JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M305245200 on June 24, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 36, 34061-34065, September 5, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/36/34061    most recent
M305245200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clubb, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clubb, R. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Sortase from Staphylococcus aureus Does Not Contain a Thiolate-Imidazolium Ion Pair in Its Active Site*

Kevin M. Connolly {ddagger} § ¶ ||, Brenton T. Smith {ddagger} ||, Rosemarie Pilpa {ddagger} § ¶, Udayar Ilangovan {ddagger} § ¶, Michael E. Jung {ddagger} ** and Robert T. Clubb {ddagger} § ¶ {ddagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, §Molecular Biology Institute, and the UCLA-Department of Energy Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1570

Received for publication, May 19, 2003 , and in revised form, June 23, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Many surface proteins are anchored to the cell wall by the action of sortase enzymes, a recently discovered family of cysteine transpeptidases. As the surface proteins of human pathogens are frequently required for virulence, the sortase-mediated anchoring reaction represents a potential target for new anti-infective agents. It has been suggested that the sortase from Staphylococcus aureus (SrtA), may use a similar catalytic strategy as the papain cysteine proteases, holding its Cys184 side chain in an active configuration through a thiolate-imidazolium ion interaction with residue His120. To investigate the mechanism of transpeptidation, we have synthesized a peptidyl-vinyl sulfone substrate mimic that irreversibly inhibits SrtA. Through the study of the pH dependence of SrtA inhibition and NMR, we have estimated the pKas of the active site thiol (Cys184) and imidazole (His120) to be ~9.4 and 7.0, respectively. These measurements are inconsistent with the existence of a thiolate-imidazolium ion pair and suggest a general base catalysis mechanism during transpeptidation.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Gram-positive bacteria infect humans through an array of surface-associated proteins that promote bacterial adhesion, resistance to phagocytic killing, and host cell invasion. Many surface proteins are covalently anchored to the cell wall by the action of sortase enzymes, a family of novel transpeptidases (reviewed in Refs. 15). The SrtA protein from Staphylococcus aureus is the most extensively characterized sortase enzyme (6) and anchors surface proteins that contain a C-terminal sorting signal consisting of a conserved LPXTG motif, a hydrophobic domain, and a tail of mostly positively charged residues (7, 8). SrtA and related proteins may be excellent targets for new broad-spectrum anti-infective agents, because sortase-like enzymes and the LPXTG signal are universally conserved in Gram-positive bacteria (5, 9), and sortase (–) strains of S. aureus (1012), Listeria monocytogenes (13, 14), and Streptococcus gordonii (15) display defects in their virulence.

The structure of SrtA revealed a novel protein fold and localized the active site to a hydrophobic surface depression that contains two highly conserved and enzymatically important residues, His120 and Cys184 (SrtA numbering) (1618). This catalytic dyad is reminiscent of the active sites of the papain cysteine proteases (Cys25-His159-Asn175, papain numbering) (19, 20), suggesting that they are mechanistically related (21). In this model of SrtA function, the imidazole ring of His120 promotes the formation of the Cys184 thiolate, which then nucleophilically attacks the carbonyl carbon at the scissile Thr-Gly peptide bond in the LPXTG motif (22). After covalent linkage via a thioacyl bond to the threonine carbonyl group, the incoming amine of the cell wall precursor lipid II (23, 24) may then be deprotonated by His120 for attack on the covalent intermediate (16, 18).

Previous work left unresolved how His120 activates Cys184. In the papain cysteine proteases, the cysteine side chain is held in an active configuration through a thiolate-imidazolium ion interaction with the histidine (25). However, in the NMR structure of SrtA solved in the absence of its substrates, the side chains of Cys184 and His120 do not interact, arguing against the presence of an ion pair (16). To resolve this issue, and as a first step toward the design of a therapeutically useful anti-infective agent, we have synthesized a peptidyl-vinyl sulfone substrate mimic that inhibits SrtA. The pH dependence of SrtA inhibition and NMR studies preclude the presence of an ion pair in the active site, because His120 and Cys184 have pKa values of 7.0, and ~9.4, respectively.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reagents—Residues 60–206 of wild-type sortase (SrtA{Delta}N59) and a single amino acid mutant of the protein containing a cysteine to alanine substitution at position 184 (C184ASrtA{Delta}N59) were overexpressed from plasmids pSRTA and pHTT45, respectively (16, 18). The expression, uniform isotopic labeling (where applicable), and purification of SrtA{Delta}N59 and C184ASrtA{Delta}N59 have been described previously (16). The fluorescent substrate peptide d-QALPETGEE-e (where d is dabcyl (4-([4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]azo)-benzoyl-) and e is EDANS ([(2-aminoethyl)-amino]naphthlene-1-sulfonyl-)) was purchased from Synpep (Dublin, CA) and purified by HPLC.1 Reagents for the synthesis of the vinyl sulfone inhibitor were purchased from Aldrich.

Synthesis of Vinyl Sulfone Inhibitor—The vinyl sulfone inhibitor was synthesized using solution phase methodology (see Fig. 1). The Leu-Pro-Ala tripeptide was synthesized by standard amino acid coupling chemistry using 1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP), starting with the carbobenzyloxy-protected amino acid Cbz-Leu-OH and N-tert-butoxycarbonyl (N-t-Boc) methyl esters of alanine and proline. L-Threonine was fully protected as the N-t-Boc-threonine methyl ester with the alcohol protected as the t-butyldiphenylsilyl ether (2) in three steps. The ester was reduced with diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) to the aldehyde, which was immediately reacted without purification with diethyl phenylsulfonylmethylphosphonate (3) to give the desired vinyl sulfone functionality (4) in good yield. Removal of the Boc group with trifluoroacetic acid followed by coupling the amine with the Cbz-protected tripeptide gave the desired tetrapeptide. Removal of the t-butyldiphenylsilyl group with HF gave the vinyl sulfone inhibitor (1). The inhibitor was purified by silica gel chromatography and the structure confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and FAB+ (fast atom bombardment) mass spectrometry.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
A, molecular structure of the peptidyl-vinyl sulfone inhibitor Cbz-Leu-Pro-Ala-Thr-SO2Ph. B, strategy for synthesis of vinyl sulfone inhibitor. L-Threonine was fully protected as the N-t-Boc-threonine methyl ester, with the alcohol protected as the t-butyldiphenylsilyl ether (2), in three steps. The ester was reduced with diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) to the aldehyde, which was immediately reacted without purification with diethyl phenylsulfonylmethylphosphonate (3) to give the desired vinyl sulfone functionality (4). Removal of the Boc group with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) followed by coupling the amine with the Cbz-protected tripeptide (Cbz-Leu-Pro-Ala) gave the desired tetrapeptide. Removal of the t-butyldiphenylsilyl group with HF gave the vinyl sulfone inhibitor (1). OTBDPS, t-butyldiphenylsilyl; TBDPSC1, t-butylchlorodiphenylsilane; DMAP, 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine; EDCI, 1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride.

 

Enzyme Assays—Fluorescent measurements of SrtA activity in the presence of the vinyl sulfone inhibitor were performed in 96-well microtiter plates as described previously (26). Inhibition reactions contained 5 µM SrtA and vinyl sulfone inhibitor (100, 300, or 600 µM) in buffer R (50 mM Tris, pH 3.5–10, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM glycine, 5 mM CaCl2). d-QALPETGEE-e was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and added to the reaction at a final concentration of 25 µM, for a total reaction volume of 200 µl. The final concentration of Me2SO in the reaction was kept below 5%. The reactions were incubated for 12 h at 37 °C with gentle mixing in a GENios multiwell fluorimeter (Tecan, Durham, NC) (360 nm excitation filter, 465 nm emission filter). Fluorescence emission was recorded at 10-min intervals and blanked against a reference solution containing SrtA in buffer R. All enzyme assays were performed in triplicate, resulting in ~450 measurements for each inhibitor concentration assayed. The inhibition parameters Ki and ki were solved simultaneously for each inhibitor concentration using the equation,

(Eq. 1)
where [P]t is the concentration of product at time t, [E] is the total concentration of SrtA, and [S] and [I] are the total concentrations of the fluorogenic substrate and inhibitor, respectively (27). Km and kcat (the Michaelis and first-order rate constants for the uninhibited SrtA transpeptidation reaction, respectively) were determined independently for each pH value (data not shown). Curves were fit using the program Sigmaplot2000 (SPSS version 6.0).

HPLC Analysis of Inhibitor Modification of SrtA—Thirty microliters of SrtA (95–100 µM) in buffer I (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM CaCl2) were adjusted to the desired pH with 1 M HCl or 1 M NaOH as needed and were incubated with a 20-fold molar excess of the vinyl sulfone inhibitor for 20 h at 37 °C with gentle agitation. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 µl of buffer A (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water), and the products were separated by reverse phase HPLC using a C18 column (Waters, Milford, MA) with the application of a gradient of 25–50% buffer B (90% acetonitrile, 10% H2O, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid).

NMR Spectroscopy—NMR experiments were carried out at 308 K on a Bruker DRX500 spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance probe using 15N- and 13C-labeled SrtA{Delta}N59 and C184ASrtA{Delta}N59 proteins (0.5 mM) in buffer N (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.2), 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM CaCl2, 3 mM dithiothreitol, and 7% D2O). The chemical shifts of wild-type SrtA{Delta}N59 have been reported previously, and the resonances of the single histidine side chain (His120) in the C184ASrtA{Delta}N59 mutant were readily assigned by reference to these data. For the pKa measurements, a series of two-dimensional 1H-13C heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectra were recorded to monitor the pH dependence of the 1H-{delta}2-13C-{delta}2 and 1H-{epsilon}1-13C-{epsilon}1 resonances of the His120 side chain (spectra recorded at pH values of 4.5–10). Chemical shifts in the NMR spectra were plotted as a function of pH and fit to the following equation,

(Eq. 2)
where {delta}HA and {delta}A are the chemical shifts of the fully protonated and deprotonated forms of the ionizable group, and {delta}obs is the observed chemical shift (28, 29). The data were fit using SigmaPlot2000.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To characterize the active site His120-Cys184 dyad, we synthesized an irreversible inhibitor that consisted of the substrate recognition motif of SrtA (-Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly-, where X is any amino acid) but replaced the scissile Thr-Gly amide bond with a vinyl sulfone group (C = C-SO2Ph) (Fig. 1A). Alanine was placed at the X position to facilitate the synthesis, and the vinyl sulfone group was used because it has previously been shown to covalently modify the active site thiol in cysteine proteases (3034). This is relevant because mutagenesis studies have demonstrated the catalytic importance of SrtA residue Cys184 (18), and several sulfhydryl-directed reagents block the activity of SrtA in vitro (17, 18).

The efficacy of the vinyl sulfone compound was tested in vitro by determining how it altered the SrtA-catalyzed hydrolysis of an internally quenched fluorescent substrate analogue (d-Gln-Ala-Leu-Pro-Glu-Thr-Gly-Glu-Glu-e). Hydrolysis progress curves were generated by monitoring the increase in fluorescence that accompanies the cleavage of the substrate (18, 26). The curves were consistent with the vinyl sulfone compound acting as an irreversible inhibitor of SrtA (Fig. 2A) (35). Typical progress curves of the reaction in the presence of 100, 300, and 600 µM inhibitor are shown in Fig. 2B. Fits of these data to Equation 1 by non-linear regression analysis determined the first-order rate constant of inactivation (ki) and the dissociation constant of inhibitor binding (Ki). At pH 7, the Ki of the inhibitor is 9 x 106 M, which is comparable with the measured Km of SrtA of 3 x 106 M for the fluorogenic substrate analogue (data not shown). The rate constant of inactivation (ki) of the vinyl sulfone inhibitor is 4 x 104 min1. To date, only two other irreversible SrtA inhibitors have been characterized. Both contain the Cbz-Leu-Pro-Ala-Thr sorting signal mimic of the vinyl sulfone compound but utilize different reactive groups (diazomethane and chloromethane) (26). The first-order rate constants of the peptidyl-diazomethane (5.8 x 103 min1) and -chloromethane (1.1 x 102 min1) SrtA inhibitors are larger than the vinyl sulfone ki by ~10- and 20-fold, respectively (26). This difference in reactivity is consistent with the higher electrophilicity of chloro- and diazomethane reactive groups and has been observed in inhibition studies of other cysteine proteases (36). For example, diazomethane and chloromethane inhibitors of human cathepsin L have second-order rate constants up to 100-fold higher than vinyl sulfone inhibitors (30, 36). As the transpeptidation reaction of SrtA is extremely poor in vitro (kcat/Km) = 20.6 M·s1 it probably does not reflect the efficiency of the enzyme in vivo, where it must complete the anchoring of surface proteins within the doubling time of the bacterium. The development of a quantitative in vivo assay for inhibition will be necessary to evaluate the efficacy of peptidyl inhibitors of sortase as anti-infective agents.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
A, mechanism of vinyl sulfone inhibition. In this mechanism, sortase (E) catalyzes the transpeptidation of its substrate (S) with the kinetic constants Km and kcat. The irreversible vinyl sulfone inhibitor (I) binds to sortase to form a Michaelis complex with affinity constant Ki. The rate of covalent attachment of the inhibitor via the vinyl sulfone moiety is described by the first-order rate constant ki. B, progress curves of vinyl sulfone inhibition of SrtA. The curves were fit to Equation 1 to simultaneously determine the inhibition constants Ki and ki (as described under "Experimental Procedures"). SrtA catalyzed the transpeptidation of the d-QALPETGEE-e substrate with a Km of 3.6 x 106 M and a kcat of 7.4 x 105 s1. These values are comparable with previously published values (Km = 1.6 x 105 M; kcat = 2.3 x 105 s1) determined under similar assay conditions (17). C, pH dependence of ki and Ki for the vinyl sulfone inhibitor. The ki (open circles) and Ki (solid circles) values were determined from progress curves of the inhibition reaction at each pH. The curves are plots of Equation 3, fixing the pKa values at 9 (dotted line), 9.5 (dashed line), and 10 (solid line).

 

Because the vinyl sulfone warhead of the peptide inhibitor is expected to be most reactive toward cysteine thiolates, and Cys184 is the only cysteine in SrtA, we measured the pH dependence of inactivation to determine the pKa of Cys184. The in vitro hydrolysis reaction was repeated at the three inhibitor concentrations over the pH range of 3.5–10, and the inhibition parameters Ki and ki were determined by curve fitting. As shown in Fig. 2C, ki increases dramatically above pH 8, whereas the Ki value is not significantly affected. To estimate the pKa of Cys184, a modified Henderson-Hasselbach equation (37),

(Eq. 3)
(where kmin and kmax are the minimum and maximum observed first-order inhibition constants) was modeled for the inhibitor data by fixing kmin (4 x 104 min1 at pH 6) and solving for kmax over a range of pKa values. Plots of Equation 3 for pKa values of 9 (dotted line), 9.5 (dashed line), and 10 (solid line) are shown in Fig. 2C. The estimated the pKa of Cys184 is ~9.4.

To confirm that the pH-dependent inhibition of SrtA results from the covalent modification of Cys184, we tracked the modification reaction by chromatography. The SrtA protein was incubated with a 20-fold molar excess of inhibitor for 20 h, and the reaction products were separated by HPLC. Fig. 3, AC shows the results of incubating SrtA with the inhibitor at pH 9, 7, and 6, respectively. Two inhibitor-modified SrtA species elute on a C18 reverse phase HPLC column (peaks 1 and 2), and mass spectrometry indicates that both peaks contain SrtA covalently modified by a single inhibitor molecule. At pH values of 6 and 7, little modification occurs within 20 h with a slight excess of species 2 being produced. However, at pH 9.0, nearly all of the SrtA protein is converted to species 1 (Fig. 3A). An analysis of the pH dependence of modification indicates that the production of species 1 is most efficient at pH values nearing 9, whereas maximal production of the minor species 2 occurs at pH ~7 (data not shown). Because the enzyme is maximally inhibited by the vinyl sulfone compound at high pH values (Fig. 2C), where species 1 is almost exclusively present, the data strongly suggest that species 1 corresponds to the inhibitor-SrtA complex that forms during the inactivation. This hypothesis was substantiated by thiolating Cys184 with a 2-fold excess of nitroxide spin label HO-225 ((1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethylpyrroline-3-methyl)-methanethiosulfonate) (38) and testing for its ability to react with the vinyl sulfone inhibitor at pH 9. As shown in Fig. 3D, preincubation with HO-225 prevented the formation of both species 1 and 2. These data are consistent with Cys184 being the primary and most reactive site for modification by the vinyl sulfone at pH values above 8.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
HPLC elution profiles for the separation of SrtA and the SrtA-inhibitor complex. The peaks representing free SrtA (F) and the SrtA-inhibitor covalent complex (1 and 2) are labeled. AC, SrtA{Delta}59 with inhibitor at pH 6 (A), pH 7 (B), and pH 9 (C). Reactions contained 95–100 µM SrtA and 20-fold molar excess of the vinyl sulfone inhibitor, and were incubated for 20 h at 37 °C. D, SrtA{Delta}59 pre-incubated with a 2-fold molar excess of spin label HO-225 prior to incubation with the vinyl sulfone inhibitor, pH 9.

 

To investigate whether an imidazolium ion is present in the active site of SrtA, NMR was used to determine the pKa of the His120 side chain. Because the chemical shifts of atoms within the imidazole are expected to be sensitive to the ionization state of the side chain, a series of 1H-13C heteronuclear single quantum correlation spectra were recorded using a 13C- and 15N-enriched sample of SrtA, and the chemical shifts of the 1H-{delta}2 and 1H-{epsilon}1 atoms of His120 were recorded at pH values between 4.5 and 10. Fig. 4 shows a plot of the chemical shift of the 1H-{epsilon}1 atom as a function of pH (a similar curve was obtained for the 1H-{delta}2 atom). A fit of the titration data to Equation 2 (see "Experimental Procedures") indicates that the His120 side chain has a pKa of 7.0 ± 0.1 in the presence of 20 mM CaCl2. Because Ca2+ binding near the active site has been shown to enhance the in vitro activity of SrtA 8-fold (16), we repeated the pH titration experiment in calcium-free buffer (buffer N with no calcium) to determine the effects of Ca2+ on the ionization state of the active site His120 residue. No significant changes in the pKa of His120 were detected in the absence of calcium (pKa = 6.6 ± 0.1) (Fig. 4B). The data indicate that at physiological pH, the imidazole side chain is only partially protonated and that calcium does not stimulate the activity of SrtA by altering the ionization state of His120. Ca2+ binding may stabilize substrate binding or the fold of the protein.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
A, pH titration of His120. Plot of the chemical shift changes in the 1H-{epsilon}1 resonance of His120 as a function of pH. The titrations were performed in the presence of 20 mM calcium, and the data were fit to Equation 2 to obtain pKa values of 7.0 and 7.3 for wild-type SrtA{Delta}N59 (solid circles) and C184ASrtA{Delta}N59 (open circles), respectively. Analysis of the heteronuclear single quantum correlation NMR spectra over the same pH range (data not shown) indicates that the protein remains folded throughout the titration study. B, effect of calcium on the pKa of His120. The solid and open circles are titration data obtained for the wild-type SrtA{Delta}N59 in the presence (solid circles) and absence (open circles) of 20 mM CaCl2. Fits to Equation 2 reveal the pKa of His120 in the absence of calcium to be 6.6.

 

If a thiolate-imidazolium ion pair exists in the active site of SrtA, one would expect the thiolate of Cys184 to perturb the ionization of His120 (i.e. alter its pKa). We ascertained the effect of Cys184 on His120 by repeating the NMR-pH titration experiment using the mutant C184ASrtA{Delta}N59. The results of this titration (Fig. 4A, open circles) were fit to Equation 2 to obtain a pKa of 7.3 ± 0.1. The similarly measured pKa values for His120 in the wild-type and mutant SrtA proteins suggest that its ionization state is independent of the Cys184 side chain, a finding that is inconsistent with the existence of an ion pair between His120 and Cys184.

A thiolate-imidazolium ion pair between the side chains of His120 and Cys184 would enhance the reactivity of the thiol toward electrophiles at weakly acidic and neutral pH (36) because the imidazole group would act to polarize the thiol. In this scenario, it is expected that the pKa value of the cysteine thiol would be more acidic and the histidine imidazole would be more basic than their normal values of 7.85 and 6.0, respectively (39). For example, the anomalous pKa values of 3.3 (for the Cys25 thiol) and 8.5 (for the His159 imidazolium) support the existence of a thiolate-imidazolium ion pair in papain (40, 41). In SrtA, however, our investigation argues against the use of a thiolate-imidazolium ion pair in the reaction mechanism.

The pH dependence of modification of Cys184 by the vinyl sulfone inhibitor (Fig. 2C) shows a dramatic increase in the first-order rate of inactivation as the pH is raised from 7.5 to 10 (at pH 10 the inhibitor is 20 times more reactive than at pH 7.5). Because the inhibitor is expected to be more reactive toward a thiolate ion, the pH dependence of inhibition can be attributed to the deprotonation of Cys184. These data argue against the presence of an ion pair in the active site, because the pKa of Cys184 is estimated to be ~9.4.

NMR studies of the His120 side chain have measured its pKa at 7.0 in the wild-type protein, which is inconsistent with the presence of an imidazolium cation at neutral pH. Moreover, our finding that the removal of the Cys184 side chain (C184ASrtA{Delta}N59) has only a modest effect on the ionization state of His120 side chain argues against the presence of an ion pair, because in the papain system the pKa of His159 is lowered by 4.5 pH units upon the methylthiolation of the Cys25 (25).

Although the thiolate-imidazolium ion pair is a common catalytic entity of cysteine proteases, it is not universal (42, 43). The absence of an ion pair in SrtA suggests its catalytic mechanism may be similar to the viral 3C proteases (picornains), a structurally and mechanistically distinct group of cysteine proteases that perform general base catalysis (reviewed in Refs. 36 and 44). The crystal structures of the picornains of hepatitis A (45), rhinovirus (46), and poliovirus (47) show a similarity of three-dimensional structures and catalytic mechanisms to the serine proteases of the trypsin/chymotrypsin family and may be evolutionarily related (36, 43, 44). The pH-dependent alkylation of the active site cysteine of poliovirus protease 3C with iodoacetamide has measured its pKa at 8.86 (42), which is similar to the estimated pKa of the SrtA thiol. This is consistent with a reaction mechanism in which the cysteine nucleophile is uncharged at physiological pH, and the histidine functions as a general base.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI/GM52217 (to R. T. C. and M. E. J.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

|| Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

** To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 310-825-7954; Fax: 310-206-3722; E-mail: jung{at}chem.ucla.edu.

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 310-206-2334; Fax: 310-206-4749; E-mail: rclubb{at}mbi.ucla.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; N-t-Boc, N-tert-butoxycarbonyl; Cbz, benzyloxycarbonyl. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Bernard Fung for the use of the fluorimeter, Dr. Kym Faull for use of the HPLC, Dr. Wayne Hubbell for spin label HO-225, and Dr. Olaf Schneewind for plasmid pSRTA. We also thank Dr. Robert Peterson, Dr. Yun Han, and Kim Phan for technical assistance and Dr. Mahdi Abu-Omar for critical reading of the manuscript.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Navarre, W. W., and Schneewind, O. (1999) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 174–229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Novick, R. P. (2000) Trends Microbiol. 8, 148–151[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Cossart, P., and Jonquieres, R. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 5013–5015[Free Full Text]
  4. Mazmanian, S. K., Ton-That, H., and Schneewind, O. (2001) Mol. Microbiol. 40, 1049–1057[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Pallen, M. J., Lam, A. C., Antonio, M., and Dunbar, K. (2001) Trends Microbiol. 9, 97–101[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Mazmanian, S. K., Liu, G., Hung, T. T., and Schneewind, O. (1999) Science 285, 760–763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Schneewind, O., Model, P., and Fischetti, V. A. (1992) Cell 70, 267–281[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Schneewind, O., Mihaylovapetkov, D., and Model, P. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4803–4811[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Janulczyk, R., and Rasmussen, M. (2001) Infect. Immun. 69, 4019–4026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mazmanian, S. K., Liu, G., Jensen, E. R., Lenoy, E., and Schneewind, O. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 5510–5515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mazmanian, S. K., Ton-That, H., Su, K., and Schneewind, O. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 2293–2298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jonsson, I. M., Mazmanian, S. K., Schneewind, O., Verdrengh, M., Bremell, T., and Tarkowski, A. (2002) J. Infect. Dis. 185, 1417–1424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Bierne, H., Mazmanian, S. K., Trost, M., Pucciarelli, M. G., Liu, G., Dehoux, P., Jansch, L., Garcia-del Portillo, F., Schneewind, O., and Cossart, P. (2002) Mol. Microbiol. 43, 869–881[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Garandeau, C., Reglier-Poupet, H., Dubail, L., Beretti, J. L., Berche, P., and Charbit, A. (2002) Infect. Immun. 70, 1382–1390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bolken, T. C., Franke, C. A., Jones, K. F., Zeller, G. O., Jones, C. H., Dutton, E. K., and Hruby, D. E. (2001) Infect. Immun. 69, 75–80[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ilangovan, U., Ton-That, H., Iwahara, J., Schneewind, O., and Clubb, R. T. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 6056–6061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ton-That, H., Mazmanian, S. K., Faull, K. F., and Schneewind, O. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9876–9881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ton-That, H., Mazmanian, S. K., Alksne, L., and Schneewind, O. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 7447–7452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Drenth, J., Jansonius, J. N., Koekoek, R., Swen, H. M., and Wolthers, B. G. (1968) Nature 218, 929–932[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Storer, A. C., and Menard, R. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 244, 486–500[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. McGrath, M. E. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28, 181–204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Navarre, W. W., and Schneewind, O. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 14, 115–121[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Ruzin, A., Severin, A., Ritacco, F., Tabei, K., Singh, G., Bradford, P. A., Siegel, M. M., Projan, S. J., and Shlaes, D. M. (2002) J. Bacteriol. 184, 2141–2147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Perry, A. M., Ton-That, H., Mazmanian, S. K., and Schneewind, O. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 16241–16248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lewis, S. D., Johnson, F. A., and Shafer, J. A. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 48–51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Scott, C. J., McDowell, A., Martin, S. L., Lynas, J. F., Vandenbroeck, K., and Walker, B. (2002) Biochem. J. 366, 953–958[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Wu, J. C., and Fritz, L. C. (1999) Methods 17, 320–328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Jimenez, M. A., Villegas, V., Santoro, J., Serrano, L., Vendrell, J., Aviles, F. X., and Rico, M. (2003) Protein Sci. 12, 296–305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Khare, D., Alexander, P., Antosiewicz, J., Bryan, P., Gilson, M., and Orban, J. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 3580–3589[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Bromme, D., Klaus, J. L., Okamoto, K., Rasnick, D., and Palmer, J. T. (1996) Biochem. J. 315, 85–89[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Palmer, J. T., Rasnick, D., Klaus, J. L., and Bromme, D. (1995) J. Med. Chem. 38, 3193–3196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Palmer, J. T., Rasnick, D., and Klaus, J. L. (1995) Chem. Abstr. 123, 309464a
  33. Pauly, T. A., Sulea, T., Ammirati, M., Sivaraman, J., Danley, D. E., Griffor, M. C., Kamath, A. V., Wang, I. K., Laird, E. R., Seddon, A. P., Menard, R., Cygler, M., and Rath, V. L. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 3203–3213[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Somoza, J. R., Palmer, J. T., and Ho, J. D. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 322, 559–568[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Tian, W. X., and Tsou, C. L. (1982) Biochemistry 21, 1028–1032[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Otto, H. H., and Schirmeister, T. (1997) Chem. Rev. 97, 133–171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Krekel, F., Samland, A. K., Macheroux, P., Amrhein, N., and Evans, J. N. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 12671–12677[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Berliner, L. J., Grunwald, J., Hankovszky, H. O., and Hideg, K. (1982) Anal. Biochem. 119, 450–455[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Dawson, R. M. C., Elliott, D. C., Elliott, W. H., and Jones, K. M. (1986) Data for Biochemical Research, p. 131, 3rd Ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford
  40. Pinitglang, S., Watts, A. B., Patel, M., Reid, J. D., Noble, M. A., Gul, S., Bokth, A., Naeem, A., Patel, H., Thomas, E. W., Sreedharan, S. K., Verma, C., and Brocklehurst, K. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 9968–9982[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Whitaker, J. R., and Bender, M. L. (1965) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 2728–2737[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Sarkany, Z., Szeltner, Z., and Polgar, L. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 10601–10606[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Sarkany, Z., and Polgar, L. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 516–522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Barrett, A. J., and Rawlings, N. D. (2001) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 382, 727–733
  45. Allaire, M., Chernaia, M. M., Malcolm, B. A., and James, M. N. (1994) Nature 369, 72–76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Matthews, D. A., Smith, W. W., Ferre, R. A., Condon, B., Budahazi, G., Sisson, W., Villafranca, J. E., Janson, C. A., McElroy, H. E., Gribskov, C. L., and Worland, S. (1994) Cell 77, 761–771[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Mosimann, S. C., Cherney, M. M., Sia, S., Plotch, S., and James, M. N. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 273, 1032–1047[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
A. W. Maresso and O. Schneewind
Sortase as a Target of Anti-Infective Therapy
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2008; 60(1): 128 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
L. A. Marraffini, A. C. DeDent, and O. Schneewind
Sortases and the Art of Anchoring Proteins to the Envelopes of Gram-Positive Bacteria
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2006; 70(1): 192 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. T. Naik, N. Suree, U. Ilangovan, C. K. Liew, W. Thieu, D. O. Campbell, J. J. Clemens, M. E. Jung, and R. T. Clubb
Staphylococcus aureus Sortase A Transpeptidase: CALCIUM PROMOTES SORTING SIGNAL BINDING BY ALTERING THE MOBILITY AND STRUCTURE OF AN ACTIVE SITE LOOP
J. Biol. Chem., January 20, 2006; 281(3): 1817 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Marraffini, H. Ton-That, Y. Zong, S. V. L. Narayana, and O. Schneewind
Anchoring of Surface Proteins to the Cell Wall of Staphylococcus aureus: A CONSERVED ARGININE RESIDUE IS REQUIRED FOR EFFICIENT CATALYSIS OF SORTASE A
J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 37763 - 37770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Zong, T. W. Bice, H. Ton-That, O. Schneewind, and S. V. L. Narayana
Crystal Structures of Staphylococcus aureus Sortase A and Its Substrate Complex
J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31383 - 31389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/36/34061    most recent
M305245200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clubb, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Clubb, R. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.