![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 36, 34066-34072, September 5, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




¶
From the
Centre for Extremophile Research, the
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, and the
Department of Chemistry, University of Bath,
Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
Received for publication, June 3, 2003 , and in revised form, June 19, 2003.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The first reaction of the non-phosphorylative Entner-Doudoroff pathway involves the NAD(P)-dependent oxidation of glucose to gluconate, catalyzed by glucose dehydrogenase. Gluconate is then dehydrated by gluconate dehydratase to 2-keto-3-deoxygluconate (KDG),1 which undergoes an aldolate cleavage to pyruvate and glyceraldehyde, catalyzed by KDG aldolase. Glyceraldehyde dehydrogenase then oxidizes glyceraldehyde to glycerate, which is phosphorylated by glycerate kinase to give 2-phosphoglycerate. A second molecule of pyruvate is produced from this by the actions of enolase and pyruvate kinase.
Glucose dehydrogenase has previously been purified to homogeneity from cell extracts of S. solfataricus (11). It was shown to have broad substrate specificity, which implied a possible function in the oxidation of other sugars. The same enzyme was found to be responsible for galactose dehydrogenase activity in the extracts, and it was suggested that the enzymes of the non-phosphorylative Entner-Doudoroff pathway might be used for the metabolism of both glucose and galactose (11). This possibility was investigated in the current work by in vitro studies of glucose dehydrogenase and KDG aldolase. The successful cloning and expression of the KDG aldolase gene has been reported previously (12), and we now report the cloning and expression of the glucose dehydrogenase gene and kinetic analysis of both enzymes.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
General ProceduresProtein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (13) using a calibration curve constructed with bovine serum albumin. Polarimetry was carried out using an AA-10 automatic polarimeter (Optical Activity Ltd., Huntingdon, UK). NMR analysis was performed on an Avance 300 machine (Bruker, Coventry, UK). HPLC analysis was performed using a Bio-Rad Aminex HPX-87H Organic Analysis column (300 mm x 7.8 mm) linked to an RID-10A refractive index detector (Shimadzu, Milton Keynes, UK). Samples were eluted in 8 mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.55 ml·min1, and the system was calibrated with pyruvate, glyceraldehyde, D-KDG and 2-keto-3-deoxy-D-galactonate (D-KDGal). Enzyme activities were monitored spectrophotometrically using a Lambda Bio 230V machine (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Beaconsfield, UK) or a Cary 300 Bio machine (Varian Ltd., Walton-on-Thames, UK).
Preparation of S. solfataricus Cell ExtractsCell paste was
resuspended at
0.2 g/ml in 50 mM MES buffer, pH 5.5,
containing 20 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Cells were broken at 4 °C by four 30-s
bursts of sonication, using a 150-watt Ultrasonic Disintegrator (MSE
Scientific Instruments, Crawley, UK). Soluble cell extract was obtained by
centrifugation at 25,000 x g for 1 h at 4 °C.
Purification and N-terminal Sequencing of Glucose Dehydrogenase Glucose dehydrogenase was purified from soluble cell extracts by gel filtration using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 column (0.32 x 60 cm) (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) with 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.0, containing 20 mM MgCl2. Pooled fractions were then applied to a Cibacron blue F3GA affinity chromatography column and eluted with buffer containing 50 mM xylose and 0.5 mM NADP+. The pooled fractions containing glucose dehydrogenase activity were subjected to SDS-PAGE (14), and the entire gel was washed for 2 h in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. The gel was then submerged in an activity-staining solution, containing 0.65 mM NADP+, 0.4 mM nitro blue tetrazolium, 0.07 mM phenazine methosulfate, and 100 mM glucose in 40 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0. It was incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 1520 min or until a blue-brown band appeared. The resulting stained band was cut out of the gel, ground in 20 µl of loading buffer and subjected to further analysis by SDS-PAGE. The band corresponding to glucose dehydrogenase activity was electroblotted onto a hydrophobic polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and the N-terminal sequence was determined using a 470 gas-phase sequencer, coupled to a 120 phenylthiohydantoin analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK).
Glucose Dehydrogenase Gene Cloning and SequencingDegenerate PCR primers were designed based on each end of the N-terminal amino acid sequence obtained from the purified glucose dehydrogenase. PCR amplification, using S. solfataricus genomic DNA as template, yielded a 72-bp product which was radiolabeled using a High Prime DNA labeling kit (Roche Applied Science, Lewes, UK). The radiolabeled PCR product was used as a hybridization probe to screen a S. solfataricus genomic DNA library in lambda phage (15). Screening was carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (16), and a secondary screen was performed on initial positives. Lambda DNA was purified using the Wizard® Lambda Preps DNA Purification System (Promega, Southampton, UK), and DNA sequencing was carried out using the dideoxynucleotide chain-termination method (17) on a 377 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Glucose
DehydrogenaseThe glucose dehydrogenase gene was amplified from the
S. solfataricus lambda library using gene-specific primers to
introduce a unique NdeI site upstream of the initiating methionine
codon and a unique BamHI site downstream of the termination codon.
The PCR product was cloned into these sites of the pREC7 expression vector and
used to transform Escherichia coli strain JM109 (Promega). One-liter
cultures were grown in LB media containing carbenicillin (50 µg/ml) at 37
°C to A600 nm = 0.6, before induction with
nalidixic acid (50 µg/ml) and further incubation for 21 h. Cells were
harvested at 2000 x g for 10 min and resuspended at
0.2
g/ml in 50 mM MES buffer, pH 5.5, containing 20 mM
MgCl2. Cells were lysed by addition of 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and
lysozyme (100 µg/ml). After1hof incubation at 37 °C, followed by five
30-s bursts of sonication at 4 °C, cell debris was removed by
centrifugation. The resulting extract was heated at 80 °C for 30 min, and
precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation. The extract was further
purified by a Matrex gel Red A column (2 x 30 cm) using the MES buffer
with a 01.5 M NaCl elution gradient.
Glucose Dehydrogenase AssayGlucose dehydrogenase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by following the increase in absorbance at 340 nm, corresponding to the reduction of NADP+, over 1 min at 70 °C. The standard assay mixture (1 ml) contained 0.5 mM NADP+, 5 mM glucose, and 20 mM MgCl2 in 100 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5 at 70 °C). Enzyme kinetic analysis was performed with 10 mM NAD+ or 1 mM NADP+ at various concentrations of glucose or galactose. Kinetic parameters were determined by the direct linear method of Eisenthal and Cornish-Bowden (18).
Expression and Purification of Recombinant KDG AldolaseS.
solfataricus KDG aldolase was expressed using the pET-3a expression
vector (Novagen, Nottingham, UK) with the gene cloned into the NdeI
and BamHI restriction sites. One-liter cultures of E. coli
BL21(DE3) (Novagen) containing the vector were grown overnight at 37 °C
without induction. Cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended at
0.2 g/ml in water. They were lysed by two passes through a cell disruptor
(One-shot model, Constant Systems, Warwick, UK) at 200 MPa before heat
precipitation at 95 °C for 30 min. Debris was removed by centrifugation at
18,000 x g for 30 min, and the resulting KDG aldolase sample
was lyophilized.
Synthesis and Analysis of
D-GlyceraldehydeD-Glyceraldehyde was
synthesized by periodate cleavage of
1,25,6-di-O-isopropylidene-D-mannitol
(19). The sample was purified
by silica gel flash chromatography in dichloromethane:methanol (9:1) and
analyzed by HPLC and 1H NMR spectroscopy. Its enantiomeric purity
was confirmed by polarimetry and derivatization with
L-()-
-methylbenzylamine in a procedure modified from
that used by Oshima and Kumanotani
(20). 25 mg of
D-glyceraldehyde in 0.5 ml of H2O was mixed with an
equal volume of methanol containing 67.5 mg of
L-()-
-methylbenzylamine and 10 mg of sodium
cyanoborohydride. The mixture was allowed to stand overnight before being
evaporated to dryness and subjected to 1H NMR spectroscopic
analysis in deuterated methanol. Samples of
DL-glyceraldehyde and L-glyceraldehyde were
analyzed in a similar way.
KDG Aldolase-catalyzed Condensation between D-Glyceraldehyde and PyruvateApproximately 1 g of D-glyceraldehyde was mixed with 2.2 g of sodium pyruvate (2-fold molar excess) in 100 ml of water containing 5 mg of lyophilized S. solfataricus KDG aldolase. The reaction was heated at 50 °C in a shaking incubator, and regular samples were taken over 9 h. 500-µl samples were added to 100 µl of 12% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged before HPLC analysis. The remaining reaction mix was lyophilized, and the diastereomers were separated by Dowex 1X8-formate anion exchange chromatography, using a 00.6 M formic acid elution gradient. Diastereomers were identified by NMR analysis of the methyl ester by comparison to literature spectra (21, 22). Separated samples of D-KDG and D-KDGal were dried over P2O5 before analysis by polarimetry and HPLC.
Coupled Assay for S. solfataricus KDG AldolaseA continuous assay was developed to assay S. solfataricus KDG aldolase in the cleavage direction using the L-lactic dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus as a coupling enzyme (23). Assays were performed at 60 °C in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, containing 5 mM fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and 0.2 mM NADH. Various concentrations of D-KDG or D-KDGal were added from 1 M stock solutions, and rates were monitored by a decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. Appropriate controls were performed to ensure the requirements for coupled enzymatic analysis were met (24), and kinetic parameters were determined by the direct linear method (18).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
41,000 by
preparative SDS-PAGE. N-terminal sequencing was successfully carried out on
this protein and determined to be MKAIIVKPPNAGVQVKDVDEKEPE. A DNA probe
corresponding to this sequence was generated by PCR amplification and, after
radiolabeling, was used to identify the full gene sequence from a genomic DNA
library in lambda phage. The gene was found to encode a polypeptide of 366
amino acids with a predicted Mr of 40,849. The nucleotide
sequence data were deposited in the GenBankTM sequence data base in
October 1998 under the accession number AJ012093
[GenBank]
and are annotated in
Fig. 2. In addition to the open
reading frame a TATA box, TTTATA, was found 2833 nucleotides upstream
of the start codon, followed by a putative Shine-Dalgarno sequence 614
nucleotides upstream. T-rich polypyrimidine termination sequences, as
described by Reiter et al.
(25), were found 2126
and 3541 bp downstream of the stop codon.
|
Characterization of Recombinant Glucose Dehydrogenase The
recombinant enzyme was successfully expressed in E. coli with a
specific activity of 2 units/mg in cell extracts. It was purified to
homogeneity by heat precipitation and Matrex gel Red A affinity
chromatography, as assessed by SDS-PAGE. Calibrated gel filtration of the
purified enzyme was consistent with a tetrameric structure with
Mr of
160,000. The enzyme was found to have activity
with a number of alternative sugar substrates and to possess dual cofactor
specificity, as listed in Table
I. These features are shared with the glucose dehydrogenase from
the related thermoacidophile T. acidophilum
(26) and the enzyme from other
archaeal sources (27,
28).
|
Analysis of the translated amino acid sequence has shown that the enzyme is
a putative member of the medium-chain alcohol/polyol dehydrogenase/reductase
branch of the superfamily of pyridine-nucleotide-dependent
alcohol/polyol/sugar dehydrogenases
(29). These enzymes are
characterized by a chain length of 350375 residues and conserved
structural zinc-binding and nucleotide-binding sites. They possess a
characteristic GXGXXG/A fingerprint motif
(30) in the classic





nucleotide-binding fold
(31). In T.
acidophilum glucose dehydrogenase the dual cofactor specificity has been
rationalized by the presence of asparagine and histidine residues at positions
215 and 217, in conjunction with a GXGXXA motif
(32). The enzyme from S.
solfataricus was found to have a GXGXXG motif from
residues 188193 and a structurally equivalent asparagine residue at
position 211 (Fig. 2). Arg-213
is likely to take the place of His-217, allowing stabilization of the
adenosine 2-phosphate of NADP. These features provide a plausible structural
explanation for the observed dual cofactor specificity of the S.
solfataricus enzyme.
S. solfataricus glucose dehydrogenase was found to possess four conserved cysteine residues at positions 93, 96, 99, and 107, which are equivalent to the residues involved in the coordinate binding of a zinc atom in the T. acidophilum enzyme (32). In addition, it was found to possess the catalytic zinc-binding residues Cys-39 and His-66, which align well with highly conserved Cys and His residues present throughout the whole alcohol dehydrogenase family (33). In support of this mechanism, activity in the standard assay was reduced by 60% in the presence of 10 mM EDTA, although there was no significant increase in the presence of ZnCl2, CaCl2, or MgCl2, at final concentrations of 0.1 mM.
As listed in Table I, the glucose dehydrogenase from S. solfataricus has activity with a number of alternative aldose sugars. Activity was found with D-galactose, the C4 epimer of D-glucose, although not with D-allose or D-mannose, the C3 and C2 epimers. Activity was also observed with D-xylose, an aldopentose sugar with identical configuration to glucose at C2, C3, and C4. Good activity was observed with its C4 epimer L-arabinose but not with its C3 or C2 epimers D-ribose or D-xylose. It therefore appears that the enzyme has a preference for the glucose-specific stereo-configuration at C2 and C3 but accepts either configuration at C4. The C2 derivatives D-glucosamine and 2-deoxy-D-glucose showed very little activity, which may indicate an interaction with the enzyme at this position. The fact that aldopentoses serve as substrates and that 6-deoxy-D-glucose has activity, shows the diminished importance of the configuration at C5 and C6. D-Fucose, the 6-deoxy derivative of D-galactose also had activity, which again confirms that the enzyme can accept either configuration at the C4 position.
Because of the potential metabolic significance of a dual activity with D-glucose and D-galactose, discussed later, the enzyme was subjected to further kinetic analysis with both substrates and the determined parameters are listed in Table II. Although the maximum rate with D-glucose is higher than the value for D-galactose, the lower observed Km with the latter gives it a higher catalytic efficiency. The Km value for D-glucose with NADP+ was found to be 1.30 (±0.05) mM, which is close to that observed for the enzyme purified from S. solfataricus cells.
|
Synthesis of D-GlyceraldehydeProblems were
encountered establishing a reliable commercial source of
D-glyceraldehyde, and it was therefore synthesized as required by
the periodate cleavage of
1,25,6-di-O-isopropylidene-D-mannitol. This
reaction affords two molecules of isopropylidene-D-glyceraldehyde,
which is converted to D-glyceraldehyde by treatment with
H2SO4. Product was shown to be free from contaminants by
HPLC and 1H NMR spectroscopy, and its enantiomeric purity was
assessed by polarimetry. The determined optical rotation,
(c = 2, H2O), was well within the reported range of
+7° to +14° (34). The
enantiomeric purity was further confirmed by derivatization with
L-()-
-methylbenzylamine, which yielded
diastereometrically pure
(S,S)-3-(1-phenylethylamine)propane-1,2-diol, as assessed by
1H NMR spectroscopy. This was compared with the other diastereomer
obtained in an equivalent reaction with L-glyceraldehyde.
KDG Aldolase SelectivityD-Glyceraldehyde samples
were used in an aldol condensation reaction with pyruvate, catalyzed by
recombinant S. solfataricus KDG aldolase. The reaction progress was
monitored by calibrated HPLC analysis as shown on the graph in
Fig. 3A. Unexpectedly,
the condensation resulted in the presence of two diastereometric products,
indicating a lack of facial selectivity in the enzyme-catalyzed reaction.
These two product peaks are clearly visible on HPLC traces, throughout the
time course of the reaction (Fig.
3B). The diastereometric products, D-KDG and
D-KDGal, were separated by anion exchange chromatography, and their
identity was confirmed by NMR analysis of the methyl ester
(21). Polarimetry was carried
out on the separated products and revealed the expected specific rotation for
D-KDG (35) and
D-KDGal (36).
D-KDG:
(c = 1.3, H2O), Lit.
(c = 1.3, H2O). D-KDGal:
(c = 2, H2O), Lit.
(c = 1.65, H2O).
|
In an equivalent experiment with racemic glyceraldehyde, the separated diastereomers did not give the expected specific rotations for single enantiomer products. This is due to the formation of KDG and KDGal as mixtures of enantiomers. In reactions between L-glyceraldehyde and pyruvate there was a similar lack of facial selectivity as observed for D-glyceraldehyde, revealed by two peaks in HPLC analysis (data not shown). In this case the enzyme is catalyzing the formation of diastereomers L-KDG and L-KDGal. In all cases the results clearly show there is little facial selectivity in the enzyme-catalyzed aldol condensation.
KDG Aldolase KineticsPurified D-KDG and D-KDGal were used for enzyme kinetic analysis in the aldolate cleavage direction using a coupled assay with the L-lactic dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus. The determined kinetic parameters are listed in Table III. The lower activity with D-KDGal is partially compensated by its lower observed Km, which increases the catalytic efficiency. The Km for D-KDG of 25.7 (±1.2) mM is high compared with the values of 1.0 (±0.1) mM for pyruvate and 3.9 (±0.3) mM for D-glyceraldehyde (12). However, the existence of KDG and KDGal in pyranose and furanose ring forms (22) may have implications for in vitro studies of the aldolase-catalyzed reaction, which must operate via the straight-chain form of the sugar.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although S. solfataricus grows autotrophically in its geothermal
habitat by the oxidation of elemental sulfur, it is considered to be an
opportunistic heterotroph (2).
Growth studies have revealed that strains of the organism can utilize both
glucose and galactose as the sole carbon source, in addition to disaccharides
containing them, such as cellobiose and lactose. Studies of
-glucosidase
from the organism have shown that the same enzyme is also responsible for
-galactosidase activity
(38). The catalytic
promiscuity of this enzyme means it can cleave
-linked glucose sugars
such as cellobiose, yielding two molecules of glucose, and can also cleave
-linked galactose-containing sugars such as lactose, yielding one
molecule of glucose and one molecule of galactose. Two independent studies of
sugar transport in S. solfataricus have revealed convincing evidence
that a single, high affinity transporter is responsible for the uptake of both
glucose and galactose into the cells
(39,
40). Taken alongside the
evidence for glucose dehydrogenase and KDG aldolase reported herein, it
appears that at no point during uptake and catabolism does the organism
distinguish between the two sugars.
There remains a question over the gluconate dehydratase activity in this metabolic pathway. Investigation into dehydratases has been hindered by lack of a simple enzymatic assay and their uncertain annotation in the published genomic sequences. However, recent analysis has led to the identification of two putative dehydratase genes in the genomic sequence of S. solfataricus strain P2 and one of these exists in an operon with the KDG aldolase gene.2
The discovery of a "promiscuous" pathway in S. solfataricus defines an unusual metabolic phenomenon when compared with related pathways in other organisms. Selectivity studies of the aldolases are central to investigating this because of their position at the critical branch-point of these pathways. In the aldolate cleavage reaction C6 sugar acids are converted to two C3 compounds with the concomitant loss of one chiral center.
In addition to S. solfataricus, the non-phosphorylative Entner-Doudoroff pathway is also found in strains of Aspergillus fungi, including Aspergillus niger (9). A condensation reaction between D-glyceraldehyde and pyruvate using glucose-grown mycelia resulted in the synthesis of D-KDG in a large diastereometric excess (41), indicating that the KDG aldolase in this organism does exhibit facial selectivity. An equivalent, inducible pathway exists in the organism for the catabolism of galactose, involving a separate KDGal aldolase with the opposite facial selectivity (42). The KDGal aldolase has also been investigated in Aspergillus terreus and shown to produce diastereometrically pure D-KDGal in a condensation between D-glyceraldehyde and pyruvate (43).
The classic Entner-Doudoroff pathway is widely distributed throughout both eukaryotes and bacteria (44, 45). In this pathway glucose is phosphorylated to glucose 6-phosphate, which is oxidized to 6-phosphogluconate before being dehydrated to 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate (KDPG). KDPG aldolase then catalyzes the reversible aldolate cleavage of KDPG to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and pyruvate. Studies of KDPG aldolase from various organisms have shown that this enzyme also exhibits facial selectivity and consequently does not have activity with 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogalactonate (KDPGal) (46). In many cases the Delay-Doudoroff pathway exists in these organisms as an equivalent route for the catabolism of galactose (47). The enzymes of this pathway are often inducibly expressed and include an alternative KDPGal aldolase with the opposite facial selectivity (48). In the case of S. solfataricus the lack of facial selectivity in the aldolase-catalyzed reaction is unusual and permits the same enzyme to be used for the cleavage of KDG and KDGal, both yielding glyceraldehyde and pyruvate.
Strains of Sulfolobus have been found to grow autotrophically (49) and contain glycogen stores (50). Both these features require gluconeogenesis, the nature of which has not been elucidated in the organism (2). It is now clear that a gluconeogenic sequence involving the promiscuous Entner-Doudoroff pathway would result in the formation of a mixture of glucose and galactose, because of the non-selective KDG aldolase-catalyzed reaction. This implies that gluconeogenesis in Sulfolobus is likely to occur via a reversal of the classic Embden-Meyerhoff-Parnas glycolytic pathway and not by a reversal of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway.
It seems likely that the metabolic pathway promiscuity of S. solfataricus will extend to closely related thermoacidophilic Archaea, such as T. acidophilum. This is supported by study of the glucose dehydrogenase in T. acidophilum, which also has a high relative activity with galactose (26). It is also possible the phenomenon extends to the part-phosphorylative Entner-Doudoroff pathway of halophilic Archaea, which would explain the failed attempts of Tomlinson et al. (51, 52) to isolate separate enzymes for the breakdown of glucose and galactose. This pathway involves the KDG kinase-catalyzed phosphorylation of KDG, which is then cleaved to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and pyruvate by KDPG aldolase. If the enzymes of this pathway are also responsible for galactose metabolism, it requires KDG kinase and KDPG aldolase to have activity with KDGal and KDPGal, respectively.
Hyperthermophiles constitute the deepest-branching organisms in the rRNA-based universal tree of life, and this still holds in phylogenies constructed using whole genome sequence data, despite evidence of large-scale horizontal gene transfer (53). Enzyme catalytic promiscuity is predicted to play a critical role in the evolution of new enzyme activities (54), and it is conceivable that promiscuity of an entire metabolic pathway is indicative of an early evolutionary state. However, it is unclear whether this promiscuous pathway in S. solfataricus reflects a primitive metabolic route or whether it is simply an adaptation to the hostile thermoacidophilic environment of the organism, allowing it to scavenge efficiently for energy substrates.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1225-386-509; Fax: 44-1225-386-779; E-mail: M.J.Danson{at}bath.ac.uk.
1 The abbreviations used are: KDG, 2-keto-3-deoxygluconate; KDGal,
2-keto-3-deoxygalactonate; KDPG, 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate; KDPGal,
2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogalactonate; HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid. ![]()
2 J. A. Gerlt, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, personal
communication. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Watanabe, M. Saimura, and K. Makino Eukaryotic and Bacterial Gene Clusters Related to an Alternative Pathway of Nonphosphorylated L-Rhamnose Metabolism J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2008; 283(29): 20372 - 20382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zaparty, A. Zaigler, C. Stamme, J. Soppa, R. Hensel, and B. Siebers DNA Microarray Analysis of Central Carbohydrate Metabolism: Glycolytic/Gluconeogenic Carbon Switch in the Hyperthermophilic Crenarchaeum Thermoproteus tenax J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2008; 190(6): 2231 - 2238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nishimasu, S. Fushinobu, H. Shoun, and T. Wakagi Crystal Structures of an ATP-dependent Hexokinase with Broad Substrate Specificity from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9923 - 9931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Milburn, H. J. Lamble, A. Theodossis, S. D. Bull, D. W. Hough, M. J. Danson, and G. L. Taylor The Structural Basis of Substrate Promiscuity in Glucose Dehydrogenase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2006; 281(21): 14796 - 14804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. J. Brouns, N. Smits, H. Wu, A. P. L. Snijders, P. C. Wright, W. M. de Vos, and J. van der Oost Identification of a Novel {alpha}-Galactosidase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. J. Bacteriol., April 1, 2006; 188(7): 2392 - 2399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nishimasu, S. Fushinobu, H. Shoun, and T. Wakagi Identification and Characterization of an ATP-Dependent Hexokinase with Broad Substrate Specificity from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii. J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2006; 188(5): 2014 - 2019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim and S. B. Lee Catalytic Promiscuity in Dihydroxy-Acid Dehydratase from the Thermoacidophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. J. Biochem., March 1, 2006; 139(3): 591 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Watanabe, T. Kodak, and K. Makino Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of Bacterial L-Arabinose 1-Dehydrogenase Involved in an Alternative Pathway of L-Arabinose Metabolism J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2612 - 2623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Theodossis, H. Walden, E. J. Westwick, H. Connaris, H. J. Lamble, D. W. Hough, M. J. Danson, and G. L. Taylor The Structural Basis for Substrate Promiscuity in 2-Keto-3-deoxygluconate Aldolase from the Entner-Doudoroff Pathway in Sulfolobus solfataricus J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43886 - 43892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Johnsen and P. Schonheit Novel Xylose Dehydrogenase in the Halophilic Archaeon Haloarcula marismortui J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2004; 186(18): 6198 - 6207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Futterer, A. Angelov, H. Liesegang, G. Gottschalk, C. Schleper, B. Schepers, C. Dock, G. Antranikian, and W. Liebl Genome sequence of Picrophilus torridus and its implications for life around pH 0 PNAS, June 15, 2004; 101(24): 9091 - 9096. [Abstract] |