JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M303549200 on July 2, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 37, 35660-35667, September 12, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/37/35660    most recent
M303549200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Umehara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Horikoshi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Umehara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Horikoshi, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Transcription Initiation Factor IID-interactive Histone Chaperone CIA-II Implicated in Mammalian Spermatogenesis*

Takashi Umehara and Masami Horikoshi {ddagger}

From the Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032 and the Horikoshi Gene Selector Project, Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 5-9-6 Tokodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 300-2635, Japan

Received for publication, April 5, 2003 , and in revised form, June 3, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Histones are thought to have specific roles in mammalian spermatogenesis, because several subtypes of histones emerge that are post-translationally modified during spermatogenesis. Though regular assembly of nucleosome is guaranteed by histone chaperones, their involvement in spermatogenesis is yet to be characterized. Here we identified a histone chaperone-related factor, which we designated as CCG1-interacting factor A-II (CIA-II), through interaction with bromodomains of TAFII250/CCG1, which is the largest subunit of human transcription initiation factor IID (TFIID). We found that human CIA-II (hCIA-II) localizes in HeLa nuclei and is highly expressed in testis and other proliferating cell-containing tissues. Expression of mouse CIA-II (mCIA-II) does not occur in the germ cell-lacking testes of adult WBB6F1-W/Wv mutant mice, indicating its expression in testis to be specific to germ cells. Fractionation of testicular germ cells revealed that mCIA-II transcripts accumulate in pachytene spermatocytes but not in spermatids. In addition, the mCIA-II transcripts in testis were present as early as 4 days after birth and decreased at 56 days after birth. These findings indicate that mCIA-II expression in testis is restricted to premeiotic to meiotic stages during spermatogenesis. Also, we found that hCIA-II interacts with histone H3 in vivo and with histones H3/H4 in vitro and that it facilitates supercoiling of circular DNA when it is incubated with core histones and topoisomerase I in vitro. These data suggest that CIA-II is a histone chaperone and is implicated in the regulation of mammalian spermatogenesis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Eukaryotic genomic DNA is packaged into a nucleoprotein complex of nucleosomes and forms chromatin structure in a nucleus (1). Conversion of nucleosome structure is a critical step in the regulation of DNA-mediated transactions (24). In addition to histone-modifying enzymes (i.e. acetyltransferase, deacetylase, and methylase) and chromatin-remodeling factors (i.e. ATPase), histone chaperone is a type of protein that modulates formation of nucleosomes (5, 6). It binds to core histones and facilitates conversion of the topology of the relaxed form of a circular plasmid DNA into the supercoiled form in the presence of topoisomerase I and core histones (5). This conversion activity is considered to stimulate assembly of histones and DNA and is therefore called nucleosome assembly activity. Such activity was confirmed by micrococcal nuclease digestion assay, where DNA ladders were detected as a gel electrophoresis pattern when histones and DNA were incubated with a histone chaperone (5). This category of proteins with nucleosome assembly activity includes nucleoplasmin (7), nucleosome assembly protein-I (NAP-I)1 (8, 9), template-activating factor-I (TAF-I) (10), suppressor of Ty 6 (11), and CCG1-interacting factor A (CIA) (12).

CIA is the most conserved histone chaperone characterized to date (12). It was identified as human factor that interacts with human cell cycle gene 1 (hCCG1), which is the largest subunit of hTFIID (12, 13). TFIID is the key factor responsible for specific binding with the TATA box, which is the basal sequence observed within the promoter of typical eukaryotic genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II (14). CCG1 associates with TATA box-binding protein (TBP) (15) and inhibits binding of TBP onto TATA box via its N-terminal region (16, 17). To date, CIA is the only histone chaperone known to associate with TFIID, through interaction with the bromodomain-containing domain of CCG1 (12, 13).

The gene encoding CIA counterpart in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was genetically identified as anti-silencing function-1 (ASF1) that causes derepression of genes located at silenced loci when it is exogeneously overexpressed (1820). Yeast Asf1p was shown to have nucleosome assembly activity as well, and its highly conserved domain is essential for histone binding, nucleosome assembly, cell growth, and anti-silencing activities, indicating preservation of the function of CIA/Asf1p throughout evolution (20). Through such activities, CIA is thought to contribute chromatin DNA-mediated reactions such as gene transcription (13) as well as DNA replication (21) and DNA repair (18).

Involvement of Asf1p in gene transcription is suggested by its suppressor of Ty phenotype-causing activity (13). More importantly, Asf1p physically associates with yeast bromodomain factor 1 (yBdf1p) (13). It has been reported that yBdf1p acts as the missing bromodomain in yCCG1/TAFII145, which is the counterpart for hCCG1 in S. cerevisiae but lacks C-terminal tandem bromodomains (22). These reports strongly indicate functional involvement of CIA/Asf1p in both gene transcription and gene silencing. Also, CCG1 is involved in the cell cycle regulation because expression of CCG1 gene complements growth defect of hamster cell lines tsBN462 and ts13 at nonpermissive temperature (2327). Because the TFIID-interactive histone acetyltransferase Tip60 (28, 29) is responsible for regulation of apoptotic cell death (30), CIA, as a TFIID-interactive histone chaperone, might also control cell fate of multicellular organisms (31). However, contribution of TFIID-interactive chromatin factors in multicellular organisms, such as in development and cell differentiation, is poorly understood.

Because TFIID-binding onto a promoter before nucleosomal formation is essential for gene activation in vitro (32) and TFIID subunits exhibit sequence similarities to core histones (3336), we thought that TFIID associates with chromatin-mediated molecules. In this aspect, we screened mammalian factors that interact with TFIID to identify novel chromatin-mediated molecules by using a human two-hybrid cDNA library (12). During the screening, in addition to the cloning of human CIA cDNA (12), to our surprise we isolated human cDNA encoding a novel factor that has sequence similarity to CIA. Through subsequent analysis of the corresponding gene, which we designated CIA-II, we found that CIA-II transcripts are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, whereas those for CIA are expressed in an apparently ubiquitous manner. Although a subtype of histone acetyltransferases was also recently shown to be involved in spermatogenesis (37), involvement of histone chaperones in the regulation of mammalian development or differentiation is poorly characterized. To better understand the role of histone chaperones in development and cellular differentiation, we investigated the expression profiles of CIA-II during spermatogenesis because testis highly expresses CIA-II transcripts compared with other organs. Here, we describe the expression analyses, which indicate involvement of CIA-II in the premeiotic to meiotic stages of spermatogenesis, as well as explain its biochemical characteristics as a histone chaperone.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen—We isolated the cDNA of CIA-II by using a yeast two-hybrid screen (12, 38, 39), searching for factors that interact with bromodomain (residues 1342–1629) of human CCG1, a subunit of TFIID. A human peripheral lymphocyte cDNA library fused to the Gal4 activation domain in pACT was co-transformed with the pAS1-CYH2-CCG1 plasmid (12) in Y190 yeast cells. Yeast transformants (~0.9 x 106 cells) were cultured on Trp(–) Leu(–) plates and replicated on Trp(–) Leu(–) His(–) plates containing 25 mM 3-aminotriazole. The resultant colonies were tested for {beta}-galactosidase activity by using X-gal (Wako). This assay for detecting specific interactions was done as previously described (12, 36). By this screening, we isolated two independent clones that have an ~1.6 kbp insert DNA that contains CIA-II sequences. We sequenced one of the clones (BRD 101) and found that this insert DNA consists of 1659 nucleotides and contains the full-length sequence of CIA-II. The entire coding sequence of CIA-II cDNA was also identified as anti-silencing function 1B (ASF1B) (40) or hypothetical protein FLJ10604 (GenBankTM accession numbers AF279307 [GenBank] and NM_018154 [GenBank] , respectively). For confirmation of protein-protein interaction, we constructed plasmid with "bait" cDNA in "prey" vector (pACTII) and plasmid with "prey" cDNA in "bait: vector (pAS1-CYH2) by excising the inserted cDNA with appropriate restriction enzymes and then ligating it with the other vector in its open reading frame. The co-transformants of pAS1-CYH2 and pACTII derivatives were spotted on filters (PROTRAN BA 85; Schleicher & Schuell) and tested for {beta}-galactosidase activity. We used a cDNA for histone H3.3 (residues 97–135) for the interaction assay with CIA-II because this clone was obtained as an interactor for CIA (12). The sequence of H3.3 is the same as the corresponding region of somatic histone H3.

Subcellular Localization—Each human cDNA that encodes CIA-II, CIA, or TBP was respectively cloned into {beta}-galactosidase expression vector pCH110. Forty micrograms of plasmid DNA were transformed into HeLa or COS cells. Resultant cells were incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 4–8 h. Cells were further incubated in 10 ml of fresh Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 2 days. After the cells were then rinsed with PBS, 10 ml of PBS containing 2% formaldehyde and 0.2% gluteraldehyde was added to the cells. After 10 min of incubation at 4 °C, 10 ml of PBS containing 1 mg/ml X-gal, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, and 2 mM MgCl2 was added to the cells. After incubation at 37 °C under 5% CO2, cells were rinsed with PBS. X-gal-stained cells were observed and photographed by using an optical microscope and a camera.

Isolation of Mouse CIA-II cDNA—Partial cDNAs that encode mouse CIA-II or CIA were screened from mouse poly(A)+ RNA by RT-PCR using 5'-GA(A/G)TGGAA(A/G)(A/C)TIA(C/T)ITA(C/T)GT-3' (sense) as the forward primer and using 5'-TCCCAI(A/T)(C/T)IAT(A/G)T(G/T)(A/G)AAIC(G/T)IGTIAC-3' (antisense) as the reverse primer, corresponding to +115 to +134 and +436 to +461 of human CIA (12), respectively. Poly(A)+ RNA isolated from testis and other tissues was used as templates. RT-PCR involved 30 cycles of the following three steps: 1.5 min at 95 °C, 2 min at 37 °C, and 3 min at 63 °C. Amplified DNA products were cloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript II SK(–) (Stratagene) and sequenced. The nucleotide sequences similar to that of human CIA-II or that of human CIA were obtained. The mouse DNA fragments that were conserved with human CIA-II sequences were labeled with [32P]dCTP by random priming (Roche Applied Science) for Northern blot analysis.

Preparation and Separation of Testicular Germ Cells—Male ICR mice (Nippon Bio-Supp. Center) were used for mouse RNA blot analyses. The testes of WBB6F1-W/Wv and WBB6F1+/+ mice (Shizuoka Experimental Animal Farm) were used for the mutant analysis (Fig. 4). Preparation of testicular germ cells was essentially the same as that previously described (41). In brief, testes were dissected from 20 adult (8-week-old) male mice, and the tunic albuginea was removed by using forceps and then placed in PBS containing 0.1% glucose. The seminiferous tubule masses were incubated in PBS containing 0.1% glucose and 0.1% collagenase S1 for 20 min at 33 °C. The dissociated seminiferous tubules were washed with PBS containing 0.1% glucose, then resuspended in PBS containing 0.1% glucose, 200 units/ml of trypsin, and 120 units/ml DNaseI, and finally incubated for 10 min at 31 °C. The suspension was placed on ice, and then 8% fetal calf serum, 0.1% soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 500 units/ml of DNaseI were added. After the suspension was filtered, centrifugal elutriation of mouse testicular germ cells was carried out with a Beckman JE6 elutriator (42).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Spermatogenic expression of mCIA-II. A, isolation of mouse CIA-II cDNA by RT-PCR. Human CIA-II and CIA proteins are schematically shown as a rectangle labeled from 1–202 and 1–204, respectively. N-terminal, central, and C-terminal segment are shaded yellow, orange, and light green, respectively. Numbers indicate amino acids at the edges of segmentation. Sequence identity of each segment is represented by percentage. Positions of DNA primers for RT-PCR and amplified mCIA-II fragment used for subsequent Northern blot analysis are shown as arrows and a bar at the bottom, respectively. B, loss of mCIA-II transcripts in the testes of adult WBB6F1-W/Wv mice. Fifty micrograms of total RNA harvested from the testes of WBB6F1+/+ (lane 1) and WBB6F1-W/Wv mutant mice (lane 2) were loaded. mCIA-II (upper), testis-specific mS-II-T1 (middle), or human {beta}-actin cDNA (lower) were used as probes. C, microscopic images of each cell fraction. Fractions rich in pachytene spermatocytes (a), round spermatids (b), elongated spermatids (c), and residual bodies (d) are compared with that of whole testis (e). D, accumulation of mCIA-II transcripts at different developmental stages of testicular germ cells. Northern blot analysis was done using four different stages of male germ cells. Twenty micrograms of total RNA prepared from fractions rich in pachytene spermatocytes (lane 1), round spermatids (lane 2), elongated spermatids (lane 3), residual bodies (lane 4), and directly from whole testis (lane 5) were blotted onto the membrane and hybridized with mCIA-II (upper), testis-specific mS-II-T1 (middle), or human {beta}-actin cDNA (lower).

 

RNA Blot Analysis—Filters for the human Northern blot analysis (multiple tissue Northern blot; Clontech) were hybridized at 42 °C in a solution containing 50% formamide, 10x Denhardt's solution, 5x SSPE, 2% SDS, and 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA for 16 h with either the [32P]dCTP-labeled human CIA-II XbaI-XhoI fragment-(+780–+1671), human CIA HindIII-XhoI fragment-(+534–+950), or {beta}-actin gene. The filters were washed three times at room temperature in a solution of 2x SSC and 0.05% SDS for 10 min and then twice at 50 °C in 0.1x SSC and 0.1% SDS for 20 min. Autoradiography was performed with intensifying screens at –80 °C for 6 days. Mouse RNA was prepared by the acid guanidine/phenol/chloroform (AGPC) method (43). Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated by using Oligotex-dT30 (Takara Shuzo) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. RNA was electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose-formaldehyde gel and transferred to a nylon filter (Gene Screen plus; PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Filters for the mouse Northern blot analysis were hybridized at 42 °C in a solution containing 50% formamide, 10x Denhardt's solution, 5x SSPE, 2% SDS, and 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA for 12 h using the mouse CIA-II cDNA fragment (nucleotides 213–559) labeled with [32P]dCTP. Filters were washed three times at room temperature in 2x SSC for 10 min and then twice at 50 °C in 2x SSC and 0.1% SDS for 20 min. Then, exposure was done for 1 day. The same procedures were performed using human {beta}-actin cDNA (Clontech) and the EcoRI-XhoI fragment of mouse S-II-T1 gene (41) as controls.

Recombinant Proteins—cDNA encoding full-length of human CIA-II was inserted into pGEX-5X-2 (Amersham Biosciences) to produce the GST·CIA-II fusion protein. GST·CIA-II was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) and extracted in BA-500 (BA: 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 0.35% 2-mercaptoethanol; BA-500 contains 500 mM NaCl) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 20 µg/ml of leupeptin and pepstatin A. The extract was then incubated with glutathione-Sepharose resin (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with BA-500, and adsorbed proteins were eluted in BA-0 (i.e. no NaCl) containing 20 mM reduced glutathione. The eluted fraction was loaded on a Poros HQ column (PerSeptive Biosystems) equilibrated with BA-0 and eluted with a linear gradient from 0.2 to 1 M NaCl. GST·CIA-II protein was eluted at about 0.4 M NaCl. Core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 from HeLa cells were purified as a mixture using a hydroxylapatite column (Bio-Rad) (44).

GST Pull-down Assay—The method for the GST pull-down assay was described previously (12). Glutathione-Sepharose resin (Amersham Biosciences) was equilibrated with the binding buffer (pH 7.5, 25 mM HEPES-NaOH, 200 mM KCl, 13 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, and 0.3% 2-mercaptoethanol), and purified recombinant protein (0.2 µg) was bound to the resin. HeLa core histones (3.6 µg) were then added and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h, with rotation. The resin was washed in the same buffer, and bound proteins were eluted with 15 µl of SDS loading buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE.

Plasmid Supercoiling Assay—Nucleosome assembly reactions were performed as follows (11). Covalently closed circular plasmid DNA pBluescript II SK (–) (2.96 kbp) was relaxed by wheat germ topoisomerase I (Promega). Relaxed circular DNA (0.1 µg; with 5 units of topoisomerase I) was combined with purified recombinant GST or GST·CIA protein (0.5 µg) and HeLa core histones (0.3 µg) in the assembly buffer (pH 7.5; 50 µl final volume; 10 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) containing 2 mM ATP. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and then incubated for 30 min to stop the reaction after adding an equal volume of the stop A buffer (20 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 1% SDS, and 200 µg/ml proteinase K). Plasmid was extracted by phenol-chloroform and precipitated with ethanol. Purified plasmid was subjected to 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of Histone Chaperone-related Factor CIA-II— In a previous study, we isolated human cDNA for histone chaperone CIA by a yeast two-hybrid screen using cDNA that encodes the bromodomain-containing fragment of human CCG1 (CCG1-BrD) as bait (12). From this screening, we simultaneously obtained an ~1.6 kbp insert cDNA that encodes the polypeptide consisting of 202 amino acids in the correct coding frame. Because this sequence is similar to that of human CIA, we designated this putative product as CIA-II. As shown in the assay (Fig. 1A), the colony that co-expresses the full-length of CIA-II fused to Gal4 activation domain and CCG1-BrD fused to Gal4 DNA-binding domain exhibits dark blue color in the X-gal assay (38). This assay also showed that the combination of SNF1-SNF4 and CCG1-BrD-CIA was a positive control of interaction and that other combinations yielding white colonies indicated negative interaction between exogenous products in yeast cells. As judged from the colony's color, interaction between CIA-II and CCG1-BrD was apparently as strong as that between CIA and CCG1-BrD (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, we tested the interaction of CIA-II with other baits, such as TAFIIs (i.e. hTAFII80), or with other domains of hCCG1, such as high mobility group (HMG) box-like domain, but none of them detects any positive interaction (data not shown). To further exclude the possibility that these interactions might be false positives because of artificial expression, we reconstructed plasmid with bait cDNA in prey vector (pACTII) and that with prey cDNA in bait vector (pAS1-CYH2). The results (Fig. 1B) showed that the co-transformants of CIA-II fused to Gal4 DNA-binding domain and CCG1-BrD fused to Gal4 activation domain did indeed form a dark blue colony in the X-gal assay, hence suggesting two-hybrid interaction exists between CIA-II and CCG1-BrD in vivo.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Identification of histone chaperone CIA-related factor CIA-II. A, identification of CIA-II as an interactor of human CCG1 bromodomains. SNF4, hCIA-II, and hCIA were fused to the Gal4 activation domain, and SNF1 and the bromodomain-containing segment of human CCG1 (CCG1-BrD) were fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain. Interactions of these factors were tested by {beta}-galactosidase assay in the yeast two-hybrid system. Combination of SNF1-SNF4 represents a positive control in the assay, which forms a dark blue colony. B, confirmation of two-hybrid interactions. SNF1, hCIA-II, and hCIA were fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain, and SNF4 and CCG1-BrD were fused to the Gal4 activation domain. C, amino acid sequences of hCIA-II. The deduced amino acid sequence of human CIA-II (upper) is aligned with that of human CIA (lower). The open reading frame of hCIA-II (GenBankTM accession number AB104486 [GenBank] ) encodes a protein of 202 amino acids. Numbers on the right side indicate the positions of amino acid. Conserved amino acids are denoted by dots, and gaps are denoted by dashes.

 

Structural Features of CIA-II—Fig. 1C shows the deduced amino acid sequence of human CIA-II aligned with those of human CIA. The amino acid sequence of CIA-II is highly similar to that of human CIA from the BLAST homology search. Sequence comparison between CIA-II and CIA suggests that CIA-II possesses 71% sequence identity with CIA. Based on sequence similarity between CIA-II and CIA, we divided the CIA-II and CIA sequences into three segments with 1–36, 37–153, and 154–202 (or 204 in CIA) (Fig. 1C; see also Fig. 4A). The N-terminal segment (residues 1–36) is well conserved, and its sequences exhibit 67% identity to each other. The central segment (residues 37–153) is highly conserved between CIA and CIA-II, and 91% of their amino acid sequences are identical to each other without any gap. Also, this central segment is evolutionarily conserved from yeast to human, although there are two gap sequences in cia1, which is the Schizosaccharomyces pombe orthologue of CIA (20). On the other hand, the C-terminal segment (residues 154–202 in CIA-II and 154–204 in CIA) is less conserved with 29% identity and has one gap. Interestingly, this C-terminal segment of CIA-II contains 7 acidic residues (14%), whereas human CIA possesses 10 residues (20%). Therefore, it suggests that the C-terminal region rich in anionic residues is specific to protozoan CIA orthologues (i.e. S. cerevisiae Asf1p and S. pombe cia1) (20).

Histone-binding Activity of CIA-II—Because CIA-II is homologous to CIA, a function of CIA-II is thought to be a chaperone for histones. To clarify this, we investigated histone-interactive activity of CIA-II by yeast two-hybrid assay using cDNA for histone H3 that associates with human CIA (12). Plasmid encoding CIA-II fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain was co-transfected with plasmid encoding histone H3 fused to the Gal4 activation domain (Fig. 2A). Interaction between CIA-II and histone H3 was positive as indicated by the dark blue colony in the {beta}-galactosidase assay (Fig. 2A). Strength of this interaction between CIA-II and histone H3 is thought to be almost the same as that between CIA and histone H3. Next, to determine whether this interaction of CIA-II is direct, we did an in vitro binding assay of CIA-II against core histones. Recombinant CIA-II fused to GST was expressed in E. coli and purified using glutathione-Sepharose resin to near homogeneity as shown in the Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained gel (Fig. 2B). Molecular size of the purified recombinant GST·CIA-II was ~48 kDa (Fig. 2B, lane 2). Using this recombinant protein, we did an in vitro binding assay against core histones. HeLa core histones were incubated with GST (lane 2), GST·CIA-II (lane 3), or GST·CIA (lane 4) immobilized with glutathione-Sepharose resin as shown in Fig. 2C. The adsorbed histones were eluted with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by using 15% SDS-PAGE. The Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained gel (Fig. 2C) showed that GST·CIA-II bound preferentially to core histones H3/H4 (lane 3) but not with histones H2A/H2B, whereas GST did not bind preferentially to core histones (lane 2), suggesting that CIA-II can bind to histones H3/H4 in vitro. Therefore, we conclude that interaction between CIA-II and core histones is direct.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Nucleosome assembly activity of CIA-II. A, histone-binding activity of hCIA-II in vivo. SNF1, hCIA-II, and hCIA were fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain, and SNF4 and histone H3 were fused to the Gal4 activation domain. A dash denotes no insert-DNA. Interactions of these factors were tested by {beta}-galactosidase assay in the yeast two-hybrid system, where positive interaction was visualized as dark blue colonies. B, purification of recombinant hCIA-II. GST (lane 1), GST-fused CIA-II (lane 2), or GST-fused CIA (lane 3) was purified using glutathione-Sepharose resin. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Positions of size markers (lane 4) are indicated to the right. Purified recombinant GST, GST·CIA-II, and GST·CIA proteins were migrated at ~28, 48, and 50 kDa, respectively (lanes 1–3). C, binding of recombinant hCIA-II with core histones H3/H4 in vitro. HeLa core histones were bound to GST (lane 2), GST·CIA-II (lane 3), or GST·CIA (lane 4) immobilized with glutathione-Sepharose resin. The adsorbed histones were eluted with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. A quarter amount of input core histones was loaded as a control (lane 1). The position of each protein is indicated to the left. D, in vitro nucleosome assembly activity of hCIA-II dependent on core histones by plasmid supercoiling assays. GST (lane 5), GST·CIA-II (lane 6), or GST·CIA (lane 7) was combined with relaxed pBluescript II SK (–) plasmids and HeLa core histones, and its nucleosome assembly activity was tested. Mobility of negatively supercoiled plasmids is greater than that of relaxed ones in the 1.2% agarose gel. Lanes 1 and 2 represent positive control of negatively supercoiled and relaxed forms of plasmid, respectively. Incubation without protein (lane 3) or NAP-I (lane 4) was used as negative and positive controls of the reaction, respectively. Gel mobilities of the negatively supercoiled (S) and relaxed (R) forms of the plasmids are indicated on the right. E, subcellular localization of hCIA-II in HeLa cells. Vector DNA was transfected to HeLa cells, and subcellular localization of each vector-coded polypeptide was visualized by addition of X-gal. Construct used for analysis is indicated as follows: control, no insert DNA (Gal4); CIA-II, Gal4-hCIA-II; CIA, Gal4-hCIA; and TBP, Gal4-hTBP.

 

Nucleosome Assembly Activity of CIA-II—Based on its observed histone-interactive activity (Fig. 2, A and C), CIA-II might also exhibit nucleosome assembly activity. Therefore, to determine whether CIA-II has core histone-dependent nucleosome assembly activity, we did a plasmid supercoiling assay in vitro. As shown in Fig. 2D, GST (lane 5), GST·CIA-II (lane 6), or GST·CIA (lane 7) was mixed with relaxed circular plasmid and HeLa core histones and tested for nucleosome assembly activity. In this assay, negative supercoils were introduced into plasmid DNA by the actions of topoisomerase I when it forms nucleosomes. We found that CIA-II stimulates supercoiling of plasmid DNA and that the activity of CIA-II to yield supercoiled DNA is comparable with that of other histone chaperones such as NAP-I (lane 4) or CIA (lane 7). These results indicate that CIA-II exhibits nucleosome assembly activity, and, indeed, belongs to a family of histone chaperones.

Subcellular Localization of CIA-II—Although CIA-II is thus demonstrated to be another member of histone chaperone, its cellular role is yet to be characterized. To discriminate whether CIA-II is involved in the assembly of newly synthesized histones in the cytosols or regulates nucleosome DNA-mediated events in the nucleus, we further investigated subcellular localization of CIA-II. Gal4-fused CIA-II was transfected to HeLa cells, and its subcellular localization was visualized using X-gal (Fig. 2E). Gal4 protein was diffused in both nucleus and cytosols in cells that were transfected with vector plasmid, whereas Gal4-TBP was localized in nuclei. Gal4-CIA-II was found to specifically localize in the nucleus of HeLa cells, although slight diffusion of Gal4-CIA-II into cytosol was detected in some cells (Fig. 2E). Furthermore, Gal4-CIA was localized in the nucleus. These results suggest that the involvement of histone chaperone CIA-II in the assembly of nucleosome in nuclei is similar to that of CIA and that it is unlikely that CIA-II contributes to structural maintenance of newly synthesized histones in cytosols.

Tissue Distribution of CIA and CIA-II—Why does the human genome contain two genes encoding closely related nuclear histone chaperones CIA and CIA-II? One possibility is that these histone chaperones are preferentially utilized in different cells or different developmental stages in multicellular organisms. To test this hypothesis, we examined the distribution of CIA-II and CIA in 16 different human tissues by Northern blot analysis. We detected two different subtypes of hCIA transcripts distributed almost ubiquitously in the tissues analyzed (Fig. 3, middle panel). On the other hand, hCIA-II transcripts were, to our surprise, detected only in restricted tissues such as testis, thymus, small intestine, and colon (upper panel). The amount of loaded poly(A)+ RNA was confirmed by Northern blot analysis using {beta}-actin as a control probe (lower panel).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Restricted expression of CIA-II mRNA in human tissues. Northern blot analysis was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Full-length human CIA-II (upper), human CIA (middle), or human {beta}-actin cDNA (lower) was used as a probe, respectively. The position(s) of each transcript(s) are indicated by arrow(s) to the right. Poly(A)+ RNA was separately collected from 16 different human tissues (lanes 1–16, respectively), which are indicated at the top of the lanes.

 

Restricted Expression of mCIA-II in Testicular Germ Cells— Expression of hCIA-II was the highest in testis (Fig. 3, lane 4). Testis consists of a variety of germ cells and somatic cells, such as Sertoli cells, Leytig cells, and macrophages. To determine whether expression of CIA-II in testis is restricted to germ or somatic cells, we first screened cDNA encoding CIA-II or CIA from mouse poly(A)+ RNA by RT-PCR. As schematically shown in Fig. 4A, DNA primers were designed to hybridize the gene segment that corresponds to the highly conserved region of both CIA-II and CIA (see "Experimental Procedures"). We obtained two kinds of mouse cDNA; one sequence was similar to that of hCIA-II and the other to that of hCIA. Next, we purified poly(A)+ RNA from the testes of WBB6F1-W/Wv mutant mice and WBB6F1+/+ wild-type mice and compared the amount of mCIA-II transcripts by Northern blotting using isolated mCIA-II cDNA as a probe. The testes of adult WBB6F1-W/Wv mice contain somatic cells but lack testicular germ cells because of a mutation in the c-kit gene (45). As shown in Fig. 4B, the mCIA-II transcripts were not detected in the testes of adult WBB6F1-W/Wv mutant mice (upper panel, lane 2), whereas abundant mCIA-II transcripts were detected in those of wild-type mice (lane 1). This RNA-blotted filter was also hybridized with cDNA encoding transcription elongation factor S-II-T1 as the positive control probe (middle panel), because S-II-T1 is specifically expressed in germ cells in testis (41, 46), and is lost in the testis of WBB6F1-W/Wv mutant mice (41). In addition, hybridization was done using {beta}-actin gene to demonstrate that loaded amounts of RNA from WBB6F1-W/Wv mutant and wild-type mice were almost equivalent (lower panel). Taken together, these results indicate that expression of mCIA-II in testis is specific to testicular germ cells.

Expression of mCIA-II in Meiotic Germ Cells—Male germ cells differentiate dramatically through both mitosis and meiosis (47). Therefore, to determine in which kinds of germ cells CIA-II is expressed, we analyzed the accumulation of CIA-II transcripts in different types of differentiated germ cells by using centrifugal elutriation of mouse testicular cells. This size-fractionation can yield different fractions such as enriched in pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids, elongated spermatids, and residual bodies (41). Fig. 4C indicates components of each fraction and of the whole testis for comparison. Using these cell fractions, we examined the expression level of mCIA-II in differentiated spermatogenic cells by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 4D, upper panel). In this study, we found that CIA-II transcripts were specifically accumulated in the fraction of pachytene spermatocytes (lane 1) and in the whole testis (lane 5) but not in the fraction enriched in round spermatids, elongated spermatids, or residual bodies (lanes 2–4, respectively). In this fractionation experiment, the amount of {beta}-actin transcripts was kept at the same level in each fraction (lower panel), and S-II-T1 was detected in every fraction (middle panel). This method of cell fractionation could not exclude contamination of small amounts (no more than 5%) of somatic Sertoli cells and spermatids (42). However, because mCIA-II expression in spermatids fractions (lanes 2 and 3) was less than the detection limits, expression of mCIA-II transcripts in the fraction of pachytene spermatocytes is attributable to pachytene spermatocytes themselves. Thus, we conclude that mCIA-II is expressed in pachytene spermatocytes but is not expressed in spermatids.

Existence of mCIA-II in Premeiotic Germ Cells—Premeiotic spermatogonium is difficult to fractionate by centrifugal elutriation; therefore, we could not determine whether CIA-II is expressed in such an early spermatogenic cell. To check whether CIA-II is expressed in spermatogonia, we evaluated the expression profiles of mCIA-II mRNA in the testes of newborn mice because emergence of testicular germ cells is distinctly regulated after birth. For example, spermatogonia, pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids are known to emerge at 4, 10, and 17 days after birth, respectively (47, 48). We thus tested Northern blot analysis using poly(A)+ RNA prepared from testes of 4-day-old to 56-day-old mice (Fig. 5A). During this observation period, {beta}-actin transcripts were constantly detected, and loaded poly(A)+ RNA was almost equivalent in each lane (Fig. 5A, lower panel). Emergence of S-II-T1 mRNA (Fig. 5A, middle panel) at around 10–14 days after birth was used as the control of onset of pachytene spermatocytes (41). The Northern blot data using mCIA-II cDNA as a probe shows that mCIA-II transcripts were already visible in the testes of 4-day-old mouse (Fig. 5A, upper panel). Considering that mCIA-II is transcribed in a germ cell-specific manner in mouse testis (Fig. 4B), transcription of mCIA-II occurs in spermatogonium, which is the unique germ cell found in a testis of this age. The testis of 7-day-old mouse contains early spermatocytes such as leptotene spermatocytes and zygotene spermatocytes in addition to premeiotic spermatogonia. Because expression level of mCIA-II in the 7-day-old testis is apparently greater than that in 4 days after birth, transcription of mCIA-II seems to be continued in these spermatocytes. In addition to leptotene and zygotene spermatocytes, pachytene spermatocytes are the major germ cells found in the testes of 14- to 35-day-old mice. The mRNA level of mCIA-II is relatively high and constant in those periods, consistent with our observation that mCIA-II mRNA is detected in fractionated pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 4D). The mCIA-II transcription in the testes of 56-day-old adult mice decreased significantly as compared with those of younger mice (Fig. 5A). In adult (56 days old) testis, spermatids were most abundant (~70%) among male germ cells. Therefore, the mCIA-II gene seems to be scarcely transcribed within spermatids. Also, it is consistent with the observation that mCIA-II transcript is not detected in the cell fractions rich in spermatids (Fig. 4D). Based on these expression analyses, we thus postulate that expression of mCIA-II transcripts in testis occurs in premeiotic to meiotic germ cells as schematically shown in Fig. 5B.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Premeiotic onset of mCIA-II during testicular germ cell maturation. A, mCIA-II expression during testis maturation. Total RNA was harvested from mouse testes. The age is listed below the autoradiograms as indicator of the stage of sexual development. Ages of mice used for analysis are 4, 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, 24, 28, 35, and 56 days after birth. Each lane contains 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA. mCIA-II (upper), testis-specific mS-II-T1 (middle), or human {beta}-actin cDNA (lower) were used as probes. Onset of spermatogonia, pachytene spermatocytes, and spermatids in the testes of wild-type mice is indicated by arrows at the top. B, schematic representation of expression profiles of CIA-II mRNA during spermatogenesis. The cell type in which CIA-II is assumed to exist is shown by a parenthesis on the bottom. A linear arrow denotes direction of differentiation. A curved arrow indicates that spermatogonia can proliferate.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we identified testicular germ cell-type histone chaperone CIA-II. The sequence and functional studies showed that CIA-II is highly homologous to previously characterized histone chaperone CIA (12, 13, 20). Through molecular cloning and functional characterization of CIA-II as a histone chaperone, this study revealed the following five aspects of CIA-related factors: 1) There are multiple members of CCG1-interactive histone chaperones in mammalians; 2) the primary structures of CIA and CIA-II could be divided into three segments, respectively, at amino acid positions 36/37 and 153/154; 3) the central segment (residues 37–153) of CIA/CIA-II is evolutionarily most highly conserved among known histone chaperones; 4) the C-terminal segment is less conserved between CIA-II and CIA, and it is evolutionarily distinct; and 5) both CIA-II and CIA are histone H3/H4-interactive nuclear factors that exhibit nucleosome assembly activity. In addition to these structural and functional aspects, we identified that CIA-II is unique in its temporal/spatial regulation of expression, whereas CIA is ubiquitously found in adult tissues. According to our expression analysis, we found that mCIA-II expression in testis is restricted to premeiotic and meiotic germ cells. However, expression of CIA-II is not limited to testis only but is also detected in proliferating cell-containing tissues such as thymus, small intestine, and colon among human tissues. Furthermore, expression of CIA-II in these tissues is several times greater than that of CIA (Fig. 3). Therefore, CIA-II might be transcribed within proliferating somatic cells in these tissues as well as in premeiotic germ cells. This raises the possibility that CIA-II facilitates nucleosome assembly reaction in the course of DNA replication during mitotic cell division of both somatic and germinal cells.

To date, tissue distribution or temporal regulation of histone chaperones is poorly understood. In this study, we conclude that CIA-II mRNA is expressed in spermatogonia and spermatocytes among male germ cells. Before this study, tissue distribution of family members of NAP-I was only characterized among mammalian histone chaperones. Nucleosome assembly protein-1-like 2 (Nap1l2) that controls neurulation is specifically expressed in neurons and binds to condensing chromatin during S phase (49). Another member of the NAP-I family, MB20, which is specifically expressed in the brain, is distributed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus and binds to histones (50). Testis-specific protein Y-encoded (TSPY), which is also structurally related to nucleosome assembly protein NAP-I, is expressed in spermatogonia and in early testicular carcinoma (51). However, it still remained unclear whether these NAP-I-related factors possess nucleosome assembly activities. Thus, our study is the first to indicate identification of temporally and spatially regulated nuclear histone chaperone. Because TSPY as well as CIA-II is highly expressed in spermatogonia, active DNA replication of spermatogonia might be guaranteed by histone chaperone CIA-II, presumably in combination with TSPY. There are various subtypes of histone genes that are highly expressed in testicular germ cells (5255). Because amino acid sequences of testis-specific histones are highly similar to those of cell cycle-regulated histones, assembly of a testis-specific nucleosome that will utilize testis-specific histones might require CIA-II or TSPY in spermatogonia. Domain analysis of CIA-II responsible for binding with cell cycle-regulated and testis-specific histones will help to clarify the nucleosome assembly process in spermatogenic cells.

In addition to possible roles for histone assembly in premeiotic cells, does CIA-II function in meiotic and postmeiotic cells? During the course of spermatogenesis, testicular histones are transiently replaced by transition proteins that emerge in spermatids to form highly condensed chromatin observed in the sperm nucleus (5661). Because CIA-II is expressed in spermatocytes, it might be involved in the maintenance of nucleosomal chromatin during this period. From our study, we cannot exclude the possibility that CIA-II might modulate disassembly of testicular chromatin postmeiotically, which will help transition proteins to assemble the highly condensed chromatin. Further investigation of temporal distribution of CIA-II protein in differentiating germ cells will provide understanding of the roles of CIA-II in meiotic and postmeiotic regulation of a germinal genome.

Activity of histone chaperone CIA-II might be regulated by protein modification (i.e. phosphorylation, acetylation) of itself. Interestingly, CIA-II as well as CIA is phosphorylated by tousled-like kinases both in vitro and in vivo (40). The protein level of CIA-II in HeLa cells seems to be virtually constant throughout the cell cycle (40). Phosphorylation of CIA-II is not detected during the cell cycle, whereas a change in CIA phosphorylation is detected during S phase (40). However, considering that the expression of CIA-II is regulated in both a temporal- and spatial-specific manner, CIA-II might be phosphorylated in testicular germ cells and proliferating somatic cells. The activity of CIA-II might also be controlled by protein modification of its interactive proteins such as core histones H3/H4 (37).

The role of CIA-II in the control of apoptotic cell death is intriguing because the hamster tsBN462 cell, which has a mutation in the gene encoding CCG1, undergoes apoptosis following growth arrest at the nonpermissive temperature 39.5 °C (62). In addition, the S. cerevisiae mutant for the CIA-II counterpart (asf1) spontaneously dies because of preferential arrest at the G2/M phase during the cell cycle (31). More importantly, this asf1 mutant accompanies many apoptotic features, such as fragmentation of the nuclei, condensation and fragmentation of chromatin DNA, reduction of the mitochondrial membrane-potential, dysfunction of the mitochondrial proton pump, and a discernible release of cytochrome c to cytoplasm (31). Given the evolutionary conservation of yeast Asf1p and human CIA-II, CIA-II is a strong candidate for nuclear key regulator for apoptotic cell death in mammalian organisms. Because mammalian testicular germ cells undergo apoptosis (63), germ cell fate might be controlled by CIA-II. Investigation of the role of CIA-II in spermatogenic development by creating CIA-II-manipulated animals will provide insight into the regulation of differentiation, cell death, or maturation of sperm.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB104486 [GenBank] .

* This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology of Japan and by grants from the Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO) program of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST) and New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked"advertisement"in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-5841-8469; Fax: 81-3-5841-8468; E-mail: horikosh{at}iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

1 The abbreviations used are: NAP, nucleosome assembly protein; CCG1, cell cycle gene 1; CIA, CCG1-interacting factor A; TFIID, transcription initiation factor IID; h, human; m, mouse; TBP, TATA box-binding protein; TAFII, TBP-associated factor; ASF1, anti-silencing function 1; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline, GST, glutathione S-transferase; X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-{beta}-D-galactopyranoside. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. S. J. Elledge for generously providing the yeast two-hybrid system, H. Fujimoto for fractionation of testicular germ cells, and K. Kataoka, N. Kudo, T. Munakata, and S. Okano for technical assistance. We also thank Drs. B. Padmanabhan and N. Whitby for critically reading the manuscript.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kornberg, R. D. (1974) Science 184, 868–871[Free Full Text]
  2. Adams, C. R., and Kamakaka, R T. (1999) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 185–190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Kornberg, R. D., and Lorch, Y. (1999) Cell 98, 285–294[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Narlikar, G. J., Fan, H. Y., and Kingston, R. E. (2002) Cell 108, 475–487[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Ito, T., Tyler, J. K., and Kadonaga, J. T. (1997) Genes Cells 2, 593–600[Abstract]
  6. Workman, J. L., and Kingston, R. E. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 545–579[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Laskey, R. A., Honda, B. M., Mills, A. D., and Finch, J. T. (1978) Nature 275, 416–420[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Ishimi, Y., Hirosumi, J., Sato, W., Sugasawa, K., Yokota, S., Hanaoka, F., and Yamada, M. (1984) Eur. J. Biochem. 142, 431–439[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Ishimi, Y., Kojima, M., Yamada, M., and Hanaoka, F. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 162, 19–24[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Matsumoto, K., Nagata, K., Ui, M., and Hanaoka, F. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10582–10587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bortvin, A., and Winston, F. (1996) Science 272, 1473–1476[Abstract]
  12. Munakata, T., Adachi, N., Yokoyama, N., Kuzuhara, T., and Horikoshi, M. (2000) Genes Cells 5, 221–233[Abstract]
  13. Chimura, T., Kuzuhara, T., and Horikoshi, M. (2002) Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 9334–9339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Roeder, R. G. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 327–335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Takada, R., Nakatani, Y., Hoffmann, A., Kokubo, T., Hasegawa, S., Roeder, R. G., and Horikoshi, M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11809–11813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kokubo, T., Gong, D. W., Yamashita, S., Horikoshi, M., Roeder, R. G., and Nakatani, Y. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 1033–1046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Liu, D., Ishima, R., Tong, K. I., Bagby, S., Kokubo, T., Muhandiram, D. R., Kay, L. E., Nakatani, Y., and Ikura, M. (1998) Cell 94, 573–583[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Le, S., Davis, C., Konopka, J. B., and Sternglanz, R. (1997) Yeast 13, 1029–1042[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Singer, M. S., Kahana, A., Wolf, A. J., Meisinger, L. L., Peterson, S. E., Goggin, C., Mahowald, M., and Gottschling, D. E. (1998) Genetics 150, 613–632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Umehara, T. Chimura, T., Ichikawa, N., and Horikoshi, M. (2002) Genes Cells 7, 59–73[Abstract]
  21. Tyler, J. K., Adams, C. R., Chen, S. R., Kobayashi, R., Kamakaka, R. T., and Kadonaga, J. T. (1999) Nature 402, 555–560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Matangkasombut, O., Buratowski, R. M., Swilling, N. W., and Buratowski, S. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 951–962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sekiguchi, T., Miyata, T., and Nishimoto, T. (1998) EMBO J. 7, 1683–1687
  24. Sekiguchi, T., Nohiro, Y., Nakamura, Y., Hisamoto, N., and Nishimoto, T. (1991) Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 3317–3325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hisatake, K., Hasegawa, S., Takada, R., Nakatani, Y., Horikoshi, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1993) Nature 362, 179–181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Ruppert, S., Wang, E. H., and Tjian, R. (1993) Nature 362, 175–179[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Suzuki-Yagawa, Y., Guermah, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 3284–3294[Abstract]
  28. Yamamoto, T., and Horikoshi, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30595–30598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kimura, A., and Horikoshi, M. (1998) Genes Cells 3, 789–800[Abstract]
  30. Ikura, T., Ogryzko, V. V., Grigoriev, M., Groisman, R., Wang, J., Horikoshi, M., Scully, R., Qin, J., and Nakatani, Y. (2000) Cell 102, 463–473[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Yamaki, M., Umehara, T., Chimura, T., and Horikoshi, M. (2001) Genes Cells 6, 1043–1054[Abstract]
  32. Workman, J. L., and Roeder, R. G. (1987) Cell 51, 613–622[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Kokubo, T., Gong, D. W., Wootton, J. C., Horikoshi, M., Roeder, R. G., and Nakatani, Y. (1994) Nature 367, 484–487[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Xie, X., Kokubo, T., Cohen, S. L., Mirza, U. A., Hoffmann, A., Chait, B. T., Roeder, R. G., Nakatani, Y., and Burley, S. K. (1996) Nature 380, 316–322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Hoffmann, A., Chiang, C. M., Oelgeschlager, T., Xie, X., Burley, S. K., Nakatani, Y., and Roeder, R. G. (1996) Nature 380, 356–359[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Bando, M., Ijuin, S., Hasegawa, S., and Horikoshi, M. (1997) J. Biochem. 121, 591–597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Lahn, B. T., Tang, Z. L., Zhou, J., Barndt, R. J., Parvinen, M., Allis, C. D., and Page, D. C. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 8707–8712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Fields, S., and Song, O. (1989) Nature 340, 245–246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Durfee, T., Becherer, K., Chen, P. L., Yeh, S. H., Yang, Y., Kilburn, A. E., Lee, W, H., and Elledge, S. J. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 555–569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Sillje, H. H., and Nigg, E. A. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11, 1068–1073[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Umehara, T., Kida, S., Hasegawa, S., Fujimoto, H., and Horikoshi, M. (1997) J. Biochem. 121, 598–603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Meistrich, M. L., Trostle, P. K., Frapart, M., and Erickson, R. P. (1977) Dev. Biol. 60, 428–441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156–159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Simon, R. H., and Felsenfeld, G. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 6, 689–696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Yoshinaga, K., Nishikawa, S., Ogawa, M., Hayashi, S., Kunisada, T., Fujimoto, T., and Nishikawa, S. (1991) Development 113, 689–699[Abstract]
  46. Umehara, T., Kida, S., Yamamoto, T., and Horikoshi, M. (1995) Gene 167, 297–302[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Bellvé, A. R., Cavicchia, J. C., Millette, C. F., O'Brien, D. A., Bhatnagar, Y. M., and Dym, M. (1977) J. Cell Biol. 74, 68–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Nebel, B. R., Amarose, A. P., and Hackett, E. M. (1961) Science 134, 832–833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Rogner, U. C., Spyropoulos, D. D., Le Novere, N., Changeux, J. P., and Avner, P. (2000) Nat. Genet. 25, 431–435[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Shen, H. H., Huang, A. M., Hoheisel, J., and Tsai, S. F. (2001) Genomics 71, 21–33[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Schnieders, F., Dork, T., Arnemann, J., Vogel, T., Werner, M., and Schmidtke, J. (1996) Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1801–1807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Doenecke, D., Drabent, B., Bode, C., Bramlage, B., Franke, K., Gavenis, K., Kosciessa, U., and Witt, O. (1997) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 424, 37–48[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Trostle-Weige, P. K., Meistrich, M. L., Brock, W. A., and Nishioka, K. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 8769–8776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Meistrich, M. L., Bucci, L. R., Trostle-Weige, P. K., and Brock, W. A. (1985) Dev. Biol. 112, 230–240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Wolfe, S. A., Anderson, J. V., Grimes, S. R., Stein, G. S., and Stein, J. S. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1007, 140–150[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Kierszenbaum, A. L., and Tres, L. L. (1978) Fed. Proc. 37, 2512–2516[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Meistrich, M. L., Brock, W. A., Grimes, S. R., Platz, R. D., and Hnilica, L. S. (1978) Fed. Proc. 37, 2522–2525[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Heidaran, M. A., and Kistler, W. S. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 13309–13315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Yelick, P. C., Kwon, Y. H., Flynn, J. F., Borzorgzadeh, A., Kleene, K. C., and Hecht, N. B. (1989) Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1, 193–200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Saunders, P. T., Millar, M. R., Maguire, S. M., and Sharpe, R. M. (1992) Mol. Reprod. Dev. 33, 385–391[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Alfonso, P. J., and Kistler, W. S. (1993) Biol. Reprod. 48, 522–529[Abstract]
  62. Sekiguchi, T., Nakashima, T., Hayashida, T., Kuraoka, A., Hashimoto, S., Tsuchida, N., Shibata, Y., Hunter, T., and Nishimoto, T. (1995) Exp. Cell Res. 218, 490–498[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Blanco-Rodriguez, J. (1998) Int. J. Androl. 21, 236–248[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea