JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M404747200 on June 15, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 34, 35334-35340, August 20, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/34/35334    most recent
M404747200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horng, Y.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Winge, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Horng, Y.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Winge, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Specific Copper Transfer from the Cox17 Metallochaperone to Both Sco1 and Cox11 in the Assembly of Yeast Cytochrome c Oxidase*

Yih-Chern Horng, Paul A. Cobine, Andrew B. Maxfield{ddagger}, Heather S. Carr{ddagger}, and Dennis R. Winge§

From the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132

Received for publication, April 28, 2004 , and in revised form, June 1, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The assembly of the copper sites in cytochrome c oxidase involves a series of accessory proteins, including Cox11, Cox17, and Sco1. The two mitochondrial inner membrane proteins Cox11 and Sco1 are thought to be copper donors to the CuB and CuA sites of cytochrome oxidase, respectively, whereas Cox17 is believed to be the copper donor to Sco1 within the intermembrane space. In this report we show Cox17 is a specific copper donor to both Sco1 and Cox11. Using in vitro studies with purified proteins, we demonstrate direct copper transfer from CuCox17 to Sco1 or Cox11. The transfer is specific because no transfer occurs to heterologous proteins, including bovine serum albumin and carbonic anhydrase. In addition, a C57Y mutant of Cox17 fails to transfer copper to Sco1 but is competent for copper transfer to Cox11. The in vitro transfer studies were corroborated by a yeast cytoplasm expression system. Soluble domains of Sco1 and Cox11, lacking the mitochondrial targeting sequence and transmembrane domains, were expressed in the yeast cytoplasm. Metallation of these domains was strictly dependent on the co-expression of Cox17. Thus, Cox17 represents a novel copper chaperone that delivers copper to two proteins.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cytochrome c oxidase (CcO)1 is the terminal enzyme of the respiratory chain within the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mammalian CcO consists of 13 polypeptide subunits, 3 of which (Cox1-Cox3) are encoded by the mitochondrial genome with the remaining 10 subunits encoded by the nuclear genome (1, 2). In addition to the subunits, over 30 distinct proteins are important for the assembly of CcO (3). A number of these accessory proteins are important in the processing and translation of COX1-COX3 mRNA transcripts, in chaperoning the assembly process, and in the synthesis or delivery of cofactors. The cofactors in CcO include two copper sites (CuA and CuB), two heme A moieties, and a magnesium and zinc ion (4). The assembly of the two copper sites will be reviewed because that is the focus of the present study. Cox2 requires two copper ions in the binuclear CuA site, and Cox1 requires one copper ion in the CuB site that exists within a Cu-heme A binuclear center. Because both Cox1 and Cox2 are synthesized inside the mitochondria, the three Cu atoms must be imported from the cytoplasm.

Four proteins (Cox11, Cox17, Cox19, and Sco1) have been implicated in copper ion delivery and insertion into CcO (reviewed in Ref. 5). The first protein implicated in copper ion delivery to newly synthesized CcO was Cox17 (6). Yeast harboring a mutant cox17–1 were shown to be deficient in respiratory growth and CcO activity, but these phenotypes were reversed by the addition of 0.4% copper salts to the growth medium (6). Among a collection of yeast respiratory-deficient mutants defective in cytochrome c oxidase activity, only cox17–1 cells were suppressed by exogenous copper, suggesting a role for Cox17 in copper ion metallation of CcO. Sco1 was first implicated in the copper delivery pathway to CcO by the observation that the respiratory-deficient phenotype of a cox17–1 strain was suppressed by overexpression of SCO1 (7). Sco1 is an integral inner membrane (IM) protein that is tethered to the IM by a single transmembrane helix and contains a globular domain, projecting into the intermembrane space (IMS) (8, 9). Null sco1 cells, like cox17{Delta} cells, are respiratory-deficient and have diminished CcO activity. Unlike cox17{Delta} cells, these phenotypes are not reversed in yeast by the addition of exogenous copper. The role of Cox11 in CuB site formation was suggested by the observation that CcO isolated from Rhodobacter sphaeroides cox11{Delta} cells lacked CuB and Mg(II) but contained the other cofactors (10). Yeast lacking Cox11 are devoid of CcO activity (11). Cox11 is also an intrinsic IM protein tethered by a transmembrane helix. A fourth protein, Cox19, is implicated in copper metallation of CcO by virtue of its limited sequence similarity with Cox17 (12). Yeast cells lacking Cox19 are respiratory-deficient, but this phenotype is not reversed by the addition of exogenous copper salts.

The roles of Cox17, Sco1, and Cox11 in copper metallation of CcO were substantiated by the observation that each protein is a Cu(I)-binding protein and that mutations that abrogate in vivo function attenuate Cu(I) binding (11, 1315). Cox17 is a soluble protein that localizes within the IMS and also within the cytoplasm (8). The dual localization of Cox17 suggested that it served as a copper ion shuttle to the mitochondrion. However, we recently demonstrated that Cox17 is fully functional if tethered to the IM by a heterologous transmembrane domain (16).

The pathway of copper ion delivery to CcO has not been resolved. Sco1 was proposed to mediate the transfer of Cu(I) ions from Cox17 to the CuA site in Cox2 (17). The observation that Sco1 and Cox2 interact supports this model (18). Cox17 has not been shown to interact with any of these proteins, so its role as a copper donor to Sco1 and/or Cox11 remains unsubstantiated. Cox19, like Cox17, is a small soluble protein within the IMS, so it may also have a copper transfer function. However, nothing is known of which step in the CcO assembly is affected by Cox19.

Three of the seven cysteine residues in the 69-residue Cox17 are in a CCXC motif that is important for Cu(I) binding (13). Multiple Cu(I) ions bind to Cox17 within a polycuprous-thiolate cluster that stabilizes a mixture of dimers and tetramers (14). A second functional domain in Cox17 lies near the C terminus. The original cox17–1 mutation creates a C57Y substitution that abrogates in vivo function without compromising either Cu(I) binding or oligomerization. Studies with C-terminal domain Cox17 mutants suggest a role in mitochondrial retention, perhaps docking with another molecule (16).

The two IM proteins Sco1 and Cox11 are postulated to be the direct copper donors to Cox2 and Cox1, respectively. Both Sco1 and Cox11 have soluble domains that project into the IMS. Sco1 has a conserved CXXXC sequence motif that together with a conserved His residue forms the Cu(I) binding site (15). The structure of the Bacillus subtilis Sco1 reveals that these two essential Cys residues lie within an exposed {beta}-hairpin loop (19). We predict that the single Cu(I) ion coordinated to Sco1 is solvent-exposed and poised for a ligand exchange transfer reaction. Cox11 coordinates Cu(I) by three cysteinyl residues (11). Mutation of any of these Cys residues reduces Cu(I) binding and abrogates CcO activity.

The postulate that Sco1 and Cox11 mediate copper ion insertion into Cox2 and Cox1, respectively, is consistent with protein-mediated copper metallation of other yeast proteins. Copper insertion into Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase (Sod1) in yeast requires the function of the Ccs1 metallochaperone (20, 21). Ccc2, a P-type ATPase copper ion transporter, receives copper ions from the Atx1 metallochaperone (2224). With both Sod1 and Ccc2, copper transfer occurs via ligand exchange reactions in protein-protein complexes of the target protein and its specific metallochaperone. Thus, the prediction is that putative copper transfer from Sco1 to Cox2 and Cox11 to Cox1 is mediated through protein-protein interactions. Likewise, copper ion metallation of Sco1 and Cox11 is expected to occur in protein-mediated reactions. At least two major questions remain: the identity of the copper donor(s) to Sco1 and Cox11 and the mechanism of copper routing to the mitochondrial IMS. In this report we have addressed the first major question and demonstrate for the first time that Cox17 is the specific copper donor to both Sco1 and Cox11.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Yeast Strains—A wild-type W303 strain (MAT a, ade2–1, his3–1,15, leu2,3,112, trp1–1, ura3–1) and isogenic cox17{Delta} variant (6) were used for all experiments. Yeast strains were cultured on plates or in liquid in complete medium lacking uracil for pYEF2 selection or lacking leucine for pRS315 selection. Cells were cultured with glucose, raffinose, or galactose as carbon sources as specified under "Results." DNA transformations were performed using a lithium acetate protocol.

Plasmids—SCO1 corresponding to codons 95–296 fused to a 5' sequence encoding a His purification tag was amplified from pTNDW4 (15) by PCR with NotI and EcoRI restriction sites added to the 5'- and 3'-ends, respectively. Likewise, mutant SCO1 encoding the same segment with the mutation (C148A,C152A) was amplified from pTNDW4–148,152 with NotI and EcoRI terminal sites. The truncated SCO1 genes were subcloned into pYEF2 containing the GAL1 promoter and CYC1 terminator for transformation of W303 cells (25). The plasmid is designated YEp-GAL1-SCO1. A fusion of thioredoxin and COX11 lacking the first 300 base pairs of the open reading frame was PCR-amplified from the pET32a vector pHCDW4 (11) and subcloned into pYEF2, creating plasmid YEp-GAL1-COX11. DNA encoding a Cox11 mutant with a triple alanine substitution of Cys-111, Cys-208, and Cys-210 was amplified as a thioredoxin fusion from an existing mutant plasmid for subcloning into pYEF2. The construction of YCp-MET25-COX17 and YCp-MET25-SCO2/COX17 was described previously (16). Maximum expression with the MET25 promoter occurs in medium lacking methionine, whereas minimal expression occurs in medium containing 0.67 mM methionine (5x the normal Met level). The Sco2-Cox17 fusion contains the 5'104 residues of Sco2 containing the N-terminal mitochondrial import sequence and transmembrane domain of Sco2 fused to Cox17. YEp-MET25-COX17–1 was constructed by insertion of COX17–1 encoding the C57Y variant of Cox17 in pRS426 (26). The correct sequences of all plasmids generated in this study were confirmed by sequencing.

Protein Purification—Recombinant Cox17 was purified as described previously by Heaton et al. (14). E. coli BL21 (DE3) transformants with COX17 on a pAED3 vector were used for the Cox17 purification using conventional chromatography on an AKTA fast protein liquid chromatography unit (Amersham Biosciences). The C57Y mutant variant of Cox17 was purified from cells harboring the COX17–1 mutant. Recombinant Sco1 and mutant Sco1 (C148A,C152A double substitution) were purified from BL21 (DE3) transformants harboring pTNDW2 (His-tagged SCO1 or mutant SCO1) as described previously by Nittis et al. (15). The Sco1 molecules purified were soluble truncates lacking the N-terminal 95 residues that form the mitochondrial target sequence and transmembrane domain. Nickel-NTA Superflow (Qiagen) was used for the purification of the His-tagged Sco1 proteins. ApoSco1 was isolated from E. coli transformants induced in the absence of added copper to the growth medium. Under these conditions, Sco1 is recovered with less than 0.1 mole equivalent of bound copper. E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) harboring pHCDW4, a pET32a (Novagen) vector containing COX11 lacking the first 300 base pairs, was used for the purification of thioredoxin-Cox11 as a His-tagged fusion. Ni-NTA (Qiagen) column chromatography was used as described previously (11). ApoCox11 was isolated from bacterial transformants induced in the absence of added copper to the growth medium. Yeast transformants with YEp-GAL1-SCO1 or YEp-GAL1-COX11 were cultured in raffinose medium to an A600 nm of 0.6. Galactose was then added to induce expression of the His-tagged Sco1 or Cox11. Cells were harvested after 5 h for preparation of lysates by use of a French press and subsequent Ni-NTA purification from clarified samples. The overexpression of the soluble domain of Sco1 or Cox11 did not cause impaired mitochondrial respiration.

Copper Transfer Assay—For in vitro studies, CuCox17 and mutants were purified from E. coli, concentrated, and stored anaerobically in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol. ApoSco1 or apoCox11 purified from E. coli was reduced in 50 mM dithiothreitol and subsequently desalted into transfer buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl). The transfer was initiated by dilution of the Cox17 into the transfer buffer followed by the addition of the apoprotein. Emissions were monitored (with a 350-nm bandwidth filter) between 350 and 700 nm after excitation at 300 nm. Excitation and emission slits were set at 5 and 20 nm, respectively. After analysis transfer, mixtures were separated by either affinity purification by Ni-NTA chromatography or by size exclusion on a Superdex 75 equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl. Ni-NTA chromatography was carried out by the addition of Ni-NTA resin to the protein mixture followed by a 10-min incubation at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Resin was removed by centrifugation, and the resulting supernatant was designated unbound. The resin was washed once in 1 volume of transfer buffer before elution in 1 volume of 20 mM Tris, pH 7.0, 250 mM imidazole (designated as bound). Protein content was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm with an elution buffer blank. Copper content was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy.

Assays—The copper concentration of the protein samples was measured using a PerkinElmer (AAnalyst 100) atomic absorption spectrophotometer or a PerkinElmer Optima (3100XL) ICP spectrometer. Protein was quantified by amino acid analysis after hydrolysis in 5.7 N HCl at 110 °C in vacuo on a Beckman 6300 analyzer. Optical absorption spectroscopy was carried out on a Beckman DU640. Luminescence was measured on a PerkinElmer LS55 fluorimeter with excitation set at 300 nm.

Westerns Analysis—Protein (10–50 µg) from the mitochondrial or postmitochondrial (cytosolic) fraction was electrophoresed on a 15% SDS-PAGE gel system and transferred to nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Membranes were blocked in 1x phosphate-buffered saline (50 mM Na2PO4, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.0), 0.01% Tween 20, and 10% milk solution prior to detection with appropriate antibodies and visualization with Pierce chemiluminescence reagents using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Antisera to phosphoglycerate kinase was from Molecular Probes. Chicken anti-yeast Cox11 antisera and rabbit anti-Sco1 antisera were generated as described previously (11, 15).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The luminescence of CuCox17 was used initially to monitor in vitro copper transfer to acceptor proteins. The emission of the copper conformer of Cox17 near 580 nm arises from thiolate-coordinated Cu(I) ions shielded from solvent quenching (14). The target molecules tested were recombinantly expressed soluble domains of Sco1 and Cox11 lacking their transmembrane segments. We had previously shown that the soluble domain of each protein was competent for specific Cu(I) binding and that the Cu(I) conformer of each protein was nonluminescent (11, 15). The addition of either apoSco1 or apoCox11 to a solution of CuCox17 led to an attenuation in luminescence consistent with either quenching of the CuCox17 emission or copper ion transfer (Fig. 1A). The attenuation was complete within a 5-min assay period. Two studies suggested that the rapid loss of emission did not arise from quenching. First, the addition of the non-luminescent CuSco1 to a solution of CuCox17 did not result in any time-dependent change in emission (Fig. 1A). Second, the addition of either bovine serum albumin or carbonic anhydrase did not attenuate luminescence (data not shown).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Cox17-mediated copper transfer to Sco1 and Cox11 monitored by CuCox17 luminescence. A, CuCox17 (dashed line 1) has Cu(I)-S-specific emission near 580 nm that is not present in either CuSco1 (dash-dot line 5) or CuCox11 (not shown). The Cu(I)-S emission is quenched by addition of either apoSco1 (solid line 3) or apoCox11 (dash-double dot line 4), but not by the addition of CuSco1 (dotted line 2). Representative data at 15 µM CuCox17 and 40 µM Sco1/Cox11 are shown. B, CuCox17 C57Y (dashed line 1) has similar Cu(I)-S emission to the wild-type protein. However, the emission is not quenched by the addition of apoSco1 (solid line 2). The addition of apoCox11 (dash-double dot line 3) results in decreased emission, suggesting copper transfer to Cox11. Representative data at 20 µM CuCox17 C57Y and 40 µM Sco1/Cox11 are shown.

 
The attenuation of CuCox17 emission by the addition of apoSco1 or apoCox11 was suggestive of Cu(I) ion transfer to this protein. Copper transfer was confirmed by the purification of Sco1 or Cox11 from the incubation mixture and quantitation of bound copper. The initial His-tagged variants of Sco1 and Cox11 contained only residual copper prior to incubation with CuCox17. After incubation with CuCox17 and re-purification by Ni-NTA chromatography, both Sco1 and Cox11 were recovered with bound copper (Fig. 2A). Cox17 was not retained on the Ni-NTA column and did not stably associate with either Sco1 or Cox11. The eluates contained only Sco1 or Cox11 (Fig. 2C). Thus, the copper recovered in the eluate was associated with either Sco1 or Cox11. Residual copper in the unbound fraction was associated with Cox17.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
Cox17-mediated copper transfer to Sco1 and Cox11 monitored by affinity purification. A, His-tagged Sco1 or Cox11 was purified after the copper transfer reaction by the addition of Ni-NTA. Copper content of the unbound (black bars) and eluate (white bars) fractions are plotted. Equal volumes were maintained for all fractions. The incubations contained 40 µM apoSco1 and 14 µM Cox17 (42 µM Cu). B, His-tagged proteins were purified after the transfer reaction with the Cox17 C57Y mutant. Black bars represent the unbound fraction and white bars the eluate. C, representative fractions from the transfer reaction and purification. The incubation mixture contains Sco1 and Cox17, the unbound contains only Cox17, and the elution fractions contained either Sco1 or Cox11.

 
The specificity of the transfer reactions was tested in two ways. First, carbonic anhydrase was used as a nonspecific apoprotein. Binding of Cu(I) by carbonic anhydrase results in a nonfunctional enzyme that cannot be activated by exogenous Zn(II) (27). Even after a prolonged incubation of CuCox17 with apocarbonic anhydrase, the enzyme was fully activated by the addition of Zn(II) to the solution, suggesting that Cu(I) ion transfer had not occurred (data not shown). Second, the C57Y mutant Cox17 encoded by the non-functional COX17–1 allele was used as a test of transfer specificity. We previously demonstrated that C57Y Cox17 binds Cu(I) normally, exists in homodimer-tetramer complexes, and when targeted to the mitochondria was still non-functional (13, 16). The addition of apoSco1 did not attenuate the luminescence of the C57Y Cox17 (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the emission of both wild-type and C57Y Cox17 molecules was attenuated by the addition of apoCox11 (Fig. 1B). Recovery of Sco1 after incubation with C57Y Cox17 did not reveal any appreciable transferred copper, whereas recovery of Cox11 after a similar incubation with C57Y Cox17 revealed copper ion transfer (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that the C57Y substitution abrogates a specific interface for Sco1.

The concentration dependence of the copper transfer reactions was determined. Titrations using a fixed CuCox17 concentration and increasing the level of the apoproteins to excess conditions revealed that only a subset of the Cox17-bound Cu is transferred to Sco1 as monitored by the CuCox17 emission (Fig. 3, A and B). Even after the addition of excess apoSco1, residual Cu(I) luminescence persisted in Cox17. Only ~40% of the Cox17-bound Cu(I) is transferred regardless of the excess of Sco1 used. The incomplete copper transfer from Cox17 arises from an inherent property within Cox17 and not Sco1. Doubling the Cox17 concentration doubles the amount of Sco1 that can be metallated. Concerning the metallation of Sco1, the nature of the titration curve suggests that copper transfer to Sco1 appears maximal near 1 mole equivalent (Fig. 3A). This observation is corroborated by recovery of Sco1, using the affinity tag, after a transfer reaction with limiting Sco1 levels. The resulting Sco1-bound copper content was near 1 mole equivalent. In a second series of titrations using excess Sco1 and varying the CuCox17 concentration, we observed a concentration dependence for copper transfer from Cox17 at limiting Cox17 levels (Fig. 3B). At concentrations below 10 µM Cox17, transfer to Sco1 appears impaired. One possibility is the known concentration dependence in Cox17 oligomerization from dimers to tetramers (KD near 20 µM) (14). Dimeric Cox17 species may be less efficient than tetrameric species in the copper transfer reaction. Cox17 incubated in the presence and absence of apoSco1 was fractionated by gel filtration, and the distribution of Cox17 oligomers was assessed by Western analysis of the column fractions (Fig. 4A). In the absence of Sco1, Cox17 was distributed in species representing tetramers, dimers, and monomers as was shown previously (14) (Fig. 4B). After incubation with apoSco1, less tetrameric Cox17 species were observed (Fig. 4B).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Concentration dependence for Cox17-mediated copper transfer. A, copper transferred, quantified by direct proportion to the change in relative luminescence, is plotted as a function of the apoprotein (Sco1 or Cox11) concentration. Titration data for 20 µM copper as Cu-Cox17 are shown. The plot shows maximal binding near 1 mole equivalent for Sco1 (solid line) and 0.5 mole equivalent for Cox11 (dashed line). B, copper transfer was also quantified by varying the CuCox17 concentration with a fixed apoSco1 (55 µM) or apoCox11 (55 µM) concentration. The concentration of copper transferred to Sco1 (solid line) and Cox11 (dashed line) is shown.

 



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Oligomerization state of Cox17 after copper transfer. A, CuCox17 exists in multiple oligomeric states with equilibriums between tetramer-dimer (KD ~20 µM) and dimer-monomer (KD ~5 µM) (14). Cox17 oligomers are resolved by size exclusion (Superdex75) chromatography. CuCox17 (20 µM) fractionates into tetramers (T), dimers (D), and monomers (M). The column was calibrated with ovalbumin (43 kDa), trypsin inhibitor (24 kDa), and RNase A (13 kDa) as size standards. B, fractions corresponding to these species were recovered from chromatography of CuCox17 incubated in the presence or absence of apoSco1. Western analysis of the fractions was carried out with anti-sera to Cox17.

 
Similar titrations of CuCox17 to apoCox11 revealed that only a subset of the Cox17-bound Cu was also transferred to Cox11 (Fig. 3A). Approximately 55% of the Cox17-bound Cu(I) was transferred to Cox11. Mixtures of Sco1 and Cox11 did not result in greater depletion of Cox17-bound Cu(I) (data not shown). The stoichiometry of Cu(I) bound to Cox11 appeared to be 0.5 Cu(I)/monomer. Titration of Cox11 with varying CuCox17 concentrations showed more efficient copper transfer relative to Sco1 at lower Cox17 levels (Fig. 3B). Cu binding to Cox11 appears to saturate in this assay at a copper stoichiometry near 0.5 mole equivalent. This stoichiometry was confirmed by recovery of Cox11 using the affinity tag.

These in vitro studies suggested that Cox17 is a specific copper donor to both Sco1 and Cox11. To further corroborate these studies, we expressed the soluble domains of each protein in a nonnative cellular compartment, the yeast cytoplasm. DNA encoding the soluble domains of SCO1 and COX11 was subcloned in a yeast episomal expression plasmid under the GAL1 promoter, permitting galactose-induced expression of each truncated gene. The soluble domains lack the mitochondrial import sequence and transmembrane domain. A His tag was added to each soluble domain to allow for affinity purification of each molecule. Galactose was added to the medium with W303 cells harboring the YEp-GAL1-SCO1 construct for 5 h prior to harvest and preparation of lysates. Fractionation of clarified lysates by Ni-NTA chromatography yielded single step purification of His-tagged Sco1. Analysis of the recovered protein by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed Sco1 as the predominant species. Quantitation of the bound copper by atomic absorption spectroscopy and protein by amino acid analysis revealed that Sco1 contained 0.2 Cu/mol (Fig. 5A). The copper content in Sco1 was increased to 0.6 mole equivalent if the cells were cultured in the presence of 0.8 mM CuSO4. These results suggested that copper metallation of Sco1 in the yeast cytoplasm was inefficient but could be achieved by high exogenous levels of copper. This situation is related to the inefficient copper metallation of Sod1 in cells lacking the Ccs1 metallochaperone (28).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
In organello assay for mitochondrial copper transfer. A, yeast (W303) transformants with YEp-GAL1-SCO1 or YEp-GAL1-mSCO1 encoding a Sco1 C148A,C152A mutant were cultured in raffinose to a A600 nm of 0.6. Galactose was added to induce expression of His-tagged Sco1. Cells were harvested after 5 h, and soluble lysates were fractionated by Ni-NTA chromatography. The copper binding stoichiometry of the purified Sco1 is shown. The YEp-GAL1-SCO1 transformants were cultured in standard synthetic medium or in medium containing 0.8 mM CuSO4 (designated +Cu). Cells co-transformed with YCp-MET25-COX17 or YEp-MET25-COX17–1 encoding C57Y Cox17 and cultured in synthetic medium (lacking additional copper) were analyzed. The medium contained normal methionine levels for YCp-MET25-COX17 but no methionine for cells with YEp-MET25-COX17–1. Also shown are cox17{Delta} cells transformed with YCp-MET25-SCO2-COX17 and YEp-GAL1-SCO1. In these cells Cox17 is tethered to the mitochondrial inner membrane, and no Cox17 is found in the cytoplasm. B, yeast (W303) transformants with YEp-GAL1-COX11 or YEp-GAL1-mCOX11 encoding a Cox11 triple mutant (C111A,C208A,C210A) were cultured in synthetic medium in the presence (+Cu) or absence of 0.8 mM CuSO4. The COX11 construct encoded a thioredoxin-His tag fusion with Cox11, permitting Ni-NTA purification. The copper binding stoichiometry of purified Cox11 was determined as described under "Materials and Methods." Cells co-transformed with YCp-MET25-COX17 or YEp-MET25-COX17–1 encoding C57Y Cox17 and cultured in synthetic medium (lacking additional copper) were analyzed. C, Western analysis of soluble Sco1 and Cox17 in W303 transformants described in panel A. Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 was used as a loading control.

 
To determine whether Cox17 is a specific metallochaperone for Sco1, cells harboring the YEp-GAL1-SCO1 were transformed with a YCp vector containing COX17 under the control of the regulatable MET25 promoter. Overexpression of COX17 results in appreciable accumulation of Cox17 in the cytosol with a lesser increase in the IMS (8, 13). His-tagged Sco1 was isolated from double transformants cultured in raffinose to an optical density of 0.5 followed by the addition of galactose for 5 h to induce SCO1. Sco1 recovered from these cells containing elevated levels of cytoplasmic Cox17 contained 1.0 mole equivalent of copper (Fig. 5A). Reduction of the COX17 expression by culturing the double transformants in high methionine still resulted in a copper content in the recovered Sco1 of 0.8 mole equivalent (data not shown). To ensure that the Sco1-bound copper was associated with the characterized Cu(I) site and not with the His tag, the experiment was repeated using a double Sco1 mutant with both cysteines in the CXXXC motif replaced by alanine residues. Co-expression of the mutant His-SCO1 and COX17 resulted in the recovery of Sco1 with less than 0.1 mole equivalent of copper bound. Cox17 did not co-purify with Sco1 in the single step affinity purification step, suggesting that the two proteins do not stably interact.

The COX17-mediated metallation of Sco1 likely arises from direct copper transfer from Cox17. To confirm that cytoplasmic Cox17 contains bound copper, we expressed a His-tagged Cox17 gene under the GAL1 promoter on a YEp vector. Induction of COX17 expression by transferring the cultures to galactose medium for 5 h resulted in appreciable accumulation of Cox17 in the cytoplasm as shown by Western analysis (Fig. 5C). Recovery of the protein by Ni-NTA chromatography revealed mean copper stoichiometries between 0.3 and 0.5 in multiple experiments. Thus, a fraction of the Cox17 molecules are copper-loaded in cells cultured in standard growth medium.

As mentioned, in vitro copper transfer studies with apoSco1 revealed no apparent copper transfer from the C57Y mutant Cox17. To test whether this mutant was capable of copper transfer in the yeast cytoplasm, double transformants containing both YEp-GAL1-SCO1 and YEp-MET25-COX17–1 (encoding C57Y Cox17) vectors were cultured in raffinose followed by 5 h in galactose as mentioned above. Sco1 purified from lysates showed a copper content near 0.2 mole equivalent, a value similar to cells not overexpressing Cox17 (Fig. 5A). The expression level of C57Y Cox17 was lower than the overexpressed Cox17 used in the above experiments (Fig. 5C). As mentioned above, reduction of the wild-type Cox17 levels by culturing cells in medium containing excess methionine did not appreciably lower copper metallation of Sco1, but the Cox17 protein levels were now comparable with the level of the C57Y mutant protein (data not shown). Thus, the C57Y Cox17 is an ineffective copper donor in both the in vitro and in vivo systems.

In the absence of Cox17 overexpression, the copper content of the recovered Sco1 is 0.2 as mentioned, potentially because of low levels of endogenous, cytoplasmic Cox17. We did not test the metallation of Sco1 in cox17{Delta} cells because they grew poorly in raffinose medium. To test whether the limited Sco1-bound copper arose from endogenous cytoplasmic Cox17, we used cox17{Delta} cells containing a SCO2-COX17 chimeric protein. This chimera is functional and resides solely within the mitochondrial IM (16). YEp-GAL1-SCO1 and YCp-ME25-SCO2-COX17 cotransformants were cultured in the usual conditions (raffinose followed by 5 h in galactose). Sco1 recovered from these cells had a copper content of <0.1 mole equivalent, suggesting that copper ion metallation of Sco1 is dependent on the Cox17 protein under normal physiological growth conditions (Fig. 5A).

The cytosolic assay was repeated using YEp-GAL1-COX11 transformants in the presence and absence of YCp-MET25-COX17. In the absence of co-expression of Cox17, Cox11 was recovered from yeast cytosol using Ni-NTA chromatography. The purity of the recovered Cox11 was insufficient for determination of the binding stoichiometry, so the samples were further purified by gel filtration on a S200 matrix. Purified Cox11 was recovered with 0.1 mole equivalent of bound copper from cells cultured in synthetic medium without any supplemental copper (Fig. 5B). Recovery of Cox11 from cells cultured in medium supplemented with 0.8 mM CuSO4 resulted in 0.4 mole equivalent of copper bound. The protein eluted from the S200 gel filtration column in a volume consistent with a dimeric species. We reported previously that Cox11 purified from E. coli forms a stable dimer (11).

Co-expression of GAL1-COX11 and MET25-COX17 chimeric genes in cells cultured without supplemental copper results in enhanced copper metallation of Cox11 (Fig. 5B). The copper content increased from 0.1 mole equivalent in the absence of Cox17 to nearly 0.5 in the presence of Cox17. This stoichiometry is 2-fold less than that observed when COX11 is expressed in E. coli cells cultured in copper-supplemented medium (11). The copper ions in the dimeric Cox11 purified from E. coli are closely spaced (11), so the repeated recovery of Cox11 from the yeast cytosol with only 0.5 mole equivalent of bound copper may suggest a species exists with a single copper ion bound at the dimer interface. When a mutant Cox11 was induced in which Cys-111, Cys-208, and Cys-210 were substituted by alanines, no appreciable copper binding was observed in the recovered protein (Fig. 5B). Thus, copper binding by Cox11 is dependent on this Cys motif. Consistent with this result, we showed previously that recombinant Cox11 purified from E. coli as a thioredoxin fusion revealed Cu(I) binding to Cox11 and not the thioredoxin (11).

Whereas the C57Y Cox17 was an ineffective copper donor to Sco1 either in vitro or in vivo, C57Y Cox17 was nearly as efficient as wild-type Cox17 as a copper donor to Cox11 in the yeast cytosol assay system (Fig. 5B). Cox11 purified from YEp-GAL1-COX11 transformants containing YEp-MET25-COX17–1 (C57Y variant) contained 0.4 mole equivalent of bound copper, confirming that C57Y Cox17 is an efficient copper donor to Cox11 but not Sco1.

The efficient copper transfer by the C57Y mutant to Cox11, but not Sco1, implies that the substitution perturbs transfer to only one target. The specificity of the mutant copper transfer is consistent with Cox17 docking with each target molecule in distinct interfaces. Cox17 did not form stable interactions with either Sco1 or Cox11 in the studies. To determine whether a weak interaction of Cox17 with either Sco1 or Cox11 existed, the purified Sco1 and Cox11 samples were tested by Western analysis for co-purification of low levels of Cox17. Cox17 was not detected in either purified Sco1 or Cox11 samples. Cox17 may only transiently interact with these target molecules. In an attempt to stabilize a putative interaction between Cox17 and Sco1, we co-expressed COX17 and a mutant SCO1 encoding a C148A,C152A double mutation of the two Cu(I) binding cysteine residues (15). No co-purification was observed of Cox17 and the Sco1 mutant lacking the ability to bind Cu(I) (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cox17 was postulated to function as a copper donor to Sco1 as an intermediate step in the copper metallation of the CuA in Cox2 during assembly of cytochrome c oxidase (7, 17, 29). This postulate was based on the suppression of the respiratory defect of a cox17{Delta} strain by overexpression of SCO1 (7) and on the fact that Sco1 is a copper-binding protein (15, 17). In the present studies we directly confirm this postulate and extend the functional significance of Cox17 to show for the first time that it is also a copper donor to Cox11. Like Sco1, Cox11 is a copper-binding protein, suggesting that copper metallation of Sco1 and Cox11 is an intermediate step in the transfer of copper to the CuA site in Cox2 and CuB site in Cox1, respectively (11).

Two assays were used to confirm the specificity of the Cox17-mediated copper transfer to both Sco1 and Cox11. First, in vitro studies with purified proteins showed physical copper transfer from CuCox17 to either Sco1 or Cox11. Specificity of this copper transfer reaction was indicated by the absence of transfer to heterologous proteins, including bovine serum albumin and carbonic anhydrase. In addition, the C57Y mutant of Cox17 failed to transfer copper to Sco1 but was competent for copper transfer to Cox11. Second, the in vitro transfer studies were corroborated by a yeast cytoplasm assay. Soluble domains of Sco1 and Cox11 lacking the mitochondrial targeting sequence and transmembrane domains were expressed in the yeast cytoplasm in the presence and absence of Cox17 co-expression. Recovery of either Sco1 or Cox11 revealed that copper metallation of either protein was dependent on either growth of cells in medium containing high exogenous copper ions or co-expression of Cox17. The Cox17-mediated metallation of Sco1 or Cox11 occurred in yeast cultured in non-copper-supplemented medium. Residual copper binding was observed in Sco1 recovered from wild-type yeast containing chromosomally encoded Cox17. This residual copper metallation of Sco1 arises from the low, endogenous levels of Cox17 within the cytoplasm (8). Copper metallation of Sco1 was nearly abolished when purified from cells containing Cox17 tethered to the mitochondrial inner membrane. Specificity in the yeast cytoplasm assay was further demonstrated by a lack of copper transfer to Sco1 by the C57Y Cox17 mutant, yet copper transfer by the mutant to Cox11 in agreement with the in vitro assay.

Yeast harboring C57Y Cox17 are respiratory-deficient and lack appreciable cytochrome c oxidase activity (6). The mutant protein fails to accumulate to a significant level within the mitochondrial IMS in the presence or absence of a heterologous IMS targeting sequence (13, 16). The recombinant C57Y Cox17 protein binds Cu(I) normally and forms similar tetrameric conformers as the wild-type protein (14, 16). Thus, the non-functionality of the protein does not arise from defective copper ion binding.

The present data show that C57Y Cox17 is defective only in copper transfer to Sco1. The ability of the mutant protein to transfer copper to Cox11 suggests that Cox17 may have different interaction interfaces for Sco1 and Cox11. We reported recently that the C-terminal segment containing Cys-57 may adopt an amphipathic helix (16). This segment of the protein may be an important interface for Sco1, but not Cox11. We were unable to detect any stable interactions between Cox17 and Sco1 or Cox11 with in vitro or yeast cytoplasm assays by evaluating co-purification, implying that its interactions with Sco1 and Cox11 may be transient. A similar situation exists with the other two known copper metallochaperones. Stable interactions of the Atx1 and Ccs1 metallochaperones and their target proteins has not been observed.

The observation that copper transfer did not deplete Cox17 of bound Cu(I) in the in vitro assay was surprising. Despite incubation with excess Sco1 or Cox11, residual copper remained associated with Cox17. Because Cox17 contains a polycopper cluster (14), the possibility remains that only a subset of the bound Cu(I) ions is available for transfer. The prediction is that the copper ions bound within the polycopper cluster are not equivalent. We have failed to obtain clear binding stoichiometries by electrospray mass spectrometry to address the number of residual bound coppers after transfer reactions.

These studies suggest the following model of Cox17-mediated metallation of CcO. Cox17 may be metallated within the IMS by transfer of copper from the matrix copper pool (30). CuCox17 transfers Cu(I) ions to both Sco1 and Cox11 for subsequent donation to Cox2 and Cox1, respectively. The postulated Sco1-mediated metallation of Cox2 is likely to occur after extrusion of the Cox2 soluble domain into the IMS by Cox18 (31). This transfer may occur upon physical interaction between Sco1 and Cox2 as shown previously (18). It is unclear at this time whether both copper ions in the CuA site are derived from CuCox17. Studies are underway to extend this yeast cytoplasm assay system as a nonnative cellular environment to evaluate copper transfer from Sco1 to Cox2 and to test the function of Cox19.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This work was supported by NIEHS, National Institutes of Health Grant ES03817 (to D. R. W.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} Supported by Grant T32 DK07115 from the National Institutes of Health. Back

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 801-585-5103; Fax: 801-585-5469; E-mail: dennis.winge{at}hsc.utah.edu.

1 The abbreviations used are: CcO, cytochrome c oxidase; IM, inner membrane; IMS, intermembrane space; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid; Sod1, superoxide dismutase. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We acknowledge support from the National Institutes of Health (5P30-CA 42014) to the Biotechnology Core Facility for DNA synthesis at the University of Utah.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Capaldi, R. A. (1990) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 569–596[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Poyton, R. O., and McEwen, J. E. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 563–607[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Tzagoloff, A., and Dieckmann, C. L. (1990) Microbiol. Rev. 54, 211–225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tsukihara, T., Aoyama, H., Yamashita, E., Tomizaki, T., Yamaguchi, H., Shinzawa-Itoh, K., Hakashima, R., Yaono, R., and Yoshikawa, S. (1995) Science 269, 1069–1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Carr, H. S., and Winge, D. R. (2003) Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 309–316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Glerum, D. M., Shtanko, A., and Tzagoloff, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14504–14509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Glerum, D. M., Shtanko, A., and Tzagoloff, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20531–20535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Beers, J., Glerum, D. M., and Tzagoloff, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 33191–33196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Buchwald, P., Krummeck, G., and Rodel, G. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 229, 413–420[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hiser, L., Di Valentin, M., Hamer, A. G., and Hosler, J. P. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 619–623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Carr, H. S., George, G. N., and Winge, D. R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 31237–31242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Nobrega, M. P., Bandeira, S. C. B., Beers, J., and Tzagoloff, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40206–40211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Heaton, D., Nittis, T., Srinivasan, C., and Winge, D. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 37582 37587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Heaton, D. N., George, G. N., Garrison, G., and Winge, D. R. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 743–751[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Nittis, T., George, G. N., and Winge, D. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42520–42526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Maxfield, A. B., Heaton, D. N., and Winge, D. R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 5072–5080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Beers, J., Glerum, D. M., and Tzagoloff, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22185–22190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lode, A., Kuschel, M., Paret, C., and Rodel, G. (2000) FEBS Lett. 448, 1–6[CrossRef]
  19. Balatri, E., Banci, L., Bertini, I., Cantini, F., and Cioffi-Baffoni, S. (2003) Structure 11, 1431–1443[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Casareno, R. L. B., Waggoner, D., and Gitlin, J. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23625–23628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Schmidt, P. J., Ramos-Gomez, M., and Culotta, V. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36952–36956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Huffman, D. L., and O'Halloran, T. V. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18611–18614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lin, S.-J., Pufahl, R. A., Dancis, A., O'Halloran, T. V. O., and Culotta, V. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9215–9220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Pufahl, R. A., Singer, C. P., Peariso, K. L., Lin, S.-J., Schmidt, P., Fahrni, C., Culotta, V. C., Penner-Hahn, J. E., and O'Halloran, T. V. O. (1997) Science 278, 853–856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cullin, C., and Minvielle-Sebastia, L. (1994) Yeast 10, 105–112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Mumberg, D., Muller, R., and Funk, M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5767–5768[Free Full Text]
  27. Geller, B. L., and Winge, D. R. (1982) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 213, 109–117[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Rae, R. D., Schmidt, P. J., Pufahl, R. A., Culotta, V. C., and O'Halloran, T. V. (1999) Science 284, 805–807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Dickinson, E. K., Adams, D. L., Schon, E. A., and Glerum, D. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26780–26785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Cobine, P. A., Ojeda, L. D., Rigby, K. M., and Winge, D. R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 14447–14455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Saracco, S. A., and Fox, T. D. (2002) Mol. Biol. Cell 113, 1122–1131

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Rigby, P. A. Cobine, O. Khalimonchuk, and D. R. Winge
Mapping the Functional Interaction of Sco1 and Cox2 in Cytochrome Oxidase Biogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15015 - 15022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Banci, I. Bertini, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, T. Hadjiloi, M. Martinelli, and P. Palumaa
Mitochondrial copper(I) transfer from Cox17 to Sco1 is coupled to electron transfer
PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 6803 - 6808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Banci, I. Bertini, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, A. Janicka, M. Martinelli, H. Kozlowski, and P. Palumaa
A Structural-Dynamical Characterization of Human Cox17
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2008; 283(12): 7912 - 7920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. M. Craig, C. M. Wood, and G. B. McClelland
Oxidative stress response and gene expression with acute copper exposure in zebrafish (Danio rerio)
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): R1882 - R1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. Lutsenko, N. L. Barnes, M. Y. Bartee, and O. Y. Dmitriev
Function and Regulation of Human Copper-Transporting ATPases
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2007; 87(3): 1011 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Khalimonchuk, A. Bird, and D. R. Winge
Evidence for a Pro-oxidant Intermediate in the Assembly of Cytochrome Oxidase
J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2007; 282(24): 17442 - 17449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Rigby, L. Zhang, P. A. Cobine, G. N. George, and D. R. Winge
Characterization of the Cytochrome c Oxidase Assembly Factor Cox19 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem., April 6, 2007; 282(14): 10233 - 10242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
J. M. Herrmann and R. Kohl
Catch me if you can! Oxidative protein trapping in the intermembrane space of mitochondria
J. Cell Biol., February 26, 2007; 176(5): 559 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Banci, I. Bertini, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, I. Leontari, M. Martinelli, P. Palumaa, R. Sillard, and S. Wang
Human Sco1 functional studies and pathological implications of the P174L mutant
PNAS, January 2, 2007; 104(1): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. A. Cobine, F. Pierrel, M. L. Bestwick, and D. R. Winge
Mitochondrial Matrix Copper Complex Used in Metallation of Cytochrome Oxidase and Superoxide Dismutase
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2006; 281(48): 36552 - 36559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
F. Fontanesi, I. C. Soto, D. Horn, and A. Barrientos
Assembly of mitochondrial cytochrome c-oxidase, a complicated and highly regulated cellular process
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): C1129 - C1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
J. Laliberte and S. Labbe
Mechanisms of copper loading on the Schizosaccharomyces pombe copper amine oxidase 1 expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Microbiology, September 1, 2006; 152(Pt 9): 2819 - 2830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Banci, I. Bertini, V. Calderone, S. Ciofi-Baffoni, S. Mangani, M. Martinelli, P. Palumaa, and S. Wang
A hint for the function of human Sco1 from different structures
PNAS, June 6, 2006; 103(23): 8595 - 8600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]