Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M313964200 on March 22, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 21, 22138-22144, May 21, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/21/22138    most recent
M313964200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qi, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qi, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

p38 MAPK Activation Selectively Induces Cell Death in K-ras-mutated Human Colon Cancer Cells through Regulation of Vitamin D Receptor*

Xiaomei Qi{ddagger}, Jun Tang{ddagger}, Rocky Pramanik{ddagger}, Richard M. Schultz§, Senji Shirasawa||, Takehiko Sasazuki||, Jiahuai Han**, and Guan Chen{ddagger}§{ddagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Department of Radiation Oncology, §Program in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry and Program in Molecular Biology and the Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois 05163, the ||Research Institute, International Medical Center of Japan, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan, and the **Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037

Received for publication, December 22, 2003 , and in revised form, February 11, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
ras is the most characterized oncogene in human cancer, and yet there are no effective therapeutics to selectively target this oncogene. Our previous work demonstrated the inhibitory activity of the p38 pathway in Ras proliferative signaling in experimental NIH 3T3 cells (Chen, G., Hitomi, M., Han, J., and Stacey, D. W. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38973-38980). Here we explore the therapeutic potential of p38 kinase activation in human colon cancer cells with and without endogenous K-ras activation. p38 activation by both adenovirus-mediated gene delivery of constitutively active p38 activator MKK6 and by arsenite selectively induces cell death in K-ras-activated human colon cancer HCT116 cells but not in the K-ras-disrupted HCT116-derived sublines. The cell death-inducing effect of MKK6 is not because of its selective activation of p38 kinase or its downstream transcription factor substrates, ATF-2 or c-Jun, in K-ras-activated cells. Rather, cell death in K-ras-activated cells is linked to the down-regulation of vitamin D receptor (VDR) by an AP-1-dependent mechanism. Forced VDR expression in K-ras-activated cells inhibits p38 activation-induced cell death, and inhibition of endogenous VDR protein expression in K-ras-disrupted cells increased the arsenite-induced toxicity. Analysis of an additional two human colon cancer cell lines with and without K-ras mutation also showed a K-ras- and VDR-dependent toxicity of MKK6. Hence, p38 pathway activation selectively induces cell death in K-ras-mutated human colon cancer cells by mechanisms involving the suppression of VDR activity.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The Ras family of proteins consists of three isoforms, H-, K-, and N-Ras, which play critical roles in control of normal and transformed cell growth (1, 2). Mutated K-ras is one of the most frequent genetic events in human cancer, with the highest incidences in pancreatic carcinomas (90%) and colorectal tumors (50%) (3, 4). Various strategies have been attempted to selectively inhibit oncogenic Ras activity, including application of farnesyltransferase inhibitors (5, 6), antisense technology (7-9), and small interference RNA (10). Although certain progress has been made in experimental models, therapeutic strategies to selectively inhibit activated ras oncogenes in human cancer remain to be established.

Increasing knowledge of Ras signaling in recent years has suggested an important alternative for the inhibition of oncogene Ras activity through regulation of Ras downstream signal transduction pathways (11). Multiple pathways are involved in transduction of Ras signaling, among which the best characterized are the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs),1 including extracellular mitogen-regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun amino-terminal kinases (JNK), and p38 (12). Of these MAPKs, the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway is most critical in Ras-induced proliferation and transformation (13). Activation of this cascade has been shown to be both necessary and sufficient for Ras transformation (14-17). Accordingly, efforts have been made to inhibit this key pathway with specific MEK inhibitors to explore the therapeutic potential (18, 19). The MEK/ERK pathway, however, is also required for normal cellular proliferation in response to growth factors. Consequently, the usefulness of the inhibition of MEK/ERK activity to suppress the ras oncogene-induced cancers remains to be further verified.

In addition to the mitogenic ERK pathway, Ras also signals to the JNK and p38 stress MAP kinases (13). Oncogene ras is known to activate JNK and its physiological substrate c-Jun (20, 21). The JNK pathway was also shown to be required for Ras transformation in many cell types because JNK inhibition suppresses Ras-induced transformation (22), and Ras-transforming activity is compromised in c-Jun knock-out cells (23). In contrast to the cooperative role of the JNK pathway, our previous work demonstrated that the p38 MAPK pathway is inhibitory in Ras mitogenic signaling (24). This was shown by the fact that oncogene Ras activates p38 and its downstream kinases PRAK and MK2 in NIH 3T3 cells, and each of these kinases in turn suppresses Ras-induced proliferation (24). The inhibitory effect of p38 kinase on Ras activity was further confirmed in rat intestine epithelial cells in which the p38 inhibition by SB drugs leads to an increased growth of Rastransformed cells in soft agar (25). Moreover, the p38 activation in human mammary epithelial cells appeared to be specific to H-Ras but not to N-Ras (26), and higher levels of phosphorylated p38 proteins were even shown to be able to predict an in vivo growth inhibitory response in several human breast and prostate tumor cell lines (27). In this report, human colon cancer cells with and without activated K-ras were used to address whether activation of p38 kinase is selectively toxic to K-ras-activated human colon cancer cells. Our results demonstrate that p38 activation by genetic as well as pharmacological means selectively induces cell death in K-ras-activated human colon cancers. This effect was further shown to occur through down-regulation of the AP-1 target gene vitamin D receptor (VDR).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
cDNA Constructs and Cell Lines—The construct of the recombinant adenovirus vector containing HA-tagged constitutively active MKK6 (ad-MKK6) was prepared as previously described (28), and its use to infect human breast cancer cells in our laboratory was described (29, 30). Human VDR cDNA was provided by Leonard Freedman (31) and was cloned into a V5-tagged pcDNA3 expression vector (Invitrogen). A FLAG-tagged constitutively active p38 activator MKK6 in a pcDNA3 vector was previously described (32). A 0.5-kb mouse VDR luciferase promoter (VDR-Luc) was provided by Hector DeLuca (33). The AP-1 site-mutated VDR promoter was characterized previously in our laboratory (29). The AP-1 luciferase reporter (AP-1 Luc, three AP-1 repeats fused to a minimal c-Fos promoter) was provided by Craig Hauser (34). Human colon cancer cell line HCT-116 containing a mutated K-ras at codon 13 (Gly to Asp) and its K-ras-disrupted subclones, Hke3 and HK2-8, have been described (35-37). Human colon cancer cells SK-CO-1 (K-ras-mutated) and HT-29 (without K-ras mutation) were provided by Dennis Stacey (38, 39).

Cell Culture, Transfection, and Luciferase Promoter Assay—Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C, and 5% CO2. To establish stable VDR expression clones, HCT116 cells were transfected with a V5-tagged VDR construct or a corresponding vector using calcium phosphate (a kit from Promega) and selected with G418 for drug-resistant clones (29). For AP-1 and VDR luciferase promoter assay, cells were transiently transfected with AP-1 Luc or VDR-Luc, with or without cotransfection with MKK6, and luciferase activity was determined 48 h later after transfection using a dual luciferase kit from Promega as previously described (29). In the case of ARS treatment, the reporter assay was carried out 24 h after the pulse treatment.

Experiments with Small Interference RNA to Inhibit Endogenous VDR Expression—To silence endogenous VDR protein expression, a pSUPER (pSR) RNAi kit (catalogue number VEC-pRT-0002; Oligo-Engine) was used. This retrovirus pSR vector is designed to direct transcription from a pair of 64-nt oligonucleotides, which are processed into functional small interference RNA to specifically inactivate selected target genes (40). We have selected four target sequences downstream of the start codon of the human VDR gene (coding region) and designed four corresponding 64-mer oligonucleotides (synthesized by IDT Company). These oligonucleotides were cloned into the pSR vector according to the manufacturer's protocol. For infection, the pSR constructs were transfected into the Phoenix-Ampo retrovirus packing cells (ATCC) as previously described (41). Two days after the transfection, supernatants were used to infect Hke3 colon cancer cells. One of these sequences (5'-GATGATCCAGAAGCTAGCC-'3 at -1259) in pSR was shown to consistently suppress endogenous VDR protein expression in 293 as well as Hke3 colon cancer cells and was used for the toxicity assay.

Cell Death Assay—For cell death, cells were plated at the same density and treated with 20 µM ARS or 40 µM amsacrine (provided by NCI, National Institutes of Health) for 24 h. Infection with adenovirus vector and adenovirus containing MKK6 was carried out as previously reported (29), and cell death was analyzed 48 h following infection. Cell death was determined by the trypan blue exclusion assay and analyzed by Student's t test for statistical significant difference. Results from the viability assay were confirmed either by morphological observations under light microscope and/or fluorescence-activated cell sorter for a sub-G1 population (30, 42).

Western Blotting Analyses—Cells were pulsed-treated with ARS for 30 min and collected in 1x loading buffer to examine for protein expression and protein phosphorylations. In the case of adenovirus infection, cells were collected 24 h postinfection for Western analyses. Protein was separated on an SDS-PAGE, which was transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using a liquid-transfer system (Bio-Rad). The resultant membrane was typically blocked with 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline-Tween 20 for 1 h and incubated with primary antibody in 5% milk TBST at 4 °C overnight. Rabbit and goat polyclonal antibodies against VDR (C-20), c-Jun, and ATF-2 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies against phosphorylated p38, JNK, ERK, c-Jun (Ser-63), and ATF-2 and their corresponding forms for total proteins were from Cell Signaling. The membrane was then washed four times with 1x TBST and incubated with the proper peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 1 h at room temperature. The ECL reaction was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and the resultant bands were visualized in a PhosphorImager (Amersham Bioscience). Each membrane was typically stripped off and reprobed with additional antibodies for comparison and normalization as described previously (29). Similar results were obtained from at least one additional experiment.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
p38 Activation Selectively Induces Cell Death in Human Colon Cancer Cells with K-ras Activation—To examine effects of p38 activation on cell survival of human colon cancer cells with and without endogenous Ras activation, the K-ras-activated HCT116 human colon cancer cell line and its two K-ras-disrupted subclones (Hke3 and HK2-8) were treated with p38 activators. Previous work has demonstrated that disruption of the activated K-ras gene in HCT116 cells by homologous recombination leads to a loss of malignant growth in soft agar and nude mice (35). To activate p38 kinase, cells were infected with an adenovirus vector containing a constitutively active MKK6 (ad-MKK6), a specific p38 activator (28, 32, 43), or a control empty vector (Vect). Moreover, a group of cells was also treated with a typical physiological chemical p38 stimulus, ARS (24, 44), to confirm results with MKK6 without cDNA overexpression. As shown in Fig. 1A, both ARS and MKK6 selectively induced cell death in HCT116 cells that harbor an activated K-ras (p <0.05 versus control), but the same treatment had no substantial effects on cell viability in K-ras-disrupted HK2-8 and Hke3 subclones (p >0.05 versus Vect control in both lines). Although infection with ad-MKK6 led to a moderate increase in sub-G1 population as well as some morphological alterations in Hke3 and HK2-8 cells (Fig. 1, B and C), these effects are much less than those in K-ras-activated HCT116 cells. Hence, MKK6 and ARS are specifically toxic to K-ras-activated human colon cancer cells.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
p38 activation selectively induces cell death in K-ras-activated human colon cancer cells. A, MKK6 and ARS induce cell death in K-ras-activated HCT116 but not in K-ras-disrupted Hke3 and HK2-8 cells. Human colon cancer cells (K-ras-activated HCT116 line and its K-ras-disrupted Hke3 and HK2-8 sublines) were infected with ad-Vector (Vect) or ad-MKK6 (MKK6)for5hin serum-free medium; cell viability was determined 48 h later. For ARS treatment, cells were incubated with the chemical (20 µM) for 24 h. There was no effect on cell viability by the solvent (H2O) treatment alone (data not shown). Results shown are means of four separate experiments (bars, S.E.; p <0.05 for ARS and ad-MKK6 versus Vect in HCT116 cells but not Hke3 or HK2-8 cells). B, morphological alterations of colon cancer cells by ad-MKK6 or ARS. Cells were infected or treated as above and photographed under light microscope. Pictures showed that most HCT116 cells became detached (dead) after ad-MKK6 or ARS, whereas only a few were detached in K-ras-disrupted Hke3 or HK2-8 cells. C, cell death induced by ad-MKK6 or ARS is apoptotic. A portion of these treated cells were fixed in ethanol and prepared for FACS for sub-G1 apoptotic populations.

