JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M306308200 on July 3, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 37, 35826-35836, September 12, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/37/35826    most recent
M306308200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shields, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vance, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shields, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vance, D. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular Dissection of the S-Adenosylmethionine-binding Site of Phosphatidylethanolamine N-Methyltransferase*

David J. Shields {ddagger} §, Judith Y. Altarejos ¶, Xu Wang {ddagger} §, Luis B. Agellon {ddagger} || and Dennis E. Vance {ddagger} **

From the Departments of {ddagger}Biochemistry and Pediatrics, and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Group on Molecular & Cell Biology of Lipids, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada

Received for publication, June 16, 2003 , and in revised form, July 2, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) is a quatrotopic membrane protein that catalyzes the conversion of phosphatidylethanolamine to phosphatidylcholine through three sequential methylation reactions. Analysis of mice lacking a functional PEMT gene revealed a severe reduction in plasma homocysteine levels. Homocysteine is generated by the hydrolysis of S-adenosylhomocysteine, which is also a product of the PEMT reaction. To gain insight into the PEMT transmethylation reaction and the mechanism by which PEMT regulates homocysteine levels, we sought to define residues that are required for binding of the methyl group donor, S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet). Bioinformatic analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence of human PEMT identified two putative AdoMet-binding motifs (98GXG100 and 180EE181). Site-directed mutagenesis experiments demonstrated the requirement for the conserved motifs in PEMT specific activity. Analysis of the AdoMet binding ability of mutant recombinant PEMT derivatives established that residues Gly100 and Glu180 are essential for binding of the AdoMet moiety. A significantly elevated KD with respect to AdoMet is observed following conservative mutagenesis of residues Gly98 (400 pmol) and Glu181 (666.7 pmol), relative to the unmodified enzyme (303.1 pmol), suggesting that these residues also participate in AdoMet binding. A model positions two separate AdoMet-binding motifs of PEMT in close proximity at the external leaflet of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PEMT catalyzes the sequential transfer of three methyl groups from AdoMet to phosphatidylethanolamine to generate the essential phospholipid, phosphatidylcholine (PC)1 (1). Concomitant production of one S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) molecule occurs with each methylation step (1). The liver is the primary site of PEMT activity, and the PEMT-controlled pathway accounts for ~30% of hepatic phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis (14). The enzymes of the CDP-choline pathway, which are active in all nucleated cells, catalyze the remaining 70% of PC biosynthesis in the liver (25).

In addition to being a key modulator of PC biosynthesis, the liver is the site of ~85% of all methylation reactions (6). AdoMet, the primary methyl group donor, is utilized by at least 39 mammalian methyltransferases, including DNA, RNA, protein, lipid, and small molecule methyltransferases (7, 8). Each AdoMet-dependent transmethylation reaction generates AdoHcy, which in turn is hydrolyzed to yield adenosine and the non-protein amino acid, homocysteine (Hcy) (9). Because mild hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and atherosclerotic disease, circulating plasma homocysteine levels are of significant clinical interest (10).

Previous studies on PEMT focused on the PC biosynthetic function of the enzyme and, in particular, whether PEMT-derived PC was targeted to a specific hepatic fate such as very low density lipoprotein particles or bile (1114). Recently, however, phenotypic analysis of mice homozygous for a disrupted PEMT allele revealed a novel role for PEMT in the regulation of plasma Hcy levels (15). Although the liver is the site of numerous AdoMet-dependent methylation reactions, each of which contributes to the Hcy pool, genetic ablation of the PEMT gene alone resulted in a 50% decrease in circulating Hcy levels (15). Furthermore, hepatoma cells transfected with a cDNA encoding PEMT secreted more Hcy than mock transfected cells (15). Combined, these results suggest a key yet previously unknown role for PEMT in the regulation of hepatic one-carbon metabolism.

To gain further insight into the PEMT transmethylation reaction and the mechanism by which this enzyme modulates plasma Hcy levels, we sought to identify residues that are required to bind AdoMet/AdoHcy. A plethora of enzymes bind AdoMet and/or AdoHcy, including the AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases, AdoMet synthetase, AdoMet decarboxylase, and AdoHcy hydrolase (16). Comparative amino acid sequence analysis previously identified several conserved motifs that bind the AdoMet/AdoHcy moieties, but a small number of methyltransferases including the eukaryotic PEMT family of enzymes do not contain any of these motifs (1618).

Using bioinformatic analysis, two putative AdoMet/AdoHcy-binding motifs were identified that are conserved among the eukaryotic PEMT proteins. Here, we describe the biochemical evaluation of the motifs in the human PEMT enzyme. Understanding the nature of the interaction between AdoMet/AdoHcy and PEMT will promote resolution of the mechanism by which the enzyme modulates plasma Hcy levels and facilitate the design of agents for therapeutic intervention in cases of hyperhomocysteinemia.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum, restriction endonucleases, and Platinum Pfx DNA polymerase were from Invitrogen. Oligonucleotides for mutagenesis were synthesized in the DNA core facility at the Department of Biochemistry of the University of Alberta. FuGENE transfection reagent was from Roche Applied Science. S-Adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine (15 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Biosciences. S-Adenosyl-L-methionine was from Sigma. HAWP 02500 filters and Multiscreen 96-well filtration/assay plates (MHABN4510) for AdoMet binding assays were from Millipore. Goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were purchased from Pierce. All other reagents were of the highest standard commercially available.

