|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 28, 29816-29820, July 9, 2004
Regulation of CXC Chemokine Receptor 4-mediated Migration by the Tec Family Tyrosine Kinase ITK*![]() ![]() ![]() ¶|| **![]() ¶![]() ![]()
From the
Received for publication, November 24, 2003 , and in revised form, April 23, 2004.
Chemokines are critical in controlling lymphocyte traffic and migration. The CXC chemokine CXCL12/SDF-1 interacts with its receptor CXCR4 to induce the migration of a number of different cell types. Although an understanding of the physiological functions of this chemokine is emerging, the mechanism by which it regulates T cell migration is still unclear. We show here that the Tec family kinase ITK is activated rapidly following CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation, and this requires Src and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activities. ITK regulates the ability of CXCL12/SDF-1 to induce T cell migration as overexpression of wild-type ITK-enhanced migration, and T cells lacking ITK exhibit reduced migration as well as adhesion in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 . Further analysis suggests that ITK may regulate CXCR4-mediated migration and adhesion by altering the actin cytoskeleton, as ITK null T cells were significantly defective in CXCL12/SDF-1a-mediated actin polymerization. Our data suggest that ITK may regulate the ability of CXCR4 to induce T cell migration.
Lymphocyte trafficking is critical for proper migration to areas of inflammation and for the ability of these cells to perform their immunosurveillance roles. This trafficking is controlled in part by chemokines binding to their receptors expressed on specific cells. Understanding the signaling pathways that regulate chemokine signaling will be essential for a proper understanding of the mechanisms by which chemokines coordinate lymphocyte trafficking and the inflammatory response (1). CXCL12/SDF-1 1 is a chemokine that serves as a potent chemoattractant for monocytes, bone marrow neutrophils, early stage B cell precursors, T lymphocytes, and CD34+ human progenitor cells (2-4). The only known receptor for CXCL12/SDF1- , CXCR4, is a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor (5, 6). Human Jurkat T cells also express this chemokine receptor and migrate in a dose-dependent manner to its ligand, CXCL12/SDF-1 . CXCR4 is most notably recognized as a coreceptor for the binding of T-tropic human immunodeficiency virus strains (6, 7).
Recent studies using the ZAP-70-deficient Jurkat T cell line P116 have identified a role for ZAP-70 in CXCR4 signaling and migration, where ZAP-70 deficiency results in decreased migration levels to SDF-1
The Tec family kinase ITK lies downstream of Zap-70 in the T cell receptor signaling pathway as well as the PI3K pathway (11-13). In addition, the adaptor protein Slp-76 is a prominent substrate and interaction partner for ITK (14, 15). We have tested whether the ITK is involved in regulating CXCL12/SDF-1
Animals and Miscellaneous ReagentsITK-/- mice (16) were a kind gift of Dr. D. Littman (New York University School of Medicine) and were backcrossed onto the C57Bl/6 background for >10 generations. Wild-type (WT) mice were from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). 6-8-week-old mice were used for these experiments. Animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Pennsylvania State University. Antibodies against ITK have been published previously (17) against phosphotyrosine (RC20) from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY) and against actin from Sigma. PP1 and LY294002 were from Calbiochem. The vector pIREShyg was purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA). Cell Culture and TransfectionsThe human leukemic Jurkat T cell line, clone E6-1, was maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For stable transfections, 7.5 x 106 cells were electroporated with 15 µg of plasmid DNA (either pIREShyg alone or containing the hemagglutinin-tagged WT ITK) (18) using a T820 square wave electroporator (BTX, San Diego, CA), stable lines were derived by selection in 1.0 mg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen), and expression was confirmed by Western blot analysis.
Cell Stimulation, Lysis, Immunoprecipitation, and ImmunoblotsJurkat cells were serum-starved overnight and then stimulated as indicated in the figure legends. Aliquots of 20 x 106 cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml CXCL12/SDF-1
Chemotaxis AssayMigration assays were performed using blind well chemotaxis chambers (Neuro Probe, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). 1.5 x 106 Jurkat T cells and derivatives were added to the upper chamber and incubated for 2 h or 4 x 106 primary murine thymocytes for 4 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The cells were allowed to migrate through 0.5-µm polyvinylpyrrolidone-free filters (Osmometrics) into a lower chamber containing migration buffer with or without 50 ng/ml CXCL12/SDF-1
Adhesion AssayAdhesion assays were performed as described previously (19). In brief, 2 x 106 primary murine thymocytes were stimulated with 50 ng/ml CXCL12/SDF-1
In Vivo Migration AssayWT or ITK null mice were lightly anesthetized with isoflurane, and 100 ng of CXCL12/SDF-1 Flow CytometryCells were analyzed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies against CD3 (conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine), CD4 (conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate), CD8 (conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine) (BD Biosciences), or CXCR4 (rabbit anti-CXCR4, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) and detected using goat anti-rabbit fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Actin Polymerization AssayPrimary murine thymocytes were stimulated with 100 ng/ml CXCL12/SDF-1 StatisticsResults were compared using Student's t test, with p values < 0.05 taken as significant.
Activation of ITK by CXCR4 via an Src and PI3K PathwayTo determine whether ITK is involved in CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation, Jurkat E6-1 cells were serum-starved and stimulated with CXCL12/SDF-1 for the indicated times (Fig. 1). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with a specific anti-ITK antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were then analyzed by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. As shown in Fig. 1, CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation induced a rapid and transient tyrosine phosphorylation of ITK starting at 90 s, with maximum tyrosine phosphorylation detected at 5 min after the addition of 50 ng/ml SDF-1 . This time frame of ITK activation via CXCR4 was similar to what we have observed previously for TcR-induced activation of ITK (21).
CXCR4 signaling leads to activation of Src kinases as well as PI3K, two upstream activators of ITK. To investigate the roles of Src kinases and PI3K on ITK phosphorylation during CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation, Jurkat T cells were pretreated with the Src kinase inhibitor, PP1, or the PI3-kinase inhibitor, LY294002, followed by stimulation with CXCL12/SDF-1 for 5 min. Fig. 2 demonstrates that both Src and PI3K activity were required for CXCL12/SDF-1 -mediated ITK activation. These data indicate that ITK plays a role in CXCR4 signaling and requires Src and PI3K activity for its activation by CXCL12/SDF-1 .
Regulation of CXCR4-mediated Chemotaxis by ITKOur analysis of CXCR4 signaling indicates that ITK is activated by this chemokine receptor. To find out whether ITK regulates migration induced by CXCR4, we tested the effect of overexpressing WT ITK in Jurkat cells on CXCL12/SDF-1 -induced migration. We established stable Jurkat cells overexpressing WT ITK by transfecting Jurkat cells with an expression vector carrying hemagglutinin-tagged ITK (Fig. 3A). This exogenous ITK was also responsive to CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation, similar to what we observed for the endogenous ITK (data not shown). We then compared the responses of these cells with the parental Jurkat cell line for their migratory response to CXCL12/SDF-1 . As reported previously (8), CXCL12/SDF-1 induced cell migration in the parental Jurkat cell line (Fig. 3B). In the unstimulated state, the ITK overexpressing Jurkat cells exhibited increased migration, and stimulating these cells with CXCL12/SDF-1 under the same conditions led to increased migration, although the fold increase in adhesion in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 was actually lower than that observed in the parental cell line perhaps because of the increased basal migration in these cells (Fig. 3B). Both cell lines had equivalent levels of CXCR4 expression as analyzed by flow cytometry (data not shown). These data suggest that ITK can control the ability of CXCR4 to induce migration. To determine whether the absence of ITK would affect the ability of cells to migrate, we took advantage of mice lacking ITK (16). We compared the ability of CXCL12/SDF-1 to induce migration of WT or ITK null thymocytes (on a C57Bl/6 background) and found that the absence of ITK resulted in a significant inhibition of migration in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 (Fig. 4A). Since the lack of ITK alters T cell development such that the ratio of CD4+:CD8+ thymocytes is reduced, we examined the migrating cells to determine whether the migration of particular populations of ITK null thymocytes was preferentially altered. The CD4 and CD8 patterns of expression of the WT and ITK null thymocytes were examined prior to and after CXCL12/SDF-1 -induced migration. We found that in both populations, there seemed to be preferential migration of double positive thymocytes and less migration of double negative cells after CXCL12/SDF-1 -induced migration (Fig. 4B; note that we recovered fewer cells from the ITK null populations). We have shown previously that ITK is involved in regulating TcR-induced adhesion (19). To determine whether ITK is also involved in the ability of thymocytes to adhere to fibronectin in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 , we performed adhesion assays, stimulating cells with CXCL12/SDF-1 and examining adhesion to dishes coated with fibronectin. We found that, similar to the results observed with migration, ITK also affected the ability of these thymocytes to adhere to fibronectin in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation (Fig. 4C). It was also possible that ITK null thymocytes expressed lower levels of CXCR4, the receptor for CXCL12/SDF-1 . However, analysis of CXCR4 expression indicated that both WT and ITK null populations expressed equivalent levels of CXCR4 (Fig. 4D). Finally, we determined whether ITK could affect the ability of T cells to migrate in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation in vivo. For these experiments, we delivered CXCL12/SDF-1 intranasally and determined the ability of T cells to migrate to the lung in response to this stimulus, which requires adhesion and migratory properties. These experiments confirmed the in vitro experiments, showing that although the number of WT T cells increased in the lung following CXCL12/SDF-1 stimulation, the number of ITK null T cells did not and actually decreased instead (Fig. 4E). This was similar to what we have observed previously in a murine model of allergic asthma, in that ITK null T cells were defective in getting into the lung following allergic challenge (20). These data indicate that ITK regulates the ability of T cells and thymocytes to adhere and migrate in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 .
Regulation of CXCR4-mediated Actin Polymerization by ITKShimizu and colleagues (19) as well as Tsoukas and colleagues (22) and Schwartzberg and colleagues (27) have recently reported that ITK can regulate the ability of the TcR to induce actin polymerization. As chemokine-induced migration is dependent on signal-induced changes in the actin super-structure (23), we asked whether actin polymerization in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 was affected in ITK null thymocytes. We stimulated WT or ITK null thymocytes with CXCL12/SDF-1 and measured the level of actin polymerization using Alexa Fluor-468-labeled phalloidin and flow cytometry. We found that, although CXCL12/SDF-1 induced WT thymocytes to increase F-actin levels 2-fold, the absence of ITK resulted in a significant reduction in the ability of CXCL12/SDF-1 to induce actin polymerization (Fig. 5). These data suggest that ITK may regulate the ability of CXCL12/SDF-1 to induce actin polymerization and therefore the ability of cells to migrate in response to CXCL12/SDF-1 .
The requirements for Zap-70, Slp-76, and PI3K in regulating CXCR4 signaling suggest that signaling between these molecules is important for this pathway (8, 24). In the TcR pathway, Zap-70 is required for ITK activation, and ITK requires PI3K for efficient activation (11-13). In addition, Slp-76 is a binding partner for ITK, and ITK can phosphorylate Slp-76, which may lead to the assembly of critical components of this pathway leading to migration, including the molecule ADAP/Fyb/Slap-130 (15, 25). Thus ITK may play a critical role in the proper assembly of these components, leading to altered actin rearrangement and migration. Indeed, ITK is involved in regulating the actin cytoskeleton downstream of the TcR (22, 26, 27), and our data suggest that ITK may play a larger role in regulating actin cytoskeletal changes downstream of CXCR4 as well. Interestingly, CXCR4 is involved in regulating T cell migration to lymph nodes, and although we have not observed any difference in the percentages of T cells in the lymph nodes of ITK null mice under steady state conditions (other than an overall decrease in total T cell numbers, reported previously (16)), we have observed altered recruitment of ITK null T cells to the lung during the induction of allergic asthma in ITK-/- mice (20). It will be of considerable interest to determine whether T cells from ITK null mice exhibit altered homing of the lymph node under stimulated conditions and whether ITK or other Tec family kinases also regulate other chemokine responses.
* This work was supported by grants from the Johnson & Johnson Focused Giving Program, the American Heart Association (0330036N), and the National Institutes of Health (RO1-AI51626) (all to A. A.) and in part by a graduate student research grant from the College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University (to A. M. F.) and the Sloan Foundation (to M. J. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
|| Graduate fellow of the Huck Institutes for Life Sciences.
1 The abbreviations used are: CXCL, CXC chemokine ligand; SDF-1
We thank Dr. Chen Dong (Pennsylvania State University) for the use of migration chambers. We also thank Dr. Dan Littman for the gift of the ITK-/- mice, Elaine Kunze and Susan Magargee at the Center for Quantitative Cell Analysis for technical assistance, Cynthia Mueller for animal breeding, and members of the Immunology Research Laboratories in the Department of Veterinary Science at Pennsylvania State University for critical comments.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||