 
To analyze effects of MKK6 and ARS on p38 activity, cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by Western blot for p38 phosphorylation using a specific p38 phospho-antibody and compared with levels of phosphorylated ERK and phosphorylated JNK proteins. Also, the effects on c-Jun and ATF-2, transcription factors downstream of the JNK and p38 kinases that are most frequently activated by stress signaling (45-47), were examined. Infection with ad-MKK6 selectively induced p38 phosphorylation without substantial effects on the JNK and ERK activity. These effects occurred similarly in all three cell lines regardless of the Ras status (Fig. 2). Moreover, MKK6 had no effect on c-Jun activity but activated ATF2 in all three cell lines. ATF2 activation was shown as an increased band density as well as a decreased mobility as a result of phosphorylations (48). The similar effects of MKK6 on p38 and p38 substrates ATF-2 and c-Jun (49) in all three cell lines suggest that the cell death-inducing effect of MKK6 is not due to its selective activation of the p38 pathway in HCT116 cells.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Ad-MKK6 and ARS stimulate p38 phosphorylation independently of K-ras activation. Cells were collected 24 h after ad-Vector or ad-MKK6 infection for detection of p38 phosphorylation. For ARS, cells were pulse-treated for 30 min at 100 µM and collected immediately for Western analyses. The membrane was stripped and reprobed with different antibodies for comparison and normalization. In some cases, the same lysates were separated by separate gels. A similar result was obtained from an additional experiment from a separate culture.

 
Although ARS treatment similarly stimulates p38 phosphorylation in three cell lines, this chemical, as opposed to MKK6, also activates JNK and ERK, which are more predominant in HCT116 cells in comparison with the K-ras-disrupted lines (Fig. 2). Moreover, ARS appears to specifically phosphorylate c-Jun in K-ras-activated HCT116 cells, an effect that is opposite to that induced by mitogenic stimuli such as serum and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, which more strongly activate c-Jun in the K-ras-disrupted Hke3 cells (50). An increase in ATF2 protein level and decreased mobility by ARS, on the other hand, were observed in all three cell lines, although these were stronger in HCT116 cells. Activation of three MAPKs (p38, ERK, and JNK) by ARS has been previously described (51), and some of these multiple effects may be caused by its inhibitory activity on phosphatases (52). Despite the selective stimulation of cellular targets JNK/ERK/c-Jun in HCT116 cells, it is clear that ARS activates the p38 pathway (p38/ATF2) in all three cell lines, regardless of K-ras activation, a similar scenario as with ad-MKK6 infection. These results, again, suggest that p38 activation is apoptotic only in human colon cancer cells that harbor an activated K-ras, possibly as a result of inactivation of anti-apoptotic genes and/or activation of proapoptotic genes through a combined effect of K-ras mutation and p38 activation.

p38 Activation Induces an AP-1-dependent Trans-suppression of VDR Gene Expression in K-ras-activated but Not in K-ras-disrupted Colon Cancer Cells—VDR is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors, which is believed to mediate most, if not all, biological effects of vitamin D3 (53). Although VDR is traditionally considered only to be expressed in vitamin D3 target tissues such as skin, intestine, and kidney (54), the VDR transcript and/or its protein product is actually detectable in most of the tissues/cell types examined (53). Our recent work established that VDR in breast cancer cells is trans-activated by a combined AP-1 signal induced by the p38 and JNK stress MAP kinases in a manner independent of ligand vitamin D3 (29). This observation indicates that VDR may perform previously unappreciated functions in stress response. To explore whether MKK6- and ARS-induced cell death in HCT116 cells is through the regulation of VDR, p38 activation-regulated VDR protein expressions were determined by Western blot analysis. Of interest, both ad-MKK6 infection and ARS treatment led to a significant reduction of VDR protein expression in the activated Ras-containing HCT116 cells (Fig. 3A). The reduction of VDR protein levels is in contrast to MKK6 and ARS stimulation of VDR in human breast cancer cells (29). In the colon cancer HCT116 cells, infection with ad-MKK6 resulted in an ~50% decrease in VDR protein expression (49.4% ± 6.9% of the vector control from three separate experiments). More interestingly, the same treatments had no observable effects on VDR protein levels in K-ras knock-out Hke3 cells (Fig. 3B). The different effects of ad-MKK6 on VDR in HCT116 and Hke3 cell lines are not due to different MKK6 protein expression after adenovirus infection (Fig. 3C). These results thus demonstrated that MKK6 and ARS are specifically inhibitory to VDR protein expression in K-ras-mutated human colon cancer cells.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
p38 activation decreases VDR protein expression in K-ras-activated HCT116 but not in K-ras-disrupted Hke3 human colon cancer cells. p38 activation reduces VDR protein expression in HCT116 (A) but not Hke3 cells (B). Cells were treated and collected as described in Fig. 2, and lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE for VDR protein expression. The same membrane was reprobed with an anti-actin antibody as a loading control. C, infection with ad-MKK6 leads to MKK6 overexpression in both cell lines. Cells were collected for Western analysis 24 h after infection with either ad-Vect or ad-MKK6.

