JBC Advanced Glycation Endproducts

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M303206200 on July 10, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 39, 37169-37174, September 26, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/39/37169    most recent
M303206200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Contreras, F.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Goñi, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Contreras, F.-X.
Right arrow Articles by Goñi, F. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Sphingomyelinase Activity Causes Transbilayer Lipid Translocation in Model and Cell Membranes*

F.-Xabier Contreras {ddagger} §, Ana-Victoria Villar {ddagger}, Alicia Alonso {ddagger}, Richard N. Kolesnick ¶ and Félix M. Goñi {ddagger} ||

From the {ddagger}Unidad de Biofísica (Centro Mixto CSIC-UPV/EHU) and the Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidad del País Vasco, 48080 Bilbao, Spain and Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021

Received for publication, March 28, 2003 , and in revised form, June 23, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ceramide is known to induce structural rearrangements in membrane bilayers, including the formation of ceramide-rich and -poor domains and the efflux of aqueous solutes. This report describes a novel effect of ceramide, namely the induction of transbilayer lipid movements. This effect was demonstrated in both model (large unilamellar vesicles) and cell (erythrocyte ghost) membranes in which ceramide generation took place in situ through the action of an externally added sphingomyelinase. Two different novel assays were developed to detect transbilayer lipid movement. One of the assays required the preparation of vesicles containing a ganglioside only in the outer monolayer and entrapped neuraminidase. Sphingomyelinase activity induced ganglioside hydrolysis under conditions in which no neuraminidase was released from the vesicles. The second assay involved the preparation of liposomes or erythrocyte ghosts labeled with a fluorescent energy donor in their inner leaflets. Sphingomyelin hydrolysis was accompanied by fluorescence energy transfer to an impermeable acceptor in the outer aqueous medium. Ceramide-induced transbilayer lipid movement is explained in terms of another well known property of ceramide, namely the facilitation of lamellar to non-lamellar lipid-phase transitions. Thus, sphingomyelinase generates ceramide on one side of the membrane; ceramide then induces the transient formation of non-lamellar structural intermediates, which cause the loss of lipid asymmetry in the bilayer, i.e. the transbilayer movement of ceramide together with other lipids. As direct targets for ceramide tend to be intracellular, these observations may be relevant to the mechanism of transmembrane signaling by means of the sphingomyelin pathway.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell membranes are asymmetric in the steady state, i.e. lipid and protein compositions of the inner and outer leaflets are not the same. Far from being a static phenomenon, this asymmetry arises from a series of constant and concerted transmembrane movements leading to an apparently invariant distribution of bilayer components. Lipid asymmetry in particular is known to be altered in physiological or pathological events such as recognition by phagocytes, blood coagulation, or apoptosis (see Ref. 1 for a review). The collapse of lipid asymmetry is often known as "lipid scrambling."

Sphingomyelin is a phospholipid localized mainly at the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, where it was originally conceived to act in a structural manner to provide a semipermeable barrier to the extracellular environment (2). In 1987, however, it was reported that 1,2-diacylglycerols induce sphingomyelinase activation in GH3 pituitary cells (3), and it was suggested for the first time that this response may activate a sphingomyelin-based signaling pathway (4, 5). Subsequently, Okazaki et al. (6, 7) confirmed this notion, demonstrating that receptor binding of vitamin D3 induced sphingomyelinase activation and that the generated ceramide served as a second messenger in a differentiation pathway of HL-60 cells. Over the past decade, ceramide and other sphingolipids have been identified as primary regulators of signal transduction involved in multiple biological functions (8, 9). Recent studies have suggested that much of the sphingomyelin in the plasma membrane exists in preformed microdomains in mammalian cells (10) called rafts and that this is the site of ceramide generation and signal transmission (11).

Ceramide was originally conceived of as a classic second messenger, directly and stoichiometrically activating a set of target proteins (see below) (8, 9). However, recent data suggest that ceramide may act in part by physically altering the structure and properties of membrane rafts. In this context, it has been suggested that ceramide generated in rafts induces their coalescence into larger platforms and that these macrodomains serve as a site for oligomerization of cell surface receptors such as Fas and CD40 (1214) and the internalization of bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (15, 16). In this paradigm, acid sphingomyelinase is initially translocated onto the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane where it catalyzes the hydrolysis of raft-associated sphingomyelin.

Ceramide affects a number of membrane properties in model membrane systems, which may impact platform formation in biological membranes; ceramide increases lipid order, gives rise to ceramide-rich separate domains, and destabilizes the lamellar structures, inducing membrane permeabilization and membrane fusion (see Ref. 17 for a review). As a consequence, treating defined model membrane systems containing sphingomyelin with sphingomyelinase has been found to produce, via ceramide formation, vesicle efflux (18, 19), membrane fusion (20, 21), and vesicle budding (22). These events are believed to occur through the transient formation of non-bilayer intermediates (17, 23, 24).

Ceramide structural effects on membranes are interesting in the context of the sphingomyelin pathway (9). Evidence shows that the sphingomyelin pathway is a ubiquitous signaling pathway conserved through evolution and that it signals events as distinct as differentiation, senescence, proliferation, and cell cycle arrest (11, 25, 26). A large body of research has focused on its role in stress responses (11, 2729). Over the past decade, a number of direct targets for ceramide have been explored as mediators of ceramide signaling. Ceramide reportedly interacts directly with kinase suppressor of Ras (identical to ceramide-activated protein kinase) (30, 31), ceramide-activated protein phosphatase (32), the protein kinase C isoforms {delta}, {epsilon}, and {zeta} (33, 34), c-Raf-1 (35, 36), and other proteins. A recent report by Kashiwagi et al. (33) demonstrated that ceramide binds to the C1b domain of protein kinase C-{delta} in COS7 and Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells, directing its translocation to the intracellular membrane compartments. Ceramide exhibited a high affinity toward the C1b domain, exceeding the binding affinity of the phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Other potential ceramide targets, such as kinase suppressor of Ras and c-Raf-1, also contain C1b domains, but whether the C1b domain targets these proteins to sites of ceramide generation, such as plasma membrane rafts, is presently unknown. However, these targets are intracellular, and it is presently uncertain whether ceramide generated on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane can initiate their activation.

The present study was intended to address, using biophysical techniques, the question of how sphingomyelin hydrolysis on one side of a bilayer might induce transbilayer lipid reorganization. We have developed two novel systems to examine ceramide-induced transfer across a membrane bilayer, one of which we have applied to large unilamellar vesicles and the other to both vesicles and resealed erythrocyte ghosts. In all three cases, we observe transmembrane lipid movements in parallel with sphingomyelinase activity.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—Acid sphingomyelinase (EC 3.1.4.12 [EC] ) from Bacillus cereus was obtained from Sigma and was used in the presence of 2 mM o-phenanthroline to inhibit traces of contaminant phospholipase C activity. Previous studies showed that o-phenanthroline did not affect sphingomyelinase activity, in agreement with published data (37). ADP-dependent short chain acyl-CoA hydrolase (EC 3.1.2.18 [EC] ) from Clostridium perfringens, cholesterol, Triton X-100, and N-acetylneuraminyl-lactose from bovine colostrum were obtained from Sigma. Egg sphingomyelin (SM)1 and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL), and monosialoganglioside (GM3) was obtained from Larodan AB (Sweden). Tetramethylrhodamine goat anti-mouse IgG (Rho-IgG) and N-(7-nitrobenzene-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl) phosphatidylethanolamine (NBD-PE) were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Sephadex G-75 and HiTrap protein G were purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Uppsala, Sweden). YM-100 Centricon filters (100,000 molecular weight cut-off) were purchased from Millipore. A polyclonal antibody against neuraminidase was raised in rabbits according to Ref. 54. Sodium dithionite was purchased from Fluka (Biochemika, Switzerland).

Liposome Preparation—SM/PE/Ch (2:1:1 molar ratio) large unilamellar vesicles (LUV) were prepared by the extrusion method (38) using Nuclepore filters of 0.1-µm pore diameter at room temperature, as detailed previously (39). Chemical analysis of the extruded vesicles showed that the extrusion procedure did not modify their composition.

LUV were prepared in 10 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, pH 6.5. When required, neuraminidase (0.16 unit/ml) was added to the hydration buffer. In this case, non-entrapped neuraminidase was removed by gel filtration through Sephadex G-75.

Asymmetric Incorporation of Glycolipids—To incorporate GM3 ganglioside to the outer monolayer of liposomes prepared as described above, the glycolipids in organic solvent were dried and resuspended in a volume of methanol that was 5% of the vesicle suspension volume. Vesicles were added to this methanolic glycolipid solution so that GM3 was 10 mol % of the total lipids. After vortex mixing, they were left to incubate for 15 min at room temperature (40).

Purification of Anti-neuraminidase IgG—The antibody raised in rabbits against neuraminidase was separated from hemoglobin by using a HiTrap protein G affinity column; 1 ml of the mixture was passed through the column, and the HiTrap column was washed 3 times with a 20 mM phosphate, pH 7, buffer to remove hemoglobin. Anti-neuraminidase IgG was eluted from the affinity column with a 0.1 mM glycine-HCl, pH 2.7, buffer.

Enzyme Assay—All experiments were performed at 37 °C, lipid concentration was 0.3 mM, and enzymes were used at 1.6 units/ml for sphingomyelinase on LUV, 0.16 unit/ml for sphingomyelinase on erythrocytes, and 0.16 unit/ml for neuraminidase.

Sphingomyelinase activity was assayed by determining phosphorous content (41) in the aqueous phase of an extraction mixture (chloroform/methanol/hydrochloric acid, 200/100/1, by volume) after the addition of aliquots from the reaction mixtures at different times. Sialic acid formed after treatment of liposomes containing GM3 with neuraminidase was determined by using a modification of the resorcinol-sialic acid assay (42). When required, neuraminidase activity was tested with an artificial substrate, N-acetylneuraminyl-lactose.

Neuraminidase Inhibition by Anti-neuraminidase IgG—LUV containing entrapped neuraminidase were prepared as above and diluted to 0.3 mM lipid. The vesicle suspension was treated with Triton X-100 (0.1% w/v) to release the enzyme; 100 µl of the anti-neuraminidase IgG (0.5 µg/µl) was then added, and the reaction mixture was left to incubate for 30 min. Then, 0.03 mM N-acetylneuraminyl-lactose was added, and the production of sialic acid was measured after 1 h. A control in the absence of IgG was performed simultaneously.

Ghost Membrane Preparation—Human erythrocyte ghost membranes were obtained by a modified Steck and Kant method (43, 44). The membranes obtained from 20 ml of erythrocyte concentrate (as provided by the blood bank) were washed three times by centrifugation in 0.9% NaCl, and the pellet was resuspended with cold 1.2 mM acetic acid, 4 mM MgSO4, pH 3.2, buffer, left for 30 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged. In the next step, the pellet was suspended in 3 volumes of 10 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, pH 6.5, containing 3 µM NBD-PE, and then membranes were stabilized and allowed to reseal by incubating them for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing 3 times by centrifugation in the same buffer, the resulting membrane suspension was layered over 43% sucrose in 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and centrifuged for 60 min at 27,500 x g (TST 55.5 rotor, Kontron) (45). The resealed ghosts floating on top of the sucrose solution were harvested and washed 3 times in the 10 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, pH 6.5, buffer. At this step, the ghosts were labeled with NBD on both sides of the membranes. To eliminate the outer leaflet label, we used 0.6 mM sodium dithionite, which reduced outer NBD and thus abolished its fluorescence. Reduction was monitored in an LS50 spectrofluorometer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) at room temperature with a continuously stirred cuvette. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 465 and 530 nm, respectively. A cut-off filter (515 nm) was used to prevent contamination from scattered light. Labeled ghosts were separated from excess sodium dithionite by centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in the buffer described above.

LUV Labeled in the Inside Bilayer with NBD-PE—SM/PE/Ch LUV were prepared by using the method described above, including 0.6 mol % NBD-PE. To eliminate the outer leaflet NBD-PE fluorescence, the same dithionite method described above for ghost membranes was used, except that to separate LUV from excess sodium dithionite, a Sephadex G-75 chromatography column was used.

Fluorimetric Assays—All experiments were performed at 37 °C, lipid concentration was 0.3 mM for LUV assays and 0.09 mM for ghost assays, and sphingomyelinase was used at 1.6 unit/ml and 0.16 unit/ml for LUV and ghost assays, respectively. Aliquots (50 or 100 µl for LUV or ghost membranes, respectively) were removed from the reaction mixture at regular intervals and mixed with 10 µl of Rho-IgG in 10 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, pH 6.5, buffer to a final volume of 500 µl. Energy transfer was monitored by using an LS50 spectrofluorometer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) under the same conditions described above.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ganglioside Translocation in Lipid Vesicles—LUV composed of SM:PE:Ch (2:1:1 molar ratio) were treated with GM3 ganglioside in methanol to obtain vesicles containing GM3 (~10 mol % of total lipid) located exclusively on the outer leaflet (40). These vesicles contained neuraminidase and when kept at 4 °C, the vesicles were stable for at least 12 h; no significant amount of GM3 was hydrolyzed in this period of time. Addition of sphingomyelinase (1.6 units/ml) to a suspension of these vesicles induced SM hydrolysis, which reached equilibrium after ~20 min, when ~40% of SM had been hydrolyzed (Fig. 1A). Addition of Triton X-100 after 60 min caused membrane disruption, but SM hydrolysis did not go beyond 50% at 30 min after detergent addition, i.e. 90 min after sphingomyelinase addition. Previous experiments had shown that this Triton X-100 concentration did not inhibit sphingomyelinase or neuraminidase.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Flip-flop of gangliosides induced by sphingomyelinase activity in large unilamellar vesicles. A, sphingomyelin hydrolysis by sphingomyelinase. Average values ± S.E. (n = 4). B, GM3 ganglioside hydrolysis by entrapped neuraminidase. Average values ± S.E. (n = 5). Vesicle composition was SM:PE:Ch (2:1:1) + 10 mol % GM3 on the outer leaflet only.

 

Aliquots of the vesicle suspension were removed at fixed times after the addition of sphingomyelinase and analyzed for the GM3 product of neuraminidase activity, sialic acid. GM3 was hydrolyzed almost in parallel with SM, except that no saturation was observed (Fig. 1B). After the addition of Triton X-100, virtually all GM3 was cleaved by neuraminidase. One interpretation of these data is that, as a consequence of sphingomyelinase activity, GM3 was flipping to the inner leaflet, thus becoming accessible to neuraminidase.

However, it was necessary to rule out the possibility of neuraminidase coming out from the vesicles as a result of sphingomyelinase activity. Ceramides increase membrane permeability (18, 19, 45), and an efflux of molecules up to 40 kDa has been observed in sphingomyelin-treated vesicles (19). Neuraminidase has a molecular mass of 70 kDa. To clarify this aspect, neuraminidase activity outside the sphingomyelinase-treated vesicles was assayed with the water-soluble substrate N-acetylneuraminyl-lactose. For this purpose, aliquots of the vesicle suspension were filtered through YM-100 Centricon filters, which allow the easy passage of neuraminidase. Neuraminidase activity in the filtrates is shown in Fig. 2A. Even in the absence of sphingomyelinase activity (time zero), ~18% of the total enzyme activity was recovered in the filtrates. This is probably because of vesicle breakdown due to shear stress during the filtration procedure. Vesicles containing GM3 but not sphingomyelinase or internal neuraminidase were treated with neuraminidase at the concentration found in the filtrates. Neuraminidase was added to the vesicle suspension from the outside to ensure enzyme-substrate interaction. In this case (as seen in Fig. 2B), the time course of GM3 hydrolysis is totally different from the one depending on sphingomyelinase activity. Thus, the results in Fig. 1B cannot be explained on the basis of neuraminidase efflux from the vesicles.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Neuraminidase is not released as a result of sphingomyelinase activity. A, fraction of released neuraminidase in the time course of sphingomyelinase action. Free neuraminidase was separated from the vesicles by filtration. Average values ± S.E. (n = 3). B: {blacktriangleup}, hydrolyzed GM3 ganglioside when LUV not containing neuraminidase were treated with the same amount of enzyme that was released in the experiment in A. Average values of two closely similar experiments; {circ}, data of Fig. 1B replotted for comparison. C, GM3 ganglioside hydrolysis by entrapped neuraminidase, with antineuraminidase IgG added to the LUV suspension. Average values ± S.E. (n = 4).

 

An additional control was performed in which any extravascular neuraminidase would have been neutralized by a specific antibody. With this aim, a polyclonal antineuraminidase antibody was raised in rabbits. We verified that the purified antineuraminidase IgG at 50 µg/ml completely abolished neuraminidase activity at 0.16 unit/ml. The same concentration of IgG had no effect on sphingomyelinase activity. When the experiment described in Fig. 1 was repeated with 50 µg/ml antineuraminidase antibody in the medium (Fig. 2C), no significant differences were found between the fractions of hydrolyzed GM3 in the presence and absence of antibody (Student's t test, p > 0.05 for all pairs of data points). We concluded that GM3 hydrolysis was catalyzed by neuraminidase inside the vesicles; thus, sphingomyelinase activity had caused GM3 to flip to the inside lipid monolayer.

Fluorescence Energy Transfer in Lipid Vesicles—A completely different assay was developed to test the transmembrane movement of lipids in a system in which sphingomyelinase activity was likely to cause membrane permeabilization to solutes of Mr <= 40,000. This novel procedure was based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer between NBD-PE and Rho-IgG. Energy transfer between NBD and rhodamine is well known and often used in membrane studies. Our modification consisted of using rhodamine bound to an irrelevant IgG, whose large Mr (150,000) ensured that, in principle, it could not penetrate the vesicles.

LUV were prepared as usual, except that 0.6 mol % NBD-PE was included in the lipid mixture. After preparation, the vesicle suspension was treated with the essentially impermeable reducing agent sodium dithionite, so that NBD in the outer monolayers was reduced and its fluorescence was abolished. Excess dithionite was removed immediately by gel filtration. LUV labeled with NBD only in their inner lipid leaflets were then treated with sphingomyelinase. Enzyme activity was the same as described in Fig. 1A. Aliquots were removed from the reaction mixture at regular intervals and mixed with Rho-IgG in buffer. As the sphingomyelinase reaction proceeded, NBD-PE flopped toward the outer monolayer, and energy transfer to Rho-IgG could take place. Consequently, when the fluorescence of NBD-PE was excited, its emission intensity decreased with time, and the emission intensity of Rho-IgG increased accordingly. The corresponding data are shown in Fig. 3. Control experiments, also shown in the figure, indicated that in the absence of sphingomyelinase, NBD-PE fluorescence remained invariant with time. Thus, fluorescence energy transfer measurements confirm that sphingomyelinase activity induces the transmembrane movement of lipids.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Flip-flop of NBD-PE induced by sphingomyelinase activity in LUV. Sphingomyelin hydrolysis as in Fig. 1A. •, time course of NBD-PE fluorescence intensity; {circ}, time course of Rho-IgG fluorescence intensity; {blacktriangleup}, {triangleup}, controls in the absence of sphingomyelinase. NBD-PE was initially located on the inner leaflet only; Rho-IgG was outside the vesicles during the whole experiment. Rho-IgG fluorescence was excited through NBD-PE by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Average values ± S.E. (n = 3). a.u., absorbance units.

 

Fluorescence Energy Transfer in Erythrocyte Ghosts—A similar procedure was applied to erythrocyte ghosts to explore the transbilayer movement of lipids induced by sphingomyelinase in a cell membrane. Unsealed ghosts were treated with NBD-PE, which became incorporated into both membrane leaflets. Ghosts were then resealed and treated with dithionite to reduce outer leaflet NBD. Excess dithionite was removed by repeated centrifugation and washing. Sphingomyelinase activity reached equilibrium in erythrocyte membranes much faster than in liposomes (compare Figs. 1A and 4A). The experiments in Fig. 4 were obtained by using 0.16 unit/ml sphingomyelinase, i.e. of the amount used with liposomes. The reasons for this high rate of sphingomyelin degradation in red blood cells are currently the object of a separate investigation in this laboratory. Because of the fast ceramide production, fluorescence resonance energy transfer was detected in ghosts after a very short time (Fig. 4B). The correlation between rates of ceramide production and energy transfer (compare Figs. 3 and 4B) supplies additional evidence that SM hydrolysis is driving the transmembrane lipid movement.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Flip-flop of NBD-PE induced by sphingomyelinase activity in resealed erythrocyte ghosts. A, sphingomyelin hydrolysis by sphingomyelinase. Average values ± S.E. (n = 5). B, flip-flop of NBD-PE, as in Fig. 3. •, time course of NBD-PE fluorescence; {circ}, time course of Rho-IgG fluorescence. Average values ± S.E. (n = 3). a.u., absorbance units.

 

An additional control experiment was performed to ensure that sphingomyelinase did not stimulate transfer of Rho-IgG across the erythrocyte ghost membrane (Table I). For that purpose, resealed ghosts were prepared containing Rho-IgG and treated with sphingomyelinase for 10 min. The ghosts were then passed through a HiTrap protein G affinity column to retain any Rho-IgG that had leaked out. The fluorescence intensity of the column-eluted ghosts was the same as that of an equivalent ghost preparation untreated with sphingomyelinase, indicating that no loss of Rho-IgG had occurred as a result of enzyme treatment. When ghosts previously treated with Triton X-100 were passed through the HiTrap column, the fluorescence level was {approx}10% of the former cases, showing that, in the presence of the detergent, loss of Rho-IgG had occurred. Later, the HiTrap column containing any leaked Rho-IgG was eluted with a pH 2.7 buffer. In this case, the eluates from the control and sphingomyelinase-treated ghosts showed virtually no fluorescence, whereas the eluate from the detergent-treated ghosts showed a clear fluorescence signal (Table I).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Rho-IgG does not cross erythrocyte ghost membranes as a consequence of sphingomyelinase treatment

Average values of two closely similar independent measurements are shown.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mechanistic Aspects—The easiest answer to the question of how sphingomyelinase activity induces transbilayer lipid movement is probably related to the ability of ceramide to promote non-lamellar phase formation. It has also been found (46) that sphingolipid-sphingolipid interactions play a role in controlling the transmembrane distribution of these lipids; thus, cleavage of SM may lead to an altered distribution. Short chain ceramide derivatives have been shown to undergo spontaneous transbilayer movements much faster than phospholipids (47). This suggests that the commonly occurring long chain ceramides may also move across the bilayer. In turn, ceramide motion can facilitate the translocation of other lipids. Our previous studies (18, 48) have demonstrated that ceramide facilitates the lamellar-to-inverted hexagonal and/or lamellar-to-inverted cubic phase transitions at proportions that are comparable with those formed in our systems through sphingomyelinase action.

Under our experimental conditions, which were similar to those used by Ruiz-Argüello et al. (18), a dynamic equilibrium is probably established between lamellar and non-lamellar phase elements within an overall lamellar structure. Of course, only a stable bilayer allows the maintenance of asymmetry. As shown by 31P NMR in Ruiz-Argüello et al. (18), the ceramide-induced formation of isotropic components in a lamellar environment can explain very well the loss of asymmetry. A relationship between flip-flop movement and the formation of non-lamellar lipid structures was already suggested by Cullis and de Kruijff (49). The cryotransmission electron microscopy observations by Basañez et al. (20) are pertinent in this context. These authors examined large unilamellar vesicles containing SM:PE:Ch (2:1:1 molar ratio) treated with sphingomyelinase, i.e. the same system used in the present study. Vesicle aggregation and increase in size were clearly seen, but no images that could be related to pores or non-lamellar intermediates could be seen. This may be because those intermediates were either too small or, probably, too short-lived. However, the data by Basañez et al. (20) confirm that, under our conditions, the lipid organization is essentially lamellar, even after sphingomyelinase treatment. In summary, we suggest that sphingomyelinase generates ceramide and that ceramide induces the transient formation of non-lamellar structures, the latter leading to the (partial) loss of asymmetry in the transbilayer lipid distribution.

Kinetic Aspects—At least two kinetic aspects from the above results deserve some comment. One is the observation, particularly clear in Figs. 1 and 4, that transbilayer movement can go on even after ceramide production has reached equilibrium. With the neuraminidase method (Fig. 1), the amount of ceramide increases between 20 and 60 min by ~10% of total sphingolipid, whereas hydrolyzed GM3 increases by ~30%. In the case of ghosts (Fig. 4), only 6% of phospholipid is further hydrolyzed between 10 and 120 s, but energy transfer (measured as the increase in rhodamine fluorescence) increases by ~42%. This reveals the different nature of the two processes under consideration (sphingomyelin hydrolysis and lipid transbilayer motion). In enzyme catalysis, equilibrium is dictated by the law of mass action, and once it is reached, no net change in product or substrate concentration will be observed. With transbilayer lipid transfer, however, once the minimum proportion of ceramide that allows non-lamellar phase transition is formed, the process will continue until complete symmetry is reached (independently of the changes in ceramide production rate).

Also noticeable is the very fast lipid scrambling in sphingomyelinase-treated erythrocyte ghosts, which is secondary to the equally fast SM hydrolysis (Fig. 4). Apart from confirming the cause-effect relationship between ceramide production and transbilayer movement, the fast kinetics helps to differentiate our observations from those attributed to a putative "scramblase" (1, 50, 51). These authors find that flip-flop of phospholipids ensues when treating red blood cells with calcium and an ionophore. Because we used Ca2+ in the sphingomyelinase assay medium and the enzyme activity permeabilizes the erythrocyte membranes (18), it could be argued that we were, in fact, activating the "scramblase." However, the kinetics of Ca2+/ionophore-induced transbilayer movements has halftimes on the order of 10 min (50, 51) versus less than 10 s in our case (Fig. 4). This large kinetic difference virtually excludes any influence of "scramblase" in our results.

Physiological Implications—Lipid and protein motions are known to be closely interrelated in cell membranes (52). The observation that ceramide formation by sphingomyelinase leads to transbilayer movements of various lipid species may be related to a number of physiological cellular events and properties not well understood at present. An important one is the apparently anomalous distribution of SM predominantly in the outer monolayer of the cell plasma membrane, whereas ceramide receptor proteins are intracellular. Such distribution may appear reasonable in the resting condition, but how are ceramide and receptor both put together after stimulation of the ceramide signaling pathway? Our results are consistent with the fact that the secretory form of the acid sphingomyelinase must be translocated into raft structures on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane to hydrolyze raft SM and initiate signaling within seconds to minutes, which results in the activation of intracellular signaling cascades. At least in some instances, this may be spatially integrated through ceramide-driven platform formation (1214). The resulting ceramide, originally generated in the outer leaflet, is soon distributed among both monolayers, thus being able to bind intracellular proteins docking the plasma membrane inner monolayer. Moreover, as shown in Figs. 1, 3, and 4, ceramide motion will be accompanied by the transbilayer transfer of other lipids that will in turn become accessible to cytosolic enzymes. Importantly, SM may be internalized as a result of ceramide formation, thus becoming a substrate for intracellular sphingomyelinases.

Moreover, the present study defines a mechanism for transmembrane signaling distinct from that reported by Tepper et al. (53). In their study, the apoptotic stimulus itself resulted in the loss of membrane asymmetry because of a membrane scramblase, allowing some SM molecules access to the inner leaflet and initiating ceramide formation in a time frame of hours to days after stimulation. However, as noted above, the physiological process of cell signaling is triggered in a period of seconds to minutes, a time scale more compatible with the kinetics of sphingomyelinase-induced transbilayer motion demonstrated in this paper than with the scramblase-dependent mechanism.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported in part by Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (Spain) Grant BMC 2002-00784 and Universidad del País Vasco Grant 042.310-13552/2001. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§ Recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the Basque Government. Back

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gbpgourf{at}lg.ehu.es.

1 The abbreviations used are: SM, egg sphingomyelin; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; Rho-IgG, tetramethylrhodamine goat anti-mouse IgG; GM3, monosialoganglioside; NBD, N-(7-nitrobenzene-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl); Ch, cholesterol; LUV, large unilamellar vesicles. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bevers, E. M., Comfurius, P., Dekkers, D. W. C. & Zwaal, R. F. A. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1439, 317–330[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kolesnick, R. N. (1991) Prog. Lipid Res. 30, 1–38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Kolesnick, R. N. & Paley, A. E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 9204–9210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Kolesnick, R. N. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7617–7623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kolesnick, R. N. & Clegg, S. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6534–6537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Okazaki, T., Bell, R. M. & Hannun, Y. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19076–19080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Okazaki, T., Bielawska, A., Bell, R. M. & Hannun, Y. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 15823–15831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hannun, Y. A., Luberto, C. & Argraves, K. M. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4893–4903[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Mathias, S., Peña, L. A. & Kolesnick, R. N. (1998) Biochem. J. 335, 465–480
  10. Simons, K. & Ikonen, E. (2000) Science 290, 1721–1726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kolesnick, R. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 110, 3–8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Grassme, H., Jendrossek, V., Bock, J., Riehle, A. & Gulbins, E. (2002) J. Immunol. 168, 298–307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cremesti, A., Paris, F., Grassme, H., Holler, N., Tschopp, J., Fuks, Z., Gulbins, E. & Kolesnick, R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23954–23961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Grassme, H., Schwarz, H. & Gulbins, E. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 284, 1016–1030[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Grassme, H., Jendrossek, V., Riehle, A., Von Kurthy, G., Berger, J., Schwarz, H., Weller, M., Kolesnick, R. & Gulbins, E. (2003) Nat. Med. 9, 322–330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Grassme, H., Gulbins, E., Brenner, B., Ferlinz, K., Sandhoff, K., Harzer, K., Lang, F. & Meyer, T. F. (1997) Cell 91, 605–615[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kolesnick, R. N., Goñi, F. M. & Alonso, A. (2000) J. Cell. Physiol. 184, 285–300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ruiz-Argüello, M. B., Basañez, G., Goñi, F. M. & Alonso, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26616–26621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Montes, L. R., Goñi, F. M. & Alonso, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11788–11794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Basañez, G., Ruiz-Argüello, M. B., Alonso, A., Goñi, F. M., Karlsson, G. & Edwards, K. (1997) Biophys. J. 72, 2630–2637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ruiz-Argüello, M. B., Goñi, F. M. & Alonso, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22977–22982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Holopainen, J. M., Angelova, M. I. & Kinnunen, P. K. J. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 830–838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Goñi, F. M. & Alonso, A. (2000) Biosci. Rep. 20, 443–463[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Cremesti, A. E., Goñi, F. M. & Kolesnick, R. N. (2002) FEBS Lett. 531, 47–53[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Kolesnick, R. & Hannun, Y. A. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 224–225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Luberto, C., Kraveka, J. M. & Hannun, Y. A. (2002) Neurochem. Res. 27, 609–617[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Gulbins, E. & Kolesnick, R. (2002) Subcell. Biochem. 36, 229–244[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Lin, X., Fuks, A. & Kolesnick, R. (2000) Crit. Care Med. 28, 87–93
  29. Pettus, B. J., Chalfant, C. E. & Hannun, Y. A. (2002) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1585, 114–125[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Yan, F. & Polk, D. B. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 963–969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Zhang, Y., Yao, B., Delikat, S., Bayoumy, S., Lin, X. H., Basu, S., McGinley, M., Chan-Hui, P. Y., Lichenstein, H. & Kolesnick, R. (1997) Cell 89, 63–72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Chalfant, C. E., Rathman, K., Pinkerman, R. L., Wood, R. E., Obeid, L. M., Ogretmen, B. & Hannun, Y. A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 12587–12595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kashiwagi, K., Shirai, Y., Kuriyama, M., Sakai, N. & Saito, N. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18037–18045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lozano, J., Berra, E., Municio, M. M., Diaz-Meco, M. T., Dominguez, I., Sanz, L. & Moscat, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19200–19202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Huwiler, A., Brunner, J., Hummel, R., Vervoordeldonk, M., Stabel, S., van den Bosch, H. & Pfeilschifter, J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 6959–6963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Zhou, M., Horita, D. A., Waugh, D. S., Byrd, R. A. & Morrison, D. K. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 315, 435–446[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Ikezawa, H., Mori, M., Ohyabu, T. & Taguchi, R. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 528, 247–256[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Mayer, L. D., Hope, M. H. & Cullis, P. R. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 858, 161–168[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Nieva, J. L., Goñi, F. M. & Alonso, A. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 7364–7367[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Villar, A. V., Alonso, A., Pañeda, C., Varela-Nieto, I., Brodbeck, U. & Goñi, F. M. (1999) FEBS Lett. 457, 71–74[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Böttcher, C. S. F., Van Gent, C. M. & Fries, C. (1961) Anal. Chim. Acta 24, 203–204[CrossRef]
  42. Wybenga, L. E., Epand, R. F., Nir, S., Chu, J. W. K., Sharom, F. J., Flanagan, T. D. & Epand, R. M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 9513–9518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Steck, T. L. & Kant, J. A. (1974) Methods Enzymol. 31, 172–180[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Fussle, R., Bhakdi, S., Sziegoleit, A., Tranum-Jensen, J., Krans, T. & Wellensiek, H. J. (1981) J. Cell Biol. 91, 83–94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Siskind, L. & Colombini, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38640–38644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Mattjus, P., Malewicz, B., Valiyaveettil, J. T., Baumann, W. J., Bittman, R. & Brown, R. E. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 19476–19481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Bai, J. & Pagano, R. E. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 8840–8848[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Veiga, M. P., Arrondo, J. L. R., Goñi, F. M. & Alonso, A. (1999) Biophys. J. 76, 342–350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Cullis, P. R. & de Kruijff, B. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 513, 31–42[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Kamp, D., Sieberg, T. & Haest, C. W. M. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 9438–9446[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Dekkers, D. W. C., Comfurius, P., Bevers, E. M. & Zwaal, R. F. A. (2002) Biochem. J. 362, 741–747[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Sprong, H., van der Sluijs, P. & van Meer, G. (2001) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 504–513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Tepper, A. D., Ruurs, P., Wiedmer, T., Sims, P. J., Borst, J. & van Blitterswijk, W. J. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 150, 155–164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Harlow, E. & Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. M. Crane and A. S. Verkman
Long-Range Nonanomalous Diffusion of Quantum Dot-Labeled Aquaporin-1 Water Channels in the Cell Plasma Membrane
Biophys. J., January 15, 2008; 94(2): 702 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
O. Bakht, P. Pathak, and E. London
Effect of the Structure of Lipids Favoring Disordered Domain Formation on the Stability of Cholesterol-Containing Ordered Domains (Lipid Rafts): Identification of Multiple Raft-Stabilization Mechanisms
Biophys. J., December 15, 2007; 93(12): 4307 - 4318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
O. Coll, A. Morales, J. C. Fernandez-Checa, and C. Garcia-Ruiz
Neutral sphingomyelinase-induced ceramide triggers germinal vesicle breakdown and oxidant-dependent apoptosis in Xenopus laevis oocytes
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1924 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. He, T. A. Luster, and P. E. Thorpe
Radiation-Enhanced Vascular Targeting of Human Lung Cancers in Mice with a Monoclonal Antibody That Binds Anionic Phospholipids
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 13(17): 5211 - 5218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
F.-X. Contreras, J. Sot, A. Alonso, and F. M. Goni
Sphingosine Increases the Permeability of Model and Cell Membranes
Biophys. J., June 1, 2006; 90(11): 4085 - 4092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
D. C. Carrer, S. Schreier, M. Patrito, and B. Maggio
Effects of a Short-Chain Ceramide on Bilayer Domain Formation, Thickness, and Chain Mobililty: DMPC and Asymmetric Ceramide Mixtures
Biophys. J., April 1, 2006; 90(7): 2394 - 2403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Lopez-Montero, N. Rodriguez, S. Cribier, A. Pohl, M. Velez, and P. F. Devaux
Rapid Transbilayer Movement of Ceramides in Phospholipid Vesicles and in Human Erythrocytes
J. Biol. Chem., July 8, 2005; 280(27): 25811 - 25819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. Sot, F. J. Aranda, M.-I. Collado, F. M. Goni, and A. Alonso
Different Effects of Long- and Short-Chain Ceramides on the Gel-Fluid and Lamellar-Hexagonal Transitions of Phospholipids: A Calorimetric, NMR, and X-Ray Diffraction Study
Biophys. J., May 1, 2005; 88(5): 3368 - 3380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Ran, J. He, X. Huang, M. Soares, D. Scothorn, and P. E. Thorpe
Antitumor Effects of a Monoclonal Antibody that Binds Anionic Phospholipids on the Surface of Tumor Blood Vessels in Mice
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2005; 11(4): 1551 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
F.-X. Contreras, G. Basanez, A. Alonso, A. Herrmann, and F. M. Goni
Asymmetric Addition of Ceramides but not Dihydroceramides Promotes Transbilayer (Flip-Flop) Lipid Motion in Membranes
Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 348 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. Olsson, R.-D. Duan, L. Ohlsson, and A. Nilsson
Rat intestinal ceramidase: purification, properties, and physiological relevance
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): G929 - G937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Kalin, J. Fernandes, S. Hrafnsdottir, and G. van Meer
Natural Phosphatidylcholine Is Actively Translocated across the Plasma Membrane to the Surface of Mammalian Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33228 - 33236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]