![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 43, 41914-41920, October 24, 2003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



¶
From the
Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 282, D-69120 Heidelberg and the
University of Constance, Department of Immunology, Universitätsstrasse 10, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany
Received for publication, March 6, 2003 , and in revised form, July 15, 2003.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
of more than 6 h). 4) The cleaved SPGP-C resides in the membrane and is resistant to digestion with proteinase K even in the presence of detergents, suggesting a very compact structure. 5) SPGP-C accumulates in virus particles. These unusual features of the cleaved SPGP-C suggest that SPGP-C not only targets the nascent pGP-C to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane but also has additional functions in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus life cycle. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After cleavage from the preprotein, SPs are thought to be either directly degraded or processed by signal peptide peptidase (SPP) into distinct fragments that are released from the membrane (13, 14). SPP has recently been shown to be a presenilin-type intramembrane-cleaving protease (15). Several determinants for processing by SPP have been identified: the SP has to be cleaved from the preprotein and the hydrophobic core region has to contain helix-breaking residues. Moreover, as yet ill-defined features of the SP flanking regions can affect SP processing (16).
SP fragments resulting from processing by SPP can be functionally active. In the case of the hormone preprolactin and the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) gp160, the N-terminal portion of the respective SP is released into the cytosol and binds to calmodulin in a Ca2+-dependent manner (17). This implies that these SP-derived fragments may influence signal transduction pathways in the cell (17).
SPs can also play a role in immunorecognition. SPs of the polymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules contain a highly conserved sequence that is capable of binding to nonpolymorphic MHC class I molecules (HLA-E in human) (18). The peptide-HLA-E complex interacts at the cell surface with an inhibitory receptor on natural killer cells and thereby monitors the level of MHC class I molecule expression (19). Presentation of the SP-derived epitope is dependent on the transporter associated with antigen processing that transports peptides generated by the proteasome into the ER lumen (20).
The glycoproteins (GP-1 and GP-2) of the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) are synthesized as a type I precursor glycoprotein C (pGP-C) that is processed during intracellular transport into GP-1 and GP-2 (21). The predicted SP of LCMV pGP-C (SPGP-C) is rather unusual: it is longer than average SPs, comprising 58 amino acid residues, and has two hydrophobic regions separated by a lysine residue. An epitope derived from the core region, amino acid residues 3341/43 of the SPGP-C (gp33), is presented by MHC class I molecules to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (2124). Presentation requires a functional transporter associated with antigen processing (25) and proteasome activity (26). We have investigated the cleavage and fate of the SPGP-C in transfected and LCMV-infected cells.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A DNA fragment encoding pGP-C-HA was generated by polymerase chain reaction using the forward primer 5'-GGA TCT CTA GAG TCG ACC CC-3' and the backward primer 5'-CTG GAT CCT CAA GCG TAA TCT GGA ACA TCG TAT GGG TAG CGT CTT TTC CAG ATA G-3'. The PCR product was inserted into the BamHI site of pSV51l (pSV51l/pGP-C-HA).
Cells and VirusHeLa and L929 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). MC57 cells have been described previously (29). HeLa, MC57, and L929 cells were grown under recommended conditions. The LCMV (WE) strain was originally obtained from F. Lehmann-Grube (30).
Peptides and AntibodiesSynthetic peptides deduced from the SPGP-C and including amino acid residues 718 (MFEALPHIIDEV, SP7), 3041 (TSIKAVYNFATC, SP30), and 4857 (SFLFLAGRSC, SP48) were coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and injected into rabbits to raise anti-SP7, -SP30, and -SP48 antibodies. Antisera were immunopurified. KL25 is a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with the LCMV glycoprotein GP-1 (31).
Transfection, Infection, and LCMV Particle PreparationExpression vectors were transfected into HeLa cells by the calcium phosphate precipitation method for 2024 h (32). The cells were grown for an additional 48 h. MC57 cells were infected for 24 h with LCMV (WE) (multiplicity of infection, 0.05). LCMV particles were prepared as described (33) without using a continuous sucrose gradient.
Metabolic Labeling and ImmunoprecipitationAfter transfection, about 1 x 106 cells were starved in Met/Cys-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus 10% fetal calf serum for 150 min at 37 °C and labeled with 0.15 mCi/ml [35S]Met/Cys for 30 min. Labeling medium was removed, and cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and either directly analyzed or chased in complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium for the indicated time periods.
Cells were harvested and lysed for 15 min on ice in 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES/KOH (pH 7.3), 5 mM MgCl2, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, 100 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin. Equal aliquots were used for immunoprecipitation (34).
After infection 2 x 106 confluent cells were starved in Met/Cys-free RPMI 1640 plus 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum for 45 min at 37 °C and labeled with 0.1 mCi/ml [35S]Met/Cys for 60 min. Labeling medium was removed, and cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and chased in complete medium for the indicated time periods. Cells were harvested and lysed for 45 min on ice in 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 0.85 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µM leupeptin, 2.8 µM pepstatin, 0.75 µM aprotinin, and 2% (v/v) Nonidet P-40. Equal aliquots were used for immunoprecipitation. The beads were boiled in the appropriate sample buffer (35, 36), and proteins were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by phosphorimaging using a BAS 1500 (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan). Protein amounts have been quantified using MacBas2.0 program.
Cell Fractionation and Treatments of Isolated MembranesTransfected HeLa cells were harvested, resuspended in 20 volumes of hypotonic buffer (5 mM HEPES/KOH (pH 7.4), 0.5 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin), incubated on ice for 10 min, and broken up by using a Dounce homogenizer. The homogenate was adjusted to 0.25 M sucrose and centrifuged at 4 °C, 13,800 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was loaded on a high salt sucrose cushion (500 mM sucrose, 500 mM KOAc, 50 mM HEPES/KOH (pH 7.6), 2 mM MgOAc, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and centrifuged at 4 °C, 100,000 x g for 30 min. The resulting pellet (membranes) was resuspended in hypotonic buffer, adjusted to 100 mM NaCl and 0.25 M sucrose, and aliquots were treated on ice with different combinations of 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K, 0.5 mg/ml trypsin, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, or increasing concentrations of SDS (0.2, 0.5, and 1.0%) as indicated in the legend for Fig. 4.
|
For carbonate extraction, one aliquot of membranes was treated with 1/10 volume of 1 M Na2CO3 (pH 11) for 15 min on ice and loaded on a sucrose cushion (250 mM sucrose, 100 mM Na2CO3, pH 11). After centrifugation (4 °C, 130,000 x g, 10 min), the supernatant was taken off, and the pellet was resuspended in hypotonic buffer adjusted to 100 mM NaCl and 0.25 M sucrose.
PNGase F Treatment of Immunoprecipitated ProteinsImmunoprecipitated proteins bound to resin were incubated with 100 units of PNGase F (New England Biolabs, Schwalbach, Germany) in a final volume of 30 µl as specified by the supplier and incubated for 12 h at 37 °C.
Western Blot AnalysisProteins of total cell lysates, fractions of membranes, cytosol, or LCMV particles were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and identified using anti-SP7, anti-Sec61
, or anti-
-tubulin antibodies by standard Western blot analysis technique (32).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Identification of (p)GP-C-HA and SP Cleavage from pGP-C SPs are usually cleaved very rapidly after their membrane insertion from the nascent or just completed secretory or membrane protein. To follow cleavage of the SPGP-C from pGP-C, we initially used a cell-free system in which pGP-C142 was synthesized in the presence of rough microsomal membranes (13). Cleavage of the SPGP-C from pGP-C142 was very inefficient as compared with SP cleavage from the secretory protein preprolactin (data not shown). We therefore reasoned that SPGP-C cleavage from pGP-C might be inherently inefficient. To test this hypothesis, we transfected HeLa cells with a plasmid expressing HA epitope-tagged LCMV pGP-C (pGP-C-HA) (Fig. 1A). Cells were labeled with [35S]Met/Cys for 30 min. The extract was treated with PNGase F to remove N-linked carbohydrates from pGP-C-HA and thereby obtain a more distinct banding pattern. Unglycosylated (p)GP-C-HA ((p)GP-C-HA*) was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA or anti-SP7 antibodies (Fig. 2A). Both antibodies immunoprecipitated a major band of about 55 kDa, the expected molecular mass of unglycosylated (p)GP-C-HA, (p)GP-C-HA* (lanes 3 and 4). In the anti-HA immunoprecipitates, we cannot detect a smaller form representing mature GP-C-HA*, suggesting either that pGP-C-HA* and GP-C-HA* are not resolved by the gel system used or that GP-C-HA* is degraded. In addition, the anti-SP7 antibody immunoprecipitates a peptide of about 6 kDa. The 6-kDa peptide comigrates with in vitro synthesized SPGP-C comprising the N-terminal 58 amino acid residues of pGP-C (SP58) (Fig. 2B, lane 2). This suggests that the complete SPGP-C accumulates.
|
To investigate whether the SPGP-C is stable enough to be detected under steady state conditions, we used Western blotting. A cell extract from transfected HeLa cells was separated on an SDS-PAGE Tricine gel that separates peptides with high resolution, and a Western blot was probed with the anti-SP7 antibody. As can be seen in Fig. 2C, the SPGP-C can be detected in cells expressing pGP-C-HA (lane 2) but not in cells transfected with the empty vector (lane 1).
Stability of the Cleaved SPGP-CTo follow cleavage of the SPGP-C from pGP-C-HA, we pulse-labeled transfected HeLa cells for 30 min and chased them with medium containing unlabelled amino acids for 3 and 6 h (Fig. 3A). Aliquots of the samples were treated with PNGase F as indicated in the figure. The anti-SP7 antibody was used to immunoprecipitate pGP-C-HA and the cleaved SPGP-C. SP7 or control peptides were added to the samples as indicated. After the labeling and PNGase F treatment, the 55-kDa pGP-C-HA* and a prominent small peptide are immunoprecipitated with the anti-SP7 antibody (Fig. 3A, lane 4). Both, the 55-kDa protein and the 6-kDa peptide (SPGP-C) are no longer immunoprecipitated when the SP7 peptide is included in the immunoprecipitation (lanes 7 and 8). During the 3- and 6-h chase period, the amount of the 55-kDa protein is substantially reduced, whereas the amount of SPGP-C is not markedly altered (lanes 4, 10, and 16).
|
To expand the chase times and see whether the HA tag affects the stability of pGP-C or the SPGP-C, we expressed pGP-C as described above but used chase times of 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. To rule out the possibility that SPGP-C migrates at the gel front, we again used the SDS-PAGE Tricine gel system that separates peptides with high resolution. SPGP-C immunoprecipitated by the anti-SP7 antibody is still detectable after 24 h of chase labeling (Fig. 3B). From a quantification of the amount of SPGP-C detectable at the chase times, we calculated a half-life of more than 6 h for SPGP-C (Fig. 3C).
Membrane Association and Protease Sensitivity of SPGP-C To investigate the membrane association of SPGP-C, we pulse-labeled transfected cells and prepared a cytoplasmic and membrane fraction by centrifugation of a cell homogenate. As markers for cytosol and ER membranes, antibodies against
-tubulin and Sec61
were used, respectively (see supplementary data, Fig. 1S). SPGP-C was exclusively found in the membrane fraction (Fig. 4, cf. lanes 2 and 3). Carbonate (pH 11) extraction was also not able to remove SPGP-C from the membrane fraction (cf. lanes 10 and 11). To test whether the SPGP-C was accessible on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, proteinase K was added to the membrane and cytoplasmic fractions. Neither proteinase K (lanes 4 and 5) nor trypsin (data not shown) were able to cleave the SPGP-C. To see whether the resistance against protease digestion was due to the membrane barrier or is an intrinsic property of the SPGP-C, we solubilized the membranes with either the nondenaturing detergent Triton X-100 or increasing concentrations (0.2, 0.5, and 1.0%) of SDS (30 min on ice). Although pGP-C-HA was digested under these conditions, SPGP-C was not (lanes 69).
SPGP-C after Infection with LCMVTo investigate the cleavage and fate of SPGP-C during viral biogenesis and maturation, we infected MC57 mouse fibroblasts with LCMV. 24 h after infection, cells were labeled with [35S]Met/Cys for 60 min and chased for 3 or 6 h with medium containing nonlabeled amino acids. An antibody recognizing an epitope in the mature GP-1 protein (KL25) and the anti-SP7 antibody were used in immunoprecipitations. As compared with the noninfected cells (Fig. 5, lanes 1 and 2), an intensively labeled protein of about 70 kDa was immunoprecipitated with the KL25 antibody as well as the anti-SP7 antibody (lanes 38). The amount of this protein was reduced at the 3 and 6 h chase times. The size of this protein (70 kDa) and the fact that the protein is immunoprecipitated by KL25 as well as the SP7 antibody suggests that it is mainly pGP-C. Cleaved SPGP-C is clearly detectable in anti-SP7 immunoprecipitates even after 6 h of chase (lanes 68). Thus the high stability of the SPGP-C is not restricted to transfected cells but is also a property of the SPGP-C during virus infection.
|
To see whether the cleaved SPGP-C also accumulates in the virus, we purified LCMV particles from culture supernatants of acute infected L929 cells and identified the SPGP-C by using the anti-SP7 antibody and Western blot analysis. As can be seen in Fig. 6, the SPGP-C is detected in the infected cells (lane 2) as well as in the purified LCMV particles (lanes 4 and 5). The SPGP-C comigrates with in vitro synthesized SPGP-C (SP58), indicating that the entire SP accumulates (cf. lanes 3 and 4). The purity of the virus particle preparation is indicated by the absence of the cellular 50-kDa protein cross-reacting with the anti-SP7 antibody (cf. Fig. 6, lanes 1 and 2 with lane 5). Furthermore, a marker protein for the ER, Sec61
, could not be detected in the LCMV particle preparation (see supplementary data, Fig. 2S). In infected cells, the anti-SP7 antibody recognized a peptide smaller than SPGP-C by about 12 kDa. This peptide might represent an SPP processing product of the SPGP-C (15).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
SPGP-C Cleavage from pGP-CWe raised an antibody (anti-SP7) that specifically recognizes the signal peptide of LCMV pGP-C. Specificity was demonstrated by using competing and control peptides in immunoprecipitations. In transfected and LCMV-infected cells, pGP-C and the cleaved signal peptide SPGP-C could be detected and found to be rather long-lived. We were unable to resolve or detect mature GP-C. This may be due to the gel system used or may indicate degradation of GP-C. The recombinant LCMV (WE) pGP-C we used in this study is derived from persistent infected cells. During progression from acute to persistent infection, pGP-C accumulates 12 point mutations (between amino acids 94 and 457), which are exclusively found in the mature part of the glycoprotein but not in its signal peptide (amino acids 158). One (L110P) of these point mutations prevents processing into GP-1 and GP-2 (37). However, accumulation of pGP-C and SPGP-C is also seen in acute infected cells and therefore reflects an intrinsic property of pGP-C and is not due to the mutations accumulating in GP-C in persistent infected cells.
Inefficient SP cleavage has also been found for some other viral membrane proteins. A fraction of newly synthesized HCMV US11 molecules retains the SP after the US11 has been completed (7). Delayed cleavage is caused by amino acid residues in the N-terminal part of the US11 SP. A second region that affects the rate and extent of SP cleavage is the transmembrane region of US11 (7). A precursor form of the HIV-1 gp160 has also been found to accumulate. In this case, the SP cleavage has been shown to be a prerequisite for intracellular transport of gp160. The SP of pre-gp160 interferes with gp160 folding and surface expression (8, 38). Whether similar functions can be assigned to the SPGP-C awaits further experimentation.
SPGP-C Accumulation in Infected Cells and in LCMV ParticlesIn contrast to other SPs, the cleaved SPGP-C is not rapidly processed and degraded. It accumulates in transfected cells expressing pGP-C as well as in LCMV-infected cells producing virus particles. Stability is thus not dependent on other factors encoded by the viral genome. The basis for the high stability of the SPGP-C probably lies in the structural features of SPGP-C. Although an average signal peptide comprises about 20 amino acid residues, the SPGP-C extends over 58 amino acid residues and is characterized by two hydrophobic regions separated by a lysine residue (Fig. 1B). The N-terminal h1 region includes 15 uncharged amino acid residues, of which 11 are hydrophobic. The h2 region contains 20 uncharged amino acid residues. Membrane insertion of signal peptides of a secretory or type I membrane protein is thought to occur in a loop-like fashion such that the N terminus is exposed on the cytoplasmic side, and the cleavage site for signal peptidase is exposed on the lumenal side (Fig. 7). Given that the two hydrophobic regions of SPGP-C are both of sufficient length and hydrophobicity to span the membrane, it is well conceivable that SPGP-C spans the membrane twice. We have demonstrated using carbonate extraction that all SPGP-C peptides are integrated in the membrane. As cleavage sites of signal peptidase are usually in proximity to the hydrophobic segment of a signal peptide, we consider it very likely that the h2 region spans the membrane during membrane insertion such that signal peptidase has access to the cleavage site on the lumenal side of the ER. The h1 region is also of sufficient hydrophobicity to span the membrane. If this is true, the N terminus would have to translocate across the membrane, and the h1 and h2 regions would span the membrane in antiparallel configuration (Fig. 7). Several observations argue for such a configuration: 1) Protease added to membrane vesicles does not cleave the SPGP-C. If only the h2 region would span the membrane, the more than 30 amino acid residues of the N terminus would be exposed on the cytoplasmic side accessible to the added protease. 2) The SPGP-C is very resistant to proteolysis even in the presence of detergents, suggesting a compact structure as formed in the suggested antiparallel configuration of the two h regions. 3) The N-terminal hydrophilic region contains an excess of acidic amino acid residues over basic ones. A statistical analysis has revealed that clusters of positively charged amino acid residues are mostly found on the cytoplasmic side of membrane-spanning proteins (39). As judged by this criterion, the slightly negatively charged N-terminal region of the SPGP-C would be compatible with translocation across the ER membrane.
An unusually long and stable SP has also been found for the foamy virus envelope glycoprotein (Env) (40). The foamy virus SPEnv is 148 amino acid residues in length and contains a single hydrophobic region located between residues 70 and 90. This SP becomes glycosylated and is found in virus particles. What structural features of this SP prevent proteolytic processing and rapid degradation is not yet known.
Possible Implications of SPGP-C Cleavage and Stability What relevance could the accumulation of pGP-C and the rather stable SPGP-C have for the LCMV life cycle? pGP-C might represent a biosynthetic intermediate that could be converted posttranslationally to transport competent GP-C by cleavage of the SP. Alternatively, pGP-C might be a substrate for the ER-associated degradation system. Clearly, further work is required to distinguish between these two or other possibilities.
LCMV is the prototype of the arenaviridae. Glycoproteins of other arenaviridae are synthesized with SPs of similar length. In addition, these SPs show sequence similarity and also contain two hydrophobic segments separated by one or two positively charged amino acid residues (see supplementary data, Fig. 3S). Cleavage of Lassa virus signal peptide was recently shown to be necessary for GP-C processing into GP-1 and GP-2 and maturation in the secretory pathway (41).
The unusual stability and accumulation of SPGP-C strongly argues for functions besides targeting to the ER membrane. An attractive hypothesis would be that SPGP-C plays a role for virus assembly or formation and stabilization of the virus particle itself. Our finding that SPGP-C is present in purified virus particles in substantial amounts supports such a notion.
A striking biosynthetic and structural similarity can be found between the SPGP-C and the 6K peptide of Semliki Forest virus and Sindbis virus (42). The 6K peptides of these viruses are synthesized as part of a polyprotein between the two glycoproteins P62 and E1 and are excised by two proteases to give the final 6K products. The 6K peptides comprise 5558 amino acid residues and have an acidic, hydrophilic N-terminal region and two hydrophobic segments interrupted by 1 or 2 basic amino acid residues. 6K, like SPGP-C, is thought to be cleaved at its C-terminal side by signal peptidase (42). It is known that Semliki Forest virus 6K is required for efficient virus budding and is found in the virus in submolar amounts (4347).
A function in virus budding and integration into virus particles has also been shown for the SP of foamy virus Env protein (40). However, this SP does not share many structural similarities with the SPGP-C.
The signal peptide of pGP-C contains the immunodominant MHC class I restricted T cell epitope (gp33) comprising amino acid residues 3341/43 (23, 24). A quite obvious consequence of SPGP-C stability is that the T cell epitope will not directly be released, and thus the T cell response will be delayed. Generation of the SPGP-C-derived T cell epitope requires a functional proteasome, suggesting that the SPGP-C is eventually released from the membrane into the cytosol, where it becomes proteolytically processed (26). Whether processing of cleaved SPGP-C is relevant for generating the gp33 T cell epitope is unclear. Alternatively, mistargeted pGP-C accumulating during biosynthesis in the cytosol may be degraded by the proteasome and generate the gp33 T cell epitope.
Work described here strongly suggests that the SP of pGP-C is more than a targeting device to the ER. It may function at further stages of the LCMV life cycle.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplementary figures 1S3S showing Western blot analysis of supernatant and pellet fractions after cell fractionation, Western blot analysis of L929 cells and purified virus particles, and sequence alignment of the predicted signal sequences of some arenavirus glycoproteins. ![]()
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 49-6221-546825; Fax: 49-6221-545892; E-mail: dobberstein{at}zmbh.uni-heidelberg.de.
1 The abbreviations used are: SP, signal peptide; SPP, signal peptide peptidase; pGP-C, pre-glycoprotein C; pGP-C-HA, C-terminal HA-tagged pGP-C; pGP-C142, truncated (amino acid residues 1142) pGP-C; SPGP-C, signal peptide of pGP-C; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; HA, hemagglutinin; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; LCMV (WE), lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus strain WE; gp, glycoprotein; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HIV-1 gp160, glycoprotein 160 of HIV-1; PNGase F, protein N-glycanase F; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Lee, J. M. Rojek, C. F. Spiropoulou, A. T. Gundersen, W. Jin, A. Shaginian, J. York, J. H. Nunberg, D. L. Boger, M. B. A. Oldstone, et al. Unique Small Molecule Entry Inhibitors of Hemorrhagic Fever Arenaviruses J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18734 - 18742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dultz, M. Hildenbeutel, B. Martoglio, J. Hochman, B. Dobberstein, and K. Kapp The Signal Peptide of the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Rem Protein Is Released from the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane and Accumulates in Nucleoli J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9966 - 9976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. York and J. H. Nunberg A Novel Zinc-Binding Domain Is Essential for Formation of the Functional Junin Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Complex J. Virol., December 15, 2007; 81(24): 13385 - 13391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schrempf, M. Froeschke, T. Giroglou, D. von Laer, and B. Dobberstein Signal Peptide Requirements for Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Glycoprotein C Maturation and Virus Infectivity J. Virol., November 15, 2007; 81(22): 12515 - 12524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Rojek, K. P. Campbell, M. B.A. Oldstone, and S. Kunz Old World Arenavirus Infection Interferes with the Expression of Functional {alpha}-Dystroglycan in the Host Cell Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2007; 18(11): 4493 - 4507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Saunders, J. P. C. Ting, J. Meisner, B. W. Neuman, M. Perez, J. C. de la Torre, and M. J. Buchmeier Mapping the Landscape of the Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus Stable Signal Peptide Reveals Novel Functional Domains J. Virol., June 1, 2007; 81(11): 5649 - 5657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Agnihothram, J. York, M. Trahey, and J. H. Nunberg Bitopic Membrane Topology of the Stable Signal Peptide in the Tripartite Junin Virus GP-C Envelope Glycoprotein Complex J. Virol., April 15, 2007; 81(8): 4331 - 4337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. York and J. H. Nunberg Role of the Stable Signal Peptide of Junin Arenavirus Envelope Glycoprotein in pH-Dependent Membrane Fusion. J. Virol., August 1, 2006; 80(15): 7775 - 7780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Agnihothram, J. York, and J. H. Nunberg Role of the stable signal Peptide and cytoplasmic domain of g2 in regulating intracellular transport of the junin virus envelope glycoprotein complex. J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(11): 5189 - 5198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Eschli, K. Quirin, A. Wepf, J. Weber, R. Zinkernagel, and H. Hengartner Identification of an N-Terminal Trimeric Coiled-Coil Core within Arenavirus Glycoprotein 2 Permits Assignment to Class I Viral Fusion Proteins. J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(12): 5897 - 5907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Holden, D. R. Keene, G. P. Lunstrum, H. P. Bachinger, and W. A. Horton Secretion of Cartilage Oligomeric Matrix Protein Is Affected by the Signal Peptide J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 17172 - 17179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||