 
Because MKK6 activates VDR through an AP-1 site in the VDR promoter in human breast cancer cells (29), we were then interested to explore whether the difference in VDR regulation is because of different signals from the AP-1 transcription activity. To this end, AP-1-dependent transcription was determined by transient transfection of an AP-1 luciferase reporter (AP-1 Luc) with and without MKK6, and the luciferase activity was determined 48 h after transfection. Results in Fig. 4A showed that MKK6 reduces AP-1 activity in HCT116 cells (p <0.05), but not in Hke3 cells. The AP-1 inhibitory effect in HCT116 cells is specific to p38 activation by MKK6 because a JNK activator, MEKK1, stimulated AP-1 in both cell lines (data not shown). Together, these results indicate that the AP-1 inhibitory effect of MKK6 in K-ras-activated cells represents differences in p38 pathway signal integration at AP-1 that is specifically associated with K-ras activation. It is thus critical to explore further whether this different AP-1 transcriptional activity in cells with and without K-ras activation can lead to a changed regulation of the AP-1 target gene VDR.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
p38 activation by MKK6 or ARS leads to an AP-1-dependent decrease in VDR promoter activity in K-ras-activated colon cancer HCT116 cells. A, MKK6 decreases AP-1-dependent transcription only in HCT116 cells with an activated K-ras gene. Cells were transfected with an AP-1 luciferase reporter together with or without MKK6; luciferase activity was determined 48 h later by a dual luciferase kit (Promega). Results are means of three separate determinations (bars, S.E.; p <0.05 versus control in HCT116 but not in HKe3 cells). B, MKK6 and ARS reduce the wild-type but not AP-1 site mutated VDR promoter activity in HCT116 cells. A mouse VDR luciferase promoter (wild-type, Wt-AP1-VDR, or the AP1 site mutated, Mt-AP1-VDR) was cotransfected with or without MKK6, and luciferase activity was determined 48 h later. In the case of ARS treatment, the promoter activity was assessed 24 h after ARS pulse exposure (100 µM). Results are means of three separate experiments (bar, S.E.; p <0.05 for MKK6 or ARS versus Vect for the wild-type promoter, but not for the Mt promoter). C, MKK6 and ARS do not decrease the VDR promoter activity in K-ras-disrupted Hke3 cells. Results are means of three experiments (bars, S.E.).

 
To examine whether the VDR down-regulation occurs through AP-1-dependent transcription, a 0.5-kb mouse VDR luciferase promoter (Wt-AP1-VDR) (33) and its AP-1 site-mutated counterpart (Mt-AP1-VDR) were transfected into HCT116 cells. Effects of MKK6 and ARS on the VDR promoter activity were examined by luciferase assay. As shown in Fig. 4B, both MKK6 and ARS decreased the wild-type VDR promoter activity in K-ras-activated HCT116 cells. More strikingly, this suppressing effect was completely abolished when the AP-1 site on the promoter was mutated (29). Consistent with VDR protein regulations, MKK6 and ARS have no significant effects on the VDR promoter activity in K-ras-disrupted Hke3 cells (Fig. 4C). These results together suggest that it is a combined effect of K-ras mutation and p38 activation that leads to an AP-1 inhibition, resulting in VDR trans-suppression.

Levels of VDR Protein Concentration in Human Colon Cancer Cells Determine Their Sensitivity to p38-induced Cell Death—To directly examine whether VDR down-regulation is responsible for the selective toxicity of p38 activation in HCT116 cells, human VDR cDNA in a V5-tagged pcDNA3 vector was forced to express in these cells by stable transfection and G418 selection. Drug-resistant clones were pooled and examined for V5-VDR expression by Western blotting in comparison with the empty vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5A, 116/Neo). Early passages of these cells were treated with MKK6 or ARS, and cell death was examined as described in Fig. 1. Results in Fig. 5B showed that VDR overexpression significantly reduced cell death by MKK6 or ARS, and similar cell death protection was also observed against another p38 stimulus, amsacrine (data not shown). Although vitamin D3 is known to be inhibitory in colon cancer cell proliferation, perhaps through a differentiation-associated process (55-57), addition of vitamin D3 to these cells did not significantly alter their sensitivity to MKK6 or ARS (data not shown). These results suggest a ligand (vitamin D3)-independent anti-apoptotic function of VDR in human colon cancer cells. Although additional signaling components may also be involved in p38-induced cell death, these results suggest that VDR down-regulation represents one important mechanism by which K-ras-activated human colon cancer cells are selectively targeted.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Levels of VDR protein expression determine the sensitivity of colon cancer cells to p38 activation. A, VDR overexpression in HCT116 cells. HCT116 cells were transfected with pcDNA3-V5-VDR or the corresponding empty vector and selected with G418 for about 2 weeks. Drug-resistant clones were pooled and examined for VDR protein expression by Western blot. B, VDR-forced expression confers resistance to cell death induced by p38 activators. Early passages of the VDR and the vector-transfected cells were infected or treated with ARS as in Fig. 1 or amsacrine (AMSA, 40 µM for 24 h) and analyzed for cell death by a viability assay. Results shown are means of three experiments (bars, S.E.). The viability for all treatments between the 116/Neo and 116/VDR lines was statistically significant (p <0.05). C, inhibition of endogenous VDR protein expression by retrovirus-mediated small interference RNA. HKe3 colon cells were infected with pSR vector or pSR VDRi and lysates were collected 24 and 48 h after infection for VDR protein expression by Western blotting. The number under each panel indicates the percentage of VDR protein in comparison with the Vect control as measured by the Scion software. D, suppression of endogenous VDR expression in Hke3 cells increases ARS-induced cell death. 24 h after the retrovirus infection, cells were treated with 20 µM ARS for an additional 24 h. Cell death was determined by trypan blue staining. Results shown are the mean of four determinations (bars, S.E.; p <0.01).

 
If cellular VDR concentrations determine the outcome of p38 activation in colon cancer cells, depletion of endogenous VDR protein in K-ras-disrupted cells should increase their sensitivity to p38 pathway-induced cell death. In this case, a retrovirus vector (pSR)-mediated delivery of the VDR small interfering RNA was used to knock down endogenous VDR protein (VDRi) in K-ras-disrupted Hke3 cells (40). Infection with pSR-VDRi led to about 80% depletion of VDR protein in comparison with the control pSR vector infection (Fig. 5C). Strikingly, the VDR depletion resulted in a significant increase in the sensitivity of K-ras-disrupted Hke3 cells to ARS-induced cell death (Fig. 5D, p <0.05 versus the pSR vector-infected cells treated with ARS). ARS was used as the p38 pathway activator in these experiments, because ad-MKK6 infection would necessitate an additional transfection shock to these cells. A separate pSR-VDRi that encodes a different VDR target sequence did not decrease VDR protein expression, which also did not change the viability of ARS-treated Hke3 cells (data not shown). Thus, the level of cellular VDR protein after p38 activation decides whether p38 activation leads to cell death or survival.

The above results demonstrate that K-ras activation can confer a higher sensitivity to p38 activation through down-regulation of VDR protein expression. To generalize this observation, two additional human colon cancer cell lines were included in our analysis. SK-CO-1 is human colon cancer cells containing a mutated K-ras gene, whereas colon cancer HT-29 cells contain only the normal cellular K-ras alleles (38, 39, 58). Following ad-MKK6 infection, cell viability was determined by trypan blue staining (Fig. 6B) as well as morphological observation (data not shown). Consistent with results in the HCT116 lines, ad-MKK6 selectively induces cell death in K-ras-mutated SK-CO-1 cells, whereas it has no substantial effects on cell viability in HT-29 cells in which there is no activated K-ras. Different than in HCT116 cells, the MKK6 has no effect on VDR protein concentrations in the K-ras-mutated SK-CO-1 cells, but it increases VDR protein expression in the HT-29 cells (Fig. 6A). Although mechanisms for these differences in VDR regulation remain to be established, the consequence of MKK6 overexpression is the same in all cases, i.e. cell death in K-ras-mutated cells with low concentrations of VDR protein but not in cells without K-ras activation in which there are elevated concentrations of VDR proteins. Thus, MKK6 is specifically toxic to human colon cancer cells with K-ras activation, and this may occur through a combined effect of Ras and MKK6 (ARS) to suppress VDR protein expression/activation.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
VDR induction is linked to resistance to MKK6-induced cell death in human colon cancer cells without ras mutation. A, ad-MKK6 infection induces VDR protein expression in normal K-ras-containing HT-29 cells but not in K-ras-mutated SK-CO-1 cells. Cells were infected with ad-Vect or ad-MKK6; 24 h later lysates were collected for detection of MKK6 and VDR expression. The MEK1 band serves as a loading control. B, MKK6 induces cell death only in K-ras-mutated SK-CO-1 cells. 48 h after infection, cell viability was determined as in Fig. 1. Results are the means of four experiments (bars, S.E.; p <0.05 for viability between MKK6 and the vector control in SK-CO-1 cells).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our results have presented several pieces of evidence that together support a model that p38 stress pathway activation selectively induces cell death in K-ras-activated human colon cancer cells through VDR regulation (Fig. 7). First, p38 activation, either by genetic or chemical means, selectively induces cell death in K-ras-mutated HCT-116 and SK-CO-1 cells, but not in K-ras-disrupted HCT116-derived Hke3 and HK2-8 cells or in colon cancer HT-29 cells that contain normal K-ras alleles. Second, mechanistic analysis revealed that the selective cell death-inducing effect is linked to a lower level of VDR protein concentrations. In HCT116-derived cell lines, the selective toxicity of p38 activation by MKK6 and ARS correlates with an AP-1-dependent VDR trans-suppression, whereas in K-ras-activated SK-CO-1 cells the increased sensitivity associates with the lack of VDR induction by MKK6 in comparison with HT-29 cells that contain normal K-ras genes. A cell death inhibitory activity of VDR is further confirmed by a protection against p38-induced cell death by forced VDR expression in K-ras-activated HCT-116 cells and by an increase of ARS-induced toxicity in K-ras-disrupted Hke3 cells through the small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of endogenous VDR protein. Hence, in addition to proliferative signaling (35), activated K-ras also triggers VDR down-regulation or prevents its activation in response to p38 activation, which may serve as a suicide pathway in human colon cancer cells.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
An experimental model showing p38 activation inducing cell death that is dependent on K-ras mutation in human colon cancer cells through AP-1-dependent VDR trans-suppression in HCT116 and its sublines. p38 activation is shown to be apoptotic only in human colon cancer cells with endogenous K-ras mutation, and this may occur through AP-1-dependent VDR transsuppression. The question mark indicates that mechanisms for the AP-1 inhibition by a combined effect of K-ras mutation and p38 activation remain to be determined.

 
Demonstration of the selective toxicity of p38 activation in K-ras-activated HCT116 human colon cancer cells through VDR inhibition contributes to our understanding of the increased sensitivity to stress-induced cell death in Ras oncogene signaling. An increased apoptotic response to ceramide was previously demonstrated in the HCT116 line in comparison with the K-ras knock-out HKe-3 cells, but the mechanism was not established (36). Although an increased sensitivity of NIH 3T3 cells transformed by ras and other oncogenes to stress has been reported by us (42) and others (59, 60), most of these studies only attribute the increased sensitivity to an enhanced activation of stress pathways and/or downstream transcription factors. Our results presented here are the first of this kind showing the increased toxicity to the stress p38 pathway in human cancer with endogenous Ras activation due to the down-regulation of the AP-1 target gene VDR. The vitamin D3-independent anti-apoptotic effect of VDR was previously demonstrated by increased cell toxicity by the antisense-mediated inhibition of endogenous VDR protein (61) and by an inhibition of stress-induced cell death by VDR overexpression (62). Moreover, the VDR cell death inhibitory activity is suggested by a development of apoptotic hair loss in VDR knockout mice (63-65). Our results presented here show that VDR may function as a stress-regulatory protein in human colon cancer, because its expression level after p38 activation determines whether the outcome of the p38 signaling is cell death or survival.

AP-1 is a critical transcription factor involved in Ras transformation (66). Consistent with this, basal AP-1 transcription activity and AP-1 binding are higher in K-Ras-activated HCT116 cells in comparison with the K-Ras-disrupted cells (67) (data not shown). Of interest, p38 activation resulted in AP-1 inhibition only in K-ras-mutated HCT116 cells, leading to the VDR trans-suppression (Fig. 7). Similar to this observation, our previous work also showed that activation of the p38 pathway inhibits H-Ras-induced AP-1 activity in NIH 3T3 cells, but in this case the AP-1 suppression correlated with the JNK inhibition (24). The AP-1 inhibitory effect of MKK6 in the HCT116 human colon cancer cells, on the other hand, occurs independent of JNK suppression (Fig. 2). Mechanisms for this selective AP-1 inhibition are not understood at present and may involve induction of an AP-1 suppressor such as JDP2 (68, 69) and PPAR (70, 71) through a combination effect of K-ras mutation and p38 activation in human colon cancer cells, which warrants further investigation. These results together suggest that the AP-1 antagonism may be a common mechanism for p38-mediated inhibition of Ras proliferative activity in mouse 3T3 cells and for p38-induced cell killing in K-ras-activated HCT116 human colon cancer cells, although mechanisms involved may differ. The AP-1-dependent VDR trans-suppression mechanism, however, may not apply to K-ras-activated SK-CO-1 cells because MKK6 did not decrease VDR protein levels in these cells, indicating a cell line-dependent VDR regulation by a combined K-ras mutation and p38 activation. The selective cell death-inducing effect of MKK6 coupled with a lower level of VDR protein in K-ras-mutated SK-CO-1 cells, however, provides independent evidence for our conclusion that p38 activation is specifically apoptotic to K-ras-activated human colon cancer cells by a VDR-dependent mechanism.

The selective cell killing effects of p38 activation in K-ras-mutated human colon cancer cells may have important therapeutic implications. Reagents that activate the stress p38 pathway may specifically induce cell death in human colon cancer cells with a mutated K-ras oncogene without affecting survival of colon cancer cells that contain normal cellular K-ras genes. Theoretically, any agents that activate p38 kinase could have therapeutic value in treatment of K-ras-activated human colon cancer. These reagents, however, also activate additional signaling cascades besides p38 MAPK in a manner that is dependent on cell type. For example, although MKK6 was shown to specifically activate p38 in HCT116 colon cancer cells, it also stimulates JNK in human breast cancer cells (29). However, many of the corollary effects of these compounds, such as activation of ERK and JNK, may be compensated by each other in the determination of the cellular outcome (72, 73) and consequently may have no biological consequence. Therefore, experiments are warranted to further examine the selective toxicity of additional p38 stimuli, including genetic and chemotherapeutic agents (74, 75), in a panel of K-ras-activated human cancer cell lines.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA91576 (to G. C.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger}{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University of Chicago, 114B-Bldg.1, B303 (Hines), 2160 S. First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153. Tel.: 708-202-5762; Fax: 708-202-2019; E-mail: gchen1{at}lumc.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; VDR, vitamin D receptor; Luc, luciferase; ARS, arsenite; pSR, pSUPER; Vect, vector. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. Hector DeLuca for the mouse VDR promoter, Leonard Freedman for human VDR cDNA, and J. Qin and Brain Nickloff for fluorescence-activated cell sorter. We also thank Research and Development, Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center for facility support.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Boguski, M. S., and McCormick, F. (1993) Science 366, 643-654
  2. Chin, L., Tam, A., Pomerantz, J., Wong, M., Holash, J., Bardeesy, N., Shen, Q., O'Hagen, R., Pantginis, J., Zhou, H., Horner, J. W., Cordon-Cardo, C., Yancopoulos, G., and DePinho, R. (1999) Nature 400, 468-472[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Bos, J. L., Fearon, E. R., Hamilton, S. R., Verlaan-de Vries, M., van Boom, J. H., van der Eb, A. J., and Vogelstein, B. (1987) Nature 327, 293-297[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Forrester, K., Almoguera, C., Han, K., Grizzle, W. E., and Perucho, M. (1987) Nature 327, 298-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Kohl, N. E., Mosser, S. D., deSolms, S. J., Giuliani, E. A., Pompliano, D. L., Graham, S. L., Smith, R. L., Scolnick, E. M., Oliff, A., and Gibbs, J. B. (1993) Science 260, 1934-1937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gibbs, J., Oliff, A., and Kohl, N. E. (1994) Cell 77, 175-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Mukhopadhyay, T., Tainsky, M., Cavender, A. C., and Roth, J. A. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 1744-1748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chen, G., Oh, S., Monia, B. P., and Stacey, D. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28259-28265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Koller, E., Gaarde, W. A., and Monia, B. P. (2000) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 142-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Brummelkamp, T. R., Bernards, R., and Agami, R. (2002) Cancer Cells 2, 243-247
  11. Gupta, S., Plattner, R., Der, C. J., and Stanbridge, E. J. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 9294-9306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Campbell, S. L., Khosravi-Far, R., Rossman, K. L., Clark, G. J., and Der, C. J. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1395-1413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Vojtek, A. B., and Der, C. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19925-19928[Free Full Text]
  14. Cowley, S., Paterson, H., Kemp, P., and Marshall, C. J. (1994) Cell 77, 841-852[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Mansour, S., Matten, W. T., Hermann, A. S., Candia, J. M., Rong, S., Fukasawa, K., Vande Woude, G. F., and Ahn, N. G. (1994) Science 265, 966-970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lange-Carter, C. A., Pleiman, C. M., Gardner, A. M., Blumer, K. J., and Johnson, G. L. (1993) Science 260, 315-319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Janulis, M., Silberman, S., Ambegaokar, A., Gutkind, J. S., and Schultz, R. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 801-813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sebolt-Leopold, J., Dudley, D. T., Herrera, R., Van Becelaere, K., Wiland, A., Gowan, R. C., Tecle, H., Barrett, S. D., Bridges, A., Przybranowski, S., Leopold, W. R., and Sattiel, A. R. (1999) Nat. Med. 5, 810-816[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Favata, M. F., Horiuchi, K. Y., Manos, E. J., Daulerio, A. J., Stradley, D. A., Feeser, W. S., Van, D. D., Pitts, W. J., Earl, R. A., Hobbs, F., Copeland, R. A., Magolda, R. L., Scherle, P. A., and Trzaskos, J. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18623-18632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Westwick, J. K., Cox, A. D., Der, C. J., Cobb, M. H., Hibi, M., Karin, M., and Brenner, D. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6030-6034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Smeal, T., Binetruy, B., Mercola, D., Birrer, M., and Karin, M. (1991) Nature 354, 494-496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Clark, G. J., Westwick, J. K., and Der, C. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1677-1681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Johnson, R., Spiegelman, B., Hanahan, D., and Wisdom, R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4504-4511[Abstract]
  24. Chen, G., Hitomi, M., Han, J., and Stacey, D. W. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38973-38980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Pruitt, K., Pruitt, W. M., Bilter, G. K., Westwick, J. K., and Der, C. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 31808-31817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kim, M. S., Lee, E. J., Kim, H. R. C., and Moon, A. (2003) Cancer Res. 63, 5454-5461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Aguirre-Ghiso, J. A., Estrada, Y., Liu, D., and Ossowski, L. (2003) Cancer Res. 63, 1684-1695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wang, X., McGowan, C. H., Zhao, M., He, L., Downey, J. S., Fearns, C., Wang, Y., Huang, S., and Han, J. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 4543-4552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Qi, X., Pramank, R., Wang, J., Schultz, R. M., Maitra, R. K., Han, J., DeLuca, H. F., and Chen, G. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25884-25892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Qi, X., Borowicz, S., Pramanik, R., Schultz, R. M., Han, J., and Chen, G. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 6769-6777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Alroy, I., Towers, T. L., and Freedman, L. P. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5789-5799[Abstract]
  32. Han, J., Lee, J., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Feng, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2886-2891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Jehan, F., and Deluca, H. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10138-10143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Galang, C. K., Der, C. J., and Hauser, C. A. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2913-2921[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Shirasawa, S., Furuse, M., Yokoyama, N., and Sasazuki, T. (1993) Science 260, 85-88[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ohmori, M., Shirasawa, S., Furuse, M., Okumura, K., and Sasazuki, T. (1997) Cancer Res. 57, 4714-4717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Baba, I., Shirasawa, S., Iwamoto, R., Okumura, K., Tsunoda, T., Nishioka, M., Fukuyama, K., Yamamoto, K., Mekada, E., and Sasazuki, T. (2000) Cancer Res. 60, 6886-6889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Stacey, D. W., Degudicibus, S. R., and Smith, M. R. (1987) Exp. Cell Res. 171, 232-242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Perucho, M., Goldfarb, M., Shimizu, K., Lama, C., Fogh, J., and Wigler, M. (1981) Cell 27, 467-476[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Brummelkamp, T. R., Bernards, R., and Agami, R. (2002) Science 296, 550-553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Tang, J., Gordon, G. M., Muller, M. G., Dahiya, M., and Foreman, K. E. (2003) J. Virol. 77, 5975-5984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Chen, G., Shu, J., and Stacey, D. W. (1997) Oncogene 15, 1643-1651[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Enslen, H., Raingeaud, J., and Davis, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1741-1748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Raingeaud, J., Gupta, S., Rogers, J., Dickens, M., Han, J., Ulevitch, R. J., and Davis, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7420-7426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. van Dam, H., Wilhelm, D., Herr, I., Steffen, A., Herrlich, P., and Angel, P. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1798-1811[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Ono, K., and Han, J. (2000) Cell Signal. 12, 1-13[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Shaulian, E., and Karin, M. (2002) Nat. Cell Biol. 5, E131-E136
