JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M302200200 on April 17, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 26, 24003-24010, June 27, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/26/24003    most recent
M302200200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, S.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, S.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Fas-associated Factor 1, FAF1, Is a Member of Fas Death-inducing Signaling Complex*

Seung-Wook Ryu {ddagger}, Soo-Jin Lee {ddagger}, Min-Young Park {ddagger}, Joon-il Jun §, Yong-Keun Jung § and Eunhee Kim {ddagger} 

From the {ddagger}Research Center for Biomedicinal Resources and Division of Life Science, PaiChai University, Daejeon 302-735, Korea, and the §Department of Life Science, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Kwangju 500-712, Korea

Received for publication, March 3, 2003 , and in revised form, March 26, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
FAF1 has been introduced as a Fas-binding protein. However, the function of FAF1 in apoptotic execution is not established. Based on the fact that FAF1 is a Fas-binding protein, we asked if FAF1 interacted with other members of the Fas-death-inducing signaling complex (Fas-DISC) such as Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) and caspase-8. FAF1 could interact with caspase-8 and FADD in vivo as well as in vitro. The death effector domains (DEDs) of caspase-8 and FADD interacted with the amino acid 181–381 region of FAF1, previously known to have apoptotic potential. Considering that FAF1 directly binds to Fas and caspase-8, FAF1 shows similar protein-interacting characteristics to that of FADD. In the coimmunoprecipitation with an anti-Fas antibody (APO-1) in Jurkat cells, endogenous FAF1 was associated with the precipitates in which caspase-8 was present. By confocal microscopic analysis, both Fas and FAF1 were detected in the cytoplasmic membrane before Fas activation, and in the cytoplasm after Fas activation. FADD and caspase-8 colocalized with Fas in Jurkat cells validating the presence of FAF1 in the authentic Fas-DISC. Overexpression of FAF1 in Jurkat cells caused significant apoptotic death. In addition, the FAF1 deletion mutant lacking the N terminus where Fas, FADD, and caspase-8 interact protected Jurkat cells from Fas-induced apoptosis demonstrating dominant-negative phenotype. Cell death by overexpression of FAF1 was suppressed significantly in both FADD- and caspase-8-deficient Jurkat cells when compared with that in their parental Jurkat cells. Collectively, our data show that FAF1 is a member of Fas-DISC acting upstream of caspase-8.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoptosis requires the transmission of apoptotic signals from the plasma membrane receptors to caspases. In receptor-mediated apoptosis, apoptotic initiation is due to the formation of a protein-signaling complex that involves the physical association of caspases followed by their activation (1, 2). Fas, a member of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, has an intracellular death domain (DD)1 in its cytoplasmic region (36). The DD is essential for the transduction of apoptotic signal. The Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) binds to the DD of Fas through its DD in the C terminus (7, 8). In addition to DD, FADD has a DED at its N terminus, another protein interaction module. Therefore, FADD can recruit caspase-8 to the DISC by homotypic interactions between the DEDs of FADD and caspase-8 (2, 9). The Fas-DISC formation is the first event that occurs during Fas-initiated cell death signaling. Following Fas-DISC formation, caspase-8 subsequently can be activated by autocleavage leading to the release of the active subunits p18 and p10 (2, 10). In addition, the activated caspase-8 activates downstream effector caspases such as caspase-3, caspase-6, and caspase-7 (1116).

In addition to FADD and caspase-8, another DED-containing protein related to DISC has been reported. Viral FLICE inhibitory protein (v-FLIP) is composed of two DEDs and binds to the Fas·FADD complex and inhibits the recruitment of caspase-8 to Fas-DISC. A human homolog of v-FLIP has many different names c-FLIP, FLAME, I-FLICE, Casper, CASH, usurpin, MRIT, and CLARP, respectively (1724). FLICE-associated huge protein (FLASH) is another protein with binding activity to the DEDs of caspase-8 and FADD through its DED-like domain and is a component of the Fas-DISC (25). In addition, FLASH enhances the activation of caspase-8 in Fas-mediated apoptosis. Thus, DED-containing proteins seem to modulate the apoptotic process.

Two different cell types in Fas signaling pathways have been identified (26). Type I cells are characterized by recruitment of caspase-8 to the DISC following Fas activation, leading to direct activation of downstream caspases, including caspase-3 and caspase-7. In type I cells, the blocking of mitochondrial apoptotic function by overexpression of Bcl-2 has no effect on caspase activation. In type II cells, the amount of active caspase-8 generated in the DISC is low. In addition, DISC formation in type II cells is strongly reduced, and overexpression of Bcl-2 or Bcl-XL blocks caspase-8 and caspase-3 activation. Thus, Fas-mediated apoptosis in type II cells is dependent on mitochondrial activity.

FAF1 is a Fas-associating molecule, which enhances Fas-mediated apoptosis (27). In our previous work, mere intrinsic overexpression of FAF1 initiated apoptosis in the absence of extrinsic death signals in BOSC23 cells (28). This apoptotic potential required the region comprising amino acids 181–381 of FAF1. Mouse FAF1 (mFAF1), however, was able to enhance but unable to initiate apoptosis in L-cells (27). Thus, the apoptotic potential of FAF1 is not clear. The N terminus of FAF1 binds to the DD of Fas even though it does not contain the typical death domain (29). Although FAF1 contains domains found in the proteins of ubiquitination pathway, the function of FAF1 in relation to ubiquitin is largely unknown. FAF1 localizes in the nucleus, the perinuclear cytoplasm, and the nucleoli depending on the cell type (28, 30, 31). FAF1 is not only a binding partner of protein kinase CK2 but also a substrate target for serine residues 289 and 291 (31, 32). Also, the interaction of protein kinase CK2 and FAF1 is enhanced in vivo upon induction of apoptosis (33).

In this study, we demonstrate that FAF1 is a component of Fas-DISC, and DISC is formed by interaction of the DED-like region (amino acid 181–381 of FAF1) of FAF1 and the DEDs of caspase-8 and FADD. Therefore, this study provides a molecular explanation regarding the proapoptotic role of FAF1 in Fas-mediated signaling.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials and Reagents—For confocal microscopy, antibodies against FAF1 (M-20), Fas (C-20), FADD (N-18), caspase-8 (N-19), and PARP (F-2) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies against FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and rabbit anti-goat, and TRITC-conjugated rabbit anti-goat were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). For Western analysis, antibodies against FADD (A66–2) and caspase-8 (IC12) were purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY) and Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA), respectively. FAF1 monoclonal antibody was a gift from Dr. J. S. Lim (Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Korea). For stimulation of Fas, antibody against Fas (CH-11) was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). For immunoprecipitation of DISC, antibody against Fas (APO-1) kindly provided by Dr. P. H. Krammer (German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany) was used. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Sigma. The glutathione beads and Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid beads were purchased from Peptron (Daejeon, Korea) and Qiagen (Heidelberg, Germany), respectively. The protein A/G-agarose beads were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. All restriction enzymes were purchased from TaKaRa Shuzo Co. (Shiga, Japan).

Plasmids—Construction of the HA-tagged FADD, GST-fused FAF1, GFP-tagged FAF1, pcDNA3/FAF1, FLAG-tagged FAF1, and FLAG-tagged FAF1-(181–650), which where named to FAF1-{Delta}FID, was reported previously (28, 29, 34). FLAG-tagged FAF1-(366–650) was cloned by PCR using FLAG-tagged FAF1 as a template and named to FAF1-{Delta}FID·DEDID. pcDNA3/FAF1-{Delta}DEDID was generated by PCR using the pJG4–5/FAF1(s) (29). FAF1(s) is an endogenous isoform of FAF1 with an internal in-frame deletion that overlaps most of the DEDID (FAF1-DEDID corresponds to amino acids 181–381 of FAF1, and amino acids 188–339 of FAF1 is deleted in FAF1(s)). The construction of His-tagged caspase-8 (pET21b/caspase-8) and His-tagged caspase-8C (pET21b/caspase-8C) was reported previously (35). To clone the FAF1 deletion mutants (FAF1-(1–305), FAF1-{Delta}FID, and FAF1-DEDID) into glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion vector (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden), PCRs with primers containing EcoRI and XhoI linkers were performed using GST-FAF1 full-length cDNA as a template. The pcDNA3/caspase-8 DED construct was generated by PCR using the PET21b/caspase-8 plasmid as a template with primers containing HindIII and BamHI linkers. To subclone the FADD and its deletion mutants (FADD-DD and FADD-DED) into GST fusion vector, PCRs were performed using pcDNA3/FADD plasmid as a template. pcDNA3.1/FADD-DED was kindly provided by Dr. S. H. Kim (Seoul National University, Korea).

In Vitro Protein Binding—GST fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) with isopropyl-{beta}-D-thiogalactopyranoside induction. Subsequently, cells were sonicated in ice-cold lysis buffer (200 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 100 µM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The GST fusion proteins were incubated with glutathione-coated beads for 4 h at 4 °C and normalized for protein concentration. The pcDNA3/FAF1, pcDNA3/FADD, pET21b/caspase-8, pET21b/caspase-8C, and pcDNA3/caspase-8 DED were translated in vitro with TN Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation Systems (Promega, Madison, WI). Briefly, 2 µg of DNA was incubated with 20 µCi of [35S]methionine in the TNT® Quick Master mix for 90 min at 30 °C. In vitro translated products were mixed with GST-fused proteins bound onto glutathione-coated beads in the binding buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol) and then incubated for 4 h at 4 °C. After washing three times in the lysis buffer, samples were treated with SDS-loading buffer containing 5% {beta}-mercaptoethanol. The samples were loaded onto an SDS-PAGE gel and visualized by using a BAS analyzer (Fuji Photo Film Co., Tokyo, Japan).

Cell Culture—Jurkat cells were all maintained in RPMI 1640 (Jeil Biotechservices Inc., Daegu, Korea), antibiotic-antimycotic (100 units/ml penicillin G sodium, 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 0.25 µg/ml amphotericin B) (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) and 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen) in 5% CO2. For immunoprecipitation assay using anti-FADD antibody (N-18), anti-FAF1 monoclonal antibody, and control antibody, IgG1, (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), 1 x 107 Jurkat cells were cultured and serum-starved with RPMI 1640 medium without fetal bovine serum for 12 h. Cells were harvested at 1 h after 50 ng/ml anti-Fas (CH-11) antibody treatment together with 5 µg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) and lysed. The antibodies and protein A/G-Sepharose beads were added to the samples and incubated for2hat4 °C. The beads were washed four times with lysis buffer and subjected to either SDS-PAGE or immunoblotting.

