![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 19, 17475-17482, May 9, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Biology Department and Molecular Biology Institute, and
§ Department of Chemistry, San Diego State University,
San Diego, California 92182-4614
Received for publication, December 13, 2002, and in revised form, February 21, 2003
We integratively assessed the function of
alternative versions of a region near the N terminus of
Drosophila muscle myosin heavy chain (encoded by exon 3a or
3b). We exchanged the alternative exon 3 regions between an embryonic
isoform and the indirect flight muscle isoform. Each chimeric myosin
was expressed in Drosophila indirect flight muscle, in the
absence of other myosin isoforms, allowing for purified protein
analysis and whole organism locomotory studies. The flight muscle
isoform generates higher in vitro actin sliding velocity
and solution ATPase rates than the embryonic isoform. Exchanging the
embryonic exon 3 region into the flight muscle isoform decreased ATPase
rates to embryonic levels but did not affect actin sliding velocity or
flight muscle ultrastructure. Interestingly, this swap only
slightly impaired flight ability. Exchanging the flight muscle-specific
exon 3 region into the embryonic isoform increased actin sliding
velocity 3-fold and improved indirect flight muscle ultrastructure
integrity but failed to rescue the flightless phenotype of flies
expressing embryonic myosin. These results suggest that the two
structural versions of the exon 3 domain independently influence the
kinetics of at least two steps of the actomyosin cross-bridge cycle.
Myosin powers muscle shortening by converting the chemical energy
of ATP into actin movement through conformational changes in the myosin
head. Developmental stage and muscle-specific myosin isoforms have
distinct rates of ATP hydrolysis and propel actin at velocities that
strongly correlate with muscle contractile properties (1-3).
Differences in myosin isoform function have been well characterized in
many species (4). However, the mechanism by which variation in specific
structural regions of the myosin heavy chain
(MHC)1 contributes to
isoform-specific properties is not well understood, especially in
striated muscle isoforms (5, 6).
Studies aimed at defining structural regions of MHC that are
responsible for setting isoform-specific properties have focused on two
flexible surface loops that connect the proteolytic domains of the
myosin head (25/50-kDa, loop 1; and 50/20-kDa, loop 2) (for review see
Murphy and Spudich (6)). Altering these loops in some myosin types
influences in vitro ATPase rates and actin sliding
velocities (7, 8). In mammalian smooth muscle and scallop and
carp muscle isoforms, the pattern of Mhc RNA alternative splicing suggests that these loops contribute to differences in myosin
functional properties; in some cases this has been supported by
in vitro chimeric studies (9-12). However, in other
organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster, these two surface
loops are invariant among all muscle myosin isoforms (13).
In Drosophila, all structural variation between muscle MHC
isoforms is confined to four discrete regions of the S-1 head (Fig. 1), to the S-2 hinge region, and to the
C-terminal tailpiece (13). The discrete domain variation in
Drosophila myosin isoforms, which differs from the
widespread variation observed in most vertebrate striated isoforms,
highlights areas that must set isoform-specific functional properties.
Structural variation in these regions is generated by alternative
splicing of mRNA transcripts from the single Drosophila
Mhc gene (14-16). This mechanism produces at least 15 myosin
isoforms that are expressed in a wide variety of muscle types including
slow embryonic and larval body wall muscle and the very fast indirect
flight muscle (17, 18).
We recently compared the functional properties of two
Drosophila myosin isoforms that differ in all four S-1
variable regions, the indirect flight muscle isoform (IFI) and a major
embryonic body wall muscle isoform (EMB) (19). Expression of the EMB
isoform in a Drosophila myosin null background results in a
flightless phenotype, impaired jump ability, poor ambulation, and
difficulty in mating (20). EMB myosin isolated from the transgenic line propels actin at one-tenth the velocity in the in vitro
motility assay and has one-fourth the basal Mg-ATPase rate but does not differ in unitary step size compared with IFI (19). Thus the functional
differences between the two isoforms arise primarily from kinetic
differences in the cross-bridge cycle and must be caused by variation
in one or more of the alternative exon-encoded regions.
One variable S-1 head region in Drosophila is encoded by
alternative versions of exon 3. It is located near the N terminus of
the protein, between the ATP hydrolysis site and the pivot point of the
lever arm, and corresponds to residues 69-116 of chicken skeletal MHC
(Fig. 1). The two alternative versions of exon 3 differ in 18 of 48 amino acids, 12 of which are non-conserved substitutions (13). Exon 3b
is expressed primarily in adult muscles, including the indirect flight
muscle, and a few external embryonic body wall muscles (17, 18). Exon
3a appears to be expressed only in embryonic muscles, including most
intermediate and internal body wall muscles, visceral muscle, and
embryonic cardioblasts (17). This highly regulated expression pattern strongly suggests that alternative versions of exon 3 help set Drosophila myosin isoform-specific properties.
In this study we used the unique genetic capabilities of the
Drosophila myosin system to determine the role that exon 3 plays in setting isoform-specific functional properties of myosin. We constructed two chimeric transgenes with the exon 3 region exchanged between the IFI and EMB isoforms. We report on P
element-mediated expression of the myosin transgenes, ATPase rates, and
actin sliding velocities. Because the Drosophila system is
currently the only system where single mutant myosin isoforms can be
expressed in a functioning locomotory muscle, we also examined how the
altered myosin properties influence Drosophila indirect
flight muscle (IFM) myofibrillar ultrastructure and flight performance.
Our results demonstrate that at least two steps of the myosin
cross-bridge cycle are independently affected by different versions of
the exon 3 region.
Myosin DNA Construct Preparation--
To determine the
functional role of the MHC region encoded by exon 3, we constructed two
P element-based transgenes. The first transgene, IFI-3a,
allows expression of only the "embryonic" version of exon 3 (3a) in
all MHC isoforms, including the IFI isoform. It was constructed by
replacing the entire exon 3 coding region and flanking introns in
pWMHC2, a wild type genomic Mhc clone (5), with a
fragment containing only exon 3a (from an embryonic cDNA,
P[w+
Mhcemb]lw3 or
Mhcemb (20)). Specifically, an N-terminal coding region of
pWMHC2 was created by subcloning a 5-kb XbaI
fragment containing exons 1-6 and flanking introns into pBluescriptKS
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). A 3.6-kb fragment from
Mhcemb containing exons 1, 2, 3a, and 4 (without 3b
and the introns between 2, 3a, and 4) was exchanged into the N-terminal
subclone using XbaI and StuI. The modified
subclone was ligated back into pWMHC2 at the XbaI
sites. The pWMHC2 clone expresses wild type myosin at normal
levels and restores flight ability of Mhc10, a
myosin null specific to the jump muscle and IFM mutant flies (5). We
chose to express the modified genomic clone (IFI-3a) rather
than a modified IFI cDNA because expression of a myosin isoform
closely resembling IFI might have been lethal at the embryonic or
larval stage.
The second transgene forces expression of the "adult" version of
exon 3 (3b) in the embryonic isoform (EMB). Exon 3a in the Mhcemb cDNA clone (20) was replaced by cDNA
encoding exon 3b. Specifically, an XbaI and ApaI
4.7-kb fragment of Mhcemb containing exons 1-12 was
subcloned into pBluescript KS. Exon 3a was removed from the subclone by
digestion with PstI (restriction site in exon 2) and
StuI (restriction site in exon 4). Digestion of an adult
cDNA with the same restriction enzymes created a DNA fragment
containing exon 3b. This fragment was ligated into the subclone, and
the subclone insert was ligated back into digested Mhcemb.
Both clones were ligated into a CaSPeR vector behind the Mhc
promoter, which drives high levels of myosin expression in all muscle
types (21). All ligation sites were sequenced, and appropriate restriction digestions were carried out to ensure transgene fidelity.
Transformation of Drosophila with Chimeric
Mhcs--
Drosophila were transformed by injecting the
chimeric exon 3 plasmids at 0.6 mg ml RT-PCR--
To confirm expression of the proper transgene with
the expected alternative version of exon 3 in the transgenic organisms, we performed RT-PCR on RNA extracted from IFMs of the transgenic Drosophila lines. Sets of IFMs from 25 flies were dissected
in York modified glycerol and collected in a microcentrifuge tube as
described in Swank et al. (19). After sedimentation by
centrifugation for 5 min in a benchtop microcentrifuge, the IFMs were
resuspended and washed in 300 µl of York modified glycerol (without
Triton X-100 and glycerol). Following a 5-min centrifugation, the IFM pellet was homogenized in 200 µl of TRIzol (Invitrogen), and total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
final RNA pellet was dissolved in 20 µl of diethyl
pyrocarbonate/H2O.
An aliquot of total RNA (4.75 µl) was used for cDNA synthesis in
a volume of 10 µl of reverse transcriptase buffer containing 10 mM dithiothreitol, 10 units of RNasin, 10 units of Moloney murine leukemia virus-reverse transcriptase, and 3 µmol of an exon 7a
reverse primer (5'-TCAACAGACAAATGTCTT-3') or an exon 7d reverse primer
(5'-AGAGGAAGCACATCTCTT-3'). After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C,
the reaction was terminated by heating at 95 °C for 10 min.
PCR was performed with 1 µl of the cDNA and 0.4 µmol of the
primers using Ready-to-Go PCR beads (Amersham Biosciences). The primer
pairs were 3a (5'-ATCCGAGAAGGTGGAAAA-3') with 7d and 3b (5'-GAAAGATCTGCTCCAGCA-3') with 7a. Touchdown PCR (25) was performed as
follows. After a 3-min incubation of the primers and single-stranded cDNA at 95 °C, 2 cycles consisting of 45 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, and 2 min at 72 °C were performed. This was
followed by a series of cycles, each repeated once, where the annealing
temperature, initially 60 °C, was progressively decreased by 1 °C
until an annealing temperature of 54 °C was reached. The last cycle,
i.e. 45 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 54 °C, and 2 min at
72 °C, was repeated 25 times. PCR products were analyzed on a 1%
agarose gel.
Myosin Expression Levels--
To determine the amount of myosin
expressed by the transgenes in the Mhc10 background,
one-dimensional SDS-PAGE was performed (26). At least 3 upper thoraxes
were individually homogenized in separate 60-µl aliquots of sample
buffer. Ten µl of homogenate from each sample was loaded into a
single lane on a 7.5% gel. Coomassie Blue-stained gels were digitally
photographed (Eagle Eye II, Stratagene), and relative protein amounts
were determined using gel-scanning macros available with the public
domain NIH Image software package. The myosin to actin ratio for each
lane was determined and normalized to that of wild type (yw) flies.
Protein Isolation and Purification--
Myosin was isolated as
described by Swank et al. (19). Briefly, 120 sets of
dorsolongitudinal IFMs (DLMs) were dissected from
Mhc10 Drosophila expressing the myosin
transgene of interest. After incubation in a glycerol and Triton X-100
solution, myosin was extracted and purified by a series of high salt
suspensions and low salt precipitations. Myosin purity was confirmed on
a 10% polyacrylamide gel. Myosin protein amounts were quantified by absorbance at 280 nm using an extinction coefficient of 0.53 cm
Actin was isolated from dissected DLMs as described by Razzaq
et al. (1999). Purified F-actin was resuspended in assay
buffer (AB), which contained 25 mM imidazole, pH 7.4, 25 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (27). Actin
was quantified by absorbance at 290 nm minus absorbance at 310 nm using
an extinction coefficient of 0.62 cm
For actin-activated ATPase assays, chicken actin was used instead of
Drosophila actin because Drosophila actin yields
were too low to be practical. Chicken pectoralis actin was prepared as
in Pardee and Spudich (28). Aliquots of G-actin were frozen at
In Vitro Motility and ATPase Assays--
Actin sliding and basal
ATPase assays were performed on isolated myosin immediately following
purification. Methods and analyses were identical to those used
previously (19). In some experiments smooth muscle tropomyosin (smTM)
(chicken gizzard, Sigma) was bound to Drosophila IFM actin
by mixing at a 1:1 molar ratio. In this case, smTM (100 nM)
was included in all solutions added to the flow cell after actin
addition to prevent smTM dissociation from actin. Motility assays were
conducted at 22-23 °C, and filament movement was recorded onto videotape.
Actin-activated ATPase assays were performed in 0.15 ml of assay
solution consisting of 10 mM imidazole, pH 6.0, 20 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
[ Ultrastructure Analysis--
To determine the effect of the exon
3 transgenes on assembly and stability of myofibrils, we analyzed
cross-sections and longitudinal thin sections of IFMs using
transmission electron microscopy as described previously (29).
Flight Assays--
Flight ability was assayed by observing
whether a fly was capable of flying up (U), horizontally (H), down (D),
or not at all (N) when released in a Plexiglas flight chamber. An
attractant light was suspended above the chamber as wild type flies
normally fly up toward a light source (30). Flight index equals
6U/T + 4H/T + 2D/T + 0N/T,
where T is the total number of flies tested. At least 100 flies were assayed for flight ability from each line of each transgene
expressed in the Mhc10 null background. All flight
assays were performed at 22 °C with 2-day-old flies. Student's
t test and one-way analysis of variance were used for most
statistical analysis with p values <0.05 considered statistically significant.
Generation of Transgenic Lines--
We generated multiple
transgenic Drosophila lines expressing chimeric myosins with
alternative exon 3 regions exchanged between the EMB and IFI isoforms.
We injected 522 yw embryos with the EMB-3b P
element vector to produce over 10 independently transformed lines. We
injected IFI-3a into 730 yw embryos to yield 3 independently transformed lines. The probability of a P
element-mediated insertion event decreases exponentially as the size of
the plasmid increases (23). Thus the difference in transformation
frequency between the IFI-3a plasmid (30.5 kb) and
EMB-3b (17.5 kb) was expected. We also used the embryo
injection protocol to produce three additional EMB lines
(Mhcemb) that are identical to those described
in Wells et al. (20) (Table
I).
One of the three IFI-3a transgene insertions mapped to the third
chromosome. This makes it useful for MHC studies, as the transgene can
readily be crossed with stocks carrying Mhc mutations on the
second chromosome. The other two lines were not useful in that one was
homozygous lethal and the other mapped to the second chromosome. We
generated an additional line by genetically moving (jumping) the
P element construct from the second chromosome to the third.
Lines with transgenes that mapped to either the first or third
chromosomes were crossed into the Mhc10 background,
(IFM and jump muscle specific myosin null) and were used for all
subsequent analyses.
Verification of Transgene Transcription and Protein
Expression--
We confirmed that the Mhc transgenes were
transcribing the appropriate mRNA by using RT-PCR. cDNA created
from RNA isolated from wild type IFM contains alternative exons 3b and
7d, whereas cDNA from the IFM of EMB flies contains exons 3a and
7a. cDNA created from RNA isolated from the IFM of IFI-3a flies was
checked to verify the presence of embryonic exon 3a with adult exon 7d, a combination not found in yw (wild type) or
Mhc10 IFM (Fig.
2A, lanes 1 and
2). cDNA generated from RNA isolated from IFM of IFI-3a
lines produced the expected band at 800 bp in PCRs using primers to
exons 3a and 7d (Fig. 2A, lanes 3-5). The 3a
primer verified that exon 3 was exchanged, and the 7d primer verified
the IFI MHC background. A band was not produced in PCRs using primers
to exons 3b and 7a (Fig. 2B, lanes 3-5). The
expected inclusion of the IFI-specific versions of exons 9, 11, and 15 was verified by RT-PCR and restriction enzyme digestion (data not
shown).
cDNA generated from RNA isolated from EMB-3b lines produced the
expected 790-bp DNA band in PCRs using primers to exons 3b and 7a,
(Fig. 2B, lanes 7-9). The 3b primer verified the
exon 3 exchange, and the 7a primer confirmed the EMB background. No band was observed in PCRs using primers to exons 3a and 7d (Fig. 2A, lanes 7-9). No bands were generated in PCRs
using cDNA from IFM of yw (wild type) or
Mhc10 with this set of primers (Fig. 2B,
lanes 1 and 2).
Three of four EMB-3b lines carrying the transgene on the 3rd chromosome
and the two-thirds chromosome IFI-3a lines expressed MHC at wild type
levels (Table I). Thus for our in vivo studies we analyzed
the three EMB-3b lines expressing myosin at wild type levels along with
the two third-chromosome IFI-3a lines.
Basal and Actin-activated ATPase Rates--
Similar to our initial
measurements (31), basal Ca- and Mg-ATPase rates for IFI were 1.7- and
2.1-fold faster than EMB myosin, and IFI actin-activated ATPase rates
were almost 2-fold greater than EMB (Table
II). The degree of actin activation above
basal was 11-fold for IFI and 15-fold for EMB.
All ATPase rates for IFI-3a were markedly decreased compared with IFI
rates. Basal Mg-ATPase and Ca-ATPase rates decreased to 50 and 34% of
IFI, respectively, and Vmax values of
actin-activated ATPase decreased to 42% of IFI (Table II and Fig.
3A). These ATPase rates are
similar to those of EMB but lower than EMB for Ca-ATPase. The switch
appeared to decrease Km for actin, but this was not
statistically significant (p = 0.167, Student's
t test). These results suggest that the embryonic exon 3 region, 3a, is sufficient to set EMB ATPase rates.
Surprisingly, the IFI version of exon 3 had little or no influence on
ATPase rates when incorporated into EMB. The basal Mg-ATPase and
Vmax values of actin-activated ATPase of EMB-3b
were not significantly different from that of EMB, although EMB-3b
Ca-ATPase rates were significantly increased compared with EMB (Table
II and Fig. 3B). The Km values of EMB for
actin were not altered by the exon 3 exchange.
In Vitro Actin Sliding Velocity--
IFI myosin moves actin 9-fold
faster than EMB (19). To determine whether the exon 3 region influences
this property, we measured the rates at which the two chimeras moved
actin in the in vitro motility
assay. The velocity at which EMB-3b
propelled actin filaments was 5.4-fold faster than EMB (Fig.
4A and Table III). However,
actin propelled by IFI-3a moved at the same velocity as IFI-propelled
actin (Fig. 4B).
Previously, we observed that binding smTM to actin (smTM-actin)
increased the velocity at which EMB myosin moved actin filaments by
5.7-fold. However, smTM-actin moved at the same velocity over IFI
myosin or slightly slower compared with actin (19). To determine whether this effect is linked to the exon 3 region, we tested the
effect of smTM-actin on velocity in motility assays with IFI-3a and
EMB-3b myosin. smTM-actin moved 1.4-fold faster over EMB-3b myosin than
actin alone (Table III). In contrast, both actin and smTM-actin moved
over IFI-3a myosin at the same velocity. This result demonstrates that
exon 3 is not responsible for the smTM effect.
IFM Myofilament Assembly and Ultrastructure Maintenance--
As is
the case for expression of the EMB isoform in IFM (20), expression of
the chimeric myosins did not disrupt myofibril assembly. Furthermore,
the myofibrillar ultrastructure of each of these lines was identical to
wild type at the pupal stage (compare Fig.
5, A and B) instead
of resembling the structurally distinct embryonic muscle (20).
However, the two chimeric transgenes differed dramatically in their
impact on myofibril ultrastructure maintenance. IFI-3a myofilament
protein arrangement remained highly ordered and identical to IFI for at
least 2 weeks following eclosion (Fig. 5, C and D). In contrast, EMB-3b myofibrils showed disrupted filament
packing in 2-day-old Drosophila, and the normally rigid
hexagonal arrangement of thick and thin filaments was disturbed (Fig.
5E). The characteristic oval shape of the periphery of the
myofibril was less defined. Viewed longitudinally, the EMB-3b
myofibrils appeared cracked and frayed because of gaps between thick
and thin filaments and/or loss of thick and thin filaments. This
phenotype became progressively worse with age (Fig. 5F).
However, compared with EMB, EMB-3b myofibril ultrastructure was
markedly improved (compare Fig. 5, E and F with
G and H). EMB expression in IFM causes severe
cracking and fraying of myofibrils and disruption of hexagonal thick
and thin filament packing. The basic sarcomere pattern is disrupted at
2 days, as Z-line material alignment is abnormal. Whereas EMB-3b
myofibrils showed similar structural degeneration, this occurred at a
much slower rate than EMB. For example, at 2 weeks of age, myofibrils
in EMB fibers were no longer discernible; only a random mixture of
thick and thin filaments remained (Fig. 5H). In contrast, at
2 weeks of age distinct sarcomeres were still discernible in EMB-3b
fibers, with the majority of thick and thin filaments still in their
normal location (Fig. 5F). Thus, the exchange of the IFI
exon 3 region into EMB partially rescues the degenerative EMB
ultrastructural phenotype.
Flight Ability--
Drosophila expressing the EMB
isoform in an Mhc10 background are flightless (20).
Incorporating the exon 3 region from IFI did not rescue flight (Fig.
6), even though actin velocity of EMB-3b
myosin was increased to more closely resemble IFI velocity. Interestingly, the decrease in ATPase rates of IFI-3a myosin compared with IFI did not render the IFI-3a lines flightless. However, flight
indexes of the IFI-3a lines were all significantly lower (p = 0.002, one-way analysis of variance) than flight
indexes of IFI lines as follows: IFI-3a line 223, 3.0 ± 0.2; line
7, 2.9 ± 0.3 versus IFI line 1, 3.9 ± 0.2; IFI
line 2, 4.0 ± 0.2. Specifically, the ability of IFI-3a
Drosophila to fly up appears impaired compared with IFI
(Fig. 6).
Drosophila MHC isoforms EMB and IFI differ structurally
in only four regions of the myosin S-1 head (13). The IFI isoform moves
actin in vitro 9-fold faster than EMB, has 1.7-fold higher actin-activated ATPase Vmax values, and 2-fold
higher basal Mg- and Ca-ATPase rates (Table II) (19, 31). Making use of
the powerful genetic techniques available with the
Drosophila MHC system, we now show that the exon 3-encoded
variable region near the N terminus can influence all the properties
known to differ between the two native isoforms.
The two alternative versions of exon 3 did not affect the same
functional property when exchanged between the native isoforms. The EMB
version of exon 3 decreased all IFI ATPase rates, but did not influence
IFI actin sliding velocity. The IFI version of the exon 3 region
increased EMB actin sliding velocity but did not alter EMB ATPase
rates, except for the non-physiological Ca-ATPase rate. These results
suggest that the exon 3 region can independently influence at least two
kinetic rate constants of the actomyosin cross-bridge cycle.
The EMB version of the exon 3-encoded region converted the
actin-activated ATPase rates of IFI to EMB levels. This indicates that
3a may be the only EMB-specific region needed to set EMB ATPase
kinetics. In a previous study of the variable region encoded by exon
11, termed the "converter" domain, we were surprised to find that
the EMB converter increased the Vmax value of
the actin-activated ATPase when exchanged into the IFI isoform (31).
The exon 3a region, and/or an EMB-specific version of the other 2 variable regions encoded by exons 7 and 9, must set EMB ATPase rates by overriding the opposing effect of the EMB converter on
Vmax values. From its location in the molecule
(Fig. 1), it is plausible that the exon 7-encoded region might also
influence ATPase rates (13). Future studies of regions encoded by exons
7 and 9 plus studies of coordinately exchanged alternative regions will
determine whether exon 3a is the only exon that can specify EMB ATPase rates.
The values obtained in the actin-activated Mg-ATPase assays should be
interpreted cautiously in light of the fact that these assays were
performed with chicken actin, due to the technical limitations of
isolating large amounts of actin from Drosophila IFM.
However, the 2-fold difference in the actin-activated Mg-ATPase rate
for IFI-3a compared with IFI is the same fold difference seen in the
absence of actin. This strongly suggests that the reduced ATPase
activity is a change in the inherent properties of the chimeric myosin
molecule that is independent of actin isoform present.
The IFI version of the exon 3-encoded region increased EMB in
vitro actin sliding velocity 5-fold (from 0.7 to 3.8 µm
s Interestingly, the EMB version of the exon 3-encoded region (3a) did
not decrease motility when inserted into IFI, as one might have
expected based on our results with the EMB-3b chimera. Thus either exon
3a has no influence on velocity or another alternative exon must be
exchanged in concert with exon 3a for it to decrease actin velocity.
Perhaps the strong positive influence of the IFI converter on velocity
(32) inhibits exon 3a from decreasing the actin sliding velocity of
IFI. In support of this concept, a recent study (33) suggests that
portions of the exon 3- and 11-encoded areas interact during
cross-bridge steps involved in ADP release, steps thought to set
unloaded actin velocity.
All muscle types studied so far have similar ATPase to muscle
shortening velocity ratios, i.e. a tightly "coupled"
positive correlation is observed when ATPase activity is plotted
against maximum muscle shortening velocity (34). Similarly, vertebrate myosin isoforms have a tightly coupled ATPase to actin sliding velocity
ratio (1). Our exon 3 chimeras appear to alter this correlation. IFI-3a
had a decreased actin-activated ATPase rate without a corresponding
decrease in actin sliding velocity compared with IFI, whereas EMB-3b
had a much higher actin sliding velocity than EMB without a
corresponding increase in Vmax of
actin-activated ATPase activity. Furthermore, we found previously (31)
that the chimeras made by exchanging alternative versions of exon 11 between IFI and EMB are also uncoupled. Of these 4 "uncoupled" chimeras, only EMB-3b is native to Drosophila as it is
expressed in a few of the embryonic body wall muscles (17). If myosin chimeras with uncoupled ATPase to velocity ratios are not typically expressed, this would support a selective pressure for tight coupling of myosin ATPase and velocity. Alternatively, the ATPase to velocity ratios of the IFI or EMB isoform(s) may be atypical, resulting in
apparent uncoupling of some chimeras. ATPase and velocity measurements of other native Drosophila myosin isoforms are needed to
address this issue.
The Drosophila system not only permits insight into the
effect of structural changes on the molecular properties of myosin but
also has the unique advantage of showing how changes in myosin influence muscle ultrastructure and function. Based on our structural examination of the chimeric exon 3 IFMs, and previous work with exon 11 chimeras (32), we conclude that when overall transgenic myosin
properties are not drastically different from IFI, the result is normal
myofibril ultrastructure and a functional muscle capable of supporting
flight. Expressing IFI-3a instead of IFI myosin caused no obvious
ultrastructural abnormalities and resulted in only a slight decrease in
Drosophila flight ability at 22 °C. However, the impaired
ability to fly up suggests that the decreased ATPase rate results in
lower power generation by the IFMs.
Whereas myofibrils in the EMB-based transgenics (EMB, EMB-3b, and
EMB-IC) show normal assembly properties, their degeneration and failure
to support flight indicate that the myosin isoforms are incompatible
with the contractile protein complement and architecture of the IFMs.
Alterations in myosin kinetics and abnormal actomyosin interactions
likely account for the observed degeneration rather than disuse
atrophy, because mutants that lack contractile function maintain wild
type ultrastructure (35, 36).
Structural variation in exon 3 may influence the mechanical properties
of muscle fibers and the biochemical and biophysical properties of
isolated myosin by changing the mechanical or kinetic properties of
myosin. It is unlikely that the exon 3 exchange influences myosin step
size, although this could have accounted for the increased actin
sliding velocity of EMB-3b. Previously, we found no difference in
myosin unitary step size between the IFI and EMB isoforms (19) or
between IFI and IFI-EC (31). Rather, different amino acid interactions
from alternative versions of exon 3 regions likely influence the rates
of local myosin conformational changes associated with rate-limiting
cross-bridge steps. The rate-limiting steps of the cycle are generally
thought to be release of products (2). Although the exon 3 region is
close to the nucleotide-binding site, it is not sufficiently close to
directly influence product release. Instead, it probably indirectly
influences local structural changes that are linked to product release.
There is ample evidence for discrete movements of several myosin
subdomains, some of which have been correlated with specific steps of
the cross-bridge cycle (2, 37). Because the exon 3 exchanges caused
independent changes in ATPase and velocity, the two versions of exon 3 must be able to influence independently at least two separate myosin
conformational changes. The EMB version of the exon 3 region likely
affects a conformational change associated with attachment to actin and
Pi release, as Pi release is thought to be
rate-limiting for actin-activated ATPase in solution. The IFI version
likely influences the rate of a conformational change associated with
detachment and ADP release, steps of the cycle thought to limit
unloaded actin velocity (38).
The region encoded by exon 3, to our knowledge, has not been the
subject of previous mutagenesis studies of myosin structure/function. However, mutation of a nearby highly conserved lysine, Lys-130, in
Dictyostelium myosin II had no effect on
Vmax values of actin-activated ATPase or
in vitro actin velocity but did affect ATP affinity (39).
Furthermore, Burghardt et al. (40) propose that amino acids
84 and 85 (encoded by exon 3) interact with the converter region and/or
lever arm during or following the power stroke, based on optical
spectroscopic signals from extrinsic probes bound to rabbit S1. Prior
to the MgADP state, exon 3 only interacts with other portions of the
catalytic domain, but in the MgADP and rigor states, it is in close
proximity to the converter domain and the portion of the lever arm
adjacent to the catalytic domain.
It will be interesting to determine whether other organisms show
functional variation in the same structural regions that are encoded by
alternative exons in Drosophila myosin. Animals that require
very fast myosin isoforms, approaching the speed of the flight muscle
isoform, may use similar mechanism and would be good candidates for
such investigations. Our work and that of others (41-43) indicate that
modifications of other structural domains, in addition to loops 1 and
2, can produce similar alterations in myosin kinetics. Thus one must be
cognizant that fine-tuning of the myosin motor may not be accomplished
by the same mechanism in different organisms or, indeed, in different
isoforms of the same organism.
We thank Floyd Sarsoza, Allen Church, and
Corey Dambacher for excellent technical assistance and
Kimberly Littlefield for helpful discussions and assistance preparing
chicken skeletal actin.
*
This work was supported in part by postdoctoral fellowships
from the American Heart Association Western States Affiliate (to D. M. S.) and National Institutes of Health Grant GM32443 (to S. I. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Supported by National Institutes of Health Minority Biomedical
Research Grant GM 58906.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 26, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M212727200
2
D. M. Swank, A. F. Knowles, and
S. I. Bernstein, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
MHC, myosin heavy
chain;
EMB, embryonic isoform;
IFM, indirect flight muscle;
RT, reverse transcription;
DLM, dorsolongitudinal IFMs;
smTM, smooth muscle
tropomyosin.
Variable N-terminal Regions of Muscle Myosin Heavy Chain Modulate
ATPase Rate and Actin Sliding Velocity*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Location and alternative sequence
choices for the exon 3 region. The exon 3 region
(yellow) and three other variable regions (7,
9, and 11) encoded by Drosophila
alternative exons (shades of red) are mapped onto
the chicken myosin S1 structure (gray). The exon 3 region
encompasses amino acids 69-116 of the chicken S-1 structure. It is
located near the reactive sulfhydryls (orange spheres) and
near the point about which the light chain region (light
gray) pivots in response to ADP release (13). The blue
spheres depict ADP in the active site. The two alternative amino
acid sequences of the exon 3 region are shown above the
molecular structure. * signifies non-conserved substitutions.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1, along with 0.05 mg ml
1 of a
2-3 helper plasmid that
expresses transposase, into a yw strain (22, 23). The
balancer line w1118;
CyO/Bl1; TM2/TM6B,
was used to map transgenes to specific chromosomes. The transgenes were
crossed into Mhc10 (lacks myosin in the indirect
flight and jump muscles) to produce flies expressing only the
transgenic myosin in their IFM and jump muscle. Additional lines were
created by mobilizing the P element (containing the
transgene) to another chromosome. Mobilization was achieved by crossing
a transgenic line to a line constitutively expressing P
element transposase from the
2-3 insertion on its third
chromosome (24).
1 for 1 mg ml
1.
1 for 1 mg
ml
1 (27). For the motility assay, actin was labeled
with rhodamine-phalloidin (19).
80 °C, and polymerized before use.
-32P]ATP, and myosin to a final concentration of 70 nM. Calcium in this buffer does not affect basal or
actin-activated Mg-ATPase rates.2 Actin concentration
was varied from 0 to 2 µM. Myosin was preincubated with
actin in the assay solution (minus ATP) for 10 min at 22-23 °C. The
reaction was started with the addition of 15 µl of 10 mM
[
-32P]ATP and was terminated 30 min later with the
addition of 50 µl of 1.8 N HClO4. This
reaction period was determined to lie on the linear portion of the time
versus Pi production curve. Pi
production was monitored as described in Swank et al. (19). For each myosin form, Vmax and actin-activated
Km values for actin were computed by fitting all
data points from one myosin preparation with the Michaelis-Menten
equation. Vmax and Km values
from multiple preparations were averaged (n of at least 3)
to give mean ± S.E.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Myosin expression levels

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Verification of IFI-3a and EMB-3b transgene
insertion and mRNA synthesis by RT-PCR. A, primers
to exons 3a and 7d were used in PCRs with cDNA templates prepared
from mRNA from IFM of different transgenic fly lines. Lanes
correspond to the following Drosophila lines or markers:
lane 1, yw; lane 2,
Mhc10; lane 3, IFI-3a line 49; lane
4, IFI-3a line 7; lane 5, IFI-3a line 223; lane
6, 1-kb DNA ladder (1,018-bp fragment, 506-bp fragment);
lane 7, EMB-3b line 72; lane 8, EMB-3b line 91;
lane 9, EMB-3b line 157. The 800-bp band in the IFI-3a lanes
confirmed that these flies expressed the EMB version of exon 3 (3a) in
conjunction with the IFI version of exon 7 (7d). B, primers
to exons 3b and 7a were used in PCRs with cDNA templates prepared
from the same Drosophila lines as above. A 790-bp band in
the EMB-3b lanes verified that the flies expressed the IFI version of
exon 3 (3b) in conjunction with the EMB version of exon 7 (7d).
ATPase kinetics

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Actin-stimulated myosin Mg-ATPase
activity. The rate at which myosin hydrolyzed Mg-ATPase was
measured over an actin range of 0-2 µM. A,
IFI and IFI-3a actin-activated Mg-ATPase rates. B, EMB and
EMB-3b actin-activated Mg-ATPase rates. All data points from at least
three preparations are plotted. Basal Mg-ATPase levels were subtracted
prior to plotting the data. All data points for each transgenic line
were fit with the Michaelis-Menten equation (rectangular hyperbola,
y = ax/(b + x)).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Actin sliding velocity when propelled
in vitro by myosin from transgenic
Drosophila. A, actin sliding velocity
increases when the IFI exon 3 region is exchanged into the EMB isoform
(EMB-3b). B, IFI and IFI-3a do not differ in actin sliding
velocity.
In vitro actin sliding velocity

View larger version (177K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effects of exchanging alternative exon 3 on
IFM myofibril assembly and stability. All panels display
longitudinal (left) and transverse (right) views
of DLMs (the medial set of the two opposing sets of IFMs). The length
of both scale bars equal 0.5 µm. A, wild type
IFM at the late pupal stage. B, EMB-3b IFM at the late pupal
stage. IFI-3a IFM myofibril structure in 2-day (C) and
2-week-old adults (D) is identical to wild type. Note that
myofibril diameter is larger than at the pupal stage due to continued
addition of thick and thin filaments during the initial period of the
adult stage. EMB-3b IFMs in 2-day-old (E) and 2-week-old
adults (F). EMB IFMs of 2-day (G) and 2-week-old
adults (H).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Flight ability of exon 3 transgenic
Drosophila lines. At least 100 adults per line
were sequentially released in a Plexiglas chamber and scored as to
whether they flew up toward a light source, horizontal, down, or
dropped (no flight ability). IFI-3a Drosophila appear
slightly flight-impaired compared with the IFI controls because fewer
flew up and a greater number dropped. The IFI-3a line used in this
graph is IFI-3a, 223.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1). This value is still lower than the velocity of IFI,
i.e. 6.4 µm s
1. Thus at least one more IFI
exon needs to be coordinately exchanged along with exon 3 into EMB to
achieve IFI actin velocity. Previously, we found that alternative exon
11 had a major impact on actin velocity (32). Substitution of the IFI
converter into EMB increased actin velocity to 5.4 µm
s
1 (32). Simply adding the actin sliding velocity for the
IFI exon 3 region in the EMB backbone (3.8 µm s
1, Table
II) to the 4.7 µm s
1 augmentation observed with the IFI
converter would be more than sufficient to increase actin velocity to
that of IFI.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Biology Department and
Molecular Biology Institute, San Diego State University, San
Diego, CA 92182-4614. Tel.: 619-594-4160; Fax: 619-594-5676; E-mail: dswank@sunstroke.sdsu.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Tyska, M. J.,
and Washaw, D. M.
(2002)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
51,
1-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Geeves, M. A.,
and Holmes, K. C.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
687-728[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Barany, M.
(1967)
J. Gen. Physiol.
50,
197-218 4.
Lowey, S.,
Waller, G. S.,
and Trybus, K. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20414-20418 5.
Swank, D. M.,
Wells, L.,
Kronert, W. A.,
Morrill, G. E.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(2000)
Microsc. Res. Tech.
50,
430-442[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Murphy, C. T.,
and Spudich, J. A.
(2000)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
21,
139-151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Sweeney, H. L.,
Rosenfeld, S. S.,
Brown, F.,
Faust, L.,
Smith, J.,
Xing, J.,
Stein, L. A.,
and Sellers, J. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6262-6270 8.
Murphy, C. T.,
and Spudich, J. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
6738-6744[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Kurzawa-Goertz, S. E.,
Perreault-Micale, C. L.,
Trybus, K. M.,
Szent-Gyorgyi, A. G.,
and Geeves, M. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
7517-7525[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Rovner, A. S.,
Freyzon, Y.,
and Trybus, K. M.
(1997)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
18,
103-110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Lauzon, A. M.,
Tyska, M. J.,
Rovner, A. S.,
Freyzon, Y.,
Warshaw, D. M.,
and Trybus, K. M.
(1998)
J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil.
19,
825-837[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Hirayama, Y.,
and Watabe, S.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
246,
380-387[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Bernstein, S. I.,
and Milligan, R. A.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
271,
1-6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Bernstein, S. I.,
Mogami, K.,
Donady, J. J.,
and Emerson, C. P., Jr.
(1983)
Nature
302,
393-397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Rozek, C. E.,
and Davidson, N.
(1983)
Cell
32,
23-34[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
George, E. L.,
Ober, M. B.,
and Emerson, C. P., Jr.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
2957-2974 17.
Zhang, S.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(2001)
Mech. Dev.
101,
35-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Hastings, G. A.,
and Emerson, C. P., Jr.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
114,
263-276 19.
Swank, D. M.,
Bartoo, M. L.,
Knowles, A. F.,
Iliffe, C.,
Bernstein, S. I.,
Molloy, J. E.,
and Sparrow, J. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
15117-15124 20.
Wells, L.,
Edwards, K. A.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
4454-4459[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Hess, N.,
Kronert, W. A.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(1989)
in
Cellular and Molecular Biology of Muscle Development
(Kedes, L.
, and Stockdale, F., eds)
, pp. 621-631, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York
22.
Cripps, R. M.,
Becker, K. D.,
Mardahl, M.,
Kronert, W. A.,
Hodges, D.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
689-699 23.
Cripps, R. M.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(2000)
in
Introducing DNA into Living Cells and Organisms
(Norton, P. A.
, and Steel, L. F., eds)
, Eaton Publishing, Natick, MA
24.
Grigliatti, T. A.
(1998)
in
Drosophila, a Practical Approach
(Roberts, D. B., ed), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 85-107, Oxford University Press, New York
25.
Roux, K. H.
(1995)
in
PCR Primer, A Laboratory Manual
(Dieffenback, C. W.
, and Dueksler, G. S., eds)
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
26.
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Kron, S. J.,
Toyoshima, Y. Y.,
Uyeda, T. Q.,
and Spudich, J. A.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
196,
399-416[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Pardee, J. D.,
and Spudich, J. A.
(1982)
Methods Enzymol.
85,
164-181[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
O'Donnell, P. T.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
2601-2612 30.
Drummond, D. R.,
Hennessey, E. S.,
and Sparrow, J. C.
(1991)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
226,
70-80[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Littlefield, K. P.,
Swank, D. M.,
Sanchez, B. M.,
Knowles, A. F.,
Warshaw, D. M.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(2003)
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
284,
C1031-C1038 32.
Swank, D. M.,
Knowles, A. F.,
Suggs, J. A.,
Sarsoza, F.,
Lee, A.,
Maughan, D. W.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(2002)
Nat. Cell Biol.
4,
312-317[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Burghardt, T. P.,
Cruz-Walker, A. R.,
Park, S.,
and Ajtai, K.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
4821-4833[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Barany, M.,
Conover, T. E.,
Schliselfeld, L. H.,
Gaetjens, E.,
and Goffart, M.
(1967)
Eur. J. Biochem.
2,
156-164[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Kronert, W. A.,
Acebes, A.,
Ferrus, A.,
and Bernstein, S. I.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
989-1000 36.
Dickinson, M. H.,
Hyatt, C. J.,
Lehmann, F. O.,
Moore, J. R.,
Reedy, M. C.,
Simcox, A.,
Tohtong, R.,
Vigoreaux, J. O.,
Yamashita, H.,
and Maughan, D. W.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
3122-3134 37.
Yengo, C. M.,
De La Cruz, E. M.,
Chrin, L. R.,
Gaffney, D. P., II,
and Berger, C. L.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
24114-24119 38.
Spudich, J. A.
(1994)
Nature
372,
515-518[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Ruppel, K. M.,
Uyeda, T. Q.,
and Spudich, J. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18773-18780 40.
Burghardt, T. P.,
Park, S.,
and Ajtai, K.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
4834-4843[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Alpert, N. R.,
Brosseau, C.,
Federico, A.,
Krenz, M.,
Robbins, J.,
and Warshaw, D. M.
(2002)
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
283,
H1446-H1454
42.
Pereira, J. S.,
Pavlov, D.,
Nili, M.,
Greaser, M.,
Homsher, E.,
and Moss, R. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
4409-4415 43.
Cande, W. Z.
(1986)
Methods Enzymol.
134,
473-477[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Razzaq, A.,
Schmitz, S.,
Veigel, C.,
Molloy, J. E.,
Geeves, M. A.,
and Sparrow, J. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28321-28328
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Cammarato, C. M. Dambacher, A. F. Knowles, W. A. Kronert, R. Bodmer, K. Ocorr, and S. I. Bernstein Myosin Transducer Mutations Differentially Affect Motor Function, Myofibril Structure, and the Performance of Skeletal and Cardiac Muscles Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2008; 19(2): 553 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Swank, V. K. Vishnudas, and D. W. Maughan An exceptionally fast actomyosin reaction powers insect flight muscle PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17543 - 17547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Hooper and J. B. Thuma Invertebrate Muscles: Muscle Specific Genes and Proteins Physiol Rev, July 1, 2005; 85(3): 1001 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Swank, W. A. Kronert, S. I. Bernstein, and D. W. Maughan Alternative N-Terminal Regions of Drosophila Myosin Heavy Chain Tune Muscle Kinetics for Optimal Power Output Biophys. J., September 1, 2004; 87(3): 1805 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||