  48. Hayakawa, J., Depatie, C., Ohmichi, M., and Mercola, D. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 20582-20592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Raingeaud, J., Whitmarsh, A. J., Barrett, T., Derijard, B., and Davis, R. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1247-1255[Abstract]
  50. Okumura, K., Shirasawa, S., Nishioka, M., and Sasazuki, T. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 2445-2450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Ludwig, S., Hoffmeyer, A., Goebeler, M., Kilian, K., Hafner, H., Neufeld, B., Han, J. H., and Rapp, U. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1917-1922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Cavigelli, M., Li, W., Lin, A., Su, B., Yoshioka, K., and Karin, M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6269-6289[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Jones, G., Strugnell, S. A., and Deluca, H. F. (1998) Physiol. Rev. 78, 1193-1231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Stumpf, W. E., Sar, M., Reid, F., and Tanaka, Y. (1979) Science 206, 1188-1190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Garland, C. F., Garland, F. C., Shaw, E. K., Comstock, G. W., Helsing, K. J., and Gorham, E. D. (1989) Lancet 2, 1176-1178[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Shabahang, M., Buras, R. R., Davoodi, F., Schumaker, L. M., Nauta, R. J., and Evans, S. R. T. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 3712-3718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Palmer, H. G., Gonzalez-Sancho, J. M., Espada, J., Berciano, M., Puig, I., Baulida, J., Quintanilla, M., Cano, A., de Herreros, A. G., Lafarga, M., and Munoz, A. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 154, 369-387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Lorentz, O., Cadoret, A., Dubluc, I., Capeau, J., Gespach, C., Cherqui, G., and Freund, J. (1999) Oncogene 18, 87-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Chang, M., Won, S., Yang, B., Jan, M., and Liu, H. (1999) Exp. Cell Res. 248, 589-598[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Benhar, M., Dalyot, I., Engelberg, D., and Levitzki, A. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6913-6926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Hewison, M., Dabrowski, M., Vadher, S., Faulkner, L., Cockerill, F. J., Brickell, P., O'Riordan, J. L. H., and Katz, D. R. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 4391-4400[Abstract]
  62. Kousteni, S., Bellido, T., Plotkin, L. I., O'Brien, C. A., Bodenner, D. L., Han, L., Han, K., DiGregorio, G. B., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Katzenellenbogen, B. S., Roberson, P. K., Weinstein, R. S., Jilka, R. L., and Manolagas, S. C. (2001) Cell 104, 719-730[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Li, Y. C., Pirro, A., Amling, M., Delling, G., Baron, R., Bronson, R., and Demay, M. B. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 9831-9835[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Yoshizawa, T., Handa, Y., Uematsu, Y., Takeda, S., Sekine, K., Yoshihara, Y., Kawakami, T., Arioka, K., Sato, H., Uchiyama, Y., Masusgige, S., Fukamizu, A., Matsumoto, T., and Kato, S. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 391-393[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Schilli, M. B., Paus, R., and Menrad, A. (1998) J. Investig. Dermatol. 111, 598-604[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  66. Karin, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16483-16486[Free Full Text]
  67. Allgayer, H., Wang, H., Shirasawa, S., Sasazuki, T., and Boyd, D. (1999) Br. J. Cancer 80, 1884-1891[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Aronheim, A., Zandi, E., Hennemann, H., Elledge, S. J., and Karin, M. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3094-3102[Abstract]
  69. Jin, C., Li, H., Murata, T., Sun, K., Horikoshi, M., Chiu, R., and Yokoyama, K. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 4815-4826[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Ricote, M., Li, A. C., Willson, T. M., Kelly, C. J., and Glass, C. K. (1998) Nature 391, 79-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Kitamura, S., Miyazaki, Y., Hiraoka, S., Nagasawa, Y., Toyota, M., Takakura, R., Kiyohara, T., Shinomura, Y., and Matsuzawa, Y. (2001) Int. J. Cancer 94, 335-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  72. Xia, Z., Dickens, M., Raingeaud, J., Davis, R. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1995) Science 270, 1326-1331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Shen, Y. H., Godlewski, J., Zhu, J., Sathyanarayana, P., Leaner, V., Birrer, M. J., Rana, A., and Tzivion, G. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26715-26721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Okano, J., and Rustgi, A. K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 19555-19564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Mansouri, A., Ridgway, L. D., Korapati, A. L., Zhang, Q., Tian, L., Wang, Y., Siddik, Z. H., Mills, G. B., and Claret, F. X. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 19245-19256[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Macias-Perez, C. Borza, X. Chen, X. Yan, R. Ibanez, G. Mernaugh, L. M. Matrisian, R. Zent, and A. Pozzi
Loss of Integrin {alpha}1{beta}1 Ameliorates Kras-Induced Lung Cancer
Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6127 - 6135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Qi, N. M. Pohl, M. Loesch, S. Hou, R. Li, J.-Z. Qin, A. Cuenda, and G. Chen
p38{alpha} Antagonizes p38{gamma} Activity through c-Jun-dependent Ubiquitin-proteasome Pathways in Regulating Ras Transformation and Stress Response
J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2007; 282(43): 31398 - 31408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Lu, X. Wang, Z.-F. Chen, D.-F. Sun, X.-Q. Tian, and J.-Y. Fang
Inhibition of the Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase/Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway Decreases DNA Methylation in Colon Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 12249 - 12259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Q.-P. Li, X. Qi, R. Pramanik, N. M. Pohl, M. Loesch, and G. Chen
Stress-induced c-Jun-dependent Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) Activation Dissects the Non-classical VDR Pathway from the Classical VDR Activity
J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1544 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
X. Qi, J. Tang, M. Loesch, N. Pohl, S. Alkan, and G. Chen
p38{gamma} Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Integrates Signaling Crosstalk between Ras and Estrogen Receptor to Increase Breast Cancer Invasion.
Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7540 - 7547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
N. Smakman, D. J. M. van den Wollenberg, I. H. M. B. Rinkes, R. C. Hoeben, and O. Kranenburg
Sensitization to Apoptosis Underlies KrasD12-Dependent Oncolysis of Murine C26 Colorectal Carcinoma Cells by Reovirus T3D
J. Virol., December 1, 2005; 79(23): 14981 - 14985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Tang, X. Qi, D. Mercola, J. Han, and G. Chen
Essential Role of p38{gamma} in K-Ras Transformation Independent of Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 23910 - 23917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. P. B. Dackiw, S. Ezzat, P. Huang, W. Liu, and S. L. Asa
Vitamin D3 Administration Induces Nuclear p27 Accumulation, Restores Differentiation, and Reduces Tumor Burden in a Mouse Model of Metastatic Follicular Thyroid Cancer
Endocrinology, December 1, 2004; 145(12): 5840 - 5846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. P. Collett and F. C. Campbell
Curcumin induces c-jun N-terminal kinase-dependent apoptosis in HCT116 human colon cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2183 - 2189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/21/22138    most recent
M313964200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qi, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qi, X.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement