HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 14, 13393-13401, April 2, 2004

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 279/14/13393    most recent M311502200v1 Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, C. Articles by Matschinsky, F. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, C. Articles by Matschinsky, F. M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

A Signaling Role of Glutamine in Insulin Secretion^*

Changhong Li, Carol Buettger, Jae Kwagh, Andrea Matter, Yevgeny Daikhin¶, Ilana B. Nissim¶, Heather W. Collins, Marc Yudkoff¶, Charles A. Stanley, and Franz M. Matschinsky||

From the Division of Endocrinology, the ^¶Division of Child Development and Pediatric Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Diabetes Center, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Received for publication, October 20, 2003 , and in revised form, January 5, 2004.

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Children with hypoglycemia due to recessive loss of function mutations of the -cell ATP-sensitive potassium (K_ATP) channel can develop hypoglycemia in response to protein feeding. We hypothesized that amino acids might stimulate insulin secretion by unknown mechanisms, because the K_ATP channel-dependent pathway of insulin secretion is defective. We therefore investigated the effects of amino acids on insulin secretion and intracellular calcium in islets from normal and sulfonylurea receptor 1 knockout (SUR1–/–) mice. Even though SUR1–/– mice are euglycemic, their islets are considered a suitable model for studies of the human genetic defect. SUR1–/– islets, but not normal islets, released insulin in response to an amino acid mixture ramp. This response to amino acids was decreased by 60% when glutamine was omitted. Insulin release by SUR1–/– islets was also stimulated by a ramp of glutamine alone. Glutamine was more potent than leucine or dimethyl glutamate. Basal intracellular calcium was elevated in SUR1–/– islets and was increased further by glutamine. In normal islets, methionine sulfoximine, a glutamine synthetase inhibitor, suppressed insulin release in response to a glucose ramp. This inhibition was reversed by glutamine or by 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine, a non-metabolizable glutamine analogue. High glucose doubled glutamine levels of islets. Methionine sulfoximine inhibition of glucose stimulated insulin secretion was associated with accumulation of glutamate and aspartate. We hypothesize that glutamine plays a critical role as a signaling molecule in amino acid- and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, and that -cell depolarization and subsequent intracellular calcium elevation are required for this glutamine effect to occur.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The study of inherited disorders of insulin secretion expands our understanding of metabolism and stimulus secretion coupling in pancreatic -cells. For example, the exploration of glucokinase diseases, which are due to activating or inactivating mutants of -cell glucokinase, has confirmed basic concepts about this enzyme as the sensor for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS)¹ (1, 2). Similarly, the elucidation of a novel hyperinsulinism syndrome associated with mild hyperammonemia and linked to overactivity the glutamate dehydrogenase enzyme (GDH-HI) has led to the identification of a prominent role of glutaminolysis in the regulation of insulin secretion (3, 4, 5). These successful studies in human biochemical genetics of insulin secretion motivated the present investigation to find an explanation for the striking clinical observation that the patients with hyperinsulinism caused by inactivating mutations of the -cell ATP-sensitive potassium channel (K_ATP-HI) (6, 7) exhibit hypoglycemia following a protein meal (6, 8, 9), while the -cell response to glucose is impaired (10). An additional and unexplained observation of relevance in this context is the lack of -cell responsiveness in K_ATP-HI to pharmacological stimulation with leucine (6, 10) that contrasts with the remarkable leucine hypersensitivity of patients with GDH-HI (11).

Sulfonylurea receptor 1 knockout (SUR1–/–) mice were designed to facilitate experimental studies of the human K_ATP-HI syndrome (12, 13). However, SUR1–/– mice do not share the hypoglycemia phenotype of the human K_ATP-HI syndrome. Nevertheless, isolated islets from these animals exhibit all the features expected to result from nonfunctional K_ATP channels, i.e. -cell depolarization and elevation of intracellular calcium (12, 13). Thus, islets from SUR1 knockout mice provide a useful in vitro model to explore the mechanism of protein, i.e. amino acid hypersensitivity, and leucine refractoriness observed in K_ATP-HI. Study of this model also provides an opportunity to extend the understanding of the role of amino acids in modulating physiological glucose-dependent -cell functions (14). In the course of these studies, a prominent role for glutamine was identified in amino acid stimulated insulin secretion (AASIS) and also in GSIS. This glutamine effect emerges to be central for the understanding of fuel stimulated insulin release from the -cell.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Mouse Islets Preparation and Insulin Secretion—SUR1 knockout mice (SUR1–/–) were obtained from Dr. Mark A. Magnuson. The knockout procedure and genotyping were described by Shiota et al. (12). Both SUR1–/– mice and control mice (B6D2H1) were fed a standard rodent chow diet, maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle. Islets were isolated by collagenase digestion and cultured for 3 days in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10 mM glucose. The culture medium was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and the islets were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO₂, 95% air-humidified incubator. Batches of 100 cultured mouse islets were loaded onto a nylon filter in a chamber and perifused with Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (115 mmol/liter NaCl, 24 mmol/liter NaHCO₃, 5 mmol/liter KCl, 1 mmol/liter MgCl₂, 2.5 mmol/liter CaCl₂, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) with 0.25% bovine serum albumin at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. Perifusate solutions were gassed with 95% O₂, 5% CO₂ and maintained at 37 °C. The physiological mixture of 20 amino acids when used at a maximum concentration of 12 mM (about 3 times physiological concentration) had the following composition (in mM): glutamine 2.0, alanine 1.25, arginine 0.53, aspartate 0.11, citrulline 0.27, glutamate 0.35, glycine 0.85, histidine 0.22, isoleucine 0.27, leucine 0.46, lysine 1.06, methionine 0.14, ornithine 0.20, phenylalanine 0.23, proline 1.0, serine 1.62, threonine 0.77, tryptophan 0.21, valine 0.57. Samples were collected every minute for insulin assays. Insulin was measured by radioimmunoassay.

Cytosolic Free Ca²⁺ Measurements—Mouse islets were isolated and cultured on poly-L-lysine coated glass coverslips under the same condition as described above. The perifusion procedure and cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ ([Ca²⁺]_i) measurement were described previously (4). In brief, the coverslip with attached islets was incubated with 15 µM Fura-2 acetoxymethylester (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer with 5 mM glucose for 35 min at 37 °C. Islets were then perifused with Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer with 0.25% bovine serum albumin at 37 °C at a flow rate of 2 ml/min, while various agents were applied. [Ca²⁺]_i was measured with a dual wavelength fluorescence microscope as previously described.

Studies with ¹⁵NH₄Cl—Control mouse islets were cultured with 10 mM glucose for 3–4 days as described above. Batches of 1,000 islets were first preincubated with glucose free Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer for 60 min at 37 °C with or without 1 mM methionine sulfoximine (MSO), an inhibitor of glutamine synthetase (GS). The islets were then incubated 120 min with either 300 µM ¹⁵NH₄Cl (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., Andover, MA) alone as control, or with additional 25 mM glucose or with 25 mM glucose plus 1 mM MSO in accordance with the pretreatment protocol. After 120 min the medium was assayed for total ammonia, amino acids, and insulin. The islets were then washed once with ice-cold glucose-free Hank's buffer, and the cellular amino acids were extracted with 6% perchloric acid. Assays of amino acids and ammonia were performed as described previously (5). The ¹⁵N enrichment of amino acids was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) as described previously (15).

ATP Assays—Control mouse islets were cultured with 10 mM glucose for 3 days. Batches of 100 islets were first preincubated with glucose free Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer for 60 min at 37 °C with or without 1 mM MSO. This pretreatment was followed by 60 min of incubation with 10 mM glucose with or without 1 mM MSO in accordance with the pretreatment protocol. Supernatants were sampled for insulin assays. ATP in the islet homogenate was measured as described previously (5) using an ATP assay kit (Enliten ATP assay kits, Promega).

Western Blot Analysis of GS—Monoclonal anti-mouse GS from rabbit was used as the primary antibody (Sigma) and goat anti-rabbit IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Bio-Rad Laboratories) as a secondary antibody. A total of 25 µg of protein from cultured islets or from -HC9 cells were used for Western blotting.

GS Activity Measurements—Batches of at least 1,000 cultured islets were collected and washed with Hank's buffer. Islets were then homogenized with 0.1 M imidazole-HCl buffer (pH 7.1, containing 0.01 mM EDTA). The homogenate was centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 5 min, and the supernatant was used to determine GS activity by the method of Meister (16). The reaction mixture contained in a final volume of 0.5 ml: 50 mM sodium glutamate, 10 mM ATP, 20 mM MgCl₂, 125 mM hydroxylamine, and 25 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The reaction was initiated by the addition of islet or cell extract, and the assay tube was then incubated for 15 min at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 0.75 ml of FeCl₃ solution (2.5% FeCl₃ in 1.5 N HCl with 5% trichloroacetic acid). After centrifugation at 3,000 x g the absorbance of the supernatant was read at 535 nm. A tube containing 4 mM MSO was considered as blank. One unit of GS activity was defined as 1 µmol of L-glutamate -monohydroxamate formed per minute.

Materials—All chemicals were from Sigma except where indicated otherwise.

Data Analysis—All the data are presented as mean ± S.E. The Student's t test was performed when two groups were compared. One way analysis of variances were used when multiple groups were compared. Differences were considered significant for p < 0.05. To determine the threshold concentration of agents for insulin secretion in ramp perifusion studies, a Student's t test was used to compare the rates of each time point with the baseline insulin secretion rates. The first point that was significantly different from baseline was considered the threshold.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
AASIS of SUR–/– and Control Islets—We studied the molecular basis of pancreatic -cell hypersensitivity to amino acids that had been observed in patients with loss of function mutations of the K_ATP channel by perifusing isolated and cultured islets of SUR1–/– and control mice with an amino acid mixture. As shown in Fig. 1 (panel A), SUR1–/– islets responded to ramp stimulation by a physiological mixture of 20 amino acids (using an increment of 0.04 mM/min for glutamine and 0.2 mM/min for the other amino acids). Baseline insulin secretion in SUR1–/– islets was twice that of control islets. The amino acid mixture increased insulin release nearly 3-fold in SUR1–/– islets, while normal islets were not affected by this stimulus. The threshold concentrations at which amino acids induced insulin secretion in SUR1–/– islets were about 0.5 mM for glutamine and 3 mM for the 19 other amino acids, i.e. close to the physiological concentrations. The presence of 10 mM glucose did not change the response of SUR1–/– islets to the amino acid mixture (data not shown). The effects of the amino acid were also tested in the absence of glutamine, because glutaminolysis is known to increase insulin secretion. Omitting glutamine reduced the effect of the mixture by 60% (Fig. 1, panel A).

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. AASIS by SUR1–/– and control islets. Isolated mouse islets were cultured with 10 mM glucose for 3 days and then perifused with a ramp of a physiological mixture of amino acids (0–12 mM, at 0.04 mM/min for glutamine and 0.2 mM/min for the other 19 amino acids). Control islet perifusions were performed with or without 10 mM glucose stimulation prior to starting the amino acid mixture ramp. Panel A, solid triangles, SUR1–/– islets perifused with all 20 amino acids; open diamonds, normal islets perifused with all 20 amino acids; open triangles, SUR1–/– islets perifused with 19 amino acids (in the absence of glutamine). Panel B, open diamonds, control islets perifused with all 20 amino acids; open circles, control islets perifused with 19 amino acids (in the absence of glutamine). The inset of panel B shows the detailed insulin secretion profile between 30 and 50 min of perifusion. Results are presented as means ± S.E. for 100 islets from 3 to 6 separate perifusions for each condition.

Effects of Glutamine on Insulin Secretion of SUR1–/– and Control Islets—SUR1–/– and control islets showed striking qualitative and quantitative differences in fuel responsiveness (Fig. 2, A–D). SUR1–/–, but not control islets responded to glutamine ramp stimulation (increasing 0.5 mM/min) with a threshold of about 5 mM (Fig. 2A). A glucose ramp (increasing 0.5 mM/min) was totally ineffective in the SUR1–/– islets, but produced the expected stimulation in control islets with a threshold of 5–6 mM (Fig. 2B). A leucine ramp (increasing 0.5 mM/min) superimposed on 2 mM glutamine caused a 10-fold increase of insulin secretion in control islets, but a much less pronounced response in SUR1–/– islets (Fig. 2C). The secretion profile showed an initial dip, i.e. insulin secretion first declined but then recovered back to or slightly above baseline (difference not significant statistically). It is noteworthy that baseline insulin secretion of SUR1–/– islets was elevated in all experiments and that 2 mM glutamine augmented basal insulin release even further (2.3 ± 0.06 versus 1.7 ± 0.07 ng/100 islets/min, p < 0.01), consistent with the results of glutamine ramp stimulation. These observations were interpreted to indicate that the apparent activation of SUR1–/– islets did not reflect increased glutamine metabolism, but was a direct response to glutamine itself. This conclusion is supported by the greatly reduced leucine sensitivity. This interpretation was further strengthened by the results with a dimethyl-glutamate ramp (increasing 0.5 mM/min) as we noted an initial shallow dip of insulin secretion followed by a slight increase over baseline in SUR1–/– islets, but virtually no response in control islets (Fig. 2D). The insulin release profile of dimethyl-glutamate stimulation in SUR1–/– islets was comparable to that seen during leucine stimulation: both showed the "dip" phenomenon, apparently an expression of inhibited secretion. These results with glutamine, complemented by the lack of responsiveness to the other fuels suggested that the remarkable effects of glutamine in SUR1–/– islets were mediated neither by enhanced glutaminolysis nor via increased glutamate. Instead, the effect appeared to be the direct result of a glutamine-induced signal.

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2. Fuel responsiveness of control and SUR1–/– islets. Isolated mouse islets were cultured with 10 mM glucose for 3 days and then perifused with a ramp of glutamine (panel A, 0–25 mM at 0.5 mM/min), a ramp of glucose (panel B, 0–25 mM at 0.5 mM/min), a ramp of leucine in presence of 2 mM glutamine (panel C, 0–25 mM at 0.5 mM/min) and a ramp of dimethyl glutamate (panel D, 0–25 mM at 0.5 mM/min). Solid triangles, SUR1–/– islets; open diamonds, normal control islets. Results are presented as means ± S.E. for 100 islets from 3 to 6 separate perifusions for each condition.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3. [Ca2+]i changes in SUR1–/– and control islets in response to fuel stimulation. Isolated mouse islets were cultured with 10 mM glucose for 3 days on coverslips. [Ca2+]i was continually measured by Fura-2 fluorescence in response to different reagents. The sequence of concentrations and additions are shown in the figures. Representative experiments are shown. All studies were repeated at least three times and showed comparable results.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4. Possible mechanisms of glutamine effects on [Ca2+]i in SUR1–/– islets. Experiments were carried out as described in Fig. 3. The sequence of concentrations and additions are shown in the figure. Representative experiments are shown. All studies were repeated at least three times and showed comparable results.

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5. Effects of glutamine on glyburide-treated control islets. Experiments were carried out as described in Fig. 3. The sequence of concentrations and additions are shown in the figure. Representative experiments are shown. All studies were repeated at least three times and showed comparable results. Insulin secretion by 100 perifused islets is recorded in panel C. Islets were first exposed to 300 nM glyburide, and then stimulated by 10 mM glutamine (solid circles) or 10 mM glucose (open triangles), and finally 5 µM nimodipine was added.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6. Effects of glutamine on GSIS in normal islets. Isolated control mouse islets were cultured with 10 mM glucose for 3 days and then perifused with 10 mM glucose prior to stimulation with (solid circles) or without (open diamonds) a ramp of glutamine (0–25 mM at 0.5 mM/min). Results are presented as means ± S.E. for 100 islets from 3 to 6 separate perifusions for each condition.

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 7. Effects of inhibition of GS by MSO on GSIS in normal islets. Isolated control mouse islets were cultured with 10 mM glucose for 3 days and then perifused without (solid squares) or with (solid diamonds) 1 mM MSO or with 1 mM BSO (open triangles) prior to starting the glucose ramp (panel A, 0–25 mM at 0.5 mM/min). Results are presented as means ± S.E. for 100 islets from 3 to 6 separate perifusions. Panel B, islets were perifused in the absence of glutamine (solid diamonds) or in presence of 2 (open circles), 5 (open diamonds) mM glutamine, or 40 µM DON (open squares) with 1 mM MSO added prior to stimulating by a glucose ramp.

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 8. Western blot analysis of GS. Cultured control mouse islet GS (lanes 1 and 2), -HC9 cells (lane 4), purified Escherichia coli. GS (lane 5) and sheep brain GS (lane 6) were tested by Western blot analysis. Protein standards are shown (lane 3).

The islet ¹⁵N amino acid enrichments were less than 5 APE (atom % excess), the detection limit of the GC-MS method for both [¹⁵N]glutamate and [¹⁵N]aspartate (actual data are therefore not shown). This result indicates that reductive amination of -ketoglutarate by GDH was unlikely to be quantitatively significant even with high glucose present. Because most of the glutamine was lost to the medium, islet glutamine was undetectable by GC-MS and ¹⁵N enrichment could not be determined.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The marked hypersensitivity to protein or amino acid stimulation of insulin release in children with SUR1/Kir6.2 mutations had posed the question how this phenomenon could be explained mechanistically. The present study shows that isolated pancreatic islets from SUR1 knockout mice respond briskly to a physiological mixture of 20 amino acids even though these islets cannot be stimulated by glucose or by leucine. These findings in islets of this mouse model duplicate precisely the clinical observation in K_ATP-HI patients, showing the impairments of glucose and leucine stimulated insulin release, but enhanced responsiveness to amino acids. Although SUR1–/– mice are not hypoglycemic (12, 13), isolated islets from these animals manifest the features of K_ATP channel deletion and offer an ideal opportunity to investigate the molecular basis of clinical observation in children with K_ATP-HI.

Glutamine plays a prominent role in mediating amino acid stimulation of insulin release by SUR1 knockout -cells. About 60% of the insulin response can be attributed to glutamine, even though it contributes only 16% to the total amino acids load. The importance of glutamine was also demonstrable when normal -cells were stimulated by a physiological amino acid mixture in presence of glucose. The amino acid threshold for potentiation of GSIS was increased from 1.2 to 2.6 mM when glutamine was omitted. It is worth noting that the glutamine concentration needed for this effect is very low (0.2 mM). In addition, isolated perifused islets of SUR1–/– mice or normal islets treated with glyburide were sensitized to stimulation by a glutamine ramp, whereas normal untreated islets did not respond at all. This phenomenon did not require enhanced glutaminolysis, which was previously reported to be the mechanism of glutamine induced insulin release (4, 5). Thus we hypothesize that glutamine per se plays a signaling role in insulin section that has not been recognized previously. This newly proposed role does not require deamidation by phosphate dependent glutaminase (PDG) or oxidative deamination of glutamate by GDH, processes that ultimately result in increased ATP production (4, 5). Furthermore, this glutamine effect manifests itself only if intracellular calcium is elevated, and it also requires L-type calcium channels to remain operative. Elevation of intracellular calcium is a prerequisite for this glutamine signaling effect to occur. SUR1 knockout and normal islets treated with sulfonylurea or diazoxide plus KCl all result in -cell depolarization and elevation of [Ca²⁺]_i (17, 18) and thus permit glutamine action. Note that the glutamine signal may result either from an extracellular source or may arise from enhanced intracellular synthesis via the enzyme GS.

The precise mechanism by which glutamine exerts its effects remains to be determined. As noted above, an unlikely factor is glutamate as proposed by Maechler and Wollheim (19). Dimethyl-glutamate is not an effective substitute and MSO, an inhibitor of GS, reduced GSIS even though internal glutamate accumulated significantly and ATP levels were not influenced when the inhibitor was present. The cytosolic glutamate level has many determinants: export of glutamate and -ketoglutarate from the mitochondria and transamination reactions involving numerous amino acids especially aspartate and alanine. A critical factor is the phosphate potential and the overall mitochondrial metabolism, which regulates the synthesis and hydrolysis of glutamine. Both PDG and GDH are located within the mitochondrial matrix and are regulated by the phosphate potential. A high phosphate potential inhibits both of these enzymes favoring glutamine synthesis and blocking glutaminolysis (5, 20). We hypothesize that the GS/PDG system may serve as an energy-sensing device to track the changes of the phosphate potential. Glucose metabolism increases ATP and also glutamate that those substrates drive the GS reaction to produce glutamine while hydrolysis of glutamine by PDG and oxidation of glutamate by GDH are inhibited. The glutamate accumulation that is seen when GS is blocked by MSO supports this interpretation. The level of cytosolic glutamine is thus well suited to serve as a sensitive and precise indicator of cellular fuel supply and is a plausible mitochondrial-derived cofactor for fuel stimulated insulin release.

The studies with ¹⁵NH₄Cl showed that the formation of glutamate by reductive amination of -ketoglutarate even in the presence of high glucose is quantitatively insignificant. This is perhaps not surprising considering the fact that the K_m of GDH for NH ⁺₄ is very high ( 10 mM) and that the enzyme is probably strongly inhibited when high glucose is present (5). Estimate of GDH flux from -ketoglutarate to glutamate with ¹⁵NH₄Cl as substrate, using the maximum possible ¹⁵N enrichment value of 5 APE of glutamate and aspartate, gives a rate of about 0.4 nmol/1000 islets/2 h. This is about 3% of the flux rate we observed when studying the reverse reaction with [2-¹⁵N]glutamine as substrate (5). The effect of high glucose on the islet glutamate level varies greatly with experimental designs (17, 18, 21). It appears that the changes of the glutamate pool are controlled primarily by transamination reactions, by the GS and PDG reactions. The very low level of cellular glutamine under the present experimental condition confounded the measurements of [5-¹⁵N]glutamine by standard GC-MS methods. Future studies are planned to investigate the flux via GS in the presence of a physiological mixture of amino acids including basal glutamine.

The interpretation of the present data relies heavily on the use of MSO as an inhibitor of GS. MSO is known to also inhibit other glutamate dependent reactions including the synthesis of -glutamylcysteine (22), the precursor of glutathione. However, if such an effect were important for its action on GSIS, the MSO blockade should not be preventable by glutamine or by DON. Furthermore, the MSO analogue, BSO inhibits -glutamylcysteine synthetase but not GS (23) and has no effects on GSIS (Fig. 7). We also found that MSO did not affect either aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or GDH (data not shown).

Other mechanisms that could be involved in a signaling role of glutamine in insulin secretion need to be considered. Membrane depolarization by the amino acid mixture or by glutamine seems to be an unlikely mechanism to explain the functional effects seen here, because a potassium chloride ramp (rising with a 1 mM increment/min to as high a level as 40 mM) did not increase insulin release in perifused SUR1–/– islets in contrast to the effectiveness of this measure in normal islets (24). It is conceivable that increased intracellular sodium is the mediator of the glutamine effect when sodium-dependent transport systems are involved, but this explanation is probably not applicable when glutamine is generated intracellularly during glucose-stimulated release (a condition known to lower intracellular sodium) (25). Furthermore, it seems improbable that the low glutamine threshold levels are associated with a significant rise of intracellular sodium. A clear picture may emerge once more is known about the kinetics of transporters with respect to glutamine, sodium, and the other amino acids. Increased glutamine turnover might also be a factor. It should be remembered that glutamine serves as co-substrate for the synthesis of fructosamine-6-P, asparagine, purines, and pyrimidines that could be critical.

In conclusion, the present studies demonstrate a prominent role of glutamine in AASIS and suggest GSIS could be influenced by the changes of internal glutamine. The glutamine effect is observed only when [Ca²⁺]_i is elevated. The glutamine level is determined by the concerted regulation of at least 4 enzymes: PDG, GS, GDH, and AST, with the phosphate potential as the critical regulatory parameter (Fig. 9). These new observations and hypotheses establish a basis for intensive follow-up studies.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 9. Hypothetical role of glutamine in GSIS. Metabolism of glucose in -cell produces ATP, which closes KATP channels, depolarizes the cell membrane, opens voltage dependent calcium channels and causes Ca2+ influx to trigger insulin granule exocytosis. A second role of ATP is to inhibit glutaminolysis at the PDG and the GDH steps (5). A third effect of ATP is to drive the GS reaction to generate glutamine with glutamate and ammonia serving as substrates. Glutamate is produced primarily from aspartate through the AST reaction. Glutamine or its analogue DON may increase [Ca2+]i or enhance the downstream calcium signaling to amplify insulin exocytosis. Inhibition of the two steps of glutamine oxidation and stimulation of the GS reaction results in a net increase of glutamine, of which a large portion is released from the cell. Two prerequisites must be met to allow glutamine to function as co-factor for insulin release: the ATP levels must be elevated and cytosolic Ca2+ must be increased through glucose metabolism.

	FOOTNOTES

^|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Diabetes Center, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel.: 215-898-1971; Fax: 215-898-2178; E-mail: matsch{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.

¹ The abbreviations used are: GSIS, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion; AASIS, amino acid-stimulated insulin secretion; SUR1, sulfonylurea receptor I; K_ATP channel, ATP-sensitive potassium channel; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GS, glutamine synthetase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PDG, phosphate-dependent glutaminase; DON, 6-diazo-5-oxo-norleucine; MSO, methionine sulfoximine; BSO, buthionine sulfoximine; APE, atom % excess; GABA, -aminobutyric acid.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Matschinsky, F. M. (2002) Diabetes 51, Suppl. 3, S394–S404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Matschinsky, F. M. (1995) Diabetes 45, 223–241[CrossRef]
3. Stanley, C. A., Lieu, Y. K., Hsu, B. Y., Burlina, A. B., Greenberg, C. R., Hopwood, N. J., Perlman, K., Rich, B. H., Zammarchi, E., and Poncz, M. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 1352–1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Gao, Z. Y., Li, G., Najafi, H., Wolf, B. A., and Matschinsky, F. M. (1999) Diabetes 48, 1535–1542[Abstract]
5. Li, C., Najafi, H., Daikhin, Y., Nissim, I. B., Collins, H. W., Yudkoff, M., Matschinsky, F. M., and Stanley, C. A. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 2853–2858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Thornton, P. S., MacMullen, C., Ganguly, A., Ruchelli, E., Steinkrauss, L., Crane, A., Aguilar-Bryan, L., and Stanley, C. A. (2003) Diabetes 52, 2403–2410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Stanley, C. A. (2002) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87, 4857–4859[Free Full Text]
8. Fourtner, S. H., Kelly, A., and Stanley, C. A. (2003) The Endocrine Society's 85^th Annual Meeting, June 19–22, 2003, Philadelphia, PA (abstr.)
9. Kelly, A., Steinkrauss, L., Bhatia, P., Stanley, C. A. (2003) The Endocrine Society's 85th Annual Meeting, June 19–22, 2003, Philadelphia, PA (abstr.)
10. Grimberg, A., Ferry, R. J., Jr., Kelly, A., Koo-McCoy, S., Polonsky, K., Glaser, B., Permutt, M. A., Aguilar-Bryan, L., Stafford, D., Thornton, P. S., Baker, L., and Stanley, C. A. (2001) Diabetes 50, 322–328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Kelly, A., Ng, D., Ferry, R. J., Jr., Grimberg, A., Koo-McCoy, S., Thornton, P. S., and Stanley, C. A. (2001) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 3724–3728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Shiota, C., Larsson, O., Shelton, K. D., Shiota, M., Efanov, A. M., Hoy, M., Lindner, J., Kooptiwut, S., Juntti-Berggren, L., Gromada, J., Berggren, P. O., and Magnuson, M. A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 37176–37183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Seghers, V., Nakazaki, M., DeMayo, F., Aguilar-Bryan, L., and Byran, J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9270–9277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Dura, E., Jijakli, H., Zhang, H. X., Oguzhan, B., Sener, A., and Malaisse, W. J. (2002) Int. J. Mol. Med. 9, 527–531[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Schwenk, W. F., Berg, P. J., Beaufrere, B., Miles, J. M., and Haymond, M. W. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 141, 101–109[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Meister A. (1985) in Methods in Enzymology (Meister, A., ed) Vol. 113, pp. 185–199, Academic Press Inc., New York[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Liu, Y. J., Cheng, H., Drought, H., MacDonald, M. J., Sharp, G. W., and Straub, S. G. (2003) Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 285, E380–E389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Bertrand, G., Ishiyama, N., Nenquin, M., Ravier, M. A., and Henquin, J. C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 32883–32891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Maechler, P., and Wollheim, C. B. (1999) Nature 402, 685–689[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Michalik, M., Nelson, J., and Erecinska, M. (1992) Metabolism. 41, 1319–1326[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. MacDonald, M. J., and Fahien, L. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34025–34027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Meister, A. (1980) in Glutamine: Metabolism, Enzymology, and Regulation (Mora, J., and Palacios, R., eds) pp. 1–41, Academic Press, Inc., New York
23. Arrick, B. A., Nathan, C. F., and Cohn, Z. A. (1983) J. Clin. Investig. 71, 258–267
24. Vatamaniuk, M., Zelent, D., Najafi, H., Doliba, N., Li, C., Collins, H., Buettger, C., and Matschinsky, F. M. (2003) Diabetes 52, Suppl. 1, A374 (abstr.)
25. Doliba, N. M., Vatamaniuk, M. Z., Buettger, C. W., Qin, W., Collins, H. W., Wehrli, S. L., Carr, R. D., and Matschinsky, F. M. (2003) Diabetes 52, 394–394[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Sayed, D. R. Langdon, S. Odili, P. Chen, C. Buettger, A. B. Schiffman, M. Suchi, R. Taub, J. Grimsby, F. M. Matschinsky, et al. Extremes of Clinical and Enzymatic Phenotypes in Children With Hyperinsulinism Caused by Glucokinase Activating Mutations Diabetes, June 1, 2009; 58(6): 1419 - 1427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. D. De Leon, C. Li, M. I. Delson, F. M. Matschinsky, C. A. Stanley, and D. A. Stoffers Exendin-(9-39) Corrects Fasting Hypoglycemia in SUR-1-/- Mice by Lowering cAMP in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells and Inhibiting Insulin Secretion J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2008; 283(38): 25786 - 25793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Li, I. Nissim, P. Chen, C. Buettger, H. Najafi, Y. Daikhin, I. Nissim, H. W. Collins, M. Yudkoff, C. A. Stanley, et al. Elimination of KATP Channels in Mouse Islets Results in Elevated [U-13C]Glucose Metabolism, Glutaminolysis, and Pyruvate Cycling but a Decreased {gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid Shunt J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 17238 - 17249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B.-G. Fan Effects of Parenteral Nutrition on the Exocrine Pancreas in Response to Cholecystokinin JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 2008; 32(1): 57 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Doliba, S. L. Wehrli, M. Z. Vatamaniuk, W. Qin, C. W. Buettger, H. W. Collins, and F. M. Matschinsky Metabolic and ionic coupling factors in amino acid-stimulated insulin release in pancreatic beta-HC9 cells Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1507 - E1519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Szollosi, M. Nenquin, and J.-C. Henquin Overnight Culture Unmasks Glucose-induced Insulin Secretion in Mouse Islets Lacking ATP-sensitive K+ Channels by Improving the Triggering Ca2+ Signal J. Biol. Chem., May 18, 2007; 282(20): 14768 - 14776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Pino, K.-A. Kim, K. D. Shelton, J. Lindner, S. Odili, C. Li, H. W. Collins, M. Shiota, F. M. Matschinsky, and M. A. Magnuson Glucokinase Thermolability and Hepatic Regulatory Protein Binding Are Essential Factors for Predicting the Blood Glucose Phenotype of Missense Mutations J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2007; 282(18): 13906 - 13916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. O. Westermark, J. H. Kotaleski, A. Bjorklund, V. Grill, and A. Lansner A mathematical model of the mitochondrial NADH shuttles and anaplerosis in the pancreatic beta-cell Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2007; 292(2): E373 - E393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-C. Henquin, D. Dufrane, and M. Nenquin Nutrient Control of Insulin Secretion in Isolated Normal Human Islets Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 3470 - 3477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Newsholme, L. Brennan, and K. Bender Amino Acid Metabolism, {beta}-Cell Function, and Diabetes Diabetes, December 1, 2006; 55(Supplement_2): S39 - S47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Doliba, W. Qin, M. Z. Vatamaniuk, C. W. Buettger, H. W. Collins, M. A Magnuson, K. H. Kaestner, D. F. Wilson, R. D. Carr, and F. M. Matschinsky Cholinergic regulation of fuel-induced hormone secretion and respiration of SUR1-/- mouse islets Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2006; 291(3): E525 - E535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Li, A. Matter, A. Kelly, T. J. Petty, H. Najafi, C. MacMullen, Y. Daikhin, I. Nissim, A. Lazarow, J. Kwagh, et al. Effects of a GTP-insensitive Mutation of Glutamate Dehydrogenase on Insulin Secretion in Transgenic Mice J. Biol. Chem., June 2, 2006; 281(22): 15064 - 15072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Li, A. Allen, J. Kwagh, N. M. Doliba, W. Qin, H. Najafi, H. W. Collins, F. M. Matschinsky, C. A. Stanley, and T. J. Smith Green Tea Polyphenols Modulate Insulin Secretion by Inhibiting Glutamate Dehydrogenase J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2006; 281(15): 10214 - 10221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Remedi, J. C. Koster, B. L. Patton, and C. G. Nichols ATP-Sensitive K+ Channel Signaling in Glucokinase-Deficient Diabetes Diabetes, October 1, 2005; 54(10): 2925 - 2931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Henwood, A. Kelly, C. MacMullen, P. Bhatia, A. Ganguly, P. S. Thornton, and C. A. Stanley Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Children with Congenital Hyperinsulinism Due to Recessive Mutations of the Adenosine Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel Genes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 789 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Remedi, Joseph. C. Koster, K. Markova, S. Seino, T. Miki, B. L. Patton, M. L. McDaniel, and C. G. Nichols Diet-Induced Glucose Intolerance in Mice With Decreased {beta}-Cell ATP-Sensitive K+ Channels Diabetes, December 1, 2004; 53(12): 3159 - 3167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. N. Magge, S.-L. Shyng, C. MacMullen, L. Steinkrauss, A. Ganguly, L. E. L. Katz, and C. A. Stanley Familial Leucine-Sensitive Hypoglycemia of Infancy Due to a Dominant Mutation of the {beta}-Cell Sulfonylurea Receptor J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4450 - 4456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Nenquin, A. Szollosi, L. Aguilar-Bryan, J. Bryan, and J.-C. Henquin Both Triggering and Amplifying Pathways Contribute to Fuel-induced Insulin Secretion in the Absence of Sulfonylurea Receptor-1 in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32316 - 32324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 279/14/13393    most recent M311502200v1 Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Li, C. Articles by Matschinsky, F. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Li, C. Articles by Matschinsky, F. M. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?