JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M310198200 on January 27, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 17, 17607-17616, April 23, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/17/17607    most recent
M310198200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleckenstein, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sollid, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleckenstein, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sollid, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular Characterization of Covalent Complexes between Tissue Transglutaminase and Gliadin Peptides*

Burkhard Fleckenstein, This author holds a fellowship from EMBIO, University of Oslo{ddagger}§, Shuo-Wang Qiao{ddagger}, Martin R. Larsen§, Günther Jung||, Peter Roepstorff§, and Ludvig M. Sollid{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Institute of Immunology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, N-0027 Oslo, Norway, §Protein Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark, and ||Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Tübingen, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany

Received for publication, September 14, 2003 , and in revised form, January 26, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tissue transglutaminase (TG2) modifies proteins and peptides by transamidation or deamidation of specific glutamine residues. TG2 also has a central role in the pathogenesis of celiac disease. The enzyme is both the target of disease-specific autoantibodies and generates deamidated gliadin peptides recognized by intestinal T cells from patients. Incubation of TG2 with gliadin peptides also results in the formation of covalent TG2-peptide complexes. Here we report the characterization of complexes between TG2 and two immunodominant gliadin peptides. Two types of covalent complexes were found; the peptides are either linked via a thioester bond to the active site cysteine of TG2 or via isopeptide bonds to particular lysine residues of the enzyme. We quantified the number of gliadin peptides bound to TG2 under different conditions. After 30 min of incubation of TG2 at 1 µM with an equimolar ratio of peptides to TG2, approximately equal amounts of peptides were bound by thioester and isopeptide linkage. At higher peptide to TG2 ratios, more than one peptide was linked to TG2, and isopeptide bond formation dominated. The lysine residues in TG2 that act as acyl acceptors were identified by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization and nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic digests of the TG2-peptide complexes. At a high molar excess of gliadin peptides to TG2 altogether six lysine residues of TG2 were found to participate in isopeptide bond formation. The results are relevant to the understanding of how antibodies to TG2 are formed in celiac disease.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tissue transglutaminase (TG21; EC 2.3.2.13 [EC] ) belongs to a family of structurally and functionally related enzymes that catalyze the formation of intra- or intermolecular N{epsilon}({gamma}-glutamyl)lysine bonds within their target proteins (1, 2). In this Ca2+-dependent transamidation reaction, an acyl residue, derived from the {gamma}-carboxamide group of a peptide-bound glutamine (acyl donor), is transferred to an appropriate primary amine, most commonly the {epsilon}-amino group of lysine residues (acyl acceptor) (3). A catalytic triad involving cysteine 277, histidine 335, and aspartic acid 358 forms the active site of TG2 (4). In the first step, the side chain of a glutamine residue forms a thioester with the active site cysteine, and ammonia is released (acylation). In the following transamidation step, the activated acyl group is transferred to the acyl acceptor amine, forming an isopeptide bond (deacylation). Alternatively, hydrolysis of the thioester bond leads to deamidation, converting the glutamine into a glutamic acid residue.

The food-sensitive enteropathy celiac disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology (5, 6). In patients with CD, ingestion of wheat gluten and related proteins of barley and rye induces mucosal lymphocyte infiltration and villous atrophy. CD demonstrates a strong genetic association with the genes encoding for HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 (5). Gluten-reactive CD4+ T cells have been isolated from the small intestine of CD patients and are almost exclusively restricted by either of these HLA molecules (7, 8). Activation of such T cells is likely to be a critical event in the disease development (5). The gluten-reactive T cells of the celiac lesion predominantly recognize modified gluten peptides in which distinct glutamines have been deamidated and thereby converted to glutamic acid residues (9). Accumulating evidence suggests that this deamidation and formation of gluten-derived T cell epitopes in the intestinal mucosa is mediated by TG2 (1012). Although the transamidation reaction has a higher rate than the deamidation reaction at neutral pH (3), the rate of the deamidation reaction is increased at lower pH (13), such as in the proximal small intestine (14). The sequence specificity of TG2 toward acyl donor substrates was recently elucidated (13, 15), and studies on the affinity of TG2 for various gliadin peptides suggested that TG2 is directly involved in the selection of gluten T cell epitopes (13).

Patients with active CD have autoantibodies to TG2 (16), which are highly disease-specific and whose formation is dependent on ingestion of gluten. Notably, TG2 itself was described to be involved in covalent complex formation with gluten-derived peptides in the presence of calcium (6, 17). Those TG2-gliadin peptide complexes have been suggested to act as hapten-carrier complexes, which could explain the typical antibody response against TG2 in untreated CD patients (18). In this model the complexes are taken up after binding to the immunoglobulin receptor of TG2-specific B cells. Subsequently the gliadin peptide cargo is presented and recognized by gliadin-specific T cells, which give help to the B cells to secrete TG2-specific antibodies. However, little is known about the formation and the molecular nature of these TG2-gluten peptide complexes.

The aim of the current study was to investigate the complex formation between TG2 and two immunodominant gliadin-derived T cell epitopes. Because these peptides contain glutamine but no lysine residues, TG2 will act as an acyl acceptor in these experiments. Our experiments allowed quantitation of the number of gliadin peptides covalently bound to TG2 under different conditions and demonstrated the chemical nature of this linkage. After proteolytic digestion of these complexes, the sites of the modified lysine residues within TG2 were identified by mass spectrometry.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Definition and Synthesis of Peptides—The following peptides were synthesized: peptide QLQPFPQPQLPY (defined as {alpha}I, corresponding to {alpha}9-gliadin-(57–68)), the deamidated derivative {alpha}9-gliadin-(57–68) E65 (QLQPFPQPELPY, defined as {alpha}IE), the N-terminal-biotinylated analogues of peptides {alpha}I and {alpha}IE (B-{alpha}I and B-{alpha}IE, respectively), the N-terminal fluorescein-labeled analogue of peptide {alpha}I (F-{alpha}I), and peptide PQPQLPYPQPQLPY (defined as {alpha}II, corresponding to {alpha}2-gliadin-(62–75)). Peptides were prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis on a robotic system (Syro MultiSynTech, Bochum, Germany) using Fmoc/O-tert-butyl chemistry and 2-chlorotrityl resin (Senn Chemicals AG, Dielsdorf, Switzerland) (19). A 5-fold molar excess of Fmoc-L-amino acids was used for coupling. For biotinylation and fluorescein labeling of peptides, biotin or carboxyfluorescein (3 eq each, both from Sigma) was coupled to the free N-terminal amino group of the resin-bound, protected peptides using diisopropylcarbodiimide (5eq) as coupling reagent. The identity of all peptides was confirmed by electrospray mass spectrometry, and purity was analyzed by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. The 125I-radiolabeling at the C-terminal Tyr residue of peptide {alpha}I was performed using the chloramines T method (20).

Production of Tissue Transglutaminase—Human TG2 was expressed as a GST fusion protein in Escherichia coli using the vector construct as described (21). Thus, "TG2" in this paper stands for the GST-TG2 fusion protein. The protein concentration of the GST-TG2 preparation was determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay, a modified Bradford assay. To obtain data as accurate as possible, the sequence homolog guinea pig TG2 (Sigma) was used as a standard.

Detection of TG2-Peptide Complexes by SDS-PAGE—Biotinylated peptides B-{alpha}I and B-{alpha}IE were incubated at concentrations indicated with 1 µM TG2 at 37 °C in phosphate-buffered saline, 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4, for 2 h. In one sample, TG2 was inactivated by incubation with 10 mM iodoacetamide for 15 min at room temperature, before incubation with peptide. The samples were added to Laemmli buffer containing 1% {beta}-mercaptoethanol and 2% SDS, heated at 97 °C for 3 min, and subjected to SDS-PAGE separation with 0.1% SDS in the running buffer. The proteins were blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (OPTITRAN BA-S 85, 0.45 µm, Schleicher & Schuell) by using 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol. After blocking of unspecific binding (5 mM EDTA, 2% dry milk powder in 50 mM Tris/HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, pH 8.0, for 20 min), the membrane was incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (Southern Biotechnology, 1:10,000) for 60 min and washed by 50 mM Tris/HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, pH 8.0 (4 times x 10 min). Fluorescent reagents (Amersham Biosciences) were added, and autofluorescence was detected by exposure to a film (Scientific Imagin film, Kodak X-OmatTM AR).

Mini Spin Columns—In the kinetics study 2.5 µM TG2 was incubated at 37 °C in phosphate-buffered saline, 2 mM CaCl2 with minute amounts of radiolabeled 125I-{alpha}I or 125I-{alpha}IE together with 100 µM unlabeled {alpha}I or {alpha}IE, respectively. After incubation, the peptide-TG2 complexes were separated from unbound peptides on Sephadex G50 Superfine (Amersham Biosciences) spin columns equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and 0.1% NaN3, which was used as the running buffer throughout the experiment. Preparation of the spin columns and separations were performed as described (22). Just before separation columns (1-ml pipette tips closed by small cotton plugs) were packed with Sephadex G50 Superfine (swelled in the running buffer) and spun semi-dry (1500 rpm, 593 x g for 5 min, Sigma 4–10P, rotor 11140), resulting in a 650-µl gel bed volume. Samples (15 µl) were gently pipetted on top of the gel matrix, and columns were spun by an adapted protocol (linear acceleration 0–3500 rpm (2150 x g) within 8 min followed by 3500 rpm for 2 min). Radioactivity in the void volume and in the columns was counted by a {gamma}-counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland). The counts were converted to an average number of gliadin peptides bound per TG2 molecule as follows: number of peptides/TG2 = [void count/(column count + void count)] x [mol of peptide/mol of TG2].

In the peptide titration studies, 1 µM TG2 was incubated with different concentrations of peptide {alpha}I for 30 min at 37 °C. Samples were either directly analyzed by spin column experiments or further treated with 10 mM hydroxylamine, pH 7.4, or 10 mM hydroxylamine, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.9, before spin column separation.

Capillary Electrophoresis—To quantify deamidation of peptide {alpha}I, 1 µM TG2 was incubated for 30 min with the fluorescein-labeled peptide F-{alpha}I under conditions identical to those applied in spin column experiments. The deamidated product F-{alpha}IE was separated and quantified by micellar electrokinetic chromatography and laser-induced fluorescence detection at 488 nm (Beckman MDQ capillary electrophoresis system) as described (13). Briefly, samples were injected by pressure (0.5 p.s.i., 5 s) into a fused-silica capillary (25 cm in length, 75 µm inner diameter) equilibrated by three rinsing steps using 100 mM sodium hydroxide, water, and electrophoresis buffer (64 mM sodium borate, 20 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate, pH 9.3) (20 p.s.i., 1.5 min in each step). Separations were performed at 22 kV at room temperature, and samples were run from the cathode to the anode. All experiments were performed at least in duplicate.

Chemical Modification of Lysine Residues within GST-TG2—An aliquot of GST-TG2 was dialyzed against reaction buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.2) supplemented with 10 mM EDTA (Micro-dialyzing system, Pierce). GST-TG2 (2.1 mg, 21 nmol) was dissolved in 700 µl of reaction buffer, and N-[{gamma}-maleimidobutyryloxy]succinimide ester (Pierce; 80 µl of 10 mM, dissolved in 100% Me2SO) was added and incubated for 30 min. The sample was dialyzed against reaction buffer/10 mM EDTA and incubated with the control peptide CLRMKLPQPELPYPQPELPY (200 µl 1 mM) for 120 min. After the addition of 100 mM cysteine (in 0.1 M Tris/Cl, pH 7.0) for 30 min, the modified GST-TG2 was dialyzed against 10 mM NH4HCO3 and lyophilized. For digestion, modified GST-TG2 (30 pmol) was incubated with trypsin (1 µg, Promega) in 50 mM NH4HCO3 (65 µl total) for 24 h at 37 °C, and proteolytic fragments were analyzed by MALDI-TOF and ESI mass spectrometry.

In-gel Digestion—Protein bands corresponding to GST-TG2-peptide complexes (104 kDa) were excised from the Coomassie-stained polyacrylamide gel and cut into several pieces. The pieces were washed twice by acetonitrile/water 1:1 (v/v) (20 min each) and acetonitrile (20 min each) and dried in a SpeedVac. Proteins were reduced by swelling the gel particles in 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 M NH4HCO3 (30 min, 56 °C). Excess liquid was removed, and thiol groups were alkylated by adding 55 mM iodoacetamide, 0.1 M NH4HCO3 (30 min at room temperature in the dark). Gel particles were washed and dried as described above. A digestion buffer composed of 12.5 ng/µl of trypsin (Promega, modified, sequencing grade) in 50 mM NH4HCO3 was added, and samples were kept on ice for 30 min to allow rehydration of the gel particles with limited autoproteolysis of trypsin. The remaining supernatant was replaced by 50 mM NH4HCO3, and tryptic digestion was carried out overnight at 37 °C.

Mass Spectrometry—Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectra were acquired on a Bruker Reflex II MALDI-TOF instrument (Bruker-Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). Electrospray ionization tandem mass spectra were recorded on a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, England). Tryptic peptide mixtures were desalted and concentrated on Poros 20 R2 reverse-phase packing sorbent (Applied Biosystems) packed in GELoader tips (Eppendorf). For ESI mass spectrometry, samples were eluted into nanoelectrospray needles (Protana Engineering, Odense, Denmark) as previously described (23). For spraying, needles were typically held at 800 V toward a skimmer cone (40 V). In collision-induced dissociation experiments (collision gas argon, manifold pressure ~8 x 10-15 millibar, collision energy 32–40 eV) product ions were analyzed by the orthogonal TOF analyzer.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Detection of Covalent TG2-Peptide Complexes by SDS-PAGE—TG2 was incubated for 2 h with 5–300 µM N-terminalbiotinylated gliadin peptide, QLQPFPQPQLPY (B-{alpha}I). The reaction was stopped by the addition of Laemmli buffer containing 1% {beta}-mercaptoethanol and a heating step, and samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Specific detection of the biotin moiety on the following blot resulted in a distinct band corresponding to the molecular weight of the GST-TG2 fusion protein (104 kDa) (Fig. 1). The intensity of the signal gradually increased with higher peptide concentrations, reaching a plateau at 150 µM. A very weak band was observed at 20 µM, whereas no signal was visible at 5 µM. Glutamine 65 in peptide {alpha}I is known to be specifically deamidated by TG2 (24). Substitution of that glutamine for a glutamic acid residue (peptide B-{alpha}IE) resulted in a complete loss of the 104-kDa-band even when B-{alpha}IE was used at 150 µM. The same negative result was obtained when TG2 was treated with iodoacetamide (10 mM,15 min) before incubation with peptide, leading to an irreversible alkylation of cysteine residues in TG2 (data not shown).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Detection of TG2-gliadin peptide complexes by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. TG2 (1 µM) was incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with increasing amounts of the N-terminal-biotinylated peptide QLQPFPQPQLPY (B-{alpha}I). A biotinylated peptide derivative (B-{alpha}IE) having a glutamic acid instead of the glutamine in position 9 of B-{alpha}I (thereby not a substrate) was used as a control. After stopping the reaction by the addition of Laemmli buffer and heating up to 97 °C for 3 min, samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Streptavidin-horse radish peroxidase was added, and signals were detected by autofluorescence based on the presence of the biotin moiety. A biotinylated class II MHC {beta}-chain served as a positive control for the blotting and staining procedure.

 
Quantitation of Peptides Bound to TG2—TG2-{alpha}I-complex formation was studied quantitatively by using a 125I-labeled derivative of {alpha}I as a tracer peptide during incubation. Samples were loaded on a miniaturized gel filtration column, and free peptides were separated from generated TG2-peptide complexes and the unmodified enzyme. The high molecular weight components were detected exclusively in the void volume as shown by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2A). The peptide fraction, however, was retained in the gel matrix, as proved by measuring the radioactivity in the void volume and the remaining column. After incubation of TG2 with peptide {alpha}I, radioactivity in these two compartments was counted, and the molar amount of peptide in the void volume was calculated. Together with the known amount of TG2, the average number of peptides bound to a single TG2-molecule could be determined.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Quantitation of gliadin peptides covalently bound to TG2. After complex formation, unbound gliadin peptides were separated from TG2-peptide complexes or unmodified TG2 by mini spin columns. A, as shown by SDS-PAGE, TG2 and TG2-peptide complexes are exclusively found in the void volume. Free peptides are quantitatively retained in the gel (data not shown). MW, molecular weight. B, 2.5 µM TG2 was incubated with 100 µM peptide {alpha}I and traces of the 125I-labeled derivate at 37 °C. The number of peptides bound per TG2 molecule was determined after various time points. C,1 µM TG2 was incubated with various concentrations of peptide {alpha}I or with its fluorescence-labeled derivative F-{alpha}I for 30 min at 37 °C. The number of peptides per TG2 molecule was determined by spin column experiments (squares); deamidation was measured by micellar electrokinetic chromatography (circles). D, 1 µM TG2 was incubated with peptide {alpha}I. After 30 min, samples were either directly analyzed (open squares) or treated with 10 mM hydroxylamine pH 7.4 before analysis (filled squares). Identical results were obtained by treatment with 10 mM hydroxylamine, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.9. The slight differences in the number of peptides/TG2 between Fig. 2, C and D, are due to two different preparations of TG2 used. E, percentage of peptides bound via thioester (filled triangles) versus isopeptides bonds (open triangles). Calculations were done based on the results presented in D.

 
In a first kinetic study, TG2 (2.5 µM) was incubated in the presence of calcium with a 40-fold molar excess of peptide {alpha}I, and the average number of peptides bound to TG2 was determined after different time intervals (Fig. 2B). Complex formation was found to occur rapidly. After 5 and 10 min, about 1.2 and 1.9 {alpha}I peptides per TG2 molecule were calculated, respectively. A maximum of 2.8 peptides/TG2 was observed between 30 and 60 min of incubation time. Interestingly, a slight but continuous decrease of this ratio was found during further incubation, reaching a value of 2.1 peptides/TG2 after 240 min. No radioactivity was found in the void volume if TG2 was treated by iodoacetamide before incubation with peptide {alpha}I (data not shown).

Subsequently, TG2 (1 µM) was incubated with a 0.5–250-fold molar excess of peptide {alpha}I (Fig. 2C). An incubation time of 30 min was chosen to allow maximal complex formation (Fig. 2B). For an equimolar ratio, an average number of about 0.2 peptides/TG2 was found. The titration curve showed a maximal slope between 10 µM (1.1 peptides/TG2) and 60 µM (3.8 peptides/TG2). At a 40-fold molar excess, 3.0 peptides were determined to be bound to TG2, consistent with the result from Fig. 2B (2.8 peptides/TG2 for an identical incubation time and molar excess). The titration curve reached a plateau at 100–150-fold molar excess, where a maximal number of 4.2 peptides/TG2 was obtained.

Isopeptide and Thioester Bonds in TG2-Peptide Complexes— In the TG2-peptide complexes described so far (Figs. 1, 2B, and 2C), peptide {alpha}I could be bound via a thioester bond to C-277 in the active site of the enzyme or via isopeptide bonds involving lysine resides of TG2. To quantify these two peptide fractions, TG2 (1 µM) was incubated with peptide {alpha}I for 30 min followed by treatment with hydroxylamine at pH 7.4 or 8.9. The nucleophile hydroxylamine specifically cleaves thioester but not amide bonds.

The hydroxylamine treatment led to a slight decrease of the total number of peptides bound to TG2, as shown by spin column analysis (Fig. 2D). The observed difference between both graphs corresponds to peptides bound via thioester bonds to TG2. At peptide concentrations between 45 and 135 µM, 1 µmol of TG2 carried about 0.5 to 0.7 µmol of peptide {alpha}I linked via thioester bonds. With decreasing concentrations of peptide {alpha}I the relative amount of thioester-bound peptides continually increased (Fig. 2E). After incubation with 1 µM peptide {alpha}I, hydroxylamine treatment removed about 50% of the bound radioactivity, indicating that peptide {alpha}I is bound in similar amounts via thioester and isopeptide linkage. Thus, both thioester and isopeptide bond formation take place over a broad concentration range.

To address whether the thiol to amine exchange reaction for the formation of isopeptide bonded complexes is intermolecular, we studied the backward reaction by adding extra TG2 to isolated TG2-peptide {alpha}I complexes in a 5-fold molar excess. This, however, did not cause an accelerated decay of the reaction shown in Fig. 2B as it would be expected from an inter-molecular thiol to amine exchange reaction.

Complex Formation Versus Deamidation—To quantify the deamidation reaction taking place concurrently to complex formation, samples in which peptide {alpha}I was replaced by its fluorescein-labeled derivative F-{alpha}I were incubated under identical conditions. Samples were analyzed by micellar electrokinetic chromatography. Incubation for 30 min with 200 µM F-{alpha}I resulted in 37 µM F-{alpha}IE (Fig. 2C), which still increased at longer incubation times (data not shown). However, at lower peptide concentrations the ratio between TG2-bound peptides (both thioester and isopeptide-linked) and deamidated peptides clearly increased. At 10 µM, about 1.1 µM peptides were detected in the complex, and 4.3 µM were deamidated. At 1 µM, the amounts of covalently bound (0.2 µM) and deamidated peptides (0.33 µM) were almost identical. Under those conditions half of the bound peptides are linked via thioesters (Fig. 2E), meaning that only 0.1 µM (19%) of all converted peptides (0.53 µM) were isopeptide-linked. With increasing peptide concentrations, however, isopeptide bond formation became a rather infrequent event compared with thioester hydrolysis.

Identification of Acyl Acceptor Sites within TG2 by Mass Spectrometry—Next we identified which lysine residues in the GST-TG2 fusion protein are involved in isopeptide bond formation to the targeted glutamine residue in peptide {alpha}I. After incubation of TG2 (1 µM) with peptide {alpha}I at molar ratios of 1:1, 1:10, 1:50, and 1:150, complexes were separated by SDS-PAGE. The band corresponding to TG2-peptide complexes and unmodified TG2 (these are not separated under the conditions used) was cut out from the Coomassie-stained gel and subjected to in-gel digestion by trypsin. Digests were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in the reflector and linear mode, and spectra were searched for masses characteristic for tryptic fragments from GST-TG2 cross-linked to peptide {alpha}I. Theoretically expected masses were calculated by excluding tryptic cleavage C-terminal of a lysine residue involved in isopeptide bond formation and by allowing one missed cleavage site in the GST-TG2-derived peptide. In the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum obtained after incubating peptide {alpha}I with TG2 in a 50-fold molar excess, six masses characteristic for the cross-linked tryptic fragments I–VI were found (Fig. 3, Table I). Because peptide {alpha}I carries an N-terminal glutamine residue, all six signals are preceded by a typical -17-Da signal due to pyroglutamate formation of that residue.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
MALDI-TOF MS detection of tryptic TG2-derived peptides I–VI cross-linked to peptide {alpha}I (see also Table I). TG2 (1 µM) was incubated with peptide {alpha}I (50 µM) for 25min, and complexes were separated from free peptides by SDS-PAGE. Their corresponding Coomassie-stained bands were cut out, and the protein was in-gel-digested by trypsin. The digest was analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. Shown are mass windows of 50 atomic mass units containing the isotopic mass pattern for the observed six crosslinked products and the pattern at -17 Da coming from pyroglutamate formation of peptide {alpha}I. The monoisotopic masses are assigned.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Identified lysine residues of TG2 involved in covalent complex formation with two {alpha}-gliadin peptides The table reports the m/z values of six tryptic TG2 peptides that are cross-linked by isopeptide bonds to either peptide {alpha}Ior {alpha}II. Lysine residues acting as acyl acceptors are underlined and in bold, and their number within the TG2 sequence is given in the second column. All listed m/z values were observed by MALDI-TOF or ESI MS.

 
MS/MS Experiments—The identity of the six putative crosslinked products I-{alpha}ItoVI-{alpha}I was verified by nano-ESI MS/MS. All six products were observed as 3- or 4-fold charged ions in the ESI MS spectrum (Table I; insets in Fig. 4). Fig. 4, A and B, shows the MS/MS spectrum of the triply charged ions 962.5 and 705.7, corresponding to products II-{alpha}I and VI-{alpha}I, respectively. MS/MS was performed by collision-induced dissociation (CID) of selected parent ions in the second quadrupole of the quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The identity of both the tryptic TG2-derived peptides II and VI and the gliadin peptide {alpha}I could be clearly elucidated from the generated characteristic b- and y-type fragment ions (25) (found as single and double charged daughter ions). Results were further proved by the series of counter parting b*- and y*-ions, which describe fragments containing the isopeptide bond. Fragmentation within peptide {alpha}I was preferentially observed N-terminal to proline, as expected in ESI CID MS/MS, and the C-terminal fragment PY was the major signal in all MS/MS spectra recorded. These MS/MS spectra also unambiguously confirmed the site at which the cross-linking reaction had taken place. Of 4 glutamine residues in peptide {alpha}I, only Gln-65 is cross-linked to lysine 562 and lysine 677 of the TG2-derived peptides II and VI, respectively. By increasing the collision energy, weak signals deriving from fragmentation of the isopeptide bond itself were observed. Under these conditions multiple fragmentation in the backbone of peptide {alpha}I were induced as well (Fig. 4). Identified fragment ions in the MS/MS spectra of tryptic, peptides I–VI cross-linked to peptide {alpha}I, are summarized in Fig. 5, left side.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
ESI MS/MS spectra of cross-linked products II-{alpha}I (A) and VI-{alpha}I (B). The insets show the signals of the triply charged parent ions selected for CID (monoisotopic signals 962.60 and 705.80 for II-{alpha}I and VI-{alpha}I, respectively). They also include the signals obtained due to pyroglutamate formation in peptide {alpha}I (monoisotopic signals 956.94 and 700.12, respectively). The monoisotopic mass 701.95 observed in the inset of B belongs to a doubly charged tryptic peptide of TG2, which is not involved in cross-linking. In the MS/MS spectra, daughter ions originating from fragmentation in peptide {alpha}I are marked by roman letters; those resulting from fragmentation within the TG2-derived peptide are labeled by italic letters.A star indicates daughter ions, which contain the isopeptide bond (see also Fig. 5); daughter ions arising from double fragmentation in peptide {alpha}I are given by their amino acid sequence. Daughter ion QLQPFPQPELPY in B results from fragmentation within the isopeptide bond itself.

 



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Schematic illustration of observed daughter ions in all ESI MS/MS spectra recorded. The six cross-linked TG2-derived peptides I–VI (see also Table I), either bound to peptide {alpha}I (left side) or to peptide {alpha}II (right side), were subjected to CID, and daughter ions were detected. A star indicates daughter ions containing the isopeptide bond. For cross-linked products II-{alpha}I and VI-{alpha}I, daughter ions arising from fragmentation within the TG2-derived peptide are given by italic letters to allow an unambiguous assignment in Fig. 4.

 
For a further verification of the identified cross-linking sites in the enzyme, TG2-peptide complexes were generated with another gliadin peptide ({alpha}II) using identical conditions. Analysis of the tryptic in-gel digest by MALDI-TOF MS and nano-ESI MS/MS confirmed the results obtained for peptide {alpha}I. Expected masses of tryptic peptides I–VI cross-linked to peptide {alpha}II were observed, both in MALDI-TOF- and ESI MS spectra. By MS/MS analysis characteristic daughter ions for cross-linked peptides I, II, III, V, and VI were detected, whereas no clear signals were observed for cross-linked peptide IV (presumably due to the low signal intensity of the parent ion) or any other TG2-derived peptide (Table I; Fig. 5, right side).

Hierarchy of Lysine Residues Involved in Complex Formation—Cross-linking within TG2-peptide complexes generated at four different TG2/peptide molar ratios (1:1, 1:10, 1:50, and 1:150) was analyzed as described. Comparing the results obtained from MALDI-TOF and nano-ESI mass spectrometry for complexes made with both the {alpha}I and {alpha}II gliadin peptides, a clear hierarchy in the participation of the identified lysine residues in the cross-linking reaction was observed (Table II). At a 1:1 ratio, a low signal was observed only for the crosslinked product of tryptic peptide III. This signal got more intensive at a 1:10 ratio, and also peaks for cross-linked peptides II and IV appeared. By increasing the TG2/peptide ratio to 1:50 and 1:150, signals for all six cross-linked peptides were observed, although with different intensities. However, no additional lysine residues within the GST-TG2 fusion protein were found to be involved in isopeptide bond formation when a 150-fold molar excess of peptides was applied during complex formation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE II
Observed cross-linking sites in TG2 at different molar ratios of TG2 to peptide {alpha}I The signals for the TG2-derived peptides I–VI covalently linked to peptide {alpha}I were found with very low ((+)), intermediate (+), or high intensities (++) in the MALDI-TOF and ESI mass spectra. Similar results were obtained by using peptide {alpha}II for complex formation. Peptides I–VI were aligned by their acyl acceptor residue (bold and underlined). Lys-602 (in italics) does not belong to peptide IV itself and was included to illustrate the sequence of preferred acyl acceptor sites.

 
Chemical Modification of Lysine Residues within GST-TG2—In a control experiment, the lysine residues most easily accessible for chemical modification were identified. GST-TG2 (21 nmol, corresponding to 1113 nmol of lysine residues) was reacted with limited amounts of the heterobifunctional crosslinker N-[{gamma}-maleimidobutyryloxy]succinimide ester (800 nmol) and subsequently incubated with the control peptide CLRMKLPQPELPYPQPELPY (200 nmol). The modified fusion protein was digested by trypsin, which also cleaves the control peptide C-terminal of Arg-3 and Lys-5. Thus, accessible lysine residues are modified by a carboxy-arginyl-leucyl-cysteinyl-succinimidebutyryl moiety, resulting in a typical mass shift of 555.66 atomic mass units of the corresponding tryptic fragment. The digest was analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS and nano-ESI MS/MS, and 10 lysine residues were identified as modified. Within TG2, Lys-74, Lys-414, Lys-425, and Lys-649 were found as acylated (TG2 sequence given by gi4759228). In the GST protein Lys-27, Lys-45, Lys-113, Lys-125, Lys-191, and Lys-218 were identified as modified (GST sequence given by gi595726).

Location of Lysine Residues Involved in Isopeptide Bond Formation—As seen from the three-dimensional structure of TG2 (Protein Date Bank file pdb1fau.ent.Z in the Brookhaven Data Bank), the six lysine residues participating in enzymatic isopeptide bond formation to gliadin peptides are not randomly distributed (Fig. 6). Lys-590, Lys-600, Lys-649, and Lys-677 are all located in the C-terminal domain 4, and Lys-444 and Lys-562 are situated in domain 2. Interestingly, Lys-677 is located at the interface of domain 2 and 4, rather buried in the interior of the protein than exposed at the surface. Also, Lys-562 appears to be partly buried, whereas the other four lysine residues are clearly exposed to the surface of the protein.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Location of identified acyl acceptor lysine residues within the three-dimensional structure of TG2. The illustration is based on the Protein Date Bank file pdb1fau.ent.Z taken from the Brookhaven Data bank and was done by RasWin Molecular Graphics, Windows Version 2.6. Only the side chains of the six lysine residues (space-fill model) participating in isopeptide bond formation and those of the catalytic triad (ball and sticks) are illustrated. The backbone of domains 1–4 is colored in blue, green, orange, and red, respectively.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study we characterized covalent gliadin peptide-TG2 complexes generated in vitro. A spin column protocol was used to determine quantitatively the number of gliadin peptides covalently bound to TG2. Peptides were either linked by thioester or isopeptide bonds. MALDI-TOF and ESI tandem mass spectrometry were applied to directly monitor the location of the acyl acceptor sites within TG2. This paper demonstrates the chemical nature and structure of covalent TG2-gliadin peptide complexes generated with two of the immunodominant T cell epitopes in CD (peptides {alpha}I and {alpha}II).

Covalent TG2-peptide complexes have been described previously (6, 16), but their molecular structure has remained elusive. Incubation of TG2 in the presence of calcium with the known substrate peptide B-{alpha}I resulted in complex formation between the peptide and TG2 (Fig. 1). The pretreatment of those samples and the presence of SDS indicate a covalent linkage between the biotinylated peptide and TG2. These covalent complexes might derive from thioester formation between Cys-277 in the active site of TG2 and the side chain of Gln-65 in B-{alpha}I. Alternatively, TG2 itself could act as an acyl acceptor molecule, resulting in isopeptide bond formation.

The acyl acceptor sites in TG2 were identified by mass spectrometric analysis of tryptic digests of the complexes. By MALDI-TOF MS, nano-ESI MS, and nano-ESI MS/MS, six lysine residues were identified to be involved in isopeptide bond formation to Gln-65 in peptide {alpha}I (Table I). With peptide {alpha}II, evidence for involvement of at least five of these six lysine residues was obtained. The number of identified acyl acceptor sites for different peptide/TG2 ratios were slightly higher than expected from the data obtained from spin column experiments (Fig. 2, C and D). The latter results provide only the average number of peptides bound via isopeptide linkage per TG2. However, these peptides could be statistically attached to different lysine residues in different TG2 molecules. The maximum of 3.5 peptides bound per TG2 molecule via isopeptide bonds corresponds to only six lysine residues of TG2 identified as acyl acceptors, demonstrating that isopeptide bond formation is rather specific. Moreover, all modified lysine residues reside in the TG2 moiety. No lysine residues in the fused GST-protein were found to be involved in isopeptide bond formation, although GST has been described as a substrate of TG2 (26).

The identified acyl acceptor (lysine) residues in TG2 are remote from Cys-277 in the active site. Thus, the thiol to amine exchange reaction resulting in the isopeptide-bonded complexes is either intermolecular or TG2 may undergo a major conformational change upon binding to peptide {alpha}I. With the multiple lysine residues targeted, we believe the former is more likely. However, experiments in which extra TG2 was added to complexes after removing the free peptide did not lead to accelerated decay of the reaction depicted in Fig. 2B as could be expected if the reaction is intermolecular (27). The reason may be that this backward reaction is too slow to be detected under our experimental conditions. Moreover, we observed that hydroxylamine-treated and separated complexes were very stabile over 15 h (data not shown), speaking against a conformational change as the mechanism involved in the thiol to amine exchange reaction.

The enzymatic specificity for the targeted acyl acceptor residues is supported by data generated by chemical modification of lysine residues within GST-TG2. After coupling a control peptide via a succinimide ester and maleimide chemistry, 10 lysine residues were identified as modified, 6 of them in the GST moiety. Only one of those lysines involved in enzymatic cross-linking was modified in these experiments (Lys-649), underlining the specific selection of these acyl acceptor sites. In addition, the observed hierarchy within the targeted lysine residues demonstrates the enzymatic specificity (Table II). The findings might reflect different accessibilities of the targeted lysine residues to the acyl-loaded active site of a second TG2 molecule in an intermolecular acyl transfer reaction or might come from differences in the nucleophilicity between the lysine residues.

In four of the six cross-linked TG2-derived peptides (II–V), the targeted lysine residue is followed by another positively charged amino acid in position +2. In peptide VI an arginine residue is located in position +3. Peptide I deviates from the others because it carries proline in position +2, which induces a kink in the polypeptide backbone. A hydrophobic residue precedes all targeted lysine residues. Possibly these findings may reflect a consensus sequence of preferred acyl acceptor sites.

For some tryptic GST-TG2-derived peptides cross-linked to the {alpha}I or {alpha}II peptides, masses above 4000 atomic mass units would, at least theoretically, be expected. These products would be difficult to observe by analyzing the heterogeneous tryptic digest of the complexes by MALDI-TOF MS in the reflector mode. They might be detected by ESI MS as multiple charged ions; however, dependent on their ability to be ionized, signals might also be suppressed. To search more reliably for crosslinked molecules of higher molecular weight within the digests, MALDI-TOF mass spectra were recorded in the linear mode, and furthermore, samples were analyzed by LC-ESI MS/MS experiments, separating the compounds before entering the mass spectrometer. No additional cross-linked products were, however, observed by either of these methods.

To explain the typical antibody response against TG2 in untreated CD patients by TG2-gliadin complexes (18), the deamidated peptide must be released after endocytosis of the complexes. This could be achieved by the hydrolysis of either the thioester or the isopeptide bonds. The results shown in Fig. 2B imply that such a release of peptides is possible. Studying TG2-{alpha}I-complex formation at a 40-fold molar excess of peptide {alpha}I over 4 h, a slight but continuous decrease of the complexes was observed after 30 min. After 240 min a release of 25% was measured. Complexes generated with such a 40-fold molar excess of peptide {alpha}I carry about 27% of their peptides via thioester linkage (Fig. 2E). Hydrolysis of the isopeptide bonds would either require an intermolecular transfer of the acylpeptide from the modified lysine to Cys-277 or, in an intramolecular reaction, a major conformational change of TG2, as the targeted lysine residues are remote from the active site thiol group. The failure to accelerate cleavage by adding more TG2 to isolated complexes and the stability of hydroxylamine-treated and purified complexes suggest that release by hydrolysis of thioester bonds strongly dominates over cleavage of isopeptide bonds. Hydrolysis of the thioester bond represents the common deamidation reaction and is favored at slightly acidic pH (13), which would be found in early endosomes after uptake of the complexes.

To what extent these complexes are formed in vivo and their physiological relevance will be investigated in the future. Especially in case of an overexpression of TG2 and after a glutenrich meal, generation of those complexes might well take place. Studies on their uptake by TG2-specific B cells and on antigen presentation will shed further light on their immunological relevance for antibody production against TG2.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was funded by research grants from the Research Council of Norway, European Commission Grants QLK1-2000-00657 and QLGA-CT-2000-51218, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB 510, project D4. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of Immunology, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, N-0027 Oslo, Norway. Tel.: 47-230-71373; Fax: 47-230-73510; E-mail: burkhard.fleckenstein{at}labmed.uio.no.

1 The abbreviations used are: TG2, tissue transglutaminase; CD, celiac disease; CID, collision-induced dissociation; ESI, electrospray ionization; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Nicole Sessler for excellent technical assistance in peptide synthesis and Prof. Charles Greenberg and Dr. Thung-S. Lai for providing the TG2 expression plasmid.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Aeschlimann, D., and Paulsson, M. (1994) Thromb. Haemostasis 71, 402-415[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Grenard, P., Bates, M. K., and Aeschlimann, D. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33066-33078[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Folk, J. E. (1983) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 54, 1-56[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Liu, S., Cerione, R. A., and Clardy, J. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 2743-2747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sollid, L. M. (2000) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18, 53-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Schuppan, D. (2000) Gastroenterology 119, 234-242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Lundin, K. E. A., Scott, H., Hansen, T., Paulsen, G., Halstensen, T. S., Fausa, O., Thorsby, E., and Sollid, L. M. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178, 187-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lundin, K. E. A., Scott, H., Fausa, O., Thorsby, E., and Sollid, L. M. (1994) Hum. Immunol. 41, 285-291[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Sjöström, H., Lundin, K. E. A., Molberg, Ø., Körner, R., McAdam, S. N., Anthonsen, D., Quarsten, H., Noren, O., Roepstorff, P., Thorsby, E., and Sollid, L. M. (1998) Scand. J. Immunol. 48, 111-115[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Molberg, O., McAdam, S. N., Körner, R., Quarsten, H., Kristiansen, C., Madsen, L., Fugger, L., Scott, H., Noren, O., Roepstorff, P., Lundin, K. E. A., Sjöström, H., and Sollid, L. M. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 713-717[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. van de Wal, Y., Kooy, Y., van Veelen, P., Pena, S., Mearin, L., Papadopoulos, G., and Koning, F. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 1585-1588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Molberg, O., McAdam, S., Lundin, K. E. A., Kristiansen, C., Arentz-Hansen, H., Kett, K., and Sollid, L. M. (2001) Eur. J. Immunol. 31, 1317-1323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Fleckenstein, B., Molberg, O., Qiao, S. W., Schmid, D. G., von der Mulbe, F., Elgstoen, K., Jung, G., and Sollid, L. M. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 34109-34116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Evans, D. F., Pye, G., Bramley, R., Clark, A. G., Dyson, T. J., and Hardcastle, J. D. (1988) Gut 29, 1035-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Vader, L. W., de Ru, A., van der Wal, Y., Kooy, Y. M., Benckhuijsen, W., Mearin, M. L., Drijfhout, J. W., van Veelen, P., and Koning, F. (2002) J. Exp. Med. 195, 643-649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Dieterich, W., Ehnis, T., Bauer, M., Donner, P., Volta, U., Riecken, E. O., and Schuppan, D. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 797-801[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Schuppan, D., Dieterich, W., Ehnis, T., Bauer, M., Donner, P., Volta, U., and Riecken, E. O. (1998) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 859, 121-126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sollid, L. M., Molberg, Ø., McAdam, S., and Lundin, K. E. A. (1997) Gut 41, 851-852[Free Full Text]
  19. Jung, G., and Beck-Sickinger, A. G. (1992) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 31, 367-383[CrossRef]
  20. Greenwood, F. C., Hunter, W. H., and Glover, J. S. (1963) Biochem. J. 89, 114-123[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Lai, T. S., Slaughter, T. F., Koropchak, C. M., Haroon, Z. A., and Greenberg, C. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31191-31195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Buus, S., Stryhn, A., Winther, K., Kirkby, N., and Pedersen, L. O. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1243, 453-460[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Neubauer, G., and Mann, M. (1999) Anal. Chem. 71, 235-242[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Arentz-Hansen, H., Korner, R., Molberg, O., Quarsten, H., Vader, W., Kooy, Y. M., Lundin, K. E. A., Koning, F., Roepstorff, P., Sollid, L. M., and McAdam, S. N. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 191, 603-612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Roepstorff, P., and Fohlman, J. (1984) Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 11, 601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Piredda, L., Farrace, M. G., Lo Bello, M., Malorni, W., Melino, G., Petruzzelli, R., and Piacentini, M. (1999) FASEB J. 13, 355-364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Parameswaran, K. N., Cheng, X. F., Chen, E. C., Velasco, P. T., Wilson, J. H., and Lorand, L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10311-10317[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
Z. Keresztessy, E. Csosz, J. Harsfalvi, K. Csomos, J. Gray, R. N. Lightowlers, J. H. Lakey, Z. Balajthy, and L. Fesus
Phage display selection of efficient glutamine-donor substrate peptides for transglutaminase 2.
Protein Sci., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2466 - 2480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
D A van Heel and J West
Recent advances in coeliac disease
Gut, July 1, 2006; 55(7): 1037 - 1046.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
W Dieterich, B Esslinger, D Trapp, E Hahn, T Huff, W Seilmeier, H Wieser, and D Schuppan
Cross linking to tissue transglutaminase and collagen favours gliadin toxicity in coeliac disease
Gut, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 478 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Sblattero, F. Maurano, G. Mazzarella, M. Rossi, S. Auricchio, F. Florian, F. Ziberna, A. Tommasini, T. Not, A. Ventura, et al.
Characterization of the Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody Response in Nonobese Diabetic Mice
J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5830 - 5836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. Schwertz, F. Kahlenberg, U. Sack, T. Richter, M. Stern, K. Conrad, K.-P. Zimmer, and T. Mothes
Serologic Assay Based on Gliadin-Related Nonapeptides as a Highly Sensitive and Specific Diagnostic Aid in Celiac Disease
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2370 - 2375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/17/17607    most recent
M310198200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services