HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 7, 4747-4755, February 14, 2003

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 278/7/4747    most recent M210229200v1 Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bollan, K. Articles by Connolly, C. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bollan, K. Articles by Connolly, C. N. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

GABA_A Receptor Composition Is Determined by Distinct Assembly Signals within  and  Subunits^*

Karen Bollan, Dale King, Laura A. Robertson, Kenneth Brown, Pamela M. Taylor^§, Stephen J. Moss^§, and Christopher N. Connolly^¶

From the  Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Ninewells Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland and ^§ Medical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, Gordon St., London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

Received for publication, October 7, 2002, and in revised form, December 4, 2002

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Key to understanding how receptor diversity is achieved and controlled is the identification of selective assembly signals capable of distinguishing between other subunit partners. We have identified that the 1-3 subunits exhibit distinct assembly capabilities with the 2L subunit. Similarly, analysis of an assembly box in 1-(57-68) has revealed an absolute requirement for this region in the assembly of receptors. Furthermore, a selective requirement for a single amino acid (Arg-66), previously shown to be essential for the formation of the low affinity GABA binding site, is observed. This residue is critical for the assembly of 12 but not 11 or 13 receptors. We have confirmed the ability of the previously identified GKER signal in 3 to direct the assembly of receptors. The GKER signal is also involved in driving assembly with the 1 subunit, conferring the ability to assemble with 1^R66A on the 2 subunit. Although this signal is sufficient to permit the formation of 22 receptors, it is not necessary for 32 receptor formation, suggesting the existence of alternative assembly signals. These findings support the belief that GABA_A receptor assembly occurs via defined pathways to limit the receptor diversity.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

-Aminobutyric acid, type A (GABA_A)¹ receptors are the major sites of fast synaptic inhibition in the brain. In mammals, they are constructed as pentameric structures from multiple subunits selected predominantly from the following distinct classes:  (1-6),  (1-3),  (1-3), , , , and , creating an incredible (16⁵) potential for structural diversity.

However, relatively few functionally distinct receptor compositions are thought to exist in vivo (1). It is possible that multiple receptor types may exist that are functionally equivalent. Their distinct subunit compositions may provide subtle functions such as modulation by endogenous ligands such as neurosteroids (2) or second messenger systems (3, 4), subcellular localization (5), or long term differences in the regulation of receptor surface expression (6, 7). Despite these caveats, GABA_A receptor heterogeneity occurs via defined pathways to limit receptor diversity (3, 6). Possible mechanisms include brain region-specific (8) and temporal expression (9). However, many neuron types often express multiple receptor subunit mRNAs simultaneously (8), suggesting that subcellular mechanisms for differential receptor assembly may also exist. Potential processes could include the discrete sites of subcellular receptor assembly (10, 11) and/or the presence of assembly signals capable of differential interaction with other subunits.

In support of the existence of differential assembly signals, GABA_A receptor assembly appears to be strictly controlled, producing receptors with a fixed stoichiometry of 2, 2, and 1 (12-17). Furthermore, GABA_A receptor assembly signals have been identified in the 1 (18, 19), 2/3 (19, 20), and 3 (21) subunits. Although the regions identified in these studies may exhibit subunit class-specific interactions, to date no studies have investigated the ability of GABA_A receptors to discriminate between subunits of the same class.

Consistent with the location of these assembly signals to intersubunit contact points, the / signals (18, 19, 21) are located proximal to the GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites (22, 23) formed at subunit interfaces between the - and subunits, respectively, and also the 2 high affinity GABA site (24). Similarly, the homologous region in 1 is an important component of the GABA binding domain (25).

Given the high degree of homology between the  and  subunits in this region combined with their differential ability to assemble with  subunits (1 with 1-3, 2 with 3, possibly 1, but not 2) (20), we sought to investigate the role of these sequences in the differential assembly of / subunits with  subunits. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we have determined that the conversion of a single amino acid in 1 to that of 2 (R66A) is sufficient to alter the assembly profile of the 1 subunit to that of the 2, as determined by immunofluorescence and cell surface ELISA. These results demonstrate that the identity of a single amino acid may be critical in determining assembly with particular receptor subunits and may identify a basis for subunit-specific GABA_A receptor assembly. Furthermore, we present evidence for the existence of alternative assembly signals, which may permit the formation of diverse receptor types, dependent upon subunit availability.

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Cell Culture and Transfection-- COS 7 cells (ATCC CRL 1651) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 units/ml penicillin in an atmosphere of 5% CO₂. Exponentially growing cells were transfected by electroporation (400 V, infinity resistance, 125 microfarads, Bio-Rad Gene Electropulser II). 10 µg of DNA was used per transfection (2 × 10⁶ cells) using equimolar ratios of expression constructs. Cells were analyzed 12-48 h after transfection.

DNA Constructions-- Murine 1, 1-3, and 2L subunit cDNAs containing either the Myc or FLAG epitope tags (between amino acids 4 and 5 of the mature polypeptide) have been described previously and shown to be functionally silent with respect to receptor pharmacology and physiology (5, 18, 20, 26). The mutant constructs 1S, 1(1), 2^GKER, and 3^DNTK were generated by site-directed mutagenesis as reported previously (18, 20). The remaining mutant 1/2 constructs were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the oligonucleotides: 1⁽²⁾, 5'-CATCCTTCCAAGTTTGAGCGAAAAAAATATCTATTGTATACTC-3'; 1^(R-A), 5'-CTTCCAACTTTGAGCGAAAAACACATC-3'; 2⁽¹⁾, 5'-TGTCATACCAGGATTGGCGAAAAAAAACATCAATTGTATATTC-3', 2^(A-R), 5'-CATACCAGGTTTGGCGAAAAAAAATATC-3'. The fidelity of the final expression constructs was verified by DNA sequencing.

Antibodies-- The 9E10 antibody was obtained from 9E10 hybridoma cells (27) and used directly as supernatant without purification. The secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568 and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488, were purchased from Molecular Probes and goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxide was from Amersham Biosciences.

Immunofluorescence-- COS7 cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde (in PBS), washed twice in 50 mM NH₄Cl (in PBS), and blocked (10% fetal bovine serum, 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS) for 30 min. Subsequent washes and antibody dilutions were performed in PBS containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.5% bovine serum albumin. After surface immunofluorescence cells were permeabilized by the addition of 0.5% Triton X-100 (10 min), and the immunofluorescence protocol was repeated from the NH₄Cl step. Cells were examined using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM510).

Quantification of Cell Surface Expression-- COS7 cells were plated onto 3-cm wells of a 6-well dish. Two transfections were pooled and used to seed 6 wells ("surface" and "total" in triplicate). Cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde (in PBS). Cell surface detection was performed in the absence of detergent, and total expression levels were determined following Triton X-100 (0.5%, 15 min) treatment. Cells were washed twice in 50 mM NH₄Cl (in PBS) and blocked (5% fat-free powdered milk (Marvel), 10% fetal bovine serum , 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS) for 1 h. Subsequent washes were performed in block. Receptor expression was determined using a horseradish peroxide-conjugated secondary antibody and assayed using 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma) as the substrate, with detection at 450 nm after 30 min, after the addition of 0.5 M H₂SO₄. The reaction rate was determined to remain linear for up to 1 h (results not shown).

Immunoprecipitation-- Cells were L-methionine-starved for 30 min before labeling with [³⁵S]methionine (0.5 mCi/10-cm dish, Translabel ICN/Flow) for 4 h. Cells were lysed in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 50 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml antipain, 10 µg/ml pepstatin, 0.1 mg/ml aprotinin, and 2% Triton X-100 (lysis buffer). Post-nuclear supernatants were preabsorbed with protein A-Sepharose and immunoprecipitated with 200 µl of 9E10 supernatant in the presence of protein A-Sepharose. Pellets were washed in lysis buffer (containing 0.5% deoxycholate and 0.2% SDS) and centrifuged through a 30% sucrose cushion followed by 3 additional washes in buffer supplemented with 0.5 M NaCl and a final wash without NaCl. Pellets were then resuspended in reducing sample buffer (2% SDS, 5% -mercaptoethanol in 0.68 M Tris, pH 6.8) and analyzed by 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Previous studies have revealed that the subunits of the most commonly expressed GABA_A receptor (122) cannot reach the cell surface when expressed alone nor when 12L or 22L combinations are co-expressed. Only when 12 or 122L subunits are co-expressed are functional cell surface receptors produced (5). Non-productive subunit monomers or 12L or 22L dimers are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by interactions with BiP or calnexin.

Receptor Homology within the Region of a Putative Assembly Signal-- Recently, a putative assembly signal within the 1 and 6 subunits (see 6S, Fig. 1A) was identified as being required for assembly and cell surface expression with 3 (18). This region exhibits homology between all the GABA_A receptor subunits (Fig. 1). The highest homology exists within subunit classes ( values = 63.2%,  values = 78.9%, and  values = 71.1%), whereas homology between the subunit classes (including  and ) is 26.3%. Within this region, both the glutamine (Gln-67) and the tryptophan (Trp-69) have been shown to be essential for assembly (18, 28). However, the glutamine is completely conserved among all GABA_A receptors, and the tryptophan is completely conserved among all members of the ligand-gated ion channel superfamily, indicating a general role in subunit architecture or folding.

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Sequence alignment of GABAA receptor subunits between amino acids 57 and 94 (1 mouse numbering). Sequence alignments over this region of  (A),  (B), and  (C) subunits are shown. Consensus sequences are shown for each individual subunit class. An overall consensus sequence is shown for , , and  subunits (D) along with the sequences of  and  subunits. The amino acid underlined (in bold) identifies a single residue completely conserved within each subunit class but absent from all other subunits. Completely conserved tryptophans (in all members of the ligand-gated superfamily) are illustrated in bold.

To implicate residues that may be involved in subunit class-specific assembly of GABA_A receptors, we examined the sequences in this region to identify residues completely conserved within a subunit class but absent from the other subunit classes. Surprisingly, despite the high degree of homology evident, only one residue (Arg-66 in 1) fits this criterion. At this position, an arginine (s), glutamine (s), or alanine (s), is always present (histidine in , serine in ). Interestingly, this residue in 1 has been shown to be critical for GABA binding (22).

To assess the role of this region in GABA_A receptor assembly we investigated 1/2 subunit chimeras and mutants for their ability to assemble with the  subunits. The constructs used are 1^myc, 1S^myc (lacking residues 57-68), 1^(2)myc (residues 57-68 replaced with the homologous residues from 2), 1^(R-A)myc (arginine at position 66 mutated to alanine), 2L^myc, 2L^(1)myc (residues replaced with homologous residues from 1), and 2L^(A-R)myc. Subunit detection was performed using 9E10 antibodies that recognize the Myc epitope present in all the 1/2L subunits. All  subunits used were epitope-tagged with the FLAG epitope. When expressed alone, all the above 1/2L subunits do not reach the cell surface but are retained within the ER (5) (results not shown). Thus, we measure the ability of the 1/2L subunits to be rescued from the ER and expressed on the surface as heteromeric receptors with  subunits.

Cell Surface Expression of 1/2 Subunits with 2-- COS7 cells were transfected with /^myc2^FLAG, and immunofluorescence was performed using 9E10 antibodies. As shown previously (5, 26), 1 and 2 subunits are able to assemble and form heteromeric receptors on the cell surface (Fig. 2A). Consistent with the presence of an assembly signal existing between residues 57 and 68 of the 1 subunit, 1S (lacking this region) cannot reach the cell surface despite the presence of the 2 subunit. The 1S is retained within the ER, as evidenced by the classic reticular staining pattern observed (Fig. 2A). To address the possibility that this subunit might misfold, we examined an 1⁽¹⁾ chimera in which residues 57-68 in the 1 were replaced with the homologous residues from GABA_C receptor 1 subunit (18). Given the expected structural similarities between 1 and GABA_A receptor subunits combined with the recent observation that this region in 1 also contributes to the GABA binding site (25), this chimera would be less likely to misfold. In keeping with the inability of the 1 subunit to assemble with the GABA_A receptor  subunits (29, 30), coexpression of 1⁽¹⁾ with 2 did not lead to cell surface expression (results not shown).

View larger version (45K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Surface expression of 2 recombinant GABAA receptors requires the presence of the 1 subunit. COS 7 cells coexpressing 2FLAG with either 1myc, 1Smyc, 2Lmyc, 1(2)myc, 1(R-A)myc, 2L(1)myc, or 2(A-R)myc were examined by immunofluorescence (A) for the presence of the Myc-tagged subunits at the surface and intracellularly. Quantification of surface expression levels (B) were performed by cell ELISA in the absence (Surface) or presence (total) of detergent and normalized to 1 levels. COS 7 cells were coexpressing 2FLAG with either 1myc (lane 1), 1Smyc (lane 2), 2Lmyc (lane 3), 1(2)myc (lane 4), 1(R-A)myc (lane 5), 2L(1)myc (lane 6), or 2(A-R)myc (lane 7). Each recording represents the mean ± S.E. of at least nine determinants in at least three independent experiments. Results are significantly different from 1 control (p < 0.001, t test).

Receptors composed of 22 do not access the cell surface but are retained in the ER (5) (Fig. 2). Therefore, we assessed the ability of 1⁽²⁾ to assemble with 2. Consistent with a role for 1 residues 57-68 in assembly with 2, cell surface expression of 1⁽²⁾ is abolished.

Given the critical role of arginine at position 66 of 1 in GABA binding (22) and the complete conservation of this position within all subunit classes (Fig. 1), we mutated this arginine (in 1) to the corresponding residue (alanine) in 2 creating 1^(R-A). This mutation completely abolished the ability of 1 to assemble with 2.

To determine whether this putative 1 assembly signal might be transplanted into the 2 subunit, we generated a 2L⁽¹⁾ construct containing the residues 57-68 from 1 in place of the homologous 2 sequence. When expressed with 2, 2L⁽¹⁾ is still incapable of assembling with 2 (Fig. 2A). Thus, although the 1 region 57-68 is essential for the assembly of 1 and 2 and critically dependent upon an arginine at position 66, this region is insufficient to direct this assembly event. This is corroborated by the 2L^(A-R) construct, which cannot assemble with 2.

Quantification of these observations was performed by whole cell ELISA to determine receptor cell surface expression (no detergent) versus total (detergent) receptor expression. The values presented here do not reflect a true percentage of surface-expressed receptors for two reasons; first, the 12 values have been normalized to 100% and, second, surface values greater than 100% have been detected for 3 homomers (results not shown), suggesting a possible inhibitory influence of prior detergent treatment on this assay. In these experiments (Fig. 2B, Table I) it can be seen clearly that the assembly of 2 with 1 requires residues 57-68 of 1 (1S = 0.9 ± 1.3%), most notably an arginine at position 66 (1^(R-A) = 5.0 ± 4.3%). In agreement with the results observed by immunofluorescence, although this region is critically involved in assembly with 2, transplantation of this signal to 2 does not confer the ability to assemble with 2 (1⁽²⁾ = 3.7 ± 3.1%).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table I Summary of cell surface expression for mutant GABAA receptors Values are obtained from Fig. 2-6 and are expressed as the percentage cell surface expression relative to 1 (normalized to 100%) ± S.E.

Cell Surface Expression of 1/2 Subunits with 1-- COS7 cells were transfected with /^myc1^FLAG, and immunofluorescence was performed using 9E10 antibodies. As shown previously (26) 1 and 1 subunits are able to assemble and form heteromeric receptors on the cell surface (Fig. 3). Consistent with the presence of an assembly signal existing between residues 57-68 of the 1 subunit, 1S cannot reach the cell surface despite the presence of the 1 subunit (2.7 ± 3.1%). Similar results were observed for the 1⁽¹⁾ (results not shown).

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   Surface expression of 1 recombinant GABAA receptors requires the presence of the 1 subunit. COS 7 cells coexpressing 1FLAG with either 1myc, 1Smyc, 2Lmyc, 1(2)myc, 1(R-A)myc, 2L(1)myc, or 2(A-R)myc were examined by immunofluorescence (A) for the presence of the Myc-tagged subunits at the surface and intracellularly. Quantification of surface expression levels (B) were performed by cell ELISA in the absence (Surface) or presence (total) of detergent and normalized to 1 levels. COS 7 cells were coexpressing 1FLAG with either 1myc (lane 1), 1Smyc (lane 2), 2Lmyc (lane 3), 1(2)myc (lane 4), 1(R-A)myc (lane 5), 2L(1)myc (lane 6), or 2(A-R)myc (lane 7). Each recording represents the mean ± S.E. of at least nine determinants in at least three independent experiments. *, denotes significant difference from 1 control (p < 0.001, t test).

In this study, we could detect only very low levels of 2L1 surface receptors by immunofluorescence (Fig. 3A) that could not be resolved from background (mock-transfected cells) when analyzed quantitatively (10.2 ± 11.8%, Fig. 3B). To determine whether the robust surface expression observed upon 11 expression results from the use of the 1 57-68 assembly signal, we assessed the ability of 1⁽²⁾ to assemble with 1. In contrast to the results observed with the 2 subunit, cell surface expression of 1⁽²⁾ is not significantly different (108.6 ± 23.4%) from that observed for wild-type 1 (100 ± 7.6%) but higher than that observed for the wild-type 2L (10.2 ± 11.8%). These findings suggest that, in contrast to the 2 subunit, the 1 subunit does not exhibit the same requirements for this region of the 1 for the assembly of 11 heteromeric receptors. This possibility is corroborated by the efficient assembly of 1 with 1^(R-A) (83.9 ± 16.1%, Fig. 3). However, this region is still essential for 11 receptor assembly, as evidenced by the inability of 1S (Fig. 3) and 1⁽¹⁾ (results not shown) to assemble with 1. Both of the 2 mutants (2⁽¹⁾ and 2^(A-R)) were indistinguishable from the wild-type 2L with respect to cell surface expression with 1, i.e. weak surface immunofluorescence and non-detectable surface levels by ELISA (Fig. 3).

Cell Surface Expression of 1/2 Subunits with 3-- COS7 cells were transfected with /^myc3^FLAG, and immunofluorescence was performed using 9E10 antibodies. As shown previously (26) 1 and 3 subunits are able to assemble and form heteromeric receptors on the cell surface (Fig. 3). Consistent with the presence of an assembly signal existing between residues 57 and 68 of the 1 subunit, 1S cannot reach the cell surface (3.5 ± 3.6%) despite the presence of the 3 subunit. Similar results were observed for the 1⁽¹⁾ (results not shown).

Receptors composed of 32 have been reported to be capable of forming functional cell surface receptors (18). In this study, we observed robust surface expression by immunofluorescence (Fig. 4A) and ELISA (54.7 ± 19.7%, Fig. 4B). We assessed the ability of 1⁽²⁾ to assemble with 3. As observed with the 1 subunit, 1⁽²⁾ is capable of assembling with 3 and even exhibits enhanced levels of surface expression (163 ± 21.9%, p < 0.02, t test) compared with 1 (100 ± 10.5%) or 2L (54.7 ± 19.7%). These findings suggest that, like the 1 subunit but in contrast to the 2 subunit, 3 does not require this region of the 1 for the assembly of 13 heteromeric receptors. This possibility is corroborated by the efficient assembly of 3 with 1^(R-A) (81.2 ± 9.2%, Fig. 4). Both of the 2 mutants (2⁽¹⁾ and 2^(A-R)) were indistinguishable from the wild-type 2L with respect to cell surface expression with 3, i.e. strong surface immunofluorescence and detectable surface levels by ELISA (Fig. 4, 2L⁽¹⁾ = 50.9 ± 16.2% and 2L^(A-R) = 85 ± 23.3%).

View larger version (62K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Surface expression of 3 recombinant GABAA receptors requires the presence of the 1 subunit. COS 7 cells coexpressing 3FLAG with either 1myc, 1Smyc, 2Lmyc, 1(2)myc, 1(R-A)myc, 2L(1)myc, or 2(A-R)myc were examined by immunofluorescence (A) for the presence of the Myc-tagged subunits at the surface and intracellularly. Quantification of surface expression levels (B) were performed by cell ELISA in the absence (Surface) or presence (total) of detergent and normalized to 1 levels. COS 7 cells coexpress 3FLAG with either 1myc (lane 1), 1Smyc (lane 2), 2Lmyc (lane 3), 1(2)myc (lane 4), 1(R-A)myc (lane 5), 2L(1)myc (lane 6) or 2(A-R)myc (lane 7). Each recording represents the mean ± S.E. of at least nine determinants in at least three independent experiments. *, denotes significant difference from 1 control (*, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05 t test).

Interestingly, the 3 subunit (20, 31) and to a lesser extent the 1 subunit (32, 33) can form functional homomeric ion channels (not GABA-gated), whereas the 2 subunit is incapable of exiting the ER (5). A four-amino acid signal (GKER) that controls 3 homooligomerization has been identified (20). When transferred to 2 (2^GKER), this subunit is capable of cell surface expression as functional ion channels. The reciprocal construct (3^DNTK) can no longer assemble into homomeric receptors but is retained in the ER (20). To determine whether the assembly signal identified in the 1 may also recognize the homomeric assembly signal present in the 3 subunit, we analyzed the assembly of 1/2 subunits with the 2^GKER and 3^DNTK subunits.

Cell Surface Expression of 1/2 Subunits with 2-- COS7 cells were transfected with /^myc2^GKER(FLAG), and immunofluorescence was performed using 9E10 antibodies. As expected, 1 and 2^GKER subunits are able to assemble and form heteromeric receptors on the cell surface (Fig. 5). Again, 1S cannot reach the cell surface (9.7 ± 6.9%) despite the presence of the 2^GKER subunit. Similar results were observed for the 1⁽¹⁾ (results not shown). In contrast to the ER retention of 22L complexes (5) (3.0 ± 3.0% surface expression, Fig. 2), when 2^GKER and 2L are coexpressed, cell surface (74.3 ± 19.9%) receptors are produced (Fig. 5). Furthermore, surface expression with 1⁽²⁾ was increased for 2^GKER (118.6 ± 21.9%) compared with 2 (10.2 ± 10%). More striking is the ability of the 1^(R-A) to assemble with 2^GKER and reach the cell surface (90.1 ± 24.3%) compared with 2 (5.0 ± 4.3%). Analysis of the 2 mutants reveals that the 2L⁽¹⁾ and the 2L^(A-R) are also expressed on the cell surface at significant levels (55.8 ± 26.0% and 31.3 ± 9.9%) comparable with those observed for 3 (50.9 ± 16.2% and 85 ± 23.3%, respectively), not 2 (3.7 ± 3.1% and 7.5 ± 6.0%, respectively). The results with the 2^GKER construct identifies the 3 homomeric assembly signal as capable of conferring 3-like assembly characteristics to the 2 subunit and suggests that, although 3 requires the presence of 1 signal, the homomeric assembly signal in 3 does not depend critically upon the identity of the sequence between 57-68 of the 1 and is capable of assembling with both 1 or 2L.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5.   Surface expression of 2GKER recombinant GABAA receptors requires the presence of the 1 subunit. COS 7 cells coexpressing 2GKER/FLAG with either 1myc, 1Smyc, 2Lmyc, 1(2)myc, 1(R-A)myc, 2L(1)myc, or 2(A-R)myc were examined by immunofluorescence (A) for the presence of the Myc-tagged subunits at the surface and intracellularly. Quantification of surface expression levels (B) was performed by cell ELISA in the absence (Surface) or presence (total) of detergent and normalized to 1 levels. COS 7 cells coexpressing 2GKER/FLAG with either 1myc (lane 1), 1Smyc (lane 2), 2Lmyc (lane 3), 1(2)myc (lane 4), 1(R-A)myc (lane 5), 2L(1)myc (lane 6), or 2(A-R)myc (lane 7). Each recording represents the mean ± S.E. of at least nine determinants in at least three independent experiments. *, denotes significant difference from 1 control (p < 0.001, t test).

Cell Surface Expression of 1/2 Subunits with 3^DNTK-- COS7 cells were transfected with /^myc3^DNTK(FLAG), and immunofluorescence was performed using 9E10 antibodies. As expected, 1 and 3^DNTK subunits are able to assemble and form heteromeric receptors on the cell surface (Fig. 6). Again, 1S cannot reach the cell surface (7.9 ± 5.6%) despite the presence of the 3^DNTK subunit. Similar results were observed for the 1⁽¹⁾ (results not shown). As observed for the 32L receptors (54.7 ± 19.7% surface expression, Fig. 6), when 3^DNTK and 2L are coexpressed, cell surface (26.8 ± 11.5%) receptors are produced (Fig. 6). Furthermore, surface expression of 1⁽²⁾ with 3^DNTK occurred at significant levels (99.6 ± 5.8%). In addition, the ability of the 1^(R-A) to assemble with 3^DNTK and reach the cell surface (61.6 ± 13.2%) compared with 3 (81.2 ± 9.2%) was unaffected. Analysis of the 2 mutants reveals that the 2L⁽¹⁾ and the 2L^(A-R) are expressed on the cell surface at significant levels (38.3 ± 20.5 and 24.7 ± 13.2%), comparable with those observed for 3 (50.9 ± 16.2 and 85 ± 23.3%, respectively) but not 2 (3.7 ± 3.1% and 7.5 ± 6.0, respectively). Although the values obtained for the assembly of 3^DNTK are consistently lower than that observed for the wild-type 3, the differences are not statistically significant, with the exception of 1⁽²⁾ and 2^(A-R) (p < 0.005, t test). Paradoxically, results observed for 3^DNTK suggests that the 3 homomeric assembly signal is not an essential requirement for the assembly of 3 with either 1 or 2.

View larger version (57K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6.   Surface expression of 3DNTK recombinant GABAA receptors requires the presence of the 1 subunit. COS 7 cells coexpressing 3DNTK/FLAG with either 1myc, 1Smyc, 2Lmyc, 1(2)myc, 1(R-A)myc, 2L(1)myc, or 2(A-R)myc were examined by immunofluorescence (A) for the presence of the Myc-tagged subunits at the surface and intracellularly. Quantification of surface expression levels (B) were performed by cell ELISA in the absence (Surface) or presence (total) of detergent and normalized to 1 levels. COS 7 cells coexpressing 3DNTK/FLAG with either 1myc (lane 1), 1Smyc (lane 2), 2Lmyc (lane 3), 1(2)myc (lane 4), 1(R-A)myc (lane 5), 2L(1)myc (lane 6), or 2(A-R) (lane 7). Each recording represents the mean ± S.E. of at least nine determinants in at least three independent experiments. *, denotes significant difference from 1 control (p < 0.001, t test).

To determine the ability of the 1/2 polypeptides to oligomerize with 2, cDNAs were cotransfected into COS7 cells, [³⁵S]methionine-labeled, and immunoprecipitated via the Myc epitope tag on the 1/2 subunits. Only the extracellular domain of 2 was used to eliminate any contribution from other subunit interactions (34) and events at the cell surface such as receptor turnover (6). Bands corresponding to the 1/2 and 2 extracellular fragments were excised and quantified using a scintillation counter. The ratio of 2 co-immunoprecipitated with the 1/2 subunit was normalized to that of wild-type 1 (39%) such that the ratio (2:1) of 2 co-immunoprecipitated by 1 represents 100%. No significant reduction in binding was evident for any of the 1/2 subunits (Fig. 7). This is not surprising, because each subunit must possess at least two interfaces (and presumably assembly signals) with other subunits (Fig. 8).

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7.   Oligomerization of / subunits with 2. COS 7 cells coexpressing the entire N-terminal extracellular region of 2 (2- extFLAG) with either 1myc, 1Smyc, 2Lmyc, 1(2)myc, 1(R-A)myc, 2L(1)myc, or 2(A-R)myc were labeled with [35S]methionine, immunoprecipitated with antibodies against the Myc epitope (9E10), separated by SDS-PAGE, and examined by autoradiography. Bands representing the / and 2-extFLAG were excised and counted by scintillation. The ratio of /:2 was determined and normalized to that of 1.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8.   Identification and location of putative assembly signals in GABAA receptor subunits. A, putative assembly signals are illustrated for Interface 1 and their opposite interface (Interface 2) shown. 1B may form an interface with either a (a)  or a (b)  subunit. 3B may possess alternative signals capable of interacting with 1A/2A. Two different 2A signals have been identified. <GABA or >GABA represents the low or high affinity GABA binding sites, respectively. 1, Ref. 18. 2, Ref. 39. 3, Ref. 20. 4, Ref. 19. 5, Ref. 21. *, this study. B, arrangement of subunits in an pentameric receptor indicating subunit interfaces and binding sites for GABA (G) and benzodiazepines (Bz). The mirror image of this structure is equally possible (39).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

To date 16 different GABA_A receptor cDNAs have been isolated from a variety of vertebrates (4). Many of these subunits exhibit differing patterns of both spatial and developmental expression in the CNS, with many neurons often expressing multiple numbers of receptor subunits (8, 35). A major challenge in trying to analyze the diversity of GABA_A receptor structure in the brain is determining what processes control receptor assembly. The determination of receptor composition may arise from temporal and spatial regulation, subcellular subunit segregation, and/or differential assembly/stability. Although there is extensive evidence for a role of temporal (9) and spatial (8, 35) regulation of subunit expression in determining receptor composition, these mechanisms cannot explain how receptor diversity is limited in neurons co-expressing multiple GABA_A receptor subunits simultaneously (8, 35). To date, there is no supporting evidence for discrete subcellular assembly sites for GABA_A receptors, although emerging evidence for the localized translation of proteins at synapses (11) may be relevant.

The potential for hierarchical assembly signals is supported by the strict control of receptor stoichiometry (12-17) and the observations that 13 (versus 3 homomers) and 122 (versus 12) receptors form to the exclusion of the other possible combinations (3, 31, 36). In vivo evidence for hierarchical receptor assembly has been provided by the analysis of 6 knockout mice, which determined that the  subunit was concomitantly "knocked-out" by a partial 6 polypeptide product that remains able to associate with the  subunit but cannot produce functional receptors (37).

The discovery of putative GABA_A receptor assembly signals began with the identification of a natural splice variant of 6 that lacked 10 amino acids in the N-terminal extracellular domain (38). This splice variant (termed 6Short) was determined to be incapable of assembling into functional receptors (18, 38). The high degree of homology between all GABA_A receptor subunits within this region suggests a common role in receptor assembly, a possibility vindicated for the 1 (18) (but see Ref. 19) and 3 (21). Putative assembly signals have also been discovered adjacent to this region in 1 (for binding to 2) (39) and 2 (for binding to 1 and 3) (19). Furthermore, two invariant tryptophans within this region have been shown to be essential for GABA_A receptor assembly and benzodiazepine, but not GABA, binding (28). Indeed these tryptophans are completely conserved in all members of the ligand-gated ion channel superfamily and may provide some common structural feature necessary for receptor assembly (28).

Given the similarity between the homologous regions between  (MEYTIDVFFRQSW) and  (MEYTIDIFFAQTW) subunits, we examined the possibility that the sequence differences between these subunit classes might be responsible for the differential ability of the 2 subunit to assemble with 1 and 3 (20, 33), but not 2 (5, 20), whereas the 1 can assemble with all three  subunits (26).

Consistent with previous findings, 1S and 1⁽¹⁾ (18) are not able to assemble with 1-3. In addition, 2L cannot assemble with 2 (20) and only weakly with 1 (Table I) (3). In keeping with the possibility that 1-(57-68) constitutes an assembly signal determining oligomerization with  subunits (18), 1⁽²⁾ is also unable to assemble with 2. In fact, a single site (Arg-66) was found to be critical for the assembly of 12 receptors. However, the failure of 2L⁽¹⁾ to assemble with 2 suggests that this putative assembly signal is necessary but not sufficient to direct this oligomerization step.

Interestingly, a striking overlap between the A site and the GABA binding site (loop D) exists for 12 receptors (22). Boileau et al. (22) showed that residues Phe-64, Arg-66, and Ser-68 were found to be part of (or close to) the GABA binding site, with Phe-64 and Arg-66 critical for modulation by GABA. In keeping with other studies (18, 28), these authors found that Gln-67 and Trp-69 were essential for the production of functional receptors. Moreover, this region is not only important in the 1 subunit contribution to GABA binding, but the high affinity GABA binding site has been shown to be produced by the homologous region in 2 (2A interface to 1) (24). In addition, the benzodiazepine binding site on the 2 subunit resides within the same homologous region, with A79 (homologous position to Arg-66 in 1) lining the benzodiazepine binding pocket (23). A similar overlap between assembly signal and benzodiazepine binding is observed for the opposing interface on the 1 subunit, with residues 74-123 providing the binding site (40) and residues 81-100 (MTVLRLNNLMASKIWTPDTFF, see Fig. 1) involved in oligomerization with 2 (39).

In contrast to the tight correlation between receptor assembly and the formation of the GABA/benzodiazepine binding site in 122 receptors, little overlap exists for the opposing side of this interface, the B site. This side of the interface has been determined to be constructed from 3 distinct regions; loop A between residues 93 and 101, loop B between residues 157 and 160, and loop C between residues 202 and 209 to generate the GABA binding domain on the 2 subunit (41, 42). The residues required for assembly (GDKAVTGVER in 3) fall between loops B and C.

In contrast to the findings for the 2 subunit, although 1, 3, 2^GKER, and 3^DNTK all require the presence of residues 57-68 from either 1 or 2, they do not exhibit the same dependence upon this sequence as 2. The most likely explanation for these results is a general requirement for this region to either induce correct folding or subunit architecture but not to provide an assembly signal. This would be consistent with the role of these sequences in the formation of GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites. Alternatively, assembly signals for 1 and 3 may reside within this region, as for assembly with 2, but be interchangeable between 1 and 2. However, this seems unlikely given that 1 assembles only poorly with 2L, yet robustly with 1(2). Thus, it seems more likely that 1 and 3 utilize unique assembly signals in 1 and 2. This is consistent with previous findings (19) in which assembly signals just downstream from the 1 57-68 region have been identified for 2 binding to 3 (Figs. 1 and 8). However, unlike the 2, 3 does utilize the homologous assembly signal (MEYQIDIFFAQTW) used by 1 (to assemble with 2) to assemble with 3 (21).

A more complex scenario is also possible. Perhaps 1 and 3, but not 2, may possess and utilize alternative assembly signals dependent on availability. In this way GABA_A receptors may form their preferred receptor compositions depending on subunit availability. In other words, a process of hierarchical assembly may operate, as observed previously (3, 31, 36). Such a possibility is supported by the observation that although "GKER" in 3 is sufficient to drive assembly with 1 and 2 (see 2^GKER), it is not necessary to do so (see 3^DNTK). Thus, it seems possible that multiple, alternative assembly signals may exist for GABA_A receptor formation, providing a flexible mechanism for the construction of GABA_A receptors. In such a scenario, a  subunit would be able to select its most desirable companion available without committing itself to just one partner. This is observed in  knockout mice, in which 4 and 6 subunits, normally assembling with the  subunit, are now free to assemble with 2 (35, 43, 44). Thus, the selection of a second choice would not be expected to be possible in the presence of a favorite. This is well illustrated by the fatal attraction suffered for the  subunit in cerebellar granule neurons of 6 knockout mice (37) (that retain the 6 assembly signal), implying a complete devotion of the  subunit for 6 assembly signal within this environment.

In summary, we have identified a single amino acid within the proposed assembly signal of 1 for  subunits that is absolutely required for 12, but not 11 or 13, receptor formation. 1, 2, and 3 exhibit distinct assembly profiles with 1 and 2, utilizing distinct assembly signals in 1/2. We have identified an assembly signal in 3 that is sufficient to drive assembly with both 1 and 2. However, it is not necessary, implicating the presence of multiple assembly signals capable of fulfilling the same function, selecting a subunit with which to assemble.

	FOOTNOTES

^* This work was supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 059321 (to C. N. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

^¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 1382-632527; Fax: 1382-667120; E-mail: c.n.connolly@dundee.ac.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 5, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M210229200

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GABA_A, -aminobutyric acid, type A; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. Bracamontes and J. H. Steinbach Multiple Modes for Conferring Surface Expression of Homomeric {beta}1 GABAA Receptors J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2008; 283(38): 26128 - 26136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Liang, A. Suryanarayanan, A. Abriam, B. Snyder, R. W. Olsen, and I. Spigelman Mechanisms of Reversible GABAA Receptor Plasticity after Ethanol Intoxication J. Neurosci., November 7, 2007; 27(45): 12367 - 12377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Sarto-Jackson, R. Furtmueller, M. Ernst, S. Huck, and W. Sieghart Spontaneous Cross-link of Mutated {alpha}1 Subunits during GABAA Receptor Assembly J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4354 - 4363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Frugier, F. Coussen, M.-F. Giraud, M.-F. Odessa, M. B. Emerit, E. Boue-Grabot, and M. Garret A {gamma}2(R43Q) Mutation, Linked to Epilepsy in Humans, Alters GABAA Receptor Assembly and Modifies Subunit Composition on the Cell Surface J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3819 - 3828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. Hales, T. Z. Deeb, H. Tang, K. A. Bollan, D. P. King, S. J. Johnson, and C. N. Connolly An Asymmetric Contribution to {gamma}-Aminobutyric Type A Receptor Function of a Conserved Lysine within TM2-3 of {alpha}1, beta2, and {gamma}2 Subunits J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2006; 281(25): 17034 - 17043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Gallagher, W. Shen, L. Song, and R. L. Macdonald Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention and Associated Degradation of a GABAA Receptor Epilepsy Mutation That Inserts an Aspartate in the M3 Transmembrane Segment of the {alpha}1 Subunit J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37995 - 38004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Smith, B. Oxley, S. Malpas, G. V. Pillai, and P. B. Simpson Compounds Exhibiting Selective Efficacy for Different {beta} Subunits of Human Recombinant {gamma}-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2004; 311(2): 601 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. I. Ortinski, C. Lu, K. Takagaki, Z. Fu, and S. Vicini Expression of Distinct {alpha} Subunits of GABAA Receptor Regulates Inhibitory Synaptic Strength J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1718 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Bailey and M. Toth Variability in the Benzodiazepine Response of Serotonin 5-HT1A Receptor Null Mice Displaying Anxiety-Like Phenotype: Evidence for Genetic Modifiers in the 5-HT-Mediated Regulation of GABAA Receptors J. Neurosci., July 14, 2004; 24(28): 6343 - 6351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Jin, D. Walther, J. Zhang, C. Rowe-Teeter, and G. K. Fu Serine 171, a Conserved Residue in the {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid Type A (GABAA) Receptor {gamma}2 Subunit, Mediates Subunit Interaction and Cell Surface Localization J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 14179 - 14183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Martinez-Torres and R. Miledi Expression of functional receptors by the human {gamma}-aminobutyric acid A {gamma}2 subunit PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 3220 - 3223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. Boyd, A. I. Doward, E. F. Kirkness, N. S. Millar, and C. N. Connolly Cell Surface Expression of 5-Hydroxytryptamine Type 3 Receptors Is Controlled by an Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention Signal J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2003; 278(30): 27681 - 27687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 278/7/4747    most recent M210229200v1 Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bollan, K. Articles by Connolly, C. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bollan, K. Articles by Connolly, C. N. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?