Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M403058200 on June 9, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 33, 34411-34420, August 13, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/33/34411    most recent
M403058200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kersten, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kersten, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Direct Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor Target Fasting-induced Adipose Factor (FIAF/PGAR/ANGPTL4) Is Present in Blood Plasma as a Truncated Protein That Is Increased by Fenofibrate Treatment*

Stéphane Mandard{ddagger}, Fokko Zandbergen{ddagger}, Nguan Soon Tan§, Pascal Escher¶, David Patsouris{ddagger}, Wolfgang Koenig||, Robert Kleemann**, Arjen Bakker{ddagger}{ddagger}, Frank Veenman{ddagger}, Walter Wahli§, Michael Müller{ddagger}, and Sander Kersten{ddagger}§§

From the {ddagger}Nutrition, Metabolism and Genomics Group, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands, §Center for Integrative Genomics, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland, Institute of Physiology, Pharmazentrum, University of Basel, Basel CH-4056, Switzerland, the ||Department of Internal Medicine II-Cardiology, University of Ulm, Ulm D-89081, Germany, **Gaubius Laboratory, TNO-Prevention and Health, Leiden 2301 CE, The Netherlands, and the {ddagger}{ddagger}Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands

Received for publication, March 19, 2004 , and in revised form, June 8, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The fasting-induced adipose factor (FIAF, ANGPTL4, PGAR, HFARP) was previously identified as a novel adipocytokine that was up-regulated by fasting, by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, and by hypoxia. To further characterize FIAF, we studied regulation of FIAF mRNA and protein in liver and adipose cell lines as well as in human and mouse plasma. Expression of FIAF mRNA was up-regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha} (PPAR{alpha}) and PPAR{beta}/{delta} agonists in rat and human hepatoma cell lines and by PPAR{gamma} and PPAR{beta}/{delta} agonists in mouse and human adipocytes. Transactivation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and gel shift experiments identified a functional PPAR response element within intron 3 of the FIAF gene. At the protein level, in human and mouse blood plasma, FIAF was found to be present both as the native protein and in a truncated form. Differentiation of mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes was associated with the production of truncated FIAF, whereas in human white adipose tissue and SGBS adipocytes, only native FIAF could be detected. Interestingly, truncated FIAF was produced by human liver. Treatment with fenofibrate, a potent PPAR{alpha} agonist, markedly increased plasma levels of truncated FIAF, but not native FIAF, in humans. Levels of both truncated and native FIAF showed marked interindividual variation but were not associated with body mass index and were not influenced by prolonged semistarvation. Together, these data suggest that FIAF, similar to other adipocytokines such as adiponectin, may partially exert its function via a truncated form.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Obesity, defined as excess body fat, is associated with numerous secondary ailments, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance, and is therefore an important health concern. As the prevalence of obesity is rising, there is an increasing interest in understanding the metabolic behavior of adipose tissue.

Since the discovery of leptin in 1994 (1), it has become clear that fat tissue not merely serves to store excess energy but also has an important endocrine function (2). Over the past few years, several factors secreted by white adipose tissue (WAT),1 aptly named adipocytokines, have been identified and characterized, including resistin (also known as FIZZ 3 or ADSF (for adipocyte secreted factor)) (35), adiponectin (also known as adipoQ or ACRP30 (for adipocyte complement-related protein 30)) (68), acylation-stimulating protein (C3ades-Arg) (9), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (10), renin angiotensin system (11), metallothioneins (12), and the inflammatory cytokines interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, and tumor growth factor-{beta} (13, 14). They have been implicated in a variety of different processes, ranging from blood pressure control to lipid metabolism and insulin sensitizing. Consequently, it has been tempting to attribute many of the clinical abnormalities associated with obesity, including insulin resistance, to altered secretion of particular adipocytokines.

Recently, we and others identified a new gene encoding the secreted fasting-induced adipose factor (FIAF), also known as PGAR (for PPAR{gamma} angiopoietin-related protein), ANGPTL4 (for angiopoietin-like protein 4), or HFARP (for hepatic fibrinogen/angiopoietin-related protein) (1517). Several nonexclusive functions for FIAF have so far been proposed. Expression of FIAF is dramatically up-regulated during hypoxia in both endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes (18, 19), leading to the suggestion that FIAF may be involved in angiogenesis, in analogy with two other proteins that carry an angiopoietin/fibrinogen-like domain, angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2. Subsequently, it was found that FIAF is able to induce a strong proangiogenic response in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay (19). FIAF has also been proposed to act as an apoptosis survival factor in vascular endothelial cells (16).

The closest relative of FIAF is angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3). KK/Snk mice, a mutant strain of KK obese mice, carry a mutation in the gene for ANGPTL3, resulting in low plasma triglyceride and free fatty acid levels (20). The low plasma triglyceride levels are possibly due to elevated lipoprotein lipase activity, which was reported to be inhibited by ANGPTL3 in vitro, whereas the low plasma free fatty acid levels may be connected to the impaired stimulatory effect of ANGPTL3 on adipose tissue lipolysis (21, 22). Similar to ANGPTL3, there is evidence that FIAF also may inhibit lipoprotein lipase activity and hereby influence plasma levels of triglycerides (18, 23), thus connecting FIAF to lipid metabolism.

Expression of FIAF in liver and WAT was originally found to be up-regulated by the nuclear hormone receptors PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} (15, 17, 23). PPARs are ligand-activated transcription factors that mediate the effects of fibrates (PPAR{alpha}) or thiazolidinediones (PPAR{gamma}) on DNA transcription (24, 25). PPAR{alpha} is mainly expressed in brown adipose tissue and liver and plays an important role in the hepatic fatty acid oxidation, whereas PPAR{gamma} is the master regulator of adipogenesis. However, it is still unclear whether FIAF is a direct PPAR target gene, with a functional PPAR response element in its promoter.

In order to close in on the potential function of FIAF, we studied the regulation of FIAF mRNA and protein expression in vitro and in human blood plasma. Our main conclusions are that FIAF is a classical PPAR target gene in both humans and rodents and that FIAF protein is mainly present in blood plasma in a truncated form, whose levels show a large interindividual variability. Plasma levels of the truncated form of FIAF are increased by treatment with fenofibrate.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals—Wy14643 was obtained from ChemSyn Laboratories. Rosiglitazone was from Alexis. Recombinant human insulin (Actrapid) was from Novo Nordisk. SYBR Green was from Eurogentec. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, fetal calf serum, calf serum, and penicillin/streptomycin/fungizone were from BioWhittaker Europe (Cambrex Bioscience). Otherwise, chemicals were from Sigma.

Primary Human Adipocyte Differentiation—Isolation of stromal vascular cells was done as follows. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissues were obtained during gastric restriction surgery. Adipose tissue was collected in phosphate-buffered saline and cut into 3 x 3-mm pieces with scissors. The 3 x 3-mm pieces were further processed with a scalpel. Next, the pieces of adipose tissue were digested in DMEM-high glucose containing 4% bovine serum albumin and 2 mg/ml collagenase. 1–2.5 g of adipose tissue was digested in 5 ml of this solution at 37 °C on a shaking platform for 2 h. Next, the digest was transferred to a 5-ml syringe and gently pressed over a 500-µm sterile pore size disposable nylon mesh. Stromal vascular cells were separated from adipose cells by centrifugation (1 min, 170 g). Adipose cells were removed, and the stromal vascular cells were precipitated by centrifugation (5 min, 350 g). Red blood cells were lysed by resuspending the cell pellet in 10 ml of red cell lysis solution (154 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA). After 5 min, stromal vascular cells were spun down (5 min, 350 g) and resuspended in DMEM/F-12 containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and further referred to as complete medium. Approximately 107 cells were plated in a 75-cm2 flask. After 48 h, the medium was replaced by differentiation medium consisting of complete medium (instead of 10% FCS, 2% FCS was used) plus 15 mM NaHCO3, 15 mM HEPES, 33 µM biotin, 17 µM panthothenate, 200 pM T3, 1 µM dexamethasone, 500 nM insulin, 4 µg/ml transferrin, and 10 µM cPGI2. After an average period of 30 days of differentiation, extraction of total RNA was performed.

SGBS Cell Line Culture and Induction of Adipogenesis—The culture of the SGBS cells and their induction into mature human adipocytes were performed exactly as previously published (26).

3T3-L1 Adipogenesis Assay—3T3-L1 fibroblasts were amplified in DMEM plus 10% calf serum and plated for final differentiation in DMEM plus 10% FCS. Two days after reaching confluence (which was day 0), the medium was changed, and the following compounds were added: isobutyl methylxanthine (0.5 mM), dexamethasone (1 µM), and insulin (5 µg/ml). On day 3, the medium was changed to DMEM plus 10% FCS and insulin (5 µg/ml). On day 6, the medium was changed to DMEM plus 10% FCS, which was changed every 3 days.

Isolation of Total RNA and RT-PCR—Total RNA was extracted from cells or tissue with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the supplier's protocol. 3–5 µg of total RNA was treated with DNase I amplification grade (Invitrogen) and then reverse-transcribed with oligo(dT) using Superscript II RT RNase H (Invitrogen).

Real Time Quantitative PCR—Primers were designed to generate a PCR amplification product of 100–200 bp. Only primer pairs yielding unique amplification products without primer dimer formation were subsequently used for real time quantitative PCR assays. The following primer pairs were used: mFIAF (forward), 5'-GTTTGCAGACTCAGCTCAAGC-3'; mFIAF (reverse), 5'-CCAAGAGGTCTATCTGGCTCTG-3'; hFIAF (forward), 5'-CGTACCCTTCTCCACTTGGG-3'; hFIAF (reverse), 5'-GCTCTTGGCGCAGTTCTTG-3'; m{beta}-Actin (forward), 5'-CTGACTGACTACCTCATGAAGATCCT-3'; m{beta}-Actin (reverse), 5'-CTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTCC-3'; h{beta}-Actin (forward), 5'-CTTCCTGGGCATGGAGTC-3'; h{beta}-Actin (reverse), 5'-GCCAGGGTACATGGTGGT-3'; rPPAR{alpha} (forward), 5'-CACCCTCTCTCCAGCTTCCA-3'; rPPAR{alpha} (reverse), 5'-GCCTTGTCCCCACATATTCG-3'; rPPAR{beta} (forward), 5'-AACGAGATCAGCGTGCATGTG-3'; rPPAR{beta} (reverse), 5'-TGAGGAAGAGGCTGCTGAAGTT-3'; rPPAR{gamma} (forward), 5'-ATGGAGCCTAAGTTTGAGTTTGCT-3'; rPPAR{gamma} (reverse), 5'-GGATGTCCTCGATGGGCTTCA-3'; hPPAR{alpha} (forward), 5'-CTGGAAGCTTTGGCTTTACG-3'; hPPAR{alpha} (reverse), 5'-TGTCCCCGCAGATTCTACAT-3'; hPPAR{beta} (forward), 5'-ACAGCATGCACTTCCTTCCA-3'; hPPAR{beta} (reverse), 5'-TCACATGCATGAACACCGTA-3'; hPPAR{gamma} (forward), 5'-GAGCCCAAGTTTGAGTTTGC-3'; hPPAR{gamma} (reverse), 5'-CAGGGCTTGTAGCAGGTTGT-3'.

PCR was carried out using Platinum Taq polymerase (Invitrogen) and SYBR Green on an iCycler PCR machine (Bio-Rad). Expression was related to actin, which did not change under any of the experimental conditions studied.

Transactivation Assay—A 350-nucleotide fragment surrounding the putative PPRE within intron 3 of the human or mouse FIAF gene was PCR-amplified from human or mouse genomic DNA (mouse strain C57/B6) and subcloned into the KpnI and BglII sites of pTAL-SEAP (Clontech). This reporter vector was transfected into human hepatoma HepG2 cells together with an expression vector for PPAR (mPPAR{alpha}, mPPAR{beta}/{delta}, or mPPAR{gamma} in pSG5) in the presence or absence of Wy14643 (50 µM), L165041 (5 µM), or rosiglitazone (5 µM), respectively. Transfections were carried out by calcium phosphate precipitation. A {beta}-galactosidase reporter was co-transfected to normalize for differences in transfection efficiency. Secreted alkaline phosphatase activity was measured in the medium 48 h post-transfection via the chemiluminescent SEAP reporter assay (Roche Applied Science). {beta}-Galactosidase activity was measured in the cell lysate by standard assay using 2-nitrophenyl-{beta}-D-galactopyranoside as a substrate.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)—Pure-bred wild-type or PPAR{alpha} null mice on a sv129 background were used. Mice were fed by gavage with either Wy14643 (50 mg/kg/day) or vehicle (0.5% carboxymethylcellulose) for 5 days. Alternatively, mice were fasted or not for 24 h. After the indicated treatment, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The liver was rapidly perfused with prewarmed (37 °C) phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min followed by 0.2% collagenase for 10 min. The liver was diced and forced through a stainless steel sieve, and the hepatocytes were collected directly into DMEM containing 1% formaldehyde. After incubation at 37 °C for 15 min, the hepatocytes were pelleted, and ChIP was done using mouse PPAR{alpha}-specific antibodies as previously described (27). Sequences of primers used for PCR were 5'-TCTGGGTCTGCCCCCACTCCTGG-3' (forward) and 5'-GTGTGTGTGTGGGATACGGCTAT-3' (reverse). Control primers used were 5'-AGTAACTTTGACAGGAACCAGGGGTC-3' (forward) and 5'-TTTGGACTGGGAACTTAGCTTAGTTG-3' (reverse).

3T3-L1 cells were differentiated as described above. After cell lysis and sonication, the supernatant was diluted 20-fold in re-chIP dilution buffer (1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, 50 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X) prior to incubation with mouse PPAR{gamma} antibody. The remainder of the assay was carried out as described previously (27).

Gel Shift—hRXR{alpha} and hPPAR{alpha} proteins were generated from pSG5 expression vectors using the TNT coupled in vitro transcription/translation system (Promega). The following oligonucleotides were annealed: hFIAF-PPRE, 5'-TCGGGGAAAGTAGGGGAAAGGTCGTGG-3' and 5'-CTGGGCCAGCGACCTTTCCCCTACTTTCCC-3'; mFIAF-PPRE, 5'-TCGGGGAAAGTAGGAGAAAGGTCACTGG-3' and 5'-CTGGCCAGTGACCTTTCTCCTACTTTCCC-3'; for specific competition malic enzyme PPRE, 5'-TCGCTTTCTGGGTCAAAGTTGATCCA-3' and 5'-CTGGTGGATCAACTTTGACCCAGAAAG-3'; for nonspecific competition ETS, 5'-TGGAATGTACCGGAAATAACACCA-3' and 5'-TGGTGTTATTTCCGGTACATTCCA-3'. Oligonucleotides were annealed and labeled by Klenow filling (Roche Applied Science) using Redivue [{alpha}-32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) (Amersham Biosciences). In vitro translated proteins (0.5–0.8 µl/reaction) were preincubated for 15 min on ice in 1x binding buffer (80 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 10% glycerol plus protease inhibitors) in presence of 2 µg of poly(dI·dC), 5 µg of sonicated salmon sperm DNA, and competitor oligonucleotides in a final volume of 20 µl. Then 1 ng (1 ng/µl) of radiolabeled oligonucleotide was added, and incubation proceeded for another 10 min at room temperature. Complexes were separated on a 4% polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/bisacrylamide, 37.5:1) equilibrated in 0.5x TBE at 25 mA.

Western Blot—The mouse polyclonal antibody used was directed against the epitope CQGPKGKDAPFKDSE located in the N-terminal part of the mouse FIAF protein. The human polyclonal antibody used was directed against the epitope CQGTEGSTDLPLAPE also located in the N-terminal part of the human FIAF protein. The peptide affinity-purified antibodies were generated in rabbit and ordered via Eurogentec's customized antibody production service. Western blotting was carried out using an ECL system (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:1000 (mouse) or between 1:2000 and 1:5000 (human), and the secondary antibody (anti-rabbit IgG, Sigma) was used at a dilution of 1:8000. All incubations were performed in 1x Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.5, with 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% dry milk, except for the final washings, when milk was omitted.

Human Subjects—In experiment 1, blood was taken from 16 young adults after an overnight fast. In experiment 2, blood was taken after an overnight fast from 28 subjects before and after a 4-week treatment with 250 mg of micronized fenofibrate daily. In experiment 3, blood was taken after an overnight fast from 20 men (body mass index ranging 22.7 to 39.8). Samples were from a published study (28). In experiment 4, blood was taken after an overnight fast from 22 subjects before and after a 46-day semistarvation program (2.1 MJ/day). Samples were from a published study (29). All human experiments were approved by the medical ethics committee of Wageningen University, Maastricht University, or the University of Ulm.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
FIAF Expression Is Regulated by All Three PPARs—Previous studies have indicated that expression of FIAF/PGAR/ANGPTL4 is up-regulated by PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} in mice. Several genes are known that are targets of PPAR{alpha} in mice but not in humans (30, 31). To investigate whether expression of FIAF is under control of PPAR{alpha} in other species, rat hepatoma FAO cells were treated with the PPAR{alpha} agonist Wy14643 (Fig. 1A). According to real time quantitative PCR, FAO cells express relatively high levels of PPAR{alpha} as well as PPAR{beta}/{delta}, whereas PPAR{gamma} mRNA was below our detection limit (Fig. 1B). Basal expression of FIAF in FAO cells was extremely low but was dramatically increased by Wy14643, either alone or in combination with the RXR agonist Lg100268 (Fig. 1A). The synthetic PPAR{beta}/{delta} agonist L165041 also strongly increased FIAF mRNA, suggesting that PPAR{beta}/{delta} stimulates FIAF gene expression too. Finally, the PPAR{gamma} agonist ciglitazone had little effect on rat FIAF gene expression, which may be explained by the low expression of PPAR{gamma} mRNA in these cells.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{beta} agonists induce FIAF gene expression in both rat hepatoma FAO and human hepatoma HepG2 cell lines. A, FAO cells were treated for 24 h with different agonists selective for each PPAR isotype, Wy14643 (5 µM, PPAR{alpha}), L165041 (7.5 µM, PPAR{beta}), and ciglitazone (25 µM, PPAR{gamma}). The synthetic RXR agonist Lg100268 (5 µM) was used in combination with the different PPAR agonists. Expression was determined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. B, relative expression of PPARs in FAO cells as determined by quantitative RT-PCR. C, HepG2 cells were treated for 48 h with PPAR or RXR agonists at the same concentrations as for FAO cells except for Wy14643 (50 µM). Data shown are representative results from three independent experiments in three different batches of HepG2 cells. D, relative expression of PPARs in HepG2 cells.

 
To examine whether the human FIAF gene is also up-regulated by PPARs, human hepatoma HepG2 cells were treated with PPAR agonists (Fig. 1C). HepG2 cells express all three PPARs, with PPAR{beta}/{delta} being the most abundant (Fig. 1D). Similar to what was observed in FAO cells, although with much more modest -fold inductions, FIAF mRNA was increased by Wy14643 and Lg100268, either alone or used in combination (Fig. 1C). The PPAR{beta}/{delta} agonist L165041 also induced FIAF mRNA, but no additional effect of Lg100268 was observed. In contrast to PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{beta}/{delta} agonists, the PPAR{gamma} agonist ciglitazone reduced FIAF expression, which was maintained in the presence of Lg100268. Taken together, these results indicate that FIAF is up-regulated by PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{beta}/{delta}, but probably not by PPAR{gamma}, in human and rat hepatoma cells.

To better examine regulation of human FIAF expression by PPAR{gamma}, we turned to primary human preadipocytes. Upon stimulation with a mixture of hormones, these cells can be differentiated into adipocytes. Stromal vascular cells from both subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue were isolated and induced to differentiate into adipocytes. Expression of FIAF was higher in adipocytes versus preadipocytes in all three subjects with cells from both subcutaneous and visceral origin (Fig. 2A). A similar induction of expression was observed for PPAR{gamma}, suggesting that FIAF is up-regulated by PPAR{gamma} during human adipocyte differentiation. In differentiated human SGBS adipocytes, both rosiglitazone and L165041 caused an induction of FIAF mRNA (Fig. 2, B and C, respectively), indicating that both PPAR{gamma} and PPAR{beta}/{delta} regulate FIAF expression in human adipocytes. Together, these data suggest that FIAF is a PPAR{gamma} and possibly a PPAR{beta}/{delta} target gene in human adipocytes.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
FIAF is a probable PPAR{gamma} target in human adipocytes. Stromal vascular cells were isolated from subcutaneous (solid line) and visceral (dotted line) adipose tissue from three subjects and put into culture. Cells were differentiated into adipocytes by incubation with adipogenic medium. Expression is expressed relative to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Human SGBS differentiated adipocytes (day 13) were treated for 40 h with different concentrations of rosiglitazone (B) or L165041 (C). Concentrations are indicated in µM. FIAF gene expression was determined by quantitative RT-PCR.

 
FIAF Is a Direct Target Gene of PPAR—To unequivocally determine FIAF as a direct target gene of PPARs, direct binding of PPAR to the FIAF promoter needs to be demonstrated. Comparative analysis of the hFIAF and mFIAF gene sequence upstream of the transcription start site did not reveal any conserved stretches of DNA that might harbor a PPRE. Transactivation studies with several kilobases of the immediate upstream sequence from both the mouse and human FIAF gene did not yield any significant activation of a reporter gene, suggesting that the responsive element may be located elsewhere. While scanning the FIAF gene sequence for PPREs, a putative PPRE was identified in a conserved region of intron 3 of the human and mouse FIAF gene (AGG(G/A)GAAAGGTC(G/A)) that differed little from the consensus PPRE (Fig. 3A). To determine whether this PPRE binds PPAR in vitro, gel shift experiments were carried out with in vitro translated/transcribed PPAR{alpha} and RXR{alpha}. For both the human and mouse PPRE, a retarded complex was only observed in the presence of both PPAR{alpha} and RXR{alpha} (Fig. 3B), indicating that this complex represents a PPAR{alpha}/RXR{alpha} heterodimer. The complex disappeared in the presence of an excess of cold specific oligonucleotide but not nonspecific oligonucleotide. Similar results were observed for PPAR{gamma} (data not shown). These data indicate that PPAR is able to bind to the human and mouse PPRE within intron 3 in vitro.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
FIAF up-regulation by PPAR{alpha} is mediated by a PPRE present in intron 3. A, alignment of the PPRE present in intron 3 of the human and mouse FIAF gene with known PPREs. Cons., consensus. B, binding of the PPAR/RXR heterodimer to putative PPRE as determined by gel shift. A double-stranded response element containing the human (left) or mouse (right) FIAF PPRE was incubated with in vitro transcribed/translated hPPAR{alpha} and hRXR{alpha}, and binding complexes were resolved on a 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. -Fold excess of specific (malic enzyme PPRE) or nonspecific (ETS oligonucleotide) cold probe is indicated. C, HepG2 cells were transfected with a SEAP reporter vector containing a 350-nucleotide fragment of intron 3 of the human (left) or mouse (right) FIAF gene and a PPAR expression vector. SEAP activity was determined in the medium 24–48 h post-transfection.

 
To assess whether the PPRE within intron 3 is able to mediate PPAR-dependent transactivation, a 350-nucleotide fragment surrounding the human or mouse PPRE was cloned in front of the thymidine kinase promoter followed by a SEAP reporter. In HepG2 cells, co-transfection of the reporter vector with a PPAR{alpha}, PPAR{beta}/{delta}, or PPAR{gamma} expression vector increased SEAP activity, which was further enhanced by the addition of ligand (Fig. 3C). In this assay, PPAR{alpha} seemed to be the most potent activator, followed by PPAR{beta}/{delta} and PPAR{gamma}. These data suggest that the PPRE identified in intron 3 of the FIAF gene is able to mediate PPAR-dependent transactivation.

Finally, to find out whether PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} are bound to this sequence in vivo, ChIP was performed using antibodies against PPAR{alpha} or PPAR{gamma}. In human HepG2 cells, binding of PPAR{alpha} to the sequence spanning the putative PPRE within intron 3 was enhanced by Wy14643 (Fig. 4A). No immunoprecipitation was observed with preimmune serum, and no amplification was observed for a control sequence. In mice, treatment with Wy14643 enhanced binding of PPAR{alpha} to the PPRE sequence in liver, which was not observed in PPAR{alpha} null mice (Fig. 4B). Similarly, fasting enhanced binding of PPAR{alpha} to the PPRE sequence, which was not observed in the PPAR{alpha} null mice (Fig. 4C). With respect to PPAR{gamma}, previous data had shown that FIAF is up-regulated during mouse 3T3-L1 adipogenesis (17), indicating that it may be a direct PPAR{gamma} target gene. Using ChIP, we observed binding of PPAR{gamma} to the PPRE sequence in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes but not in preadipocytes (Fig. 4D). These data clearly demonstrate that PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} bind to the intronic sequence harboring the PPRE in vivo. Thus, FIAF can be formally classified as a direct PPAR target gene in human and mouse.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} bind to the PPRE within intron 3 of the FIAF gene in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of PPRE within intron 3 of the FIAF gene using antibodies against PPAR{alpha} or PPAR{gamma}. The gene sequence spanning the putative PPRE and a random control sequence were analyzed by PCR in the immunoprecipitated chromatin of HepG2 cells treated with Wy14643 (A), livers of wild-type and PPAR{alpha} null mice treated or not with WY14643 (B), livers of fed or fasted wild-type and PPAR{alpha} null mice (C), or 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and adipocytes (D). Preimmune serum was used as a control. PI, preimmune serum; Cntl, random control sequence; Veh, vehicle; WT, wild type; KO, knock-out.

 
FIAF Protein Is Processed during Mouse Adipocyte Differentiation—The increased level of FIAF mRNA in primary differentiated adipocytes versus preadipocytes, regardless of the fat depot, indicates that FIAF is up-regulated during human adipocyte differentiation. Indeed, it was observed that FIAF mRNA increases during human SGBS adipocyte differentiation, displaying a dramatic up-regulation during early differentiation that diminished during prolonged differentiation (Fig. 5A). According to Western blot using an antibody that recognizes human FIAF (Fig. 5B), the mRNA expression profile of FIAF was mirrored at the protein level, with some delay (Fig. 5C). In the Western blot, a single band at the expected molecular mass (~45 kDa) was observed.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
FIAF protein is processed during 3T3-L1 but not SGBS adipogenesis. A, hFIAF mRNA expression during human SGBS adipogenesis as assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. B, Western blot of medium of HEK293 cells transfected with empty pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1 expressing human FIAF using an anti-hFIAF antibody. C, hFIAF protein expression during SGBS adipogenesis as assessed by Western blot using anti-hFIAF antibody. 10 µg of protein (supernatant 16,000 x g) was loaded per lane. NC, nonconfluent. D, mFIAF mRNA expression during mouse 3T3-L1 adipogenesis as assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. Inset, effect of IBMX on mFIAF expression in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Confluent 3T3-L1 cells were treated for 3 days with IBMX (0.5 mM). E, mFIAF protein expression during 3T3-L1 adipogenesis as assessed by Western blot using anti-mFIAF antibody. 40 µg of protein (supernatant 16,000 x g) was loaded per lane.

 
In accordance with previous studies by Yoon et al. (17), an increase in FIAF mRNA during prolonged mouse 3T3-L1 adipogenesis was observed (Fig. 5D). However, we also observed that FIAF expression transiently peaks at day 3 of differentiation, reaching a level exceeding that of fully differentiated adipocytes. This effect could be attributed to IBMX, since incubation of confluent 3T3-L1 cells with only IBMX, which does not induce adipocyte differentiation, markedly increased FIAF mRNA (Fig. 5D, inset). IBMX is removed from the medium from day 3 onwards, explaining the precipitous drop in FIAF mRNA at day 4.

Whereas FIAF protein directly followed FIAF mRNA expression during human adipocyte differentiation (Fig. 5, A and C), a remarkable protein expression pattern was observed for mouse adipocyte differentiation (Fig. 5, D and E). In parallel with FIAF mRNA, with a delay of 1 day, native FIAF protein rose during early differentiation and peaked at day 4, 1 day after the maximal FIAF mRNA level. Thereafter, its level decreased (Fig. 5E). Interestingly, in the same immunoblot, an additional band with a molecular mass of about 32 kDa appeared at day 4 and further increased at days 6 and 10. Thus, the upper band, representing native FIAF, follows FIAF mRNA during early differentiation, whereas the lower band follows FIAF mRNA during prolonged adipocyte differentiation, suggesting it is derived from FIAF. We hypothesized that this band represents a truncated form of FIAF, which is observed in mouse but not human adipocytes.

If this is correct, it would be expected that the abundance of truncated FIAF would mirror the FIAF mRNA expression data in 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with synthetic PPAR and RXR agonists. Indeed, induction of FIAF mRNA by the RXR agonist Lg100268 and by rosiglitazone in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes was associated with an increased abundance of the lower molecular weight band (Fig. 6, A and B). Similarly, in livers of mice treated with Wy14643, which results in up-regulation of FIAF mRNA (Fig. 6C), the abundance of the lower molecular weight band was increased in parallel, providing compelling evidence that this band represents a truncated form of FIAF. Hereon, this form of FIAF is referred to as FIAF-S1 (for FIAF small form 1).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
The truncated form of FIAF is up-regulated in concert with FIAF mRNA by synthetic RXR/PPAR agonists. mFIAF protein (30 µg of total protein loaded per lane) and mRNA expression in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes (day 10) after treatment for 48 h with 5 µM Lg100268 (A) or rosiglitazone (B) as assessed by Western blot and quantitative RT-PCR are shown. C, mFIAF protein (12 µg of total protein loaded per lane) and mRNA in liver of mice fed WY14643 (0.1%) for 5 days. D, Western blot of mouse plasma using anti-mFIAF antibody in the absence or presence of the peptide epitope. E, presence of truncated mFIAF variants in mouse white adipose tissue, blood plasma, and mouse liver. The position of native mFIAF is shown by transfection of pcDNA3 expressing mFIAF into HEK293 cells. Medium was collected, precipitated using trichloroacetic acid, and prepared for SDS-PAGE.

 
Because FIAF was initially found to be a protein secreted into the blood plasma, we set out to determine whether the same was true for FIAF-S1. Interestingly, besides native FIAF and FIAF-S1, another immunoreactive form of slightly higher molecular weight (about 2–3 kDa) was also detected, which we named FIAF-S2 and which was by far the most abundant (Fig. 6D). Preincubation of the mouse FIAF antibody with its peptide epitope completely abolished all three forms. Notice that in Fig. 6E native FIAF is barely visible because the blot was exposed for less time. It is not inconceivable that FIAF-S2 might represent a phosphorylated or glycosylated form of FIAF-S1. Both FIAF-S1 and FIAF-S2 were well detected in mouse WAT, whereas only native FIAF and FIAF-S1 were detected in mouse liver (Fig. 6E). Together, these data suggest that FIAF is present in truncated forms in mouse blood plasma.

FIAF-S1 and FIAF-S2 Are Present in Human Blood Plasma—To establish that FIAF is also present in truncated forms in human plasma, Western blot was carried out on human blood plasma using an anti-hFIAF antibody. Almost copying the picture of mouse blood plasma, in human plasma both native human FIAF protein at 50 kDa but also two bands of lower molecular weight were observed, probably corresponding to FIAF-S1 and FIAF-S2 (Fig. 7A). Incubation with the peptide epitope caused the complete disappearance of all bands. The molecular weight of the putative FIAF-S1 and FIAF-S2 in human was lower than that of the same species in mice. Omission of dithiothreitol in the SDS-sample buffer led to the appearance of a very high molecular weight immunoreactive complex, suggesting that FIAF forms oligomers or possibly a high molecular weight complex involving other plasma proteins (Fig. 7B). Omission of dithiothreitol also slightly increased the mobility of native FIAF and FIAF-S2. Levels of putative FIAF-S2 after an overnight fast were very reproducible within subjects (not shown) but extremely variable between subjects (Fig. 7C). Levels of native FIAF also differed markedly between subjects but to a somewhat lesser extent. Together, these data indicate that FIAF is circulating in blood in several forms of different sizes at different concentrations.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.
Plasma levels of hFIAF-S2 are increased by fenofibrate treatment. A, Western blot of human blood plasma with anti-hFIAF antibody in the absence and presence of peptide epitope. B, Western blot of human blood plasma with anti-hFIAF antibody, in the presence and absence of dithiothreitol (DTT). The time of exposure was less in B versus A, which explains why FIAF-S1 is not visible. C, interindividual variation in plasma levels of native hFIAF and hFIAF-S2, as determined by Western blot. The part of the blot showing native hFIAF was exposed for a longer time. D, effects of fenofibrate treatment on plasma levels of native hFIAF and hFIAF-S2, as determined by Western blot. Four representative subjects are shown. The part of the blot showing native hFIAF was exposed for a longer time. E, quantitation of the effect of fenofibrate on plasma FIAF-S2 levels in 28 subjects.

 
Levels of FIAF-S2 in Human Blood Plasma Are Increased by Fenofibrate—Our data indicate that human FIAF mRNA is up-regulated by PPAR{alpha} agonists in human hepatoma cells. If the lower molecular weight band in the immunoblot blot of human plasma indeed represents truncated FIAF protein, its level would be expected to increase after treatment with PPAR{alpha} agonists. To find out whether this is true, plasma levels of putative FIAF-S2 were assessed by Western blot in 28 subjects before and after treatment with fenofibrate, a potent PPAR{alpha} agonist (Fig. 7, D and E). In 24 of the 28 subjects, levels of FIAF-S2 rose after fenofibrate treatment, whereas four individuals showed a decrease or no change. The mean increase was 84.5% ± 20.1 (S.E.) (paired Student's t test, p < 0.0001). Levels of native FIAF did not respond or only slightly responded to fenofibrate treatment. These data suggest that FIAF is mainly present in human blood plasma in a truncated form (FIAF-S2), whose level is increased by fenofibrate treatment.

Fenofibrate, which primarily acts on liver, influences plasma levels of FIAF-S2 but not native FIAF. At the same time, human SGBS adipocytes only produce native FIAF. This raises the possibility that human liver mainly produces FIAF-S2, whereas human WAT mainly synthesizes native FIAF. In agreement with this notion, we only detect FIAF-S2 in human liver, and native FIAF in human WAT (Fig. 8A).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.
Native FIAF and FIAF-S2 are produced by adipose tissue and liver, respectively, yet plasma levels are not influenced by semistarvation or associated with body mass index. A, presence of native hFIAF and hFIAF-S2 in human liver, plasma, and white adipose tissue samples according to Western blot using anti-hFIAF antibody. B, plasma levels of native hFIAF and hFIAF-S2 before and after 46 days of semistarvation, as determined by Western blot. Four representative subjects are shown. The part of the blot showing native hFIAF was exposed for a longer time. Association between plasma levels of native hFIAF (C) or hFIAF-S2 (D) and body mass index.

 
Despite WAT possibly being the main contributor to native FIAF in plasma, plasma levels of native FIAF did not respond significantly in a group of 22 subjects undergoing a 46-day semistarvation program (2.1 MJ/day), although they lost an average of 12 kg (Fig. 8B, representative results of four subjects). The same was true for FIAF-S2. Also, no association was observed between body mass index and plasma levels of native FIAF or FIAF-S2 in a group of individuals with varying body mass index (22.7–39.8) (Fig. 8, C and D).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the past decade, it has become clear that adipose tissue not merely serves to store energy but also has an important endocrine function, secreting an array of proteins that include leptin, resistin, adiponectin/ACRP30/adipoQ, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}. These so called adipokines or adipocytokines are involved in numerous processes and have been particularly studied as potential mediators of the link between obesity and obesity-related metabolic abnormalities, with special emphasis on insulin resistance (2).

An adipocytokine that received a lot of publicity lately is adiponectin. A special property of adiponectin is that it is cleaved to generate a smaller product called globular adiponectin, which is probably the physiologically active form (32). According to our data, FIAF may also become proteolytically processed to generate a protein of 20–35 kDa, the exact size of which depends on the species and probably on glycosylation. Alternatively, FIAF-S could be generated through alternative splicing of FIAF mRNA, by differential initiation start sites, or by some unknown mechanisms. However, neither RT-PCR experiments using different primers, Northern blots, nor RNase protection provided any evidence of the generation of an additional mRNA. This suggests that FIAF-S1 and FIAF-S2 are generated by proteolytic processing. Considering that native FIAF is glycosylated, FIAF-S1 and FIAF-S2 may represent different glycosylated forms (15, 16). Our data also indicate that human liver mainly synthesizes FIAF-S2, whereas human WAT seems to produce native FIAF exclusively. This suggests that FIAF-S2 and native FIAF in plasma may originate from different tissues. This is supported by the observation that fenofibrate, which mainly acts on liver, increases plasma levels of FIAF-S2 but not native FIAF. In mice, the contribution of various tissues to plasma FIAF is less transparent.

Proteolytic processing of prohormone precursor proteins is a common theme in endocrinology. Numerous protein and peptide hormones, including insulin, glucagon, and adipocytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and adiponectin, are proteolytically cleaved to generate the smaller functional form of the protein. The most common processing recognition site in prohormones consists of a doublet of basic amino acids (33), which is recognized by subtilisin-like proprotein convertases, although other types of motifs are also possible. Carboxypeptidase E is responsible for the removal of carboxyl-terminal basic residues exposed by the endoproteases (34). Interestingly, in the primary structure of FIAF, two conserved adjacent arginines could be identified, which might represent proteolytic recognition sites. Digestion around this site (Arg229 and Arg230 in hFIAF) would be compatible with the size of fragments FIAF-S1 and FIAF-S2. Recently, it was found that expression of the proprotein convertases PACE4, PC7, and furin increases during 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation, when processing of native FIAF to FIAF-S1 becomes apparent (35). Consequently, it is conceivable that these enzymes participate in the processing of FIAF in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

Besides being proteolytically processed, adiponectin also forms higher order oligomers, which may have a different functional activity than monomeric adiponectin. Resistin has been shown to self-associate as well (36, 37), which again may influence functional activity. According to our data, FIAF may also be present in human blood plasma as higher order oligomers, although the exact composition of the observed higher molecular weight complex(es) remains to be determined. Similar to adiponectin and resistin, oligomerization of FIAF may influence functional activity.

Very recently, Ono et al. reported that ANGPTL3 is cleaved in vivo, and, similar to our observations for FIAF (or ANGPTL4), is present in mouse blood plasma in several forms of around 30 kDa (38). Interestingly, it was found that the resulting N-terminal fragment is probably responsible for the plasma triglyceride-raising effect of ANGPTL3. Furthermore, while our manuscript was in preparation, data were published showing that recombinant FIAF protein is truncated and forms oligomers in HEK293 cells and in vivo (39). No data were provided on endogenous FIAF, in contrast to the present paper. Although details about the site of truncation seem to be different between the two papers, together they suggest that proteolytic processing, and perhaps oligomerization, may be important for FIAF function. Thus, proteolytic processing may be common among members of this protein family and may serve to regulate functional activity.

Previous studies have indicated that, at least in mouse, FIAF mRNA is most highly expressed in white adipose tissue (15). According to our data, human WAT mainly produces native FIAF. The lack of a significant association between body mass index and plasma levels of native FIAF and the absence of an effect of prolonged weight loss on native FIAF suggest that either the size of WAT has little impact on the total amount of native FIAF released from WAT into blood plasma or that adipose tissue may not be the primary source for native FIAF in human plasma.

Experiments in mice have shown that both hepatic and adipose expression of FIAF are elevated by fasting (15). With respect to FIAF in plasma, levels of native FIAF were found to be elevated after fasting (15), whereas levels of FIAF-S2 or FIAF-S1 did not seem to be affected.2 Preliminary data indicate that the fasting-induced up-regulation of FIAF mRNA in adipose tissue may not be observed in mice of the FVB strain. With regard to humans, it is unclear whether fasting causes up-regulation of FIAF mRNA in liver and WAT. Levels of FIAF in plasma do not appear to be influenced by short term fasting (data not shown) or long term semistarvation. Thus, the term fasting-induced adipose factor may not aptly describe the behavior of FIAF in several species.

Previously, we and others have demonstrated that in mice FIAF is up-regulated by both PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} (15, 17). Here it is shown that this regulation also occurs in humans, in contrast to many other PPAR{alpha} target genes. Furthermore, besides PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma}, PPAR{beta} is similarly able to induce FIAF expression in hepatocytes and adipocytes. It is also shown that up-regulation of FIAF expression by PPARs is, at least partly, mediated by a PPRE present in intron 3. Via chromatin immunoprecipitation on livers of fasted and fed or Wy14643-treated mice, direct in vivo binding of PPAR{alpha} to intron 3 was demonstrated, which was enhanced by fasting and by Wy14643. Furthermore, binding of PPAR{alpha} to the same sequence was enhanced by Wy14643 in human HepG2 cells. Finally, binding of PPAR{gamma} to the sequence could be demonstrated in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes but not preadipocytes. Thus, FIAF can be added to the list of direct PPAR target genes. Although the presence of a functional PPRE within an intron is remarkable, it is not completely uncommon. Indeed, recently the presence of a functional PPRE within intron 3 of the rat peroxisomal thiolase B gene was demonstrated (40).

Plasma levels of FIAF-S2 are increased by fenofibrate treatment. Inasmuch as there is evidence that FIAF is involved in lipid metabolism, it can be speculated that the effects of synthetic PPAR{alpha} agonists on plasma lipid levels may be partially mediated via changes in FIAF expression. Further studies are necessary to ascertain the potential of FIAF as a target for treatment of various forms of dyslipidemia.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, with additional support by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Art and Sciences, the Dutch Diabetes Foundation, the Wageningen Center for Food Sciences, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Human Frontier Science Program. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Nutrition, Metabolism and Genomics Group, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, P. O. Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands. Tel.: 31-317-48-57-87; Fax: 31-317-48-33-42; E-mail: sander.kersten{at}wur.nl.

1 The abbreviations used are: WAT, white adipose tissue; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SEAP, secreted alkaline phosphatase; FIAF, fasting-induced adipose factor; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; PPRE, PPAR response element; RT, reverse transcriptase; IBMX, isobutylmethylxanthine. Back

2 S. Mandard, F. Zandbergen, and S. Kersten, unpublished data. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Mark Leibowitz (Ligand Pharmaceuticals) for the kind gift of Lg100268, Marco Alves for the synthesis of L165041, Dr. M. Wabitsch for the gift of the SGBS cell line, Dr. Folkert Kuipers for the gift of a human liver sample, and Dr. Wim Saris and Monica Mars for providing human blood plasma samples for this study.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Zhang, Y., Proenca, R., Maffei, M., Barone, M., Leopold, L., and Friedman, J. M. (1994) Nature 372, 425–432[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ahima, R. S., and Flier, J. S. (2000) Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 11, 327–332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Steppan, C. M., Bailey, S. T., Bhat, S., Brown, E. J., Banerjee, R. R., Wright, C. M., Patel, H. R., Ahima, R. S., and Lazar, M. A. (2001) Nature 409, 307–312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Banerjee, R. R., Rangwala, S. M., Shapiro, J. S., Rich, A. S., Rhoades, B., Qi, Y., Wang, J., Rajala, M. W., Pocai, A., Scherer, P. E., Steppan, C. M., Ahima, R. S., Obici, S., Rossetti, L., and Lazar, M. A. (2004) Science 303, 1195–1198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kim, K. H., Lee, K., Moon, Y. S., and Sul, H. S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 11252–11256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hu, E., Liang, P., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10697–10703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Scherer, P. E., Williams, S., Fogliano, M., Baldini, G., and Lodish, H. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26746–26749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Arita, Y., Kihara, S., Ouchi, N., Takahashi, M., Maeda, K., Miyagawa, J., Hotta, K., Shimomura, I., Nakamura, T., Miyaoka, K., Kuriyama, H., Nishida, M., Yamashita, S., Okubo, K., Matsubara, K., Muraguchi, M., Ohmoto, Y., Funahashi, T., and Matsuzawa, Y. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 257, 79–83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Cianflone, K. M., Sniderman, A. D., Walsh, M. J., Vu, H. T., Gagnon, J., and Rodriguez, M. A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 426–430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Samad, F., Yamamoto, K., and Loskutoff, D. J. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 37–46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Frederich, R. C., Jr., Kahn, B. B., Peach, M. J., and Flier, J. S. (1992) Hypertension 19, 339–344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Trayhurn, P., Duncan, J. S., Wood, A. M., and Beattie, J. H. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, R2329–R2335
  13. Wallenius, V., Wallenius, K., Ahren, B., Rudling, M., Carlsten, H., Dickson, S. L., Ohlsson, C., and Jansson, J. O. (2002) Nat. Med. 8, 75–79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Hotamisligil, G. S., Shargill, N. S., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1993) Science 259, 87–91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kersten, S., Mandard, S., Tan, N. S., Escher, P., Metzger, D., Chambon, P., Gonzalez, F. J., Desvergne, B., and Wahli, W. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28488–28493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kim, I., Kim, H. G., Kim, H., Kim, H. H., Park, S. K., Uhm, C. S., Lee, Z. H., and Koh, G. Y. (2000) Biochem. J. 346, 603–610
  17. Yoon, J. C., Chickering, T. W., Rosen, E. D., Dussault, B., Qin, Y., Soukas, A., Friedman, J. M., Holmes, W. E., and Spiegelman, B. M. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 5343–5349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Belanger, A. J., Lu, H., Date, T., Liu, L. X., Vincent, K. A., Akita, G. Y., Cheng, S. H., Gregory, R. J., and Jiang, C. (2002) J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 34, 765–774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Le Jan, S., Amy, C., Cazes, A., Monnot, C., Lamande, N., Favier, J., Philippe, J., Sibony, M., Gasc, J. M., Corvol, P., and Germain, S. (2003) Am. J. Pathol. 162, 1521–1528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Koishi, R., Ando, Y., Ono, M., Shimamura, M., Yasumo, H., Fujiwara, T., Horikoshi, H., and Furukawa, H. (2002) Nat. Genet. 30, 151–157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Shimizugawa, T., Ono, M., Shimamura, M., Yoshida, K., Ando, Y., Koishi, R., Ueda, K., Inaba, T., Minekura, H., Kohama, T., and Furukawa, H. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33742–33748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Shimamura, M., Matsuda, M., Kobayashi, S., Ando, Y., Ono, M., Koishi, R., Furukawa, H., Makishima, M., and Shimomura, I. (2003) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 301, 604–609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Yoshida, K., Shimizugawa, T., Ono, M., and Furukawa, H. (2002) J. Lipid Res. 43, 1770–1772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Desvergne, B., and Wahli, W. (1999) Endocr. Rev. 20, 649–688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mandard, S., Muller, M., and Kersten, S. (2004) Cell Mol. Life Sci. 61, 393–416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Wabitsch, M., Brenner, R. E., Melzner, I., Braun, M., Moller, P., Heinze, E., Debatin, K. M., and Hauner, H. (2001) Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 25, 8–15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Di Poi, N., Tan, N. S., Michalik, L., Wahli, W., and Desvergne, B. (2002) Mol. Cell 10, 721–733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Mars, M., de Graaf, C., van Rossum, C. T., de Groot, C. P., Seidell, J. C., and Kok, F. J. (2003) Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 27, 574–581[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Hukshorn, C. J., Westerterp-Plantenga, M. S., and Saris, W. H. (2003) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77, 771–776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lawrence, J. W., Li, Y., Chen, S., DeLuca, J. G., Berger, J. P., Umbenhauer, D. R., Moller, D. E., and Zhou, G. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 31521–31527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hsu, M. H., Savas, U., Griffin, K. J., and Johnson, E. F. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27950–27958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Fruebis, J., Tsao, T. S., Javorschi, S., Ebbets-Reed, D., Erickson, M. R., Yen, F. T., Bihain, B. E., and Lodish, H. F. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 2005–2010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Harris, R. B. (1989) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 275, 315–333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Steiner, D. F. (1998) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2, 31–39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Croissandeau, G., Basak, A., Seidah, N. G., Chretien, M., and Mbikay, M. (2002) J. Cell Sci. 115, 1203–1211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Banerjee, R. R., and Lazar, M. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 25970–25973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Chen, J., Wang, L., Boeg, Y. S., Xia, B., and Wang, J. (2002) J. Endocrinol. 175, 499–504[Abstract]
  38. Ono, M., Shimizugawa, T., Shimamura, M., Yoshida, K., Noji-Sakikawa, C., Ando, Y., Koishi, R., and Furukawa, H. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41804–41809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ge, H., Yang, G., Huang, L., Motola, D. L., Pourbahrami, T., and Li, C. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 2038–2045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hansmannel, F., Clemencet, M. C., Jossic-Corcos, C., Osumi, T., Latruffe, N., and Nicolas-Frances, V. (2003) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 311, 149–155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Kersten, L. Lichtenstein, E. Steenbergen, K. Mudde, H. F.J. Hendriks, M. K. Hesselink, P. Schrauwen, and M. Muller
Caloric Restriction and Exercise Increase Plasma ANGPTL4 Levels in Humans via Elevated Free Fatty Acids
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2009; 29(6): 969 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M.-h. Yau, Y. Wang, K. S. L. Lam, J. Zhang, D. Wu, and A. Xu
A Highly Conserved Motif within the NH2-terminal Coiled-coil Domain of Angiopoietin-like Protein 4 Confers Its Inhibitory Effects on Lipoprotein Lipase by Disrupting the Enzyme Dimerization
J. Biol. Chem., May 1, 2009; 284(18): 11942 - 11952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Wu, L. Wei, Y. Bao, J. Lu, P. Huang, Y. Liu, W. Jia, and K. Xiang
Fenofibrate reduces serum retinol-binding protein-4 by suppressing its expression in adipose tissue
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2009; 296(4): E628 - E634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
C. Chomel, A. Cazes, C. Faye, M. Bignon, E. Gomez, C. Ardidie-Robouant, A. Barret, S. Ricard-Blum, L. Muller, S. Germain, et al.
Interaction of the coiled-coil domain with glycosaminoglycans protects angiopoietin-like 4 from proteolysis and regulates its antiangiogenic activity
FASEB J, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 940 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
H. Staiger, C. Haas, J. Machann, R. Werner, M. Weisser, F. Schick, F. Machicao, N. Stefan, A. Fritsche, and H.-U. Haring
Muscle-Derived Angiopoietin-Like Protein 4 Is Induced by Fatty Acids via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)-{delta} and Is of Metabolic Relevance in Humans
Diabetes, March 1, 2009; 58(3): 579 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. J. Talmud, M. Smart, E. Presswood, J. A. Cooper, V. Nicaud, F. Drenos, J. Palmen, M. G. Marmot, S. M. Boekholdt, N. J. Wareham, et al.
ANGPTL4 E40K and T266M: Effects on Plasma Triglyceride and HDL Levels, Postprandial Responses, and CHD Risk
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2008; 28(12): 2319 - 2325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Rieck, W. Meissner, S. Ries, S. Muller-Brusselbach, and R. Muller
Ligand-Mediated Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR) {beta}/{delta}: A Comparative Analysis of PPAR-Selective Agonists and All-trans Retinoic Acid
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2008; 74(5): 1269 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Gealekman, A. Burkart, M. Chouinard, S. M. Nicoloro, J. Straubhaar, and S. Corvera
Enhanced angiogenesis in obesity and in response to PPAR{gamma} activators through adipocyte VEGF and ANGPTL4 production
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2008; 295(5): E1056 - E1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Y.-H. Yang, Y. Wang, K. S.L. Lam, M.-H. Yau, K. K.Y. Cheng, J. Zhang, W. Zhu, D. Wu, and A. Xu
Suppression of the Raf/MEK/ERK Signaling Cascade and Inhibition of Angiogenesis by the Carboxyl Terminus of Angiopoietin-Like Protein 4
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2008; 28(5): 835 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Are, L. Aronsson, S. Wang, G. Greicius, Y. K. Lee, J.-A. Gustafsson, S. Pettersson, and V. Arulampalam
Enterococcus faecalis from newborn babies regulate endogenous PPAR{gamma} activity and IL-10 levels in colonic epithelial cells
PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 1943 - 1948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
L. Lichtenstein, J. F.P. Berbee, S. J. van Dijk, K. W. van Dijk, A. Bensadoun, I. P. Kema, P. J. Voshol, M. Muller, P. C.N. Rensen, and S. Kersten
Angptl4 Upregulates Cholesterol Synthesis in Liver via Inhibition of LPL- and HL-Dependent Hepatic Cholesterol Uptake
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(11): 2420 - 2427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Degenhardt, M. Matilainen, K.-H. Herzig, T. W. Dunlop, and C. Carlberg
The Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein 1 Gene Is a Primary Target of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., December 22, 2006; 281(51): 39607 - 39619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
L. Michalik, J. Auwerx, J. P. Berger, V. K. Chatterjee, C. K. Glass, F. J. Gonzalez, P. A. Grimaldi, T. Kadowaki, M. A. Lazar, S. O'Rahilly, et al.
International Union of Pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 726 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Cazes, A. Galaup, C. Chomel, M. Bignon, N. Brechot, S. Le Jan, H. Weber, P. Corvol, L. Muller, S. Germain, et al.
Extracellular Matrix-Bound Angiopoietin-Like 4 Inhibits Endothelial Cell Adhesion, Migration, and Sprouting and Alters Actin Cytoskeleton
Circ. Res., November 24, 2006; 99(11): 1207 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Lord, B. D Murphy, J. A Desmarais, S. Ledoux, D. Beaudry, and M.-F. Palin
Modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {delta} and {gamma} transcripts in swine endometrial tissue during early gestation.
Reproduction, May 1, 2006; 131(5): 929 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Patsouris, J. K. Reddy, M. Muller, and S. Kersten
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Mediates the Effects of High-Fat Diet on Hepatic Gene Expression
Endocrinology, March 1, 2006; 147(3): 1508 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Mandard, F. Zandbergen, E. van Straten, W. Wahli, F. Kuipers, M. Muller, and S. Kersten
The Fasting-induced Adipose Factor/Angiopoietin-like Protein 4 Is Physically Associated with Lipoproteins and Governs Plasma Lipid Levels and Adiposity
J. Biol. Chem., January 13, 2006; 281(2): 934 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Koster, Y. B. Chao, M. Mosior, A. Ford, P. A. Gonzalez-DeWhitt, J. E. Hale, D. Li, Y. Qiu, C. C. Fraser, D. D. Yang, et al.
Transgenic Angiopoietin-Like (Angptl)4 Overexpression and Targeted Disruption of Angptl4 and Angptl3: Regulation of Triglyceride Metabolism
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4943 - 4950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. R. Weichselbaum
Bugging the intestinal response to radiation
PNAS, September 20, 2005; 102(38): 13363 - 13364.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. J. Donato and N. Noy
Suppression of Mammary Carcinoma Growth by Retinoic Acid: Proapoptotic Genes Are Targets for Retinoic Acid Receptor and Cellular Retinoic Acid-Binding Protein II Signaling
Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8193 - 8199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. A. Crawford and J. I. Gordon
From The Cover: Microbial regulation of intestinal radiosensitivity
PNAS, September 13, 2005; 102(37): 13254 - 13259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. Ge, J.-Y. Cha, H. Gopal, C. Harp, X. Yu, J. J. Repa, and C. Li
Differential regulation and properties of angiopoietin-like proteins 3 and 4
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1484 - 1490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Genolet, S. Kersten, O. Braissant, S. Mandard, N. S. Tan, P. Bucher, B. Desvergne, L. Michalik, and W. Wahli
Promoter Rearrangements Cause Species-specific Hepatic Regulation of the Glyoxylate Reductase/Hydroxypyruvate Reductase Gene by the Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {alpha}
J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 24143 - 24152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Xu, M. C. Lam, K. W. Chan, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, R. L. C. Hoo, J. Y. Xu, B. Chen, W.-S. Chow, A. W. K. Tso, et al.
Angiopoietin-like protein 4 decreases blood glucose and improves glucose tolerance but induces hyperlipidemia and hepatic steatosis in mice
PNAS, April 26, 2005; 102(17): 6086 - 6091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Yu, S. C. Burgess, H. Ge, K. K. Wong, R. H. Nassem, D. J. Garry, A. D. Sherry, C. R. Malloy, J. P. Berger, and C. Li
Inhibition of cardiac lipoprotein utilization by transgenic overexpression of Angptl4 in the heart
PNAS, February 1, 2005; 102(5): 1767 - 1772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/33/34411    most recent
M403058200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kersten, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandard, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kersten, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement