JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M304698200 on June 3, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 34, 32005-32013, August 22, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An addition or correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/34/32005    most recent
M304698200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Longaker, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cowan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Longaker, M. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Age-related Changes in the Biomolecular Mechanisms of Clvarial Osteoblast Biology Affect Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Signaling and Osteogenesis*

Catherine M. Cowan, Natalina Quarto, Stephen M. Warren, Ali Salim and Michael T. Longaker {ddagger}

From the Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5148

Received for publication, May 6, 2003 , and in revised form, May 30, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The ability of immature animals to orchestrate successful calvarial ossification has been well described. This capacity is markedly attenuated in mature animals and humans greater than 2 years of age. Few studies have investigated biological differences between juvenile and adult osteoblasts that mediate successful osteogenesis. To identify possible mechanisms for this clinical observation, we investigated cellular and molecular differences between primary osteoblasts derived from juvenile (2-day-old) and adult (60-day-old) rat calvaria. Data demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts contain a subpopulation of less differentiated cells as observed by spindle-like morphology and decreased osteocalcin production. Juvenile, compared with adult, osteoblasts showed increased proliferation and adhesion. Furthermore, following rhFGF-2 stimulation juvenile osteoblasts increased expression of collagen I{alpha}1 (5-fold), osteopontin (13-fold), and osteocalcin (16-fold), compared with relatively unchanged adult osteoblasts. Additionally, juvenile osteoblasts organized and produced more matrix proteins and formed 41-fold more bone nodules. Alternatively, adult osteoblasts produced more FGF-2 and preferentially translated the high molecular weight (22 kDa) form. Although adult osteoblasts transcribed more FGF-R1 and juvenile osteoblasts transcribed more FGF-R2 at baseline levels, juvenile osteoblasts translated more FGF-R1 and -R2 and showed increased phosphorylation. Collectively, these findings begin to explain why juvenile, but not adult, osteoblasts successfully heal calvarial defects.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Successful calvarial ossification is a characteristic generally restricted to juvenile animals and infants younger than 2 years of age (1, 2). Since this osteogenic capacity rapidly diminishes, older children and adults with non-healing cranial defects present a difficult reconstructive challenge and a substantial biomedical burden. Studies have documented a paracrine interaction between the underlying juvenile dura mater and the overlying cranial osteoblasts during the bone induction processes of calvarial morphogenesis, cranial suture fusion, and calvarial ossification (310). Previous studies have focused on the cellular and molecular differences between juvenile and adult dura mater, which are critical to calvarial bone induction. In contrast, few studies have investigated the effects of age on the cellular and molecular differences between juvenile and adult-derived calvarial osteoblasts (11).

Developmentally, mesenchymal cells enter the osteoblastic lineage and undergo a spatial and temporal progression (12, 13). Early pre-osteoblasts proliferate before maturing into bone-producing osteoblasts. Osteoblasts direct osteogenesis through the production of extracellular matrix, mineralization of matrix, and regulation of bone remodeling through resorption and deposition. For osteoblasts to proliferate, migrate, differentiate, and eventually form bone, they must be able to produce and organize a variety of cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix molecules. As osteoblasts adhere to a new environment, they initially attach to fibronectin and the cell body begins to flatten (14). At this point, the cell organizes its actin bundles and cytoskeletal proteins including integrins. These molecules then signal the cell to enter either a proliferative or differentiated state.

Progression of osteoblast differentiation corresponds to sequential gene expression. Proliferative pre-osteoblasts express early markers of differentiation including runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and collagen I{alpha}1 (15, 16). As osteoblasts mature they begin to express intermediate markers of differentiation including osteopontin, an extracellular matrix protein associated with matrix formation and maturation (17). Mature osteoblasts express the extracellular matrix protein osteocalcin, which is associated with increased matrix mineralization and decreased proliferation (18). The progression of osteoblast differentiation and the expression of the previously mentioned genes are tightly regulated by several factors including fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2)1 (19).

FGF-2 has a two pronged effect as it is an osteoblast mitogen and it stimulates bone formation as demonstrated in several mammalian models (12, 2024). Furthermore the immature, but not mature, dura mater is a potent source of FGF-2, stimulating juvenile osteoblasts during cranial development, suture fusion, and calvarial healing (2530). Interestingly, FGF-2 has differential effects on osteoblast biology depending on the stage of cellular maturation (12, 2024). FGF-2 exerts its biological effect upon binding to its receptors (FGF-R 1–4) for differential regulation of osteogenesis (31). These tyrosine kinase receptors become phosphorylated upon FGF-2 binding and activate ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways (32). While FGF-R3 and -R4 are restricted to areas of growth plate development and cranial musculature respectively, FGF-R1 and -R2 are found in areas of the frontal and parietal bones and coronal sutures (23, 33). FGF-R1 transcription is associated with highly differentiated osteoblasts, while FGF-R2 transcription is associated with more proliferative osteoblasts (23). FGF-2 binds with equal affinity to FGF-R1 and -R2 (31, 34), thus regulation of signaling must occur not only with ligand availability, but also with receptor abundance and availability.

To investigate the effects of age on osteoblast biology and assess FGF-2 signaling in this system, we established primary juvenile (2-day-old) and adult (60-day-old) rat calvarial osteoblast cultures. The data demonstrated that juvenile osteoblast cultures, as compared with adult osteoblast cultures, contained a larger subpopulation of less differentiated immature cells, as indicated by spindle-like morphology and decreased osteocalcin production. Additionally, juvenile osteoblasts showed increased proliferation, attachment, and expression of osteogenic genes in response to rhFGF-2. Juvenile osteoblasts increased production and organization of several key cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins as well as increased bone nodule formation 41-fold. Finally, juvenile osteoblasts produced less FGF-2 protein, while demonstrating increased FGF-R1 and -R2 mRNA, protein, and phosphorylation upon stimulation. These results suggest that FGF-2 caused juvenile osteoblasts to initially increase proliferation and later to become more differentiated, while it had little effect on adult osteoblasts. Taken together, the data begin to demonstrate the competency of juvenile, but not adult, animals to respond to FGF-2 stimulation and successfully orchestrate calvarial osteogenesis.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cells and Culture Conditions—All experiments were performed in accordance with Stanford University Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories Inc. (Wilmington, MA). For all animals, the first day of life was considered the first day after birth. Animals were housed in light and temperature controlled facilities and given food and water ad labitum. Osteoblasts were harvested from juvenile (2-day-old) and adult (60-day-old) rats (28). In brief, calvariae were meticulously stripped free from dura mater and overlying pericranium, washed with serial dilutions of betadine in phosphate-buffered saline, then digested 5 times for 15 min in 0.2% dispase II and 0.1% collagenase A at 37 °C (digestions 3–5 were pooled for osteoblast cultures). Cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 x g and resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM). Cultures were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS (Gemini Bioproducts, Woodland, CA), 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 IU/ml streptomycin, and 0.1% Fungizone (all from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were passed by trypsinization, plated in tissue culture dishes, and allowed to grow to subconfluence. Freshly harvested cells less than 4 passages were used for all experiments.

Proliferation Assay—Proliferation rates were measured through cell counting and proliferating cellular nuclear antigen (PCNA) Western blot analysis. 50,000 juvenile and adult osteoblasts were plated separately on tissue culture plates in triplicate. Cells were harvested each day post-plating and cell number was determined by counting with a hemacytometer. To determine the effects of FGF-2 on osteoblast proliferation, PCNA production was analyzed by Western blot analysis of cells grown to subconfluence in cell culture dishes with or without 10 ng/ml rhFGF-2 (Invitrogen) in DMEM with 1% FBS for 24 h. Assays were repeated at least three times and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test with *, p <= 0.05 considered significant.

Adhesion Assay—50,000 freshly isolated and first passage juvenile and adult osteoblasts were plated separately. At each time point (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 16 h) after plating, attached cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and then stained with 0.25% crystal violet. Cell adhesion was measured by cell counting. Assays were repeated at least three times and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test with *, p <= 0.05 considered significant.

Immunofluorescence—The presence and organization of cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix molecules was analyzed by immunofluorescence. 8000 juvenile and 16,000 adult first passage osteoblasts were seeded on 2.5% bovine serum albumin-coated 8-well Lab-Tek II Chamber Slides (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL). Cells were cultured in media with 1% FBS overnight with or without 10 ng/ml rhFGF-2 stimulation. Cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X for 10 min, and blocked with 1% Triton-X/2% bovine serum albumin for 2 h at 37 °C. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies at 37 °C for 1 h, washed two times with phosphate-buffered saline, then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark and washed two times with phosphate-buffered saline. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-integrin {alpha}1, anti-integrin {alpha}2, anti-integrin {alpha}3, anti-integrin {beta}1, and anti-pFAK (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-FGF-2, anti-vitronectin, anti-fibronectin, phalloidin (F-actin) (all from Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and anti-osteocalcin (Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA). Alexa fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies specific for goat, mouse, and rabbit as well as DAPI nuclear stain were purchased from Molecular Probes. Nuclei were stained with 300 nM DAPI for 5 min then rinsed with water. Cover slips were mounted and fluorescence was enhanced with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Photographs were taken with the Zeiss AxioPlan Immunofluorescence microscope equipped with Zeiss AxioCam HRc digital camera (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc., Thornwood, NY). Controls for each antibody consisted of probing with the secondary antibody in the absence of primary antibody.

RNA Isolation and Purification—To study the mRNA expression profiles, 1.5 x 106 juvenile and adult osteoblasts were plated separately on 10-cm culture plates. Upon subconfluence, cells were cultured overnight in media containing 1% FBS and then stimulated with 10 ng/ml of rhFGF-2 protein. RNA was harvested after 1, 3, 5, 10, and 24 h of rhFGF-2 stimulation and isolated in 6 ml of TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Total cellular RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's specifications. RNA isolated from cells in serum-free media alone served as controls for all groups. RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry (Amersham Biosciences). Ethidium bromide staining of 18 S and 28 S ribosomal RNA bands was performed to confirm RNA integrity.

Probe Preparation—Rat probes for collagen I{alpha}1, osteopontin, and 18 S were 727, 532, and 334-base pair PCR-amplified fragments cloned into the EcoRI cloning sites of pCR2.1, respectively (35). Additionally, rat probes for FGF-R1 (forward 5'-CCCGGGGCATGGAGTATCTT-3', reverse 5'-GCCACAATCCGGTCCAGGTCTTC-3') and FGF-R2 (forward 5'-GCCCGGCCCTCCTTCAGTTTAG-3', reverse 5'-GAGGATGGGCCGGTGTGGTG-3') were amplified by RT-PCR. All PCR generated probes were sequenced to confirm sequence identity through BLAST search. For Northern blot analysis, 100 ng of each complementary DNA (cDNA) probe was labeled with 50 µCi of [{alpha}-32P]dCTP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) using Ready-To-Go DNA Labeling Beads (Amersham Biosciences). Probes were purified from unlabeled nucleotides using Sephadex G-50 DNA-grade Nick columns (Amersham Biosciences). A specific activity of at least 1 x 105 cpm/ml of cDNA probe was used for all experiments.

Northern Blot Analysis—To determine relative mRNA expression levels in cell cultures, Northern blot analysis was performed as previously described (28). Briefly, 10–20 micrograms of total cellular RNA was fractionated on a 1% formaldehyde denaturing gel, transferred to Nytran positively charged nylon membranes (Schleicher and Scheull, Keene, N.H.) and cross-linked by ultraviolet light (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Membranes were prehybridized with ExpressHyb solution (Clontech) at 68 °C for 1 h, followed by hybridization with [{alpha}-32P]dCTP labeled rat cDNA probe for 6 h at 68 °C. Stringency washes were performed with 1x sodium saline citrate (1x = 15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM sodium citrate, pH 7) and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at room temperature for 10 min followed by 0.1x sodium saline citrate/0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 68 °C for 10–20 min. Membranes were exposed to phosphorimaging plates overnight and analyzed with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). Resulting images were quantified using ImageQuant image analysis software (Molecular Dynamics). Equal RNA loading and uniformity of blot transfer were assessed by stripping and reprobing the same membranes with a probe for rat 18 S. Experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate.

Western Blot Analysis—Juvenile and adult osteoblasts were grown to subconfluence then either harvested or stimulated with 10 ng/ml rhFGF-2 for 24 h. For analysis of receptor phosphorylation, cells were incubated with 10 ng/ml rhFGF-2 and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate (Sigma, stock of 200 mM in water, pH 10) for 15 min before harvesting cells. Cell cultures were scraped off the plate in cold phosphate-buffered saline. Cell lysate was harvested by incubating cells in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) with protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min at 4 °C and sheared with a syringe. Debris was removed by centrifugation for 5 min at 4 °C. For membrane preparation, cells were swelled in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer (Kontes, Vineland, NJ) (36). Briefly, nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 600 x g for 10 min. Remaining supernatant sheared with a syringe and further centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 20 min. The pelleted membrane associated proteins were then collected. Protein concentration was assessed with BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). 50–200 µg of protein was boiled for 10 min then loaded onto a 6% or 15% Tris-glycine SDS-polyacrylamide gel with a 5% stacking gel. Proteins were transferred to an Immobilon-P transfer membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) 0.45-µm pore size, overnight at 20 V. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Membranes were probed with following antibodies: anti-FGF-2, anti-PCNA, anti-Flg (FGF-R1), anti-Bek (FGF-R2), or anti-p-Try (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies specific for mouse and rabbit were purchased from Amersham Biosciences and antibodies specific for goat were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Band intensity was quantified using Quantity One software (BioRad).

Real-time PCR—Reverse transcription was performed on 1 µg of total RNA from each time point using oligo(dT)-priming in separate 50-µl reactions according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Taqman® Reverse Transcription Reagent Kit; Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed in 20-µl reactions using Sybr Green Mastermix (Applied Biosystems) for 15 min at 95 °C for initial denaturing, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 1 min in the ABI Prism® 7900HT Sequence Detection System. Each primer set was first tested to determine optimal concentrations, and products were run out on a 3% agarose gel to confirm the appropriate size. Each cDNA sample was evaluated separately for osteocalcin (forward 5'-GAGCTAGCGGACCACATTGG-3', reverse 5'-GGCAACACATGCCCTAAACG-3') and GAPDH (primer set purchased from Applied Biosystems). cDNA prepared from pooled samples was used to construct a standard curve for each gene. Values for each gene were normalized to expression levels of GAPDH. Assays were repeated at least 3 times and statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test with *, p <= 0.05 considered significant.

Bone Nodule Staining—Bone nodule staining was performed to assess the ability of osteoblasts to form bone nodules. 400,000 juvenile and adult osteoblasts were plated in triplicate on 6-well tissue culture plates. Upon confluence, cells were cultured in differentiation media (BGJb media, 10% FBS, 100 µg/ml ascorbic acid, 10 mM {beta}-glycerophosphate, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 IU/ml streptomycin, and 0.1% Fungizone) and monitored for 28 days. Bone nodules were stained using the Von Kossa method (28). Briefly, cells were fixed in formalin for 30 min, incubated with 1% aqueous silver nitrate for 15 min under UV light, stained with 5% sodium thiosulfate for 2 min, and finally counter-stained with 1% Safranin O for 10 min. Photomicrographs of the bone nodules were analyzed using Scion Image software (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD). Experiments were performed in triplicate.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Extent of Maturation in Juvenile and Adult Osteoblasts— Initial studies assessed states of differentiation in juvenile (2-day-old) and adult (60-day-old) rat calvarial osteoblasts based on properties of morphology and osteocalcin production. After 3 days in culture, freshly harvested juvenile and adult osteoblast cultures contained mixed populations of adherent cells; however, juvenile cultures contained a larger subpopulation of immature spindle-shaped cells, while adult cultures contained a larger subpopulation of mature cuboidal cells (Fig. 1A). Immunofluorescence for osteocalcin, a late marker of differentiation, demonstrated that adult osteoblast cultures showed uniform intense immunoreactivity for osteocalcin (91% positive), while juvenile osteoblast cultures had a mixed population of immunoreactive cells (57% positive) as compared with background fluorescence and nonspecific binding to control (NIH3T3) cells (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Morphology and differentiation states of juvenile and adult osteoblasts. A, crystal violet staining demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts contained less differentiated subpopulations (spindle-like) and adult osteoblasts contained more differentiated populations (cuboidal-shaped) at 40x magnification. B, osteocalcin immunofluorescence of juvenile osteoblasts, adult osteoblasts and control at x10 magnification. Juvenile osteoblasts show intermittent fluorescence, while adult osteoblasts show uniform high level fluorescence compared with background.

 

Proliferation and Attachment Rates—Differences in morphology and osteocalcin production suggested varied states of differentiation between juvenile and adult osteoblasts and led to investigation of proliferation and attachment rates. Juvenile osteoblasts proliferated significantly faster than adult osteoblasts on days 3–12 (Fig. 2A). This result may have been due to the ability of juvenile osteoblasts to attach more rapidly than adult osteoblasts and transmit mitotic signals. Therefore, to investigate attachment rates, attached primary osteoblasts were quantitated over a 16-h period. The 16-h cutoff time was necessary to prevent contamination of results by cellular proliferation. Significantly more freshly harvested juvenile compared with adult osteoblasts attached to culture dishes throughout the study period (Fig. 2B). These differences were noted as early as a half-hour after plating. Furthermore, viability of the remaining floating cells was assessed at each time point to ensure that a decreased attachment rate was not a reflection of decreased viability. After 8 h, trypan blue exclusion indicated that 40% of the juvenile and 95% of the adult remaining floating cells were still viable (data not shown). These data may reflect the sensitivity of the juvenile cells to the harvesting process. To ensure that the attachment results were valid and not an after-affect of the harvesting process, first passage osteoblasts were assessed for attachment rates. These results were consistent with the initial attachment differences; significantly increased juvenile osteoblast attachment was noted at 4 h (Fig. 2C) and viability of remaining floating cells for both samples dropped to 30% by 8 h (data not shown).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Proliferation and attachment rate differences. A, juvenile osteoblasts proliferated faster than adult osteoblasts as determined by cell counting over 12 days. Attachment rates were determined for freshly harvested (B) and first passage osteoblasts (C). At various time points after plating, attached cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.25% crystal violet, and then cell number was determined by counting. Data are presented as the percentage of cells attached as compared with the total number of juvenile osteoblasts attached at 16 h. Assays were stopped at 16 h to prevent contamination of results through cellular proliferation. *, p <= 0.05; **, p <= 0.007.

 

Cytoskeletal and Extracellular Matrix Production and Organization—Differences in proliferation and attachment may result from differences in expression and organization of cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix molecules. Proteins associated with adhesion and signaling such as fibronectin, F-actin, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), commonly seen integrins ({alpha}1, {alpha}2, {alpha}3, and {beta}1), and vitronectin were examined for their production and organization in juvenile and adult osteoblasts after 1 day of plating (Fig. 3). Stressed F-actin bundles demonstrated dramatic differences in juvenile and adult osteoblasts; juvenile osteoblasts showed complex webbing while adult osteoblasts showed only peripheral localization. Because of the importance of the actin cytoskeleton, juvenile and adult osteoblast plating was carried out to 3 days at which time adult osteoblast F-actin expression and organization equaled that of juvenile osteoblasts. Additionally, juvenile osteoblasts demonstrated increased production and organization of attachment and signaling molecules including fibronectin, vitronectin, integrin {alpha}1, and integrin {alpha}3. In contrast, both juvenile and adult osteoblasts produced equally small amounts of integrin {alpha}2, integrin {beta}1, and activated FAK.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix protein expression and organization differences. Immunofluorescence of juvenile and adult osteoblast cultures displayed differential expression and organization of fibronectin, F-actin, integrin {alpha}1 and {alpha}3, and vitronectin, while they showed equal expression of F-actin (day 3), phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (pFAK), and integrin {alpha}2 and {beta}1.

 

Gene Expression in Response to rhFGF-2—Because of the reported differential effects of FGF-2 on osteoblasts of varied maturation, gene expression in juvenile and adult osteoblasts was assessed in response to FGF-2 stimulation. Northern blot analysis or real time PCR for collagen I{alpha}1 (early differentiation/proliferation), osteopontin (intermediate differentiation/matrix maturation), and osteocalcin (late differentiation/matrix mineralization) was performed. At baseline levels, juvenile osteoblasts expressed 3-fold more collagen I{alpha}1 mRNA than adult osteoblasts (Fig. 4A). After 10 h of rhFGF-2 stimulation, juvenile osteoblasts increased their expression of collagen I{alpha}1 5-fold, while the expression was comparatively unchanged in the adult osteoblasts. The expression of osteopontin in juvenile and adult cultures was equivalent at baseline levels; however, with rhFGF-2 stimulation juvenile osteoblasts increased their expression 13-fold by 24 h, while adult osteoblasts only increased their expression 5-fold (Fig. 4B). Finally, adult osteoblasts expressed 3-fold more osteocalcin than juvenile osteoblasts at baseline. After 3 days of rhFGF-2 stimulation, juvenile osteoblasts increased their osteocalcin expression nearly 16-fold, while adult osteoblast osteocalcin expression was relatively unchanged (Fig. 4C).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Regulation of markers of differentiation by rhFGF-2 and formation of bone nodules. Northern blot analysis and real time PCR of juvenile and adult osteoblast RNA showed differential patterns of gene expression for collagen I{alpha}1 (A), osteopontin (B), and osteocalcin (C) (*, p <= 0.05) upon stimulation with 10 ng/ml rhFGF-2. These three genes represent early, intermediate, and late markers of differentiation, respectively. D, confluent juvenile and adult osteoblasts cultured in differentiation media for 28 days and stained with Von Kossa's methods showed that juvenile osteoblasts produced 41-fold more bone nodules than adult osteoblasts.

 

Bone Nodule Formation—As osteoblasts become fully differentiated, they increase their production and deposition of an organized collagen extracellular matrix. In vitro, the collagen extracellular matrix is mineralized to form bone nodules. After 4 weeks in differentiation media, young osteoblasts produced 41-fold more bone nodules than adult osteoblasts, as measured by bone nodule size and density (Fig. 4D).

Production, Autoregulation, and Modulation of FGF-2 Protein—To further understand the pathways involved in proliferation and differentiation, we examined juvenile versus adult osteoblast regulation of FGF-2 production and localization. At baseline, FGF-2 immunoreactivity demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts produced less FGF-2 that localized mainly to the cytoplasm, while adult osteoblasts produced more FGF-2 that was found both in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig. 5A). After stimulation with rhFGF-2, juvenile osteoblasts increased their intracellular FGF-2 to resemble that of the adult cultures; FGF-2 was now localized to both the cytoplasm and nucleus of juvenile and adult osteoblasts.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Translation and mitogenic effects of FGF-2 protein. A, immunofluorescence of FGF-2 showed differential localization of FGF-2 in juvenile versus adult osteoblasts. Upon rhFGF-2 stimulation, both cultures showed localization to cytoplasm and nucleus. B, Western blot analysis of FGF-2 demonstrated increased FGF-2 levels in adult osteoblasts compared with juvenile osteoblasts and differential translation for FGF-2 forms. After FGF-2 stimulation, juvenile osteoblasts increased translation of HMW forms to resemble adult osteoblast levels. C, Western blot demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts of extended culture (2 months) modulated FGF-2 translation to resemble untreated adult osteoblast FGF-2 levels. D, Western blot of PCNA demonstrated that FGF-2 stimulation induces juvenile osteoblasts to proliferate faster than adult osteoblasts.

 

Western blot analysis of juvenile and adult osteoblasts further demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts produced less total FGF-2 protein than adult osteoblasts (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, juvenile osteoblasts translated equal levels of both the low and high molecular weight (LMW and HMW) forms of FGF-2, while adult osteoblasts preferentially translated an increased amount of the HMW (22 kDa) form of FGF-2. Upon rhFGF-2 (18 kDa) stimulation, both juvenile and adult osteoblasts showed an increase in intracellular FGF-2 protein, which resulted from both an uptake of exogenous FGF-2 and an increase in endogenous production of FGF-2. Evidence of exogenous FGF-2 uptake was identified by an increase of the 18 kDa band and the presence of a 16-kDa band, which represents the product of the internalized and partially cleaved 18-kDa form of FGF-2 as previously described (37). The increase in the high molecular weight forms suggests an autoregulation in FGF-2 translation. Interestingly, following rhFGF-2 stimulation juvenile osteoblasts switched from a low FGF-2 translation to an increased level of FGF-2 translation, mimicking the adult osteoblasts.

Furthermore, because of the modified phenotype (decreased proliferation and increased differentiation, data not shown) exhibited by juvenile osteoblasts after extended culture (2 months), juvenile and adult osteoblasts were analyzed for FGF-2 production. After extended culture, juvenile osteoblasts began to modulate FGF-2 translation by specifically up regulating HMW FGF-2 forms to mirror that of untreated adult osteoblasts, while the FGF-2 profile of adult osteoblasts resembled that of adult osteoblasts after FGF-2 stimulation (Fig. 5C). These results suggest that preferential expression of HMW FGF-2 assists in the more differentiated state.

FGF-2 is known to be an osteoblast mitogen. Western blot analysis of PCNA demonstrated that rhFGF-2 stimulation increased proliferation in both juvenile and adult osteoblasts (Fig. 5D). However, adult osteoblast PCNA levels after rhFGF-2 stimulation did not reach baseline levels of juvenile osteoblast PCNA production. These results suggested the higher proliferative state as well as the less differentiated state of juvenile osteoblasts.

FGF-R1 and -R2 mRNA, protein, and phosphorylation states. Expression of FGF-R1 and -R2 mRNA are believed to reflect osteoblast cellular differentiation and proliferation, respectively (23). Since our data indicated that juvenile osteoblasts proliferated significantly faster than adult osteoblasts, we investigated the regulation of FGF-R1 and FGF-R2 expression. At baseline levels, adult osteoblasts produced twice as much FGF-R1 mRNA than juvenile osteoblasts (Fig. 6A). However, after 24 h of rhFGF-2 stimulation, juvenile osteoblasts increased their expression of FGF-R1 mRNA 2.5-fold to equal that of adult osteoblasts, indicating that the young osteoblasts may have rapidly differentiated after 24 h of rhFGF-2 stimulation (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, baseline levels of FGF-R2 mRNA were more than 5-fold higher in juvenile osteoblasts compared with adult osteoblasts (Fig. 6B). In the presence of rhFGF-2, juvenile osteoblasts transiently increased their expression of FGF-R2 mRNA to almost 6.5-fold over the expression of adult FGF-R2 mRNA at 5 h and then decreased their expression by more than half at 24 h (Fig. 6B). These results support the reports by Iseki et al. (23) that FGF-2 bead-driven stimulation in fetal coronal sutures induced the adjacent skeletogenic membrane to increase expression of FGF-R1 and decrease expression of FGF-R2 by 24 h.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Regulation of FGF-R expression and signaling. Northern blot analysis for FGF-R1 (A) and FGF-R2 (B) mRNA show differential expression profiles between juvenile and adult osteoblasts after rhFGF-2 stimulation. Western blot analysis for FGF-R1 (C) and FGF-R2 (D) protein show increased translation in juvenile osteoblasts with or without 24 h of rhFGF-2 stimulation. To examine the status of receptor phosphorylation, cultures were stimulated with 10 ng/ml rhFGF-2 for 15 min, and membrane proteins were harvested. Immunoprecipitation of FGF-R1 (C) or FGF-R2 (D) proteins was electrophoresed and Western blot analyzed for phosphorylated tyrosine kinase receptors.

 

Because of the differential transcript levels, we further examined FGF-R1 and -R2 protein abundance and phosphorylation potential. Surprisingly, Western blot analysis demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts translated 4-fold more FGF-R1 and 3-fold more FGF-R2 protein compared with adult osteoblasts (Fig. 6, C and D), indicating the increased potential for FGF-2 signaling in juvenile osteoblasts. After rhFGF-2 stimulation for 24 h, juvenile and adult osteoblasts did not significantly increase their production of FGF-R1 and -R2 protein, although adult osteoblast receptor levels after stimulation remained substantially reduced compared with juvenile osteoblast receptor baseline levels (Fig. 6, C and D).

Because of the large disparity in the abundance of FGF-R, we investigated the functionality of these receptors through their phosphorylation. FGF-R1 and -R2 were immunoprecipitated out of total membrane-associated protein and then immunoblotted for phosphorylation status. Juvenile osteoblasts showed increased phosphorylation for both FGF-R1 and -R2 protein after 15 min of rhFGF-2 stimulation (Fig. 6, C and D), indicating increased FGF-R1 and -R2 signaling. Whereas, in adult osteoblasts the FGF-2 signaling was minimal through FGF-R1 and almost absent through FGF-R2. Thus, these results clearly demonstrate the active FGF-2 signaling in juvenile, compared with adult, osteoblasts.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Infants successfully ossify large cranial defects; however, this regenerative capacity is lost in children older than 2 years of age. The molecular mechanisms underlying this regenerative capacity are still largely unknown (11). Most investigations have focused on the underlying dura mater; however, this study investigated the age-related cellular and molecular differences between juvenile and adult primary osteoblast cultures and has shown a correlation between their states of proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential in vitro.

As demonstrated in previous studies, primary newborn mouse osteoblast cultures contained morphologically-mixed populations of spindle-shaped (immature) and cuboidal (mature) cells (12). We found that juvenile osteoblasts contained a larger number of immature cells, while adult osteoblast cultures included mostly mature cells. Furthermore, the abundance of osteocalcin, a late marker of differentiation, in adult osteoblast cultures suggested their uniform differentiation as opposed to the varied levels in juvenile osteoblast cultures. Differences in morphology and osteocalcin production support our hypothesis that juvenile osteoblast cultures contain a larger subpopulation of less differentiated cells.

Further investigation demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts proliferated and attached to culture dishes significantly faster than adult osteoblasts. This ability may reflect the large immature population found in juvenile osteoblast cultures and begins to explain their quick adaptation to a new environment. The decreased potential of adult osteoblasts to proliferate and attach may follow an inability to quickly organize their cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix molecules. Our data demonstrated a low production and organization of critical cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix molecules in adult osteoblasts, including fibronectin (initial attachment), F-actin (cytoskeleton), integrin {alpha}1, and integrin {alpha}3 (structure and signaling), and vitronectin (attachment and migration). Previous studies have shown a correlation between the presence of integrin {alpha}3 and a positive regulation of osteogenesis (38), alluding to the juvenile osteoblasts' increased osteogenic potential. Additionally, previous reports have demonstrated that expression levels of integrin {alpha}3{beta}1 change during development (39), and, furthermore, integrin {alpha}3 knockout mice die perinatally, indicating the importance of this protein developmentally (40). Because integrin signaling occurs through a dimer composition of {alpha} and {beta} subunits (41) or integrin-FAK complexes (42), differences in individual subunits may not reflect actual integrin function. Other proteins including focal adhesion kinases (FAK), integrin {alpha}2, and integrin {beta}1 showed equivalent low levels in juvenile and adult osteoblasts and may not have played a significant role in their different phenotypes. FAK activation is an immediate downstream result of integrin {beta}1 signaling (43), therefore, low levels of integrin {beta}1 predict low FAK phosphorylation. Collectively, these data indicated that juvenile osteoblasts produced and organized critical cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins necessary for increased attachment, proliferation, and signaling to a greater degree than adult osteoblasts.

Because of conflicting reports in the literature as to the differential mitogenic and osteogenic effects of FGF-2 on osteoblasts of varied ages (12, 2024, 31, 44, 45), we further investigated juvenile versus adult osteoblast gene expression in response to FGF-2. As osteoblasts differentiate, they express collagen I{alpha}1 (early), osteopontin (intermediate), and osteocalcin (late). Collagen I{alpha}1 is the main component of the bony extracellular matrix and showed increased expression in juvenile osteoblasts both before and after rhFGF-2 stimulation. These data demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts expressed more early markers of differentiation, were more responsive to rhFGF-2, and were primed to produce more bone. Osteopontin is associated with matrix formation and maturation. Juvenile and adult osteoblasts expressed equivalent baseline levels of osteopontin; however, after rhFGF-2 stimulation juvenile osteoblasts, in contrast to adult, dramatically increased their expression of osteopontin. Our findings agree with Iseki et al.; they found an increase of osteopontin expression after 24 h of FGF-2 stimulation in fetal mouse osteogenic progenitor cells in the calvariae (23). Finally we examined osteocalcin, a third extracellular protein thought to play a role in matrix mineralization. Previous studies have alluded to the low or absent expression of osteocalcin in osteoprogenitor cells in vitro as compared with in vivo (20). Consistently, osteocalcin expression was most detectable by the sensitive real time PCR analysis. At baseline levels, adult osteoblasts expressed more osteocalcin than juvenile osteoblasts, indicating that the adult osteoblasts maintained a differentiated phenotype. After rhFGF-2 stimulation, juvenile osteoblasts dramatically increased their osteocalcin expression, while adult osteoblasts did not alter their osteocalcin expression. Together, these results indicated the increased potential of the juvenile osteoblasts to produce and mineralize bone.

Previous work has demonstrated the ability of osteoprogenitor cells to differentiate down the osteoblastic lineage in the presence of chemicals, including {beta}-glycerophosphate, dexamethasone, and ascorbic acid (46). Thus, stimulation with osteoblast differentiation medium demonstrated increased matrix mineralization in juvenile osteoblasts through a 41-fold increase in bone nodule formation in vitro. These data further confirmed our results indicating that juvenile osteoblast cultures have a greater osteogenic potential and larger osteoprogenitor population than adult osteoblast cultures.

Because of the differential response rhFGF-2 stimulation, we further investigated endogenous FGF-2 production and regulation. FGF-2 is transcribed as a single mRNA, with at least 3 sites for initiation of translation (47, 48). FGF-2 forms have different roles depending on species, tissue type, developmental stage, and environmental conditions (49). The high molecular mass forms (HMW; 21.5 and 22 kDa) accumulate in the nucleus, while the low molecular mass form (LMW; 18 kDa) is mainly cytoplasmic, although it is poorly secreted (47, 5052). Additionally, the HMW forms yield a different phenotype than the LMW form, indicating that HMW and LMW forms can have distinct targets and functionally roles (53, 54).

Interestingly, adult osteoblasts produced more total FGF-2, which was mainly composed of the HMW form, while juvenile osteoblasts produced low levels of all three forms. It is tempting to speculate that the preferential HMW FGF-2 translation in adult osteoblasts may contribute to their mature phenotype. Additionally, FGF-2 has a gradient effect on osteoblast proliferation and differentiation (23, 33, 55). Our results associated low levels of FGF-2 with juvenile osteoblasts into a more proliferative state, and high levels of FGF-2 with adult osteoblasts into a more differentiated state. Furthermore, rhFGF-2 stimulation of juvenile and adult osteoblasts increased both LMW and HMW FGF-2 production through both exogenous uptake and an autoregulation of endogenous FGF-2 production. Differential FGF-2 concentration and form production further support the idea of different role(s) for FGF-2 forms during regulation of development, proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenesis and may contribute to the phenotypic differences observed in juvenile and adult osteoblasts (54, 56, 57).

As primary osteoblasts were cultured for longer periods of time they began to loose their initial phenotypic and gene expression profile, so we further investigated FGF-2 production after extended culture (2 months). Juvenile osteoblasts showed a modulation in FGF-2 translation, whereby they preferentially up-regulated translation of the HMW FGF-2 form to resemble that of unstimulated adult osteoblasts. This indicated that extended culture influenced translational regulation of FGF-2 and induced juvenile osteoblasts to become more differentiated corresponding to a modified phenotype.

Because of the known mitogenic effects of FGF-2, we investigated juvenile versus adult osteoblast proliferation rates in response to rhFGF-2 stimulation. Both juvenile and adult osteoblasts increased proliferation upon rhFGF-2 stimulation, although juvenile osteoblasts consistently proliferated faster. These data, in combination with the gene expression data, indicated that juvenile osteoblasts were more responsive to the mitogenic and osteogenic effects of FGF-2.

Fibroblast growth factor-2 elicits a signal when bound to high affinity FGF receptors (FGF-R 1–4). FGF-R1 mRNA marks differentiated osteoblasts while FGF-R2 mRNA marks proliferative osteoblasts; both are expressed by osteoblasts of the parietal bone (23) and bind FGF-2 with equal affinity (34). Thus, regulation of FGF-2 signaling must occur not only with ligand availability, but also with receptor abundance and availability. Osteoblast proliferation and differentiation were further investigated through FGF-R production and signaling. Consistent with previous reports, adult osteoblasts transcribed more FGF-R1, while juvenile osteoblasts transcribed more FGF-R2 at baseline levels. Upon rhFGF-2 stimulation, juvenile osteoblasts first temporarily increased their expression of FGF-R2 after which they increased FGF-R1 expression, indicating their transition from a proliferative to a differentiated state. In contrast, rhFGF-2 stimulated adult osteoblasts maintained FGF-R1 expression and only slightly increased expression of FGF-R2 after 24 h. Accordingly, Iseki et al. demonstrated in vivo that osteogenic stem cells of fetal mice calvaria stopped proliferating 6 h after stimulation with rhFGF-2-soaked beads (23). In addition, this FGF-2 bead-driven stimulation in fetal coronal sutures induced the adjacent skeletogenic membrane to increase expression of FGF-R1 and decrease expression of FGF-R2 by 24 h. While the work of Iseki et al. was performed in vivo on a mixed "osteogenic stem cell" population in the embryonic calvaria, our work clearly demonstrated the shift in FGF-R1 to -R2 expression of osteoblasts in vitro.

Because mRNA transcription is not always an accurate reflection of protein production, we further investigated FGF-R translation in juvenile and adult osteoblasts. The data demonstrated that juvenile osteoblasts translated more FGF-R1 and -R2 protein at baseline levels. After rhFGF-2 stimulation, juvenile and adult osteoblasts did not significantly increase their production of FGF-R1 and -R2. These data are important because FGF-R1 and -R2 protein perform the signaling function and do not necessarily reflect the mRNA-associated states of proliferation or differentiation, but instead may reflect differential signaling pathways. Thus, juvenile osteoblasts had an increased amount of receptor potentially available for binding to FGF-2, while adult osteoblasts had minimal receptor amounts.

Finally, because subtle differences in FGF-2 signaling may profoundly affect phenotype (33), the signaling potential of FGF-R1 and -R2 was determined by analyzing phosphorylation states. Upon 15 min of rhFGF-2 stimulation, juvenile osteoblasts phosphorylated more FGF-R1 and -R2 as compared with adult osteoblasts. This indicated the increased ability of juvenile osteoblasts to transmit signals through FGF-R1 and -R2 and thus increase their proliferation and then differentiation. Additionally, adult osteoblasts showed some phosphorylation of FGF-R1, but almost an absence of FGF-R2 phosphorylation. Thus, expression of and signaling through FGF-R1 may lead to a differentiated phenotype, while that of FGF-R2 may lead to a proliferative phenotype. These results indicate that the adult osteoblasts may be in an almost quiescent state because of the reduced ability of their receptors to transmit a signal.

Previous research has demonstrated that states of proliferation are partially regulated by translation of different FGF-2 forms (52, 54), concentration of FGF-2, and receptor regulation (23). The present study indicated that juvenile osteoblasts were in a less differentiated state, attached and proliferated faster, translated low levels of HMW FGF-2, had less endogenous FGF-2, and had more cell surface associated FGF-R1 and -R2 protein with increased phosphorylation. In contrast, adult osteoblasts were in a fully differentiated state, preferentially increased translation of HMW FGF-2, produced high levels of FGF-2, and demonstrated less FGF-R1 and -R2 protein and phosphorylation. Thus, the large subpopulation of less differentiated osteoblasts found in juvenile calvaria are more responsive to FGF-2 signaling, while osteoblasts of adult calvaria are minimally responsive leading to "locked out" FGF-2 signaling.

In summary, we hypothesize that juvenile calvaria contain a subpopulation of pre-osteoblasts in a low FGF-2 environment, which are capable of proliferating and migrating into the area of a skull defect. At this point, pre-osteoblasts encounter a high FGF-2 environment supplied by the juvenile dura mater underlying the calvarial defect (26). Pre-osteoblasts differentiate and mineralize a bony matrix mediating successful calvarial ossification. Since adult osteoblasts demonstrate low proliferation, low FGF-R1 and -R2 signaling, and minimal ability to form bone nodules, they cannot participate in successful healing. These results deserve further investigation into the roles of the LMW and HMW forms of FGF-2 in juvenile versus adult osteoblasts as well as the gene expression and phenotype resulting from either FGF-R1 or -R2 signaling.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by Grant R01DE-14526 from the National Institutes of Health (to M. T. L.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 257 Campus Dr., Stanford, CA 94305-5148. Tel.: 650-736-1707; Fax: 650-736-1705; E-mail: Longaker{at}Stanford.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: FGF, fibroblast growth factor; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Sirola, K. (1960) Ann. Med. Exp. Biol. Fenn. 38, 1–10[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hassler, W., and Zentner, J. (Neurosurgery 27, 539–54, 1990[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Bradley, J. P., Levine, J. P., Blewett, C., Krummel, T., McCarthy, J. G., and Longaker, M. T. (1996) Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 33, 150–156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Bradley, J. P., Levine, J. P., Roth, D. A., McCarthy, J. G., and Longaker, M. T. (1996) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 98, 1039–1045[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Bradley, J. P., Levine, J. P., McCarthy, J. G., and Longaker, M. T. (1997) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100, 1091–1099; discussion; 1100–1092[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Opperman, L. A., Sweeney, T. M., Redmon, J., Persing, J. A., and Ogle, R. C. (1993) Dev. Dyn. 198, 312–322[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Opperman, L. A., Passarelli, R. W., Morgan, E. P., Reintjes, M., and Ogle, R. C. (1995) J. Bone Miner. Res. 10, 1978–1987[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Opperman, L. A., Passarelli, R., Nolen, A., Gampper, T., Lin, K., and Ogle, R. C. (1996) In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 32
  9. Mehrara, B. J., Most, D., Chang, J., Bresnick, S., Turk, A., Schendel, S. A., Gittes, G. K., and Longaker, M. T. (1999) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 104, 435–444[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Greenwald, J. A., Mehrara, B. J., Spector, J. A., Warren, S. M., Crisera, F. E., Fagenholz, P. J., Bouletreau, P. J., and Longaker, M. T. (2000) J. Bone Miner. Res. 15, 2413–2430[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. de Pollak, C., Arnaud, E., Renier, D., and Marie, P. J. (1997) J. Cell. Biochem. 64, 128–139[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Mansukhani, A., Bellosta, P., Sahni, M., and Basilico, C. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 149, 1297–1308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Stein, G. S., Lian, J. B., Stein, J. L., van Wijnen, A. J., Frenkel, B., and Montecino, M. (1996) in Principles of Bone Biology (Rodan, G. A., ed), pp. 69–86, Academic Press, New York
  14. LeBaron, R. G., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2000) Tissue Eng. 6, 85–103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Karsenty, G. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 3037–3051[Free Full Text]
  16. Ducy, P., Starbuck, M., Priemel, M., Shen, J., Pinero, G., Geoffroy, V., Amling, M., and Karsenty, G. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1025–1036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zur Nieden, N. I., Kempka, G., and Ahr, H. J. (2003) Differentiation 71, 18–27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Candeliere, G. A., Liu, F., and Aubin, J. E. (2001) Bone 28, 351–361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Schedlich, L. J., Flanagan, J. L., Crofts, L. A., Gillies, S. A., Goldberg, D., Morrison, N. A., and Eisman, J. A. (1994) J. Bone Miner. Res. 9, 143–152[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Tanaka, H., Ogasa, H., Barnes, J., and Liang, C. T. (1999) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 150, 1–10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Shimoaka, T., Ogasawara, T., Yonamine, A., Chikazu, D., Kawano, H., Nakamura, K., Itoh, N., and Kawaguchi, H. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 7493–7500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Montero, A., Okada, Y., Tomita, M., Ito, M., Tsurukami, H., Nakamura, T., Doetschman, T., Coffin, J. D., and Hurley, M. M. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 105, 1085–1093[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Iseki, S., Wilkie, A. O., and Morriss-Kay, G. M. (1999) Development 126, 5611–5620[Abstract]
  24. Iseki, S., Wilkie, A. O., Heath, J. K., Ishimaru, T., Eto, K., and Morriss-Kay, G. M. (1997) Development 124, 3375–3384[Abstract]
  25. Mehrara, B. J., Greenwald, J., Chin, G. S., Dudziak, M., Sagrioglu, J., Steinbrech, D. S., Saadeh, P. B., Gittes, G. K., and Longaker, M. T. (1999) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 104, 1003–1013[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Greenwald, J. A., Mehrara, B. J., Spector, J. A., Chin, G. S., Steinbrech, D. S., Saadeh, P. B., Luchs, J. S., Paccione, M. F., Gittes, G. K., and Longaker, M. T. (2000) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105, 1382–1392[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Greenwald, J. A., Mehrara, B. J., Spector, J. A., Fagenholz, P. J., Saadeh, P. B., Steinbrech, D. S., Gittes, G. K., and Longaker, M. T. (2000) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106, 630–638; discussion 639[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Spector, J. A., Greenwald, J. A., Warren, S. M., Bouletreau, P. J., Crisera, F. E., Mehrara, B. J., and Longaker, M. T. (2002) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109, 631–642; discussion 643–634[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Spector, J. A., Greenwald, J. A., Warren, S. M., Bouletreau, P. J., Detch, R. C., Fagenholz, P. J., Crisera, F. E., and Longaker, M. T. (2002) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109, 645–654[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Warren, S. M., Brunet, L. J., Harland, R. M., Economides, A. N., and Longaker, M. T. (2003) Nature 422, 625–629[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Ornitz, D. M., Xu, J., Colvin, J. S., McEwen, D. G., MacArthur, C. A., Coulier, F., Gao, G., and Goldfarb, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15292–15297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ornitz, D. M., and Marie, P. J. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 1446–1465[Free Full Text]
  33. Moore, R., Ferretti, P., Copp, A., and Thorogood, P. (2002) Dev. Biol. 243, 99–114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Dionne, C. A., Crumley, G., Bellot, F., Kaplow, J. M., Searfoss, G., Ruta, M., Burgess, W. H., Jaye, M., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2685–2692[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Mehrara, B. J., Rowe, N. M., Steinbrech, D. S., Dudziak, M. E., Saadeh, P. B., McCarthy, J. G., Gittes, G. K., and Longaker, M. T. (1999) Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 103, 536–547[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Lin, C. Y., Wang, J. K., Torri, J., Dou, L., Sang, Q. A., and Dickson, R. B. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9147–9152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Bouche, G., Gas, N., Prats, H., Baldin, V., Tauber, J. P., Teissie, J., and Amalric, F. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 6770–6774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Moursi, A. M., Globus, R. K., and Damsky, C. H. (1997) J. Cell Sci. 110, 2187–2196[Abstract]
  39. Kreidberg, J. A. (2000) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 548–553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Kreidberg, J. A., Donovan, M. J., Goldstein, S. L., Rennke, H., Shepherd, K., Jones, R. C., and Jaenisch, R. (1996) Development 122, 3537–3547[Abstract]
  41. Hynes, R. O. (1992) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2, 621–624[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Takeuchi, Y., Suzawa, M., Kikuchi, T., Nishida, E., Fujita, T., and Matsumoto, T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29309–29316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Clark, E. A., and Brugge, J. S. (1995) Science 268, 233–239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Okada-Ban, M., Thiery, J. P., and Jouanneau, J. (2000) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 32, 263–267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Escaffit, F., Estival, A., Bertrand, C., Vaysse, N., Hollande, E., and Clemente, F. (2000) Int. J. Cancer 85, 555–562[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Leboy, P. S., Beresford, J. N., Devlin, C., and Owen, M. E. (1991) J. Cell. Physiol. 146, 370–378[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Bugler, B., Amalric, F., and Prats, H. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 573–577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Florkiewicz, R. Z., Shibata, F., Barankiewicz, T., Baird, A., Gonzalez, A. M., Florkiewicz, E., and Shah, N. (1991) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 638, 109–126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Delrieu, I. (2000) FEBS Lett. 468, 6–10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Renko, M., Quarto, N., Morimoto, T., and Rifkin, D. B. (1990) J. Cell. Physiol. 144, 108–114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Quarto, N., Finger, F. P., and Rifkin, D. B. (1991) J. Cell. Physiol. 147, 311–318[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Bikfalvi, A., Klein, S., Pintucci, G., Quarto, N., Mignatti, P., and Rifkin, D. B. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 233–243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Vagner, S., Touriol, C., Galy, B., Audigier, S., Gensac, M. C., Amalric, F., Bayard, F., Prats, H., and Prats, A. C. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 1391–1402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Quarto, N., Talarico, D., Florkiewicz, R., and Rifkin, D. B. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 699–708[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Sarkar, S., Petiot, A., Copp, A., Ferretti, P., and Thorogood, P. (2001) Development 128, 2143–2152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Amalric, F., Bouche, G., Bonnet, H., Brethenou, P., Roman, A. M., Truchet, I., and Quarto, N. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol 47, 111–115[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Couderc, B., Prats, H., Bayard, F., and Amalric, F. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 709–718[Medline]