![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 17, 17142-17147, April 23, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



From the Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, University of Liège, 17, place Delcour, 4020 Liège, Belgium
Received for publication, December 11, 2003 , and in revised form, January 28, 2004.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is, thus, tempting to speculate that protein phosphorylation by ThTP is also an ancient process and that cell signaling mechanisms involving ThTP may be more important in microorganisms than, for instance, in mammals. This prompted us to investigate ThTP biosynthesis in bacteria. As we have recently reported, E. coli grown aerobically in a LB medium under optimal conditions contain no detectable amounts of ThTP (1). However, measurable amounts appeared when the bacteria were switched from aerobic to anaerobic conditions. It was, thus, interesting to investigate in more detail the relationship between ThTP biosynthesis and adaptation of E. coli to changing metabolic conditions and growth. Here we show that when bacteria are transferred from LB medium to a minimal medium containing glucose or pyruvate but no amino acids, ThTP levels rapidly and transiently increase (up to 20% of total thiamine). Furthermore, bacteria rendered ThTP-deficient by overexpression of a specific mammalian ThTPase displayed an intermediate plateau in growth rate under the conditions that normally lead to ThTP synthesis. The results suggest that ThTP synthesis is a signal facilitating the adaptation of bacteria to stringent conditions such as amino acid starvation, possibly through protein phosphorylation.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ppk-ppx::km) (8), or BL21 (Amersham Biosciences). BL21 were transformed with pGEX-5X-1 encoding either glutathione S-transferase (GST), the GST-ThTPase fusion protein (9), or the GST-EFHC1 fusion protein (see next paragraph). The bacteria were grown overnight (37 °C, 250 rpm) in 50100 ml of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Tryptone, 10 g/liter; yeast extract, 5 g/liter; NaCl, 10 g/liter, at pH 7.0). Then the bacteria were centrifuged (5 min; 10,000 x g) and suspended in the initial volume of fresh LB medium or M9 minimal medium (Na2HPO4, 6 g/liter; KH2PO4, 3 g/liter; NaCl, 0.5 g/liter; NH4Cl, 1 g/liter; CaCl2, 3 mg/liter; MgSO4, 1 mM, pH 7.0) containing various metabolic substrates. If not otherwise stated, the bacteria were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with shaking (250 rpm). For transformed bacteria, ampicillin (200 µg/ml) was present in the culture medium at all stages. After incubation, the bacteria were sedimented as above, the pellets were suspended in 12% trichloroacetic acid, the precipitated proteins were spun down (15 min, 10,000 x g), and the pellet was dissolved in 0.8 N NaOH for protein determination by the method of Peterson (10). The supernatant was treated with diethyl ether and analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography for thiamine compounds (11) and ATP (12). The authenticity of ThTP synthesized was checked by purification on an AG-50W-X8 (H+ form, Bio-Rad) cation exchange resin and subsequent hydrolysis by purified bovine ThTPase as previously described (1). Construction of GST-EFHC-1EFHC1 (GenBankTM accession number BC020210 [GenBank] ) codes for a eukaryotic protein with a single EF-hand domain. Its open reading frame was amplified from human brain cDNA using primers EFHC1for (5'-GAATTCATGGTGTCCAATCCCGTGCATG-3') and EFHC1rev (5'-CTCGAGTCAGTTTGAGAAAGCACGAAC-3') and Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The PCR fragment was first cloned into pCR4 using the zero blunt TOPO PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen). The fragment was isolated by XhoI and EcoRI digestion and inserted into the GST expression plasmid pGEX-5X-1 (Amersham Biosciences). Expression of the full-length protein was checked after IPTG induction by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie blue staining.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LB broth is an undefined complex medium mainly composed of amino acids (Tryptone, a pancreatic digest of casein), yeast extract, and NaCl, and we therefore switched to the minimal medium M9 supplemented with various carbon sources (10 mM). ThTP and ATP were determined after 30 min in the defined minimal medium M9 under aeration (Table I). No significant amount of ThTP could be detected in the absence of a carbon source, although the bacteria still contained appreciable amounts of ATP. Glucose, fructose, gluconate, pyruvate, and acetate induced an important increase in intracellular ThTP levels. ThTP was identified after purification and hydrolysis by a specific ThTPase as previously described (1). A smaller amount of ThTP was observed in the presence of glycerol, oxoglutarate, and succinate. Other Krebs cycle intermediates such as citrate, fumarate, oxaloacetate, and malate were completely ineffective, although especially the latter two significantly raised bacterial ATP content. These results suggest that ThTP accumulation is not directly related to the cellular ATP concentration but that the important factor is the nature of the carbon source. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that acetate is a good inducer of ThTP accumulation, although the ATP content remains low.
|
Krebs cycle intermediates will not rapidly yield high amounts of acetyl-CoA, and they do not induce the accumulation of a significant amount of ThTP, with two notable exceptions, oxoglutarate and succinate. It may be significant that both compounds are able in one step to yield another thioester, succinyl-CoA, the former via oxoglutarate dehydrogenase and the latter via succinyl-CoA synthetase. Thus, all our results suggest a link between thioesters and ThTP levels.
ThTP Accumulation Is Initiated in Minimal Medium within Minutes after the Addition of a Suitable SubstrateAs shown in Fig. 1, ThTP was detected already 5 min after the addition of glucose or pyruvate (10 mM) to the minimal M9 medium. The maximum (about 200250 pmol·mg1) was reached after 4060 min, and ThTP levels started to decrease after 1 h. In the presence of the same concentration of glutamate, the appearance of ThTP was strongly delayed, and the maximum amount obtained remained much lower than in the presence of glucose or pyruvate. In the presence of malate no significant amount of ThTP was observed. Interestingly, when pyruvate was added to the LB medium, a maximum ThTP content of about 3035 pmol·mg1 was reached after 90 min (not shown). This value is 510 times lower than the one obtained in M9 medium. No significant accumulation was observed in the presence of glucose in LB medium. Under these conditions the bacteria remained in a stationary phase, and no significant bacterial growth was observed within the 3-h incubation period. This is probably due to the very high bacterial density under these conditions (A600 > 2).
|
|
|
|
In the Absence of Amino Acids, Bacteria Lacking ThTP Show an Intermediate Plateau in Growth RateThe data presented above show that a transient accumulation of ThTP occurs in response to the transfer of bacteria from LB to M9 medium (containing an appropriate carbon source but no amino acids), and it is, thus, possible that ThTP may play a role in this adaptation. To test this hypothesis we compared the growth rate of E. coli expressing a highly specific ThTPase as a GST fusion protein (GST-ThTPase (9)) with bacteria expressing GST alone. In M9 medium containing 10 mM pyruvate, GST bacteria rapidly entered an exponential growth phase and reached a plateau after about 9 h (Fig. 5A). In GST-ThTPase bacteria an "intermediate plateau" appeared after 5 h. It lasted about 56 h, before exponential growth resumed.
|
It could be argued that GST-ThTPase overexpression induces a slow down in cell growth independently of ThTP hydrolysis. Indeed, because the molecular weight of the fusion protein (50 kDa) is twice higher than that of GST (25 kDa), its synthesis should require more energy. Therefore, we tested the effect of a larger fusion protein, GST-EFHC1 (100 kDa), on bacterial growth. EFHC1, under investigation in our laboratory, is a eukaryotic protein containing one EF-hand. In the presence of this fusion protein, which is irrelevant to thiamine metabolism and devoid of ThTPase activity, bacteria grew at the same rate as GST bacteria (not shown).
When bacteria were grown in M9 medium supplemented with pyruvate in the absence of IPTG, no differences in the growth rate between GST and GST-ThTPase bacteria were observed (Fig. 5C). Under these conditions GST-ThTPase bacteria contain about half the amount of ThTP present in the GST bacteria (not shown). Indeed our previous results have shown that in the absence of IPTG ThTPase activity is about 10% of the activity in the presence of IPTG (9). This activity, although higher than endogenous ThTPase activity in E. coli, is not sufficient to hydrolyze all ThTP and, thus, impair bacterial growth.
It could also be argued that the intermediate plateau observed in GST-ThTPase bacteria (Fig. 5A) is due to some kind of toxicity of ThTPase moiety independent of ThTP hydrolysis. Although several studies showed the high specificity of the 25-kDa ThTPase for ThTP, a significant hydrolysis of ATP in GST-ThTPase bacteria cannot be excluded. Determination of ATP in GST- and GST-ThTPase-expressing bacteria showed no significant differences (not shown). Moreover, when grown in LB medium supplemented with IPTG (Fig. 5D), both GST and GST-ThTPase bacteria rapidly entered the exponential growth phase and reached a stationary phase after about 3 h. In this medium, rich in amino acids, the expression of GST-ThTPase did not cause the appearance of an intermediate plateau. As expected, no ThTP was detected in either of the two cultures (not shown). These results strongly suggest that the intermediate plateau observed in GST-ThTPase bacteria in the absence of amino acids (Fig. 5A) is really due to ThTP depletion.
After induction by IPTG, we consistently observed a decrease in the absorbance of the medium containing GST bacteria after a plateau was reached in minimal (Fig. 5A) as well as in LB (Fig. 5D) medium. After induction the amount of intracellular GST reached 10% of total protein, significantly more than GST-ThTPase (not shown). Protein overexpression is a significant metabolic burden for bacteria (18) and a slow-down of growth after induction of GST is, therefore, not surprising.
In the experiment shown in Fig. 5A, the differences in growth rate between GST- and GST-ThTPase-expressing bacteria were studied in the presence of pyruvate as the carbon source. We also observed those differences using two other substrates inducing ThTP accumulation, i.e. glucose and acetate (Fig. 6). As with pyruvate, an intermediate plateau was observed with bacteria depleted in ThTP but not in the absence of IPTG. In glucose, the growth curves diverged already after 2.5 h (compared with 4.5 in pyruvate), whereas in acetate, the curves diverged only after 6 h. In each case, the growth curves started to diverge when the absorbance doubled, i.e. after approximately one division. In glucose, GST-ThTPase bacteria recovered after the intermediate plateau phase, and after 4 h the cell density was the same for both strains. In contrast, GST-ThTPase bacteria grown in acetate showed no recovery of growth after 24 h. In this case, ThTP depletion appears to induce a long-term impairment of growth rather than an intermediate plateau. This inability to recover may be related to the fact that growth in acetate is considerably slower than in glucose. Acetate is indeed a poor energetic substrate (as shown in Table I, intracellular ATP levels are lower in acetate than with most other carbon sources).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An important observation is that ThTP accumulation is impaired when the minimal medium, containing glucose, is supplemented with amino acids (i.e. a mixture of the 20 amino acids at 0.5 mM each). Taken together, those data support the idea that the appearance of ThTP is a signal involved in the adaptation of the bacteria to stringent conditions, such as amino acid starvation.
It should be emphasized that ThTP levels reached were similar (about 300 pmol/mg of protein) whether the bacteria were in the stationary (Fig. 1) or the exponential (Fig. 5A) growth phase. Thus, the important factor for ThTP accumulation in minimal medium is not the physiological state of the culture but the nature of the carbon source.
The second finding points more directly to the physiological role of ThTP, as we have shown that E. coli rendered ThTP-deficient by overexpression of a specific ThTPase exhibit an intermediate plateau of growth when they are switched to the minimal medium under conditions that would normally lead to ThTP accumulation. This does not mean that ThTP is always required for optimal growth, because we have seen that bacteria grown in optimal LB medium contain no ThTP. Rather, ThTP appears to be required temporarily when the bacteria have to adapt to a medium that contains no amino acids. ThTP accumulation may be only an early step in a cascade of adaptive biochemical processes.
Although the present study appears as a useful basis for understanding the biological role of ThTP in bacteria, it leaves a number of important questions unanswered. First, we know very little about the enzymatic mechanism of ThTP synthesis and about the biochemical events that regulate ThTP concentrations in the cell. Yet some indications can be drawn from our results. We have seen that when the bacteria accumulate a certain amount of ThTP they loose an equimolar amount of ThDP, suggesting that the diphosphate is the precursor. A phosphate donor should thus be required, and the most obvious candidate is ATP. However, the data of Table I show only a poor correlation between the cellular ATP content and the amount of ThTP appearing in the cells. It is particularly noteworthy that malate and oxaloacetate, which increase cellular ATP, are completely ineffective in increasing ThTP, whereas acetate, which is a very poor substrate for ATP production, induces an appreciable accumulation of ThTP. Therefore, if we assume that ATP is in fact the direct phosphate donor, some other factor(s) probably controls the rate of synthesis or hydrolysis. As we pointed out, substrates that can be processed to form acetyl-CoA (or succinyl-CoA) raise ThTP levels, whereas oxaloacetate, which reacts with acetyl-CoA to form citrate, is unable to induce ThTP accumulation. It is, thus, tempting to speculate that acetyl-CoA (and possibly other thioesters) is either an activator of ThTP synthesis or an inhibitor of its hydrolysis. Conversely, the presence of amino acids would inhibit ThTP synthesis or stimulate its hydrolysis.
A second important and unanswered question is, once ThTP is present, what are its cellular targets? Preliminary experiments have shown that [
-32P]ThTP phosphorylates a 26-kDa protein in E. coli (not shown). It will be important to identify this protein to find out whether this phosphorylation is biologically relevant. Alternatively, the target may be a receptor protein binding ThTP, as is observed for cAMP and transcription factors in bacteria (19). Even mechanisms involving a riboswitch (20) may be considered.
It is interesting to compare ThTP with another molecule that attracted much interest during recent years, i.e. polyP. Like ThTP, polyP transiently accumulates when bacteria are switched from a rich to a minimal medium (21). This accumulation is stimulated by a rapid rise in levels of guanosine pentaphosphate (22), which strongly inhibits exopolyphosphatase (8). PolyP in turn promotes protein degradation by the Lon protease (17), supplying amino acids needed for growth. Bacteria deficient in polyP kinase and, thus, unable to synthesize polyP exhibit an important lag in growth that is reversed in the presence of amino acids (16). In this case, however, the growth lag is observed immediately after starting the experiment, whereas in our experiments there was a delay of 35 h between induction of GST-ThTPase and the slow-down of growth corresponding to the intermediate plateau (Figs. 5A and 6, A and C). A possible explanation would be that, even in the complete absence of ThTP, a relatively constant growth rate can be maintained as long as the intracellular concentration of some key intermediate(s) (may be amino acids) is maintained above a certain threshold. Once the intermediates are exhausted, the growth slows down, leading to an intermediate plateau. ThTP would be part of a rescue system stimulating the synthesis of the intermediate(s), thus facilitating bacterial growth. The observation that with three different substrates (glucose, pyruvate, and acetate) the intermediate plateau starts after different time intervals (respectively, 2.5, 4.5, and 6 h) but always approximately after doubling of the cell density would be in favor of the exhaustion of a key intermediate in metabolism.
Further work will be required to substantiate this interpretation, but our results indicate at least that ThTP levels in E. coli do not directly control the growth rate. Rather, the initial accumulation of ThTP appears as a transient signal inducing a cascade of secondary biochemical processes, eventually resulting in growth facilitation. Although most of our results were obtained with the BL21 strain deficient in Lon protease, the adaptive mechanism involving ThTP accumulation probably exists in wild-type E. coli as well, as we have shown a similar initial accumulation of ThTP using the K-12 strain. On the other hand, ThTP accumulation requires a suitable carbon source, whereas there is no indication that the nature of the carbon source is important for polyP synthesis. Therefore, no obvious relationship appears to exist between the two responses to amino acid starvation.
Even if the two mechanisms are unrelated, we should emphasize some striking similarities between ThTP and polyP. Both compounds are found in most organisms ranging from bacteria to mammals. Both compounds contain high energy phosphoanhydride bonds and are increased in bacteria after a stress such as amino acid starvation. Their role in eukaryotes remains enigmatic, but ThTP may phosphorylate certain proteins (2), whereas polyP stimulates mammalian protein kinase target of rapamycin, involved in the proliferation of mammary cancer cells (23). Both compounds are conserved through evolution and appear to be involved in basic cellular processes.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
These authors equally contributed. ![]()
A graduate student of the Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture. ![]()
¶ Research Associate at the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS). ![]()
|| Senior Research Associate at the FNRS. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 32-4-366-59-67; Fax: 32-4-366-59-53; E-mail: L.Bettendorff{at}ulg.ac.be.
1 The abbreviations used are: ThTP, thiamine triphosphate; ThDP, thiamine diphosphate; ThTPase, thiamine triphosphatase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; polyP, inorganic polyphosphate; IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Song, L. Bettendorff, M. Tonelli, and J. L. Markley Structural Basis for the Catalytic Mechanism of Mammalian 25-kDa Thiamine Triphosphatase J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10939 - 10948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Liu, D. E. Timm, and T. D. Hurley Pyrithiamine as a Substrate for Thiamine Pyrophosphokinase J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2006; 281(10): 6601 - 6607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |