JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M305266200 on June 18, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 39, 37530-37535, September 26, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/39/37530    most recent
M305266200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Der-Sarkissian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Langen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Der-Sarkissian, A.
Right arrow Articles by Langen, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Structural Organization of {alpha}-Synuclein Fibrils Studied by Site-directed Spin Labeling*

Ani Der-Sarkissian {ddagger} §, Christine C. Jao ¶, Jeannie Chen {ddagger} || ** and Ralf Langen ¶ || {ddagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, the ||Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute and Arnold and Mabel Beckman Macular Research Center, and the **Mary D. Allen Laboratory for Vision Research, Doheny Eye Institute, Departments of Ophthalmology and Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089

Received for publication, May 20, 2003


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Despite its importance in Parkinson's disease, a detailed understanding of the structure and mechanism of {alpha}-synuclein fibril formation remains elusive. In this study, we used site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to study the structural features of monomeric and fibrillar {alpha}-synuclein. Our results indicate that monomeric {alpha}-synuclein, in solution, has a highly dynamic structure, in agreement with the notion that {alpha}-synuclein is a natively unfolded protein. In contrast, fibrillar aggregates of {alpha}-synuclein exhibit a distinct domain organization. Our data identify a highly ordered and specifically folded central core region of ~70 amino acids, whereas the N terminus is structurally more heterogeneous and the C terminus (~40 amino acids) is completely unfolded. Interestingly, the central core region of {alpha}-synuclein exhibits several features reminiscent of those observed in the core region of fibrillar Alzheimer's amyloid {beta} peptide, including an in-register parallel structure. Although the lengths of the respective core regions differ, fibrils from different amyloid proteins nevertheless appear to be able to take up highly similar, and possibly conserved, structures.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The deposition of amyloid fibrils has been linked to a variety of slow-onset degenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease (PD),1 type II diabetes mellitus, and spongiform encephalopathies. In the case of PD, these amyloid fibrils are formed by {alpha}-synuclein (1), which is found in intracellular inclusions of dopaminergic neurons, called Lewy bodies. Several lines of evidence suggest that {alpha}-synuclein plays a causative role in PD. Linkage studies have shown that rare familial forms of early-onset PD, inherited as an autosomal dominant form, result from two independent missense mutations (A53T and A30P) within the {alpha}-synuclein gene (2, 3). Moreover, experimental fly (4) and other animal (5, 6) models have suggested an important role of {alpha}-synuclein in the etiology of PD.

{alpha}-Synuclein is a 140-amino acid, thermally stable (7, 8), cytoplasmic protein, found in presynaptic terminals of neuronal cells (9, 10). Although the precise physiological role of this protein is not fully understood, it has been suggested that {alpha}-synuclein is involved in the modulation of neurotransmitter release (11). In aqueous solution, {alpha}-synuclein has been found to be highly dynamic and, therefore, has been classified as a natively unfolded protein (8). However, upon aggregation, some not yet well-defined regions of {alpha}-synuclein undergo a conformational change and take up a cross-{beta}-structure (12, 13), in which individual {beta}-strands run perpendicular to the fiber axis.

Originally, a 35-amino acid fragment of {alpha}-synuclein was isolated from brain tissue of Alzheimer patients (14). This fragment (amino acids 61–95), designated NAC (non-amyloid {beta} (A{beta}) component of Alzheimer's disease amyloid), comprises the hydrophobic core of the protein and has been shown to be important in fibril formation (15). More recent analysis suggests, however, that the core domain of {alpha}-synuclein might be even shorter. In the latter study, a 12-amino acid peptide (residues 71–82), located within the NAC region, was shown to be capable of undergoing self-aggregation (16). The importance of this hydrophobic stretch is further supported by its absence in {beta}-synuclein, a homologue of {alpha}-synuclein (17), with strongly reduced propensity for fibril formation (12, 18). In contrast, a third line of evidence, based on protease digestion studies (19), suggests that the core region of {alpha}-synuclein is longer. In this study, a 7-kDa fragment (comprising residues 31–109) was shown to be protected from proteinase K digestion. This region contains the putative 12-residue core domain, as well as the NAC region.

In an effort to determine which of these core regions potentially correspond to the cross-{beta}-structure and to decipher the overall structural features of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils, we used site-directed spin labeling (SDSL), together with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Although SDSL had originally been developed to study the structural and conformational dynamics of soluble and membrane proteins (20), this method has recently been applied successfully to structural and dynamic studies of other amyloid proteins, such as A{beta} (21) and transthyretin (22). SDSL is based upon the introduction of a cysteine-specific nitroxide spin label, which serves as a reporter molecule, into selected sites of the protein to generate the side chain R1 (Fig. 1). The structural environment of the spin label can then be monitored by EPR spectroscopy. The mobility information contained in the EPR spectra can be used to distinguish between loop, surface, or buried sites (2325). In nitroxide scanning experiments, this information can furthermore be used to determine secondary structural elements (20). In addition, the distance between two R1 side chains can be estimated based on magnetic dipolar interactions (20).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
The spin labeling reaction. The reaction of the spin label [1-oxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl D-pyrroline-3-methyl]methanethiosulfonate with the sulfhydryl group of cysteine, resulting in the generation of the side chain R1, is shown.

 

Our findings show that {alpha}-synuclein, in its fibrillar state, has a distinct domain organization. We identified a core region of ~70 amino acids (residues 34–101), packed in highly ordered, parallel fashion, with the same residues from different strands in exact register. Similar parallelism was also observed in the core regions of synthetic A{beta} fibrils assembled in vitro using SDSL (21). The N terminus of fibrillar {alpha}-synuclein is structurally more heterogeneous, displaying a less ordered structural organization. The C-terminal region of the protein remains unfolded, even within fibrillar bundles. Taken together, these findings suggest that there may be a common mechanism underlying the formation of amyloid fibrils, at least in Alzheimer's disease and PD.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
{alpha}-Synuclein Mutagenesis—The wild-type human {alpha}-synuclein expression construct (pRK172) was kindly provided by Dr. M. Goedert. Wild-type {alpha}-synuclein sequence contains no cysteine residues. Single cysteine mutants for spin labeling were generated using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The introduced mutations were verified by DNA sequencing.

{alpha}-Synuclein Expression and Purification—Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)pLys-S cells were transformed with the pRK172 construct by heat shock. Expression of {alpha}-synuclein was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio-{beta}-D-galactopyranoside at 25 °C overnight. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 x g for 10 min and lysed in 500 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The cell lysate was then boiled for 10 min and subsequently centrifuged for 30 min at 13,000 x g. The resulting supernatant was precipitated in acid at pH 3.5 and centrifuged for an additional 30 min at 15,000 x g. The supernatant was dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, and loaded onto a HiTrap ANX column (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated in the same buffer. Proteins were eluted in a 0–1 M NaCl gradient. {alpha}-Synuclein-containing fractions were pooled and applied to a HiTrap Q XL column (Amersham Biosciences) and were identified by SDS-PAGE. Protein purity was >95%, as judged by Coomassie Blue staining and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The concentration of purified proteins was determined using the Micro BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).

Spin Labeling and EPR Measurements—Purified proteins were filtered through Microcon YM-100 (molecular weight cut off, 1 x 105) (Amicon, Bedford, MA) spin filter units to ensure the absence of preexisting {alpha}-synuclein aggregates. Immediately before spin labeling, dithiothreitol was removed from the buffer using size exclusion chromatography (PD-10 columns, Amersham Biosciences). The composition of the buffer used for equilibration and spin labeling was 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl. Sulfhydryl groups of the purified cysteine mutants were then reacted with a 3-fold molar excess of the spin label [1-oxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-D-pyrroline-3-methyl]-methanethiosulfonate (Toronto Research Chemicals, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (see Fig. 1) at room temperature for 1 h. Unreacted spin label was removed using PD-10 columns. Spin-labeled proteins were concentrated using Microcon YM-3 (molecular weight cut off, 3,000) (Amicon, Bedford, MA).

Fibrillar or monomeric {alpha}-synuclein was loaded into sealed glass capillaries for subsequent EPR analysis. EPR spectroscopy was performed using the Bruker EMX spectrometer (Bruker Instruments, Billerica, MA), fitted with a loop-gap resonator (26) for room temperature measurements and with an ER 4119HS resonator for measurements taken at –40 °C. X-band room temperature EPR spectra were obtained at 2 mW incident microwave power and at a field modulation of 1.5 Gauss at 100 kHz over a scan range of 150 Gauss. Spectra were accumulated over 20 scans. All first-derivative EPR spectra were normalized by double integration to represent the same number of spins. To correct for small amounts of free spin label and/or nonspecific labeling, all spectra were baseline corrected by subtracting the spectrum of spin-labeled (Cys-less) wild-type {alpha}-synuclein, which yielded a highly characteristic sharp line shape of 1.6 Gauss. This subtraction amounted to ~5% of the signal (data not shown).

Inter-spin distances can be quantified based upon magnetic dipolar interactions (20, 2730). Here, distances between the same R1 labels within {alpha}-synuclein strands were determined using a Pake pattern-based simulation software generously provided by Drs. Hubbell and Altenbach (31), which has proven successful in measuring inter-spin distances within fibrils of A{beta} (21). Using this software, distances between R1-labeled derivatives of {alpha}-synuclein were measured by comparing the EPR spectra of fully labeled protein with those co-mixed with an equal molar ratio of unlabeled wild-type protein (spin diluted), as described previously (21, 31). Any residual coupling in the spin-diluted spectra were removed by subtracting the spin-coupled spectrum using the built-in option in the program.

{alpha}-Synuclein Fibril Assembly—Purified spin labeled proteins (4 mg/ml) were incubated in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% NaN3 at 37 °C for 7–10 days with stirring. Fibrils were isolated by centrifugation and washed twice with 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4. Purified, unlabeled wild-type {alpha}-synuclein was used for spin-dilution experiments. Spin-labeled derivatives of {alpha}-synuclein were mixed with unlabeled wild-type protein in a 1:1 molar ratio at 4 mg/ml of total protein concentrations.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Structural Changes upon Transition from Monomeric to Fibrillar {alpha}-Synuclein—To identify the structural organization of soluble and fibrillar {alpha}-synuclein, single spin labels were introduced at selected sites throughout the protein, and their EPR spectra were recorded in solution and in fibrils. As shown in Fig. 2, the EPR spectra for all {alpha}-synuclein derivatives in solution (monomeric; black traces) are very similar and are characterized by sharp and narrowly spaced lines. Such spectral features arise from the rapid motion of the R1 label and are typical of highly dynamic and unfolded structures, in close agreement with the notion of {alpha}-synuclein as a "natively unfolded" protein (8).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
A, normalized EPR spectra of soluble (black trace) and fibrillar (green trace) {alpha}-synuclein obtained at room temperature. R1 was introduced at selected sites in the C terminus, as indicated in the figure. The scan width is 150 Gauss. B, EPR spectra of selected {alpha}-synuclein derivatives taken at room temperature, in the soluble state (black trace) and in the fibrillar state (green trace). To show the spectral features of 68R1 and 88R1, the respective spectra were magnified as indicated. All spectra were normalized by double integration to the same number of spins and were recorded at 150 Gauss scan width.

 

Next, by growing fibrils from spin-labeled {alpha}-synuclein derivatives, we sought to determine how this unfolded structure is altered upon fibril formation. Fibril morphology for all sites was verified by electron microscopy (data not shown) and was found to be very similar to fibrils taken from wild-type {alpha}-synuclein (15, 32, 33). Fig. 2A shows the effect of fibril formation on the EPR spectra of {alpha}-synuclein derivatives containing spin labels at selected sites in the C terminus (103R1, 106R1, 107R1, 124R1, 127R1, 130R1, 131R1, and 136R1; green trace). As was the case in solution, these sites gave rise to very sharp and narrowly spaced lines, even after fibril formation. Thus, we found little evidence of any ordering in the C-terminal region of {alpha}-synuclein aggregates and believe it is likely that the C-terminal region remains largely unfolded, even after fibril formation (also see discussion of Fig. 3 below).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Normalized EPR spectra of fibrils from R1-labeled {alpha}-synuclein (green trace) and of fibrils from R1-labeled {alpha}-synuclein diluted with wild-type {alpha}-synuclein (black trace). Spectra were obtained at –40 °C and represent 200 Gauss scan width.

 

To test whether structural changes might occur in the N-terminal 100 amino acids of {alpha}-synuclein, we recorded the room temperature EPR spectra of fibrillar {alpha}-synuclein labeled at positions 5R1, 26R1, 68R1, and 88R1, respectively (Fig. 2B, green and red traces). Residues 5R1 and 26R1 showed some decrease in signal amplitude (Fig. 2B, green trace), whereas residues 68R1 and 88R1, located in the NAC region of the protein, showed a marked decrease in amplitude (Fig. 2B, green trace). To clearly visualize details of the line shape, spectra of fibrillar 68R1 and 88R1 were scaled at 10- and 5-fold, respectively (Fig. 2B, red trace). In addition to a strong reduction of signal intensity, we also observed a pronounced spectral broadening, characterized by the overall width of the spectrum exceeding 100 Gauss (all spectra were accumulated in a magnetic scan range of 150 Gauss). These spectral features are indicative of very strong spin-spin interactions and are reminiscent of what was observed for fibrillar A{beta} peptide (21), suggesting that some regions of {alpha}-synuclein, as in A{beta}, might also be arranged in parallel fashion.

{alpha}-Synuclein Fibrils Exhibit a Core Region of Parallel and In-register Structure—To further confirm the presence of spin-spin interactions and to probe the extent of a parallel, ordered structure, we recorded the EPR spectra of the R1-labeled {alpha}-synuclein fibrils in their frozen state (Fig. 3).

Two factors can significantly contribute to changes in amplitude and line shape, namely, mobility and spin-spin interactions between nearby labels because of dipolar coupling and spin exchange (20). In the frozen state, EPR spectra are no longer influenced by local structure and mobility; therefore, major changes in the EPR line shapes can be attributed solely to spin-spin interactions.

EPR spectra of sites ~34R1 through ~101R1 show clear spin-spin interactions, as reflected in the marked drop in signal intensity and a spectral line broadening beyond 100 Gauss (Fig. 3, green trace). A lesser effect was seen at the N-terminal regions of fibrillar {alpha}-synuclein, and little or no effect was observed at C-terminal sites (103R1, 106R1, 107R1, 109R1, 124R1, 127R1, 131R1, and 136R1), which exhibited relatively large amplitudes. These EPR spectra are indicative of the absence of strong spin-spin interactions, in agreement with the data shown in Fig. 2A, indicating that this region is not ordered.

To further confirm and quantify the effect of spin-spin interactions, we performed spin-dilution experiments, wherein R1-labeled and wild-type {alpha}-synuclein were co-mixed and allowed to form fibrils over time (see "Experimental Procedures"). Such experiments were conducted based upon the following rationale: if wild-type {alpha}-synuclein and its R1-labeled derivatives were to co-mix interchangeably to form fibrils, the potential of one spin label located on a given {alpha}-synuclein protein coming in close proximity to another spin label located on a neighboring protein would be expected to decrease as a function of increasing concentration of unlabeled wild-type protein. Thus, spin-spin interactions would be reduced upon co-mixing of the R1-labeled and wild-type {alpha}-synuclein. As a result, the EPR spectral line shapes would become sharper and narrower. Dilution experiments were performed, and once again, fibril formation was verified by electron microscopy (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 3, these wild-type dilutions resulted in highly similar EPR spectra for all of the sites (black traces). A comparison of the spectra from R1-labeled (green traces) and wild-type-diluted fibrils (black traces) shows that the largest spectral changes occurred in sites between ~34R1 and ~101R1. Within this region, spin dilution caused a significant loss of spin-spin interaction, as can be seen from the increase in signal intensity and the concomitant decrease in spectral breadth. In contrast, the EPR spectral changes in the N- and C-terminal regions of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils are much smaller. In addition to its importance in demonstrating spin-spin interactions, the co-mixing of wild-type and R1-labeled proteins indicates that the R1-labeled and wild-type proteins are able to adopt similar structures within the fibril. Thus, as has already been observed for Alzheimer's A{beta} (21), the introduction of R1 is tolerated remarkably well in amyloid fibrils.

For a more quantitative evaluation of the spin-spin interactions, we determined the distances between spin labels, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Distances obtained by SDSL are very accurate, as reported previously in a comparison of distances obtained by x-ray crystallographic methods with those obtained by SDSL in T4 lysozyme (28). It is important to note, however, that SDSL measures distances between the nitroxide side chains of the spin labels rather than between the protein backbone atoms. A summary of distance distributions of filamentous {alpha}-synuclein using SDSL is shown in Fig. 4A, wherein the percentage of distance distributions is plotted against the corresponding residue number. Red columns represent distance distributions beyond 20 Å, yellow columns indicate distance distributions between 15 and 20 Å, and black columns are indicative of distance distributions of <15 Å. As depicted in this figure, the distance contributions from residues ~34 to ~101 are <15 Å (typically 8–11 Å) (black columns), with negligible amounts of distance contributions from longer distances (red columns), which is indicative of a highly specific, in-register arrangement of {alpha}-synuclein amyloid fibrils. Interestingly, the degree of parallelism includes but extends beyond residues 71–82 and the amyloidogenic NAC region. The C-terminal residues of the protein primarily exhibit distance distributions of >20 Å (red columns), which is consistent with the data presented in Figs. 2 and 3, showing that the C-terminal region of {alpha}-synuclein is unstructured. A much more heterogeneous distance distribution is observed in the N-terminal region of {alpha}-synuclein. Structural heterogeneity may arise from the existence of multiple conformations as observed in other amyloid fibrils such as A{beta} (21) studied by EPR and by protease digestion studies of the A{beta} peptide (34).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Intermolecular distance distributions between equivalent R1 side chains on neighboring proteins in {alpha}-synuclein fibrils. A, red columns indicate distance distributions of >20 Å, yellow columns represent distance distributions between 15 and 20 Å, and black columns indicate distance distributions of <15 Å. B, schematic representation of domain organization in {alpha}-synuclein fibrils. Darker regions indicate transition zones between domains.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The principal objective of this study was to identify the overall structural organization of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils. Using SDSL and EPR analysis, we observed a distinctive domain organization in {alpha}-synuclein fibrils. We found a core region of ~70 residues that is flanked by shorter N- and C-terminal domains of ~30 and 40 amino acids, respectively (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, the core region is characterized by strong spin-spin interactions arising from the close proximity of R1 side chains (mostly, 8–11 Å distances between nitroxide groups) of the same residues from different {alpha}-synuclein molecules, thus indicating the formation of highly ordered packing interactions that result in a homogeneous, parallel, and in-register structure. The core region of {alpha}-synuclein, identified by SDSL and EPR, contains the NAC domain, as well as the hydrophobic 12-residue peptide 71VTGVTAVAQKTV82, which was found to be necessary and sufficient for fibril formation (16). However, our data demonstrate that the core region of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils extends beyond these regions to a significant extent, a finding that is further supported by a proteinase K-resistant fragment (residues 31–109) identified recently by Miake et al. (19).

It is important to note that a parallel arrangement of amyloid fibrils is not limited to {alpha}-synuclein alone. In fact, a number of studies on Alzheimer's A{beta} peptide by SDSL (21) and solid-state NMR (35) have revealed that this peptide is also packed in a parallel and highly specific manner. Studies involving many different amyloid fibril-forming proteins have revealed an overwhelming number of similarities in the mechanism(s) of fibril formation. For example, amyloid fibrillogenesis consistently appears to be a nucleation-dependent process (36) that ultimately results in a cross-{beta} structure, where individual strands run perpendicular to the fiber axis (37). Moreover, all amyloid fibrils exhibit specific tinctorial properties, i.e. they bind Congo red and Thioflavin S (38). Common structural features of amyloids are furthermore supported by conformational antibodies that appear to recognize a common amyloid fibril fold that seems to be shared by a number of different amyloid fibrils (39). This overall structural similarity might even extend to prefibrillar structures, considering that another conformationally specific antibody recognizes protofibrillar aggregates from various amyloidogenic proteins, including {alpha}-synuclein (40). Thus, in light of these similarities, it is possible that parallel arrangement is a general feature of the core regions of amyloid fibrils.

In contrast to this possibly conserved and highly organized structural arrangement in the core region of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils, we find little evidence of any ordered structure in the C terminus of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils. It is therefore unlikely that the C terminus contributes to the stability of fibrils. In fact, it is conceivable that the high negative charge density of the C terminus could cause significant electrostatic repulsions, a feature that may serve to prevent a further extension of the parallel-arranged core region beyond residue 101. A fibril-destabilizing role of the C terminus is further supported by kinetic analysis that has shown a significant enhancement in fibril formation upon removal of the C-terminal regions (12, 41). Although it is unclear if removal of this destabilizing region contributes to enhanced fibril formation in vivo, it is interesting to note that partially truncated {alpha}-synuclein at the C terminus has been isolated from Lewy bodies of patients suffering from dementia with Lewy bodies (42).

Identification of a distinct domain organization in {alpha}-synuclein fibrils, together with the finding of strong parallelism in the core region, constitutes a first step toward understanding the mechanism of fibrillogenesis and places constraints on possible structural models. Additional structural constraints can be obtained from simple geometrical considerations. For example, we can eliminate the possibility of parallel, fully extended strands containing 70 amino acids. Given the 3.5-Å axial distance between adjacent amino acids in an extended {beta}-strand, the parallel polypeptide core region of {alpha}-synuclein would be ~250 Å (25 nm) in length; however, this length exceeds the narrowest fiber dimension (6 nm) reported for {alpha}-synuclein fibrils (12). Thus, several turn and bend regions must exist to account for such geometrical dimensions (21, 43).

The existence of hairpins consisting of anti-parallel {beta}-strands has been proposed for {alpha}-synuclein (13, 44) and A{beta} fibrils (45, 46), based upon Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis of amyloid fibrils and those of soluble proteins containing such antiparallel strands. A general model for a two-stranded hairpin with anti-parallel {beta}-strands is shown in Fig. 5A, where the interstrand distance is ~5 Å, the intersheet distance is estimated at ~10 Å, and the {beta}-strands run perpendicular to the fiber axis (37). To observe parallelism, one might envision a parallel arrangement of individual hairpins in which the same residues will be at ~10 Å distance from each other (Fig. 5A, red marks). Such a structure could be taken up entirely by shorter peptides, such as NAC or the A{beta} peptide. However, for the much longer core region of {alpha}-synuclein, this arrangement would not be likely because additional strands (probably at least four) and bend regions are required to accommodate ~70 amino acids under the constraints of the fiber dimensions (see Fig. 5B). The resulting distances between the same residues in different molecules, repeated along the fibril axis (>=25 Å), would be outside the detectable range using the current approach and clearly too long to account for the strong spin-spin interaction observed from the EPR data presented herein. Nevertheless, it is still possible to account for parallelism if the sheets are arranged in parallel fashion, as depicted in Fig. 5C. Although we cannot exclude such a model based on the EPR data alone, this model could not readily explain the growth and propagation properties of amyloid fibrils. As an example, the contact surface for growth in the fibril direction would be limited to only a single {beta}-strand region, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 5D. Furthermore, if the parallel sheet packing is stabilizing, one might expect greater variations in the number of stacked sheets; in turn, this could result in highly irregular fibril thickness, a feature not generally observed in fibrillar assemblies.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Possible structural models of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils. Red marks indicate the same residues on different strands. Dashed lines indicate additional possible turn or bend regions. A, parallel {beta}-hairpins stacked in sheets. B, additional {beta}-strands to account for fibril dimension (see text). C, same as in B, indicating possible parallelism in the sheet direction. D, yellow strands represent an incoming molecule during fibril propagation based on model C. Red lines symbolize hydrogen bonding between existing fibrils and the incoming molecule. E, one example of fibril structure in which all strands within a given sheet are arranged in parallel. To accommodate fibril dimensions, several bends or turns have to occur. F, likely mechanism of fibril growth and propagation for model shown in E. Incoming molecule is shown in yellow. Hydrogen bonds are shown in red.

 

Problems of this nature would not be encountered with the model shown in Fig. 5E. This model is based on the existence of parallel strands that are interrupted by a number of regions that cause bending of the entire sheet. The model shown in Fig. 5E represents one of several possible organizations to which such bent regions could be achieved. One positive feature of this model is that the fibril propagation can be easily explained, i.e. both fibril ends would expose an extensive surface of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors that could act as templates for incoming molecules (see Fig. 5F). Such "template-guided folding" would further ensure that precise conformation and fibril type would be maintained. Additional support for such a model is derived from a recent solid-state NMR analysis of A{beta}1–40 peptide (47), which showed that individual strands, rather than sheets of hairpins, are arranged in parallel.

Through future studies using SDSL and EPR, we hope to prove the validity of the model in Fig. 5E (and variations thereof, possibly including some {beta}-helical structures) and to identify the location(s) of the bend or turn regions. Similarly, this approach should also enable a more detailed structural analysis of prefibrillar intermediates and their membrane-bound forms.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the Hillblom Foundation (to R. L. and J. C.) and the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation (to R. L.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§ Supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the National Institutes of Health and by NIDCR, National Institutes of Health Grant T32 DE07211. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, 1501 San Pablo St., Los Angeles, CA 90089. Tel.: 323-442-1323; Fax: 323-442-2145; E-mail: langen{at}usc.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: PD, Parkinson's disease; NAC, non-A{beta} component of Alzheimer's disease amyloid; SDSL, site-directed spin labeling; EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy; A{beta}, amyloid {beta}. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. M. Goedert for the provision of the {alpha}-synuclein DNA construct and are grateful to Lena Te and Winnie Tse for their outstanding technical support.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Spillantini, M. G., Schmidt, M. L., Lee, V. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., Jakes, R., and Goedert, M. (1997) Nature 388, 839–840[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Polymeropoulos, M. H., Lavedan, C., Leroy, E., Ide, S. E., Dehejia, A., Dutra, A., Pike, B., Root, H., Rubenstein, J., Boyer, R., Stenroos, E. S., Chandrasekharappa, S., Athanassiadou, A., Papapetropoulos, T., Johnson, W. G., Lazzarini, A. M., Duvoisin, R. C., Di Iorio, G., Golbe, L. I., and Nussbaum, R. L. (1997) Science 276, 2045–2047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kruger, R., Kuhn, W., Muller, T., Woitalla, D., Graeber, M., Kosel, S., Przuntek, H., Epplen, J. T., Schols, L., and Riess, O. (1998) Nat. Genet. 18, 106–108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Feany, M. B., and Bender, W. W. (2000) Nature 404, 394–398[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Masliah, E., Rockenstein, E., Veinbergs, I., Mallory, M., Hashimoto, M., Takeda, A., Sagara, Y., Sisk, A., and Mucke, L. (2000) Science 287, 1265–1269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. van der Putten, H., Wiederhold, K. H., Probst, A., Barbieri, S., Mistl, C., Danner, S., Kauffmann, S., Hofele, K., Spooren, W. P., Ruegg, M. A., Lin, S., Caroni, P., Sommer, B., Tolnay, M., and Bilbe, G. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20, 6021–6029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kim, T. D., Ryu, H. J., Cho, H. I., Yang, C. H., and Kim, J. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 14839–14846[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Weinreb, P. H., Zhen, W., Poon, A. W., Conway, K. A., and Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 13709–13715[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Iwai, A., Masliah, E., Yoshimoto, M., Ge, N., Flanagan, L., de Silva, H. A., Kittel, A., and Saitoh, T. (1995) Neuron 14, 467–475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Maroteaux, L., and Scheller, R. H. (1991) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 11, 335–343[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Murray, I. V., Lee, V. M.-Y., and Trojanowski, J. Q. (2001) Clin. Neurosci. Res. 1, 445–455[CrossRef]
  12. Serpell, L. C., Berriman, J., Jakes, R., Goedert, M., and Crowther, R. A. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 4897–4902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Conway, K. A., Harper, J. D., and Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 2552–2563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ueda, K., Fukushima, H., Masliah, E., Xia, Y., Iwai, A., Yoshimoto, M., Otero, D. A., Kondo, J., Ihara, Y., and Saitoh, T. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11282–11286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Iwai, A., Yoshimoto, M., Masliah, E., and Saitoh, T. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10139–10145[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Giasson, B. I., Murray, I. V., Trojanowski, J. Q., and Lee, V. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2380–2386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jakes, R., Spillantini, M. G., and Goedert, M. (1994) FEBS Lett. 345, 27–32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Biere, A. L., Wood, S. J., Wypych, J., Steavenson, S., Jiang, Y., Anafi, D., Jacobsen, F. W., Jarosinski, M. A., Wu, G. M., Louis, J. C., Martin, F., Narhi, L. O., and Citron, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34574–34579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Miake, H., Mizusawa, H., Iwatsubo, T., and Hasegawa, M. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 19213–19219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Hubbell, W. L., Cafiso, D. S., and Altenbach, C. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 735–739[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Török, M., Milton, S., Kayed, R., Wu, P., McIntire, T., Glabe, C. G., and Langen, R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40810–40815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Serag, A. A., Altenbach, C., Gingery, M., Hubbell, W. L., and Yeates, T. O. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 9089–9096[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Margittai, M., Fasshauer, D., Pabst, S., Jahn, R., and Langen, R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13169–13177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Isas, J. M., Langen, R., Haigler, H. T., and Hubbell, W. L. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 1464–1473[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Mchaourab, H. S., Lietzow, M. A., Hideg, K., and Hubbell, W. L. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 7692–7704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Hubbell, W. L., Froncisz, W., and Hyde, J. S. (1987) Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 1879–1886[CrossRef]
  27. Hustedt, E. J., Smirnov, A. I., Laub, C. F., Cobb, C. E., and Beth, A. H. (1997) Biophys. J. 72, 1861–1877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mchaourab, H. S., Oh, K. J., Fang, C. J., and Hubbell, W. L. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 307–316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Rabenstein, M. D., and Shin, Y. K. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8239–8243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Steinhoff, H. J., Radzwill, N., Thevis, W., Lenz, V., Brandenburg, D., Antson, A., Dodson, G., and Wollmer, A. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 3287–3298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Altenbach, C., Oh, K. J., Trabanino, R. J., Hideg, K., and Hubbell, W. L. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 15471–15482[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. El-Agnaf, O. M., Jakes, R., Curran, M. D., Middleton, D., Ingenito, R., Bianchi, E., Pessi, A., Neill, D., and Wallace, A. (1998) FEBS Lett. 440, 71–75[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Han, H., Weinreb, P. H., and Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (1995) Chem. Biol. 2, 163–169[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Kheterpal, I., Williams, A., Murphy, C., Bledsoe, B., and Wetzel, R. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 11757–11767[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Tycko, R. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 3151–3159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (1997) Neuron 19, 1151–1154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Makin, O. S., and Serpell, L. C. (2002) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 30, 521–525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Soto, C. (2003) Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 49–60[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. O'Nuallain, B., and Wetzel, R. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 1485–1490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kayed, R., Head, E., Thompson, J. L., McIntire, T. M., Milton, S. C., Cotman, C. W., and Glabe, C. G. (2003) Science 300, 486–489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Crowther, R. A., Jakes, R., Spillantini, M. G., and Goedert, M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 436, 309–312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Baba, M., Nakajo, S., Tu, P. H., Tomita, T., Nakaya, K., Lee, V. M., Trojanowski, J. Q., and Iwatsubo, T. (1998) Am. J. Pathol. 152, 879–884[Abstract]
  43. Uversky, V. N., Li, J., and Fink, A. L. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10737–10744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Narhi, L., Wood, S. J., Steavenson, S., Jiang, Y., Wu, G. M., Anafi, D., Kaufman, S. A., Martin, F., Sitney, K., Denis, P., Louis, J. C., Wypych, J., Biere, A. L., and Citron, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 9843–9846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Fraser, P. E., Nguyen, J. T., Inouye, H., Surewicz, W. K., Selkoe, D. J., Podlisny, M. B., and Kirschner, D. A. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10716–10723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Hilbich, C., Kisters-Woike, B., Reed, J., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 218, 149–163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Petkova, A. T., Ishii, Y., Balbach, J. J., Antzutkin, O. N., Leapman, R. D., Delaglio, F., and Tycko, R. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 16742–16747[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
P. Jiang, L.-w. Ko, K. R. Jansen, T. E. Golde, and S.-H. Yen
Using leucine zipper to facilitate {alpha}-synuclein assembly
FASEB J, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 3165 - 3174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Vilar, H.-T. Chou, T. Luhrs, S. K. Maji, D. Riek-Loher, R. Verel, G. Manning, H. Stahlberg, and R. Riek
The fold of {alpha}-synuclein fibrils
PNAS, June 24, 2008; 105(25): 8637 - 8642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. B. Wickner, F. Dyda, and R. Tycko
Amyloid of Rnq1p, the basis of the [PIN+] prion, has a parallel in-register {beta}-sheet structure
PNAS, February 19, 2008; 105(7): 2403 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Z. Zhang, H. Chen, and L. Lai
Identification of amyloid fibril-forming segments based on structure and residue-based statistical potential
Bioinformatics, September 1, 2007; 23(17): 2218 - 2225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Chen, M. Margittai, J. Chen, and R. Langen
Investigation of {alpha}-Synuclein Fibril Structure by Site-directed Spin Labeling
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2007; 282(34): 24970 - 24979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
S. Zibaee, O. S. Makin, M. Goedert, and L. C. Serpell
A simple algorithm locates beta-strands in the amyloid fibril core of {alpha}-synuclein, Abeta, and tau using the amino acid sequence alone
Protein Sci., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 906 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
Z. Bu, Y. Shi, D. J. E. Callaway, and R. Tycko
Molecular Alignment within {beta}-Sheets in A{beta}14-23 Fibrils: Solid-State NMR Experiments and Theoretical Predictions
Biophys. J., January 15, 2007; 92(2): 594 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Shewmaker, R. B. Wickner, and R. Tycko
Amyloid of the prion domain of Sup35p has an in-register parallel beta-sheet structure
PNAS, December 26, 2006; 103(52): 19754 - 19759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Margittai and R. Langen
Side Chain-dependent Stacking Modulates Tau Filament Structure
J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37820 - 37827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. K. Paravastu, A. T. Petkova, and R. Tycko
Polymorphic Fibril Formation by Residues 10-40 of the Alzheimer's {beta}-Amyloid Peptide
Biophys. J., June 15, 2006; 90(12): 4618 - 4629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. G. Glabe and R. Kayed
Common structure and toxic function of amyloid oligomers implies a common mechanism of pathogenesis
Neurology, January 24, 2006; 66(1_suppl_1): S74 - S78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]