| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 19, 19867-19874, May 7, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Biological Chemistry Department, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
Received for publication, December 17, 2003 , and in revised form, February 3, 2004.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONEXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONEXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Oxalate decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.2
[EC]
) catalyzes the conversion of oxalate to carbon dioxide and formate. Until recently, the best characterized enzymes have been from fungi (7). The extracellular fungal enzymes are induced by acid pH and are thought to control excess oxalic acid levels (8–10). It is likely that the decarboxylase is involved in the elevation of external pH because the reaction involves the consumption of a proton. The first bacterial oxalate decarboxylase was recently identified in Bacillus subtilis (OxdC, formerly known as YvrK) (11). This cytoplasmic enzyme was induced by low pH and not by oxalate salts suggesting that it is involved in the elevation of cytoplasmic pH. B. subtilis was shown to possess a second oxalate decarboxylase because a hypothetical protein homologous to OxdC exhibited oxalate decarboxylase activity when expressed in Escherichia coli (OxdD, formerly known as YoaN) (12). The oxalate decarboxylase sequences show that they belong to the cupin superfamily that is characterized by conserved motifs and a 
-barrel domain fold (13). They are in fact members of a subset of this family, the bicupins, because the cupin domain occurs twice, presumably due to an evolutionary gene duplication event.
B. subtilis OxdC has been shown to contain manganese ions in predominantly the Mn(II) oxidation state (12). It was also shown that catalysis was uniquely dioxygen-dependent despite the reaction involving no net redox change. The oxalate oxidase (EC 1.2.3.4 [EC] ) from barley shares many properties with the decarboxylases: it contains manganese in predominantly the Mn(II) oxidation state (14), and it is a member of the cupin superfamily. However, unlike the decarboxylases, the oxidase is a monocupin (15) that converts oxalate and dioxygen to carbon dioxide and hydrogen peroxide in a net redox reaction using dioxygen as a substrate.
Given the common properties of the oxalate decarboxylases and oxidases, we have proposed a divergent catalytic mechanism for these enzymes (12). An important feature of this mechanism is the binding of oxalate and dioxygen to the Mn(II) ion to give a Mn(III)-superoxo species (Fig. 1). This acts as an electron sink to facilitate the decarboxylation of oxalate to give a manganese ion-bound formyl radical anion intermediate. Importantly what differentiates the two enzymes is the ability of the decarboxylase to specifically protonate the carbon atom of this intermediate.
|
It was anticipated that the structures of both the oxalate decarboxylase and oxidase would provide a simple explanation of how the active sites of these enzymes control their reaction specificities particularly in terms of the identity of the crucial proton donor in the decarboxylase. The oxidase structure showed the manganese ion to be coordinated by a Glu and 3 His residues of the cupin motif (22) as predicted previously (14). The lack of any other acidic or basic amino acid residue in the active site of the oxidase is consistent with the mechanistic hypothesis. A structure of the bacterial decarboxylase confirmed the prediction that this bicupin was composed of two -barrel cupin domains per subunit in a hexameric arrangement (23). Both domains contained manganese ions with the same amino acid coordination environment as the oxidase. The question then arose as to which sites are catalytically active. Anand et al. (23) have proposed that only the C-terminal domain site (site 2) is the active one. This was based on the observation that only this site has an acidic group (Glu-333) close to a manganese ion that would be capable of protonating the formyl radical intermediate at the optimum pH of the enzyme of between 3.5 and 5.0 (11, 18). This hypothesis was supported by the 25- and 4-fold lowering of activity of an E333A mutant according to assays detecting the production of formate and carbon dioxide, respectively.
This report describes a new B. subtilis oxalate decarboxylase OxdC structure with an altered conformation. This provides evidence that Glu-162, rather than Glu-333, is the crucial active site proton donor required for catalysis and that the N-terminal manganese binding site (site 1), rather than site 2, is catalytically active. Site-directed mutagenesis studies supporting these conclusions are also described.
|
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONEXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Expression, Purification, and Crystallization of Non-His-tagged OxdC—B. subtilis OxdC was cloned, expressed, and purified as described previously (12). Protein expression was induced in E. coli using isopropyl--D-thiogalactopyranoside following the addition of 5 mM MnCl2 to the growth medium and after heat shocking the culture at 42 °C for 2 min. The protein was purified using anion exchange and gel filtration chromatography and was concentrated to 9 mg ml-1 by ammonium sulfate precipitation. The protein was buffer-exchanged into 20 mM Tris, pH 7.0, and filtered through a 0.1-µm Ultrafree filter (Millipore) prior to crystallization. Crystals were grown by hanging drop vapor diffusion using VDX plates (Hampton Research) at 18 °C, and drops consisted of 1 µl of protein mixed with 1 µl of precipitant. Crystallization conditions for the recombinant, non-His-tagged B. subtilis OxdC were derived independently of the conditions previously reported for the His-tagged protein (23). Nevertheless the final optimized conditions of 8% polyethylene glycol 8000 in 100 mM Tris, pH 8.5, at 18 °C were very similar to those published.
X-ray Crystallography—All crystal manipulations were performed using Hampton Research tools. The crystals were cryoprotected using an artificial mother liquor containing 25% ethylene glycol in place of the buffer volume and flash-cooled to 100 K in a stream of gaseous nitrogen produced by an X-Stream cryocooler (Rigaku/MSC). Diffraction data to 2.0-Å resolution were collected in-house using a Mar 345 image plate detector (x-ray research) mounted on a Rigaku RU-H3RHB rotating anode x-ray generator (operated at 50 kV and 100 mA) fitted with Osmic confocal optics and a copper target (CuK
; 
= 1.542 Å). X-ray data were processed using the HKL software package (24). All other downstream data processing and statistical analysis were carried out using programs from the CCP4 software suite (25). The crystals were essentially isomorphous with those obtained previously (23). They belonged to space group R32 with cell parameters of a = b = 154.7 Å, c = 122.8 Å (hexagonal setting) and contained a single 43.6-kDa monomer per asymmetric unit, giving an estimated solvent content of 62% (26). Details of the data collection and processing statistics are summarized in Table I. The initial coordinate set and starting phases were obtained by rigid body refinement of the 1.75-Å resolution structure of OxdC (23) (Protein Data Bank entry 1J58
[PDB]
) against the new 2.0-Å resolution data set using the program REFMAC5 (27). Model building was performed with interactive computer graphics using the program O (28) with reference to SIGMAA-weighted (29) 2mFobs - dFcalc and mFobs - dFcalc Fourier electron density maps. Positional and thermal parameters of the model were subsequently refined using REFMAC5. A subset of the data comprising a random 5% of the reflections was excluded from refinement and used in the calculation of the "free" (Rfree) crystallographic R factor (30). A summary of the model contents and geometrical parameters of the final structure is given in Table I. The coordinates and structure factor data for this structure have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank.
|
-D-thiogalactopyranoside after the heat shock treatment and addition of MnCl2 as described above. The cells were harvested after a further 4 h of incubation at 37 °C with agitation and stored at -20 °C. Thawed cells were resuspended in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing DNase and lysozyme and lysed with three passes through a French pressure cell. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was passed through a 0.2-µm Minisart high flow syringe filter (Sartorius) before being loaded onto a 5-ml HiTrap chelating HP column (Amersham Biosciences), which had previously been charged with 0.1 M NiCl2 and equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 0.5 M NaCl and 20 mM imidazole. OxdC was eluted using a 0.02–1 M imidazole gradient in this buffer at 0.3 M imidazole. The protein was buffer-exchanged with 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.5, containing 0.5 M NaCl2 using a PD-10 desalting column (Amersham Biosciences). Protein solutions were treated with Chelex 20 resin (Bio-Rad) to remove adventitiously bound divalent metal ions before being concentrated with Vivaspin 20 concentrators (Viva Science). An N-terminally His-tagged version of the protein was found to be unstable leading to precipitation as reported previously (23). Oxalate Decarboxylase Assay—One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the conversion of 1 µmol of substrate to product/min. Oxalate decarboxylase activity at pH 4.0 was determined using a stopped assay at 26 °C where the production of formate was coupled to the reduction of NAD by formate dehydrogenase as described previously (12). Unless otherwise stated, the oxalate decarboxylase reaction mixtures contained 150 mM potassium oxalate, 100 mM sodium citrate, pH 4.0, 300 µM o-phenylenediamine, 10 µM bovine serum albumin, and enzyme (up to 0.9 mg ml-1) and were incubated for 10 min.
Oxalate Oxidase and Dye Oxidation Assays—Oxalate oxidase activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 23 °C using a continuous assay in which the production of hydrogen peroxide was coupled to the oxidation of ABTS1 using horseradish peroxidase as described previously (14). Reaction mixtures contained 50 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 4.0, horseradish peroxidase (25 units, as defined by supplier), 5 mM ABTS, 20 mM potassium oxalate, and enzyme (up to 0.02 mg ml-1). To distinguish between oxalate oxidase (i.e. hydrogen peroxide production) and direct oxalate-dependent dye oxidation activities of the enzyme, controls without peroxidase were necessary.
Molecular Modeling—Molecular modeling calculations were performed with Insight II software (release 2000.1, Accelrys Ltd., Cambridge, UK) using the Discover module and consistent valence force field. All water molecules were omitted. The geometries of the oxalate and O2 ligands were constructed using geometric parameters from known crystal structures, and partial atomic charges were estimated based on the values for related species. Since Discover contains a potential for iron but not manganese, the former was used to substitute for the manganese atom. The following constraints were set for the geometry optimization: residues 6–81 and 202–382, all atoms fixed; residues 81–160 and 166–201, backbone atoms only fixed. Residues 161–165 were fully unrestrained. The oxalate, O2, and manganese were all kept fixed. The optimized geometry was validated using the Procheck module of Insight II.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONEXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The full sequence of OxdC (GenBankTM accession number 21362729) contains 385 amino acids. In our model of the structure, it was possible to resolve residues 6–382 with confidence. Thus, 5 additional amino acids were included at the termini compared with the previously published structures that comprised residues 8–379 only. In addition, a Tris molecule was clearly resolved at each subunit interface in the central solvent channel along the 3-fold axis of the hexamer. However, there was no evidence of the formate molecules nor of a surface-bound metal ion (presumed to be a magnesium ion) observed in the previous structures.
Conformational Changes in OxdC—Not surprisingly, the coordinates of our OxdC structure superimpose closely with those of the previously published structure (23), giving a root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of 0.52 Å based on all common main-chain atoms. Nevertheless, aside from a number of altered surface side-chain conformations, there are two regions where the structures were noticeably different. A minor change occurs in a surface region and is largely restricted to residues 307 and 308. Despite the C atoms remaining in roughly the same positions, their backbone conformations are flipped between the two structures. The remoteness of this region to the manganese binding sites would suggest that this difference is not functionally important.
A much more significant change involves the movement of a surface loop comprising residues 161–165 (Ser-Glu-Asn-Ser-Thr) that includes a 310 helix. In the original OxdC structure, this loop borders the access channel to the manganese binding site 1 (Fig. 2A) (23). In the structure presented here, this loop occludes the channel, thereby preventing solvent access to the site 1 manganese ion (Fig. 2B). For this reason we will refer to this structure as the "closed" form of OxdC, the previously published structure as the "open" form, and the mobile loop as the "lid." It is interesting to note that the C atoms of the lid in the open structure have up to 2.5-fold elevated temperature factors relative to the average for all of the main-chain atoms, hinting at its conformational flexibility (Fig. 3A). An elevated relative temperature factor for the lid in the closed structure was also evident, but it is much less dramatic, possibly suggesting the closed conformation is more stable (Fig. 3A). The largest movement in the C atoms of the lid is associated with Asn-163 (6.9 Å), and this corresponds with it having the largest temperature factor (Fig. 3A). The side chain of Glu-162 shows the most dramatic movement with the O
-2 atom moving 13.6 Å. Changes in the main-chain torsion angles of Ser-161, Ser-164, and Thr-165 are primarily responsible for the altered conformation (Fig. 3B), and these can be regarded as the hinges of the lid. The lid is flanked by two Phe residues, 160 and 166, that do not move significantly and therefore can be considered to be the two anchor points. When residues 161–165 and 307–308 are excluded from the superposition, the r.m.s.d. between main-chain atoms of the open and closed structures decreases to 0.15 Å.
|
|
-2 atom of Glu-162 occupies essentially the same position as the distal oxygen atom of the formate that is bound to the metal ion in the open structure. This position is clearly predisposed to bind carboxyl groups favorably. In the open position, Glu-162 makes hydrogen bonding interactions with residues Thr-44 and His-299 from one neighboring subunit and Asp-297 from another adjoining subunit. The manganese binding site 2 is, by contrast, essentially identical in both structures (Fig. 4, C and D). The only difference is in the number of water molecules coordinated to the metal ion: one in the closed structure (Fig. 4B) and two in the open structure (Fig. 4D).
|
|
The wild type non-His-tagged enzyme is known to possess small amounts of oxalate oxidase and oxalate-dependent dye oxidation activities (0.2 and 0.5% relative to oxalate decarboxylase activity, respectively) (12). Although these activities are small and difficult to detect, similar observations have also been made in this study with the His-tagged enzyme. Five of the eight mutants lost the oxalate oxidase side activity completely with only the E162A, E162Q, and E333A mutants retaining this activity according to the production of hydrogen peroxide. Six of the eight mutants had lower levels of dye oxidation activity compared with the wild type enzyme, but the E162A mutant had an essentially unchanged activity, and E162Q had more than double the activity.
Molecular Modeling—Monoprotonated oxalate and dioxygen were modeled into site 1 of the closed structure of OxdC. The first model had oxalate coordinated to the manganese ion in a monodentate mode via its carboxylate group to the site occupied by formate in the open structure. Dioxygen was placed in the remaining site occupied by water in the open structure. The orientations of the oxalate and dioxygen were manually adjusted to minimize steric clashes with the amino acids lining the active site cavity, excluding those of the lid. The oxalate, but not the dioxygen, did clash a little with some side chains, most particularly with that of Glu-162. The conformations of the amino acid side chains were then energy-minimized while keeping the backbone atoms fixed. The resultant changes were largely restricted to the lid. A second round of energy minimization was required, with the backbone of the lid also free to move, to resolve the remaining steric clashes.
The resulting model showed some interesting features. The position of the lid in the final model (Fig. 4E) was a little more open than in the closed crystal structure (Fig. 4A). The Glu-162 side chain moved the most to allow room for the distal carboxylic acid group of the bound oxalate; the Glu-162 C and O-2 atoms moved about 2 and 4 Å, respectively. Despite these movements, there remained no solvent access to the site in the model. The proximal carbonyl group of oxalate was able to form hydrogen bonding interactions with both the N and N
-2 atoms of Arg-92 with negligible change in the Arg side-chain conformation. These interactions resembled those between formate and Arg-92 in the open structure (Fig. 4C). The distal carboxylic acid group of oxalate was in a position to form favorable interactions with both Glu-162 and Tyr-200 in the model (Fig. 4E).
Modeling of oxalate and dioxygen with their coordination positions to the manganese ion reversed showed that while it may be possible for the active site to accommodate such an orientation, there were no potential stabilizing hydrogen bonding interactions. In addition, particularly unfavorable interactions between oxalate and Ile-114 led to the movement of this side chain (C
moved about 2.5 Å) and those around it in the hydrophobic core of the protein. There was no need for the lid to change conformation with this orientation. The cavity of site 2, on the other hand, did not allow room for both oxalate and dioxygen whichever orientation they adopted. Molecular modeling of site 2 with both ligands bound was not explored further because substantial movements in the protein would be required for which we have no experimental cues.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONEXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Identity of the Catalytic Site—It has been suggested by Anand et al. (23) that only the manganese binding site 2 is catalytically active and that Glu-333 is the catalytic proton donor. However, there are a number of problems associated with this hypothesis. On examination of the open structure, it is not clear on what basis Anand et al. (23) state that there is a channel leading to site 2. The water molecules bound to site 2 are not solvent-exposed in either structure, so it is not obvious how substrates and products could gain access. There is no obvious lid, equivalent to that found in site 1, and the temperature factors around site 2 do not indicate how this site could become solvent-exposed. (It must be noted, however, that both structures were determined at pH 8.0–8.5 and the enzyme is not active above pH 7.5.) Site 1, on the other hand, has a product of the reaction, formate, bound to the manganese ion along with a water molecule. Furthermore the site 1 has access to solvent through a water-filled channel (Fig. 2A). Anand et al. (23) have argued that site 1 could not be catalytically active because the open structure did not have an acidic group near the manganese ion that could be the crucial proton donor in the decarboxylase reaction (Fig. 2A). However, the proximity of Glu-162 to the site 1 manganese ion in the closed structure clearly makes this a good candidate for the proton donor (Fig. 2B).
Site-directed mutagenesis has shown that substitution of Glu-162 by Gln or Ala leads to a lowering of both the Vmax and kcat/Km to 1% that of the wild type enzyme or no detectable activity, respectively (Table II). Such a dramatic effect on the efficiency of the reaction would be expected if Glu-162 were the proton donor of the decarboxylase catalytic cycle and only site 1 were catalytically active. By contrast, the Vmax and kcat/Km values for the E333A mutant were 6 and 25% that of the wild type enzyme, respectively. This would not be consistent with Glu-333 being the proton donor. This result suggests that although site 2 is not a catalytic site, its disruption does affect catalysis at site 1. The loss of charge coupled with a side chain of comparable size in the E333Q mutant seems to be so disruptive that site 1 is no longer active.
If site 1 were catalytically active, Arg-92 could be expected to be involved in substrate recognition and/or the stabilization of catalytic intermediates. Its substitution by Ala giving an inactive enzyme is consistent with this hypothesis. On the other hand, one would predict that a Lys residue at this position would give a less active, but not inactive, enzyme. This was indeed observed since the kcat/Km of the R92K mutant was 7% that of the wild type enzyme. By contrast, substitution of the Arg-270 residue of a catalytically inactive site 2 would be expected to be less detrimental to activity, having only indirect effects on site 1. This was observed with the relative kcat/Km values being 3 and 43% for R270A and R270K, respectively. Again the substitution of an Arg by a Lys is the least disruptive. Consistent with this hypothesis, Anand et al. (23) have previously shown that an R270E mutant has 20-fold less activity according to the rate of carbon dioxide production.
It is interesting to note that the oxalate Km values for all of the active mutants were significantly lower than for the wild type enzyme except for the E162Q mutant. It is perhaps surprising that the values for the mutants, especially the Arg-92 mutants, were not higher given that one would predict that a disrupted active site 1 would bind the substrate less favorably. Nevertheless the fact that the E162Q mutant is the only one with an essentially unaltered Km for oxalate might be expected given that it is the only active enzyme with a mutation in the lid rather than the main body of the protein. This suggests that the lid and Glu-162 are involved in catalysis but not substrate recognition.
If site 2 is not catalytically active, the question then arises as to why mutations at this site have a significant effect on activity. It should be noted that the minimum distance of 21 Å between any two manganese ions in the structures appears to preclude any electron transfer between them during catalysis. Therefore, the absence of any opportunity for the sites to cooperate catalytically means that the disruption of one by another must have a structural basis. One can envisage this occurring through an altered conformation of the hydrophobic interfaces between the two domains of each subunit. For example, a change in the position of the residue at position 333 could affect the hydrophobic interactions of Leu-332 and Ile-334 with Trp-102 of the neighboring domain. This could in turn affect the conformation of Glu-101, one of the ligands to the site 1 manganese ion. Perhaps the most intimate contact between sites 1 and 2 is between adjacent subunits within each of the two trimers that make up the hexamer. The Trp-96 and Trp-274 residues are both straddled in sequence by 2 of the His residues that bind to the manganese ion in each site (His-95, His-97, His-273, and His-275). The side chains of these Trp residues form stacking interactions with substantial overlap. It is most probably through this interaction that structural changes within one site are transmitted to the other. It is important to note that this type of argument must be invoked whether only site 1, only site 2, or both sites were active given the mutagenesis results. Crystal structures of the mutants will help clarify this issue.
If Glu-162 were the crucial proton donor for the decarboxylase reaction and it is this feature that distinguishes between the oxalate decarboxylase and oxidase enzymes, its substitution might be expected to lead to the conversion of the decarboxylase into an oxidase. In terms of absolute specific activities this was not the case, showing that other changes are necessary to effect a full conversion to give values comparable with that of the plant oxalate oxidase (13 units mg-1 (14)). However, it is important to note that only the E162Q mutant retained full oxidase activity, which was 25% that of its own decarboxylase activity. Therefore its oxidase/decarboxylase activity ratio was 2 orders of magnitude higher than for the wild type enzyme. Even more dramatic is the retention of two-thirds of the oxidase activity with the E162A mutant despite it having no decarboxylase activity. To convert the decarboxylase into a fully active oxalate oxidase, additional changes required might include the substitution of Arg-92 by an Asn, the structurally equivalent amino acid in the oxalate oxidase (22).
The only other mutant with detectable oxidase activity was E333A. This result is consistent with the observation by Anand et al. (23) that the activity of this mutant was depressed more strongly in formate production than in carbon dioxide production (25- and 4-fold, respectively). Why this was the case is not clear if only site 1 were catalytically active, but it was the mutant with the highest Vmax for the decarboxylase reaction. Nevertheless this result means that the possibility that site 2 has some oxalate decarboxylase activity as well as site 1 cannot yet be completely ruled out. However, if both were active, the evidence so far strongly suggests that site 1 is the dominant active site.
The dye oxidation activities of all the mutants, except those of Glu-162, are lower than for the wild type enzyme. The substitution of Glu-162 would be expected to disrupt the completion of the normal decarboxylase catalytic cycle. This would allow the accumulation of electron-deficient intermediates that would be capable of the oxidation of dyes. This might also be enhanced if the lid were not able to close properly and isolate the active site. The fact that the E162Q mutant had the highest dye oxidation activity of all (also higher than for the wild type enzyme) is consistent with this possibility. The details of this side reaction are not clear other than it is oxalate-dependent and does not seem to produce hydrogen peroxide (12). It is also not clear why mutants that have lost both oxalate decarboxylase and oxidase activities retain some dye oxidation activity, such as the R92A and E333Q mutants.
Anand et al. (23) have shown that the rate of carbon dioxide production was lowered 13-fold by a Y340F mutation in site 2. It was suggested that this residue could be involved in electron or proton transfer to a peroxy intermediate. However this site 2 residue is not completely conserved in the sequences of confirmed oxalate decarboxylases; the fungal enzymes have Phe at this position (12, 31, 32). The lowering of activity of this mutant would appear to have a structural basis as discussed above.
Catalytic Cycle—A working hypothesis for the molecular events during the catalytic cycle of the enzyme at site 1 (Fig. 1) can be drawn up based on the evidence that we have available so far. It would appear that oxalate followed by dioxygen bind to the manganese ion when the lid is open. The binding of oxalate to the site occupied by formate in the open structure could be stabilized by hydrogen bonding interactions with Arg-92 and Tyr-200. There is evidence that the formation of an oxalate radical is concomitant with its deprotonation (18). It is likely that the lid closes most of the way prior to this step to allow proton transfer to Glu-162. The negative charge of the proximal zwitterionic carboxylate radical of the oxalate radical intermediate could be stabilized by Arg-92. The loss of CO2 would allow Glu-162 to be suitably placed to deliver a proton to the carbon atom of the highly basic anionic formyl radical intermediate.
The closed conformation would allow the isolation of the active site from bulk solvent during catalysis. One purpose of this may be to protect the electron-deficient free radical intermediates of the catalytic cycle from contact with potential reductants. If this were the case, it clearly does not work with complete efficiency because the decarboxylase is capable of the oxalate-dependent oxidation of dyes albeit in only 1 in 350 turnovers. There are examples of other enzymes with redoxactive intermediates that possess a lid to prevent access of solvent during catalysis, such as lactate dehydrogenase (33).
The evidence so far cannot completely rule out that site 2 has some catalytic activity. However, it would appear more probable that site 2 has a purely structural role. Site 1 is therefore either the dominant active site or, more likely, the only catalytically active site of OxdC.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (code 1uw8 [PDB] ) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
* This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 
Supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the BBSRC.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
¶ Recipient of a BBSRC quota studentship.
|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1603-450741; Fax: 44-1603-450018; E-mail: Stephen.Bornemann{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
1 The abbreviations used are: ABTS, 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); r.m.s.d., root mean square deviation.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONEXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURESRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. M. Whittaker, H.-Y. Pan, E. T. Yukl, and J. W. Whittaker Burst Kinetics and Redox Transformations of the Active Site Manganese Ion in Oxalate Oxidase: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CATALYTIC MECHANISM J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2007; 282(10): 7011 - 7023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. Simmons, Q. Liu, Q. Huang, Q. Hao, T. P. Begley, P. A. Karplus, and M. H. Stipanuk Crystal Structure of Mammalian Cysteine Dioxygenase: A NOVEL MONONUCLEAR IRON CENTER FOR CYSTEINE THIOL OXIDATION J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2006; 281(27): 18723 - 18733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. R. Escutia, L. Bowater, A. Edwards, A. R. Bottrill, M. R. Burrell, R. Polanco, R. Vicuna, and S. Bornemann Cloning and Sequencing of Two Ceriporiopsis subvermispora Bicupin Oxalate Oxidase Allelic Isoforms: Implications for the Reaction Specificity of Oxalate Oxidases and Decarboxylases Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2005; 71(7): 3608 - 3616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
, filled squares; and 
, open diamonds.