|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 47, 46210-46218, November 21, 2003
Cytosolic Multiple Inositol Polyphosphate Phosphatase in the Regulation of Cytoplasmic Free Ca2+ Concentration*![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ¶ ¶![]() ||![]()
From the
Received for publication, April 10, 2003 , and in revised form, September 5, 2003.
Multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase (MIPP) is an enzyme that, in vitro, has the interesting property of degrading higher inositol polyphosphates to the Ca2+ second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (Ins(1,4,5)P3), independently of inositol lipid breakdown. We hypothesized that a truncated cytosolic form of the largely endoplasmic reticulum-confined MIPP (cyt-MIPP) could representanimportantnewtoolintheinvestigationofIns(1,4,5)P3-dependent intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. To optimize our ability to judge the impact of cyt-MIPP on intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) we chose a poorly responsive -cell line (HIT M2.2.2) with an abnormally low [Ca2+]i. Our results show for the first time in an intact mammalian cell that cyt-MIPP expression leads to a significant enhancement of Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration. This is achieved without a significant interference from other cyt-MIPP-derived inositol phosphates. Furthermore, the low basal [Ca2+]i of these cells was raised to normal levels (35 to 115 nM) when they expressed cyt-MIPP. Noteworthy is that the normal feeble glucose-induced Ca2+ response of HIT M2.2.2 cells was enhanced dramatically by mechanisms related to this increase in basal [Ca2+]i. These data support the use of cyt-MIPP as an important tool in investigating Ins(1,4,5)P3-dependent Ca2+ homeostasis and suggest a close link between Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration and basal [Ca2+]i, the latter being an important modulator of Ca2+ signaling in the pancreatic -cell.
Inositol polyphosphates have established roles in signal transduction (15). The first inositol polyphosphate recognized to be a second messenger was inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (Ins(1,4,5)P3)1 (1). Ins(1,4,5)P3 releases Ca2+ from intracellular stores (6) and thus plays a central role in intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. The normal source of Ins(1,4,5)P3 in mammalian cells is the breakdown of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2/PIP2) following the activation of G protein- or tyrosine kinase-coupled membrane receptors (1). Interestingly, in non-mammalian cells, namely Dictyostelium, evidence has been presented that the abundant higher inositol polyphosphates, particularly Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 can also be degraded to Ins(1,4,5)P3 (7, 8), thus separating Ins(1,4,5)P3 production from PIP2 breakdown and the diacylglycerol-mediated activation of protein kinase C. However, these studies did not report whether the Ins(1,4,5)P3 so produced could impact intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. In intact mammalian cells no such pathway has been reported; however, in vitro multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase (MIPP) has been shown to possess the enzymatic activity to convert Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 to Ins(1,4,5)P3 via inositol tetrakisphosphate intermediates (7). The role of this pathway in an intact cell is rather problematic because of the fact that the majority of the MIPP is confined in the ER (9, 10) and thus removed from Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5, which exists largely in the cytosol (11). There are, however, exceptions to this generalization as membrane-associated MIPP activity in human erythrocytes is exposed to the cytosol (12). However, in general, the limited access of MIPP to its substrates restricts its use as a tool to study the impact of higher inositol polyphosphate-generated Ins(1,4,5)P3 on [Ca2+]i. In contrast, we reasoned that a cytosolic version of this enzyme (cyt-MIPP) may be a such a tool, allowing us to separate the production of Ins(1,4,5)P3 from the concomitant breakdown of lipids. To best judge the impact of cyt-MIPP expression we used a -cell line with an abnormally low basal intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), reasoning that this system would represent the most sensitive assay for recording a possible impact of cyt-MIPP on [Ca2+]i homeostasis.
We now report for the first time that cyt-MIPP expression can generate Ins(1,4,5)P3 in an intact cell. Furthermore, it significantly impacts on cellular Ca2+ homeostasis by both raising the low basal [Ca2+]i in our model cell line to more normal levels and, as a likely consequence, considerably enhancing a previously poor Ca2+ response to glucose. This enhanced response was mediated by several interlinked factors. These included the sensitizing of the ryanodine receptor (RYR) to Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) and the subsequent enhancement of Ca2+ entry, predominantly through store-operated Ca2+ channels. These data suggest that cyt-MIPP will be a useful tool in the investigation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 in intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, as evidenced by 1) data suggesting a link between basal Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration and basal [Ca2+]i and 2) the importance of this basal [Ca2+]i in determining the responsiveness of the RYR. Moreover, it should be noted that the full-length form of MIPP has unrestricted access to the cytosol in some mammalian cells (12). Hence, the pathway discussed here may have an impact on cellular Ca2+ handling in general.
Cell Culture, Transfection, and Labeling ProtocolsHIT M2.2.2. cells were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum, glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) as described previously (13). For experiments a modified RPMI 1640, 1640-M, was used. This modified medium contained additional MgSO4 (to give a final concentration of 0.8 mM) and 50 µM inositol (to make it more representative of the physiological milieu and to enable more efficient labeling) and 5.5 mM glucose. The 10% serum in this medium had been dialyzed (1000 molecular weight cut-off; Spectro Por) to remove inositol. HIT M2.2.2 cells were plated at about 10% of their confluent density into 35- or 92-mm dishes and allowed to grow in the above RPMI 1640-M medium for 24 h. The cells were then changed into the transfection medium, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, with the same inositol concentration as the experimental RPMI 1640-M. Cyt-MIPP expression plasmid (pCI.FLAG-MIPP) or vector alone were transfected into the cells using a Ca2+ phosphate precipitation technique (13). The next day the cells were washed and reintroduced into the RPMI 1640-M medium and maintained for a further 24 h. For some experiments measuring inositol polyphosphates and [Ca2+]i, cells were washed twice in a Krebs buffer and preincubated for 45 min in the RPMI 1640-M medium, with a reduced glucose concentration (0.1 mM). To determine cell number and approximate volume, cells were trypsinized from the dish and counted, and the volume was estimated by measuring the diameter of spherical cells with a microscope and calibrated graticule. For the measurement of inositol phosphates cells were labeled for the entire growth period of 72 h with 6 µCi/ml myo-[3H]inositol (Amersham Biosciences) in the above medium in either 35- or 92-mm-diameter dishes. Inositol Phosphate AnalysisInositol phosphates were extracted using previously published methodologies (1416). Briefly, medium was removed from the cells, and the cells were washed rapidly with Krebs-Ringer before addition of ice-cold 5% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. The cell debris was pelleted, and the supernatant was removed and neutralized by ether washing and the addition of 0.1 M EDTA (pH 7.0) to bring the final pH to 6.57.0. To determine the mass of Ins(1,4,5)P3 a commercial binding protein assay was used (Amersham Biosciences). The assay was carried out exactly as described in the supplied manual using a perchloric acid extraction protocol. Samples were then stored at 20 °C until required for HPLC.
HPLCWe performed HPLC on a 25-cm Whatman Partisphere-SAX column (Laserchrom, United Kingdom). For InsP separations HPLC was carried out as described previously (16). Initial identification of InsP species was carried out by the inclusion of [3H]inositol phosphate standards: inositol 1-phosphate, inositol 1,4-bisphosphate, inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate, Ins(1,4,5)P3, Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, and InsP6 in samples split into two. The two halves were run with and without standards. Standards were obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences, with the exception of inositol 1,3,4 trisphosphate, which was prepared from the Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 by dephosphorylation using human erythrocyte membranes. Other inositol phosphates were identified by their relative elution positions and comparison of a previous study (16) on
Measurement of [Ca2+]iCells were cultured and transfected as above. They were then preincubated in basal glucose (0.1 mM) for 45 min. At the beginning of this preincubation period cells were loaded with Fura-2/AM to give a final concentration of 2 µM. Transfected cells were identified by DsRed (Molecular Probes, Leiden, Netherlands) fluorescence following coexpression with pRcCMVi.DsRed. DsRed was used rather than GFP because of the substantial interference of GFP in Fura-2 measurements, whereas DsRed has little impact. Fluorescence imaging was performed with a cool charged-coupled device camera (CH250 with KAF 1400; Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) connected to an imaging system (Inovision, Durham, NC) placed on a Zeiss Axiovert 135TV microscope (Carl Zeiss AGT, Göttingen, Germany) with a 515/40 emission filter using the Ratiotool software (Inovision). A SPEX fluorolog-2 CMlT11I spectrofluorimeter (SPEX industries, Edison, NJ) was used for fluorescence excitation at 340 and 380 nm. [Ca2+]i was expressed as the ratio of fluorescence at 340 and 380 nm. To estimate basal [Ca2+]i in the MIPP-versus mock-transfected cells, the experiments were calibrated as described previously (17). To verify that the pharmacological agents were working, we did parallel experiments on normal mouse ElectrophysiologyHIT M2.2.2 cells were transfected with either pCI.FLAG-MIPP (cyt-MIPP) in combination with pRcCMVi.EGFP or pRcCMVi.EGFP alone as mock transfection. In this case DsRed was not needed as no Fura-2 Ca2+ measurements were carried out. The transfected cells were cultured from 2 to 4 days on coverslips. The cells expressing EGFP were selected for single channel recordings. Pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries (Hilgenberg, Malsfeld, Germany) on a horizontal programmable puller (DMZ Universal Puller; Zeitz-Instrumente, Ausburg, Germany). Typical electrode resistance was 24 megohms. Cell-attached single channel recordings were made with Ba2+ as the charge carrier (in mM): 110 BaCl2, 10 tetraethyl ammonium chloride, 5 HEPES-Ba(OH)2, pH 7.4. A depolarizing external recording solution, containing (in mM) 125 KCl, 30 KOH, 10 EGTA, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 5 HEPES-KOH, pH 7.15, was used to bring the intracellular potential to approx 0 mV. Recordings were made with an Axopatch 200 amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Voltage pulses (200 ms) were applied at a frequency of 0.5 Hz to depolarize cells from a holding potential of 70 mV to a membrane potential of 0 mV. Resulting currents were filtered at 1 kHz, digitized at 5 kHz, and analyzed with the software program pCLAMP 6 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA).
The construct used in this study was based on the N-terminal truncated rat MIPP sequence first reported by Craxton et al. (10). This sequence lacks the signal peptide necessary for translocation into the ER and was used to degrade cytosolic inositol polyphosphates. Although our cyt-MIPP had no ER signal peptide, recent reports have suggested that other internal peptide sequences can confer ER targeting (18). Furthermore, the only other published study using a truncated MIPP (19) had both the signal peptide and the ER retention sequence removed, whereas in the current study the construct still had the ER retention sequence. To verify that the cyt-MIPP was indeed cytosolic and not ER-localized, a cyt-MIPP bearing a GFP tag was expressed in HIT M2.2.2 cells. Examination with confocal microscopy discerned that GFP-cyt-MIPP was present throughout the cytosol. There was no co-localization with the fluorescent ER marker Brefeldin A, BODYiPY 558/568 conjugate, Molecular Probes (data not shown). Our experience (20), along with the experience of many others (21), is that a GFP tag itself does not present a restriction for the entry of peptides into the ER. Changes in Inositol Polyphosphate Profile following cyt-MIPP ExpressionIn our initial experiments we established that cyt-MIPP expression decreased the concentration of its principal substrates, Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6. Note, however, that only 30% of the cells were transfected (data not shown), so changes in concentration of inositol polyphosphates in a single cyt-MIPP-transfected cell were considerably underestimated because of the dilution with non-transfected cells. Fig. 1A indicates a significant 25% reduction in the concentrations of both Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6 after cyt-MIPP expression.
Next we wanted to assess the downstream products of Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6 degradation. To enable us to detect changes in Ins(1,4,5)P3 resulting from cyt-MIPP transfection, we insured that little Ins(1,4,5)P3 was being generated from PtdIns(4,5)P2 by preincubating the cells for 45 min in medium with low glucose (0.1 mM) thereby creating a basal state. All subsequent data (unless stated otherwise) were obtained from cells preincubated in this manner.
Fig. 2 presents a scheme depicting the putative products of cyt-MIPP-catalyzed metabolism of Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6. There were significant increases in Ins(1,2,3)P3 (20%) and in peaks with the elution characteristics of D/L-Ins(1,4,6)P3 (56%) and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (79%) in cyt-MIPP-compared with mock-transfected cells, (data not shown). However, it is important to note that the concentrations of these inositol polyphosphates were initially so low (
Effect on Basal [Ca2+]iThe next important question was whether this increased Ins(1,4,5)P3 impacted on cellular [Ca2+]i homeostasis. We therefore examined the [Ca2+]i homeostasis in cyt-MIPP-expressing cells. In contrast to the data derived for the inositol phosphates, which were obtained from batch-transfected cells, [Ca2+]i measurements were performed at the single cell level in cells identified by DsRed fluorescence after co-transfection with cyt-MIPP and DsRed. Because we only measured cells that had been transfected, eliminating non-transfected cells from consideration, we substantially improved the signal to noise ratio. HIT M2.2.2 cells transfected with cyt-MIPP or mock-transfected were loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fura-2/AM, and the [Ca2+]i in individual DsRed-positive cells were recorded using digital fluorescence imaging. Fig. 3 represents a quantification of basal [Ca2+]i in mock- and cyt-MIPP-transfected cells, determinations made in 45 separate cells from more than three separate preparations. Basal [Ca2+]i in cyt-MIPP-transfected cells was significantly higher (3-fold) than in mock-transfected cells (115.1 ± 4.1 versus 35.5 ± 2.5 nM ± S.E.). Untransfected cells had a [Ca2+]i similar to mock-transfected cells (data not shown). Because the parent HIT T15 cell line has a basal [Ca2+]i between 100 and 150 nM, the untransfected HIT M2.2.2 cells clearly have an abnormally low basal [Ca2+]i. Thus cyt-MIPP expression is able to raise the basal [Ca2+]i in HIT M2.2.2 cells to a more normal level.
Effect on Glucose-stimulated Rise in [Ca2+]iNext we wanted to clarify whether the changes in basal [Ca2+]i implemented by cyt-MIPP influenced the way that glucose, the principal stimulus of pancreatic -cells, affected [Ca2+]i. Fig. 4A is a representative trace illustrating the stimulatory effect of glucose (16.7 mM) on [Ca2+]i. The Ca2+ responses of cyt-MIPP-transfected cells were considerably greater in amplitude and duration than the responses for the mock-transfected cells, which were rather feeble. Moreover, the pattern of multiple peaks in cyt-MIPP-transfected cells was not discerned in the mock-transfected cells. This pattern of multiple peaks has also been recorded in -cell studies in which the RYR was sensitized (22) and are thought to be representative of CICR. These data suggest that cyt-MIPP transfection was able to dramatically enhance the glucose-stimulated rise in [Ca2+]i in this previously poorly responsive insulin-secreting cell line. Thus it was important to understand the mechanism of this transformation in greater depth.
In normal pancreatic -cells the dominant mechanism whereby glucose raises [Ca2+]i is thought to be through the opening of voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels (23). To establish whether L-type Ca2+ channels were involved in the improved response in cyt-MIPP-expressing cells, we pretreated the cells with the specific L-type Ca2+ channel blocker nimodipine and then stimulated with glucose. Fig. 4B demonstrates that nimodipine abolished the small rise in [Ca2+]i seen in mock-transfected cells, suggesting that in mock-transfected cells the small glucose-stimulated rise in [Ca2+]i is dependent on L-type Ca2+ channels. In contrast, the overall increase in [Ca2+]i in cyt-MIPP-transfected cells was reduced by only 20% when nimodipine was applied (see Fig. 4B and accompanying legend). These data suggest that only a minor component of the glucose-induced [Ca2+]i rise in cyt-MIPP-expressing cells is dependent on influx of Ca2+ through L-type channels. However, the majority of the increase in [Ca2+]i in cyt-MIPP-expressing cells is coming from another source. So where is this Ca2+ coming from? The Ca2+ could come through another membrane Ca2+ channel or from intracellular stores or a combination of both. Fig. 4C indicates that removal of extracellular Ca2+ completely blocked the rise in [Ca2+]i elicited by glucose in cyt-MIPP-transfected cells. This suggests that if intracellular Ca2+ stores are involved they require the entry of extracellular Ca2+ to sustain the response. The most likely kind of mechanism would be a store-operated capacitative Ca2+ entry through the plasma membrane (24). Thus Ca2+ influx via the L-type Ca2+ channel, and maybe more importantly, non-voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, played key parts in the restoration of the glucose-induced rise in [Ca2+]i in cyt-MIPP-expressing cells. Role of Voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ ChannelsTo address the role of voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels in the improved Ca2+ response following cyt-MIPP expression in more detail, single channel activity was recorded, using the cell-attached mode of the patch clamp technique. Both mock- and cyt-MIPP-transfected cells were examined for L-type Ca2+ current. Transfected cells were identified by co-expression of GFP. Fig. 5A illustrates examples of Ba2+ currents flowing through single Ca2+ channels recorded from patches attached to cells subjected to mock transfection (left panel) and cyt-MIPP transfection (right panel), respectively. The cell transfected with cyt-MIPP displayed more frequent openings of the Ca2+ channel than the control cell. Open time (Fig. 5B) and current amplitude (Fig. 5C) distributions from the same recordings were fit by a single exponential function and exhibit Gaussian distributions with a clear separation between closed and open states, respectively. This indicates that only one channel was present in the patches recorded. Compiled data demonstrated that cyt-MIPP expression significantly increased open probability (Fig. 5E) and availability (Fig. 5F) of single L-type Ca2+ channels without influencing mean open time (Fig. 5D). Thus L-type Ca2+ channels from cyt-MIPP-transfected cells have changed characteristics that may favor increased Ca2+ flux into the cell.
Examination of Intracellular Ca2+ StoresFig. 4, B and C clearly indicate that a substantial amount of the glucose-induced [Ca2+]i rise is independent of Ca2+ entry through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and is coming through some other membrane channel. One mechanism for Ca2+ entry could be the emptying of intracellular Ca2+ stores and the subsequent promotion of capacitative Ca2+ entry (24). An increased emptying of intracellular stores is likely following cyt-MIPP expression because of raised levels of Ins(1,4,5)P3. The subsequent increase in basal [Ca2+]i may enhance Ca2+ release from both Ins(1,4,5)P3- and ryanodine (RY)-sensitive stores, respectively. We therefore used pharmacological agents to ascertain the nature of the stores involved in mock- and cyt-MIPP-transfected HIT M2.2.2 cells.
Fig. 6A shows cells preincubated with the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor blocker 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl-borate (2-APB) and then stimulated with glucose. 2-APB completely blocked the glucose-induced rise in [Ca2+]i in both mock- and cyt-MIPP-transfected cells (cf. Fig 4A). During the blockade of the Ins(1,4,5)P3-sensitive stores it should still be possible to measure Ca2+ entry through L-type Ca2+ channels by depolarizing the cells with KCl. Addition of KCl, together with glucose or on its own, resulted in a distinct but small change in [Ca2+]i. This confirms the nimodipine data that suggested that the L-type channel only made a small contribution to the overall [Ca2+]i increase and raises the notion that this
We next examined the role of RY-sensitive stores, suggested previously (22) to have an important role in -cell CICR mechanisms. RY-sensitive stores can be blocked by high concentrations of RY but only when the receptor is in the open form. Thus we used the combination of caffeine to open the receptor and a high concentration of RY to block it. In -cells caffeine does not significantly impact the Ins(1,4,5)P3-sensitive stores (26). Fig. 6C demonstrates that blockade of the RYR dramatically reduced the Ca2+ response of mock- and cyt-MIPP-transfected cells (Fig. 6C versus Fig. 4A). Again K+ depolarization alone revealed a small component of [Ca2+]i increase dependent on the entry of Ca2+ through L-type Ca2+ channels. Summarizing the data from the pharmacological studies above, it is clear that the full glucose-induced Ca2+ response can only be partially blocked by a the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor antagonist Xestospongin C. This is the antagonist whose actions are not complicated by effects on Ca2+ entry. However, blockade of the RYR virtually abolished the glucose-induced Ca2+-response. Thus, although Ca2+ release from Ins(1,4,5)P3-sensitive stores can contribute to the overall Ca2+ rise, without the operation of the RYR-sensitive Ca2+ stores, this Ca2+ mobilization is ineffective in promoting the glucose-stimulated rise in [Ca2+]i. The above data suggest that cyt-MIPP enables the coupling between glucose metabolism and the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. This mechanism was apparently defective in the parent HIT M2.2.2 cell. One possible explanation for the difference between mock- and cyt-MIPP-transfected cells could be the Ca2+ content of the stores themselves. Therefore we assessed the content of the stores by adding the store Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin (Tg) (Fig. 7). Fig. 7 indicates that application of Tg releases Ca2+ from intracellular stores of both mock- and MIPP-transfected cells; however, the cyt-MIPP-transfected cells had a lower amount of Ca2+ in the stores. Fig. 7 also illustrates that if the cells were stimulated with 16.7 mM glucose, subsequent to the addition of Tg and thereby increasing basal [Ca2+]i in mock-transfected cells to a more normal level, the deficient [Ca2+]i response was partially restored.
Previous studies have suggested that a preparation of purified MIPP can degrade higher inositol polyphosphates, principally Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5, to the Ca2+ second messenger Ins(1,4,5)P3 (7). However, in many cells MIPP is confined in the ER with a limited access to Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5, and thus in these cells MIPP is likely to have a limited impact on cellular Ca2+ homeostasis. Our hypothesis was that a truncated form of the MIPP (cyt-MIPP) normally expressed in the cytosol might serve as an important general tool in the investigation of Ins(1,4,5)P3- dependent Ca2+ homeostasis independently of receptor-activated inositol lipid breakdown. If this hypothesis is to be verified we need to demonstrate both that Ins(1,4,5)P3 can be generated from higher inositol polyphosphates in an intact cell and that this generated Ins(1,4,5)P3 could make an impact on [Ca2+]i. We also needed to be sure that other potential by-products of MIPP activity are not likely to be significant contributors to both Ca2+ homeostasis and cell physiology in general. To this end we used a cell line with an abnormally low basal [Ca2+]i to facilitate the detection of the impact of cyt-MIPP on [Ca2+]i. Our experiments have demonstrated that not only can cyt-MIPP generate Ins(1,4,5)P3 in an intact cell, but when that cell has an abnormally low basal [Ca2+]i, cyt-MIPP transfection can restore the [Ca2+]i to normal levels. What was more unexpected and exciting was that cyt-MIPP expression resulted in a dramatically enhanced Ca2+ response to glucose, a principal stimulus of [Ca2+]i elevation in -cells. The new insights gained from these observations confirm that cyt-MIPP has the potential to be an important tool in the investigations of the role of Ins(1,4,5)P3 in [Ca2+]i homeostasis. We will now discuss the implications and possible mechanisms for these changes in more detail. Cyt-MIPP Degrades Higher Inositol Polyphosphates to Ins(1,4,5)P3 and Other Downstream ProductsThe expected primary consequence of cyt-MIPP-transfection would be the depletion of its principal substrates, in this case Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6. In this respect, the 25% reduction in both Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6 in cyt-MIPP-expressing cells is therefore not surprising. Because about one-third of the cells were transfected the impact in an individual cell would be considerably greater than this. These data are also consistent with the one other published report (19) documenting the expression of a cytosolic version of MIPP. In this latter case, an even greater reduction in Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6 was observed (57 and 40%, respectively; see Ref. 19). This difference is likely to be a reflection of the different levels of expression of cyt-MIPP in the two cell systems.
Fig. 2 illustrates the possible impact of cyt-MIPP expression on inositol phosphate biochemistry. In contrast to the current study, the previous report documenting the impact of cyt-MIPP on Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 and InsP6 (19) did not characterize the downstream products in detail. The principal detected increases in concentration resulting from cyt-MIPP expression are found in the InsP3 and inositol tetrakisphosphate regions of the chromatogram, namely, Ins(1,2,3)P3, D/L-Ins(1,4,6)P3, Ins(1,4,5)P3, and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4. Ins(1,2,3)P3 is a downstream product of InsP6 dephosphorylation in mammalian cells (16). D/L-Ins(1,4,6)P3 is a putative inositol 1,3,4,6-tetratrisphosphate metabolite (see Fig. 2 and Ref. 27). Both inositol 1,3,4,6-tetratrisphosphate and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 can be derived by the action of MIPP on Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 (see Fig. 2 and Ref. 7). However, Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 can also be produced by the action of the Ca2+-activated Ins(1,4,5)P3 3'-kinase on Ins(1,4,5)P3 (Fig. 2). It is worth reinforcing at this time that the relatively small increase in Ins(1,4,5)P3 (
The usefulness of cyt-MIPP as a tool is dependent on whether other products of MIPP activation, besides Ins(1,4,5)P3, have an impact on cell Ca2+ homeostasis or on general cellular physiology. However, at the outset it is important to note that these other inositol polyphosphates exist at low concentrations, and their increase upon MIPP expression is relatively small. The inositol polyphosphates with detectable increases that also may impact on Ca2+ handling are D/L-Ins(1,4,6)P3 (28, 29) and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (30, 31). D/L-Ins(1,4,6)P3 is a partial agonist of the Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor with the D-isoform being the most potent and thus relevant enantiomer (29). We estimate the increase in this mixed peak in a single transfected cells to be maximally 0.17 µM over basal concentrations, in contrast to an increase in Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration of 0.7 µM over basal concentrations. The combination of the 4-fold higher concentration of Ins(1,4,5)P3 allied with the 380-fold lower potency of D-Ins(1,4,6)P3 (28, 29), dependent on Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptor subtype (29), suggests that the contribution of D-Ins(1,4,6)P3 will be negligible, especially in cells in which the type 2 or type 3 receptors dominate (29), which includes These data indicate for the first time that Ins(1,4,5)P3 can be generated in the intact cell following cyt-MIPP expression. The fact that Ins(1,4,5)P3 can be derived from higher inositol polyphosphates, principally Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5, has previously only been shown in a non-mammalian cell, Dictyostelium (7, 8), although the identity of the enzyme responsible remains unknown. Full-length MIPP is confined in the ER in a number of cell types (9, 19) and thus separated from its principal substrates. However, studies on human erythrocytes have suggested that MIPP activity is associated with the inner leaflet of plasma membranes and thus with easy access to its principal substrates (12). This suggests that, in at least some mammalian cells, a pathway exists that makes the generation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 independent of lipid breakdown a real physiological possibility. Impact of cyt-MIPP Expression on [Ca2+]i Homeostasis in HIT M2.2.2 CellsGiven that Ins(1,4,5)P3 (1) was generated in the intact cell we next wanted to know whether production of Ins(1,4,5)P3 in this manner could affect [Ca2+]i. In choosing the HIT M2.2.2 cell with its abnormally low [Ca2+]i, we hoped to maximize our ability to detect the impact of cyt-MIPP expression on basal [Ca2+]i. We studied [Ca2+]i by loading mock- and cyt-MIPP-transfected cells with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fura-2. We identified transfected cells by co-transfection with DsRed, and thus the [Ca2+]i measurements were restricted to cells expressing cyt-MIPP or mock-transfected controls. Therefore, the magnitude of the response was not diluted by untransfected cells, unlike the Ins(1,4,5)P3 and other inositol polyphosphate data. There were two critical changes rendered by cyt-MIPP expression on [Ca2+]i. The first was a rise in [Ca2+]i under basal conditions. The second was the enhancement of a glucose-induced Ca2+ response. Cyt-MIPP Expression Raises Basal [Ca2+]iIt might seem self-evident that the increased basal concentration of the Ca2+ mobilizing second messenger Ins(1,4,5)P3 would lead to a concomitant rise in [Ca2+]i. However, the literature is more circumspect on this issue (36, 37). This is because a number of contributing factors, in addition to Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration, can play a role in setting basal [Ca2+]i, in particular plasma membrane and ER Ca2+-ATPases and various plasma membrane Ca2+ channels (36). Also, the mechanism of Ins(1,4,5)P3 action is normally associated with an acute rise and fall in [Ca2+]i, characteristic of its second messenger function (1). Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that this is the third study that we are aware of that has correlated Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration or Ins(1,4,5)P3-sensitive Ca2+ stores with the steady state basal [Ca2+]i. The first approach to chronically raising Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration was achieved by an antisense knockdown of the principal degradatory enzyme of Ins(1,4,5)P3, the Ins(1,4,5)P3/Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 5-phosphatase (3335). The authors recorded both chronically raised Ins(1,4,5)P3 and a concomitantly increased basal [Ca2+]i (33). The elevated level of [Ca2+]i found in the cells with reduced Ins(1,4,5)P3/Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 5-phosphatase activity was still largely maintained in the absence of extracellular Ca2+ (33). This suggests that the increased [Ca2+]i was being maintained by the components of the intracellular Ca2+ handling apparatus. The second study relates to an examination of kidney glomerula cells from mice with the Ins(1,4,5)P3 type 1 receptor knocked out and with no compensatory change in other types of Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptors (37). In this study the basal [Ca2+]i was significantly lower in the knock-out mouse cells than that of the controls, again implying that Ins(1,4,5)P3 gated stores influence basal [Ca2+]i. In all three cases and particularly the knock-out mouse, what we are observing is the result of chronic changes that could have been implemented by some longer term adaptive responses in [Ca2+]i homeostasis. However, we believe the simplest explanation is that basal Ins(1,4,5)P3 can set basal [Ca2+]i. Evident from all three studies is that the relationship between basal Ins(1,4,5)P3 and basal [Ca2+]i must be given a greater weight in the future modeling of basal [Ca2+]i homeostasis in mammalian cells in general.
Cyt-MIPP Expression Enhances Stimulus-induced Increases in [Ca2+]iThe second area of impact of cyt-MIPP expression was to considerably enhance the glucose-stimulated [Ca2+]i rise in the previously rather unresponsive HIT M2.2.2 cells. In normal
Increased basal Ca2+ can enhance L-type Ca2+ channel activity via the increased stimulation of Ca2+-calmodulin-sensitive adenylate cyclases present in
In normal insulin-secreting One other important final element needs to be integrated into this model. The fact that both the omission of extracellular Ca2+ (Fig. 4C) and the application of 2-APB (an inhibitor of capacitative Ca2+ entry (Fig. 6A) (see above)) can completely block the response, suggests that store-operated Ca2+ entry plays an important role (24). Hence, the apparent depletion of the intracellular stores in cyt-MIPP-expressing cells (Fig. 7) may act to enhance capacitative Ca2+ entry as the stores will require less Ca2+ released from them to reach the threshold needed for store-operated Ca2+ influx to be activated. In short, we hypothesize that the primary consequence of the raised basal [Ca2+]i is to prime the RYR to Ca2+. The RYR can then be activated by glucose metabolism and the glucose-induced increase in [Ca2+]i coming largely from Ins(1,4,5)P3-sensitive stores.
We have shown that expression of cyt-MIPP can raise Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration in an insulin-secreting cell, without a significant contribution of other cyt-MIPP side products. The raised Ins(1,4,5)P3 has an impact on basal [Ca2+]i, raising a previously low [Ca2+]i to a more physiological basal concentration. This increase in basal [Ca2+]i is mechanistically linked to the dramatically enhanced glucose-stimulated [Ca2+]i seen following cyt-MIPP expression. These data support the use of cyt-MIPP as an important tool in investigating Ins(1,4,5)P3-dependent Ca2+ homeostasis and the idea of a close link between basal Ins(1,4,5)P3 concentration and basal [Ca2+]i, the latter being an important modulator of Ca2+ signaling in the pancreatic
* This work was supported by grants from Karolinska Institutet, Novo Nordisk Foundation, the National Institutes of Health (DK-58508), the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Diabetes Association, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, Åke Wibergs Foundation, and Berth von Kantzow's Foundation. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 46-8-517-79454; Fax: 46-8-517-79450; E-mail: chris.barker{at}molmed.ki.se.
1 abbreviations used are: Ins(1,4,5)P3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; PtdIns(4,5)P2/PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; Ins (1,3,4,5,6)P5, inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentaphosphate; MIPP, multiple inositol polyphosphate phosphatase; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; RYR, ryanodine receptor; CICR, Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, inositol 1,3,4,5-tetraphosphate; InsP, inositol phosphate; GFP, green fluorescent protein; EGFP, enhanced GFP; Ins(1,2,3)P3, inositol 1,2,3-trisphosphate; D/L-Ins (1,4,6)P3, D/L-inositol 1,4,6-trisphosphate; InsP6, inositol hexakisphosphate; InsP3, inositol triphosphate; RY, ryanodine; 2-APB, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl-borate; Tg, thapsigargin.
We thank Dr. T. Moede for help with Ca2+ imaging and Drs. M. S. Islam and S. R. James for useful discussions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||