Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M304607200 on June 10, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 34, 31529-31535, August 22, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/34/31529    most recent
M304607200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antignac, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taha, M.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antignac, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taha, M.-K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Correlation between Alterations of the Penicillin-binding Protein 2 and Modifications of the Peptidoglycan Structure in Neisseria meningitidis with Reduced Susceptibility to Penicillin G*

Aude Antignac {ddagger}, Ivo G. Boneca § , Jean-Claude Rousselle ||, Abdelkader Namane ||, Jean-Philippe Carlier **, Julio A. Vázquez {ddagger}{ddagger}, Andrew Fox ¶¶, Jean-Michel Alonso {ddagger} and Muhamed-Kheir Taha {ddagger} ||||

From the {ddagger}Unité des Neisseria and Centre National de Référence des Méningocoques, §Unité de Pathogénie Bactérienne des Muqueuses, ||Plate-forme de Protéomique, **Unité des Bactéries Anaérobies et des Toxines, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France, {ddagger}{ddagger}Spanish Reference Laboratory for Meningococci, National Center for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, 28220, Spain, and ¶¶Meningococcal Reference Unit, Manchester Public Health Laboratory, Withington Hospital, Manchester, M20 2LR, England

Received for publication, May 2, 2003 , and in revised form, June 10, 2003.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reduced susceptibility to penicillin G in Neisseria meningitidis is directly correlated with alterations in the penA gene, which encodes the penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2). Using purified PBP2s from different backgrounds, we confirmed that the reduced susceptibility to penicillin G is associated with a decreased affinity of altered PBP2s for penicillin G. Infrared spectroscopy analysis using isogenic penicillin-susceptible strains and strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin G suggested that the meningococcal cell wall is also modified in a penA-dependent manner. Moreover, reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis of these meningococcal strains confirmed the modifications of peptidoglycan components and showed an increase in the peaks corresponding to pentapeptide-containing muropeptides. These results suggest that the D,D-transpeptidase and/or D,D-carboxypeptidase activities of PBP2 are modified by the changes in penA gene.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Neisseria meningitidis is an exclusive human bacterium that usually infects the nasopharynx. It occasionally provokes invasive infections such as septicemia, meningitis, and arthritis. Meningococcal infections are still a major public health concern due to periodic epidemics of meningitis in Africa and local outbreaks in developed countries. This concern is heightened by the increasing prevalence of meningococcal strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin G (PenI),1 one of the major antibiotics used for the treatment of meningococcal infections.

Penicillin G binds to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). SDS-PAGE analysis showed that N. meningitidis contains three PBPs (1, 2), PBP1 encoded by ponA, PBP2 encoded by penA, and PBP3 encoded by pbp3. Two other putative PBPs have also been identified from the complete genomic sequences of a serogroup B strain (3) and a serogroup A strain (4) of N. meningitidis. Meningococcal strains that are highly resistant to penicillin G (MIC > 1 µg/ml) due to the production of a plasmid-encoded {beta}-lactamase have been detected in some countries (5–8). However, meningococcal strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin G (PenI) (MICs between 0.125 and 1 µg/ml) have been reported worldwide (9), and this reduction in susceptibility is at least partly due to the decreased affinity of PBP2 encoded by an altered penA gene (10, 11). N. gonorrhoeae also shows increased resistance to penicillin G due to the decreased affinity of both PBP1 and PBP2 for penicillin G combined with alterations of the gonococcal porin and the overexpression of the MtrCDE efflux pump (12). N. meningitidis is naturally competent for transformation, which enables the horizontal transfer of DNA between strains, resulting in mosaic structures at genetic loci and a highly diverse meningococcal population (13, 14). The penA gene is altered as a result of DNA transfer between meningococcal strains or from commensal Neisseria species (15–18). We previously developed a rapid approach to define meningococcal penA alleles based on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Penicillin-susceptible (PenS) strains harbor highly related penA alleles regardless of their genotype. Conversely, PenI strains harbor different penA alleles, and the PenI phenotype is directly related to alterations in the penA gene in N. meningitidis (19). The penA gene encodes PBP2, a 60-kDa protein, which is homologous to high molecular weight class B PBPs. By analogy with PBP3 from Escherichia coli, PBP2 probably catalyzes a transpeptidation reaction that is necessary for the cross-linking of peptidoglycan in the meningococcal cell wall. Alterations of penA gene mostly affect the 3' transpeptidase-encoding region. The active serine residue SXXK, the SXN, and the KTG motifs, which are all located in this region, are usually conserved, but a high degree of polymorphism is observed in the surrounding sequences (19).

Because penicillin binds covalently to PBP2, the alterations around the active site-encoding domain probably reduce the affinity of PBP2 for penicillin G, thus accounting for the PenI phenotype. However, the effects of penA alterations on the enzymatic activity of PBP2 (particularly the transpeptidation reaction involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis) and the involvement of such modifications in the PenI phenotype have not been addressed. The lack of information concerning the structure of the N. meningitidis peptidoglycan has hindered this analysis. We recently solved this structure using reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (57). The aim of this study was to characterize meningococcal strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin G and to study the functional consequences of PBP2 alterations. In particular, we analyzed the modifications in the peptidoglycan structure in well defined isogenic strains that only differed by the penA gene.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions—The meningococcal strains used in this study are listed in Table I. N. meningitidis was grown for 18 h on GCB medium (Difco) containing Kellogg supplements (20). E. coli TG1 was used as a host for cloning experiments, and E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS was used as an expression system (21). E. coli cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with 40 µg/ml kanamycin and 15 µg/ml chloramphenicol when necessary. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by the Etest method and serological typing were performed as previously described (19, 22, 23). N. meningitidis strain LNP8013 was transformed with either the entire penA gene or the 3' end of the penA gene amplified from PenI strains with oligonucleotides 99-14/99-23 and AA-18/99-23 (Table II), respectively, as previously described (19). Transformants were selected on GCB medium containing various concentrations of penicillin G.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE I
Characteristics of meningococcal strains

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE II
Oligonucleotides used in this study

 



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of recombinant plasmid pAA8 containing the penA-lacZ-aph3' transcriptional fusion and recombination events with the homologous locus on the meningococcal chromosome. A, oligonucleotides are represented by small arrows, white boxes correspond to DNA of the vector pGEM-T easy, black boxes represent meningococcal penA gene, and hatched boxes stand for the meningococcal DNA fragment located downstream from the penA gene. The recombinant plasmid pAA8 was used to transform N. meningitidis strains LNP8013 (PenS), LNP16969 (PenI), and LNP16635 (PenI). lacZ was integrated by double-crossing-over (dotted lines) downstream from each penA allele, creating three transcriptional fusions, penA1-lacZ (strain LNP8013), penA21-lacZ (strain LNP16969), and penA11-lacZ (strain LNP16635). B, {beta}-galactosidase activity assays. {beta}-Galactosidase activities, which reflect the expression level of the three corresponding penA alleles were assayed after 2 and 6 h of growth.

 
Penicillin Binding Assays—Total meningococcal membrane extracts were prepared as previously described (24). The crude membranes (30 µg of protein) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in the presence of increasing concentrations of [3H]benzylpenicillin (20 Ci/mmol, 1 mCi/ml, Amersham Biosciences). The reactions were stopped by adding 5 µl of unlabeled penicillin G (2.5 mg/ml) for 20 min at room temperature. The binding affinity of penicillin G to purified PBP2s was assayed by competition experiments with [3H]benzylpenicillin. The purified PBP2s (2 µg of protein) were first incubated with increasing concentrations of penicillin G, then with saturating concentrations of [3H]benzylpenicillin and processed as described above. After SDS-PAGE analysis, the gels were fixed for 30 min in 40% ethanol and 10% acetic acid, washed for 10 min with water, and placed in Amplify (Amersham Biosciences) for 30 min. The gels were dried and used to expose Hyperfilm-MP (Amersham Biosciences) at –80 °C. The signals were quantified using the ImageQuant program (Molecular Dynamics).

Infrared Spectroscopy—Cells that had been grown for 18 h were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in distilled water. The optical densities of the suspensions were adjusted to yield optimal infrared spectra. A 35-µl aliquot of cells and a 20-µl aliquot of purified peptidoglycan preparations were transferred to a ZnSe optical plate (sample holder), vacuum-dried, and then used directly for Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy. Each sample was measured in five independent assays. All spectra were recorded between wave numbers 4000 and 500 cm–1 with an IFS 28/B Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The OPUS software, version 3.02 (Bruker), was used to process the data.

Determination of Peptidoglycan Structure—Peptidoglycan preparations, reverse-phase HPLC analysis, desalting of muropeptides, and mass spectrometry were performed as previously described (57). Briefly, peptidoglycans were isolated by an adapted version of the method developed for E. coli (25) with boiling sodium dodecyl sulfate, digested with muramidase from Streptomyces globisporus, and reduced with sodium borohydride. Muropeptides were separated and desalted by HPLC on a Hypersil ODS column (ThermoHypersil-Keystone) and submitted to mass spectrometry analysis. All matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry and post source decay experiments were carried out on a Voyager DE STR instrument (Applied Biosystems Inc., Framingham, MA) as previously described (57).

Molecular Typing—Strains were typed by multilocus DNA fingerprinting using five genes (pilA, pilD, crgA, regF, and iga) as previously described (26–28). Polymorphisms of the penA and ponA genes were analyzed by RFLP as previously described (19). The ponA gene was amplified by PCR using oligonucleotides AA-6 and AA-7 (Table II). Amplicons were then digested with HpaII and analyzed on polyacrylamide gels. The nucleotide sequences of the penA gene were analyzed as previously described (19).

Purification of Recombinant PBP2s—penA' codes for a water-soluble form of PBP2 lacking the N-terminal transmembrane domain. penA' from strains with different penA alleles (LNP8013, LNP16519, LNP17041, LNP16454, LNP17723, and LNP18425) was PCR-amplified with oligonucleotides AA-4 (with 5' BsaI adaptor) and AA-2 (with 5' XhoI adaptor) (Table II). These resulting fragments were digested with BsaI and XhoI and ligated into the NcoI and XhoI sites of pET28b (Novagen) to create genes encoding PBP2s with six C-terminal histidine residues (His6-tagged PBP2s) expressed under the control of the T7 bacteriophage promoter. These recombinant plasmids were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS, and protein purification was performed using a nickel nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose column (Qiagen) as previously described (29). The fractions containing PBP2 were pooled, dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline, adjusted to 20% glycerol (v/v), and stored at –20 °C.

Construction of penA-lacZ Transcriptional Fusions—The entire penA coding sequence from strain LNP8013 (penA1 allele) was amplified with oligonucleotides 99-1 and 99-2 (Table II) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) to obtain the recombinant plasmid pAA3. A 400-bp fragment located immediately downstream from the penA gene on the meningococcal chromosome was amplified with oligonucleotides AA-13 (with a 5' NdeI adaptor) and AA-14 (with a 5' SacI adaptor) (Table II). The resulting fragment was cloned between the NdeI and SacI sites located downstream from the penA gene in pAA3. A promotorless lacZ gene (30) was introduced into the SpeI site located downstream from the penA gene. The aph-3' gene, encoding kanamycin resistance (31), was amplified with oligonucleotides KM-6 and KM-7 (Table II) and inserted into the blunt-ended HindIII site at the end of the lacZ gene. This recombinant plasmid, named pAA8, harbors the penA-lacZ-aph-3' operon (Fig. 1A) and was used to transform meningococcal PenS strain LNP8013 (penA1) and PenI strains LNP16969 (penA21) and LNP16635 (penA11) (Table I). Upon transformation, the recombinant plasmid pAA8 is not maintained, and double recombination occurs. PCR and RFLP analysis were used to select transformants in which lacZ and aph-3' genes had been integrated correctly but in which the original penA allele in the chromosome had been preserved in each strain. {beta}-Galactosidase assays were performed as previously described (32).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization of Meningococcal Strains—We first selected a subset of well defined meningococcal clinical isolates including ten PenI strains and one PenS strain (Table I). We determined the serogroup, serotype, and serosubtype of each strain. The MICs of penicillin G, amoxicillin, and cefotaxime were determined by the Etest method. The multilocus DNA fingerprinting approach using five genes (pilA, pilD, crgA, regF, and iga) showed that strains belonged to different genetic lineages (Table I). RFLP analysis showed that the penA allele of all PenI strains differed from that of the strain LNP8013 (PenS) (Table I). Because alterations of both PBP2 and PBP1 are associated with an increased level of penicillin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae (12), we also used RFLP to analyze the ponA polymorphism in 66 PenS and PenI meningococcal strains. Several restriction enzymes were tested, and only digestion with HpaII gave four highly related ponA alleles, but no association was observed between ponA alleles and PenS/PenI phenotypes (Table I and data not shown). It has previously been shown that the disappearance of PstI site in the ponA gene is correlated with penicillin resistance in gonococci (12). However, this polymorphism was not found in any of our meningococcal strains (data not shown).

We next transformed PCR-amplified penA alleles from eight PenI strains into the PenS strain LNP8013 to generate a set of isogenic meningococcal variants that differed only by penA alleles. All the transformants (TR) acquired the penA allele from the donor strain and showed reduced susceptibility to penicillin G, with an MIC greater than 0.125 µg/ml (Table I).

Effects of penA Alterations on Its Own Expression—We studied the expression of different penA alleles by analyzing the expression of penA-lacZ transcriptional fusions. The penA coding sequence from strain LNP8013 was cloned upstream from a promoterless lacZ gene. The resulting recombinant plasmid, pAA8, also harbored the aph-3' gene, encoding resistance to kanamycin and the region of the meningococcal chromosome located immediately downstream from the penA gene (Fig. 1A). Transformation and allelic replacement into the PenS strain, LNP8013, and two PenI strains, LNP16969 and LNP16635, allowed us to construct strains expressing lacZ under the control of the promoter region of the chromosomal penA1, penA21, and penA11 genes, respectively (Table I). The {beta}-galactosidase activity reflected the transcription of these alleles. No significant differences were observed in {beta}-galactosidase activities of the PenS and PenI strains in our experimental conditions (Fig. 1B). These results show that penA alterations do not affect the transcription of the penA gene and suggest that the transcriptional level of penA does not play a role in the PenI phenotype.

Effects of penA Alterations on Binding of Penicillin to PBP2—We found that 10 times less [3H]benzylpenicillin bound to PBP2s from all PenI strains than to PBP2 from the PenS strain in crude membranes (PBP2s from PenI and PenS strains were saturated by 0.5 and 0.05 µg/ml [3H]benzylpenicillin, respectively) (Fig. 2). There was no apparent difference in the amount of [3H]benzylpenicillin bound to the other PBPs (PBP1 and PBP3) between the two types of strains, even in strains with higher MICs (saturation at 0.5 and 0.05 µg/ml [3H]benzylpenicillin for PBP1 and PBP3, respectively). In transformants, the acquisition of altered penA genes and reduced susceptibility to penicillin G were accompanied by changes in the binding of [3H]benzylpenicillin to PBP2s as in the donor strains but not to PBP1 and PBP3 (Fig. 2).



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
Binding affinity of PBPs for [3H]benzylpenicillin from one representative PenS strain (LNP8013), PenI strain (LNP16454), and PenI transformant (TR 16454). Membrane extracts (30 µg of protein) were incubated with the indicated concentrations of [3H]benzylpenicillin. After SDS-PAGE analysis, the gels were fixed, treated with Amplify (Amersham Biosciences), and then autoradiographed. The positions of the three PBPs (PBP1, PBP2, and PBP3) and the penicillin G MICs of each strain are indicated on the left.

 

We next studied the binding of penicillin G to purified PBP2s from PenS and PenI strains. penA alleles lacking the transmembrane-coding region (penA') were amplified and cloned into pET28b (Novagen), creating genes coding for water-soluble forms of PBP2s with six C-terminal histidine residues. His6-tagged PBP2s were overproduced and purified to greater than 95% purity (data not shown). We then determined the binding affinity of the purified PBP2s for penicillin G in competition experiments with [3H]benzylpenicillin. We tested purified PBP2s from one PenS (S-PBP2) and five PenI (R-PBP2s) strains with different penicillin G MICs. The binding was scored by determining the concentration of non-radioactive penicillin G that inhibited the binding of saturating concentrations of [3H]benzypenicillin by 50% (inhibition concentration 50, IC50). R-PBP2s bound less penicillin G than S-PBP2. The IC50 values and the penicillin G MICs of the corresponding PenI transformants matched closely. However, no strict correlation was found between the IC50 values and the penicillin G MICs of the corresponding clinical PenI strains (Fig. 3). These data strongly suggest that alterations in the penA genes resulted in PBP2s with decreased affinity for penicillin G. However, the decreased affinity of PBP2s for penicillin G cannot solely explain the different penicillin G MICs of the clinical PenI isolates.



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
Binding affinity of purified S-PBP2 (from PenS strain LNP8013) and R-PBP2s (from PenI strains LNP16519, LNP17041, LNP16454, LNP17723, and LNP18425) for penicillin G in competition experiments with [3H]benzylpenicillin. Purified PBP2s (2 µg of protein) were first incubated with increasing concentrations of penicillin G, then with saturating concentrations of [3H]benzylpenicillin. After SDS-PAGE analysis, the gels were fixed, treated with Amplify (Amersham Biosciences), and then autoradiographed. Bands were quantified using the ImageQuant program (Molecular Dynamics). The concentrations of penicillin G that inhibited the binding of saturating concentrations of [3H]benzylpenicillin by 50% (IC50) are indicated on the right. The penicillin G MICs of the clinical strains and of the corresponding transformants are indicated on the left.

 

Effects of penA Alterations on the Structure of Meningococcal PBP2—We sequenced the region of the penA gene that encodes the transpeptidase domain of PBP2 of a large collection of PenI clinical isolates obtained in France, England, and Spain as previously described (19). The deduced amino acid sequences of PBP2 (amino acids 298–581) were aligned, and meningococcal PenI strains showed 8.5–14.4% divergence (data not shown). Eight positions were modified in almost all PenI strains (Fig. 4). These altered positions were located around the conserved KTG motif. The corresponding residues in PBP2x from Streptococcus pneumoniae are part of the structure that forms the active site (33), particularly the {beta}-sheets 3 and 4 (Fig. 4). This suggests that these amino acid substitutions are important in determining reduced affinity of PBP2 for penicillin G. We transformed the PenS strain LNP8013 with a PCR-amplified DNA fragment corresponding to the 3' end of the penA gene harboring these eight modifications. All the transformants obtained replaced their 3' end of the penA gene by the transforming fragment and displayed reduced susceptibility to penicillin G with an MIC ranging from 0.38 to 1 µg/ml. Therefore, this penA fragment was able to confer resistance to a PenS strain, suggesting that only a small number of amino acid changes are important for decreasing the affinity of meningococcal PBP2 for penicillin G.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
Partial sequences of penicillin-binding protein 2 from meningococcal PenS strain LNP8013 (Nm PBP2) and of penicillin-binding protein 2x from pneumococcal PenS strain R6 (Sp PBP2x). The most frequent modified residues (8 residues) in the sequences from meningococcal PenI strains and the corresponding amino acid changes are indicated in bold in the sequence of Nm PBP2 (amino acids 443–581). The amino acid positions associated with resistance in pneumococci are also indicated in bold in the sequence of Sp PBP2x. The secondary structures ({alpha}-helices and {beta}-sheets) of the PBP2x are indicated according to Dessen et al. (33).

 

Association between Bacterial Cell Wall Alterations and PBP2 Modifications—Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy can be used to analyze bacterial cell walls and peptidoglycans. Infrared spectroscopy has been used to tentatively assign bacterial molecules according to their vibrational features (34). Spectra for the intact PenS strain (LNP8013) and its isogenic PenI derivatives (TR 16454, TR TH-41) were recorded and compared between wave numbers 4000 and 500 cm–1. Variations in peptidoglycan structure can be detected by comparing infrared absorption in the wave number regions corresponding to amides and sugar rings bands. Significant differences were found between amide and carbohydrate absorption bands of the PenS and isogenic PenI strains (Fig. 5). We calculated the heterogeneity index of absorption at several wave numbers and used it to construct a dendrogram. This showed that the isogenic PenI derivatives clustered together and separately from the PenS parental strain (Fig. 5). Identical results were obtained when we compared purified peptidoglycan preparations from these strains (data not shown). These data suggest that penA alterations affect the meningococcal cell wall and possibly the peptidoglycan.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
Dendrogram based on the heterogeneity of the infrared absorption spectra in the wave numbers corresponding to amides (3338–3280, 3098–3056, 1749–1715, 1669–1608, 1583–1528 cm–1) and sugar rings bands (2935–2914, 1477–1433, 1413–1381, 1179–1157, and 1096–1067 cm–1). Each strain (PenS strain LNP8013 and its PenI isogenic derivatives TR TH-41 and TR 16545) was tested in quintuplet.

 

Peptidoglycan Structure in Meningococcal Strains—We recently described the structure of the peptidoglycan of N. meningitidis, which consists of disaccharide subunits of N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid carrying a pentapeptide (L-Ala-D-Glu-meso-diaminopimelate-D-Ala-D-Ala) (57). To determine the nature of the peptidoglycan structural modifications that could be induced by penA alterations, we compared the muropeptide composition of the PenS strain LNP8013 and its isogenic PenI derivatives (Table I). We analyzed purified peptidoglycan preparations digested with muramidase by HPLC and mass spectrometry. We determined the structures of 28 different muropeptides species (57) (Fig. 6 and Table III). Although no new peaks were detected, differences in the amplitudes of preexisting peaks were observed between the PenS strain and its seven isogenic PenI derivatives. These mostly involved an increase in pentapeptide-containing muropeptides (Fig. 6 and Table III). The amplitude of peak 5, which corresponds to the disaccharide pentapeptide N-acetylglucosamine-N-acetylmuramic acid-L-Ala-D-Glu-meso-diaminopimelate-D-Ala-D-Ala, was significantly higher in all the isogenic PenI strains than in LNP8013. The amplitudes of peak 9, which corresponds to the tetra-penta dimer and peak 18, which contains its di-O-acetylated derivative, were also higher in the isogenic PenI strains. A minor decrease in the amplitude of peak 2 (tetra monomer) was observed in the isogenic PenI strains. The same accumulation of muropeptides carrying pentapeptide chains in peptidoglycan was also observed when the parent clinical PenI isolates were compared with strain LNP8013 (57). Our results suggest that the peptidoglycans from PenS and the isogenic PenI strains differ. These changes were transformable using penA gene from a donor PenI strain to a recipient PenS strain and are, hence, directly linked to penA alterations.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.
Reverse-phase HPLC analysis of N. meningitidis muramidase-digested peptidoglycan from the PenS strain LNP8013. Arrows indicate the peaks that differ between the PenS strain LNP8013 and the seven PenI isogenic strains. The amplitudes of peaks 5, 9, and 18 were increased in PenI isogenic strains, whereas the amplitude of peak 2 was decreased. The structures of the muropeptides corresponding to these peaks that differ quantitatively between the strain LNP8013 (PenS) and its isogenic PenI derivatives are presented in Table III.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE III
Muropeptide composition of meningococcal PenS strain LNP8013 and its isogenic PenI derivatives

 


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Susceptibility to {beta}-lactams antibiotics can be mediated by three major mechanisms, (i) decreased binding of antibiotics to PBPs, (ii) antibiotic inactivation by {beta}-lactamase, and (iii) reduced membrane permeability. In N. meningitidis, the first mechanism is usually incriminated. SDS-PAGE analysis revealed the presence of three PBPs in this bacterium, but other PBPs may also exist, as suggested from the in silico analysis of the genome of two completely sequenced meningococcal strains (3, 4). We have previously reported that penA alterations are directly linked to the PenI phenotype (19). Moreover in this study, we showed that the polymorphism in the ponA gene, encoding PBP1, is not associated with the PenI phenotype. Our results confirm that alterations of the penA gene, encoding PBP2, decrease the binding affinity of PBP2 for penicillin G. However, this decreased affinity for penicillin G may not be the only mechanism accounting for the increased MIC of this antibiotic, as the binding of penicillin G to purified PBP2s from different clinical PenI strains was not directly correlated with penicillin G MIC levels (Fig. 3). Penicillin G binds covalently to the active site of PBPs (35), therefore, we expected that the ability of altered PBP2s to bind penicillin would be affected because alterations of PBP2s are usually located near to the active site of the transpeptidase moiety of PBP2. Moreover, the eight residues modified in most PenI isolates were in the region of the meningococcal PBP2 that is homologous to the active site of PBP2x from S. pneumoniae (33) and seem to play a major role in the decreased affinity of PBP2 for penicillin G.

Because PBPs are involved in the late stages of peptidoglycan biosynthesis, their alterations associated with {beta}-lactam resistance might result in peptidoglycan modifications. Peptidoglycan is a heteropolymer that is composed of several layers of linear glycan chains of repeated disaccharide units, N-acetylglucosamine-N-acetylmuramic acid, that are interconnected by peptide cross-links. Peptidoglycan forms a barrier in the cell wall that preserves cell integrity and shape. In enterococci, staphylococci, and pneumococci, altered PBPs seem to form unusual cross-links, suggesting that the specificity of their transpeptidase activity is altered (36–40). In S. pneumoniae, resistance to penicillin G occurs in several steps involving modifications of several PBPs (41, 42), and it has been suggested that changes in peptidoglycan structure are closely related with resistance to {beta}-lactams (43–45). The peptidoglycan of non-{beta}-lactamase-mediated antibiotic resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae has been shown to contain more tripeptides than susceptible strains (46). This may be due to an increase in the activity of a D,D-carboxypeptidase that would generate more tripeptides (46). Moreover, the cell wall of H. influenzae-resistant strains showed enhanced inflammatory activity in an animal model of meningitis (47). We recently developed a murine model that should make it possible to study the effect of modifications in N. meningitidis peptidoglycan structure on the induction of inflammatory response as well as on meningococcal virulence (48).

It has been suggested that the degree of cross-linking differs between PenS and PenI strains of N. gonorrhoeae (49, 50), which is closely related to N. meningitidis. However, isogenic derivatives were not used in this work, and HPLC peaks were not characterized (51). We have shown (57) that the reduced susceptibility to penicillin G of meningococcal PenI clinical isolates was associated with changes in peptidoglycan structure (accumulation of pentapeptides). Here, we studied the peptidoglycan structure of several meningococcal isogenic PenI strains obtained by transformation of the parental susceptible strain with PCR-amplified altered penA genes. We did not observe any new peak in the HPLC profiles. However, relative changes in the amplitudes of preexisting peaks were observed. As previously observed in clinical PenI isolates (57), our data indicated an increase in muropeptides with pentapeptide chains. As we compared isogenic strains, these modifications in peptidoglycan structure are directly linked to the alterations in penA gene, and changes in another locus cannot be involved, suggesting that the modified PBP2 in PenI transformants may have an altered D,D-transpeptidase activity. However, the increase in muropeptides carrying pentapeptide chains may reflect a decrease in D,D-carboxypeptidase activity on newly synthesized peptidoglycan chains. This in turn suggests that the meningococcal PBP2 rather has D,D-carboxypeptidase activity. Most of the modifications affecting PBP2s from PenI strains were located within a region that is homologous to the active site of PBP2x from S. pneumoniae (Fig. 4). In fact, these modified sites line the active-site pocket and, therefore, are most likely to affect the enzymatic activity of PBP2 (D,D-transpeptidase and/or D,D-carboxypeptidase). Recently, similar alterations in PBP3 of H. influenzae have been shown to be associated with {beta}-lactam resistance (52, 53). Furthermore, the same region has been implicated in E. coli PBP5 role in cell morphology and D,D-carboxypeptidase activity (54).

Genomic analysis of the complete sequence of two strains of N. meningitidis (3, 4) revealed putative genes encoding D,D-carboxypeptidase and endopeptidase. Meningococcal PBP2 has been shown to interact with the lytic transglycosylase MltA (55). Furthermore, the E. coli homolog of meningococcal PBP2, PBP3, can form a complex with the lytic transglycosylase Slt70 and the low molecular weight PBP7/8 (56). Thus, the reduced D,D-carboxypeptidase activity observed in the isogenic PenI strains could be an indirect effect. The ability of altered meningococcal PBP2s to engage in protein-protein interactions with the putative D,D-carboxypeptidase would be affected, leading to the observed phenotype in PenI strains. However, this hypothesis is less likely as the amino acid modifications are all predicted to be located in the active-site pocket of meningococcal PBP2, although it is possible that they change its overall three-dimensional structure. The construction of mutants in these genes may help us to understand the effect of penA alterations on the structure of the N. meningitidis peptidoglycan.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the Pasteur Institute and by European Commission Grant QLK2-CT-2001-01436. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

Recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal (SFRH/BPD/1567/2000). Back

|||| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-1-45688438; Fax: 33-1-45688338; E-mail: mktaha{at}pasteur.fr.

1 The abbreviations used are: PenI, reduced susceptibility to penicillin; PenS, penicillin-susceptible; PBP, penicillin-binding protein; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism; TR, transformant; S-PBP2, susceptible-PBP2; R-PBP2, resistant-PBP2; IC50, inhibition concentration 50. Back



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Barbour, A. G. (1981) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 19, 316–322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dougherty, T. J., Koller, A. E., and Tomasz, A. (1981) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20, 109–114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tettelin, H., Saunders, N. J., Heidelberg, J., Jeffries, A. C., Nelson, K. E., Eisen, J. A., Ketchum, K. A., Hood, D. W., Peden, J. F., Dodson, R. J., Nelson, W. C., Gwinn, M. L., DeBoy, R., Peterson, J. D., Hickey, E. K., Haft, D. H., Salzberg, S. L., White, O., Fleischmann, R. D., Dougherty, B. A., Mason, T., Ciecko, A., Parksey, D. S., Blair, E., Cittone, H., Clark, E. B., Cotton, M. D., Utterback, T. R., Khouri, H., Qin, H., Vamathevan, J., Gill, J., Scarlato, V., Masignani, V., Pizza, M., Grandi, G., Sun, L., Smith, H. O., Fraser, C. M., Moxon, E. R., Rappuoli, R., and Venter, J. C. (2000) Science 287, 1809–1815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Parkhill, J., Achtman, M., James, K. D., Bentley, S. D., Churcher, C., Klee, S. R., Morelli, G., Basham, D., Brown, D., Chillingworth, T., Davies, R. M., Davis, P., Devlin, K., Feltwell, T., Hamlin, N., Holroyd, S., Jagels, K., Leather, S., Moule, S., Mungall, K., Quail, M. A., Rajandream, M. A., Rutherford, K. M., Simmonds, M., Skelton, J., Whitehead, S., Spratt, B. G., and Barrell, B. G. (2000) Nature 404, 502–506[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Fontanals, D., Pineda, V., Pons, I., and Rojo, J. C. (1989) Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 8, 90–91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Dillon, J. R., Pauze, M., and Yeung, K. H. (1983) Lancet 1, 779–781[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Vazquez, J. A., Enriquez, A. M., De la Fuente, L., Berron, S., and Baquero, M. (1996) Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 181–182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Botha, P. (1988) Lancet 1, 54[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Oppenheim, B. A. (1997) Clin. Infect. Dis. 24, Suppl. 1, 98–101
  10. Spratt, B. G. (1988) Nature 332, 173–176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Mendelman, P. M., Campos, J., Chaffin, D. O., Serfass, D. A., Smith, A. L., and Saez-Nieto, J. A. (1988) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32, 706–709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ropp, P. A., Hu, M., Olesky, M., and Nicholas, R. A. (2002) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46, 769–777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Feil, E. J., Maiden, M. C., Achtman, M., and Spratt, B. G. (1999) Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1496–1502[Abstract]
  14. Holmes, E. C., Urwin, R., and Maiden, M. C. (1999) Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 741–749[Abstract]
  15. Spratt, B. G., Zhang, Q. Y., Jones, D. M., Hutchison, A., Brannigan, J. A., and Dowson, C. G. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 8988–8992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Spratt, B. G., Bowler, L. D., Zhang, Q. Y., Zhou, J., and Smith, J. M. (1992) J. Mol. Evol. 34, 115–125[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Saez-Nieto, J. A., Lujan, R., Martinez-Suarez, J. V., Berron, S., Vazquez, J. A., Vinas, M., and Campos, J. (1990) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34, 2269–2272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bowler, L. D., Zhang, Q. Y., Riou, J. Y., and Spratt, B. G. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 333–337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Antignac, A., Kriz, P., Tzanakaki, G., Alonso, J. M., and Taha, M. K. (2001) J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47, 285–296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kellogg, D. S., Peacock, W. L., Deacon, W. E., Brown, L., and Pirkle, C. I. (1963) J. Bacteriol. 85, 1274–1279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Studier, F. W., Rosenberg, A. H., Dunn, J. J., and Dubendorff, J. W. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 185, 60–89[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Abdillahi, H., and Poolman, J. T. (1987) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 48, 367–371[CrossRef]
  23. Frasch, C. E., Zollinger, W. D., and Poolman, J. T. (1985) Rev. Infect. Dis. 7, 504–510[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Lujan, R., Zhang, Q. Y., Saez Nieto, J. A., Jones, D. M., and Spratt, B. G. (1991) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35, 300–304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Glauner, B., Holtje, J. V., and Schwarz, U. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 10088–10095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Guibourdenche, M., Giorgini, D., Gueye, A., Larribe, M., Riou, J. Y., and Taha, M. K. (1997) J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 745–750[Abstract]
  27. Kriz, P., Giorgini, D., Musilek, M., Larribe, M., and Taha, M. K. (1999) Res. Microbiol. 150, 273–280[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Mayer, L. W., Reeves, M. W., Al-Hamdan, N., Sacchi, C. T., Taha, M. K., Ajello, G. W., Schmink, S. E., Noble, C. A., Tondella, M. L., Whitney, A. M., Al-Mazrou, Y., Al-Jefri, M., Mishkhis, A., Sabban, S., Caugant, D. A., Lingappa, J., Rosenstein, N. E., and Popovic, T. (2002) J. Infect. Dis. 185, 1596–1605[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Deghmane, A. E., Petit, S., Topilko, A., Pereira, Y., Giorgini, D., Larribe, M., and Taha, M. K. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1068–1078[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Perkins, J. B., and Youngman, P. J. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 140–144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Taha, M. K., Morand, P. C., Pereira, Y., Eugene, E., Giorgini, D., Larribe, M., and Nassif, X. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 28, 1153–1163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Miller, J. H. (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics, pp. 352–355, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  33. Dessen, A., Mouz, N., Gordon, E., Hopkins, J., and Dideberg, O. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 45106–45112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Naumann, D., Barnickel, G., Bradaczek, H., Labischinski, H., and Giesbrecht, P. (1982) Eur. J. Biochem. 125, 505–515[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Hakenbeck, R., and Coyette, J. (1998) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 54, 332–340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. van Heijenoort, J., and Gutmann, L. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 5028–5030[Free Full Text]
  37. Garcia-Bustos, J., and Tomasz, A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 5415–5419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Mainardi, J. L., Legrand, R., Arthur, M., Schoot, B., van Heijenoort, J., and Gutmann, L. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16490–16496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Mainardi, J. L., Morel, V., Fourgeaud, M., Cremniter, J., Blanot, D., Legrand, R., Frehel, C., Arthur, M., Van Heijenoort, J., and Gutmann, L. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 35801–35807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Boneca, I. G., Xu, N., Gage, D. A., de Jonge, B. L., and Tomasz, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29053–29059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Hakenbeck, R. (1998) Electrophoresis 19, 597–601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Tomasz, A. (1997) Clin. Infect. Dis. 24, Suppl, 1, 85–88,[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Filipe, S. R., and Tomasz, A. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 4891–4896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Severin, A., Figueiredo, A. M., and Tomasz, A. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 1788–1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Severin, A., and Tomasz, A. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 168–174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Burroughs, M. H., Chang, Y. S., Gage, D. A., and Tuomanen, E. I. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11594–11598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Burroughs, M., Prasad, S., Cabellos, C., Mendelman, P. M., and Tuomanen, E. (1993) J. Infect. Dis. 167, 464–468[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Alonso, J. M., Guiyoule, A., Zarantonelli, L., Ramisse, F., Pirès, R., Antignac, A., Deghmane, A. E., Huerre, M., van der Werf, S., and Taha, M. K. (2003) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 222, 99–106[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Garcia-Bustos, J. F., and Dougherty, T. J. (1987) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31, 178–182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Dougherty, T. J. (1985) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28, 90–95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Dougherty, T. J. (1985) J. Bacteriol. 163, 69–74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Dabernat, H., Delmas, C., Seguy, M., Pelissier, R., Faucon, G., Bennamani, S., and Pasquier, C. (2002) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46, 2208–2218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Ubukata, K., Shibasaki, Y., Yamamoto, K., Chiba, N., Hasegawa, K., Takeuchi, Y., Sunakawa, K., Inoue, M., and Konno, M. (2001) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 1693–1699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Ghosh, A. S., and Young, K. D. (2003) J. Bacteriol. 185, 2178–2186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Jennings, G. T., Savino, S., Marchetti, E., Arico, B., Kast, T., Baldi, L., Ursinus, A., Holtje, J. V., Nicholas, R. A., Rappuoli, R., and Grandi, G. (2002) Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 3722–3731[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Romeis, T., and Holtje, J. V. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 224, 597–604[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Antignac, A., Rousselle, J.-C., Namane, A., Labigne, A., Taha, M.-K., and Boneca, I. G. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 31521–31528[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Powell, J. Tomberg, A. M. Deacon, R. A. Nicholas, and C. Davies
Crystal Structures of Penicillin-binding Protein 2 from Penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Reveal an Unexpectedly Subtle Mechanism for Antibiotic Resistance
J. Biol. Chem., January 9, 2009; 284(2): 1202 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. du Plessis, A. von Gottberg, C. Cohen, L. de Gouveia, K. P. Klugman, and for the Group for Enteric Respiratory and Meningea
Neisseria meningitidis Intermediately Resistant to Penicillin and Causing Invasive Disease in South Africa in 2001 to 2005
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2008; 46(10): 3208 - 3214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Thulin, P. Olcen, H. Fredlund, and M. Unemo
Combined Real-Time PCR and Pyrosequencing Strategy for Objective, Sensitive, Specific, and High-Throughput Identification of Reduced Susceptibility to Penicillins in Neisseria meningitidis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 753 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M.-K. Taha, J. A. Vazquez, E. Hong, D. E. Bennett, S. Bertrand, S. Bukovski, M. T. Cafferkey, F. Carion, J. J. Christensen, M. Diggle, et al.
Target Gene Sequencing To Characterize the Penicillin G Susceptibility of Neisseria meningitidis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2007; 51(8): 2784 - 2792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. P. Folster, V. Dhulipala, R. A. Nicholas, and W. M. Shafer
Differential Regulation of ponA and pilMNOPQ Expression by the MtrR Transcriptional Regulatory Protein in Neisseria gonorrhoeae
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2007; 189(13): 4569 - 4577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Thulin, P. Olcen, H. Fredlund, and M. Unemo
Total Variation in the penA Gene of Neisseria meningitidis: Correlation between Susceptibility to {beta}-Lactam Antibiotics and penA Gene Heterogeneity.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2006; 50(10): 3317 - 3324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
P. Courtin, G. Miranda, A. Guillot, F. Wessner, C. Mezange, E. Domakova, S. Kulakauskas, and M.-P. Chapot-Chartier
Peptidoglycan Structure Analysis of Lactococcus lactis Reveals the Presence of an L,D-Carboxypeptidase Involved in Peptidoglycan Maturation.
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2006; 188(14): 5293 - 5298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. L. Zarantonelli, A. Antignac, M. Lancellotti, A. Guiyoule, J.-M. Alonso, and M.-K. Taha
Immunogenicity of meningococcal PBP2 during natural infection and protective activity of anti-PBP2 antibodies against meningococcal bacteraemia in mice
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2006; 57(5): 924 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M.-K. Taha, M. L. Zarantonelli, A. Neri, R. Enriquez, J. A. Vazquez, and P. Stefanelli
Interlaboratory Comparison of PCR-Based Methods for Detection of Penicillin G Susceptibility in Neisseria meningitidis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2006; 50(3): 887 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Antignac, J.-C. Rousselle, A. Namane, A. Labigne, M.-K. Taha, and I. G. Boneca
Detailed Structural Analysis of the Peptidoglycan of the Human Pathogen Neisseria meningitidis
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2003; 278(34): 31521 - 31528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/34/31529    most recent
M304607200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antignac, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taha, M.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antignac, A.
Right arrow Articles by Taha, M.-K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement