JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M306624200 on July 9, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 42, 41282-41293, October 17, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/42/41282    most recent
M306624200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dias-Baruffi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dias-Baruffi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Dimeric Galectin-1 Induces Surface Exposure of Phosphatidylserine and Phagocytic Recognition of Leukocytes without Inducing Apoptosis*

Marcelo Dias-Baruffi {ddagger} § ¶, Hui Zhu {ddagger} ¶, Moonjae Cho ||, Sougata Karmakar **, Rodger P. McEver {ddagger} ¶ ** and Richard D. Cummings {ddagger} ¶ {ddagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Oklahoma Center for Medical Glycobiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, and **The Cardiovascular Biology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, the §School of Pharmaceutical Science of Ribeirão Preto-SP, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café sn 14015-900, São Paulo, Brazil, and the ||Department of Biochemistry, Cheju National University Medical School, Cheju 690-756, South Korea

Received for publication, June 23, 2003 , and in revised form, July 9, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We report that human galectin-1 (dGal-1), a small dimeric {beta}-galactoside-binding protein, induces phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, measured by Annexin V staining, on human promyelocytic HL-60 cells, T leukemic MOLT-4 cells, and fMet-Leu-Phe-activated, but not resting, human neutrophils. This effect of dGal-1 on HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells is enhanced by pretreatment of the cells with neuraminidase, but treatment of resting neutrophils with neuraminidase does not enhance their sensitivity to dGal-1. Although the induction of staining with Annexin V is often associated with apoptosis, the dGal-1-treated HL-60 cells, MOLT-4 cells, and activated neutrophils do not undergo apoptosis, and there is no detectable DNA fragmentation. HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells treated with dGal-1 continue to grow normally. By contrast, camptothecin-treated HL-60 cells, etoposide-treated MOLT-4 cells, and anti-Fas-treated neutrophils exhibit extensive DNA fragmentation and/or cell death. Lactose inhibits the dGal-1-induced effects, indicating that dGal-1-induced signaling requires binding to cell surface {beta}-galactosides. The dimeric form of Gal-1 is required for signaling, because a monomeric mutant form of Gal-1, termed mGal-1, binds to cells but does not cause these effects. Importantly, dGal-1, but not mGal-1, treatment of HL-60 cells and activated human neutrophils significantly promotes their phagocytosis by activated mouse macrophages. These dGal-1-induced effects are distinguishable from apoptosis, but like apoptotic agents, prepare cells for phagocytic removal. Such effects of dGal-1 may contribute to leukocyte homeostasis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
It is believed that the turnover of neutrophils and other leukocytes in tissues involves programmed cell death (apoptosis) and then phagocytosis by tissue macrophages (14). However, the factors regulating turnover of leukocytes are unclear. Although Fas and Fas ligand (FasL)1 induce apoptosis of mature, circulating neutrophils in vitro (57), mice deficient in FasL (gld) or Fas (lpr) have essentially normal numbers of circulating mature granulocytes (8). FasL/Fas-mediated apoptosis is not essential in regulating the clearance of neutrophils during inflammation (9). Fas and FasL may promote, rather than decrease, inflammatory responses in vivo (1012). In transgenic mice expressing bcl-2 in mature neutrophils, apoptosis of circulating cells is inhibited, but neutrophil homeostasis is unaltered, and macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of neutrophils is normal (13). Phagocytosis is required for resolution of the inflammatory process and leukocyte homeostasis in vivo (1416). These results suggest that factors not yet defined may regulate leukocyte turnover in tissues.

Such observations led us to explore whether the basement membrane and extracellular matrix might harbor other proteins capable of binding to leukocytes and inducing their apoptosis or phagocytic recognition. A candidate protein is the {beta}-galactoside-binding protein termed galectin-1 (dGal-1), which binds to most leukocytes. dGal-1 is a widely expressed dimeric protein (subunit ~14.6 kDa), which is a member of the galectin family of lectins (1719). It is secreted by many cell types, including human endothelial cells (20, 21), and is found in the basement membrane and extracellular matrices around capillary walls (22, 23). dGal-1 has been reported to have various biological activities, including effects on neurite out-growth (24, 25), growth inhibition of non-neural cells (2628), cell growth stimulation (29, 30), and apoptosis of immature thymocytes (31, 32), and to activate human T cells and T cell lines (33, 34).

To explore the biological activity of dGal-1 toward leukocytes, we prepared a recombinant form of dimeric human dGal-1 and a mutated, monomeric form of galectin-1 (mGal-1). We explored the interactions of these lectins with HL-60 cells, MOLT-4 cells, and both resting and activated human neutrophils. Our results show that dGal-1, but not mGal-1, rapidly enhances surface staining with Annexin V (phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure) in desialylated HL-60 cells, desialylated MOLT-4 cells, and activated, but not resting, human neutrophils. The exposure of PS is often associated with apoptosis (3537). However, dGal-1 does not induce apoptosis, because no DNA fragmentation is observed in dGal-1-treated cells, and HL-60 cells and MOLT-4 cells continue to grow normally. Importantly, dGal-1-treated, but not mGal-1-treated, cells are actively phagocytosed in vitro by activated mouse peritoneal macrophages. Thus, dGal-1-induced effects are distinguishable from apoptosis yet prepare cells for phagocytic recognition. These results suggest that dGal-1 could induce surface changes that play a role in leukocyte turnover in tissues independently of apoptosis.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation of dGal-1 and mGal-1—The cDNA for human dGal-1 was cloned by PCR from the published sequence (38, 39). The recombinant form of human dGal-1 was purified as described previously (40) employing affinity chromatography on lactosyl-Sepharose, and the protein was eluted with lactose. The column was washed with 5 column volumes of PBS (0.01 M Na2HPO4, 0.01 M Na2HPO4, 0.85% NaCl, pH 7.4) containing 2-ME (14 mM), and the bound dGal-1 and mGal-1 were eluted with PBS containing 2-ME (14 mM) and lactose (0.1 M). To confirm that the purified protein quantitatively retained carbohydrate-binding activity, the protein was re-chromatographed on lactosyl-Sepharose. The elution profile of the re-purified dGal-1 revealed a single peak of protein that was quantitatively eluted with lactose (data not shown). In some studies we heat-inactivated the dGal-1 by heating the protein at a concentration of 1 mg/ml to 100 °C for 10 min. The treated sample remained in suspension, although cloudy, and was inactive, because it was unable to bind lactosyl-Sepharose.

To generate a monomeric form of the protein (mGal-1), we used PCR primer-directed mutagenesis as described for the hamster-derived Gal-1 (41) to place a Ser residue codon at the Cys-2 position and an Asp residue at the Val-5 position. The cDNAs for dGal-1 and mGal-1 were ligated into the BamHI and HindIII sites of the plasmid PQE-50 (Qiagen). Both dGal-1 and mGal-1 were expressed at high levels in transformed Escherichia coli. dGal-1 and mGal-1 were purified from sonicated E. coli cell extracts on columns of lactosyl-Sepharose as described above. Human dGal-1 at a concentration from 2–80 µM behaves as a dimeric protein on size-exclusion chromatography, whereas mGal-1 behaves as a monomeric species under the same conditions, using experimental approaches previously described (41). The detailed characterization of the binding properties and kinetics of subunit association of human dGal-1 and mGal-1 will be described elsewhere.2

Cell Lines and Enzymatic Desialylation—HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in complete RPMI 1640 media containing 10% fetal calf serum, glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 milliunits/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). To desialylate the cells, HL-60 cells or MOLT-4 cells (3 x 107 cells) were treated with 100 milliunits of Arthrobacter ureafaciens neuraminidase (Sigma) in 500 µl of complete RPMI for 1 h at 37 °C. The treated cells were washed twice with RPMI before use.

Isolation, Activation, and Desialylation of Neutrophils—Heparinized blood was obtained from normal donors. Neutrophils were isolated by dextran sedimentation, hypotonic lysis, and density gradient centrifugation on Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) as described previously (42). Typically, the polymorphonuclear cells were >90% neutrophils by Wright-Giemsa staining and >90% CD16+ as assessed by flow cytometry. Neutrophils were activated by treatment with fMet-Leu-Phe (Sigma, 1.0 µM) for 10 min at 37 °C in 1 ml of HBSS/HSA (Ca2+-Mg2+-free Hanks' balanced salt solution with 0.2% HSA). Desialylated neutrophils were prepared by treating 1 x 107 neutrophils with A. ureafaciens neuraminidase (Sigma, 100 milliunits) in 500 µl of HBSS/HSA for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were washed twice with HBSS/HSA before use.

Flow Cytometry—Galectins and the sialic acid binding plant lectin Maackia amurensis leukoagglutinin (MAL) (Vector Laboratories) (43) were biotinylated by using EZ-LinkTM Sulfo-NHS-Biotin (Pierce). Cells were incubated with biotinylated forms of the lectins (10 µg/ml) for 30 min on ice and washed twice with sterile PBS. The washed cells were incubated with FITC-streptavidin (1:100 dilution, Sigma), washed with sterile PBS, and analyzed by flow cytometry in a FACSCalibur equipped with a 488-nm argon laser (BD Biosciences). Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified tissue culture incubator with 5% CO2 in the absence of either MAL, dGal-1, or mGal-1 in complete RPMI or HBSS/HSA. In the case of dGal-1 and mGal-1, we used control treatments in which lactose (20 mM) was included during the incubations to inhibit galectin binding. After this incubation, all cells either treated or untreated with galectins were treated with lactose (20 mM) in sterile PBS to remove galectins. The lactose-treated cells were washed at least two times in sterile PBS and then incubated in a 100-µl final volume in HEPES buffer (10 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl2,5mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) with a mixture of FITC-conjugated Annexin V (Roche Applied Science, 2 µlof conjugate per 100 µl of resuspended cells, as described by the manufacturer) and PI (Molecular Probes, 1 µg/ml final concentration) at room temperature for 15 min. Into this tube was pipetted 300 µl of HEPES buffer, and the sample was analyzed by flow cytometry in a FACSCalibur. As known inducers of apoptosis, we used camptothecin (Calbiochem, 0–25 µM), etoposide (Calbiochem, 20 µM), and IgM anti-Fas (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., 250 ng/ml).

Resting and activated neutrophils were stained with anti-MAC 1 antibody (anti-CD11b, Caltag) and anti-L-selectin antibody (purified DREG 56) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Approximately 1 x 106 neutrophils were washed once in HBSS and resuspended in 100 µl of HBSS/HSA. The specific antibodies were added at a final concentration of 10–20 µg/ml, and the cells were incubated at 4 °C for 45 min. Then the cells were washed twice with HBSS before resuspension in 100 µlof HBSS/HSA. Goat anti-mouse F(ab)2 conjugated to FITC was then added, and the cells were incubated at 4 °C for an additional 30 min. Cells were then washed twice with HBSS before resuspending them in HBSS/HSA for flow cytometric analysis.

Confocal Microscopy—At the end of incubations with galectins, cells were washed with 20 mM lactose in PBS and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in PBS with the DNA stain Hoechst 33342 (1 µg/ml, Molecular Probes). These cells were then stained with a mixture of FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI and analyzed by confocal microscopy on a Leica TCS NT Microscope.

DNA Fragmentation Assays—To detect DNA fragmentation, two approaches were used. In the first approach, cells were subjected to the TUNEL assay. Cells were treated with or without dGal-1 (20 µM for 8 h), the topoisomerase inhibitor camptothecin (15 µM for 4 h), or anti-Fas mouse monoclonal IgG antibody (R & D Systems, 100 ng/ml for 8 h). Cells were then washed with lactose (20 mM), fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde buffered with PBS, and permeabilized with 70% ethanol on ice. The TUNEL reaction (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) was conducted by incubating the cells for 1 h at 37 °C with 50 µl of TUNEL reaction mixture. The cells were then washed and analyzed by flow cytometry.

In the second approach, we examined DNA fragmentation by gel electrophoresis. After treatments of cells with galectins or other reagents as described above, 1 x 107 cells were lysed with 1% Nonidet P-40 in EDTA (20 mM), Tris-HCl (50 mM), pH 7.5, and then microcentrifuged to remove pelleted, insoluble material. The supernatants were then treated with RNase A (5 µg/µl) for 2 h at 56 °C, followed by digestion with proteinase K (2.5 µg/µl) for 2 h at 37 °C. A half volume of ammonium acetate (10 M) was added, and DNA was precipitated with 2.5 volumes of absolute ethanol. DNA was recovered by centrifuging at 12,000 x g for 10 min and dissolved in gel loading buffer. Finally, DNA was separated by electrophoresis in a 1.6% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (44).

Determination of HL-60 and MOLT-4 Cell Growth in the Presence of dGal-1—Desialylated HL-60 cells (1.8 x 105/ml) or MOLT-4 cells (1.5 x 105 cells/ml) were incubated with or without dGal-1 (20 µM) in complete RPMI in 12-well plates (2 ml/well). Cells were collected at 24-h intervals, washed with lactose (20 mM), pelleted by centrifugation, and resuspended in PBS. Live cell counts were determined by trypan blue exclusion and counting with a hemacytometer in duplicate assays. Camptothecin (Calbiochem, 20 µM) and etoposide (Calbiochem, 20 µM) were used in control experiments to induce apoptosis.

Phagocytosis Assays—The standard macrophage phagocytosis assay was utilized as described (45, 46). Briefly, peritoneal macrophages were collected from mice treated intraperitoneally with Brewer's thioglycolate (Difco, 4%), and the isolated macrophages were cultured in a 24-well plate. The macrophage monolayer was washed with PBS, before use. dGal-1- or mGal-1-treated cells, untreated cells (negative control), in vitro aged human neutrophils that had been incubated in vitro for 24 h at 37 °C in HBSS/HSA (positive control), or camptothecin-treated HL-60 cells (positive control), were added to each well containing macrophages and incubated for1hat37 °C. After incubation, each well was washed in ice-cold PBS and treated briefly with trypsin (0.25%) to remove lightly adherent cells. The macrophages were fixed with paraformaldehyde (1.8%), and phagocytosis was microscopically evaluated by counting 200 macrophages/well in each duplicate well and noting those macrophages that had visibly enlarged and contained visibly phagocytosed cells. Results were then expressed as the percentage of macrophages that had phagocytosed cells (% phagocytosis), as described by Fadok et al. (45) and as modified by Zhuang et al. (46).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Binding of dGal-1 and mGal-1 to HL-60 Cells, MOLT-4 Cells, Resting Human Neutrophils, and Activated Human Neutrophils—The human recombinant galectin-1 preparation was purified by affinity chromatography on lactosyl-Sepharose, as described under "Experimental Procedures." The activity and stability of the purified protein was demonstrated by the quantitative rebinding of the material to a column of lactosyl-Sepharose (data not shown). SDS-PAGE analysis of fractions demonstrated that the protein was apparently homogeneous and migrated with a molecular mass of ~14.9 kDa (data not shown). These results demonstrate that the protein used in the studies below was quantitatively active and pure. Similar purification and activity profiles were obtained with mGal-1, the monomeric mutant form of galectin-1 (data not shown), prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." Human dGal-1 at a concentration from 2–80 µM behaves as a dimeric protein on size-exclusion chromatography, whereas mGal-1 behaves as a monomeric species under the same conditions, using experimental approaches previously described (41) (data not shown).

We examined the binding of dGal-1 and mGal-1 to HL-60 cells, a human promyelocytic cell line. Both dGal-1 and mGal-1 bound to HL-60 cells, but enzymatic desialylation of the cells significantly enhanced the binding of both lectins (Fig. 1, A and B, respectively). The binding of both dGal-1 and mGal-1 was inhibitable by lactose. We confirmed the effectiveness of enzymatic desialylation by examining the binding of the sialic acid-specific lectin MAL, which recognizes NeuAc{alpha}2–3Gal{beta}1–4Glc-NAc-R linkages (43). Enzymatic desialylation of HL-60 cells (dsHL-60 cells) decreased the binding of MAL (Fig. 1C). These results demonstrate that both dGal-1 and mGal-1 bind equivalently to HL-60 cells and that enzymatic desialylation of the cells exposes more binding sites for both lectins.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Desialylation or activation increases binding sites for dGal-1 and mGal-1 on leukocytes. HL-60 cells and enzymatically desialylated HL-60 cells (dsHL-60) were incubated with 10 µg/ml biotinylated dGal-1 (A), mGal-1 (B), or MAL (C) for 30 min on ice, followed by staining with FITC-streptavidin and analysis by flow cytometry. "Unstained" indicates cells incubated in the absence of either biotinylated MAL or galectin-1. In A and B the results of staining HL-60 cells with dGal-1 or mGal-1 in the presence of lactose are not shown, because staining was essentially the same as the unstained pattern. Resting, fMet-Leu-Phe-activated, or enzymatically desialylated resting human neutrophils were incubated with 10 µg/ml biotinylated dGal-1 (D), biotinylated MAL (E), or the indicated monoclonal antibodies (F) to either L-selectin (L-sel) or MAC-1 for 30 min on ice, followed by staining with FITC-streptavidin and analysis by flow cytometry. Control indicates cells incubated in the absence of either MAL or dGal-1 or in the absence of antibody. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

 

We then assessed the binding of dGal-1 to normal human leukocytes. For these studies we used resting neutrophils, enzymatically desialylated resting neutrophils, and fMet-Leu-Phe-activated neutrophils. dGal-1 bound to resting neutrophils, but it bound at higher levels to activated neutrophils (Fig. 1D). The binding of dGal-1 was largely inhibitable by inclusion of lactose (20 mM) (Fig. 1D). dGal-1 binding was enhanced to enzymatically desialylated resting neutrophils (Fig. 1D). Similar results were obtained using mGal-1 (data not shown). The enzymatic desialylation of resting neutrophils was effective, as shown by the higher binding of MAL to resting neutrophils than to enzymatically desialylated resting neutrophils (Fig. 1E). We also observed that activation of neutrophils without treatment of the cells with neuraminidase, also slightly reduced their binding to MAL, consistent with a possible loss or redistribution of sialic acid-containing glycoconjugates upon activation (Fig. 1E). In control studies, we confirmed the activation of neutrophils, because activation resulted in up-regulation of MAC-1 expression and down-regulation of L-selectin expression (47) (Fig. 1F). These results demonstrate that dGal-1 binds to resting neutrophils but binds slightly more to activated neutrophils.

PS Exposure on Leukocytes Induced by Treatment with dGal-1—Based on observations by others that dGal-1 appears to induce apoptosis in some leukocytes (3134), we assessed whether dGal-1 could induce apoptosis of neutrophils by assessing the staining of cells by Annexin V. Apoptosis is often accompanied by increased exposure of cell surface PS, which is recognized by Annexin V (3537). dGal-1 treatment of resting human neutrophils did not significantly induce PS exposure (Fig. 2A). In addition, dGal-1 treatment of enzymatically desialylated resting neutrophils, while increasing their binding to dGal-1 (Fig. 1D), did not significantly induce surface exposure of PS (Fig. 2A). By contrast, dGal-1 treatment of fMet-Leu-Phe-activated neutrophils markedly enhanced their staining with Annexin V (Fig. 2B). Lactose inhibited the effects of dGal-1 on activated neutrophils (Fig. 2B), demonstrating that carbohydrate ligands on the cell surface are required for the dGal-1-induced staining of these cells with Annexin V (Table I and Fig. 2, A and B). dGal-1-treated neutrophils stained with Annexin V remained impermeable, as measured by the lack of staining with PI (Fig. 2B), demonstrating that changes induced by dGal-1 are not associated with membrane leakage. These results demonstrate that dGal-1 induces surface PS exposure in activated but not resting neutrophils.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
dGal-1 induces Annexin V staining of activated, but not resting or desialylated, resting human neutrophils. A, enzymatic desialylation of resting neutrophils does not enhance Annexin V staining induced by dGal-1. Resting human neutrophils were enzymatically desialylated. Approximately 1 x 106 untreated or desialylated resting neutrophils were left untreated or treated with dGal-1 (20 µM)in500 µl of HBSS/HSA for 4 h at 37 °C in the presence or absence of lactose (20 mM). Cells were washed once with PBS and then stained with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI. B, activation of neutrophils promotes Annexin V staining induced by dGal-1. Neutrophils were activated by treatment with fMet-Leu-Phe (1.0 µM) for 10 min at 37 °C in 1 ml of HBSS/HSA. The activated neutrophils were treated with dGal-1 (20 µM) in 0.5 ml of HBSS/HSA for 4 h at 37 °C in the presence or absence of lactose (20 mM). As controls, dGal-1 treatments of resting neutrophils were performed as in A. At the end of the incubations in A and B above, all dGal-1-treated cells were washed with lactose (20 mM) in PBS. The cells were then stained with a mixture of FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI. The percentage of Annexin V-positive/PI-negative cells was determined. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Induction of PS exposure on human cell lines by dimeric dGal-1

 

Although human neutrophils required activation but not enzymatic desialylation in order for dGal-1 to induce surface PS exposure, HL-60 cells and the human T leukemic MOLT-4 cells responded differently. dGal-1 treatment of HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells induced PS exposure in a lactose-inhibitable manner, but enzymatic desialylation of the cells markedly enhanced their sensitivity to dGal-1-induced PS exposure (Table I). As observed for HL-60 cells, we found that enzymatic desialylation of MOLT-4 cells enhanced their binding to dGal-1 and mGal-1 (Fig 1, A and B, and data not shown). Both HL-60 cells and MOLT-4 cells treated with dGal-1 and induced to stain with Annexin V remained intact and impermeable, as demonstrated by the lack of staining with PI (data not shown). Thus, dGal-1 induces PS exposure in both HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells and enzymatic desialylation of the cells enhances their sensitivity to the lectin.

To further assess the ability of dGal-1 to induce PS exposure on treated cells, we used confocal microscopy to analyze dsHL-60 cells and resting and activated human neutrophils treated with dGal-1. Representative fields of dsHL-60 cells and activated human neutrophils staining with Annexin V following dGal-1 treatment are shown in Fig. 3 (A–I and J–S), respectively. These results demonstrate an overall large increase in Annexin V staining induced by dGal-1 treatment, which is consistent with the flow cytometric analyses (Fig. 2 and Table I). Exposure of Annexin V is often associated with apoptosis, and apoptotic cells usually become smaller in size. We examined the cell size following treatment of cells with either dGal-1 or known inducers of apoptosis, such as camptothecin, a topoisomerase inhibitor that induces apoptosis in cells (48), or anti-Fas. The sizes of the dsHL-60 cells treated with dGal-1 did not change when analyzed by flow cytometry, but dsHL-60 cells treated with camptothecin and human neutrophils treated with anti-Fas were markedly smaller (Fig. 3S). These size changes in apoptotic cells, but not in dGal-1-treated cells, were also apparent in the confocal images, where the camptothecin-treated dsHL-60 cells or anti-Fas-treated activated human neutrophils were smaller than the untreated or dGal-1-treated cells. Nuclear fragmentation was also apparent in dsHL-60 cells treated with camptothecin (Fig. 3H) and nuclear condensation was observed in activated human neutrophils treated with anti-Fas; however, such effects were not observed in cells treated with dGal-1 (Fig. 3, E and Q). Interestingly, we observed a punctate pattern of surface staining with Annexin V following treatment of cells with dGal-1 (Fig. 3, F and R), whereas more uniform staining was observed in dsHL-60 cells treated with camptothecin (Fig. 3I) and activated human neutrophils treated with anti-Fas (Fig. 3O). These results demonstrate that dGal-1 treatment of activated neutrophils and HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells induces PS exposure but does not result in cell shrinkage, as seen for cells undergoing apoptosis.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
dGal-1 induces Annexin-V staining of desialylated HL-60 or activated neutrophil, but not nuclear fragmentation. A–I, confocal microscopy of dGal-1-treated dsHL-60 cells. dsHL-60 cells were either untreated (A–C) or treated with dGal-1 (10 µM) (D–F) or camptothecin (15 µM) (G–I) in RPMI medium for 6 h. The cells were washed with lactose (20 mM), stained with Annexin V-FITC and the DNA stain Hoechst 33342, and then analyzed by confocal microscopy. J–R, confocal microscopy of activated neutrophils treated with dGal-1. Activated neutrophils were either treated with IgM control (250 ng/ml) (J–L), anti-Fas (250 ng/ml) (M–O), or with dGal-1 (10 µM) (P–R) or in RPMI medium for 6 h. Neutrophils were activated by treatment with fMet-Leu-Phe (1.0 µM) for 10 min at 37 °C in 1 ml of HBSS/HSA. The cells were washed with lactose (20 mM), stained with Annexin V-FITC and the DNA stain Hoechst 33342, and then analyzed by confocal microscopy. Results are representative of three independent experiments. S, flow cytometric light scattering analysis of dGal-1-treated dsHL-60 cells. dsHL-60 cells were either untreated (control, green plot) or treated with dGal-1 (10 µM, black plot) or camptothecin (15 µM, red plot) in RPMI medium for 6 h. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

 

Because dGal-1, camptothecin, and anti-Fas induced PS exposure, we performed more quantitative measurements of the ability of these agents to induce this effect. Untreated dsHL-60 cells did not stain with Annexin V (Fig. 4A), but dGal-1 induced a quantitative change in the staining of dsHL-60 cells by Annexin V, and the range of fluorescence intensity was 29–1407 (Fig. 4B). This induction of PS exposure by dGal-1 was similar to that observed by camptothecin treatment of dsHL-60 cells (29–1407 intensity of fluorescence units) (Fig. 4C). A small number of untreated, activated human neutrophils exhibited background staining with Annexin V (Fig. 4D), but treatment with dGal-1 significantly enhanced the staining with a fluorescence intensity in the range of 19–906 (Fig. 4E). This induction of PS exposure by dGal-1 treatment of activated human neutrophils was somewhat lower than that observed with anti-Fas treatment (fluorescence intensity in the range of 28–5523) (Fig. 4, F and G). These results demonstrate that dGal-1 induces a broad range of PS exposure in both dsHL-60 cells and activated human neutrophils. However, the intensity of fluorescence as assessed by Annexin V staining is somewhat lower than that observed with the apoptotic agents camptothecin and anti-Fas.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
dGal-1, anti-Fas, and camptothecin induce Annexin V staining in dsHL-60 cells and human neutrophils. dsHL-60 cells (106) were either untreated (A), treated with dGal-1 (20 µM) in the absence or presence of lactose (20 mM) (B), or treated with camptothecin (20 µM) for 6 h at 37 °C (C). After treatment the cells were washed with lactose (20 mM) in PBS, stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Neutrophils (106) were activated by treatment with fMet-Leu-Phe (1.0 µM) for 10 min at 37 °C in HBSS/HSA. The activated neutrophils were either untreated (D) or treated with dGal-1 (20 µM)for6hat37 °C in the absence or presence (E) of lactose (20 mM). Resting neutrophils (106) were either untreated (F) or treated with anti-Fas IgM (250 ng/ml) or control IgM (G) (250 ng/ml) for 6 h at 37 °C. At the end of the incubation in D–G above, all cells were washed in 20 mM lactose in PBS, stained with ALEXA 488-Annexin V and PI, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The results were expressed as percentage of Annexin V-positive and PI-negative cells. The geometric mean fluorescence and range of fluorescence (indicated by the horizontal bar in each of panels B, C, E, and G) are shown. Results are representative of two independent experiments with duplicate samples.

 

The effect of dGal-1 on desialylated HL-60 cells was concentration-dependent, and optimal effects were observed with ~20 µM dGal-1 (Fig. 5A). Within 1 h following dGal-1 treatment of either dsHL-60 cells (Fig. 5B) or activated human neutrophils (Fig. 5C), we observed increased staining of the cells with Annexin V and this induction by dGal-1 was blocked by inclusion of lactose. The effect of dGal-1 on dsHL-60 cells was maximal within 4 h of treatment (Fig. 5B), whereas there was a linear response of activated neutrophils to dGal-1 over the 8-h treatment (Fig. 5C). Importantly, the dimeric dGal-1, but not the monomeric mutated mGal-1, induced staining of activated neutrophils and dsHL-60 cells with Annexin V (Table I), demonstrating that the observed effects require binding of dimeric dGal-1 to carbohydrate ligands on cell surfaces.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Kinetics and concentration dependence of dGal-1 effects on leukocytes. A, dsHL-60 cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of dGal-1 for 4 h. The cells were then washed and stained with Annexin V-FITC. B, dsHL-60 cells were treated with dGal-1 (10 µM) in the presence or absence of lactose (20 mM) for the indicated times. C, time course of Annexin V staining of activated neutrophils induced by dGal-1. Resting or fMet-Leu-Phe-activated neutrophils (1 x 106) were treated with dGal-1 (20 µM) in 0.5 ml of HBSS/HSA for the indicated times at 37 °C in the presence or absence of lactose (20 mM). After treatment the cells were washed with lactose (20 mM) and stained with Annexin V-FITC. The percentage of Annexin V-positive/PI-negative cells was determined. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

 

Although exposure of PS is often observed in apoptotic cells (3537), it has also been observed in cells undergoing alterations in membrane lipid distribution where apoptosis was not measured directly (4851). We found that the induction of PS exposure by dGal-1 on dsHL-60 cells is reversible at 37 °C within 18 h following removal of dGal-1 (data not shown). By contrast, treatment of cells with camptothecin induced irreversible PS exposure on HL-60 cells (data not shown).

Because these recombinant galectins were derived following expression in E. coli, we sought to further rule out the possibility that bacterial contaminants might cause some of these effects. Heat-inactivated dGal-1, prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures," lost the ability to bind to lactosyl-Sepharose and similarly lost the ability to induce Annexin V staining (data not shown). The loss of activity in the dGal-1 preparation by heating lessens the possibility that any effect observed might arise from heat-stable bacterial contaminants such as heat-stable lipopolysaccharides, indicating that effects observed are due to the carbohydrate-binding activity of dGal-1. This is also consistent with the observations that lactose inhibits the effects induced by dGal-1, as shown above. Additionally, we found that the monomeric mGal-1, although demonstrating excellent binding to cells (Fig. 1B), did not induce staining with Annexin V (Table I), thus further ruling out the possibility that the effects seen for dGal-1 are due to bacterial contaminants rather than dGal-1 binding to carbohydrate ligands on the cell surfaces. Both dGal-1 and mGal-1 bind to cells equivalently (Fig. 1), thus also ruling out a trivial possibility that Annexin V may bind to residual Gal-1 directly. The requirement for dimeric dGal-1 to induce PS exposure indicates that dGal-1-induced cross-linking of relevant surface ligands may be required.

Lack of DNA Fragmentation Induced by dGal-1 Treatment of HL-60 Cells, MOLT-4 Cells, and Activated Human Neutrophils—The dGal-1-induced exposure of PS in cells without cell shrinkage suggested that dGal-1 treatment does not induce apoptosis. To further explore whether apoptosis might be induced, we looked for evidence of DNA fragmentation. dGal-1 treatment did not induce DNA fragmentation in dsHL-60 and dsMOLT-4 cells, as measured by the TUNEL assay (Fig. 6A). By contrast, treatment of HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells with camptothecin induced DNA fragmentation (Fig. 6A). Similarly, no DNA fragmentation was detected in activated human neutrophils treated with dGal-1 (Fig. 6B), although significant DNA fragmentation was induced in cells treated with anti-Fas (Fig. 6B). As another method to assess DNA fragmentation, we examined dGal-1-treated dsHL-60 cells and activated human neutrophils for DNA laddering by acrylamide gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. Camptothecin treatment of HL-60 cells and anti-Fas treatment of activated human neutrophils induced DNA laddering, but treatment with dGal-1 did not (Fig. 6C). These results demonstrate that dGal-1 does not induce DNA fragmentation in these cells.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
dGal-1 does not induce DNA fragmentation in dsHL-60 and dsMOLT-4 cells and activated neutrophils. A, TUNEL assay of dsHL-60 and dsMOLT-4 cells. dsHL-60 and dsMOLT-4 cells (106 cells) were either left untreated (top panels) or treated in complete RPMI at 37 °C with dGal-1 (20 µM) (bottom panels) for 8 h. Middle Panels, HL-60 or MOLT-4 cells (106 cells) were treated with camptothecin (15 µM) for 4 h. All cells were then fixed in PBS-buffered 1% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 70% ethanol on ice, stained for DNA fragmentation by the TUNEL assay, washed, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The region designated M1 represents positive staining. The experiments were performed in duplicate, but only one experimental profile is shown, and the S.E. values are indicated. B, TUNEL assay of activated neutrophils. fMet-Leu-Phe-activated neutrophils (106 cells) were either left untreated or treated in complete RPMI at 37 °C with either dGal-1 (20 µM) or anti-Fas (100 ng/ml) for 8 h. Neutrophils were activated by treatment with fMet-Leu-Phe (1.0 µM) for 10 min at 37 °C in 1 ml of HBSS/HSA. The cells were fixed in PBS-buffered 1% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 70% ethanol on ice, and stained for DNA fragmentation by the TUNEL assay. The cells were then washed and analyzed by flow cytometry. The region designated M1 represents positive staining. The experiments were performed in duplicate, but only one experiment profile is shown, and the S.E. values are indicated. C, dsHL-60 cells (107 cells) were either left untreated or treated with dGal-1 or camptothecin as in A above. fMet-Leu-Phe-activated human neutrophils (107 cells) were either left untreated or treated with dGal-1, as in B. Resting neutrophils (107 cells) were treated with anti-Fas as in B. DNA laddering was examined by gel electrophoresis as described under "Experimental Procedures." DNA size markers are indicated. The results are representative of three independent experiments.

 

Normal Growth of dGal-1 Treated HL-60 and MOLT-4 Cells—The lack of DNA fragmentation indicated that dGal-1 does not induce apoptosis. To further critically test this conclusion, we examined the growth of both HL-60 cells and MOLT-4 cells in the continuous presence of dGal-1 over 2 days. Desialylated cells were treated with dGal-1 (20 µM) before being placed in growth media. The treated and untreated cells were assessed for PS exposure by staining with Annexin V after 6 h of incubation in the growth media. Annexin V stained ~60% of the cells treated with dGal-1, similar to that seen in Table I, whereas untreated cells were not significantly stained with Annexin V (data not shown). As positive controls, dsHL-60 cells were treated with camptothecin and dsMOLT-4 cells were treated with etoposide, which is also an inhibitor of topoisomerase and is an inducer of apoptosis. The cells were then examined for growth in the continuous presence of dGal-1 (20 µM) over a 72-h period. The growth rates for dsHL-60 cells and dsMOLT-4 cells were unaffected by dGal-1 treatment (Fig. 7). By contrast, there was quantitative apoptosis and cell loss for cells treated with either camptothecin (Figs. 6A and 7A) or etoposide (Fig. 7B). The normal growth rates and the lack of DNA fragmentation observed in these cells treated with dGal-1 demonstrate that dGal-1 does not induce cell death.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Treatment of cells with dGal-1 does not cause cell death. Growth curves of dsHL-60 (A) and dsMOLT-4 (B) cells upon various treatments are shown. dsHL-60 cells (1.8 x 105/ml) and dsMOLT-4 cells (1.5 x 105/ml) were treated with 20 µM dGal-1 in the presence or absence of 20 mM lactose and cultured in complete RPMI in a 12-well plate (2 ml/well). (Approximately 70% of the dsHL-60 cells and 55% of dsMOLT-4 were stained with Annexin V within 6 h of this treatment.) Untreated dsHL-60 or dsMOLT-4 cells were used as negative controls. dsHL-60 cells treated with camptothecin (20 µM) or dsMOLT-4 treated with etoposide (20 µM) were used as positive controls. At various times, cells were washed with lactose (20 mM) in RPMI, and the cell numbers were determined by direct counting in a hemacytometer. Greater than 90% of all cells were intact as determined by trypan blue stain staining. The results shown are duplicate analyses, and the ranges are indicated by the error bars. The results are representative of three independent experiments.

 

dGal-1 Treatment of HL-60 Cells Enhances Their Phagocytosis by Macrophages—The surface exposure of PS on cells as measured by Annexin V staining has been associated with their phagocytosis by macrophages (5256). A standard assay for phagocytosis is to place cells in contact with a macrophage monolayer, allow phagocytosis to proceed, and then remove the treated cells and count the numbers of macrophages with visibly engulfed cells (45). To assess whether treatment of cells with dGal-1 promotes their phagocytic recognition, dsHL-60 cells or resting or activated human neutrophils were incubated with dGal-1 or mGal-1. As positive controls, we used HL-60 cells incubated with camptothecin and in vitro aged human neutrophils, which spontaneously undergo apoptosis that is correlated with Annexin V staining. The cells were washed with lactose to remove galectin-1 following treatment and then immediately placed in chambers containing activated mouse peritoneal macrophages. dGal-1-treated dsHL-60 cells, camptothecin-treated dsHL-60 cells, and in vitro aged human neutrophils were phagocytosed by activated macrophages (Fig. 8A). Inclusion of lactose inhibited the dGal-1-induced effects and reduced measurable phagocytosis. Treatment of activated neutrophils with dGal-1 stimulated their phagocytosis by activated macrophages to a level comparable to that observed with in vitro aged neutrophils (Fig. 8B). The inclusion of lactose during treatment of the cells with dGal-1 blocked the ability of dGal-1 to signal changes resulting in subsequent phagocytosis (Fig. 8B). Importantly, mGal-1 treatment of dsHL-60 cells (Fig. 8A) or activated human neutrophils (Fig. 8B) did not promote their phagocytic recognition, indicating that galectin dimerization is important in signaling the changes leading to phagocytic recognition. This lack of induction by mGal-1 of phagocytic recognition of the cells correlated with its inability to induce PS exposure of treated cells (Table I). Thus, dGal-1 treatment of dsHL-60 cells and activated human neutrophils induces membrane surface changes that are recognized by activated macrophages, causing the cells to be phagocytosed.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
dGal-1 induces murine macrophage phagocytic recognition of dsHL-60 cells and activated neutrophil. A, dsHL-60 cells (3 x 106) were left untreated (negative control) or treated with dGal-1 (20 µM) or mGal-1 (20 µM) in the presence or absence of lactose (20 mM) for 6 h. All cells were then washed with lactose (20 mM). As positive controls, both HL-60 cells treated for 4 h with camptothecin (15 µM) and in vitro aged human neutrophils (24 h) were used. All cells were washed in RPMI, placed in complete RPMI, and then added to each well containing macrophages and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The percentage of macrophages that had visibly phagocytosed cells was determined by counting 200 macrophages/well. Results are expressed as the percentage of macrophages that had visibly phagocytosed cells (% phagocytosis), as described by Fadok et al. (45) and as modified by Zhuang et al. (46). Similar results were obtained in three different experiments with duplicate samples. B, activated neutrophils (3 x 106) were treated with dGal-1 (20 µM) or mGal-1 (20 µM) in the presence or absence of lactose (20 mM) for 2 h. After treatment the cells were washed by lactose (20 mM), washed in RPMI, and placed in complete RPMI. The phagocytosis of these untreated or treated cells was determined as for A. Results shown are the means of duplicate wells, and the ranges are indicated by the error bars.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our study shows that interaction of dGal-1 with carbohydrate determinants on leukocytes exposes binding sites for Annexin V, which binds with high affinity (~1 nM) and specificity to phosphatidylserine (PS) (57, 58). Importantly, dGal-1-enhanced exposure of Annexin V binding sites on HL-60 cells, MOLT-4 cells and activated, but not resting, human neutrophils is not associated with apoptosis. Our results demonstrate, however, that the exposure of binding sites for Annexin V is associated with enhanced phagocytic recognition of the dGal-1-treated cells. Thus, the effects of dGal-1 on these cells are non-apoptotic, but prepare cells for phagocytic recognition. A key finding of our study is that activation of neutrophils is required for the dGal-1-induced surface exposure of PS and corresponding binding of Annexin V. The mechanism by which neutrophil activation enhances dGal-1 binding and signaling is likely to be complex. Among the many possibilities are movement of new receptors to the cell surface or enhanced affinity of existing membrane receptors for dGal-1.

We considered the obvious possibility that neutrophil activation results in desialylation of existing glycoproteins, thereby enhancing binding of dGal-1 and promoting the induction of PS exposure. It was previously proposed that neutrophil activation is accompanied by cell surface desialylation that is associated with mobilization of an endogenous sialidase to the plasma membrane, as evidenced by blocking the effects with a specific inhibitor of neuraminidase, 2,3-dehydro-2-deoxy-N-acetylneuraminic acid (59). However, we found that inclusion of this inhibitor did not alter dGal-1 binding to or signaling of activated neutrophils (data not shown). Our results are consistent with those of others (60), who showed that activation of neutrophils in the presence of a sialidase inhibitor did not suppress the binding of M. amurensis lectin II, which recognizes surface sialic acid. Clearly, much remains to be done in identifying the dGal-1 ligands on leukocytes and the precise mechanisms of PS exposure induced by dGal-1 in cultured cells and activated neutrophils.

dGal-1-induced exposure of PS on HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells is enhanced by enzymatic desialylation of the cells, suggesting that sialic acid is likely to be a capping glycan for the dGal-1 ligands in these cells. Preliminary results also suggest that PS exposure induced in HL-60 cells by dGal-1 requires extracellular Ca2+.3 This is interesting, because treatment of Jurkat T-cells with human dGal-1 increases their intracellular [Ca2+] (61). dGal-1-induced exposure of PS likely requires cross-linking of membrane receptors, because monomeric mGal-1 binds similarly to cells, but does not induce PS exposure. This is the initial demonstration that the signaling effects of human dGal-1 on cells require a dimeric form of the protein. Taken together, the different effects of dGal-1 on activated neutrophils versus desialylated cell lines indicates that there are different mechanisms operative in human neutrophils versus HL-60 and MOLT-4 cells in terms of their responsiveness to dGal-1 and possibly in regard to the ligands recognized by dGal-1. Future studies will be focused on identifying the potentially different mechanisms and endogenous ligands for dGal-1 in human neutrophils versus cell lines.

It has been reported that dGal-1 can induce cells to undergo apoptosis (31, 33). However, the potential pro-apoptotic property of dGal-1 remains unclear in the literature. For example, one study reported that dGal-1 does not induce apoptosis of CEM cells (33), a T lymphoblastoid cell line, as demonstrated by lack of cell staining with 7-aminoactinomycin D. In another study it was concluded that dGal-1 induces apoptosis in CEM cells based on an induction of Annexin V staining in the treated cells (62). Similarly, it was reported that MOLT-4 cells are stimulated to undergo apoptosis upon treatment with dGal-1, primarily based upon staining with Annexin V (34, 62). In studies on other cells it was observed that dGal-1 treatment induced Annexin V staining, which was interpreted to represent apoptosis (32, 62, 63). Although we also found that dGal-1 induces PS exposure and Annexin V staining of MOLT-4 cells, our analysis demonstrated that this induction is not accompanied by DNA fragmentation or loss of cell viability (Table I and Figs. 6 and 7). Although exposure of Annexin V binding sites has been used as a marker of apoptosis (35, 36, 62), PS exposure is not necessarily associated with other features of apoptosis, such as DNA fragmentation, caspase activity, or cytoskeletal organizational changes (46, 6467). In addition, it has been reported that PS exposure can be induced by N-ethylmaleimide treatment of cells without inducing other indicators of apoptosis and that this induction causes phagocytic recognition of the cells by macrophages (64). Interestingly, Shi et al. (16) showed that, in a rat endotoxemia model, Kupffer cells could phagocytose neutrophils that did not display DNA fragmentation, but stained in vivo with Annexin V, suggesting that neutrophils ingested by Kupffer cells were not apoptotic. In a similar fashion, our results show that dGal-1 induces PS exposure on leukocytes (Table I and Figs. 2 and 3) without DNA degradation (Fig. 6) and cell loss (Fig. 7) and support our conclusion that these cells were being phagocytosed independently of apoptotic events. Taken together, these data also show that the appearance of Annexin V binding sites is not a reliable marker of apoptosis.

In addition, the effects of dGal-1 on leukocytes in terms of inducing PS exposure independently of apoptosis may be related to recent findings on aged human platelets. The loss-of-function in plasma-derived platelets is associated with biochemical and morphological features resembling granulocyte apoptosis, including cytoplasmic condensation, plasma membrane changes, including exposure of PS, and recognition by phagocyte scavenger receptors via a novel caspase-independent process (68).

The exposure of surface PS is associated with enhanced phagocytosis of cells (16, 53, 69), but PS exposure can occur in viable cells where it is involved in signal transduction (68, 70, 71). The PS receptor on human and mouse cells has been identified as a ~70-kDa glycoprotein, and antibodies to this receptor block phagocytosis (69). The interaction between PS and the PS receptor may promote leukocyte homeostasis by phagocytosis of live cells and subsequent modulation of inflammatory and immune responses (1416, 45, 72). Recently, it was shown that enzymatic cleavage of the PS receptor of phagocytes contributes to the unresolved inflammatory process associated with cystic fibrosis (15).

The bulk of PS within the plasma membrane is expressed on the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer. The surface exposure of PS is regulated in part by phospholipid scramblase, which moves PS to the outer leaflet and equilibrates its distribution (73), and aminophospholipid translocase, which moves PS from the outer to the inner leaflet (52). Increases in intracellular Ca2+ up-regulate phospholipid scramblase but down-regulate aminophospholipid translocase, but other factors may also be important. Scramblase-associated elevations of surface PS exposure can be induced by different pathways involving either Ca2+ or apoptosis (74).

Our results indicate that the PS exposure on HL-60 cells induced by dGal-1 is reversible. However, the exposure of PS during apoptotic death is irreversible, due to decreased backward movement of PS to the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer (75). The mechanism of the reversibility of PS exposure seen in dGal-1-treated cells is presently unknown. Frasch et al. (76) recently demonstrated that scramblase activity is transiently active in non-apoptotic, activated neutrophils, although there is no evidence that this transient activation results in significant PS exposure. This transient activation of scramblase may be involved in the reversible effects of PS exposure induced by dGal-1, but further studies will be needed to evaluate the role of scramblase or phospholipid translocase in dGal-1 induction of PS exposure.

It is interesting that we observed a punctate staining pattern of Annexin V in dsHL-60 and activated human neutrophils treated with dGal-1 (Fig. 3). Others have also observed a unique punctate pattern of Annexin V staining in dGal-1-treated MOLT-4 and CEM cells (34). The nature and function(s) of this clustering of PS in dGal-1-treated cells, as revealed by Annexin V staining, is unknown. Clearly, the clustering does not result from the simple binding of Annexin V to PS, because, in cells stimulated to undergo apoptosis by anti-Fas or camptothecin treatment (Fig. 3), there is exposure of PS but no punctate staining observed with Annexin V. It will be interesting in future studies to identify the cause and consequence of the PS clustering induced by dGal-1 treatment.

Our studies of galectin-1 were prompted by efforts to better understand factors regulating the turnover of human neutrophils. Selectins, integrins, and other adhesion molecules are required for neutrophil adhesion, activation, and extravasation from the circulation (77), after which extravasated neutrophils are removed by tissue macrophages (78). There is substantial evidence that macrophages recognize and phagocytose apoptotic neutrophils in vitro, leading to the proposition that apoptosis initiates neutrophil turnover in vivo (79, 80). However, the role of apoptosis in neutrophil turnover is uncertain. Neutrophils lacking detectable DNA fragmentation can be phagocytosed by Kupffer cells in vivo (16). Fas/FasL can stimulate neutrophil apoptosis in vitro, leading to macrophage recognition and engulfment, but mice deficient in FasL (gld) or Fas (lpr) have normal levels of circulating mature granulocytes (8, 9). Neutrophils lose expression of bcl-2 as they mature, but in transgenic mice expressing bcl-2 in mature neutrophils, spontaneous apoptosis of circulating cells is inhibited; yet, homeostasis of the neutrophil population is unaffected and macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of neutrophils is near normal (13). Giudice et al. (10) reported that neutrophil homeostasis was maintained in the Fas-defective mice. In addition, there is increasing evidence that Fas or FasL may actually promote inflammatory responses in vivo (11, 81). All of these studies suggest that non-apoptotic mechanisms may be important in regulating leukocyte turnover.

Our results raise the possibility that dGal-1 is involved in leukocyte turnover and thus serves an anti-inflammatory role. dGal-1 is expressed in the basement membrane and extracellular matrices of most tissues, and is specifically concentrated around blood vessels (20). Inflammatory cytokines also increase the synthesis of dGal-1 in vascular endothelial cells (21). Thus, activated leukocytes might encounter dGal-1 during their migration from the circulation through the basement membrane to the extravascular space at sites of inflammation. Of interest in this regard, galectin-1 and other galectins may be useful therapeutically in regulating inflammation (82, 83). Galectins and possibly other factors may initiate PS exposure of extravasated neutrophils, leading to their turnover by tissue macrophages in vivo. The gross phenotypes of mice deficient in galectin-1 so far appear normal (84, 85), although sensory olfactory axons of galectin-1-deficient mice failed to project to their correct target sites in the caudal olfactory bulb (25). However, the responses of galectin-1-deficient mice to inflammatory stimuli or the turnover of neutrophils in inflamed tissues have not been studied. Mice deficient in galectin-3 mobilize fewer neutrophils into the peritoneum in response to an inflammatory challenge compared with normal mice (86). The binding of dGal-1 and perhaps other galectins to migrating leukocytes may induce PS exposure that targets their phagocytic removal by tissue macrophages, thus limiting the inflammatory response. Our finding that dGal-1 primes activated leukocytes for phagocytosis suggests a possible pathway to maintain leukocyte homeostasis that functions independently of apoptosis. Whether dGal-1 or related proteins directly regulate neutrophil turnover in vivo should be explored in future studies.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI48075 (to R. D. C.) and HL34363 and RR15577 (to R. P. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 N.E. 10th St., BRC417, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. Tel.: 405-271-2481; Fax: 405-271-3910; E-mail: richard-cummings{at}ouhsc.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: FasL, Fas ligand; dGal-1, dimeric human galectin-1; mGal-1, mutated, monomeric human galectin-1; MAL, M. amurensis leukoagglutinin; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; HSA, human serum albumin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FITC, fluorescein-isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling; fMet-Leu-Phe, N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe chemotactic peptide; 2-ME, 2-mercaptoethanol. Back

2 M. Cho, H. Zhu, C. Brower, R. P. McEver, and R. D. Cummings, submitted for publication. Back

3 S. Karmakar, M. Dias-Baruffi, H. Zhu, R. D. Cummings, and R. P. McEver, unpublished observations. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. Paul Kincade, A. Kwame Nyame, Ron Bowditch, Joan Conaway, and James Morrissey for helpful discussions. We also thank Jim Henthorn from the Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Laboratory, William K. Warren Medical Research Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, for help in the flow cytometry and confocal microscopy experiments and Chanda Hill for help in the galectin purification.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Homburg, C. H., and Roos, D. (1996) Curr. Opin. Hematol. 3, 94–99[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Savill, J. (1997) J. Leukoc. Biol. 61, 375–380[Abstract]
  3. Fadok, V. A., Bratton, D. L., and Henson, P. M. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 957–962[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Fadok, V. A., de Cathelineau, A., Daleke, D. L., Henson, P. M., and Bratton, D. L. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1071–1077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Iwai, K., Miyawaki, T., Takizawa, T., Konno, A., Ohta, K., Yachie, A., Seki, H., and Taniguchi, N. (1994) Blood 84, 1201–1208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Stahnke, K., Hecker, S., Kohne, E., and Debatin, K. M. (1998) Exp. Hematol. 26, 844–850[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Traver, D., Akashi, K., Weissman, I. L., and Lagasse, E. (1998) Immunity 9, 47–57[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Fecho, K., Bentley, S. A., and Cohen, P. L. (1998) Cell. Immunol. 188, 19–32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Fecho, K., and Cohen, P. L. (1998) J. Leukoc. Biol. 64, 373–383[Abstract]
  10. Giudice, E. D., Ciaramella, A., Balestro, N., Neumann, D., Romano, P. G., Cesaroni, M. P., Maurizi, G., Ruggiero, P., Boraschi, D., and Bossu, P. (2001) Eur. Cytokine Netw. 12, 510–517[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hohlbaum, A. M., Gregory, M. S., Ju, S. T., and Marshak-Rothstein, A. (2001) J. Immunol. 167, 6217–6224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Misawa, R., Kawagishi, C., Watanabe, N., and Kobayashi, Y. (2001) Apoptosis 6, 411–417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Lagasse, E., and Weissman, I. L. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 1047–1052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Vandivier, R. W., Ogden, C. A., Fadok, V. A., Hoffmann, P. R., Brown, K. K., Botto, M., Walport, M. J., Fisher, J. H., Henson, P. M., and Greene, K. E. (2002) J. Immunol. 169, 3978–3986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Vandivier, R. W., Fadok, V. A., Hoffmann, P. R., Bratton, D. L., Penvari, C., Brown, K. K., Brain, J. D., Accurso, F. J., and Henson, P. M. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 109, 661–670[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Shi, J., Gilbert, G. E., Kokubo, Y., and Ohashi, T. (2001) Blood 98, 1226–1230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Cooper, D. N., and Barondes, S. H. (1999) Glycobiology 9, 979–984[Free Full Text]
  18. Varki, A., Cummings, R. D., Esko, J., Freeze, H., Hart, G., and Marth, J. (1999) Essentials of Glycobiology, 1st Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Inc., Boston
  19. Perillo, N. L., Marcus, M. E., and Baum, L. G. (1998) J. Mol. Med. 76, 402–412[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Lotan, R., Belloni, P. N., Tressler, R. J., Lotan, D., Xu, X. C., and Nicolson, G. L. (1994) Glycoconj. J. 11, 462–468[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Baum, L. G., Seilhamer, J. J., Pang, M., Levine, W. B., Beynon, D., and Berliner, J. A. (1995) Glycoconj. J. 12, 63–68[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Wasano, K., Hirakawa, Y., and Yamamoto, T. (1990) Cell Tissue Res. 259, 43–49[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Allen, H. J., Sucato, D., Gottstine, S., Kisailus, E., Nava, H., Petrelli, N., Castillo, N., and Wilson, D. (1991) Tumour Biol. 12, 52–60[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Outenreath, R. L., and Jones, A. L. (1992) J. Neurocytol. 21, 788–795[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Puche, A. C., Poirier, F., Hair, M., Bartlett, P. F., and Key, B. (1996) Dev. Biol. 179, 274–287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Wells, V., and Mallucci, L. (1991) Cell 64, 91–97[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Adams, L., Scott, G. K., and Weinberg, C. S. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1312, 137–144[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kopitz, J., von Reitzenstein, C., Andre, S., Kaltner, H., Uhl, J., Ehemann, V., Cantz, M., and Gabius, H. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 35917–35923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Pitts, M. J., and Yang, D. C. (1981) Biochem. J. 195, 435–439[Medline]