JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M403107200 on April 26, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 26, 27199-27210, June 25, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/26/27199    most recent
M403107200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Friedland, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Friedland, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Transcriptional Mechanisms Regulating Alveolar Epithelial Cell-specific CCL5 Secretion in Pulmonary Tuberculosis*

Melissa I. Wickremasinghe, Lynette H. Thomas, Cecilia M. O'Kane, Jasim Uddin, and Jon S. Friedland{ddagger}

From the Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College, Hammersmith Campus, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom

Received for publication, March 19, 2004 , and in revised form, April 23, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
CCL5 (or RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted)) recruits T lymphocytes and monocytes. The source and regulation of CCL5 in pulmonary tuberculosis are unclear. Infection of the human alveolar epithelial cell line (A549) by Mycobacterium tuberculosis caused no CCL5 secretion and little monocyte secretion. Conditioned medium from tuberculosis-infected human monocytes (CoMTB) stimulated significant CCL5 secretion from A549 cells and from primary alveolar, but not upper airway, epithelial cells. Differential responsiveness of small airway and normal human bronchial epithelial cells to CoMTB but not to conditioned medium from unstimulated human monocytes was specific to CCL5 and not to CXCL8. CoMTB induced CCL5 mRNA accumulation in A549 cells and induced nuclear translocation of nuclear factor {kappa}B (NF{kappa}B) subunits p50, p65, and c-rel at 1 h; nuclear binding of activator protein (AP)-1 (c-Fos, FosB, and c-Jun) at 4–8 h; and binding of NF-interleukin (IL)-6 at 24 h. CCL5 promoter-reporter analysis using deletion and site-specific mutagenesis constructs demonstrated a key role for AP-1, NF-IL-6, and NF{kappa}B in driving CoMTB-induced promoter activity. The IL-1 receptor antagonist inhibited A549 and small airway epithelial cell CCL5 secretion, gene expression, and promoter activity. CoMTB contained IL-1{beta}, and recombinant IL-1{beta} reproduced CoMTB effects. Monocyte alveolar, but not upper airway, epithelial cell networks in pulmonary tuberculosis cause AP-1-, NF-IL-6-, and NF{kappa}B-dependent CCL5 secretion. IL-1{beta} is the critical regulator of tuberculosis-stimulated CCL5 secretion in the lung.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
CCL51 is a member of the CC chemokine subfamily and a chemoattractant for CD4+ memory T lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils (1, 2). Originally described as restricted to activated T lymphocytes, CCL5 is expressed by many cell types including fibroblasts, renal and pulmonary epithelium, endothelium, and airway smooth muscle (36). Tuberculosis is principally a pulmonary disease causing 3 million deaths each year (7), yet the regulation of cellular influx to pulmonary granuloma is poorly defined. Tuberculous granulomas contain cell types potentially recruited by CCL5, such as antigen-specific T lymphocytes and cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. Macrophages from human tuberculous lymph node granulomas express both CCL5 protein and gene (8). Furthermore, anti-CCL5 antibodies decrease pulmonary granuloma lesion size in Mycobacterium bovis BCG strain-infected mice, suggesting a functional role for CCL5 in murine mycobacterial granulomas (9). CCL5 concentrations in BALF from infected patients rise acutely, correlating with BALF CD4+ T lymphocyte counts, and fall during convalescence (10, 11). However, in vitro studies have demonstrated that human alveolar macrophages and monocytes infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis secrete only low concentrations of CCL5 (11).

The pulmonary epithelium is the initial barrier to respiratory infection by M. tuberculosis. Epithelial cells, covering the entire alveolar surface area of the lung of ~70 m2 (12), may contribute to host defense by chemokine production (13), by adhesion molecule expression (14), and possibly by antigen presentation via HLA-DR expression (15). CCL5 may be secreted by pulmonary epithelial cells in response to proinflammatory cytokines (5, 13, 16, 17), hyperosmolarity (18), or pathogens such as RSV (19, 20). However, virulent M. tuberculosis, strain H37-Rv, which stimulates epithelial cell CXCL8 (IL-8) secretion (21), does not cause CCL5 release (22) despite invasion and replication of the pathogen within alveolar epithelial cells (23). Thus, direct infection of alveolar macrophages, monocytes, or epithelial cells by tuberculosis cannot explain the source of CCL5 detected in the BALF of patients with tuberculosis. We hypothesized that cellular networks between lung epithelium and monocytes involving proinflammatory cytokines were central to CCL5 secretion in pulmonary tuberculosis. Monocyte-derived IL-1{beta} may be critical in such networks as polymorphisms in the IL-1 locus can affect relative IL-1{beta} and IL-1ra monocyte responses to M. tuberculosis (24), and IL-1{beta} and IL-1ra imbalances may affect outcomes of chronic diseases (25).

The mechanisms regulating CCL5 secretion in lung epithelium are not completely understood but may be cell type- and stimulus-specific. Transcriptional regulation of the CCL5 gene is critical in T lymphocytes (1, 2, 26, 27). The CCL5 promoter contains response elements for the transcriptional activators NF{kappa}B, AP-1, and NF-IL-6 (26, 27) and for late acting factors restricted to T cells (28). NF{kappa}B comprises a family of Rel-related proteins retained in the cytoplasm bound to the inhibitor I{kappa}B{alpha} and is a pivotal regulator of proinflammatory responses (29). Following cellular activation, I{kappa}B{alpha} is phosphorylated on specific serine residues (30), ubiquitinated, and degraded (31), allowing NF{kappa}B to pass into the nucleus where binding to CCL5 {kappa}B binding sites may occur. NF-IL-6, originally identified as a nuclear factor binding to an IL-1-response element in the human IL-6 gene, and the AP-1 complex, comprised of Jun/Fos heterodimers or Jun/Jun homodimers, are other key regulators in cytokine gene expression (3234). RSV-induced CCL5 gene expression in lung epithelium is associated with the nuclear translocation of NF-IL-6 (33). However, little data exists on the functional role of NF-IL-6 or AP-1 in cytokine-induced CCL5 gene activation, although NF{kappa}B may be required (16, 27, 35).

We demonstrate for the first time that pulmonary epithelial cells are an important source of CCL5 following in vitro infection of human monocytes by live, virulent M. tuberculosis. The stimulus for CCL5 secretion is IL-1{beta}, released after monocyte infection by M. tuberculosis and not direct epithelial infection. Such CCL5 secretion required new gene transcription and translocation of NF{kappa}B subunits p50, p65, and c-rel to the nucleus of human primary alveolar epithelium. Promoter-reporter analysis of the CCL5 gene demonstrated that NF{kappa}B, AP-1, and NF-IL-6 binding was involved in cytokine-stimulated CCL5 gene transcription in pulmonary epithelium together with a distal region of the promoter not identified previously as a key regulatory site. Primary pulmonary epithelial CCL5, but not CXCL8, secretion was differentially responsive to the monocyte-derived IL-1{beta} depending on the origin of the epithelium. Primary alveolar epithelium of the distal airways secreted CCL5 in response to the monocyte-derived IL-1{beta}, but the upper airway cells of the trachea and main bronchi did not. Thus, the observed networking effects causing CCL5 secretion were due to monocyte-derived IL-1{beta} acting on primary alveolar epithelium. Our data indicate that the vast distal alveolar epithelial cell surface is the major cellular source of CCL5 in pulmonary tuberculosis and that the mechanisms controlling this CCL5 gene expression depend on AP-1 and NF-IL-6 activation as well as NF{kappa}B.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Human Epithelial Cell and Monocyte Culture—The human pulmonary type II alveolar epithelial A549 cell line (36) (European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures 86012804) was maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (endotoxin < 0.02 ng/ml), 2 mM glutamine, and 10 mg/ml ampicillin (an antibiotic with no significant antimycobacterial activity at this concentration).

SAEC and NHBE were purchased from Clonetics (San Diego, CA) as cryopreserved cells. They were regenerated and maintained according to the supplier's instructions. NHBE were maintained and seeded in bronchial epithelium growth medium containing 13 mg/ml bovine pituitary extract, 0.5 mg/ml hydrocortisone, 0.5 µg/ml human recombinant epidermal growth factor, 0.5 mg/ml epinephrine, 10 mg/ml transferrin, 5 mg/ml insulin, 6.5 µg/ml triiodothyronine, 50 mg/ml gentamicin, 50 µg/ml amphotericin-B. Small airway epithelial growth medium contained the above but less bovine pituitary extract (7.5 mg/ml) and in addition 50 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (fatty acid-free). The medium was changed every other day, and cells were subcultured when 60–80% confluent. To subculture, the medium was aspirated, and the monolayer was rinsed with Hanks' solution; trypsin/EDTA was added for 5 min and neutralized with trypsin-neutralizing solution. Centrifuged cells were resuspended in medium prior to cell counting and seeding. Cells were discarded after 15 population doublings.

Human monocytes were prepared from pooled buffy coats (North Thames Blood Transfusion Service, Colindale, UK) by density gradient centrifugation on a Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Biosciences). The monocytes were purified by adhesion to tissue culture plastic for 2 h and maintained in RPMI 1640.

Mycobacterial Culture—The virulent strain of M. tuberculosis, H37-Rv (National Collection of Type Cultures, Colindale, UK), was maintained in enriched Dubos medium (Difco). Before use, 1 ml of a mid-logarithmic phase mycobacterial suspension was sonicated (20 s) and left to stand for 10 min, and the top 750 µl was used, thus generating single cell mycobacterial suspensions (confirmed by modified Kinyoun staining). Viable mycobacteria were quantitated by colony counting in triplicate on Middlebrook 7H10 plates.

Epithelial Cell and Monocyte Stimulation—Monocytes were infected with M. tuberculosis (MOI 10) or left unstimulated for 24 h, and the conditioned medium, CoMTB or CoMControl, respectively, was harvested and stored at -70 °C. Epithelial cells were exposed to M. tuberculosis (MOI 10), CoMTB (at dilutions of 1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000 in appropriate serum-free medium), CoMControl, or TNF{alpha} (20 ng/ml) (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ). In experiments involving IL-1ra (37) (Peprotech), epithelial cells were preincubated for 2 h at 37 °C prior to use, and in those involving neutralizing anti-TNF antibody (Peprotech), CoMTB was preincubated with the antibody for 1 h at 37 °C prior to use. We confirmed previously that 50 µg/ml anti-TNF neutralizes activity of 10 ng/ml TNF{alpha} (21).

RNA Extraction and Northern Blotting—Epithelial cells were homogenized in RNA extraction buffer (4 mM guanidine thiocyanate, 25 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 0.5% N-lauroylsarcosine, and 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol), and RNA extraction was performed using a modified guanidium thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform extraction method (38, 39). 20-µg RNA aliquots were run on denaturing formaldehyde-1% agarose gels, transferred by capillary blotting to Hybond-N, and UV-fixed (UV StratalinkerTM 1800, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Blots were prehybridized and hybridized with a {gamma}-32P-end-labeled oligonucleotide probe mixture for CCL5 (BPR246, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and later a {beta}-actin 42-mer probe (40). Blots were autoradiographed, and images were digitized (Umax, Power Look II) and analyzed with NIH Image 1.52 (from National Institutes of Health Research Services Branch, Betheseda, MD). CCL5 signal densitometry was normalized for total RNA loading using {beta}-actin mRNA densitometry.

Cytokine Assays—CCL5 or IL-1{beta} (R&D Systems) was assayed in cell culture supernatants by ELISA. The lower limit of sensitivity was 15 pg/ml for the CCL5 assay and 7.8 pg/ml for the IL-1{beta} assay. CCL5 concentrations are expressed in pg/106 cells, and IL-1{beta} concentrations are expressed as ng/ml.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays—Nuclear extracts were prepared using a modified version of an established protocol (41). Following stimulation, cells were washed with cytoplasmic extraction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) containing protease inhibitors and with 0.15% Nonidet P-40 added. After centrifugation (500 x g), the nuclear pellet was resuspended in nuclear extract buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM EDTA, 25% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitors), incubated on ice, and recentrifuged. The protein was quantitated by Bradford assay (42). 5 µg of nuclear extract was mixed with 0.7 ng of {gamma}-32P-end-labeled double stranded DNA probe with specific activity greater than 1 x 108 cpm/µg in DNA binding buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.25 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 3 mg of poly(dI-dC), and 5% glycerol) and was resolved on 4% polyacrylamide gels. The oligonucleotides contained the consensus sequence corresponding to the NF{kappa}B (5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGG-3'), AP-1 (5'-CTAGTGATGAGTCAGCCGGATC-3'), or NF-IL-6 (5'-TGCAGATTGTGCAATGTACG-3') binding sites (43). Consensus sequences allow concurrent investigation of the four different NF{kappa}B binding sites and the four TPA-response elements. Dried gels were autoradiographed at -70 °C overnight. Binding specificity was demonstrated by competition assays using a 10-fold excess of unlabeled probe and by failure to compete out the signal with an excess of unlabeled, irrelevant probe. For supershift assays, 1 µg of antibodies either to the NF{kappa}B subunits p50, p52, p65, Rel B, and c-rel or to c-Fos (a subunit of the unrelated transcription factor AP-1) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was added to the binding mix before electrophoresis.

ELISA-based Transcription Factor Assay—To investigate the complex binding of the multiple subunits of AP-1, a transcription factor ELISA-based assay (TransAMTM, Active Motif North America, Carlsbad, CA), which is 5-fold more sensitive than EMSA, was performed. Nuclear extracts were added to a 96-well plate containing immobilized oligonucleotides including a TPA-responsive element (TRE, 5'-TGAGTCA-3'). AP-1 dimers in the nuclear extract bind to this TPA-responsive element and were detected using antibodies against c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, Fra-2, c-Jun, JunB, or JunD. A secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was added, and the color change was detected by spectrophotometry at 450 nm. Competition experiments demonstrated specificity of binding by adding 20 pmol/well either wild type or mutated AP-1 oligonucleotide before assaying with the c-Fos antibody.

Western Blotting and SDS-PAGE—Cells were lysed with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM VaS04, 170 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitors as described previously (19). Lysates were centrifuged (800 x g), the supernatant was removed, and loading buffer (10% glycerol, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, and bromphenol blue) was added. Samples were boiled, separated by SDS-PAGE, and electroblotted to nitrocellulose membranes. Western blots were blocked and incubated at 4 °C with 1 µg/ml rabbit anti-human I{kappa}B{alpha} (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After incubation with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents and film.

Transfections and Luciferase Assays—Promoter-reporter constructs of the 5'-flanking region of the CCL5 gene were used (generous gift of Dr. William Reed, Environmental Protection Agency, Chapel Hill, NC). One construct contained the full-length (-961) WT CCL5 promoter containing four NF{kappa}B, four AP-1 (TRE), and one NF-IL-6 binding site(s) (Fig. 5). The remaining constructs had been truncated by serial deletions (at -737, -421, -181, and -79). The -421 construct deleted the distal (-579) CD28/NF{kappa}B site. The -181 construct deleted all TPA-response elements and a NF{kappa}B binding site of low affinity (-231); the -79 construct deleted the NF-IL-6 site but retained two NF{kappa}B binding sites at positions -30 and -44 (19, 20). Constructs containing site-specific mutations were the very generous gift of Professor Hiroyuki Moriuchi, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. These constructs contained mutations of the -{kappa}B1 (-44), -{kappa}B2 (-30), NF-IL-6 (-92), TRE1/2 (-345), TRE3/4 (-327), TRE1/2/3/4, and CD28RE/{kappa}B2/{kappa}B1 (-579, -44, -30) sites as described previously (27). Constructs had been inserted into the firefly luciferase expression plasmid PGL2-basic. A549 cells were co-transfected using FuGENETM 6 (Roche Applied Science) with 4 µg of a CCL5 reporter plasmid and 0.08 µg of a control reporter plasmid, PRL-TK, constitutively expressing low level Renilla luciferase. Following cell stimulation, luciferase activity of extracts was measured using the Dual-LuciferaseTM reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI) with a luminometer (Bio-Orbit 1253, Labtech International, East Sussex, UK). Renilla luciferase activity was used to normalize firefly activity to control for transfection efficiency.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Kinetics of CCL5 promoter activation and the effect of serial truncations of the CCL5 promoter on activity in CoMTB-stimulated A549. A, schematic representation of full-length WT CCL5 promoter region and CCL5 promoter constructs truncated by serial deletions (at -737, -421, -181, and -79). Constructs had been inserted into the firefly luciferase (LUC) expression plasmid PGL2-basic. B, A549 cells were co-transfected with the WT CCL5 promoter luciferase expression plasmid and a control expression plasmid for assessment of transfection efficiency. Transfected cells were stimulated with CoMTB or CoMControl at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h, and cell extracts were assayed for luciferase luminescence. Normalized luciferase activity from CoMTB-stimulated A549 cells is represented as -fold difference over normalized luciferase activity from CoMControl-stimulated cells. Results are mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. At 4 h CoMTB induced CCL5 promoter activity, which peaked at 8 h and persisted at 24 h. C, A549 cells were transfected with WT CCL5 promoter expression plasmid or a deletion construct and stimulated with CoMTB or CoMControl for 8 h, and cell extracts were assayed for luciferase activity. Full-length WT CCL5 promoter was designated as maximal luciferase activity (100%), and all other results are expressed as a percentage of this maximum. Results are mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments (each done in triplicate).

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Effect of CoMTB on CCL5 Secretion from Pulmonary Epithelial Cells Compared with Effects of Direct Infection by M. tuberculosis—CoMTB was used to stimulate A549 cells over 24 h at dilutions of 1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000 in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. A549 cells stimulated with CoMTB (1:10) secreted 20,342 ± 2142 pg of CCL5/106 cells within 4 h and 53,250 ± 2696 pg of CCL5/106 cells after 24 h (Fig. 1A). Such CoMTB-induced CCL5 secretion at 24 h was 12-fold greater than from tuberculosis-infected human monocytes, which as expected secreted only 4310 ± 816 pg of CCL5/106 cells at 24 h (Fig. 1B). A549 cells directly infected by M. tuberculosis (MOI of 10, causing no significant cytotoxicity (44)) did not release CCL5 unlike the positive control TNF{alpha} (Fig. 1C). To confirm our findings with CoMTB in primary cells, NHBE were stimulated with CoMTB, but no CCL5 release was detected. Because tuberculosis is primarily an infection of the alveolar airway, we investigated the effect of CoMTB on SAEC, which are harvested from terminal bronchi of 2-mm diameter and below including alveoli consisting of type I and II pneumocytes. In contrast to NHBE, SAEC stimulated with CoMTB did secrete significant CCL5 at concentrations of 809 ± 141 pg/106 cells (Fig. 1D), suggesting a differential responsiveness of upper and lower airway epithelium to CoMTB. For this reason, further experiments focused on distal airway cells.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
CCL5 secretion from pulmonary epithelial cells and monocytes stimulated by CoMTB or M. tuberculosis. Cells were stimulated as described below, and cell culture supernatants were assayed for CCL5 by ELISA. All results are mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. A, A549 cells were stimulated with CoMTB over 24 h at dilutions of 1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000 and with CoMControl at a dilution of 1:10 in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. CoMTB induced concentration-dependent CCL5 secretion at 8 and 24 h. B, monocytes were infected with M. tuberculosis (strain H37-Rv, MOI 10) (TB) for 24 h or left unstimulated. M. tuberculosis-stimulated monocytes secreted low level CCL5 at 24 h. C, A549 cells were infected with M. tuberculosis (strain H37-Rv, MOI 10) or with 20 ng/ml TNF{alpha} or were exposed to medium alone over 24 h. M. tuberculosis failed to induce significant CCL5 secretion from A549. D, NHBE and SAEC were stimulated with CoMTB and CoMControl at dilutions of 1:10 for 24 h. CCL5 (D) or CXCL8 (E) measured at T = 0 represents monocyte-derived chemokine present in CoMTB. SAEC secreted significant levels of CCL5 following stimulation by CoMTB, but NHBE, derived from the upper airway, did not (D). In contrast, SAEC and NHBE both secreted CXCL8 when stimulated by CoMTB (E). RANTES, regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted.

 
The finding that lower but not upper airway epithelial cells respond to CoMTB by secreting CCL5 appears specific. Thus, both NHBE and SAEC stimulated with CoMTB secrete CXCL8, although the magnitude of the response in the two cell types is different (Fig. 1E). CXCL8 secretion after CoMTB stimulation increased from background levels (because of monocyte-derived CXCL8 in CoMTB) to 16,911 ± 3381 pg/106 NHBE. This was over 3.5-fold greater than that found in NHBE after stimulation for 24 h with CoMControl. The absolute concentration of CoMTB-induced CXCL8 secretion from lower airway epithelial cells was higher at 57,004 ± 325 pg/106 SAEC, although this represented just a 4.5-fold increase compared with CoMControl at 24 h.

CoMTB Induces Early CCL5 mRNA Accumulation in A549 Cells—Northern analysis demonstrated CCL5 mRNA accumulation by 2 h, peaking at 8 h and present at 24 h post-CoMTB stimulation of A549 cells (Fig. 2A), with none seen in controls (Fig. 2B). These kinetics are consistent with those for the CCL5 protein secretion. CoMTB exhibited a dose-response effect in stimulating CCL5 mRNA accumulation (Fig. 2C) demonstrating that even at a dilution of 1:100 the CoMTB was capable of inducing significant CCL5 mRNA up-regulation at 24 h. This is consistent with the observed dose-response effect of CoMTB on CCL5 secretion (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
CoMTB induced early CCL5 mRNA accumulation in A549 cells. CCL5 mRNA accumulation from CoMTB-stimulated cells (A) and CoMControl-stimulated cells (B) stimulated at a 1:10 dilution (as described in Fig. 1) was assessed by Northern analysis at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h poststimulation. Shown are a representative autoradiograph and densitometric analysis of CCL5 mRNA normalized for total RNA loading using {beta}-actin densitometry. CCL5 mRNA up-regulation was evident at 2 h and strongly expressed at 8–24 h. C, CCL5 mRNA accumulation from A549 cells stimulated by CoMTB for 24 h at dilutions of 1:10, 1:100, and 1:1000 and from cells stimulated by CoMControl (1:10 dilution) was assessed by Northern analysis as above.

 
Activation of NF{kappa}B and Degradation of I{kappa}B{alpha} in CoMTB-stimulated A549 Cells—The role of NF{kappa}B in the control of CCL5 gene expression in pulmonary epithelial cells was analyzed by EMSA. Cell nuclear extracts of A549 and SAEC were stimulated by CoMTB or CoMControl for over a 24-h period. CoMTB stimulated strong NF{kappa}B nuclear binding in A549 cells at 1–2 h, which decreased at 4 h consistent with the kinetics of onset of CCL5 gene expression (Fig. 3A, upper panel). NF{kappa}B activation was not observed with CoMControl (Fig. 3A, lower panel). CoMTB-stimulated SAEC demonstrated specific NF{kappa}B binding at 1 h post-CoMTB (Fig. 3B, upper panel), which persisted for longer, at least to 8 h, than in A549 cells. Supershift assay showed that the p50 and p65 NF{kappa}B subunits were strongly activated and that c-rel was weakly activated in the SAEC stimulated by CoMTB after 1 h. No supershift was seen with an irrelevant antibody c-Fos (Fig. 3C). Rapid degradation of I{kappa}B{alpha} following A549 cell stimulation by CoMTB was shown by Western analysis (Fig. 3D) with kinetics in keeping with the early but transient nuclear localization of NF{kappa}B. I{kappa}B{alpha} protein disappeared within 5 min, reappeared within 90 min, and was completely resynthesized by 180 min.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Kinetics of activation of NF{kappa}B and I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation in CoMTB-stimulated A549 cells and SAEC. A549 (A) and SAEC (B) were stimulated over a 24-h period by CoMTB or CoMControl, and nuclear extracts were analyzed by EMSA. NF{kappa}B activation was evident at 1–2 h in A549 and at 1–8 h in SAEC. Competition experiments demonstrated NF{kappa}B binding specificity (B). A 10-fold excess of unlabeled NF{kappa}B probe (B, 6th lane), but not of unlabeled AP-1 probe (B, 7th lane), competed out NF{kappa}B binding using SAEC nuclear extracts. C, SAEC nuclear extracts harvested at 1 h were analyzed by supershift assay using antibodies to NF{kappa}B subunits p65, p50, p52, c-rel, and Rel B and to the c-Fos subunit of AP-1 (an irrelevant antibody). The p65 and p50 NF{kappa}B subunits were supershifted strongly, and c-rel was supershifted weakly, with no supershift seen using the irrelevant c-Fos antibody. D, cytoplasmic proteins from CoMTB- or CoMControl-stimulated A549 cells, stimulated over 180 min, were analyzed for I{kappa}B{alpha} protein expression by Western blotting. I{kappa}B{alpha} was rapidly degraded at 5 min and reformed at 90 min. No I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation was seen in the control.

 
Nuclear Translocation of AP-1 and NF-IL-6 in Response to CoMTB Stimulation of A549 and SAEC—Nuclear extracts from A549 and SAEC stimulated by CoMTB or CoMControl for 0, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h were analyzed by EMSA using oligonucleotides corresponding to the NF-IL-6 or AP-1 binding sites. To prevent excess constitutive AP-1 expression, cells were prepared in serum-containing medium (45). Although AP-1 binding was constitutively present in A549 cells, increased nuclear translocation was evident 4 h post-CoMTB stimulation, persisting at lower levels between 8 and 24 h (Fig. 4A). A similar pattern of increase in AP-1 binding was demonstrated with CoMTB-stimulated SAEC (Fig. 4B). The kinetics of NF-IL-6 binding was very different compared with AP-1 or NF{kappa}B in A549 cells. NF-IL-6 nuclear translocation was seen only after 24 h poststimulation in A549 cells (Fig. 4D) with a relatively low signal intensity. Specificity of binding of each transcription factor was confirmed by competition studies (Fig. 4, A, B, and E). Competition for AP-1 binding was complete in A549 cells; however, in SAEC it appears that there is a small amount of total binding that is nonspecific and is not competed out by a specific probe, although the band intensity is much reduced compared with experiments involving an irrelevant probe (Fig. 4B, 6th and 7th lanes). In terms of specific AP-1 subunits, c-Jun, FosB, and to a lesser extent c-Fos had low level constitutive activity and were activated following the CoMTB but not the CoMControl at 4 h (Fig. 4C). Other members of the Fos/Jun family (Fra-2, JunB) were constitutively activated but were not significantly altered by CoMTB or CoMControl. Signal specificity was shown by an excess of WT AP-1 oligonucleotide causing a mean 16.65-fold reduction in the c-Fos signal compared with a 1.03-fold increase with mutated AP-1 oligonucleotide.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Kinetics of activation of AP-1 and NF-IL-6 in CoMTB-stimulated A549 cells and SAEC. Nuclear extracts from A549 or SAEC stimulated by CoMTB or CoMControl over 24 h were analyzed by EMSA for AP-1 (A and B) or NF-IL-6 (D and E) binding. A, for A549 cells, AP-1 binding was maximal at 4 h and continued until 24 h. Binding specificity was shown by a 10-fold excess of unlabeled probe, but not unlabeled irrelevant NF{kappa}B probe, competing out the 4 h AP-1 binding signal. B, nuclear extracts from SAEC showed a strong AP-1 binding signal at 4 h, which persisted at a low level up to 24 h. Binding specificity of the 4 h AP-1 binding signal was demonstrated by competition studies as described above. C, specific AP-1 subunit binding was assessed by an AP-1 transcription factor assay in A549 cells stimulated with CoMTB or CoMControl at T = 0 h and T = 4 h. Subunit activation measured as optical density units is expressed as -fold difference over time. c-Fos, FosB, and c-Jun were activated. D, NF-IL-6 binding was seen late and only at 24 h. A 10-fold excess of unlabeled NF-IL-6 probe (E, 3rd lane), but not of unlabeled AP-1 probe (E, 4th lane), competed out the NF-IL-6 binding.

 
CoMTB Activates the CCL5 Promoter and Requires Intact NF{kappa}B-, AP-1-, and NF-IL-6-response Elements—Nuclear binding of transcription factors provides indirect evidence of their involvement in regulating CCL5 gene activation. To investigate the functional effects of CoMTB, promoter-reporter gene analysis was performed (Fig. 5). Kinetic studies with the WT (-961) CCL5 promoter demonstrated that CoMTB-induced activation in A549 cells occurred by 2 h (2.5 ± 0.6-fold increase over CoMControl) with maximal activity at 8 h (21.7 ± 5.0-fold increase) (Fig. 5B) and continued until 24 h (10.2 ± 0.8-fold increase). These data are consistent with EMSAs showing binding of first NF{kappa}B, then AP-1 at 4 h, and finally NF-IL-6 at 24 h. To identify which transcription factor binding sites within the promoter were functionally important, deletion constructs were used (Fig. 5, A and C). Deletion -737 reduced CCL5 reporter activity significantly (to 37.48 ± 7.49% of wild type activity). Few consensus binding sites have been identified in this area; some are T cell-specific, whereas others, such as a CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) site, are ubiquitous (26). A greater deletion at -431, which includes removal of the single distal NF{kappa}B binding site at position -579, did not reduce promoter activity more than the -737 deletion (41.9 ± 15.7% versus 37.5 ± 7.5% of wild type, respectively) (Fig. 5C). With the -181 deletion construct, which has also lost the AP-1-response elements, a further reduction in reporter activity to 20.9 ± 2.9% of WT occurred. With the smallest construct, having 79 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site intact and no longer containing the NF-IL-6 binding site but containing two intact NF{kappa}B sites, there was a reduction to 5.5 ± 1.9% maximal luciferase activity values, similar to those obtained with the CoMControl stimulus (5.9 ± 1.8% of maximal luciferase activity). These data indicate that AP-1 and NF-IL-6 binding sites may be required for CoMTB-induced CCL5 promoter activity.

Site-directed mutagenesis, however, showed that proximal NF{kappa}B binding sites ({kappa}B1 and {kappa}B2) were important in CCL5 promoter activity with activity decreasing, respectively, to 49.5 ± 7.8% and 20.4 ± 1.72% of WT (Fig. 6). This was not evident from the analysis with deletion constructs presumably because of the significant loss of upstream transcription factor binding sites. {Delta}CD28RE/{kappa}B2/{kappa}B1 reduced activity to 19.0 ± 4.2%, which is no different from the effect of the {Delta}{kappa}B2 mutation alone and is consistent with the data using the deletion reporter constructs. {Delta}NF-IL-6 and {Delta}TRE3/4 (-327) reduced promoter-reporter activity to 49.4 ± 5.9% and 30.8 ± 16.4% of WT, respectively, whereas TRE1/2 had no effect (108.0 ± 32.2%). Mutation of all four TRE sites did not have any additional effect over that of {Delta}TRE3/4.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Effects of site-specific mutations of transcription factor binding sites in the CCL5 promoter. Transfected cells were stimulated with CoMTB or CoMControl for 24 h, and cell extracts were assayed for luciferase activity. Full-length WT CCL5 promoter was designated as maximal luciferase activity (100%), and all other results are expressed as a percentage of this maximum. Other reporter genes had specific mutations in -{kappa}B1, -{kappa}B2, NF-IL-6, TRE1/2, TRE3/4, all TREs, and CD28RE/{kappa}B2/{kappa}B1 as described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments (each done in triplicate).

 
Monocyte-derived IL-1 Is Essential for CCL5 Secretion by CoMTB-stimulated Pulmonary Epithelial Cells—Polyclonal anti-human TNF{alpha} antibody or IL-1ra (46) was used to identify the active constituents of CoMTB (Fig. 7). IL-1ra completely blocked CCL5 secretion from CoMTB-stimulated A549 cells (71,500 ± 10,259 pg of CCL5/106 cells reduced to 3255 ± 943 pg of CCL5/106 cells), whereas anti-TNF{alpha} had no effect (Fig. 7A). Similarly, IL-1ra reduced CCL5 mRNA accumulation from 89.8 ± 10.1% to 24.5 ± 11.7% (mean-normalized densitometry ± S.E.), whereas anti-TNF{alpha} had no effect (Fig. 7B). In combination anti-TNF{alpha} and IL-1ra decreased CCL5 gene expression to 5.7 ± 1.9%. The inhibitory effect of IL-1ra is thus mediated at the level of gene transcription and consistent with this IL-1ra reduced CCL5 WT (-961) promoter activity to 29.1 ± 1.4% (Fig. 6C). These findings were reproduced in the primary SAEC (Fig. 6D). Monocytes infected by M. tuberculosis secrete low levels of CCL5. Therefore, CoMTB contains CCL5, and this is represented by CCL5 at T = 0 (300 ± 46 pg/106 cells). After 24-h stimulation of SAEC by CoMTB, CCL5 levels are 1109 ± 95 pg/106 cells, and after IL-1ra pretreatment of SAEC, this is inhibited to almost base-line values (340 ± 56 pg/106 cells). Anti-TNF{alpha} only had a very small inhibitory effect (reduction to 843 ± 47 pg/106 cells).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
IL-1ra inhibits CCL5 secretion, mRNA accumulation, and promoter activity in CoMTB-stimulated epithelial cells. A, A549 cells were stimulated with CoMControl (1st lane), CoMTB (2nd lane), CoMTB after the A549 cells had been preincubated with 200 ng/ml IL-1ra for 2 h (3rd lane), CoMTB that had been preincubated with neutralizing anti-TNF{alpha} (50 µg/ml) (4th lane), and finally CoMTB that had been preincubated with neutralizing anti-TNF{alpha} (50 µg/ml) and after the A549 cells had been preincubated with 200 ng/ml IL-1ra for 2 h (5th lane). Cell culture supernatants were assayed for CCL5 by ELISA after 24 h of CoMTB stimulation. Data is expressed as mean ± S.E. of three experiments. B, A549 cells were stimulated with CoMTB or CoMControl for 2 h (1st–5th lanes, conditions as described in A). CCL5 mRNA accumulation was assessed by Northern analysis. An autoradiograph representative of three independent experiments is shown with mean ± S.E. of the densitometric analysis of the CCL5 mRNA signal. C, A549 cells were transfected with the WT CCL5 promoter luciferase expression plasmid and were stimulated for 8 h with CoMTB or CoMControl or were preincubated with IL-1ra prior to CoMTB stimulation. The cells then were assayed for luciferase activity. RANTES, regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted. D, SAEC were stimulated by CoMTB or CoMControl (1st–5th lanes, conditions as described in A), and CCL5 secretion was assayed from cell culture supernatant.

 
Next CoMTB IL-1{beta} concentrations were measured and found to be 2.05 ± 0.50 ng/ml (Fig. 8A). As CoMTB was used in experiments at dilutions of 1:10, the effective IL-1{beta} stimulus to epithelial cells will be 0.2 ng/ml. Recombinant IL-1{beta} at 0.2–2 ng/ml induced levels of CCL5 secretion from SAEC (Fig. 8B) comparable with levels of secretion from CoMTB at a 1:10 dilution (Fig. 1D). This confirms IL-1 as the critical mediator in the monocyte epithelial cell network resulting in CCL5 secretion from pulmonary epithelial cells.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
CoMTB contains IL-1{beta}, and recombinant IL-1{beta} induced CCL5 secretion from SAEC. A, undiluted CoMTB and CoMControl were assayed for IL-1{beta} by ELISA. Results are the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. B, SAEC were stimulated by recombinant IL-1{beta} for 24 h. Cell culture supernatants were assayed for CCL5 by ELISA, and the results are mean ± S.E. of three experiments. CCL5 was secreted in a concentration-dependent manner to levels equivalent to those induced by CoMTB (1:10).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study we have demonstrated that the large alveolar epithelial cell surface area is a significant contributor to production of the chemokine CCL5 during the pulmonary immune response to M. tuberculosis. Epithelial cell CCL5 secretion occurs as a result of monocyte-derived IL-1 released following phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis. We confirmed that epithelial cells infected directly by M. tuberculosis do not secrete significant concentrations of CCL5 (22). In contrast, when the alveolar epithelial cell line A549 is stimulated by CoMTB, high level CCL5 secretion occurs. A similar response of lower magnitude in human primary alveolar epithelial cells was observed. Alveolar macrophages and monocytes are an important source of immunoregulatory mediators in pulmonary tuberculosis (8, 47, 48). Although there are relatively few macrophages/alveolus, monocytes are recruited early to sites of tuberculous infection in significant numbers. We found that monocytes infected with M. tuberculosis at an MOI of 10:1 secrete CCL5 at only slightly higher concentrations than from CoMTB-stimulated SAEC. Even lower concentrations of monocyte-derived CCL5 secretion occurs in response to lower MOIs of M. tuberculosis such as are likely to be present in infected patients (11). The very large surface area of alveolar epithelium suggests therefore that the predominant source of CCL5 in the BALF during pulmonary tuberculosis will be epithelial cells exposed to secreted mediators from infected monocytes. The CCL5 secreted by pulmonary epithelium will stimulate the influx of T lymphocytes and further monocytes, critical for mycobacterial elimination and granuloma formation. CCL5 secretion from CoMTB-stimulated epithelial cells was high at 24 h consistent with the kinetics of CCL5 protein expression in pulmonary granulomas in murine models of mycobacterial inflammation (9).

We found that CCL5 secretion by CoMTB-stimulated pulmonary epithelium requires new gene transcription. In contrast, studies have shown that CCL5 secretion from tuberculosis-infected monocytes involved release of preformed, stored chemokine (11). In addition, posttranscriptional regulation of CCL5 gene expression, which we have not studied, may be important in RSV-induced CCL5 activation (49, 50). Differential control of CCL5 gene activation depends on transcriptional regulators and may occur in a cell type- and stimulus-specific fashion. The transcription factor NF{kappa}B comprises a family of at least five Rel-related subunits within the cytoplasm: p65, p50, p52, c-rel, and Rel B (29). Differing subunit combinations have stimulatory and inhibitory effects on gene promoter regions. CoMTB induced rapid nuclear translocation of NF{kappa}B in A549 cells and primary alveolar epithelium with activation of p65, p50, and c-rel subunits. In contrast, using adenoviral vectors overexpressing I{kappa}B{alpha} we have shown that RSV-induced CCL5 expression from pulmonary epithelium is NF{kappa}B-dependent and involves the p50/p65 heterodimer of NF{kappa}B but not the c-rel subunit (19). The kinetics of CCL5 gene expression production differed from those of NF{kappa}B nuclear translocation in A549 cells. NF{kappa}B binding to the CCL5 promoter peaked at 1 h or earlier consistent with rapid I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation and the early generation of CCL5 mRNA transcripts at 2 h. CCL5 mRNA was still detected at 8–24 h even though NF{kappa}B binding was virtually absent by 4 h in A549 cells. Late detection of mRNA may be because of accumulation of mRNA that has undergone post-transcriptional stabilization rather than because of new gene transcription. RSV increases CCL5 mRNA half-life from 0.8 to 6.8 h in airway epithelial cells (49). Other transcription factors may assume greater importance in late promoter activation, and we have shown that AP-1 and NF-IL-6 are translocated at later time points than NF{kappa}B. Interestingly, in SAEC, NF{kappa}B nuclear translocation may be more critical in late CCL5 gene expression because NF{kappa}B translocation persisted until at least 8 h. Relatively few studies have directly investigated transcriptional regulation of CCL5 in lung epithelium in response to cytokine stimulation. CCL5 gene expression was shown to be NF{kappa}B-dependent in TNF{alpha}-stimulated A549 cells (16, 51) and in CD40-stimulated airway epithelial cells (52). However, NF{kappa}B may be necessary but not sufficient for CCL5 gene activation as indicated by the studies with our maximally truncated promoter containing the two proximal NF{kappa}B binding sites. IL-1{beta} has been shown previously to activate p65 and p50 subunits in epithelial cell lines (53), and the fact that it drives IL-8 secretion, which is usually NF{kappa}B-dependent, suggests that this transcription factor is activated in NHBE. In addition, in another study involving primary epithelial cells in which the source is not clearly specified and may be a mixture of upper and lower airway cells, CCL5 gene expression and NF{kappa}B nuclear binding were demonstrated, although no CCL5 secretion was reported (35).

The CCL5 promoter contains four potential NF{kappa}B binding sites, -30, -44, -213, and -579 relative to the transcription start site (27). However, the -213 site is a nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT) binding site with only a weak NF{kappa}B affinity, and the distal (-579) site also serves as a CD28-responsive element (26, 27). Transient transfection assays using a WT CCL5 promoter-reporter expression plasmid confirmed that the CoMTB stimulus activated the CCL5 promoter, evident at 4 h and peaking at 8 h poststimulation of A549 cells. The observation that deletion -737 reduced CCL5 reporter activity and that deletion -431 has no further effect indicated that the most distal NF{kappa}B binding site (-579) is of little functional significance in the alveolar epithelial cell response to CoMTB. Site-directed mutagenesis did not demonstrate a key role for this distal site but did confirm that the two proximal {kappa}B binding sites are important with promoter activity reduced to 20.4% of WT in studies using {Delta}{kappa}B2 construct. {Delta}NF{kappa}B1 and {Delta}CD28RE markedly reduced human immunodeficiency virus-induced CCL5 promoter activity (27), whereas {Delta}{kappa}B1/2 reduced both TNF{alpha}- (54) and RSV-induced activity (55), demonstrating stimulus specificity in CCL5 transcription factor binding site activation. However, in the distal promoter between -961 and -737, there is a cis-acting element for CCL5 promoter activity in alveolar epithelial cells. Previously distal negative rather than positive regulatory sites have been identified in T cells (27), but this region has not been extensively investigated. In addition, in other cell types the proximal part of the promoter alone controls activity. For example, in IL-1{beta}-stimulated astrocytoma cells (56) and T cells (26), deletions to 400 base pairs have little effect on CCL5 promoter activity. This was also the situation in alveolar epithelial cells stimulated by either RSV or TNF{alpha}, where a -220 deletion of the CCL5 promoter retained near wild type activity (54, 55).

An interesting finding was the involvement and functional significance of AP-1 and NF-IL-6 in the control of pulmonary epithelial cell CCL5 secretion in response to CoMTB. The CCL5 promoter contains four AP-1 TPA-response elements (26, 27). Evidence exists to indicate a role for AP-1, often involving cooperative interactions with NF{kappa}B, in the regulation of chemokine genes other than CCL5 such as CXCL8 gene activation in RSV-stimulated A549 cells and CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) gene activation in IL-1{beta}-stimulated endothelial cells (34, 43, 45, 57). We demonstrate for the first time in epithelial cells a functional role for AP-1 in CCL5 gene activation, both in CoMTB-stimulated A549 cells and in human primary alveolar epithelial cells. CoMTB induced the nuclear translocation of AP-1 in both A549 and SAEC, exhibiting delayed kinetics compared with NF{kappa}B binding with maximal binding at 4–8 h poststimulation. The AP-1 family members binding to the TRE site were identified as c-Jun, FosB, and c-Fos in contrast with the c-Fos/JunD heterodimer, which binds to AP-1 sites in the CXCL8 gene promoter of A549 cells activated by TNF{alpha} (58). RSV infection of alveolar cells causes heterodimers involving c-Jun to bind to a cAMP-response element within the CCL5 promoter (55). These data suggest that there may be stimulus specificity in the profile of AP-1 family members that are activated to bind the CCL5 promoter in different diseases (59). Early promoter reporter studies in an erythroleukemic cell line do suggest a role for AP-1 in CCL5 promoter activation (26), but little data exists on whether AP-1 may functionally activate the CCL5 promoter in pulmonary epithelium. We found a significant amount of reporter activity in experiments using the -421 deletion construct containing all four TREs (41.9 ± 15.7% of WT activity). This was reduced by ~50% (to 20.9 ± 2.9% of WT activity) by a truncation of the promoter region to remove all AP-1-response elements, suggesting that these sites contribute to CCL5 promoter activity. Site-specific analysis revealed that the {Delta}TRE3/4 region was the most critical, and independent or concurrent mutation of TRE1/2 did not further reduce promoter-reporter activity. This is a stimulus-specific effect of CoMTB because the minimal CCL5 promoter truncated at -220 base pairs retained activity similar to a full-length promoter of -974 base pairs in cytokine- and RSV-stimulated epithelial cells (54, 55). In addition, there is cell specificity because in an astrocytoma line, a CCL5 promoter with a -278 deletion was activated to a similar extent to a full-length promoter by IL-1{beta} in part as a consequence of translocation of p50/p65 but not c-rel-containing NF{kappa}B complexes (56).

NF-IL-6 is a human basic domain leucine zipper-containing transcription factor important in inducible gene expression in acute inflammatory responses and is able to regulate promoter activity of the CXCL8 gene (60). There is a single NF-IL-6 binding site within the CCL5 promoter at position -92 relative to the transcriptional start site. NF-IL-6 protein expression in the lung is unique because in the lung, in contrast to tissues such as liver or to macrophages, NF-IL-6 translation is constitutively repressed (33, 61). In normal lung tissue unlike elsewhere there is an abundance of NF-IL-6 mRNA, but protein is almost undetectable, suggesting posttranscriptional modifications are regulating protein expression in a tissue-specific fashion. RSV-induced NF-IL-6 expression in pulmonary epithelium has been shown to involve de novo synthesis of the protein without any increases in NF-IL-6 mRNA expression assessed by Northern analysis (33). The role of NF-IL-6 in cytokine-induced CCL5 promoter activity in pulmonary epithelium is emerging. To our knowledge, we show for the first time that an IL-1-mediated stimulus, CoMTB, induces CCL5 gene activation in pulmonary epithelium by stimulating NF-IL-6 DNA binding. NF-IL-6 nuclear translocation was evident only 24 h poststimulus. This late binding of NF-IL-6 may be of functional significance as CoMTB-induced CCL5 secretion increases over a 24-h period; moreover, WT CCL5 promoter activity was present 24 h poststimulus. Furthermore, the CCL5 promoter deletion construct (-79), which removes the NF-IL-6 binding site at position -92, causes almost a 75% reduction in the activity obtained with the -181 deletion construct (from 20.9 ± 2.9% to 5.5 ± 1.9% of WT). Site-directed mutation of the NF-IL-6 binding site confirmed a central role for this region with promoter activity falling to 49.4% of WT. This is a stimulus-specific response; in studies using a minimal CCL5 promoter (up to -220 bp), NF-IL-6 had a very limited influence on RSV-induced CCL5 secretion, and the interferon regulatory factor binding site was key (55). NF-IL-6 was more critical in control of epithelial cell-derived CCL5 secretion responses to TNF{alpha}, where NF-IL-6 activity was detected on gel shifts within 1 h, much earlier than we found in response to CoMTB (54). In addition, the effects of NF-IL-6 activation are gene-specific because NF-IL-6 site mutations have no effect on CXCL8 promoter activity (62). Taken together the EMSA and promoter-reporter data suggest that it is possible that NF{kappa}B is more important in early activation of CCL5 mRNA accumulation and secretion and that AP-1 is responsible for the increased promoter activity between 4 and 8 h with NF-IL-6 contributing to late stage maintenance of CCL5 gene expression.

We demonstrated that IL-1{beta} is the predominant active constituent involved in monocyte-epithelial cell networks in pulmonary tuberculosis. CCL5 secretion and gene expression from CoMTB-stimulated A549 and SAEC are inhibited by IL-1ra but not neutralizing anti-TNF{alpha}. Furthermore, IL-1ra inhibited CoMTB-induced WT CCL5 promoter activity to 29.0 ± 1.4% suggesting that IL-1ra inhibited IL-1-mediated CCL5 gene activation. We determined that CoMTB contained IL-1{beta} and that recombinant IL-1{beta} at 200–500 pg/ml stimulated SAEC CCL5 secretion similar to that of CoMTB (1:10 dilution). These results suggest the existence of a paracrine cytokine network involving very low concentrations (200 pg/ml) of monocyte-derived IL-1{beta}. This highlights a potential critical role for IL-1{beta} in the immune response to pulmonary tuberculosis and for IL-1ra in modifying these responses. IL-1{beta} is secreted from tuberculosis-infected human monocytes (24, 63) and is found both in tuberculous granulomas of infected lymph nodes (64) and the BALF of patients with active disease (65). We show that exogenous IL-1ra can inhibit epithelial CCL5 responses during tuberculosis infection. However, airway epithelium can secrete endogenous IL-1ra to modulate IL-1 bioactivity in the airway microenvironment (37). Interestingly polymorphisms at the IL-1 locus have been shown to influence the molar ratios of IL-1ra/IL-1{beta} secreted by tuberculosis-infected monocytes (24), and a proinflammatory haplotype for this locus (higher IL-1{beta} and lower IL-1ra expression) can affect disease phenotype in tuberculosis (24). Such host genetic factors, by influencing net bioactive IL-1{beta}, may influence monocyte epithelial cell networks and subsequent CCL5 secretion. Cytokine networks involving lipopolysaccharide-stimulated monocytes stimulate pulmonary epithelial CXCL8 secretion, but in contrast to the present findings, both TNF{alpha} and IL-1 are involved (66). We previously have found that conditioned medium from tuberculosis-infected monocytes may stimulate primary pulmonary epithelial CXCL8 secretion; however, unlike for CCL5, this epithelial response is much less than that from the tuberculosis-infected monocytes themselves (21).

Finally, the data demonstrate differential responsiveness of NHBE and SAEC to monocyte-derived IL-1{beta}. Such differences between similar but distinct cell types within a single tissue are likely to be important in immune responses to different pathogens. Primary alveolar epithelium of the small airways secreted CCL5 in response to the monocyte-derived IL-1{beta} and to recombinant IL-1{beta}, whereas upper airway cells of the trachea and main bronchi did not, consistent with data showing that IL-1{beta} stimulates secretion of only picomolar CCL5 concentrations in these cells (5). Upper airways require both TNF{alpha} and interferon {gamma} to stimulate CCL5 secretion (5, 13). There remains one report that demonstrates up-regulation of CCL5 mRNA and NF{kappa}B nuclear binding in human bronchial epithelial cell cultures stimulated by IL-1{beta}, although no CCL5 secretion was observed (35). SAEC are a better primary cell correlate than NHBE for the human type II alveolar cell carcinoma line A549 because they are derived from terminal bronchioles (2 mm and below) and include type I and II pneumocytes. We have found that this differential responsiveness to IL-1 is specific for CCL5. CXCL8 is secreted by CoMTB-stimulated NHBE and SAEC, although CoMControl also induces relatively low level CXCL8 secretion from SAEC but not NHBE. Thus, small airway cells may be primed to secrete CXCL8 in the absence of exogenous stimulus, although whether this is found in vivo is not known. The full significance of this differential responsiveness of the upper and lower airway is unclear except that pulmonary tuberculosis is primarily a disease of the lower airway, a site where monocyte epithelial cell networks stimulating CCL5 secretion will be functional.

This study defines a new contextual function for monocyte-derived IL-1{beta} and a new role for the lung epithelium in host response to tuberculosis. The large surface area of pulmonary epithelial cells generates high levels of CCL5 during the pulmonary immune response to M. tuberculosis. Investigation into the mechanism of regulation of the CCL5 gene expression in the pulmonary epithelium has demonstrated that the two proximal NF{kappa}B binding sites are required for gene activation and not the -579 CD28RE/NF{kappa}B binding site, although the distal area of the promoter has a regulatory role in CoMTB-stimulated respiratory epithelium. This study has also defined functional roles for the transcription factors AP-1 and NF-IL-6 in CCL5 responses in our cellular model of tuberculosis. Very low IL-1 concentrations are identified as mediating this TNF-independent monocyte epithelial cell network in pulmonary tuberculosis. The effects of this proinflammatory cytokine on CCL5 secretion are shown to be specific for lower airway alveolar epithelial cells. Identifying the alveolar epithelium as a significant cellular source of CCL5 and defining the role of IL-1 may help in the design of local immunotherapeutic interventions to regulate T cell and monocyte recruitment to diseased lung infected with tuberculosis, particularly in patients with organisms resistant to conventional therapies.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Rd., London W12 0NN, England. Tel.: 44-20-8383-8521; Fax: 44-20-8383-3394; E-mail: j.friedland{at}ic.ac.uk.

1 The abbreviations used are: CCL, CC chemokine ligand; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; CXCL, CXC chemokine ligand; IL, interleukin; ra, receptor antagonist; AP, activator protein; NF, nuclear factor; SAEC, small airway epithelial cells; NHBE, normal human bronchial epithelial cells; MOI, multiplicity of infection; CoMTB, conditioned medium from M. tuberculosis-infected human monocytes; CoMControl, conditioned medium from unstimulated human monocytes; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; TPA, triphorbol acetate; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TRE, triphorbol acetate-response element; WT, wild type. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Schall, T. J., Jongstra, J., Dyer, B. J., Jorgensen, J., Clayberger, C., Davis, M. M., and Krensky, A. M. (1988) J. Immunol. 141, 1018-1025[Abstract]
  2. Schall, T. J., Bacon, K., Toy, K. J., and Goeddel, D. V. (1990) Nature 347, 669-671[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Rathanaswami, P., Hachicha, M., Sadick, M., Schall, T. J., and McColl, S. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5834-5839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Heeger, P., Wolf, G., Meyers, C., Sun, M. J., O'Farrell, S., Krensky, A. M., and Nielson, E. (1992) Kidney Int. 41, 220-225[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Berkman, N., Robichaud, A., Krishnan, V. L., Roesems, G., Robbins, R., Jose, P. J., Barnes, P. J., and Chung, K. F. (1996) Immunology 87, 599-603[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Marfaing-Koka, A., Devergne, O., Gorgone, G., Portier, A., Schall, T. J., Galanaud, P., and Emilie, D. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 1870-1878[Abstract]
  7. Murray, C. J. L., and Lopez, A. D. (1997) Lancet 349, 1269-1276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Devergne, O., Marfaing-Koka, A., Schall, T. T., Leger-Ravet, M., Sadick, M., Peuchmaur, M., Crevon, M., Kim, T., Galanaud, P., and Emilie, D. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 179, 1689-1694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chensue, S. W., Warmington, K. S., Allenspach, E. J., Lu, B., Gerard, C., Kunkel, S. L., and Lukacs, N. W. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 165-173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kurashima, K., Mukaida, N., Fujimura, M., Yasui, M., Nakazumi, Y., and Matsuda, T. (1997) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155, 1474-1477[Abstract]
  11. Sadek, M. I., Sada, E., Tossi, Z., Schwander, S. K., and Rich, E. A. (1998) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 19, 513-521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Thurlbeck, W. M. (1967) Thorax 22, 483-496[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Stellato, C., Beck, L. A., Gorgone, G. A., Proud, D., Schall, T. J., Ono, S. J., Lichtenstein, L. M., and Schleimer, R. P. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 410-418[Abstract]
  14. Atsuta, J., Sterbinsky, S. A., Plitt, J., Schwiebert, L. M., Bochner, B. S., and Schleimer, R. P. (1997) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 17, 571-582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Rossi, G. A., Sacco, O., Balbi, B., Oddera, S., Mattioni, T., Corte, G., Ravazzoni, C., and Allegra, L. (1990) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 3, 431-439
  16. Ayad, O., Stark, J. S., Fielder, M. M., Menendez, I. Y., Ryan, M. A., and Wong, H. R. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 2594-2599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jung Kwon, O., Jose, P. J., Robbins, R. A., Schall, T. J., Williams, T. J., and Barnes, P. J. (1995) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 12, 488-496[Abstract]
  18. Hashimoto, S., Gon, Y., Matsumoto, K., Takeshita, I., Maruoka, S., and Horie, T. (2000) Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 162, 1075-1080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Thomas, L. H., Friedland, J. S. F., Sharland, M., and Becker, S. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 1007-1016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Noah, T. L., and Becker, S. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 265, L472-L478
  21. Wickremasinghe, M. I., Thomas, L. H., and Friedland, J. S. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 3936-3947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lin, Y., Zhang, M., and Barnes, P. F. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 1121-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bermudez, L. E., and Goodman, J. (1996) Infect. Immun. 64, 1400-1406[Abstract]
  24. Wilkinson, R., Patel, P., Llewelyn, M., Hirsch, C. S., Pasvol, G., Snounou, G., Davidson, R., and Toossi, Z. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 12, 1863-1873
  25. Horai, R., Saijo, S., Akae, S., Okahara, A., Ikuse, T., and Iwakura, Y. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 191, 313-320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Nelson, P. J., Kim, H. T., Manning, W. C., Goralski, T. J., and Krensky, A. M. (1993) J. Immunol. 151, 2601-2612[Abstract]
  27. Moriuchi, H., Moriuchi, M., a