JBC Advanced Glycation Endproducts

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M308927200 on December 30, 2003

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 15, 15579-15590, April 9, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/15/15579    most recent
M308927200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misevic, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Strecker, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Misevic, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Strecker, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular Recognition between Glyconectins as an Adhesion Self-assembly Pathway to Multicellularity*

Gradimir N. Misevic{ddagger}§, Yann Guerardel¶, Lazar T. Sumanovski||, Marie-Christine Slomianny¶, Maurice Demarty{ddagger}, Camille Ripoll{ddagger}, Yannis Karamanos**, Emmanuel Maes¶, Octavian Popescu{ddagger}{ddagger}, and Gerard Strecker¶

From the {ddagger}Laboratoire des Processus Intégratifs Cellulaires, UMR 6037 CNRS, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Rouen, 76821 Mont St Aignan Cedex, France, Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, UMR 8576 CNRS, 59655 Villeneuve D'Ascq, France, ||Department of Research, University Hospital of Basel, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland, **Laboratoire de Biochimie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université d'Artois, Faculté J Perrin, rue J. Souvraz, SP18, 62307 Lens, France, and {ddagger}{ddagger}Molecular Biology Center and Institute for Interdisciplinary Experimental Research, Babes-Bolyai University, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Rumania

Received for publication, August 12, 2003 , and in revised form, December 30, 2003.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The appearance of multicellular forms of life has been tightly coupled to the ability of an organism to retain its own anatomical integrity and to distinguish self from non-self. Large glycoconjugates, which make up the outermost cell surface layer of all Metazoans, are the primary candidates for the primordial adhesion and recognition functions in biological self-assembly systems. Atomic force microscopy experiments demonstrated that the binding strength between a single pair of Porifera cell surface glyconectin 1 glycoconjugates from Microciona prolifera can hold the weight of 1600 cells, proving their adhesion functions. Here, measurement of molecular self-recognition of glyconectins (GNs) purified from three Porifera species was used as an experimental model for primordial xenogeneic self/non-self discrimination. Physicochemical and biochemical characterization of the three glyconectins, their glycans, and peptides using gel electrophoresis, ultracentrifugation, NMR, mass spectrometry, glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzyme treatment, amino acid and carbohydrate analyses, and peptide mapping showed that GNs define a new family of proteoglycan-like molecules exhibiting species-specific structures with complex and repetitive acidic carbohydrate motives different from the classical proteoglycans and mucins. In functional self-assembly color-coded bead, cell, and blotting assays, glyconectins displayed species-specific recognition and adhesion. Affinity-purified monospecific polyclonal antibodies prepared against GN1, -2, and -3 glycans selectively inhibited cell adhesion of the respective sponge species. These results together with species-specific coaggregation of GN carbohydrate-coated beads with cells showed that GN glycans are functional in cell recognition and adhesion. The specificity of carbohydrate-mediated homophilic GN interactions in Porifera approaches the binding selectivity of the evolutionarily advanced immunoglobulin superfamily. Xenoselectivity of primordial glyconectin to glyconectin recognition may be a new paradigm in the self-assembly and non-self discrimination pathway of cellular adhesion leading to multicellularity.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The emergence of multicellularity required the simultaneous development of cell adhesion and recognition properties. In addressing the unresolved question of what may have been the molecular basis for primordial self-recognition and non-self-discrimination we focused our attention on the role of proteoglycan-like glyconectins in Porifera xenogeneic cellular interactions, as the evolutionary most compatible model system for ancestors of Metazoans. Electron microscopic, x-ray diffraction, and biochemical analyses showed that large glycoconjugates such as glyconectins, classical type proteoglycans and mucins, are the largest multi-million molecular weight macromolecules, extending at least 10 times further from the cell surface than any other cell adhesion glycoprotein (1-3). Based on this evidence, here we put forward the hypothesis that Porifera glyconectins, as the most peripheral cell surface environment sensors, may have provided the initial key recognition and adhesion functions during the emergence of Metazoan ancestors. This would imply that Porifera, as the simplest Metazoans alive today, should have preserved, at least in part, a glyconectin adhesion and recognition mechanism to guide the initial phase of xenogeneic selectivity of cellular interactions. In fact, in recent atomic force microscopy experiments we demonstrated with purified molecules that the strength of glyconectin 1 to glyconectin 1 binding is fundamental in the cohesion between the cells of the sponge Microciona prolifera, ascribed to these molecules in previous functional investigations (4-8).

To examine whether homophilic glyconectin to glyconectin binding was also involved in primordial cellular adhesion and recognition self-assembly processes associated with the emergence of multicellularity, we studied the molecular basis of specific xenogeneic cell interactions in the phylum Porifera. Early work from the beginning of the 20th century on dissociated marine sponge cells provided important phenomenological evidence for cell sorting (4-8). However, these and subsequent experiments from 1960 to 1980 used semi-purified and chemically ill-defined extracts, termed aggregation factors, and thus lacked quantitative and biochemical data about the underlying molecular mechanisms (9-12). In the last two decades, the first structure-to-function-related studies have been performed on M. prolifera glyconectins (1, 13-18). Here, we have isolated glyconectins (GNs) from three marine sponge species, M. prolifera (GN1), Halichondria panicea (GN2), and Cliona celata (GN3). Physicochemical analyses and mass spectrometric fingerprinting of the three purified glyconectin macromolecules revealed species-specific proteoglycan-like structures that define a new class of glycocojugates. Using a quantitative functional approach with color-coded beads, cells, and blotting, we have shown that highly specific cell surface glyconectin to glyconectin interactions indeed mediate cell recognition and adhesion in the three Porifera species. Specific inhibition of cell adhesion by three monospecific anti-GN carbohydrate polyclonal antibodies, together with species-selective coaggregation of GN carbohydrate-coated beads with cells showed that GN glycans from the three sponge species are functional in cell recognition and adhesion. Thus, this study establishes a new paradigm for the pivotal role of primordial glyconectin carbohydrates in the self-assembly and non-self discrimination pathway of cellular adhesion prior to the evolution of multicellularity.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Isolation of Glyconectin Proteoglycans—Glyconectins were extracted from fresh cuts of sponges with artificial Ca2+- and Mg2+-free seawater (ACMFSW;1 462 mM NaCl, 10.7 mM KCl, 7 mM Na2SO4, and 2.1 mM NaHCO3) at +4 °C for 12 h. Glyconectins were purified by sequential centrifugation, 20 mM CaCl2 precipitation, and ultracentrifugation (14, 15).