Western Blotting—Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) using an electrotransporter (OWL, Portsmouth, PA). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20, 2 mM CaCl2 dihydrate, 0.01% antifoam A, and 5% milk powder. After incubation at 4 °C with anti-FADD (A66–2), anti-FAF1 monoclonal, or anti-caspase-8 (IC12) antibodies, membranes were washed in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20, 2 mM CaCl2 dihydrate, 0.01% antifoam A, and 5% milk powder. Membranes were incubated with 1:2000 dilutions of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Membrane were washed and developed with ECL plus Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden).

DISC Immunoprecipitation—1 x 107 Jurkat cells were cultured for 24 h at 37 °C in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. After 24 h, the culture medium was exchanged with serum-free RPMI 1640 medium containing antibiotics and cultured for 12 h. After 12 h, cells were harvested at different times after anti-Fas antibody (50 ng/ml) treatment together with 5 µg/ml CHX and lysed in Triton X-100 lysis buffer. As a control, anti-Fas antibody was added to lysates prepared from the unstimulated cells. Lysate protein content was determined by Bradford assay and equalized prior to immunoprecipitation. The anti-Fas (APO-1) and protein A/G-Sepharose beads were added to the samples and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed four times with lysis buffer and subjected to either SDS-PAGE or immunoblotting.

Cell Death Assay—Jurkat cells were transfected using either LipofectAMINE reagent (Invitrogen, Scotland, UK) or NucleofactorTM solution provided by using an Amaxa apparatus (Amaxa, Cologne, Germany). For using the Amaxa system, 5 x 106 Jurkat cells were harvested, washed once in PBS buffer, and resuspended in 100 µl of specified electroporation buffer. Then, 1 µg of plasmid DNA was mixed, transferred to a cuvette, and nucleofected with an Amaxa NucleofectorTM apparatus. After 30 h, cells were treated with 50 ng/ml anti-Fas antibody for 1 h. Cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 15 min and mounted on slides using xylene substitute mountant/histomount solution, stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and analyzed by microscopy. For using LipofectAMINE reagent, 5 x 106 cells of three different types of Jurkat cells (A3; parental, I2.1; FADD (–/–), and I9–2; caspase-8 (–/–)) (36) were transiently transfected with GFP-tagged FAF1 using LipofectAMINE reagent. Cells were fixed and mounted on the slides as above. The percentage of apoptotic cells was analyzed based on the morphological change of cells under a fluorescence microscope. Excitation and emission wavelengths for GFP were 488 and 505 nm, respectively. Existence of GFP-FAF1, caspase-8, and FADD was assessed by immunoblot analysis.

Indirect Immunofluorescence—For localization analysis of Fas and FAF1, Jurkat cells with or without stimulation of Fas together with CHX were plated on a poly(A)-lysine-coated coverglass. They were fixed and rinsed with 1x PBS containing 10% normal serum (Sigma). They were incubated with anti-Fas (C-20) or anti-FAF1 (M-20) antibody for 1 h, washed twice with 1x PBS, and incubated with secondary antibody conjugated with FITC (Sigma) together with RNase and propidium iodide for 30 min. They were washed three times with 1x PBS and mounted on slides using xylene substitute mountant/histomount solution.

For colocalization analysis of FAF1 and Fas-DISC, Jurkat cells with or without stimulation of Fas together with CHX were plated on a poly(A)-lysine-coated coverglass. They were fixed and rinsed with 1x PBS containing 10% normal serum. Cells were incubated with anti-Fas (C-20) antibodies for 1 h, washed twice with 1x PBS, and incubated with secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibodies conjugated with FITC for 1 h. The cells were washed three times with 1x PBS. Cells were incubated with anti-FAF1 (M-20), anti-FADD (N-18), anti-caspase-8 (N-19), and anti-PARP (F-2) antibodies for 1 h, respectively, washed twice with 1x PBS, and incubated with each secondary anti-IgG antibodies conjugated with TRITC (Sigma) for 1 h. Cells were mounted on slides using xylene substitute mountant/histomount solution. Dual color images were acquired using a Radiance 2000 confocal microscope (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
FADD and Caspase-8 Can Interact with FAF1 in Vitro— FAF1 has been introduced as a Fas-binding protein (27, 29). Therefore, we questioned if FAF1 was a component of the death-inducing signaling complex assembled with Fas (Fas-DISC). We first analyzed the binding pattern of FAF1 with Fas-DISC components. In vitro protein-protein binding assays were carried out by GST-pull-down using GST-fused FAF1, in vitro translated FADD, and caspase-8. As shown in Fig. 1A, in vitro translations of FADD and caspase-8 gave rise to 27- and 55-kDa 35S-labeled proteins, respectively. Also, recombinant GST-FAF1 and GST proteins were produced in E. coli BL21(DE3) strain as 100- and 26-kDa proteins, respectively. In vitro translated FADD and caspase-8 were retained on matrices to which GST-FAF1 had bound but not GST only (Fig. 1A). Thus, interactions between FAF1 and Fas-DISC members were demonstrated in the in vitro binding assay.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Interaction of FAF1 with Fas-DISC members. A, binding of in vitro translated 35S-FADD and 35S-caspase-8 to GST-FAF1. Reaction products were resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE. Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained GST fusion proteins from the same gel were aligned to show protein levels (bottom panel). B, interaction of FAF1 with FADD and caspase-8 in vivo. The Jurkat cells with or without Fas stimulation were harvested and lysed. Total cell lysates were immunoprecipitated by indicated antibody, and Western blot (WB) analysis was carried out with indicated antibody. C represents the control antibody. C–F, domain mapping of FAF1 with Fas-DISC members. In vitro translated 35S-FADD was incubated with GST-fused FAF1 deletion mutants (C). In vitro translated 35S-FAF1 was incubated with GST-fused FADD deletion mutants (D). Full-length and truncated 35S-caspase-8s were incubated with GST-fused FAF1 (E). In vitro translated 35S-caspase-8 was incubated with GST-fused FAF1 deletion mutants (F). The numbers at the left indicated protein molecular mass standards in kDa.

 

FAF1 Interacts with FADD and Caspase-8 in Jurkat Cells—To show that FAF1 interacts with FADD and caspase-8 in mammalian cells, endogenous FAF1 and FADD were immunoprecipitated by the anti-FAF1 monoclonal antibody and the anti-FADD (N-18) antibody, respectively. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blot using antibodies against caspase-8 and FADD, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1B, each Fas-DISC member was detected in the immunoprecipitates, whereas it was not detected in the isotype control, IgG immunoprecipitates. Thus, the interaction of Fas-DISC components and FAF1 was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, and these results show direct association of FAF1 with DISC members.

The Apoptotic Effector Domain (Amino Acids 181–381) of FAF1 Binds to the DED Domains of FADD and Caspase-8 — Based on the fact that Fas-DISC complex is formed by interactions between their protein domains, we investigated which FAF1 domains were required for the binding to the Fas-DISC members. To map the binding domains to Fas-DISC proteins, an in vitro binding assay was performed using various deletion constructs (Figs. 1, C–F, and 2A). As shown in Fig. 1 (C and D), GST-FAF1-(181–381), corresponding to the previously known apoptotic effector domain (28), was sufficient to interact with in vitro translated FADD (Fig. 1C). The in vitro translated FAF1 was sufficient to bind to GST-FADD-DED but not to GST-FADD-DD (Fig. 1D). In binding analysis between FAF1 and caspase-8, GST-FAF1-(181–381) was also mapped as the caspase-8 interacting region (Fig. 1E). Among deletion constructs of caspase-8, the DED of caspase-8 was sufficient to bind to FAF1 but not to the C terminus of caspase-8 where the catalytic activity resides (Fig. 1F). The N terminus (amino acids 1–201) of FAF1 was previously mapped as the binding site of Fas (29). Thus, our data show that FAF1 has Fas- and caspase-8-interacting domains in tandem like FADD.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Schematic representation of the binding map of FAF1 to Fas-DISC and sequence comparison. A, interaction of DEDID of FAF1 with DEDs of FADD and caspase-8. Structures of proteins used in the binding assay are shown. Numbers at the ends of each construct represent amino acid numbers. The + and – symbols indicate the interacting ability. B, sequence alignments of DEDs and DEDID. Sequence of FAF1-(302–381) with caspase-8 DEDs and FADD-DED was aligned by using the program ANTHEPROT version 6.0, and the structure of helix was analyzed by protein data base (www2.protein.Osaka-u.ac.jp). Numbers at the ends of each domain represent amino acid numbers. Gray boxes indicate helices (denoted as {alpha}).

 

The DED-interacting Domain of FAF1-(181–381) Contains Several Helices—As shown above, the region of amino acids 181–381 of FAF1 was mapped as the interacting domain with the DED domains of FADD and caspase-8 (Figs. 1, C–F, and 2A). Thus, we investigated whether the region of amino acids 181–381 of FAF1 has sequence similarities to the DED domains of FADD and caspase-8. Structure-based alignment analysis of FAF1 revealed that the amino acid similarity of the conventional DED domains to FAF1-(181–381) was not significant (Fig. 2B). In addition, the consensus amino acid residues (RXDL) found in the DEDs (37) were not conserved in FAF1-(181–381). Thus, FAF1-(181–381) is named as DEDID (DED-interacting domain) henceforth. The secondary structure analysis of FAF1-(181–381) with protein data base (www2.protein.Osaka-u.ac.jp) revealed that FAF1-(181–381) might have several helical structures (Fig. 2B). The helical structures of DED domains seemed to be important in the protein-protein interaction (37, 38).

FAF1 Is Preassociated with the Fas-DISC before Fas Activation—The DED- or DED-like-domain-containing proteins, including FADD, caspase-8, and FLASH, formed the Fas-DISC through homotypic domain interactions via DEDs. Because FAF1 interacts with Fas-DISC members and has a DEDID, we questioned if FAF1 was a member of Fas-DISC. To determine whether FAF1 is present in the Fas-DISC, Fas-DISCs were immunoprecipitated with an agonistic human antibody against Fas (anti-APO-1 antibody) in Jurkat cells before and after stimulation of Fas with the agonistic anti-Fas monoclonal antibody. As shown in Fig. 3, endogenous FAF1 was already present in the Fas-DISC before Fas activation but not caspase-8. However, caspase-8 was recruited to the Fas-DISC after Fas activation. In addition, the association of FAF1 with the Fas-DISC was enhanced at 1 h after treatment of Fas antibody and gradually weakened to the resting cell level as apoptosis proceeded. We also observed association of FAF1 with the Fas-DISC in H9 cells (Type 1 cells) as well (data not shown).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Association of FAF1 with Fas-DISC. Jurkat cells were treated with anti-Fas antibody for the indicated periods of time. Fas-DISC was immunoprecipitated by anti-Fas (APO-1) antibody. Western blots (WBs) were carried out with indicated antibodies. Whole cell lysates (WCLs) were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-PARP antibody.

 

FAF1 Colocalizes with Fas-DISC to the Cytoplasmic Membrane—It has been previously shown that Fas-DISC is formed in the cytoplasmic membrane via homotypic interactions. Previously, FAF1 has been reported to localize in diverse subcellular positions such as the nucleus, perinuclear cytoplasm, and nucleoli depending on the cell type (28, 30, 31). We found that FAF1 localized to the cytoplasm in NIH3T3, BOSC23, and HeLa cells known to be less sensitive to Fas-DISC-mediated apoptosis (data not shown). By confocal microscopic analysis using the antibodies against endogenous FAF1 and Fas, respectively, both FAF1 and Fas localized in the cytoplasmic membrane in cells that were not treated with anti-Fas antibody (Fig. 4, A and B). Then, the localization of Fas and FAF1 was monitored from 1 to 4 h after Fas treatment. As shown in Fig. 4A, clustering of Fas, which agrees with a previous report (39), and FAF1 was detected after 1 h of Fas stimulation with anti-Fas antibody. After 2 h, almost all cells showed the diffuse pattern of Fas and FAF1 in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4, A and C).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Translocation and colocalization of Fas and FAF1 in Jurkat cells. A, localization pattern of FAF1 and Fas. Jurkat cells were treated with 50 ng/ml anti-Fas antibody for indicated times. Cells were stained with either anti-Fas (C-20) antibody or FAF1 (M-20) antibody, followed by FITC-conjugated anti-antibodies (green image). After Fas and FAF1 staining, the nuclei of cell were stained with PI (red image). B and C, colocalization of FAF1 and Fas. Jurkat cells were incubated with 50 ng of anti-Fas antibody per ml for 0 h (B) or 2 h (C). Jurkat cells were double-labeled for Fas and FAF1, Fas and FADD, Fas and caspase-8, and Fas and PARP, respectively. Samples were analyzed using confocal laser microscopy. 10 z-sections of each sample were taken and used to generate a three-dimensional image with Bio-Rad software. Projections of these three-dimensional images are shown. All cells are shown at the same magnification. Immunostained proteins are indicated in the lower part of the image. Single (upper and middle panels) and merged images (bottom panels) are shown.

 

To test whether Fas-DISC and FAF1 colocalize in cells before and after stimulation of Fas with the agonistic anti-Fas monoclonal antibody, analysis of colocalization was performed by confocal microscopy using antibodies against endogenous FAF1, Fas, FADD, and caspase-8 in Jurkat cells. As shown in Fig. 4 (B and C), endogenous FAF1, FADD, and caspase-8 completely colocalized with Fas in cells treated and not treated with anti-Fas antibody. PARP was detected in the nucleus as expected.

FAF1-DEDID Is Essential for the Mediation of Fas-induced Apoptosis—To know if DEDID performs critical functions in the Fas-induced apoptosis, the DEDID deletion mutants were prepared and transiently transfected using NucleofectorTM Solution V provided by Amaxa in Jurkat cells. As shown in Fig. 5, mere overexpression of both FAF1-{Delta}DEDID and FAF1-{Delta}FID·DEDID mutants failed to induce apoptosis, whereas those of FAF1 and FAF1-{Delta}FID induced apoptosis. In addition, transfection of FAF1-{Delta}FID in which Fas interacting region is deleted inhibited Fas-mediated apoptosis significantly as expected. Moreover, transfection of FAF1-{Delta}DEDID and FAF1-{Delta}FID·DEDID, respectively, inhibited Fas-mediated apoptosis significantly as well. These data suggest that DEDID deletion mutants act as dominant negatives in the Fas-mediated apoptotic pathway. Thus, it has been demonstrated that the DEDID is essential in mediating Fas-induced apoptosis.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
FAF1-DEDID is essential for the mediation of Fas-induced apoptosis. Jurkat cells were nucleofected with FLAG vector, FLAG-tagged FAF1, FAF1-{Delta}FID, FAF1-{Delta}DEDID, and FAF1-{Delta}FID·DEDID, respectively, using an Amaxa NucleofectorTM apparatus. After 30 h, cells were treated with 50 ng/ml anti-Fas antibody for 1 h, fixed, stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride, and analyzed by microscopy. Apoptotic cells were determined by evaluating nuclear morphology. Bars represent means ± S.D. from at least three independent experiments.

 

Effect of FAF1 in FADD- and Caspase-8-deficient Jurkat Cells—FADD and caspase-8 are necessary for Fas receptor-mediated cell death. We therefore evaluated the requirement of caspase-8 and FADD for FAF1-induced cell death. To this end, GFP-tagged FAF1 was transiently transfected by LipofectAMINE reagent in parental Jurkat cells (A3), FADD-deficient Jurkat cells (I2.1), and caspase-8-deficient Jurkat cells (I9–2). As shown in Fig. 6A, transient transfection of the GFP-tagged FAF1 in parental Jurkat cells (52 ± 6%) efficiently induced morphological changes, consistent with apoptosis, when compared with that in vector-transfected parental Jurkat cells (5 ± 0.8%). However, as compared with results in FAF1-transfected parental Jurkat cells, cell death by FAF1 in either FADD-deficient (19 ± 3%) or caspase-8-deficient (24 ± 4%) cells was significantly suppressed. In all experiments, GFP vector itself induced only slight apoptosis (<5%). The ability of FAF1 to induce full-blown apoptosis required FADD and caspase-8. The fact that overexpression of FAF1 still induced a significant extent of apoptosis (19–24%) in FADD- and caspase-8-deficient Jurkat cells suggests that FAF1 might have another mechanism of cell death besides the Fas-DISC-mediated apoptosis.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Requirement of FADD and caspase-8 in FAF1-induced cell death. A, apoptotic effect of FAF1 in FADD- and caspase-8-deficient Jurkat cells. Three different types of Jurkat cells (A3; parental, I2.1; FADD (–/–), I9–2; caspase-8 (–/–)) were transfected with either GFP vector (control) or GFP-tagged FAF1 by LipofectAMINE reagent. After 30 h, the percentage of apoptotic cells was analyzed based on the morphological change of GFP-positive cells under a fluorescence microscope. Bars represent means ± S.D. from at least three independent experiments. B, apoptotic lysates were subsequently immunoblotted with anti-GFP, anti-FADD, and anti-caspase-8, respectively.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study enrolls FAF1 as a member of Fas-DISC together with FADD and caspase-8. FAF1 interacts with the DED domains of FADD and caspase-8 through a potentially helix-rich DED-like domain, DEDID, of FAF1 previously known to have an apoptotic potential. In addition, FAF1 mutants lacking DEDID inhibit Fas-induced apoptosis in a dominant-negative fashion emphasizing the essentiality of DEDID in Fas-induced apoptosis. By confocal microscopic analysis, we demonstrated that FAF1 as well as FADD and caspase-8 completely colocalized with Fas in Jurkat cells. We also show that caspase-8 functions downstream of FAF1, because significant inhibition of apoptotic induction by FAF1 occurred in caspase-8-deficient Jurkat cells.

FAF1 interacts with caspase-8 and FADD. The interaction occurs among the DEDID of FAF1 and the DEDs of caspase-8 and of FADD. Apoptotic signal transmissions via homotypic interaction domains such as death domain, death effector domain, caspase recruitment domain, and DED-recruiting domain have been reported (40). Most of the caspase-8-interacting proteins interact via their DED motifs (21, 4042). However, death effector domain-associated factor and FLASH interact with DED proteins without having a DED (25, 43). Likewise, FAF1 here is presented as another example of a protein interacting with the DEDs of caspase-8 and FADD without having a typical DED. The DED has a structure composed of six highly conserved {alpha}-helices. Even if FAF1 does not show significant homology with DED by amino acid sequence analysis, the DEDID of FAF1 has several potential {alpha}-helices when analyzed by the protein data base (www2.protein.Osakau.ac.jp) like DEDs. Thus, crystal structural analysis of DEDID of FAF1 would be able to provide information regarding its relevance to DED or DED-like domains.

Recently, FLASH has been reported as a member of Fas-DISC (25). FLASH contains a DED-recruitment domain that interacts with the DED domains of caspase-8 and FADD, and FLASH is involved in association of FADD and caspase-8 upon Fas stimulation. However, FLASH does not interact with either full-length Fas or its death domain. Unlike FLASH, FAF1 directly interacts with Fas-DD as well as FADD- and caspase-8-DEDs. FAF1 is much bigger than FADD even though they have similar protein-interacting characteristics. Thus, it is conceivable that FAF1 might play a role as a scaffolding protein that tethers Fas/FADD/caspase-8 signaling modules. Further studies of the interaction profile of FAF1 with other Fas-DISC members such as FLASH will provide us information of the putative role of FAF1 as a scaffold.

Two different mechanisms exist regarding formation of Fas-DISC (26). In type I cells, Fas-DISC is preformed without Fas activation and enhanced by Fas activation. In type II cells, the DISC is formed upon Fas activation. Thus, Fas-mediated apoptosis rapidly progresses in type I cells (25, 26). FLASH is only recruited to Fas upon Fas activation in both type I and II cells (25). In this study, we showed that FAF1 was already interacting with Fas before Fas activation in both type I (data not shown) and type II cells. In addition, the association of FAF1 with Fas was enhanced during cell death signaling upon Fas activation. Thus, these results suggest that FAF1 might serve as an early seed for the fast formation of DISC.

Interaction of FADD and caspase-8 has been reported to occur through homophilic interaction between the DEDs of FADD and caspase-8 (2, 9). The FADD mutant, lacking N-terminal amino acids 1–79 (DED), functions as a dominant-negative inhibitor of Fas- and tumor necrosis factor-mediated apoptosis. In this study, FAF1-{Delta}DEDID lacking caspase-8 binding domain functioned similarly. The dominant-negative effect of FAF1-{Delta}DEDID on Fas-induced cell death testifies to the essentiality of DEDID in mediating Fas-induced cell death. FAF1-{Delta}DEDID corresponds to the FAF1(s), an endogenous short isoform FAF1 in which most of DEDID is deleted (29). The cDNAs of FAF1(s) have been found both in the human liver and in the HeLa cell cDNA libraries even though the protein has not yet been detected by Western analysis. Thus, FAF1(s), if translated, would be able to function as an endogenous inhibitor against FAF1 in Fas-induced apoptosis.

The FID of FAF1 interacts with Fas (29), and the DEDID of FAF1 interacts with the DED of caspase-8. In this respect, FAF1 is similar to the adapter protein FADD. Moreover, both FAF1 and FADD have their interacting modules in tandem. It is conceivable that FAF1 exists in Fas-DISC to amplify the aggregation of caspase-8 via a FADD-like mechanism. We expect a cooperative relationship between FADD and FAF1 in the formation of Fas-DISC, because diminution of apoptosis by FAF1 occurred in FADD-deficient Jurkat cells.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant (Grant KRF-2000-015-DP0318). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Division of Life Science, PaiChai University, 439-6 Doma-2-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 302-735, Korea. Tel./Fax: 82-42-520-5463; E-mail: ehkim{at}mail.pcu.ac.kr.

1 The abbreviations used are: DD, death domain; FADD, Fas-associated death domain protein; DED, death effector domain; Fas-DISC, Fas-death-inducing signaling complex; FLICE, FADD-like interleukin-1{beta}-converting enzyme; FLASH, FLICE-associated huge protein; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; TRITC, tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GFP, green fluorescence protein; CHX, cycloheximide; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DEDID, DED-interacting domain; FID, Fas-interacting domain. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. P. H. Krammer for kindly donating anti-APO-1 antibody and Dr. J. Blenis (Harvard Medical School) for kindly providing caspase-8- and FADD-deficient Jurkat cells. We are grateful to Dr. R. J. Youle (National Institutes of Health) for a critical reading of the manuscript.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kischkel, F. C., Hellbardt, S., Behrmann, I., Germer, M., Pawlita, M., Krammer, P. H., and Peter, M. E. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5579–5588[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Medema, J. P., Scaffidi, C., Kischkel, F. C., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M., Krammer, P. H., and Peter, M. E. (1997) EMBO J. 6, 2794–2804[CrossRef]
  3. Ashkenazi, A., and Dixit, V. M. (1998) Science 281, 1305–1308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wallach, D., Varfolomeev, E. E., Malinin, N. L., Goltsev, Y. V., Kovalenko, A. V., and Boldin, M. P. (1999) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17, 331–367[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Krammer, P. H. (2000) Nature 407, 789–795[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Locksley, R. M., Killeen, N., and Lenardo, M. J. (2001) Cell 104, 487–501[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Boldin, M. P., Varfolomeev, E. E., Pancer, Z., Mett, I. L., Camonis, J. H., and Wallach, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7795–7798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chinnaiyan, A. M., O'Rourke, K., Tewari, M., and Dixit, V. M. (1995) Cell 81, 505–512[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Muzio, M., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Kischkel, F. C., O'Rourke, K., Shevchenko, A., Ni, J., Scaffidi, C., Bretz, J. D., Zhang, M., Gentz, R., Mann, M., Krammer, P. H., Peter, M. E., and Dixit, V. M. (1996) Cell 85, 817–827[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Juo, P., Kuo, C. J., Yuan, J., and Blenis, J. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 1001–1008[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Fernandes-Alnemri, T., Takahashi, A., Armstrong, R., Krebs, J., Fritz, L., Tomaselli, K. J., Wang, L., Yu, Z., Croce, C. M., and Salveson, G. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 6045–6052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Enari, M., Talanian, R. V., Wong, W. W., and Nagata, S. (1996) Nature 380, 723–726[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Hasegawa, J., Kamada, S., Kamiike, W., Shimizu, S., Imazu, T., Matsuda, H., and Tsujimoto, Y. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 1713–1718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Schlegel, J., Peters, I., Orrenius, S., Miller, D. K., Thornberry, N. A., Yamin, T. T., and Nicholson, D. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1841–1844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kamada, S., Washida, M., Hasegawa, J., Kusano, H., Funahashi, Y., and Tsujimoto, Y. (1997) Oncogene 15, 285–290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Takahashi, A., Hirata, H., Yonehara, S., Imai, Y., Lee, K. K., Moyer, R. W., Turner, P. C., Mesner, P. W., Okazaki, T., Sawai, H., Kishi, S., Yamamoto, K., Okuma, M., and Sasada, M. (1997) Oncogene 14, 2741–2752[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Goltsev, Y. V., Kovalenko, A. V., Arnold, E., Varfolomeev, E. E., Brodianskii, V. M., and Wallach, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19641–19644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Han, D. K., Chaudhary, P. M., Wright, M. E., Friedman, C., Trask, B. J., Riedel, R. T., Baskin, D. G., Schwartz, S. M., and Hood, L. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 11333–11338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hu, S., Vincenz, C., Ni, J., Gentz, R., and Dixit, V. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17255–17257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Inohara, N., Koseki, T., Hu, Y., Chen, S., and Nunez, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10717–10722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Irmler, M., Thome, M., Hahne, M., Schneider, P., Hofmann, K., Steiner, V., Bodmer, J. L., Schroter, M., Burns, K., Mattmann, C., Rimoldi, D., French, L. E., and Tschopp, J. (1997) Nature 388, 190–195[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Shu, H. B., Halpin, D. R., and Goeddel, D. V. (1997) Immunity 6, 751–763[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Srinivasula, S. M., Ahmad, M., Ottilie, S., Bullrich, F., Banks, S., Wang, Y., Fernandes-Alnemri, T., Croce, C. M., litwack, G., Tomaselli, K. J., Armstrong, R. C., and Alnemri, E. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18542–18545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rasper, D. M., Vaillancourt, J. P., Hadano, S., Houtzager, V. M., Seiden, I., Keen, S. L., Tawa, P., Xanthoudakis, S., Nasir, J., Martindale, D., Koop, B. F., Peterson, E. P., Thornberry, N. A., Huang, J., MacPherson, D. P., Black, S. C., Hornung, F., Lenardo, M. J., Hayden, M. R., Roy, S., and Nicholson, D. W. (1998) Cell Death Differ. 5, 271–288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Imai, Y., Kimura, T., Murakami, A., Yajima, N., Sakamaki, K., and Yonehara, S. (1999) Nature 398, 777–785[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Scaffidi, C., Schmitz, I., Zha, J., Korsmeyer, S. J., Krammer, P. H., and Peter, M. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22532–22538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Chu, K., Niu, X., and Williams, L. T. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 11894–11898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ryu, S. W., and Kim, E. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 286, 1027–1032[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Ryu, S. W., Chae, S. K., Lee, K. J., and Kim, E. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 262, 388–394[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Fröhlich, T., Risau, W., and Flamme, I. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2353–2363[Abstract]
  31. Jensen, H. H., Hjerrild, M., Guerra, B., Larsen, M. R., Hojrup, P., and Boldyreff, B. (2001) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 33, 577–589[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Kusk, M., Ahmed, R., Thomsen, B., Bendixen, C., Issinger, O. G., and Boldyreff, B. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 191, 51–58[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Guerra, B., Boldyreff, B., and Issinger, O. G. (2001) Int. J. Oncol. 19, 1117–1126[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Ryu, S. W., Chae, S. K., and Kim, E. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 279, 6–10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Kim, I. K., Chung, C. W., Woo, H. N., Hong, G. S., Nagata, S., and Jung, Y. K. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 277, 311–316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Juo, P., Woo, M. S. A., Kuo, C., Signorelli, P., Biemann, H. P., Hannun, Y. A., and Blenis, J. (1999) Cell Growth Differ. 10, 797–804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Kaufmann, M., Bozic, D., Briand, C., Bodmer, J. L., Zerbe, O., Kohl, A., Tschopp, J., and Grutter, M. G. (2002) FEBS Lett. 527, 250–254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Weber, C. H., and Vincenz, C. (2001) Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 475–481[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Algeciras-Schimnich, A., Shen, L., Barnhart, B. C., Murmann, A. E., Burkhardt, J. K., and Peter, M. E. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 207–220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., and Tschopp, J. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 155–156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Bertin, J., Armstrong, R. C., Ottilie, S., Martin, D. A., Wang, Y., Banks, S., Wang, G. H., Senkevich, T. G., Alnemri, E. S., Moss, B., Lenardo, M. J., Tomaselli, K. J., and Cohen, J. I. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 1172–1176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Stegh, A. H., Schickling, O., Ehret, A., Scaffidi, C., Peterhansel, C., Hofmann, T. G., Grummt, I., Krammer, P. H., and Peter, M. E. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 5974–5986[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Zheng, L., Schickling, O., Peter, M. E., and Lenardo, M. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 31945–31952[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
I. M. Adham, J. Khulan, T. Held, B. Schmidt, B. I. Meyer, A. Meinhardt, and W. Engel
Fas-associated factor (FAF1) is required for the early cleavage-stages of mouse embryo
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 14(4): 207 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-Y. Park, J.-h. Moon, K.-S. Lee, H.-I. Choi, J. Chung, H. J. Hong, and E. Kim
FAF1 Suppresses I{kappa}B Kinase (IKK) Activation by Disrupting the IKK Complex Assembly
J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 27572 - 27577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
T. Kinoshita, C. Kondoh, M. Hasegawa, R. Imamura, and T. Suda
Fas-associated factor 1 is a negative regulator of PYRIN-containing Apaf-1-like protein 1
Int. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 18(12): 1701 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Kim, J. H. Lee, S. Y. Lee, E. Kim, and J. Chung
Caspar, a suppressor of antibacterial immunity in Drosophila
PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16358 - 16363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Kim, C. Kang, C. Y. Shin, S. W. Hwang, Y. D. Yang, W. S. Shim, M.-Y. Park, E. Kim, M. Kim, B.-M. Kim, et al.
TRPV1 Recapitulates Native Capsaicin Receptor in Sensory Neurons in Association with Fas-Associated Factor 1
J. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 26(9): 2403 - 2412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Perez-Galan, G. Roue, N. Villamor, E. Montserrat, E. Campo, and D. Colomer
The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib induces apoptosis in mantle-cell lymphoma through generation of ROS and Noxa activation independent of p53 status
Blood, January 1, 2006; 107(1): 257 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. J. Song, S.-H. Yim, E. Kim, N.-S. Kim, and K.-J. Lee
Human Fas-Associated Factor 1, Interacting with Ubiquitinated Proteins and Valosin-Containing Protein, Is Involved in the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2005; 25(6): 2511 - 2524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H.-J. Kim, E. J. Song, Y.-S. Lee, E. Kim, and K.-J. Lee
Human Fas-associated Factor 1 Interacts with Heat Shock Protein 70 and Negatively Regulates Chaperone Activity
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 8125 - 8133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. Obradovic, M. Tirard, Zs. Nemethy, O. Hirsch, H. Gronemeyer, and O. F. X. Almeida
DAXX, FLASH, and FAF-1 Modulate Mineralocorticoid and Glucocorticoid Receptor-Mediated Transcription in Hippocampal Cells--Toward a Basis for the Opposite Actions Elicited by Two Nuclear Receptors?
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 761 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-Y. Park, H. D. Jang, S. Y. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and E. Kim
Fas-associated Factor-1 Inhibits Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) Activity by Interfering with Nuclear Translocation of the RelA (p65) Subunit of NF-{kappa}B
J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 2544 - 2549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Harper, M. A. Hughes, S. N