|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 42, 40842-40850, October 17, 2003
Disruption of Cg-Ppm1, a Polyprenyl Monophosphomannose Synthase, and the Generation of Lipoglycan-less Mutants in Corynebacterium glutamicum*![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ||
From the
Received for publication, July 23, 2003 , and in revised form, August 5, 2003.
The glycosyl donor, polyprenyl monophosphomannose (PPM), has been shown to be involved in the biosynthesis of the mycobacterial lipoglycans: lipomannan and lipoarabinomannan. The mycobacterial PPM synthase (Mt-ppm1) catalyzes the transfer of mannose from GDP-mannose to polyprenyl phosphates. Based on sequence homology to Mt-ppm1, we have identified the PPM synthase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. In the present study, we demonstrate that the corynebacterial synthase is composed of two distinct domains; a catalytic domain (Cg-ppm1) and a membrane domain (Cg-ppm2). Through the inactivation of Cg-ppm1, we observed a complex phenotype that included altered cell growth rate and inability to synthesize PPM molecules and lipoglycans. When Cg-ppm2 was deleted, no observable phenotype was noted, indicating the clear organization of the two domains. The complementation of the inactivated Cg-ppm1 strain with the corresponding mycobacterial enzyme (Mt-Ppm1/D2) led to the restoration of a wild type phenotype. The present study illustrates, for the first time, the generation of a lipoglycan-less mutant based on a molecular strategy in a member of the Corynebacterianeae family. Lipoglycans are important immunomodulatory molecules involved in determining the outcome of infection, and so the generation of defined mutants and their subsequent immunological characterization is timely.
Corynebacterial strains are widely distributed throughout nature and represent an important branch of the Actinomycetales family. The human pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae is the causal agent of diphtheria, and serious economic losses occur from the infection of animals by corynebacterial strains, such as Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and Corynebacterium matruchotti (2, 3). In addition, Corynebacterium glutamicum is of industrial importance producing large quantities of amino acids worldwide (4). Corynebacteria belong to a suprageneric actinomycete taxon termed the Corynebacterianeae (5), which includes mycobacteria, rhodococci, nocardiae, and other closely related genera. Therefore, it is of no surprise to find that corynebacteria and mycobacteria share a similar cell envelope ultrastructure, which comprises a core mycolyl-arabinogalactan peptidoglycan complex, termed mAGP (6, 7). An important class of components, found within the cell envelope, are the biosynthetically related glycolipids, phosphatidyl-myo-inositol mannosides (PIMs),1,2 and lipoglycans, termed lipomannan (LM) and lipoarabinomannan (LAM). These glycolipids and lipoglycans are present within the cell envelope of both mycobacteria (8) and corynebacteria (7, 9). The basic structural features of mycobacterial LAM are well described elsewhere and reveal that LAM possess an amphipathic tripartite structure (1013). The two common domains include a mannosyl-phosphatidyl-myo-inositol anchor (MPI), with a polysaccharide backbone consisting of mannose and arabinose that are further elaborated by either mannooligosaccharide or phosphoinositol caps, representing the third domain, and resulting in LAM being termed ManLAM (14, 15) or PILAM (16, 17), respectively. In addition, a new class of LAM, isolated and characterized from Mycobacterium chelonae, has been shown to be devoid of any capping motifs, and is termed AraLAM (18).
Both ManLAM and PILAM exhibit a broad range of immunomodulatory activities. For example, ManLAM inhibits a number of the immune system effector functions, including interferon- A number of non-mycobacterial actinomycetes possess lipoglycans, including Rhodococcus ruber (27), Rhodococcus equi (28), Amycolatopsis sulfurea (29), and Tsukamurella paurometabola.3 Structurally, these lipoglycans are related to mycobacterial LAM, but are typically smaller in size. Nevertheless, they possess a similar global architecture, with the most significant difference related to the degree of arabinosylation and mannosylation. Thus, it would seem that these close relatives have evolved a specific set(s) of enzymes dedicated to the production of these biosynthetically related PIMs, LM and LAM. As a result, a plethora of information exists to study lipoglycan biosynthesis within the Actinomycetales family, through the use of genomic and metabolomic approaches, linked to the use of more genetically tractable species, such as the industrial important bacilli, C. glutamicum.
Although the structure of mycobacterial LAM has been well documented (1013), the genetics of its biosynthesis still remain largely ill defined. It involves the addition of Manp residues to phosphatidyl-myo-inositol (PI) to produce both the short PIMs (26 Manp residues) and LM, which is further glycosylated with arabinan to form LAM. The biosynthetic relationship of PI In the present study we have established that C. glutamicum possess both PIMs and lipoglycans, which are reminiscent of M. tuberculosis products, suggesting conserved biosynthetic machineries within the two bacilli. Furthermore, through comparative genomic analyses, we have identified the corynebacterial PPM synthase Cg-ppm1, analogous to Mt-ppm1/D2. The disruption of Cg-ppm1 through homologous recombination led to a lipoglycan-less phenotype. In addition, complementation with Mt-ppm1/D2 led to restoration of lipoglycan biosynthesis in C. glutamicum. These results demonstrate the first biochemical and molecular description of lipoglycan biosynthesis in a non-mycobacterial species and highlight the inherent usefulness of examining related species to probe complex biosynthetic pathways.
Bacterial Strains and Growth ConditionsEscherichia coli DH5 mcr and C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 (the wild type strain, and referred to for the remainder of the text as C. glutamicum) were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Difco) at 37 and 30 °C, respectively. The mutants generated by this study were grown on complex medium LBHIS (which contained per liter: 5 g of tryptone, 5 g of NaCl, 2.5 g of yeast extract, 18.5 g of brain heart infusion (Difco Labs Ltd, Surrey, UK), and 90.1 g of sorbitol). Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: 50 µg/ml kanamycin, 10 µg/ml chloramphenicol, and 10 µg/ml tetracycline. Growth curves were performed using the minimal medium CGXII (36), except that 30 mg/liter protocatechuic acid was included as a chelating agent. Mutants were grown overnight on LBHIS, harvested, washed once with 0.9% NaCl, and inoculated into CGXII to give a starting optical density of 1, harvested again, washed once with 0.9% NaCl, and lyophilized. For lipid and lipoglycan analyses, along with crude cellular extract preparations, cells were grown in an identical manner. For the preparation of membranes, bacterial strains were grown in LB broth, supplemented with antibiotics, grown to mid log phase, harvested by centrifugation, washed with PBS (50 mM, pH 7.5), and stored at 20 °C until further use. Plasmids and DNA ManipulationTo enable inactivation of Cg-ppm1 in the chromosome of C. glutamicum, the plasmid pK18mob-Cg-ppm1-int was generated. An internal fragment of Cg-ppm1 was amplified via PCR using primers 5'-CCCTGCGGTCATATCGGTCA-3' and 5'-GCGTACATGGCTGGCTTCCA-3'. The resulting fragment was purified via gel electrophoresis and ligated with SmaI-cleaved pK18mob (37), using the SureClone ligation kit (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Overexpression of Mt-ppm1/D2 was obtained with pXMJ19-Mt-ppm1/D2. The primers used were 5'-GCTCTAGAAAGGAGATATAGATATGACCACCGGCCAGCC-3' and 5'-CGGAATTCTTATTCGGTCACGTCGGCGC-3' (with the cloning sites in bold and the ribosome binding site and start codon, introduced to enable expression of domain D2 of Mt-ppm1, underlined). The amplified fragment was purified, treated with XbaI and EcoRI, and ligated with similarly treated pXMJ19 (38) to give pXMJ19-Mt-ppm1/D2. Overexpression of Cg-ppm1 was obtained with pVWEx2-Cg-ppm1. The primers used were 5'-GCTCTAGAAAGGAGATATAGATATGAGCAGTGAGGCAGTAGAT-3' and 5'-CGGGATCCTTAGAGCCAGGTGTTGCGC-3'. The fragment was cloned with the SureClone ligation kit in pUC18, excised as an XbaI/BamHI fragment from the resulting vector, and ligated with similarly treated pVWEx2. The in-frame deletion of Cg-ppm2 in C. glutamicum was achieved with pK19mobsacB-Cg-ppm2. This plasmid was made using cross-over PCR (39) to enable the one-ligation step integration of upstream together with downstream sequences of Cg-ppm2 into pK19mobsacB (37). Using the Expand Highfidelity PCR system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in the first PCR round, two separate amplification products were generated with 5'-CGCGGATCCGAGCGCGACGCTGATGTAGAC-3' (Cg-ppm2-3'-out)/5'-ACAAATTCAAATCACCTACCCGCGAAAAAGGCAGCAACTAATCG-3' (Cg-ppm2-3'-in) and with 5'-CGCGATCCGCGGGCCAAGCGCATGCGCAGTG-3' (Cg-ppm2-5'-out)/5'-GGGTAGGTGATTTGAATTTGTAGTTGGGCCCGTGGACATCT-3' (Cg-ppm2-5'-in). Both PCR products were purified and used as a template to amplify, with primers Cg-ppm2-5'-out and Cg-ppm2-3'-out, a fragment devoid of Cg-ppm2 that was treated with BamHI and ligated with BamHI-cleaved pK19mobsacB to give pK19mobsacB-Cg-ppm2. The inserts in all final constructs were confirmed by sequencing. Construction of StrainsPlasmids were usually introduced via electroporation, but conjugation was used when electroporation failed. Conjugation was done with E. coli S-17-1 as the donor, and its sensitivity to nalidixic acid (50 µg/ml) was used after plating for counterselecting. Selection of recombinant C. glutamicum strains for the presence of the replicative plasmid pVWEx2-Cg-ppm1 used 2 µg/ml tetracycline, and pXMJ19-Mt-ppm1/D2 used 5 µg/ml chloramphenicol. The ppm1 gene was inactivated in C. glutamicum by transformation with pK18mob-Cg-ppm1-int. A recombinant strain was selected with 15 µg/ml kanamycin and the chromosomal inactivation confirmed by PCR. The resulting strain was termed C. glutamicum::ppm1.
To achieve deletion of Cg-ppm2, plasmid pK19mobsacB-Cg-ppm2 was introduced into C. glutamicum by conjugation. Selection for resistance to kanamycin yielded two clones, indicating integration of the vector in the chromosome by homologous recombination. Each of the clones was subjected to the subsequent selection for the second homologous recombination event. In this round the presence of sacB (together with addition of 10% sucrose to the medium) resulted in a positive selection of clones where vector sequences were lost again (37). The correct integration of sequences into the chromosome and absence of sequences, respectively, in the resulting strain, C. glutamicum Extraction of Whole Cell LipidsLyophilized C. glutamicum, C. glutamicum::ppm1, and C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2 were extracted by three consecutive overnight extractions in CHCl3/CH3OH (2:1, v/v). These lipidic extracts were combined, dried under reduced pressure, Folch-washed, CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O (4:2:1, v/v/v), and again dried under reduced pressure and analyzed by MALDI-MS. Extraction of Lipoglycans500 mg of lyophilized cells of C. glutamicum, C. glutamicum::ppm1, and C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2 were delipidated as described above. The delipidated cells were then resuspended in 10 ml of PBS (50 mM, pH 7.5) and 10 ml of phenolsaturated PBS and incubated with stirring at 90 °C for 60 min (40, 41). The mixture was then centrifuged at 4500 x g for 10 min and the upper aqueous phase removed and dialyzed for 24 h against water, with frequent changes. The recovered samples, containing lipoglycans and glycans, were dried under reduced pressure and resuspended in 500 µl of 15% propan-1-ol in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer and loaded onto an octyl-Sepharose CL-4B column (Sigma UK, 30 x 1.5 cm) and eluted with 3 column volumes of the same buffer at 5 ml/h, enabling the removal of non-lipidic moieties (22). The retained lipoglycans were eluted with 3 column volumes of 50% propan-1-ol in 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer. The resulting lipoglycans were either analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by periodic acid-silver nitrate staining, or subjected to further purification using gel filtration chromatography, as described by Gibson et al. (29), for glycosidic linkage analysis. Glycosidic Linkage AnalysisGlycosyl linkage composition was performed according to the modified procedure from Ciucanu and Kerek (42). The per-O-methylated lipoglycans were hydrolyzed using 500 µl of 2 M trifluoroacetic acid at 110 °C for 2 h, reduced using 350 µl of a 10 mg/ml solution of NaBD4 (1 M ammonium hydroxide/ethanol; 1:1, v/v) and per-O-acetylated using 300 µl of acetic anhydride for 1 h at 110 °C. The resulting alditol acetates were solubilized in cyclohexane before analysis by gas chromatography and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.
Preparation of Enzyme FractionsC. glutamicum, C. glutamicum::ppm1, and C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2 were grown (10 g wet weight), washed, and re-suspended in 30 ml of buffer A, which contained 50 mM MOPS (adjusted to pH 8.0 with KOH), 5 mM Mannosyltransferase AssaysMembrane fractions from C. glutamicum were assayed and compared with C. glutamicum::ppm1 and C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2 for in vitro mannosyltransferase activity, using methods adapted from Besra et al. (31). Reaction mixtures contained 95 µg of membranes (total protein), buffer A, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mM CaCl2 either with or without 5 µg of amphomycin (a lipopeptide antibiotic that specifically inhibits polyprenyl-P-requiring synthases and the subsequent synthesis of polyprenol-P-Man) in a total volume of 50 µl. Reactions were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C prior to the addition of 0.25 µCi of GDP-[14C]Man (Amersham Biosciences; 303 mCi/mmol) and held at 37 °C for an additional 30 min. The reactions were stopped by the addition of 4 ml of CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O (10:10:3, v/v/v) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min, followed by the addition of 1.75 ml of CHCl3 and 0.75 ml of H2O. The lower organic layer of the biphasic mixture was washed three times with 2 ml of CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O (3:47:48, v/v/v), dried under a stream of nitrogen, and resuspended in 200 µl of CHCl3/CH2OH (2:1, v/v). The transfer of [14C]Man from GDP-[14C]Man to the in vitro synthesized PI/PIMs was quantified by scintillation counting using 5 ml of EcolumeTM (ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA) and the materials analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC)/autoradiography as described previously (34). Analysis of Reaction ProductsLarge scale reaction mixtures containing unlabeled GDP-Man (80 mM) and the other components were prepared and processed as described above. The reaction products were dried, applied to preparative TLC plates (plastic-backed plates of Silica gel 60 F254; E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) along with radiolabeled material (50,000 cpm) to trace the cold enzymatically synthesized products and developed in CHCl3/CH3OH/NH4OH/H2O (65:25:0.5:3.6, v/v/v/v). Autoradiography was performed as described previously (34). The band corresponding to the new enzymatically synthesized PIM product was recovered from plates using 4 ml of CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O (10:10:3, v/v/v) at room temperature for 30 min followed by the addition of 1.75 ml of CHCl3 and 0.75 ml of H2O. The lower organic layer of the biphasic mixture was washed three times with 2 ml of CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O (3:47:48, v/v/v), dried under a stream of nitrogen, and analyzed using MALDI-MS, as described previously (33). Polyprenol Monophosphomannose Synthase AssaysReaction mixtures assessing [14C]Man incorporation consisted of 0.25 µCi of GDP-[14C]Man (Amersham Biosciences; 303 mCi/mmol), 62.5 µM ATP, 10 µM MgCl2, and 90 µg of membrane preparations, prepared as described previously, in a final volume of 50 µl (35). In some cases, exogenous lipid monophosphate substrates (C35, heptaprenyl monophosphate; C40, octaprenyl monophosphate; C50, decaprenyl monophosphate; C55, undecaprenyl monophosphate; and C60, dodecaprenyl monophosphate) were added to reaction mixtures at a final concentration of 0.25 mM in 0.25% CHAPS. The reaction mixtures were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Extraction and Characterization of [14C]Mannose-labeled Products from PPM ReactionThe above enzymatic reactions were terminated by the addition of 4 ml of CHCl3/CH3OH/0.8 M NaOH (10:10:3, v/v/v) followed by further incubation at 50 °C for 20 min. The mixtures were then allowed to cool to room temperature, and 1.75 ml of CHCl3 and 0.75 ml of H2O were added. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged, and the upper aqueous phase discarded. The organic phase was washed three times with 2 ml of CHCl3/CH3OH/H2O (3:47:48, v/v/v), dried under a stream of nitrogen to yield an organic fraction, which contained exclusively the mild-alkali stable family of PPMs. The resulting PPMs were resuspended in 200 µl of CHCl3/CH3OH (2:1, v/v), and aliquots (20 µl) were dried under a stream of nitrogen in a scintillation vial prior to scintillation counting using 5 ml of EcolumeTM (ICN Biomedicals). Thin layer chromatography of the reaction mixtures, usually aliquots representing 10% of the reaction mixtures, was conducted on aluminum-backed plates of Silica gel 60 F254 (E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using CHCl3/CH3OH/NH4OH/H2O (65:25:0.4:3.6, v/v/v/v). Autoradiograms were obtained as described previously (34).
Genome Comparison of the ppm LocusPrevious work has identified that there are subtle variations in the organization of the ppm1 locus in mycobacterial strains (35). The well characterized Mt-ppm1 gene of M. tuberculosis is a large polypeptide consisting of two domains, Mt-ppm1/D1 (functional domain) and Mt-ppm1/D2 (catalytic domain), shown in Fig. 1A. However, a great deal of heterogeneity pertaining to this gene is evident within several mycobacterial species. For instance, in Mycobacterium smegmatis these domains are encoded by two separate genes, encoding Ms-ppm1 and Ms-ppm2 (Fig. 1A), which have recently been shown to interact with each other in vivo as revealed by a bacterial two-hybrid system (43).
To gain information on the presence and organization of orthologous genes in related bacteria like C. glutamicum, and to analyze for the existence of paralogues, the Mt-ppm1/D1 and Mt-ppm1/D2 domains were blasted individually against the genomes of selected Corynebacterianeae in the hope of understanding the genetic organization of these genes within other members of this family. A phylogenetic tree constructed for the closest homologues of Mt-ppm1/D1 is shown in Fig. 1B. Interestingly, a very similar tree was obtained for the polypeptides that are orthologous to Mt-ppm1/D2, suggesting their common evolution together with D1 polypeptides (Fig. 1C). Indeed, with further comparison of the 16 S ribosomal RNA tree (Fig. 1D), there is evidence that both D1 and D2 polypeptides were already present before species separation occurred within the Corynebacterianeae, and that they were retained during vertical descent. When this evidence is taken together, one may conclude that these polypeptides catalyze core functions within this suborder of the Actinomycetales. In addition, the presence of an additional D2 paralogue in C. glutamicum (Fig. 1C) is apparently a more recent evolutionary event, because a phage integrase site is directly adjacent to the corresponding gene; moreover, this is absent in the closest related species, Corynebacterium efficiens (Fig. 1D). Through further analysis of the M. tuberculosis and M. avium genomes, we identified the presence of two sequences that are distantly related to Mt-ppm1/D2 (not shown in Fig. 1C). Interestingly, a gene that is of similar size to Mt-ppm1/D1 directly precedes these sequences; furthermore, these preceding genes also encode a protein with transmembrane domains. One may assume that, with this level of genetic organization, these paralogues are organized within an operon, and might constitute a functional complex similar to Mt-ppm1. Indeed, it would appear that both D1 and D2 domains are general structural elements that occur more frequently in mycobacteria than in corynebacteria. In all Corynebacterial species examined to date, both ppm domains are encoded by non-overlapping genes, which is also the case in M. smegmatis and Mycobacterium marinum, with the largest gap of 32 bp present in C. glutamicum. In contrast, members of the M. tuberculosis complex (H37Rv, CDC1551, Mycobacterium bovis) exhibit a different level of genetic organization, whereby both domains are fused to generate one multifunctional polypeptide (Fig. 1A). This difference may indicate a more recent episode of protein evolution, which is in accord with the notion that this branch of slow growing mycobacteria represents the most recently evolved subset of the genus (44). Construction of C. glutamicum ppm MutantsThe gene domains identified as orthologous to Mt-ppm1 in C. glutamicum were preliminarily termed Cg-ppm1 and Cg-ppm2, catalytic domain and putative transmembrane domain, respectively, according to the known function of ppm1 in M. tuberculosis (35) and consistent with the sequence and conserved genome structure of both organisms.
To inactivate Cg-ppm1, the non-replicative plasmid pK18-mob-Cg-ppm1-int was used to transform the C. glutamicum wild type to kanamycin resistance (Fig. 2A). Six colonies were obtained, all exhibiting smaller colony sizes than the wild type, approximately 0.5 and 2 mm, respectively, when grown at 30 °C for 2 days on LB media. One of the recombinant clones was analyzed in detail via PCR. For this purpose two different primer pairs were used, each pair hybridizing with vector and Cg-ppm1 sequences. In both cases the expected fragment was obtained, confirming the integration of the vector into the target gene (Fig. 2, A and C). The disruption mutant obtained was termed C. glutamicum::ppm1. In addition, a strain with an in-frame deletion of Cg-ppm2, termed C. glutamicum
Growth of C. glutamicum MutantsTo assay for any potential in vivo function of Cg-Ppm1 and Cg-Ppm2, growth rates of the generated mutants and controls were analyzed in liquid culture using salt medium. As seen in Fig. 3, the growth rate of C. glutamicum::ppm1 was impaired. Indeed, the growth rate of the mutant was 0.25 h1 as compared with 0.34 h1, obtained for the wild type. The optical density of C. glutamicum::ppm1 only became comparable with that of the wild type after 25 h of growth. As expected, when pVWEx2-Cg-ppm1 was introduced into C. glutamicum::ppm1, with the resulting strain referred to as C. glutamicum::ppm1 pCg-ppm1, growth was restored to a rate equivalent to wild type (Fig. 3). This result indicates that Cg-ppm1 is not an essential gene for growth, although it is required for optimal growth rate. Electron microscopic analyses of the mutated cells did not reveal any ultrastructural changes when compared with the wild type (data not shown). Intriguingly, when the growth rate of the strain C. glutamicum
In C. glutamicum a paralogue of Cg-ppm1 is present, which is of similar length (250 instead of 270 amino acids) and shares 76% identity with the gene product of Cg-ppm1. Nevertheless, when the plasmid-encoded paralogue was introduced to C. glutamicum::ppm1, no restoration of growth rate was observed (data not shown), which might indicate, together with the apparent recent origin, that this gene is a non-functional copy. Expression of Mt-ppm1/D2 and Functional Complementation of C. glutamicum::ppm1Plasmid pXMJ19-Mt-ppm1/D2 was constructed to contain domain 2 of the M. tuberculosis ppm1 gene, extending from amino acid residue 594 to residue 874. In the plasmid a start codon and an appropriate ribosome-binding site were introduced. In this study the plasmid was used to transform C. glutamicum::ppm1 to give C. glutamicum::ppm1 pXMJ19Mt-ppm1/D2, with the resulting strain referred to as C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2. When a crude cellular extract of this complemented strain was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, an extra protein band was observed that was absent in the uncomplemented mutated strain (Fig. 4, lanes 3 and 2, respectively). MALDI-MS analyses identified tryptic digests of the Mt-Ppm1/D2 fragments with a coverage >40% (data not shown). Therefore, domain 2 of the mycobacterial polyprenyl monophosphomannose synthase is able to form a stable protein in C. glutamicum::ppm1, an expected result that confirms the clear domain and genetic organization of the homologous proteins (Fig. 1A).
The growth of the complemented strain (C. glutamiccum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2) was analyzed as above in salt medium. When the inactivated mutant was complemented with the plasmid containing Mt-ppm1/D2, recovery of growth was observed, illustrated in Fig. 3. In summary, Mt-Ppm1/D2 is able to replace the activity of the corresponding Cg-ppm1, and the identified polyprenyl monophosphomannose synthase activities (35) are in part the result of this protein. This confirmed that the Mt-Ppm1/D2 domain itself is functional, and sufficient to restore growth rate. Incorporation of GDP-[14C]Mannose by Enzymatic Extracts from C. glutamicum, C. glutamicum::ppm1, and C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2To further prove that the altered growth rates observed for C. glutamicum::ppm1 were the result of this strain lacking a functional copy of a PPM synthase, we examined membrane extracts prepared from C. glutamicum, C. glutamicum::ppm1, and C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2, and compared their relative PPM synthase activities.
Examination of the corynebacterial PPM family by TLC/autoradiography indicated that C. glutamicum possess one species of PPM (Fig. 5). To identify the species present in C. glutamicum, membrane fractions were incubated with and without a range of exogenous commercially available polyprenol monophosphates. With the co-spotting of endogenous and exogenously added PPM molecules, we were unequivocally able to identify the corynebacterial PPM as an undecaprenol phosphate (C55) species (data not shown), similar in chain length to those found in E. coli (45). Furthermore, we found, in complete agreement with our previous studies, that the corynebacterial synthase, Cg-Ppm1, showed a similar lack of specificity for polyprenyl phosphates in relation to changes in the lipid moiety, such as saturation of the
As expected the PPM synthase-specific enzymic activity from the wild type strain was clearly evident (12.63 pmol/mg/min), and C. glutamicum::ppm1 was found to possess no PPM synthase activity (Fig. 5). The complemented mutant (C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2) was assayed for PPM synthase activity, with our results showing a restoration of enzymatic activity to almost 50% of that observed in the wild type strain (5.95 pmol/mg/min) (Fig. 5). The restoration of PPM synthase activity in the complemented mutant, through the use of a plasmid-encoded gene, further emphasizes that domain 2 of the M. tuberculosis ppm gene is catalytic, and, as expected, Cg-ppm1 possesses the PPM synthase activity of the two orthologues identified in the C. glutamicum genome. In addition, these results provide further evidence that corynebacteria represent a suitable model enabling functional studies using the expression of mycobacterial genes. In Vivo and in Vitro Characterization and Analysis of PIM and Lipoglycan Biosynthesis in C. glutamicumTo date, we are not aware of any studies comparing the nature of the in vivo and in vitro synthesized PIM molecules in corynebacteria. Therefore, we extracted the whole cell lipids, known to contain PIM molecules (46, 47), from C. glutamicum and C. glutamicum::ppm1 and analyzed these using two-dimensional TLC. As revealed via TLC, both strains produced identical PIM profiles (data not shown). In addition, the in vivo C. glutamicum lipids were analyzed by MALDI-MS (Fig. 6). In vivo, C. glutamicum produces PI (C16/C18:1; m/z 835) and Ac1PIM2 (2C16/C18:1; m/z 1397) as the major species, as well as a minor component characterized as Ac1PIM2 (C16/C18:1/C18; m/z 1425). Moreover, the identification of these PIM species together with the nature of the acyl groups is in complete agreement with previous work (7).
With the identification of both lipoglycans and glycolipids in the cell envelope of C. glutamicum, we reasoned that both corynebacteria and mycobacteria should possess similar biosynthetic pathways dedicated to the production of these complex polysaccharides. The availability of amphomycin (a lipopeptide antibiotic that specifically inhibits polyprenol-P-requiring synthases, thus blocking the synthesis of C55-P-Man, and the subsequent production of higher PIMs) meant we were able to probe the initial in vitro steps involved in the production of PIMs in C. glutamicum. Both C. glutamicum and C. glutamicum::ppm1 were examined for GDP-Man-dependent mannosyltransferase activities associated with PIM biosynthesis using an in vitro cell-free assay system. Assays were performed with freshly prepared membranes from both strains. Using thin layer chromatography/autoradiography, we observed one species of in vitro synthesized PIM molecules (Fig. 7). Indeed, using large scale assays with unlabeled GDP-Man and C. glutamicum membrane preparations, we were able to extract this species and characterize it using MALDI-MS (Fig. 6, inset). As expected both strains produced identical products, which were characterized as Ac1PIM2 (C16/C18/C18:1; m/z 1425) (Fig. 6, inset). Interestingly, the in vitro C. glutamicum membrane extracts synthesize only Ac1PIM2 (m/z 1425), which is the minor PIM species synthesized by C. glutamicum in vivo. The subsequent synthesis of higher PIMs (Ac1PIM3, etc.) and linear LM (31) in C. glutamicum was completely abrogated because of inhibition of the required C55-P-Man sugar donor by amphomycin, which was also the case, as expected, when we analyzed C. glutamicum::ppm1 (data not shown). These results mirror previous studies on the use of amphomycin and the subsequent synthesis of linear LM (31).
Mycobacterial LAM is an important factor in tuberculosis immunopathogenesis, and is a major component in the cell architecture of the tubercle bacilli, along side the other biosynthetically related lipoglycans such as lipomannan and glycolipids including PIMs. These complex lipoglycans are composed of many different carbohydrate residues, with the mannan domain typically composed of 6-Manp, 2,6-Manp, and t-Manp residues. The purified lipoglycans from C. glutamicum were examined via glycosidic linkage analysis, and the same residues were identified (data not shown). Moreover, through alkaline hydrolysis of the intact lipoglycan, we were able to distinguish C16, C18:1, and C18 fatty acids in the ratio 1:0.6: 0.1. Finally, the lipoglycan was hydrolyzed in strong acid conditions and the resulting hydrolysates analyzed using capillary electrophoresis coupled to laser induced florescence. This demonstrated that the lipoglycan was composed exclusively of Manp residues (data not shown). Altogether this pointed to the presence of a LM-like lipoglycan within the cell envelope of C. glutamicum, and was in complete agreement with the previous work of Puech et al. (7). In this study we have previously demonstrated, through the indirect use of amphomycin and the direct use C. glutamicum::ppm1, that the formation of higher PIMs and linear LM is dependent on the transfer of mannose from GDP-Man to undecaprenol phosphate, which then acts as the sugar donor for the growing lipoglycan (31, 35). With this in mind, we examined whether in vivo lipoglycan biosynthesis was affected by the inactivation of Cg-ppm1. Crude lipoglycan extractions were prepared from C. glutamicum, C. glutamicum::ppm1, and C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2. The results observed were fascinating; the inactivated mutant had lost all ability to synthesize lipoglycans (Fig. 8), which suggests that the amelioration of growth rate observed in the C. glutamicum::ppm1 mutant is linked to the production of a full complement of lipoglycans, presumably enabling the bacteria to form a suitable corynebacterial cell envelope. Because we had established that the plasmid-encoded Mt-ppm/D2 was functional when introduced to C. glutamicum::ppm1, we assumed that, when we analyzed the complemented mutant (C. glutamicum::ppm1 pMt-ppm1/D2), we would observe restoration of lipoglycan production. Indeed, when the crude lipoglycans were visualized using SDS-PAGE followed by silver nitrate-periodic acid staining, there were no observable differences (Fig. 8), suggesting a key conserved role for this synthase in both mycobacteria and corynebacteria.
Mycobacterial LAM is now well accepted as an important immunomodulatory molecule, and plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Indeed, a recent study has defined the precise role ManLAM plays in the molecular basis of mycobacterially induced phagosome maturation arrest (48). Moreover, a recent review on mycobacterial LAM suggests that LAM will continue to evolve and emerge as an important virulence factor for tuberculosis (11). Given the importance of this lipoglycan, it appears perplexing that we know very little about the biosynthetic pathways involved in its production and regulation. A number of lipoglycans structurally akin to mycobacterial LAM have been characterized from related Actinomycetales, providing a network of structural information relating to conserved domains within these macromolecules. It seems that the MPI anchor and mannan domain is structurally conserved between genera, whereas the greatest variation is found within the arabinan domain of these LAM-like molecules (11). With the general degree of conservation in both the MPI anchor and mannan region, we chose to undertake a biochemical and molecular study aimed at identifying key enzymes common to both mycobacterial and corynebacterial lipoglycan biosynthesis. Previous studies have reported the presence of lipoglycans within the corynebacterial cell envelope (7, 9), and our present study has shown that both PIMs and an LM-like molecule exist in C. glutamicum and C. pseudotuberculosis.4 These facts support the notion that there are highly conserved biosynthetic pathways within the Actinomycetales family, dedicated to the production of these lipoglycans. The precise in vivo role and function of these molecules within the corynebacteria is currently unknown. However, because they are generally non-pathogenic, one may presume they play a crucial role in cell envelope architecture, a fact illustrated by the altered growth rate of the Cg-ppm1 inactivated mutant described in this study. Further evidence for this hypothesis is provided by the findings of Puech et al. (7), who noted that the corynebacterial cell envelope does not contain enough mycolic acids to cover the entire cell surface (7). They suggested that non-covalently associated lipids may compensate for the lack of mycolic acids, and enable the production of a satisfactory hydrophobic cell envelope (7). From our findings it would appear that glycolipids and lipoglycans, also non-covalently associated macromolecules, play a role in determining overall cell architecture, and could supplement the lipids present in the cell envelope.
Detailed genomic analysis of C. glutamicum revealed orthologues of Mt-ppm1 (Rv2051c), which were termed Cg-ppm2 (transmembrane domain, orthologue of Mt-ppm1/D1) and Cg-ppm1 (catalytic domain, orthologue of Mt-ppm1/D2). This level of organization is in contrast to that found in M. tuberculosis H37Rv, where Mt-ppm1 has been postulated to be the result of a recent genetic fusion, resulting in a single bi-functional gene, where Mt-ppm1/D1 is the transmembrane domain and Mt-ppm1/D2 possesses catalytic activity (35). The genetic arrangement of the corynebacterial orthologues is more reminiscent of the ppm genes found in other mycobacterial strains such as M. avium, M. smegmatis, and M. leprae, as shown in Fig. 1A. The present study highlights the overall importance of the Ppm synthase in lipoglycan biosynthesis. We have established that, when C. glutamicum lacks a functional copy of Cg-ppm1, it is unable to produce any mature lipoglycans, but can still produce PIMs. The importance of these findings has wider implications for several reasons. First, a number of reports have identified several mannosyltransferases, termed pimA, pimB, and pimC within mycobacterial genomes, which have been shown to be involved in PIM13 biosynthesis (3234). pimA has been shown to be essential for mycobacterial growth, as it initiates lipoglycan biosynthesis through the production of PIM1. In contrast, both pimB5 and pimC have been shown to be nonessential, such that disruption of the open reading frames provides no obvious phenotype, i.e. LM/LAM-negative. Because disruption provided no obvious phenotype, it suggests that there are other redundant enzymes and pathways, which are able to compensate for such enzyme(s). A key goal of mycobacterial research is the generation of truncated variants of both LM and LAM. The recent definition of the Ppm1 synthase enzyme and its involvement in the extension of PIM precursors, leading to the generation of LM, has highlighted the enzyme as a worthy candidate for gene disruption leading to LM/LAM-negative mutants in mycobacteria. However, because of the intrinsic complications involved in the genetic manipulation of mycobacteria, such disruptions are likely to prove more fruitful through the initial exploitation of more tractable genetic models, such as C. glutamicum. Furthermore, we have found that restoration of growth rate and lipoglycan production can be observed in the C. glutamicum::ppm1 mutant by functional complementation with a plasmid-encoded copy of Mt-ppm1/D2. This finding highlights the utilization of heterologous expression of mycobacterial proteins within corynebacteria to resolve in vivo and in vitro roles of key enzymes (49, 50). As opposed to studies with pimB and pimC, further genomic and biochemical analysis established no compensatory mechanism(s) within the corynebacterial genomes, when the Cg-ppm1 gene was inactivated.
In summary, our current findings suggest that the inactivation of Mt-ppm1/D2 would be nonessential for M. tuberculosis, and provide tubercle bacilli lacking both LM and LAM. The generated mutants could then be used in detailed immunological studies aimed at defining the exact in vivo functions LM and LAM in tuberculosis pathogenesis. Moreover, if their in vivo roles are shown to echo the myriad of established in vitro functions, then ultimately this may lead to the development of novel agents that target this enzyme system, and as such a potential new breed of anti-mycobacterial drugs.
* This work was supported in part by Medical Research Council Grants G99010 [GenBank] 77 and G99010 [GenBank] 78 and by Wellcome Trust Grant 058972. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. || Jenner Research Fellow of the Lister Institute. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-121-415-8125; Fax: 44-121-414-5925; E-mail: g.besra{at}bham.ac.uk.
1 The abbreviations used are: PIM, phosphatidyl-myo-inositol mannoside; LB, Luria-Bertani; LAM, lipoarabinomannan; LM, lipomannan; MALDI-MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry; ManLAM, lipoarabinomannan with mannose caps; Manp, mannopyranose; MPI, mannosyl-phosphatidyl-myo-inositol anchor; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PI, phosphatidyl-myo-inositol; PILAM, lipoarabinomannan with phosphoinositide caps; PPM, polyprenol monophosphomannose; TLC, thin layer chromatography; t, terminal.
2 PIM nomenclature is taken from Kordulakova et al. (1). PIM is used to describe the global family of phosphatidyl-myo-inositol mannosides that carry one to four fatty acids (attached to the glycerol, myo-inositol, and/or mannose and one to six mannose residues. In AcxPIMy, x refers to the number of acyl groups esterified to the myo-inositol or mannose residues, and y refers to the number of mannose residues. For example, Ac1PIM2 corresponds to the phosphatidyl-myo-inositol dimannoside, carrying two acyl groups attached to the glycerol (the diacylglycerol moiety) and one acyl group esterified to the mannose or inositol residue.
3 K. J. C. Gibson and G. S. Besra, unpublished results.
4 G. S. Besra, unpublished results.
5 L. E. DesJardin, G. S. Besra, and L. S. Schlesinger, unpublished results.
We gratefully acknowledge Paul Crowther for assistance with the figures.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||