JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M308099200 on August 28, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 45, 44645-44649, November 7, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/45/44645    most recent
M308099200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putney, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Putney, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Na-H Exchange-dependent Increase in Intracellular pH Times G2/M Entry and Transition*

Luanna K. Putney and Diane L. Barber{ddagger}

From the Department of Stomatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143

Received for publication, July 25, 2003 , and in revised form, August 27, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
It is well established that activation of the Na-H exchanger NHE1 and increases in intracellular pH (pHi) are early and universal responses to mitogens and have permissive effects in promoting cell proliferation. Despite this evidence, a specific role for NHE1 or pHi in cell cycle progression remains undetermined. We now show that NHE1 activity and pHi regulate the timing of G2/M entry and transition. Prior to G2/M entry there is a rapid and transient increase in NHE1 activity and pHi, but in fibroblasts expressing a mutant NHE1 that lacks ion translocation activity, this increase in pHi is attenuated, S phase is delayed, and G2/M transition is impaired. In the absence of ion translocation by NHE1, expression of cyclin B1 and the kinase activity of Cdc2 are decreased and Wee1 kinase expression increases. Increasing pHi in the absence of NHE1 activity, however, is sufficient to restore Cdc2 activity and cyclin B1 expression and to promote G2/M entry and transition. These data indicate that a transient increase in pHi induced by NHE1 promotes the timing of G2/M, and they suggest that increases in pHi at the completion of S phase may constitute a previously unrecognized checkpoint for progression to G2 and mitosis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The ubiquitously expressed plasma membrane Na-H exchanger NHE11 regulates intracellular pH (pHi) homeostasis and has a permissive effect in promoting cell proliferation. Activation of NHE1 and increased pHi are early and universal responses to mitogenic stimulation (1). Growth factor-dependent cell proliferation is attenuated in NHE1-deficient cells (2, 3) in cells treated with pharmacological inhibitors of NHE1 (46) and in cells expressing a mutant NHE1 that is deficient in ion translocation (7). Additionally, retrovirus-induced transformation requires an NHE1-dependent increase in pHii, and clamping pHi to prevent alkalinization inhibits proliferation and a transformed phenotype (8). Despite an established role for NHE1 in mitogen-induced cell proliferation, the mechanisms whereby NHE1 activity and increased pHi promote cell proliferation are not well understood. We therefore investigated cell cycle progression in fibroblasts expressing a mutant NHE1 that selectively lacks ion translocation activity and is unable to regulate pHi.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Preparation—Ltk and LAP1 fibroblasts were obtained from J. Pouyssegur (University of Nice, France) (9). LAP1 cells stably expressing wild-type and NHE1–266I were obtained by co-transfection of pRSV-neo (1.0 µg) with NHE1 plasmids (10 µg of pCMV-NHE1) as described previously (7). Cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS (growth medium).

NHE1 Activity and pHiNHE1 activity was determined as described previously (10) in cells loaded with the acetoxy-methyl ester derivative of the pH-sensitive dye 2,7-biscarboxyethyl-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF, Molecular Probes). NHE1 activity was determined by measuring the rate of pHi recovery (dpHi/dt) from an NH4Cl-induced acid load by evaluating the derivative of the slope of the time-dependent pHi recovery at intervals of 0.05. The pHi-dependent H+ efflux was calculated as the product of dpHi/dt and the total intracellular buffering capacity ({beta}I) and expressed as µM/s as described previously (11). Cytosolic pH was determined by measuring BCECF fluorescence in the presence of 25 mM NaHCO3 to ensure the function of HCO3-dependent ion exchangers (7). Data represent the mean ± S.E. of four to six separate cell preparations.

Cell Cycle Analysis—DNA content was determined by flow cytometry of cells labeled with propidium iodine and data analyzed by using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). A double thymidine block was performed by a modification of previously described methods (12). In brief, 24 h after plating cells, 2 mM thymidine was added to the growth medium. After 20 h, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and released from the first thymidine block for 9 h in growth medium. A second block was initiated by adding 2 mM thymidine, and cells were maintained for 20 h. Cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline and released into growth medium for the indicated times. Mitotic index was determined as described previously (13).

Immunoprecipitation, Immunoblotting, and Kinase Activity—Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting of HA-tagged NHE1 was performed as described previously (7) using anti-HA monoclonal antibody (12CA5; Roche Applied Science). For immunoprecipitation of Cdc2, cells plated in 100-mm dishes were lysed in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer supplemented with 0.1 TIU/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Equal amounts of protein from post-nuclear supernatants (10,000 x g for 5 min) were precleared for 1 h with protein-G-Sepharose (Zymed Laboratories Inc.) and then incubated with anti-Cdc2 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 2 h followed by protein-G-Sepharose for 1 h. Cdc2 kinase activity was determined by phosphorylation of histone H1 as a substrate in in vitro kinase assays using immunoprecipitated Cdc2 as described previously (14). For immunoblotting total Cdc2, PY15-Cdc2, cyclins, and {beta}-actin, equal amounts of protein from post-nuclear supernatants were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were probed with the indicated antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and bound antibody was detected by using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Biosciences). The protein expression was analyzed by using NIH Image and the abundance of histone H1 phosphorylation was determined by phosphoimager analysis.

TaqManTM Analysis—TaqManTM analysis was performed in asynchronous cells using TaqManTM chemistry with the ABI 7700 Prism real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The forward and reverse primers for mouse Wee1 kinase were 5'-TTGCTCTTGCTCTCACAGTCGT-3' and 5'-TGGGAAAGCACTTGTGGGAT-3', respectively, and the probe was 5'-FAM/CCTTCCCAGAAATGGAGAGCACTGGC/TAM-3', corresponding to an amplicon of 118 bp. PCR was conducted in triplicate with 50-µl reaction volumes of 1x PCR buffer A (Applied Biosystems), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 µM each primer, 200 µM each dNTP, 100 nM probe, and 0.025 unit/µl Taq Gold (Applied Biosystems). For each experiment, a large master mix of the above components was made and aliquoted into each optical reaction tube. The primer/probe set (5–10 µl) was then added and PCR conducted using the following cycle parameters: 95 °C 12 min x 1 cycle (95 °C 20 s, 60 °C 1 min) x 40 cycles. Data analysis was carried out using sequence detection software that calculates the threshold cycle (Ct) for each reaction, which is used to quantitate the amount of starting template in the reaction. A difference in Ct values ({Delta}Ct) was calculated for each gene by taking triplicate Ct values from three reactions and subtracting the mean Ct of the triplicates for the control gene, GAPDH, for each cDNA sample at the same concentration. An additional difference in Ct values ({Delta}{Delta}Ct) was calculated for each gene by taking the triplicate {Delta}Ct values for each gene in the mutant LAPN1-E266I cells and subtracting the mean {Delta}Ct of the triplicates for the wild-type LAPN cells. As described previously (15), the relative expression levels were calculated as = 2{Delta}{Delta}Ct.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recent evidence indicates that in addition to its function in ion translocation and pHi homeostasis, NHE1 also acts as a scaffold to assemble signaling complexes (1, 15) and as a plasma membrane anchor for the actin-based cytoskeleton (7, 16, 17). To selectively impair only the ion translocation function of NHE1, we engineered an ion translocation-defective NHE1 containing an isoleucine substitution for glutamine 266 (NHE1-E266I). In cells expressing NHE1-E266I, the scaffolding and actin anchoring functions of NHE1 are retained, but ion translocation is absent (7, 16, 17). For the current study, the effect of ion translocation by NHE1 on cell proliferation was assessed by using NHE1-null LAP1 fibroblasts (9) selected to stably express either wild-type NHE1 with a C-terminal HA tag (LAPN cells) or HA-tagged NHE1-E266I (LAPE cells). Expression of NHE1 in LAPE cells is slightly greater than that in LAPN cells (Fig. 1A), and the increased gel mobility of NHE1-E266I likely reflects a difference in glycosylation (18). NHE1-null LAP1 cells are derived from parental Ltk cells expressing endogenous NHE (9), and Ltk cells have a pH-dependent H+ efflux that is not observed in LAP1 cells (Fig. 1B). Stable expression of wild-type NHE1 in LAPN cells, but not NHE1-E266I in LAPE cells, restored this efflux (Fig. 1B). Moreover, in LAP1 and LAPE cells maintained in 10% FCS and the presence of 25 mM NaHCO3 and 5% CO2 to ensure the function of HCO3 -dependent transporters, steady-state pHi (Fig. 1C) and the rate of cell proliferation (Fig. 1D) were significantly lower than that in Ltk and LAPN cells. These findings are consistent with those of previous reports (3, 7) that NHE1 activity provides a permissive signal for cell proliferation.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Ion translocation by NHE1 promotes cell proliferation. A, expression of NHE1, determined by immunoblotting anti-HA immunoprecipitates from total cell lysates obtained from NHE1-deficient LAP1 cells, and LAP1 cells stably expressing HA-tagged wild-type NHE1 (LAPN) or mutant NHE1-E266I (LAPE). B, H+ efflux was determined in a nominally -free Hepes buffer to confirm that Ltk and LAPN cells expressing wild-type NHE1, but not NHE1-null LAP1 cells or LAPE cells expressing the mutant NHE1-E266I, have a pHi-dependent H+ efflux. C, steady-state pHi, determined in the presence of 25 mM NaHCO3 in cells maintained in continuous 10% FCS, was significantly lower in NHE1-deficient LAP1 cells and in LAPE cells expressing NHE1-E266I than in Ltk and LAPN cells expressing wild-type NHE1. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of six separate cell preparations. D, proliferation of cells maintained in continuous 10% FCS was decreased in LAP1 and LAPE cells lacking NHE1 activity compared with Ltk and LAPN cells expressing wild-type NHE1. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of three separate cell preparations.

 

An initial analysis of DNA content in asynchronous cells indicated that G2/M progression was delayed in LAPE cells compared with LAPN cells (data not shown). This was further investigated by arresting cells in S phase with a double thymidine block and analyzing DNA content by flow cytometry at the indicated times after release from arrest (Fig. 2A). At the time of release (time 0), 83 ± 6% of LAPN cells and 80 ± 8% of LAPE cells were in S phase (mean ± S.E.; n = 3 cell preparations) (Fig. 2B). At 3 h after release, 55 ± 5% of LAPN cells, but only 18 ± 2% of LAPE cells, had entered G2/M (Fig. 2B). At 6 h after release, 58 ± 5% of LAPN cells and 47 ± 4% of LAPE cells were in G2/M, and 22 ± 3% of LAPN cells and 39 ± 4% of LAPE cells remained in S phase. Hence, in the absence of NHE1 activity there is a delay in S phase and impaired entry into G2/M. In three separate cell preparations, there was no indication that LAPE cells had increased necrosis or apoptosis compared with LAPN cells.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
NHE1 activity promotes G2/M entry. A, DNA content of LAPN and LAPE cells at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block was analyzed by flow cytometry. B, the percentage of LAPN and LAPE cells in S phase (left) and G2/M (right) at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of three separate cell preparations.

 

In LAPN cells, the transition from S phase to G2/M was associated with a significant increase in pHi and NHE1 activity. Cytosolic pH, determined in the presence of NaHCO3, increased steadily after release from a double thymidine block, reaching a maximum of 7.48 ± 0.01 at 3 h (Fig. 3A). At 4 h after release, pHi was rapidly and significantly reduced to 7.26 ± 0.02 (p < 0.01) and remained constant for up to 9 h. Additionally, the increase in pHi in LAPN cells at 3 h was associated with a transient increase in NHE1 activity (Fig. 3B), as determined by the rate of pHi recovery (dpHi/dt) from an NH4Cl-induced acid load in a Hepes buffer. In the absence of NHE1 activity in LAPE cells there was also a time-dependent increase in pHi indicating that H+ extrusion mechanisms, independent of NHE1 activity, were activated. The maximum pHi of 7.27 ± 0.01 in LAPE cells, however, was significantly lower than that in LAPN cells (Fig. 3A). These data indicate that the transition from S phase to G2/M is associated with an increase in NHE1 activity, which promotes a marked and transient increase in pHi. In the absence of NHE1 activity, the pHi increase is attenuated, S phase is delayed, and entry into G2/M is impaired.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
S phase completion is associated with transient increases in pHi and NHE1 activity. A, cytosolic pH in LAPN and LAPE cells at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of four separate cell preparations. B, NHE1 activity in LAPN cells at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block, as determined by the pHi-dependent rate of pHi recovery (dpHi/dt) from an NH4Cl-induced acid load. Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of NHE1 activity at pHi 6.5, as determined in three separate cell preparations.

 

In LAPE cells G2/M transition was also impaired and the activity and expression of G2/M regulatory proteins were markedly different compared with LAPN cells. In asynchronous cells, the mitotic index of LAPE cells was 50% lower than that of LAPN cells (4 versus 8%). In eukaryotic cells, mitotic entry is dependent on increased activity of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc2 (19). At 3 and 6 h after thymidine release, Cdc2 kinase activity in LAPN cells increased, as determined by phosphorylation of histone H1 in in vitro kinase assays using immunoprecipitated Cdc2 (Fig. 4A, top row). Cdc2 kinase activity also increased in LAPE cells, but at delayed 6- and 9-h time points and maximum activity was reduced by 40% compared with LAPN cells (Fig. 4B). The abundance of Cdc2 in LAPN and LAPE cells, however, was similar at all time points (Fig. 4A, middle row). Cdc2 activity is regulated in part by its association with the M phase cyclin B1, which begins to be synthesized at the end of S phase (20). In both LAPN and LAPE cells the expression of cyclin B1 increased at 3 and 6 h, however, the abundance of cyclin B1 at all time points was markedly less in LAPE cells (Fig. 4C). In contrast, the abundance of cyclin A (Fig. 4C), cyclin E (Fig. 4C), and cyclin D1 (data not shown) was similar in both cell types at all time points. Cdc2 kinase activity is also regulated by inhibitory phosphorylation on tyrosine 15 (21, 22), which is promoted by the Wee1/Mik1 family of kinases (23, 24). Immunoblotting with a phospho-specific antibody indicated that Tyr15 phosphorylation of Cdc2 was sustained longer in LAPE cells compared with LAPN cells (Fig. 4A, bottom row), which is consistent with decreased Cdc2 kinase activity. In cDNA array analyses of mRNA isolated from asynchronous cells, LAPE cells had a 2.3-fold increase in Wee1 kinase expression compared with LAPN cells.2 This finding was confirmed by TaqManTM analysis, which revealed that Wee1 mRNA was significantly more abundant in asynchronous LAPE cells than in asynchronous LAPN cells (Fig. 4D; p < 0.05; n = 3 separate cell preparations). Collectively, these data suggest that ion translocation by NHE1 alters the activity and expression of M phase regulators and promotes mitotic entry.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
NHE1 activity regulates the activity and expression of G2/M regulatory proteins. A, Cdc2 kinase activity at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block was determined by phosphorylation of histone H1 (top row) in in vitro kinase assays with Cdc2 immune complexes. Total Cdc2 (middle row) and PY15 Cdc2 (bottom row) were determined at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block by immunoblotting. B, relative abundance of phosphorylated histone in Cdc2 kinase assays in LAPN and LAPE cells at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block. Data represent the means of three separate cell preparations. C, abundance of cyclins B1, A, and E in LAPN and LAPE cells at the indicated times after release from a double thymidine block was determined by immunoblotting. Membranes were reprobed for {beta}-actin, and data are representative of three separate cell preparations. D, relative abundance of Wee1 kinase mRNA in asynchronous LAPN and LAPE cells, as determined by TaqManTM analysis. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of three separate cell preparations.

 

Increased pHi resulting from increased NHE1 activity could promote G2/M entry and progression, or alternatively increased pHi might simply result from G2/M entry and progression, and because S phase is delayed in LAPE cells, accompanying increases in pHi are attenuated. In support of pHi regulating the timing of G2/M, increasing pHi in the absence of NHE1 activity was sufficient to rescue the time-dependent entry into G2/M and the activity and expression of M phase regulators. To confirm that impaired G2/M entry and transition were not merely due to the constitutive loss of NHE1 activity in LAPE cells, but could also result from acute inhibition of NHE1, the effects of pHi were determined in LAPN cells treated with the amiloride analog ethylisopropylamiloride (EIPA), which selectively inhibits NHE1 activity (25). At the time of release from a double thymidine block, LAPN cells were treated with either Me2SO (control) or EIPA (25 µM) and were maintained in the continuous presence of 25 mM NaHCO3 and 5% CO2. At 3 h after release, the pHi of LAPN treated with EIPA was significantly lower than control cells (Fig. 5A; p < 0.01; n = 4) and NHE1 activity was completely inhibited (data not shown). To increase pHi in the absence of NHE1 activity, EIPA-treated LAPN cells were incubated in 50 mM NaHCO3 at 15% CO2 at the time of thymidine release, which resulted in an alkalinization to 7.38 ± 0.03, compared with a pHi of 6.98 ± 0.02 with EIPA alone (Fig. 5A). Moreover, increasing pHi in EIPA-treated cells was associated with an increased number of cells in G2/M at 3 h (Fig. 5A). At 3 h after release, the percentage of cells in G2/M was 56 ± 3 for control LAPN cells, 21 ± 3 for LAPN cells treated with EIPA, and 50 ± 4 for LAPN cells treated with EIPA but maintained in 50 mM NaHCO3 at 15% CO2. There was a similarity in the percentage of cells in G2/M at 3 h in LAPE cells expressing a mutant NHE1 lacking ion translocation (Fig. 2B) and in LAPN cells treated with EIPA (Fig. 5B). Like LAPE cells lacking NHE1 ion translocation, acutely inhibiting NHE1 activity in LAPN cells with EIPA was associated with decreased Cdc2 kinase activity compared with control cells, as indicated by histone H1 phosphorylation by immunoprecipitated Cdc2 (Fig. 5, C and D). Compared with control cells, EIPA treatment also increased Tyr15 phosphorylation of Cdc2 and decreased cyclin B1 expression (Fig. 5E), indicating that impaired Cdc2 activity and cyclin B1 expression were not merely a consequence of constitutive loss of NHE1 activity in LAPE cells but also resulted from acute inhibition of NHE1 activity. Moreover, increasing pHi in the absence of NHE1 activity was sufficient to increase Cdc2 activity (Fig. 5, C and D), attenuate Tyr15 phosphorylation of Cdc2 (Fig. 5E), and rescue cyclin B1 expression (Fig. 5E).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Increasing pHi in the absence of NHE1 activity regulates G2/M timing and regulatory proteins. A, cytosolic pH in LAPN cells at 3 h after release from a double thymidine block. At the time of thymidine release, LAPN cells were treated with Me2SO and maintained in 25 mM NaHCO3 at 5% CO2 (Control), treated with 25 µM EIPA, and maintained in 25 mM NaHCO3 at 5% CO2 (EIPA) or treated with 25 µM EIPA and maintained in 50 mM NaHCO3 at 15% CO2 (EIPA + CO2). Data represent the mean ± S.E. of four separate cell preparations. B, the percentage of cells in S, G2/M, and G0/G1 at time 0 (t0) and 3 h after release from a double thymidine block, as determined by flow cytometry analysis. Cell conditions were similar to those described in A, and data represent the mean ± S.E. of three separate preparations. C and D, Cdc2 kinase activity, determined by phosphorylation of histone H1 as described in the legend to Fig. 3A, and abundance of total Cdc2, determined by immunoblotting, at the time of thymidine release (t0) and 3 h after release in Me2SO-treated LAPN cells (Control) and in LAPN cells treated with EIPA. E, abundance of PY15-Cdc2 and cyclin B1 in Me2SO-treated LAPN cells (Control) and in LAPN cells treated with EIPA at 3 h after release from a double thymidine block.

 

Together, our findings suggest that increases in pHi promote the timing of G2/M entry and transition and that efficient timing requires a pHi of greater than 7.30 (see Fig. 3A), which is promoted by NHE1 activity. NHE1 contains an H+ modifier site, which renders activity of the exchanger exquisitely sensitive to changes in pHi. Hence, the transient increase in NHE1 activity could be a response to increased glycolysis and metabolic acid production during DNA replication in S phase, with the concomitant increase in pHi providing a signal for efficient progression from S phase to G2/M. Whether the kinase activities of Cdc2 and Wee1 are pH-sensitive is undetermined. It also remains to be determined whether a specific G2/M regulatory protein is the primary target of increased pHi, although cyclin B1 is a likely candidate. Cyclin B1 synthesis increases at the end of S phase (20), and cyclin B1 transcription or mRNA stability could be regulated by pHi. Additionally, cyclin B1 levels are transiently reduced by DNA damage (12), and decreased pHi could be part of a DNA damage-sensing response. An important future direction will be to determine whether increasing cyclin B1 expression is sufficient to rescue the delayed timing of G2/M transition in the absence of transiently increased NHE1 activity and pHi. Most intriguing is the possibility that transient increases in pHi at the completion of S phase constitute a previously unrecognized component of a checkpoint pathway.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM63465 (to L. P.) and GM47413 (to D. L. B.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Stomatology, HSW604, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0512. Tel.: 415-476-3764; Fax: 415-502-7338; E-mail: barber{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: NHE1, Na-H exchanger isoform 1; pHi, intracellular pH; BCECF, 2,7-biscarboxyethyl-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein; Cdc2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2; EIPA, ethylisopropylamiloride; FCS, fetal calf serum; HA, hemagglutinin. Back

2 L. K. Putney and D. L. Barber, manuscript in preparation. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank D. Morgan and D. Ilic for helpful discussions.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Putney, L. K., Denker, S. P., and Barber, D. L. (2002) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 42, 527–552[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Pouyssegur, J., Sardet, C., Franchi, A., L'Allemain, G., and Paris, S. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 4833–4837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kapus, A., Grinstein, S., Wasan, S., Kandasamy, R., and Orlowski, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23544–23552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bussolino, F., Wang, J. M., Turrini, F., Alessi, D., Ghigo, D., Costamagna, C., Pescarmona, G., Mantovani, A., and Bosia, A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 18284–18287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Delvaux, M., Bastie, M. J., Chentoufi, J., Cragoe, E. J., Jr., Vaysse, N., and Ribet, A. (1990) Am. J. Physiol. 259, G842–G849[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Horvat, B., Taheri, S., and Salihagic, A. (1992) Eur. J. Cancer 29A, 132–137[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Denker, S. P., Huang, D. C., Orlowski, J., Furthmayr, H., and Barber, D. L. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 1425–1436[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Reshkin, S. J., Bellizzi, A., Caldeira, S., Albarani, V., Malanchi, I., Poignee, M., Alunni-Fabbroni, M., Casavola, V., and Tommasino, M. (2000) FASEB J. 14, 2185–2197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Franchi, A., Perucca-Lostanlen, D., and Pouyssegur, J. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 9388–9392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tominaga, T., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S., and Barber, D. L. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4712–4722[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T., Conklin, B. R., Gilbert, R. L., Hooley, R., Bourne, H. R., and Barber, D. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4721–4724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jin, P., Hardy, S., and Morgan, D. O. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 875–885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gu, Y., Rosenblatt, J., and Morgan, D. O. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3995–4005[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Furnari, B., Blasina, A., Boddy, M. N., McGowan, C. H., and Russell, P. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 833–845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ginzinger, D. G. (2002) Exp. Hematol. 30, 503–512[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Denker, S. P., and Barber, D. L. (2002) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 214–220[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Denker, S. P., and Barber, D. L. (2002) J. Cell Biol. 159, 1087–1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Counillon, L., Pouyssegur, J., and Reithmeier, R. A. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 10463–10469[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nurse, P. (1990) Nature 344, 503–508[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Pines, J., and Hunter, T. (1989) Cell 58, 833–846[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Krek, W., and Nigg, E. A. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 305–316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Atherton-Fessler, S., Parker, L. L., Geahlen, R. L., and Piwnica-Worms, H. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1675–1685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lundgren, K., Walworth, N., Booher, R., Dembski, M., Kirschner, M., and Beach, D. (1991) Cell 64, 1111–1122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Parker, L. L., and Piwnica-Worms, H. (1992) Science 257, 1955–1957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Counillon, L., Scholz, W., Lang, H. J., and Pouyssegur, J. (1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 1041–1045[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Xiang, M. Feng, S. Muend, and R. Rao
A human Na+/H+ antiporter sharing evolutionary origins with bacterial NhaA may be a candidate gene for essential hypertension
PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18677 - 18681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
J. Srivastava, D. L. Barber, and M. P. Jacobson
Intracellular pH Sensors: Design Principles and Functional Significance
Physiology, February 1, 2007; 22(1): 30 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
R C Fitzgerald
Molecular basis of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Gut, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 1810 - 1820.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
D. S. Adams, K. R. Robinson, T. Fukumoto, S. Yuan, R. C. Albertson, P. Yelick, L. Kuo, M. McSweeney, and M. Levin
Early, H+-V-ATPase-dependent proton flux is necessary for consistent left-right patterning of non-mammalian vertebrates
Development, May 1, 2006; 133(9): 1657 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
R. Oliver III, E. Friday, F. Turturro, A. Lacy, and T. Welbourne
Troglitazone's rapid and sustained activation of ERK1/2 induces cellular acidosis in LLC-PK1-F+ cells: physiological responses
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): F1257 - F1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
R C Fitzgerald
Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: how does acid interfere with cell proliferation and differentiation?
Gut, March 1, 2005; 54(suppl_1): i21 - i26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
C. L. Brett, M. Donowitz, and R. Rao
Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): C223 - C239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
S. Humez, M. Monet, F. van Coppenolle, P. Delcourt, and N. Prevarskaya
The role of intracellular pH in cell growth arrest induced by ATP
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): C1733 - C1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. Baumgartner, H. Patel, and D. L. Barber
Na+/H+ exchanger NHE1 as plasma membrane scaffold in the assembly of signaling complexes
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): C844 - C850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
D. Zhou, J. Xue, O. Gavrialov, and G. G. Haddad
Na+/H+ exchanger 1 deficiency alters gene expression in mouse brain
Physiol Genomics, August 11, 2004; 18(3): 331 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Fuster, O. W. Moe, and D. W. Hilgemann
Lipid- and mechanosensitivities of sodium/hydrogen exchangers analyzed by electrical methods
PNAS, July 13, 2004; 101(28): 10482 - 10487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/45/44645    most recent
M308099200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putney, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Putney, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.