Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M404085200 on August 12, 2004

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 279, Issue 43, 44544-44553, October 22, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/43/44544    most recent
M404085200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lennartsson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Linnekin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lennartsson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Linnekin, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Synergistic Growth of Stem Cell Factor and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor Involves Kinase-dependent and -independent Contributions from c-Kit*

Johan Lennartsson{ddagger}, R. Shivakrupa, and Diana Linnekin

From the Basic Research Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland 21702

Received for publication, April 13, 2004 , and in revised form, August 4, 2004.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Stem cell factor (SCF) binds and activates the receptor tyrosine kinase c-Kit, and this interaction is critical for normal hematopoiesis. SCF also synergizes with a variety of growth factors, including those binding members of the cytokine receptor superfamily. The mechanisms mediating this synergy remain to be defined. The present study investigates both structural and biochemical cross-talk between c-Kit and the receptor for granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). We have found that c-Kit forms a complex with the {beta}-chain of the GM-CSF receptor, and this interaction involves the first part of the c-Kit kinase domain. Although inhibition of c-Kit kinase activity completely blocked SCF-induced proliferation, there was still greater than additive growth induced by SCF in combination with GM-CSF. In contrast, an inhibitory antibody against the extracellular domain of c-Kit (K-27) completely inhibited growth in response to SCF alone or in combination with GM-CSF. These results support a kinase-independent component of the synergistic growth induced by SCF and GM-CSF that may relate to interaction of these receptors. It is also clear that a significant part of the synergistic growth is dependent of c-Kit kinase activity. Although synergistic increases in phosphorylation of c-Kit and the {beta}-chain of the GM-CSF receptor were not observed, SCF and GM-CSF in combination prolonged the duration of Erk1/2 phosphorylation in a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent manner. Consistent with these findings, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is synergistically activated by SCF and GM-CSF together. Hence, c-Kit makes both kinase-independent and -dependent contributions to the proliferative synergy induced by SCF in combination with GM-CSF.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The mechanisms mediating hematopoiesis are not fully understood but require interactions between a wide array of cell surface receptors with growth factors and cytokines. Two receptor families important for hematopoiesis are the cytokine receptor superfamily and the receptor tyrosine kinase superfamily. Ligands for the cytokine receptors include granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF),1 interleukin-3 (IL-3), and erythropoietin (Epo). The receptor for human GM-CSF is comprised of a GM-CSF-specific {alpha}-chain and a {beta}-chain shared with the receptors for IL-3 and IL-5 (1, 2). Upon GM-CSF stimulation the {alpha}- and {beta}-chains cluster together, bringing associated cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases close together resulting in activation and subsequent tyrosine phosphorylation of the {beta}-chain. Stem cell factor (SCF) binds to the receptor tyrosine kinase c-Kit leading to its homodimerization and autophosphorylation (3). Phosphorylated tyrosine residues, in c-Kit and the {beta}-chain, function as docking sites for signal transduction molecules with SH2 domains. The SH2 domain is a stretch of ~100 amino acids that binds phosphorylated tyrosine residues in an amino acid sequence context-dependent manner (4).

Previous studies have suggested that c-Kit may play a role in responses mediated by IL-3 and GM-CSF. Certain c-Kit inhibitory antibodies reduce colony formation induced by GM-CSF (5). Further, a decrease in IL-3-induced proliferation was seen after treatment of CD34+ bone marrow progenitors with antisense oligonucleotides against c-Kit (6). The A/J mice strain do not express the {alpha}-chain of the IL-3 receptor and hence do not respond well to IL-3 as a single factor (7, 8). However, these mice still respond synergistically to IL-3 in combination with SCF. It has been shown that the Epo receptor and c-Kit form a physical complex that allows trans-phosphorylation to occur, and this has been suggested to play an important role in erythroid colony formation (9, 10). Taken together these studies support a role for c-Kit in cytokine signaling. Thus, SCF synergizes with ligands for the cytokine receptor superfamily members (11). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these events remain to be established. Because the in vivo effects of SCF are mediated primarily in combination with other factors, it is vital to have a detailed understanding of this process. Synergistic activation of early signal transduction pathways, including both the Erks and Stat proteins, has been reported (12–17). However, there are a lot of inconsistent results that may relate to variations in experimental procedures and/or the lineage and differentiation state of the cells used as model systems. Information concerning mechanisms mediating synergistic proliferation is valuable for designing means for optimal in vitro expansion of primitive hematopoietic stem- and progenitor cells as well as for other therapeutic uses.

In the search for a molecular mechanism behind the synergy between SCF and GM-CSF we found that c-Kit and the {beta}-chain form a complex. Several lines of evidence suggest this complex plays a structural role in synergy: 1) SCF in combination with GM-CSF induced greater than additive proliferation in the presence of a c-Kit kinase inhibitor, and 2) an antibody specific for a portion of the c-Kit extracellular domain reduced proliferation in response to SCF and GM-CSF, both alone and in combination. However, from our results it is clear that a large part of the synergy is dependent on c-Kit enzymatic activity. SCF and GM-CSF in combination induces a sustained phosphorylation of proteins in the MAP kinase pathway, and this correlated with synergistic activation of PI 3-kinase. In contrast, activation of the MAP kinases Erk1/2 by SCF and GM-CSF as single factors does not require PI 3-kinase activity. Pharmacological inhibition of Mek1/2 partially reduced synergistic proliferation. Thus, the Erk cascade contributes to the proliferative response by these factors. In conclusion, multiple mechanisms contribute to synergistic growth induced by SCF and GM-CSF.


   EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibodies and Inhibitors—Antibodies specific for phosphorylated Mek1/2 (#9121), Erk1/2 (#9106), and pTyr719-Kit (#3391) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Antibodies recognizing c-Kit (sc-168) and the GM-CSF receptor {beta}-chain (sc-678) and phosphotyrosine (sc-7020) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Pan-Ras antibody (05–516) and GST-Raf-RBD (14–278) were from Upstate Biotechnologies (Lake Placid, NY). The PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin was from Sigma, whereas LY294002, PD98059, and AG1296 were from Calbiochem. Horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-mouse/rabbit IgG was from Cell Signaling Technology. Protein concentration assay reagents were from Pierce. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent was from PerkinElmer Life Sciences.

Cell Lines—The growth factor-dependent megakaryoblastic cell line MO7e was maintained in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FCS (HyClone, Salt Lake City, UT), 1% penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine (Invitrogen), and 50 ng/ml human SCF (PeproTech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ), and 5 ng/ml human GM-CSF (PeproTech Inc.).

Cell Proliferation Assays—For [3H]thymidine incorporation assays, cells were washed twice with RPMI and resuspended in RPMI plus 10% FCS at 105 cells/ml. Then 104 cells were seeded in each well of a 96-well plate. In the cases were cells were treated with PD98059 (10 µM), AG1296 (5 µM), wortmannin (100 nM), LY294002 (10 µM), or K-27 antibody (5 µg/ml), they were preincubated for 30 min before addition of growth factors. This was followed by the addition of 100 µl of media with or without human SCF at 50 ng/ml and human GM-CSF at 5 ng/ml and inhibitors as indicated. Cells were incubated for 48 h, and then 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 5 h and harvested with a cell harvester (Mach II M, Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD), and [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured by liquid scintillation counting.

Immunoprecipitation, Total Cell Lysates, and Immunoblotting— Cells were pelleted and lysed at 107/ml with ice-cold lysis buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 20 mM Tris base, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM tetrasodium pyrophosphate, 25 mM {beta}-glycerophosphate, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, pH 7.4) and one tablet Complete inhibitor mixture per 50 ml of lysis buffer (Roche Applied Science). The lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 10 min at 4 °C at 14,000 rpm.

c-Kit or the GM-CSF receptor {beta}-chain was immunoprecipitated from 1 mg of cleared lysate with 2 µg of antibody for 2 h on ice. Following addition of protein A- or G-Sepharose the suspension was incubated rotating for 1 h. Beads were washed three times with lysis buffer, and bound proteins were eluted by incubation with SDS sample buffer for 5 min at 95 °C. Samples were resolved with SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon-P, and immunoblotted according to the antibody manufacturer's instructions.

Total cell lysates were prepared by using radioimmune precipitation assay lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris base, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM tetrasodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, pH 7.4) and one tablet Complete inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science) per 50 ml of lysis buffer.

GST Fusion Protein Production—Overnight cultures of Escherichia coli DH5{alpha} transformed with constructs of GST fusion proteins of the various regions of the intracellular domain of c-Kit were grown in LB with ampicillin (18). The next day the subcultures were diluted 10 times in fresh LB. GST fusion protein production was induced by 1.5-h incubation with 1 mM isopropyl 1-thio-{beta}-D-galactopyranoside at 30 °C. The bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and then resuspended in 1 ml of 8 M urea, 0.5% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with one tablet of Complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science) per 50 ml of buffer. After 30-s sonication, the suspension was incubated for 1 h at room temperature and then diluted 10-fold in phosphate-buffered saline complemented with 1 mM dithiothreitol. The lysate was dialyzed overnight at 4 °C against a 100-fold volume of phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM dithiothreitol. The dialyzed material was centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C, and the supernatant was recovered. Next pre-swollen glutathione-agarose beads were added, and the mixture was incubated under rotation for 30 min at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with Complete protease inhibitor mixture. The yield and integrity of the GST fusion proteins was analyzed using SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining.

GST Binding Assay—Cell lysates (1 mg of total protein) were incubated with 5 µg of GST fusion protein adsorbed to glutathione-Sepharose beads for 2 h rotating at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with lysis buffer, and bound proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon P membrane, and immunoblotted as described above. Equal loading of GST fusion protein was verified by Ponceau S staining of the Immobilon P membrane.

Affinity Precipitation of Cellular Ras-GTP—Ras-GTP loading was analyzed using GST-Raf-RBD pull down assays, performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Upstate Biotechnologies, Lake Placid, NY). In brief, equal amounts of lysates (1.5 mg) were incubated with 10 µg of GST-Raf-RBD conjugated to agarose beads rotating for 30 min at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times, and associated proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with anti-Ras antibodies. Equal loading were verified by running a parallel gel with total cell lysate.

PI 3-Kinase Assay—c-Kit was immunoprecipitated from 0.3 mg of cleared lysate as described above. Next, beads were washed twice with lysis buffer, once with 1 M LiCl, and once with PI 3-kinase assay buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EGTA). The buffer was removed completely, and 50 µl of PI 3-kinase assay buffer containing 0.3 µl of phosphoinositide (20 mg/ml stock; Sigma catalog number P-6023) was added to each tube. Next, 5 µl of MgCl2 mix (10x; x = sample number): 5 mM ATP-0.2x/2 M MgCl2-0.5x/[{gamma}-32P]ATP-0.5x/PI 3-kinase assay buffer-3.8x) was added followed by a 20-min incubation at room temperature. The kinase reaction was terminated by adding 150 µl of CHCl3:MeOH:HCl (100:200:2) and 120 µl of CHCl3. The tubes were mixed, and the mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 1 min. 150 µl of lower phase was transfer into a fresh tube. 100 µl of wash buffer was added, contents were mixed, the mixture was centrifuged, and 110 µl of lower phase was transferred to a new tube. One more extraction with wash buffer was performed. 80 µl of lower phase was transferred to a new tube and allowed to dry. The dried lipid was reconstituted with 20 µl of CHCl3 and spotted onto a TLC plate (Z29297 [GenBank] , Sigma). The TLC plate was transferred to a chamber saturated with CHCl3:MeOH:NH4OH:H20 (215:190:25:35). The samples were separated by TLC, and PI 3-kinase activity was visualized with autoradiography and quantitated using a PhosphorImager Storm 860 (Amersham Biosciences).


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
SCF Combined with GM-CSF Induces Synergistic Proliferation in MO7e Cells—We were interested in understanding the mechanism(s) mediating synergistic growth by SCF and GM-CSF. Previous work has shown that the megakaryoblastic cell line MO7e is a suitable model for studying synergy (19, 20). Fig. 1A illustrates the greater than additive tritiated thymidine incorporation of these cells in response to GM-CSF and SCF combined compared with responses to each as a single factor.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.
SCF combined with GM-CSF induces synergistic proliferation in MO7e cells. A, MO7e cells were incubated in RPMI supplemented with 10% FCS in the presence of SCF (50 ng/ml), GM-CSF (5 ng/ml), or both for 48 h followed by a 5-h [3H]thymidine pulse. B, [3H]thymidine incorporation assay of MO7e cells as described but in the presence of reagents that interfere with c-Kit signaling. Results are plotted as mean of triplicate samples. The results of a representative experiment of four are shown.

 
Next we investigated synergistic growth of MO7e cells in the presence of reagents that interfere with c-Kit function through two distinct mechanisms. One involved inhibition of c-Kit kinase activity, and the other targeted a structural domain in the c-Kit extracellular region with an antibody. Addition of a low molecular weight inhibitor targeting c-Kit kinase activity (AG1296) resulted in a complete inhibition of SCF-induced proliferation but had no significant effect on proliferation induced by GM-CSF (Fig. 1B). This contrasted the minimal effects of the Me2SO vehicle control on growth. Fig. 5 (see below) illustrates that AG1296 completely blocked SCF-induced phosphorylation of c-Kit and has no effect of GM-CSF-induced phosphorylation of the {beta}-chain subunit of the receptor. Interestingly, SCF and GM-CSF still induced synergistic proliferation, albeit reduced, in the presence of this c-Kit inhibitor (Fig. 1B). This suggests a structural role for c-Kit in synergistic growth with GM-SCF, in addition to a kinase-dependent signaling function. To further investigate the possibility of a structural role for c-Kit in synergistic growth, we included an inhibitory antibody (K-27), specific for the fourth immunoglobulin-like domain in the extracellular region of c-Kit (21), in the proliferation assay. This resulted in complete inhibition of the SCF-induced DNA synthesis (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, this antibody also inhibited GM-CSF-induced proliferation (50–60% reduction), as well as blocked synergistic growth of SCF and GM-CSF in combination. An isotype-matched control antibody had minimal effect on growth. One model compatible with these data is that the K-27 antibody interferes with a physical complex between c-Kit and the {beta}-chain of the GM-CSF receptor.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5.
No trans-phosphorylation occurs between c-Kit and the GM-CSF receptor. MO7e cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml SCF, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF, or the combination as indicated in the presence or absence of 5 µM AG1296. Cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-c-Kit antibody (A) or an anti-{beta}-chain antibody (B), followed by 8% SDS-PAGE and transfer to an Immobilon-P membrane. After blocking, the membrane was probed with phosphotyrosine antibodies and after stripping with c-Kit (A) or {beta}-chain antibodies (B). The results of a representative experiment of four are shown. S, SCF; G, GM-CSF; SG, SCF plus GM-CSF; Ip, immunoprecipitation; Ib, immunoblot; C, indicates immunoprecipitation with species-matched control antibody.

 
c-Kit Forms a Complex with the {beta}-Chain of the GM-CSF Receptor—To determine if the {beta}-chain of the GM-CSF receptor associates with c-Kit, we immunoprecipitated the {beta}-chain from cells stimulated with SCF, GM-CSF, or the combination. The immunocomplex was resolved using SDS-PAGE and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane. Fig. 2 (top panel) shows a phosphotyrosine immunoblot displaying bands with sizes corresponding to c-Kit (~160 kDa) and the {beta}-chain (~130 kDa) in the {beta}-chain immunoprecipitate. To confirm the identity of the phosphotyrosine bands, the membrane was reprobed with antibodies specific for c-Kit and {beta}-chain (Fig. 2, middle panel and lower panel). This experiment shows that a fraction of the c-Kit population is constitutively associated with the {beta}-chain, and within this complex c-Kit can be activated by SCF. Notably, the integrity of this complex was highly dependent on lysis conditions (data not shown). In MO7e cells we were unable to co-immunoprecipitate the {beta}-chain with c-Kit. However, in the murine cell line MTHC transfected with human c-Kit we could observe the reciprocal interaction with endogenous murine {beta}-chain (data not shown). Thus a likely explanation for the failure to detect the {beta}-chain in c-Kit immunoprecipitates using MO7e cells is that the antibodies we utilized against {beta}-chain do not detect the human protein well enough in immunoblotting to visualize the co-immunoprecipitation. Further experiments confirmed that the {beta}-chain antibodies were superior in detecting the murine protein compared with human (data not shown).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.
c-Kit co-immunoprecipitates with the {beta}-chain of the GM-CSF receptor. MO7e cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml SCF, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF, or the combination as indicated. Cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-{beta}-chain antibody, followed by 8% SDS-PAGE and transfer to an Immobilon-P membrane. After blocking, the membrane was probed with anti-phosphotyrosine, c-Kit, or {beta}-chain antibodies. The results of a representative experiment of four are shown. S, SCF; G, GM-CSF; SG, SCF plus GM-CSF; Ip, immunoprecipitation; Ib, immunoblot; C, immunoprecipitation with species-matched control antibody.

 
To map the region of c-Kit involved in binding to the {beta}-chain, we utilized GST fusion proteins of the different regions of the c-Kit intracellular domain. These include the juxtamembrane region (JXM, amino acids 544–577), the first part of the catalytic domain (K1, amino acids 578–685), the kinase insert (INS, amino acids 686–762), the second part of the catalytic domain (K2, amino acids 763–925), and the C-terminal tail (CT, amino acids 926–976). Because the association detected in the co-immunoprecipitation experiment was constitutive and, thus, independent of the phosphorylation status, we utilized unphosphorylated GST fusion proteins. Fig. 3A demonstrates that the {beta}-chain co-precipitated most readily with the first part of the kinase domain. Equal loading of GST fusion proteins was verified by Ponceau S staining (Fig. 3B). This experiment indicates an intracellular mechanism for the interaction between c-Kit and the {beta}-chain but does not exclude contributions from the c-Kit extracellular domain.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.
The {beta}-chain associates to the first part of the c-Kit kinase domain. MO7e cells were lysed, and equal amounts of lysates were incubated with GST fusion proteins of different regions of c-Kit intracellular region (JXM, juxtamembrane; K1, first part of the kinase domain; INS, kinase insert; K2, second part of kinase domain; and CT, C-terminal tail). After washing, the bound proteins were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane. After blocking, the membrane was probed with {beta}-chain antibodies (A). Loading of GST fusion protein was visualized using Ponceau S staining (B). The results of a representative experiment of three are shown. Ip, immunoprecipitation; Ib, immunoblot; C, immunoprecipitation with species matched control antibody; *, expected size of GST fusion protein.

 
Stimulation with SCF or GM-CSF Does Not Result in Transphosphorylation of the Reciprocal Receptor—To investigate the possibility of trans-phosphorylation between of c-Kit by kinases associated with the GM-CSF receptor, we stimulated MO7e cells for various periods of time with SCF, GM-CSF, or the combination. Cells were lysed, and c-Kit was immunoprecipitated and resolved using SDS-PAGE. After transfer to Immobilon-P membranes, immunoblotting with phosphotyrosine and c-Kit antibodies was performed. As can be seen in Fig. 4, no significant phosphorylation of c-Kit could be detected after GM-CSF treatment. Furthermore, stimulation with SCF together with GM-CSF did not enhance phosphorylation of c-Kit beyond that seen by SCF alone. These results do not exclude the possibility that trans-phosphorylation of c-Kit occurs at one or more specific tyrosine residues with such low stoichiometry that it is not detected by global phosphotyrosine immunoblotting. However, phosphospecific antibodies directed to tyrosine residues 703, 719, 823, and 936 in c-Kit did not reveal any significant differences in phosphorylation levels after stimulation with SCF alone or in combination with GM-CSF (see Fig. 8A and data not shown). This result is of importance because it contrasts the results for c-Kit and the Epo receptor where trans-phosphorylation has been observed and suggested to contribute to synergy (9).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.
SCF- and GM-CSF-induced phosphorylation of c-Kit. MO7e cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml SCF, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF, or the combination for the times indicated. The cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-c-Kit antibody, followed by 8% SDS-PAGE, and transfer to an Immobilon-P membrane. After blocking, the membrane was probed with phosphotyrosine antibodies and after stripping with c-Kit antibodies. The results of a representative experiment of four are shown. Ip, immunoprecipitation; Ib, immunoblot; C, indicates immunoprecipitation with species-matched control antibody.

 



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 8.
PI 3-kinase coupling to c-Kit after stimulation with SCF and GM-CSF as single factors or in combination. MO7e cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml SCF, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF, or the combination as indicated. The cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-c-Kit antibody (A) or an anti-p85 antibody (B). Immunocomplexes were separated 8% SDS-PAGE and transfer to an Immobilon-P membrane. After blocking, the membrane was immunoblotted as indicated. C shows the enzymatic activity of PI 3-kinase after stimulation with SCF, GM-CSF, or the combination. For each panel the results of a representative experiment of three are shown. Ip, immunoprecipitation; Ib, immunoblot; C, indicates immunoprecipitation with species-matched control antibody.

 
To assess whether c-Kit contributed to GM-CSF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the {beta}-chain, cells were pre-treated with a low molecular weight inhibitor against c-Kit (AG1296) before stimulation. c-Kit or the {beta}-chain were immunoprecipitated, and proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE followed by transfer to Immobilon-P membranes and subsequent immunoblotting. Fig. 5A illustrates that preincubation with AG1296 completely blocks SCF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Kit. In contrast, tyrosine phosphorylation of the {beta}-chain is not significantly affected by AG1296 (Fig. 5B). Thus, GM-CSF receptor {beta}-chain tyrosine phosphorylation is not dependent on c-Kit kinase activity.

In summary, our findings demonstrate that c-Kit and the {beta}-chain component of the GM-CSF receptor interact in vitro and in situ. This interaction is constitutive and does not lead to trans-phosphorylation of either receptor. Further, inhibition of c-Kit activity does not completely eliminate synergistic growth in response to SCF and GM-CSF. These data in combination with the striking effect of an antibody specific for the fourth immunoglobulin-like domain of c-Kit on synergy in response to SCF with GM-CSF support the possibility of kinase-independent mechanisms contributing to synergistic growth in response to SCF and GM-CSF.

The MAP Kinase Pathway Is Synergistically Activated by SCF in Combination with GM-CSF—Although the above data demonstrate that c-Kit makes kinase-independent contributions to synergy, treatment with an inhibitor of c-Kit (Fig. 1B) suggested kinase-dependent components as well. Accordingly, we next sought to define kinase-dependent components of synergistic growth. Figs. 4 and 5 demonstrate that neither c-Kit nor the {beta}-chain component of the GM-CSF receptor was phosphorylated synergistically in response to both factors in combination. This finding is supported in the literature (22, 23). SCF activates a variety of different signaling pathways downstream of activated c-Kit (24). Consequently we next were interested in addressing whether one or more pathways downstream of c-Kit contributed to synergy. One pathway of particular interest is the Ras-MAP kinase cascade. There is conflicting data in the literature relating to whether the Ras-MAP kinase pathway is synergistically activated in response to SCF in combination with GM-CSF or IL-3. Work by O'Farrell et al. (12), Pearson et al. (13), and Lee et al. (15) suggested synergistic activation of this pathway in response to both factors. In contrast, in the studies of Hallek et al. (22) and Miyazawa et al. (25) this was not observed. In an attempt to resolve this controversy we examined the effect of SCF and GM-CSF on activation of the Ras-MAP kinase pathway. We first examined the role of c-Kit kinase activity in SCF-induced activation of Erk1/2. Indeed, studies with the c-Kit inhibitor demonstrate that activation of this pathway is dependent on c-Kit activity (data not shown). Phosphorylation of both Erk1/2 and Mek1/2 on residues Thr202/Tyr204 and Ser217/Thr221, respectively, closely correlates with activation of these kinases. Consequently we used phospho-specific antibodies directed against both these proteins. Both Mek1/2 and Erk1/2 were phosphorylated synergistically after concurrent stimulation with SCF and GM-CSF (Fig. 6, B and C). Notably, the duration of both Mek1/2 and Erk1/2 phosphorylation is extended after stimulation with both factors.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6.
The MAP kinase pathway is synergistically activated by SCF in combination with GM-CSF. MO7e cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml SCF, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF, or the combination as indicated. Total cell lysates were prepared, or a GST-Raf-RBD pull-down assay was performed (A), followed by SDS-PAGE and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane. After blocking the membrane was probed with pan-Ras (A), phospho-Mek1/2 antibodies (B), or phospho-Erk1/2 antibodies (C). Equal loading was verified by immunoblotting of total Mek1/2 and Erk2, respectively. For the GST-Raf-RBD pull-down assay equal loading was confirmed by running a parallel gel with total cell lysates and pan-Ras immunoblotting. The results of a representative experiment of four are shown. PD, GST fusion protein pull-down assay; Ib, immunoblot; TCL, total cell lysate.

 
Ras is a key signaling component upstream of both Mek1/2 and Erk1/2. Therefore we next investigated if there was a synergistic increase in Ras activity in response to SCF and GM-CSF in combination. Fig. 6A shows no significant synergistic increase in Ras GTP loading after stimulation with SCF and GM-CSF compared with single factors. In some, but not all experiments, an increase in Ras GTP loading was noted in response to SCF combined with GM-CSF at later time points. These data suggest synergistic activation of the MAP kinase pathway occurs downstream of Ras and upstream of Mek1/2.

PI 3-kinase Contributes to Synergistic Activation of MAP Kinases—Previous studies have implicated PI 3-kinase in activation of Erk1/2 (14). How PI 3-kinase modulates Erk1/2 activation is not clear. One possibility is that the phospholipids generated by PI 3-kinase recruits PH domain-containing proteins like Gab2 to the cell membrane where they become phosphorylated and participate in activation of the Ras-MAP kinase pathway (26, 27). Another possibility is that activation of protein kinase C{epsilon} by PI 3-kinase lipid products leads to increased Raf-1 kinase activity, culminating in Erk1/2 activation (28, 29). Consequently we next investigated the role of PI 3-kinase in synergistic activation of MAP kinase by SCF in combination with GM-CSF. To this end, MO7e cells were stimulated for different periods of time in the presence or absence of the PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin. Total cell lysates were prepared, separated with SDS-PAGE, and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane. The membrane was then immunoblotted with phospho-Erk1/2 antibodies. Fig. 7 shows that the extended Erk1/2 phosphorylation in response to concurrent stimulation with SCF and GM-CSF is sensitive to PI 3-kinase inhibition. Similar results were obtained with LY294002, another inhibitor of PI 3-kinase (data not shown). As discussed above a possible mechanism for the PI 3-kinase-dependent and extended Erk1/2 phosphorylation by concurrent stimulation with SCF and GM-CSF could be enhanced phosphorylation of Gab2 due to increased membrane localization. However, we were unable to detect any differences in Gab2 phosphorylation after stimulation with SCF in combination with GM-CSF compared with SCF alone (data not shown). Similar results were obtained for other proteins analyzed, including c-Cbl, CrkII, CrkL, Dok-1, Gab-1, and Grb2 (data not shown).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 7.
Effect of PI 3-kinase inhibition on MAP kinase phosphorylation. MO7e cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml SCF, 5 ng/ml GM-CSF, or the combination in the presence of 100 nM wortmannin as indicated. Total cell lysates were prepared and separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane. After blocking, the membrane was probed with anti-phospho-Erk1/2 antibodies. Equal loading was verified by total Erk2 immunoblotting. The results of a representative experiment of three are shown. TCL, total cell lysate; Ib, immunoblot.

 
PI 3-kinase can be activated directly by c-Kit through interaction of p85PI 3-kinase with tyrosine 721 of human c-Kit or 719 of murine c-Kit. Alternately, PI 3-kinase can be activated through pathways independent of direct interaction with c-Kit. These include recruitment through other proteins such as c-Cbl and CrkL (30, 31). Also constitutively activated Ras leads to activation of PI 3-kinase, whereas dominant negative Ras inhibits the activation. Because PI 3-kinase contributes to synergistic phosphorylation of Mek1/2 and Erk1/2, we next investigated if SCF in combination with GM-CSF enhanced interaction of PI 3-kinase and c-Kit. Fig. 8 (A and B) indicates there are no differences in phosphorylation of the PI 3-kinase binding site on c-Kit or association of c-Kit with p85PI 3-kinase in response to both factors. In contrast, the enzymatic activity of PI 3-kinase after concurrent stimulation with SCF and GM-CSF was synergistically increased compared with single factors (Fig. 8C). These data suggest that enhanced activation of PI 3-kinase contributes to synergistic activation of the Erk pathway in response to SCF and GM-CSF. Interestingly, this is in the absence of an increase in association of c-Kit and PI 3-kinase.

Erks and PI 3-Kinase Contribute to Synergy—To assess the functional significance of the Erk pathway in synergistic growth of SCF in combination with GM-CSF, we investigated the effect of PD98059, an inhibitor of Mek1/2. Fig. 9A illustrates that this small molecule inhibitor reduced SCF-induced proliferation by 80%, but had little effect on proliferation induced by GM-CSF. This finding is in agreement with the modest effect of GM-CSF on Mek1/2 and Erk1/2 phosphorylation. PD98059 inhibited synergistic growth in response to SCF and GM-CSF in combination by 40% compared with control cells (Fig. 9A).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 9.
Inhibition of the MAP kinase pathway or PI 3-kinase reduces proliferation. A, MO7e cells were incubated in RPMI supplemented with 10% FCS in the presence of SCF (50 ng/ml), GM-CSF (5 ng/ml), or both for 48 h followed by a 5-h [3H]thymidine pulse. The PI 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002 or Mek1/2 inhibitor PD98059 was included as indicated. Results are plotted as mean of triplicate samples. B, MO7e cells were treated as in A but after the 48-h incubation, cell viability was analyzed by trypan-blue exclusion. Results are plotted as mean % viability of triplicate samples. The results of a representative experiment of three are shown.

 
Inhibition of PI 3-kinase by LY294002 resulted in a complete block in proliferation induced by SCF or GM-CSF (Fig. 9A). Further, proliferation induced by both factors together was dramatically reduced. Importantly, the cells were viable after the LY294002 or PD98059 treatment as judged by trypan blue exclusion (Fig. 9B). These data indicate that synergistic activation of Erk1/2 downstream of PI 3-kinase makes critical contributions to synergy mediated by SCF in combination with GM-CSF. However, it is also clear that PI 3-kinase has additional roles in proliferation induced by SCF and GM-CSF not related to Erk1/2 activation, because LY294002 completely blocked proliferation by these factors. This is in agreement with other studies showing that PI 3-kinase is essential for c-Kit-dependent growth and tumorigenesis (32–35).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
SCF dramatically enhances growth when combined with other cytokines (11). SCF and GM-CSF induces synergistic proliferation in myeloid progenitor cells, including the megakaryoblastic cell line MO7e (19, 20). Although great progress has been made in understanding the mechanism of action of SCF as a single factor, the mechanisms mediating synergy with other growth factors are still poorly understood. Synergistic effects are of critical importance biologically, because hematopoietic stem cells and early progenitor cells require growth factors in combination for self-renewal and differentiation. Moreover, in the bone marrow microenvironment the physiological actions of SCF occur in combination with other growth factors and extracellular matrix proteins

In this study we demonstrate that c-Kit forms a physical complex with the {beta}-chain of the GM-CSF receptor, both in vivo by co-immunoprecipitation and in vitro by GST fusion protein pull-down assays (Figs. 2 and 3). This complex is constitutive and independent of phosphorylation of either receptor. Importantly, SCF can still induce tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Kit associated with the GM-CSF receptor. Because inhibition of the c-Kit kinase activity does not lead to a complete block of synergistic interaction between SCF and GM-CSF, part of the synergy observed between SCF and GM-CSF is probably due to a structural role for c-Kit (Fig. 1B). This idea is further supported by the fact that addition of a monoclonal antibody against c-Kit extracellular domain (K-27) abolishes the synergistic proliferation as well as significantly inhibits GM-CSF-induced proliferation. The K-27 antibody is specific for c-Kit, and the binding epitope has been mapped to immunoglobulin-like domain 4 (21). This finding parallels studies showing that c-Kit interacts with other transmembrane cell surface proteins such as the Epo receptor and TM4SF (9, 36). In these studies as well as in this work the interactions were highly sensitive to lysis conditions.

Physical interactions between different cell surface receptors may contribute to synergy through structural support, facilitation of receptor trans-phosphorylation, or activation of downstream signaling components. Indeed, trans-phosphorylation occurs in the c-Kit-Epo receptor complex (9). Further, Src family kinases may play a role in this process (37). In contrast, we find no evidence for trans-phosphorylation between c-Kit and the GM-CSF receptor (Figs. 4 and 5). The function of this complex could be to modulate the rate of internalization and/or intracellular trafficking of the receptors. Alternately, it may co-localize the two receptors to facilitate activation of one or more downstream signaling pathways. One group has reported that association of c-Kit and the IL-7 receptor contributes to activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in the absence of IL-7 (38).

A number of groups have examined whether SCF induces synergistic activation of early signaling components when combined with other cytokines. Although there are conflicting reports regarding the effects of SCF and GM-CSF or IL-3 on tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Kit, most groups have not observed synergistic phosphorylation of either receptor component (22, 23). This is supported by findings in the present study (Figs. 4 and 5). However, downstream of receptor phosphorylation, several groups have suggested that SCF can synergistically activate MAP kinases in combination with IL-3, Epo, and GM-CSF (12–15). Lee et al. could show Erk1/2 was synergistically activated by SCF in combination with GM-CSF, but other MAP kinases such as stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 were not. In contrast, others have not seen synergistic activation of Erk1/2 by SCF combined with other growth factors (22, 25)

Our work supports the possibility that synergistic activation of Erk1/2 contributes to growth mediated by SCF combined with GM-CSF. SCF combined with GM-CSF induced a more sustained phosphorylation of Mek1/2 and Erk1/2 than either factor alone (Fig. 6). The extended duration of Erk1/2 phosphorylation was sensitive to PI 3-kinase inhibition (Fig. 7). Notably, the Erk1/2 phosphorylation induced by single factors was independent of PI 3-kinase. Similarly, earlier studies have shown that PI 3-kinase plays an essential role in the synergistic activation of MAP kinase by SCF and Epo (14). Analysis of the PI 3-kinase binding site phosphorylation and p85PI 3-kinase association to c-Kit did not reveal any significant differences by stimulation with SCF alone or combined with GM-CSF (Fig. 8, A and B). However, PI 3-kinase was synergistically activated in response to combined stimulation compared with single factors (Fig. 8C). Importantly, this shows that receptor association can not be used as an unambiguous measure of PI 3-kinase activity. Interestingly, we detected an increase in the duration of Erk1/2 phosphorylation, not the magnitude. This is a possible explanation for the conflicting literature on synergistic activation of Erk1/2. In contrast, we do not see a reproducible synergistic increase in the Ras GTP loading in response to concurrent stimulation (Fig. 6A). These results suggest that synergy is induced at a level between Ras and Mek1/2. This is in concurrence with earlier data in the literature showing that Raf-1 antisense oligonucleotides abolish synergistic proliferation between SCF and IL-3 or GM-CSF in hematopoietic progenitor cells (39). Alternatively, it is possible that the prolonged phosphorylation of Mek1/2 and Erk1/2 by the combined stimulation is due to a synergistic inhibition or down-regulation of phosphatases that negatively regulates this pathway.

Because the synergistic phosphorylation of Erk1/2 is dependent on PI 3-kinase, we investigated the effect that inhibition of these pathways has on proliferation. We observed that inhibition of the MAP kinase pathway, using PD98059, partially inhibited the synergistic proliferation (Fig. 9A). Blocking the PI 3-kinase pathway using LY294002 completely blocked synergistic proliferation as well as proliferation induced by single factors (Fig. 9A). Interestingly, inhibition of PI 3-kinase blocked proliferation by single factors more potently than inhibition of the MAP kinase pathway and completely blocked synergistic proliferation (Fig. 9A). This points to a central role for PI 3-kinase in proliferation induced by SCF and GM-CSF alone or in combination, besides its effect on MAP kinase phosphorylation kinetics. This is supported by studies using mast cells from p85{alpha}-deficient mice, which display defects in many c-Kit-mediated functions, including reduced SCF-induced proliferation (34, 35).

Downstream of immediate early signaling pathways, it is likely that changes in gene expression culminate in synergistic growth. A possibility is that pathways activated by SCF and the cytokine of interest converge and synergistically activate a common target molecule, e.g. transcription factors leading to synergistic induction of genes involved in survival, growth, or differentiation. This mechanism has been suggested for the synergistic effect of LIF and BMP2 on the differentiation of neuronal progenitor cells (40). Another possible mechanism for synergism is that one factor induces expression of the other growth factor and/or its receptor. There is evidence for this type of mechanism in the megakaryoblastic cell line MO7e, where SCF induces expression of GM-CSF (41).

In conclusion, this study demonstrates for the first time that c-Kit and the {beta}-chain of the GM-CSF/IL-3/IL-5 receptor forms a physical complex. Further, SCF and GM-CSF induce synergistic phosphorylation of proteins in the Ras-MAP kinase pathway, and this correlates with activation of PI 3-kinase. The synergistic effect occurs downstream of Ras and upstream of Mek1/2 in conformity with studies from other groups showing that Raf-1 is critical for synergistic proliferation (39). Inhibition of the MAP kinase pathway partially inhibits synergistic proliferation. Blocking PI 3-kinase signaling potently inhibited DNA synthesis induced by SCF and GM-CSF alone or in combination suggesting an essential role for PI 3-kinase in proliferation induced by these factors. These data suggest that multiple mechanisms contribute to synergistic growth of SCF in combination with GM-CSF.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{ddagger} To whom correspondence should be addressed: Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Box 595, Biomedical Center, SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden. Tel.: 46-18-160406; Fax: 46-18-160420; E-mail: Johan.Lennartsson{at}LICR.uu.se.

1 The abbreviations used are: GM-CSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor; SCF, stem cell factor; IL-3, interleukin-3; IL-5, interleukin-5; Epo, erythropoietin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; RBD, Ras binding domain; Erk, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; Stat, signal transducers and activators of transcription; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PI, phosphatidylinositol; Mek, MAP kinase/ERK kinase; FCS, fetal calf serum. Back


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Doug Lowy for reviewing the manuscript.



   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Gearing, D. P., King, J. A., Gough, N. M., and Nicola, N. A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 3667–3676[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hayashida, K., Kitamura, T., Gorman, D. M., Arai, K., Yokota, T., and Miyajima, A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9655–9659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Blume-Jensen, P., Claesson-Welsh, L., Siegbahn, A., Zsebo, K. M., Westermark, B., and Heldin, C. H. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 4121–4128[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573–580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Ashman, L. K., Cambareri, A. C., and Eglinton, J. M. (1990) Leuk. Res. 14, 637–644[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Catlett, J. P., Leftwich, J. A., Westin, E. H., Grant, S., and Huff, T. F. (1991) Blood 78, 3186–3191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Leslie, K. B., Jalbert, S., Orban, P., Welham, M., Duronio, V., and Schrader, J. W. (1996) Blood 87, 3186–3194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ichihara, M., Hara, T., Takagi, M., Cho, L. C., Gorman, D. M., and Miyajima, A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 939–950[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Wu, H., Klingmuller, U., Besmer, P., and Lodish, H. F. (1995) Nature 377, 242–246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Wu, H., Klingmuller, U., Acurio, A., Hsiao, J. G., and Lodish, H. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 1806–1810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. McNiece, I. K., Langley, K. E., and Zsebo, K. M. (1991) Exp. Hematol. 19, 226–231[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. O'Farrell, A. M., Ichihara, M., Mui, A. L., and Miyajima, A. (1996) Blood 87, 3655–3668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Pearson, M. A., O'Farrell, A. M., Dexter, T. M., Whetton, A. D., Owen-Lynch, P. J., and Heyworth, C. M. (1998) Growth Factors 15, 293–306[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Sui, X., Krantz, S. B., You, M., and Zhao, Z. (1998) Blood 92, 1142–1149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lee, Y., Mantel, C., Anzai, N., Braun, S. E., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 280, 675–683[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Boer, A. K., Drayer, A. L., and Vellenga, E. (2003) Exp. Hematol. 31, 512–520[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Duarte, R. F., and Frank, D. A. (2000) Blood 96, 3422–3430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Linnekin, D., DeBerry, C. S., and Mou, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27450–27455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Avanzi, G. C., Lista, P., Giovinazzo, B., Miniero, R., Saglio, G., Benetton, G., Coda, R., Cattoretti, G., and Pegoraro, L. (1988) Br. J. Haematol. 69, 359–366[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Hendrie, P. C., Miyazawa, K., Yang, Y. C., Langefeld, C. D., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1991) Exp. Hematol. 19, 1031–1037[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Blechman, J. M., Lev, S., Barg, J., Eisenstein, M., Vaks, B., Vogel, Z., Givol, D., and Yarden, Y. (1995) Cell 80, 103–113[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Miyazawa, K., Hendrie, P. C., Mantel, C., Wood, K., Ashman, L. K., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1991) Exp. Hematol. 19, 1110–1123[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Kamijo, T., Koike, K., Takeuchi, K., Higuchi, T., Sawai, N., Kikuchi, T., Tsumura, H., Akiyama, H., Koike, T., Ishii, E., and Komiyama, A. (1997) Leuk. Res. 21, 1097–1106[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Linnekin, D. (1999) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 1053–1074[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Hallek, M., Druker, B., Lepisto, E. M., Wood, K. W., Ernst, T. J., and Griffin, J. D. (1992) J. Cell. Physiol. 153, 176–186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Dorsey, J. F., Cunnick, J. M., Mane, S. M., and Wu, J. (2002) Blood 99, 1388–1397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Nishida, K., Wang, L., Morii, E., Park, S. J., Narimatsu, M., Itoh, S., Yamasaki, S., Fujishima, M., Ishihara, K., Hibi, M., Kitamura, Y., and Hirano, T. (2002) Blood 99, 1866–1869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lee, Y. J., Soh, J. W., Jeoung, D. I., Cho, C. K., Jhon, G. J., Lee, S. J., and Lee, Y. S. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1593, 219–229[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Ting, H. C., Christian, S. L., Burgess, A. E., and Gold, M. R. (2002) Immunol. Lett. 82, 205–215[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sattler, M., Salgia, R., Shrikhande, G., Verma, S., Pisick, E., Prasad, K. V., and Griffin, J. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10248–10253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wymann, M. P., and Pirola, L. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436, 127–150[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Chian, R., Young, S., Danilkovitch-Miagkova, A., Rönnstrand, L., Leonard, E., Ferrao, P., Ashman, L., and Linnekin, D. (2001) Blood 98, 1365–1373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Shivakrupa, Bernstein, A., Watring, N., and Linnekin, D. (2003) Cancer Res. 63, 4412–4419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Fukao, T., Yamada, T., Tanabe, M., Terauchi, Y., Ota, T., Takayama, T., Asano, T., Takeuchi, T., Kadowaki, T., Hata Ji, J., and Koyasu, S. (2002) Nat. Immunol. 3, 295–304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Lu-Kuo, J. M., Fruman, D. A., Joyal, D. M., Cantley, L. C., and Katz, H. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6022–6029[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Anzai, N., Lee, Y., Youn, B. S., Fukuda, S., Kim, Y. J., Mantel, C., Akashi, M., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (2002) Blood 99, 4413–4421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Tan, B. L., Hong, L., Munugalavadla, V., and Kapur, R. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 11686–11695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Jahn, T., Seipel, P., Principale, M., and Weinberg, K. I. (2002) Blood 100, 132a–133a
  39. Muszynski, K. W., Ruscetti, F. W., Gooya, J. M., Linnekin, D. M., and Keller, J. R. (1997) Stem Cells 15, 63–72[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Nakashima, K., Yanagisawa, M., Arakawa, H., Kimura, N., Hisatsune, T., Kawabata, M., Miyazono, K., and Taga, T. (1999) Science 284, 479–482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kiss, C., Cesano, A., Zsebo, K. M., Clark, S. C., and Santoli, D. (1993) Leukemia 7, 235–240[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
D. M. Benson Jr, J. Yu, B. Becknell, M. Wei, A. G. Freud, A. K. Ferketich, R. Trotta, D. Perrotti, R. Briesewitz, and M. A. Caligiuri
Stem cell factor and interleukin-2/15 combine to enhance MAPK-mediated proliferation of human natural killer cells
Blood, March 19, 2009; 113(12): 2706 - 2714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
S. Ito, C. R. Mantel, M.-K. Han, S. Basu, S. Fukuda, S. Cooper, and H. E. Broxmeyer
Mad2 is required for optimal hematopoiesis: Mad2 associates with c-Kit in MO7e cells
Blood, March 1, 2007; 109(5): 1923 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
L. S. Haneline, H. White, F.-C. Yang, S. Chen, C. Orschell, R. Kapur, and D. A. Ingram
Genetic reduction of class IA PI-3 kinase activity alters fetal hematopoiesis and competitive repopulating ability of hematopoietic stem cells in vivo
Blood, February 15, 2006; 107(4): 1375 - 1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z.-j. Ye, Y. Kluger, Z. Lian, and S. M. Weissman
Two types of precursor cells in a multipotential hematopoietic cell line
PNAS, December 20, 2005; 102(51): 18461 - 18466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
279/43/44544    most recent
M404085200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lennartsson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Linnekin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lennartsson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Linnekin, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement