JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M302752200 on June 17, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 34, 31918-31923, August 22, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/34/31918    most recent
M302752200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grabowski, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grabowski, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Saposin C Is Required for Normal Resistance of Acid {beta}-Glucosidase to Proteolytic Degradation*

Ying Sun, Xiaoyang Qi and Gregory A. Grabowski {ddagger}

From the Division and Program in Human Genetics, Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039

Received for publication, March 18, 2003 , and in revised form, June 16, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Saposins (A, B, C, and D) are small sphingolipid activator proteins that are derived by proteolytic processing of a common precursor, prosaposin. In the lysosomal sphingolipid degradation pathway, acid {beta}-glucosidase (GCase) requires saposin C for optimal in vitro and in vivo hydrolysis of glucocerebroside. The deficiency of prosaposin/saposins (PS–/–) in humans and mice leads to a decrease of GCase activity in selected tissues. Concordant decreases (>50%) of GCase protein and in vitro activity were detected in extracts of cultured fibroblasts and hepatocytes from PS–/– mice and human prosaposin-deficient fibroblasts. GCase RNA in the PS–/– cells was at wild-type levels. Compared with that in wild-type cells (t1/2 >24 h), the GCase protein in the PS–/– cells had a faster disappearance rate (t1/2 ~1 h in mouse and ~8 h in human) as determined by metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation with anti-GCase antibodies. Treatment of PS–/– cells with leupeptin, an inhibitor of cysteine proteases, led to significant increases (~2-fold) in GCase protein and in vitro activity. Loading saposin C to human PS–/– fibroblasts resulted in an enhancement of GCase protein and in vitro activity. Saposin D loading had no effect. These data indicate that saposin C is required for GCase resistance to proteolytic degradation in the cell. Thus, diminished in vivo GCase activity would be greater than expected only from the lack of GCase activation by saposin C. These results indicate a new property for saposin C, an anti-proteolytic protective function toward GCase.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Saposins (sphingolipid activator proteins) A, B, C, and D are ~80-amino acid lysosomal glycoproteins that are encoded by a single gene, termed prosaposin (14). The proteolytic processing of prosaposin to the individual saposins occurs predominantly in acidified compartments including the lysosome (5, 6). The physiological importance of this locus has been demonstrated by the genetic deficiencies of individual saposins or prosaposin that lead to various glycosphingolipid storage diseases (710). For example, saposin B deficiency leads to sulfatide accumulation and a metachromatic leukodystrophy-like disease (11) that is similar to the deficiency of arylsulfatase A, the cognate enzyme. Saposin C enhances acid {beta}-glucosidase (GCase)1 activity, and its deficiency leads to a Gaucher-like disease with glucosylceramide accumulation in cells (9, 12). Deficiencies of saposins A and D have not been described in humans. A deficiency of saposin A in mice leads to a late-onset, chronic form of globoid cell leukodystrophy (13). A total deficiency of human or mouse prosaposin results in the storage of multiple glycosphingolipids in a variety of organs (7, 8, 14).

Saposins enhance the activity of their respective cognate lysosomal enzymes by different mechanisms to achieve optimal in vitro and in vivo degradation of glycosphingolipids (1517). Saposin B in a dimeric shell structure facilitates the partial extraction of glycosphingolipids from membranes and the presentation of sulfatides or globotriaosylceramide to arylsulfatase A or {alpha}-galactosidase A, respectively (18, 19). Saposin C promotes GCase activity by inducing a conformation change in the enzyme at acidic pH (20, 21). In vitro, both saposin A and C enhance GCase activity, and negatively charged phospholipids are required for their actions (20, 22), but they have different membrane interaction modes (20). In vivo, saposins A and C enhance galactosylcerebrosidase and GCase activities, respectively (23). Saposin D stimulates partially purified acid ceramidase for the degradation of ceramide (24). Importantly, selected nonphysiologic detergent-based assays can obviate the need for negatively charged phospholipids and/or saposins in these GCase assays and can provide estimates of its total catalytic power within cells (25).

Although the involvement of saposins in the degradation of glycosphingolipids is well established, their in vivo mechanisms of action are not fully understood. Reductions of GCase, acid ceramidase, and galactosylcerebrosidase activities are present in extracts of tissues/cells from prosaposin knockout (PS–/–) mice and prosaposin-deficient humans (8, 14, 26). These data suggest that saposins might have roles, in addition to being activators, as protective or chaperone proteins for their cognate enzyme. The data presented here support such a role for saposin C in protecting GCase from proteolysis in lysosomes.


    EXPERMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—The following were from commercial sources: leupeptin was from Calbiochem; culture medium, fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin, and Trizol reagent from Invitrogen; [35S]cysteine/methionine protein labeling mix from PerkinElmer Life Sciences; taurocholate, 4-methylumbelliferyl-{beta}-glucoside, and Triton X-100 from Sigma; Immortomouse, containing the temperature-sensitive TAg+ from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA); goat anti-actin antibody and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); and Bradford reagent system from Bio-Rad. Dr. Thierry Levade (INSERM, Toulouse, France) provided SV40-transformed prosaposin-deficient and normal human fibroblasts (26). Dr. Thomas Kolter (Kekulé Institüt fur Organishe Chemie und Biochemie, Bonn, Germany) provided fibroblasts from a human prosaposin-deficient patient.

Cell Culture—Hepatocyte cultures were established from the wild type (WT);TAg+ and PS–/–;TAg+ mice. These mice were generated by breeding WT or PS–/– mice with the Immortomouse (TAg+), which contains the temperature-sensitive SV40 T antigen mutant driven by the mouse major histocompatibility complex H-2Kb promoter. PS–/–; TG mice were obtained by breeding PS+/– mice with mice containing the mouse prosaposin transgene (TG) and then back-crossing to obtain PS–/–;TG mice (27). TG expression was driven by the 3-phosphoglycerate kinase promoter. The fibroblast cultures were established as described (27). Mouse hepatocytes (32 °C) and fibroblasts (37 °C) and human fibroblasts were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium + 10% fetal bovine serum + 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. For leupeptin treatment, the cells were incubated with media containing leupeptin (50 or 100 µM) for 48 h with one replacement of fresh medium and leupeptin at 24 h. For the saposin loading experiments, human prosaposin-deficient fibroblasts were incubated with medium containing human saposin C or D (75 µg/ml) for 4 days. The pure human saposins were produced in Escherichia coli using the pET 21a system (22).

Enzyme Assays—The cells or tissues were lysed in 1% sodium taurocholate, 1% Triton X-100. GCase activities were determined fluorometrically with 4-methylumbelliferyl-{beta}-glucoside (28). The activity is expressed as nmol of 4-methylumbelliferone released/h/mg of protein. Protein concentrations were estimated using the Bradford reagent system. Student's t test was used to evaluate the data for Figs. 1, 2, and 4, 5, 6. Data are presented as means ± S.E.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
GCase activities in prosaposin knockout (PS–/–) mice. A, reduction of GCase activities in PS–/– tissue extracts (black columns, n = 3–5) compared with the wild type (white columns, n = 6). In vitro activities were determined in detergent-based systems. B, GCase activities in liver (n = 3–5) and fibroblast (n = 3) extracts from WT, PS–/– and PS–/–;TG (prosaposin transgene) mice. In livers and fibroblasts from PS–/–;TG mice, the PS TG RNA was expressed at 7 and 5%, respectively, of the levels for endogenous PS in WT mice. The GCase activity in these extracts was increased ~2-fold compared with those from PS–/– mice. The p value was calculated by comparing WT with PS–/– tissues in A or comparing PS–/–;TG (gray column) with PS–/– (black column) samples in B.

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
GCase RNA activity and protein levels in cultured mouse hepatocytes and fibroblasts. A, Northern blots of GCase RNA in PS–/– cells and WT (20 µg of total RNA/lane). By quantitative analyses, WT and PS–/– cells had equal levels of GCase RNA (A). Compared with WT cells, GCase activity (B) and protein (C) were decreased in both PS–/– cell types (20 µg of protein of cell lysate/lane). The p values were calculated by comparing WT (white columns, n = 3) with PS–/– cells (black columns, n = 3).

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
GCase activity and protein in extracts of mouse PS–/– cells before and after treatment with leupeptin. Mouse PS–/– fibroblasts and hepatocytes were incubated in media with or without leupeptin for 48 h before assessments of GCase activity and protein. GCase in vitro activity (A) and protein in the PS–/– cells (B) were increased concordantly after leupeptin treatment (20 µg of protein of cell lysate/lane). The p values were calculated by comparing leupeptin-treated PS–/– cells (hatched columns in A or gray columns in B; n = 3) with untreated PS–/– cells (black columns, n = 3).

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
GCase activity and protein in extracts of human fibroblasts before and after treatment with leupeptin. Human WT and PS–/– fibroblasts were incubated with media with or without leupeptin for 48 h before assessment of GCase activity and protein. A, GCase activity and RNA levels. Real-time RT-PCR was used to quantify GCase RNA levels in PS–/– cells, which were the same as those in WT cells. B, GCase protein levels. GCase activity and protein in the PS–/– cells were significantly increased after leupeptin treatment (10 µg of protein of cell lysate/lane). No significant changes were present in similarly treated WT cells. The p values in A and B were calculated by comparing leupeptin treated (gray columns, n = 3) with untreated WT (white columns, n = 3) or PS–/– cells (black columns, n = 3).

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
GCase activity and protein in extracts of human fibroblasts before and after loading saposin C or saposin D. Human PS–/– fibroblasts were incubated with media containing saposin C or saposin D (75 µg/ml) for 4 days before assessments of GCase activity and protein. GCase activity (A) and GCase protein levels (B) in the saposin C-loaded PS–/– cells were significantly increased (10 µg of protein of cell lysate/lane). Saposin D had no significant effect on GCase activity and protein. The p values were calculated by comparing the levels of GCase activity or protein of saposin C (gray column, n = 3)- or saposin D (hatched column, n = 3)-loaded and unloaded PS–/– cells (black column, n = 3).

 

Immunoblots—The cell lysates were subjected to 12.5% SDS gel and electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After blocking in 1% milk, GCase and {beta}-actin were detected by incubation with rabbit anti-mouse GCase antiserum (1/1000) or goat anti-actin antibody (1/300) diluted in 0.5% bovine serum albumin followed by treatment with alkaline phosphatase conjugated to goat anti-rabbit (1/3000) or donkey anti-goat IgG (1/500) diluted in TTBS (0.05% Tween 20, 20 mM Tris, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.4). GCase in human fibroblast cells were detected by rabbit anti-human GCase antiserum (1/1500) in 1% milk, 1% bovine serum albumin. The blots were quantified by Amersham Biosciences ImageQuant software. The values obtained for GCase bands (Mr = 65,000) were normalized to the actin bands. Rabbit anti-mouse GCase was raised against recombinant mouse GCase produced in E. coli using the pET 21a system (22).

Pulse-Chase Studies—Proteins in mouse and human fibroblasts were radiolabeled for 1 h with 150 µCi of [35S]cysteine/methionine and chased with nonradioactive media for the indicated times. The radioactively labeled GCase protein in cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using anti-mouse or human GCase antiserum (27). The fibroblasts were matched for passage number and strain. The radioactive GCase bands were quantified by Amersham Biosciences ImageQuant software.

RNA Analyses—Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent. Northern blots were performed as described (27) using the mouse GCase cDNA as probe. Real time RT-PCR reactions were performed to quantify mouse prosaposin and human GCase mRNA levels in the ABI Prism 7000 sequence detection system (29). 18 S RNA was used as internal control. The primers for RT-PCR reactions were as follows: mouse prosaposin, 5'-GCGACATATGCAAAACTGTTGTC-3' (forward) and 5'-CACAGGTCTTCTCCAGGTAATGAA-3' (reverse); human GCase, 5'-GCAGTGTCGTGGGCATCA-3' (forward) and 5'-AGACACACACCACCGAGCTGTA-3' (reverse); 18S, 5'-GCATGGCCGTTCTTAGTTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-TGAACGCCACTTGTCCCTCT-3' (reverse).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reduction of GCase in Prosaposin Knockout (PS/) Mice and Recovery of GCase Activity in PS/;TG Mice—Compared with those from strain-matched PS+/+ (WT) tissues, the in vitro GCase activities from tissue extracts of PS–/– mice were significantly reduced (65–80%) in liver and kidney. The slight decrease of GCase activity in cerebrum was not significant (Fig. 1A). In comparison, in vitro GCase activities were increased in extracts of liver and cultured fibroblasts from PS–/–;TG mice. By real-time RT-PCR analysis, the TG mRNA from liver and cultured fibroblasts of PS–/–;TG mice was ~5–7% relative to the endogenous prosaposin in the corresponding WT samples. This low level of prosaposin TG expression was sufficient to increase the GCase activity by more than 2-fold relative to PS–/– mice (Fig. 1B). These results established a relationship between PS expression, the presence of saposin/prosaposin protein, and the in vitro level of GCase activity. Clearly, small amounts of PS expression were required to re-establish GCase activity. Importantly for these studies, the detergent assays used for estimating GCase in vitro activity do not require negatively charged phospholipids or saposin C. Indeed, the detergents (taurocholate and Triton X-100) replace the function of these two more natural activators and provide an assessment of the maximal catalytic power of GCase in cells (25). Thus, the activities are not related to the in vivo levels but rather reflect the level of catalytically active GCase within cells. Such reductions could be due to decreased synthesis of GCase, its folding, or its stability within the cells.

Reduction of GCase Protein in PS/cells—To address the mechanism for GCase activity reductions, fibroblast and hepatocyte cultures were established from the wild type and PS–/– mice and used for immunoblot analysis. To eliminate the potential for diminished GCase gene expression, GCase RNA levels were determined by Northern analyses and were found to be the same as in WT and PS–/– samples (Fig. 2A). Importantly, GCase activities in the PS–/– cell extracts were reduced by >=50% relative to WT (Fig. 2B). Immunoblots using anti-mouse GCase antiserum showed a concordant decrease in GCase protein (Fig. 2C). Essentially identical results were obtained with prosaposin-deficient cultured human fibroblasts using rabbit anti-human GCase antibodies (Fig. 5). These results show that the reduction of GCase activity in PS–/– cells is due to a decrease of GCase protein and not because of misfolding of GCase into an inactive conformer. However, this does not exclude the potential for diminished translation of the normal amounts of GCase mRNA.

Turnover of GCase Protein in PS/and WT cells—Pulsechase studies were conducted to evaluate the synthetic levels of GCase protein and its stability in both mouse and human fibroblasts. Following metabolic labeling and chase, GCase in the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using anti-mouse or anti-human GCase antibodies. Quantitative immunoprecipitation of the GCase in cultured fibroblasts showed essentially the same levels of GCase signal from WT and PS–/– cells at 0 h of chase (Fig. 3). This excludes the possibility of a grossly abnormal translation of the amount of GCase mRNA in PS–/– cells. However, in WT cultured fibroblasts GCase protein was detectable for up to 72 h of chase. In contrast, GCase in PS–/– cells was at very low levels after 24 h of chase (Fig. 3). The GCases in WT cells have a t1/2 of >24 h and in PS–/– cells a t1/2 of ~1 h in mouse or ~8 h in human. These results show that essentially normal amounts of GCase are synthesized in PS–/– cells and that it was degraded at a much greater rate than in WT cells. Such enhanced degradation could occur by proteolysis in different compartments including the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, or endosome/lysosomes. To establish the mechanism of saposin/prosaposin effect on GCase degradation, studies were conducted with protease inhibitors that exert their major effects in the lysosome.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Disappearance of GCase in PS–/– fibroblasts. Autoradiograms of fibroblasts from WT and PS–/– mice and humans were obtained after being pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine and chased with medium containing nonradioactive methionine/cysteine for the indicated times. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-mouse or anti-human GCase antibodies. "pre" indicates the preimmune control. Each experiment was repeated three times, and the results shown are typical. Quantitation was performed using Amersham Biosciences ImageQuant software. The disappearance t1/2 of GCase in mouse PS–/– cells was ~1 h and in human cells ~8 h. WT fibroblasts have t1/2 of >24 h. The blank lanes (0.5 and/or 1 h) for the WT cells were not needed because of the extended half-life of GCase in these cells. For mouse and human cells, p < 0.001 for all t1/2 > 4 h.

 

GCase Activity and Protein in PS/Cells Treated with Protease Inhibitors—PS–/– cultured mouse fibroblasts and hepatocytes were incubated with leupeptin, a cysteine protease inhibitor. Leupeptin inhibits protein degradation in the lysosome by 85% and in non-lysosome compartments by 15% (30). After 48 h of leupeptin exposure, both GCase activity and protein levels increased by ~1.7–2-fold (Fig. 4). The final GCase activity and protein levels were comparable with those in WT fibroblasts (Fig. 4). Leupeptin treatment had little or no effect on WT GCase activities or protein. Treatment with pepstatin A, an aspartic protease (including cathepsins D and G) inhibitor, produced an ~1.4-fold increase in GCase activity and protein in both PS–/– cell types (data not shown).

In prosaposin-deficient human fibroblast cells, GCase RNA is at the same level as in WT control (Fig. 5A). Consistent with mouse samples, GCase activity and protein levels showed increases of 2- and 1.7-fold, respectively, after incubation with leupeptin-containing medium for 48 h (Fig. 5). Cathepsin inhibitor II, a selective lysosomal cysteine protease inhibitor, increased GCase activity and protein by ~1.3-fold in human PS–/– fibroblasts (data not shown). Leupeptin (Fig. 5) and cathepsin inhibitor II treatment had no significant effect on GCase activity and protein in WT controls. The same results were obtained from primary human fibroblast cells. These results implicate the cysteine/aspartic protease participation in the degradation of GCase in the lysosome. In these cells, leupeptin, cathepsin inhibitor II, or pepstatin had no effect on {beta}-glucuronidase activity, a soluble lysosomal enzyme that is not involved in glycosphingolipid metabolism.

Saposin C Led to Recovery of GCase Activity and Protein in PS/Cells—PS–/– cultured human fibroblasts were incubated with human saposin C or saposin D in the medium. The cells loaded with saposin C showed significant increase of GCase activity and protein (Fig. 6). Saposin D had no effect on GCase in PS–/– cells (Fig. 6). The effects of saposins A and B on GCase activity were studied using the fibroblast from saposin A-deficient mice and a human saposin B-deficient patient. No alteration of GCase activity was observed in those cells.

The results from our present study support saposin C as the protector for GCase. Saposins A and C enhance in vitro GCase activity (22, 23), but only isolated saposin C deficiency leads to glucosylceramide storage and a "Gaucher disease-like" phenotype (9, 12). In saposin A mutant mice, no accumulation of glucosylcerebroside was found (13), and GCase activity was not altered in fibroblasts from such mutant mice. Thus, saposin A is not a physiologically important activator or protector for GCase. Furthermore, saposins B and D do not have any effect on GCase activity (31). GCase activity was not reduced in human saposin B-deficient fibroblast. Loading saposin D to PS–/– cells had no effect on GCase. These results show that saposin C has a novel role as the anti-proteolytic protector for GCase in addition to being enzymatic activator.

These studies indicate that the enhanced degradation of GCase in prosaposin-deficient mice and humans occurs largely in the lysosome. This finding has two implications. 1) GCase is normally folded and trafficked to the lysosome in PS–/– cells. The protection by the lysosomally directed protease inhibitors suggests that endoplasmic reticulum-localized proteolysis of GCase is unlikely or limited. Also, the presence of several isoforms of GCase in human prosaposin-deficient fibroblast indicates passage through the Golgi and consequent oligosaccharide remodeling (32). 2) The "anti-proteolytic protective effect" of saposin/prosaposin results from interaction of GCase and mature saposins and not prosaposin. Prosaposin is processed proteolytically to the individual saposin in a late endosomal or lysosomal compartment (6, 33). Thus, these findings support a mechanism of GCase protection whereby GCase is synthesized normally and trafficked to the lysosome in PS–/– cells. Upon arrival in the late endosome/lysosome compartments, GCase interacts with mature saposin C in such a manner as to inhibit its degradation by lysosomal proteases. The "protector protein" needed for {beta}-galactosidase/neuraminidase stability and assembly represents a similar example, except that macromolecular assembly occurs in the Golgi (34, 35).

The decrease of GCase activity shown in selected tissues of PS–/– mice suggests that saposin C may have a tissue-specific protective effect for GCase. For example, GCase in vitro activities are reduced in liver and kidney tissues but are not significantly altered in the brain of PS–/– mice. GCase is a lysosomal membrane-associated protein, and negatively charged phospholipids are required for the activation effect. In prosaposin-deficient cells, the disrupted sphingolipid metabolism appears to lead to a modification of lysobisphosphatidic acid organization.2 Because this lipid may be the physiologic negatively charged phospholipid for GCase activation, saposin C deficiency may alter the interaction of GCase with this lipid and lead to proteolytic degradation. The degree of such phospholipid reorganization may be different in various tissues, particularly in the brain. This degree of lipid alteration also might contribute to the tissue-specific reduction of GCase activity in PS–/– mice. In addition, the group of proteases participating in degradation of GCase could be differentially expressed in the brain. The underlying mechanism of such tissue specificity needs to be investigated.

It is unlikely that all of the glycosphingolipid activators would have protective functions for their cognate enzyme. {beta}-Hexosaminidase A, the cognate enzyme for GM2 activator, maintained nearly normal activity in GM2 activator-deficient mice (36) and humans (37). Arylsulfatase A, which requires saposin B for optimal activation, showed normal levels in both human and mice with either saposin B or prosaposin deficiency (14, 38, 39). The level of arylsulfatase A protein was normal in PS–/– fibroblasts.2 In comparison, saposin A is essential for galactosylcerebrosidase to achieve maximal activity (40). The mouse models with deficient saposin A or prosaposin show decreased in vitro galactosylcerebrosidase activity (13, 14). Decreased acid ceramidase activity also was observed in prosaposin-deficient patient cells (26, 41) and prosaposin-deficient mouse tissues. However, the acid ceramidase protein level was not altered in PS–/– samples.2 Whether galactosylcerebrosidase was protected by saposin A and the possibility of saposin D being the chaperone for acid ceramidase are under investigation.

In vitro and ex vivo turnover studies shows that GCase interacts with the inner lysosomal membrane (21, 42, 43). Using artificial membrane systems of negatively charged phospholipids, saposin C facilitates the association of GCase with the membranes to favor the degradation of glucosylcerebroside (44). The membrane attachment is essential for GCase stability and catalytic function. In addition to its activator functions, saposin C, as a protector, might play the role of enhancing the stability and efficiency of GCase in vivo by facilitating the association of enzyme to membrane. These functions of saposin C have implications for understanding the molecular pathogenesis of Gaucher disease and the development of more efficient therapies. Most of the GCase mutations that cause Gaucher disease disrupt the inherent catalytic function and/or the proteolytic stability of the mutant enzyme (45, 46). The latter results primarily from misfolding of GCase, but one could envision specific mutations that preclude or diminish interaction of GCase and saposin C. This could lead to an unstable enzyme, which could have nearly normal in vitro intrinsic residual activity as assessed with detergents. Certainly, mutations that affect the saposin C/GCase interaction site would lead to greater decreases of in vivo activity than expected from the GCase mutation alone. Similarly, disruption of the normal stoichiometry between GCase and saposin C would lead to proteolytic susceptibility of GCase. For example, GCase can be supplied by delivery to macrophages as purified enzyme or by over-expression in selected cells, e.g. a gene therapy approach. The delivery of large excesses of GCase to these cells could overwhelm the saposin C available for interaction. This excess enzyme would be very susceptible to proteolytic degradation and diminish the expected therapeutic benefit. Thus, preservation of the appropriate stoichiometry of saposin C and GCase could significantly enhance the efficacy/cost benefit of such therapeutic approaches.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS34071 and NS36681 (to G. A. G.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division and Program in Human Genetics, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Pavilion E5.253, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039. Tel.: 513-636-7290; Fax: 513-636-2261; E-mail: greg.grabowski{at}chmcc.org.

1 The abbreviations used are: GCase, acid {beta}-glucosidase; WT, wild type; TG, transgene; PS, prosaposin/saposin; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR. Back

2 X. Qi, Y. Sun, and G. A. Grabowski, unpublished observation. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Brian Quinn, Hulian Yin, Jennifer Shoreman, and Michelle Clayton for technical assistance.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Rorman, E. G., Scheinker, V., and Grabowski, G. A. (1992) Genomics 13, 312–318[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. O'Brien, J. S., Kretz, K. A., Dewji, N., Wenger, D. A., Esch, F., and Fluharty, A. L. (1988) Science 241, 1098–1101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Collard, M. W., Sylvester, S. R., Tsuruta, J. K., and Griswold, M. D. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 4557–4564[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Nakano, T., Sandhoff, K., Stumper, J., Christomanou, H., and Suzuki, K. (1989) J Biochem. (Tokyo) 105, 152–154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Vielhaber, G., Hurwitz, R., and Sandhoff, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32438–32446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Leonova, T., Qi, X., Bencosme, A., Ponce, E., Sun, Y., and Grabowski, G. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17312–17320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Paton, B. C., Schmid, B., Kustermann-Kuhn, B., Poulos, A., and Harzer, K. (1992) Biochem. J. 285, 481–488[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Hulkova, H., Cervenkova, M., Ledvinova, J., Tochackova, M., Hrebicek, M., Poupetova, H., Befekadu, A., Berna, L., Paton, B. C., Harzer, K., Boor, A., Smid, F., and Elleder, M. (2001) Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 927–940[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rafi, M. A., de Gala, G., Zhang, X. L., and Wenger, D. A. (1993) Somatic Cell Mol. Genet. 19, 1–7[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Holtschmidt, H., Sandhoff, K., Kwon, H. Y., Harzer, K., Nakano, T., and Suzuki, K. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7556–7560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zhang, X. L., Rafi, M. A., DeGala, G., and Wenger, D. A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1426–1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Schnabel, D., Schroder, M., and Sandhoff, K. (1991) FEBS Lett. 284, 57–59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Matsuda, J., Vanier, M. T., Saito, Y., Tohyama, J., and Suzuki, K. (2001) Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 1191–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fujita, N., Suzuki, K., Vanier, M. T., Popko, B., Maeda, N., Klein, A., Henseler, M., Sandhoff, K., and Nakayasu, H. (1996) Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 711–725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kishimoto, Y., Hiraiwa, M., and O'Brien, J. S. (1992) J. Lipid Res. 33, 1255–1267[Abstract]
  16. Furst, W., and Sandhoff, K. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1126, 1–16[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Grabowski, G. A., Gatt, S., and Horowitz, M. (1990) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25, 385–414[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Sandhoff, K., van Echten, G., Schroder, M., Schnabel, D., and Suzuki, K. (1992) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 20, 695–699[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ahn, V. E., Faull, K. F., Whitelegge, J. P., Fluharty, A. L., and Prive, G. G. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 38–43[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Qi, X., and Grabowski, G. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27010–27017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Qi, X., and Grabowski, G. A. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 11544–11554[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Qi, X., Leonova, T., and Grabowski, G. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16746–16753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Harzer, K., Paton, B. C., Christomanou, H., Chatelut, M., Levade, T., Hiraiwa, M., and O'Brien, J. S. (1997) FEBS Lett. 417, 270–274[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Azuma, N., O'Brien, J. S., Moser, H. W., and Kishimoto, Y. (1994) Arch Biochem. Biophys. 311, 354–357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Gatt, S., Dinur, T., Osiecki, K., Desnick, R. J., and Grabowski, G. A. (1985) Enzyme 33, 109–119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Chatelut, M., Harzer, K., Christomanou, H., Feunteun, J., Pieraggi, M. T., Paton, B. C., Kishimoto, Y., O'Brien, J. S., Basile, J. P., Thiers, J. C., Salvayre, R., and Levade, T. (1997) Clin. Chim. Acta 262, 61–76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Sun, Y., Qi, X., Witte, D., Ponce, E., Kondoh, K., Quinn, B., and Grabowski, G. (2002) Mol. Genet. Metab. 76, 271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Xu, Y. H., Ponce, E., Sun, Y., Leonova, T., Bove, K., Witte, D., and Grabowski, G. A. (1996) Pediatr. Res. 39, 313–322[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Sun, Y., Witte, D. P., Jin, P., and Grabowski, G. A. (2002) Biochem. J. 370, 557–566[CrossRef]
  30. Grinde, B., and Seglen, P. O. (1980) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 632, 73–86[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Sandhoff, K., Kolter, T., and Van Echten-Deckert, G. (1998) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 845, 139–151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bergmann, J. E., and Grabowski, G. A. (1989) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 44, 741–750[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Fujibayashi, S., and Wenger, D. A. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 15339–15343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pshezhetsky, A. V., and Potier, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28359–28365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. van der Spoel, A., Bonten, E., and d'Azzo, A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1588–1597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Liu, Y., Hoffmann, A., Grinberg, A., Westphal, H., McDonald, M. P., Miller, K. M., Crawley, J. N., Sandhoff, K., Suzuki, K., and Proia, R. L. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8138–8143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Sandhoff, K., Harzer, K., and Furst, W. (1995) in The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., and Valle, D., eds) 7th Ed., pp. 2427–2442, McGraw-Hill, New York
  38. Stevens, R. L., Fluharty, A. L., Kihara, H., Kaback, M. M., Shapiro, L. J., Marsh, B., Sandhoff, K., and Fischer, G. (1981) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 33, 900–906[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Schlote, W., Harzer, K., Christomanou, H., Paton, B. C., Kustermann-Kuhn, B., Schmid, B., Seeger, J., Beudt, U., Schuster, I., and Langenbeck, U. (1991) Eur. J. Pediatr. 150, 584–591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Morimoto, S., Martin, B. M., Yamamoto, Y., Kretz, K. A., O'Brien, J. S., and Kishimoto, Y. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 3389–3393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Harzer, K., Paton, B. C., Poulos, A., Kustermann-Kuhn, B., Roggendorf, W., Grisar, T., and Popp, M. (1989) Eur. J. Pediatr. 149, 31–39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Leonova, T., and Grabowski, G. A. (2000) Mol. Genet. Metab. 70, 281–294[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Wilkening, G., Linke, T., and Sandhoff, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30271–30278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Vaccaro, A. M., Salvioli, R., Tatti, M., and Ciaffoni, F. (1999) Neurochem. Res. 24, 307–314[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Grace, M. E., Newman, K. M., Scheinker, V., He, G.-S., Berg-Fussman, A., and Grabowski, G. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2283–2291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Grace, M. E., Graves, P. N., Smith, F. I., and Grabowski, G. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 6827–6835[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y. Sun, D. P. Witte, M. Zamzow, H. Ran, B. Quinn, J. Matsuda, and G. A. Grabowski
Combined saposin C and D deficiencies in mice lead to a neuronopathic phenotype, glucosylceramide and {alpha}-hydroxy ceramide accumulation, and altered prosaposin trafficking
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(8): 957 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Y. Sun, B. Quinn, Y.-H. Xu, T. Leonova, D. P. Witte, and G. A. Grabowski
Conditional expression of human acid {beta}-glucosidase improves the visceral phenotype in a Gaucher disease mouse model
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 2161 - 2170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Liou, A. Kazimierczuk, M. Zhang, C. R. Scott, R. S. Hegde, and G. A. Grabowski
Analyses of Variant Acid beta-Glucosidases: EFFECTS OF GAUCHER DISEASE MUTATIONS
J. Biol. Chem., February 17, 2006; 281(7): 4242 - 4253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Y. Sun, B. Quinn, D. P. Witte, and G. A. Grabowski
Gaucher disease mouse models: point mutations at the acid {beta}-glucosidase locus combined with low-level prosaposin expression lead to disease variants
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 2102 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Salvioli, S. Scarpa, F. Ciaffoni, M. Tatti, C. Ramoni, M. T. Vanier, and A. M. Vaccaro
Glucosylceramidase Mass and Subcellular Localization Are Modulated by Cholesterol in Niemann-Pick Disease Type C
J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 2004; 279(17): 17674 - 17680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/34/31918    most recent
M302752200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grabowski, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grabowski, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.