JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M306730200 on August 20, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 45, 44995-45003, November 7, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
278/45/44995    most recent
M306730200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luppen, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frenkel, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luppen, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Frenkel, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Brief Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Treatment of Glucocorticoid-inhibited MC3T3-E1 Osteoblasts Rescues Commitment-associated Cell Cycle and Mineralization without Alteration of Runx2*

Cynthia A. Luppen{ddagger}§, Nathalie Leclerc{ddagger}§, Tommy Noh{ddagger}, Artem Barski{ddagger}, Arvinder Khokhar{ddagger}, Adele L. Boskey||, Elisheva Smith**, and Baruch Frenkel{ddagger}**{ddagger}{ddagger}

From the Departments of {ddagger}Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and **Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033 and the ||Mineralized Tissues Research Laboratory, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York 10021

Received for publication, June 25, 2003 , and in revised form, August 13, 2003.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Glucocorticoids (GCs) inhibit bone formation in vivo. In MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts, chronic administration of 1 µM dexamethasone (DEX) starting at confluency results in >98% inhibition of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) expression and apatite mineral deposition. Here, it is shown that brief exposure to recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2), as short as 6 h, is sufficient to induce irreversible commitment to mineralization in DEX-treated cultures. RhBMP-2 dose dependently rescued mineralization but not collagen accumulation in DEX-inhibited cultures. The selective restoration of mineralization was evident in the higher mineral to matrix ratios of DEX/rhBMP-2 co-treated cultures compared with control. We tested the involvement of the runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) in the DEX inhibition and rhBMP-2 rescue of mineralization. Surprisingly, DEX did not decrease Runx2 DNA binding activity, transactivation, or association with the endogenous osteocalcin gene promoter. Furthermore, the rhBMP-2 rescue did not involve Runx2 stimulation, suggesting an important role for factors other than Runx2 in BMP-2 action. Finally, we studied the differentiation-related cell cycle, which persists during commitment to mineralization in untreated cultures, but is inhibited along with mineralization in DEX-treated cultures. Although both rhBMP-2 alone and DEX alone were antimitogenic, rhBMP-2 stimulated this cell cycle in DEX-inhibited cultures. In conclusion, brief rhBMP-2 treatment restores mineralization in DEX-inhibited MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts via a mechanism different from Runx2 stimulation. This restoration may be functionally related to the accompanying rescue of the differentiation-related cell cycle. The efficacy of short term BMP-2 treatment supports the potential of short-lived BMP vectors for skeletal therapy in both traditional and gene therapeutic approaches.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Glucocorticoids (GCs)1 are potent anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, asthma, and some types of cancer. A major side effect of GC treatment is rapid bone loss and increased risk for fracture (1). The chief mechanism underlying bone loss during long term GC treatment is impairment of bone formation (2–4). In addition to inducing bone loss, GCs have been shown to impede fracture healing in animal models (5, 6), potentially via molecular mechanisms partly shared with GC-induced osteoporosis. Diverse cellular and molecular mechanisms contribute to GC-mediated inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4), including: (a) attenuation of osteoblast proliferation (7–10) and especially of a differentiation-related cell cycle (11, 12); (b) promotion of osteoblast apoptosis (2); (c) abrogation of collagen metabolism (13, 14); (d) inhibition of growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor-1 and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 (15, 16); and (e) inhibition of the osteoblast master transcription factor Runx2, also known as core-binding factor {alpha}1 and AML3 (17).

Investigation of the adverse effects of GCs on osteoblasts has been hampered by the positive actions of these same agents, which are primarily seen in vitro. In some isolated osteoblast cultures, the positive versus the negative effects occur at physiological versus pharmacological concentrations, respectively (18). However, many investigators have observed positive effects in vitro even with pharmacological GC concentrations (19–21). The present study utilizes the MC3T3-E1 osteoblast culture system, under conditions that support differentiation, evidenced by the robust deposition of bone-like collagenous matrix with crystalline apatite (11, 16). Moreover, in these cultures, administration of the synthetic GC dexamethasone (DEX) at pharmacological concentrations of 0.1–1 µM strongly inhibits collagen accumulation and mineralization (11, 16). We have previously shown that the DEX inhibition of mineralization occurs only during a commitment stage that is characterized by a cobblestone culture morphology and a uniquely controlled cell cycle (12). Additionally, DEX inhibits this commitment-associated cell cycle, possibly revealing a mechanism for the DEX inhibition of nodule formation and mineralization (11, 16).

BMPs are potent promoters of osteoblast differentiation and bone formation (22–26). Recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) has been shown to overcome the inhibitory action of prednisolone on fracture healing (27). We have recently demonstrated that the DEX-mediated arrest of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast differentiation is associated with strong inhibition of endogenous BMP-2 gene expression (16). This inhibition appears to play a pivotal role in the overall adverse effect of GCs because administration of exogenous rhBMP-2 along with DEX counteracted the inhibitory effect of DEX on mineralization (16). However, nodule formation, characteristic of osteoblast differentiation in vitro, was not rescued by rhBMP-2 in the DEX-inhibited cultures (16). Furthermore, although collagen mRNA was induced by rhBMP-2 in the DEX-treated cultures, the DEX inhibition of extracellular collagen fibril accumulation was not reversed by rhBMP-2 (16).

The inhibitory effect of GCs on mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cultures is reversible (11). Therefore, we began the present study by asking if rhBMP-2 could rescue mineralization in DEX-treated cultures when administered after DEX. Also, because GCs cannot inhibit mineralization when administered after the commitment stage described above, we asked if brief rhBMP-2 exposure of chronically DEX-treated cultures could elicit a commitment process sufficient for mineralization. Furthermore, we asked if a rescue mediated by brief exposure to rhBMP-2 is associated with recapitulation of the commitment-associated cell cycle as observed in untreated cultures. Additionally, because GCs inhibit Runx2 in calvarial and bone marrow stromal osteoblast cultures (17, 28), and because BMPs induce Runx2 (29, 30), we tested the involvement of this osteoblast master transcription factor in the rhBMP-2 rescue. We report that brief exposure to rhBMP-2 indeed restores both a differentiation-related cell cycle and mineralization in GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cultures. Moreover, both the cell cycle and mineralization are rescued even when exposure to rhBMP-2 commences after DEX treatment has begun. Surprisingly, the rhBMP-2 rescue is not associated with increased Runx2 activity.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reagents—To maintain the MC3T3-E1 cell line, {alpha}-minimum essential medium and penicillin/streptomycin were obtained from Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA). Individual lots of fetal bovine serum, also from Invitrogen, were selected based on their ability to support mineralization. The lot used in the current study was somewhat less osteogenic than that used in our recent study (16), resulting in delayed mineralization (day 14 versus day 10 in our recent study), as well as stimulation of the control cultures by rhBMP-2. Ascorbic acid, {beta}-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone were from Sigma. RhBMP-2 was generously provided by Wyeth Research (Cambridge, MA). Cell culture dishes were purchased from Corning Inc. (Corning, NY). The biochemical assays were conducted using Sigma diagnostics kit 587 for calcium, Sigma diagnostics kit 104-LL for alkaline phosphatase, diaminobenzoic acid for DNA (Sigma), MicroBCA (Pierce) for protein, and Sircol® assay kit (Biocolor Ltd., Newtonabbey, North Ireland) for collagen. The histological calcium assay was conducted with Alizarin Red (Sigma). Runx2 antibodies for electromobility supershift assays were from Oncogene Research (San Diego, CA). [{gamma}-32P]ATP for probe labeling was from Amersham Biosciences. Runx2 antibodies (sc-10758X), preimmune rabbit IgG, and Protein A/G Plus-agarose beads for chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The protein A/G-agarose beads were preblocked with 1 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin prior to use in the ChIP assays. The luciferase assay system was purchased from Promega Corp. Luciferase constructs based on osteocalcin promoter sequences were generously provided by Dr. Gerard Karsenty (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). For cell cycle analysis, propidium iodide and ribonuclease A were obtained from Sigma.

Cell Culture—A robustly mineralizing subclone of the MC3T3-E1 cell line that has been previously described was used in this study (11). Cells were plated at 30,000 cells/cm2 in 12-well plates for histological and biochemical assays, 6-well plates for transfection, and 100-mm plates for cell cycle, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Northern, reverse transcriptase-PCR, electromobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. Cells were maintained in {alpha}-minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1.5% penicillin/streptomycin. Starting at 80% confluency (typically day 3, after plating on day 0), the culture medium was supplemented with 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM {beta}-glycerophosphate. In some experiments that are not shown, calcium deposition was measured in DEX-treated cultures after brief or chronic exposure to rhBMP-2, all in the presence of 5 mM instead of 10 mM {beta}-glycerophosphate, and the results were essentially unchanged.

Histological Demonstration of Calcium Deposition—Culture wells were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline and fixed for 1 h at 4 °C in 70% ethyl alcohol. Calcium deposits were stained for 10 min at room temperature with Alizarin Red solution (40 mM, pH 4.2) that was filtered through Whatman paper prior to application. Nonspecific staining was removed by several washes in water.

Biochemical Assays—Extracts for biochemical assays were collected by scraping the contents of each well in 10 mM Tris saline buffer (pH 7.2) containing 0.2% Triton X-100. The extracts were tested for alkaline phosphatase activity using p-nitrophenyl phosphate as substrate. To measure calcium and DNA, aliquots of the extracts were acid-hydrolyzed (final concentration 0.5 N HCl) prior to processing. The spectrophotometric analyses of the protein (562 nm), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (410 nm), and calcium (575 nm) assays were conducted in 96-well plates using a PowerWaveX microplate scanning spectrophotometer (Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT). The fluorometric DNA assay was conducted using diaminobenzoic acid essentially according to a published protocol,2 using excitation wavelength 400 ± 15 nm and emission wavelength 485 ± 10 nm on a FLx800 fluorescence microplate reader (Biotek Instruments). For collagen accumulation, cell layers were scraped in PBS, centrifuged, and hydrolyzed in 0.5 M acetic acid for 18 h at 4° C. The acid extracts were reacted with Sircol® reagent, and the collagen-bound dye was quantitated according to the manufacturer's protocol.

FTIR—Extracellular matrix composition was analyzed by FTIR. Cell layers were collected in ammoniated water (50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0), lyophilized, and analyzed as potassium bromide (KBr) pellets on a Bio-Rad FTS 40-A spectrometer (Bio-Rad). The spectral data were baseline corrected and analyzed using GRAMS/386 software (Galactic Industries, Salem, NH) as previously described (32). The mineral to matrix ratio was derived from the areas of phosphate (900 to 1200 cm-1) and protein amide I (1585 to 1720 cm-1) absorbance. Crystallinity, or crystal maturity, was evaluated based on the intensity ratios of the 1030:1020 sub-bands of the phosphate {nu}1,{nu}3 absorbance spectrum (33). The presence of crystalline apatite was verified by a split phosphate {nu}2 band (500 to 635 cm-1).

RNA Analyses—Total cellular RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and osteocalcin gene expression was evaluated as previously described (16). For Northern analysis, 15 µg of total RNA was separated in a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel, transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences), and hybridized with a 300-bp mouse osteocalcin probe excised from pBGP with BamHI and EcoRI. Prehybridization and hybridization were performed in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 50% formamide, 5x SSC, 10x Denhardt's solution, 1% SDS, and 0.1 mg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. The blots were washed extensively in buffer containing 2x SSC and 0.1% SDS at room temperature and then at 50 °C and exposed to film overnight. For reverse transcriptase-PCR, single-stranded cDNA was synthesized from the Trizol-extracted, DNase-treated RNA. A 187-bp osteocalcin cDNA fragment was PCR amplified as described previously under conditions providing close to linear signal as a function of input (16).

Runx2 Electromobility Shift Assay (EMSA)—Cultures for whole cell extract preparation were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and the cell layers were scraped and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. Cell pellets were resuspended in 1.5 packed cell volumes of lysis buffer (100 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 500 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 28% glycerol) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (5 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µM MG132). The cells were further subjected to successive passes through 18.5-, 20.5-, and then 23-gauge needles, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C to remove cell debris. The supernatant was snap frozen and stored at -80 °C. EMSA was performed with 15 µg of whole cell extract and 80 fmol of an end-labeled 23-base pair oligonucleotide probe containing the Runx2-binding OSE2 site from the mouse osteocalcin gene 2 (OG2) promoter (34). The cell extract was initially preincubated on ice for 10 min in the presence of 100 mM KCl with 1 µg of salmon sperm DNA and, when indicated, unlabeled oligonucleotides or antibodies. Probe binding reaction (final volume: 20 µl) was then performed in 20 mM Hepes buffer (pH 7.5) containing (final concentrations) 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EDTA, and 2.8% glycerol for 10 min on ice followed by 15 min at room temperature. The protein-DNA complexes were then resolved in a 0.25x TBE native polyacrylamide (5%) gel containing 5% glycerol.

Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assay—MC3T3-E1 cells were plated as above (day 0) and transiently transfected on day 1 using calcium phosphate co-precipitation as described previously (11). DEX (1 µM) and/or rhBMP-2 (100 ng/ml) treatment commenced as cultures became confluent on day 4 and lasted 48 h. Cells were then lysed and luciferase activity was determined using an MLX microtiter plate luminometer (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA).

ChIP—ChIP was performed essentially as previously described (35). Cross-linking was performed using 1% formaldehyde (10 min, 25 °C) and was stopped by adding glycine to a final concentration of 0.125 M. Cells were swelled in hypotonic buffer: 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and protease inhibitor mixture (Complete Mini, Roche Applied Science). Nuclei were lysed in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.1) containing 1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors. Resulting chromatin solution was sonicated using a Virsonic 60 sonicator (VirTis Co., Gardiner, NY; 4 pulses at 4 watts, 10 s each) and centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 10 min to remove cell debris. At this point, samples were diluted to adjust the absorbance to 0.25 A260 units and 100 µl was further diluted 10 times with IP buffer (16.7 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, 0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 167 mM NaCl) and protease inhibitors. Preclearing was performed with 2 µg of preimmune rabbit IgG and 100 µl of protein A/G-agarose beads. Following overnight incubation with 10 µg of Runx2 antibodies, complexes were precipitated with 30 µl of protein A/G-agarose and the beads were sequentially washed with IP buffer, high salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, 500 mM NaCl), Sarcosyl buffer (0.2% Sarcosyl, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1), and TE. Complexes were eluted twice with 250 µl of elution buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3) and cross-links were reversed by incubation at 65 °C for 4 h. The DNA was then deproteinized and purified on QIAquick PCR purification column (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The osteocalcin -264/-7 promoter fragment was amplified with the primers 5'-gagagcacacagtaggagtggtggag and 5'-tccagcatccagtagcatttatatcg. The insulin -246/-4 promoter fragment was amplified as a negative control with the primers 5'-tggatgcccaccagctttatagtcc and 5'-aactggttcatcaggccatctggtc. PCR were performed within a close to linear range under conditions that yield comparable signals for osteocalcin and insulin when genomic DNA is used as template.

Cell Cycle Analysis—Cell cycle profiles were determined as previously described (11). Briefly, cells were trypsinized and collected by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 4 °C, 15 min) in phosphate-buffered saline. Following centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in 100% ethyl alcohol and kept at -20 °C. The ethyl alcohol was removed by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 4 °C, 15 min) and the cells were resuspended in Hanks' balanced buffer solution containing 20 µg/ml propidium iodide and 100 µg/ml DNase-free ribonuclease A. Following 30 min incubation at room temperature, the stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using the EPICSTM XL-MCL analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and the percentages of cells in the G1, S, and G2/M phases of the cell cycle were determined using MultiCycle analysis software (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA).

Statistical Analysis—Results from each quantitative assay were analyzed to test four effects: (i) the effect of DEX in the absence of BMP-2; (ii) the effect of BMP-2 in the absence of DEX; (iii) the effect of BMP-2 in the presence of DEX and (iv) the effect of chronic versus brief rhBMP-2 treatment for each condition. Mean ± S.D. were compared using the Student's t test and the differences were considered significant when p <= 0.05.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Inhibition of Mineralization by Chronic DEX Treatment Is Corrected by Chronic BMP-2 Treatment Commencing 48 h after DEX—We have previously shown that rhBMP-2 counteracts GC-mediated inhibition of mineralization in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cultures (16). In that study the negative regulator, DEX, and the positive regulator, rhBMP-2, were administered together commencing on day 3. The ability of rhBMP-2 to rescue mineralization in cultures that have already been exposed to DEX for a substantial period of time was not tested. Therefore, in the current study, MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with DEX starting on day 3 and rhBMP-2 was added 48 h later (day 5). DEX and rhBMP-2 treatments continued throughout the rest of the experiment. Analysis of calcium deposition on day 14, by either Alizarin Red staining (Fig. 1A) or biochemical assay (Fig. 1B), showed that 1 µM DEX completely inhibited mineralization while rhBMP-2, at either 10 or 100 ng/ml, dramatically counteracted the DEX inhibition. A time course experiment (Fig. 1B) revealed that the rhBMP-2-rescued mineralization was even accelerated as compared with that of control cultures. Furthermore, FTIR analysis of day 14 cultures showed that the crystallinity of the rescued mineral was comparable with that of control; the intensity ratio between the 1030 and 1020 phosphate sub-bands ranged between 1.057 and 1.068 in the control cultures and between 1.051 and 1.088 in the cultures rescued with either 10 or 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2. Thus, rhBMP-2 not only counteracts DEX when the two are administered together (16), but it also rescues deposition of the apatite-like mineral when added 48 h following commencement of DEX treatment.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
Effect of chronic GC and BMP-2 treatments on calcium accumulation. MC3T3-E1 cells were chronically treated with 1 µM DEX starting on day 3 and/or rhBMP-2 (10 or 100 ng/ml) starting on day 5. A, top, schematic illustration of experimental protocol. Bottom, Alizarin Red staining of cultures on day 14. B, calcium levels in acid extracts of cell layers on days 8–14. The calcium values are corrected for DNA measured in the same extracts. Mean ± S.D. (n = 3). The letter U indicates undetectable levels of calcium. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are denoted by a when compared with control and by b when compared with DEX alone.

 

GC-inhibited Cultures Are Rescued by Brief Exposure to BMP-2—Maximum inhibition of mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cultures is observed when DEX treatment commences just prior to confluency (day 3) (11). During the 1–3 days that follow confluency, cultures become resistant to the inhibitory effects of DEX, which indicates a process of commitment to mineralization (11). If rhBMP-2 induces such a commitment, then the rescue of the DEX-treated cultures might not require chronic administration of rhBMP-2. To test this possibility, we chronically treated MC3T3-E1 cells with DEX from day 3 to 14, and limited the treatment with 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2 to brief exposure on day 5. The brief rhBMP-2 exposure lasted between 15 min and 12 h, following which the cultures were maintained in the presence of DEX and stained with Alizarin Red on day 14. As shown in Fig. 2A, 4 h of rhBMP-2 treatment on day 5 was sufficient to induce commitment to mineralization and full commitment was achieved after 6 h. Although both doses of rhBMP-2, 10 and 100 ng/ml, were equally effective in rescuing mineralization when administered chronically (Fig. 1), this was not the case for brief exposure. As demonstrated in Fig. 2B by Alizarin Red staining and in Fig. 2C by a biochemical assay, 10-h exposure of DEX-treated cultures to 10 ng/ml rhBMP-2 induced only marginal calcium accumulation, whereas the 100 ng/ml dose fully rescued mineralization (Fig. 2, B and C). A time course experiment monitoring calcium deposition following brief exposure to rhBMP-2 revealed that the rescued mineralization was accelerated compared with control cultures (Fig. 2C).



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
Effect of brief BMP-2 administration on calcium accumulation in cultures treated chronically with GCs. MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in the absence (Cont) or presence of 1 µM DEX starting on day 3. RhBMP-2 (10 or 100 ng/ml) or vehicle (serum-free media) was briefly added to the cultures on day 5. At the end of the brief rhBMP-2 treatment, the medium was removed, the cultures were washed with serum-free medium and fresh DEX-containing medium was added. A, top, schematic illustration of the experimental protocol. Bottom, Alizarin Red staining of day 14 cultures that were treated on day 5 with 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2 or vehicle for a period of 0.25–12 h as indicated. B, Alizarin Red staining of day 14 cultures that were treated on day 5 for 10 h with either 10 or 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2. C, calcium levels in acid extracts of cell layers on days 8–14. The calcium values are corrected for DNA measured in the same extracts. Mean ± S.D. (n = 3). The letter U indicates undetectable levels of calcium. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are denoted by a when compared with control and by b when compared with DEX alone. D, representative FTIR spectra of cultures treated with vehicle, DEX, or DEX plus 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2. I, II, and III represent the amide I, phosphate {nu}1,{nu}3, and phosphate {nu}2 bands, respectively.

 

The nature of the rescued mineral was evaluated by FTIR. As shown by representative spectra, both the control and the rescued cultures formed crystalline apatite, as indicated by the split phosphate {nu}2 band (III in Fig. 2D). Despite some apparent differences in crystal structure between the rescued and the control mineral (the rescued mineral phosphate {nu}2 band was sharper and more reminiscent of a bone-like extracellular matrix), the crystallinity, measured as the intensity ratio between the 1030 and 1020 phosphate sub-bands, was comparable between the rescued (range: 1.064–1.085) and the control mineral (range: 1.051–1.088).

Rescue of Mineralization by Chronic or Brief Exposure to BMP-2 Is Not Accompanied by Rescue of DEX-inhibited Collagen Accumulation or Nodule Formation—In our previous study, rhBMP-2 did not counteract the DEX inhibition of collagen accumulation or nodule formation (16). Because rhBMP-2 alone inhibited collagen accumulation (16), we postulated that delayed or brief rhBMP-2 administration might better support collagen accumulation and nodule formation. Cultures were treated with DEX starting on day 3 and then with rhBMP-2 starting on day 5, for either 10 h or 9 days. Collagen and DNA were measured on days 6–14. Fig. 3A describes the accumulation of collagen, corrected for DNA as a measure of cell number. DEX inhibited collagen accumulation by 82–95% compared with control at all time points, whereas DNA accumulation was inhibited by only 14–32% (Fig. 3A, bottom panel). Unlike the mineralization results, neither chronic nor brief administration of rhBMP-2 to the DEX-treated cultures rescued collagen accumulation to near control levels at any time point. In fact, 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2, especially when administered chronically, further inhibited collagen accumulation on days 10 and 14 compared with DEX alone. A similar inhibition of collagen accumulation by rhBMP-2 was observed in the absence of DEX (Fig. 3A).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
Effect of prolonged and short term BMP-2 treatment on collagen accumulation, mineral to matrix ratio, and culture morphology in GC-inhibited cultures. MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µM DEX starting on day 3 and rhBMP-2, either 10 or 100 ng/ml, was added on day 5 for either 10 h (S, short) or 9 days (P, prolonged). A, collagen per DNA on days 6, 10, and 14 (top panel). The DNA levels are shown in the bottom panel. B, mineral to matrix ratios in day 14 cultures as determined by FTIR. The ratio of the integrated areas of the phosphate {nu}1,{nu}3 band to the amide I band is linearly related to the mineral content (ash weight) of the specimen. C, bright-field micrographs of day 10 cultures that were treated on day 5 with rhBMP-2 at the indicated concentrations for 10 h (original magnification x200). In A and B, the bars represent the mean ± S.D. of triplicate cultures. However, in panel B, the DEX cultures exposed to short term 10 ng/ml rhBMP-2 did not have sufficient material for FTIR; thus, the triplicate samples were combined. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are denoted by a when compared with control, by b when compared with DEX alone, and by c when short term rhBMP-2 is compared with prolonged treatment for the same rhBMP-2 and DEX dose.

 

We further studied the effects of DEX and/or rhBMP-2 administration on the properties of the extracellular matrix by FTIR analysis of day 14 cultures. DEX alone decreased the mineral to matrix ratio by 4-fold (Fig. 3B), suggesting stronger inhibition of mineral deposition as compared with that of collagen accumulation. Chronic exposure of the DEX-treated cultures to rhBMP-2 (10 or 100 ng/ml) increased the mineral to matrix ratio to levels greater than control (Fig. 3B), reflecting the rescue of calcium accumulation without an increase in collagen accumulation. Ten-hour exposure of the DEX-treated cultures to rhBMP-2 also increased the mineral to matrix ratio, but only at the 100 ng/ml dose (Fig. 3B), consistent with the dose-dependent rescue of calcium accumulation when rhBMP-2 is administered for a short time (Fig. 2C).

DEX treatment arrests MC3T3-E1 cultures at the cobblestone stage, preventing condensation and nodule formation (11, 12). Co-administration of rhBMP-2 does not rescue nodule formation in DEX-treated cultures (16). Microscopic evaluation of day 10 cultures in the current study revealed that brief exposure of DEX-treated cultures to rhBMP-2 (on day 5) also failed to rescue nodule formation (Fig. 3C). This was also the case in DEX-treated cultures chronically exposed to rhBMP-2 starting on day 5 (data not shown). Thus, both chronic and brief exposure of DEX-treated cultures to rhBMP-2 rescues mineralization, but collagen accumulation and nodule formation remain inhibited.

Sustained Up-regulation of Alkaline Phosphatase Requires Continuous Treatment with BMP-2—We next examined ALP activity in DEX-treated cultures and those treated with rhBMP-2 either briefly or chronically. MC3T3-E1 cells were treated as above with DEX commencing on day 3, and with rhBMP-2 commencing on day 5, and ALP activity was measured 1, 5, or 9 days following rhBMP-2 administration. Although treatment with rhBMP-2 generally induced ALP activity (Fig. 4), this induction did not always parallel mineralization. Most notably, whereas brief exposure of DEX-treated cultures to 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2 was as effective in rescuing mineralization as was chronic treatment (Figs. 1B and 2C), only the chronic treatment strongly induced ALP activity, reaching 7.5-fold stimulation on day 14, as compared with only 1.9-fold with brief treatment (Fig. 4). Furthermore, while brief rhBMP-2 treatment rescued mineralization in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2B), the two rhBMP-2 doses tested, 10 and 100 ng/ml, had similar effects on ALP activity (Fig. 4). Finally, DEX itself, which completely abolished mineralization, did not inhibit, but in fact stimulated ALP activity in the present study (Fig. 4). These results suggest that DEX and rhBMP-2 affect mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cultures via mechanisms different from those regulating ALP activity.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
Effect of prolonged and short term BMP-2 treatment on alkaline phosphatase activity in GC-inhibited cultures. MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µM DEX starting on day 3 and rhBMP-2, either 10 or 100 ng/ml, was added on day 5 for either 10 h (S, short)or 9 days (P, prolonged). Mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are denoted by a when compared with control, by b when compared with DEX alone, and by c when short term rhBMP-2 is compared with chronic treatment for the same rhBMP-2 and DEX dose.

 

BMP-2 Rescue of Mineralization in MC3T3-E1 Cultures Is Not Accompanied by Up-regulation of Runx2 Activity—Runx2 is a master transcription factor in osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. In primary rat calvarial osteoblasts and in the ST2 bone marrow-derived stromal cell line DEX downregulates Runx2 (17, 28). There is ample evidence for upregulation of Runx2 by BMP-2 (29, 30). However, as demonstrated by EMSA in Fig. 5A, Runx2 DNA binding activity was not significantly altered in MC3T3-E1 cultures treated with DEX for up to 42 h, by which time both osteocalcin gene expression (Fig. 5D) and the differentiation-related cell cycle (11) were strongly inhibited. Furthermore, Runx2 DNA binding activity was not stimulated during a 10-h exposure of DEX-treated cultures to 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2 (Fig. 5B), which was sufficient for the rescue of mineralization (Fig. 2A).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
Effect of GCs and BMP-2 on Runx2 DNA binding activity. MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µM DEX on day 3 and 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2 on day 5. A, Runx2 EMSA was performed 2, 21, or 42 h after administration on day 3 of fresh medium containing DEX or ethanol vehicle. B, Runx2 EMSA was performed on day 5, after short exposure (0.5–10 h) to either 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2 or medium vehicle. C, identification of the main complex as Runx2. Runx2 EMSA of a control culture was performed without competition, in the presence of a wild-type unlabeled Runx2-binding oligonucleotide (WT), in the presence of a similar oligonucleotide that bears a mutation at the Runx2 binding site (MT), and in the presence of Runx2 antibodies (Ab). In the second lane from the right, the Ab were incubated with the probe in the absence of cell extract. D, Northern analysis of osteocalcin mRNA in cultures treated with DEX as in panel A for 2, 5, and 21 h. The ethidium bromide-stained gel is shown to demonstrate equal loading.

 

Because Runx2 activity may be modulated in ways that are not detectable by EMSA, the effects of DEX and rhBMP-2 on Runx2 were also tested by transfecting MC3T3-E1 cells with luciferase constructs that report on Runx2 transcriptional potential. As shown in Fig. 6, neither DEX, rhBMP-2, nor the combination of both agents significantly affected luciferase activity driven by the osteocalcin 147-bp proximal promoter. The dependence of this promoter activity on the Runx2-binding OSE2 site at position -138 (34) was confirmed in our MC3T3-E1 cells, as mutation of the OSE2 site resulted in an 8–9-fold decrease in luciferase activity in both untreated and DEX-treated cells (data not shown). We further tested Runx2 transcriptional activity using the (OSE2)x6-luc construct, which contains six repeats of the OSE2 site fused upstream of the minimal 34-bp osteocalcin promoter (34). As expected, activity of (OSE2)x6-luc was severalfold higher than that of -147 OC-luc, and mutations in the OSE2 repeats abolished activity (Fig. 6). However, activity of the synthetic (OSE2)x6 enhancer was not significantly affected by DEX, rhBMP-2, or both together. Unlike both the 147-bp osteocalcin promoter and the synthetic OSE2 driven promoter, the 1.3-kb osteocalcin promoter was inhibited by DEX and partially rescued by rhBMP-2 (Fig. 6), resembling the responsiveness of the endogenous osteocalcin gene (Ref. 16 and Fig. 6, inset). This data suggests that transcription factors binding upstream of position -147, likely other than Runx2, mediate osteocalcin responsiveness to DEX and rhBMP-2 in MC3T3-E1 cells.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.
Effect of GCs and BMP-2 on Runx2 transcriptional activity. MC3T3-E1 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs and treated with DEX and/or rhBMP-2 as indicated. Luciferase activity was measured on day 6 and is presented as relative light units (mean ± S.D.; n = 3). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are denoted by a when compared with control, and by b when compared with DEX alone. Inset, representative reverse transcriptase-PCR showing endogenous osteocalcin (OC) and 18 S RNA in parallel cultures.

 

We also tested the possibility that Runx2 is involved in the GC inhibition of mineralization in a way that cannot be disclosed by transient transfection assays. Specifically, we hypothesized that DEX blocks the accessibility of Runx2 to target genes within the nuclei of living cells. MC3T3-E1 cultures were treated with DEX during various stages of differentiation. DNA and DNA-binding proteins were cross-linked with formaldehyde and chromatin prepared from these cultures was immunoprecipitated with anti-Runx2 antibodies. The osteocalcin gene was used as a model Runx2 target. Occupancy of this gene by Runx2 was determined by PCR amplification of an osteocalcin promoter fragment in the immunoprecipitated DNA. Amplification of an insulin promoter fragment served as an internal negative control to measure the level of nonspecific precipitation (background) for each ChIP. The results in Fig. 7, representing one of 2–3 ChIPs for each treatment protocol, indicate that DEX did not reduce occupancy of the osteocalcin promoter by Runx2.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 7.
Effect of GC on Runx2 association with the osteocalcin promoter in living cells. MC3T3-E1 cultures were treated for 48 h with 1 µM DEX, starting on days 3, 5, or 7 and subjected to chromatin immunoprecipitation with Runx2 antibodies. Purified DNA was PCR-amplified with primers corresponding to promoter sequences of the osteocalcin (O) gene flanking the Runx2-binding site at position -138. An insulin (I) promoter fragment was amplified as control. Genomic DNA was amplified to demonstrate comparable amplification efficiency for the two promoter fragments. All PCR reactions were performed within a close to linear range. The figure shows an ethidium bromide-stained 1% agarose gel with results from one representative of at least two experiments.

 

rhBMP-2 Rescues Differentiation-related Cell Cycle in DEX-treated MC3T3-E1 Cultures—As differentiating MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cultures become confluent they assume a cobblestone appearance then enter a commitment stage characterized by persistent cell cycle and condensation (11, 12). DEX-mediated inhibition of mineralization is associated with parallel attenuation of this differentiation-related cell cycle (11, 12). To test whether the rhBMP-2 rescue of mineralization (Figs. 1, 2) is associated with rescue of the differentiation-related cell cycle, MC3T3-E1 cultures were treated with DEX and/or rhBMP-2 commencing on days 3 and 5, respectively, and cell cycle profiles were determined immediately following rhBMP-2 administration. The rhBMP-2 was administered either along with medium change as in Fig. 1, or by addition without medium change, as in Fig. 2. Cells were then collected every 3 h until 37 h. The effects of DEX and rhBMP-2 on cell cycle progression were independent of the method of rhBMP-2 addition (Fig. 8). As reported previously (16), DEX and rhBMP-2 each inhibited the G1/S transition, indicated by a ~2-fold decrease in the percentage of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle (Fig. 8). However, the addition of rhBMP-2 to DEX-treated cultures resulted in rescue of the cell cycle, which reached near control levels by 25 h of rhBMP-2 treatment (Fig. 8). Thus, rhBMP-2 concomitantly rescues both the differentiation-related cell cycle and the commitment to mineralization in GC-inhibited MC3T3-E1 cultures.



View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 8.
Effect of GCs and BMP-2 on cell cycle progression. MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µM DEX on day 3 and rhBMP-2 (100 ng/ml) was added on day 5 either (A) with medium change, to simulate the chronic exposure protocol, or (B) without medium change, to simulate the short term exposure protocol. The percentages of cells in the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle were determined every 3 h between 10 and 37 h after administration of rhBMP-2.

 


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
GCs inhibit proliferation, impede differentiation, and induce apoptosis of both immune cells and osteoblasts, thus frequently causing osteoporosis as a side effect when administered for immune suppression. In the absence of synthetic GCs that specifically suppress immune cells, a search for compounds that protect osteoblasts from GCs is warranted. Here, we employ DEX-arrested MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cultures, and demonstrate that rhBMP-2 rescues mineralization, even when added 48 h after DEX and only for a brief period of 4–6 h. Furthermore, the rescued cultures have increased mineral to matrix ratios, their mineral is deposited as bone-like crystalline apatite, and calcium accumulation is accelerated as compared with control cultures not treated with DEX or rhBMP-2.

Local administration of rhBMP-2 has been demonstrated effective in counteracting the inhibitory effect of GCs on osteotomy healing in a rabbit model (27). In that study, administration of rhBMP-2 (on an absorbable collagen sponge) was both preceded and followed by systemic treatment with a pharmacological dose of prednisolone. The present study sheds light on the remarkable efficacy of rhBMP-2 in the osteotomy healing model, because it demonstrates the ability of rhBMP-2 to counteract GCs when administered both following the commencement of GC treatment and for just a brief period of time. It is now easier to imagine how rhBMP-2 in the in vivo study could have induced irreversible commitment in cells of the chondro-osteoblast lineage at the osteotomy site, resulting in accelerated repair regardless of whether the rhBMP-2 itself was present during the entire healing process. The concept of BMP-2-induced irreversible commitment is also important in the context of gene therapy: complex and long processes of cartilage and bone formation may be induced by vectors, genes, or engineered cells producing BMPs, even if the vectors themselves are short-lived.

How long should rhBMP-2 be administered to induce commitment to mineralization in GC-treated osteoblasts? In the present study, detectable commitment of DEX-treated MC3T3-E1 cells to mineralization required more than 1 but less than 4 h of exposure to 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2. Full commitment required approximately 6 h. However, more than 10 h of rhBMP-2 treatment was required to induce commitment to mineralization using the lower, 10 ng/ml dose. In addition to dosage, we anticipate that rhBMP-2-induced commitment will depend on the developmental stage in which GCs are introduced to arrest differentiation. It is likely that if cells are arrested after they have begun spontaneous commitment, then less rhBMP-2 (time or dose) will be required to induce full commitment.

Despite its efficacy in promoting fracture healing, rhBMP-2 is not yet a clinical option for the treatment of GC-induced osteoporosis because of its short half-life following systemic administration. Furthermore, in the in vitro MC3T3-E1 culture system, rhBMP-2 did not restore the entire osteoblast phenotype. Specifically, collagen accumulation remained inhibited by chronic DEX treatment regardless of whether rhBMP-2 administration paralleled that of DEX (16), or started 48 h later than DEX and was administered for the remainder of the study or for a brief period of 10 h (this study). Thus, although rhBMP-2 increases {alpha}1(I) collagen mRNA levels (36, 37) including in MC3T3-E1 cells (16), it is unable to counteract the post-transcriptional inhibitory effect of GCs on collagen synthesis. This post-transcriptional effect may be related to the general inhibition of translation by GCs, which has been documented primarily in myoblasts (38).

The opposing effects of DEX and rhBMP-2 on mineralization in the MC3T3-E1 culture model provide a unique opportunity to discover novel molecular mechanisms mediating the actions of these two ligands. Shortly after the discovery of Runx2, it was proposed, based on in vitro data (17, 39), that GCs and BMPs exert opposing effects on osteoblast commitment by their respective inhibition and stimulation of Runx2 (40). In MC3T3-E1 cultures, we and others have previously shown that GCs, either at physiological or pharmacological concentrations, induce only modest alterations in the levels of Runx2 type I and type II mRNA (16), the level of the Runx2 protein and its DNA binding activity (41). In the present study, we further demonstrate that pharmacological levels of GCs do not alter Runx2 DNA binding activity in early MC3T3-E1 cultures. Moreover, transfection experiments show that DEX does not alter Runx2-mediated transcription of the osteocalcin gene in these cells. Finally, using the osteocalcin promoter as a model Runx2 target gene, we demonstrate by ChIP that DEX does not impede Runx2 accessibility to its cognate elements in the chromatin of living MC3T3-E1 cells.

The lack of Runx2 inhibition in MC3T3-E1 cultures during the initial 42 h of GC treatment is unlike the inhibition observed in fetal rat calvarial osteoblasts (17). In later stages of MC3T3-E1 cultures, DEX decreased Runx2 DNA binding activity by up to 2-fold (data not shown). In early MC3T3-E1 cultures, the repression of endogenous osteocalcin gene expression and the inhibition of the transfected 1.3-kb osteocalcin promoter, without a decrease in Runx2, suggest that GCs inhibit additional, yet unidentified, transcription factor(s). The potential importance of such additional GC-responsive factors is underscored by another study with fetal rat calvarial osteoblasts in which the GC inhibition of Runx2 gene expression was not accompanied by inhibition of mineralization (42). Mapping the osteocalcin GC response element under conditions that mediate the strong phenotype suppression in MC3T3-E1 cells may lead to disclosure of the non-Runx2-mediated inhibitory mechanism.

Just as GCs inhibited osteocalcin gene expression in early MC3T3-E1 cultures in a Runx2-independent fashion, BMP-2 restored osteocalcin expression without alteration of Runx2. Non-Runx2, BMP-2-responsive mechanisms have been previously implied when high doses of BMP-2 stimulated the osteocalcin promoter in Runx2 knockout cells (39) and recently Dlx5 was reported to be a direct BMP-2 target that acts upstream of Runx2 during osteoblast differentiation (31). In the present study, Runx2 was not stimulated by up to 10 h of rhBMP-2 treatment, whereas a 6-h treatment was sufficient to induce commitment to mineralization. Furthermore, rhBMP-2 stimulated osteocalcin transcription through an element(s) other than the Runx2 binding site, OSE2. Also, the rescue of mineralization did not parallel alkaline phosphatase activity, a classical target of BMPs. Factors other than Runx2 that mediate the BMP-2 rescue of mineralization in GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cultures may be disclosed in future investigations of the combined actions of GCs and rhBMP-2 on both the distal osteocalcin promoter and the differentiation-related cell cycle, as explained in the next paragraph.

We previously defined a commitment stage during MC3T3-E1 osteoblast differentiation, which occurs as cells reach confluency (11). Morphologically, this commitment stage is characterized by transition from cobblestone to condensed cultures. We have further characterized this commitment based on its association with spontaneous up-regulation of c-Myc (12) and a uniquely controlled, post-confluent persistent cell cycle (11). This differentiation-related cell cycle is inhibited by GCs via activation of glycogen synthase kinase 3{beta}, leading to inhibition of c-Myc expression (12) and ultimately downregulation of cyclin A, which then dissociates from E2F4·p130 complexes at the promoters of the cell cycle regulatory genes (11). We presented several lines of evidence linking the differentiation-related cell cycle to mineralization: both were inhibited by GCs, both were reversible upon GC withdrawal, and both were antagonized by the GC partial agonist/antagonist RU486 (11). In the present study we show that the rhBMP-2-induced commitment to mineralization is also associated with resumption of what appears to be a differentiation-related cell cycle. This cell cycle reached near control levels in GC-treated osteoblasts within 25 h of rhBMP-2 administration and was induced whether or not fresh serum was added along with the rhBMP-2 treatment. Moreover, it appears that induction of the differentiation-related cell cycle by rhBMP-2 in the DEX-treated cultures was quite specific, because: 1) rhBMP-2 did not stimulate, but in fact inhibited the cell cycle in cultures not treated with DEX, in which the differentiation-related cell cycle has likely been completed at the time of rhBMP-2 administration; 2) despite the cell cycle rescue, the DEX/rhBMP-2-co-treated cultures maintained a cobblestone morphology throughout the experiment, as demonstrated by the micrographs of day 10 cultures; and 3) in our previous study, cell cycle analysis of DEX/rhBMP-2-co-treated cultures under conditions different from those employed here, did not show cell cycle rescue, either because cells were collected too late (72 h following administration of rhBMP-2) or because treatment with both agents was initiated at the same time (16). Ongoing investigations of the differentiation-related cell cycle and its regulation by DEX and rhBMP-2 may provide insight into novel mechanisms other than Runx2, which mediate the inhibition and stimulation of osteoblast differentiation by GCs and BMPs.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AR47052, AR037661 [GenBank] , DE04141, and DE07211 and the Arthritis Foundation. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§ Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

Supported by NIDCR National Institutes of Health Training Grant DE07211. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute for Genetic Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2250 Alcazar St., CSC/IGM240, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Tel.: 323-442-1322; Fax: 323-442-2764; E-mail: frenkel{at}usc.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: GC, glucocorticoid; DEX, dexamethasone; BMP-2, bone morphogenetic protein 2; rhBMP-2, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; FTIR, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Back

2 P. G. Held (2001) Lab Division Applications Detail, www.biotek.com. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Tai-Lan Tuan for helpful discussions about collagen. We acknowledge the excellent technical contributions of Sara Martinez, Lyudmila Spevak, and Yujiki Fujimoto. We are grateful to Wyeth Research for generously providing rhBMP-2. The osteocalcin probe and the osteocalcin promoter and (OSE2)x6 constructs were a generous gift from Gerard Karsenty.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Van Staa, T. P., Leufkens, H. G., Abenhaim, L., Zhang, B., and Cooper, C. (2000) J. Bone Miner. Res. 15, 993-1000[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Weinstein, R. S., Jilka, R. L., Parfitt, A. M., and Manolagas, S. C. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 102, 274-282[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Canalis, E., and Delany, A. M. (2002) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 966, 73-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lukert, B. (1997) in Osteoporosis (Markus, R., Feldman, D., and Kelsey, J., eds) pp. 801-820, Academic Press, San Diego
  5. Waters, R. V., Gamradt, S. C., Asnis, P., Vickery, B. H., Avnur, Z., Hill, E., and Bostrom, M. (2000) Acta Orthop. Scand. 71, 316-321[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kostenszky, K. S., and Olah, E. H. (1974) Acta Biol. 25, 49-60[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Chen, T. L., Cone, C. M., and Feldman, D. (1983) Endocrinology 112, 1739-1745[Abstract]
  8. Chevalley, T., Strong, D. D., Mohan, S., Baylink, D., and Linkhart, T. A. (1996) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 134, 591-601[Abstract]
  9. Kamalia, N., McCulloch, C. A., Tenebaum, H. C., and Limeback, H. (1992) Blood 79, 320-326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lian, J. B., Shalhoub, V., Aslam, F., Frenkel, B., Green, J., Hamrah, M., Stein, G. S., and Stein, J. L. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 2117-2127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Smith, E., Redman, R. A., Logg, C. R., Coetzee, G. A., Kasahara, N., and Frenkel, B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19992-20001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Smith, E., Coetzee, G. A., and Frenkel, B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18191-18197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Delany, A. M., Gabbitas, B. Y., and Canalis, E. (1995) J. Cell. Biochem. 57, 488-494[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Delany, A. M., Jeffrey, J. J., Rydziel, S., and Canalis, E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26607-26612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Linkhart, T. A., Mohan, S., and Baylink, D. J. (1996) Bone 19, 1S-12S[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Luppen, C. A., Smith, E., Spevak, L., Boskey, A. L., and Frenkel, B. (2003) J. Bone Miner. Res. 18, 1186-1197[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chang, D. J., Ji, C., Kim, K. K., Casinghino, S., McCarthy, T. L., and Centrella, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4892-4896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ishida, Y., and Heersche, J. N. (1998) J. Bone Miner. Res. 13, 1822-1826[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Tenenbaum, H. C., and Heersche, J. N. (1985) Endocrinology 117, 2211-2217[Abstract]
  20. Leboy, P. S., Beresford, J. N., Devlin, C., and Owen, M. E. (1991) J. Cell. Physiol. 146, 370-378[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Shalhoub, V., Conlon, D., Tassinari, M., Quinn, C., Partridge, N., Stein, G. S., and Lian, J. B. (1992) J. Cell. Biochem. 50, 425-440[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Urist, M. R. (1965) Science 150, 893-899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wozney, J. M., Rosen, V., Celeste, A. J., Mitsock, L. M., Whitters, M. J., Kriz, R. W., Hewick, R. M., and Wang, E. A. (1988) Science 242, 1528-1534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wang, E. A., Rosen, V., Cordes, P., Hewick, R. M., Kriz, M. J., Luxenberg, D. P., Sibley, B. S., and Wozney, J. M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 9484-9488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gitelman, S. E., Kobrin, M. S., Ye, J. Q., Lopez, A. R., Lee, A., and Derynck, R. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 1595-1609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sampath, T. K., Maliakal, J. C., Hauschka, P. V., Jones, W. K., Sasak, H., Tucker, R. F., White, K. H., Coughlin, J. E., Tucker, M. M., and Pang, R. H. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20352-20362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Luppen, C. A., Blake, C. A., Ammirati, K. M., Stevens, M. L., Seeherman, H. J., Wozney, J. M., and Bouxsein, M. L. (2002) J. Bone Miner Res. 17, 301-310[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Pereira, R. C., Delany, A. M., and Canalis, E. (2002) Bone 30, 685-691[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Gori, F., Thomas, T., Hicok, K. C., Spelsberg, T. C., and Riggs, B. L. (1999) J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 1522-1535[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Lee, K. S., Kim, H. J., Li, Q. L., Chi, X. Z., Ueta, C., Komori, T., Wozney, J. M., Kim, E. G., Choi, J. Y., Ryoo, H. M., and Bae, S. C. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8783-8792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lee, M. H., Kim, Y. J., Kim, H. J., Park, H. D., Kang, A. R., Kyung, H. M., Sung, J. H., Wozney, J. M., and Ryoo, H. M. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 34387-34394
  32. Kato, Y., Boskey, A., Spevak, L., Dallas, M., Hori, M., and Bonewald, L. F. (2001) J. Bone Miner. Res. 16, 1622-1633[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Boskey, A. L., Spevak, L., Paschalis, E., Doty, S. B., and McKee, M. D. (2002) Calcif. Tissue Int. 71, 145-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Ducy, P., and Karsenty, G. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1858-1869[Abstract]
  35. Boyd, K. E., Wells, J., Gutman, J., Bartley, S. M., and Farnham, P. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13887-13892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Rickard, D. J., Sullivan, T. A., Shenker, B. J., Leboy, P. S., and Kazhdan, I. (1994) Dev. Biol. 161, 218-228[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Lecanda, F., Avioli, L. V., and Cheng, S. L. (1997) J. Cell. Biochem. 67, 386-396[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Shah, O. J., Kimball, S. R., and Jefferson, L. S. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, E74-E82
  39. Komori, T., Yagi, H., Nomura, S., Yamaguchi, A., Sasaki, K., Deguchi, K., Shimizu, Y., Bronson, R. T., Gao, Y. H., Inada, M., Sato, M., Okamoto, R., Kitamura, Y., Yoshiki, S., and Kishimoto, T. (1997) Cell 89, 755-764[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Cooper, M. S., Hewison, M., and Stewart, P. M. (1999) J. Endocrinol. 163, 159-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Prince, M., Banerjee, C., Javed, A., Green, J., Lian, J. B., Stein, G. S., Bodine, P. V., and Komm, B. S. (2001) J. Cell. Biochem. 80, 424-440[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Pereira, R. M., Delany, A. M., and Canalis, E. (2001) Bone 28, 484-490[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg