![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 28, 29628-29638, July 9, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



||
From the
Département de Pharmacologie, Laboratoire de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UPR2580, 141 Rue de la Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier, France and ¶Institute of Molecular Physiology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom
Received for publication, April 8, 2004 , and in revised form, April 29, 2004.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seven P2X subunit genes (P2X1-P2X7) are found in the human genome; this number seems to be an accurate estimation of the extent of the P2X family in mammalian species, although in zebrafish two additional subunits appear to exist (2, 3). The basic structural determinants of P2X channels have been established by numerous molecular studies (4). P2X subunits have a membrane topology with two transmembrane domains linked by a large extracellular loop; N and C termini are localized intracellularly (5, 6). To form a channel, P2X subunits are thought to associate as homo- or hetero-oligomers, composed of three subunits (7, 8) organized in a head-to-tail orientation around a central pore (9). This model is consistent with studies that show that the permeation pathway is associated with transmembrane regions (10-12), and with the fact that the gating of the channel is in part due to movements of the subunits relative to the each other (12). Conserved charged residues in the extracellular loop have been implicated in ATP binding (13, 14), and desensitization is tightly linked to transmembrane domains and intracellular regions localized immediately below the plasma membrane (15, 16).
Signals that regulate intracellular trafficking of P2X receptors are not well understood. In P2X4 subunits, an atypical endocytosis motif responsible for the rapid recycling of the receptor has been identified in the C terminus of the channel (17, 18); however, the existence of subcellular trafficking signals in other P2X subunits has not been reported. Yet evidence suggests that additional trafficking signals are present in P2X subunits. For example, transiently expressed P2X6 subunits are not properly addressed to the cell surface presumably because of a glycosylation defect (19), and the presence of a retention signal in the rat P2X5 subunit has been suggested to explain its poor functional expression (20). Different mutations that alter surface expression of P2X subunits have also been reported. Disrupting some of the conserved disulfide bridges of the extracellular loop of P2X1 subunits alters their normal trafficking to the cell surface (21); similarly, deletion of the three glycosylated asparagines of the P2X2 subunits induces an intracellular retention and a complete loss of function of the receptors (5, 22). However, these mutations are likely to alter the folding of the protein, and the trafficking defects might rather be due a failure to pass the quality check test that normally takes place in the endoplasmic reticulum than due to a trafficking defect per se. In the human P2X7 receptor a dibasic amino acid motif (23) and a polymorphism (Ile568 to Asn) (24), both located in the C-terminal tail of the protein, have been shown to be necessary for the proper trafficking of the channel. No mechanistic explanations have been put forward to explain these trafficking defects.
In the present study, we have identified a motif in the C-terminal tail of P2X subunits that is conserved in almost all subunits known to date. By using a chemiluminescence assay (25, 26) to measure the cell surface expression of P2X subunits, we show that in HEK1 cells and in neurons this motif is involved in the stabilization at the plasma membrane of all P2X subunits tested (P2X2, P2X3, P2X4, P2X5, and P2X6). We also provide evidence that this motif might be important for the polarized expression of P2X2 receptors in neurons.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MutagenesisMutations were introduced as described previously (10) by using the QuickChange (Stratagene) protocol. A mutagenized fragment was excised by restriction digestion and subcloned into the respective backbone P2X subunit. All mutants were confirmed by sequencing.
Construction of CD4 ChimerasHuman cDNA genes (hCD4-AAXX, hCD4-KKXX, and hCD4-GFP-KKXX) were the kind gift of B. Schwappach (Zentrum fur Molekulare Biologie, University of Heidelberg). The C termini of P2X2, P2X2b, and P2X3 were amplified with a forward primer containing an in-frame NotI site. NotI-XbaI fragments were generated and subcloned in the different CD4 plasmids (CD4-AAXX, -KKXX, and CD4-GFP-KKXX). All the clones were subsequently verified by sequencing.
Chemiluminescent AssayCells were transfected in 35-mm dishes. Twenty four hours after transfection, each plate was divided into 4 wells of a 12-well plate. Assays were carried out 48 h after transfection. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min, and the cells in two of four wells in each case were permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100. Cells were incubated in blocking solution PBS, 1% fetal calf serum for 30 min and incubated with primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. After extensive washing, cells were incubated for 20 min at room temperature with a secondary antibody coupled to peroxidase (1/1000, anti-mouse peroxidase-conjugated, Amersham Biosciences). Luminescence was measured using Supersignal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay femto-maximum sensitivity substrate (Pierce) and quantified in a Victor 2 luminometer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
For FLAG- and HA-tagged constructs, we used a primary antibody directly coupled with peroxidase (1/4000, anti-FLAG M2-peroxidase (Sigma), and 1/2000, anti-HA peroxidase, clone 12CA5 (Roche Applied Science)), thus eliminating the need for a secondary antibody. For other constructs, we used Myc antibody (1/1000, monoclonal anti-Myc antibody clone 9E10, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) or CD4 antibody (1/100, monoclonal anti-hCD4, Immunotech). Surface expression was calculated as the ratio between the signal obtained for nonpermeabilized cells (representing the amount of proteins at the cell surface) and the signal obtained for permeabilized cells (which represents the total cellular amount of proteins).
Cell Culture and TransfectionsHEK293 cells and COS cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Hepes containing 10% fetal calf serum, 1% GlutaMAX, and 1% penicillin plus streptomycin. Transfections were carried out in 35-mm dishes with a maximum of 1 µg of plasmid DNA, using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) for HEK293 cells and JetPei (Qbiogen) for COS cells, according to the manufacturers' protocols. Hippocampal cultures were prepared from E17 to E18 mice and grown in B27-supplemented neurobasal medium (Invitrogen) on poly-L-ornithine and laminin pre-coated coverslips as described previously. Ten-day-old cultures were transfected with P2XGFP fusion protein using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen); 1.5 µg of DNA and 1.5 µl of LipofectAMINE 2000 were each mixed with 50 µl of neurobasal medium for 15 min and then mixed together and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After addition of 150 µl of neurobasal B27, the mixture was applied to the neuronal culture for 2 h at 37 °C, and then replaced by fresh neurobasal B27. Neurons were studied 48 h later. Data were collected from at least three different dishes prepared from at least three different cultures and transfections.
Immunofluorescence on HEK293 CellsImmunofluorescence experiments were carried out 48 h after transfection. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min, blocked in PBS, 0.5% BSA for 30 min, and incubated for 1-2 h at room temperature with the primary antibody (1/1000, anti-FLAG M2 biotinylated, Sigma) in blocking solution, and then for 20 min at 37 °C with streptavidin Texas Red (1/2000, Amersham Biosciences). For labeling living cells, cells were incubated in complete culture medium for 1 h with the primary antibody at 37 °C followed by incubation for 20 min at 37 °C with streptavidin Texas Red prior to fixation.
Immunofluorescence on COS Cells and Hippocampal NeuronsForty eight hours after transfection, COS cells were fixed for 10 min at 37 °C in 4% paraformaldehyde, 4% sucrose. Cells were then washed in PBS, 0.3% BSA, and 50 mM glycine and permeabilized at 37 °C in blocking solution (PBS, 0.3% BSA, and 0.05% saponin). Cells were incubated in blocking solution containing primary antibody at room temperature for 2 h, and after an extensive wash, cells were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with secondary antibody. For cells transfected with P2X2-GFP fusion, anti-calreticulin (1/200, Alexis Biochemicals) and Cy3-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1/1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch) were used. For cells transfected with CD4-GFP-KKXX and FLAG-P2X2 receptors, we used biotinylated anti-FLAG M2 antibody (1/1000, Sigma) and streptavidin-Texas Red (1/2000, Amersham Biosciences). Fluorescence was visualized on a Leica DMRA2 epifluorescent microscope using a x40 oil immersion objective. Images were acquired using a cool-snap HQ (photometrics) digital camera.
Internalization ExperimentsHEK293 cells stably expressing P2X2, P2X2[K366A], or P2X2[Y362A] were grown on polyornithine-coated coverslips for 24 h. To monitor receptor internalization, cells were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Hepes containing monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 antibody (1/1000, Sigma) and 100 µg/ml leupeptin. The cells were then placed on ice and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min. Coverslips were transferred in a PBS solution containing 0.3% BSA and 192 mM glycine for 15 min at room temperature to quench paraformaldehyde fluorescence. After an additional 30 min of blocking in PBS, 0.3% BSA, surface staining was achieved for 20 min at 37 °C with an FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1/1000, Chemicon) in PBS, 0.3% BSA blocking solution. Cells were then permeabilized for 5 min in 0.01% Triton X-100 and internalized receptors-antibodies complexes were measured following a 20-min incubation at 37 °C in the presence of a Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1/2000, The Jackson Laboratory) in PBS, 0.3% BSA. Fluorescence was visualized using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal inverted microscope with a Nikon 63 x 1.32 HCX planapochromatic objective. FITC was excited with an argon laser at 488 nm; Cy3 was excited with a helium/neon at 543 nm. Images were collected sequentially to avoid cross-contamination between fluorochromes. Series of optical sections were scanned at a 1024 x 1024 pixels resolution and collected in the Leica confocal software. 8-Bit TIFF images were imported and analyzed with ImageJ 1.62 (NIH software).
Electrophysiological RecordingsHEK293 cells were used to express the wild type and mutant P2X receptors with green fluorescent protein as described above. A plasmid ratio of 1/5 was adopted for co-expression of P2X2 and P2X3 subunits. Whole cell recordings were carried out at room temperature using an EPC9 patch clamp amplifier (HEKA Elektronik, Germany) as detailed previously and briefly described below. Membrane potential of the patched cells was held at -60 mV. Extracellular solution contained (in mM) 147 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 Hepes, and 13 glucose. Intracellular solution contained (in mM) 147 NaF, 10 Hepes, and 10 EGTA. These solutions were maintained at pH 7.3 and 300-315 mosmol-1. Agonists were applied using an RSC 200 fast-flow delivery system (Bio-Logic Science Instruments, France). The current responses from individual cells were normalized to cell membrane capacitance (in a range of 8-20 pF) and presented as current density (in pA/pF). All data are presented where appropriate as mean ± S.E.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
As shown in Fig. 1C, in nonpermeabilized conditions the luminescent signal was strongly reduced for cells expressing P2X2[Y362A] or P2X2[K366A] subunits as compared with cells transfected with Wt P2X2. No difference in the total amount of mutant protein was observed. The ratio of nonpermeabilized state/permeabilized state indicates that 73 ± 16% (n = 9) of Wt P2X2 receptor were present at the plasma membrane but only 34 ± 5.5% (n = 7) and 28 ± 4.5% (n = 7) for P2X2[Y362A] and P2X2[K366A], respectively. The double mutant P2X2[Y362A,K366A] did not show any further decrease in the receptor surface expression (data not shown).
We next studied whether other residues in the vicinity of the YXXXK motif could also interfere with the surface expression of the P2X2 subunit. Residues downstream of the second transmembrane region, from Lys360 to Lys369, were individually mutated to alanine, and their membrane expression was examined. As shown in Fig. 1D, none of these mutants showed any decreased membrane expression nor did the mutation to alanine of the two leucines (Leu354 and Leu355) located at the end of the second transmembrane domain (data not shown). These results indicate that the YXXXK motif plays an important role in the trafficking of the P2X2 subunit to the plasma membrane.
Specificity of the YXXXK Motif and Functional Characterization of Mutant SubunitsAdditional amino acid substitutions were introduced at the Tyr362 and Lys366 positions (Tyr to Phe; Lys to Arg, Lys to Gly, and Lys to Gln). All mutants were individually transfected in HEK cells, and membrane expression was quantified by chemiluminescent assay. Fig. 2A shows that all mutants had reduced surface expression ranging from 22 ± 6.2% (n = 3) for K366Q to 43 ± 3.5% (n = 3) for Y362F; even when the conservative substitutions Y362F and K366R were introduced, surface expression of the receptor was still decreased. These values were not different from what was observed for membrane expression of Y362A and K366A.
|
The lack of function of P2X2 Lys366 mutants might be due to a disruption of the oligomeric organization of the channel and subsequently its trafficking to the cell surface. To test this hypothesis we performed co-immunoprecipitation between Wt P2X2 and P2X2[K366A] subunits. Receptor complexes were immunoprecipitated through the FLAG epitope present on one subunit, and the presence of the second subunit was detected because of its Myc epitope. In all situations, including the homomeric P2X2[K366A] complex, co-immunoprecipitation of subunits was successfully obtained (Fig. 2D). These results demonstrate that the decreased surface expression of the P2X2[K366A] subunit and its lack of function cannot be attributed to an inability of the mutant to oligomerize with itself or with other subunits.
The YXXXK Motif Regulates Surface Expression of Other P2X SubunitsThe YXXXK motif is conserved in almost all P2X subunits cloned to date; therefore, we asked whether the mutation of this motif in other P2X subunits would also impair their surface expression. Mutations to alanine of the Tyr and Lys residues were individually introduced in Myc-P2X3, HAP2X4, HA-P2X5, and FLAG-P2X6 subunits. Membrane expression of these different mutants and of their respective wild type subunits was measured by the chemiluminescence assay (Fig. 3A). Mutation of either tyrosine or lysine residues in all P2X subunits caused a large decrease of surface expression when compared with the respective wild type subunits; surface expression levels of mutated subunits were all in the same range, except for P2X6: P2X3[Y353A] 27 ± 5.3% (n = 3), P2X3[K372A] 23 ± 0.3% (n = 3), P2X4[Y367A] 36 ± 6.4% (n = 4), P2X4[K370A] 27 ± 7.2% (n = 4), P2X5[Y369A] 34 ± 6% (n = 5), P2X5[K372A] 37 ± 4.3% (n = 5), and P2X6[K365A] 58 ± 3.5% (n = 4). In all cases, the total cellular amount of protein was not altered (data not shown), indicating that a decrease of the stability mutant P2X subunits could not be accounted for the observed decrease in their surface expression.
|

-methylene-ATP (
-me-ATP) was also ineffective in inducing current in HEK cells transfected with P2X3[Y353A] and P2X3[K357A] mutants. Of the eight P2X mutant subunits tested, only P2X2[Y362F] and P2X2[Y362A] showed any functional response to ATP; in the latter case the currents desensitized markedly. Surface Expression of Mutant P2X Subunit Is Rescued by Wild Type SubunitsP2X2 and P2X3 subunits form well characterized hetero-oligomeric receptors with pharmacological and biophysical properties that are clearly distinct from homo-oligomeric P2X2 and P2X3 channels (28, 29). We studied the trafficking of hetero-oligomeric P2X receptors formed by the association of wild type and trafficking deficient subunits. As show in Fig. 4A, when FLAG-P2X2[K366A] was co-expressed with nontagged P2X3 subunits, a strong surface immunostaining of the mutant P2X2 was recovered. Quantification of the recovery by chemiluminescent assay confirmed that when P2X2[K366A] was co-expressed with P2X3,80 ± 6.7% (n = 4) of the total cellular amount of the subunit was expressed at the cell surface, compared with only 32 ± 1.0% (n = 4) when P2X2[K366A] was expressed alone. Similar results were found when P2X2[Y362A] was co-expressed with P2X3 (data not shown). In the converse experiment, when the Myc-tagged P2X3[K357A] subunit was co-expressed with the nontagged P2X2 subunit, its surface expression rose from 23 ± 0.3% (n = 3) (P2X3[K357A]) to 79 ± 4.9% (n = 3) (P2X3[K357A]/P2X2) (Fig. 4C).
|

-me-ATP induced currents that desensitized slowly compared with P2X3 currents. The hetero-oligomeric current was isolated by measuring the amplitude of the currents evoked by 
-me-ATP (30 µM) 2 s after the start of the agonist application; this is expressed as a percentage of the peak current. For P2X2[K366A]/P2X3 receptors, currents at 2 s were 37 ± 3.0% (n = 7) of the peak current, compared with 77 ± 3.1% (n = 13) and 3.3 ± 0.8% (n = 6) for P2X2/3 and homo-oligomeric P2X3 channels, respectively. These values indicate that Wt P2X3 also rescues the function of the P2X2[K366A] mutant. However, the converse was not true. When P2X2 wild type subunit was co-expressed with the P2X3K357A mutant, no currents could be induced with 30 µM 
-me-ATP. This was somewhat surprising because 78% of P2X3[K357A] was expressed at the surface expression when co-expressed with the wild type P2X2 (Fig. 4A). One likely explanation is that the P2X3 subunit is dominant in P2X2/3 receptors and implies that in a hetero-oligomeric channel the dominant subunit needs to be functional itself to enable the oligomeric channel to operate (9). Mutation of the YXXXK Motif Does Not Induce Retention of P2X2 Subunits in the Endoplasmic ReticulumImmunofluorescence and luminescence data clearly indicated that P2X2[Y362A] and P2X2[K366A] subunits as well as the other P2X mutant subunits were not expressed at the cell surface but were present intracellularly. One possibility is that the mutation of the YXXXK motifs impaired the transport of the receptor to the plasma membrane and induced its retention in an intracellular compartment. We therefore investigated if Wt and mutant P2X2 subunits showed different intracellular localization. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with P2X2-GFP fusion constructs containing or not containing the [Y362A] or the [K366A] mutations. Cells were fixed 48 h after transfection, and endoplasmic reticulum was labeled with an anti-calreticulin antibody for co-localization experiments. As shown in Fig. 5A, in COS-7 cells expressing P2X2-GFP, the protein is localized at the plasma membrane as well as in intracellular compartments that are labeled by the anti-calreticulin antibody. In cells transfected with mutant P2X2-GFP subunits, no GFP signal could be resolved at the plasma membrane, whereas it clearly co-localizes with calreticulin. No difference was observed in the intracellular localization of Wt and mutant subunits. This was further observed when a CD4-GFP fusion protein that carried a C-terminal KKXX ER retention motif (25) was co-expressed with FLAG-P2X2 Wt or mutant subunits (data not shown). In addition, co-labeling experiments with markers of the trans-Golgi network did not reveal any differences between Wt and mutant P2X2 subcellular localization. Because in transient transfection the synthesis of the recombinant protein is constant, it is difficult to discriminate using classical immunofluorescent approaches between proteins that are retained in intracellular compartments such as the endoplasmic reticulum from proteins being normally shipped to their terminal location. To circumvent this problem, we performed glycosylation analyses to monitor a possible ER-to-Golgi transport defect in mutant P2X2 subunits. Fig. 5B illustrates pulse-chase assays that demonstrate that both Wt and mutant P2X2 subunits were able to acquire endoglycosidase H-resistant carbohydrates after a 1- or 3-h chase period. No differences in the endoglycosidase H sensitivity could be observed between Wt and mutant subunits at these different time points, ruling out a difference in the rate of transport between compartments of mutant and Wt subunits. These results indicate that mutant P2X subunits are not retained in the ER and that their transport is not likely to be affected.
|
|
Trafficking Deficient P2X2 Subunits Have Altered Surface Expression and Axodendritic Localization in NeuronsP2X receptors are expressed in different types of neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems. We have therefore determined whether the surface expressions of mutant P2X2 subunits were similarly affected in neurons. Cultures (9-10 days) of embryonic hippocampal neurons were transfected with Wt or mutant FLAG P2X2-GFP cDNAs and studied 48 h later. Surface expression of receptors was studied using an anti-FLAG antibody on nonpermeabilized neurons, whereas total receptor expression was visualized using GFP fluorescence. As shown in Fig. 7A, in neurons transfected with Wt P2X2-GFP, FLAG staining (corresponding to cell surface-expressed receptors) and GFP fluorescence (corresponding to all receptors) were found to be nearly identical in appearance. Fluorescence was observed in varicosities even in distal regions of neuronal processes. However, when neurons were transfected with either P2X2[Y362A]-GFP or P2X2[K366A]-GFP subunits, a strong reduction of extracellular FLAG staining was observed in the varicosities; the GFP signal remained not different from the control. The number of varicosities that were double positive for FLAG and GFP signals were quantified in neurons transfected with Wt and mutants P2X2 receptors. Only 14 ± 2.9% (n = 13) and 11 ± 2.4% (n = 24) of varicosities were double positive for P2X2[Y362A] or P2X2[K366A] mutants, respectively, whereas the corresponding figure for Wt P2X2 was 43 ± 4.2% (n = 25). This clearly indicates that in neurons mutant P2X2 subunits have a reduced membrane expression, although their transport to varicosities did not seem to be affected.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our present results demonstrate that the YXXXK motif is responsible for appropriate surface expression of P2X2, P2X3, P2X4, P2X5, and P2X6 receptors. Mutation to alanine of either conserved residue also leads to a loss of function of most the mutant channels. Although we cannot exclude that the loss of function and the reduced surface expression of mutant P2X subunits are directly related, several lines of evidence suggest that this is not the case. Indeed, three mutants, P2X2[Y362A], P2X2[Y362F], and P2X1[Y363F] (31), retained residual activity (see Fig. 2) even though their surface expression was reduced. In addition, hetero-oligomeric channels formed by the association of Wt P2X2 and mutant P2X3 subunits are still not functional, although both subunits have a normal surface expression (see below). This excludes a direct causality between the lack of functional expression of mutated subunits and their trafficking deficit. We cannot interpret the lack of function of the mutant subunits. One possibility is that these residues are involved in the regulation of the desensitization of the channels. Indeed, in the case of the P2X2[Y362A] mutant, we observed that a single application of 30 µM ATP completely desensitizes the channel. Similar findings were made previously on the P2X1[Y363F] mutant (31). In addition, several studies (15, 27) have demonstrated that the rate of desensitization of P2X2 currents is modulated when mutations are introduced in the region downstream of the second transmembrane domain. It is possible that mutations introduced in the YXXXK motif in P2X subunits induce conformational changes to the receptor that corresponds to a desensitized state. Alternatively, the YXXXK motif might be necessary for interactions with cytoskeletal proteins that normally regulate the desensitization of these channels. Such interactions have been shown to regulate the desensitization of P2X1 receptors (32).
Trafficking Rescue of Mutant P2X SubunitsP2X receptors are oligomers probably composed of three subunits (7) that assemble either as homo-oligomers or hetero-oligomers. P2X2/3 hetero-oligomeric channels have been extensively studied (28, 29). Based on biochemical and functional evidence, it has been proposed recently that the P2X2/3 receptor is formed by the head-to-tail association of one P2X2 and two P2X3 subunits (9). Our results show that the surface expression of P2X3[K357A] can be efficiently rescued by co-expression with the Wt P2X2 or P2X3 subunits. By taking the proposed arrangement of the P2X2/3 subunits as valid, this suggests that one P2X2 subunit is sufficient to stabilize the whole channel complex at the cell surface. Similar rescue of the surface expression of trafficking deficient ion channels by Wt subunits has been reported for the homo-oligomeric Kir2.1 and hetero-oligomeric Kir3 inward rectifier potassium channel (33). Kir channels have a tetrameric subunit organization; however, the number of Wt Kir subunits that are sufficient to drive the surface expression of the channel complex has not been documented. Our results suggest that one could be sufficient if the trafficking of P2X receptors and Kir channels follows the same general rules.
Functional Rescue of Trafficking Deficient P2X Receptors Is Subunit-dependentHetero-oligomeric P2X2/3 channels have unique biophysical and pharmacological properties (sensitivity to the agonist 
-me-ATP and slow desensitization kinetics) that make them easily distinguishable from the homo-oligomeric P2X2 and P2X3 receptors. Our results show that co-expression of P2X3 with P2X2[K366A] rescues the lack of function of the mutated P2X2 subunits in a heteromeric channel. A similar rescue is observed with zebrafish P2X2 and P2X3 subunits (3). zP2X2 has no function when expressed as a homo-oligomeric channel, presumably because it lacks the trafficking motif in its C-terminal tail and/or a critical lysine implicated in ATP binding (13); on the other hand, ATP induces typical P2X3-like fast desensitizing currents at zP2X3. When both zP2X2 and zP2X3 subunits are co-expressed, ATP induces non-desensitizing currents typical of P2X2/3 receptors. These results as well as our presents findings provide strong evidence that in the hetero-oligomeric P2X2/3 channel the P2X2 subunit is not directly implicated in ATP-induced gating but rather that binding to the P2X3 subunit alone is responsible for the channel activation. This is further supported by the observation that hetero-oligomeric P2X2/3[K357A] channels could not be activated by 
-me-ATP. The most probable interpretation for the lack of functional rescue of the P2X3[K357A] subunit by Wt P2X2 is that P2X2 and P2X3 subunits do not participate equally in the receptor complex and that at least two functional subunits are necessary for a channel to gate normally. An alternative explanation is that the P2X3[K357A] channel is not able to confer 
-me-ATP sensitivity to the hetero-oligomeric channel but can still be activated by ATP. This is unlikely because homo-oligomeric P2X3[K357A] channels are not activated by 30 µM or 1 mM ATP (see Fig. 3, and data not shown). However, this question will be difficult to address experimentally because in co-expression experiments ATP does not discriminate between homo-oligomeric P2X2 and hetero-oligomeric P2X2/3 channels.
Mutation of the YXXXK Motif Destabilized Surface Expression of P2X2 SubunitsMutations of the YXXXK motif reduce the surface expression of all homomeric P2Xs tested. Such a reduction may have different causes such as a misfolding of the protein leading to its degradation, a reduction in the forward trafficking of the protein during its biosynthesis, or a lack of stabilization of the receptors at the plasma membrane. The two first possibilities seem unlikely. Thus, we never noticed any decrease in the total cellular content of mutated subunits when compared with wild type subunits as assayed either by Western blotting or by luminescence assay (see Fig. 1C); this rules out a misfolding and/or degradation of mutated P2X subunits. By comparison, a P2X2 subunit that lacks glycosylation sites presents a trafficking defect (5) that can be attributed, at least in part, to a misfolding of the protein, because a reduction in the total cellular content of the nonglycosylated channel was observed.2 In addition, it is likely that a misfolded subunit would not have formed an oligomeric receptor nor retained any channel activity. Our results show that mutant P2X2 subunits are able to co-immunoprecipitate and to some extent can be activated by ATP (see Fig. 2). The forward trafficking of mutant P2X receptors is not impaired. Indeed, our pulse-chase experiments clearly demonstrate that mutant P2X receptors acquire complex sugars resistant to endoglycosidase H. This clearly indicates that these proteins are able to travel from the ER to the Golgi apparatus where endoglycosidase H-resistant sugars are added. The rate of forward trafficking of mutant P2X subunits is not likely to be affected because we did not observe any differences in the rate at which mature glycosyl residues are added to WT or trafficking deficient subunits. A reduced forward trafficking rate can therefore not explain the residual membrane expression of mutant P2X subunits that we consistently observed. We cannot exclude that mutant P2X subunits accumulate in the Golgi network; however, such subcellular location would have been noticed in our immunostaining experiments as a marked difference compared with the Wt P2X subunit cellular distribution.
Our results show that mutant P2X receptors have a reduced surface expression because of a reduced residency time at the cell surface. Indeed, we show that mutant P2X2 subunits are significantly internalized over a period as short as 30 min, whereas Wt P2X2 shows very little endocytosis as already described (17). This internalization of P2X2 mutant subunits is not likely mediated by clathrin-mediated endocytosis because these mechanisms are based on the recognition by the endocytic machinery of tyrosine-based motifs. This is clearly not the case for mutant P2X subunits in which the deletion of a tyrosine residue promotes internalization. The most likely interpretation for these results is that mutant P2X receptors are internalized through clathrin-independent or fluid-phase endocytosis. We believe that after their endocytosis mutant subunits are recycled to the plasma membrane; this could explain the residual surface expression that we observed for all mutant P2X subunits that were analyzed. Because we did not observe any difference in the total cellular content between mutant and Wt subunits, it is not likely that internalized P2X mutant receptors are directed to the lysosomal pathway. Clathrin-independent internalization and recycling of the D2 dopamine receptor have been demonstrated; however, the mechanism underlying this type of endocytosis remains unexplained (34).
We propose that the YXXXK motif stabilizes P2X receptors at the plasma membrane. This interpretation is supported by our experiments using CD4 protein fused with the C terminus of either P2X2 or P2X3. These CD4 fusion proteins display higher surface expression than Wt CD4, which returns to normal levels when the YXXXK motif is mutated. Because the YXXXK is not involved in the forward trafficking of P2X receptors, it is most likely that it enhances CD4 residency time at the plasma membrane by promoting its stabilization (presumably by interactions with cytoskeletal proteins).
There are several examples of stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors or ion channel proteins by interaction with cytoskeletal or scaffolding proteins (for review see Ref. 35). For instance, dopamine D2 receptor or the inward rectifier Kir2.1 channels have been shown to interact with filamin A, an actin-binding protein. This interaction promotes their surface expression by increasing their half-life at the plasma membrane (35). Similarly Kv1.4 potassium channels undergo constitutive internalization unless it is stabilized by co-expression with the scaffolding protein PSD-95 (36, 37). Membrane stability of ligand-gated channels might also be promoted by interactions with intracellular proteins that regulate membrane turnover and degradation of the receptor. Indeed,
and
subunits of the
-aminobutyric acid, type A receptor are stabilized at the plasma membrane through a direct interaction with Plic-1, a ubiquitin-like protein (38). Although we cannot exclude that P2X subunits interact through the YXXXK motif with a stabilizing protein such as Plic-1, P2X2 subunits do not interact with Plic-1, and protease inhibitors had no effect on the number of wild type or mutant P2X2 subunits at the cell surface (not shown).
The YXXXK Motif Is Involved in the Polarized Expression of P2X2 in NeuronsInteractions of membrane protein with cytoskeletal or scaffolding proteins not only promote their stabilization but also determine their subcellular expression in polarized cells. We found that the YXXXK motif of the P2X2 receptor regulates their surface expression and polarization in neurons. Because this motif is present in all P2X receptors, it is unlikely that it represents a true dendritic trafficking motif. Rather, we think that P2X receptors are stabilized at the plasma membrane through interactions with intracellular proteins that might have a polarized expression depending on the cell type. Such an hypothesis is supported by the results obtained on the polarized expression of
2B-adrenergic receptors. These receptors are stabilized at the basolateral membrane of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells through interaction with the scaffolding protein spinophilin. Mutant
2B-adrenergic receptors that do not interact with spinophilin display an enhanced rate of internalization. However, the artificial targeting of spinophilin to the apical membrane also promotes the redistribution of Wt
2B-adrenergic receptors to that surface (39). Interactions of the YXXXK motif with specific cytoskeletal proteins might promote the stabilization and the polarization of P2X receptors to specialized membrane domains.
The YXXXK motif is too degenerate to be used in data mining. We searched data bases with a more stringent pattern (LI)(LV)X8YX3K in which the double hydrophobic residues help to anchor the motif near the membrane (see Fig. 1). This pattern is still not very stringent, but we identified the motif in several membrane proteins, usually at the interface between a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic region. Most interesting, in the three
2-adrenergic receptors, this pattern is found in the proximal region of their third intracellular loop where basolateral trafficking and stabilization signals have been located. The pattern is also present in intracellular regions of other G protein-coupled receptors such as the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine, type 4 receptor, the cannabinoid CB1, or the chemokine CCR7 receptors. The pattern is also found in other membrane proteins such as the sodium channel
subunit SCN8, chloride channels CLC3-5, single transmembrane domain proteins such as neuronal cell adhesion molecule or atrial natriuretic peptide clearance receptor IB, as well as different kinds of transporters. The presence of the pattern in the third loop of
2-adrenergic receptors suggests that it might represent a protein-protein interaction domain involved in stabilization of the subset of membrane proteins.
In summary, we have identified a conserved motif in P2X receptors that is involved in their surface expression. This motif is necessary for the stabilization of these receptors at the cell surface likely through direct interactions with intracellular proteins. In addition we provide evidence that P2X2-polarized expression in neurons is also related to the presence of this trafficking motif.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Supported by a postgraduate fellowship from Ministère de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche. ![]()
|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-499-61-99-78; Fax: 33-499-61-99-01; E-mail: far{at}igh.cnrs.fr.
1 The abbreviations used are: HEK, human embryonic kidney; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; COS cells, African green monkey kidney cells; GFP, green fluorescent protein; BSA, bovine serum albumin; Cy3, cyanine 3; Wt, wild type;
,
-me-ATP,
,
-methylene ATP; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; HA, hemagglutinin; pF, picofarad; zP2X2, zebrafish P2X2. ![]()
2 F. Rassendren and S. Chaumont, unpublished observations. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|