Bioinformatic Analysis—The PROWL ProteinInfo sequence analysis program (prowl.rockefeller.edu) was used to screen for putative AdoMet-binding motifs in the predicted human PEMT primary structure (accession number, NP_009100 [GenBank] ). The ALIGN program (based on the ClustalW algorithm) at the San Diego Supercomputer Biology Workbench (workbench.sdsc.edu) was utilized to analyze the conservation of motifs between orthologous eukaryotic PEMT enzymes (19).

Recombinant Plasmid Construction—Mutant PEMT derivatives for analysis of putative AdoMet-binding residues/motifs were generated by the "splice by overlap extension" PCR mutagenesis method, using the wild type hPEMT-pCI plasmid as a template for all reactions (20, 21). This plasmid consists of the human PEMT open reading frame cloned 5' to 3' into the XhoI and XbaI sites, respectively, of the pCI mammalian expression vector polylinker (Promega) (21). Transcription is under the control of a cytomegalovirus promoter. Full-length mutant PCR products were blunt end-ligated to SmaI-cut pBluescript II (KS) (Stratagene) and recloned into the pCI expression vector using XhoI and XbaI restriction sites. All of the constructs were sequenced to confirm fidelity of amplification and orientation of the insert at the Molecular Biology Services Unit of the University of Alberta. Plasmids encoding conservative GXG motif mutants were generated as follows. To mutagenize the glycine residue at the first position in the GXG tripeptide motif to an alanine residue and generate the plasmid, hP-G98A, PCR A was performed with oligonucleotide 1 (5'-CTCGAGATGACCCGGCTGCTGGGCTAC-3') and oligonucleotide 2 (5'-CAGGAGCGCGAGGCCCAGGCTG-3'), PCR B was performed with the mutant oligonucleotide 3 (5'-AGCCTGGGCCTCGCGCTCCTGGCACTGGGCGTCGT-3') and oligonucleotide 4 (5'-TCTAGATCAGCTCCTCTTGTGGGAC-3'), and PCR C, to generate the full-length mutant product, was performed with oligonucleotides 1 and 4, using amplicons from PCR A and B as templates. Each of the other mutant plasmids was produced by the same protocol but using a different mutant oligonucleotide (oligonucleotide 3) for the construction of each PEMT derivative. To mutagenize the glycine residue at the second position in the GXG tripeptide motif to an alanine residue and generate the plasmid, hP-G100A, oligonucleotide 3 was 5'-AGCCTGGGCCTCGCGCTCCTGGGACTGGCCGTCGT-3'. To mutagenize both glycine residues in the GXG tripeptide motif to alanine residues and generate the plasmid, hP-GAGA, 5'-AGCCTGGGCCTCGCGCTCCTGGCACTGGCCGTCGT-3' was the mutant oligonucleotide. For construction of the single and combinatorial non-conservative GXG mutant plasmids, the mutant oligonucleotides were as follows: hP-G98E, 5'-AGCCTGGGCCTCGCGCTCCTGGAACTGGGCGTCGT-3'; hP-G100D, 5'-AGCCTGGGCCTCGCGCTCCTGGGACTGGACGTCGT-3'; and hP-GEGD, 5'-AGCCTGGGCCTCGCGCTCCTGGAACTGGACGTCGT-3'. Plasmids encoding the di-glutamate motif mutants E180D and E181D were generated as follows. To mutate the glutamate at position 180 to an aspartate residue and generate the plasmid, hP-E180D, PCR A was performed with oligonucleotide 1 (as above) and oligonucleotide 5 (5'-ATAGGAGAGCCATTATGTAGGTG-3'), PCR B was performed with the mutant oligonucleotide 6 (5'-CTACATAATGGCTCTCCTATACGACGAGCCCTTCACCGCTGAGATC-3') and 4 (as above), and PCR C, to generate the full-length mutant product, was performed with oligonucleotides 1 and 4, using amplicons from PCR A and B as templates. To mutate the glutamate at position 181 to an aspartate residue and generate the plasmid, hP-E181D, a similar protocol was followed except the mutant oligonucleotide was 5'-CTACATAATGGCTCTCCTATACGAAGATCCCTTCACCGCTGAGATC-3'.

Cell Culture and Transfections—Cos-7 cells, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection repository, were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Transfection of various plasmids encoding PEMT and mutant PEMT derivatives was performed using the FuGENE reagent as described previously (22).

PEMT Activity Assays and Immunoblots—PEMT activity assays were performed as described previously using phosphatidylmonomethylethanolamine (PMME) as the methyl acceptor and S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine as the methyl group donor (23). Immunoblots of the recombinant PEMT protein and mutant derivatives were performed as described previously using an anti-PEMT peptide antibody at the indicated concentrations (22).

S-Adenosylmethionine Binding Assays—Binding assays were performed on microsomes prepared from transiently transfected Cos-7 cells. The microsomes were prepared as described previously except the resultant microsomal pellet was resuspended in 75 µl of Buffer X (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.5, 5 mM dithiothreitol) (22). Binding assays were carried out according to a modified version of the method of Zhu et al. (24). Briefly, microsomal protein (50 µg) was incubated with 10 µCi of S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine (15 Ci/mmol) in Buffer X for 10 min at 37 °C (total assay volume, 30 µl). The binding assay mixture was passed over a HAWP 02500 filter (Millipore) on a filtration funnel, and unbound S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine was removed by washing with 100 ml of Buffer X. The filters were dried, and bound S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine was quantitated by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Similar assays were performed in the absence of microsomal protein to account for nonspecific binding of S-adenosyl-L-[methyl- 3H]methionine to the filter. Binding assays on microsomes from mock transfected cells quantitated AdoMet bound by microsomal components other than PEMT. Binding activities of microsomes from cells expressing mutant PEMT proteins were expressed relative to the binding activity of microsomes from cells expressing the unmodified enzyme.

Microtitre S-Adenosylmethionine Binding Assays—Binding assays were adapted for high throughput analysis as follows. Briefly, microsomal protein (30 µg), prepared as above, was incubated with 3 µCi of radiolabeled AdoMet and the indicated concentrations of unlabeled AdoMet for 10 min at 37 °C in a round-bottomed microtitre plate. 200 µl of Buffer X was added to each sample, and the resultant mixture was transferred to a 96-well filtration plate (MHABN4510, Millipore) and centrifuged immediately at 1500 x g for 5 min. Microtitre plates were placed on an aspiration apparatus, and each well was washed 15 times with 200 µl of Buffer X. Microtitre filters were air-dried, 50 µl of Microscint PS (Packard Biosciences) was added to each well, and bound S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine was quantitated by liquid scintillation spectrometry in a microbeta scintillation counter (model 1450, Wallac Trilux). Control binding assays were performed as described above for nonmicrotitre S-adenosylmethionine binding assays.

Statistical Analyses—The data are expressed as the means ± S.E. The Student-Newman-Keuls method was utilized to perform an analysis of variance to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Kinetic Analyses—Kinetic data were analyzed according to the Michaelis-Menten equation and with nonlinear regression algorithms using the Curvefit kinetic analysis program (Graphpad.com).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of a Putative AdoMet-binding Motif—PEMT catalyzes a series of AdoMet-dependent methylation reactions to produce PC and the byproduct, AdoHcy (Fig. 1). Three AdoMet-binding motifs (I, II, and III) are conserved in the majority of non-DNA AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases (Fig. 2A, row (i)), but a small number of methyltransferases including the enzymes of the eukaryotic PEMT family do not contain the three motifs (16). However, using bioinformatic analysis, we identified a partial motif I consensus sequence that is conserved among the eukaryotic PEMT orthologs (Fig. 2, B and C) (25). Furthermore, this partial motif (GXG, where X is any amino acid) is similar to a DNA methyltransferase AdoMet-binding motif, one of the AdoMet-binding motifs of AdoMet synthetase, as well as a nucleotide-binding motif found in protein kinases and other nucleotide-binding proteins such as the NAD-binding proteins (Fig. 2A, rows (ii), (iii), and (iv)) (17, 2628).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Interrelationships between the PEMT-catalyzed biosynthesis of PC and Hcy metabolism. PEMT catalyzes the synthesis of PC via three AdoMet-dependent transmethylation reactions. AdoHcy is produced with each methylation step (1). AdoHcy hydrolase catalyzes the hydrolysis of AdoHcy to yield Hcy and adenosine (Ado) (9). Hcy may be directed to the irreversible trans-sulfuration pathway to generate Cys, reincorporated to the Met cycle for regeneration of AdoMet or exported from the cell (36).

 


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
A putative AdoMet binding motif (GXG) is conserved in PEMT orthologs. A, alignment of conserved AdoMet/nucleotide-binding motifs. Row (i), three conserved AdoMet-binding motifs found in the majority of non-nucleic acid AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases. Row (ii), motif I of the conserved DNA methyltransferase AdoMet-binding site. Row (iii), motif I of the AdoMet synthetase AdoMet-binding site. Row (iv), ATP/nucleotide-binding motif of protein kinases and other nucleotide-binding proteins, such as the NAD-binding proteins. The shaded box indicates conservation of the GXG motif in disparate motifs. B, linear schematic map of the human PEMT enzyme indicating the position of the conserved GXG motif. C, amino acid sequence alignment of eukaryotic PEMT orthologs. The shaded box indicates conservation of the GXG motif in PEMT enzymes from different species. GenBankTM accession numbers for each protein are included.

 

Conservative Mutagenesis of the GXG Motif—To probe the role of the conserved glycine residues in PEMT-mediated binding of the AdoMet moiety, each glycine residue of the GXG motif was individually mutated to an alanine residue (encoded by the mutant PEMT plasmids, hP-G98A and hP-G100A). To evaluate the effect of conservative mutagenesis of each glycine residue on PEMT activity, Cos-7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding wild type PEMT or the mutant PEMT derivatives or mock transfected with empty vector, and cell homogenate protein was assayed for PEMT activity. Mutagenesis of Gly98 to an alanine residue decreased PEMT activity by ~25%, whereas similar mutagenesis of Gly100 completely abolished enzymatic activity in the recombinant PEMT derivatives (Fig. 3A). Immunoblots with an anti-PEMT peptide antibody demonstrated similar levels of abundance of the recombinant proteins (Fig. 3B). Enzymatic assays of homogenates performed in the presence of various concentrations of substrate revealed that conservative mutagenesis of Gly98 results in a slightly elevated Km with respect to the methyl donor, AdoMet, but not with respect to the methyl acceptor, PMME (Fig. 3, C and D). Thus, mutagenesis of Gly98 would appear to have perturbed a facet of the transmethylation reaction pertaining to the AdoMet moiety. The hP-G100A mutant was inactive at all concentrations of PMME and AdoMet evaluated (data not shown).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Conservative mutagenesis of the GXG motif alters PEMT specific activity. Cos-7 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids (3 µg) containing wild type PEMT or epitope-tagged PEMT derivatives or mock transfected with empty pCI vector. A, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity. The results are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate, relative to the values obtained for similar assays on cells transfected with wild type PEMT. The asterisk signifies p < 0.05. B, immunoblot with anti-PEMT antibody using 25 µg of transfectant homogenate protein. C, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity in the presence of a constant AdoMet concentration (200 µM) and various PMME concentrations (100–1000 µM). Three separate experiments were conducted with each assay performed in duplicate. The results were subjected to nonlinear regression using the Curvefit software (Graphpad.com). The Vmax and Km values were calculated using the Michaelis-Menten equation. The units for kinetic parameters are as follows: Vmax, pmol/min/mg protein; Km, µM. D, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity in the presence of a constant PMME concentration (500 µM) and various AdoMet concentrations (100–1000 µM). The results were calculated as described for C.

 

Conservative Mutagenesis of 100G Abolishes AdoMet Binding Activity—To determine whether the changes in PEMT activity were specifically due to decreased AdoMet binding activity, we transfected Cos-7 cells with the wild type or mutant PEMT plasmids or mock transfected with empty vector. The microsomes were prepared for AdoMet binding assays. The microsomal fraction was utilized for AdoMet binding assays because we have previously demonstrated that PEMT activity is enriched in the microsomal subcompartment (22).

Microsomes from cells expressing the mutant hp-G98A protein displayed a reduction of ~20% in AdoMet binding activity compared with the unmodified enzyme (Fig. 4A). In contrast, conservative mutagenesis of Gly100 completely abolished the AdoMet binding activity of the mutant enzyme. To determine whether the altered enzymatic activity of the mutant recombinant PEMT proteins was a consequence of direct changes in AdoMet binding activity, binding assays were performed with various concentrations of AdoMet. Mutagenesis of Gly98 to an alanine results in a PEMT derivative with an elevated KD with respect to AdoMet, relative to values for the unmodified enzyme (Fig. 4B). Thus, a specific role for the GXG motif in binding of the AdoMet moiety is supported. Increasing concentrations of AdoMet did not result in detectable AdoMet binding activity for the Gly100 mutant (data not shown), suggesting that the integrity of this residue is essential to the AdoMet binding function of PEMT.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Conservative mutagenesis of the GXG motif alters AdoMet binding activity. A, microsomes (50 µg of protein) prepared from transfected cells were assayed for AdoMet binding activity. The results are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate, relative to the values obtained for similar assays on microsomes from cells transfected with wild type PEMT. The asterisk signifies p < 0.05. Binding assays on microsomes from mock transfected cells quantitated AdoMet bound by microsomal components other than PEMT. B, microsomes (30 µg of protein) prepared from transfected cells were assayed for AdoMet binding activity in the presence of a constant S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine concentration and various unlabeled AdoMet concentrations (5–125 µM). Three separate experiments were conducted with each assay performed in duplicate. The results were subjected to nonlinear regression using the Curvefit software (Graphpad.com); the KD with respect to AdoMet (expressed in pmol) was determined.

 

Nonconservative and Combinatorial Mutations of the GXG Motif—To further investigate the role of the glycine residues in the putative AdoMet-binding motif, we performed nonconservative mutagenesis of each glycine residue to glutamate or aspartate residues to yield the mutant plasmids hP-G98E and hP-G100D, respectively. Additionally, combinatorial mutant plasmids were generated in which both glycine residues were mutated to alanine residues (hP-GAGA) or to glutamate and aspartate residues (hP-GEGD). To assess the PEMT activity of the nonconservative and combinatorial mutants, Cos-7 cells were transiently transfected with wild type or mutant plasmids or mock transfected with empty vector. The cellular homogenates were assayed for PEMT activity.

The cells expressing the nonconservative mutant PEMT derivatives (hP-G98E and hP-G100D) were completely inactive as compared with mock transfected cells (Fig. 5A). In the case of hP-G98E, this was in contrast to the conservative G98A mutation, which only caused a decrease of 20% in PEMT activity (Fig. 3A). Cells expressing the combinatorial mutant PEMT derivatives were similarly devoid of PEMT activity (Fig. 5A). Immunoblots with an anti-PEMT peptide antibody confirmed the expression of each PEMT derivative (Fig. 5B). Assays performed in the presence of various concentrations of PMME or AdoMet did not demonstrate enzymatic activity in any of the nonconservative or combinatorial GXG mutants (Fig. 5, C and D).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Nonconservative and combinatorial mutagenesis of the GXG motif decreases PEMT specific activity. Cos-7 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids (3 µg) containing wild type PEMT or epitope-tagged PEMT derivatives or mock transfected with empty pCI vector. A, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity. The results are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate, relative to the values obtained for similar assays on cells transfected with wild type PEMT. B, immunoblot with anti-PEMT antibody using 25 µg of transfectant homogenate protein. C, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity in the presence of a constant AdoMet concentration (200 µM) and various PMME concentrations (100–1000 µM). The results are expressed as the means of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate. The data points for the nonconservative and combinatorial mutants are clustered along the abscissa because those PEMT derivatives were inactive at all PMME concentrations evaluated. D, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity in the presence of a constant PMME concentration (500 µM) and various AdoMet concentrations (100–1000 µM). The results are expressed as the means of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate. The data points for the nonconservative and combinatorial mutants are clustered along the abscissa because those PEMT derivatives were inactive at all AdoMet concentrations evaluated.

 

Nonconservative Mutagenesis of Gly98 Reduces AdoMet Binding Activity—In the next series of experiments, we resolved the issue of whether the reduction in PEMT activity of the nonconservative hP-G98E mutant was due to a specific decrease in the AdoMet binding activity of the recombinant mutant protein. Cos-7 cells were transfected, and microsomal AdoMet binding assays were performed as described.

Although the cells expressing the mutant hP-G98E protein did not display any significant PEMT activity (Fig. 5A), the mutant protein still retained ~55% of AdoMet binding activity as compared with the unmodified enzyme (Fig. 6A). Binding assays performed in the presence of various concentrations of AdoMet revealed that the mutant hP-G98E protein displays an increased KD with respect to AdoMet, relative to values for the unmodified enzyme (Fig. 6B). Combined, these results suggest that although the mutant protein is partially capable of binding AdoMet, the bound AdoMet moiety is not available for PEMT-catalyzed transmethylation (i.e. the mutant PEMT enzyme is unable to transfer the methyl group from the bound AdoMet moiety). This may arise because AdoMet is bound in such a conformation that the methyl group is not accessible to the transmethylation machinery. Furthermore, because mutagenesis of Gly98 to the small amino acid, alanine, had only minimal effects on both PEMT activity and binding activity (Figs. 3A and 4A), but mutation to the larger and charged glutamate residue caused a significant decrease in binding activity (Fig. 6, A and B), Gly98 may serve to structurally position Gly100 or other residues for optimal binding activity rather than actually binding to AdoMet itself.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Nonconservative and combinatorial mutagenesis of the GXG motif decreases AdoMet binding activity. A, microsomes (50 µg of protein) prepared from transfected cells were assayed for AdoMet binding activity. The results are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate, relative to the values obtained for similar assays on microsomes from cells transfected with wild type PEMT. Binding assays on microsomes from mock transfected cells quantitated AdoMet bound by microsomal components other than PEMT. B, microsomes (30 µg of protein) prepared from transfected cells were assayed for AdoMet binding activity in the presence of a constant S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine concentration and various unlabeled AdoMet concentrations (5–125 µM). Three separate experiments were conducted with each assay performed in duplicate. The results were subjected to nonlinear regression using the Curvefit software (Graphpad.com), and the KD with respect to AdoMet (expressed in pmol) was determined.

 

As expected, the hP-G100D mutant protein and the combinatorial mutant PEMT derivative, hP-GEGD did not bind AdoMet, whereas the mutant PEMT protein, hP-GAGA, retained only fractional activity (Fig. 6A). Assays performed in the presence of various concentrations of AdoMet did not enhance binding (data not shown).

Identification of a Second Putative AdoMet-binding Motif—A number of AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases do not contain the classical AdoMet-binding motifs (16, 17, 26). Analysis of enzymes that lack the three classical AdoMet-binding motifs (including the yeast PEM2-encoded PEMT ortholog) identified a novel tripartite motif (Fig. 7A) (18), referred to in abbreviated form as the "RHPXY-hyd-EE" motif. This motif consists of two regions of homology (Region A and Region B) separated by a hydrophobic region of ~30 residues (18). To determine whether the tripartite motif is conserved among the higher eukaryotic PEMT enzymes, we performed feature analysis of the aligned amino acid sequences. Although the greater part of Regions A and B do not exist in human PEMT, two specific portions of the motifs, which flank the hydrophobic region, are conserved, i.e. PXY-hydrophobic region-EE, where X represents any amino acid (Fig. 7).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
A putative AdoMet-binding motif (EE) is conserved in PEMT orthologs. A, a tripartite putative AdoMet-binding motif is conserved in several methyltransferases that lack the classical AdoMet-binding motifs. Two regions of homology (Regions A and B) are separated by a hydrophobic region (hyd) of ~30 amino acids. The shaded boxes indicate regions that are conserved in eukaryotic PEMT orthologs. B, linear schematic map of the human PEMT enzyme indicating the position of the conserved di-glutamate motif. C, amino acid sequence alignment of eukaryotic PEMT orthologs. The shaded box indicates conservation of the di-glutamate motif in PEMT enzymes from different species. GenBankTM accession numbers for each protein are included.

 

Recently, we demonstrated that PEMT is a quatrotopic ER membrane protein with a topographical orientation that localizes both termini external to the ER subcompartment (22). Such a topographical orientation would localize the PXY motif to the ER lumen and the di-glutamate motif to the external surface of the ER membrane. Because AdoMet is most concentrated in the cytosolic compartment, we hypothesize that the di-glutamate motif is more likely to function in an AdoMet binding capacity in human PEMT (29).

Mutagenesis of the Di-glutamate Motif Decreases PEMT Activity—To examine the role of the conserved di-glutamate motif in binding to AdoMet, we mutated each glutamate residue to an aspartate residue to generate the mutant PEMT plasmids hP-E180D and hP-E181D. To evaluate the conservative glutamate mutants, we assayed PEMT activity in homogenates from cells that express the recombinant PEMT derivatives. Mutagenesis of Glu180 to an aspartate residue completely abolished PEMT activity, whereas similar mutagenesis of Glu181 resulted in a 70% decrease in PEMT activity (Fig. 8A). Immunoblots with an anti-PEMT peptide antibody demonstrated similar levels of abundance of the recombinant proteins (Fig. 8B). Provision of various concentrations of PMME or AdoMet did not suffice to restore the enzymatic activity to wild type levels (Fig. 8, C and D). However, assays performed in the presence of various concentrations of AdoMet revealed an elevated Km with respect to AdoMet in the case of the hP-E181D mutant (Fig. 8D). Thus, a role for the di-glutamate motif in an AdoMet-specific aspect of the transmethylation reaction is suggested.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
Site-directed mutagenesis of the di-glutamate motif decreases the enzymatic activity of PEMT. Cos-7 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids (3 µg) containing wild type PEMT or epitope-tagged PEMT derivatives or mock transfected with empty pCI vector. A, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity. The results are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate, relative to the values obtained for similar assays on cells transfected with wild type PEMT. B, immunoblot with anti-PEMT antibody using 25 µg of transfectant homogenate protein. C, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity in the presence of a constant AdoMet concentration (200 µM) and various PMME concentrations (100–1000 µM). The results are expressed as the means of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate. The data points for the E180D derivative are clustered along the abscissa because this mutant did not display activity at any concentration of PMME evaluated. D, cell homogenates (50 µg of protein) were assayed for PEMT activity in the presence of a constant PMME concentration (500 µM) and various AdoMet concentrations (100–1000 µM). Three separate experiments were conducted with each assay performed in duplicate. The results were subjected to nonlinear regression using the Curvefit software (Graphpad.com). The Vmax and Km values were calculated using the Michaelis-Menten equation. Units for kinetic parameters are as follows: Vmax, pmol/min/mg protein; Km, µM.

 

Mutagenesis of the Di-glutamate Motif Diminishes AdoMet Binding Activity—To elucidate whether the changes in PEMT activity could be attributed to a reduction in AdoMet binding activity, we performed microsomal AdoMet binding assays on transfected cells. Mutation of Glu180 to an aspartate residue abolished the AdoMet binding capacity of the recombinant mutant enzyme (Fig. 9A). Similar mutagenesis of Glu181 yielded a protein that exhibited a 55% decrement in AdoMet binding activity (Fig. 9A). Binding assays of the hP-E181D PEMT derivative did not detect binding activity at any AdoMet concentration evaluated (data not shown). Thus, the integrity of residue Glu180 is essential to the AdoMet binding activity of PEMT. Mutagenesis of Glu181 results in a PEMT derivative with significantly reduced AdoMet binding ability (KD, 666.7 pmol) relative to the wild type enzyme (KD, 303.1 pmol) (Fig. 9B). Because the changes in binding activity and enzymatic activity of the hP-E181D mutant are proportionally similar (Figs. 8A and 9A), and the replacement of Glu181 with an aspartate residue yields a protein with severely reduced AdoMet binding ability, it appears that the altered PEMT activity of the di-glutamate mutants was a consequence of specific changes in the AdoMet binding activity. Thus, a functional role for the di-glutamate motif in the AdoMet binding activity of the human PEMT enzyme is supported.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9.
Site-directed mutagenesis of the di-glutamate motif decreases the AdoMet binding activity of PEMT. A, microsomes (50 µg of protein) prepared from transfected cells were assayed for AdoMet binding activity. The results are expressed as the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments, each performed in duplicate, relative to the values obtained for similar assays on microsomes from cells transfected with wild type PEMT. The asterisk signifies p < 0.05. Binding assays on microsomes from mock transfected cells quantitated AdoMet bound by microsomal components other than PEMT. B, microsomes (30 µg of protein) prepared from transfected cells were assayed for AdoMet binding activity in the presence of a constant S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine concentration and various unlabeled AdoMet concentrations (5–125 µM). Three separate experiments were conducted with each assay performed in duplicate. The results were subjected to nonlinear regression using the Curvefit software (Graphpad.com), and the KD with respect to AdoMet (expressed in pmol) was determined.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
AdoMet is the most commonly used substrate after ATP (7). The AdoMet moiety is required for the synthesis of several essential biomolecules including PC, creatine, and epinephrine, as well as for the methylation of DNA and RNA (30). A measure of the importance of AdoMet is perhaps best illustrated in that the only known genome that lacks the gene encoding AdoMet synthetase is that of the obligate intracellular parasite Chlamydia trachomatis (31). Of clinical relevance, the AdoMet molecule is intrinsically linked with the non-protein amino acid, Hcy, elevated plasma concentrations of which are considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (10).

To gain insight into the PEMT transmethylation reaction and, thereby, the mechanism by which genetic ablation of PEMT can cause decreased circulating plasma homocysteine levels, we examined the role of specific PEMT amino acid residues in the binding of AdoMet/AdoHcy. We have now identified two distinct motifs that are required for PEMT to bind the methyl donor.

Three AdoMet-binding motifs are conserved in the majority of the AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases, but these motifs are absent from several enzymes including those of the eukaryotic PEMT family and the isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase (ICMT) family of enzymes (16, 18). The ICMT enzymes constitute part of a post-translational modification process, in which proteins that terminate in a CAAX motif, such as Ras, undergo isoprenylation, C-terminal proteolytic cleavage and carboxyl methylation (10). Although absent from all eukaryotic PEMT enzymes, the three classical AdoMet-binding motifs are present in the prokaryotic Rhodobater sphaeroides PEMT ortholog, encoded by the pmtA gene (16, 32). However, this enzyme is a soluble cytosolic protein that has little homology with the higher eukaryotic, membrane-bound PEMT orthologs (32, 33).

A partial consensus AdoMet-binding motif (98GXG100) is conserved in the eukaryotic PEMT enzymes, and site-directed mutagenesis of each glycine residue demonstrated their importance in the AdoMet binding activity of PEMT. Whereas an intact Gly100 residue is essential for binding of the AdoMet moiety, Gly98 may serve in a structural capacity, because conservative mutagenesis of the residue was quite well tolerated. Moreover, significant binding activity was retained even when Gly98 was substituted with a glutamate residue. However, because the KD with respect to AdoMet was elevated in the case of each Gly98 mutant, a role for this residue in binding of AdoMet is suggested. Our data do not allow us to exclude the possibility that the glutamate residue is also mediating the binding of AdoMet, especially because we have demonstrated the role of other PEMT glutamate residues in AdoMet binding. However, because an intact Gly100 residue is essential for AdoMet binding function, and the replacement of Gly98 with an alanine residue has a lesser impact on AdoMet binding, insertion of a glutamate residue combined with an intact Gly100 might be expected to result in enhanced AdoMet binding. Because this was not the case, we favor a structural role for Gly98 in the AdoMet binding activity of the human PEMT enzyme.

To further define the AdoMet binding site of human PEMT, we examined a novel, recently proposed, AdoMet-binding motif (RHPXY-hyd-EE) (18). This nonclassical motif was derived following alignment-based analyses of the ICMT family of enzymes, homologs thereof, the yeast PEM2 enzyme, and several sterol reductases (18). By in silico analysis, we determined that the consensus motif is also partially conserved in the rat, mouse, and human PEMT orthologs.

Topographical analysis of Ste14p, a member of the ICMT family of methyltransferases, indicated that the enzyme is oriented in the ER membrane such that the two flanking regions of the motif are colocalized on the external face of the membrane (18). Such an orientation might be possible because the intervening hydrophobic domain is predicted to "double back" within the membrane plane through the use of a helical hairpin (18). The C-terminal transmembrane domain of the yeast PEM2 enzyme is proposed to adopt a similar structural conformation (18).

In contrast, the corresponding transmembrane domain in the human PEMT enzyme is shorter than the minimum length (31 amino acids) necessary for helical hairpin formation, and a topographical model based on four transmembrane domains has been elucidated (22). Such a topographical structure would position the two flanking segments of the motif on opposite sides of the ER membrane. Hence, in this model, the N-terminal portion of the motif (PXY) is lumenally oriented and therefore diametrically opposed to the AdoMet-rich cytosol (22, 29). Although we have not eliminated the possibility that the lumenally oriented PXY motif might still have a role in the AdoMet binding activity of PEMT, our working hypothesis is that the cytosolic-localized di-glutamate motif is the functional AdoMet-binding portion of the RHPXY-hyd-EE motif in the human PEMT enzyme.

Mutagenesis of the di-glutamate motif coupled with AdoMet binding assays verified the importance of the glutamate pair, with Glu180 in particular being essential to the AdoMet binding activity of PEMT. However, Glu181 also has a role in AdoMet binding, because mutagenesis of the residue results in a significantly elevated KD with respect to AdoMet. Nucleotide-binding proteins such as p21, contain an invariant acidic residue and a GXGXXG motif that are separated by ~20 amino acids (34). Hydrogen bonding between the acidic residue of such proteins and the 2'-hydroxy group of the adenosine ribose has been demonstrated (34). Thus, either or both glutamate residues in the conserved di-glutamate motif of PEMT may bind the AdoMet moiety through hydrogen bonding. Mutagenesis of each glutamate residue to an aspartate residue reduced AdoMet binding activity. Although aspartate residues may also form hydrogen bonds, the shorter length of the aspartate side chain may impair the AdoMet binding capacity of the residues in this region of the human PEMT enzyme.

From the topographical orientation of the PEMT enzyme and the predicted length of the transmembrane domains, we envision a model that would position the conserved GXG and diglutamate motifs toward the cytosolic face of the third and fourth transmembrane helices, respectively (Fig. 10). This would provide optimal access to the AdoMet pool in the cytosol (29). Moreover, because the third and fourth transmembrane helices are adjacent domains, the conserved GXG and di-glutamate motifs may be juxtaposed (Fig. 10). Intriguingly, S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase, which hydrolyzes AdoHcy to Hcy and adenosine, is also localized in the cytosol (35). Thus, the combined topographical organization of these disparate elements may provide the basis of a mechanism that links the AdoMet-dependent PEMT reaction to circulating Hcy levels.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10.
Model of the topographical organization of the AdoMet-binding site of PEMT. Topographical model of PEMT is based on data from previous studies (22). Four transmembrane domains span the ER membrane in an orientation that positions the N and C termini external to the ER membrane. The positions of the GXG and di-glutamate motifs are indicated.

 

In summary, we identified two closely oriented amino acids motifs in the human PEMT enzyme that are essential for binding of AdoMet. The resolved AdoMet-binding site of PEMT is unique in that it conforms to neither the classical nor nonclassical binding motifs but rather is a novel combination of both classes. Because PEMT has been shown to modulate circulating plasma Hcy levels, the enzyme represents a novel target for therapeutic intervention in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia. Resolution of key motifs that bind AdoMet will greatly accelerate the design of such therapeutic agents.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Eraldo Antonini, eminent biochemist, who died prematurely 20 years ago, March 19, 1983. Back

§ Supported by a Studentship from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Back

|| Senior Scholar of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Back

** Canada Research Chair in Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids and Heritage Medical Scientist of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. To whom correspondence should be addressed: 320 HMRC Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada. Tel.: 780-492-8286; Fax: 780-492-3383; E-mail: Dennis.Vance{at}ualberta.ca.

1 The abbreviations are: PC, phosphatidylcholine; AdoMet, S-adenosylmethionine; AdoHcy, S-adenosylhomocysteine; Hcy, homocysteine; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PMME, phosphatidylmonomethylethanolamine; PEMT, phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase; ICMT, isoprenylcysteine carboxyl methyltransferase. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Susanne Lingrell for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Dr. Richard Lehner for invaluable discussions.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Vance, D. E., and Ridgway, N. D. (1988) Prog. Lipid. Res. 27, 61–79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. DeLong, C. J., Shen, Y. J., Thomas, M. J., and Cui, Z. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29683–29688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Reo, N. V., and Adinehzadeh, M. (2000) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 164, 113–126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Reo, N. V., Adinehzadeh, M., and Foy, B. D. (2002) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1580, 171–188[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kent, C. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1348, 79–90[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Finkelstein, J. D., and Martin, J. J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 1582–1587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Fauman, E. B., Blumenthal, R. M., Cheng, X. (1999) in S-Adenosylmethionine-Dependent Methyltransferases: Structures and Functions (Cheng, X., Blumenthal, R. M., eds) pp. 1–32, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
  8. Fujioka, M. (1992) Int. J. Biochem. 24, 1917–1924[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Finkelstein, J. D. (1998) Eur. J. Pediatr. 157, (Suppl, 2) S40–S44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Refsum, H., and Ueland, P. M. (1998) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 9, 533–539[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Vance, J. E., and Vance, D. E. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4486–4491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Nishimaki-Mogami, T., Suzuki, K., Okochi, E., and Takahashi, A. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1304, 11–20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Nishimaki-Mogami, T., Suzuki, K., and Takahashi, A. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1304, 21–31[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Agellon, L. B., Walkey, C. J., Vance, D. E., Kuipers, F., and Verkade, H. J. (1999) Hepatology 30, 725–729[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Noga, A. A., Stead, L. M., Zhao, Y., Brosnan, M. E., Brosnan, J. T., and Vance, D. E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 5952–5955[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kagan, R. M., and Clarke, S. (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 310, 417–427[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Posfai, J., Bhagwat, A. S., Posfai, G., and Roberts, R. J. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 2421–2435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Romano, J. D., and Michaelis, S. (2001) Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1957–1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 77, 51–59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Walkey, C. J., Shields, D. J., and Vance, D. E. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436, 405–412[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Shields, D. J., Lehner, R., Agellon, L. B., and Vance, D. E. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 2956–2962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ridgway, N. D., and Vance, D. E. (1992) Methods Enzymol. 209, 366–374[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Zhu, Y., Qi, C., Cao, W. Q., Yeldandi, A. V., Rao, M. S., and Reddy, J. K. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 10380–10385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cui, Z., Vance, J. E., Chen, M. H., Voelker, D. R., and Vance, D. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16655–16663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lauster, R., Trautner, T. A., and Noyer-Weidner, M. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 206, 305–312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Saraste, M., Sibbald, P. R., and Wittinghofer, A. (1990) Trends. Biochem. Sci. 15, 430–434[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Scrutton, N. S., Berry, A., and Perham, R. N. (1990) Nature 343, 38–43[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Farooqui, J. Z., Lee, H. W., Kim, S., and Paik, W. K. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 757, 342–351[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Clarke, S., and Banfield, K. (2001) in Homocysteine in Health and Disease (Carmel, R., and Jacobsen, D. W., eds) pp. 63–78, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  31. Stephens, R. S., Kalman, S., Lammel, C., Fan, J., Marathe, R., Aravind, L., Mitchell, W., Olinger, L., Tatusov, R. L., Zhao, Q., Koonin, E. V., and Davis, R. W. (1998) Science 282, 754–759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Arondel, V., Benning, C., and Somerville, C. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16002–16008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cain, B. D., Donohue, T. J., Shepherd, W. D., and Kaplan, S. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 942–948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wierenga, R. K., and Hol, W. G. (1983) Nature 302, 842–844[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Ueland, P. M., Berge, R. K., Saebo, J., and Farstad, M. (1979) FEBS Lett. 101, 184–186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Finkelstein, J. D. (2001) in Homocysteine in Health and Disease (Carmel, R., and Jacobsen, D. W., eds) pp. 92–99, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
Z. Li and D. E. Vance
Thematic Review Series: Glycerolipids. Phosphatidylcholine and choline homeostasis
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 1187 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. E. Vance, Z. Li, and R. L. Jacobs
Hepatic Phosphatidylethanolamine N-Methyltransferase, Unexpected Roles in Animal Biochemistry and Physiology
J. Biol. Chem., November 16, 2007; 282(46): 33237 - 33241.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S H. Mudd, J. T Brosnan, M. E Brosnan, R. L Jacobs, S. P Stabler, R. H Allen, D. E Vance, and C. Wagner
Methyl balance and transmethylation fluxes in humans
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. J. Shields, S. Lingrell, L. B. Agellon, J. T. Brosnan, and D. E. Vance
Localization-independent Regulation of Homocysteine Secretion by Phosphatidylethanolamine N-Methyltransferase
J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 27339 - 27344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Hofemeister and P. O'Hare
Analysis of the Localization and Topology of Nurim, a Polytopic Protein Tightly Associated with the Inner Nuclear Membrane
J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2005; 280(4): 2512 - 2521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page