![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 21, 22076-22083, May 21, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*

From the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
Received for publication, October 7, 2003 , and in revised form, February 27, 2004.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
stimulated PLD2 activity to an even higher level than wild type PKC
. Co-expression of wild type PKC
, but not PKC
, greatly enhanced both basal and PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation. A PKC
-specific inhibitor, rottlerin, failed to inhibit PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation and activation. Co-immunoprecipitation studies indicated an association between PLD2 and PKC
under basal conditions that was further enhanced by PMA. Time course studies of the effects of PKC
on PLD2 showed that as the phosphorylation of PLD2 increased, its activity declined. In summary, the data demonstrated that PLD2 is activated and phosphorylated by PMA and PKC
in COS-7 cells. However, the phosphorylation is not required for PKC
to activate PLD2. It is suggested that interaction rather than phosphorylation underscores the activation of PLD2 by PKC in vivo and that phosphorylation may contribute to the inactivation of the enzyme. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PLD1 and PLD2 are two isoforms of mammalian PLD that share about 50% amino acid similarity. However, their regulatory properties are quite different, e.g. that PLD1 has a low basal activity and is regulated by PKC and members of the Rho, adenosine diphosphate ribosylation factor, and Ras/Ral families of small G proteins (49). In contrast, PLD2 exhibits a high basal activity when assayed in vitro and shows little or no in vitro response to the activators of PLD1 (1012). However, other regulators of PLD2 activity have been reported. For example, PLD2 activity may be modulated in vivo by inhibition (11). The reported inhibitors include a heat-stable 18-kDa protein (11), adolase (13), ceramide (14),
-actinin (15), and
- and
-synucleins (16). On the other hand, a lot of activators of PLD2 activity have also been found. These activators include phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (10), unsaturated fatty acid (17), caveolin (18), calcium (19), GM2 activator (20), and adenosine diphosphate ribosylation factor (12). Although the regulation of PLD1 by PKC is universally accepted, it is controversial on whether or not PLD2 is also regulated by PKC. The initial report showed that PLD2 was largely refractory to PKC activation in vitro and in vivo (11). However, recent reports demonstrate that PMA can activate PLD2 in vivo, suggesting the possible regulation of PLD2 activity by PKC (19, 21, 22). Hence, the role of PKC in PLD2 activation remains to be defined.
Regarding the PKC regulation of PLD1 activity, both phosphorylation-dependent (23, 24) and -independent mechanisms (5, 25, 26) have been proposed. A protein-protein interaction rather than phosphorylation has been proposed as the main mechanism for PKC
to activate PLD1 (26). Compared with PLD1, only one group has explored the phosphorylation of PLD2 by PKC and its effect on activity (22). This group reported that PKC
is involved in PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation and activation in PC12 cells (22), whereas another group reported that PLD2 activity is enhanced by dephosphorylation of Ser/Thr residues (27). Thus, the role of phosphorylation in the activation of PLD2 by PKC requires further work.
We report in the present study that PMA induces PLD2 activation via the involvement of PKC
and that PLD2 becomes phosphorylated on both Ser and Thr residues. In addition, we demonstrate PKC
and PLD2 interact in vivo and that the phosphorylation is not required for the activation of PLD2. Evidence is presented that phosphorylation more likely contributes to deactivation of PLD2.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, bovine serum albumin, and Triton X-100 were from Sigma. Phosphatidylethanolamine, PC, and phosphatidylbutanol (PtdBut) standard were from Avanti Polar Lipids Corp. Dipalmitoyl[2-palmitoyl-9,10-3H]PC, [
-32P]ATP, and [3H]myristic acid were from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Protein G-agarose beads, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, penicillin, streptomycin, Tris-glycine SDS-polyacrylamide gels, PcDNA3.1(+), PcDNA3.1(HisA, -B, -C) vectors, anti-Xpress monoclonal antibody, and fetal bovine serum were from Invitrogen. The transfection reagent FuGENE 6 and the protease inhibitor mixture were from Roche Applied Science. COS-7 cells were from the American Type Culture Collection. Anti-phosphoserine and anti-phosphothreonine polyclonal antibodies were from Zymed Laboratories Inc.. Anti-PKC
polyclonal and anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were from Santa Cruz. Anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, Hyperfilm, and ECL reagents were from Amersham Biosciences. The Immobilon transfer membranes were from Millipore. Anti-PKC
rabbit antiserum was from Upstate. Anti-PCK
, -
, -
, -
, -
, -
, -
, and -
monoclonal antibodies were from BD Transduction Laboratories. Ro-31-8220, bisindolylmaleimide I, Gö 6976, and rottlerin were from Calbiochem. Human recombinant PKC
was from Panvera. Cell Culture and TransfectionCOS-7 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum in humidified 10% CO2. Six-well plates were seeded with 2 x 105 cells per well, and 10-cm dishes were seeded with 8 x 105 cells and transfected with FuGENE 6 according to the manufacturer's instructions.
In Vivo PLD AssayAfter a 6-h transfection with FuGENE 6, COS-7 cells in 6-well plates were serum-starved (0.5% fetal bovine serum in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium in the presence of 1 µCi/ml [3H]myristic acid). After overnight starvation, PLD activity was assayed as described (28). Briefly, cells were preincubated in 0.3% 1-butanol and then treated as indicated in the figure legends. Cells were then washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and stopped with methanol. Lipids were extracted, and the PtdBut product was resolved by thin layer chromatography. Bands co-migrating with a PtdBut standard were scraped and quantitated by liquid scintillation counting.
Subcellular FractionationCOS-7 cells in 100-mm plates were harvested after transfection with PLD2 constructs and starved overnight as described above. After treatment with the appropriate reagents the cells were washed and harvested with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline buffer. Cells were then centrifuged and resuspended in 500 µl of ice-cold lysis buffer (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.2, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor mixture). After two bursts (10 s) of sonication, the cell lysate was centrifuged at 500 x g for 10 min to remove unbroken cells. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 120,000 x g for 45 min at 4 °C to separate the cytosolic and crude membrane fractions. The particulate fraction was washed twice with the lysis buffer and resuspended in the same buffer by passing through a 27-gauge needle until the pellet was resuspended.
In Vitro PLD AssayThe PLD activity was measured by the formation of [3H]PtdBut in vitro as described previously (28) with modifications. The composition of phospholipid vesicles (11.5 µM PC, 2 µM phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, and 97.75 µM phosphatidylethanolamine) was optimized for PLD2 activity. [Palmitoyl-3H]PC (0.5 µCi/reaction) was used with 1-butanol (0.3%) as substrate. Where applicable, 100 µM ATP, 200 ng of PKC
(PanVera), or 500 nM PMA was also included in the reaction system. The reaction mixtures were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and stopped with chloroform/methanol/HCl (50:98:2, v/v). The lipids were extracted from the organic phase and resolved by thin-layer chromatography. Bands co-migrating with a PtdBut standard were quantitated by liquid scintillation counting.
Western BlottingProtein samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon-P, Millipore Corp.). The blots were then blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin and incubated with appropriate primary antibodies (1 mg/ml) (1:5000) followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL).
Immunoprecipitation COS-7 cells cultured in 100-mm dishes were transfected and starved as described above. After treatment, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and then harvested in 600 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer containing 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.2, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM KC1, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM Na4P2O7, 1.2 mM Na3VO4, and protease inhibitors mixture. The cell suspension was then sonicated for 2 x 5 s, and the resulting cell lysate was centrifuged at 120,000 x g for 30 min to remove the detergent-insoluble fraction. The supernatant was then precleared by mixing it with 1 µg of affinity-purified mouse IgG and 20 µl of 1:1 slurry of protein G-agarose beads for 1 h at 4 °C. The mixture was then spun, and the supernatant was incubated with 2 µl of anti-Xpress mouse antibody (1 mg/ml) and 20 µl of protein G-agarose beads overnight. The immunoprecipitates were washed twice with the lysis buffer and then resuspended in SDS sample buffer and analyzed by Western blotting.
In Vitro Phosphorylation of PLD2 by PKC
Immunoprecipitated PLD2 from PLD2-overexpressing COS-7 cells was washed with phosphorylation buffer (30 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.0, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM EGTA, 0.4 mM CaCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100) four times and resuspended in the phosphorylation buffer. Aliquots of beads containing immunoprecipitated PLD2 were then mixed with 0.12 mM ATP, 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, 100 ng of PKC
, and 100 nM PMA. The mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 30 min and then electrophoresed through an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and the membrane was exposed to a photographic film for autoradiography.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-specific PKC inhibitor, showed marked inhibition of the basal activity of both PLD1 and PLD2 but no inhibition of the effect of PMA itself. These data indicate that PKC is involved in PMA-induced activation of both PLD1 and PLD2.
|
PLD2 Undergoes Serine and Threonine Phosphorylation after PMA TreatmentThe possible Ser/Thr phosphorylation of PLD2 after PMA treatment was examined using anti-phospho-Ser and anti-phospho-Thr antibodies. As indicated in Fig. 3A, PLD2 was basally phosphorylated on Thr but not on Ser residues. Upon PMA treatment, PLD2 became phosphorylated on Ser and Thr in a time-dependent manner. However, the phosphorylation on Ser became detectable only after 5 min of PMA treatment. The increase of phosphorylation was further demonstrated by the slower migration of PLD2 on the gel upon PMA treatment for longer times, as indicated by the Western blotting with Xpress antibodies in Fig. 3A.
|
, are involved in the phosphorylation of PLD2 induced by PMA.
PKC
Mediates PMA-induced PLD2 PhosphorylationTo obtain further information about which PKC isoform mediates the phosphorylation, the expression of different PKC isoforms in COS-7 cells was examined by Western blotting. Fig. 4A shows that PKC
, PKC
, PKC
, PKC
, and PKC
were detected, whereas PKC
, PKC
, PKC
, and PKC
were not even though the antibodies were shown to be effective (data not shown). Among the isoforms, PKC
showed a complete translocation from cytosol to membrane fractions after PMA treatment. In sharp contrast to PKC
, PKC
and PKC
were located mainly in the membrane fraction and showed little or no translocation when stimulated. These data imply that PKC
is more likely than other PKC isoforms to be involved in PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation.
|
or PKC
was overexpressed together with PLD2 in COS-7 cells, and PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation was examined. As shown in Fig. 4B, co-expression of PKC
greatly enhanced PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation on both Ser and Thr residues. In contrast, co-expression of PKC
had minimal effect. The lower panel of Fig. 4B shows that PKC
and PKC
were well expressed. The data provide further support that PKC
, rather than PKC
, is involved in PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation. To test if PKC
can directly phosphorylate PLD2, in vitro phosphorylation of PLD2 by PKC
was conducted. As shown in Fig. 4C, both PLD1 and PLD2 were phosphorylated by PKC
in the presence of PMA, although the phosphorylation of PLD1 was greater.
Phosphorylation Is Not Required for PLD2 Activation by PKC
The requirement of phosphorylation for PLD2 activation by PMA is next explored. First, the dose response of PMA on PLD2 phosphorylation was compared with that for PMA on PLD2 activation. Fig. 5A shows that PMA induced PLD2 phosphorylation by a dose-dependent manner. The phosphorylation was detectable at a PMA concentration of 2.5 nM and higher. Fig. 5B shows the dose dependence for PMA activation of PLD2. In contrast to the phosphorylation pattern, activation was evident at PMA concentrations as low as 0.5 nM and was maximal at 5 nM. The difference between these two patterns indicates that activation of PLD2 is not dependent on its phosphorylation.
|
-mediated PLD2 activation, a kinase-dead mutant of PKC
(KN-PKC
) was tested for its effect on the activation of PLD2. As shown in Fig. 6A, wild type PKC
enhanced PLD2 activity when co-transfected with PLD2 in COS-7 cells. Surprisingly, the kinase-dead PKC
mutant displayed an even stronger stimulation than wild type PKC
on basal and PLD2 activity. As a control, PKC
and PKC
were also co-expressed with PLD2 and showed no significant stimulation, showing the specificity for PKC
activation of PLD2. Fig. 6B confirms that, although wild type PKC
enhanced both basal and PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation, the kinase-dead mutant was unable to phosphorylate PLD2. Fig. 6C further shows that in contrast to wild type, kinase-dead PKC
does not exhibit autophosphorylation after PMA treatment. These data strongly support the conclusion that phosphorylation is not required for PKC
to activate PLD2 activity.
|
after PMA TreatmentConsistent with the fast activation of PLD2 by PKC
in vivo, PMA induced a rapid translocation of this PKC isoform from cytosol to the membrane fraction (Fig. 7A). Because PLD2 localizes to membranes (11, 29), this raises the possibility that the translocation of PKC
makes it more accessible to interact with PLD2. To explore this, the co-immunoprecipitation of PLD2 and PKC
was examined in COS-7 cells. Fig. 7B shows that there is a basal association between PLD2 and PKC
, and the binding is greatly enhanced by PMA treatment. Fig. 7C shows that, consistent with the results in Fig. 7B, PLD2 was present in PKC
immunoprecipitates and that PMA potentiated the association in a time-dependent manner. These data demonstrate that PLD2 can interact with PKC
. To examine whether the interaction between PLD2 and PKC
is specific, the presence of endogenous PKC
, PKC
, or PKC
in PLD2 immunoprecipitates was determined. As shown in Fig. 7D, endogenous PKC
is associated with PLD2, and the association is increased after PMA treatment in a time-dependent manner. In contrast, no PKC
or PKC
was detected in PLD2 immunoprecipitates before and after PMA treatment. These data therefore show that PKC
rather than PKC
or PKC
mediates PMA-induced PLD2 activation. The effect of PKC inhibitors on the PLD2-PKC
interaction was also examined. As shown in Fig. 7E, Ro-31-8220, Bis, and Gö 6976 completely or almost completely inhibited PMA-induced PLD2-PKC
interaction, whereas rottlerin showed no inhibition at all. The large inhibitory effect of Gö 6976 on the interaction seemed inconsistent with its minimal inhibition of PLD2 activity. We hypothesized that the relationship between the interaction between PKC
and PLD2 and the activation of PLD2 was not linear. In other words, only a small amount of PKC
binding was required for the full activation of PLD2. To prove this hypothesis, we expressed increasing amounts of PKC
together with PLD2 and examined the effects on the PLD2-PKC
interaction and PLD2 activity. As shown in Fig. 7F, the addition of increasing of PKC
cDNA from 0.08 to 0.48 µg led to a proportional increase in the PLD2-PKC
association. However, 0.48 µg of PKC
cDNA produced no further increase in PLD2 activity than did 0.08 µg. In other words, the relationship between PLD2-PKC
association and PLD2 activation was nonlinear.
|
. The question then is, What is the role of phosphorylation in the control of PLD2 activity? Fig. 8A shows the changes of PLD2 activity after PMA treatment of COS-7 cells in the absence or presence of overexpressed PKC
. Without PKC
expression, the PLD product PtdBut accumulated linearly over 10 min in the presence of PMA, showing that PLD2 remained active during this period. However, in the presence of overexpressed PKC
, there was an increase in PtdBut before PMA treatment (0 min) followed by a slow increase with PMA. The latter change indicates that PLD2 is deactivated after several minutes of PMA treatment under the condition of PKC
coexpression. In support of a role for phosphorylation, Fig. 8B showed that PLD2 was phosphorylated much earlier and stronger in the presence of overexpressed PKC
than in its absence. This phosphorylation pattern is highly correlated with the deactivation of PLD2 activity. The in vitro assay of PLD2 in Fig. 8C shows that the inclusion of ATP in the reaction with PKC
and PMA inhibited PLD2 activity and that the inhibition was abolished by the PKC inhibitor Ro-31-8220. These data indicate that phosphorylation can contribute to the suppression of PLD2 activity.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
when overexpressed (19, 30).
A major issue in exploring the mechanism by which PMA/PKC activates PLD1 or PLD2 is the role of phosphorylation. It has been reported that PLD2 is Ser/Thr phosphorylated by PKC
after PMA treatment of rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells (22). In this case the Ser/Thr phosphorylation was revealed by phosphoamino acid analysis. In another paper, the Ser/Thr phosphorylation of PLD2 was implicated by using okadaic acid, an inhibitor of Ser/Thr protein phosphatases 1 and 2A (27). In the present study, using phospho-specific antibodies, we clearly demonstrate that PLD2 undergoes phosphorylation on both serine and threonine residues upon PMA treatment of COS-7 cells (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, we provide evidence that PKC
mediates the effect of PMA. This conclusion is based on the following points. First, Gö 6976, a PKC inhibitor that is relatively specific for PKC
and PKC
1, abolished PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3B). In contrast, the relatively PKC
-specific inhibitor rottlerin did not have any inhibitory effect (Fig. 3B). A possible role for PKC
1 was eliminated by the fact that PKC
was not detected in COS-7 cells (data not shown). Second, PKC
but not PKC
greatly potentiated both basal and PMA-induced phosphorylation of PLD2 (Fig. 4B). Third, the overexpression of PKC
but not PKC
or PKC
stimulated the activity of PLD2 in COS-7 cells (Fig. 6A). Consistent with our results, Siddiqi et al. (19) demonstrate that in Sf9 cells, where both PKC
and PKC
expression are undetectable, PMA barely activated PLD2. However, overexpression of PKC
, but not PKC
, significantly enhanced both basal and PMA-stimulated PLD2 activity. In contrast, it has been reported that PKC
mediates PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation and activation in PC12 cells (22). Therefore, it is possible that different PKC isoforms are used in different cells or tissues to mediate PLD2 activation.
The issue of whether or not phosphorylation is required for PLD activation still remains controversial. This issue has mostly involved studies of PLD1. A recent paper from our lab provides evidence that phosphorylation is not required for PLD1 activation (26), but there are reports to the contrary (23, 24). The requirement of phosphorylation for PKC
-mediated PLD2 activation by PMA was therefore examined in this study. Although our findings indicate that during PMA-induced activation PLD2 becomes heavily phosphorylated on both Ser and Thr residues (Fig. 3A), there is much evidence that this phosphorylation is not required for PLD2 activation. First, although Gö 6976 eliminated the ability of PMA to phosphorylate PLD2 (Fig. 3B), it only exerted a slight inhibition on the activation of the enzyme (Fig. 2). Second, KN-PKC
, a PKC
kinase-dead mutant, still activated PLD2 robustly (Fig. 6A). Third, comparison between the time courses of the effects of PMA on PLD2 phosphorylation (Fig. 3A) and activation (Fig. 1A) showed that the activation of PLD2 by PMA occurred earlier than did phosphorylation. Fourth, by comparing the concentration curve of PMA-induced PLD2 activation (Fig. 5B) and the dose-response pattern of PMA-induced PLD2 phosphorylation (Fig. 5A) we found that PLD2 was activated by PMA at concentrations (0.5 and 1 nM) where phosphorylation of PLD2 didn't occur yet. Based on the above findings, we have concluded that phosphorylation is not required for the activation of PLD2 by PMA.
Furthermore, our data suggest that the phosphorylation of PLD2 actually suppresses its enzyme activity. First, overexpression of the kinase-dead PKC
mutant showed a bigger stimulation of PLD2 activity than did overexpression of wildtype PKC
at the same level (Fig. 6A), implying that phosphorylation decreases PLD2 activity. Second, after the initial activation by PMA treatment of COS-7 cells, PLD2 lost activity faster in the presence of co-expression of PKC
than in its absence (Fig. 8A), and this is highly correlated with the fact that PLD2 undergoes phosphorylation much faster in the former case than in the latter (Fig. 8B). Third, in vitro PLD assay also showed that when ATP was included in the assay system, PLD2 activity decreased, and this decrease was abolished by the PKC inhibitor Ro-31-8220 (Fig. 8C). Consistent with our results, Watanabe and Kanaho (27) also demonstrate that phosphorylation leads to the inhibition of PLD2 activity.
PLD2 has been reported to bind to a lot of intracellular proteins. These proteins include the µ-opioid receptor (31), phospholipase
1 (32), c-Src (33), epidermal growth factor receptor (34), and PKC
(22). The binding is either ligand-dependent or -independent. PLD2 has also been reported to associate with PKC
in HEK-293 cells when both proteins were overexpressed, but this association was ligand-independent (30). Siddiqi et al. (19) report that when PLD2 and PKC
were both overexpressed in Sf9 cells, an association between them was observed and was increased by PMA. It is, therefore, possible that the protein-protein interaction between PLD2 and PKC
contributes to the activation of PLD2. In the present study, we showed that in COS-7 cells, an association between PLD2 and PKC
is also present, and this association was greatly enhanced by PMA (Fig. 7B). In addition, in the absence of PMA, KN-PKC
showed a stronger association with PLD2 than wild type PKC
(Fig. 6B). This is correlated with the fact that KN-PKC
induced a larger stimulation of PLD2 activity than did wild type PKC
(Fig. 6A). Furthermore, the effects of PKC inhibitors on PMA-induced PLD2 activation were correlated with their effects on PMA-induced PLD2-PKC
interaction. These observations support the conclusion that the PLD2-PKC
interaction is responsible for PLD2 activation. In contrast to PKC
, interaction of PKC
and PKC
, the other two PMA-responsive PKC isoforms, with PLD2 was not detected (Fig. 7D). Also, overexpression of PKC
or PKC
caused no stimulation of PLD2 activity (Fig. 6A). These data demonstrate that PMA induces a specific interaction between PKC
and PLD2 and that PKC
subsequently activates PLD2 by protein-protein interaction.
In conclusion, our findings show that PLD2 becomes Ser/Thr-phosphorylated during its activation by PMA and that PKC
mediates the effect. However, the phosphorylation of PLD2 is not required for its activation. Rather, the phosphorylation is related to a slow deactivation of PLD2. We suggest that a protein-protein interaction between PLD2 and PKC
is responsible for PLD2 activation by PMA in COS-7 cells.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 615-322-6494; Fax: 615-322-4381; E-mail: john.exton{at}vanderbilt.edu.
1 The abbreviations used are: PLD, phospholipase D; PKC, protein kinase C; PA, phosphatidic acid; Bis, bisindolylmaleimide I; PMA, 4
-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PtdBut, phosphatidylbutanol; KN, kinase negative. ![]()
2 In the absence of PMA, Ro-31-8220 induced some activation of PLD1 and PLD2. This probably relates to its ability to activate PKC
as shown by the membrane translocation of this PKC isozyme (data not shown). ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
cDNA. | REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Knoepp, M. S. Chahal, Y. Xie, Z. Zhang, D. J. Brauner, M. A. Hallman, S. A. Robinson, S. Han, M. Imai, S. Tomlinson, et al. Effects of Active and Inactive Phospholipase D2 on Signal Transduction, Adhesion, Migration, Invasion, and Metastasis in EL4 Lymphoma Cells Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 574 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hardel, N. Harmel, G. Zolles, B. Fakler, and N. Klocker Recycling endosomes supply cardiac pacemaker channels for regulated surface expression Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 52 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Kolsch, P. G. Charest, and R. A. Firtel The regulation of cell motility and chemotaxis by phospholipid signaling J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2008; 121(5): 551 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Duijsings, E. Wessels, S. E. van Emst-de Vries, W. J. G. Melchers, P. H. G. M. Willems, and F. J. M. van Kuppeveld Reduction of phospholipase D activity during coxsackievirus infection J. Gen. Virol., November 1, 2007; 88(11): 3027 - 3030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Holinstat, B. Voss, M. L. Bilodeau, and H. E. Hamm Protease-Activated Receptors Differentially Regulate Human Platelet Activation through a Phosphatidic Acid-Dependent Pathway Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 686 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pilquil, J. Dewald, A. Cherney, I. Gorshkova, G. Tigyi, D. English, V. Natarajan, and D. N. Brindley Lipid Phosphate Phosphatase-1 Regulates Lysophosphatidate-induced Fibroblast Migration by Controlling Phospholipase D2-dependent Phosphatidate Generation J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38418 - 38429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Benitez-Rajal, M.-J. Lorite, A. D. Burt, C. P. Day, and M. G. Thompson Phospholipase D and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in hepatic stellate cells: effects of platelet-derived growth factor and extracellular nucleotides. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): G977 - G986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Preininger, L. G. Henage, W. M. Oldham, E. J. Yoon, H. E. Hamm, and H. A. Brown Direct Modulation of Phospholipase D Activity by Gbeta{gamma} Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 311 - 318. [Abstra |