JBC Ideal method for primary cell transfection

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M313601200 on March 5, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 19, 19832-19838, May 7, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/19/19832    most recent
M313601200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maglich, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maglich, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Nuclear Receptor CAR Is a Regulator of Thyroid Hormone Metabolism during Caloric Restriction*

Jodi M. Maglich{ddagger}, Joe Watson§, Patrick J. McMillen¶, Bryan Goodwin{ddagger}, Timothy M. Willson||, and John T. Moore{ddagger}**

From the {ddagger}High Throughput Biology, §Bioscience Support, Genetics Research, and ||High Throughput Chemistry, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Received for publication, December 11, 2003 , and in revised form, February 27, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The orphan nuclear receptor CAR (NR1I3) has been characterized as a central component in the coordinate response to xenobiotic and endobiotic stress. In this study, we demonstrate that CAR plays a pivotal function in energy homeostasis and establish an unanticipated metabolic role for this nuclear receptor. Wild-type mice treated with the synthetic CAR agonist 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene (TCPOBOP) exhibited decreased serum concentration of the thyroid hormone (TH) thyroxine (T4). However, treatment of Car–/– mice with TCPOBOP failed to elicit these changes. To examine whether CAR played a role in the regulation of TH levels under physiological conditions, wild-type and Car–/– mice were fasted for 24 h, a process known to alter TH metabolism in mammals. As expected, the serum triiodothyronine and T4 concentrations decreased in wild-type mice. However, triiodothyronine and T4 levels in fasted Car–/– mice remained significantly higher than those in fasted wild-type animals. Concomitant with the changes in serum TH levels, both CAR agonist treatment and fasting induced the expression of CAR target genes (notably, Cyp2b10, Ugt1a1, Sultn, Sult1a1, and Sult2a1) in a receptor-dependent manner. Importantly, the Ugt1a1, Sultn, Sult1a1, and Sult2a1 genes encode enzymes that are capable of metabolizing TH. An attenuated reduction in TH levels during fasting, as observed in Car–/– mice, would be predicted to increase weight loss during caloric restriction. Indeed, when Car–/– animals were placed on a 40% caloric restriction diet for 12 weeks, Car–/– animals lost over twice as much weight as their wild-type littermates. Thus, CAR participates in the molecular mechanisms contributing to homeostatic resistance to weight loss. These data imply that CAR represents a novel therapeutic target to uncouple metabolic rate from food intake and has implications in obesity and its associated disorders.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In Western societies, obesity is reaching potentially epidemic proportions. In the United States, it is estimated that 55% of adults are overweight, and nearly a quarter are obese (1). Associated with the rise in obesity are concomitant rises in the incidence of metabolic syndrome or syndrome X, typified by type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The epidemic of obesity inflicts significant disadvantages on both the individual and society, i.e. increased risk of death and disease, increased health care costs, and reduced social and educational status.

A significant and discouraging factor for obese individuals trying to lose weight is that homeostatic resistance mechanisms operate to resist weight loss (2, 3). A major homeostatic barrier is decreased basal metabolic rate during periods of reduced caloric intake. Thyroid hormones (THs)1 (thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3)) are the predominant regulators of basal metabolic rate. Serum levels of TH show a direct correlation with energy expenditure and caloric loss (4), decreasing significantly during fasting. The most potent thyroid hormone, T3, has been observed to drop by as much as 33% in subjects in weight loss programs after 10 weeks (5). The mechanisms that regulate thyroid hormone during weight loss are not well understood. Understanding the molecular basis of this homeostatic resistance pathway could create pharmacological opportunities for the treatment of obesity.

TH exerts its effects in virtually every tissue, and its action is mediated by binding and activation of the nuclear receptors TR{alpha} (NR1A1) and TR{beta} (NR1A2) (6). T3 is derived by enzymecatalyzed deiodination of the prohormone thyroxine (T4) (7) (Fig. 1). Hepatic and extrahepatic metabolism of T4 regulates the level of T3 in the systemic circulation and other tissues. Type I deiodinase, the major deiodinase in liver and kidney, catalyzes outer ring deiodination to produce T3 as well as inner ring deiodination to produce the inactive metabolite reverse-T3. Remarkably, outer ring deiodination becomes undetectable when T4 is sulfated, whereas the rate of inner ring deiodinase activity increases over 130-fold (8). Thus, the hepatic phase II sulfotransferases are of particular significance in TH metabolism because they control the preferred site of deiodination of T4, effectively catalyzing a reaction that ultimately leads to a rapid and irreversible inactivation of TH (Fig. 1).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Thyroid hormone metabolism. Schematic representation of T4 metabolism in mammals. T4 is converted to T3 by outer ring deiodination (ORD) catalyzed by specific deiodinases including deiodinase type I. T4 is also the substrate for the phase II conjugation enzyme reactions including glucuronidation by UGTs and sulfation by sulfotransferases. Sulfation of T4 renders a change in the enzymatic preference of deiodinase type I to inner ring deiodination (IRD), resulting in retro-T3 product production.

 
In addition to deiodination, multiple pathways of T4 metabolism have been elucidated, including glucuronidation, ether bond cleavage, and oxidative deamination (9, 10). In particular, conjugation by UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), specifically by members of the UGT1 family (Fig. 1), increases the water solubility of TH, which promotes biliary and urinary excretion (11). The net effect of hepatic metabolism of T4 is the production of TH metabolites, many of which are either less active on the thyroid hormone receptor or excreted rapidly. Notably, the relative quantitative contributions of conjugative metabolism pathways such as sulfation and glucuronidation in regulating T3 production during fasting have not been reported.

The nuclear receptor CAR (NR1I2) is expressed mainly in liver and has been considered a xenobiotic receptor like its closest relative, the pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2) (1214). Global gene expression analysis has shown that CAR regulates phase I and II pathways of oxidative metabolism, conjugation, and transport (15). Recent studies utilizing phenobarbital have also demonstrated a CAR-dependent repression of genes involved in aspects of energy metabolism, including glucose synthesis and fatty acid oxidation (16). To understand the action of CAR on genes involved in energy homeostasis, we sought to identify a physiological function beyond its role as a xenosensor.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental Animals and Protocols—All procedures performed were in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and United States Department of Agriculture regulations and approved by the Glaxo-SmithKline Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Car-null mice were generated by Deltagen, Inc. (Redwood City, CA; www.deltagen.com/deltaone) by homologous recombination using a targeting vector that deletes nucleotides 38–159 of the Car open reading frame. This targeting event removes the first zinc finger of the DNA binding domain and results in a frameshift. The resulting protein product is expected to have neither the genomic nor non-genomic properties (e.g. ability to recruit cofactor proteins to the ligand-binding domain) of wild-type CAR. Embryonic stem cells derived from the 129/Sv-+P+Mgf-SLJ/J mouse substrain were used to generate chimeric mice. F1 mice were generated by breeding with C57BL/6 females. Offspring were screened by PCR analysis of DNA obtained from tail biopsies to identify those heterozygous for the mutant Car allele. The heterozygous offspring were then intercrossed to obtain mice homozygous for the Car mutation and wild-type littermate controls. Car–/– mice were normal in terms of gross morphology and bred with normal Mendelian characteristics. The characterization of this strain of Car–/– mice has been described previously (15). Mice were maintained on standard laboratory chow and allowed food and water ad libitum.

Differential Gene Expression Analysis—Male 10–12-week-old Car–/– and wild-type mice (4–5 mice/group) were utilized for gene expression analysis. For the 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene (TCPOBOP) studies, wild-type or CAR-null mice were treated with the CAR-selective ligand TCPOBOP i.p. at 0.3 mg/kg once daily for 7 days, at which time blood and livers were harvested. For the fasting studies, food was removed from the mice (from both wild-type and Car–/– groups) at midnight on day 1, and the mice were fasted for 24 h. Livers and blood were harvested at 24 h. Total RNA from liver samples was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Northern blot analysis was performed exactly as described previously (12). Blots were hybridized to 32P-labeled cDNAs corresponding to CYP2B10 (bases 7–1527) of the published cDNA (Gen-BankTM accession number NM_009998 [GenBank] ), mSULT1A1 (bases 561–1300) of the published cDNA (GenBankTM accession number NM_001055 [GenBank] ), mSULT-N (bases 98–985) of the published cDNA (GenBankTM accession number AF026073 [GenBank] ), and mUGT1a1 (bases 51–606) of the published cDNA (GenBankTM accession number NM_145079 [GenBank] ). The blots were subsequently probed with radiolabeled r18S (bases 293–970) of the published cDNA (GenBankTM accession number X01117 [GenBank] ) or {beta}-actin (Clontech). Signal intensity was quantitated using IMAGEQUANT software (Amersham Biosciences). Values were normalized for expression of either {beta}-actin (TCPOBOP study) or r18S RNA (fasting study). Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-QPCR) analysis was performed using an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System instrument and software (PE Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA) exactly as described previously (15). Primers and probes were designed using Primer Express Version 2.0.0 (Applied Biosystems) and synthesized by Keystone Laboratories (Camarillo, CA). All primers and probes were entered into the NCBI Blast program to ensure specificity. Fold induction values were calculated by subtracting the mean threshold cycle number (Ct) for each treatment group from the mean Ct for the vehicle group and raising 2 to the power of this difference. For animal studies, the average of each treatment group (4–5 animals/group) was used.

Serum Analysis—Total serum T3 and T4 analysis was performed by Anilytics, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). Total serum T4 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Alpha Diagnostic International, San Antonio, TX).

Quantitative Nuclear Magnetic Resonance—Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance was performed on individual, unanesthetized animals using an EchoMRI Whole Body Composition Analyzer (EchoMedical Systems, Houston, TX).

Caloric Restriction Studies—Car–/– mice and wild-type siblings (8 animals/group) were fed regular chow ad libitum for 3 months. Mice were then single-caged and fed an AIN-93 M diet (Bio-Serv) in 1-g pellets using a pellet feeding tube. Semipurified diet (17) was used rather than nonpurified (i.e. lab chow) because the latter is comprised of less refined foodstuffs than that found in a semipurified diet and more prone to being contaminated by nonnutritive substances. The animals ad libitum regular chow average consumption (total kcal) was calculated to be 13.3 kcal/day, and this was used as the measured normal diet control value in the caloric restriction studies. The animals were then divided into two groups, with half being fed a 40% reduced calorie diet of 8 kcal/day (16 x 1-g pellets/week). The number of calories we calculated for a 40% reduced calorie diet is in good agreement with averages from other studies (18). The animals were weighed weekly for 3 months.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Effects of CAR Agonist on TH Levels—In rats, chronic treatment with the CAR activators phenobarbital and TCPOBOP has been shown to markedly lower T4 levels (19, 20). TH lowering by TCPOBOP was shown to be dramatic enough to lead to compensatory thyroid hyperplasia (20). Using CAR-null mice, we examined whether the effects of TCPOBOP on TH levels were receptor-dependent.

Mice were treated with TCPOBOP (i.p., 0.3 mg/kg) for 7 days, and total serum T3 and T4 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. After a 7-day TCPOBOP treatment, decreases in the average concentrations of serum T3 and T4 levels were seen in the wild-type mice (Fig. 2A), but only the decrease in T4 levels was statistically significant. Average T4 levels decreased 27% (p < 0.005 in the T4 samples) in these animals. In contrast, no statistically significant changes in serum T3 or T4 were observed in TCPOBOP-treated Car–/– mice (Fig. 2A). The serum levels of both T3 and T4 in untreated wild-type mice are consistent with previously published values (21, 22). Serum levels of TSH were also measured after this study and shown to increase by 33% (p = 0.03) in wild-type mice, whereas no significant increases were seen in Car–/– mice (data not shown). These results are consistent with the fact that T4 (a key regulator of the negative feedback loop controlling thyroid hormone homeostasis) is decreased only in wild-type mice. These results are also consistent with the hypothesis that TCPOBOP is effecting decreases in T4 by causing increased metabolism, rather than decreasing its synthesis.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Effects of TCPOBOP treatment on thyroid hormone levels in Car–/– mice. A, serum T3 and T4 levels were measured in wild-type and CAR-null animals (4–5 animals/group) before and after TCPOBOP treatment. Measured T3 and T4 concentrations are expressed as ng/ml or µg/ml ± S.E.; **, p < 0.005. B, total RNA was prepared from the livers of wild-type and CAR-null mice treated with vehicle or TCPOBOP for 7 days. RNA samples were pooled, and Northern blot analysis was performed with probes specific for CYP2B10, UGT1A1, SULT-N, SULT1A1, and {beta}-actin. The values shown below each band represent fold change relative to untreated wild-type animals. C, RT-QPCR analysis of the effects of TCPOBOP on expression of Sult2a1 from livers from TCPOBOP-treated wild-type and CAR-null mice; *, p < 0.005.

 
CAR target genes were assessed after the 7-day TCPOBOP treatment. With the exception of the prototypical CAR target gene, Cyp2b10, our analysis was biased toward genes previously linked to TH metabolism. Northern blot analysis revealed that the TCPOBOP treatment resulted in induction of Cyp2b10 (56-fold), Ugt1a1 (2.4-fold), SultN (6.8-fold), and Sult1a1 (1.5-fold). None of these gene changes were observed in TCPOBOP-treated Car–/– mice (Fig. 2B). We also examined the expression of the Sult2a1 gene. For this analysis, we used RT-QPCR due to the high sequence identity of this gene to other sulfotransferases. We observed that Sult2a1 was strongly induced (~20-fold) after the 7-day TCPOBOP treatment in wild-type mice, but not in Car–/– mice (Fig. 2C).

TH Levels during Fasting Are Dysregulated in Car–/– Mice—To identify a physiological role for CAR in TH metabolism, the effect of food deprivation was studied. Serum T3 and T4 levels in Car–/– mice and sibling wild-type mice were compared under standard feeding and 24-h fasted conditions. After a 24-h fast, a significant difference in serum T4 and T3 levels was observed in wild-type versus Car–/– mice (Fig. 3A). T3 and T4 levels decreased by 39% (p < 0.005) and 36% (p < 0.05), respectively, after a 24-h fast in wild-type mice. The magnitude of these changes is consistent with previously published mouse studies (23). In contrast, the fasted Car–/– mice did not show statistically significant changes in either T3 or T4. The Car–/– mice had an average T3 relative decrease of only 24% and an average T4 decrease of 12%, but p values for both were >0.05 (Fig. 3A). These experiments suggested that CAR activity is required for the full response in TH metabolism during fasting.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Effects of fasting on thyroid hormone levels in Car–/– mice. A, total serum T3 and T4 were measured in wild-type and CAR-null animals before and after a 24-h fast. Measured T3 and T4 concentrations are expressed as ng/ml or g/ml, µ ± S.E.; ** p < 0.005. B, total RNA was prepared from the livers of wild-type and CAR-null mice before and after a 24-h fast. RNA samples were pooled, and Northern blot analysis was performed with probes specific for CYP2B10, UGT1A1, SULT-N, SULT1A1, and 18S. The values shown below each band represent fold change relative to fed wild-type controls. C, RT-QPCR analysis of the effect of fasting on expression of Sult2a1 from livers from 24-h fasted wild-type and CAR-null mice; *, p < 0.001.

 
CAR Target Gene Expression Increases during Fasting—The mouse Cyp2b10 gene is a prototypical CAR target gene (24, 25). We found that Cyp2b10 expression is increased during fasting in a CAR-dependent manner (Fig. 4). Northern blot analysis showed that Cyp2b10 is induced ~7-fold over basal levels after 24 h of fasting (Fig. 3B). No increase in Cyp2b10 was observed in Car–/– mice. These results are consistent with previous studies that showed the CYP2B gene is induced upon fasting in rats (26).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Effects of caloric restriction on weight loss in Car–/– animals. CAR wild-type and CAR-null mice were fed the AIN-93 M diet at 8 kcal/day (40% reduction) for 12 weeks. A, body weights were monitored every 2 weeks during the course of the caloric restriction study in calorie-restricted Car–/– and wild-type sibling mice. After 12 weeks, Car–/– mice on the 40% caloric restriction diet lost an average of 2.5x the amount of weight lost by the calorie-restricted wild-type mice (6.9 versus 2.8 g, respectively; *, p < 0.05). B, whole animal QNMR was used to assess lean mass/total body mass ratios. Lean and fat compositions are displayed as lean or fat mass (in grams) over total body weight (in grams).

 
As described earlier, the phase II glucuronidation and sulfotransferase enzymes play important roles in the regulation of extrathyroidal metabolism of TH. Both of these classes of genes have previously been shown to be induced by the CAR agonist TCPOBOP in mice (Fig. 1) (15). We investigated whether CAR-dependent increases in known mouse sulfotransferase genes occur upon fasting. The sulfotransferases examined included Sult-N, Sult-X1, Sult-1A1, Sult-1B1, Sult-2B1, and Sult2a1 (27). Characterization of these genes was carried out by both Northern blot analysis and RT-QPCR. Three of the sulfotransferase genes were induced by fasting and in a CAR-dependent manner. Sult-N has previously been shown to be induced by TCPOBOP in mouse liver (15). Northern blot analysis revealed that during fasting, Sult-N was increased ~4-fold, but no increase was seen in Car–/– mice (Fig. 3B). Sult1a1 expression was also shown to increase during fasting (Fig. 3B). SULT1A1 mRNA levels increased ~2-fold during fasting but were not induced in the Car–/– mice. Finally, using RT-QPCR, we found that Sult2a1 was induced 4-fold by fasting in wild-type but not Car–/– animals (Fig. 3C). Our results suggest that induction of phase II sulfotransferase enzymes is one of the primary pathways for CAR-dependent increases in T4 metabolism during fasting.

The expression of the major mRNA isoforms expressed from the Ugt1a gene (UGT1A1, UGT1A6, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9) was probed by Northern blot. Both the bilirubin UGT1A1 and the phenol UGT1A9 enzymes have been shown to glucuronidate T4 (28). We found that Ugt1a1 was modestly induced during fasting (1.5-fold increase) and that the induction was CAR-dependent (Fig. 3B). Ugt1a6, Ugt1a7, and Ugt1a9 were not induced by fasting in Car–/– mice, although Ugt1a7 and Ugt1a9 exhibited increased basal expression levels in the knockout mice. We conclude that the induction of phase II glucuronidation of TH by Ugt1a1 upon fasting is a CAR-mediated process that may also contribute to the TH phenotype.

Caloric Restriction Study—Lowering of T3 and T4 levels during caloric restriction opposes weight loss. To assess whether the higher levels of thyroid hormones seen in Car–/– during caloric restriction were physiologically significant, we challenged Car–/– and wild-type littermates with a reduced calorie diet (an approximately 40% decrease in daily calorie intake) for 12 weeks. Statistically significant differences in the weights of the animals were observed at the end of the study (Fig. 4A). The wild-type animals lost an average of 2.8 g of weight, whereas the Car–/– lost an average of 6.9 g (p = 0.044), or >20% of their starting body weights. Thus, by 12 weeks, the Car–/– animals lost 2.5x as much weight as wild-type animals. Analysis of the weights of the animals during the course of the study revealed that the Car–/– mice lost weight for a longer period of time before reaching a plateau in weight. No differences in total serum T3 between wild-type and Car–/– mice were observed at the end of the study. At the end of the study, QNMR analysis was used to quantify lean mass and fat mass/total body weight. Changes in fat mass/total body weight were observed after caloric restriction in both wild-type (39% decrease) and Car–/– animals (46% decrease) (Fig. 4B). Similarly, corresponding changes in the lean mass/total body weight were also observed after caloric restriction in wild-type (32% increase) and Car–/– animals (50% increase) (Fig. 4B). Both of the ratios were consistent with the fact that Car–/– animals lost more weight versus wild-type animals. Importantly, these data indicate that the weight loss observed in the Car–/– animals was normal loss of stored fat from adipose tissue and not lean mass.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the current study, three sulfotransferase genes (Sult1a1, SultN, and Sult2a1) were induced in a CAR-dependent manner during fasting. The phase II sulfotransferase enzymes have previously been shown to be important contributors to extrathyroidal metabolism of TH (29). The human SULT1A1 gene, the functional ortholog of mouse Sult1a1 (30), has been extensively characterized (31). Both human SULT1A1 and CAR are expressed in the tissues that show the highest distribution of TH sulfation activity (32). Human SULT1A1 has been shown to sulfate TH in vitro (33), and it shows a higher affinity for iodothyronines compared with the closely related SULT1A3 isozyme (34). In contrast, SULT-N has only recently been described, and its activity as a T4 sulfotransferase has not been elucidated. However, the fact that SULT-N is closely related to SULT1A1 (35) suggests that this enzyme will have similar substrate specificity. Finally, SULT2A1 has recently been shown to exhibit low Km values for TH relative to other members of the human SULT family and is known to contribute to triiodothyronine sulfation (36).

There are several potential mechanisms for the nutritional regulation of CAR activity. In mouse primary hepatocytes and in mouse liver in vivo, CAR resides in the cytoplasm and translocates to the nucleus upon activation (37). Induction of CAR nuclear translocation does not require ligand binding, and phenobarbital has been shown to be an indirect activator in vivo through a phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cascade (37). A similar mechanism may be utilized to regulate CAR translocation during fasting upon receipt of a signal from the cell surface. However, at present, the nature of this signal is unknown. Interestingly, the increases in CAR target genes during fasting are much less robust compared with the dramatic changes induced by the potent agonist TCPOBOP. This fact indicates that the mode of activation of CAR during fasting is more likely to be induced translocation of the receptor rather than activation by a hormonal ligand or metabolite. Interestingly, CAR activation may be related to the status of PGC-1{alpha}, a fasting-induced transcriptional cofactor that plays a critical role in regulating multiple aspects of energy metabolism (38). Shiraki et al. (39) have recently shown that there is a functional coupling of CAR and PGC-1{alpha} in cells. We have also shown that PGC-1{alpha} can interact specifically with CAR in mammalian two-hybrid assays.2 It is possible that CAR activation during fasting may be functionally related to induction of PGC-1{alpha} expression.

Although our data demonstrate that CAR is required for the full decrease in T3 and T4 levels upon fasting, it is notable that a partial response was still observed in the CAR knockout mice, indicating that other mechanisms contribute to the process. The mechanisms leading to reduced plasma T3 appear to differ between humans and rats. For example, rats display an increased reliance on decreased TSH secretion during caloric restriction to effect decreased production of T3 and T3 (40). Thus, in rodents, TSH may play a role in the observed partial decrease in TH even after short-term caloric restriction. Another potential candidate is the related xenosensor PXR, which has also been shown to regulate Ugt and Sult gene expression (15). However, we only observed small changes during fasting in the expression of Cyp3a11 (data not shown), a target gene primarily regulated by PXR in mice (41). Thus, it is unlikely that PXR is responsible for the partial decrease in T3 levels in the fasted CAR knockout mice.

We observed CAR-dependent increases in Ugt1a1 gene expression during fasting. UGT1A1 has been shown to play a role in TH metabolism (22, 42), and both T4 and T3-glucuronides of TH are excreted in the bile (43). In general, Ugt1a1 was not induced strongly by CAR during fasting. Consistent with this observation, treatment of wild-type mice with the potent CAR agonist TCPOBOP induced hepatic Ugt1a1 expression only 2–3-fold (Fig. 2B) (15). Because we could detect only a relatively small change in a single glucuronidase compared with the larger increases in expression of multiple sulfotransferases, it is likely that the latter provide the major pathway for regulation of TH metabolism during fasting in mice. Because we only assessed a single time point after fasting (24 h), other significant gene expression changes may have occurred that were not captured in our analysis. For example, we only detected a modest (<2-fold) increase in hepatic deiodinase type I after a 24-h fast or after our 7-day TCPOBOP treatment (data not shown), but another group has shown that TCPOBOP induces this gene 4.9-fold after 3 h of treatment (44).

CAR is closely related to the xenobiotic receptor PXR, and it is noteworthy that TH metabolism and xenobiotic metabolism share common features. Multiple phase II enzymes show broad substrate specificity and are able to metabolize a range of xenobiotics and thyroid hormones. Furthermore, the major sites of xenobiotic and TH metabolism include liver, intestine, and brain, the same tissues in which CAR expression is highest. PXR and CAR have been shown to activate largely overlapping sets of genes in comparative global gene expression studies in mice (15). Thus, it is the activation signals, not the target genes, that appear to differentiate the physiological roles of these receptors. In head-to-head comparisons, PXR was shown to be directly activated by a diverse spectrum of xenobiotics, whereas CAR was not (45). Significantly, CAR has also been shown to respond to another metabolic stress, hyperbilirubinemia (46, 47), through an indirect mechanism that does not require ligand binding. The ability of CAR to respond to a wide range of non-ligand-mediated signals may have allowed this receptor to develop a specialized function distinct from a PXR-like progenitor. Hence, whereas the predominant role of PXR is to coordinate a response to xenobiotic stress, the role of CAR may be to respond to metabolic and nutritional stress.

Overall, our studies have shown that CAR is activated during fasting and required for the normal decrease in T3 and T4 levels. Thus, CAR inverse agonists represent potentially useful drugs because their activity may provide a therapeutic approach to uncouple metabolic rate from food intake. The caloric restriction studies using Car–/– animals support the concept that inhibiting CAR activity can have significant effects on weight loss. It is likely that decreases in thyroid hormone are ultimately lowered to equal levels by decreases in TSH, a known response to fasting in rodents (40). Because of species differences in thyroid hormone metabolism, it will also be important to test this hypothesis in a chronic weight loss model in primates or human clinical studies. The only CAR inverse agonist active in a human system that has been reported to date is androstanol, and this compound is not sufficiently orally available or receptor-selective for such studies, emphasizing a need to identify new human CAR inverse agonists.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: GlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Dr., Venture116-1b, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Tel.: 919-483-3936; Fax: 919-315-6720; E-mail: John.T.Moore{at}gsk.com.

1 The abbreviations used are: TH, thyroid hormone; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; TCPOBOP, 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene; TSH, thyrotropin; RT-QPCR, real-time quantitative PCR. Back

2 J. M. Maglich, J. Watson, P. J. McMillen, B. Goodwin, T. M. Willson, and J. T. Moore, unpublished data. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Chopra, M., Galbraith, S., and Darnton-Hill, I. (2002) Bull. W. H. O. 80, 952–958[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Krotkiewski, M. (2000) Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 24, S116–S119
  3. Spiegelman, B. M., and Flier, J. S. (2001) Cell 104, 531–543[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. LiVolsi, V. A. (1989) Pathology of the Thyroid, W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia
  5. Rosenbaum, M., Hirsch, J., Murphy, E., and Leibel, R. L. (2000) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 71, 1421–1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Harvey, C. B., and Williams, G. R. (2002) Thyroid 12, 441–446[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bianco, A. C., Salvatore, D., Gereben, B., Berry, M. J., and Larsen, P. R. (2002) Endocr. Rev. 23, 38–89[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mol, J. A., and Visser, T. J. (1985) Endocrinology 117, 8–12[Abstract]
  9. Larsen, P. R., and Ingbar, S. H. (1992) in Textbook of Endocrinology (Andreoli, T. E., Appleton, W. S., Aurbach, G. D., and Bierman, E. L., eds) 8th Ed., pp. 357–487, W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia
  10. Visser, T. J. (1996) Acta Med. Austriaca 23, 10–16[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Burchell, B., and Coughtrie, M. W. (1989) Pharmacol. Ther. 43, 261–289[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Goodwin, B., Moore, L. B., Stoltz, C. M., McKee, D. D., and Kliewer, S. A. (2001) Mol. Pharmacol. 60, 427–431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wei, P., Zhang, J., Dowhan, D. H., Han, Y., and Moore, D. D. (2002) Pharmacogenomics J. 2, 117–126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Willson, T. M., and Kliewer, S. A. (2002) Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 259–266[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Maglich, J. M., Stoltz, C. M., Goodwin, B., Hawkins-Brown, D., Moore, J. T., and Kliewer, S. A. (2002) Mol. Pharmacol. 62, 638–646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ueda, A., Hamadeh, H. K., Webb, H. K., Yamamoto, Y., Sueyoshi, T., Afshari, C. A., Lehmann, J. M., and Negishi, M. (2002) Mol. Pharmacol. 61, 1–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Reeves, P. G., Nielsen, F. H., and Fahey, G. C., Jr. (1993) J. Nutr. 123, 1939–1951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pugh, T., Klopp, R., and Weindruch, R. (1999) Neurobiol. Aging 20, 157–165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. O'Connor, J. C., Frame, S. R., and Ladics, G. S. (2002) Toxicol. Sci. 69, 79–91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Diwan, B. A., Henneman, J. R., Rice, J. M., and Nims R. W. (1996) Carcinogenesis 17, 37–43[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hood, A., Allen, M. L., Liu, Y., Liu, J., and Klaassen, C. D. (2003) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 188, 6–13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Vansell, N. R., and Klaassen, C. D. (2002) Toxicol. Sci. 65, 184–191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wu, S. Y. (1990) Acta Endocrinol. 122, 175–180[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Honkakoski, P., Zelko, I., Sueyoshi, T., and Negishi, M. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5652–5658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sueyoshi, T., Kawamoto, T., Zelko, I., Honkakoski, P., and Negishi, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6043–6046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Brown, B. L., Allis, J. W., Simmons, J. E., and House, D. E. (1995) Toxicol. Lett. 81, 39–44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Glatt, H., Engelke, C. E., Pabel, U., Teubner, W., Jones, A. L., Coughtrie, M. W., Andrae, U., Falany, C. N., and Meinl, W. (2000) Toxicol. Lett. 112–113, 341–348[CrossRef]
  28. Findlay, K. A., Kaptein, E., Visser, T. J., and Burchell, B. (2000) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 85, 2879–2883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rutgers, M., Pigmans, I. G., Bonthuis, F., Docter, R., and Visser, T. J. (1989) Endocrinology 125, 2175–2186[Abstract]
  30. Honma, W., Kamiyama, Y., Yoshinari, K., Sasano, H., Shimada, M., Nagata, K., and Yamazoe, Y. (2001) Drug Metab. Dispos. 29, 274–281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kong, A. N., Ma, M., Tao, D., and Yang, L. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1171, 315–318[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Hurd, R. E., Santini, F., Lee, B., Naim, P., and Chopra, I. J. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 1951–1955[Abstract]
  33. Li, X., Clemens, D. L., Cole, J. R., and Anderson, R. J. (2001) J. Endocrinol. 171, 525–532[Abstract]
  34. Kester, M. H., Kaptein, E., Roest, T. J., van Dijk, C. H., Tibboel, D., Meinl, W., Glatt, H., Coughtrie, M. W., and Visser, T. J. (1999) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 1357–1364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sakakibara, Y., Takami, Y., Zwieb, C., Nakayama, T., Suiko, M., Nakajima, H., and Liu, M. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30470–30478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Li, X., and Anderson, R. J. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 263, 632–639[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Kawamoto, T., Sueyoshi, T., Zelko, I., Moore, R., Washburn, K., and Negishi, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6318–6322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Yoon, J. C., Puigserver, P., Chen, G., Donovan, J., Wu, Z., Rhee, J., Adelmant, G., Stafford, J., Kahn, C. R., Granner, D. K., Newgard, C. B., and Spiegelman, B. M. (2001) Nature 413, 131–138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Shiraki, T., Sakai, N., Kanaya, E., and Jingami, H. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 11344–11350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kinlaw, W. B., Schwartz, H. L., and Oppenheimer, J. H. (1985) J. Clin. Investig. 75, 1238–1241[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Moore, L. B., Parks, D. J., Jones, S. A., Bledsoe, R. K., Consler, T. G., Stimmel, J. B., Goodwin, B., Liddle, C., Blanchard, S. G., Willson, T. M., Collins, J. L., and Kliewer, S. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15122–15127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Vansell, N. R., and Klaassen, C. D. (2002) Drug Metab. Dispos. 30, 240–246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Visser, T. J. (1990) in The Thyroid Gland (Greer, M. A., ed) pp. 255–283, Raven Press, New York
  44. Locker, J., Tian, J., Carver, R., Concas, D., Cossu, C., Ledda-Columbano, G. M., and Columbano, A. (2003) Hepatology 38, 314–325[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Moore, L. B., Maglich, J. M., McKee, D. D., Wisely, B., Willson, T. M., Kliewer, S. A., Lambert, M. H., and Moore, J. T. (2002) Mol. Endocrinol. 16, 977–986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Huang, W., Zhang, J., Chua, S. S., Qatanani, M., Han, Y., Granata, R., and Moore, D. D. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 4156–4161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Xie, W., Yeuh, M. F., Radominska-Pandya, A., Saini, S. P., Negishi, Y., Bottroff, B. S., Cabrera, G. Y., Tukey, R. H., and Evans, R. M. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 4150–4155[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
L. Li, T. Chen, J. D. Stanton, T. Sueyoshi, M. Negishi, and H. Wang
The Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor Ligand 1-(2-Chlorophenyl-methylpropyl)-3-isoquinoline-carboxamide Is a Novel Antagonist of Human Constitutive Androstane Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2008; 74(2): 443 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
R. L. Araujo, B. M. de Andrade, A. S. P. de Figueiredo, M. L. da Silva, M. P. Marassi, V. dos Santos Pereira, E. Bouskela, and D. P Carvalho
Low replacement doses of thyroxine during food restriction restores type 1 deiodinase activity in rats and promotes body protein loss
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 119 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Y. Alnouti and C. D. Klaassen
Regulation of Sulfotransferase Enzymes by Prototypical Microsomal Enzyme Inducers in Mice
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2008; 324(2): 612 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
I. Echchgadda, C. S. Song, T. Oh, M. Ahmed, I. J. De La Cruz, and B. Chatterjee
The Xenobiotic-Sensing Nuclear Receptors Pregnane X Receptor, Constitutive Androstane Receptor, and Orphan Nuclear Receptor Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4{alpha} in the Regulation of Human Steroid-/Bile Acid-Sulfotransferase
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 21(9): 2099 - 2111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. Chen, X. Cheng, M. Z. Dieter, Y. Tanaka, and C. D. Klaassen
Activation of cAMP-Dependent Signaling Pathway Induces Mouse Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 2 Expression
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2007; 71(4): 1159 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. Fontana and S. Klein
Aging, Adiposity, and Calorie Restriction
JAMA, March 7, 2007; 297(9): 986 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
S. S. Auerbach, J. G. DeKeyser, M. A. Stoner, and C. J. Omiecinski
CAR2 Displays Unique Ligand Binding and RXR{alpha} Heterodimerization Characteristics
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2007; 35(3): 428 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. M. Blattler, F. Rencurel, M. R. Kaufmann, and U. A. Meyer
In the regulation of cytochrome P450 genes, phenobarbital targets LKB1 for necessary activation of AMP-activated protein kinase
PNAS, January 16, 2007; 104(3): 1045 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
Y. Zhai, H. V. Pai, J. Zhou, J. A. Amico, R. R. Vollmer, and W. Xie
Activation of Pregnane X Receptor Disrupts Glucocorticoid and Mineralocorticoid Homeostasis
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2007; 21(1): 138 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. S. Tien, K. Matsui, R. Moore, and M. Negishi
The Nuclear Receptor Constitutively Active/Androstane Receptor Regulates Type 1 Deiodinase and Thyroid Hormone Activity in the Regenerating Mouse Liver
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 307 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
F. Rencurel, M. Foretz, M. R. Kaufmann, D. Stroka, R. Looser, I. Leclerc, G. da Silva Xavier, G. A. Rutter, B. Viollet, and U. A. Meyer
Stimulation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Is Essential for the Induction of Drug Metabolizing Enzymes by Phenobarbital in Human and Mouse Liver
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 1925 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Ding, K. Lichti, I. Kim, F. J. Gonzalez, and J. L. Staudinger
Regulation of Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Its Target Genes by Fasting, cAMP, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor {alpha}, and the Coactivator Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} Coactivator-1{alpha}
J. Biol. Chem., September 8, 2006; 281(36): 26540 - 26551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Fontana, S. Klein, J. O. Holloszy, and B. N. Premachandra
Effect of Long-Term Calorie Restriction with Adequate Protein and Micronutrients on Thyroid Hormones
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 3232 - 3235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. R. Faucette, T. Sueyoshi, C. M. Smith, M. Negishi, E. L. LeCluyse, and H. Wang
Differential Regulation of Hepatic CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 Genes by Constitutive Androstane Receptor but Not Pregnane X Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1200 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Miao, S. Fang, Y. Bae, and J. K. Kemper
Functional Inhibitory Cross-talk between Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Hepatic Nuclear Factor-4 in Hepatic Lipid/Glucose Metabolism Is Mediated by Competition for Binding to the DR1 Motif and to the Common Coactivators, GRIP-1 and PGC-1{alpha}
J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2006; 281(21): 14537 - 14546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocrinology