Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M313683200 on May 25, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 31, 32142-32150, July 30, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/31/32142    most recent
M313683200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foley, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Griep, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foley, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Griep, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Temporal Regulation of VEID-7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin Cleavage Activity and Caspase-6 Correlates with Organelle Loss during Lens Development*

John D. Foley, Heidi Rosenbaum, and Anne E. Griep{ddagger}

From the Department of Anatomy, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Received for publication, December 15, 2003 , and in revised form, May 24, 2004.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Lens fiber cell differentiation involves extensive reconstruction of the cell's architecture, including the degradation and elimination of all membrane-bound organelles via a process that has been likened to apoptosis. Using caspase reporter assays under conditions in which nonspecific cleavage of the reporter peptides by the proteasome has been inhibited, we investigated whether any specific caspase activities are temporally correlated with this process of organelle loss. Extracts from neonatal mouse lenses contained strong VEID-7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin (AFC) and minor IETD-AFC and LEVD-AFC cleavage activities, but no DEVD-AFC cleavage activity. Further testing suggested that the VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC cleavage activities were likely due to the same enzyme. In lens extracts from rat embryos, VEID-AFC cleavage activity increased during the period when organelles are eliminated, between embryonic days 15.5 and 18.5, whereas procaspase-6 protein levels decreased, suggesting that this enzyme is responsible for VEID-AFC cleavage. By contrast, in extracts from {alpha}AE7 transgenic mouse lenses in which apoptosis was induced, strong DEVD-AFC cleavage activity and activated caspase-3 protein were detected. Thus, within the same tissue, different caspase activities can predominate depending on the context, normal differentiation versus apoptosis. These results highlight the difference between normal fiber cell differentiation and apoptosis and the capacity of the lens to differentially regulate these two processes.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Apoptosis is a tightly controlled process that results in the ordered disassembly of cells into small membrane-bound fragments that are efficiently eliminated from the organism. It is an important mechanism in the development of all multicellular organisms, being used for such processes as eliminating self-reactive immune cells, ensuring appropriate cell-tissue targeting, and defining organ morphology (1, 2). In addition to classical apoptosis, there appear to be a few cases in which a limited destruction of components of the cell occurs during terminal differentiation. In these cases, a restricted destruction of subcellular organelles is necessary to accommodate some unique cellular function. The classical examples of this phenomenon are found in the lens, epidermis, and mammalian erythrocytes (3–5). Although these differentiation events are distinct from classical apoptosis in that a highly specialized cell remains behind, these processes and apoptosis do share some characteristics, suggesting that a common set of effector molecules may be involved. In apoptosis, the effector molecules include members of a family of cysteine proteases, the caspases (6, 7). These enzymes play central roles in both the initiation and execution of the apoptotic pathway. Through their cleavage of a limited number of important cellular proteins, caspases alter specific enzymatic processes and structural properties of cells, ultimately resulting in the ordered dismantling of those cells. Caspases may also be important in initiating and executing discrete steps in cell differentiation such as intracellular organelle loss. In this study, we investigated which caspases are active during normal lens differentiation and compare the results with those found under conditions in which apoptosis is induced in the same tissue.

The vertebrate lens consists of a single cell type in two general states: a single cell layer called the anterior epithelium that, on the anterior surface, covers a large mass of differentiated cells referred to as fiber cells (8, 9). The process of fiber cell differentiation involves extensive reconstruction of the architecture of the cell. Lens cells begin as small cuboidal epithelial cells, but during the process of differentiation, they become extremely elongated, highly specialized cells that are ordered into very precise arrays. To accommodate the lens' proper function in vision, the fibers must express large amounts of tissue-specific crystallin proteins as well as eliminate all membrane-bound organelles from the optical pathway. Failure to eliminate these organelles results in opacity in the lens due to disordered fiber cell packing and scattering of light by the organelles.

The manner in which lens cell nuclei are lost during lens fiber cell differentiation bears many similarities at the morphological and biochemical levels to that seen in apoptosis. These include a clumping and marginalization of chromatin (10), DNase I-like activity that leaves 3'-OH groups and fragmentation of DNA into integers of nucleosomal length (11), and kinase activities (12). Experimental evidence also suggests molecular links between apoptosis and the differentiation of fiber cells. Expression of transgenes that disrupt normal cell cycle control within the lens, such as the E7 oncogene from human papilloma virus type 16 and C-terminally truncated T antigen from simian virus 40, leads to massive apoptosis within the lens (13–16). Coexpression of human papilloma virus type 16 E6 with E7 can attenuate this apoptosis. Notably, when expressed alone, E6 also can inhibit nuclear loss during fiber cell differentiation (13). Similarly, overexpression of the anti-apoptotic gene bcl-2 in the lenses of transgenic mice severely disrupts normal lens development, resulting in defects in fiber formation and the retention of nuclei in spatially inappropriate regions of the lens (17). Finally, in in vitro lens epithelial cell differentiation models, the addition of cell-permeable caspase inhibitors to the culture medium results in the retention of nuclei (18, 19). Although suggesting a role for caspases in denucleation, these latter in vitro studies failed to provide direct evidence for specific caspase activities that correlate with organelle loss. Despite these similarities in organelle loss during fiber cell differentiation and apoptosis, there are key differences. In fiber cell differentiation, a functional cell body remains behind; cell membrane integrity and an actin cytoskeleton are maintained; and the overall period of time from the beginning of organelle loss to the DNA fragmentation at the end of denucleation is estimated to be several days rather than hours (20, 21). These differences in the organelle loss program between fiber cell differentiation and apoptosis suggest that they are distinct processes. If and how they overlap at the molecular level therefore remains to be elucidated.

Because of their central role in apoptosis, we have chosen to determine whether caspases are expressed and active within normal murine lenses in a temporal pattern that could suggest a role in organelle loss during fiber cell differentiation. Multiple caspases and many of their regulatory genes were found to be expressed in the lens. A caspase-6-like VEID-AFC1 cleavage activity was detected within normal lenses, and this activity increased just prior to the onset of DNA degradation in primary fiber cells. Additionally, a decrease in the full-length inactive proenzyme form of caspase-6 was detected in this same time frame. Surprisingly, no DEVD-AFC cleavage or activated caspase-3 protein was detected in normal lenses. On the other hand, strong DEVD-AFC cleavage activity and activated caspase-3 were detected in extracts from lenses in which apoptosis was induced by the human papilloma virus oncogene E7. We conclude that lens cells are capable of the differential regulation of caspase activities and that only some of these activities are temporally correlated with organelle destruction during differentiation. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that some (but not all) caspases associated with apoptosis contribute to organelle loss during lens fiber cell differentiation.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals
FVB/n mice were used as the source for all non-transgenic mouse RNA, fixed sections, and extracts. {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice, from line 75a described previously (13), were used as the source for apoptotic lens extracts. Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc.) were used as the source for all rat RNA, fixed sections, and lens extracts. For lenses isolated from embryos, the day of the vaginal plug was defined as day 0.5 in embryogenesis (E0.5).

RT-PCR
RT-PCR was carried out using 2.5 µg of total mRNA from lenses of neonatal FVB/n mice for the genes indicated in Table I. 2 The identity of the PCR products was confirmed either by restriction digest analysis or by cloning into pGEM®-T (Promega) or pBluescript SK II vectors, followed by dideoxy-DNA sequencing.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE I
Expression of caspases and their regulators in the mouse lens

Neonatal mouse lenses were tested for expression of caspase and caspase regulatory genes by the methods listed. "No" indicates that expression was detected in a suitable control sample, but not in lenses. TNFR1, tumor necrosis factor receptor-1; AIF, apoptosis-inducing factor.

 

In Situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed as described previously (14). bax and bak were amplified by PCR from 5'-RACE products derived from an E12.5 whole mouse embryo and cloned into the pGEM®-T-Easy vector to generate probes for in situ hybridization. A rat bcl-x gene (provided by R. Nickells, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) was used for in situ hybridization of eye sections from neonatal mice. RNase protection was carried out with rat mRNA as described (22).

Cell Culture
15-ml cultures of THP-1 human monocytic leukemia cells were grown at 37 °C and 95% humidity in Iscove's modified medium, 9% horse serum, 2 mM glutamine, 0.05 M {beta}-mercaptoethanol, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. THP-1 cells were induced to undergo apoptosis (referred to as "activated" THP-1 cells) by incubation in 25 µM cycloheximide for 4 h prior to preparation of the extract (see below).

Cytosolic Extract Preparation
Whole lenses from neonatal mice or E15.5–18.5 rat embryos were excised, placed in hypotonic lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor mixture (13)), and sheared in a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer. Cytosolic extracts were prepared as described previously (23). The extracts were dialyzed overnight at 4 °C using Slide-A-Lyzer® mini-dialysis units (Mr 7000 cutoff, Pierce) against buffer containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10% sucrose, and 20 mM dithiothreitol and then stored at –80 °C until used. Typically, lenses from two litters of neonatal mice were pooled, and three separate pools were analyzed for caspase activities. Likewise, lenses from two to four litters of mouse or rat embryos were pooled, and at least two separate pools were analyzed for caspase activity. For THP-1 cell extracts, cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 x g; the pellet was resuspended in hypotonic lysis buffer; and cells were allowed to swell for 20 min prior to lysis in a tight-fitting Dounce homogenizer. Extracts were prepared as described for lens tissue. Protein concentrations for all extracts were determined by BCA reaction (Pierce).

Enzyme Activity Assays
General Caspase Activity Assay Conditions—Assays were performed in 100-µl reaction mixtures containing 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10% sucrose, 0.1% CHAPS, and 10 µM dithiothreitol with the extract amounts and peptide concentrations indicated in the figure legends. Production of AMC or AFC was measured at 10-min intervals for 50–60 min at 37 °C in a Tecan Flurostar 96-well plate reader using excitation wavelengths of 360 nm (AMC) and 405 nm (AFC) and emission wave-lengths of 465 nm (AMC) and 535 nm (AFC). For each sample in each assay, duplicate measurements were made. Enzyme activities were calculated using the CaspACETM fluorometric assay system (Promega Corp.) as described by the manufacturer (60). Briefly, the caspase-dependent cleavage activity of the specific reporter peptide was calculated as the difference between the rate of cleavage of the peptide in the absence of the corresponding inhibitor and the rate of cleavage after preincubation with the corresponding CHO or fmk inhibitor for 30 min. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using one-way analysis of variance.

Caspase Reporter and Inhibitor Peptides—Caspase activity was measured using the following reporter peptides and inhibitors: YVAD-AFC/YVAD-CHO, WEHD-AFC/WEHD-fmk, VDVAD-AFC/VDVAD-fmk, DEVD-AFC/DEVD-CHO, LEVD-AFC/LEVD-CHO, VEID-AFC/VEID-CHO, IETD-AFC/IETD-CHO, and LEHD-AFC/LEHD-fmk (Calbiochem).

Proteasome Activity Assays and Proteasome Inhibitors—Proteasome activity was measured by monitoring cleavage of 300 µM LLVY-AMC (Calbiochem) as described for caspase activity. Lactacystin (100 µM) was used to control for proteasome-specific activity. The proteasome inhibitors tested for their effects on caspase activity were lactacystin (100 µM), 4-hydroxy-5-iodo-3-nitrophenylacetyl-Leu-Leu-Leu-vinylsulfone (100 µM), epoxomicin (50 µM), and clasto-lactacystin/{beta}-lactone (50 µM) (all from Calbiochem). The effect of proteasome inhibitors on caspase cleavage activity was calculated as the percentage of caspase reporter peptide cleavage by the recombinant caspase in the absence of inhibitor. All recombinant caspases were obtained from Calbiochem.

Western Blot Analysis
Lenses were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation buffer; lysates were prepared; and protein concentrations were measured as described previously (13, 24). 300 µg of extract was separated on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose, and the membranes were probed overnight with anti-caspase-6 or anti-caspase-3 antibody (9762 and D175, respectively; Cell Signaling Technology). Primary antibody was detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham Biosciences), and signal was detected using the ECL Plus chemiluminescent detection system (Amersham Biosciences). The blot was stripped and reprobed with anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase antibody (MAB374, Chemicon International, Inc.) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG as a loading control. Blots were imaged on the StormTM 860 system, and levels of fluorescence were quantified using ImageQuant (Amersham Biosciences) and Microsoft Excel.

TUNEL Analysis
Heads from E15.5, E17.5, and E19.5 rat embryos were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. 5-µm sections were cut, and sections corresponding to the most central regions of the lens were subjected to TUNEL analysis using the ApopTag Plus fluorescein in situ apoptosis detection kit (Intergen Co.) as described previously (14).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Expression of Caspases and Regulatory Molecules in the Lens—Many caspases and caspase regulatory molecules have been reported to be expressed in lenses from a range of species (3, 19, 25–27). Although some studies have examined caspase and caspase regulator expression in murine lenses (28–30), a broad survey of the spectrum of molecules involved in the caspase pathway for mouse and rat has not been conducted. To determine the extent to which caspases and their regulators are expressed in murine lenses, we conducted RT-PCR, RNase protection, and in situ hybridization experiments on lens RNA or lens sections from neonatal mice. Caspases can be divided roughly into three groups based on their substrate affinities (31). Group I caspases are primarily involved in the generation of an immune response. Group II caspases are thought to mediate the majority of changes that are associated with the apoptotic phenotype. Group III caspases are thought to be primarily involved in the activation of the group II caspases. RNA transcripts from a wide range of caspase genes and genes that encode proteins that can regulate caspases were detected in neonatal mouse lenses (Table I). Intact receptor-associated pathways were present for both tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 and fas. Transcripts for the Group I caspase, caspase-1, and for several Group II and III caspases were detected. Finally, transcripts for many caspase regulatory molecules also were also detected, indicating that multiple levels of control of caspase activity might be in place within the lens. Thus, it would appear that lens cells should be capable of regulating and promoting a variety of caspase responses.

Establishing Caspase-specific Assays for the Lens: Eliminating the Contribution of the Proteasome in Caspase Activity Assays—To determine which caspases are active in cell extracts from the lens, we used caspase activity assays. These assays take advantage of a panel of short peptide substrates, each of which contains the preferred sequence for cleavage by a given caspase (32). For use in these activity assays, the short peptide substrates are conjugated to fluorochromes and used as reporter molecules. When mixed with extracts containing caspases, the reporter peptide is recognized by caspases in an amino acid sequence-specific manner, and the fluorochrome is cleaved from the peptide, generating fluorescence that can be measured by fluorometry. The same peptides, when conjugated to reactive chemical moieties such as CHO and fmk are potent inhibitors of caspases (33). Preincubation of an extract with an inhibitor prior to the addition of the corresponding reporter peptide arguably controls for non-caspase-mediated cleavage of the reporter peptides. The difference between fluorescence generated in the absence and presence of inhibitor is taken to be reflective of the "caspase-specific" activity. However, for the calculation to be accurate, these peptides must be highly specific substrates for caspases. If any other enzyme cleaves the reporter and is also inhibited by the caspase inhibitor, then caspase activity will be overestimated. This error could become quite pronounced if there is a large amount of nonspecific enzyme activity and/or a small amount of intrinsic caspase activity within the extracts being tested.

The proteasome is a cytosolic multisubunit complex containing a number of discrete proteolytic activities that degrade specifically targeted proteins. The proteasome contains an activity capable of cleaving caspase reporter peptides (34, 35). This capacity of the proteasome most likely is due to the post-glutamyl-peptide hydrolase activity of this enzyme complex (36). Of note, this proteasome activity was also found to be sensitive to preincubation with YVAD-CHO and YVKD-CHO, two caspase peptidyl inhibitors. Bovine, rat, and human lenses have been shown to contain significant levels of proteasome activity (37–39). To assess proteasome activity levels in murine lens extracts ourselves, we tested extracts from whole lenses of neonatal mice for their capacity to cleave the proteasome chymotrypsin-like substrate LLVY-AMC. The extracts contained an activity of 15.88 ± 1.82 fmol µg–1 min–1. Additionally, the LLVY-AMC cleavage activity was inhibited by the caspase inhibitors VEID-CHO and IETD-CHO (data not shown). Finally, YVAD-AFC cleavage activity was abolished by preincubation with the proteasome inhibitor lactacystin. Thus, not only can the proteasome recognize caspase substrates, as previously noted (34, 35), but also at least four different caspase inhibitory peptides can significantly inhibit the proteasome. From these data, we conclude that proteasome activity must be inhibited to measure accurately caspase activity in lens extracts.

To identify a proteasome inhibitor that would not cross-react with caspases, we tested four common proteasome inhibitors for their ability to inhibit caspases. Recombinant caspase-1, -3, -6, and -8 were examined for activity against their preferred reporter peptides after preincubation with the proteasome inhibitors listed in Table II. Each of these proteasome inhibitors has been demonstrated to inhibit the trypsin-like, chymotrypsin-like, and post-glutamyl-peptide hydrolase activities of the proteasome (40–42). As shown in Table II, the inhibitors varied in their effect on the recombinant caspases, ranging from minimal to almost complete inhibition. Of the four inhibitors studied, lactacystin was the only one to show minimal effects on the activity of all caspases tested. Therefore, we chose to use lactacystin to inhibit the proteasome in subsequent caspase activity assays.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE II
Proteasome inhibitors versus recombinant caspases

Recombinant human caspase-1, -3, -6, and -8 were tested for activity against their preferred reporter peptides (WEHD-AFC, DEVD-AFC, VEID-AFC, and IETD-AFC, respectively) after a 30-min preincubation with the listed proteasome inhibitors. For each inhibitor and caspase, the percentage of activity measured in the absence of inhibitor is shown. ND, not determined; NIP-L3 VS, 4-hydroxy-5-iodo-3-nitrophenylacetyl-Leu-Leu-Leu-vinylsulfone.

 
We next determined the concentration of lactacystin needed to inhibit the proteasome activity found in lens extracts. Consistent with previous studies in the lens (39), proteasome activity was fully inhibited by 100 µM lactacystin (data not shown), a concentration ~10-fold higher than that typically used to inhibit this activity in extracts from other tissues.

Caspase Activity in Normal Lens Extracts—Having determined the appropriate conditions for reliably measuring caspase activities in mouse lens extracts, we next tested lens extracts for caspase peptidyl cleavage activities. As a wide range of caspases were found to be transcribed in the lens (Table I), cleavage of eight different reporter peptides that are the preferred substrates for eight different caspases (31) was tested. First, to verify that all peptides could be cleaved, cleavage of all the peptides was tested in an extract generated from THP-1 cells that had been induced to undergo apoptosis. In preliminary experiments, there was very little cleavage of the WEHD-AFC and VEID-AFC peptides by the THP-1 extract. To ensure that the preferred enzymes for cleaving these substrates were present in the extract, recombinant caspase-1 and caspase-6 were added to the extract. Fig. 1A shows that all eight substrate peptides could be cleaved by an activated THP-1 extract supplemented with recombinant caspase-1 and caspase-6.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
Caspase activities in lens extracts from neonatal FVB mice. A, peptidyl cleavage activities in control THP-1 cell extracts. 20 µg of apoptotic THP-1 extract supplemented with 0.1 unit of recombinant human caspase-6 and 8 units of recombinant human caspase-1 was tested for caspase cleavage activities against the indicated caspase reporter peptides (30 µM). The corresponding CHO or fmk inhibitors were used at 10 µM, and lactacystin was used at 10 µM. B, peptidyl cleavage activities in mouse lens extracts under low stringency conditions. 70 µg of lens extract from neonatal FVB mice was tested for cleavage of 30 µM reporter peptides. The CHO or fmk inhibitors were used at 10 µM, and lactacystin was used at 10 µM. C, peptidyl cleavage activities in mouse lens extracts under high stringency conditions. 70 µg of lens extract from neonatal FVB mice was tested for cleavage of 30 µM reporter peptides. The corresponding CHO inhibitors were used at 500 nM, and lactacystin was used at 100 µM. For A–C, the cleavage activities (expressed in fmol µg–1 min–1) represent the difference in the rate of fluorescence generated by the cleavage of the reporter peptide in the absence of the corresponding CHO or fmk inhibitor and the rate of fluorescence generated by the cleavage activity in the presence of the corresponding CHO or fmk inhibitor. The average activity ± S.D. from three independent experiments is shown. In C, the differences between the four groups are statistically significant (p < 0.0001).

 
Lens extracts were subjected to a two-step analysis. First, an initial screen was performed at relatively low stringency so that cleavage of any peptide by a caspase would not be over-looked. The cleavage of all eight caspase reporter peptides by the lens extract was tested using the corresponding caspase inhibitors (10 µM) and lactacystin (10 µM). Next, peptides that were cleaved in this initial screen were subjected to testing at a much higher stringency using 500 nM to 1 µM caspase inhibitor and 100 µM lactacystin to determine accurate caspase activities for cleavage of these peptides. The VEID-AFC, IETD-AFC, LEVD-AFC, and YVAD-AFC peptides were all cleaved by lens extract in the initial screen (Fig. 1B). No caspase-specific cleavage of the other four peptides, including DEVD-AFC, was detected. In the high stringency assays (Fig. 1C), the cleavage rate for VEID-AFC, the preferred substrate for caspase-6, was highest in the extracts at 18.75 ± 0.32 fmol µg–1 min–1; the IETD-AFC and LEVD-AFC cleavage rates were 5.34 ± 0.13 and 3.23 ± 0.11 fmol µg–1 min–1, respectively. YVAD-AFC cleavage activity was zero under these high stringency conditions. These results indicate that normal lens extracts contain a subset of possible caspase cleavage activities.

Peptide Cleavage by One Versus Multiple Caspases—Although each of the reporter peptides we tested for cleavage by lens extracts is the preferred peptide for one specific caspase, it is known that an individual caspase can also cleave at least some other peptides, albeit at suboptimal rates (31). The reporter peptides that were cleaved by lens extracts (VEID-AFC, IETD-AFC, and LEVD-AFC) are the preferred peptides for caspase-6, -8, and 4, respectively. These caspases are known to be the most promiscuous caspases in terms of their substrate specificity. We had determined previously that recombinant caspase-6 and caspase-8 will cleave both their preferred reporter peptides (VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC, respectively) as well as the other reporters, albeit at differing rates (data not shown). It is therefore possible that the cleavage of IETD-AFC and LEVD-AFC by the lens extracts was due to suboptimal cleavage of these peptides by the enzyme that cleaves VEID-AFC rather than the activity of additional enzymes. This possibility seemed likely because LEVD-AFC is considered the preferred peptide for human caspase-4, an enzyme for which no mouse homolog has been identified. We therefore asked whether the cleavage of VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC might be due to a single caspase.

To address this question, we investigated whether the VEID-CHO and IETD-CHO inhibitors could help us distinguish between caspase-6 and caspase-8 activities. Specifically, we measured the relative efficiency with which each of these peptide inhibitors could inhibit the peptide cleavage activities of recombinant caspase-6 and caspase-8. As shown in Fig. 2A, both the cleavage of VEID-AFC by caspase-6 and the cleavage of IETD-AFC by caspase-8 were efficiently inhibited by 500 nM VEID-CHO. However, although the cleavage of IETD-AFC by caspase-8 was completely inhibited by 500 nM IETD-CHO, the cleavage of VEID-AFC by caspase-6 was only partially inhibited by 500 nM IETD-CHO. Because the IETD-CHO peptide discriminates between caspase-6 and caspase-8 activities, we used it to help determine whether the cleavage of VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC by lens extracts was due to caspase-6 and/or caspase-8.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
Reporter peptide cleavage by one versus multiple caspases in lens extracts from neonatal mice. A, recombinant human caspase-6 (0.1 unit) and caspase-8 (5 units) were tested for their ability to cleave 30 µM VEID-AFC or IETD-AFC reporter peptide, respectively, in the presence or absence of 500 nM VEID-CHO or IETD-CHO inhibitor, as indicated. The cleavage activity is shown as a percentage of the activity measured in the absence of inhibitor. B, 70-µg aliquots of lens extracts from neonatal FVB mice were incubated with 30 µM VEID-AFC or IETD-AFC reporter peptide in the absence or presence of 500 nM VEID-CHO or IETD-CHO inhibitor peptide. The average percent of uninhibited activity ± S.D. from three independent experiments is shown. There was no statistically significant difference between the values obtained when the IETD-CHO inhibitor was used to inhibit VEID-AFC versus IETD-AFC cleavage activity (p = 0.76). Likewise, there was no statistically significant difference between the values obtained when VEID-CHO was used to inhibit VEID-AFC versus IETD-AFC cleavage activity (p > 0.8).

 
The VEID-CHO and IETD-CHO inhibitors were tested for their ability to inhibit cleavage of VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC by lens extracts from neonatal mice. Fig. 2B shows that the degree of inhibition of the peptide cleavage reactions by the two inhibitors paralleled that seen with recombinant caspase-6, i.e. IETD-CHO only partially inhibited the cleavage of these two reporters, whereas VEID-CHO efficiently inhibited the cleavage of both. This result is consistent with caspase-6 in lens extracts being the enzyme mainly responsible for cleaving both VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC. Were caspase-8 in lens extracts responsible for cleavage of IETD-AFC, we should have seen efficient inhibition of its cleavage by IETD-CHO, as seen for the recombinant caspase-8.

Timing of DNA Degradation in Rat Primary Fiber Nuclei—In late stage murine embryos, the fiber cell compartment of the lens consists of two populations of cells referred to as primary and secondary fiber cells. The primary fiber cells are the first fiber cells to form and arise from elongation of cells at the posterior of the hollow lens vesicle. The vesicle is fully occluded by about E13.5 in mice and E14.5 in rats (43). These primary fiber cells become a scaffold upon which secondary fiber cells are concentrically laid down throughout the life of the organism. Due to the relatively synchronous differentiation of the primary fibers, these cells represent a large population of cells in approximately the same state of differentiation at any given time. The secondary fiber cells differentiate asynchronously; therefore, there are fewer cells in any one state of differentiation at a given time. Thus, we reasoned that primary fiber cell differentiation is the stage of lens differentiation where it would be possible to determine whether caspase cleavage activities are temporally regulated in a manner that correlates with organelle loss (44). DNA degradation is a convenient marker for the end stages of organelle loss, as the fragmented ends of the DNA are easily labeled by TUNEL analysis. To determine whether VEID-AFC cleavage activity is temporally correlated with primary fiber denucleation, we elected to use rat embryos as the source of lens tissue due to their relatively large size compared with mouse lenses. It has been shown previously that primary fiber cell denucleation begins at ~17 days of embryonic development in the Wistar strain of rats (45). To confirm that the timing of denucleation is similar in the Sprague-Dawley rats, we performed TUNEL analysis on lens sections from E15.5, E17.5, E18.5, and E19.5 rat embryos. As shown in Fig. 3, at E15.5, primary fiber cell nuclei were not labeled by TUNEL. At E17.5, a small percentage of nuclei were TUNEL-positive in most (but not all) lenses examined. By E18.5 (data not shown) and E19.5, TUNEL-positive primary fiber cell nuclei were widespread in all of the lens sections examined. In addition, the intensity of the TUNEL labeling was less at E17.5 than at E18.5 (data not shown) and E19.5. Overall, these results confirm the previous findings of He et al. (45) and define the temporal window for primary fiber cell DNA degradation as beginning sometime between E15.5 and E17.5 and being widespread by E19.5.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
In situ detection of DNA degradation using TUNEL assay. 5-µm sections of paraffin-embedded heads from E15.5 (A and D), E17.5 (B and E), and E19.5 (C and F) rat embryos were subjected to fluorescein/TUNEL assay and counterstained with propidium iodide. Representative sections are shown. Fluorescein imaging (A–C) shows TUNEL-positive nuclei in lenses. Texas Red imaging (D–F) shows the propidium iodide staining of all nuclei in the same sections. Magnification x100. Cn, cornea; L, lens; R, retina.

 
Temporal Regulation of VEID Cleavage Activity—To determine whether caspase activity is correlated with the onset of nuclear labeling by TUNEL analysis, we tested lens extracts from E15.5–18.5 rat embryos for VEID-AFC, IETD-AFC, and DEVD-AFC cleavage activities. As shown in Fig. 4, at E15.5, weak VEID-AFC was detected (3.36 ± 1.83 fmol µg–1 min–1). At E16.5, the cleavage activity was substantially higher and continued to increase incrementally at E17.5 and E18.5, at which point it had reached 20.61 fmol µg–1 min–1. This level of activity was similar to that found in extracts from neonatal mouse lenses (18.75 fmol µg–1 min–1). Thus, the VEID-AFC cleavage activity increased by 3.7-fold between E15.5 and E16.5 and by 4.5-fold between E15.5 and E17.5, for an overall increase of 6.1-fold between E15.5 and E18.5. The activities measured at E16.5 and E17.5 were more variable than those detected at other time points, both pre- and postnatal. This variability correlates with the wider variability of TUNEL labeling on sections from E17.5 embryos and may reflect the variability in developmental ages of the embryos within a given litter or from liter to litter or the genetic variability between embryos of the outbred Sprague-Dawley strain, which could influence the exact timing of organelle loss. E18.5 mouse lens extracts were also tested for VEID-AFC cleavage activity, and the rate correlated closely with the rate determined for later stage rat embryos (data not shown). These data indicate that VEID-AFC cleavage activity is temporally regulated in a manner that correlates with DNA degradation in primary fiber nuclei.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC cleavage activities as a function of developmental age. Lens extracts (45 µg) generated from E15.5, E16.5, E17.5, and E18.5 rat embryos were tested for activity against 30 µM VEID-AFC ({blacksquare}) or IETD-AFC ({diamondsuit}) peptide. The corresponding CHO inhibitor was used at 500 nM, and lactacystin was used at 100 µM. The cleavage activities (expressed in fmol µg–1 min–1) represent the difference in the rate of fluorescence generated by the cleavage of the reporter peptide in the absence of the corresponding CHO inhibitor and the rate of fluorescence generated by the cleavage activity in the presence of the corresponding CHO inhibitor. The average activity ± S.D. from two independent experiments is shown. The values obtained for VEID-AFC cleavage activity at E17.5 (p = 0.05) and E18.5 (p = 0.01) are significantly different from the value obtained for VEID-AFC cleavage activity at E15.5. There was no statistically significant difference between the values obtained for IETD-AFC cleavage activity at E16.5 (p = 0.51), E17.5 (p = 0.26), and E18.5 (p = 0.34) and the value obtained at E15.5.

 
The IETD-AFC cleavage activity was much lower and highly variable. Although there appeared to be a small increase in activity, the increase was not statistically significant. This very low cleavage activity could represent suboptimal cleavage of the IETD-AFC reporter by the enzyme that cleaves VEID-AFC. Therefore, the inhibitory activities of the DEVD-CHO and VEID-CHO peptides on cleavage activities in lens extracts from rat and mouse embryos were compared in tests analogous to those described for caspase-6 and caspase-8 (Fig. 2). The results from these tests suggest that a single enzyme could account for most of the activity (data not shown).

Curiously, no DEVD-AFC cleavage activity was detected in any of the extracts from rat or mouse embryos. Caspase-3 activity has been associated with activation of DNases and degradation of nuclei in apoptotic cells (46, 47). To determine whether a DEVD-AFC activity might be associated with the organelles that were removed during preparation of the extracts, we tested the pellets generated during the extract preparation for DEVD-AFC and VEID-AFC activities. No DEVD-AFC activity was detected; however, a low level of VEID-AFC cleavage activity was detected (data not shown). This activity may represent an enzyme activity that is associated with the organelles, a residual enzyme activity resulting from the incomplete removal of the supernatant from the pelleted fractions, or a combination of both.

Temporal Regulation of Caspase-6 Protein Levels—VEID is the preferred consensus cleavage sequence for caspase-6 (31, 48). To determine whether the increase in the VEID-AFC activity correlates with changes in caspase-6 protein levels, extracts from rat embryos were subjected to Western blot analysis with an anti-caspase-6 antibody that can recognize procaspase-6 (Fig. 5A). Procaspase-6, the inactive precursor form of the enzyme, was detected at E15.5–18.5. Changes in the levels of procaspase-6 during this developmental window were assessed by comparing the levels with those of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Fig. 5A) and {beta}-actin (data not shown). Between E15.5 and E18.5, procaspase-6 levels decreased by 5.9-fold (i.e. the levels at E18.5 were 17% of those at E15.5). This decrease correlated with the 6.1-fold increase in VEID-AFC cleavage activity (Fig. 4) detected over the same time frame. Furthermore, the -fold decreases in procaspase-6 levels from E15.5 to E16.5 (3.1-fold) and from E15.5 to E17.5 (5.4-fold) correlated with the -fold increases in VEID-AFC cleavage activity from E15.5 to E16.5 (3.7-fold) and from E15.5 to E17.5 (4.5-fold). A second antibody, anti-Mch2 antibody, which recognizes full-length caspase-6 and the alternatively spliced {beta}-isoform (49) of the protein, detected both of these isoforms in extracts from neonatal FVB mice (data not shown). These results demonstrate that multiple isoforms of caspase-6 are expressed in lenses and that a decrease in procaspase-6 levels (Fig. 5) during the developmental window tested is inversely correlated with the increase in VEID-AFC cleavage activity (Fig. 4). In contrast, consistent with our failure to detect DEVD-AFC cleavage activity, Western blot analysis of extracts from E15.5–17.5 rat embryos using an antibody specific for the cleaved activated form of caspase-3 failed to detect cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 5B). Two other anti-caspase-3 antibodies also failed to detect cleaved caspase-3 in these extracts (data not shown). Together, these results suggest that caspase-6 may be responsible for the VEID-AFC cleavage activity detected in lenses.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
Western blot analysis of caspase-6 and caspase-3 in lens extracts from rat embryos. A, caspase-6. Lens extracts (300 µg) from E15.5 (lane 1), E16.5 (lane 2), E17.5 (lane 3), and E18.5 (lane 4) rat embryos; control apoptotic Jurkat cells (lane 5); recombinant caspase-6 (lane 6); and control non-apoptotic Jurkat cells (lane 7) were probed with an anti-caspase-6 antibody by Western blot analysis. The blot was then stripped and reprobed with an anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) antibody as a control. The levels of procaspase-6 were quantified with the StormTM 860 system and Image-Quant using glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase levels as the internal standard. The levels of procaspase-6 at all time points were compared with the levels at E15.5. The relative level (ratio) of procaspase-6 at E15.5 compared with that at each time point is indicated. B, caspase-3. Lens extracts (300 µg) from E15.5 (lane 1), E16.5 (lane 2), and E17.5 (lane 3) rat embryos; 0.8 ng of recombinant human caspase-3 (lane 4); extract from control non-apoptotic Jurkat cells (lane 5); and extract from control apoptotic Jurkat cells (lane 6) were probed with an antibody that specifically recognizes the cleaved form of caspase-3. The arrow indicates the 17-kDa fragment of activated caspase-3.

 
Caspase Activities in Apoptotic Lenses—Lens fiber cell denucleation has often been characterized as an apoptosis-like event (3). However, the caspase activities found in extracts from normal murine lenses (Figs. 1C, 2B, and 4) are atypical of a classical apoptotic profile because caspase-3-like DEVD-AFC cleavage was not detected. To determine whether the lens is restricted in its potential to VEID-AFC caspase activities, we examined the caspase profile in lenses that had been induced to undergo classical apoptosis.

We previously characterized transgenic mice that express the human papilloma virus type 16 E7 gene within the lens, referred to as {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice (13, 14). Expression of E7 results in dysregulation of cell cycle control and concomitant apoptosis of lens fiber cells. We used lenses from neonatal {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice as a source of apoptotic lens cells. Extracts prepared from the lenses of these mice were screened at low stringency for activity against the panel of caspase reporter peptides listed in Fig. 1A. Positive peptides were then subjected to retesting at high stringency. Fig. 6A shows that lens extracts from neonatal {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice contained a high level of cleavage activity for DEVD-AFC (38.16 ± 3.47 fmol µg–1 min–1), the preferred reporter peptide for caspase-3. Consistent with this result, we detected activated caspase-3 protein in extracts from neonatal {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice by Western blot analysis (Fig. 6B), suggesting that this enzyme is responsible for the DEVD-AFC cleavage activity in these lenses. As seen in rat lenses (Fig. 5B), activated caspase-3 was not detected in lens extracts from neonatal FVB non-transgenic mice (Fig. 6B). In lens extracts from {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice, the cleavage rate for VEID-AFC was 21.84 ± 1.64 fmol µg–1 min–1, which was slightly higher than that seen in extracts from neonatal FVB non-transgenic mice. The inhibitory activities of DEVD-CHO and VEID-CHO against reporter peptide cleavage by the extracts from the {alpha}AE7 mice were compared in tests analogous to those described for caspase-6 and caspase-8 (Fig. 2). These tests showed that the enzyme responsible for cleavage of the DEVD-AFC peptide (i.e. caspase-3) in the {alpha}AE7 lens extract contributed partially (but not fully) to the cleavage of the VEID-AFC peptide (data not shown). Low and highly variable cleavage activity of IETD-AFC was also observed. Thus, our results are consistent with both activated caspase-3 and activated caspase-6 being present in extracts of lens cells undergoing apoptosis.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.
DEVD cleavage activity and activated caspase-3 protein in extracts from apoptotic lenses of {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice. A, peptidyl cleavage activities in lens extracts from control and apoptotic {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice. 14 µg of lens extract from neonatal {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice was tested for cleavage of 30 µM DEVD-AFC, VEID-AFC, or IETD-AFC. The corresponding CHO inhibitors were used at 500 nM, and lactacystin was used at 100 µM. The cleavage activities (expressed in fmol µg–1 min–1) represent the difference in the rate of fluorescence generated by the cleavage of the reporter peptide in the absence of the corresponding CHO inhibitor and the rate of fluorescence generated by the cleavage activity in the presence of the corresponding CHO inhibitor. The average activity ± S.D. from three independent experiments is shown. The four groups are significantly different from each other (p < 0.0001). B, Western blot analysis of cleaved (activated) caspase-3 protein in lens extracts from {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice. 300 µgof lens extract from {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice (lane 1), 450 µg of lens extract from control FVB mice (lane 2), and 0.8 ng of recombinant human caspase-3 (lane 3) were probed for activated caspase-3. The arrow indicates the 17-kDa fragment of cleaved activated caspase-3.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Multiple lines of evidence suggest that caspases might be involved in the elimination of organelles from lens fiber cells in vertebrates (3). In this study, we determined whether caspase activities are present in normal murine lens tissue and if these activities correlate with organelle loss. We showed that a VEID-AFC activity predominates in normal lenses (Fig. 1C). This activity most likely arises from caspase-6 given that VEID is the preferred peptide for caspase-6 and given the observed decrease in the levels of full-length procaspase-6 that was temporally and inversely proportional to the increase in VEID-AFC cleavage activity (compare Figs. 4 and 5A). In addition, the lens VEID-AFC activity resembles caspase-6 in its sensitivity to VEID-CHO and IETD-CHO inhibition. However, lens organelle loss does not appear to be affected in mice carrying a null mutation of caspase-6.3 The absence of a phenotype in caspase-6-null mice may be due to compensation for the loss of caspase-6 by other caspases, influences of the genetic background of the mutant mice that modify the effect of loss of caspase-6 function, or the presence and activity of a previously unidentified caspase-6-like protein in murine lenses. Our data suggest that the IETD-AFC cleavage activity is due mainly to the same enzyme that cleaves VEID-AFC (Fig. 2 and data not shown). However, it is possible that a minor part of the IETD-AFC cleavage activity is due to caspase-8 given the divergence of VEID-AFC and IETD-AFC cleavage rates seen at later embryonic time points (Fig. 4) compared with earlier time points.

Previous work has suggested that organelle loss occurs over a period of as long as 3 days, beginning with a rapid loss of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum over ~2–4 h and ending with a protracted process of nuclear loss that occurs over 2–3 days (20, 21). Using the strong TUNEL staining in rat primary fibers as a marker for the DNA fragmentation occurring during denucleation (Fig. 3), this time window appears to encompass E16.5–19.5. We detected a sharp rise in VEID-AFC cleavage activity on E16.5 (Fig. 4). That the VEID-AFC cleavage activity rises 2–3 days before widespread extensive DNA degradation suggests that this caspase activity may play a role not only in DNA degradation, but also in earlier aspects of organelle loss. Alternatively, these data may suggest that the caspase activity is involved only in denucleation, but that denucleation is a lengthy and highly regulated process.

Surprisingly, we detected neither DEVD-AFC cleavage activity (Fig. 1B) nor activated caspase-3 protein (Figs. 5B and 6B) in normal lenses despite the fact that both were readily detected in apoptotic lenses of {alpha}AE7 transgenic mice (Fig. 6). Consistent with our observations, recent studies suggest that caspase-3 activity is not associated with epidermal differentiation (50, 51), a process that is also characterized by organelle loss. However, because it may be possible that caspase-3 is rapidly turned over in cells, we cannot rule out the possibility that activated caspase-3 is present at levels below our detection limits. Even if this were the case, the biological significance of an undetectable caspase-3 activity is unclear, given that targeted deletion of caspase-3 in mice does not affect lens development despite causing developmental defects in other tissues (52).

Two previous studies examining the possibility that caspases are involved in fiber cell differentiation led to the conclusion that caspase-3 is involved in fiber cell denucleation, a conclusion that differs from ours. Ishizaki et al. (18) reported that the pan-caspase inhibitor benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD-fmk inhibits loss of nuclei and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage in rat lens explant cultures. The inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage by benzyloxycarbonyl-VAD-fmk led them to conclude that caspase-3 or a caspase-3-like caspase may be involved in the loss of nuclei. Wride et al. (19) reported that multiple activated caspase family members, including caspase-3, are present at the protein level in the developing chick lens. They also reported that multiple caspase inhibitor peptides, but significantly, not the caspase-3 inhibitor DEVD-CHO, reduce the loss of nuclei in a chick lens cell culture differentiation assay. Given that these two studies did not measure caspase activities directly, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase can be cleaved by multiple caspases (53, 54), and DEVD-CHO did not inhibit chick lens cell differentiation in culture, it is unclear whether caspase-3 activity accounts for the inhibition of denucleation these authors observed. Interestingly, Wride et al. found that the most effective caspase inhibitor in their system was VEID-fmk, a result that is consistent with our findings and that supports our conclusion that a caspase-6 or caspase-6-like enzyme is required for denucleation.

We have shown that the caspase activity in normal lenses is regulated in a temporal fashion that correlates with denucleation, suggesting that this activity promotes the DNA degradation during lens fiber cell differentiation (Fig. 4). How this proteolytic activity might promote DNA degradation is not known. In apoptosis, caspase-3 has been shown to target ICAD (inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase; DNA fragmentation factor) and thus promote internucleosomal fragmentation (55). Although it has been documented that cleavage of DNA into internucleosomal-length fragments occurs during fiber cell differentiation in chicks (11), the DNA in differentiating mouse and rat lens fibers appears to be more random in size (13, 14). Thus, the primary mechanism of DNA fragmentation in the murine lens may not be internucleosomal cleavage. In support of a non-ICAD-related mechanism, we found no caspase-3 activity in normal lenses, and targeted deletions of caspase-3 or ICAD in mice do not lead to lens phenotypes (52, 56). Caspase-6 might promote the activation of a DNase, other than CAD (caspase-activated DNase), within the lens. Nishimoto et al. (57) recently reported that targeted deletion of the DLAD (DNase II-like acidic) gene results in denucleation defects in the mouse lens. Unlike that seen with CAD, hydrolysis of DNA by DLAD results in 3'-phosphates. Why 3'-OH groups are detected by TUNEL on DNA within degenerating lens nuclei is unclear, but might be the result of phosphatase activity secondary to DLAD-dependent DNA hydrolysis. Alternatively, caspase-6 might promote DNA degradation via an indirect mechanism. Bassnett and Mataic (20) have shown that DNA degradation in chick lenses is a relatively late event, occurring after nuclear envelope breakdown. A caspase-6-mediated breakdown of the nuclear envelope could facilitate access of a DNase that is activated via a non-caspase mechanism.

The profile of caspase activities in normal lenses differs from that seen in the classically apoptotic situation within the same tissue. These differences underscore the fact that organelle loss and apoptosis are distinct processes and suggest that a cell can use an apoptotic enzyme(s) for more than one purpose. How lens cells might accomplish the differential regulation of caspase activities is an interesting question. Kamradt et al. (58) have demonstrated that {alpha}B-crystallin, a major protein species in lens fiber cells, can bind to partially processed but inactive caspase-3 and block its maturation to a fully active enzyme. These findings provide a plausible explanation for the ability of lens cells during normal fiber cell differentiation to contain an activated caspase capable of VEID-AFC cleavage activity and, at the same time, prevent activation of caspase-3. How procaspase-3 is activated in lens cells when apoptosis is induced remains to be elucidated.

The role of caspases in initiating and effecting the events of apoptosis has been well established. Their function in dismantling cells, along with their combination of strictly circumscribed targets and tight regulation, makes them ideal candidates for effecting the more limited destruction of organelles that occurs during differentiation of tissues such as the lens, epidermis, and mammalian erythrocytes. We have demonstrated that a small subset of caspase activities exists within the lens and that these activities can exist without cross-activating caspase activities found in a typical apoptotic response. This suggests that the disassembling role of caspases can be parceled out into discrete packages, i.e. that activities can be controlled in such a way that some structures are eliminated while others remain intact. Indeed, intact actin filaments within the lens attest to the ability of the lens to protect some cellular structures that are known caspase targets during apoptosis (59). If caspase-6 is involved in organelle loss, it must have a relatively limited range of potential substrates within the lens. Further evaluation of the potential role of caspases in the organelle loss and determination of the mechanisms by which caspase activity is regulated are important areas for future study.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants EY09091 and HD1007477. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Anatomy, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1300 University Ave., Madison, WI 53706. Tel.: 608-262-8988; Fax: 608-262-7306; E-mail: aegriep{at}wisc.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: AFC, 7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin; RT, reverse transcription; E, embryonic day; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; AMC, 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin; CHO, aldehyde; fmk, fluoromethyl ketone; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP digoxygenin nick end labeling. Back

2 Primer sequences are available on request. Back

3 S. Bassnett, personal communication. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank B. J. Wagner for suggesting that the proteasome may affect caspase assays; P. Friesen and Y. Li for help with caspase assays; S. Bassnett for sharing unpublished data; C. M. Stolen, R. Dahn, R. K. Hyde, and P. F. Lambert for comments on the manuscript; A. Frassetto and S. Potter for technical assistance; R. Nickells for the bcl-x plasmid; S. Austin-Phillips and T. Ziegelhoffer for use of the Tecan Flurostar plate reader; J. Warren for rat embryos; R. Dirks for E12.5 whole embryo 5'-RACE products; and M. Nguyen, R. K. Hyde, T. Wood, L. James, R. Norman, and B. Weisblum for help throughout.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Jacobson, M. D., Weil, M., and Raff, M. (1997) Cell 88, 347–354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Los, M., Wesselborg, S., and Schulze-Osthoff, K. (1999) Immunity 10, 629–639[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Dahm, R. (1999) Ophthalmic Res. 31, 163–183[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Polakowska, R., Piacentini, M., Bartlett, R., Goldsmith, L., and Haake, A. (1994) Dev. Dyn. 199, 176–188[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Morioka, K., Tone, S., Mukaida, M., and Takano-Ohmuro, H. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 240, 206–217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Earnshaw, W., Martins, L., and Kaufmann, S. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 383–424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Nicholson, D., and Thornberry, N. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 8, 299–306
  8. Piatigorsky, J. (1981) Differentiation 19, 134–153[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Kuszak, J. (1995) Int. Rev. Cytol. 163, 305–350[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Vrensen, G. F., Graw, J., and De, W. A. (1991) Exp. Eye Res. 52, 647–659[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Appleby, D. W., and Modak, S. P. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5579–5583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Gao, C. Y., Bassnett, S., and Zelenka, P. S. (1995) Dev. Biol. 169, 185–194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Pan, H., and Griep, A. E. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 1285–1299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Pan, H., and Griep, A. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 2157–2169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fromm, L., Shawlot, W., Gunning, K., Butel, J., and Overbeek, P. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6743–6754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Griep, A., and Westphal, H. (1990) New Biol. 2, 727–738[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Fromm, L., and Overbeek, P. (1997) Dev. Genet. 20, 276–287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ishizaki, Y., Jacobson, M., and Raff, M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 153–158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wride, M., Parker, E., and Sanders, E. (1999) Dev. Biol. 13, 142–156
  20. Bassnett, S., and Mataic, D. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 37–49[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bassnett, S. (2002) Exp. Eye Res. 74, 1–6[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  23. Liu, X., Kim, C. N., Yang, J., Jemmerson, R., and Wang, X. (1996) Cell 86, 147–157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Stolen, C. M., Jackson, M., and Griep, A. E. (1997) Development (Camb.) 124, 4009–4017[Abstract]
  25. Andersson, M., Sjostrand, J., Peterson, A., Honarvar, A., and Karlsson, J.-O. (2000) Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 2623–2632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Jordan, J., Kociok, N., Grisanti, S., Jacobi, P., Esser, J., Luther, T., Krieglstein, G., and Esser, P. (2001) Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 239, 613–618[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Nishi, O., Nishi, K., Wada, K., Ohmoto, Y., and Akura, J. (2001) Curr. Eye Res. 23, 192–198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Tamada, Y., Fukiage, C., Nakamura, Y., Azuma, M., Kim, Y. H., and Shearer, T. R. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 275, 300–306[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Yoshizawa, K., Oishi, Y., Nambu, H., Yamamoto, D., Yang, J., Senzaki, H., Miki, H., and Tsubura, A. (2000) Toxicol. Pathol. 28, 555–564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yao, K., Wang, K., Xu, W., Sun, Z., Shentu, X., and Qiu, P. (2003) Chin. Med. J. (Engl. Ed.) 116, 1034–1038
  31. Thornberry, N., Rano, T., Peterson, E., Rasper, D., Timkey, T., Garcia-Calvo, M., Houtzager, V., Nordstrom, P., Roy, S., Vaillancourt, J., Chapman, K., and Nicholson, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17907–17911[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Thornberry, N. A., Bull, H. G., Calaycay, J. R., Chapman, K. T., Howard, A. D., Kostura, M. J., Miller, D. K., Molineaux, S. M., Weidner, J. R., Aunins, J., Elliston, K. O., Ayala, J. M., Casano, F. J., Chin, J., Ding, G. J.-F., Egger, L. A., Gaffney, E. P., Limjuco, G., Palyha, O. C., Raju, S. M., Rolando, A. M., Salley, J. P., Yamin, T.-T., Lee, T. D., Shively, J. E., MacCross, M., Mumford, R. A., Schmidt, J. A., and Tocci, M. J. (1992) Nature 356, 768–774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Garcia-Calvo, M., Peterson, E., Leiting, B., Ruel, R., Nicholson, D., and Thornberry, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32608–32613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kobayashi, T., Shinozaki, A., Momoi, T., Arahata, K., and Tsukahara, T. (1996) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 120, 699–704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kisselev, A. F., Akopian, T. N., Castillo, V., and Goldberg, A. L. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 395–402[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Orlowski, M. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 10289–10297[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Wagner, B., Margolis, J., Garland, D., and Roseman, J. (1986) Exp. Eye Res. 43, 1141–1143[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Shang, F., Gong, X., McAvoy, J., Chamberlain, C., Nowell, T., and Taylor, A. (1999) Exp. Eye Res. 68, 179–192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Andersson, M., Sjostrand, J., and Karlsson, J.-O. (1998) Exp. Eye Res. 67, 231–236[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Fenteany, G., and Schreiber, S. L. (1996) Chem. Biol. 3, 905–912[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Dick, L. R., Cruikshank, A. A., Grenier, L., Melandri, F. D., Nunes, S. L., and Stein, R. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7273–7276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Meng, L., Mohan, R., Kwok, B., Elofsson, M., Sin, N., and Crews, C. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 10403–10408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. McAvoy, J. (1978) J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 45, 271–281[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Kuwabara, T., and Imaizumi, M. (1974) Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 13, 973–981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. He, H. Y., Gao, C., Vrensen, G., and Zelenka, P. (1998) Dev. Dyn. 211, 26–34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Enari, M., Sakahira, H., Yokoyama, H., Okawa, K., Iwamatsu, A., and Nagata, S. (1998) Nature 391, 43–50[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Woo, M., Hakem, R., Soengas, M. S., Duncan, G. S., Shahinian, A., Kagi, D., Hakem, A., McCurrach, M., Khoo, W., Kaufman, S. A., Senaldi, G., Howard, T., Lowe, S. W., and Mak, T. W. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 806–819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Takahashi, A., Alnemri, E., Lazebnik, Y., Fernandez-Alnemri, T., Litwack, G., Moir, D., Goldman, R., Poirier, G., Kaufmann, S., and Earnshaw, W. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8395–8400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Fernandes-Alnemri, T., Litwack, G., and Alnemri, E. S. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2737–2742[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Lippens, S., Kockx, M., Knaapen, M., Mortier, L., Polakowska, R., Verheyen, A., Garmyn, M., Zwijsen, A., Formstecher, P., Huylebroeck, D., Vandenabeele, P., and Declercq, W. (2000) Cell Death Differ. 12, 1218–1224
  51. Rendl, M., Ban, J., Mrass, P., Mayer, C., Lengauer, B., Eckjart, L., Declercq, W., and Tschachler, E. (2002) J. Investig. Dermatol. 119, 1150–1155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Nicholson, D., Ali, A., Thornberry, N. A., Vaillancourt, J. P., Ding, C. K., Gallant, M., Gareau, Y., Griffin, P. R., Labelle, M., Lazebnik, Y. A., Munday, N. A., Raju, S. M., Smulson, M. E., Yamin, T.-T., Yu, V. L., and Miller, D. (1995) Nature 376, 37–43[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Germain, M., Affar, E. B., D'Amours, D., Dixit, V. M., Salvesen, G. S., and Poirier, G. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28379–28384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Slee, E., Adrian, C., and Martin, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 7320–7326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Liu, X., Zou, H., Slaughter, C., and Wang, X. (1997) Cell 89, 175–184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Zhang, J., Lee, H., Lou, D., Bovin, G., and Xu, M. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 274, 225–229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Nishimoto, S., Kawane, K., Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., Fukuyama, H., Ohsawa, Y., Uchiyama, Y., Hashida, N., Ohguro, N., Tano, Y., Morimoto, T., Fukuda, Y., and Nagata, S. (2003) Nature 424, 1071–1074[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Kamradt, M., Chen, F., and Cryns, V. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16059–16063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Bassnett, S., Missey, H., and Vucemilo, I. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 2155–2165[Abstract]
  60. Promega Corp. (2003) CaspACETM Assay System, Fluorometric, Technical Bulletin No. 248, Promega Corp., Madison, WI

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
A. De Maria and S. Bassnett
DNase II Distribution and Activity in the Mouse Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5638 - 5646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
K. Wang, C. Cheng, L. Li, H. Liu, Q. Huang, C.-h. Xia, K. Yao, P. Sun, J. Horwitz, and X. Gong
{gamma}D-Crystallin Associated Protein Aggregation and Lens Fiber Cell Denucleation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 3719 - 3728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
A. J. Zandy and S. Bassnett
Proteolytic Mechanisms Underlying Mitochondrial Degradation in the Ocular Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 293 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Exp BotHome page
M. Boren, A.-S. Hoglund, P. Bozhkov, and C. Jansson
Developmental regulation of a VEIDase caspase-like proteolytic activity in barley caryopsis
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2006; 57(14): 3747 - 3753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
G. F. Weber and A. S. Menko
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is necessary for lens fiber cell differentiation and survival.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4490 - 4499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
V. Morozov and E. F. Wawrousek
Caspase-dependent secondary lens fiber cell disintegration in {alpha}A-/{alpha}B-crystallin double-knockout mice
Development, March 1, 2006; 133(5): 813 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Zandy, S. Lakhani, T. Zheng, R. A. Flavell, and S. Bassnett
Role of the Executioner Caspases during Lens Development
J. Biol. Chem., August 26, 2005; 280(34): 30263 - 30272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. F. Weber and A. S. Menko
The Canonical Intrinsic Mitochondrial Death Pathway Has a Non-apoptotic Role in Signaling Lens Cell Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., June 10, 2005; 280(23): 22135 - 22145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GENES CELLSHome page
K. Sakamaki, C. Takagi, K. Kominami, S.-i. Sakata, Y. Yaoita, H. Y. Kubota, M. Nozaki, S. Yonehara, and N. Ueno
The adaptor molecule FADD from Xenopus laevis demonstrates evolutionary conservation of its pro-apoptotic activity
Genes Cells, December 1, 2004; 9(12): 1249 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/31/32142    most recent
M313683200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foley, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Griep, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foley, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Griep, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement