JBC Transcription and Nuclear Factor Monoclonals

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M402842200 on July 20, 2004 Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M402842200 on July 15, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 38, 39736-39744, September 17, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/38/39736    most recent
M402842200v2
M402842200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, H.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mullen, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, H.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Mullen, G. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification of Small Molecule Synthetic Inhibitors of DNA Polymerase {beta} by NMR Chemical Shift Mapping*

Hong-Yu Hu{ddagger}§, Julie K. Horton§**, Michael R. Gryk||, Rajendra Prasad**, Jana M. Naron**, Di-An Sun{ddagger}{ddagger}, Sidney M. Hecht{ddagger}{ddagger}, Samuel H. Wilson**§§, and Gregory P. Mullen{dagger}{ddagger}

From the {ddagger}Biochemistry and ||Molecular, Microbial, and Structural Biology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06032, **Laboratory of Structural Biology, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, and {ddagger}{ddagger}Departments of Chemistry and Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901

Received for publication, March 12, 2004 , and in revised form, July 8, 2004.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
DNA polymerase {beta} ({beta}-pol) plays a central role in repair of damaged DNA bases by base excision repair (BER) pathways. A predominant phenotype of {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts is hypersensitivity to the DNA-methylating agent methyl methanesulfonate. Residues in the 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol that seem to interact with a known natural product {beta}-pol inhibitor, koetjapic acid, were identified by NMR chemical shift mapping. The data implicate the binding pocket as the hydrophobic cleft between helix-2 and helix-4, which provides the DNA binding and deoxyribose phosphate lyase activities of the enzyme. Nine structurally related synthetic compounds, containing aromatic or other hydrophobic groups in combination with two carboxylate groups, were then tested. They were found to bind to the same or a very similar region on the surface of the enzyme. The ability of these compounds to potentiate methyl methanesulfonate cytotoxicity, an indicator of cellular BER capacity, in wild-type and {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts, was next ascertained. The most active and {beta}-pol-specific of these agents, pamoic acid, was further characterized and found to be an inhibitor of the deoxyribose phosphate lyase and DNA polymerase activities of purified {beta}-pol on a BER substrate. Our results illustrate that NMR-based mapping techniques can be used in the design of small molecule enzyme inhibitors including those with potential use in a clinical setting.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Base lesions in DNA can arise endogenously from spontaneous base loss, base oxidation, or deamination, among other ways, and can also occur after exposure to alkylating agents, some of which are used for chemotherapy. DNA polymerase {beta} ({beta}-pol)1 is critical for protection of cells against the harmful effects of such single base lesions in DNA, most probably because of its roles in multiple DNA base excision repair (BER) pathways. The simplest and most well characterized `single nucleotide' BER pathway comprises five sequential steps: excision of the damaged base by a specific glycosylase, strand cleavage by apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease, DNA synthesis and removal of the deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) by {beta}-pol, and ligation of the nick by a DNA ligase (1). Controlled proteolysis and structural studies have revealed that {beta}-pol is organized into two distinct domains. The 31-kDa domain has double stranded DNA binding and DNA polymerase activity, and the 8-kDa domain contributes single-stranded nucleic acid binding and dRP lyase activity (2). The solution structure of the 8-kDa domain (residues 1-87) has been determined by NMR (3, 4). The cellular requirement for {beta}-pol, specifically the dRP lyase activity of {beta}-pol, for repair of damaged bases was demonstrated earlier by studies of the hypersensitivity of {beta}-pol null mouse embryonic fibroblasts to the monofunctional methylating agent methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) (5-7).

In recent years, there has been considerable effort toward isolating and identifying natural product inhibitors of mammalian DNA polymerases, in particular {beta}-pol. Active agents, as ascertained by inhibition of {beta}-pol DNA synthesis activity in in vitro assays, have been discovered in extracts from bacteria, marine organisms, fungi, and higher plants (8-14). Many of the "{beta}-pol inhibitory" compounds (glycoglycerolipids, sulfolipids, triterpenoids, phenalenone derivatives) have been found to inhibit other polymerases as well (e.g. DNA polymerases {alpha}, {gamma}, and {lambda} and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase) (15-20); certain triterpenoid-derivative polymerase inhibitors were more recently found to also inhibit topoisomerases (21).

In several previous studies, the long-term aim given for the identification of potent {beta}-pol inhibitors is the possibility of inhibiting repair of DNA adducts formed after treatment with DNA-damaging anticancer drugs and thus potentiating chemotherapeutic treatments. However, {beta}-pol null cells are not significantly hypersensitive to many clinically useful, DNA-alkylating antitumor agents, including the monofunctional and bifunctional chloroethylating agents mitozolomide and melphalan and the nitrosourea 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (7), nor are they hypersensitive to ionizing radiation (5, 22). Although {beta}-pol has been shown to be involved in the repair of bleomycin-induced DNA damage in vitro (23, 24), hypersensitivity to this agent is observed only in late passage, but not early passage, {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts (25). Overexpression of {beta}-pol has been associated with resistance to cisplatin (26) and down-regulation of {beta}-pol by antisense RNA was able to sensitize mammalian cells to this agent (27); however, in the {beta}-pol null cells, no hypersensitivity is observed (25). The only clinical agent found to elicit significant hypersensitivity in {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts is the methylating triazene derivative temozolomide (7).

Another valid reason for discovery of specific {beta}-pol inhibitors that can penetrate cells is the potential for use of such agents as probes to dissect DNA polymerase functions in the various sub-pathways of repair. For example, inhibition of cellular {beta}-pol-dependent repair by such a compound in an already repair-deficient background (e.g. x-ray cross-complementing factor 1 [XRCC1] -/- or xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A [XPA] -/-) could provide information on the requirement for activity of other repair proteins within a repair pathway and associations between repair activities across specific repair pathways. As discussed above, a predominant phenotype of {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts is hypersensitivity to monofunctional alkylating agents such as MMS. Thus, in mouse fibroblasts, an appropriate way to assay for a block of intracellular {beta}-pol activity is to look for an increase in cellular sensitivity to MMS. Such an enhancement of MMS cytotoxicity has been reported previously for one {beta}-pol inhibitor (15); however, in most studies in which cellular sensitivity was evaluated, the DNA-damaging agents used were bleomycin or cisplatin (8, 14, 28).

The interaction of bile acid and long-chain fatty acid {beta}-pol inhibitors with the N-terminal 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol has been analyzed previously by NMR (29, 30). In the current study, the binding site for a known natural product {beta}-pol inhibitor, koetjapic acid (KJA) (10), was localized by NMR chemical shift mapping of the {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain. Large chemical shifts were observed upon binding, and this allowed us to make approximate assignments of the inhibitor and {beta}-pol interfaces. The NMR binding study was then extended to include structurally similar synthetic terpenoids and finally other synthetic compounds containing aromatic or other hydrophobic groups in combination with two carboxylate groups. Dissociation constants for binding were estimated for these compounds, and the binding sites on the {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain were mapped. The ability of the nine synthetic compounds with the highest binding affinities to potentiate MMS cytotoxicity in wild-type and {beta}-pol null mouse embryonic fibroblasts was then ascertained. The most active and most {beta}-pol-specific agent, pamoic acid (PA), was found to be inhibitory for activity in in vitro assays for both the dRP lyase and DNA polymerase activities of {beta}-pol. Overall, these results illustrate the utility of NMR chemical shift mapping in small molecule enzyme inhibitor development, including those with potential for use in a clinical setting.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials—Synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides purified by high pressure liquid chromatography were obtained from Oligos Etc, Inc. (Wilsonville, OR). [{alpha}-32P]ddATP and [{alpha}-32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Recombinant human full-length {beta}-pol, 8-kDa {beta}-pol, uracil-DNA glycosylase with 84 amino acids deleted from the amino terminus, and AP endonuclease were overexpressed and purified as described previously (2, 31, 32).

The previously characterized {beta}-pol inhibitor KJA was isolated directly from Sandicorum koetjape as described previously (10). The synthetic compounds, glycyrrhizic acid (GA), carbenoxolone (CBX), PA, mordant blue (MB), biquinoline-dicarboxylic acid, naphthochrome green, 4,4'-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) bis(benzoic acid), and 4'4'-biphenyl dicarboxylic acid were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, and 3-(4-carboxyphenyl) 2,3-dihydrotrimethyl 1-indene-5-carboxylic acid was from Acros Organics/Fisher Scientific. These agents were dissolved in high pH 25 mM sodium phosphate dibasic at a concentration of 10 mM; unless specified otherwise, the pH of the solutions was brought down or raised to pH 7.2-7.4 by addition of the appropriate volume of HCl or NaOH with constant stirring and monitoring of the pH. Solutions were stored at 4 °C.

NMR Chemical Shift Mapping—NMR titrations were performed using 100 µM {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain. Inhibitor stock solutions were 5-20 mM and were titrated such that the 600-µl NMR sample was diluted by no more than 10%. All NMR HSQC spectra were acquired at 25 °C on a four-channel Varian Inova-500 spectrometer equipped with a pulse field gradient triple-resonance probe. NMR data were processed and peak picked using Felix (Biosym Inc.) with scripts generated from the web site sbtools.uchc.edu.

Measurement of Dissociation Binding Constants—When the inhibitor exchange rate is greater than the chemical shift difference between the free and bound states (as observed for the inhibitors in this study), the observed chemical shift, {delta}av, is a weighted average between the chemical shifts of the free and bound states (3, 33) given by

(Eq. 1)

where {delta}F is the chemical shift of the protein in the absence of inhibitor, {delta}B is the chemical shift of the protein bound to inhibitor, [PB] is the concentration of inhibitor-bound protein and [PT] is the total concentration of protein. In the fast exchange regime, addition of inhibitor results in the gradual shifting of the protein resonances from the free to bound positions (see Supplemental Material). The dependence of the observed chemical shift, {delta}av, on the total inhibitor concentration, [ST], is related to the dissociation constant, [KD], through its effect on the concentration of inhibitor-bound protein, [PB] (3, 33) as shown in Equation 2.

(Eq. 2)

Dissociation constants of the order of the total protein concentration can therefore be determined quite accurately, although the accuracy decreases for very tight binders. Nevertheless, dissociation constants 1 order of magnitude lower than the protein concentration can readily be distinguished with this method (see Supplemental Material).

Cell Lines and Cytotoxicity Studies—Clones of the previously characterized wild-type and {beta}-pol null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MB16.3 and MB19.4, respectively) and cell culture conditions have been described previously (5, 34). Alternate isogenically matched wild-type (MB36.3) and {beta}-pol null (MB38{Delta}4) cell lines and {beta}-pol null cells expressing Flag epitope-tagged, full-length, wild-type or 8-kDa domain {beta}-pol proteins have also been described previously (6). Cells were grown at 34 °C in a 10% CO2 incubator in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT) supplemented with GlutaMAX-1 (Invitrogen), 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone), and hygromycin (80 µg/ml; Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Cells were routinely tested and found to be free of mycoplasma contamination.

Cytotoxicity was determined by growth inhibition assays as described previously (34). Wild-type and {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts (MB16.3 and MB19.4, respectively, unless otherwise indicated) were seeded at a density of 40,000 cells/well in six-well dishes. The following day, cells were exposed for 1 h to a range of concentrations of MMS in growth medium without hygromycin and in the presence or absence of the {beta}-pol inhibitor under study. Cells were then washed with Hanks' balanced salt solution (Invitrogen), and fresh medium plus or minus inhibitor was added. Dishes were incubated for 4-5 days at 34 °C in a 10% CO2 incubator until untreated control cells were ~80% confluent. Cells (triplicate wells for each drug concentration) were counted by a cell lysis procedure (35), and results were expressed as the number of cells in drug-treated wells relative to control wells.

3'-End Labeling—Dephosphorylated 34-mer oligodeoxyribonucleotide (5'-CTGCAGCTGATGCGCUGTACGGATCCCCGGGTAC-3') containing a uracil residue at position 16 was 3'-end-labeled with terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase and [{alpha}-32P]ddATP. The complementary DNA strand (5'-GTACCCGGGGATCCGTACGGCGCATCAGCTGCAG-3') was annealed by heating the solution at 90 °C for 3 min, and the solution was allowed to slowly cool to 25 °C. 32P-labeled duplex oligonucleotide was separated from unincorporated [{alpha}-32P]ddATP using a Sephadex G-25 column according to the manufacturer's suggested protocol. The radiolabeled oligonucleotide was stored at -30 °C until use.

Uracil-DNA Glycosylase/AP Endonuclease Treatment of DNA Substrate—In general, 50 nM 32P-labeled duplex oligonucleotide substrate was pretreated with 10 nM human uracil-DNA glycosylase in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 20 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 2 mM dithiothreitol for 20 min at 37 °C. The reaction mixture was then supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2 and 10 nM AP endonuclease and the incubation continued for 20 min at 37 °C. These reactions generated substrates for DNA synthesis (15-mer with 3'-OH) and dRP lyase assays (32P-labeled 19-mer with 5'-sugar phosphate) as shown in Fig. 6a. Because of the labile nature of the dRP-containing DNA, this DNA substrate was prepared just before performing the experiment.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.
Inhibition of {beta}-pol activity by PA. The reaction conditions and product analyses are described under "Experimental Procedures." a, schematic representation of the dRP lyase and DNA gap-filling substrate (34-base pair), the 32P-labeled dRP lyase substrate after AP endonuclease cleavage (19-mer with 5'-sugar phosphate), the dRP lyase product (19-mer without 5'-sugar phosphate), and the DNA synthesis substrate (15-mer). The DNA synthesis product (indicated on the gel in b) is the DNA synthesis substrate after {beta}-pol-mediated incorporation of [{alpha}-32P]dCTP. b, dRP lyase and DNA synthesis activities of {beta}-pol without (lane 2) or with (lanes 3-8) increasing concentrations of PA (5-250 µM). Lane 1 represents a control in the absence of {beta}-pol. The arrows indicate the positions of substrate and products. c, graphical representation of the data shown in b. The percentage inhibition of dRP lyase and DNA synthesis activities of {beta}-pol are plotted as a function of PA concentration (micromolar).

 
Pretreatment of {beta}-pol with PA{beta}-Pol (100 nM) and PA (50 to 2500 µM) were mixed (1:1, v/v) in enzyme dilution buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 20% glycerol) and incubated at 25 °C for 10 min. This mixture was used to initiate the dRP lyase/DNA gap-filling synthesis reaction resulting in a final concentration of 10 nM {beta}-pol and 5-250 µM PA.

DNA Gap-Filling Synthesis and dRP Lyase Assay—The lyase and DNA gap-filling synthesis reactions were performed as described previously (1). The reaction mixture (10 µl) contained 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 20 mM KCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 4 mM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, and 2.3 µM [{alpha}-32P]dCTP (specific activity, 1 x 106 dpm/pmol) and 50 nM 3'-end labeled DNA. The reaction was initiated by adding 10 nM {beta}-pol, either pretreated or not with PA. After incubation at 37 °C for 10 min, the reaction was terminated with 1 µl of 0.5 M EDTA and the products were stabilized by addition of NaBH4 to a final concentration of 340 mM and incubated for 30 min at 0 °C. The stabilized products were recovered by ethanol precipitation in the presence of 0.1 µg/ml tRNA and resuspended in 10 µl of DNA gel loading buffer (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.02% bromphenol blue, and 0.02% xylene cyanol). After incubation at 75 °C for 2 min, the reaction products were separated by electrophoresis in a 15% polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea in 89 mM Tris-HCl, 89 mM boric acid, and 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.8. The amount of radioactivity in the product bands was quantified using a PhosphorImager and ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemical Shift Mapping of the Interaction Interface of Inhibitors and {beta}-pol15N-labeled recombinant 8-kDa domain of human {beta}-pol (2) was first titrated with the known natural product {beta}-pol inhibitor, KJA (10). The compound bound with high affinity (KD = 11 µM; Table I), and residues that seemed to interact with the inhibitor were identified by NMR chemical shift mapping. Thirty-four structurally related and soluble synthetic compounds were similarly analyzed. Of these, nine compounds were selected that contained aromatic or other hydrophobic groups in combination with two carboxylate groups and had binding constants in the micromolar range estimated from NMR titrations. The molecular structures of KJA, and the nine compounds chosen for more detailed analysis are shown in Fig. 1. 15N-labeled 8-kDa domain of human {beta}-pol was titrated with each of these synthetic compounds, and the backbone amide chemical shifts were monitored in 15N-HSQC spectra. For each of the agents studied, the amide proton and nitrogen resonances of affected residues shifted gradually as the concentration of inhibitor was increased, indicating that the binary complexes were in fast exchange on the NMR timescale (kex>> 150 s-1). Changes in chemical shift were analyzed to ascertain both the structural interface as well as the dissociation constant of interaction, as shown for KJA, GA, CBX, and PA in Figs. 2 and 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE I
Dissociation constants for binding to {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain and enhancement of growth inhibitory effect of MMS by {beta}-pol inhibitors

 



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.
Molecular structures of the {beta}-pol inhibitors. Shown is the known natural product {beta}-pol inhibitor KJA and the nine other structurally related synthetic compounds characterized.

 



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.
NMR titrations using the {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain. a, superposition of the HSQC spectra of {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain without (black) and with (red) a 2-fold excess of GA, representing the second titration point. Labeled are residues that shift the most upon binding GA. b, the sum of the absolute chemical shift differences,|{Delta}{delta}1H| +|{Delta}{delta}15N| (Hz), are plotted versus residue number for a 5-fold excess of GA, representing the fifth titration point. The mean chemical shift change is shown (bottom line) together with lines representing 1 and 1.5 S.D. from the mean (upper two lines). Changes exceeding 1.5 S.D. were considered significant and are mapped in green onto the NMR structure of the {beta}-pol N-terminal domain for addition of GA (d), CBX (f), and KJA (h). Binding constants were determined by monitoring the absolute change in the proton chemical shift (|{Delta}{delta}1H|) of the residue with the largest chemical shift change, Ile-69, as a function of inhibitor concentration (c, e, and g). Taking into account that the digital resolution is 3 Hz, the intrinsic accuracy is primarily governed by peak position determination, which is estimated to be ~1 Hz. For GA, this error is smaller than the data symbols.

 



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.
Chemical shift mapping of the PA binding site. Panels are as described above for GA in a-d of Fig. 2, except that a and b represent the third titration point, an equimolar amount of PA and {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain. As for GA, the error in c (~1 Hz) is smaller than the data symbols.

 
To identify the interaction interface, the absolute chemical shift changes,|{Delta}{delta}1H| +|{Delta}{delta}15N| (Hz), between the free and bound state were plotted versus {beta}-pol residue number for the final point in each titration (Figs. 2b and 3b). From each plot, the mean chemical shift change was determined. Residues with significantly large chemical shift changes (>1.5 standard deviations) upon addition of each inhibitor were mapped onto the known structure of {beta}-pol (4). The binding site was found to be the same or very similar for each compound in this group. Taken together, the data implicate as the binding pocket the hydrophobic cleft formed between helix-2 and the N-terminal portion of helix-4, which provides the DNA binding and dRP lyase activities of the enzyme. Inhibitors seem to require two carboxylate groups and aromatic components that could form favorable hydrophobic interactions with Ala-38, Tyr-39, Gly-66, Ile-69, and Leu-85.

Binding constant values were estimated by monitoring the absolute change in individual resonance chemical shifts,|{Delta}{delta}1H| or|{Delta}{delta}15N| (Hz), as a function of inhibitor concentration. In each case, the chemical shift titration curves were fit to a two-state equilibrium model, assuming a single binding site for the inhibitor, as was described previously for single-stranded DNA binding (3). Chemical shift titrations with PA for various residues in the {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain were analyzed (see Supplemental Material). The results for each of these residues were similar, yet the magnitude of the chemical shift for Ile-69 was greater. The measured KD of a single inhibitor differed by no more than 1 order of magnitude for the various resonances found to shift upon binding. Because the accuracy of chemical shift measurements is the same for all resonances, measurement of the change in chemical shift is most accurate for resonances that shift the greatest amount. In addition, the resonances that shift the most are expected to be most representative of direct interaction, rather than indirect effects. For this reason, the estimates for the equilibrium dissociation constants for binding of the compounds to the {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain listed in Table I are those arising from the HN of Ile-69, the resonance found to shift the most throughout the titration experiment. Likewise, the titration curves for KJA, GA, CBX, and PA shown in Figs. 2, c, e, and g and 3c, respectively, were determined by monitoring the absolute change in the proton chemical shift,|{Delta}{delta}1H|, of Ile-69. About half of the compounds tested were found to bind with high affinity (KD ≤10 µM), whereas the remaining compounds were moderately weak binders (KD ≥ 100 µM). The error in the measured KD is quoted as the standard error of the fit. For accurate measurements of this type, it is assumed that a good estimation of the chemical shift of the bound state is made (requiring the KD to be no more than 1 order of magnitude larger than the protein concentration) as well as several titration points during the inflected part of the curve (in our case, requiring the KD to be no less than 1 order of magnitude smaller than the protein concentration). Therefore, for our study, a KD between 10 µM and 1 mM is expected to be accurate, whereas a KD less than 10 µM is assumed to be approximate and an upper estimate.

{beta}-pol Inhibitors Enhance Cellular Sensitivity to MMS—The sensitivity of mouse embryonic fibroblasts to MMS is dependent on the activity, in particular the dRP lyase activity, of {beta}-pol within the cell (5, 6). If the {beta}-pol inhibitors can be taken up into {beta}-pol-expressing cells and bind to the 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol, as described above, and inhibit activity, then these agents should be able to enhance cellular sensitivity to MMS. If the mechanism of sensitization is {beta}-pol-specific, sensitization will be seen in wild-type but not in {beta}-pol null cells, and the resulting sensitivity to MMS in the wild-type cells will mimic that observed in {beta}-pol null cells. In the initial study, the cytotoxicity of nine synthetic {beta}-pol inhibitors was checked in wild-type mouse fibroblasts. For a 24-h exposure, toxicity at a concentration of 100 µM was seen only with CBX (data not shown). In the next series of experiments, the effect of 100 µM of the inhibitors (50 µM for CBX) on MMS cellular sensitivity was ascertained in both wild-type and {beta}-pol null cells. In each case, cells were treated for 1 h with a range of concentrations of MMS in the presence or absence of inhibitor, and then the incubation with inhibitor was continued for a total of 24 h.

The data obtained on the enhancement of MMS-induced growth inhibition at an MMS concentration of 2 mM in wild-type cells and 1 mM in {beta}-pol null cells is compiled in Table I. The values were calculated as represented diagrammatically in Fig. 4. This method for presenting survival data was chosen rather than the more usual comparison of the concentration required for equivalent growth inhibition (e.g. IC50 or IC90). It allowed a more clear distinction between active and inactive inhibitors, particularly in {beta}-pol null cells in which these values were extremely close. All of the compounds except 4'4'-biphenyl dicarboxylic acid were able to sensitize wild-type cells to MMS; 4'4'-biphenyl dicarboxylic acid also had no effect in {beta}-pol null cells. Co-treatment with GA, 2,3-dihydrotrimethyl 1-indene-5-carboxylic acid, and CBX resulted in 5.2-, 4.5- and 4.6-fold sensitizations, respectively, to MMS in wild-type cells. However, these agents also sensitized {beta}-pol null cells (2.6-, 2.7-, and 3.7-fold, respectively), suggesting that the observed sensitization is not the result of a {beta}-pol inhibitory mechanism alone. Another agent, 4,4'-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) bis(benzoic acid), induced a 2.6-fold sensitization in wild-type cells but also a 1.5-fold sensitization in {beta}-pol null cells. The remaining compounds, PA, biquinoline-dicarboxylic acid, naphthochrome green, and MB, were able to sensitize wild-type cells to 2 mM MMS (2.9-11.3-fold), but had very little effect (<1.3-fold) in {beta}-pol null cells, suggesting that for these agents, the sensitization mechanism is {beta}-pol-specific. By far the most active (11.3-fold sensitization in wild-type cells) and the most specific compound (only 1.3-fold sensitization in {beta}-pol null cells) was PA (Table I), which was further characterized in the experiments described below. PA was also found to bind with fairly high affinity to the 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol (9 µM; Table I).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.
Diagrammatic representation of the growth inhibition by MMS. Shown is the growth inhibition in control wild-type and {beta}-pol null cells achieved by a 1-h exposure to MMS and the potential enhancement of sensitivity by co-treatment with a {beta}-pol inhibitor. x = enhancement of growth inhibitory effect of 2 mM MMS in wild-type cells by co-treatment with {beta}-pol inhibitor. y = enhancement of growth inhibitory effect of 1 mM MMS in {beta}-pol null cells by co-treatment with {beta}-pol inhibitor. x/y = enhancement ratio (wild-type/{beta}-pol null).

 
Pamoic Acid Can Sensitize Wild-type but Not {beta}-Pol Null Mouse Fibroblasts to MMS—The schedule and concentration dependence for the effectiveness of PA was first investigated. Wild-type cells were treated with MMS for 1 h in the presence of 300 µM PA. The incubation with PA was for a total of 24 h, as previously, but with varied incubation times before and after the 1-h MMS. A schedule of 7-h PA before MMS and 16-h PA after the 1-h MMS was shown to be the most effective at sensitizing wild-type cells to MMS (Fig. 5a). Negatively charged compounds such as PA enter cells slowly, and a lengthy incubation may be necessary to allow build up of an intracellular PA concentration sufficient to bind enough {beta}-pol protein to result in inhibition of intracellular {beta}-pol activity.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.
Sensitization of mouse fibroblasts to MMS by co-treatment with PA. Growth inhibition assays were conducted as described under "Experimental Procedures." a, wild-type mouse fibroblasts (MB16.3) were exposed for 1 h to MMS in the absence (circles) or presence of 300 µM PA. Cells were treated with PA for 23 h (diamonds), 16 h (triangles), or 7 h (squares) before dosing with MMS; the total PA incubation time was always 24 h. b, wild-type (MB16.3; closed symbols) and {beta}-pol null (MB19.4; open symbols) mouse fibroblasts were pretreated for 7 h with 200 µM (triangles), 300 µM (squares), or 400 µM (diamonds) PA, exposed to MMS for 1 h in the presence of the same concentration of PA, and then the PA incubation continued for a total of 24 h. c, wild-type (MB36.3; closed symbols) and {beta}-pol null (MB38{Delta}4; open symbols) mouse fibroblasts were exposed for 1 h to MMS in the absence (circles) or presence (squares) of 300 µM PA. Pretreatment with PA was for 7 h, and the PA incubation continued after MMS for a total of 24 h. d, {beta}-pol null cells (MB38{Delta}4) expressing wild-type {beta}-pol protein (closed symbols) or 8-kDa domain {beta}-pol protein (open symbols) were exposed for 1 h to MMS in the absence (triangles) or presence (diamonds) of PA. The schedule for PA co-treatment was as described for c. The sensitivity of control non-transfected {beta}-pol null cells is also shown (open circles). Data are the mean ± S.E. of three to four independent experiments or are from representative experiments in which the values are the mean of triplicate determinations.

 
Next, using this schedule, a range of concentrations of PA (200, 300 and 400 µM) was tested. A concentration of 300 µM PA was considerably more effective than 200 µM at sensitizing wild-type cells to MMS and produced only a minimal shift in the {beta}-pol null cell survival curve (Fig. 5b), suggesting a {beta}-pol-specific mechanism for the sensitization. A concentration of 400 µM PA was slightly more effective still in wild-type cells, but now there was a larger effect in the {beta}-pol null cells, especially evident at low concentration MMS (0.5 mM). This suggests that, at this higher concentration, PA has a {beta}-pol targeted but also a nonspecific mechanism.

Using the optimal treatment schedule and the concentration (300 µM) as determined above, the effect of PA was tested in an alternate set of wild-type and {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts. Consistent with the results obtained in the first set of cell lines, co-treatment with PA resulted in a substantial sensitization to MMS in wild-type cells but was totally without effect in the {beta}-pol null cells (Fig. 5c). In the next experiments, we used {beta}-pol null mouse fibroblasts expressing either full-length wild-type {beta}-pol protein or the 8-kDa dRP lyase domain of {beta}-pol (6). As expected, because it is the dRP lyase activity of {beta}-pol that has been shown to be required to protect against MMS-induced cytotoxicity (6), both of these cell lines were considerably more resistant to MMS than the control nontransfected {beta}-pol null cells (Fig. 5d). In addition, PA was able to sensitize both types of transfected cells to MMS. In the 8-kDa-expressing cells, the MMS resistance gained after transfection with the dRP lyase domain was completely reversed by co-treatment with PA (Fig. 5d), suggesting that PA is able to quantitatively inhibit the dRP lyase activity of {beta}-pol.

Inhibition of {beta}-pol dRP Lyase and DNA Synthesis Activities by PA—In view of the results described above, we next investigated the effect of PA on the in vitro dRP lyase and DNA synthesis activities of full-length {beta}-pol protein. With the BER substrate shown in Fig. 6a, we used both [{alpha}-32P]dCTP and 3'-32P-end labeled DNA to separately analyze dRP lyase and DNA synthesis activities in the same reaction mixture. A gel showing the positions of the substrate and the anticipated repair products is presented in Fig. 6b. The products obtained in the absence of PA are shown in lane 2, and those obtained in the presence of increasing concentrations of PA (5-250 µM) are shown in lanes 3-8. A graphical representation of the data in Fig. 6b is presented in Fig. 6c. A PA concentration-dependent equivalent inhibition of both dRP lyase and DNA synthesis activities of {beta}-pol was observed. Inhibition was seen only when PA was preincubated with {beta}-pol before initiation of the BER reactions, perhaps implying that the binding of PA to the {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain is not a rapid process; PA was not an effective inhibitor when preincubated with DNA alone. These findings are consistent with the kinetic behavior of KJA determined previously (10). The results suggest that binding of PA to the 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol results in inhibition of both the DNA synthesis and dRP lyase activities associated with the protein.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Even though natural product inhibitors of {beta}-pol activity in vitro are well known, this is the first report characterizing the biological effects of a series of synthetic small molecule {beta}-pol inhibitory compounds. Here, we correlated binding affinity to the {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain and NMR mapping of the approximate inhibitor-enzyme interfaces to the effects of blocking {beta}-pol activity in vivo in cells. Further, we showed that the most active and {beta}-pol-specific of these agents, PA, can inhibit both dRP lyase and DNA polymerase activities of {beta}-pol on a BER substrate (Fig. 6). As a result of this inhibitory activity in cells, PA is able to sensitize wild-type, but not {beta}-pol null, mouse fibroblasts to the DNA-methylating agent MMS (Fig. 5). Most importantly, our results illustrate that NMR chemical shift mapping techniques can be used to select small molecule enzyme inhibitors, including those with potential for use in a clinical setting.

The natural product KJA has been described previously as a {beta}-pol inhibitor (10). This triterpenoid compound was shown to inhibit rat {beta}-pol-mediated DNA synthesis on activated calf thymus DNA. Now, we demonstrate that this compound binds with fairly high affinity (KD = 11 µM; Table I) to the {beta}-pol N-terminal domain. NMR chemical shift mapping suggests that surface residues that include Gly-66 and Ile-69 form the binding site (Fig. 2). These residues are part of the 8-kDa helix-hairpin-helix motif of {beta}-pol (residues 55-79) that interacts directly with the sugar phosphate backbone downstream of gapped DNA (36). The two structurally similar triterpenoid compounds GA and CBX, and seven other synthetic compounds containing aromatic or other hydrophobic groups in combination with two carboxylate groups (Fig. 1) analyzed in the same way, were found to bind to the same or similar sites on the {beta}-pol N-terminal domain. The compounds bound with varying degrees of affinity, ranging from a KD of 2 µM for MB to 970 µM for 4,4'-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) bis(benzoic acid) (Table I).

The residues of {beta}-pol interacting with the {beta}-pol inhibitors include Lys-35, Gly-66, Ile-69, Arg-83, and Leu-85 that overlap the DNA binding and dRP lyase active sites of the enzyme (Figs. 2 and 3). However, we note that the precision of our backbone chemical shift measurements for identifying ligand and individual side chain interactions should be considered suggestive only. Remote conformational effects can confound interpretations, as noted recently with MutT (37), and side-chain interactions are not directly measured through backbone chemical shift changes. Nevertheless, these residues are in the dRP lyase active site, and Lys-35 is known to be involved in both single-stranded DNA binding activity and in recognition of a 5'-phosphate in gapped DNA structures (38, 39).

Previous NMR mapping studies have analyzed binding of the fatty acids linoleic and nervonic acid and the bile acid lithocholic acid to the N-terminal 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol (29, 30). For nervonic acid, the major shifted amino acids were Leu-11, Lys-35, His-51, and Thr-79; for lithocholic acid, they were Lys-60, Leu-77, and Thr-79. Several of these residues are also within the 8-kDa helix-hairpin-helix motif; Lys-60 as well as Lys-35 is involved in single-stranded DNA binding activity (39). Each of these previously reported natural product compounds bound to the 8-kDa domain as a 1:1 complex with a KD in the 1-3 mM range.

It is difficult to correlate the dissociation constants for binding to {beta}-pol 8-kDa domain determined by NMR and the ability of the compounds to sensitize wild-type cells. The most effective compound in wild-type cells, PA, did have a fairly high binding affinity (KD = 9 µM), but the next most active agent, GA, exhibited lower binding affinity (KD = 437 µM; Table I). The compound with the highest binding affinity, MB, exhibited an intermediate activity in cells, whereas the only inactive compound, 4'4'-biphenyl dicarboxylic acid, had one of the lowest affinities (KD = 858 µM; Table I). Obviously, other factors (e.g. the ability of compounds to penetrate cells and access nuclear {beta}-pol protein) are important determinants of in vivo activity. It is also possible that the discrepancy between the NMR binding constants and the results in cells reflects the fact that the NMR studies used the isolated 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol, whereas in cells, inhibition of full-length {beta}-pol protein is required. Likewise, a 50% inhibition of the in vitro BER activities of {beta}-pol occurred at ~100 µM PA (Fig. 6c), whereas the KD for binding to the purified 8-kDa domain was 9 µM (Table I). Hence, the ability of PA to gain access to its binding site on {beta}-pol was different in the two experimental systems.

{beta}-pol protects cells against the harmful effects of single base lesions in DNA as a result of its roles in BER. The 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol with dRP lyase, but no DNA synthesis activity, is sufficient to protect cells from MMS-induced cytotoxicity (Fig. 5d and Ref. 6). In {beta}-pol null cells expressing the 8-kDa domain, the enhanced MMS resistance in the transfected cells could be completely reversed by PA (Fig. 5d), directly demonstrating that PA can completely inhibit intracellular dRP lyase activity. In addition, we show that PA can inhibit both {beta}-pol-dependent dRP lyase and DNA synthesis activities in an in vitro assay on a specific BER substrate (Fig. 6). Taken together, the results suggest that PA can bind to the 8-kDa domain of {beta}-pol in vivo as well as in vitro, resulting in inhibition of both dRP lyase and DNA synthesis activities associated with this protein and sensitization of {beta}-pol-expressing cells to MMS (Fig. 5).


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This research was supported in part by Grants GM52738 (to G. P. M.) and ES09847 (to M. R. G.) from the National Institutes of Health and by Grant CA50771 from the National Institutes of Health (to S. M. H.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. 1-3. Back

§ Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

Current address: Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai 200031, China. Back

{dagger} Deceased. Back

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: 111 T. W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Tel.: 919-541-3267; Fax: 919-541-3592; E-mail: wilson5{at}niehs.nih.gov.

1 The abbreviations used are: {beta}-pol, DNA polymerase {beta}; BER, base excision repair; AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic; dRP, deoxyribose phosphate; MMS, methyl methanesulfonate; KJA, koetjapic acid; PA, pamoic acid; GA, glycyrrhizic acid; CBX, carbenoxolone; MB, mordant blue. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. William A. Beard for help with figure preparation.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Srivastava, D. K., Vande Berg, B. J., Prasad, R., Molina, J. T., Beard, W. A., Tomkinson, A. E., and Wilson, S. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21203-21209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Beard, W. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 262, 98-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Liu, D.-J., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., DeRose, E. F., and Mullen, G. P. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6188-6200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Maciejewski, M. W., Liu, D., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., and Mullen, G. P. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 296, 229-253[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Sobol, R. W., Horton, J. K., Kuhn, R., Gu, H., Singhal, R. K., Prasad, R., Rajewsky, K., and Wilson, S. H. (1996) Nature 379, 183-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Sobol, R. W., Prasad, R., Evenski, A., Baker, A., Yang, X.-P., Horton, J. K., and Wilson, S. H. (2000) Nature 405, 807-810[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Horton, J. K., Joyce-Gray, D. F., Pachkowski, B. F., Swenberg, J. A., and Wilson, S. H. (2003) DNA Repair 2, 27-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Chen, J., Zhang, Y.-H., Wang, L.-K., Sucheck, S. J., Snow, A. M., and Hecht, S. M. (1998) J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 2769-2770
  9. Deng, J.-Z., Sun, D.-A., Starck, S. R., Hecht, S. M., Cerny, R. L., and Engen, J. R. (1999) J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1147-1149
  10. Sun, D.-A., Starck, S. R., Locke, E. P., and Hecht, S. M. (1999) J. Nat. Prod. 62, 1110-1113[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Mizushina, Y., Takahashi, N., Ogawa, A., Tsurugaya, K., Koshino, H., Takemura, M., Yoshida, S., Matsukage, A., Sugawara, F., and Sakaguchi, K. (1999) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 126, 430-436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Deng, J.-Z., Starck, S. R., and Hecht, S. M. (1999) J. Nat. Prod. 62, 477-480[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Deng, J.-Z., Starck, S. R., and Hecht, S. M. (2000) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 8, 247-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Deng, J.-Z., Starck, S. R., Sun, D.-A., Sabat, M., and Hecht, S. M. (2000) J. Nat. Prod. 63, 1356-1360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Ogawa, A., Murate, T., Izuta, S., Takemura, M., Furuta, K., Kobayashi, J., Kamikawa, T., Nimura, Y., and Yoshida, S. (1998) Int. J. Cancer 76, 512-518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Mizushina, Y., Watanabe, I., Ohta, K., Takemura, M., Sahara, H., Takahashi, N., Gasa, S., Sugawara, F., Matsukage, A., Yoshida, S., and Sakaguchi, K. (1998) Biochem. Pharmacol. 55, 537-541[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Tanaka, N., Kitamura, A., Mizushina, Y., Sugawara, F., and Sakaguchi, K. (1998) J. Nat. Prod. 61, 193-197[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Mizushina, Y., Kamisuki, S., Kasai, N., Shimazaki, N., Takemura, M., Asahara, H., Linn, S., Yoshida, S., Matsukage, A., Koiwai, O., Sugawara, F., Yoshida, H., and Sakaguchi, K. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 630-638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Perpelescu, M., Kobayashi, J., Furuta, M., Ito, Y., Izuta, S., Takemura, M., Suzuki, M., and Yoshida, S. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 7610-7616[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kasai, N., Mizushina, Y., Sugawara, F., and Sakaguchi, K. (2002) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 132, 819-828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Mizushina, Y., Iida, A., Ohta, K., Sugawara, F., and Sakaguchi, K. (2000) Biochem. J. 350, 757-763
  22. Raaphorst, G. P., Ng, C. E., and Yang, D. P. (2002) Int. J. Hyperthermia 18, 33-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Miller, M. R., and Chinault, D. N. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 10204-10209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Xu, Y.-j., Kim, E. Y., and Demple, B. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28837-28844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Horton, J. K., Baker, A., Vande Berg, B. J., Sobol, R. W., and Wilson, S. H. (2002) DNA Repair 1, 317-333[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Canitrot, Y., Cazaux, C., Frechet, M., Bouayadi, K., Lesca, C., Salles, B., and Hoffmann, J.-S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 12586-12590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Horton, J. K., Srivastava, D. K., Zmudzka, B. Z., and Wilson, S. H. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3810-3815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ma, J., Starck, S. R., and Hecht, S. M. (1999) J. Nat. Prod. 62, 1660-1663[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Mizushina, Y., Ohkubo, T., Date, T., Yamaguchi, T., Saneyoshi, M., Sugawara, F., and Sakaguchi, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25599-25607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Mizushina, Y., Ohkubo, T., Sugawara, F., and Sakaguchi, K. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 12606-12613[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Slupphaug, G., Eftedal, I., Kavli, B., Bharati, S., Helle, N. M., Haug, T., Levine, D. W., and Krokan, H. E. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 128-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Strauss, P. R., Beard, W. A., Patterson, T. A., and Wilson, S. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1302-1307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lian, L. Y., Barsukov, I. L., Sutcliffe, M. J., Sze, K. H., and Roberts, G. C. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 239, 657-700[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Horton, J. K., Prasad, R., Hou, E., and Wilson, S. H. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2211-2218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Butler, W. B. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 141, 70-73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Mullen, G. P., and Wilson, S. H. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4713-4717[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Saraswat, V., Massiah, M. A., Lopez, G., Amzel, L. M., and Mildvan, A. S. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 15566-15577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Sawaya, M. R., Prasad, R., Wilson, S. H., Kraut, J., and Pelletier, H. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11205-11215[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Prasad, R., Beard, W. A., Chyan, J. Y., Maciejewski, M. W., Mullen, G. P., and Wilson, S. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11121-11126[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
X. Li, J. Zhang, Z. Cao, J. Wu, and Y. Shi
Solution structure of GOPC PDZ domain and its interaction with the C-terminal motif of neuroligin
Protein Sci., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 2149 - 2158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
F. Boudsocq, P. Benaim, Y. Canitrot, M. Knibiehler, F. Ausseil, J. P. Capp, A. Bieth, C. Long, B. David, I. Shevelev, et al.
Modulation of