Ultracentrifugation Analysis—Molecular weight and sedimentation coefficient of sponge glyconectins were determined by sedimentation equilibrium and sedimentation velocity analyses in seawater-Tris (SWT; 0.5 M NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4) at +20 °C using a Beckman Model E analytical Ultracentrifuge according to procedures described previously (14, 15).

Agarose Electrophoresis—Electrophoretic separation of sponge glyconectins was performed on a 0.75% agarose gel in 50 mM Tris acetate, pH 7.3, for 2 h at 100 V and 4 °C (13). Gels were stained with 0.02% toluidine blue in 3% acetic acid followed by 0.1% Amido Black 10B in 3% acetic acid.

Peptide Mapping of Glyconectins—GN1, GN2, and GN3 were reduced with dithiothreitol and alkylated with acrylamide in the presence of SDS 1%, 0.2 M Tris, pH 8.4 (19), and then digested by trypsin in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 30 °C for 12 h. Salts were removed on ZipTip C18 (Millipore) and peptides analyze by mass spectrometry. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) was performed on a "Voyager DE STR" time-of-flight instrument (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a 337-nm UV laser. The mass spectra were acquired in reflectron mode with positive detection and with 20 kV accelerating voltage. Aliquots (0.5 µl) of the elution solution were mixed with an equal volume of the matrix solution, {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxy-trans-cinnamic acid (10 mg/ml dissolved in acetonitrile-water, 50/50 by volume). External calibration was performed using a peptide mix: des-Arg-bradykinin (904.4681 kD), angiotensin I (1296.6853 kD), Glu-fibrinopeptide B (1570.6774 kD), ACTH(clip 1-17) (2,093.0867 kD), and ACTH(clip 18-39) (2,465.1989 kD).

Purification of Glyconectin Glycans—Purified glyconectins were precipitated with 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min. The glyconectin pellet was resuspended again in 70% ethanol, and centrifugation was repeated. Finally glyconectins were precipitated with a water/chloroform/methanol (1/1/3 by volume) mixture and dried under a N2 stream. Pronase (type E from Merck) was dissolved in 0.1 M Tris, pH 8, 1 mM CaCl2 at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and preincubated for 20 min at 60 °C. Subsequently 1 ml of preincubated pronase (1 mg/ml) was added to 20 mg of dried glyconectin pellet and incubated for 12 h at 60 °C. This proteolysis digestion procedure was repeated twice by adding fresh aliquots of preincibated pronase. Released glycans were separated from free amino acids, salts, and small peptides by gel filtration and subsequent ion exchange chromatography.

Preparation of Monospecific Polyclonal Antibodies against Glyconectin Carbohydrates—Purified glyconectin carbohydrates were used for preparation of polyclonal antibodies according to the procedure described previously (14). Monospecific polyclonal antibodies were obtained by affinity purification on GN glycans cross-linked to a solid matrix using previously a reported methodology of immobilization (13). Immunoglobulins bound to GNs were eluted with 1 M NaCl and subsequently dialyzed against CSW (Ca2+- and Mg2+-free seawater buffered with 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4). The monospecificity of these isolated anti-GN carbohydrate antibodies to their respective glycan antigens was confirmed in immunodot assay (14).

Polyacrylamide Electrophoresis—Electrophoretic separation of purified glyconectin glycans was performed on a polyacrylamide gradient gel (7.5-15%) at 350 V in 0.09 M Tris borate, pH 8.3, 2.4 mM EDTA (15, 20). Gels were stained with 0.3% alcian blue in 3% acetic acid and 25% isopropanol solution.

Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry of Oligosaccharides—The molecular mass of the oligosaccharides was measured by MALDI-TOF MS on a Vision 2000 time-of-flight instrument (Finnigan Mat) equipped with a 337 nm UV laser. 1 µl of sample at a concentration of 100 pmol/µl was mixed with an equal volume of matrix and allowed to crystallize. We used 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 3-aminoquinoline for the neutral and acidic oligosaccharides, respectively.

Electrospray Mass Spectrometry—All measurements were carried out in positive-ion mode on a triple quadrupole instrument (Micromass Ltd., Altrincham, UK) fitted with an atmospheric pressure ionization electrospray source. A mixture of polypropylene glycol was used to calibrate the quadrupole mass spectrometer. Underivated oligosaccharides were dissolved in methanol/water (50/50) and permethylated oligosaccharides in acetonitrile at a concentration of 10 pmol/µl. Samples were infused using the nanoflow probe at 50 nl/min. Quadrupole was scanned from 200 to 2000 Da with a scan duration of 3 s and a scan delay of 0.1 s. The samples were sprayed using 1.4-kV needle voltage, and the declustering (cone) was typically set at 70 V. For collision-induced dissociation (CID) experiments, the pressure of argon in the cell was set at 4 x 10-3 millibar and the collision energy was set to values ranging from 25 to 75 eV.

NMR Spectroscopy—The NMR experiments were performed on Bruker® ASX400 and DMX600 spectrometers, both equipped with a 5-mm 1H/13C mixed probe-head operating in the pulse Fourier transform mode and controlled by an Aspect 3000 computer. Each glyconectin sample was dissolved in 400 µl of 2H2O after three exchanges with 2H2O (99.97% atom 2H, Euriso-top, CEA group, Gif-sur-Yvette France) and intermediate lyophilizations. The glyconectins were analyzed at 300 K. The chemical shifts ({delta}) were referenced to internal acetone ({delta}1H = 2.225 and {delta}13C = 31.55 ppm under the conditions used). Two-dimensional homonuclear (COSY90, TOCSY) and heteronuclear (HMQC) experiments were performed by using standard Bruker® pulse programs. The main pulses and variable delays were optimized for each pulse program and sample.

Gas Chromatography—Monosaccharides were analyzed by GC/MS as per-trimethylsilyl (21) and per-heptafluorobutyryl derivatives (22). Methylation of oligosaccharides was conducted according to Ciucanu and Kerek (23) before analysis on GC/MS.

Other Analytical Methods—The size of the oligosaccharides was assessed by gel filtration on a Bio-Gel P2 or P4 column (Bio-Rad) equilibrated in 0.5% acetic acid and calibrated with hydrolyzed dextran in combination with thin layer chromatography as already described. Amino acid composition was assessed by Pico-Tag HPLC and content by Dionex high pH anion-exchange chromatography, both after 6 M HCl hydrolysis at 100 °C for 12 h.

Preparation of Cells and Glyconectin-coated Beads—Sponge cells were dissociated and washed in ACMFSW at 0 °C. In some experiments cells were fixed with 1% glutaraldehyde (14, 15).

A volume of 200 µl of 2% latex-amidine bead suspension, 0.6 µm in diameter (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR), was washed three times with 1 ml of SWT by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 10 min. Beads were resuspended in 200 µl of SWT and bath-sonicated for 5 min. To allow adsorption to beads on the basis of charge, 100 µg of either glyconectins or glycans isolated from these glyconectins was added to a 100 µl of bead suspension that was then incubated at 22 °C for 15 min followed by three washes as described above. The glyconectin-coated beads were resuspended in 100 µl of SWT. Because the diameter of the beads is 600 nm and the size of glyconectins are in the same range, each bead bound at least 1 molecule of glyconectin and about 20-50 large glycan molecules.

Recognition, Adhesion, and Overlay Assays with Cells and Beads—Cell-cell adhesion assays were performed with 106 cells bearing surface glyconectins in 100 µl of ACMFSW, without or with 10 mM Ca2+, in the presence or absence of anti-GN-glycan polyclonal antibodies. For glutaraldehyde-fixed cells assays were done in SWT with or without Ca2+. For the cell-bead assay, 5-10 µl of 2% bead suspension in SWT was added to 100 µl of cell suspension containing 106 cells in the presence or absence of 10 mM Ca2+. In bead overlay assays 50-100 µl of 2% bead suspension in SWT was added to nitrocellulose membrane or agarose gel equilibrated in 1 ml of CSW in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+.

The degree of cell-cell and bead-bead adhesion in the presence of variable calcium or magnesium ion concentrations or anti-GN-glycan polyclonal antibodies was quantified after a 20-min rotation either by counting single cells and aggregates of at least 40 µm in diameter or by spectrophotometrically measuring the absorbance of supernatants after sedimentation at 100 x g for 1 min.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purification and Physical Characterization of Glyconectins of Three Sponge Species—GNs were purified by CaCl2 precipitation and sequential ultracentrifugation of isotonic Ca2+-free seawater extracts from three different marine sponge species, M. prolifera (GN1), H. panicea (GN2), and C. celata (GN3). This procedure is similar to the one we originally used for M. prolifera and is thus different from guanidinium hydrochloride or urea extraction techniques applied for classical mammalian proteoglycans (24-26). Analytical ultracentrifugation and agarose electrophoresis of isolated glyconectins showed that each species expressed a unique type of multi-million macromolecule with sedimentation greater then 40 S composed of one or few highly negatively charged glycosylated subunits (Table I and Fig. 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Physicochemical properties of sponge glyconectins

Molecular weight (Mr) and sedimentation coefficient (s20,w) of sponge GNs were determined by analytical centrifugation. The carbohydrate and amino acid composition (mol %) of glyconectins were obtained from gas chromatography and HPLC, respectively. Carbohydrate/protein ratio, content of uronic acids, and were calculated from amino acid, monosaccharide, and ion composition. The standard deviation from three analyses was maximally 1% of each value (see "Experimental Procedures").

 



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Electrophoretic separation of sponge glyconectins. A, 0.75% agarose gel stained with 0.02% toluidine blue followed by 0.1% Amido Black 10B. a-c, GNs from M. prolifera GN1, H. panicea GN2, and C. celata GN3, respectively (10 µg each). B, 0.75% agarose gel stained with color-coded fluorescent beads coated with GN1 (pink) (a), GN2 (green) (b), and GN3 (blue) (c) in the presence of SWT with 10 mM CaCl2.

 
Carbohydrate and Amino Acid Compositional Analysis of Native Glyconectins—The three purified native glyconectins were analyzed for their sugar compositions by gas chromatography (Table I). Common monosaccharides, Fuc, Ara, Man, Gal, GlcNAc, GalNAc, GlcA, and a single type of pyruvated hexose were found in various amounts. Pyruvated hexose was at first visualized by gas chromatography as methyl-glycoside heptafluoryl derivative as two peaks tentatively attributed to its {alpha} and {beta} anomers. This structure was confirmed as a pyruvated hexose in methyl-glycoside heptafluoryl derivative because of a [M + NH4] ion at m/z 698 in chemical ionization mass spectrometry and a very intense [M - COOMe] ion at m/z 611 in EI-MS (Fig. 2) (27). The exact nature of this residue was established as 4,6-O-(1-carboxyethylidene)-{alpha}-D-Galp (Py(4,6)Gal) by trimethylsilyl derivatization of methylglycoside and comparison with standard EI-MS spectra from the literature (Fig. 2) (27). Indeed, spectra was dominated by an ion at m/z 243, characteristic of a 4,6-O-(1-carboxyethylidene)-D-galactose structure (27), and by an intense [M - COOMe] at m/z 363. The intense ion at m/z 204, resulting from the cleavage of two adjacent trimethylsilyl groups, also characterized the 4,6-linkage position of the pyruvate group. Subsequently, this attribution was confirmed by NMR experiments of glyconectin hydrolysis fragments from GN2 (see accompanying article (40)). This is in agreement with previous work that identified a Py(4,6)Gal-containing oligosaccharide obtained by hydrolysis of glyconectin from M. prolifera (28). The stability of the 4,6-O-(1-carboxyethylidene)-galactose pyranose ring to methanolysis (27) enabled us to estimate, among the other monosaccharides, the amount of this particular component in each sample (Table I).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
EI-MS identification of 4,6-O-(1-carboxyethylidene)-D-galactose. A, trimethylsilyl derivative. B, permethylated derivative.

 
As shown in Table I, glyconectins from the three analyzed species showed differences regarding their sugar compositions. GN1 was characterized by a high quantity of fucose (about one-third of the total monosaccharide content) and minute amounts of Py(4,6)Gal, whereas GN2 was characterized by a lower proportion of fucose and a molar ratio of Py(4,6)Gal four times higher than GN1. On the other hand, GN3 was the only one to contain arabinose (11 mol %) as well as high quantities of fucose but no Py(4,6)Gal at all. This last species was also the only one to exhibit significant amounts (>5%) of GalNAc.

Amino acid analysis of three sponge glyconectins showed species-specific differences with some common features such as the presence of over 7% serine, threonine, and asparagine/aspartic acid (Table I).

Peptide Mapping of Native Glyconectins—Native GN1, GN2, and GN3 were reduced with dithiothreitol, alkylated with acrylamide in the presence of SDS, and subsequently treated with trypsin and analyzed by mass spectrometry as described under "Experimental Procedures." All three glyconectins had different peptide maps, indicating distinct core structures and species-specific sequences (Fig. 3). Detailed analyses of MS spectra showed that GN1 has 67, GN2 84, and GN3 44 peptides. A comparison of GN1, GN2, and GN3 tryptic fragment masses revealed 10 peptides with the same mass. Whether these peptides are identical would have to be verified by direct sequencing. Furthermore, the cloning and sequencing of GN2 and GN3 genes for their respective core proteins will show the exact differences to the already cloned gene of GN1 (16, 18).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Peptide mapping of glyconectins by mass spectrometry. Tryptic peptide maps of GN1 (top), GN2 (middle), and GN3 (bottom) are shown.

 
Purification and Biochemical Analyses of Glyconectin Glycans—Purified glyconectins GN1, -2, and -3 were extensively treated with pronase, as described under "Experimental Procedures," to digest the protein part. After removal of small peptides and amino acids by gel filtration and ion-exchange chromatography, glycans of GN1, -2, and -3 were analyzed for their monosaccharide and amino acid contents (Table II). Monosaccharide analysis of the total GN glycans showed a composition almost identical to the native GNs, with the exception of GN3, where the ratio of fucose and GlcNAc were different. Recovery of total carbohydrates was more than 90%. These data indicated that there was neither selective nor quantitatively significant loss of carbohydrates during pronase treatment. Amino acid analyses showed that glycans are essentially free of protein excluding the linkage and their neighboring amino acids (Table II). Sulfate analyzes of the three GN total glycan fractions revealed over 90% recovery from the intact GNs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II
Monosaccharide composition of GN glycans

Carbohydrate and amino acid composition (mol %) of glyconectin glycans were obtained from gas chromatography after methanolysis and HPLC after HCl hydrolysis, respectively, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Carbohydrate/protein ratios and content of uronic acids and were calculated from amino acid and monosaccharide composition. The standard deviation from three analyses was maximally 1% of each value (see "Experimental Procedures"). The total amount of recovered in GN glycans after pronase treatment of each GN was more than 90%.

 
A study of glyconectin glycan heterogeneity after pronase treatment was performed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 4). Staining of gels by alcian blue revealed that GN1 has two major species of acidic glycans with molar masses of 200 and 6 kDa as reported previously (14, 15, 18, 29). GN2 had one major large acidic glycan type with a molar mass of 180 kDa, representing more then 60% of the total carbohydrate content, and heterogeneous populations of acidic oligosaccharides with sizes below 10 kDa very faintly stained by alcian blue because of the larger area spread (Fig. 4). The amount of this glycan was more closely estimated after gel filtration on a Bio-Gel P6. GN3 also contained one major acidic glycan species (50% total carbohydrates) with a molar mass of 110 kDa and a size-heterogeneous population of smaller glycans shown tailing from the major band (Fig. 4). According to the size, composition, and fingerprinting (presented in the accompanying article (40)) the two large glycans of GN2 and GN3 should be built by repetitive units as in the case of GN1 (14-16, 18, 29).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of purified glyconectin glycan fraction. Electrophoresis of glyconectin glycans was performed on a polyacrylamide gradient gel (7.5-15%). Gels were stained with 0.3% alcian blue in 3% acetic acid in aqueous 25% isopropanol. Lane a, 20 µg of GN1 glycans; lane b, 20 µg of GN2 glycans; lane c, 20 µg of GN3 glycans; lane d, 50 µg of hyaluronic acid (Sigma, from bovine vitreous humor), 200 kDa, partially degraded; lane e, 50 µg of chondroitin sulfate (Sigma, from shark cartilage), 80 kDa.

 
One- and two-dimensional homonuclear NMR (COSY90, TOCSY) and heteronuclear (HMQC) spectroscopy of three GN total glycans indicated new types of species-specific repetitive acidic polysaccharide structures with a high degree of complexity (Fig. 5). These sequences were established by mass spectrometry analyses (reported in the article (40)). The large size and great complexity of the GN glycans do not allow identification of the complete arrangement of these sequences within the polymer. It was nevertheless possible to confirm that fucose is represented more in GN1 and GN3 than in GN2 glycan, as shown by the intensity of the methyl signal resonances on the one-dimensional spectrum (Fig. 5A). The GN2 glycan spectra showed an intense signal relative to the methyl group of the pyruvate unit. This signal was significantly smaller in GN1 and was completely absent in GN3. The one-dimensional NMR spectra of the GN glycans also indicated the presence of {alpha} and {beta} anomeric protons. In the case of GN1 glycans, these were assigned as {alpha}Fuc, {alpha}Gal, {beta}Gal, and {beta}GlcNAc. For GN2 glycans, {beta} anomers were predominant. The {alpha} or {beta} anomericity was confirmed by two-dimensional NMR, based on the characteristic H-2 chemical shifts (Fig. 5B). Moreover, the H-3 and H-4 signals of a {beta}Gal unit with a sulfate group at the C-3 position were easily assigned in the case of GN1, whereas the spin system of pyruvated {beta}Gal clearly appeared in the COSY spectrum of GN2. The NMR spectra of GN3 indicated that the distribution of anomeric signals, the absence of pyruvate, and the presence of pentose could be attributable to novel type of sequences. These NMR results were in agreement with the mass spectrometry fingerprinting of glycan sequences presented in the following article. Isolation of large quantities of each glycan fragment and comparative NMR analyses with the intact polysaccharides would allow construction of the overall sequence maps of glyconectin glycans.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
NMR analyses of glyconectin glycans. A, one-dimensional spectra of GN1 glycans (top), GN2 glycans (middle), and GN3 glycans (bottom). B, two-dimensional COSY90 spectra of GN1 (top), GN2 (middle), and GN3 (bottom).

 
Enzymatic treatment of either intact glyconectins or their isolated glycans with different types of glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzymes such as hyaluronidases, chondroitinases, and heparinases were not able to degrade any of GN1, -2, and -3 glycans under conditions that completely digest the respective enzyme substrates. In conclusion, NMR and enzymological data together with compositional and electrophoretic analyses specify that three GN carbohydrates have a novel type of species-specific and repetitive structure residing in the large acidic polysaccharides. More detailed chemical sequence analyses of GN glycans combined with NMR and mass spectrometry are described in the accompanying article (40).

The linkage type of GN glycans to the protein core was studied using a chemical and enzymological approach. We analyzed the total glyconectin glycans using the method of Maes et al. (30), which shows that classical methanolysis conditions quantitatively cleave the N-glycosidic bond (96%), liberating glucosamine (and not its O-methylglycosides). Because other N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) residues are quantitatively liberated as the O-methylglycosides of glucosamine, the GlcNAc residue involved in the N-glycosidic bond is separated from the others using gas chromatography of heptafluorobutyrate derivatives. GC/MS indicated that all three GNs have N-linked glycans. Because of the large size of the glycans, the great amounts of internal GlcNAc, and the comparatively small amount of possible linkage GlcNAc, gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy data of GN-type molecules cannot be absolutely quantitative in terms of the exact number of moles of linkage GlcNAc but rather are of a qualitative nature. Classical alkali treatment of intact glyconectins was able to only partially release glycans (about 30-50%), as in the classical examples of N-linked glycans. Peptide-N-glycanase was not able to release any of the large glycans but was able to release the small 6-kDa glycan in the case of GN1 as reported previously (29). Most likely peptide-N-glycanase did not cleave because of the well known steric inaccessibility of the linkage due to the high charge and large size of the glycans. Hydrazinolysis of intact GNs under standard conditions released glycans; however, these conditions are now known to cleave both N-linked and O-linked glycans. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy analyses and alkali treatment of GNs indicate that the large glycans of GN2 and -3 are N-linked to the protein core as in the case of both GN1 glycans (16, 18, 29). To confirm the nature of the glycan-protein linkage, a more quantitative analysis of the isolated linkage region must be made. This will require a new methodology to take into account the spacing of glycan chains, their internal sequences and charge distribution, as well as the peptide sequences of the core protein (which greatly influence enzymatic and chemical cleavage). Our structural data of GN polysaccharides presented in the accompanying article (40) promote the development of sequencing techniques applicable to novel classes of glycans. Such potential methods, when used on the purified GN fragments close to the core protein together with cloning of the GN genes, will definitively confirm the exact nature of GN glycan core and linkage to protein.

Taking in account the amount of carbohydrate present per intact glyconectin, the quantity of each individual glycan species recovered from the respective glyconectin, the size of the glycans, and the size of the intact glyconectins, a rough estimation was made that: 1) GN1 would have 20 chains of 200 kDa and 950 chains of 6 kDa glycans as discussed previously (14, 15, 18); 2) GN2 would have 10 repeats of 180 kDa glycan and 300 glycans with an average size of 6 kDa; and 3) GN3 would have 13 copies of 110 kDa glycans. The rest of the size-heterogeneous population of GN3 polysaccharides showing tailing from the 110 kDa glycan band on the gel is most likely either the result of degradation or the unfinished synthesis product of this major glycan species (see accompanying article (40)). We cannot completely exclude the possibility that this product is also mixed with some less abundant yet undefined polysaccharide species.

Glyconectin Glycoconjugates are Cell Adhesion Molecules—The cell adhesive function of two new sponge glyconectins purified from H. panicea (GN2) and C. celata (GN3) was tested and compared with that of M. prolifera (GN1) in a rotary reaggregation assay with live metabolically attenuated and/or fixed cells depleted of endogenous GNs. All three glyconectins, at concentrations mimicking in vivo conditions, mediated cell adhesion in the presence of physiological seawater with 10 mM CaCl2 and not below 1 mM CaCl2 (Fig. 6A). In the absence of GNs, independently of CaCl2 concentration, no aggregation could be observed (data not shown). Magnesium ions could not replace Ca2+ (Fig. 6D). These data indicate the essential and specific role of the three tested glyconectins and Ca2+ in sponge cell adhesion.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Glyconectin- and calcium ion-dependent cell aggregation, glyconectin-coated bead adhesion, and self-interaction of glyconectins. A and D, cell aggregation promoted by GNs was performed with glutaraldehyde-fixed cells in CSW supplemented with Ca2+ ranging from 0 to 20 mM or Mg2+ ranging from 0 to 50 mM as described (13, 14). B and E, GN-coated bead aggregation assay was done in CSW supplemented with Ca2+ ranging from 0 to 20 mM or Mg2+ ranging from 0 to 50 mM as described under "Experimental Procedures." C and F, self-interaction assay was performed with 10 µg of GNs in 100 µl of CSW supplemented with Ca2+ ranging from 0 to 20 mM or Mg2+ ranging from 0 to 50 mM. After a 20-min incubation at room temperature samples were centrifuged at 5000 x g, and pellet and supernatant were analyzed in a colorimetric and immunodot assay for the presence of GNs. A-C, CaCl2 range from 0 to 20 mM. D-F, MgCl2 range, 10 to 50 mM. All three assays used similar conditions for self-interaction of glyconectins.

 
Ca2+-dependent Glyconectin to Glyconectin Interactions Mediate Cell Adhesion—We have previously shown by atomic force microscopy and glyconectin-coated bead adhesion that Ca2+-dependent self-interactions between glyconectin 1 from M. prolifera sponge provides the major driving force for cell adhesion (1, 14, 15). To quantitatively test whether glyconectins 2 and 3 from sponges H. panicea and C. celata also utilize the same adhesive molecular mechanism via Ca2+-dependent glyconectin to glyconectin interactions, we used two assay systems, Ca2+-induced aggregation of glyconectin-coated beads (Fig. 6B) and glyconectins self-interaction monitored by gelation (Fig. 6C). All three glyconectins revealed 100% self-association at 10 mM CaCl2 and no interactions in the absence of calcium ions in either assay system (Fig. 6, B and C; see also bead recognition assay in Figs. 8 and 9). CaCl2 could not be substituted with MgCl2 indicating a specific role of Ca ions (Fig. 6, E and F). Titration experiments of Ca2+ concentration dependence of sponge glyconectin self-interactions revealed a transition at 5 mM and 100% interactions at physiological 10 mM CaCl2 (Fig. 6, B and C), identical to that of Ca2+-dependent glyconectin-promoted cell adhesion (Fig. 6A). These experiments indicated that Ca2+-dependent glyconectin to glyconectin interactions play a pivotal role in the cell adhesion of the three selected marine sponge species.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
Simultaneous species-specific glyconectin to glyconectin recognition in suspension and blotting assay. Letters were drawn using 4 µl of 1.5 mg/ml glyconectins on a Hybond-C extra nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences) and probed in SWT with pink, green, and blue fluorescent beads coated with glyconectin 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A, SWT without 10 mM Ca2+. B, SWT with 10 mM Ca2+. All photographs were taken after 30 min of mixing.

 



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9.
Species-specific glyconectin to glyconectin interactions mediate bead-cell recognition and adhesion. Xenogeneic glyconectin self-recognition in a mixture of glutaraldehyde-fixed cells and glyconectin-coated beads in SWT in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+. M. prolifera cells bearing glyconectin 1 were incubated with: glyconectin 1 (pink beads) (A), glyconectin 2 (yellow beads) (D), and glyconectin 3 (white beads) (G). H. panicea cells bearing glyconectin 2 were incubated with: glyconectin 1 (B), glyconectin 2 (E), and glyconectin 3 (H) color-coded beads. C. celata cells bearing glyconectin 3 were incubated with: glyconectin 1 (C), glyconectin 2 (F), and glyconectin 3 (I) color-coded beads (glutaraldehyde fixation changes cell colors, i.e. M. prolifera, orange to yellowish white; H. panicea, white to yellowish brown; and C. celata, brown to brownish orange. We did not observe differences in adhesion properties between fixed and live metabolically attenuated cells in a rotary assay.

 
Specific Glyconectin to Glyconectin Interactions Mediate Porifera Cellular Recognition and Adhesion—To test whether cell-adhesive glyconectin-glyconectin interactions can also mediate xenogeneic recognition in sponges, we performed ex vivo color-coded cell-cell, bead-bead, and bead-surface recognition experiments. This type of approach is essential to understanding the molecular mechanism underlying previously reported phenomenological and biochemical studies on the role of proteoglycan-like glycoconjugates in binary assays of dissociated sponge cells (4-12).

First, we tested the specificity of adhesion of GNs bearing cells in a ternary species combination. Living dissociated and metabolically attenuated cells in ACMFSW (at 0 °C) from M. prolifera (Fig. 7A), H. panicea (Fig. 7B), and C. celata (Fig. 7C) were mixed in the presence (Fig. 7E) and absence (Fig. 7D) of 10 mM Ca2+ (physiological concentration in seawater). In a rotary assay, within 5-15 min species-specific recognition and adhesion occurred only with 10 mM Ca2+ (Fig. 7E). Fig. 7D shows a mixture of dissociated cells before CaCl2 addition. Upon removal of GNs from cell surface by repetitive washing, none of the three species displayed aggregation in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+ (results similar to that of Fig. 7D). Adding back the purified GNs to the same live cells at 0 °C completely restored species-selective cohesion (results similar to that of Fig. 7E). Similar results were obtained with non-living fixed cells (not shown). These experiments indicated that glyconectins and Ca2+ mediate the initial steps of xenogeneic cell recognition and adhesion of the three selected sponge species.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Glyconectin glycoconjugates are cell adhesion and recognition molecules. Ca2+-dependent glyconectin to glyconectin interactions mediate species-specific cell-cell recognition and adhesion. A-C, M. prolifera (A), H. panicea (B), and C. celata (C) living sponges. Shown are self- and non-self-discrimination and adhesion in the suspension of mixed M. prolifera (orange), H. panicea (white), and C. celata (brown) live cells bearing glyconectins. D and E, ACMFSW without 10 mM Ca2+ (D) and ACMFSW with 10 mM Ca2+ at 0 °C after 20 min of rotation (E). The microscopically observed color of the cells is somewhat different from that of the whole sponge. Early cell sorting experiments were usually done with binary sponge combinations at room temperature without rotation. The sorting is thus dependent on the presence of recognition molecules at the cell surface, cell motility, and speed of new synthesis and/or secretion of additional recognition molecules. Our rotary assays using either metabolically attenuated or fixed cells reduce the number of variable parameters.

 
In the second type of recognition assay we reconstituted the observed cell recognition by using artificial system of glyconectin color-coated beads. Glyconectin 1 was attached by adsorption to fluorescent pink, glyconectin 2 to fluorescent green, and glyconectin 3 to fluorescent blue latex-amidine beads. Unlabeled glyconectins were immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane in such a manner that the three molecules were used to draw the subsequent letters of the words "GLYCONECTIN RECOGNITION." The three bead types were mixed and added to the coated membrane in the presence of 10 mM CaCl2 (Fig. 8B) or absence of calcium ions (Fig. 8A). Within 5 to 15 min of constant rotation, species-specific bead-bead aggregation and homophilic recognition between membrane-bound and bead-bound glyconectins were observed through three separate color aggregates and selective staining of each letter only with 10 mM CaCl2 (Fig. 8B). Both processes occurred at apparently similar rates for each of the three glyconectins. In control experiments with glyconectin 1 separately attached to pink, yellow, and white beads, as expected, mixed-color aggregates were formed upon the addition of 10 mM CaCl2 (not shown). In the absence of 10 mM CaCl2, bead aggregation did not occur either in the mixture of the three glyconectins or in one glyconectin coated to three colored beads (same as Fig. 8A).

A similar type of experiment was performed by overlaying agarose gel containing three electrophoretically separated glyconectins with color-coated glyconectin beads. After overnight incubation at room temperature in the presence of 10 mM CaCl2 under gentle agitation, species-specific staining of gel glyconectin bands identical to the ones stained with toluidine blue and Amido Black showed that glyconectin to glyconectin interactions are highly species-specific (Fig. 1).

The combinations of the above described experiments demonstrate species-specific molecular self-recognition of glyconectins in an elementary reconstituted bead adhesion system, which fully resembles glyconectin-mediated cell-cell recognition and adhesion. Thus, glyconectins mediate self- and non-self-discrimination in the initial step of sponge cell adhesion and xenogeneic recognition. The degree of GN selectivity is analogous to that of antibody-antigen interactions in similar assay systems.

Self-assembly of a Biological and Artificial Cell-Bead System via Species-specific Glyconectins Recognition—To evaluate the exclusive role of glyconectins in self-recognition we tested specificity of homophilic glyconectin-glyconectin interactions in a color-coded cell-bead adhesion assay. Each of the three glyconectins was attached to color-coded beads, as in the above described experiments, and beads were mixed in nine combinations with glyconectin-bearing cells of the three sponge species in the presence of 10 mM Ca2+. To simultaneously follow cells and beads, visible light microscopy was used. In visible light, fluorescent pink beads with glyconectin 1 appear as pink, fluorescent green beads with glyconectin 2 are yellow, and fluorescent blue beads with glyconectin 3 are white. Bead-cell coaggregation was observed for homotypic combinations, as observed microscopically by the color and shape of uniformly mixed beads and cells (Fig. 9, A, E, and I). The heterotypic combinations always resulted in bead and cell segregation (Fig. 9, B, C, D, F, G, and H). Cell-bead recognition and adhesion occurred at apparently equal rates and ended in similar aggregate sizes for all three species. Such recognition took place only when cells had glyconectin on their surfaces and in the presence of 10 mM CaCl2. This process did not require live cells because the same results were obtained with glutaraldehyde-fixed and/or metabolically attenuated cells at 0 °C (data not shown). Self-assembly experiments with live cells, metabolically attenuated cells, fixed cells, and non-natural latex beads showed that, independently of the carrier surface, glyconectins are able to recognize self and distinguish self from non-self via cohesive glyconectin to glyconectin interactions.

Glyconectin Carbohydrates Mediate Cell Recognition and Adhesion—The final question was to examine whether glyconectin carbohydrates are involved in cell adhesion and recognition processes during reaggregation of Porifera cells. The facts that GNs are carbohydrate-rich molecules and that GN1 glycans specifically mediate cell adhesion in M. prolifera led us to test for the cell adhesive function of GN2 and GN3 carbohydrates using two different approaches. In the first immunological method, we prepared affinity-purified monospecific polyclonal antibodies against isolated GN1, -2, and -3 total glycans, essentially free of proteins (see Table II), as described under "Experimental Procedures." Then we examined whether such anti-GN-glycan antibodies can specifically inhibit cell aggregation of the three respective sponge species. The results presented in Fig. 10A showed that each of the three anti-GN-glycan polyclonal antibodies, anti-GN1-glycan, anti-GN2-glycan, and anti-GN3-glycan, species-selectively inhibited cellular adhesion in the presence of 10 mM CaCl2 of the respective GN-bearing cells. In the second direct approach, we coated preferentially large GN glycans, which were shown to be essentially free of proteins (see Table II), to color-coded latex-amidine beads using the same adsorption procedure as described for the intact GNs. The adsorption is based on charge interactions, which in high salt concentrations are much greater in the case of the larger glycans. We verified, by gel electrophoresis of the material coated to beads and the material remaining in supernatants, that beads were coated principally with the large glycans and not with the small ones. Of course, in the case of a long glycan chain, many of its sites are not bound to the surface of the bead and are therefore free to interact with other molecules. The size of a single bead surface (0.6 µm diameter) can accommodate either one GN molecule or a roughly similar number of large glycan molecules as found in a single intact GN molecule. Because polyvalency of adhesion epitopes in GN1 was shown to be an imperative for its species-specific cell adhesive function (14, 30, 33, 35), valency reconstitution experiments, performed by coating multiple copies of large glycans on 0.6-µm diameter latex beads, were necessary. These reconstituted polyvalent GN-glycan-beads were tested in coaggregation assays with cells using the following combinations: M. prolifera cells bearing glyconectin 1 with GN1-glycan-beads, GN2-glycan-beads, or GN3-glycan-beads; H. panicea cells bearing glyconectin 2 with GN1-glycan-beads, GN2-glycan-beads, or GN3-glycan-beads; and C. celata cells bearing glyconectin 3 with GN1-glycan-beads, GN2-glycan-beads, or GN3-glycan-beads (Fig. 10B). The results presented in Fig. 10B demonstrated that only homotypic coadhesion of GN-glycan-beads with cells occurred (images of homotypic coadhesion are similar to those shown in Fig. 9, A, E, and I). The results of both experimental approaches indicated that species-specific carbohydrates of GNs are directly involved in Porifera cell recognition and adhesion, which may be implicated in xenogeneic self-assembly and the non-self-discrimination pathway of cellular interactions leading to multicellularity.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10.
Glyconectin carbohydrates are involved in cell recognition and adhesion. A, cell aggregation was performed as described for Fig. 6, A and D, in the presence of 50 µg of anti-GN monospecific polyclonal antibodies. Adhesion of GN-bearing cells from each of the three sponge species was assayed in the presence of the three anti-GN-glycan polyclonal antibodies. B, cell and GN-glycan-bead coaggregation was performed under the conditions described in the legend for Fig. 9 for the intact glyconectin-coated beads using the following combinations: M. prolifera cells bearing glyconectin 1 with GN1-glycan-beads, GN2-glycan-beads, or GN3-glycan-beads; H. panicea cells bearing glyconectin 2 with GN1-glycan-beads, GN2-glycan-beads, or GN3-glycan-beads; and C. celata cells bearing glyconectin 3 with GN1-glycan-beads, GN2-glycan-beads, or GN3-glycan-beads.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In 1987 it was demonstrated that the isolated cell surface macromolecule from the M. prolifera sponge, then termed the aggregation factor, mediates cell adhesion via a novel type of carbohydrate-carbohydrate self-interactions (14). The distinct functional and physicochemical properties of this compound suggested that although it shares the general features of proteoglycans such as large size and long, sulfated, negatively charged glycans, it could define a new class of primordial cell recognition and adhesion proteoglycan-like glycoconjugates, named glyconectins. Recently reported partial sequence analysis of the carbohydrate moiety of the M. prolifera glyconectin 1 demonstrated new structural features distinct from glycosaminoglycans (17, 24, 28). The use of Block 1 and 2 monoclonal antibodies established the role of 1 sulfated and 1 pyruvated saccharide unit in the carbohydrate-carbohydrate self-interaction of GN1 (14, 15, 17, 28). Plasmon resonance kinetic binding studies on the synthetically prepared sulfated epitope of GN1 directly showed that this oligosaccharide is capable of self-association (31). In the initial study using three sponge species (M. prolifera, H. panicea, and C. celata), it was shown that the two new glyconectins also are involved in species-specific aggregation (13). Here we have isolated and performed detailed physicochemical and functional characterizations of glyconectin 2 from H. panicea and glyconectin 3 from C. celata and extended the analyses of glyconectin 1 from M. prolifera. In this comparative study of three glyconectins we have found that they have species-specific and complex repetitive glycan structures with some common properties for isolated glycans such as a large size, a high charge content (sulfate and/or pyruvate), and N-acetylated hexose, pentose, or deoxyhexose, which classifies them as a new type of polysaccharide molecule distinct from classical glycosaminoglycans. A more detailed description of this new type of glycan sequences and their possible structures is reported and discussed in the accompanying article (40).

The degree of selectivity observed in the evolutionarily advanced, heterophilic, self and non-self molecular recognition within the immunoglobulin superfamily is closely approached by the degree of specificity of homophilic carbohydrate-mediated glyconectin to glyconectin interactions in Porifera. However, the structural differences between these two systems imply conceptually distinct molecular mechanisms. First, glyconectins are 100 times larger and extend 10 times farther from the cell surface than immunoglobulin molecules. Second, the glyconectin 1 specificity and tight binding of >109 M-1 reside in polyvalent carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions of >1000 sites, with a low affinity for the single site (<103 M-1) (14, 15, 29, 32-34), whereas immunoglobulins recognize antigens via higher affinity ranging from 104 to 109 M-1, with low valency binding (34-38). The low affinity of the monovalent glyconectin oligosaccharide units needs reconstitution of the naturally occurring valency in GNs to recover the adhesion function. Therefore, the use of classical inhibition experiments with monovalent glycan units, commonly utilized as evidence of glycan function in the conceptually different lectin-carbohydrate type of interactions, is not applicable for GN glycans. Here reported carbohydrate-mediated glyconectin-glyconectin interactions may provide a new paradigm for initial molecular self-recognition.

The close evolutionary relationship between the Porifera of today and the ancestors of multicellular organisms (33-35) indicates that xenogeneic discrimination of self-cohesive glyconectins may have been essential for the appearance of multicellularity. Clearly the evolution from primordial Metazoans to complex organisms required the development of additional cell recognition and adhesion mechanisms mediated via immunoglobulin, lectin, integrin, and cadherin families of molecules. Such an increase in molecular diversity enabled a corresponding increase in functions based on a more demanding self- and non-self-discrimination such as embryonal morphogenesis, renewal of adult tissues, and defense from foreign pathogens. Despite this evolving complexity of the components participating in cellular interactions, glyconectin-like structures have been preserved in mammalian systems, suggesting their versatility in recognition and adhesion (39). A model system for primordial xenogeneic self-recognition and adhesion based on the simplest Metazoans of the phylum Porifera gives results consistent with the hypothesis that the emergence of the first multicellular organisms, as well as the divergence of species and the appearance of more complex multicellular forms of life, may have been achieved by the evolution of glyconectin-like proteoglycan molecules with the capacity for self-recognition and adhesion via carbohydrates.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported mainly by private funds (from G. N. M.) and in part by the Conseil Régional Nord-Pas de Calais, CNRS, and the University of Rouen and University of Lille. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 332-35-14-69-08; Fax: 332-35-14-70-20; E-mail: gradimir{at}gradimir.com.

1 The abbreviations used are: ACMFSW, artificial Ca2+- and Mg2+-free seawater; SWT, seawater-Tris; CSW, Ca2+- and Mg2+-free seawater buffered with Tris; GC/MS, gas chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry; GN, glyconectin; EI-MS, electronic impact mass spectrometry; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; Py(4,6)Gal, 4,6-O-(1-carboxyethylidene)-{alpha}-D-Galp; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank V. Norris for helpful discussions, D. Florea for help in preparing samples, J. P. Zanetta for gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis of N-type linkage, and C. Richet for amino acid analysis.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Dammer, U., Popescu, O., Wagner, P., Anselmetti, D., Guntherodt, H. J., and Misevic, G. N. (1995) Science 267, 1173-1175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dwek, R. A. (1996) Chem. Rev. 96, 683-720[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Varki, A. (1993) Glycobiology 3, 97-130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Moscona, A. A. (1968) Dev. Biol. 18, 250-277[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Wilson, H. V. (1907) J. Exp. Zool. 5, 245-258[CrossRef]
  6. Wilson, H. V. (1910) Bull. Bur. Fisheries 30, 1-30
  7. Galstoff, P. S. (1925) J. Exp. Zool. 42, 183-221[CrossRef]
  8. Curtis, A. S. G. (1962) Nature 196, 245-248[CrossRef]
  9. Cauldwell, C. B., Henkart, P., and Humphreys, T. (1973) Biochemistry 12, 3051-3055[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Humphreys, T. (1963) Dev. Biol. 8, 27-47
  11. Jumblatt, J. E., Schlup, V., and Burger, M. M. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 1038-1042[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Muller, W. E., and Zahn, R. K. (1973) Exp. Cell Res. 80, 95-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Popescu, O., and Misevic, G. N. (1997) Nature 386, 231-232[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Misevic, G. N., Finne, J., and Burger, M. M. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 5870-5877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Misevic, G. N., and Burger, M. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4922-4929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Fernandez-Busquets, X., Kammerer, R. A., and Burger, M. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23558-23565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Spillmann, D., Thomas-Oates, J. E., van Kuik, J. A., Vliegenthart, J. F., Misevic, G., Burger, M. M., and Finne, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5089-5097[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jarchow, J., Fritz, J., Anselmetti, D., Calabro, A., Hascall, V. C., Gerosa, D., Burger, M. M., and Fernandez-Busquets, X. (2000) J. Struct. Biol. 132, 95-105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Brune, D. C. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 207, 285-290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Misevic, G. N. (1989) Methods Enzymol. 179, 95-104[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kamerling, J. P., Gerwig, G. J., Vliegenthart, J. F., and Clamp, J. R. (1975) Biochem. J. 151, 491-495[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Zanetta, J. P., Timmerman, P., and Leroy, Y. (1999) Glycobiology 9, 255-266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ciucanu, I., and Kerek, F. (1984) Carbohydr. Res. 131, 209-217[CrossRef]
  24. Hassell, J. R., Kimura, J. H., and Hascall, V. C. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55, 539-567[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Hascall, V. C., and Kimura, J. H. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 82, 769-800
  26. Hascall, V. C., and Heinegard, D. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 4242-4249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Dudman, W. F., and Lacey, M. J. (1986) Carbohydr. Res. 145, 175-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Spillmann, D., Hard, K., Thomas-Oates, J., Vliegenthart, J. F., Misevic, G., Burger, M. M., and Finne, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13378-13387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Misevic, G. N., and Burger, M. M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20577-20584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Maes, E., Strecker, G., Timmerman, P., Leroy, Y., and Zanetta, J. P. (1999) Anal. Biochem. 267, 300-308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Haseley, S. R., Vermeer, H. J., Kamerling, J. P., and Vliegenthart, J. F. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 9419-9424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Misevic, G. N., and Burger, M. M. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 2853-2859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Misevic, G. N., Jumblatt, J. E., and Burger, M. M. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 6931-6936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Misevic, G. N. (1991) Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 3, 400-405
  35. Iozzo, R. V., and Murdoch, A. D. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 598-614[Abstract]
  36. van der Merwe, P. A., and Barclay, A. N. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 354-358[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Corr, M., Slanetz, A. E., Boyd, L. F., Jelonek, M. T., Khilko, S., al Ramadi, B. K., Kim, Y. S., Maher, S. E., Bothwell, A. L., and Margulies, D. H. (1994) Science 265, 946-949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Gallagher, J. T. (1995) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 376, 125-134[Medline]