiveness of norV transcription to authentic NO. Exposure of anaerobic AG300 to 960 ppm gaseous NO (2 µM in solution) induced -galactosidase activity by ~50-fold within 5 min. -Galactosidase expression peaked after 30-45 min of exposure resulting in 1000-fold induction (Fig. 1A). A 30-fold increase in norV transcription was observed with 120 ppm NO (0.25 µM in solution) (Fig. 1B). Maximal induction of -galactosidase activity was observed with 480 ppm NO (1 µM in solution). Expression was blunted with 960 ppm NO exposure suggesting toxicity of NO under these conditions.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Expression of a norV-lacZ fusion in anaerobic cultures exposed to NO. Strain AG300 was exposed to 960 ppm gaseous NO for various times (A) or to various NO concentrations for 45 min (B), and -galactosidase activity was measured. Cultures were initiated from static overnight cultures at an A550 = ~0.1 and were grown under an N2 atmosphere in phosphate-buffered LB medium. At an A550 of ~0.3, cultures were exposed to mixtures of NO in N2. Cells were harvested, and extracts were prepared and assayed for -galactosidase activity in triplicate as described under "Materials and Methods." Error bars represent the S.D. of measurements from three independent exposures.

NO similarly induced norW-lacZ in strain AG400 under anaerobic conditions (Table II). However, the norW-lac fusion was induced to a 10-fold lower extent than that observed for the norV-lac fusion following a similar NO exposure.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table II Expression of norV-, norW-, and norR-lacZ fusions Cultures were grown under anaerobic N2, 0.5% O2, or 21% O2 to A550 = ~0.3. Anaerobic and fully aerated (21% O2) cultures were grown with or without exposure to 960 ppm NO for 45 min. Low O2 cultures were grown with or without exposure to 600 ppm NO for 45 min. Cells were assayed for -galactosidase activity as described under "Materials and Methods." Anaerobic and (micro)aerobic cultures were initiated at an A550 = 0.1 from static and aerated overnight cultures, respectively. Activities were determined in triplicate for three to five independent exposures.

The dampened response of norW-lac to NO may be explained by the production of significant NOR activity from norV expression within strain AG400 (8), thus resulting in a lower steady-state NO level. It is also possible that higher steady-state NO levels are required to activate maximal norW transcription. Nevertheless, the results clearly demonstrate a rapid, robust, and coordinate up-regulation of norV and norW transcription in response to low levels of NO. The results in Table II also demonstrate a low non-inducible level of transcription from norR consistent with previous results obtained using nitroprusside as the potential inducer (32).

O₂ Decreases norV and norW Transcription in Response to NO-- NO-mediated induction of norV-lac and norW-lac fusions was significantly inhibited by O₂. Under fully aerated conditions (~200 µM O₂), induction ratios for norV-lacZ and norW-lacZ fusions were reduced 200- and 20-fold, respectively, with no change in the basal expression levels (Table II). At a lower O₂ concentration (~5 µM), norV-lac and norW-lac induction ratios were reduced 3.1- and 1.8-fold, respectively. Lower norV and norW induction in the presence of O₂ can be explained by the decrease in cellular NO levels achieved by the inducible NOD. Indeed, NOD expression decreased norV-lac expression by ~96% in cells exposed to an atmosphere containing 960 ppm NO in 21% O₂ for 45 min. NOD-deficient strain AG301 and control strain AG300 produced 3453 ± 493 and 149 ± 23 milliunits/mg -galactosidase (n = 4, ±S.E.), respectively. Thus, norV and norW are maximally induced under conditions in which the O₂-sensitive NOR functions most effectively (8, 20), and NOD indirectly regulates NOR expression.

Induction of norVW Transcription Is Dependent on ⁵⁴-- The central domain of the tripartite NorR protein is highly homologous with ⁵⁴-dependent response regulators (31, 39) thus suggesting an important role for ⁵⁴ in the NO response. Furthermore, the region upstream of the norVW genes contains the respective 12 and 24 elements TTGCA and TGGCA characteristic of ⁵⁴-dependent promoters (40, 41).

We used rpoN mutants to test the role of ⁵⁴ in NO-induced norV transcription and NOR activity expression. -Galactosidase activity was measured in AG300 and ⁵⁴-deficient strain AG305 following a 45-min exposure to 600 ppm gaseous NO under microaerobic conditions. In the absence of ⁵⁴, norV-lacZ expression was substantially impaired (Fig. 2A). The ⁵⁴-deficient strain AG500 and parental AB1157 were similarly exposed to NO under low O₂ and tested for anaerobic NOR and aerobic NOD activity. NOR activity was significantly reduced in strain AG500 (Fig. 2B). There was no significant effect of ⁵⁴ on NOD (hmp) expression under these conditions (Fig. 2C). The results clearly demonstrate a role for ⁵⁴ in norV transcription. The residual induction of norV transcription and NOR activity in the absence of ⁵⁴ suggests ancillary roles for other  factors in norV transcription or mechanisms for post-transcriptional regulation.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Effect of 54 on constitutive and induced norV transcription and NO metabolism. A, -galactosidase activity was measured in strain AG300 and 54-deficient strain AG305 grown under a N2 atmosphere containing 0.5% O2 balanced with N2 in the absence (white bars) or presence of 600 ppm gaseous NO (black bars). Anaerobic (B) and aerobic (C) NO consumption activities were measured for the parental strain AB1157 and the 54-deficient strain AG500 grown under an N2 atmosphere containing 0.5% O2 (white bars) or 0.5% O2 and 600 ppm NO (black bars). Cultures were initiated at A550 = ~0.1 from aerated overnight cultures grown in phosphate-buffered LB medium. Cultures were grown to A550 = ~0.3 and were either exposed to NO or maintained under an atmosphere containing 0.5% O2 in N2. After a 45-min exposure, cultures were shifted to a N2 atmosphere and immediately harvested for the assay of -galactosidase activity, or anaerobic NOR activity and aerobic NOD activity as described under "Materials and Methods." Error bars represent the S.D. of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate p < 0.05 relative to the corresponding value for AG300 (A) or AB1157 (B).

NorR Activates NOR Expression in trans-- Expression of NorR from a multicopy plasmid rescued the NO inducibility of NOR activity in the norR deletion strain AG200 (Fig. 3A) thus confirming the trans-acting regulatory role of NorR in the activation of norVW transcription and NOR activity expression (8, 32). In the absence of NO, there was no measurable NOR activity expressed (Fig. 3A, open bars) indicating that overexpression of wild-type NorR does not by itself increase NorVW expression. However, internal deletion of NorR, eliminating amino acids 30-164 containing the putative signaling domain (31, 39), but retaining the entire central ⁵⁴-interacting ATPase domain and the C-terminal DNA binding domain, induced NOR activity in the absence of NO (Fig. 3A). Further deletion of NorR to amino acid 214, eliminating part of the ⁵⁴-interacting ATPase domain, did not induce -galactosidase activity (data not shown) thus further delineating the requirement for ⁵⁴ interaction with NorR for transcriptional activation. Interestingly, the NO-mediated induction of NOD activity was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced in strains expressing NorR and elevated NOR activity (Fig. 3B) thus suggesting an indirect role for NorR and NOR in regulating NOD expression by reducing NO levels.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   Effects of NorR and a NorR N-terminal domain deletion mutant on the expression of NOR and NOD activities. Anaerobic NOR (A) and aerobic NOD (B) activities were measured in the norR::lac deletion strain AG200 containing either pUC19 (control), pUC19NorR (NorR), or pUC19NorR30-164 (30-164). Cultures were either maintained under an atmosphere containing 0.5% O2 balanced with N2 (white bars) or exposed for 60 min to 600 ppm gaseous NO in 0.5% O2 balanced with N2 (black bars). Cultures were initiated, grown, and harvested as described in the legend to Fig. 2, except that ampicillin was added at 50 µg/ml. Error bars represent the ±S.D. for three to five independent trials. Asterisks indicate p < 0.05 relative to the value of the corresponding control.

These results demonstrate the signaling function of the N-terminal domain of the E. coli norVW transcription regulator NorR similar to that described for other tripartite regulators (31, 42). In addition, the results demonstrate that neither NorR nor ⁵⁴ is directly involved in the NO-mediated up-regulation of the E. coli NOD (hmp).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Our data demonstrate that the exposure of E. coli to NO induces transcription of the norV and norW genes via a NorR and ⁵⁴-dependent mechanism. The data extend the results of Hutchings et al. (32) demonstrating activation of norV transcription by the NO⁺ donor nitroprusside, nitrite, or nitrate in a NorR-dependent fashion. Given the relatively low concentration of NO required for anaerobic norV induction (Fig. 1B), NO is the most probable physiological signal modulating NorR and norVW transcription. Our results differ from those of Hutchings et al. (32) who reported that constitutive and induced norV transcription was greater in the presence of O₂. One likely explanation for the discrepancy is that we used NO gas and Hutchings et al. (32) used nitroprusside as a NO⁺ donor and potential NO-generating agent. Nitroprusside may have deleterious effects on transcription or, alternatively, may generate NO at higher levels in aerobic cells. Pure NO gas is readily available and is clearly preferred for investigations of the effects of NO on NO defense gene regulation.

The use of pure NO gas for the quantitative evaluation of gene expression responses also presents challenges because of the existence of multiple pathways for rapid and inducible NO metabolism and because of the incipient toxicity of NO. Nevertheless, the demonstration that the NO levels required for norV induction correspond with levels shown to exert cellular damage strongly supports the proposed role of the norRVW operon in NO reduction and detoxification. Thus, 240 ppm gaseous NO (0.5 µM in solution) inactivated E. coli aconitase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydratase and inhibited growth in the absence of the induced NorVW activity (6, 8). Furthermore, the level of NO inducing half-maximal norV transcription (0.7 µM) approximates the apparent K_m (NO) value of ~0.4 µM determined for NorVW-catalyzed NO reduction (8). These results diminish the likelihood of a significant function of the operon in O₂ detoxification or in the detoxification of unspecified reactive nitrogen intermediates generated from nitroprusside or NO exposure as previously suggested (25, 32).

A search of GenBank^TM (NCBI) with the N-terminal 182 amino acids of NorR identifies several NorR orthologues (Fig. 4). As in E. coli, NorR orthologues in Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pnuemoniae, Shigella flexnerei (AAN44223), and Vibrio vulnificus CMCP6 (NP_763239) are positioned upstream of norVW orthologues. Interestingly, NorR orthologues in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio cholera, Azetobacter vinelandii (ZP_00091183), Burkholderia sp. strain TH2 (BAC16772), and Burkholderia fungorum (ZP00028693) genomes are found divergently transcribed from flavohemoglobin (hmp) genes suggesting a potential role for NorR in regulating NODs in response to NO. In this regard it is noteworthy that NorR was not required for the induction of NOD activity in response to NO in E. coli (Fig. 3B), thus demonstrating the existence of one or more separate NO-responsive regulator(s) of hmp in E. coli.

View larger version (64K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Conservation within the N-terminal domain of NorR orthologues. An alignment of NorR orthologues was performed using the ClustalW program (MacVector 7.0). Dark shading, identical amino acids; light shading, similar amino acids; double dots, close similarities with a threshold comparison value of 0.50. GenBankTM accession numbers are as follows: E. coli, NP_417189 using the second start methionine for a 504-amino acid protein; S. typhimurium, NP_461760; K. pneumoniae, contig 661 with three base pairs added to maintain reading frame (available at genome.wustl.edu); R. eutropha NorR, CAC00710; R. eutropha NorR2, CAC00712; P. aeruginosa, NP_251355; V. cholera, NP_232582. Asterisks mark conserved aspartate residues in position for potential phospho-acceptance. The number symbol identifies the putative kinase-stimulating acidic site. Solid dots indicate potential heme iron ligands.

NorR belongs to the family of two-component response regulators (42). Similar to other tripartite regulators in this family, deletion of the N-terminal signaling or inhibitory domain of NorR activated NorVW expression independent of NO (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, conserved aspartate residues in the NorR N-terminal signaling domain suggest the potential for phosphorylation by a sensor histidine-kinase similar to that described for the NtrB/NtrC pair (43). In particular, aspartates 57 and 62 are in position to accept phosphate, and the conserved acidic residue at position 14 may serve to optimize phosphorylation (Fig. 4) (44). Alternatively, the NorR N-terminal domain could activate transcription by interacting with a signal transducing protein as described for NifL/NifA (45) or by binding NO directly as the formate-sensing transcription regulator FhlA binds formate (46). The NorR N-terminal domain contains potential metal-liganding histidine and cysteine residues that could form the NO sensor module. For example, NorR contains an His¹¹¹-X-Cys¹¹³ site reminiscent of the Cys⁷⁵-X-His⁷⁷ heme iron ligand-switch motif in the carbon monoxide-sensing CooA of Rhodospirillum rubrum (47).

Fig. 5 summarizes our current view of the NO defense network in E. coli. NO exposure elicits the synthesis of two major NO-metabolizing enzymes, NOD and NOR (NorVW) by activating transcription of their corresponding genes, hmp and norVW. The respective contribution of each enzyme to NO detoxification depends primarily on the availability of O₂. NOD is effective under aerobic and microaerobic conditions (K_m (O₂) = 60-100 µM) (13, 14). The NOR activity of NorVW is unique in that its exquisite sensitivity to O₂ restricts its NO scavenging function to anaerobic or microaerobic conditions (8, 20). The results also support a model in which norVW and hmp transcription are indirectly influenced by O₂ availability, because O₂ levels affect NorVW and NOD activities, which ultimately determine NO steady-state levels and the activity of transcription regulators such as NorR and Fnr (29, 48).

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5.   NO defense network in E. coli. NO induces expression of NOR (NorVW) and NOD activities that scavenge NO and prevent damage to critical cellular targets, stasis, and death throughout the physiological O2 concentration range. NorR controls norVW transcription in response to NO stress via a 54 (s54)-dependent mechanism. A putative histidine-aspartate kinase (?) senses NO levels and phosphorylates and activates NorR and norVW transcription. Alternatively, NO activates NorR directly. NO reacts with Fnr and de-represses hmp transcription under anaerobic conditions (29). Unknown regulator (X) controls hmp transcription under aerobic conditions. Additional genes activated by NO-sensing regulators constitute a NO defense network.

Interestingly, neither SoxRS nor OxyR, which have been persistently proposed to be critical NO stress response sensor-regulators (49, 50) appear to be involved in the regulation of either hmp or norVW in E. coli (Fig. 5) (48).² Future investigations will aim to further clarify the diverse roles and mechanisms of NO defense genes, enzymes, and regulators in microbial adaptations to NO in vitro and in various models of infection.

	ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Alex Ninfa and Kenn Rudd for supplying strains and phage used in these investigations.

	FOOTNOTES

^* This work was supported by a grant from the Children's Hospital Research Foundation Trustees and Public Health Services Grant GM-65090 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: ML 7006, Children's Hospital Research Foundation, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229. Tel.: 513-636-8712; Fax: 513-636-4892; E-mail: Anne.Gardner@cchmc.org.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 15, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M212462200

² A. M. Gardner and P. R. Gardner, unpublished results.

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; NOR, NO reductase; NOD, NO dioxygenase; LB, Luria-Bertani; Cm^r, chloramphenicol resistance, Ap^r, ampicillin resistance; Tc^r, tetracycline resistance; Kn^r, kanamycin resistance.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. J. Gilberthorpe and R. K. Poole Nitric Oxide Homeostasis in Salmonella typhimurium: ROLES OF RESPIRATORY NITRATE REDUCTASE AND FLAVOHEMOGLOBIN J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11146 - 11154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Trautwein, S. Kuhner, L. Wohlbrand, T. Halder, K. Kuchta, A. Steinbuchel, and R. Rabus Solvent Stress Response of the Denitrifying Bacterium "Aromatoleum aromaticum" Strain EbN1 Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 15, 2008; 74(8): 2267 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Jarboe, D. R. Hyduke, L. M. Tran, K. J. Y. Chou, and J. C. Liao Determination of the Escherichia coli S-Nitrosoglutathione Response Network Using Integrated Biochemical and Systems Analysis J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 5148 - 5157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Chiranand, I. McLeod, H. Zhou, J. J. Lynn, L. A. Vega, H. Myers, J. R. Yates III, M. C. Lorenz, and M. C. Gustin CTA4 Transcription Factor Mediates Induction of Nitrosative Stress Response in Candida albicans Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2008; 7(2): 268 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. Tucker, B. D'Autreaux, F. K. Yousafzai, S. A. Fairhurst, S. Spiro, and R. Dixon Analysis of the Nitric Oxide-sensing Non-heme Iron Center in the NorR Regulatory Protein J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2008; 283(2): 908 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Pullan, M. D. Gidley, R. A. Jones, J. Barrett, T. M. Stevanin, R. C. Read, J. Green, and R. K. Poole Nitric Oxide in Chemostat-Cultured Escherichia coli Is Sensed by Fnr and Other Global Regulators: Unaltered Methionine Biosynthesis Indicates Lack of S Nitrosation J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2007; 189(5): 1845 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Nisoli and M. O. Carruba Nitric oxide and mitochondrial biogenesis J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2006; 119(14): 2855 - 2862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Bodenmiller and S. Spiro The yjeB (nsrR) Gene of Escherichia coli Encodes a Nitric Oxide-Sensitive Transcriptional Regulator J. Bacteriol., February 1, 2006; 188(3): 874 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Arai, M. Hayashi, A. Kuroi, M. Ishii, and Y. Igarashi Transcriptional Regulation of the Flavohemoglobin Gene for Aerobic Nitric Oxide Detoxification by the Second Nitric Oxide-Responsive Regulator of Pseudomonas aeruginosa J. Bacteriol., June 15, 2005; 187(12): 3960 - 3968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nikolajewa, A. Beyer, M. Friedel, J. Hollunder, and T. Wilhelm Common patterns in type II restriction enzyme binding sites Nucleic Acids Res., May 11, 2005; 33(8): 2726 - 2733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Helmick, A. E. Fletcher, A. M. Gardner, C. R. Gessner, A. N. Hvitved, M. C. Gustin, and P. R. Gardner Imidazole Antibiotics Inhibit the Nitric Oxide Dioxygenase Function of Microbial Flavohemoglobin Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2005; 49(5): 1837 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Flatley, J. Barrett, S. T. Pullan, M. N. Hughes, J. Green, and R. K. Poole Transcriptional Responses of Escherichia coli to S-Nitrosoglutathione under Defined Chemostat Conditions Reveal Major Changes in Methionine Biosynthesis J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10065 - 10072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Busch, A. Pohlmann, B. Friedrich, and R. Cramm A DNA Region Recognized by the Nitric Oxide-Responsive Transcriptional Activator NorR Is Conserved in {beta}- and {gamma}-Proteobacteria J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2004; 186(23): 7980 - 7987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. Tucker, B. D'Autreaux, D. J. Studholme, S. Spiro, and R. Dixon DNA Binding Activity of the Escherichia coli Nitric Oxide Sensor NorR Suggests a Conserved Target Sequence in Diverse Proteobacteria J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2004; 186(19): 6656 - 6660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Moore, M. M. Nakano, T. Wang, R. W. Ye, and J. D. Helmann Response of Bacillus subtilis to Nitric Oxide and the Nitrosating Agent Sodium Nitroprusside J. Bacteriol., July 15, 2004; 186(14): 4655 - 4664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Mukhopadhyay, M. Zheng, L. A. Bedzyk, R. A. LaRossa, and G. Storz Prominent roles of the NorR and Fur regulators in the Escherichia coli transcriptional response to reactive nitrogen species PNAS, January 20, 2004; 101(3): 745 - 750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 278/12/10081    most recent M212462200v1 Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gardner, A. M. Articles by Gardner, P. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gardner, A. M. Articles by Gardner, P. R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?