JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M302343200 on August 12, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 43, 41914-41920, October 24, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/43/41914    most recent
M302343200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froeschke, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dobberstein, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froeschke, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dobberstein, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Long-lived Signal Peptide of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Glycoprotein pGP-C*

Marc Froeschke{ddagger}, Michael Basler§, Marcus Groettrup§, and Bernhard Dobberstein{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 282, D-69120 Heidelberg and the §University of Constance, Department of Immunology, Universitätsstrasse 10, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany

Received for publication, March 6, 2003 , and in revised form, July 15, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Signal peptides (SPs) direct nascent secretory and membrane proteins to the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. They are usually cleaved from the nascent polypeptide by signal peptidase and then further proteolytically processed. The SP of the pre-glycoprotein (pGP-C) of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus SPGP-C (signal peptide of pGP-C) shows different properties: 1) The SPGP-C is unusually long (58 amino acid residues) and contains two hydrophobic segments interrupted by a lysine residue. 2) The SPGP-C is cleaved only from a subset of pGP-C proteins. A substantial portion of pGP-C accumulates that still contains the SPGP-C.3)The cleaved SPGP-C is rather long-lived (t1/2 of more than 6 h). 4) The cleaved SPGP-C resides in the membrane and is resistant to digestion with proteinase K even in the presence of detergents, suggesting a very compact structure. 5) SPGP-C accumulates in virus particles. These unusual features of the cleaved SPGP-C suggest that SPGP-C not only targets the nascent pGP-C to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane but also has additional functions in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus life cycle.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesized as preproteins with an N-terminal signal peptide (SP)1 (1, 2). Signal peptides are usually 15–25 amino acid residues in length and are typically comprised of three distinct regions: a central hydrophobic core of 7–10 residues (h-region), a polar N-terminal region that can be very variable in length and is usually positively charged, and a C-terminal region that contains the cleavage site for the signal peptidase (3). In eukaryotes, SPs target nascent secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mediate insertion of the nascent polypeptides into the translocon (4). Membrane insertion is thought to occur in a loop-like fashion such that the N terminus of the SP is exposed on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. Signal peptidase then cleaves the SP on the lumenal side of the membrane (5, 6). Cleavage usually occurs cotranslationally; however in some cases, SP cleavage is delayed or does not occur at all. Delayed cleavage is observed for the US11 SP (7) and the SP of the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) glycoprotein 160 (gp160) (8). The SP of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) US2 gene product is not even cleaved at all (9). Mutational analyses of several preproteins revealed that the efficiency and fidelity of SP cleavage can be influenced by mutations within the signal sequence itself but also by mutations in the mature protein (1012).

After cleavage from the preprotein, SPs are thought to be either directly degraded or processed by signal peptide peptidase (SPP) into distinct fragments that are released from the membrane (13, 14). SPP has recently been shown to be a presenilin-type intramembrane-cleaving protease (15). Several determinants for processing by SPP have been identified: the SP has to be cleaved from the preprotein and the hydrophobic core region has to contain helix-breaking residues. Moreover, as yet ill-defined features of the SP flanking regions can affect SP processing (16).

SP fragments resulting from processing by SPP can be functionally active. In the case of the hormone preprolactin and the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) gp160, the N-terminal portion of the respective SP is released into the cytosol and binds to calmodulin in a Ca2+-dependent manner (17). This implies that these SP-derived fragments may influence signal transduction pathways in the cell (17).

SPs can also play a role in immunorecognition. SPs of the polymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules contain a highly conserved sequence that is capable of binding to nonpolymorphic MHC class I molecules (HLA-E in human) (18). The peptide-HLA-E complex interacts at the cell surface with an inhibitory receptor on natural killer cells and thereby monitors the level of MHC class I molecule expression (19). Presentation of the SP-derived epitope is dependent on the transporter associated with antigen processing that transports peptides generated by the proteasome into the ER lumen (20).

The glycoproteins (GP-1 and GP-2) of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) are synthesized as a type I precursor glycoprotein C (pGP-C) that is processed during intracellular transport into GP-1 and GP-2 (21). The predicted SP of LCMV pGP-C (SPGP-C) is rather unusual: it is longer than average SPs, comprising 58 amino acid residues, and has two hydrophobic regions separated by a lysine residue. An epitope derived from the core region, amino acid residues 33–41/43 of the SPGP-C (gp33), is presented by MHC class I molecules to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (2124). Presentation requires a functional transporter associated with antigen processing (25) and proteasome activity (26). We have investigated the cleavage and fate of the SPGP-C in transfected and LCMV-infected cells.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasmids—The expression plasmid pSV51l/pGP-C was derived from the widely used original cDNA of LCMV (WE) S RNA (27) and the pSV51l expression vector (28). A DNA fragment including the entire coding region for LCMV (WE) pGP-C (GenBankTM accession number M22138 [GenBank] : base pairs 17–1,579) was cloned into pSV51l using an additionally introduced BamHI site (pSV51l/pGP-C).

A DNA fragment encoding pGP-C-HA was generated by polymerase chain reaction using the forward primer 5'-GGA TCT CTA GAG TCG ACC CC-3' and the backward primer 5'-CTG GAT CCT CAA GCG TAA TCT GGA ACA TCG TAT GGG TAG CGT CTT TTC CAG ATA G-3'. The PCR product was inserted into the BamHI site of pSV51l (pSV51l/pGP-C-HA).

Cells and Virus—HeLa and L929 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). MC57 cells have been described previously (29). HeLa, MC57, and L929 cells were grown under recommended conditions. The LCMV (WE) strain was originally obtained from F. Lehmann-Grube (30).

Peptides and Antibodies—Synthetic peptides deduced from the SPGP-C and including amino acid residues 7–18 (MFEALPHIIDEV, SP7), 30–41 (TSIKAVYNFATC, SP30), and 48–57 (SFLFLAGRSC, SP48) were coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and injected into rabbits to raise anti-SP7, -SP30, and -SP48 antibodies. Antisera were immunopurified. KL25 is a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with the LCMV glycoprotein GP-1 (31).

Transfection, Infection, and LCMV Particle Preparation—Expression vectors were transfected into HeLa cells by the calcium phosphate precipitation method for 20–24 h (32). The cells were grown for an additional 48 h. MC57 cells were infected for 24 h with LCMV (WE) (multiplicity of infection, 0.05). LCMV particles were prepared as described (33) without using a continuous sucrose gradient.

Metabolic Labeling and Immunoprecipitation—After transfection, about 1 x 106 cells were starved in Met/Cys-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus 10% fetal calf serum for 150 min at 37 °C and labeled with 0.15 mCi/ml [35S]Met/Cys for 30 min. Labeling medium was removed, and cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and either directly analyzed or chased in complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium for the indicated time periods.

Cells were harvested and lysed for 15 min on ice in 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES/KOH (pH 7.3), 5 mM MgCl2, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, 100 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin. Equal aliquots were used for immunoprecipitation (34).

After infection 2 x 106 confluent cells were starved in Met/Cys-free RPMI 1640 plus 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum for 45 min at 37 °C and labeled with 0.1 mCi/ml [35S]Met/Cys for 60 min. Labeling medium was removed, and cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and chased in complete medium for the indicated time periods. Cells were harvested and lysed for 45 min on ice in 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 0.85 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µM leupeptin, 2.8 µM pepstatin, 0.75 µM aprotinin, and 2% (v/v) Nonidet P-40. Equal aliquots were used for immunoprecipitation. The beads were boiled in the appropriate sample buffer (35, 36), and proteins were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by phosphorimaging using a BAS 1500 (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan). Protein amounts have been quantified using MacBas2.0 program.

Cell Fractionation and Treatments of Isolated Membranes—Transfected HeLa cells were harvested, resuspended in 20 volumes of hypotonic buffer (5 mM HEPES/KOH (pH 7.4), 0.5 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin), incubated on ice for 10 min, and broken up by using a Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate was adjusted to 0.25 M sucrose and centrifuged at 4 °C, 13,800 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was loaded on a high salt sucrose cushion (500 mM sucrose, 500 mM KOAc, 50 mM HEPES/KOH (pH 7.6), 2 mM MgOAc, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and centrifuged at 4 °C, 100,000 x g for 30 min. The resulting pellet (membranes) was resuspended in hypotonic buffer, adjusted to 100 mM NaCl and 0.25 M sucrose, and aliquots were treated on ice with different combinations of 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K, 0.5 mg/ml trypsin, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, or increasing concentrations of SDS (0.2, 0.5, and 1.0%) as indicated in the legend for Fig. 4.



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Membrane association of SPGP-C. Transfected pulse-labeled HeLa cells were fractionated into supernatants (s) and pellets (p) by centrifugation (lanes 2 and 3). Aliquots were treated with proteinase K (Pk), Triton X-100 (Tx), or 0.2, 0.5, or 1% SDS on ice as indicated. Antigens from each fraction were immunoprecipitated with the anti-SP7 antibody. An aliquot of the pellet fraction was extracted with carbonate (pH 11) and separated into supernatant and pellet by centrifugation as indicated (lanes 10 and 11). pGP-C-HA* and the SPGP-C are indicated.

 

For carbonate extraction, one aliquot of membranes was treated with 1/10 volume of 1 M Na2CO3 (pH 11) for 15 min on ice and loaded on a sucrose cushion (250 mM sucrose, 100 mM Na2CO3, pH 11). After centrifugation (4 °C, 130,000 x g, 10 min), the supernatant was taken off, and the pellet was resuspended in hypotonic buffer adjusted to 100 mM NaCl and 0.25 M sucrose.

PNGase F Treatment of Immunoprecipitated Proteins—Immunoprecipitated proteins bound to resin were incubated with 100 units of PNGase F (New England Biolabs, Schwalbach, Germany) in a final volume of 30 µl as specified by the supplier and incubated for 12 h at 37 °C.

Western Blot Analysis—Proteins of total cell lysates, fractions of membranes, cytosol, or LCMV particles were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and identified using anti-SP7, anti-Sec61{beta}, or anti-{alpha}-tubulin antibodies by standard Western blot analysis technique (32).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization of Antibodies Directed against the pGP-C Signal Peptide (SPGP-C)—To characterize the SP of the LCMV glycoprotein pGP-C (SPGP-C) (Fig. 1A), antibodies against three different segments of the SPGP-C were raised in rabbits. The peptides used for immunization comprised amino acid residues 7–18 (SP7), 30–41 (SP30), and 48–57 (SP48) (Fig. 1B). Antibodies were affinity-purified and used to immunoprecipitate a fragment of pGP-C, comprising amino acid residues 1–142 (pGP-C142) (Fig. 1A), which was synthesized in vitro. An aliquot of the translation reaction (Fig. 1C, lane 1) and the immunoprecipitates (lanes 2–13) were separated by SDS-PAGE, and pGP-C142 was visualized by phosphorimaging. Only the anti-SP7 antibody was able to immunoprecipitate pGP-C142 (Fig. 1C, lane 2). The specificity of the reaction was demonstrated by the addition of the SP7 or an unrelated (control) peptide. No immunoprecipitation is seen when the specific peptide SP7 is included in the reaction (lane 3), whereas a control peptide had no effect (lane 4). The preimmune serum did not immunoprecipitate pGP-C142 (lane 5). Antibodies raised against the other two SP peptides, SP30 and SP48, did not immunoprecipitate pGP-C142 (lanes 6–13). Anti-SP7 antibody was used for the further studies.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
A, outline of LCMV pGP-C tagged at its C terminus with a HA tag (pGP-C-HA). The signal peptide (SPGP-C), the transmembrane region (TM), and the HA tag (HA) are indicated. The forked symbols indicate potential sites for N-glycosylation. pGP-C142 is a fragment of pGP-C synthesized in an in vitro system from a truncated pGP-C mRNA. B, outline of SPGP-C. The N-terminal (n), hydrophobic (h1, h2), the C-terminal (c) regions, and the site for signal peptidase (SPase) cleavage are indicated. The position of the lysine residue between the h1 and h2 region (K) and positively (+) and negatively (–) charged amino acid residues in the SPGP-C are indicated. The immunodominant epitope of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), gp33 and peptide sequences (SP7, SP30, and SP48) that were used to raise antibodies are underlined. C, characterization of anti-SP7, -SP30, and -SP48 antibodies by immunoprecipitation of in vitro synthesized pGP-C142. Proteins were separated on a 15% SDS gel and pGP-C142 visualized by phosphorimaging. The respective specific peptides or unrelated peptides were added as indicated.

 

Identification of (p)GP-C-HA and SP Cleavage from pGP-C— SPs are usually cleaved very rapidly after their membrane insertion from the nascent or just completed secretory or membrane protein. To follow cleavage of the SPGP-C from pGP-C, we initially used a cell-free system in which pGP-C142 was synthesized in the presence of rough microsomal membranes (13). Cleavage of the SPGP-C from pGP-C142 was very inefficient as compared with SP cleavage from the secretory protein preprolactin (data not shown). We therefore reasoned that SPGP-C cleavage from pGP-C might be inherently inefficient. To test this hypothesis, we transfected HeLa cells with a plasmid expressing HA epitope-tagged LCMV pGP-C (pGP-C-HA) (Fig. 1A). Cells were labeled with [35S]Met/Cys for 30 min. The extract was treated with PNGase F to remove N-linked carbohydrates from pGP-C-HA and thereby obtain a more distinct banding pattern. Unglycosylated (p)GP-C-HA ((p)GP-C-HA*) was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA or anti-SP7 antibodies (Fig. 2A). Both antibodies immunoprecipitated a major band of about 55 kDa, the expected molecular mass of unglycosylated (p)GP-C-HA, (p)GP-C-HA* (lanes 3 and 4). In the anti-HA immunoprecipitates, we cannot detect a smaller form representing mature GP-C-HA*, suggesting either that pGP-C-HA* and GP-C-HA* are not resolved by the gel system used or that GP-C-HA* is degraded. In addition, the anti-SP7 antibody immunoprecipitates a peptide of about 6 kDa. The 6-kDa peptide comigrates with in vitro synthesized SPGP-C comprising the N-terminal 58 amino acid residues of pGP-C (SP58) (Fig. 2B, lane 2). This suggests that the complete SPGP-C accumulates.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Identification of pGP-C(-HA) and SPGP-C in transfected HeLa cells. In A, HeLa cells were transfected with plasmid pSV51l (V) or pSV51l/pGP-C-HA and labeled for 30 min. with [35S]Met/Cys. Antigens were immunoprecipitated with anti-SP7 or anti-HA antibodies and PNGase F-treated. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and unglycosylated pGP-C-HA* and SPGP-C were visualized by phosphorimaging. B, size estimation of SPGP-C. Transfected cells expressing SPGP-C were analyzed as in A (lane 1). To obtain a molecular size standard of the SPGP-C, we translated a truncated mRNA coding for the N-terminal 58 amino acids of pGP-C (SP58) (lane 2). SPGP-C and in vitro synthesized SP58 comigrate (cf. lanes 1 and 2). C, identification of SPGP-C by Western blotting. Transfected cells expressing pGP-C-HA as described in A were prepared for Western blotting using a Tricine type gel and probed with anti-SP7 antibody. SPGP-C is seen in cells expressing pGP-C-HA (lane 2) but not in cells transfected with control vector (V) (lane 1).

 

To investigate whether the SPGP-C is stable enough to be detected under steady state conditions, we used Western blotting. A cell extract from transfected HeLa cells was separated on an SDS-PAGE Tricine gel that separates peptides with high resolution, and a Western blot was probed with the anti-SP7 antibody. As can be seen in Fig. 2C, the SPGP-C can be detected in cells expressing pGP-C-HA (lane 2) but not in cells transfected with the empty vector (lane 1).

Stability of the Cleaved SPGP-CTo follow cleavage of the SPGP-C from pGP-C-HA, we pulse-labeled transfected HeLa cells for 30 min and chased them with medium containing unlabelled amino acids for 3 and 6 h (Fig. 3A). Aliquots of the samples were treated with PNGase F as indicated in the figure. The anti-SP7 antibody was used to immunoprecipitate pGP-C-HA and the cleaved SPGP-C. SP7 or control peptides were added to the samples as indicated. After the labeling and PNGase F treatment, the 55-kDa pGP-C-HA* and a prominent small peptide are immunoprecipitated with the anti-SP7 antibody (Fig. 3A, lane 4). Both, the 55-kDa protein and the 6-kDa peptide (SPGP-C) are no longer immunoprecipitated when the SP7 peptide is included in the immunoprecipitation (lanes 7 and 8). During the 3- and 6-h chase period, the amount of the 55-kDa protein is substantially reduced, whereas the amount of SPGP-C is not markedly altered (lanes 4, 10, and 16).



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Pulse-chase analysis of pGP-C-HA. In A, transfected HeLa cells expressing pGP-C-HA were labeled for 30 min and chased for the times indicated. Solubilized proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-SP7 antibody and aliquots of these proteins were treated with PNGase F and further analyzed as described in the legend for Fig. 2. The positions of unglycosylated pGP-C-HA* and SPGP-C are shown. V, pSV51l. B, transfected HeLa cells expressing pGP-C were labeled and immunoprecipitated as described under A but chased for 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. Unglycosylated pGP-C* and SPGP-C are indicated. C, quantification of the amount of SPGP-C as shown under B.

 

To expand the chase times and see whether the HA tag affects the stability of pGP-C or the SPGP-C, we expressed pGP-C as described above but used chase times of 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. To rule out the possibility that SPGP-C migrates at the gel front, we again used the SDS-PAGE Tricine gel system that separates peptides with high resolution. SPGP-C immunoprecipitated by the anti-SP7 antibody is still detectable after 24 h of chase labeling (Fig. 3B). From a quantification of the amount of SPGP-C detectable at the chase times, we calculated a half-life of more than 6 h for SPGP-C (Fig. 3C).

Membrane Association and Protease Sensitivity of SPGP-C To investigate the membrane association of SPGP-C, we pulse-labeled transfected cells and prepared a cytoplasmic and membrane fraction by centrifugation of a cell homogenate. As markers for cytosol and ER membranes, antibodies against {alpha}-tubulin and Sec61{beta} were used, respectively (see supplementary data, Fig. 1S). SPGP-C was exclusively found in the membrane fraction (Fig. 4, cf. lanes 2 and 3). Carbonate (pH 11) extraction was also not able to remove SPGP-C from the membrane fraction (cf. lanes 10 and 11). To test whether the SPGP-C was accessible on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, proteinase K was added to the membrane and cytoplasmic fractions. Neither proteinase K (lanes 4 and 5) nor trypsin (data not shown) were able to cleave the SPGP-C. To see whether the resistance against protease digestion was due to the membrane barrier or is an intrinsic property of the SPGP-C, we solubilized the membranes with either the nondenaturing detergent Triton X-100 or increasing concentrations (0.2, 0.5, and 1.0%) of SDS (30 min on ice). Although pGP-C-HA was digested under these conditions, SPGP-C was not (lanes 6–9).

SPGP-C after Infection with LCMV—To investigate the cleavage and fate of SPGP-C during viral biogenesis and maturation, we infected MC57 mouse fibroblasts with LCMV. 24 h after infection, cells were labeled with [35S]Met/Cys for 60 min and chased for 3 or 6 h with medium containing nonlabeled amino acids. An antibody recognizing an epitope in the mature GP-1 protein (KL25) and the anti-SP7 antibody were used in immunoprecipitations. As compared with the noninfected cells (Fig. 5, lanes 1 and 2), an intensively labeled protein of about 70 kDa was immunoprecipitated with the KL25 antibody as well as the anti-SP7 antibody (lanes 3–8). The amount of this protein was reduced at the 3 and 6 h chase times. The size of this protein (70 kDa) and the fact that the protein is immunoprecipitated by KL25 as well as the SP7 antibody suggests that it is mainly pGP-C. Cleaved SPGP-C is clearly detectable in anti-SP7 immunoprecipitates even after 6 h of chase (lanes 6–8). Thus the high stability of the SPGP-C is not restricted to transfected cells but is also a property of the SPGP-C during virus infection.



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Pulse-chase labeling of LCMV-infected cells. LCMV-infected and -uninfected cells were [35S]Met/Cys-labeled and chased for 3 and 6 h. Antigens were immunoprecipitated with the KL25 antibody recognizing an epitope in the GP-1 protein or with the anti-SP7 antibody and separated on a Laemmli gel. The positions of pGP-C and SPGP-C are indicated.

 

To see whether the cleaved SPGP-C also accumulates in the virus, we purified LCMV particles from culture supernatants of acute infected L929 cells and identified the SPGP-C by using the anti-SP7 antibody and Western blot analysis. As can be seen in Fig. 6, the SPGP-C is detected in the infected cells (lane 2) as well as in the purified LCMV particles (lanes 4 and 5). The SPGP-C comigrates with in vitro synthesized SPGP-C (SP58), indicating that the entire SP accumulates (cf. lanes 3 and 4). The purity of the virus particle preparation is indicated by the absence of the cellular 50-kDa protein cross-reacting with the anti-SP7 antibody (cf. Fig. 6, lanes 1 and 2 with lane 5). Furthermore, a marker protein for the ER, Sec61{beta}, could not be detected in the LCMV particle preparation (see supplementary data, Fig. 2S). In infected cells, the anti-SP7 antibody recognized a peptide smaller than SPGP-C by about 1–2 kDa. This peptide might represent an SPP processing product of the SPGP-C (15).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Identification of SPGP-C in LCMV particles by Western blot analysis. Proteins from LCMV-uninfected and -infected cells (lanes 1 and 2) and purified virus particles (lanes 4 and 5) were separated by SDS-PAGE and probed by Western blotting with anti-SP7 antibody. The position of the SPGP-C is indicated. *, a cellular protein cross-reacting with the anti-SP7 antibody. An in vitro synthesized peptide (SP58) comprising amino acid residues 1–58 of SPGP-C is used as a size marker (lane 3). In lane 5, a longer exposure of lane 4 is shown.

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Signal peptides are usually cleaved from their preprotein shortly after membrane insertion and are then rapidly proteolytically processed and/or degraded (3, 6). The SP of LCMV pGP-C is different with respect to cleavage from the preprotein and its processing and degradation (for a schematic representation, see Fig. 7). The SPGP-C is not cleaved from all glycoprotein molecules, and pGP-C accumulates for several hours in transfected and infected cells. More unexpected is that the cleaved SPGP-C is unusually stable, having a half-life of more than 6 h, and accumulates in LCMV particles.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Proposed model for signal peptide cleavage from pGP-C. During membrane insertion, the SP of pGP-C is only cleaved from a subset of synthesized molecules. SPGP-C has a half-life of more than 6 h. It may span the membrane twice as it harbors two hydrophobic regions, h1 and h2 (boxed inset), and has a compact structure that is resistant to mild proteolysis even in the presence of detergents. SPase, signal peptidase.

 

SPGP-C Cleavage from pGP-C—We raised an antibody (anti-SP7) that specifically recognizes the signal peptide of LCMV pGP-C. Specificity was demonstrated by using competing and control peptides in immunoprecipitations. In transfected and LCMV-infected cells, pGP-C and the cleaved signal peptide SPGP-C could be detected and found to be rather long-lived. We were unable to resolve or detect mature GP-C. This may be due to the gel system used or may indicate degradation of GP-C. The recombinant LCMV (WE) pGP-C we used in this study is derived from persistent infected cells. During progression from acute to persistent infection, pGP-C accumulates 12 point mutations (between amino acids 94 and 457), which are exclusively found in the mature part of the glycoprotein but not in its signal peptide (amino acids 1–58). One (L110P) of these point mutations prevents processing into GP-1 and GP-2 (37). However, accumulation of pGP-C and SPGP-C is also seen in acute infected cells and therefore reflects an intrinsic property of pGP-C and is not due to the mutations accumulating in GP-C in persistent infected cells.

Inefficient SP cleavage has also been found for some other viral membrane proteins. A fraction of newly synthesized HCMV US11 molecules retains the SP after the US11 has been completed (7). Delayed cleavage is caused by amino acid residues in the N-terminal part of the US11 SP. A second region that affects the rate and extent of SP cleavage is the transmembrane region of US11 (7). A precursor form of the HIV-1 gp160 has also been found to accumulate. In this case, the SP cleavage has been shown to be a prerequisite for intracellular transport of gp160. The SP of pre-gp160 interferes with gp160 folding and surface expression (8, 38). Whether similar functions can be assigned to the SPGP-C awaits further experimentation.

SPGP-C Accumulation in Infected Cells and in LCMV Particles—In contrast to other SPs, the cleaved SPGP-C is not rapidly processed and degraded. It accumulates in transfected cells expressing pGP-C as well as in LCMV-infected cells producing virus particles. Stability is thus not dependent on other factors encoded by the viral genome. The basis for the high stability of the SPGP-C probably lies in the structural features of SPGP-C. Although an average signal peptide comprises about 20 amino acid residues, the SPGP-C extends over 58 amino acid residues and is characterized by two hydrophobic regions separated by a lysine residue (Fig. 1B). The N-terminal h1 region includes 15 uncharged amino acid residues, of which 11 are hydrophobic. The h2 region contains 20 uncharged amino acid residues. Membrane insertion of signal peptides of a secretory or type I membrane protein is thought to occur in a loop-like fashion such that the N terminus is exposed on the cytoplasmic side, and the cleavage site for signal peptidase is exposed on the lumenal side (Fig. 7). Given that the two hydrophobic regions of SPGP-C are both of sufficient length and hydrophobicity to span the membrane, it is well conceivable that SPGP-C spans the membrane twice. We have demonstrated using carbonate extraction that all SPGP-C peptides are integrated in the membrane. As cleavage sites of signal peptidase are usually in proximity to the hydrophobic segment of a signal peptide, we consider it very likely that the h2 region spans the membrane during membrane insertion such that signal peptidase has access to the cleavage site on the lumenal side of the ER. The h1 region is also of sufficient hydrophobicity to span the membrane. If this is true, the N terminus would have to translocate across the membrane, and the h1 and h2 regions would span the membrane in antiparallel configuration (Fig. 7). Several observations argue for such a configuration: 1) Protease added to membrane vesicles does not cleave the SPGP-C. If only the h2 region would span the membrane, the more than 30 amino acid residues of the N terminus would be exposed on the cytoplasmic side accessible to the added protease. 2) The SPGP-C is very resistant to proteolysis even in the presence of detergents, suggesting a compact structure as formed in the suggested antiparallel configuration of the two h regions. 3) The N-terminal hydrophilic region contains an excess of acidic amino acid residues over basic ones. A statistical analysis has revealed that clusters of positively charged amino acid residues are mostly found on the cytoplasmic side of membrane-spanning proteins (39). As judged by this criterion, the slightly negatively charged N-terminal region of the SPGP-C would be compatible with translocation across the ER membrane.

An unusually long and stable SP has also been found for the foamy virus envelope glycoprotein (Env) (40). The foamy virus SPEnv is 148 amino acid residues in length and contains a single hydrophobic region located between residues 70 and 90. This SP becomes glycosylated and is found in virus particles. What structural features of this SP prevent proteolytic processing and rapid degradation is not yet known.

Possible Implications of SPGP-C Cleavage and Stability— What relevance could the accumulation of pGP-C and the rather stable SPGP-C have for the LCMV life cycle? pGP-C might represent a biosynthetic intermediate that could be converted posttranslationally to transport competent GP-C by cleavage of the SP. Alternatively, pGP-C might be a substrate for the ER-associated degradation system. Clearly, further work is required to distinguish between these two or other possibilities.

LCMV is the prototype of the arenaviridae. Glycoproteins of other arenaviridae are synthesized with SPs of similar length. In addition, these SPs show sequence similarity and also contain two hydrophobic segments separated by one or two positively charged amino acid residues (see supplementary data, Fig. 3S). Cleavage of Lassa virus signal peptide was recently shown to be necessary for GP-C processing into GP-1 and GP-2 and maturation in the secretory pathway (41).

The unusual stability and accumulation of SPGP-C strongly argues for functions besides targeting to the ER membrane. An attractive hypothesis would be that SPGP-C plays a role for virus assembly or formation and stabilization of the virus particle itself. Our finding that SPGP-C is present in purified virus particles in substantial amounts supports such a notion.

A striking biosynthetic and structural similarity can be found between the SPGP-C and the 6K peptide of Semliki Forest virus and Sindbis virus (42). The 6K peptides of these viruses are synthesized as part of a polyprotein between the two glycoproteins P62 and E1 and are excised by two proteases to give the final 6K products. The 6K peptides comprise 55–58 amino acid residues and have an acidic, hydrophilic N-terminal region and two hydrophobic segments interrupted by 1 or 2 basic amino acid residues. 6K, like SPGP-C, is thought to be cleaved at its C-terminal side by signal peptidase (42). It is known that Semliki Forest virus 6K is required for efficient virus budding and is found in the virus in submolar amounts (4347).

A function in virus budding and integration into virus particles has also been shown for the SP of foamy virus Env protein (40). However, this SP does not share many structural similarities with the SPGP-C.

The signal peptide of pGP-C contains the immunodominant MHC class I restricted T cell epitope (gp33) comprising amino acid residues 33–41/43 (23, 24). A quite obvious consequence of SPGP-C stability is that the T cell epitope will not directly be released, and thus the T cell response will be delayed. Generation of the SPGP-C-derived T cell epitope requires a functional proteasome, suggesting that the SPGP-C is eventually released from the membrane into the cytosol, where it becomes proteolytically processed (26). Whether processing of cleaved SPGP-C is relevant for generating the gp33 T cell epitope is unclear. Alternatively, mistargeted pGP-C accumulating during biosynthesis in the cytosol may be degraded by the proteasome and generate the gp33 T cell epitope.

Work described here strongly suggests that the SP of pGP-C is more than a targeting device to the ER. It may function at further stages of the LCMV life cycle.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB 352/B1 (to B. D.) and Grant 31-52284 from the Swiss National Science foundation (to M. G.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplementary figures 1S–3S showing Western blot analysis of supernatant and pellet fractions after cell fractionation, Western blot analysis of L929 cells and purified virus particles, and sequence alignment of the predicted signal sequences of some arenavirus glycoproteins. Back

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 49-6221-546825; Fax: 49-6221-545892; E-mail: dobberstein{at}zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.

1 The abbreviations used are: SP, signal peptide; SPP, signal peptide peptidase; pGP-C, pre-glycoprotein C; pGP-C-HA, C-terminal HA-tagged pGP-C; pGP-C142, truncated (amino acid residues 1–142) pGP-C; SPGP-C, signal peptide of pGP-C; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; HA, hemagglutinin; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; LCMV (WE), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus strain WE; gp, glycoprotein; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HIV-1 gp160, glycoprotein 160 of HIV-1; PNGase F, protein N-glycanase F; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Rita de Giuli for excellent technical assistance and Michael Buchmeier, Bruno Martoglio, and Martin Poolfor advice. We thank Rolf M. Zinkernagel for bringing to our attention the signal peptide of LCMV and Joachim Hombach for providing the cDNA of the LCMV S RNA.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Blobel, G. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 1496–1500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. von Heijne, G. (1990) J. Membrane Biol. 115, 195–201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. von Heijne, G. (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 184, 99–105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Walter, P., and Johnson, A. E. (1994) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 87–119[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Blobel, G., and Dobberstein, B. (1975) J. Cell Biol. 67, 835–851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Martoglio, B., and Dobberstein, B. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 410–415[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Rehm, A., Stern, P., Ploegh, H. L., and Tortorella, D. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 1573–1582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Li, Y., Bergeron, J. J., Luo, L., Ou, W. J., Thomas, D. Y., and Kang, C. Y. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9606–9611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gewurz, B. E., Ploegh, H. L., and Tortorella, D. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11306–11313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Russel, M., and Model, P. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 1717–1721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. von Heijne, G. (1983) Eur. J. Biochem. 133, 17–21[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Andrews, D. W., Perara, E., Lesser, C., and Lingappa, V. R. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15791–15798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lyko, F., Martoglio, B., Jungnickel, B., Rapoport, T. A., and Dobberstein, B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19873–19878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Klappa, P., Dierks, T., and Zimmermann, R. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 239, 509–518[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Weihofen, A., Binns, K., Lemberg, M. K., Ashman, K., and Martoglio, B. (2002) Science 296, 2215–2218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lemberg, M. K., and Martoglio, B. (2002) Mol. Cell. 10, 735–744[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Martoglio, B., Graf, R., and Dobberstein, B. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6636–6645[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Braud, V., Jones, E. Y., and McMichael, A. (1997) Eur. J. Immunol. 27, 1164–1169[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Braud, V. M., Allan, D. S., O'Callaghan, C. A., Soderstrom, K., D'Andrea, A., Ogg, G. S., Lazetic, S., Young, N. T., Bell, J. I., Phillips, J. H., Lanier, L. L., and McMichael, A. J. (1998) Nature 391, 795–799[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Bai, A., and Forman, J. (1997) J. Immunol. 159, 2139–2146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Burns, J. W., and Buchmeier, M. J. (1993) in The Arenaviridae (Salvato, M. S., ed), pp. 17–35, Plenum Press, New York
  22. Klavinskis, L. S., Whitton, J. L., Joly, E., and Oldstone, M. B. (1990) Virology 178, 393–400[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Buchmeier, M. J., and Zinkernagel, R. M. (1992) Science 257, 1142[Free Full Text]
  24. Hudrisier, D., Oldstone, M. B., and Gairin, J. E. (1997) Virology 234, 62–73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Hombach, J., Pircher, H., Tonegawa, S., and Zinkernagel, R. M. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 1615–1619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gallimore, A., Schwarz, K., van den Broek, M., Hengartner, H., and Groettrup, M. (1998) Mol. Immunol. 35, 581–591[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Romanowski, V., Matsuura, Y., and Bishop, D. H. (1985) Virus Res. 3, 101–114[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Huylebroeck, D., Maertens, G., Verhoeyen, M., Lopez, C., Raeymakers, A., Jou, W. M., and Fiers, W. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 66, 163–181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Aden, D. P., and Knowles, B. B. (1976) Immunogenetics 3, 209[CrossRef]
  30. Lehmann-Grube, F. (1971) Virol. Monogr. 10, 1[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Bruns, M., Cihak, J., Muller, G., and Lehmann-Grube, F. (1983) Virology 130, 247–251[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  33. Buchmeier, M. J., Elder, J. H., and Oldstone, M. B. (1978) Virology 89, 133–145[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Lipp, J., and Dobberstein, B. (1986) Cell 46, 1103–1112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680–685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368–379[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Beyer, W. R., Miletic, H., Ostertag, W., and von Laer, D. (2001) J. Virol. 75, 1061–1064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Li, Y., Luo, L., Thomas, D. Y., and Kang, C. Y. (2000) Virology 272, 417–428[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Hartmann, E., Rapoport, T. A., and Lodish, H. F. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 5786–5790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lindemann, D., Pietschmann, T., Picard-Maureau, M., Berg, A., Heinkelein, M., Thurow, J., Knaus, P., Zentgraf, H., and Rethwilm, A. (2001) J. Virol. 75, 5762–5771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Eichler, R., Lenz, O., Strecker, T., and Garten, W. (2003) FEBS Lett. 538, 203–206[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Garoff, H., Kondor-Koch, C., and Riedel, H. (1982) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 99, 1–50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Gaedigk-Nitschko, K., Ding, M. X., Levy, M. A., and Schlesinger, M. J. (1990) Virology 175, 282–291[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Liljestrom, P., Lusa, S., Huylebroeck, D., and Garoff, H. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 4107–4113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Lusa, S., Garoff, H., and Liljestrom, P. (1991) Virology 185, 843–846[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Loewy, A., Smyth, J., von Bonsdorff, C. H., Liljestrom, P., and Schlesinger, M. J. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 469–475[Abstract]
  47. Yao, J. S., Strauss, E. G., and Strauss, J. H. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 7910–7920[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Lee, J. M. Rojek, C. F. Spiropoulou, A. T. Gundersen, W. Jin, A. Shaginian, J. York, J. H. Nunberg, D. L. Boger, M. B. A. Oldstone, et al.
Unique Small Molecule Entry Inhibitors of Hemorrhagic Fever Arenaviruses
J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18734 - 18742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Dultz, M. Hildenbeutel, B. Martoglio, J. Hochman, B. Dobberstein, and K. Kapp
The Signal Peptide of the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Rem Protein Is Released from the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane and Accumulates in Nucleoli
J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9966 - 9976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. York and J. H. Nunberg
A Novel Zinc-Binding Domain Is Essential for Formation of the Functional Junin Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Complex
J. Virol., December 15, 2007; 81(24): 13385 - 13391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. Schrempf, M. Froeschke, T. Giroglou, D. von Laer, and B. Dobberstein
Signal Peptide Requirements for Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Glycoprotein C Maturation and Virus Infectivity
J. Virol., November 15, 2007; 81(22): 12515 - 12524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. M. Rojek, K. P. Campbell, M. B.A. Oldstone, and S. Kunz
Old World Arenavirus Infection Interferes with the Expression of Functional {alpha}-Dystroglycan in the Host Cell
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2007; 18(11): 4493 - 4507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. A. Saunders, J. P. C. Ting, J. Meisner, B. W. Neuman, M. Perez, J. C. de la Torre, and M. J. Buchmeier
Mapping the Landscape of the Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Stable Signal Peptide Reveals Novel Functional Domains
J. Virol., June 1, 2007; 81(11): 5649 - 5657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. S. Agnihothram, J. York, M. Trahey, and J. H. Nunberg
Bitopic Membrane Topology of the Stable Signal Peptide in the Tripartite Junin Virus GP-C Envelope Glycoprotein Complex
J. Virol., April 15, 2007; 81(8): 4331 - 4337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. York and J. H. Nunberg
Role of the Stable Signal Peptide of Junin Arenavirus Envelope Glycoprotein in pH-Dependent Membrane Fusion.
J. Virol., August 1, 2006; 80(15): 7775 - 7780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. S. Agnihothram, J. York, and J. H. Nunberg
Role of the stable signal Peptide and cytoplasmic domain of g2 in regulating intracellular transport of the junin virus envelope glycoprotein complex.
J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(11): 5189 - 5198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
B. Eschli, K. Quirin, A. Wepf, J. Weber, R. Zinkernagel, and H. Hengartner
Identification of an N-Terminal Trimeric Coiled-Coil Core within Arenavirus Glycoprotein 2 Permits Assignment to Class I Viral Fusion Proteins.
J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(12): 5897 - 5907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Holden, D. R. Keene, G. P. Lunstrum, H. P. Bachinger, and W. A. Horton
Secretion of Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Is Affected by the Signal Peptide
J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 17172 - 17179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]